The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSEPA EPIC-FD-87 - WEYMOUTH JAMES - MOTEL (48TH AVENUE SOUTH)WEYMOUTH MOTEL COMPLEX EPIC -FD -87 CITY OF TUKWILA OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT /FINAL DECLARATION OF ON —S I GU I F I CA JCE Description of proposal Motel Complex (131 units) Proponent James Weymouth Location of Proposal 48th Avenue South - approximately 500 feet north of Interurban Ave. Office of Community Development EPIC -FD -87 Lead Agency File No. This proposal has been determined to (11111/not have) a significant adverse im- pact upon the environment. An EIS (1//is not) required under RCW 43.21C.030(2) (c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Responsible Official Kjell Stoknes Position /Title Director, Office of Community Development Date 22 March 1979 Signature COMMENTS: The applicant shall make every reasonabile effort to retain as many of the ornamental trees as possible. 0 CITY OF TUKWILA • ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE REVIEW FORJ'1 PROJECT NAME: (()ei m c wi'J'1 C.0Y1G��.1 wV�oi Q. fl 0 e L PROJECT ADDRESS: `" - )i2)-)-)'1 U re.n (I 9,, DATE ACCEPTED FOR FILING: • ) O')Cj lrCh 197 9 1. DEPARTMpiTAL REVVIEW: (date) (reviewer) Ur Buildin g 4i' t'% / / / / 2 I by: . , ❑ Engineering: by: ❑ Fire: by: ❑ Planning: by: C.J Police: by: 2. ANY PERTINENT COMMENTS: • CITY OF TUKWILA ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE REVIEW FORM 99,o to b PROJECT NAME: U) rn 0 eH@dwrwJ L ksei nn PROJECT ADDRESS: at 2E fl L SL DATE ACCEPTED FOR FILING: r l(JYY) 1c1-7 9 1. DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: (date) (reviewer) ❑ B)ilding: by: D'Engineering: f ! by: —/Z 917 ❑ Fire: by: ❑ Planning: by: ❑. Police: by: r __ 2. ANY PERTINENT COMMENTS: PROJECT NAME: PROJECT ADDRESS: q DATE ACCEPTED FOR FILING: • CITY OF TUKWILA • ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE REVIEW FORM 1. DEPARTMENTAL REV IEW: ❑ Building: by: ❑ EEnngineering: by: 0 ire: 3?/ i4% by: ❑ Planning: by: ❑.Police: by: 0 mh Care rl 1 Yfloxch 19-7c( (date) 2. ANY P RTINENT COMMENTS: (Ai Pa4 fotsultelLi. 1■0 (reviewer) PROJECT NAME: PROJECT ADDRESS: DATE ACCEPTED FOR FILING: • , CITY OF TUKWILA • ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE REVIEW FORM 0-1.(snJ �J,s�l mc�eQ • curc h 1q7? 1. DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: (date) ❑ Building: by: ❑ Engineering: by: ❑ Fire: by: ❑ P1 n q : by: by: Police: 2. ANY PERTINENT COMMENTS: (reviewer) t {S CITY OF TUKWILA Q RECEIVED CITY OF TU KWILA p8an' BUILDING �DEp ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM This questionnaire must be completed and submitted with the application for permit. This questionnaire must be completed by all persons applying for a permit from the City of Tukwila, unless it is determined by the Responsible Official that the permit is exempt or unless the applicant and Responsible Official previously agree an Environmental Impact Statement needs to be completed. A fee of $50.00 must accompany the filling of the Environmental Questionnaire to cover costs of the threshold determination. I. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent: C.T01,146,T del oc l o.6er7/0 Oe`/IrviOcel 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: 25// Aa /eP A-- C_)es7L g e n U IiCC( • Gr /mil , 73 7 3. Date Checklist Submitted: '-id tC h /, /97 4. Agency Requiring Checklist: 5. Name of Proposal, if applicable: 6. Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature): / 7� `. / �ni / `%v%fie/ _ 19ka e j^Pf `�r' $' ,Ca J- 7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental im- pacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate under- standing /of the environmental setting of the proposal): /0c 4 led afis ro x 1 vr4 e /P / 533 16,6,71 pas/ D/` / 1 K 7 er to ,4o e Oh 44 8- >a. Aie Jc g e P /s /e'5',7 7 .S�c,or 4-e4 we/4 5s, 4(,S- /roil/ ,4e/ h6, Q1reQ /S Lid caw/ acry/ / %7' 8. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal: 451))y.),041? i r 7 / 9. List of all Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals Required for the Proposal (federal, state and local): (a) Rezone, conditional use, shoreline permit, etc. YES )( NO (b) King County Hydraulics Permit a YES NO / (c) Building permit YES >( NO • (d) Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Permit (e) Sewer hook up permit (f) Sign permit (g) Water hook up permit (h) Storm water system permit (i) Curb cut permit (j) Electrical permit (State of Washington) (k) Plumbing permit (King County) (1) Other: YES N0_A_ YES )C NO YES X NO YES X NO YES X NO YES X NO YES 2( NO YES NO 10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or futher activity related to11 i or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain: Pass / O�e �O ti , t- Qiti n e)( t )-e ler 746 pre / M i n a 1- / sale p/4 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain: ho 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe ✓ the nature of such application form: akr� T/afrq ! (�t //s� II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS - (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? (b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcover- ing of the soil? (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief fea- tures? (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? -2- YES MAYBE NO x (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? Explanation: 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? (b) The creation of objectionable odors? (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? Explanation {a)F, -,,,, a u 4 ex- 4a us/— YES MAYBE NO X 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? X (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? (e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? -3- • • YES MAYBE NO (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? (i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise avail- able for public water supplies? X Explanation: 4. Flora. Will the proposal result in: (a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? 2< (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? ?� (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? Explanation: 5. Fauna. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? X (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? >< (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration �( or movement of fauna? (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? Explanation: 6. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? Explanation: S/ {9 /7{ a (1710 11OlS' � roN., Lus/omel'S, 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? Explanation: 1)4 r k /of aktcr pue /c /1-7 /(,. "s 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in the altera- tion of the present or planned land use of an area? Explanation; %( c is ��e /y r / 664.01/- ! 2 G./J. -e 7O /4? 0/e/ CG cS e YES MAYBE NO 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? ?( (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? Explanation: 10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radi- ation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? Explanation: • • 11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? Explanation: YES MAYBE NO x 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? X Explanation: 13. Transportation /Circulation. Will the proposal result in: (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? (b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and /or goods? (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? Explanation: (0) ,c(i) *"fire kit 04./ U,((/ '[vow cec /, /iouq/ Q04-47 moue ,* eh.1L ?`o (fg >4 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the. following areas: (a) Fire protection? (b) Police protection? (c) Schools? (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? (e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? x K • • (f) Other governmental services? Explanation: 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? Explanation: 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: (a) Power or natural gas? (b) Communications systems? (c) Water? (d) Sewer or septic tanks? (e) Storm water drainage? (f) Solid waste and disposal? Explanation: 17. Human Health. Will the proposal . result in the crea- tion of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? Explanation: YES MAYBE NO • 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal resultin the obstruc- tion of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically of- fensive site open to public view? Explanation: 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of exist- ing recreational opportunities? Explanation: 20. Archeological /Histroical. Will the proposal result in an alteration of a signifi- cant archeological or his- torical site, structure, object or building? Explanation: CERTIFICATION BY APPLICANT: YES MAYBE NO I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non - significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. /e1 a27/P77 Signature and Title Date