The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSEPA EPIC-FD-80 - BOEING / PROJECT 293/294 - BSIPBOEING PROJECTS 293 /294 BSIP EPIC -FD -80 CITY OF TUKWILA OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FINAL DECLARATION OF £IGN1f ICARtf /NON- SIGNIFICANCE Description of proposal BSIP - Boeing Projects 293/294 Proponent Ed Hunt - McCann Construction Company Location of Proposal West end of North Access Road Lead Agency City of Tukwila File No EPIC -FD- This proposal has been determined to (iaia►w /not have) a significant adverse im- pact upon the environment. An EIS (his not) required under RCW 43.21C.030(2) (c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Responsible Official Position /Title Date 25 May 1973 Kjell Stoknes Director, Office of Commun y Development COMMENTS: Signature K�.eII Stokites Environmental questionnaire considers impacts of proposed buildings /use. City f Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 Edgar D. Bauch, Mayor 29 January 1979 Mr. Timothy R. Clifford Roberts, Shefelman, Lawrence, Gay & Moch 1818 IBM Building Seattle, Washington 98101 RE: William E. Boeing, Jr. Aetna Loan Application #34754 and William Rademaker, Jr. Letter dated 26 January 1979 Dear Mr. Clifford: I have been requested by Mr. William Rademaker to respond to your office regarding three issues. These issues are detailed in Mr. Rademaker's letter to me. dated 26 January 1979, attached herewith, and concern Boeing Projects #293 and #294 in the City Tukwila. 1. A final declaration of significance #293 and #294 pursuant to WAC 197 -10 any other agency. made for Projects was not distributed to 2. Both Buildings #293 and #294 were considered in the environmental check - list submitted for the proposed Binding Site Improvement Plan. Both buildings were ultimately included in the abovementioned declaration of non- significance. 3. The project site for both Buildings #293 and #294 lies well over 200 feet from any shoreline regulated by the City of Tukwila Shoreline Master Program. Should you have any further questions, please feel free to contact me at 433 -1847. Respectfully, S: terstro Planning Supervisor FNS /ckh cc: Enclosure • WILLIAM RADEMAKER, JR. ATTORNEY AT LAW 1411 FOURTH AVENUE SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 (206) 682 -7760 January 26, 1979 Mr. Fred N. Satterstrom Planning Supervisor City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 Dear Mr. Satterstrom: Re: William E. Boeing, Jr. Aetna Loan Application #34754 Aetna Life Insurance Company has requested a written clarification from your offices with respect to the following matters. Accordingly, your early response will be appreciated. 1. Under the provisions of the State Environmental Protection Act, what agencies did you circulate the Declaration of Non - Significance for Buildings No. 293 and 294 owned by William E. Boeing, Jr. 2. Are both Buildings No. 293 and 294 included under the Environmental Checklist, prepared pursuant to the Binding Site Improvement Plan as recorded and, therefore, are both buildings reflected in the Declaration of Non - Significance. 3. Are the land and buildings involving Building 293 and 294 over 200 feet from the Green River Shoreline, therefore, precluding an application of the State Shorelines Management Act. Your written response to Mr. Timothy R. Clifford, Roberts, Shefelman, Lawrence, Gay & Moch, 1818 IBM Building, Seattle, Wa. 98101 would be appreciated. Thank you for your patience and c foregoing. Si eration with respect t. the r cc: William E. Boeing, Jr. Timothy R. Clifford • G�" CITY OF TUKWILA • ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIOJ'"AIRE REVIEW FORM PROJECT NAME: PROJECT ADDRESS: /f' - ¢ c6/ eia o ` *coo , DATE ACCEPTED FOR FILING: S"'/ /S 72f 1. DEPART ZNTAL RE`lIEW: (date) (reviewer) Building: j . / 9 7 r by: af .� ❑ Engineering: by: ❑ Fire: by: ❑ Planning: by: ❑ Police: by: 2. ANY PERTINENT COMMENTS: A/4 C otir M C -T • CITY OF TUKWILA ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE REVIEW FORM PROJECT NAME: 1 3 5 r — E' o e. t 244 PROJECT ADDRESS: Va5 e 4.. i Joeit ..,4-000SS Icaaa� DATE ACCEPTED FOR FILING: 5 / 15/7' 1. DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: (date) (reviewer) ❑ Building: by: Engineering: Mttif tt jg77 by: 12e- _t_ — � ❑ Fire: by: ❑ Planning: by: ❑ Police: by: 2. ANY PERTINENT COMMENTS: iatee-ee, z;e,_ 744.,stezd.e../d) c,6 • CITY OF.TUKWILA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST. FORM This questionnaire must be completed and submitted with the application for permit. This questionnaire must be completed by all persons applying for a permit from the City of Tukwila, unless it is determined by the Responsible Official that the permit is' exempt or unless the applicant and Responsible Official previously agree an Environmental Impact Statement needs to be completed. A fee of •550.00 must accompany the filling of the Environmental Questionnaire to cover costs of the threshold determination. . BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent: William E. Boeing Jr. 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: 1411 Fourth Avenue Seattle, Washington 98101 682 -7760 3. Date Checklist Submitted: May 12, 1978 4. Agency Requiring Checklist: Short Subdivision Conmiittee 5. Name of Proposal, if applicable: Project 294 6. Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give . an accurate understanding of its scope and nature): Multi -tenant warehouse building approximately 100,000 square feet, tilt -up concrete dock height. Designated Project 294. 7. Location of .Proposal (describe the physical. setting of the proposal, as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental im- pacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate under- standing of the environmental setting of the proposal): See attached drawing titled Binding Site Improvement Plan. Total land e .•proxu a e y :. acres. 8. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal: December 1978 9. List of all Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals Required for the. Proposal (federal, state and local): (a) Rezone,_ conditional use, shoreline permit, etc. (b)-- King County Hydraulics Permit (c) Building permit YES NO X YES NOj YES X NO (d) Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Permit (e) Sewer hook up permit (f) Sign permit (g) Water hook_ up permit (h) Storm water system permit (i) Curb cut permit (j) Electrical permit (State of Washington) (k) Plumbing permit (King County) (1) Other: Boundary Line Adjustment Binding,Site Improvement Flan and Lertiticate of Segregation. YES NOX YES X NO YES X NO YES X NO YES X NO YES— NO YES X NO YES X NO 10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or futher activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain: No 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain: No 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: Binding Site Improvement Plan and Certificate of Segregation City of Tukwila Planning Commission, City of Tukwila Building Permit II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? (b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcover- ing of the soil? (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief fea- tures? (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? -2- YES MAYBE NO X X Paving X X (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? Explanation: Air. Will the proposal result in: (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? (b) The creation of objectionable odors? (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? Explanation: 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? (e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? -3- YES MAYBE NO X X X X •. • (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? (i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise avail- able for public water supplies? Explanation: 4. Flora. Will the proposal result in: (a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? Explanation: . Fauna. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? Explanation: YES MAYBE NO X X 6. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? Explanation: 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? Explanation: 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in the altera- tion of the present or planned land use of an area? Explanation: YES MAYBE NO .9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? = X (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? X Explanation: 10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radi- ation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? Explanation: X 11. Population. Explanation: Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? 12: Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? Explanation: 13. Transportation /Circulation. Will the proposal result -in: (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? (b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and /or goods? (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? Explanation: Warehouse and Distributing Activity. -< molt/ ,de ,e,��i�,vo/ed acae.S S "oss /1/ rG ' to,J -7 rva,h Yx�•�l �dea� 7477? $6v7774. ,4? ! 5 .£fl ( ;PA Pee -exS 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: YES MAYBE NO X X X (a) Fire protection? (b) Police protection? (c) Schools? (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? (e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? -6- x X (f) Other governmental services? Explanation: 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? Explanation: 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities. (a) Power or natural gas? (b) Communications systems? (c) Water? (d) Sewer or septic tanks? (e) Storm water drainage? (f) Solid waste and disposal? Explanation: 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the crea- tion of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health Explanation:. YES MAYBE NO x x X X • 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruc- tion of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically of- fensive site open to public view? Explanation: 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of exist- ing recreational opportunities? Explanation: 20. Archeological /Histroical. Will the proposal result in an alteration of a signifi- cant archeological or his - torical site, structure, object or building? Explanation: CERTIFICATION BY APPLICANT: YES MAYBE NO I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non - significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Signature and Title -�� /z / /;7g. a Date -8- X 4.37 75 Q ti �._- - °1-�f x.;•7.0) O • 7,fe. DO J3O'c"7` ` b 433. M � c O.? 8. .3 i I f�i471 /AT E.QOAO I A a .187 Land Surveyor's Certificate: The above sketch is based upon a survey 'made by me and is a true and accurate representation of the boundary line adjustment pertaining to the Upland's Tukwila Industrial Park Plat as recorded in Volume 104 of Plats, pages 8, 9 and 10, records of King County, Washington. May 9 , 1918 (`� %'� �.��= _. r 1 �' .�_- �• Date Certificate No. ' 8393 7857/ /?0,4.0 S. /89' Scale: 1" —200' Page of {`I . U,j :Z ' • iti 37 ' L4 '» f'ri li( •j LP (vv1J -V% • T. .9', •rurif 4L YstrY -3 se el. 0•10-c .I ere. col -.pa-ad see col . w4Y irV60.1.:. — " .070' C.1 ..,w *mace' - .)•9 —. tcY.eYv.o ". <4JV1AOtl'•••= 641. M.L?H:.r+o • • • •' al y i . �Sllfr;r�jup xr� ' '"'la .4Y13i1n a�r.q l fliA I. I i I ulq� o Nl'vdi " ran Li4f:.:iy 16Y.:1l,ry o -,I ,stw v1�'ld dOO - tailnrin - a L G •r zn Yes ,. •0 -. �4Q 37 I 1 1 pia) 'A rbve• 11.11 ; LNW/ ./.20y 0104,111 Wert Nlave) a m r&c W pt cnCv WirtYa.;.a ctl » , .n YF 3 Wan • k� a1j.L.Ar"7r ,9`1.11 vv ,scow V.3+•44 J Ye Jowl .Y )I.-11 MC 7�2 ;f101-13tone, G?] u a .: 01 1 Wi- UaMw I.AV plID9 7UrY1hNY )ni\.) 442 3C n011301/.. 011h1GI1C2 • • . CITY OF TUKWIL.A 1 EdVIRONMEN`ITAL QUESTIONNAIRE REVIEW FORM PROJECT NAME: 6�/f- / / 4 PROJECT ADDRESS: �U/ Al of / - , iee45 b DATE ACCEPTED FOR FILING: 7//5/'7P 1. DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: (date) (reviewer) ❑ Building: by: ❑ Engineering: by: ❑ Fire: by: Planning: by: ❑ Police: by: 2. ANY PERTINENT COMMENTS: CITY OF TUKWILA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM This questionnaire must be completed and submitted with the application for permit. This questionnaire must be completed by all persons applying for a permit from the City of Tukwila, unless it is determined by the Responsible Official that the permit is exempt or unless the applicant and Responsible Official previously agree an Environmental Impact Statement needs to be completed. A fee of $50.00 must accompany the filling of the Environmental Questionnaire to cover costs of the threshold determination. I. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent: William E. Boeing Jr. 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: 1411 Fourth Avenue Seattle, Washington 98101 682 -7760 3. Date Checklist Submitted: May 12, 1978 4. Agency Requiring Checklist: Short Subdivision Committee 5. Name of Proposal, if applicable: Project 294 6. Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature): Multi- tenant warehouse building approximately 100,000 square feet, tilt -up concrete dock height. Designated Project 294. 7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental im- pacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate under- standing of the environmental setting of the proposal): See attached drawing titled Binding'Site Improvement Plan. Total land parcel area approximately 8.2 Acres. 8. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal: December 1978 9. _List of all Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals Required for the Proposal (federal, state and local): (a) Rezone, conditional use, shoreline permit, etc. YES NO X (b) King County Hydraulics Permit YES NO x (c) Building permit YES X NO (d) Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Permit (e) Sewer hook up permit (f) Sign permit (g) Water hook up permit (h) Storm water system permit (i) Curb cut permit (j) Electrical permit (State of Washington) (k) Plumbing permit (King County) (1) Other: Boundary Line Adjustment Binding Site Improvement Plan and Certificate of Segregation. YES NOX YES X NO YES X NO YES X NO YES X NO YES— NO YES X NO YES NO 10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or futher activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain: No 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain: No 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: Binding Site Improvement Plan and Certificate of Segregation City of Tukwila Planning Commission, City of Tukwila Building Permit II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required 1.. Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a). Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? (b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcover- ing of the soil? (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief fea- tures? (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? -2- SW YES MAYBE ' NO Paving X X X (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? Explanation: YES MAYBE NO X 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: (a) -Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? X (b) The creation of objectionable odors? X (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either X locally or regionally? Explanation: 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? (e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? -3- X (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage , of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? (i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise avail- able for public water supplies? Explanation: YES MAYBE NO 4. Flora. Will the proposal result in: (a) -Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, X grass, crops,.microflora and aquatic plants)? (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or X - endangered species of flora? _ (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? Explanation: 5. Fauna. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? Explanation: X X X • 6. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? Explanation: 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? Explanation: 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in the altera- tion of the present or planned land use of an area? Explanation: YES MAYBE NO '9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? X (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? X Explanation: 10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to,•oil, pesticides, chemicals or radi- ation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? Explanation: X 11. Population. Explanation: • • Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate - of the human population of an area? 12.- Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? Explanation: 13. Transportation /Circulation. Will the proposal result :in: (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? (b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and /or goods? (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? Explanation: Warehouse and Distributing Activity. f' X06 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: (a) Fire protection? (b) Police protection? (c) Schools? (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? (e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? YES MAYBE NO X X X s/kke.la x X X X X YES MAYBE NO (f) Other governmental services? X Explanation: 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? Explanation: 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: (a) Power or natural gas? (b) Communications systems? (c) Water? (d) Sewer or septic tanks? (e) Storm water drainage? (f) Solid waste and disposal? Explanation: 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the crea- tion of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? Explanation: X X • • 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruc- tion of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically of- fensive site open to public view? Explanation: 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact. upon the quality or quantity of exist- • ing recreational opportunities? Explanation: 20. Archeological /Histroical. Will the proposal result in an alteration of a signifi- cant archeological or his- torical site, structure, object or building? Explanation: CERTIFICATION BY APPLICANT: YES MAYBE NO I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of .non- significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. i2 / 9 7g Signature and Title v Date -8- X X • I 4/B.7"S� V.. 4/ 437.76" ---LOT 8 SJ7'ts p • SSO 27 s.f_ • l • South 4;7e r0.1." ;✓/0;/8). N 1 / 433. 03' • ZOT -• /i/BT •.-55 "02" 49a. O 9 Land Surveyor's Certificate: /O. ao 3'8 "SS'02 ? B. 3 7 /0R /1/.47 J. L7 27 S8," . '19'' 790 -67_ 4----N\:;1 I The above sketch is based upon a survey made by me and is a true and accurate representation of the boundary line adjustment pertaining to the.Upland',s Tukwila Industrial Park Plat as recorded in Volume 104 of Plats, pages 8, 9 and 10, records of King County, Washington. May 9, 1978 Date Certificate No. 8393 78.57/ S'. /80' ' ,S Scale: 1" = 200' Page of YYf, ci o 7,77 fT !W.- ^?'i ' T:.] 1 r r'n !per c:'; - T` - -,�_ �;J.1 "� � •roxd a. vnyrs .v y,nctr 144Si and. cot- „AraNtdls.s• wl • Oaftd 4r0b1si .:. - --- r, mJ'c.41 • ..ti.ls,ovss vo+vosets•,'_ Wit M "'sue "1ru x.4 1 ∎••;41- • "1 VhAl o ulnd y1.. " rii•.J,_ `-ecit I T ' I f1 �. ' ! (,'',I'1 ! I'if • 1 7. -vast, v6; .1.47'>:id1 •0 -,1 .I14 - .. d oa - sJi1(ntln - �11s Q �_® ..w.y/ . a.a , ,u. -.*. ' ry ooi1 -t1 wr, sons s.. 2 v.v+ sru ..aa. eawcns, cnonnr.n•o 1 c x...• .v...o � a ...... ...- ._ - =- =c - -- z- tl°f -l9 _ L*(Y1TLfl'f!(:;iwnl .w,• VLSI 1.0.1.0-1. v.Y-, -.. .. ... j.: / / �� ..,•Q ,�. r y`vb,.u.0.111. ar.a ,r..: w.un� ,o� x+ 1 N'a :11.11 iF '.. ••x• • w ,•,..1 1 i •o-7 ' .o snnj CEO m • t-= 118 v .S tJF]tiA .•r o.nr c 1 Ana 4.1 111,11 aw.a, ,.,......a.” PrI cro ti�ti. 'IriY. l a.n Y.rsau' �1 ( .11 �Jv't1L .n. *. .tn 1 KY f62 it 110rf3NW 011IJG1'43