HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOW 2011-06-13 COMPLETE AGENDA PACKET Tukwila City Council Agenda
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
Jim Haggerton, Mayor Councilmembers: Joe Duff ie Joan Hernandez
Steve Lancaster, City Administrator Dennis Robertson Verna Seal
Allan Ekberg, Council President Kathy Hougardy De'Sean Quinn
Monday, June 13, 2011, 7:00 PM Tukwila City Hall Council Chambers
1. CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
2. CITIZEN COMMENT At this time, you are invited to comment on items not included on this agenda
(please limit your comments to five minutes per citizen). To comment
on an item listed on this agenda, please save your comments until the issue is
presented for discussion.
3. PUBLIC HEARING Comprehensive Plan Amendments for the Manufacturing Industrial Center Pg.1
(MIC).
4. SPECIAL a. Comprehensive Plan Amendments for the Manufacturing Industrial Pg.1
ISSUES Center (MIC).
b. Fireworks permit for City's July 4th event. Pg.131
c. Interlocal agreement with the City of Kent regarding permitting Pg.145
authority for Tukwila South.
d. Bid award for the Interurban Avenue South Gravity Sewer. Pg.161
e. A resolution approving the Transportation Improvement Program for Pg.169
2012 -2017.
f. A resolution in support of the ballot measure on the formation of the Pg.183
Tukwila Pool Metropolitan Park District.
5. REPORTS a. Mayor
b. City Council
c. Staff
d. City Attorney
e. Intergovernmental
6. MISCELLANEOUS
7. EXECUTIVE SESSION
S. ADJOURNMENT
Tukwila City Hall is wheelchair accessible.
Reasonable accommodations are available at public hearings with advance notice to the
City Clerk's Office (206- 433 -1800 or tukclerk @tukwilawa.gov). This notice is available at
www.tukwilawa.aov, and in alternate formats with advance notice for those with disabilities.
Tukwila Council meetings are audio taped.
HOW TO TESTIFY
If you would like to address the Council, please go to the podium and state your name and address clearly for
the record. Please observe the basic rules of courtesy when speaking and limit your comments to five
minutes. The Council appreciates hearing from citizens but may not be able to take immediate action on
comments received until they are referred to a Committee or discussed under New Business.
COUNCIL MEETINGS
No Council meetings are scheduled on the 5th Monday of the month unless prior public notification is given.
Regular Meetings The Mayor, elected by the people to a four -year term, presides at all Regular Council
Meetings held on the 1st and 3rd Mondays of each month at 7:00 p.m. Official Council action in the
form of formal motions, adopting of resolutions and passing of ordinances can only be taken at Regular
Council meetings.
Committee of the Whole Meetings Council members are elected for a four -year term. The Council
President is elected by the Council members to preside at all Committee of the Whole meetings for a
one -year term. Committee of the Whole meetings are held the 2nd and 4th Mondays at 7:00 p.m.
Issues discussed are forwarded to the Regular Council meeting for official action.
GENERAL INFORMATION
At each Council meeting citizens are given the opportunity to address the Council on items that are not
included on the agenda during CITIZENS COMMENTS. Please limit your comments to 5 minutes.
Special Meetings may be called at any time with proper public notice. Procedures followed are the same as
those used in Regular Council meetings.
Executive Sessions may be called to inform the Council of pending legal action, financial, or personnel
matters.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Public Hearings are required by law before the Council can take action on matters affecting the public interest
such as land -use laws, annexations, rezone requests, public safety issues, etc. Section 2.04.150 of the
Tukwila Municipal Code states the following guidelines for Public Hearings:
1. The proponent shall speak first and is allowed 15 minutes for a presentation.
2. The opponent is then allowed 15 minutes to make a presentation.
3. Each side is then allowed 5 minutes for rebuttal.
4. Citizens who wish to address the Council may speak for 5 minutes each. No one may speak a second
time until everyone wishing to speak has spoken.
5. After each speaker has spoken, the Council may question the speaker. Each speaker can respond to the
question, but may not engage in further debate at this time.
6. After the Public Hearing is closed and during the Council meeting, the Council may choose to discuss
the issue among themselves, or defer the discussion to a future Council meeting, without further public
testimony. Council action may only be taken during Regular or Special Meetings.
cOUNcm AGENDA SYNOPSIS
nitialr ITEM NO.
Meetir:X Date Pre pared by I Ma yor�eview I Council revie,
06/13/11 I RF
a I 06/20/11 I RF
4
ITEM INFORMATION
CAS NUMBI R: 11-057 STAFF SPONSOR: REBECCA FOX NORA GIERLOFF I ORIGINAL. AGI DATE: 6/13/11
AGENDA ITEM TITL.r-: Comprehensive Plan Update Manufacturing Industrial Center (MIC)
C,\17?C,0RY Discussion Motion Resolution Ordinance Bid Award Public Hearing Other
Mtg Date 6 /13/11 Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date 6/20/11 Aft Date Mtg Date 6113111 A4tg Date
SPONSOR Council Mayor HR DCD Finance -Fire IT P&R Police PWI
SPONSOR'S Policies and uses for the Manufacturing Industrial Center are being considered as part of
SLJN4T\ZnRY the regular review /update of the Comprehensive Plan that the State of Washington
Growth Management Act requires. The recommended revisions affirm that the MIC should
continue to be primarily for industrial activity, and make certain changes to emphasize
that status. The Council was briefed on MIC background information, update process and
public outreach in October, 2010 and February, 2011.
RIiv1HWI D BY COW Mtg. CA &P Cmte F &S Cmte Transportation Cmte
Utilities Cmte Arts Comm. Parks Comm. Planning Comm.
DATE: 5/23/11 COMMITTEE CHAIR: SEAL
RECOMMENDATIONS:
SPONSOR /ADMIN. Department of Community Development
C(_)Mf\4"fI'El; Forward to Committee of the Whole for public hearing
COST IMPACT FUND SOURCE
EYPI:_NDITURIz.� RI QUIRI;D AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED
Fund Source:
Comments:
I MTG.DATEI RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION
06/13/11
I
MTG. DATE I ATTACHMENTS
06/13/11 I Informational Memorandum dated 5/18/11, with attachments
Comprehensive Plan Ordinance in Draft Form
I I Zoning Ordinance in Draft Form
Minutes from the Community Affairs and Parks Committee meeting of 5/23/11
I I
I
1
2
City of Tukwila
Jim Haggerton, Mayor
INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor Haggerton
Community Affairs and Parks Committee (CAP)
FROM: Nora Gierloff, Deputy Director, Department of Community Development
DATE: May 18, 2011
SUBJECT: Manufacturing Industrial Center Comprehensive Plan Update
Planning Commission Recommendations
ISSUE
Washington cities subject to the requirements of the Growth Management Act are periodically
required to undertake an overall review and update of their Comprehensive Plans, separate
from the annual amendment process. Staff has conducted public outreach and developed a
set of recommendations for updating the Manufacturing and Industrial Center (MIC) element as
part of the required review. The Planning Commission has made a set of recommendations to
Council for changes to these sections of the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code. Tukwila is
required to complete its entire update process by December, 2014.
BACKGROUND
A moratorium on issuing permits for certain non industrial uses in the MIC was instituted
during the Comprehensive Plan update review. In February, 2011, the City Council
indicated that it wished to complete action on the MIC update before the current
moratorium expires on July 1, 2011.
Tukwila's Manufacturing Industrial Center, the area covered by the MIC /H and MIC /L
zoning districts, is an important regional center of industrial activity. It is one of the four
regional centers of industrial activity designated in the King County's County Wide
Planning Policies. This designation reflects the corridor's long- standing industrial use
and its current importance in the regional economy. Approximately 14, 000 jobs are
located in the MIC, which provides a significant portion of Tukwila's economic activity.
(Map, Attachment A)
City of Tukwila Comprehensive Plan policies establish that the Manufacturing Industrial Center
is intended for industrial activity in order to "maximize the employment and economic benefits to
the people of Tukwila and the region, while minimizing the impacts on residential
neighborhoods." The Zoning Code implements the Comprehensive Plan's policies by; 1)
limiting non industrial uses allowed in the MIC, especially office and retail; and 2) reserving the
land largely for industrial activities with some limited non industrial support for these uses.
ACTIVITIES TO DATE
1. Background Report
Staff prepared the Manufacturing /Industrial Center Background Report, including
a review of applicable policies and regulations and an overview of economic and
physical conditions. The City Council was briefed on the document in October,
2010.
3
INFORMATIONAL MEMO
Page 2
2. Public Involvement /Input on MIC
After preparing the Background Report, staff sought input and involvement from
stakeholders and interested individuals through a survey process. In February,
2011, the City Council directed staff to hold a public workshop to elicit additional
comment.
Methods used to solicit public involvement include:
Information on Manufacturing Industrial Center update, including all materials
and meetings, posted on City website
http: /www. ci.tukwila.wa. us /dcd /micstudv. htmi
Mailings to property owners, tenants in the MIC, as well as Low Density
Residential within 500' of the MIC boundary
Targeted mailing to selected MIC businesses
Notices in "The Hazelnut" and "Tukwila Reporter"
Phone and in- person interviews with stakeholders
On -line surveys and comment form
Public workshop on Issues and Opportunities recommendations
Planning Commission meeting and public hearing
3. Preparation of Issues and Opportunities Rerort
Staff assessed MIC issues and opportunities in light of current and anticipated
conditions, the Comprehensive Plan vision, and stakeholder comments, and
prepared an Issues and Opportunities Report, including recommendations.
(Attachment B)
4. Public Inrut and Open House on the Issues and Ooportunities Rerort
A well- attended public workshop and open house on the Issues and
Opportunities report was held on April 14, 2011. Attendees commented on
railroad operations near Allentown, alternate routes for truck traffic to the BNSF
yard, desire for more amenities, such as restaurants /coffee shops etc., for MIC
employees, and the importance of maintaining the health and industrial character
of the MIC. Several written comments were received after the workshop.
(Attachments C —Staff response /summary and D— Written Comments)
DISCUSSION
The Planning Commission held a public hearing on April 28, 2011, and made
recommendations after taking testimony. The Planning Commission found that regional
and Tukwila goals for the MIC are still valid. It recommended specific changes that are
within the parameters of regional policy guidance and that focus on recognizing and
improving what is already in place in the MIC. Planning Commission recommendations
are discussed below. Planning Commission minutes and a summary of
recommendations are attached. (Attachments E F)
Comprehensive Plan (See Attachment B Issues and Ooportunities Report, pp.
12 to 16)
Recommended actions include:
Add a new implementation strategy to reroute BNSF traffic from S. 124
to lessen impacts on the Allentown neighborhood (p. 15)
C:ID000ME- -11 Teri- SILOCALS- 11Temp\GWViewer CAP Info Doc-- 5.23.11.doc
4
INFORMATIONAL MEMO
Page 3
Add a new policy to seek light rail and commuter rail stops in the vicinity
of Boeing Access Road (p. 16)
Development Regulations (See Attachment B Issues and Opportunities Report,
pp. 17 to 27)
Recommendations for development regulations are intended to focus the uses in
the MIC zone on industrial activity and activities that support it. Non industrial
uses, such as retail and services, are allowed but primarily to serve area
employees. Recommended use changes include:
require that schools and colleges, currently conditional uses, be oriented
toward vocational curricula and associated with an existing industrial or
aviation use in light of the need for trained employees;
reorganize and clarify manufacturing uses according to their likely impact;
make certain uses, such as barber shops, medical services, health clubs,
and financial services conditional rather than permitted uses and
emphasize that they are intended to be small in scale and serve area
employees;
make hotels and motels conditional, rather than permitted, uses since
they may be incompatible with the noise in the industrial area;
delete certain uses that do not support industrial activity, such as
dormitories, extended stay hotel /motels, billiard halls and nightclubs; and
require administrative design review for new offices given their
characteristics and potential for impacts or incompatibilities.
(Attachment G— Zoning Matrix summary of PC recommended changes)
Boundaries (See Attachment B Issues and Opportunities Report, pp. 27 to 31)
A boundary change pertaining to Duwamish Hill Preserve is recommended:
remove the Duwamish Hill Preserve from the MIC;
rezone the area from Manufacturing Industrial Center /Light (MIC /L) to
Low Density Residential (LDR), as is the case for other parks; and
add a Public Recreation Overlay in recognition of its park use.
This site specific, quasi judicial matter will come before the City Council as part
of the annual Comprehensive Plan amendments later in the year.
Planned Action Document (See Attachment B Issues and Opportunities Report,
op. 32 to 331:
The Planning Commission concurred with the Staff recommendation to review
the Planned Action document for any needed updates.
An additional public comment was received after the Planning Commission
hearing (Attachment H). Draft ordinances reflecting Planning Commission
recommendations are Attachments I and J to this memo.
CADOCUME-11 Teri- STOCALS- l 1Temp\GWVieweACAP Info Doc-- 5.23.11.doc
5
INFORMATIONAL MEMO
Page 4
RECOMMENDATION
The Committee is being asked for forward this item to the June 13, 2011 COW meeting for a
public hearing. Final action will need to be taken on either June 20 or June 27, 2011 in order for
any changes to be in place before the moratorium expires on non industrial uses in the MIC.
ATTACHMENTS
A. MIC map
B. Issues and Opportunities Report (with attachments including Business Survey Summary and
Business Survey Tabulation)
C. Summary of Comments and Staff Responses —April 14 workshop
D. Written comments received prior to 4/20/11
E. Draft Planning Commission minutes 4/28/11
F. Summary Recommended changes
G. Zoning Matrix with MIC uses and recommended changes
H. R.W. Thorpe Comment Letter
I. Draft Ordinance Comprehensive Plan text changes
J. Draft Ordinance Zoning Code text changes
C: IDOCUME 1lTeri- SILOCALS- 11TemplGWViewerlCAP Info Doc-- 5.23.11.doc
6
Manufacturing /Industrial Center At tachment
S rhim9a a I i 3
s
RN
S ROSe St
�a�` y"h
1% srn�gne st
e
S c. werdgiest
SM -weano
S Tres ton St
f h�
5 Henderson St 1�,,, Ki County S nde St
rnational
iii11 irport 9
Ill CO
v vw s 94 P1
a a
'NA 5 93 St S Benef t St a
v
9d) f�
tS tiO '1", X49
S Bond St
S 100 St S NorthGOlkSt
-r— ,v wry, 9 SGazelle t
S104St D
Cn
S 107 St d' i S Creston St
E N h
�u�� SHazel St
a P
S Founin St
112 Si
CID
rn
111.
m h
115 St S11 4S1
p+
N 118 S�,
S 118 St
m
S120St S120St� tv C& AS S
Y
a m
Legend '�i 5,2a,st
I I
fin, .o w Tukwila City Limits
r i'= 1,700 feet
Manufacturing Industrial Center sl2ast 1
200' Shoreline Buffer Zone on both m S1za
sides h o f the river S 130
m� St N 5 4
Zonino Designations
MIC /H- Manufacturing Industrial
Center /Heavy Industrial
MIC /L- Manufacturing Industrial
Center /Light Industrial
7
8
ATTACHMENT B
ISSUES OPPORTUNITIES REPORT
(Report with survey results summary included)
City of Tukwila Department of Community Development
April 4, 2011
ukwi a Manufacturing
I ndustria Center
Issues and Opportunities
Report
Cornprehensive Plan and Development Regulation Consistency
Analysis
P-
4? 10
9
10
BACKGROUND
Tukwila's Manufacturing/ Industrial Center is an important regional center of industrial
activity. it is one of four such centers designated in King County. The Manufacturing/
Industrial Center (MIC) is an area that is meant to preserve and enhance manufacturing
and industrial activity, and the land that allows these activities to operate. King
County's Countywide Planning Policies set parameters for the employment and uses that
may occur within an MIC. Tukwila's MIC is one of the few remaining concentrations of
industrial land in the urban Puget Sound region.
Tukwila's MIC is approximately 966 acres alon the Ouwamish River, bounded generally
by the City of Seattle on the north, South 126 Street on the south, the Burlington
Northern railway right -of -way on the east, and the Tukwila City limits on the west. The
MIC is home to over 14,000 jobs, and provides a significant portion of Tukwila's
economic activity.
City of Tukwila Comprehensive Plan policies establish that the Manufacturing Industrial
Center is intended for industrial activity in order to "maximize the employment and
economic benefits to the people of Tukwila and the region, white minimizing the
impacts on residential neighborhoods." The Zoning Code, which implements the
Comprehensive Plan's policies, limits non industrial uses, especially office and retail,
which may occur in the MIC, and reserves the land for industrial activities and some
limited support for these uses. New housing is not permitted.
Purpose of the Report
This analysis is being undertaken as part of the City's required periodic review and
update of its Comprehensive Plan goals and policies. It is a review of the applicable
policies and regulations in effect and an examination of the geographic extent of the
MIC. Staff has sought input from Tukwila's business community to identify key issues
that affect industrial businesses and lands in the Manufacturing/ Industrial Center.
This report will highlight issues to be reviewed by the Planning Commission. The
Planning Commission will recommend a set of changes to the City Council.
W: \Long Range Projects \MIC Study \CAP_5 -23 -11 \Attachment B Issues &OppsReport-- complete.doc
Page 1
11
Opportunities
U����UU���� and �������U~��0U��UK~U����
m�bm7(�ns��en
CVmp/chensiyeP�nand�exek�pn?en���� cy n�
��x��| f Contents
o����� of
Background.....,,...---.........---^^^^^^^^'^'^~~~^~--'^~^^~~--''~^~~~--'^~1
Purposenf the Report l
Stakeholder Survey Responses 3
SurveyProcess 3
Summary ofKey Findings j
CommcntsandSuggasbonstotheCityofTukwi|a ----------.S
Policy Cons Analysis x
Countywide Planning Pdicies--------------------..
Tukw Comprehensive Plan—Goals and Policies ----------..12
Development Regulations Review 17
Summary.......................................................................................... 17
Discussion of Permitted Uses --------------------.18
Discussion nf Accessory Uses 2o
Discussion ofConditional Uses 2h
BoundaryReview 27
DuvvamishHill Preserve 27
Group Health Cooperative 2U
Department of Homeland Security jU
PlannedAction .......-'.^`^~^`^^^^^^^-~~^~~^~~-~~^^^^~^^^^^--^-`^^^~^'^-'^~^^^^32
Summary of Recommendations .^~~...-~^~.....~.....-.........-......,3w
T�F�|
Figures
Figure 1: Map ofTukwila Ml[----------------.----. 2
Figure Z: Duvvamish Hill Preserve Zoning---------------28
Figure 3: GroupHealth[ooperativaZoning JU
Figure 4: Department of Homeland Security Zoning ---------..31
List Attachments
Attachment Summary ofBusiness Stakeholder Survey Results
Attachment D Tabulated Business Stakeholder Survey with [nnnrnents
VV:\Long Range Pnjeds\MICStudy\CAP_S-Z3-11\AttachmentB-lsoues&0ppsRepod--
comp}ete.doc Page 2
STAKEHOLDER SURVEY RESPONSES
Survey Process
To gain background data for its review of the Manufacturing/ Industrial Center, as well
as a way to involve business stakeholders, the Department of Community Development
conducted a survey of businesses in the MIC. The purpose of the survey was to gain
information about concerns of businesses, identify pressures that industrial businesses
are facing, and to ask for feedback regarding the City of Tukwila's policies, especially
industrial land use.
Tukwila sent postcards to 200 tenants and property owners in the MIC, inviting them to
participate in an online survey to determine which issues were important to them.
Tukwila staff also sent personal letters to approximately 15 businesses, asking them to
participate in a more detailed survey, either on the phone or in- person, depending on
individual preference. Extensive follow up phone calling occurred to secure business
participation.
As a result of significant outreach efforts, Tukwila staff conducted interviews either in
person or by phone or, in one case via email, with 20 businesses located in the MIC.
Four responses were received to the shorter website surveys. As a result, a total of 23
businesses and one resident provided comments regarding the MIC out of a total of
approximately 130 in the entire area.
Staff prepared a 17 question survey which included both short answer and open -ended
questions aimed at specific information, and a range of responses. It is based on
surveys prepared by the City of Seattle in 2007. For most of the short answer
questions, results were readily summarized. In the case of the open -ended questions
categories were created, results were summarized and displayed based on common
themes that the businesses expressed.
The survey results provide important information and raise interesting questions about
Tukwila businesses in the MIC. However, conclusions drawn from the results should be
considered primarily as a snapshot of selected businesses, rather than indicating trends.
The sampling method was not intended to be, and is not, statistically valid.
A summary of all results is included as Attachment A. The tabulated survey with all
comments is Attachment B.
Summary of Key Findincas
Businesses value Tukwila's central location: Businesses place a high value on their
location in Tukwila's Manufacturing/ Industrial Center for its access to major
transportation corridors, customers and suppliers. Tukwila's central location provides
excellent access to Seattle, the east side, Western Washington and Alaska.
Access is the key benefit to a Tukwila location: The outstanding benefit to a having a
Tukwila industrial location is access. Throughout the survey the importance of
Tukwila's good access and central location was mentioned. Some ways that access is
considered notable includes the following:
Access to the highway system, including 1-5 and Highway 599, primarily for getting
onto the regional transportation network for reaching markets outside of the
immediate area.
W: \Long Range Projects \MIC Study \CAP_5 -23-11 \Attachment B Issues &OppsReport-- complete.doc
Page 3
13
Access to airports is a significant plus, as is access to the Port of Seattle. Rail
access is not considered important by survey respondents.
Employee access to worksltes is convenient from a variety of locations
Access to customers, clients and suppliers is convenient and economical
In addition, firms consider having truck access to their individual site to be especially
important. Having enough parking at the site is also very important.
A location in Tukwila's MIC has many advantages: In addition to access
(freeways/ transportation network, airports, ability to serve customers efficiently) and a
central location, businesses felt their Tukwila location provided them with a good
facility with reasonable costs.
Others mentioned the availability of power, fiber optics, good police response, good
business climate, a large industrial area with industrial neighbors and the ability to be
separate from residential uses. One remarked that Tukwila was the "heart of
everything," including Alaska Marine lines and truck lines. They appreciated the ability
to ship anywhere, anytime.
A location in the MIC has negatives, too: Responses were varied, but could generally
be grouped into categories including: 1) public safety /crime concerns; 2) traffic
congestion; 3) codes/ permitting (slow permitting, restrictive zoning and sign codes); 4)
regulation; 5) negative business climate; 6) lack of amenities/ services for employees
(transit /light rail, restaurants, retail); and 7) high costs (rent, City fees).
One business remarked on the difficult east /west traffic pattern due to the Duwamish
River, King County International Airport and the 116 Avenue South bridge closure.
Another was concerned over the perception that Tukwila was "too far south," and
therefore difficult to access. The Superfund environmental cleanup was mentioned, as
was the distance from other tourist destinations. One business expressed regret that the
expected convergence of transit, light rail, highways and employment had not occurred.
Most industrial businesses prefer to be located with similar uses and away from non-
industrial uses: Industrial businesses prefer to be grouped together with similar or
complementary businesses. Industrial uses like to be located with other industrial
businesses to generate business and share suppliers and customers. A significant number
wanted business neighbors involved with trucking, either sales, repair, distribution,
truck courier or businesses that generated lots of truck traffic.
Incompatibility with non industrial operations: The most commonly cited reason for
avoiding non industrial neighbors was the view that industrial operations were just not
compatible with many non industrial activities due to impacts (noise, odor, truck
traffic, appearance). For example, businesses were concerned that their operations
could result in complaints from their non industrial neighbors, or in negative impacts
since their operations were not necessarily "attractive."
Many businesses stated that they wish to be located away from residences and non-
industrial uses due to the noise and impacts they themselves produced, and their desire
to operate without being considered a nuisance by others. Two respondents felt that
having residential uses nearby could be a source of criminal activity or break -ins at
their business.
W: \Long Range Projects \MIC Study \CAP_5 -23 -11 \Attachment B Issues &OppsReport-- complete.doc
Page 4
14
There are some benefits to having some non industrial neighbors: Some industrial
businesses view certain non industrial uses, such as restaurant and retail, as amenities
that can enhance the work environment for their employees. A few thought that
additional offices could provide them more customers. At least one business felt that
proximity to residences could provide a source of additional customers for the business,
and that all viable uses should be encouraged.
Costs and the need for larger facilities would cause businesses to change location: In
general, businesses would prefer to stay in place, but if necessary would be compelled
to move to seek a larger facility and lower costs. Many industrial land users are
concerned about the availability of space that fits their needs, and the rising costs of
rent and land. All of the respondents stated that the costs of land and /or rent was
either very important or somewhat important.
If necessary, King County, especially Auburn or Kent, would be the favored place to
relocate: If businesses decided to leave Tukwila, over one in four would choose either
Auburn or Kent due to lower costs and the ability to get larger facilities.
Businesses would like faster, more certain permit processing: Businesses commented
on fire permit -fees, rack permits, building code requirements, seismic requirements,
and permits for machine installation.
Public safety /crime is a priority: When asked their concerns about a Tukwila location,
over 70% of respondents felt that public safety /crime issues were very important to
them, citing problems with burglary /car prowl. Police response for personal crime was
good, and businesses had good interactions with the police. Response for property crime
was somewhat less satisfactory.
Traffic congestion is a problem or not: Businesses were evenly split with
approximately 50% feeling that traffic was an important problem, and approximately
50% saying that it wasn't important at all. Congestion made getting to Southcenter
difficult for some. Interurban works well.
Amenities: Several businesses were pleased with trails and parks in the MIC. Others
felt that restaurants and other amenities for their employees were lacking, and wanted
more. Several businesses were especially interested in additional public transit options,
including additional bus service, and a light rail stop.
Business Climate and Perception: Feelings were mixed regarding business climate.
Some businesses felt that the City had a good or neutral business climate, others felt
that the City had a negative attitude toward business. One business remarked that they
didn't feel connected to Tukwila, although they had used the Tukwila Community
Center for meetings and a staff picnic. One business requested that the City keep
reaching out to business as it is doing now with the survey, since businesses sometimes
feel that the City of Tukwila doesn't care about them.
Comments and Suaaestions to the Citv of Tukwila
Businesses were asked open -ended questions about ways the City could help their
business operations and also to provide comments for the City of Tukwila. Businesses
made 48 very interesting suggestions or comments regarding better communication,
zoning, transportation, permitting, transit /light rail, taxes/ bureaucracy, public
safety, landscaping requirements, other regulations.
W: \Long Range Projects \MIC Study \CAP_5 -23 -11 \Attachment B Issues &OppsReport-- complete.doc
Page 5
15
Communication: The most common suggestions concerned communication, including
providing additional opportunities for communication through the City's website, email,
safety alerts, even business cards. Businesses appreciated prior flood information and
asked for more.
Zoning /Permitted Uses: Land use was a topic of interest. Three individuals wanted only
industrial uses in the area and five wanted additional non industrial uses including more
offices (to generate customers), restaurants and a hotel. Of these, one business
suggested a transitional buffer around the MIC to allow commercial uses that could
serve both residents and industrial employees, while another felt that the southern part
of the MIC should be rezoned to office.
Transportation: Suggestions concerned traffic lights, including better timing for lights
along E. Marginal Way and desire for a traffic light at S. 112 and E. Marginal Way.
There was concern over a potential bike lane on E. Marginal.
Permitting: Three businesses wanted faster or more certain permitting. One
suggested offering permitting assistance and advice, while another wanted more notice
for business license renewals. One suggested that the City adapt its processes to fit
real demands.
Transit /Light Rail: Three businesses wanted the light rail stop at E. Marginal and
better access to public transportation.
Taxes /Bureaucracy: Not surprisingly, tower taxes and no B&O tax were requested.
Another business asked for friendlier service to business with less bureaucracy.
Public Safety: Additional police patrols were requested, as well as more emergency
training. Better police and fire department cooperation was suggested.
Landscaping: Trees and bushes along E. Marginal Way attracted notice with a request
for trimming to improve safety and visibility, as well as a suggestion for fewer
landscaping requirements.
Regulations: Request was made for consistent sign code enforcement. The City was
asked to to work with State and federal governments to change paint .regulations.
Other: Several additional comments were made, including: 1) Keep supporting the Rock
and Roll Marathon; 2)Monitor City actions for impacts on business; 3)Keep reaching out
to business as you are doing through this survey businesses sometimes feel that the
City of Tukwila doesn't care about them; 4) Provide help in hiring qualified employees;
5)Thanks to Mayor Haggerton for his participation in Museum of Flight programs.
Survey results will be shared with City officials for consideration.
W: \Long Range Projects \MIC Study\ CAP_5- 23- 11 \Attachment Issues &OppsReport-- complete.doc
Page 6
16
POLICY CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS
(CounLMwide Planning Policies
The Growth Management Act fundamentally changed the way that comprehensive
planning was done and land use decisions were made in Washington State. The
challenge of the Growth Management Act was to establish a Countywide vision and
devise a strategy to achieve it. This included balancing growth, economics, land use,
infrastructure, and finance.
The Growth Management Act gave local officials new tools for planning and, for the first
time, mandated that the County and cities work together to establish an overall vision.
Through a collaborative process, the local jurisdictions of King County prepared the
Countywide Planning Policies. The Policies serve as the framework for each
jurisdiction's own comprehensive plan, which must be consistent with Countywide
Planning Policies. These individual comprehensive plans throughout the County,
then, will be consistent with the overall vision for the future of King County.
When a Countywide Policy states that a jurisdiction "shall" or "will" do something, such
a policy requires the jurisdiction's Comprehensive Plan to contain a policy that is
written to accomplish the purpose of the Countywide Policy. When a Countywide Policy
states that a jurisdiction "should" do something, such a policy requires the
jurisdiction's Comprehensive Plan to contain a policy that is written to accomplish the
purpose of the Countywide Policy unless the jurisdiction identifies reasons why it has
not done so. When a Countywide Policy states that a jurisdiction "may" do something,
such a policy suggests the jurisdiction's Comprehensive Plan contain a policy written to
accomplish the purpose of the Countywide Policy if it is in their interest.
Framework policies establish the overall direction for the policies while land use
policies provide more detail. Following is a review of Countywide Planning Policies,
both framework and land use, relevant to Tukwila's MIC. Each policy is followed by a
staff evaluation
FW -12(a) All jurisdictions within King County share the responsibility to accommodate
the 20 -year population projection and employment forecast. Anticipated growth shall
be allocated pursuant to the following objectives:
a. To plan for a pattern of growth that is guided by the Regional Growth Strategy
contained in Vision 2040, the growth management, transportation, and economic
development plan for the 4- county central Puget Sound region;
b. To ensure efficient use of land within the UGA by directing growth to Urban
Centers and Activity Centers;
c. To limit development in the Rural Areas;
d. To protect designated resource lands;
e. To ensure efficient use of infrastructure;
f. To improve the jobs /housing balance within the county;
g. To promote a land use pattern that can be served by public transportation and
other alternatives to the single occupancy vehicle; and
W: \Long Range Projects \MIC Study \CAP_5 -23 -11 \Attachment B Issues &OppsReport complete.doc
Page 7
17
h. To provide sufficient opportunities for growth within the jurisdictions.
Analysis: Tukwila's regional share of employment growth is 17,550 new employees by
2031. Approximately one -third of that growth is planned to be accommodated in the
MIC.
According to the Countywide Planning Policies:
Manufacturing/ Industrial Employment Centers are key components of the regional
economy. These areas are characterized by a significant amount of manufacturing,
industrial, and advanced technology employment. They differ from other employment
areas, such as business /office parks (see FW -16 and LU- 70 -74), in that a land base and
the segregation of major non manufacturing uses are essential elements of their
operation.
FW -15 Within the Urban Growth Area, the Countywide Planning Policies shall assure the
creation of a number of locally determined Manufacturing/ Industrial Centers which
meet specific criteria. The Manufacturing/ Industrial Centers shall be characterized by
the following:
a. Clearly defined geographic boundaries;
b. Intensity/ density of land uses sufficient to support manufacturing, industrial and
advanced technology uses;
c. Reasonable access to -the regional highway, rail, air and /or waterway system for
the movement of goods;
d. Provisions to discourage large office and retail development; and
e. Fast -track project permitting.
Analysis: Tukwila's MIC boundary generally follows physical boundaries such as the
Duwamish River, freeways or arterials or the political boundary of the City limits. The
more complex boundary along the southern edge of the area delineates significant use
changes such as the boundary between single family houses and the BNSF railroad tracks
and yard in the Allentown neighborhood. Additional discussion of this issue is found in
the Boundary Review section of this report.
The excellent transportation access to the MIC was cited as a major reason for business
Location by participants in our public survey. This includes access to airports and the
highway system (1 -5, 1 -405, SR 599) to reach markets, suppliers and clients.
Tukwila's MIC contains aerospace manufacturing (Boeing), transportation (KC Metro bus
yard), freight (UPS, BNSF) and heavy manufacturing (Jorgensen Forge). However under
code changes approved in 2001 significant new non manufacturing uses have been
permitted such as the Group Health Cooperative and Department of Homeland Security.
These changes allow office uses up to 20,000 sf outright and office uses over 20,000 sf
as conditional uses in MIC /L.
Retail uses are still limited to "a type and size that clearly intend to serve other
permitted uses and /or the employees of those uses" TMC 18.36.040.
A Planned Action, adopted in 1998, evaluates and anticipates environmental impacts in
the MIC, and allows streamlined and certain environmental review for qualifying
projects.
W: \Long Range Projects \MIC Study \CAP_5 -23 -11 \Attachment B Issues &OppsReport complete.doc
Page 8
18
Manufacturing /industrial Center Designation Process
LU -51 The location and number of regional Manufacturing/ Industrial Centers in King
County were determined through the joint local and Countywide adoption process,
based on the following steps:
a. Countywide Planning Polices include specific criteria for Manufacturing/ Industrial
Centers;
b. Jurisdictions electing to contain a Manufacturing/ Industrial Center provided the
Growth Management Planning Council with a statement specifying how the Center
will meet the intent of the Countywide Policies, including plans to adopt criteria,
incentives, and other commitme��ts to implement Manufacturing /Industrial Centers;
c. The Growth Management Planning Council reviewed the Manufacturing/ Industrial
Centers elected by local jurisdictions consistent with policy FW -1, and the following
criteria:
1. The Center's location in the region, especially relative to existing and
proposed transportation facilities and its potential for promoting a Countywide
system of Manufacturing/ Industrial Centers;
2. The total number of Centers that are needed in the County over the next 20-
years based on 20 years projected need for manufacturing land to satisfy regional
projections of demand for manufacturing land that assume a ten percent increase
in manufacturing jobs over this period;
3. The type and level of commitments that each jurisdiction has identified for
achieving Manufacturing/ Industrial Center goals;
4. Review of other jurisdictional plans to ensure that growth focused to
Manufacturing/ Industrial Centers is assured; and
5. The accessibility of the Center to existing or planned transportation facilities.
d. The Growth Management Planning Council confirmed the following
Manufacturing/ Industrial Centers: North Tukwila /Duwamish, Ballard /Interbay, the
Kent Industrial Area, and Redmond Overtake.
Analysis: The factors that supported the designation of Tukwila's MIC are still relevant.
Manufacturing /Industrial Center Criteria
LU -52 Each jurisdiction which contains a regional Manufacturing/ Industrial Center shall
adopt in its comprehensive plan a definition of the Center which specifies the exact
geographic boundaries of the Center. Jurisdictions with Manufacturing/ Industrial
Centers shall have zoning and detailed plans in place to achieve the following goals by
the year 2010.
a. Preserve and encourage the aggregation of vacant or non manufacturing/
industrial land parcels sized for manufacturing /industrial uses;
b. Discourage land uses which are not compatible with manufacturing, industrial and
advanced technology uses;
c. Accommodate a minimum of 10,000 jobs; and
W: \Long Range Projects \MIC Study \CAP_5 -23-11 \Attachment B Issues &OppsReport- -complete.doc
Page 9
19
d. Limit the size of offices and retail unless as an accessory use.
Analysis: Tukwila has delineated the boundaries of its MIC and has revisited that
boundary over time. For additional discussion see the Boundary Review section. Tukwila
Comprehensive Plan Policy 2.1.4 calls for using some capital improvements to
encourage land assembly if concurrent with substantial private actions.
Figures from 2009 show the total covered employment in the MIC at 14,353. Retail sales
are limited to a scale intended to serve the local permitted uses.
New office uses are limited to 20,000 sf as permitted uses in the MIC /L. In the MIC /H,
new offices are permitted outright if associated with another permitted use. Larger
offices may be allowed within the MIC /L and MiC /H zones (subject to specific size and
locational requirements) as stand -alone conditional uses. This provides an additional
means to address potential impacts, especially traffic, of office uses on other uses in
the vicinity.
LU -53 All jurisdictions support the development of a regional industrial siting policy to
promote industrial activity.
Analysis: Tukwila Comprehensive Plan Policy 11.1.11 states: Work with other
jurisdictions to bring about necessary changes in laws and regulations and to develop
other approaches to solving common problems. Opportunities remain to implement this
policy on a regional basis to develop a regional industrial siting policy.
LU -54 Jurisdictions shall design access to the regional Manufacturing /Industrial Centers
to facilitate the mobility of employees by transit, and the mobility of goods by truck,
rail or waterway as appropriate. Regional comprehensive plans shall include strategies
to provide capital improvement projects which support access for movement of goods.
Analysis: The deferred Link Light Rail stop at Boeing Access Road would provide much
greater transit access to the MIC. Reconstruction of the 16 Avenue Bridge will maintain
this east -west link in the transportation network. Otherwise transportation into and
within the MIC is robust and continues to have excess capacity.
LU -55 Jurisdictions which contain regional Manufacturing/ Industrial Centers in
conjunction with transit agencies, shall identify transit station areas and rights -of -way
in each jurisdiction's comprehensive plan. Where transit stations exist or are planned,
jurisdictions in conjunction with transit agencies shall identify various options such as
feeder systems, bicycle routes and pedestrian systems to link the Center with its transit
stations.
Analysis: Funding for a planned light rail station at Boeing Access Road was eliminated
from the initial routing to SeaTac Airport. When the light rail station is once again
under consideration, Tukwila will work with Sound Transit to finalize various options to
access the future station. Tukwila's Walk and Roll Plan identifies bicycle and
pedestrian routes within the MIC. Commuter use of car and van pools is supported by
the Tukwila Commute Trip Reduction program. Per Comprehensive Plan policy 11.1.9
Reduce reliance on the single- occupancy vehicle for transportation of employees in and
out of the MIC.
LU -56 In order to reserve rights -of -way and potential station areas for high- capacity
transit or transit hubs in the regional Manufacturing/ Industrial Centers, jurisdictions
shall:
W: \Long Range Projects;�MIC Study\CAP_5 -23-11 \Attachment B Issues &OppsReport-- compiete.doc
Page 10
20
a. Upon adoption of specific high- capacity transit alignments by METRO, adopt
policies to avoid development which would restrict establishment of the high
capacity transit system;
b. Preserve rights -of -way controlled by the jurisdiction which are identified for
potential transit use; and
c. Provide METRO an option to acquire property owned by the jurisdiction.
Analysis: Tukwila has a Comprehensive Plan policy in place to address this: 11.1.9
Reduce reliance on the single- occupancy vehicle for transportation of employees in and
out of the MIC. In support of LU -56, the accompanying implementation strategy states:
Regional /rapid rail service to the M/C.
LU -57 Transit agencies shall strive to provide convenient and economical mass transit
service for the Manufacturing/ Industrial Centers that will result in a decrease in single
occupancy non commercial vehicle trips within the Centers.
Analysis: See LU -56 above. Additionally, the Tukwila Commute Trip Reduction program
supports commuter use of car and van pools and buses in larger businesses in the MIC.
Tukwila works with the Duwamish Transportation Management Association to secure and
encourage transportation alternatives, including increased bus service, for the MIC.
The bus alternative has been affected since service to the MIC reflects a trend of
service hour reduction.
LU -58 Jurisdictions' comprehensive plans for regional Manufacturing/ Industrial Centers
shall demonstrate compliance with the criteria. In order to promote
manufacturing /industrial growth, the Manufacturing/ Industrial Center plan for each
jurisdiction shall establish strategies:
a. To provide capital facility improvement projects which support the movement of
goods and manufacturing /industrial operations;
b. To coordinate planning with serving utilities to ensure that utility facilities are
available to serve such Centers;
c. To provide buffers around the Center to reduce conflicts with adjacent land uses;
d. To facilitate land assembly; and
e. To attract the type of businesses that will ensure economic growth and stability.
Analysis: Comprehensive Plan Policy 2.1.4 Budget for public infrastructure (for
example, roads, sewers, curbs, lighting, parks, open space) Use some capital
improvement funds to encourage in -fill, land assembly, redevelopment, and land
conversion for family -wage jobs, but only if concurrent with substantial private actions.
Infrastructure to support area buildout has been previously identified in the
infrastructure comprehensive plans for transportation, sewer, water and storm
drainage. Tukwila's Six -Year Capital Improvement Plan identifies projects within the
City, including the MIC. Road improvement and utility improvements were completed
along E. Marginal Way South in the mid- 1990's to enhance mobility and capacity.
Adequate current and future capacity exists to serve the MIC with all utilities. Storm
water improvements are under discussion in conjunction with Duwamish River cleanup
to address outfalls to the river. Opportunities exist for private land owner participation
and cooperation with the City of Tukwila in siting pipes and outfalls.
W: \Long Range Projects \MIC Study \CAP_5 -23 -11 \Attachment B Issues &OppsReport-- complete.doc
Page 11
21
Zoning establishes buffers around the MIC in the form of the transitional MIC /L zone,
through natural features such as the Duwamish River or with man -made elements
including roadways such as Highway 599 and 1 -5. In the Allentown area where single
family homes abut industrial uses, the City of Tukwila has sought to minimize conflicts
through enforcement of non conforming use requirements and through the
Comprehensive Plan and zoning map amendment process.
Comprehensive Plan policy 11.1.1 Support the efforts of existing industries to expand
and new industrial businesses to develop in the Manufacturing/ Industrial Center by
providing them with economic data, information on available development sites, help in
understanding and getting through the permit processes, and other appropriate
assistance.
Tukwila's high quality infrastructure and favorable tax structure serve to retain and
attract desirable industrial businesses. Tukwila's website provides information for
businesses considering locating in the City. Tukwila's Economic Development
Administrator and planning staff are available to work with businesses considering a
Tukwila location. Planning staff will review development site options and City
regulatory requirements. Assistance is provided informally or for a fee at a pre
application meeting with the City's regulatory department representatives.
LU -59 Each Manufacturing Center containing a minimum of 15,000 jobs and having
sufficient employment densities to support high- capacity transit should be served by
high- capacity transit. It is recognized that by their nature, Manufacturing/ Industrial
Centers may not achieve densities necessary to make high- capacity transit service
viable. Nevertheless, Manufacturing/ Industrial Centers which are located on the
regional high- capacity transit alignment and which meet the transit friendly criteria in
policies LU -54 through LU -58 above should receive one or more high- capacity transit
stations and /or transit centers.
Analysis: Tukwila's MIC meets this threshold for employment and is planned for even
greater densities in the future. Construction of the deferred Boeing Access Road station
would meet the intent of this policy.
LU -61 Jurisdictions shall consider conducting detailed State Environmental Policy Act
review for the regional Manufacturing/ Industrial Center at the planning stage so that
project- specific environmental review is minimized.
Analysis: Tukwila has had a Planned Action in place in the MIC since 1998. This
eliminates the need for individual SEPA analysis for projects that meet the criteria at
TMC 21.04.152.
Tukwila Comorehensive Plan —Goals and Policies
The Tukwila Comprehensive (Comp) Plan is a long -range policy plan designed to
articulate a vision of how Tukwila will grow in ways that sustain its citizens' values. The
City first adopted the Comp Plan in 1995 as required by the state Growth Management
Act of 1990.
The Comprehensive Plan makes basic policy choices and provides a flexible framework
for adapting to real conditions over time. It sets forth the goals and policies the City
uses to guide future decisions about how much growth Tukwila should plan for and
where it should be located. The Comp Plan also describes in a general way how the City
wilt address the effects of growth on transportation and other City facilities. It is the
W: \Long Range Projects \MIC Study \CAP_5 -23 =11 \Attachment B-- Issues &OppsReport-- complete.doc
Page 12
22
basis for zoning and capital improvements. As conditions change, amendments to the
Comprehensive Plan may be considered, subject to criteria that support the overall
benefit of the community.
The City of Tukwila's Comprehensive Plan views the retention of industrial land and
activity as very important to Tukwila's continued well being. It establishes four
fundamental objectives for Tukwila, upon which all goals and policies are based,
including to "redevelop and reinvigorate the industrial uses along East Marginal Way."
Citywide policies that affect the MIC are found in the Economic Development, Natural
Environment and Transportation elements. Policies directly affecting the
Manufacturing /Industrial Center are concentrated in the Manufacturing/ Industrial
Center element. With one exception, the Comprehensive Plan review focuses on
policies directly found in the Manufacturing/ Industrial Center element. This element
articulates the following overall goal for the Manufacturing/ Industrial Center:
Goal 11.1
Support for existing industrial activities in the Manufacturing /Industrial Center and
development of new industrial activity in order to maximize the employment and
economic benefits to the people of Tukwila and the region, while minimizing impacts on
residential neighborhoods.
Policies that support the primary goal include the following:
Support New Development
These policies are designed to take advantage of the development and improvement
opportunities offered by the Manufacturing/ Industrial Center, and to realize its full
revenue and employment potential.
11 .1.1 Support the efforts of existing industries to expand and new industrial
businesses to develop in the Manufacturing/ Industrial Center by providing them with
economic data, information on available development sites, help in understanding and
getting through the permit processes, and other appropriate assistance.
Analysis: See LU -58 above.
11. 1.2 Assist landowners in remediating site problems caused by contaminated soil.
Analysis: Tukwila MIC property owners are eligible for free assistance through King
County's Brownfields program. This may include research on past and present site uses,
review of existing environmental studies and referrals to qualified environmental
consultants. Under certain circumstances (i.e. if the end use of the site will result in a
public benefit), private property owners may also be eligible for environmental site
assessment services. Loans, in partnership the State of Washington, may also be
available for cleanup of brownfield properties.
Simplify Permit Processing
These policies aim at reducing unpredictable permit conditions and permit review time.
11.1.3 Develop appropriate permit processes that minimize lengthy public review and
simplify the development permit process, while providing meaningful opportunities for
citizen input and protecting the environment.
W: \Long Range Projects \MIC Study \CAP_5 -23 -11 \Attachment B Issues &OppsReport-- complete.doc
Page 13
23
Analysis: The Planned Action, adopted in 1998, anticipates environmental impacts of
development in the MIC to provide shorter administrative review with increased
consistency and predictability. Substantive development requirements are not
decreased.
Public notice via the City of Tukwila website, mailings and property postings informs
the public of opportunities to comment on proposed development and /or changes in
regulations either directly to city staff, to the Planning Commission or to the C -ity
Council. Additionally, records of City Council actions are available online. A new Sign
Code, adopted in 2010, simplifies signage requirements.
The Tukwila Department of Community Development is currently developing online
permitting services, and expanded map offerings to simplify the permit process and
make information more readily available to the public.
11.1.4 Tailor Manufacturing/ Industrial Center shoreline requirements to achieve
consistency between Shoreline and MIC element goals and policies.
Analysis: This policy is addressed through Tukwila's revised Shoreline Master Plan
which the Tukwila City Council adopted in December, 2009. The SMP is currently under
review by the Washington State Department of Ecology, with final adoption anticipated
at a later date. Until final approval is given, Tukwila's current SMP and Comprehensive
Plan policies and development regulations pertaining to the shoreline area remain in
effect. As part of the Master Program update, new Shoreline Overlay District
regulations will be implemented.
The new Master Plan establishes new shoreline environments within the MIC, including
High Intensity Environment north of the turning basin, and Urban Conservancy south of
the turning basin. The Plan addresses a number of issues including shoreline
stabilization, protecting existing and new development from high river flows, and
restoring important habitat. Other important aspects of the update recommend
increasing buffers along the river, increasing public access opportunities, preserving
native vegetation, and removal of invasive plants.
The City's vision for future land use, based on its overall Comprehensive Plan, includes
maintenance and further development of its urban character, particularly its identity as
a regionally significant center for manufacturing, industrial, and commercial
development. A challenge lies ahead in determining how best to accommodate new and
redevelopment near the shoreline in a manner consistent with both the Comprehensive
Plan and the Shoreline Master Program.
Protect the Land Resource
The land in the Manufacturing/ Industrial Center must be used effectively to allow it to
generate its potential of high -wage jobs and public revenue.
11.1.5 Allow uses that are commonly associated with manufacturing and industry,
including those directly supporting such activity, such as offices and laboratories, while
limiting unrelated uses.
Analysis: This policy is addressed through zoning and development codes that allow
industrial and manufacturing uses, as well as supportive uses, including retail intended
to serve employees and other permitted uses as a conditional use. Residential uses are
not permitted in the MIC. Office uses are subject to conditions and size limits. Stand-
alone office use has expanded in the past decade due to changes in the zoning code.
W: \Long Range Projects \MIC Study \CAP_5 -23-11 \Attachment B Issues &OppsReport-- complete.doc
Page 14
24
11.1.6 Develop and designate appropriate zoning, buffers, mitigation and access
opportunities where manufacturing zoning directly abuts or impacts residential zoning
so that MIC uses may operate without significant degradation of the residential
environment.
Analysis: This policy is addressed through the zoning code, code enforcement and the
Comprehensive Plan amendment /rezone process. In 2010 the City of Tukwila approved
a rezone from MIC /H to Office adjacent to a City park on S. 115th. This had the effect
of establishing the Office zone and future office use as a means to buffer the
surrounding single- family homes from MIC uses that could have developed there.
The Allentown community has a significant and direct interface between single- family
residences and MIC uses, primarily BNSF railroad but also including certain non-
conforming historic industrial uses. The City of Tukwila has sought to minimize
conflicts both through enforcement of non conforming use requirements and through
the Comprehensive Plan and zoning map amendment process. Tukwila's control over
interface between BNSF's intermodal yard and residential uses is limited by BNSF's
preemption powers that allow the railroad to disregard state and local regulations that
affect railroad operations.
Over the years, the City of Tukwila has met with BNSF in efforts to find a way to
reroute trucks carrying cargo containers away from S. 124th. Both the City of Tukwila
and BNSF are interested in finding a solution, but significant questions of routing and
funding remain. This project is currently included in the 2011 -2016 Capital Improvement
Plan, but neither grant nor City funds are available. Resolving this issue would have a
major positive impact on the Allentown neighborhood.
Recommendation: Add an implementation strategy as follows,
Actively seek alternative railroad related freight routing away from residential streets
in Allentown.
Improve Duwamish River Access
The Duwamish River as a natural amenity can be an asset to the industrial community.
11.1.7 Support the Duwamish River becoming a natural feature amenity in the MIC.
11.1.8 Improve public access and use of the west side of the river, protecting owner's
rights to reasonable use and enjoyment, improve employee access to the east side of
the river, and emphasize restoration on both sides of the river.
Analysis: These policies have been addressed in Tukwila's draft Shoreline Master
Program through regulations that provide incentives for resloping and revegetating the
river bank as well as providing public access.
Improve Transportation Flow
Work with other governmental agencies to address transportation problems.
11.1.9 Reduce reliance on the single- occupancy- vehicle for transportation of employees
in and out of the MIC.
Analysis: This policy is addressed through Tukwila's Commute Trip Reduction program
which operates to provide alternatives to single- occupancy vehicle commuting, and non
motorized options. Several Metro bus routes serve the MIC, including routes 124, 154
W: \Long Range Projects \MIC Study \CAP_5 -23-11 \Attachment B Issues &OppsReport-- complete.doc
Page 15
25
(peak only), 173, and 600 Group Health Express (Metro). Reflecting a decrease in
service and shift to light rail, route 126 was changed to 124 in the 2009, white the 170
was cancelled.
The MIC Boeing Access Road is ideally suited for both light rail and commuter rail
stations; both types of rail either pass through or beside the MIC. Co- locating stops
provide opportunities to spur development, improve the regional traffic situation, and
reduce carbon emissions by reducing single- occupancy vehicle trips. Unfortunately, the
anticipated light rail stop at Boeing Access Road was removed, and Sounder Rail passes
the MIC, but does not stop.
If funding for light and commuter rail stations appears likely to become available in the
future, -it may be desirable to review the impacts to determine if MIC zoning remains
the most suitable for the areas around the station, or if another classification is more
appropriate.
Recommendation: Add a new Comprehensive Plan Policy as follows:
Pursue light rail and commuter rail stops in the vicinity of Boeing Access Road.
Continue Intergovernmental Coordination
Work with other jurisdictions as required to ensure that the economic purpose of the
MIC is fulfilled.
11.1.10 Make appropriate adjustments to the boundaries between Tukwila, King County
and Seattle.
11.1 .11 Work with other jurisdictions to bring about necessary changes in taws and
regulations and to develop other approaches to solving common problems.
Analysis: Tukwila is addressing boundary adjustments through periodic discussions with
King County and Seattle to establish the most workable boundaries for all jurisdictions.
This includes the Unified Grocers site, and property at the northern edge of King County
International Airport. At present, Tukwila is reviewing options for the North Highline
Area with Seattle. This area is part of Tukwila's Potential Annexation Area, and is
delineated future Manufacturing /Industrial Center. Seattle has also expressed interest
in the area. If this area is annexed to Tukwila, it may be necessary to assess Tukwila
zoning and existing uses in the area to determine that there are no inconsistencies.
Tukwila is coordinating with the Department of Ecology and EPA toward Duwamish River
cleanup solutions, as well as regional stormwater runoff issues. The City is also active
in seeking transit solutions for the MIC area discussions with Metro through its Commute
Trip Reduction program.
W: \Long Range Projects \MIC Study \CAP_5 -23 -11 \Attachment B Issues &OppsReport-- complete.doc
Page 16
26
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS REVIEW
Manufacturing Industrial Center -Light (MIC /L) and Manufacturing Industrial Center
Heavy (MIC /H) zoning and development standards implement the
Manufacturing /Industrial Center Comprehensive Plan designation that provides a major
employment area for manufacturing and industrial uses, and other activities that
support those uses. The uses and standards are meant to enhance the redevelopment of
the Duwamish Corridor.
MIC /L is distinguished by distributive light manufacturing, while MIC /H is focused on
heavy or bulk manufacturing and industrial uses, in addition to distributive and light
manufacturing /industrial uses.
Determining what constitutes a 21 century industrial business is challenging. Many
"industrial" businesses are no longer the polluting, noisy type of business that many
people believe them to be. A goal of Tukwila's zoning for the MIC is to provide enough
flexibility to allow for innovation in industry and to attract new businesses, enable
existing businesses to operate and grow successfully, and to maintain sufficiently strict
regulations to keep incompatible uses out of the industrial area.
With the intent of evaluating whether the allowed uses in the MIC support its goals,
staff reviewed portions of Tukwila Municipal Code Chapter 18, including:
1) TMC Chapter 18.36 Manufacturing /Industrial Center Light;
2)TMC Chapter 18.38 Manufacturing/ Industrial Center Heavy, and
3) portions of Chapter 18.50 Supplemental Development Standards, including
18.50.045 Height Regulations Around Major Airports and 18.50.100 MIC /L and MIC /H
Site Lighting Standards.
Summary
Staff review of Chapter 18.50.045 and 18.50.100 determined that these sections do not
require revision. Review of TMC Chapter 18.36 (MIC /L) and Chapter 18.38 (MIC /H)
found the following:
1. Some permitted uses do not directly support industrial development and are
more properly considered as conditional uses that serve the immediate area.
These include such uses as beauty and barbershop, financial services, medical
services, and certain recreational services.
2. Manufacturing and processing uses can be clarified by adding wording about their
expected impacts.
3. The status of office as either permitted or conditional use depending on size and
circumstance is appropriate. Given office's characteristics and the potential for
impacts, new office development should have administrative design review.
4. Recognizing the need for trained employees, any educational uses in the MIC
should have a vocational focus and be associated with an established aviation,
manufacturing or industrial use.
5. Extended stay hotels /motels are incompatible with the noise, light and traffic
found in industrial areas. They should not be allowed.
W: \Long Range Projects \MIC Study \CAP_5 -23 -11 \Attachment B Issues &OppsReport-- complete.doc
Page 17
27
6. Hotels and motels may be incompatible with the noise, light and traffic found in
industrial areas. They should be conditional uses.
In the following discussion, topics and possible changes are grouped together for
consideration. The changes are meant to clarify that uses in the MIC are intended to be
either industrial in nature or to support this type of use. Proposed revisions follow with
a brief explanation.
Discussion of Permitted Uses
Staff reviewed the permitted uses in the MIC /L and MIC /H zones to evaluate how they
support the district's goals of providing a major employment area for industrial uses
and uses that support them, and whether it was possible to simplify or clarify the list of
permitted uses. In most cases, the discussion of uses in the MIC /L and MIC /H districts is
combined.
Beauty and Barber Shops (TMC 18.36.020.3 and TMC 18.38.020.3)
Analysis: These uses are permitted in all commercial and industrial zones throughout
Tukwila, allowing employees in the MIC to readily find this service if desired. White this
activity does not directly support industrial development, it is appropriate as a
conditional use to serve employees in the MIC area.
Recommendation:
Delete "Beauty or barber shops" from Permitted Uses
Add to Conditional uses Retail Sales (TMC 18.36.040.11 and TMC 18.38.040. 9.)
Retail sales of health and beauty aids, prescription drugs, food, hardware, notions,
crafts and craft supplies, housewares, consumer electronics, photo equipment, and
film processing, books, magazines, stationery, clothing, shoes, flowers, plants,
pets, jewelry, gifts, recreation equipment and sporting goods, and similar items;
retail services such as beauty and barber shoos, banks, outpatient medical services,
and health clubs; retail sales and services are limited to uses of a type and size
that clearly intend to serve other permitted uses and /or the employees of those
uses.
Extended -Stay Hotel /Motel (TMC18.36.020.10 and TMC 18.38.020.10)
Analysis: Extended -stay hotels and motels are currently permitted uses in both the
MIC /L and MIC /H zones.
Per the definition in TMC18.06.287 Extended -Stay Hotel or Motel:
W: \Long Range Projects \MIC Study \CAP_5 -23-11 \Attachment B Issues &OppsReport-- complete.doc
Page 18
28
"Extended -stay hotel or motel" means a building or buildings or portion thereof,
the units of which contain independent provisions for living, eating and sanitation
including, but not limited to, a kitchen sink and permanent cooking facilities, a
bathroom and a sleeping area in each unit, and are specifically constructed, kept,
used, maintained, advertised and held out to the public to be a place where
temporary residence is offered for pay to persons for a minimum stay of more than
30 days and a maximum stay of six months per year. Extended -stay hotels or motels
shall not include dwelling units, as defined in this section, for permanent
occupancy. The specified units for extended -stay must conform to the required
features, building code, and fire code provisions for dwelling units as set forth in
this code. Nothing in this definition prevents an extended -stay unit from being used
as a hotel or motel unit. Extended -stay hotel or motels shall be required to meet
the hotel /motel parking requirements. Not included are institutions housing
persons under legal restraint or requiring medical attention or care.
Hotels and motels, which are also allowed in the MIC, serve the traveling public for
short -term stays i.e. less than 30 days. Extended stay hotels and motels are meant for
longer stays of between 30 days and six months. In addition extended -stay
hotels /motels typically fulfill a housing or home -like function, with a kitchen sink and
permanent cooking facilities, a bathroom and a sleeping.area in each unit. They are
often used as semi permanent housing.
Housing is not a permitted use in the MIC zones. It is not compatible with industrial
uses due to noise, truck traffic, light and other impacts that industrial activity typically
produces.
Extended -stay hotels /motels as well as standard hotels and motels are also permitted
uses in the Regional Commercial (RC), Regional Commercial Mixed Use (RCM), Tukwila
Urban Center (TUC), Commercial/ Light Industrial (C /LI), Light Industrial (LI), Heavy
Industry (HI), Tukwila Valley South (TVS), and could develop and operate there. Given
the range of areas in which they may locate, allowing extended -stay hotel /motel uses
in the MIC district is not necessary. No extended stay hotels are currently located in
the MIC, therefore no non conforming uses would be created by this change.
Recommendation:
Delete Extended -stay hotel /motel from Permitted Uses in MIC /L and MIC /H
Hotel (TMC18.36.020.12 and TMC 18.38.020.14) and Motel (TMC 18.36.020.23 and TMC
18.38.020.27)
Analysis: Hotels and motels are currently permitted uses in both the MIC /L and MIC /H
zones. They provide lodging for travelers on a temporary and transitory basis under 30
days in duration. Although the permitted stay is shorter, the characteristics of the use,
and the likelihood that it may be incompatible with the industrial surroundings is
similar to the situation discussed with extended -stay hotel /motel above. Moreover,
amenities, such as restaurants, that are typically sought by the traveling public, are not
widely available in the MIC.
Hotels and motels may be used by the traveling public who have business with firms,
such as Boeing, that are located within the MIC. Having this option may be considered a
supportive use to industry. Given the potential noise, light, and traffic impacts on
these uses, as well as the impacts that they may have, it is most appropriate to
W: \Long Range Projects \MIC Study \CAP_5 -23 -11 \Attachment B Issues &OppsReport-- complete.doc
Page 19
29
reclassify them as conditional uses in order to ensure that they receive special
consideration regarding the impacts on the industrial neighborhood and land uses in the
vicinity.
Recommendation:
Delete Hotels and Motels from Permitted Uses in the MIC /L and MIC /H
Add to Conditional Uses in MIC /L and MIC /H
Financial Banking, mortgage and other services (TMC 18.38.020)
Analysis: This use is treated inconsistently in the MIC. In the MIC /L, financial services
are grouped with other office uses that are permitted if under 20,000 s.f. This size
limit is appropriate to smaller, customer service bank branches. However, financial
uses are permitted outright in the MIC /H without regard to building size. Rather than
providing customer related banking services for employees in the immediate area as
intended, this could permit a large financial office building to be built. Financial
services in the MIC should be limited to a "retail" type use serving employees in the
immediate area.
Recommendation:
Delete Financial banking, mortgage and other services from Permitted Uses in MIC /H
Add the underscored changes to Conditional Uses, Retail Sales TMC 18.38.040.9
Retail sales of health and beauty aids, prescription drugs, food, hardware, notions,
crafts and craft supplies, housewares, consumer electronics, photo equipment, and
film processing, books, magazines, stationery, clothing, shoes, flowers, plants,
pets, jewelry, gifts, recreation equipment and sporting goods, and similar items;
retail services such as beautv and barber shops, financial services, outpatient
medical services, and health clubs: retail sales and services are limited to uses of a
type and size that clearly intend to serve other permitted uses and /or the
employees of those uses.
Manufacturing
Analysis: Examples of heavy industrial and manufacturing uses in the MIC zone include
the Boeing Corporation and Jorgensen Forge. Other companies produce and repair
equipment for trucks, process and package food, machine gears, and similar.
Manufacturing, processing, assembly and packaging uses are listed in TMC 18.36 for
MIC /L and 18.38 for MIC /H. All MIC /L manufacturing uses are permitted in the MIC /H
zone. Manufacturing uses exclusive to the MIC /H include additional heavy metal and
chemical /solvent related processing that have greater potential of creating external
environmental impacts. Separately listing the items that are manufactured and
processed is intended to ensure that activities with similar characteristics are grouped to
provide clarity. Changing technologies and production processes make it difficult to
consider and list all possible uses, however the Code provides the Community
W: \Long Range Projects \MIC Study \CAP_5 -23 -11 \Attachment B Issues &OppsReport=- complete.doc
Page 20
30
Development Director with flexibility to approve uses that are similar to others listed in
the chapter.
An alternative to Tukwila's approach would be to delete specific definitional elements,
and instead use a simplified format known as performance zoning. Performance zoning
systems establish standards and criteria to control or limit the impacts of proposed uses
or activities on neighboring properties. For instance, performance standards may limit
the noise, glare or traffic impacts that an activity or use generates and that will be felt
beyond the property boundary.
Tukwila's list of manufacturing uses groups together uses with similar characteristics
and impacts, while providing examples for businesses, and the public of the specific
activities that are desired and appropriate in the particular district. Staff believes that
the list of permitted manufacturing uses would be easier to understand if it were
organized according to the level of impact that the uses produced.
Recommendation for MIC /L and MIC /H:
Reorganize manufacturing uses. Add a preface to the permitted
manufacturing /processing uses that explicitly states the potential impacts as follows:
TMC 18.36.020.17 -22 Manufacturing and industrial uses that have little potential
for creating off -site noise, smoke, dust, vibration or other external environmental
impacts or pollution, including but not limited to manufacturing, processing,
assembling, packaging and /or repairing of:
a. Electrical or mechanical equipment, vehicles and machines including, but
not limited to, heavy and light machinery, tools, airplanes, boats or other
transportation vehicles and equipment;
b. Previously prepared metals including, but not limited to, stamping,
dyeing, shearing or punching of metal, engraving, galvanizing and hand
forging
c. Food, including but not limited to, baked goods, beverages (including
fermenting and distilling), candy, canned or preserved foods, dairy products
and byproducts, frozen foods, instant foods and meats (provided that no
slaughtering is permitted);
d. Pharmaceuticals and related products, such as cosmetics and drugs;
e. Previously prepared materials including, but not limited to, bags, brooms,
brushes, canvas, clay, clothing, fur, furniture, glass, ink, paint, paper,
plastics, rubber, tile, and wood;
f. Electronic, mechanical or precision instruments such as medical and dental
equipment, photographic goods, measurement and control devices, and
recording equipment.
Recommendation for MIC /H:
W: \Long Range Projects \MIC Study \CAP_5 -23-11 \Attachment B Issues &OppsReport-- complete.doc
Page 21
31
Add reorganized MIC /L uses per discussion above. Reorganize and combine the listing of
permitted manufacturing uses and add a preface to the permitted
manufacturing /processing uses as follows:
TMC 18.38.020 -13, 19 -20 Manufacturing and industrial uses that have moderate
to substantial potential for creating noise, smoke, dust, vibration or other external
environmental impacts including, but not limited to:
a. Heavy metal processes such as smelting, blast furnaces, drop forging or drop
hammering;
b. Manufacturing, processing, assembly, packaging and repair of:
1) Chemicals, light metals, plastics, solvents, soaps, !good, coal, glas enamels,
textiles, fabrics, plaster, agricultural products or animal products (no rendering or
slaughtering)
2) Previously manufactured metals, such as iron and steel fabrication; steel
production by electric arc melting, argon oxygen refining and consumable electrode
melting, and similar heavy industrial uses.
Office
Analysis: Staff reviewed development standards and permitted sizes for offices in the
MIC /H and MIC /L zones. Offices are permitted in both MIC /L and MIC /H subject to
specific size limits and /or characteristics either as permitted or conditional uses.
In 2001, the MIC /L Zone was amended to allow offices and similar uses up to 20,000 s.f.
as stand -alone permitted uses. Offices and similar uses 20,000 s.f. and over may be
allowed as conditional uses.
MIC /H allows offices associated with another permitted use, such as administrative uses
for a manufacturing firm, as a permitted use.
In 2003, MIC /H was amended to allow stand alone offices as conditional uses subject to
specific size and location restrictions including:
1) New offices shall not exceed 100,000 sf per lot that was established prior to
9/20/2003;
2) No new offices on the Duwamish River north of the turning basin;
3) An existing office development established prior to 12 -11 -1995 (the effective date
of the Comprehensive Plan) may convert to a stand -alone office use subject to the
provisions of the zoning code.
Size limits and the conditional use process address potential impacts, such as traffic,
and the intent of preserving the majority of the land resource for industrial activity.
Since the time this zoning change was adopted, several large office developments have
been built in the MIC /L zone but there has not been a similar expansion in the MIC /H
zone.
Options for regulating office uses include:
1) Maintaining the current regulations
W: \Long Range Projects \MIC Study \CAP_5 -23-11 \Attachment B Issues &OppsReport=- complete.doc
Page 22
32
2) Reducing the size of new stand -alone offices that are allowed in the MIC /H
Citing concern over non industrial uses bidding up the price of land, Seattle recently
limited the size of new offices allowed in industrial areas to 10,000 sf in light
industrial and 25,000 s.f. in heavy industrial. In Tukwila's case, this would render a
number of newer offices non conforming.
3) Eliminating new stand -alone office uses from the MIC /H zone
This would be a reversion to the situation that existed at the time that the zoning
code was adopted in 1995.
Recommendation:
After considering these options and reviewing regulations governing office use in the
MIC zone it is determined that maintaining existing regulations is appropriate. No
additional change in office use size or status is recommended at this time. However
staff recommends requiring administrative design review for new office buildings, see
discussion below.
Design Review for Office Uses (TMC 18.36.070 and TMC 18.38.070)
Analysis: Administrative design review is currently required for new developments
within 300 feet of residential developments or within 200 feet of the Green /Duwamish
River in both MIC /L and MIC /H.
Developments that do not meet these locational criteria, including office, are currently
exempted from design review. Characteristics of office uses, including their interface
with the public, are different from more typical industrial uses. Their development
merits additional consideration to ensure that their appearance and function are
appropriate.
Recommendation:
Require design review for new office uses in MIC /L and MIC /H as follows:
18.36.070 Design Review
Administrative design review is required for all new office development, and
other developments within 300 feet of residential districts or within 200 feet
of the Green /Duwamish River.
18.38.070 Design Review
Administrative design review is required for all new office development, and other
developments within 300 feet of residential districts or within 200 feet of the
Green /Duwamish River
Offices including Schools and Studios for Self improvement
Also in the "office" use category, MIC /L allows stand alone office and similar activities
up to 20,000 square feet as a permitted use. This category includes "schools and
studios for self improvement" (TMC 18.36.020.24) as follows:
24. Offices including, but not limited, to software development and similar uses,
financial services, schools and studios for education or self improvement less than
20,000 square feet.
W: \Long Range Projects \MIC Study \CAP_5 -23 -11 \Attachment B Issues &OppsReport-- complete.doc
Page 23
33
Larger offices and similar uses may be allowed as conditional uses per TMC 18.36.040.7.
Analysis: Office and other uses are appropriate to this category. Staff believes that
schools and studios for self improvement are somewhat different from office and other
uses included in this category. If allowed in the MIC, school uses should support the
employment goals of the MIC, and should be focused on providing assistance and
training that is oriented toward industrial occupations.
Studios for self improvement should be removed because dance, yoga or art studios do
not further the industrial goals of the MIC.
Recommendation:
Add the following underlined wording to the MIC /L chapter Permitted Uses 18.36.020.24
and strike language about studios for self improvement.
Offices including, but not limited, to software development and similar uses,
financial services, schools Gpd- Stbid_i^c for professional and vocational
education or calf i 7pr- evement if associated with an established aviation,
manufacturinp, or industrial use. and less than 20,000 square feet.
Add the following underlined wording to the MIC /L chapter Conditional uses 18.36.040.7
and strike language about studios for self improvement.
Offices including, but not limited, to software development
and similar uses, financial services, schools for professional and
vocational education o r self -i 9pr- eyement if associated with an established
aviation, manufacturing or industrial use. 20,000 square feet and over.
Outpatient, Inpatient, and Emergency Medical and Dental (TMC 18.36.020.25 and
TMC 18.38.020.29)
Analysis: This group of uses is permitted in both MIC /L and MIC /H. In- patient medical
services are typically provided in hospital settings, providing "housing for patients
under the care of doctors and nurses." (TMC 18.06.435) Hospitals are not permitted
uses in the MIC, therefore inpatient medical services are not appropriate. Medical and
dental offices are permitted in all non residential districts except RCC, and therefore
have multiple places in the city in which they can locate and operate. Although this
activity does not directly support industrial development, it is appropriate as a
conditional use to serve employees in the MIC area.
Recommendation:
Delete "Outpatient, inpatient and emergency medical dental" from permitted uses.
Add "Outpatient and emergency medical dental" to Conditional Use Retail Services
(18.36.040.xx and 18.38.040xx)
W: \Long Range Projects \MIC Study \CAP_5 -23-11 \Attachment B Issues &OppsReport-- complete.doc
Page 24
34
Retail sales of health and beauty aids, prescription drugs, food, hardware, notions,
crafts and craft supplies, housewares, consumer electronics, photo equipment, and
film processing, books, magazines, stationery, clothing, shoes, flowers, plants,
pets, jewelry, gifts, recreation equipment and sporting goods, and similar items;
retail services such as beauty and barber shops, banks, outpatient and 'tar
medical and dental services, and health clubs; retail sales and services are limited
to uses of a type and size that clearly intend to serve other permitted uses and /or
the employees of those uses.
Recreation Facilities (Commercial indoor) Athletic or Health Clubs (TMC
18.36.020.28 and TMC 18.36.020.28)
Analysis: These facilities do not directly support industrial development, but can serve
permitted uses and /or the employees of those uses as conditional uses. Additional
opportunities for employee recreation are allowed as accessory uses.
Recommendation:
Delete Recreation Facilities (Commercial indoor) athletic or health clubs from
Permitted Uses in MIC /L and MIC /H
Add to Conditional Use Retail Services (18.36.040.xx and 18.38.040xx)
Retail sales of health and beauty aids, prescription drugs, food, hardware, notions,
crafts and craft supplies, housewares, consumer electronics, photo equipment, and
film processing, books, magazines, stationery, clothing, shoes, flowers, plants,
pets, jewelry, gifts, recreation equipment and sporting goods, and similar items;
retail services such as beauty and barber shops, banks, outpatient and emergency
medical and dental services, and health clubs; retail sales and services are limited
to uses of a type and size that clearly intend to serve other permitted uses and /or
the employees of those uses.
Schools and studios for education or self improvement (TMC 18.38.020.39)
Analysis: Per the discussion pertaining to Offices and Schools for Self Improvement in
the MIC /L above, if allowed in the MIC, school uses should support the employment
goals of the MIC, and should be focused on providing assistance and training that is
oriented toward industrial occupations.
Studios for self improvement should be removed because dance, yoga or art studios do
not further the industrial goals of the MIC.
Recommendation:
Add the following underlined wording to the MIC /H chapter Permitted Uses 18.38.020.39
and strike language about studios for self improvement.
Schools Grid studies for professional and vocational education or- s elf irnr
if associated with an established aviation, manufacturing or industrial use
Taverns, nightclubs (TMC18.36.020.37 and TMC18.38.020.43)
W: \Long Projects \MIC Study \CAP_5 -23 -11 \Attachment B Issues &oppsReport-- complete.doc
Page 25
35
Analysis: These uses are permitted in MIC /L and MIC /H. They do not directly support
industrial development or activity. However, we draw the distinction between tavern
and nightclub regarding their respective appropriateness in the MIC.
Tavern is a customary use providing workers in the immediate employment area, with
the ability to enjoy a social opportunity after work. Nightclubs, however, are more
oriented toward specialized nighttime entertainment. Customarily nightclub patrons
leave their workplace, and come to the nightclub after dinner and a change of clothing
for an evening's entertainment. Further, as a more specialized venue for evening
entertainment, nightclubs typically draw their patrons are from a larger area than the
immediate vicinity of the workplace.
Recommendation:
Delete "nightclubs" from Permitted Uses in MIC /L and MIC /H
Discussion of Accessory Uses
Staff reviewed Accessory Uses, 18.36.030 and 18.38.030, which are appurtenant and
incidental to permitted uses in the MIC /L and MIC /H districts and have the following
findings.
Billiard or Pool Rooms (TMC 18.36.030.1 and TMC 18.38.030.1)
Analysis: This is a specialized entertainment use that does not directly support
industrial development.
Recommendation:
Delete billiard or pool rooms from Accessory Uses in MIC /L and MIC /H
Dormitory as an accessory use to other uses that are otherwise permitted or
approved conditional uses such as Universities, Colleges or Schools (TMC 18.36.030.2
and TMC 18.38.030.2)
Analysis: Dormitories are currently allowed as accessory uses to colleges and
universities. Per the following discussion of "Colleges and Universities staff is
recommending that they have a vocational and /or industrial focus. Vocational and
industry- oriented schools typically do not offer lodging. Dormitories are places to live
and housing is neither a permitted nor an appropriate in the MIC.
Recommendation:
Delete dormitory from Accessory Uses in MIC /L and MIC /H (TMC 18.36.030.2 and TMC
18.38.030.2).
Discussion of Conditional Uses
Staff reviewed Conditional Uses, 18.36.040 and 18.38.040, which are those which
require additional scrutiny in the MIC /L and MIC /H districts and have the following
findings.
Colleges and Universities (TMC 18.36.040.1)
W: \Long Range Projects \MIC Study \CAP_5 -23 -11 \Attachment B Issues &OppsReport-- complete.doc
Page 26
36
Analysis: Colleges and universities are currently allowed as conditional uses in the
MIC /L and MIC /H zones. Strictly speaking, these educational uses support neither
industrial or manufacturing activity. It is not critical that they are allowed in the MIC
since they can be located in ail non residential zones throughout Tukwila, except
Residential Commercial Center (RCC).
Industrial and manufacturing practice is changing rapidly, incorporating new technology
to develop and produce goods and services. School or education uses in the MIC should
directly support industrial activity through appropriate training opportunities with the
goal of educating individuals to assume well paying positions in these fields. This is
essential to developing and maintaining a diverse economy with family -wage jobs for
Tukwila and the region. It is consistent with the goals of the Manufacturing /Industrial
Center.
This will benefit industry in the MIC with skilled labor, a need that was underscored
through business surveys conducted by staff. Several respondents indicated that they
had difficulty in securing trained labor, and a request was made for City of Tukwila
assistance in locating and hiring these individuals.
Despite the range of siting options, given industry's demonstrated need for well trained
employees, it is appropriate to allow these uses in the MIC provided they are associated
with and directly support established industrial uses.
Recommendation:
Add the following wording to the Colleges and Universities Conditional Use category in
MIC /L and MIC /H.
18.36.040.1 Colleges and universities with primarily vocational curriculum if
associated with an established aviation, manufacturing or industrial use
18.38.040.1 Colleges and universities with primarily vocational curriculum if
associated with an established aviation, manufacturing or industrial use
BOUNDARY REVIEW
There are three proposed changes to the MIC boundaries, all would remove properties
from the MIC. One, the Duwamish Hill Preserve open space, has been suggested by staff
and the other two were raised during the stakeholder interview process. Each site is
discussed below with a staff recommendation.
Duwamish Hill Preserve
Analysis: The Duwamish Hill Preserve is an 8.6 acre parcel of land with historical,
cultural and ecological importance. Through the actions of many partners including the
Friends of the Hitt, Cascade Land Conservancy and City of Tukwila, the property was
purchased in 2004 and ongoing restoration has been taking place on the site ever since.
The site will act as a permanent buffer between the residential neighborhoods to the
east and south and commercial and industrial uses to the north and west.
Since the site is now protected from commercial or industrial development it should be
removed from the MIC and zoned appropriately. Tukwila's other parks are zoned Low
Density Residential (LDR) with a Public Recreation Overlay.
W: \Long Range Projects \MIC Study \CAP_5 -23 =11 \Attachment B Issues &OppsReport-- complete.doc
Page 27
37
Recommendation:
Change the Zoning and Comprehensive Plan designation to Low Density Residential (LDR)
with a Public Recreation Overlay to reflect its status as public open space.
Ngtwopq
1
�Wt-
rw
S
s
Figure 2: Duwamish Hill Preserve Zoning
Group Health Cooperative
Analysis: This site was developed in 2001 as a research and development campus for
Group Health Cooperative operations. When the MIC /L code was changed in 2001 to
allow office uses over 20,000 square feet as a conditional use Building B applied for and
was granted a CUP to operate as an office use. Building A was granted similar approval
in 2007.
During the MIC stakeholder interview process a representative of the Sabey Corporation
suggested that the zoning for this site be changed to Commercial/ Light Industrial (CLI).
The setback, landscape and height standards are similar in the two zones.
C /LI BASIC DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS MIC /L BASIC DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Setbacks to yards, minimum: Setbacks to yards, minimum:
Front 25 feet Front 20 feet
Second front 12.5 feet Second front 10 feet
Second front, if any portion of the yard is Second front, if any portion of the yard is
within 50 feet of LDR, MDR, HDR 15 feet within 50 feet of LDR, MDR, HDR 15 feet
Sides 5 feet Sides None
Sides, if any portion of the yard is within Sides, if any portion of the yard is within 50
50 feet of LDR, MDR, HDR feet of LDR, MDR, HDR
1 st floor 15 feet 1st floor 15 feet
2nd floor 20 feet 2nd floor 20 feet
W: \Long Range Projects \MIC Study \CAP_5 -23 -11 \Attachment B-- Issues &OppsReport-- complete.doc
Page 28
38
3rd floor 30 feet 3rd floor 30 feet
Rear 5 feet Rear None
Rear, if any portion of the yard is within 50 Rear, if any portion of the yard is within 50
feet of LDR, MDR, HDR feet of LDR, MDR, HDR
1 st floor 15 feet 1st floor 15 feet
2nd floor 20 feet 2nd floor 20 feet
3rd floor 30 feet 3rd floor 30 feet
Height, maximum 4 stories or 45 feet Height, maximum 4 stories or 45 feet
Landscape requirements (minimum): Landscape requirements (minimum):
See Landscape, Recreation, Recycling/ Solid See Landscape, Recreation, Recycling/ Solid
Waste Space requirements chapter for further Waste Space requirements chapter for further
requirements requirements
Fronts 12.5 feet Fronts 5 feet
Fronts, if any portion of the yard is within Fronts, if any portion of the yard is within
50 feet of LDR, MDR, HDR 15 feet 50 feet of LDR, MDR, HDR 15 feet
Sides 5 feet Sides None
Sides, if any portion of the yard is within Sides, if any portion of the yard is within 50
50 feet of LDR, MDR, HDR 15 feet feet of LDR, MDR, HDR 15 feet
Rear None Rear None
Rear, if any portion of the yard is within 50 Rear, if any portion of the yard is within 50
feet of LDR, MDR, HDR 15 feet feet of LDR, MDR, HDR 15 feet
The uses allowed in the two zones are also similar, though there are a greater variety
allowed in CLI. Primary differences include C /LI allowing commercial parking under
certain circumstances, additional offices, small craft /repair shops, retail sales, and
theatres as permitted uses.
C /LI design review requirements are greater than in MIC /L.
Because this is a fully developed site with high value buildings a change in
Zoning/ Comprehensive Plan designation is unlikely to result in changes to the use or
structures in the near to medium term.
The other property owners with MIC /L zoning between S 124 and S 126 Street have
been notified that a change to the zoning in this area is being discussed. We have not
received any indication of their preferences.
Recommendation:
Retain the MIC /L Comprehensive Plan and Zoning designation.
W: \Long Range Projects \MIC Study \CAP_5 -23 -11 \Attachment B Issues &OppsReport-- complete.doc
Page 29
39
+r'i- y €,,:c ff '1 k
3 fit+ y t+ zcZ2h e FF xm ii. fi 4
.rte s,� t `-'-4 f SF N
t1 ,L"r"'r r, y iB" '�'"„+YF'
x J' r" r a a i x`''� uf f i.n�v r �x t L
a£,. "r r r i
gr
'x}"j s. a= e t+ FZ.�
r
.`r^v,E 1`,"' �r q. ij ]rl M FQ �iy� +5y'
;:C iii Jcdi•r s
H v
�`��t� 3,.,�a r �fsa, k t
iM k }4yQ�''
�C7 'd rs`�•�a-�9 +���'z .f��t�',`
y t r rtiCu.3, b '-u. Y- y J "+°r, N
�'M"r'A y ,u., 4, 't.a S y
N y r 4 fE
b ,y 'x F t �t it `ltd ,ar +s C.'�',x,k -1 iJt'''
'rya
�Ye+t�,. ui :x �."S4Y r'"°,-'r;.tf ."'i�'x� •t 4 a a i
yqy �a-x
ee
r +Y Cs
C7'.LYI� u���. 6pt"'S"" -i }'4 ,�-'v'Ckt't F Y ti S Rib vt
�.-r3 yt p
AW
r t�
t��
.b 1-� ssR• uiu'S.. L- rt,.i: r'. ��cY
Figure 3: Group Health Cooperative Zoning
Department of Homeland Security.
Analysis: This site was developed in 2003 as an office building for US Citizenship and
Immigration Services. At that time the parcel was split between MIC /L, CLI and LDR
zoning., though the majority of the building was in MIC /L. The project was granted a
conditional use permit for the stand alone office use.
In 2004 the property owner applied for a comprehensive plan amendment to change the
LDR portion of the site to CLI. Instead the Council opted to zone the entire site MIC /L
after making a development agreement with the owner that provided additional
screening for the residential properties to the east.
During the MIC stakeholder interview process a representative of the Sabey Corporation
suggested that the zoning for this site be changed to Commercial Light Industrial (CLI).
The setback, landscape and height standards are similar in the two zones, see above.
Because this is a fully developed site with high value buildings a change in
Zoning/ Comprehensive Plan designation is unlikely to result in changes to the use or
structures in the near to medium term.
The other property owners with MIC /L zoning between S 124 and S 126 Street have
been notified that a change to the zoning in this area is being discussed. We have not
received any indication of their preferences.
Recommendation:
No significant changes have occurred on site since the Council and Planning Commission
reviewed the zoning in 2004. Therefore Staff recommends that no change be made.
W: \Long Range Projects \MIC Study \CAP_5 -23 -11 \Attachment B Issues &OppsReport-- complete.doc
Page 30
40
r
I N
#c F
1 SYr ,t �y
Y
t
Figure 4: Department of Homeland Security Zoning
W: \Long Range Projects \MIC Study \CAP_5 -23=11 \Attachment B Issues &OppsReport complete.doc
Page 31
41
PLANNED ACTION
In 1998, the City Council adopted a Strategic Implementation Plan for the MIC and an
accompanying Planned Action Environmental Impact Statement that that analyzed
anticipated development alternatives in the MIC area and streamlined SEPA review for
development in that corridor. The Planned Action studied and anticipated development
in the MIC area, and accounts for its impacts.
The "Planned Action" option for State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) review is allowed
by the Washington Growth Management Act in sub areas, such as the MIC, that have an
adopted plan for development. Planned action environmental review is a voluntary
process meant to eliminate unnecessary regulatory barriers, shorten the review process,
and provide more predictable review through development standards. Tukwila has
received 44 planned action requests to date in 2010, with 36 approved.
To be eligible for planned action environmental review, proposed projects must meet
some basic qualifications, including:
1) The action is a "permitted use" or "accessory use" located within the MIC /L or
MIC /H zones.
2) The action is:
a. Not an "essential public facility" per RCW 36.707A.200;
b. Not a conditional or unclassified use, in the MIC /L or MIC /H zones;
c. Not a development that extends waterward of the ordinary high water
mark;
d. Not a development associated with the 16 Avenue Bridge construction
activities.
The growth that has occurred since the preparation of the Planned Action Environmental
Impact Statement has not exceeded the analyzed levels, and significant growth capacity
is still available.
Infrastructure needed to support area buildout was previously identified in the
infrastructure comprehensive plans for transportation, sewer, water and storm drainage.
Facilities have either been built, or recommended in the Tukwila Capital Improvement
program.
Per the Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element Policy 13.3.1, LOS E is the standard
to guide City improvement and development approval decisions. In the northern portion
of the MIC, transportation improvements, including curb, gutter, lights, storm drain and
the timing of light signals, were completed for East Marginal Way in the late 1990s.
There is adequate capacity for the next six years, and through 2030. The 16 Avenue
Bridge will be rebuilt, ensuring east west connections at the north edge of the area.
Rebuilding the Boeing Access Road bridge is a high priority. Identified in the 2011 -2016
Capital Improvement Program, funding is not available at present. The light rail stop,
W: \Long Range Projects \MIC Study\CAP_5 -23-11 \Attachment B Issues &OppsReport-- complete.doc
Page 32
42
identified at Boeing Access Road, was withdrawn from the plans. Improvements along
Tukwila International Boulevard have been implemented.
Currently the 2011 -2015 Capital Improvement Program includes additional projects that
directly impact the MIC, including:
1) Develop a program for NPDES reporting and compliance as required by the State
of Washington;
2) Establish legal drainage connections from E. Marginal Way to the Duwamish
River Drainage from E. Marginal Way S. is discharged through outfalls owned and
operated by the Boeing Company, Jorgensen Forge and two King County International
Airport storm systems without easements. The Boeing Company has asked the City
of Tukwila to take over ownership of their storm line and outfall. This project will
clarify maintenance responsibility and will ensure the reliability of the system.
3) New BNSF Regional Center Access —The project would construct a new access to
the BNSF Regional Distribution Center. It would relocate 900+ truck trips /day from
residential streets in Allentown, increase the efficiency of truck access between the
BNSF facility and freeways, freeway traffic and regional freight movement. At least
two alternatives have been identified, but no cost estimates have been determined
and no funding is available. The project would have a major positive impact on the
Allentown neighborhood.
Sewer and water service, provided the City of Tukwila, has no capacity issues. A
previous waterline project to separate Tukwila and Seattle lines was implemented, and
capacity remains. In portions of the southern MIC, Valley View Sewer District provides
service. Water is provided by Water Districts 20 and 125.
While it appears that the assumptions of the Planned Action remain valid, and that
capacity remains for further growth, it is necessary to review and confirm or alter the
assumption.
Recommendation:
Staff recommends a review of the Planned Action document to determine if an update is
required.
W: \Long Range Projects \MIC Study \CAP_5- 23- 11 \Attach merit B Issues &oppsReport-- complete.doc
Page 33
43.
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS
Listed below are the recommended actions for discussion.
Tukwila Comprehensive Plan —Goals and Policies
Add an implementation strategy to Tukwila Comprehensive Plan Policy 11.1.6 as
follows,
Actively seek alternative railroad related freight routing away from residential
streets in Allentown.
Add a new Tukwila Comprehensive Plan Policy as follows,
Pursue light rail and commuter rail stops in the vicinity of Boeing Access
Road.
Development Regulations Review
Beauty and Barber Shops (TMC 18.36.020.3 and TMC 18.38.020.3)
Delete "Beauty or barber shops" from Permitted Uses
Add to Conditional uses Retail Sales (TMC 18.36.040.11 and TMC 18.38.040. 9.)
Retail sales of health and beauty aids, prescription drugs, food, hardware, notions,
crafts and craft supplies, housewares, consumer electronics, photo equipment, and
film processing, books, magazines, stationery, clothing, shoes, flowers, plants,
pets, jewelry, gifts, recreation equipment and sporting goods, and similar items;
retail services such as beauty and barber shoos, banks, outpatient medical services,
and health clubs; retail sales and services are limited to uses of a type and size
that clearly intend to serve other permitted uses and /or the employees of those
uses.
Extended -Stay Hotel /Motel (TMC18.36.020.10 and TMC 18.38.020.10)
Delete Extended -stay hotel /motel from Permitted Uses in MIC /L and MIC /H
Hotel (TMC18.36.020.12 and TMC 18.38.020.14) and Motel (TMC 18.36.020.23 and TMC
18.38.020.27)
Delete Hotels and Motels from Permitted Uses in the MIC /L and MIC /H
Add to Conditional Uses in MIC /L and MIC /H
Financial— Banking, mortgage and other services (TMC 18.38.020)
Delete Financial banking, mortgage and other services from Permitted Uses in MIC /H
Add the underscored changes to Conditional Uses, Retail Sates TMC 18.38.040.9
W: \Long Range Projects \MIC Study \CAP_5 -23 -11 \Attachment B Issues &OppsReport-- complete.doc
Page 34
44
Retail sales of health and beauty aids, prescription drugs, food, hardware, notions,
crafts and craft supplies, housewares, consumer electronics, photo equipment, and
film processing, books, magazines, stationery, clothing, shoes, flowers, plants,
pets, jewelry, gifts, recreation equipment and sporting goods, and similar items;
retail services such as beauty and barber shots, financial services, outpatient
medical services, and health clubs; retail sales and services" are limited to uses of a
type and size that clearly intend to serve other permitted uses and /or the
employees of those uses.
Manufacturing
Reorganize manufacturing uses. Add a preface to the permitted
manufacturing/ processing uses that explicitly states the potential impacts as follows:
TMC 18.36.020.17 -22, and 18.38.020 Manufacturing and industrial uses that
have little potential for creating off -site noise, smoke, dust, vibration or other
external environmental impacts or pollution, including but not limited to
manufacturing, processing, assembling, packaging and /or repairing of:
a. Electrical or mechanical equipment, vehicles and machines including, but
not limited to, heavy and light machinery, tools, airplanes, boats or other
transportation vehicles and equipment;
b. Previously prepared metals including, but not limited to, stamping,
dyeing, shearing or punching of metal, engraving, galvanizing and hand
forging
c. Food, including but not limited to, baked goods, beverages (including
fermenting and distilling), candy, canned or preserved foods, dairy products
and byproducts, frozen foods, instant foods and meats (provided that no
slaughtering is permitted);
d. Pharmaceuticals and related products, such as cosmetics and drugs;
e. Previously prepared materials including, but not limited to, bags, brooms,
brushes, canvas, clay, clothing, fur, furniture, glass, ink, paint, paper,
plastics, rubber, tile, and wood;
f. Electronic, mechanical or precision instruments such as medical and dental
equipment, photographic goods, measurement and control devices, and
recording equipment.
Reorganize and combine the listing of permitted manufacturing uses in MIC /H and add a
preface to the permitted manufacturing/ processing uses as follows:
TMC 18.38.020 -13, 19 -21 Manufacturing and industrial uses that have moderate
to substantial potential for creating noise, smoke, dust, vibration or other external
environmental impacts including, but not limited to:
a. Heavy metal processes such as smelting, blast furnaces, drop forging or drop
hammering;
b. Manufacturing, processing, assembly, packaging and repair of:
W: \Long Range Projects \MIC Study \CAP_5 -23-11 \Attachment B Issues &OppsReport-- complete.doc
Page 35
45
1) Chemicals, light metals, plastics, solvents, soaps, wood, coal, glass, enamels,
textiles, fabrics, plaster, agricultural products or animal products (no rendering or
slaughtering)
2) Previously manufactured metals, such as iron and steel fabrication; steel
production by electric arc melting, argon oxygen refining and consumable electrode
melting, and similar heavy industrial uses.
Design Review for Office Uses (TMC 18.36.070 and TMC 18.38.070)
Require design review for new office uses in MIC /L and MIC /H as follows:
18.36.070 Design Review
Administrative design review is required for all new office development, and
other developments within 300 feet of residential districts or within 200 feet
of the Green /Duwamish River.
18.38.070 Design Review
Administrative design review is required for all new office development, and other
developments within 300 feet of residential districts or within 200 feet of the
Green /buwamish River
Offices including Schools and Studios for Self- improvement
Add the following underlined wording to the MIC /L chapter Permitted Uses 18.36.020.24
and strike language about studios for self improvement.
Offices including, but not limited, to software development and similar uses,
financial services, schools for professional and vocational
education ^r s elf -irr, r-eyemen- if associated with an established aviation,
manufacturine or industrial use. and less than 20,000 square feet.
Add the following underlined wording to the MIC /L chapter Conditional uses 18.36.040.7
and strike language about studios for self improvement.
Offices including, but not limited, to software development
and similar uses, financial services, schools ^nom' *udi for professional and
vocational education ^r self -im r- eyement if associated with an established
aviation, manufacturinp, or industrial use. 20,000 square feet and over.
Outpatient, Inpatient, and Emergency Medical and Dental (TMC 18.36.020.25 and
TMC 18.38.020.29)
Delete "Outpatient, inpatient and emergency medical dental" from permitted uses.
Add "Outpatient and emergency medical dental" to Conditional Use Retail Services
(18.36.040.xx and 18.38.040xx)
W: \Long Range Projects \MIC Study \CAP_5 -23-11 \Attachment B Issues &OppsReport-- complete.doc
Page 36
46
Retail sales of health and beauty aids, prescription drugs, food, hardware, notions,
crafts and craft supplies, housewares, consumer electronics, photo equipment, and
film processing, books, magazines, stationery, clothing, shoes, flowers, plants,
pets, jewelry, gifts, recreation equipment and sporting goods, and similar items;
retail services such as beauty and barber shops, banks, outpatient and emergencv
medical and dental services, and health clubs; retail sales and services are limited
to uses of a type and size that clearly intend to serve other permitted uses and /or
the employees of those uses.
Recreation Facilities (Commercial- indoor) Athletic or Health Clubs (TMC
18.36.020.28 and TMC 18.36.020.28)
Delete Recreation Facilities (Commercial- indoor) athletic or health clubs from
Permitted Uses in MIC /L and MIC /H
Add to Conditional Use Retail Services (18.36.040.xx and 18.38.040xx)
Retail sales of health and beauty aids, prescription drugs, food, hardware, notions,
crafts and craft supplies, housewares, consumer electronics, photo equipment, and
film processing, books, magazines, stationery, clothing, shoes, flowers, plants,
pets, jewelry, gifts, recreation equipment and sporting goods, and similar items;
retail services such as beauty and barber shops, banks, outpatient and emergency
medical and dental services, and health clubs; retail sales and services are limited
to uses of a type and size that clearly intend to serve other permitted uses and /or
the employees of those uses.
Schools and studios for education or self- improvement (TMC18.38.020.39)
Recommendation:
Add the following underlined wording to the MIC /H chapter Permitted Uses 18.38.020.39
and strike language about studios for self improvement.
Schools GPd for professional and vocational education r- self -im r Gy ement
if associated with an established aviation, manufacturing or industrial use
Taverns, nightclubs (TMC18.36.020.37 and TMC18.38.020.43)
Delete "nightclubs" from Permitted Uses in MIC /L and MIC /H
Billiard or Pool Rooms (TMC 18.36.030.1 and TMC 18.38.030.1)
Delete billiard or pool rooms from Accessory Uses in MIC /L and MIC /H
Dormitory as an accessory use to other uses that are otherwise permitted or
approved conditional uses such as Universities, Colleges or Schools (TMC 18.36.030.2
and TMC 18.38.030.2)
Delete dormitory from Accessory Uses in MIC /L and MIC /H (TMC 18.36.030.2 and TMC
18.38.030.2).
W: \Long Range Projects \MIC Study \CAP_5 -23 -11 \Attachment B Issues &OppsReport-- complete.doc
Page 37
47
Colleges and Universities (TMC 18.36.040.1)
Add the following wording to the Colleges and Universities Conditional Use category in
"I' L and MIC /H.
18.36.040.1 Colleges and universities with vrimarily vocational curriculum if
associated with an established aviation, manufacturing or industrial use
18.38.040.1 Colleges and universities with orimarilV vocational curriculum if
associated with an established aviation, manufacturing or industrial use
Boundary Review
Duwamish Hill Preserve
Change the Zoning and Comprehensive Plan designation to Low Density Residential (LDR)
with a Public Recreation Overlay to reflect its status as public open space.
Planned Action
Review Planned Action to determine if an update is required.
W: \Long Range Projects \MIC Study \CAP_5 -23 -11 \Attachment B Issues &OppsReport-- complete.doc
Page 38
48
City of Tukwila Department of Community Development
April 4, 2011
Business Sta keho der Survey
Resu is and Summary
Manufacturing
,11ndustrial Center Study
W:\Long Range Projects\MIC B--Issues&OppsReport--complete.doc
Page 39
49
��UU��
Business Stakeholder Survey
M �n�f�c�y/fn�/I/�u���a/��n�cr[uo7p/ehen�/vc P�n (/pd��*
��x��| f Contents
,w�'�� of
Introduction.-......-.^.-'..~.^^^-~^^^~^~^^~'-^~~--^^^^-^^^^^^^-~~^^--~^^^~41
Background....-..,,~~~~,_,,,,,^^_,_,~~,_,,,,~~,~,,^.__,,,_,,,,,,,_^,,,,,_,,~~41
Methods........'.......~....~'......'.~~^^~^-'^^^^^^^'^^^^^^-'^^^'-^^'^~'^'^^~^-~~~~^^^'41
Summaryof Key Findings 43
Summary of Survey Responses 46
T��� f�'
of Figures
Figure 1 Goods or Services from Tukw Locations----------.. 48
Figure 2 Site Characteristic Preferences SO
Figure 3 Transportation Priorities for Site Selection 51
Figure 4 Concerns Regarding Tukwila Location S3
Figure 5 Future Location Preferences S6
Nt\LnngRange 11\Attachment -oomoletedoc
Page 40
INTRODUCTION
This survey was undertaken as part of a study of the Manufacturing /Industrial Center
(MIC) that is being prepared for the City's required periodic review and update of its
Comprehensive Plan goals and policies. It provides information to supplement a review
of the applicable policies and regulations in effect and an examination of the
geographic extent of the MIC. Staff has sought input from Tukwila's business
community to identify key issues that affect industrial businesses and lands in the
Manufacturing/ Industrial Center, especially as relates to land use in the MIC and City
policies toward business. Survey results will help develop recommendations for code
and /or policy changes that will go the Tukwila Planning Commission and the Tukwila
City Council for consideration.
BACKGROUND
Tukwila's Manufacturing/ Industrial Center is an important regional center of industrial
activity. It one of four such centers designated in King County. The Manufacturing/
Industrial Center (MIC) is an area that is meant to preserve and enhance manufacturing
and industrial activity, and the land that allows these activities to operate. King
County's Countywide Planning Policies set parameters for the employment and uses that
may occur within an MIC. Tukwila's MIC is one of the few remaining concentrations of
industrial land in the urban Puget Sound region.
Tukwila's MIC is approximately 966 acres alon the Duwamish River, bounded generally
by the City of Seattle on the north, South 125 Street on the south, the Burlington
Northern railway right -of -way on the east, and the Tukwila City limits on the west. The
MIC is home to over 14, 000 jobs, and provides a significant portion of Tukwila's
economic activity.
City of Tukwila Comprehensive Plan policies establish that the Manufacturing Industrial
Center is intended for industrial activity in order to "maximize the employment and
economic benefits to the people of Tukwila and the region, while minimizing the
impacts on residential neighborhoods." The Zoning Code, which implements the
Comprehensive Plan's policies, limits non industrial uses, especially office and retail,
which may occur in the MIC, and reserves the land for industrial activities and some
limited support for these uses. New housing is not permitted.
METHODS
To gain background data for its review of the Manufacturing/ Industrial Center, as well
as a way to involve business stakeholders, the Department of Community Development
conducted a survey of businesses in the MIC. The purpose of the survey was to gain
information about concerns of businesses, identify pressures that industrial businesses
are facing, and to ask for feedback regarding the City of Tukwila's policies, especially
industrial land use.
Tukwila staff sent postcards to 200 tenants and property owners in the MIC, inviting
them to participate in an online on -line survey to determine which issues were
important to them. Tukwila staff also sent personal letters to approximately 14
businesses, asking them to participate in a more detailed survey, either on the phone or
W: \Long Range Projects \MIC Study \CAP_5 -23 -11 \Attachment B Issues &OppsReport-- complete.doc
Page 41
51
in- person, depending on individual preference. Extensive follow up phone calling
occurred to secure business participation.
T o get additional information, and as a means to engage businesses in discussion, City
staff developed this 17 question survey. It is based on surveys done by the City of
Seattle in 2007. Survey questions focused on:
1) business demographics/ background;
2) location factors;
3) industrial vs. non industrial neighbors;
4) advantages and disadvantages of a Tukwila location;
5) future location decisions; and 6) City of Tukwila actions.
The survey included both short- answer questions aimed at specific information, and
open -ended questions with the intention of eliciting a range of response. For most of
the short answer questions, results could readily summarized. In the case of the open
ended questions categories were created, and results were summarized and displayed
based on common themes that the businesses expressed.
After significant outreach efforts, Tukwila staff conducted interviews either in person or
by phone or, in one case via email, with 20 businesses located in the MIC. Four responses
were received to the shorter website surveys. A total of 23 businesses and one resident
provided comments regarding the MIC out of a total of approximately 130 businesses in
the MIC. They took place primarily between November 2010 and January, 2011. One
survey was received in March 2011.
The survey results provide important information and raise interesting questions about
Tukwila businesses in the MIC. However, conclusions drawn from the results should be
considered primarily as a snapshot of selected businesses, rather than indicating trends.
The sampling method is not, and was not intended to be, statistically valid.
The Tabulated Survey with Comments is available.
W: \Long Range Projects \MIC Study \CAP_5 -23-11 \Attachment B Issues &OppsReport-- complete.doc
Page 42
52
SUMMARY OF KEY FINDINGS
Businesses value Tukwila's central location: Businesses place high value their location
in Tukwila's Manufacturing/ Industrial Center for its access to major "transportation
corridors, customers and suppliers. Tukwila's central location provides excellent access
to Seattle, the east side, Western Washington and Alaska.
Access is the key benefit to a Tukwila location: The outstanding benefit to a having a
Tukwila industrial location is access. Throughout the survey the importance of
Tukwila's good access and central location was mentioned. Some ways that access is
considered notable includes the following:
Access to the highway system, including 1 -5 and Highway 599, primarily for getting onto
the regional transportation network for reaching markets outside of the immediate
area.
Access to airports is a significant plus, as is access to the Port of Seattle. Rail access is
not considered important by survey respondents.
Employee access to worksites is convenient from a variety of locations
Access to customers, clients and suppliers is convenient and economical
In addition, firms consider having truck access to their individual site to be especially
important. Parking at the site is also very important.
Most industrial businesses prefer to be located with similar uses and away from non-
industrial uses: Industrial businesses prefer to be grouped together with similar or
complementary businesses. Industrial uses like to be located with other industrial
businesses to generate business, share suppliers, customers. A significant number
wanted business neighbors involved with trucking, either sales, repair, distribution,
truck courier or businesses that generated lots of truck traffic.
Incompatibility with non industrial operations —The most commonly cited reason for
not having non industrial neighbors was the view that industrial operations were just
not compatible with many non industrial activities due to impacts (noise, odor, truck
traffic, appearance). For example, businesses were concerned that their operations
could result in complaints from their non industrial neighbors, or in negative impacts
since their operations were not necessarily "attractive."
Many businesses stated that they wish to be located away from residences and non-
industrial uses due to the noise and impacts they themselves produced, and their desire
to operate without being considered a nuisance by others. Two respondents felt that
having residential uses nearby could be a source of criminal activity or break ins at
their business.
There are some benefits to having some non industrial neighbors —Some industrial
businesses view certain non industrial uses, such as restaurant and retail, as amenities
that can enhance the work environment for their employees. A few thought that
additional offices could provide them more customers. At least one business felt that
proximity to residences could provide a source of additional customers for the business,
and that all viable uses should be encouraged.
Costs and the need for larger facilities would cause businesses to change location In
general, businesses would prefer to stay in place, but if necessary would be compelled
W \Long Range Projects \MIC Study \CAP_5 -23-11 \Attachment B Issues &OppsReport complete.doc
Page 43
53
to move to seek a larger facility and lower costs. Many industrial lands users are
concerned about the availability of space that fits their needs, and the rising costs of
rent and land. All of the respondents stated that the costs of land and /or rent was
either very important or somewhat important.
If necessary, King County, especially Auburn or Kent, would be the favored place to
relocate. If businesses decided to leave Tukwila, over one in four would choose either
Auburn or Kent due to lower costs and the ability to get larger facilities.
Businesses would like faster, more certain permit processing Businesses commented
on fire permit fees, rack permits, building code requirements, seismic requirements,
and permits for machine installation.
Public safety is a high priority When asked their concerns about a Tukwila location,
over 70% of respondents felt that public safety /crime issues were very important to
them, citing problems with burglary /car prowl. Police response for personal crime was
good, and businesses had generally good interactions with the police. Response for
property crime was somewhat less satisfactory.
Traffic congestion is a problem or not Businesses were evenly split with
approximately 50% feeling that traffic was an important problem, and approximately
50% saying that it wasn't important at all. Congestion made getting to Southcenter
difficult for some. Interurban works well.
A location in Tukwila's MIC has many advantages In addition to access
(freeways/ transportation network, airports, ability to serve customers efficiently) and a
central location, businesses felt their Tukwila location provided them with a good
facility with reasonable costs.
Others mentioned the availability of power, fibreoptics, good police response, good
business climate, a large industrial area with industrial neighbors and the ability to be
separate from residential uses. One remarked that Tukwila was the "heart of
everything," including Alaska Marine lines and truck lines. They appreciated the ability
to ship anywhere, anytime.
A location in the MIC has some negatives, too Responses were varied, but could
generally be grouped into categories including: 1) public safety /crime concerns; 2)
traffic congestion; 3) codes/ permitting (slow permitting, restrictive zoning and sign
codes); 4) regulation; 5) negative business climate; 6) lack of amenities/ services for
employees (transit /light rail, restaurants, retail); and high costs (rent, City fees).
One business remarked on the difficult east /west traffic pattern due to the Duwamish
River, King County International Airport and the 116 Avenue South bridge closure.
Another was concerned over the perception that Tukwila was "too far south," and
therefore difficult to access. The Superfund environmental cleanup was mentioned, as
was the distance from other tourist destinations. One business expressed regret that the
expected convergence of transit, light rail, highways and employment had not occurred.
Amenities Several businesses were pleased with trails and parks in the MIC. Others
felt that restaurants and other amenities for their employees were lacking, and wanted
more. Several businesses were especially interested additional public transit options,
including additional bus service, and a light rail stop.
Business Climate and Perception Feelings were mixed regarding business climate.
Some businesses felt that the City had a good or neutral business climate, others felt
W: \Long Range Projects \MIC Study \CAP_5 =23 -11 \Attachment B Issues &OppsReport-- complete.doc
Page 44
54
that the City had a negative attitude toward business. One business remarked that they
didn't feet connected to Tukwila, although they had used the Tukwila Community
Center for meetings and a staff picnic. One business requested that the City keep
reaching out to business as it is doing now with the survey, since businesses sometimes
feel that the City of Tukwila doesn't care about them.
Comments and Suggestions to the City of Tukwila
Businesses were asked open -ended questions about ways the City could help their
business operations and also to provide comments for the City of Tukwila. Businesses
made 48 very interesting suggestions or comments regarding better communication,
zoning, transportation, permitting, transit /light rail, taxes/ bureaucracy, public
safety, landscaping requirements, other regulations and other specific issues.
Communication: The most common suggestions concerned communication, including
providing additional opportunities for communication through the City's website, email,
safety alerts, even business cards. Businesses appreciated prior flood information, and
asked for more.
Zoning Permitted Uses: Land use was a topic of interest. Three individuals wanted only
industrial uses in the area and five were wanted additional non industrial uses including
more offices (to generate customers), restaurants and a hotel. Of these, one business
suggested a transitional buffer around the MIC to allow commercial uses that could
serve both residents and industrial employees, while another felt that the southern part
of the MIC should be rezoned to office. One business felt
Transportation: Suggestions concerned traffic lights, including better timing for lights
along E. Marginal Way and desire for a traffic light at S. 112 and E. Marginal Way.
There was concern over a potential bike lane on E. Marginal.
Permitting: Three businesses wanted faster or more certain permitting. One suggested
offering permitting assistance and advice, while another wanted more notice for
business license renewals. One suggested that the City adapt its processes to fit real
demands.
Transit /Light Rail: Three businesses wanted the light rail stop at E. Marginal and better
access to public transportation.
Taxes /Bureaucracv.: Not surprisingly, lower taxes and no BFtO tax were requested.
Another business asked for friendlier service to business with less bureaucracy.
Public Safetv: Additional police patrols were requested, as well as more emergency
training. Better police and fire department cooperation was suggested.
Landscaping: Trees and bushes along E. Marginal Way attracted notice with a request
for trimming to improve safety and visibility, as well as a suggestion for fewer
landscaping requirements.
Regulations: A request was made for consistent sign code enforcement. The City was to
work with the State and federal governments to change paint regulations.
Other: Several additional comments were made, including: 1)Keep supporting the Rock
and Roll Marathon; 2)Monitor City actions for impacts on business; 3)Keep reaching out
to business as you are doing through this survey businesses sometimes feel that the
City of Tukwila doesn't care about them; 4) Provide help in hiring qualified employees;
W: \Long Range Projects \MIC Study \CAP_5 -23 -11 \Attachment B Issues &OppsReport-- complete.doc
Page 45
55
5) Make more of an effort to buy from local businesses i.e. revise
contracting /purchasing requirements; 6)Thanks to Mayor Haggerton for his participation
in Museum of Flight programs.
Survey results will be shared with City officials for consideration.
SUMMARY OF SURVEY RESPONSES
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
1. Primary Goods and /or Services Sold from Location
Question #1 asked respondents what primary goods and /or services are
manufactured /sold from their location. Responses were categorized into one
of six categories. These include: 1) manufacturing; 2) distribution /warehouse;
3) transportation; 4) truck related; 5) services; and 6) other. A total of 30
responses were received. Not all businesses replied to this question, but some
provided more than one answer.
Distribution /Warehouse was the largest category with 23 of respondents
providing goods /services in this group. Manufacturing and "other" were next
with 20% each. Truck related businesses and services each had 13% of the
total responses. Transportation- related businesses comprised 10% of the total.
Due to rounding, the total is 99 A wide range of activities, some not
traditionally found in an industrial area, was represented including airport,
mail processing and distribution, data center, distribution of office furniture
systems, museum and housing. A fuller listing is shown below:
Distribution /Warehouse
Office products /furniture
Office furniture systems
Snack foods
Truck and trailer parts
Warehouse
Healthcare distribution center
Mail processing and distribution
Manufacturing
Van bodies
Apparel for men and women
Aluminum, titanium, specialty steel
Specialty snack foods
Aircraft
Machinery and gear cutting for heavy industry
W: \Long Range Projects \MIC Study \CAP_5 -23 =11 \Attachment B Issues &OppsReport-- complete.doc
Page 46
56
Other
Data center
Healthcare call center, labs
Museum
Housing
Airport
Office
Truck Related
Commercial/ industrial painting
Repairs
Sales and service
Truck and trailer repairs
Services
Cafe Ft catering
Services (unspecified)
Services (unspecified)
Audio /lighting /video installation for concerts, performances
Transportation
Contract carrier (trucking)
Delivery service
Dispatch, maintain, and fuel buses
Figure 1. Goods or Services from Tukwila Locations
of Businesses
23%
20% 20%
13% 13%
em 10%
J5 ``c o, `re ��a Ge5 n \c°
J�aG`J O 0e�` yQo�a
5
W: \Long Range Projects \MIC Study \CAP_5 -23-11 \Attachment B Issues &OppsReport-- complete.doc
Page 47
57
Figure 5 Goods or Services from Tukwila Locations
2. Years Located at Current Address
Respondents were asked how long the company had been located at its current
address. The largest group (36 had been at their current site for 20 years or more,
including one company that had occupied the same site for 82 years. The next
largest (27 had been in their current location for between 11 and 15 years. Those
at their current locations from between 6 to 10 years followed at 22 and between 0
to 4 years with 14
3. Owner or a Tenant?
This question asked if the company was an owner or a tenant in the property
identified in question #2. The majority were tenants (59%); the remaining 41% were
owners.
4. Business Levels during the Past 3 Years
Respondents were asked if business increased, decreased or stayed the same during
the past three years. Most (52 reported that business decreased. 29% indicated
that business increased, and 19% said that it stayed the same.
5. Emplovees— Current
6. Emplovees Future
These questions should be considered together, with #5 asking how many full -time
and part -time employees currently work at their locations, and #6 asking respondents
how many full -time and part -time people they expected in three to five years. This
is the direct answers rather than percentages since not all those surveyed replied to
each question.
8 respondents (out of 23) said they had between 21 and 50 employees. 6
respondents (out of 19) said they would have between 21 to 50 employees.
6 respondents (out of 23) said they had between 0 and 20 employees, and 6
respondents (out of 19) said they would have between 0 and 20 workers.
The three largest employers had 600, 600 and 1,800 employees respectively, and
expected to keep approximately the same number of workers.
7. Factors in Deciding on a Location
This question asked respondents to indicate how influential different factors were
when deciding on an operating location, by indicating whether they were
W: \Long Range Projects \MIC Study \CAP_5 -23 -11 \Attachment B Issues &OppsReport-- complete.doc
Page 48
58
"important "somewhat important" or "not important Questions were grouped
into categories— facility characteristics, site characteristics, labor, business links and
transportation.
Facilitv Characteristics: The first group of questions concerned space characteristics.
Respondents were asked to rank the importance of: room for expansion; ground floor
occupancy; loading bays; high ceilings. The responses were a bit confusing since
each question had a different number of responses. That said, each of these factors
was quite important, receiving over 60% "very important."
High ceilings were mentioned very important to 70% (14 of 20 responses), and room
to expand close behind with 68% (15 of 22 responses) saying it was very important.
67% saw ground floor occupancy was very important followed by 61% (11 of 18
responses) for loading bay.
Site Characteristics: The next group of questions focused on site characteristics and
included: cost of land /rent; outdoor storage; access to transit; high visibility; large
truck access; rail access and separation from residential areas.
100% of respondents agreed that cost of land /rent and adequate parking was either
important or very important. 86 found access for large trucks to be "very
important." On the other hand, 89% and 65% said that rail access and outdoor storage
respectively were "not important" characteristics of their site.
61% thought it was either very important or important have a site that was separated
from residential areas.
W: \Long Range Projects \MIC Study \CAP_5 -23-11 \Attachment B Issues &OppsReport-- complete.doc
Page 49
59
Figure 2. Site Characteristic Preferences
o Very important 0 Somewhat important
m °i nil+
100%
90%
7
80%
70%
60
50%
40% .1
3
s
-r
20
10%
0% T T
4,1`a a °`yam° a�
0
Figure
P
Figure 6 Site Characteristic Preferences
Labor Characteristics: This group of questions addressed the labor pool in selecting
operating location. The factors included being close to skilled labor, unskilled labor
and management. Relatively few answers were received for these questions.
Being close to skilled labor was important with 75% (9 of 12 responses) saying that
this was very important or somewhat important. Replies were almost equally divided
on whether it was important (50 or not important (50 3 of 6 responses) to be
close to unskilled labor. Responses were similar for the importance of proximity to
management.
Business Links: These questions focused on business links, and included being close to
customers, close to suppliers, and close to competitors. We also asked the
importance of the location being pleasant for one's employees in making a siting
decision.
The replies indicated that it is very important (60 or important (10 to be near
customers. About the same number thought that it was very important or somewhat
important to be near suppliers (41% very important and 30% important). Proximity to
competitors was not seen as important by 67 Having a pleasant area for employees
was considered very important by 53% of respondents, although amenities were
needed.
W: \Long Range Projects \MIC Study \CAP_5 -23 -11 \Attachment B Issues &OppsReport-- complete.doc
Page 50
60
Transportation: The last group of questions was on transportation issues, and
included: being close to downtown Seattle; ease of access to major highways, rail
transport, the port of Seattle and airports.
Ease of access to major highways was "very important" to 100% of respondents. 75%
found it very important to have easy access to downtown Seattle. Easy access to
airports was very important to 40 and somewhat important to another 40
Businesses were split over having easy access to the Port of Seattle. 50% thought this
was either very or somewhat important to their site selection, while 50% thought it
was not important. Finally 80% thought that having rail access to their site was not
important.
Figure 3. Transportation Priorities for Site
Selection
IEi very Important MSomewhat Important ❑Not Important
y 18 i
16
w 12
r W
16 M
8-
c g
4
M.
1 I f RAM
I IN
I I I
Z Access to Access to Access to Access to Access to
Downtown Highways Rail Port of Airports
Seattle Seattle
Figure 7 Transportation Priorities for Site Selection
Issues Relating to Tukwila Location:
A separate group of questions asked about possible concerns or problems
encountered in the Tukwila location, including: traffic congestion; lack of room for
expansion; high rents; high land costs; public safety /crime; permitting costs /delays;
flood concerns; business climate; regulations.
Concerns over public safety and crime drew the greatest response: 71 felt it was
"very important," and 12% felt it was somewhat important. Burglary /car
prowl /property theft was most frequently mentioned. Several commented that they
had had good police response, especially for personal crime. Response for property
crime was somewhat less satisfactory.
W: \Long Range Projects \MIC Study \CAP_5 -23-11 \Attachment B Issues &OppsReport-- complete.doc
Page 51
61
Replies about traffic congestion were evenly split -It was either no problem (50 or
a very important (35 or somewhat important (15 concern. Surface streets were
sometimes congested.
High rents and high land costs were not important to 50% and 56% of respondents
respectively. Permit costs /delays were very important to 42% (5 of 12 replies) and
somewhat important to 17% (2 replies of 12 total). They were not important to 42%
(5 of 12 replies).
In a similar split, having room to expand was either very important or somewhat
important to 53% or not important to 47
Flood concerns were not important to 64% (9 replies of 13) of respondents, perhaps
due to their location and the decreased risk of flood.
People responded to a question about the business climate in different ways, making
it difficult to interpret these replies. 55% (6 replies of 11 received) said that it was
very important. Looking at comments, 5 thought that the business climate was
either "good" or "ok," and 2 said that either the state or the City Council wasn't
friendly to business.
Only 5 people responded to a question about regulations, with 60% (3 of 5 replies
received) indicating that they were "very important." Comments indicated that
enforcement of regulations was inconsistent, and that shoreline regulations were
unwieldy.
W: \Long Range Projects \MIC Study \CAP_5 -23 -11 \Attachment B Issues &OppsReport-- complete.doc
Page 52
62
Figure 4. Concerns Regarding Tukwila Location
I o very Important im Somewhat Important 0 Not Important
14-
12
0 10
0
CL
0
0
6
ffi
E 4
z
A
2
A
0
_1 40
+9 CP CP de
0 CP
110 oe
CP 1,6 Cj
0 0 e o
Figure 8 Concerns Regarding Tukwila Location
TUKWILA LOCATION DECISION
This section asked about businesses whether they moved to their current site from
another location, and open-ended[y asked why they made the choice.
8. Move from Elsewhere?
80 (16 responses of 20 received) of businesses located in Tukwila from another
location. 16 of these indicated from where they'd moved, including 69% (11
responses of 16 received) moved from Seattle, 19% (3 responses of 16 received) came
from another Tukwila location, and 13% (2 of 16 responses received) came from other
south King County cities (i.e. Kent F± Renton).
9. Reasons for Choosing Tukwila Location
As a follow up to question 8, respondents were asked why their present location was
chosen. This was an open-ended question. Answers were varied, but responses have
been grouped into categories including: 1) cost; 2) location; 3) space /amenities; 4)
ingress/egress; and 5) other.
W:\Long Range Projects\MIC Study\CAP_5-23-11\Attachment B--Issues&OppsReport--complete.doc
Page 53
63
33% said that the decision was based on locational variables including being
convenient for employees and management, and the availability of flat land. 29
mentioned factors relating to cost such as the consolidating operations, cheaper
rent, and no B it 0 tax. Ingress /Egress /Access was considered by 13% who felt that.
they wanted to be close to 1 -5 and 1 -405, to have easy highway access, and not to
have trucking restrictions when bringing in supplies. Other factors included owning a
ground lease, and working with a developer.
10. Business Neighbors
Respondents were asked which businesses they'd most like to have as neighbors.
This was intended to provide insight into whether industrial businesses preferred
industrial or perhaps non industrial neighbors. This was an open ended question, and
produced a range of answers. Due to overlapping answers, the total is greater than
100
57 specifically wanted industrial type neighbors, including 35% of respondents
wanted neighbors involved with trucking— either repair, sales, distribution, truck
courier, cargo carrier or generating lots of truck traffic. In general, of those who
wanted industrial -type neighbors, some wanted similar neighbors to draw more
business to the area, and others wanted complementary neighbors as suppliers.
One business welcomed any and all neighbors who didn't interfere with the property
or cause negative impacts, and another wanted noisy neighbors who would not be
bothered with the noise that his business produced. Another said that Boeing has
been a good neighbor. 10% (2 responses of 21 received) specifically wanted non-
industrial neighbors, including tourist attractions to general critical mass, and office
parks with businesses to buy their products. 10% (2 responses of 21 received) didn't
know or care about their neighbors.
11. Impacts of Non Industrial Neighbors
This question was intended to take the industrial vs non industrial question a step
further by asking about the benefits or challenges presented by having non industrial
neighbors such as retail, office, residential or mixed use residential/ commercial in
the MIC. This was also an .open -ended question that drew a range of answers. Due to
overlapping replies, the total is greater than 100
49% (11 of 23 businesses responding) expressed concern about the negative effects,
either on their businesses or non industrial neighbors, of having interface between
non industrial and industrial uses. Examples included industrial and light -rail noise
disturbing non industrial neighbors, negative visual and odor impacts, conflicts
between truck traffic and other vehicles, and unwanted pedestrians.
26% (6 of 23 replies) either had no problem with or wanted some non industrial
neighbors to generate business or synergy for their businesses. 26% (6 of 23 replies)
specifically wanted more retail or restaurant, including 5 who wanted these as
W: \Long Range Projects \MIC Study \CAP_5 -23-11 \Attachment B Issues &OppsReport-- complete.doc
Page 54
64
amenities for their own employees. This type of use is permitted in the zoning code
as a conditional use.
ADVANTAGES/ DISADVANTAGES OF TUKWILA LOCATION
12.Advantap,es of ODeratinp- at Present Location /Doing, Business in Tukwila
Respondents were asked the primary advantages of operating at their current
Tukwila location. This was an open -ended question, and resulted in a range of
replies.
These could be grouped into general categories, including: 1) access
(freeways/ transportation network, airports, ability to serve customers); 2) central
location; 3) having a good facility; and 4) reasonable costs. Other comments
included the availability of power, fiberoptics, good police response, good business
climate, large industrial area with industrial neighbors and the ability to be isolated
from residential uses.
13. Disadvantages of Operating at Present Location /Doing Business in Tukwila
This question was the "flip side" of #12 above, and asked respondents to name the
primary disadvantages of their present location. This was an open -ended question
that gave a range of responses.
Responses were varied but could generally be grouped into several categories,
including: 1) public safety /crime concerns; 2) congestion; 3) codes/ permitting; 4)
regulation; 5) negative business climate; 6) lack of amenities/ services for employees
(transit /light rail, restaurants, retail); and 7)high costs (rent, city fees).
Individual concerns include: the very complex air space in the area due to the
proximity to SeaTac distance from other tourist destinations; Superfund
environmental cleanup. One respondent remarked on the difficult east /west traffic
pattern due to the Duwamish River, King County International Airport and the 116
Avenue South bridge closure. Another was concerned over a perception that Tukwila
was "too far south," and therefore difficult to access. Several respondents said that
they had no real problems.
13.a Future Location Decisions
Respondents were asked what factors might cause them to leave their Tukwila
location. This question was open- ended.
There were 11 responses, including two that emphatically stated that they had no
intention of moving. Replies could be grouped as follows: 1) costs (2 of 11 responses
received); 2) need for larger/ different type facility (2 of 11 responses); 3) need to
change business model (3 of 11 business responses). One business indicated that they
would need to move if their primary client left the area, and another said they would
need to leave if they could not continue renting outdoor storage from City Light.
W: \Long Range Projects \MIC Study \CAP_5 -23 -11 \Attachment B Issues &OppsReport complete.doc
Page 55
65
14. Location of New Facilitv
Businesses were asked what areas they would consider if they relocated. Five options
were given, including: 1) Other Tukwila; 2) City'of Seattle; 3) South King County; 4)
Other Western Washington; and 5) other.
Of 18 responses, 39% said they would seek another location in King County, the
majority of whom would relocate to South King County, specifically Auburn or Kent,
which comprised 28% of the total. 17% would seek a location in Seattle, and an
additional 17% would want another Western Washington location outside of King
County. A final 17% would go to the east coast (Virginia), overseas or purchase in an
unnamed area.
Figure 5. Future Location Preferences
E0 Other Tukwila
IM Seattle
P
ma y_
0 Kent/Auburn
0 Other Western
Washington
Other
38%
Figure 9 Future Location Preferences
W: \Long Range Projects \MIC Study \CAP_5 -23-11 \Attachment B Issues &oppsReport-- complete.doc
Page 56
66
CITY OF TUKWILA ACTIONS
15. Limitations Caused by City of Tukwila Policies /Regulations /Actions
This question asked ways in which the City of Tukwila's policies and operations
currently constrained the business. This open -ended question elicited 17 replies
covering a variety of topics.
Two businesses replied that they had no problems (11%) with City policies or
regulations. Two comments concerned inspections/ inspectors, including what they
felt was over reaching inspectors and the insufficient amount of time allowed for
vactor cleaning under NPDES requirements (a federal regulation). 17% (3 of 18
responses) indicated concerns with the sign code. 17% (3 of 18 responses) mentioned
a desire for faster /easier /more certain permitting, including one request for with
additional public notice. 11% (2 of 18 responses received) felt that lack of flexibility
in interpreting the zoning or fire code was a problem for their business. 11 (2 of 18
responses) wanted additional information or services, including snow plow and flood.
One respondent felt they were charged disproportionately high parks and fire impact
fees since they didn't generate ambulance /fire calls or use parks.
16. Governmental Actions That Would He[D Business Operations
This question asked what City of Tukwila actions would help facilitate the company's
existing operations and /or future plans. These comments were combined with
responses from Question 17 (below).
17. Comments for the Citv of Tukwila
The question asked "Do you have any suggestions or comments that you would like to
communicate to the City of Tukwila These suggestions tended to be quite specific
to the firm, but some gave more general ideas and suggestions. Other comments
mirrored those given in Question 16.
A total of 46 comments/ suggestions were received for questions #16 and #17
combined. They have been grouped into several categories including the following in
order of descending frequency, including:
1) communication (20 9 of 46 responses);
2) zoning/ permitted uses in MIC (17 8 of 46 responses);
3) public works/ transportation (11%, 5 of 46 responses);
4) permitting (11 5 of 46 responses);
5) transit /light rail (7%, 3 of 46 responses);
6) taxes/ bureaucracy (7%, 3 of 46 responses);
7) public safety (7%, 3 of 46 responses);
8) purchasing /sales (4%, 2 of 46 responses;
9) landscaping/ maintenance; other regulations
10) city support
11) sign code;
12) other.
W: \Long Range Projects \MIC Study \CAP_5 -23 -11 \Attachment B Issues &OppsReport complete.doc
Page 57
67
A list of the comments/ suggestions follows:
Communication:
Better communication with affected parties
Website— Include "How are we doing for anonymous feedback
Business Cards "How am I doing
Revise forms to require email addresses from all business contacts
Send email safety alerts to businesses (i.e. don't turn off your electricity)
Website Showcase a Tukwila business each month
Provide updated flood information (Prior leadership appreciated!)
Keep providing flood information. (Prior leadership appreciated!)
Keep reaching out to businesses as you are doing now since businesses sometimes
feel that City doesn't care about them
Zoning Permitted Uses in MIC:
Rezone south MIC to Office
Keep industrial area as is because it's working!
Retain large industrial areas with industrial neighbors
Encourage more non industrial uses, including quality hotel and more restaurants
Allow only industrial uses in area
Encourage more non industrial uses including office services and restaurant
Provide a transitional buffer that allows commercial uses that could serve both
residents and industrial employees
Allow more offices in area (to generate customers for cafe)
Public Works Transportation
Better timing for lights on E. Marginal (They seem better now, but had been a
problem)
Install a traffic light at S. 112 and E. Marginal
Concern over proposed bike lane on E. Marginal
Relocate E. Marginal to the west to allow planes to cross more easily
Permittinp,:
Faster permitting
More certainty
Provide permitting assistance and advice for businesses
Provide more notice for business license renewals since larger companies need
more than a month to get through their administrative review
Transit /lip,ht rail:
Support a light rail stop on E. Marginal
Light rail E. marginal
Better access to public transportation
W: \Long Range Projects \MIC Study \CAP_5 -23-11 \Attachment B Issues &OppsReport-- complete.doc
Page 58
68
Taxes bureaucracv:
Reduce taxes
Keep noBEt0
Less bureaucracy to make things easier, friendlier for businesses
Public Safetv:
Provide more police patrols, presence
Provide more emergency training to businesses from Police and Fire Departments
Police and Fire need to cooperate better between themselves
Purchasing/ sates:
The City should buy tires from us through its procurement process
Encourage business development so we have more customers
Landscaping- /Maintenance:
Trim trees and bushes on E. Marginal for safety and visibility
Require less landscaping... trees limit business visibility
Other regulations:
City work w /State, federal government to change paint regulations
Monitor City actions for impacts on businesses
City support:
Retain City support for Rock and Roll Marathon!
Provide assistance to businesses in hiring skilled people
Sign Code:
Consistent enforcement needed
Other:
Mayor Haggerton has been supportive of Museum programs through his
participation
W: \Long Range Projects \MIC Study \CAP_5 -23-11 \Attachment B Issues &OppsReport-- complete.doc
Page 59
69
e0 p-
ii v, O P
City of Tukwila
Manufacturing /Industrial Area Survey
Date:
Name
Company /Position
Address
City /State /Zip
Phone Fax
Email
BACKGROUND INFORMATON
1. What are the primary goods and /or services that you manufacture or provide from this location?
Manufacture Van Bodies Commercial /industrial painting for big trucks
Repairs
Housing
Warehouse Office
Audio, lighting video installation for concerts and other performances
Office product /furniture /copy product distribution
Operations for health care, including distribution center, warehousing, repackaging, centralized
labs, data center, claims processing, call centers, billing
Truck sales service (retail, wholesale)
Manufacture apparel for men and women
Tire sales, including trucks /cars /backhoes
USPS Mail processing for western region
Aluminum, titanium, specialty steel manufacturing
Contract carrier (trucking)
Machinery and gear cutting for heavy industry (fishing, logging, cranes, printing)
Truck and trailer parts distribution and repairs
Storage of digital data servers /offices /warehouses /distribution center
Dispatch, maintain, and fuel buses
Distribute office furniture systems for schools, hospitals, offices
Food and beverage cafe and catering
Office— advocacy for industry and manufacturing
Manufacture, distribute specialty snack foods
Aviation museum
Delivery service
Aircraft manufacturing /airport
Service
Service
W: \Long Range Projects \MIC Study \CAP_5 -23 -11 \Attachment B Issues &OppsReport-- complete.doc
Page 60
70
2. How long has the company been located at this address?
7 years
2 years
4 years (in Park for 7 years)
15 years
11 years (25 years in Tukwila)
6
40 years
14 years
69
6 years
21
33 years
10 years
31 years
14 years
15 years
4
20
15 years
82 years
50
8 years
3. Is the company an owner or a tenant at this location?
Owner 9
Tenant 14 *one company has ground lease but owns building)
4. In the last 3 years, has your business:
Increased 6
Decreased 11
Stayed the same 4
5. Approximately how many employees currently work at this location?
Full time
7
12
59
1800
39
34
15
600
165
20
7
48
60
W: \Long Range Projects \MIC Study \CAP_5 -23-11 \Attachment B Issues &OppsReport-- complete.doc
Page 61
71
600
45 (35 office, 10 installation -70% can work remotely)
40
45 30 (temp)
144
60
3
37
25
65
Part time
22 -25
40
Up to 140 (during holiday season up to 20% of business)
30 -50
3
6. How many employees do you anticipate at this location 3 to 5 years from now?
Full time
10
16
75
1800
45*
50
19
600
220
20
10
48
60 -62
600 (depends on vote, budget)
45 (Same as 2011)
43 -45
70 (want to turn 30 temps into permanent, full -time)
144 (same as 2010)
1
Part-time
30
55
30 -50 (same as 2010)
2
Will stay below 50. Thinks there is bias against blue collar jobs
Balance out workforce by using more internet, offsite warehouse
Currently using State shared work program that offsets any hours between 24 /week and 40 /week.
This keeps workers at full time.
W: \Long Range Projects \MIC Study \CAP_5 -23 -11 \Attachment B Issues &OppsReport-- complete.doc
Page 62
72
LOCATION FACTORS
7. Please indicate how important each factor is to you when deciding on an operating location for your
business.
Very Somewhat
Important important
Facility Characteristics
Room to Expand 15 5
Comment: Would expand here
if land available, but instead will
expand elsewhere
Comment: Would like to
expand, but no property
available... current property not
too good for their
manufacturing /office /warehouse
needs
Ground floor 14 4
occupancy Comment:warehouse
Comment: Need more
warehouse space
Loading Bay 11 4
Corn ment:wa rehouse
High Ceilings 14 5
Comment: warehouse
Other (Please Comment: Space for 40 yd,
specify) dumpster loading dock
Comment:Warehouse Space
Comment: Office /wa rehouse
space. Just remodeled to put in
2 nd floor
Comment:Freeway access
Comment:Access to power and
fibreoptic cable
Comment: Built building to
own specifications /needs
Site Characteristics
Cost of land /rent 17 4
Comment: South end is good
for distribution via trucks that
go all over
Comment: Lease up 3/31/11.
Will probably need to move
since suitable property not
available at affordable rate.
Cannot fix current space.
Outdoor storage 5 2
Adequate parking 15 4
Comment: Impt. for trucks,
employees
W: \Long Range Projects \MIC Study \CAP_5 -23 -11 \Attachment B Issues &OppsReport-- complete.doc
Page 63
73
Very Somewhat
Important important
Comment: wish light
rail /commuter rail /van had
converged as planned. Poor
connections w /north
Comment: Trucks need
parking
Comment: Had considered
employee parking garage
(drivers)
Access to transit 7 6
Comment:helps employees
Comment:wish were better;
cars don't fit w /corporate image
Comment: Light rail desired on
Boeing Access
Comment: Wish there were
better transit service!
Comment: No transit on east
side of airport
Comment: Wish transit were
better
High visibility 4 9
Comments: Site is a bit hard Comment:
to find. Not a problem for Would be nice, but
customers, but can be a don't want to pay
problem for visitors. Comment:
Comment: Important for Helps, but not that
tenants impt.
Comment: Not in
retail, so not really
impt.
Large truck 18 2
access Comment: Receive supplies
Comment: Truck access is a
bit tight on site, ok from I -5 and
Highway 99
Rail access 1 1
7 4
Separation from Comment: Company makes Crime (concern that
residential areas noise, and would disturb homes residents will break
Comment: Big truck noise in)
would disturb residents
Comment:$80 MM spent on
sound insulation for homes
affected by noise! Height
restriction areas
Comment: Make lots of noise.
Residential creeoinq in
Labor
Close to 3
management
W: \Long Range Projects \MIC Study \CAP_5 -23-11 \Attachment B Issues &OppsReport-- complete.doc
Page 64
74
Very Somewhat
Important important
Close to skilled 7 2
labor Comment: location good for
attracting employee base
Comment: Union shop
Comment: Convenient for
workers
Close to unskilled 5 1
labor Comment: location good for
attracting employee base
Business Links
Proximity to 12 2
customers Comment: Unified Grocers is Comment: all on
only client. Must be close! I -5
Comment: Boeing
Comment: Downtown Seattle,
Kent Valley, Duwamish. When
UPS was shut due to Nisqually
Quake, airport substituted
Proximity to 7 5
suppliers /services Comment:Close to
subcontractors, freeway access
Comment: Need good access
to suppliers for delivery stream
of parts /inventory items i.e.
engines, transmissions, paint,
glass, commodities (diesel, oil)
Comment: Come in on trucks
(Please specify) Comment: United /supplier in All over the area
Renton Comment: all on I-
Comment— suppliers out of 5
state Comment: UPS
Proximity to 5
Competitors Comment: Loa n
tools to competitors
Pleasant area for 9 5
employees Comment:would like more Comment:
amenities for healthy lifestyles. (accessible to all
Difficult to access running who live in various
walking trails places)
Comment: Amenities needed
in area
Comment: Use trail
Comment: Wish were better!
Transportation
Ease of access to 15 1 2
W: \Long Range Projects \MIC Study \CAP_5 -23 -11 \Attachment B Issues &OppsReport-- complete.doc
Page 65
75
Very Somewhat
Important important
downtown Comment: Highway 99
Seattle Comment: 70% of customers
in downtown Seattle
Comment: Buses use
dedicated on -ramp on SR 519
Comment: No light rail! No
choice but to drive car! Need
better connection to Capitol Hill
Comment: Physically close,
mentally far
Ease of access to 16
major highways Com ment:Tacoma/ Everett,
eastern WA
Comment: Deliver from
Bellingham to Lakewood,
Issaquah w/9 trucks
Comment: Good location for
serving Bellevue, Tacoma,
Seattle
Comment: Distribution center
Comment: Excellent freeway
access
Comment: Good access from
I -5 Highway 99
Ease of access to 1 3
rail transport
Ease of access to 5 5
Port of Seattle Comment:Kenmore Air people
take SeaTac shuttle to KCIA
Ease of access to 8 8
airport Comment: Provide support *Staff flies to
service to LINK from Tukwila Spokane medical
location centers
Comment: Take clients to
airport
Other (please
specify)
Problems/ Concerns in Tukwila location
Traffic 7 3
Congestion Comment: Hard to get to Comment -Would
SCTR to buy parts have liked
Comment: Hard to get to undergrounding.
SCTR Congestion on E.
Comment: ok on City 2streets. Marginal
Congested on highways
Comment: Access ramp is
critical! Using E. Marginal would
be very bad.
No room to 6 4
W: \Long Range Projects \MIC Study \CAP_5 -23 -11 \Attachment B Issues &OppsReport-- complete.doc
Page 66
76
Very Somewhat
Important important
expand Comment: Would
like more space in
building... not
available
High Rents 5 3
*Will leave when rent is up *(rent is high, but
if go to Auburn then
farther awav)
High land costs 4
Comment: Cheaper than in
downtown Seattle
Public 12 2
Safety/crime (Had car prowl /theft —don't see Comment:
patrols) Good police force
(Fire did good inspection) Comment:
Comment: Safety/crime next Some property
to walkway, near footbridge. damage incidents,
Always keep door locked. cars stolen
Comment: Lots of night -time
crime -3 police repts.
in 30 days (burglary, theft,
Comment: Good personal
safety response. 911 response
good. Property crime —not so
good. Suggestions to try
cameras not so helpful.
Comment: Theft issues. Some
break ins, but mostly people
steal from outdoor storage.
Good police response
Comment: Car issues,
breaking windows
Comment: Ok. Had car
prowls. Good interaction
w /Police
Comment: Late night /early
a.m. car prowls
Comment: Have own police
force. Good relations w /Tukwila
Police
Comment: Police response
good
Permit 5 2
Costs /Delays (High pile storage permit $100 Comment: Costs
from F.D.) ok,
(Rack permit is aggravating— responsiveness /delay
set to low) not so good /hard to
Comment: Permitting sort of schedule inspection
hard for 2 nd story addition to install large
Comment: MIC Zoning not machine
exact fit so permitting was
W: \Long Range Projects \MIC Study \CAP_5 -23-11 \Attachment B Issues &OppsReport-- complete.doc
Page 67
77
Very Somewhat
Important important
somewhat involved. Done fine
w/o surprises. Other work was
remodels just fine.
Comment: Too many
requirements i.e.seismic
testing for lean -to for keeping
rain off spare parts!
Comment: Delays cause
uncertainty. Outside storage
inspection building folks
Comment: Bldg permit
requirements too intense, silly
requests
Comment: No problem.
Landlord takes care of
improvements, permits
Comment: All fees
increasing —Fire inspection is
$500
Flood concerns 1 3
Comment: Greatest
fear is gone
Business climate 6 1
Comment: Good here (Seems ok)
Comment: City Council doesn't
like business
Comment: Good business
climate
Regulations 3 1
Comment: Enforcement is
problem... inconsistent
Comment: Shoreline
regulations unwieldy
W: \Long Range Projects \MIC Study \CAP_5 -23-11 \Attachment B Issues &OppsReport complete.doc
Page 68
78
Very Somewhat
Important important
I I
Other (Pls. Comment: Very good that
specify) fibreoptic cable is coming into
building to attract tenants
w /higher technical capabilities
Comment:Parking priced right!
Comment: Work w /Tukwila on
stormwater drainage, Superfund
sites. Have paid several $MM
Other Comments:
Comment: Their lease stipulates that 102 Bridge shall stay open! Must not close!
Comment: Tukwila has no "center." Don't think of Tukwila as having a sense of "place"
Comment: Lots of exposure on E. Marginal Way, but traffic goes fast and speed can be a problem.
Comment: Traffic Congestion
TUKWILA LOCATION DECISION
8. Did you move to this location from elsewhere?
Yes 16
No 4
If yes, where from where did you move?
Moved from another Tukwila location
Kent
Moved from another building in same Tukwila business park. Now own building; good to
generate revenue through tenants.
Moved from operations center from Renton; other functions from Seattle
Other Tukwila (13123 48 Ave S.)
Seattle (Elliott Ave.)
Seattle (needed larger facility)
Small warehouse on Harbor Island
Seattle —I Avenue S.
Seattle (needed more space)
Downtown Seattle—
Seattle
Interbay
Seattle Center
Seattle— Spokane Street
Seattle Georgetown
9. Why did you choose your current Tukwila location?
Want to be close to I -405 I -5 to serve Tacoma Everett
Cheaper rent
Location, location, location. Good for distribution, and also for employee management
convenience. Train ride from Auburn was faster than bus from SCTR
Wanted to consolidate operations into one space, and also lower cost (cheaper than fixing
previous building continuing to rent highrises)
Available space when company split into two parts
W: \Long Range Projects \MIC Study \CAP_5 -23-11 \Attachment B Issues &OppsReport-- complete.doc
Page 69
79
Lower rent /Proximity to I -5 /1-ocation along River /Warehouse space available /plenty of
parking
Worked w /Sabey Co. /very astute
Cost, convenience, location
More space
No B 0 tax in Tukwila!
Opportunity for reasonably priced land
Fits business model —buses don't need to travel too far.
Logistically good for serving both S. King County downtown back in reasonable time
period
Quality of building, and physical characteristics (parking, high ceilings, loading dock and
bay)
Freeway access to serve Bellevue, Seattle, Tacoma
Co- location w /Museum of Flight
Location, rent facility included both office manufacturing.
Proximity of public land adjacent to airport
Own ground lease for Aviation HS
Larger facility w /cheaper rent
Flat land in flood plain 80+ years ago. Wanted to provide facilities that would prevent
Boeing from moving to California.
Wanted to be near light rail station
Easy access to highways.
No trucking restrictions when bringing in supplies
NEIGHBORS
10. What businesses or industries would be your ideal neighbors?
Suppliers! Would like to have suppliers (i.e. glass shop) but they have all moved south due
to lower rent. Do not have reciprocal business with other firms in vicinity
Construction firms, wholesalers, noisy people with lots of in and out
Would like industrial companies w/o a lot of foot traffic
Other trucking companies— Overnight trucking, Horizon Ford
Apparel factory
Commercial trucking
Prefer neighbor w /lots of truck traffic like they have
Boeing has been good neighbor
Don't care
Pipe fitter
Truck or trailer repair or welding. Tire dealers.
Growth businesses technology companies, aerospace industry, young professionals
Truck/transportation- related i.e. rebuild shops, light trucking, truck courier, tire shop
Office parks w/ midsized businesses who would buy their products
Would like more workers nearby, and more through traffic to use cafe
Other tourist attractions to develop critical mass and synergy
Don't know...
Cargo carriers /aircraft manufacturing /UPS sorting facilities /air shippers
Any and all neighbors fine as long as they don't interfere w /property or create negative
impacts
Really like current neighbors i.e. UPS, Federal Express, Harris Trucking since they can use
our services
Industrial neighbors
11. What are the benefits or problems for your business of having non industrial neighbors
such as office, retail, residential or mixed residential /commercial?
W: \Long Range Projects \MIC Study \CAP_5 -23-11 \Attachment B Issues &OppsReport-- complete.doc
Page 70
80
Glass shop was nice since company could buy from them
Concert equipment rental is too noisy for office /warehouse neighbors and would prefer
industrial neighbors since the noise wouldn't bother them
Non industrial generates too much foot traffic. Was going to rent to temp agency, but didn't
want lots of people hanging around.
More restaurants more people functions for employees
No benefit Problems include perception that industrial activity is "dirty", conflicts between
trucks other vehicles
More options for places to eat. No downsides
Retail— negative impact due to truck traffic
Office —ok
Non- industrial neighbors may have problems with 24 hour industrial operations, truck traffic
Residential would not like noise from shop operations
Noise from trains is a bit of a problem
No problem with residential neighbors. Could provide additional customers (i.e. boat, horse,
utility trailers for retail trade)
Need to have buffer between office and residential
Good to have clustering of office and technology
Need more amenities and access to light rail
GHC good neighbor, but there were problems with bus fumes interfering with office workers
in the past. No longer a problem.
Repair shop has negative visual impact, and should be separate from residential use.
Industrial use creates traffic /congestion, and should not be near residential uses.
Would like more employee amenities (i.e. non industrial, such as restaurants, stores). Ideal
spot is Georgetown Design Center.
Would like office workers since want more people to use cafe
Would like to have similar "tourist destination" non industrial neighbors
No problem with non industrial. Need to "encourage all viable uses" to prevent further
decline
We create too much noise and would disturb non industrial neighbors
ADVANTAGES/ DISADVANTAGES OF TUKWILA LOCATION.
12. Currently, what are the primary advantaaes of your present location, and /or doing business
in Tukwila
Access to highways and customers
Freeway access
Access to downtown Seattle without having to be located there
Convenient location for distribution of products and employees' commute
Location including accessibility to I -405, I -5, airport cost
Central location
Freeway access
Lots of potential
Plenty of Parking
Freeway Access
Airport access
Lots of windows, nice high ceilings in building
Well- known, established in Tukwila location
Cheaper than Seattle
Location proximity to downtown processing facility
W: \Long Range Projects \MIC Study \CAP_5 -23 -11 \Attachment B Issues &OppsReport-- complete.doc
Page 71
81
Good transportation network (I -5, downtown, Airport Way)
We're already here
Convenient primary clients (Unified Grocer Hagen)
Good proximity to suppliers, customers, freeway access
NoB &Otax
Quick police response
Good access to roads.
Central location for stores in Tacoma (south) and Everett (north)
Sufficient space in good building w /dock access
Location
Availability of power, fiberoptics.
Workforce
Good business climate
Location is isolated from others —good!
Ready freeway access
Isolated from residential so that industrial use doesn't affect negatively
Access! Ability to serve Bellevue, Seattle, Tacoma at a reasonable price
Easy north /south access (Tacoma, Seattle, Bellevue)
Free parking
Meeting rooms rented out during day, and Museum rents out after hours for events
Airport location with aviation uses friendly colleagues
Room available for expansion
Access to highways
Boeing adjacency facilitates participation in programs (Would like to develop similar relationship with
all industrial uses!)
Tukwila is relatively close to Seattle and Bellevue, yet far enough south to have office parks
Close to downtown and SeaTac (synergy!)
Wholesale /distribution tenants of airport benefit from location
Not much interaction with City of Tukwila (permits, licenses through King County)
Freeway airport access
Heart of everything— Alaska Marine lines and truck lines. Can ship anywhere, anytime.
Location near customers
Location near Seattle
Access to highways
Access to airports
Location near suppliers and customers
Access to highways
Access to highways
Location near Seattle
13. What are the disadvantages of your current location and /or doing business in Tukwila?
Comment: S. 116 St. location is a bit isolated, and would like a bit more police presence in
north of area.
Comment: Crime. Have been broken into during regular hours, although not after hours.
Salesperson had car broken into. People get into dumpster to steal. Must lock.
Comment: Perception that Tukwila is too far south therefore hard to access
Comment: Sign code should allow more signs, including A- frames, more directional signs
Security is problem w /break ins, drug people
Permitting process was slow when 2n floor addition was built.
Land cost is higher as compared with Auburn but, don't want to pay drivers to drive to and from
Auburn.
W: \Long Range Projects \MIC Study \CAP_5 -23 -11 \Attachment B Issues &OppsReport-- complete.doc
Page 72
82
Lack of amenities including parts, trails, employee transportation options, better public
transportation, bus service.
Miss light rail stop and convergence of transit, light rail, highways, employment
High rent
Difficult regional traffic
Lack of truck amenities —most truck people have relocated to Pierce County for cheaper land. No
truck stops or truck wash facilities
No real disadvantages. Employee population comes from all over the area, so its convenient
Site has poor visibility
Highway traffic congested
No real problems
Sometimes traffic congestion when going north
Bad business climate
Slow permitting
Superfund cleanup /state laws attitudes (Not really a Tukwila regulatory problem, but a problem in
this location)
Crime (breaking and entering) at neighbors (Eagle Goodyear)
Not enough police /need electric fence
Big accounts moving from Seattle to Kent
No real problems. High rent may become a problem.
Impact fees —Parks and fire Business doesn't generate the calls and doesn't use parks... retailers
generate ambulance /fire calls. Fees disproportionate
Relationship between Seattle City Light and City of Tukwila should be improved. Improvements on
TIB were problem.
Permitting *don't know specific concern!)
High water table near river —water gets into underground tanks
Physical and psychological distance to Seattle (from employees' viewpoint)
Isolated for east /west traffic pattern due to Duwamish, KCIA, 116 St. Bridge closure
Lose tourists due to distance from downtown Seattle and lack of direct access
Not near schools or neighborhoods.
Very complex airspace w /in which to operate /one of worst in US. Three airports w /in 6 miles (KCIA,
SeaTac, Renton), and also west north are Bremerton, Bangor and Paine Field.
Restrictive zoning with lack of flexibility in accommodating a wide range of uses
Negative business climate in Tukwila
Too few services for employees in area
Need better transit service
FUTURE LOCATION DECISIONS
13.A. What would cause your company to leave its Tukwila location and why?
High rent Cheaper in South King County
Like Tukwila and will not move
No plans to move. Could move if lower cost facility combined with better opportunity for
brand /image /access /environment
Inability to continue renting outdoor storage space from City Light
Real estate costs
Big business drop
To get larger facility and consolidate with other postal processing facilities
If /when primary client leaves, they will follow
When expand in future, will get more offsite i.e. cheaper warehouse space, rather than
expanding in Tukwila
If business model no longer made sense...
W: \Long Range Projects \MIC Study \CAP_5 -23 -11 \Attachment B Issues &OppsReport-- complete.doc
Page 73
83
(Company has just moved to Kent —Lease came up and rents were lower. If Tukwila facility
had had a high loading dock, they would probably have negotiated and stayed in Tukwila)
14. If your company were to consider a move, what areas would you consider and why?
a. Other Tukwila 2
b. City of Seattle 3
Looked at Georgetown
Georgetown (Design Center) psychologically closer to downtown
Higher density area i.e. AGC Building on S. Lake Union
c. South King County 7
Kent or Auburn –the farther south, the cheaper
Maybe Kent, due to lower rental costs
Costs, land availability, meet service profile for buses since most servie starts
outside of Seattle
(Company just moved to Kent —lower rents high loading dock)
South KC has cheaper warehouse space... but, SR 167 is always slow, and I -5 is too
residential
d. Other Western Washington 1
Pierce County
Tacoma
Lynnwood
e. Other
Shift business to overseas plants
Will probably purchase. Depends on ROI
Reston, VA
Did you know that.large portions of the Kent Valley are in the flood plain?
Yes 1 No
CITY OF TUKWILA ACTIONS
15. How do City of Tukwila policies/ regulations or actions currently constrain /limit your business?
None really. Would like to be able to wash trucks outside, but...
No problems
Problems with sign code —too few signs allowed for each business. Bought expensive sign
can't use
Problems w /vactor cleaning /NPDES enforcement. Need longer than 30 days to clean storm
drains
Feel that inspectors are overstepping codes
No problems
Permitting is difficult —Hard to get large machinery installed
Impact fees
No problems
Sign code -Need larger /better signage for cafe
Need Fire Code to allow special events tenting
Need better, larger campus signage
Need better snow plow services
W: \Long Range Projects \MIC Study \CAP_5 -23 -11 \Attachment B Issues &OppsReport-- complete.doc
Page 74
84
Would like more flood info
Would like more advance information/ notice on land use actions. City needs to be more
proactive. Did not like Sabey rezone process —Plans call for too high concentration of people
w /too tall buildings so close to airport.
Lack of flexibility in accommodating viable (non industrial uses
Would like faster permitting with more certainty
16. What actions by the City of Tukwila could help your company's existing operations and /or future
plans?
Comment: Would like more advance notice on renewals for business licenses. One month not
enough to go through big company's administration
Maybe faster permitting, and more certainty. Challenging to get 2� floor built
Would like more commercial businesses to sell to Encourage business development.
Get light rail stop at Boeing Access Road!
Provide consistent sign code enforcement —Go after illegal signs
Would like City of Tukwila to buy tires from them (i.e. police cars, dump trucks, cars,
backhoes etc.)
Reduce taxes /bureaucracy to make it easier, friendlier to do business
Provide help in hiring skilled people
Provide more police patrols, presence
Retain no B &O tax structure
Provide rezones of southern MIC areas to office
Support a light rail stop on E. Marginal!
Allow more offices in area (generate more business for cafe)
Provide better access to public transportation
Traffic on E. Marginal when lights change —Time lights better?
Trim street trees /require less landscaping— street trees limit visibility. Museum wants to be
seen better.
Better communication with affected parties
Adapt processes to fit real demands —Study this by removing all distinctions created by large
property owners in the area (i.e. Boeing, KCIA, GHC)
Ask City to work w /State and Federal govts to change paint regulations
Would like more certainty for permit review
Would like quicker permit review
17. Do you have any suggestions or comments that you would like to communicate to the City of
Tukwila?
Keep supporting Rock and Roll Marathon
Had some problems w /last R R Marathon Police wanted to remove stages but the streets
were closed.
Website— Include "How are we doing" feature for anonymous feedback
Business Cards Include "Did this person do a good job" feature
Revise forms to get email address for every contact
Send alerts to businesses i.e. don't turn off your electricity or pipes
Website— Showcase a business each month
Concern over flood Tukwila did excellent job informing previous, but now company would
like to know what's happening
Trim brush and street trees on E. Marginal to be sure that they don't block sightlines when
pulling out of driveway. Don't want too much landscaping
Need stop light S. 112 in order to pull out into traffic on E. Marginal. Light rail should
have put in stop light since its pillars obstruct vision
Tukwila was good leader in flood prep (info sharing)
W: \Long Range Projects \MIC Study \CAP_5 -23 -11 \Attachment B Issues &OppsReport-- complete.doc
Page 75
85
Would like more frequent emergency training, and more shared information training
w /Tukwila Police Fire
Tukwila Police and Fire need to cooperate better between themselves.
Check timing of lights on E. Marginal Way (They seem better now; had been a problem.)
Mayor Haggerton has been very supportive through participation in programs.
Keep reaching out to business (as you are doing now) since businesses sometimes feel that
City of Tukwila doesn't care about them.
Concerns over proposed bike lane on E. Marginal Way
Move E. Marginal Way
Keep industrial area as is since it is working!
Keep large industrial areas with industrial neighbors
Monitor city actions for impacts on local industrial businesses
Provide permitting assistance and advice for businesses
Encourage more non industrial uses in area, including quality hotel and more restaurants
Allow only industrial uses in area
Encourage more non industrial uses, including retail, restaurant, office services
Provide more of a transitional buffer that allows commercial uses that could service both
residents and employees
18. Is there anyone else that we should talk to?
Name
Contact info
Anticipated trends for industrial
area
W: \Long Range Projects \MIC Study \CAP_5 -23 -11 \Attachment B Issues &OppsReport-- complete.doc
Page 76
86
ATTACHMENT C
Manufacturing/Industrial Center Comments on Issues and Opportunities Report
April 14, 2011 Open House
Comineaat 5 Z, ta pon'tme at /analyses /opteons
ar g' �a a a
n
a ate /source
A
k 3� k 4Y
s t^," p
x rr rFt A, .o y
A. TRANSPORTATION
1. Alternate Routing for BNSF freight through Allentown 4/14/11 Staff recommends the following
residents new Comprehensive Plan:
verbal Implementation strategy "Seek
comments to alternative routing for
staff
No specific routing has been
identified. This is currently a 2011-
2016 CIP project
2. Truck Traffic on 44th Ave. S. near 112th -1) Residential 4/19/11 The area around S. 112th is a
area affected by truck traffic. Yukiko trucking services node, and is zoned
Tanaka for MIC. Some of this traffic may
(email) be BNSF related. Staff proposes
the following: "Actively seek
alternative railroad related freight
routing away from residential
streets in Allentown.
3. Light rail stop at Boeing Access Road 4/18/22 Issues and Opportunities
Suzanne recommends new Comprehensive
Hittman Plan policy: "Pursue light rail and
(mailed commuter rail stops in vicinity of
comment) Boeing Access Road"
B. ZONING/BOUNDARIES
Support industrial activities and retain industrially- 4/14/11 Staff zoning recommendations limit
zoned land in the MIC Marilyn non industrial uses to support
(written industrial and manufacturing
comment) activity. Issues Opportunities
4/18/11 report supports retaining MIC.
Suzanne
Hittman
(mailed
comment)
RF 1 05/17/2011
W: \Long Range Projects \MIC Study\ CAP_ 5- 23- 11 \AttachmentC-- All.comments. 4.14.11.doc
87
ATTACHMENT C
Boundaries 1) Request Allentown rezone to extend MIC 4/13/11- -Pat Comprehensive Plan priority for
for additional industrial use from E. side 46th S., south to Malara retaining/enhancing residential
122nd East to 44th Place S, all of 44th pl. S.) (email) areas does not support this
expansion of MIC zoning
Boundaries/Uses 4/14/11 —Bill Staff recommendation to maintain
2)Request Possible rezone of MIC south of Boeing Access Summers current MIC boundaries in this
Road to SR 599 to allow additional non industrial use (verbal area.
comment)
C. STRENGTHENING/MAINTAINING MIC
Importance of maintaining MIC zoning, and 4/18/11 Staff recommends maintaining MIC
strengthening industrial uses Suzanne area and zoning to provide
Hittman sufficient land for industrial
(written activity.
comment)
4/14/11
Marilyn
Skogland
(written
comment)
D. SERVICES FOR EMPLOYEES
Lack of parking on E. Marginal Way for bus riders Is 4/19/11 It would be necessary to speak
there potential for using private lots with excess capacity? Yukiko with private property owners re
Tanaka potential parking arrangements.
(email)l Parking permit required.
Additional restaurants, services are needed as amenities 4/14/11— Retail services to serve employees
Sven Bitners are permitted. Staff
(verbal recommendation makes certain uses
comment) (i.e. health club, barber shop, etc.)
conditional, rather than permitted.
E. OTHER
Access for landlocked property 4/14/11 Property owner will need to work
Property owner requests access /driveway for property located (Verbal with State, Federal government and
north of Boeing Access Road between I -5 and BNSF rails Comment) BNSF for right -of -way issues.
RF 2 05/17/2011
W: \Long Range Projects \MIC Study\ CAP_ 5- 23- 11 \AttachmentC-- All.comments. 4.14.11.doc
88
ATTACHMENT D
WRITTEN COMMENTS RECEIVED
PRIOR TO
PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING
(4/ 2cv 1 11 N
89
'APR 1 2011
HERE ARE MY COMMENTS ON THE
MANUFACTURINGANDUSTRIAL CENTER (MIC)
UPDATE:
-4�
a
',tie
Please provide your contact ormation if you'd like to receive updates:
Name:
Address: p
Phone: g'
Email:`
I'd like to discuss this further. Please contact me:
90
HERE ARE MY COMMENTS ON THE
MANUFACTURINGANDUSTRIAL CENTER (MIC)
UPDATE:
(4 vw
rCimmld
[V /0
Please provide your contact information if you'd like to receive updates:
Name:
Address:
Phone:
Email:
I'd like to discuss this further. Please contact me:
Mtn
91
(04/19/2011) T Rebecca Fox comment on manifactunng /industrial center hearing page 1
From: Yuki Tanaka <foxytanaka @yahoo.com>
To: <rfox ci.tukwila.wa. us>
Date: 04/18/2011 4:24 PM
Subject: comment on "manifacturing/industrial center hearing
Dear MIC
As a relatively new resident of Tukwila, I'd like to express my opinion in regard to MIC issue.
1. 1 live on 44th Av S near 112th St and I realize how much traffic of huge industrial tracks go by daily. I
am in fact surrounded by commercial/industrial facilities. I moved here because I liked a bit of rural feel in
my immediate neighborhood. I do now want any more industrial build up, which will distroy a good feel it
so far maintains (with enough trees still standing)
2 1 follow the recommendation of "ride bus, not drive a car" and go downtown, UW, Seattle Center, etc by
bus #124, 1 am satisfied with the bus service but have problem of finding parking space near my bus stop.
It is a bit far to walk from my house. Despite much open space on or by E Marginal Way, no parking space
as the area are occupied by industrial /commercial businesses. And, Boeing takes up such huge open
space and their parking is near empty all the time. Is there anything the city can do to rectify this situation?
There is a Park and Ride, but going north from 112th, which is the last of one bus zone, I cannot use it.
Please make Tukwila a bit more residents friendly city.
Thank you,
Yukiko Tanaka
11685 44th Av S
Yuki Tanaka foxytanaka @yahoo.com
92
MI A1
From: �omm��@d1uk�|m.maua>
To: x�ox��oituhwi|a.wauu>
Date: 04/13/2011 3:57 PM
Subject: Mk�Comme�e
Email Address: pa1m��waatorn000nade.00m
Comments: /�pri|13.2O11
To The Tukxvka<�d Counsel
The stekernentbelow ia quoted from the TukwUa(�ommunhvDeve|pomentRepo� dated April 4th.2O11.
Issues and <]ppo�un�ieaRepo�.
%22Tukmi|a�,82ayN|(�ko approximately SGG acres along the DuwamkshRive[ bounded generally
by the (�dycf Sea�|eon the no�h.South 126th Street on the south, the Budington
Nodhernrailway ri0h�of'woyon the east, and the Tukwila (�itylimits on the xveaLThe
PW|Cio home 0o over 14.O0O jobs, and provides aeign�icantpo�ionofTukwi|e9�S2o
econonnioacdvd�4
y.22
The business own, VVeobenn(�aocedeiain the boundheoao stated above. VVe have been doing business
in Tukwila for 24 years auofK8ay7th.of this year.VVo offer union paid jobs and mxoeUentbmnifito.Since
2O0Omy business has resided on3 acres of �yw�hintheboundriaaao stated |n the quoted
statement above, (12065 44th place south.) Unfodunai|ythe [�ityelected to not include myfaoiUb/inthe
original K8|��zoning.
This has been a burden to the business and ,aoidenda| community located wdhinAUentown.
The laws are mnodestricter ao stated in the {�ommujity Development report, making d very di#iou|t0o do
business. The (�ityconUnueoto make the reoidmnUa|oommunby believe that the Allentown area iasingle
family rmnidenda|. when infact the use has been mnanufacturingand industrial since 1SSG and wiU
condnumvv�hthe noi|naod.eirpod and highway. This community wiUa|vvayobe surrounded by the |'S.the
Budin0tonnJo�hernRailroad and Boeing Field. AUof them make lots of unregulated noise and don't o�mr
tax doUaroonthbudmnto the oommun�y.
C�omponimolike VVmstenn<�a000dehave been a good neighbor and have always looked for vvayotmdo
business m/�hthe least impa�on the oommnunity.
It ioUmo for the (�ib/ to look out for the best interest of the business and reoidentai|oommunUy located in
Allentown. |wmu|douoon�mendtha1tbm{�hybaopmnandhonea in��in0 the AUen1ownoommuhy know that the
8udin00onNodhennRailroad can ope�dem1vviUaa can the mirpo�and freeway system.
|�eaona4Gth avenue south on the meo side of the o�met 1o122ndsu/ south, then east to44t
place south and aUof44th place south from 468h a1 the no�h point bo124th aveto the south as &1|��.
Install a buffer zone on the bnundriea that would isolate truck traffic and |imi� the noise from the railroad.
This vvmu|dbeof great service to the nooidmnUa|and business community in Allentown. The zoning change
wiU0�athe residences that are vvithinthese bmundriaoa greater value for their pnmpe�y.
|am very vviUingto meet vvhbthe Planning ��omm�wionand Oepa�mentofCommunbydmvm|opem1to
discuss myidea.
am traveling this vxahk and can not attend the meeting onthe 14th April.
You can contact mmbyemaiLpatm�0vvmmtenmcaoomda.comoradmy off ice 28G-7S7-2151.
Reopeoffu|h/aubm�ed.
Pat yWa|ana. President
Page 1 of 1
Rebecca Fox Re: Fwd: Manufacturing Industrial Center (MIC)
From: Rebecca Fox
To: Kimberly Matej
Subject: Re: Fwd: Manufacturing Industrial Center (MIC)
On 4/26/2011 at 10:40 AM, in message <4DB70383.2010308 @comcast.net paem
paem2005@comcast. net> wrote:
Because I received the Hazelnut after the MIC meeting was concluded, I missed
the notice of the MIC meeting. See the extract following.
However, I would like to furnish my self evident humble comments:
Don't run up the cost of business by exacting a head tax on current and
prospective businesses! Moreover, keep fees at a rate that does not raise
revenues above the cost of the service provided. When 'you do that it is called a
tax which is an illegal ruse.
Thank you,
Paul Willoughby
Ref: The Hazelnut, April 2011, Volume 32, Number 1 (MIC)
We are looking for answers to these questions: How can the City of Tukwila help
grow the economy in its Manufacturing /Industrial Center? How do existing
Comprehensive Plan policies, zoning regulations and area boundaries protect or
discourage industrial activity? What changes, if any, are needed?
Interested? This is an opportunity to discuss these issues with property owners,
businesses and residents in the East Marginal Way South vicinity, and to provide
City staff with your ideas and feedback. We've done a preliminary investigation and
will share what we've found.
Visit our web page at www.ci.tukwila .wa.us /dcd /micstudv.html. and take a few
minutes to share your ideas and comments.
If you'd like more information, please contact Rebecca Fox at 206 431 -3683, or
email rfox(dci.tukwila.wa.us.
94
Paje 1 of 1
Rebecca Fox Alternate routes
s:.•�.,,,aUr'"fo- :fiit3ce._ .a..:.. sir "€��,gi+.Lt::.xsm- :.s r�:'�:�c..y> t- x�.._. ._a.xx:tcs.�.�...,ua___�,::..' T• ._ru.•ez�arra.,x�:�..:euc v.....,.a...
From: DONNA M ANDERSON
To:
Date: 04/26/2011 10:09 AM
Subject: Alternate routes
I am all for Burlington Northern using the north end of their lot or using 48th. It would be
good to have the trucks off of 50th Place South and 124th.
r. .��rn qtr r. i"n�n. _•,�n/!1 .__,nn,"Af'f7rinneccll/' 7lnnnnl nA In PIA 11
95
ATTACHMENT E
City of Tukwila
Planning Commission
Planning Commission (PC) Minutes
Date: April 28, 2011
Time: 6:30 PM
Location: City Hall Council Chambers
Present: Margaret Bratcher, Chair; Brooke Alford, Vice Chair; Commissioners, Thomas McLeod, Louise
Strander, David Shumate, Mike Hansen, and Aaron Hundtofte
Staff: Nora Gierloff, Deputy DCD Director, Rebecca Fox, Senior Planner, and Wynetta Bivens,
Planning Commission Secretary
Chair Bratcher opened the public hearing at 6:30 PM, and swore in those wishing to provide testimony.
Minutes: Commissioner McLeod made a motion to adopt the January 27, 201. 1. minutes and
Commissioner Alford seconded the motion. The motion was unanimously approved.
Staff received two public comment emails that were handed out to' the Commission.
Commissioner Strander recused herself from the meeting and all review .of the Tukwila Manufacturing
Industrial Center (MIC). She said that her family owns property in the area where the projects are being
considered and is concerned that she may not be impartial
Commissioner Hansen, employed by The Sabey Corporation, said tk The Sabey Corporation owns
property in the MIC and they will give testimony tonigh(on the manufacturing boundaries study. He said that
he would like to hear the testimony unless there are objections. He,intends to recuse himself if this item is
heard at the quasi-judicial hearing in May.
CASE NUMBER: PL 6-016
APPLICANT: City of Tukwila.
REQUEST: Recommendatioris for update eta Comprehensive Plan, zoning code and boundaries
for::Manufaeturing Industrial Center (MIC)
LOCATION Manufacturing Industrial Center, including approximately 966 acres bounded
generally by the City of Seattle on the north, South 125th Street on the south, the
Burlington Northern railway right -of -way on the east, and the Duwamish River
6rf the west
Rebecca Fox, Senior Planner, Department of Community Development, gave background on the review
process, and gave an overview of staff's recommendations. The Washington State Growth Management Act
requires jurisdictions'that are planningz under the act to periodically review and update their Comprehensive
Plan. The entire update is due to be completed by December 2014.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Comprehensive Plan Review:
1) Add an implementation strategy as follows:
Actively seek alternative railroad related freight routing away from residential streets in Allentown.
2) Add a new Comprehensive Plan Policy as follows;
Pursue light rail and commuter rail stops in the vicinity of the Boeing Access Road.
96 -Page 1 of 3
PC Hearing Minutes
April 28, 2011
Development Regulations Review:
I Delete several permitted uses and add them to conditional uses as follows:
Beauty and barbershops, banks, outpatient medical, indoor recreational facilities, hotels and
motels.
2) Reorganize and clarify the .MIC uses by adding verbiage on their expected impacts.
3) Add a design review requirement for offices.
4) Educational uses in the MIC should have a vocational focus.
5) Delete nightclubs, billiards or pool rooms, extended stay hotels and dormitories from permitted uses.
Boundary Review:
Change the zoning and Comprehensive Plan designation on the Duwamisfi Hill Preserve area to Low
Density Residential and add a Public Recreation Overlay to reflect it curr
Environmental Review:
Review the Planned Action document to see if it needs to be updated. This is an environmental document
that anticipates the impacts of development in advance 46-streamline.. project review.
Nora Gierloff, Deputy Director, Department of Community Development, explained that the schedule for the
MIC review is driven by the Council's desire to adopt the MIC changes before the expiration of the current
moratorium on non industrial uses expires in July`
TESTIMONY:
Joe Sabey, representative for The Sabey Corporation, asked the PC to consider an addition to the MIC
Boundary review. Mr. Sabey showed slides of a parcel inside the 62 acre unified grocer parcel, which he said
Ix
is currently zoned differenfN*om the rest `UHe requested i�he parcel be rezoned from MIC Heavy to
Commercial Light Industrialto make the entire site consistent. He said that 32 acres of the parcel are in
Tukwila and 30 acres are in Seattle. He sar`d that m 2007 the Tukwila portion was rezoned from MIC Heavy
to Commercial Light Industrial In' 00.0 the City of Sea.... ezoned the acres in Seattle from Industrial
Commercial ta`General Industrial This item is scheduled to go before the PC at a quasi-judicial public
hearing at a Iater date.
Bill Summers, owner of the old lied Lion Hotel, requested that the PC take a look at the entire MIC zone,
adjacent to Tukwila International Blvd and East Marginal Way. He stated that the zoning taking place there
and the zoning decisions are based on an image of a zone that does not exist. He said that the statistics are
very misleading as to wh at is reall., ening there. He suggested looking at the 15 of businesses that are
impacted by the changes made in the MIC zone. He also suggested allowing special zoning or flexibility for
businesses that really need t_;or they are going to go out of business because it is not an economically feasible
area.
Commissioner Alford said that it would be interesting to hear what the manufacturing uses are exclusively in
the area because it is unlike the other uses.
Ms. Fox listed various manufacturing uses in the area. She explained that the name "Manufacturing
Industrial Center" was determined by King County. She said a traditional manufacturing use may be different
from what's in the area, but the uses are manufacturing. She also said the zone is not specifically
manufacturing but is also industrial and there is a range of industrial activity that takes place in the area.
Staff addressed questions from the PC.
Page 2 of 3
97
PC Hearing Minutes
April 28, 2011
There were no further comments.
The public hearing was closed.
The Planning Commission deliberated.
Staff answered several additional questions for the PC.
COMMISSIONER ALFORD MADE A MOTION TO ACCEPT STAFFS RECOMMENDATIONS IN
THE ISSUES AND OPPORTUNITIES REPORT, INCLUDING TEXT AND MAPS ON CASE
NUMBER PL10 -016 AND TO FORWARD THEM TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THEIR
REVIEW. COMMISSIONER HANSEN SECONDED THE MOTION. ALLWERE IN FAVOR.
DIRECTOR'S REPORT
The Community Bank parcel will come to the PC in a quasi„judicralpublic hearing next month.
There was discussion on conflict of interest documentation that was handed out to the PC.
Chair Bratcher asked the new Commissioners to state their name for the record when they
speak.
Adjourned: 7:45 PM
Submitted By: Wynetta Bivens
Planning Commission Secretary
t
Page 3 of 3
98
Attachment F
��kwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor
1
i DL of Community De velopment Jack Pace, Director
•s:
Manufacturing /Industrial Center Update
Summary Planning Commission Recommendations
Tukwila Comprehensive Plan —Goals and Policies,
Add an implementation strategy to Tukwila Comprehensive Plan Policy 11.1.6 as follows:
Actively seek alternative railroad related freight routing away from residential streets in
Allentown.
Add a new Tukwila Comprehensive Plan Policy as follows:
Pursue light rail and commuter rail stops in the vicinity of Boeing Access Road.
Development Requlations Review
DELETE THE FOLLOWING FROM PERMITTED USES AND ADD TO CONDITIONAL USES:
Beauty and Barber Shops (TMC 18.36.020.3 and TMC 18.38.020.3)
Delete "Beauty or barber shops" from Permitted Uses
Add to Conditional uses Retail Sales (TMC 18.36.040.11 and TMC 18.38.040. 9.) (See
revised wording below)
Recreation Facilities (Commercial- indoor) Athletic or Health Clubs (TMC 18.36.020.28 and
TMC 18.36.020.28)
Delete Recreation Facilities (Commercial- indoor) athletic or health clubs from
Permitted Uses in MIC /L and MIC /H
Add the underscored changes to Conditional Use Retail Services (18.36.040.xx and
18.38.040xx) (See revised wording below)
Financial— Banking, mortgage and other services (TMC 18.38.020)
Delete Financial banking, mortgage and other services from Permitted Uses in MIC /H
6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #1.00.• Tukwila, Washington 98188 o Phone 206- 431 -3670 Fax 206- 431 -3665
99
Add the underscored changes to Conditional Uses, Retail Sales TMC 18.38.040.9 (See
revised wording below)
Outpatient and Emergency Medical and Dental
Add "Outpatient and emergency medical dental" to Conditional Use Retail Services
(TMC 18.36.040.11 and TMC 18.38.040.11) (See revised wording below)
MIC /L (Revised wording per discussion above regarding beauty and barber
shops, recreation facilities, and outpatient medical /dental)
Retail sales of health and beauty aids, prescription drugs, food, hardware,
notions, crafts and craft supplies, housewares, consumer electronics, photo
equipment, and film processing, books, magazines, stationery, clothing, shoes,
flowers, plants, pets, jewelry, gifts, recreation equipment and sporting goods,
and similar items; retail services such as beauty and barber shops, banks,
outpatient and emergencv medical and dental services, and health clubs, retail
sales and services are limited to uses of a type and size that clearly intend to
serve other permitted uses and /or the employees of those uses.
MIC /H (Revised wording per discussion above discussion above regarding
beauty and barber shops, recreation facilities, and outpatient
medical /dental, and financial services)
Retail sales of health and beauty aids, prescription drugs, food, hardware,
notions, crafts and craft supplies, housewares, consumer electronics, photo
equipment, and film processing, books, magazines, stationery, clothing, shoes,
flowers, plants, pets, jewelry, gifts, recreation equipment and sporting goods,
and similar items; retail services such as beauty and barber shops, financial
services, outpatient medical services, and health clubs; retail sales and services
are limited to uses of a type and size that clearly intend to serve other permitted
uses and /or the employees of those uses.
Hotel (TMC18.36.020.12 and TMC 18.38.020.14)
Delete Hotels and Motels from Permitted Uses in the MIC /L and MIC /H
Add to Conditional Uses in MIC /L and MIC /H
Motel (TMC 18.36.020.23 and TMC 18.38.020.27)
Delete Hotels and Motels from Permitted Uses in the MIC /L and MIC /H
Add to Conditional Uses in MIC /L and MIC /H
I�
100 Page 2of6 i
REORGANIZE AND CLARIFY:
Manufacturing
Reorganize manufacturing uses. Add the underscored wording to the permitted
manufacturing/ processing uses that explicitly states the potential impacts as follows:
TMC 18.36.020.17 -22, and 18.38.020 Manufacturing and industrial uses that
have little potential for creating off -site noise, smoke, dust, vibration or other,
external environmental impacts or pollution, including but not limited to
manufacturing, processing, assembling, packaging and /or repairing of:
a. Electrical or mechanical equipment, vehicles and machines including, but not
limited to, heavy and light machinery, tools, airplanes, boats or other
transportation vehicles and equipment;
b. Previously prepared metals including, but not limited to, stamping, dyeing,
shearing or punching of metal, engraving, galvanizing and hand forging
c. Food, including but not limited to, baked goods, beverages (including
fermenting and distilling), candy, canned or preserved foods, dairy products and
byproducts, frozen foods, instant foods and meats (provided that no slaughtering
is permitted);
d. Pharmaceuticals and related products, such as cosmetics and drugs;
e. Previously prepared materials including, but not limited to, bags, brooms,
brushes, canvas, clay, clothing, fur, furniture, glass, ink, paint, paper, plastics,
rubber, tile, and wood;
f. Electronic, mechanical or precision instruments such as medical and dental
equipment, photographic goods, measurement and control devices, and recording
equipment.
Reorganize and combine the listing of manufacturing uses permitted only in MIC /H and
add the underscored wording to preface the permitted manufacturing/ processing
uses as follows:
TMC 18.38.020 -13 19 -21 Manufacturing and industrial uses that have moderate
to substantial potential for creating noise, smoke, dust, vibration or other
external environmental impacts including, but not limited to:
a. Heavy metal processes such as smelting, blast furnaces, drop forging or drop
hammering;
b. Manufacturing, processing, assembly, packaging and repair of:
1) Chemicals, light metals, plastics, solvents, soaps, wood, coal, glass,
enamels, textiles, fabrics, plaster, agricultural products or animal products (no
rendering or slaughtering)
Page 3 of 6
101
2) Previously manufactured metals, such as iron and steel fabrication; steel
production by electric arc melting, argon oxygen refining and consumable
electrode melting, and similar heavy industrial uses.
ADD THE FOLLOWING:
Design Review for Office Uses (TMC 18.36.070 and TMC 18.38.070)
Require design review for new office uses in MIC /L and MIC /H. Add the following
underscored language in MIC /L and MIC /H:
18.36.070 Design Review
Administrative design review is required for all new office development, and
other developments within 300 feet of residential districts or within 200 feet of
the GreenlDuwamish River.
18.38.070 Design Review
Administrative design review is required for all new office development, and
other developments within 300 feet of residential districts or within 200 feet of
the GreenlDuwamish River
ADD THE FOLLOWING:
Offices including Schools and Studios for Self improvement
Add the following underlined wording to the MIC /L chapter Permitted Uses
18.36.020.24 and strike language about studios for self improvement.
Offices including, but not limited, to software development and similar uses,
financial services, schools ^nom' ctudi ^c for professional and vocational education
^r calf im r- eyement if associated with an established aviation, manufacturing, or
industrial use. and less than 20,000 square feet.
Add the following underlined wording to the MIC /L chapter Conditional uses
18.36.040.7 and strike language about studios for self improvement.
Offices including, but not limited, to software development
and similar uses, financial services, schools Gnd ctudi for professional and
vocational education ^r self _im r- Gyement if associated with an established
aviation, manufacturing or industrial use, 20,000 square feet and over.
Schools and studios for education or self improvement (TMC18.38.020.39)
Add the following underlined wording to the MIC /H chapter Permitted Uses
18.38.020.39 and strike language about studios for self improvement.
Page 4 of 6
102
Schools end studi for professional and vocational education or
e, if associated with an established aviation, manufacturing or
industrial use
CLARIFY THE FOLLOWING:
Colleges and Universities (TMC 18.36.040.1 and TMC 18.38.040.1)
Add the following underscored wording to the Colleges and Universities Conditional
Use category in MIC /L and MIC /H.
18.36.040.1 Colleges and universities with primarily vocational curriculum if
associated with an established aviation, manufacturing or industrial use
18.38.040.1 Colleges and universities with primarily vocational curriculum if
associated with an established aviation, manufacturing or industrial use
DELETE THE FOLLOWING:
Extended -Stay Hotel /Motel (TMC1 8.36.020. 10 and TMC 18.38.020.10)
Delete Extended -stay hotel /motel from Permitted Uses in MIC /L and MIC /H
Taverns, nightclubs (TMC18.36.020.37 and TMC18.38.020.43)
Delete "nightclubs" from Permitted Uses in MIC /L and MIC /H
Billiard or Pool Rooms (TMC 18.36.030.1 and TMC 18.38.030.1)
Delete billiard or pool rooms from Accessory Uses in MIC /L and MIC /H
Dormitory as an accessory use to other uses that are otherwise permitted or approved
conditional uses such as Universities, Colleges or Schools (TMC 18.36.030.2 and TMC
18.38.030.2)
Delete dormitory from Accessory Uses in MIC /L and MIC /H (TMC 18.36.030.2 and TMC
18.38.030.2).
Boundary Review
Duwamish Hill Preserve
Page 5 of 6
103
Change the Zoning and Comprehensive Plan designation from
Manufacturing/ Industrial Center -Light (MIC /L) to Low Density Residential (LDR) with a
Public Recreation Overlay to reflect the property's status as public open space.
Planned Action
Review Planned Action document to determine if an update is required.
W: \Long Range Projects \MIC Study\April 14 Workshop \Handout- Summary of Recommendation final.doc
Page 6 of 6
104
7 777 77
v
2
n
x g�
SN
�m N
"V"
r 914 SRI
*W
CZ
Wv�
t4jg �lg
V 1 y� h 4 4t 7 {4 A r�
V
x 'Y,P- F f'. f �Pr X )4 f 7 14
gYv
y �y u Q" i 7 .z^?, �..e .'...Qi"?, �!'.!tF",:a �.5..: i AZ,
�D
I
Ll L
I P. la P. P. a. u 11, a, 10, 1 <1 I Ll a
*Eli 77 7777
E
m r
IE
I A
R
'M
M -W� YW U. M:
pg
U
L'A
1-9 a I P. 10. 0, 0. 0. 0. U 19 'L I,, I I u
P. Pw a. I P. P., P. A, 4, 1 U Jaj a 0- a U
0, a. P, cn u P., s a, P.
u 9w Q u
aw s a u
u -d
19
P. P. a PW 0. P. on u a s a
u
u
z 0. u a u
cz
u U
Q
n r
0 9 a Al U P. PL.
O a Con P. u u
10
U co CIO P.
00 81�
U u
5
t3
L Z �t
gw o=
bf:'
cr X
a)
00 cc
-0 E
ca.
cc 9:6 1 Q
a) S
CIO
E
IAGT b C: 0 b u t
if 7
a 0 5 0 t ai P� 0 W 1= v
Z u
0
0 :3 0 r u Cc co
6b 0
0 tic 0
CO I o o 0 0 0 0 0
m pa W u u L) u u u u C) Ca w
C:'
0 1= C) CD CD C:, C' Z) C:) 1= C)
1= CD C14 M vl 10 C) C11 W) In m m i
rq
rq C'4 N r'4 cn 'n M en
105
`1
k V `ti
ta
y"�� A�
!y
w :T.
1r£ p
C:r a t ai p ''3� +•F� t r�:.. -i�;s E
ti i n
ea p
c r r# .r s a �'z x 1
U
U
iF
F r 2 r r p .y a c r G'��*
,t
o lal a I] I a I a I I I I I a I I a al Ialal
I aI a l l a I a IUlal Q I IaI I a I i� D ,te �I �D l U N
2 I'M G v P:t fd
t rr ry .f r h+�, •9 t d x ti�v y55 a3,�
r r'j v Fly
t E,..
T, I k c. 7• T v ti3 'r t s
f E4.
rz. r
?a�'' f
M
cF.'" ,.a:4i x"}�'s• is .x. ..x Y :E. v t _ki+ "p "y4 ,k. Y Cvi f 1*.. C
rn
x IaI I I
a I a Mai a I, U IaI._ I a a' IaIaI a
a
IaI a I�D I a l a IUIaI Q I IaI I a ICI a I a I �D I aIaI
a a a a a U a a a a s a s U
u
U
U a a :D a a U a Q a a a s �D a s
a
F
PM a a a U P. Q a �D a �D a, a.
U
a
a a a a U a a a U a a s
U
a
z lal a I a I I I I I I I l
a IaI I I I I"lal I I I I I I I lal"I
o IaI i I a IuI I I I I I I I I Ialal
o a Q a U a s
a d U P
a
m
a d U U
a
a Q d U �D U
A
.a
C
O
d� 3 0 cc a w¢ E mb
b o U oa o
o
N G vi y b0 .cd p A O •O N op U o0
V
d y II r• ri o y id ;cj a., -O co
0 on a Y y o b m .5 o
to to
o o Cam 2 oc i y
b0 p y cE o rn of rn :c o G o o 6:
C y ca Q U U N cd 'b ro G �o rn c� G co y o0
P T X t N o N 9 h N N b p .c W G y G c0 G
h p
8;5 'Z b a> 04 c U G 3 a� U a� n 'aCi bo
c G II p a v o m o y U v t J� r d v `r c c v b
v A o 0 o A. 3 3 Fy a�i w o c)
tLc Q II :cj o c c� E oG C`�' a� ca v a a a�i aRi v 'G 3
it .7 o U v G y G v a o G a> Z y o U w o
c U U m co on b co cn co a b a� i° o m 2
G co i p v a cn o G U
co o o o U a s Es
a
.5 G o o
zU a o o'7)6 U
c on a`i J� a� a R
P. m o o° o o a E o t G y U y G
L p oll _G G U U .U-. N 'O o yU+ 'b y o� N co A..,.., 43 rL d a o c O c c d v G o w m v'� o a
a
I�j II a a chi o vU�i a. X C w x cc
ta
c� ca
.0 a a� o T 'o c
A. Q P. 0. W w w 4.) w w it w w x G N UIx o n U x x w x x a� S a w a a
h
c 0 0 0 cD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cl 0 Cl 0 0 0 0 0
to �o r- oo C. oo O� M 7 w %o r- oo 01
U CO �7 rn cn cn cn v v ct v v In vi vi vi 'n vi �n o 0
106
'r
n, o
g s IN ti
O ���*'L ,y�+ �rfi, 1�. ate
C
4hr, yf ,,,.s. .t" t Q .F, "C! 7,• i t .7 i Ai
Y.
t
.._r. .r
a
0
H I U I a I a I U a
x
K" J- r ts"y 4 °..w'4'� t a In
a �$y k' T •3 2 T.•t `tiff 1^P ,Y '�fy"�s C
m I
a
U U a a a a w
U
U a a a, a
0
F
U
a
U
U
a
z
z
0
a
a
a
x
a
a
a
0
a
C T W
n bn
a y •C a� a m It w c 0 co E o
Q Q ai a c 0. bo o y n ou d v C
x O U P. aid E tco o W
d 0�
to t 040 3° c c 0 0 Nw R
C+ v L c b`b c v o o° w d a
'O b0 U cd y R N 0. O L1. •y p m 'O L N 'p by L 0
dc° Lc LoE L c Lco Eo�� nz°
eq o o o o c w o v i a� «L. a� S c O c
m L p
0 :J 0.� N CC p C cd 'O W bA cd Rt •7 O N cd •C N N
m id II b0 .c V N bo to 0 bo .5 U C9 O' O .0 cd
id T7 b q GG W
V y
u cc N Q m y V .n m G O 'm 'm mid w O 'm OL 'm m
d F I 7 1 a c W a F v a .o m ai •o c u to
y
a o..c oo o ccJ a 0 a a o p o a> G c
»p C OD 0 U N b0 ^m d b0 id P- .0 by y bb !I U C* bb -M
w c o c r .c m c a c c a c
flZU L -5 ,7 m IE a'Y oA c r 03 O y o o� m
c bL G C W c b0.E W N m N w Cd bL N m -E W .V C bB N w G c H b 'D V
co c a� 0 c ao a c
k cd c y a` cd G m i2.. o 1 cd N C o a cd aci d o v
aUaaw 2 L C/ c>v be a d a a�•
9 H d o7 U C1 w w C). x
0 7° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
107
V
T IE
r5l
d t t k r�+y 3 Sip 'k' i 5
A
21 rx
I
PK 31
bo
S6
IVA
-M
q
,w Ti, I I
4
Frl o 1 0 1 a lul I F, I U
:D I �JP-j l a l a a P. U J�j- P- u QI u D
cc
V
0�
C N
ea
V..
�K4 j?.
t "<A
�Z� u 4
P F F Fl P. P. lul-11
I la, 1 10.1 P- 11. P. JUJQj I U P- I U Q I I U :D l 1
sn. P. a P, P. U CL• u a a U gL, U A.
�D a a a a u a u a a u cl, U
P. P. 0. a a u as u at u P, U
U
;4
U u a u o, U P. U
u
z <1.1 u
u
9
0 �D A- a l a IUI<l 11 1 U I I I I U I Q 1� U
0 Cl- a. u 0. u a. u P. L)
cl. u u
Q u u u
Q P. u u
bn
00 o m
E m a a 0
0. cl
co
co o
ca
w 04 t: r, 0 0 B tb
0 0
0 cc o
0
cr co 0 48 bb o g,
bo 0 .0 :E Z 5 tb Z
oo m I c o"
E e�' I —ca 8
15 e W)
o 0 -6 Z
0 to
bo 0
Q 1 0
on
c
t '2 0
cd bo t tr,
cd 0 -F, 2 0 �F
F .5 f, u -M
w� c�
co m 47 R m 0 E o ai w Q
um *E
-Z5
—M V 'd 9
0
1; 9 12 Q c
7.: 0 0 u 's
-Io -,n
Z u
E
bn aj
;a t5 cc to 0 v 0 8
r- co G 0 -z 0 0
6b W
m cu o
lo
.15 .5 0 c v c's 0
aUa r 0 r, w E 0= o P4 r� g� I o
,c gn
c
5
CD C) C> O C, C) c:> O c, c:, cD 1= O O O O O CD
N c) V1 'o oo CD rq m co Cl cD M rl oo oc oo oo oo 00 oo oo
108
no
pp tY
moo mom
sw
EMS
q- any
O"n Quo
u
AS
Host few k
am ANA
maw
l ooks
r f r t o e d sr G
n
a
IQI a l a I U l a l l a l a, IP� a, I l a I
P. Q a, a U a a a a a P, P. ac a.
U
U Q a a a a a a s a
F
v
x
a
a
x
a
x
x a,
0
x
a
a
.L bA bL bo N bD
II o a a y U L ai •G b
u a a 7 b y 0 .x 7
p o E N o N b7 v
L
L per. R
a> y•� L o N v a
d «d a o y r oD o C a 06 v p a L o o T o
p a a 3 a� a� o
o a O N y co v y
v� O r L L 'm oa y
Cl ,L L C N O
a�i a x bh :v •p, o a�i 3 o o a o v b ro
4" 00 aNi
a� o
y C II U L 5 g
a
CL o G �w °v
dII bo o'4 c c•0" w °v >�G w
d o y v a c o o b o v v �o o y o 0 cc o
U b o bb o w p° L o o o m v C a a c
O o O C 6 s C O. by bC Y� w b- y .b X v
a p o w O C �.0 bn w a •o •o -0 o
E fl z U L v c a A 3 0 a. co 3� p ro 3 °J o
c bu o co 'L o o y a� a o v i a� 3 a0i
r U U •p td 'Lt bC b0 y p DD by y w
o x° 6 a o m o d o
co
Low 6, ar�,,.c�C a� •O 3 c i�
a. P, W LY. L� GC C� w a� oc R: m ci °r rn a ri rC") rn o v v�
U o w F F E-� V U
C V 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
�p t` oo O N N M 10 °l O O O O O
U Ca �l 00 00 00 00 01 rn rn a 11 01 °rn rn o
109
C -7
p
d
A
cn I r I
O
F l a�
s
a laaa
U
0
V
a a
F
0
a a v
v
a q
v
a
U
U I I I
Z
Oq
U I w •o
o W v c a
m •y v
GK LL v C
q y. v
x a c
q h r r
N
c c c- S
v r.
a of o
d C O b •U V V O a
Q b
Q O H
Q II ;b O N° C h C Fi
II •y N y y
`n 0G v yt O
w p C v y U c 3
o
ZU 43 �rrc c
`c aC
sz
J
vJ V
d
C C a
O 7 V_ 00 00 z v
Z
110
ATTACHMENT H
Robert Thorpe Comment email 5/5/11
On 5/5/2011 at 1:40 PM, in message <C9E85949.CFC1 %rwta @rwta.com
"Robert W. Thorpe, AICP" <rwta @rwta.com> wrote:
Dear Councilmembers:
We would like to bring to your attention to a matter that will come before
you as part of the Manufacturing /Industrial Center (MIC) Study. As you know
that on April 27, the Planning Commission received City's Staff Issues and
Opportunities Report which provided recommendations to change the
development regulations for the Manufacturing and Industrial Zones in the
City Of Tukwila. The Planning Commission accepted the recommendations from,.
staff and moved that the City Council adopt these changes at the June 13,
2011;Public Hearing
We are writing this e -mail to urge you to also accept the recommendation
from staff which will leave intact all automobile services within the .MIC
We have been working closely with an alternative fuel supplier who would
prefer to locate their facility within the city of Tukwila. Their facility
would, provide alternative fuel to commercial fleet vehicles. The; company has
been working closely with several major businesses as Well as local and
state p g ncies to convert conventional gas vehicles to alternative
ublic'a e
fuels.. B y acce p ting staff s Issues and Opportunities Report, and leaving
all automobile services as permitted uses this will result in the existing
F. moratorium being lifted and allow 'our client to begin the construction of
this alternative ,fuel supply face ity.
We look forward to testifying on behalf of this company at
Public- June 13
Public Hearing and hope that the moratorium can be lifted. We `do not wish
to interfere with any future land use application that may be before the
hat if you have questions for. us, please lim
th it them to
city e e 'g ulat ons and th
e moratorium that. are subject to the Public Hearing on
Y ou have any me or Lee
Jun 13 If y questions,. p lease feel. free to co
n uestions
Michaelis at 206.624.6239
Robert W Thorpe, AICP President
R. W. Thorpe Associates, Inc.
7438 SE 27th Street,'Mercer Island, WA 98040
Phone' 20 I a co
i g
Pa e www rw m
t
Email: rwta @.rwta.com
P e 6 624 -6239 Fax 206 -625 -0930 Web
111
112
I
DRAFT
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE
LAND USE PLAN MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIAL CENTER
ELEMENT; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND ESTABLISHING
AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, in 1995 the City of Tukwila adopted the Comprehensive Land Use Plan
and Map based on consideration of existing conditions and long -term community goals;
and
WHEREAS, RCW 36.70A.130 requires the City of Tukwila to review and, if needed,
revise its Comprehensive Plan and development regulations on or before December 1,
2014; and
WHEREAS, as part of its Comprehensive Plan Update process, the City of Tukwila
has reviewed policies and development regulations pertaining to Manufacturing
Industrial Center (MIC) Element, as well as the area's geographic extent to ensure it will
"maximize the employment and economic benefits to the people of Tukwila and the
region, while minimizing the impacts on residential neighborhoods and
WHEREAS, Tukwila's MIC is one of four Manufacturing and Industrial Centers
officially designated in the King County Countywide Planning Policies; and
WHEREAS, Tukwila's MIC is an important source of industrial land and well paying
industrial employment, and contributes to the health and diversity of the regional
economy; and
WHEREAS, the MIC is intended to foster and encourage manufacturing and
industrial uses, and discourage non industrial uses unless they support industrial
activity and employees; and
W: Word Processing \Ordinances \MIC -Comp Plan Amended 6 -6 -11
RF:bjs Page 1 of 3
113
WHEREAS, the Department of Community Development prepared and circulated
the "Tukwila Manufacturing Industrial Center Comprehensive Plan Update Background
Report" and an "Issues and Opportunities Report," including a review of pertinent
regional and Tukwila policies and consideration of development regulations, especially
concerning permitted uses in the MIC, and evaluation of MIC boundaries with
recommendations, findings and conclusions; and
WHEREAS, the City engaged and informed stakeholders in and adjacent to the
MIC area in the MIC review process through mailings, surveys, interviews, web site
postings and print articles to elicit information, concerns and comments; and
WHEREAS, on April 14, 2011 a public workshop and open house was held to
receive input on recommended changes to the Manufacturing Industrial Center Element
of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan; and
WHEREAS, on April 28, 2011, the City of Tukwila Planning Commission held a
public hearing and, after considering staff analysis and comments from the public, has
recommended approval of recommendations to amend the Comprehensive Land Use
Plan policies, as stated in the "Issues and Opportunities Report;" and
WHEREAS, the City of Tukwila has complied with the requirements of the State
Environmental Policy Act; and
WHEREAS, on April 28, 2011, Comprehensive Plan amendments were determined
to have no significant environmental impact; and
WHEREAS, notices of public hearings were published in The Seattle Times and
mailed to surrounding properties; and
WHEREAS, on June 13, 2011, the City Council held a public hearing and, after due
consideration of the testimony, the Council believes an amendment to the City's
Comprehensive Plan is necessary,
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA,
WASHINGTON, HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Recommendations Adopted. The City Council hereby adopts recom-
mendations for the text changes of the Tukwila Planning Commission.
Section 2. Comprehensive Land Use Plan Amended. The Comprehensive Land
Use Plan is hereby amended to add a new implementation strategy to Tukwila
Comprehensive Plan Policy 11.1.6 to the Manufacturing Industrial Center Element to
read as follows: "Actively seek alternative railroad related freight routing away from
residential streets in Allentown."
W: Word Processing \Ordinances \MIC -Comp Plan Amended 6 -6 -11
RF:bjs Page 2 of 3
114
Section 3. Comprehensive Land Use Plan Amended. The. Comprehensive Land
Use Plan is hereby amended to add new policy 11.1.10 to the Manufacturing Industrial
Center Element to read as follows: "Pursue light rail and commuter rail stops in the
vicinity of Boeing Access Road."
Section 4. Severability. If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause or
phrase of this ordinance or its application to any person or situation should be held to be
invalid or unconstitutional for any reason by a court of competent jurisdiction, such
invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of the
remaining portions of this ordinance or its application to any other person or situation.
Section 5. Effective Date. This ordinance or a summary thereof shall be published
in the official, newspaper of the City, and shall take effect and be in full force five days
after passage and publication as provided by law.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, at
a Regular Meeting thereof this day of 2011.
ATTEST /AUTHENTICATED:
Christy O'Flaherty, CMC, City Clerk Jim Haggerton, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM BY: Filed with the City Clerk:
Passed by the City Council:
Published:
Effective Date:
Shelley M. Kerslake, City Attorney Ordinance Number:
W: Word Processing \Ordinances \MIC -Comp Plan Amended 6 -6 -11
RF:bjs Page 3 of 3
115
116
J
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, AMENDING VARIOUS ORDINANCES AS
CODIFIED IN TUKWILA MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTERS 18.36 AND
18.38 TO MODIFY PERMITTED USES IN THE MANUFACTURING
INDUSTRIAL CENTER; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND
ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, in 1995 the City of Tukwila adopted the Zoning Code and Map based
on consideration of existing conditions and long -term community goals; and
WHEREAS, RCW 36.70A.130 requires the City of Tukwila to review and, if needed,
revise its Comprehensive Plan and development regulations on or before December 1,
2014; and
WHEREAS, as part of its required Comprehensive Plan update process, the City of
Tukwila has reviewed development regulations pertaining to Manufacturing Industrial
Center (MIC) Element, as well as the area'.s geographic extent to ensure it will
"maximize the employment and economic benefits to the people of Tukwila and the
region, while minimizing the impacts on residential neighborhoods and
WHEREAS, Tukwila's MIC is one of four designated by King County's Countywide
Planning Policies; and
WHEREAS, the MIC zoning is intended to foster and encourage manufacturing and
industrial uses, and limit non industrial uses unless they support industrial activity and
employees; and
WHEREAS, the Department of Community Development prepared and circulated a
"Background Report" and an "Issues and Opportunities Report," including a review of
pertinent regional and Tukwila policies and consideration of development regulations,
especially concerning permitted uses in the MIC, and evaluation of MIC boundaries with
analysis and recommendations; and
W: Word Processing \Ordinances \MIC -TMC Zoning Map Amended strike -thru 6 -6 -11
RF:bjs Page 1 of 12
117
WHEREAS, the City of Tukwila has engaged and informed stakeholders in and
adjacent to the MIC area of the review process and materials through mailings, surveys,
interviews, web site postings and print articles to elicit information, concerns and
comments, and
WHEREAS, on April 14, 2011, a public workshop and open house was held to
receive input on recommended changes to the Manufacturing Industrial Center Element
of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan and corresponding development regulations as
described in the "Issues and Opportunities Report;" and
WHEREAS, on April 28, 2011, the City of Tukwila Planning Commission held a
public hearing and, after receiving and studying staff analysis and comments from the
public, has recommended approval of changes to the Comprehensive Land Use Plan,
and zoning as stated in the "Issues and Opportunities Report;" and
WHEREAS, the City of Tukwila has complied with the requirements of the State
Environmental Policy Act; and
WHEREAS, on April 28, 2011, Zoning Code amendments were determined to have
no significant environmental impact; and
WHEREAS, notices of public hearings were published in The Seattle Times and
mailed to surrounding properties; and
WHEREAS, on June 13, 2011, the City Council held a public hearing and, after due
consideration of the testimony, the Council believes an amendment to the City's Zoning
Code is necessary;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA,
WASHINGTON, HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Recommendations Adopted. The City Council hereby adopts
recommendations for the text changes of the Tukwila Planning Commission.
Section 2. Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) Section 18.36.020, "Permitted
Uses," Amended. Ordinance Nos. 2287 §27, 2251 §50, 2235 §6 (part), 2021 §8, 1986
§13, 1974 §9, 1954 §2, 1814 §2, 1774 §3, and 1758 §1 (part), as codified at TMC
Section 18.36.020, are hereby amended to read as follows.
18.36.020 Permitted Uses
The following uses are permitted outright within the Manufacturing Industrial Center/
Light Industrial District, subject to compliance with all other applicable requirements of
the Tukwila Municipal Code.
W: Word Processing \Ordinances \MIC -TMC Zoning Map Amended strike -thru 6 -6 -11
RF:bjs Page 2 of 12
118
1. Adult entertainment establishments are permitted, subject to the following
location restrictions:
a. No adult entertainment establishment shall be allowed within the
following distances from the following specified uses, areas or zones, whether such
uses, areas or zones are located within or outside the City limits:
(1) In or within 1,000 feet of any LDR, MDR, HDR, MUO, O, NCC, RC,
RCM or TUC zone districts or any other residentially -zoned property;
(2) In or within 1/2 mile of:
(a) Public or private school with curricula equivalent to
elementary, junior or senior high schools, or any facility owned or operated by such
schools, and
(b) Care centers, preschools, nursery schools or other child care
facilities,
(3) In or within 1,000 feet of:
(a) public library;
(b) public park, trail, or public recreational facility; or
(c) religious facility.
b. The distances specified in TMC Section 18.36.020.1.a. shall be
measured by following a straight line from the nearest point of the property parcel upon
which the proposed use is to be located to the nearest point of the parcel of property or
land use district boundary line from which the proposed land use is to be separated.
c. No adult entertainment establishment shall be allowed to locate within
1,000 feet of an existing adult entertainment establishment. The distance specified in
this section shall be measured by following a straight line between the nearest points of
public entry into each establishment.
2. Automotive services:
a. gas, outside pumps allowed;
b. washing;
c. body and engine repair shops (enclosed within a building).
4 Bea nr harbor shops-
4 Bicycle repair shops.
54. Brew pubs.
6 Bus stations.
7 Commercial laundries.
6 Contractor storage yards.
98. Day care centers.
44. Extended stay hntel/metol
44-9. Heavy equipment repair and salvage.
4-2- Hetels.
4310. Industries involved with etching, film processing, lithography, printing,
and publishing.
1411. Internet data /telecommunication centers.
W: Word Processing \Ordlnances\MIC -TMC Zoning Map Amended strike -thru 6 -6 -11
RF:bjs Page 3 of 12
119
i 15 Laundries:
a. self serve,
b. dry cleaning;
c. tailor, dyeing.
16 Libraries, museums or art galleries (public).
4-7 Manufacturina and industrial uses that have little potential for creatina
off -site noise, smoke. dust, vibration or other external environmental impacts or
pollution. including but not limited to manufacturing, processina, assemblina, packaginq
and /or repairina of:
1 1 7 nn +n� if +r�fi irinn nrnr` nJv; n�^n� may g ofa. Electrical or
y
mechanical equipment, vehicles and machines including, but not limited to, heavy and
light machinery, tools, airplanes, boats or other transportation vehicles and equipment
ag b. Previously prepared
metals including, but not limited to, stamping, dyeing, shearing or punching of metal,
engraving, galvanizing and hand forging,
4-9 c. Food, including but
not limited to, baked goods, beverages (including fermenting and distilling), candy,
canned or preserved foods, dairy products and byproducts, frozen foods, instant foods
and meats (provided that no slaughtering is permitted),
20. MaRUfaGWFing, PFOGC.S.C: ng d. Pharmaceuticals
and related products, such as cosmetics and drugs,
24 r.JJ! andl,r paG ninn e. Previously prepared
materials including, but not limited to, bags, brooms, brushes, canvas, clay, clothing, fur,
furniture, glass, ink, paint, paper, plastics, rubber, tile, and wood; and
22- as f.
Electronic, mechanical or precision instruments such as medical and dental
equipment, photographic goods, measurement and control devices, and recording
equipment,
23- mss
24 Offices including, but not limited to, software development and similar
uses, financial services, schools and studio r professional and vocational education
nr golf imnrnverne if associated with an established aviation. manufacturina or
industrial use, less than 20,000 square feet. This cateaory does not include outpatient
medical and dental clinics.
26 Parks, trails, picnic areas and playgrounds (public) but not including
amusement parks, golf courses, or commercial recreation.
2717. Railroad tracks, (including lead, spur, loading or storage).
2.8-. C?e r+4inn facilities (GeMrneFGi al i� dG r_l at hletin nr health GIHIDc
e
2-9 Rental of vehicles not requiring a commercial driver's license (including
automobiles, sport utility vehicles, mini -vans, recreational vehicles, cargo vans and
certain trucks).
30 Rental of commercial trucks and fleet rentals requiring a commercial
driver's license.
W: Word Processing \Ordinances \MIC -TMC Zoning Map Amended strike -thru 6 -6 -11
RF:bjs Page 4 of 12
120
X Restaurants, including:
a. drive through;
b. sit down;
c. cocktail lounges in conjunction with a restaurant.
X Sales and rental of heavy machinery and equipment subject to
landscaping requirements of the Landscape, Recreation, Recycling /Solid Waste Space
Requirements chapter of this title.
X Salvage and wrecking operations that are entirely enclosed within a
building.
X4 Self- storage facilities.
35 Storage (outdoor) of materials is permitted up to a height of 20 feet
with a front yard setback of 25 feet, and to a height of 50 feet with a front yard setback
of 100 feet; security required.
3625. Storage (outdoor) of materials allowed to be manufactured or handled
within facilities conforming to uses under this chapter, and screened pursuant to the
Landscape, Recreation, Recycling /Solid Waste Space Requirements chapter of this
title.
37-26. Taverns R i gh t Gl y -t ubs.
38 Telephone exchanges.
39 Tow truck operations, subject to all additional State and local
regulations
48 Truck terminals.
44 Warehouse storage and /or wholesale distribution facilities.
42- Other uses not specifically listed in this title, which the Director
determines to be:
a. similar in nature to and compatible with other uses permitted outright
within this district; and
b. consistent with the stated purpose of this district; and
c. consistent with the policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Plan.
Section 3. TMC Section 18.36.030, "Accessory Uses," Amended. Ordinances
Nos. 2251 §51, 1976 §56, and 1758 §1 (part), as codified at TMC Section 18.36.030,
are hereby amended to read as follows:
18.36.030 Accessory Uses
Uses and structures customarily appurtenant to a permitted use, and clearly incidental
to such permitted use, are allowed within the Manufacturing Industrial Center /Light
Industrial District, as follows
4-. Billiard oF pee
2-. Dermitery as an aGGeSSGFY use te other uses that aFe othepwise permitted
S Gh as i RiVor_ o selleges nr SGheelc
3 Parking areas.
4 Recreational area and facilities for employees.
63. Residences for security or maintenance personnel.
W: Word Processing \Ordinances \MIC -TMC Zoning Map Amended strike -thru 6 -6 -11
RF:bjs Page 5 of 12
121
6 Other uses not specifically listed in this title, which the Director determines
to be:
a. uses customarily accessory to other uses permitted outright within this
district and
b. consistent with the stated purpose of this district and
c. consistent with the policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Plan.
Section 4. TMC Section 18.36.040, "Conditional Uses," Amended. Ordinance
Nos. 2135 §16, 1954 §3, 1865 §42, and 1758 §1 (part), as codified at TMC Section
18.36.040, are hereby amended to read as follows:
18.36.040 Conditional Uses
The following uses may be allowed within the Manufacturing Industrial Center /Light
Industrial District, subject to the requirements, procedures, and conditions established
by the Conditional Use Permits chapter of this title.
1. Colleges and universities with primarily vocational curriculum if associated
with an established aviation. manufacturina or industrial use.
2. Electrical substations distribution.
3. Fire and police stations.
4. Hotels.
5. Manufacturina and industrial uses that have moderate to substantial
potential for creatina off -site noise, smoke. dust, vibration or other external
environmental impacts, including, but not limited to
4-. a. Heavy metal processes such as smelting, blast furnaces, drop forging, or
drop hammering;
-5. b. Manufacturina, Drocessina, assembly of
Manufa GWFiRg PFOGeso;ng and /nr assemhliRg (1) 'Chemicals, light
metals, plastics, solvents, soaps, wood, coal, glass, enamels, textiles, fabrics, plaster,
agricultural products or animal products (no rendering or slaughtering); and
6 any f GtURnn nrnr+nccinn and /Er nccomhlinn of ('L) Previously
manufactured metals, such as iron and steel fabrication; steel production by electric arc
melting, argon oxygen refining, and consumable electrode melting; and similar heavy
industrial uses.
6. Motels.
7. Offices including, but not limited to, software development and similar uses,
financial services, schools and sfr�ud;es for professional and vocational education -er self
irri rroom_ont if associated with an established aviation, manufacturina or industrial use,
20,000 square feet and over.
8. Park and -ride lots.
9. Radio, television, microwave, or observation stations and towers.
10. Recreation facilities (public) including, but not limited to, sports fields,
community centers, and golf courses.
11. Retail sales of health and beauty aids, prescription drugs, food, hardware,
notions, crafts and craft supplies, housewares, consumer electronics, photo equipment,
and film processing, books, magazines, stationery, clothing, shoes, flowers, plants,
W: Word Processing \Ordinances \MIC -TMC Zoning Map Amended strike -thru 6 -6 -11
RF:bjs Page 6 of 12
122
pets, jewelry, gifts, recreation equipment and sporting goods, and similar items; retail
services such as beauty and barber shops, outpatient and emergencv medical /dental
services, and recreation /health clubs. Retail sales and services are limited to uses of a
type and size that clearly intend to serve other permitted uses and /or the employees of
those uses.
12. Rock crushing, asphalt or concrete batching or mixing, stone cutting, brick
manufacture, marble work, and the assembly of products from the above materials.
Section 5. TMC Section 18.36.070, "Design Review," Amended. Ordinance
Nos. 2005 §13 and 1758 §1 (part), as codified at TMC Section 18.36.070, are hereby
amended to read as follows:
18.36.070 Design Review
Administrative design review is required for all new office development and other new
developments within 300 feet of residential districts or within 200 feet of the
Green /Duwamish River.
Section 6. TMC Section 18.38.020, "Permitted Uses," Amended. Ordinance
Nos. 2287 §28, 2251 §52, 2235 §7, 2021 §9, 1986 §14, 1974 §10, 1971 §16, 1814 §2,
1774 §4, and 1758 §1 (part), as codified at TMC Section 18.38.020, are hereby
amended to read as follows
18.38.020 Permitted Uses
The following uses are permitted outright within the Manufacturing Industrial
Center /Heavy Industrial District, subject to compliance with all other applicable
requirements of the Tukwila Municipal Code.
1. Adult entertainment establishments are permitted, subject to the following
location restrictions
a. No adult entertainment establishment shall be allowed within the
following distances from the following specified uses, areas or zones, whether such
uses, areas or zones are located within or outside the City limits:
(1) In or within 1,000 feet of any LDR, MDR, HDR, MUO, O, NCC, RC,
RCM or TUC zone districts or any other residentially zoned property;
(2) In or within 1/2 mile of:
(a) Public or private school with curricula equivalent to
elementary, junior or senior high schools, or any facility owned or operated by such
schools, and
(b) Care centers, preschools, nursery schools or other child care
facilities;
(3) In or within 1,000 feet of:
(a) public library;
(b) public park, trail, or public recreational facility; or
(c) religious facility.
W: Word Processing \0rdinances\M1C -TMC Zoning Map Amended strike -thru 6 -6 -11
RF:bjs Page 7 of 12
123
b. The distances specified in TMC Section 18.38.020.1.x. shall be
measured by following a straight line from the nearest point of the property parcel upon
which the proposed use is to be located to the nearest point of the parcel of property or
land use district boundary line from which the proposed land use is to be separated.
c. No adult entertainment establishment shall be allowed to locate within
1,000 feet of an existing adult entertainment establishment. The distance specified in
this section shall be measured by following a straight line between the nearest points of
public entry into each establishment.
2. Automotive services:
a. gas, outside pumps allowed;
b. washing;
c. body and engine repair shops (enclosed within a building).
Beauty or harbor shops
43. Bicycle repair shops.
54. Brew pubs.
6 Bus stations.
7 Computer software development and similar uses.
8 Contractor storage yards.
-9 Day care centers.
40. Extended taxi hotel /motel
44. FT aRGial:
a. baR
h Mortg
r ether se WiGes
42 Heavy equipment repair and salvage.
4 -3. Heavy metal nreGess CYGh v c meltiRg blast furnagv ire fern g' y
dreg hammering r 7
44-. Hetels.
410. Industries involved with etching, film processing, lithography, printing,
and publishing.
4 Internet data /telecommunication centers.
17 Laundries:
a. self serve;
b. dry cleaning;
c. tailor, dyeing.
48 Libraries, museums or art galleries (public).
14. Manufacturinq and industrial uses that have moderate to substantial
potential for creatinq off -site noise, smoke. dust, vibration or other external
environmental impacts. includina, but not limited to:
a. Heavv metal processes such as smelting, blast furnaces, drop forqinq
or drop hammering;
b. Manufacturinq, processina, assembly, packaginq and repair of:
19IVIanufaGtUring nror Jyi and /or assembling (1) Chemicals, light
metals, plastics, solvents, soaps, wood, coal, glass, enamels, textiles, fabrics, plaster,
agricultural products or animal products (no rendering or slaughtering); and
W: Word Processing \Ordinances\MIC -TMC Zoning Map Amended strike -thru 6 -6 -11
RF:bjs Page 8 of 12
124
(2) Previously
manufactured metals, such as iron and steel fabrication; steel production by electric arc
melting, argon oxygen refining, and consumable electrode melting, and similar heavy
industrial uses.
15. Manufacturina and industrial uses that have little potential for creatina off
site noise. smoke. dust, vibration or other external environmental impacts or pollution,
includina but not limited to, manufacturina, processina, assemblina, packaainq and /or
repairina of:
24-. a. Previously prepared
metals including, but not limited to, stamping, dyeing, shearing or punching of metal,
engraving, galvanizing and hand forging.
22 b nn,�,arrufaEttrr'i g V I
mechanical 35ss�ag wrad�er ,s hlem�,ir,� Electrical or
mechanical equipment, vehicles and machines including, but not limited to, heavy and
light machinery, tools, airplanes, boats or other transportation vehicles and equipment.
23 C ManufaGtUriny YrnnaSSing and/nr paGka of Food, including but not
limited to, baked goods, beverages (including fermenting and distilling), candy, canned
or preserved foods, dairy products and byproducts, frozen foods, instant foods and
meats (provided that no slaughtering is permitted).
d n aG g p a nd/ e r paGkaging Pharmaceuticals and
related products, such as cosmetics and drugs.
2k e lVl anu f aG t UFIRg, p FeGessin gg, a pAl r Previously prepared
materials including, but not limited to, bags, brooms, brushes, canvas, clay, clothing, fur,
furniture, glass, ink, paint, paper, plastics, rubber, tile, and wood.
26_ f. lVlaRLifaGtUFiRg ClaC�
Electronic, mechanical or precision instruments such as medical and dental equipment,
photographic goods, measurement and control devices, and recording equipment.
97 MAtPhS
2 16. Offices; must be associated with another permitted uses (e.g.,
administrative offices for a manufacturing company present within the MIC).
30-.17. Parks, trails, picnic areas and playgrounds (public) but not including
amusement parks, golf courses, or commercial recreation.
34 Railroad tracks (including lead, spur, loading or storage).
32-. 19. Recreation facilities (commercial indoor), athletic or health clubs.
33 Rental of vehicles not requiring a commercial driver's license (including
automobiles, sport utility vehicles, mini -vans, recreational vehicles, cargo vans and
certain trucks).
34 Rental of commercial trucks and fleet rentals requiring a commercial
driver's license.
X Restaurants, including:
a. drive through;
b. sit down;
c. cocktail lounges in conjunction with a restaurant.
3 23. Rock crushing, asphalt or concrete batching or mixing, stone cutting,
brick manufacture, marble work, and the assembly of products from the above
materials.
W: Word Processing \Ordinances \MIC -TMC Zoning Map Amended strike -thru 6 -6 -11
RF:bjs Page 9 of 12
125
X 24. Sales and rental of heavy machinery and equipment subject to
landscaping requirements of the Landscape, Recreation, Recycling /Solid Waste Space
Requirements chapter of this title.
38 Salvage and wrecking operations.
3826. Schools and studies -for professional and vocational education or self-
irnpreyemen+ if associated with an established aviation, manufacturing or industrial use.
4827. Self- storage facilities.
44- Storage (outdoor) of materials is permitted up to a height of 20 feet
with a front yard setback of 25 feet, and to a height of 50 feet with a front yard setback
of 100 feet; security required.
42 Storage (outdoor) of materials allowed to be manufactured or handled
within facilities conforming to uses under this chapter, and screened pursuant to the
Landscape, Recreation, Recycling /Solid Waste Space Requirements chapter of this
title.
43-30. Taverns n— r�,gh+�IDS
44- Telephone exchanges.
4-5 Tow truck operations, subject to all additional State and local
regulations
46- Truck terminals.
4 34. Warehouse storage and /or wholesale distribution facilities.
48 Other uses not specifically listed in this title, Pursuant to TMC Section
18.104.010(2), which the Director determines to be:
a. similar in nature to and compatible with other uses permitted outright
within this district; and
b. consistent with the stated purpose of this district; and
c. consistent with the policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Plan.
Section 7. TMC Section 18.38.030, "Accessory Uses," Amended. Ordinance
Nos. 2251 §53, 1976 §57, and 1758 §1 (part), as codified at TMC Section 18.38.030,
are hereby amended to read as follows:
18.38.030 Accessory Uses
Uses and structures customarily appurtenant to a permitted use, and clearly incidental
to such permitted use, are allowed within the Manufacturing Industrial Center /Heavy
Industrial District, as follows:
Billiard er pool roemc
2. Dermitery as aR aGGesseFy Lise te other uses that are etheRVise permitted
eF approved fir• C YGh as i inivefsi4 selleges OF crhnnlc
3 Parking areas.
4 2 Recreational area and facilities for employees.
6 Residences for security or maintenance personnel.
6- Other uses not specifically listed in this title, which the Director determines
to be:
a. uses that are customarily accessory to other uses permitted outright
within this district; and
W: Word Processing \Ordinances \MIC -TMC Zoning Map Amended strike -thru 6 -6 -11
RF:bjs Page 10 of 12
126
b. consistent with the stated purpose of this district; and
c. consistent with the policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Plan.
Section 8. TMC Section 18.38.040, "Conditional Uses," Amended. Ordinance
Nos. 2287 §29, 2135 §17, 2028 §2, 1865 §44, and 1758 §1 (part), as codified at TMC
Section 18.38.040, are hereby amended to read as follows:
18.38.040 Conditional Uses
The following uses may be allowed within the Manufacturing Industrial Center /Heavy
Industrial District, subject to the requirements, procedures, and conditions established
by the Conditional Use Permits chapter of this title.
1. Colleges and universities with primarily vocational curriculum if associated
with an established aviation, manufacturina or industrial use.
2. Electrical substations distribution.
3. Fire and police stations.
4. Hazardous waste treatment and storage facilities (off -site) subject to
compliance with State siting criteria (RCW 70.105; see TMC Chapter 21.08).
5. Hotels
6. Motels
-5 Offices not associated with other permitted uses and excluding
medical /dental clinics, subject to the following location and size restrictions:
a. New Office Developments:
(1) New office developments shall not exceed 100,000 square feet of
gross floor area per lot that was legally established prior to 09/20/2003.
(2) No new offices shall be allowed on lots that abut the Duwamish
River and are north of the turning basin. The parcels that are ineligible for stand -alone
office uses are shown in Figure 18 -12.
b. An existing office development established prior to 12/11/1995 (the
effective date of the Comprehensive Plan) that exceeds the maximum size limitations
may be recognized as a conforming Conditional Use under the provisions of this code.
An existing office development established prior to 12/11/1995 (the effective date of the
Comprehensive Plan) may convert to a stand -alone office use subject to the provisions
of this code.
6-. Park- and -ride lots.
7—. Radio, television, microwave, or observation stations and towers.
8-: Recreation facilities (public) including, but not limited to, sports fields,
community centers, and golf courses.
-9- Retail sales of health and beauty aids, prescription drugs, food,
hardware, notions, crafts and craft supplies, housewares, consumer electronics, photo
equipment, and film processing, books, magazines, stationery, clothing, shoes, flowers,
plants, pets, jewelry, gifts, recreation equipment and sporting goods, and similar items,
retail services such as beautv and barber shops, financial services. outpatient and
emerqencv medical /dental services, and recreation /health clubs. _Retail sales and
services are limited to uses of a type and size that clearly intend to serve other
permitted uses and /or the employees of those uses.
W: Word Processing \Ordinances \MIC -TMC Zoning Map Amended strike -thru 6 -6 -11
RF:bjs Page 11 of 12
127
Section 9. TMC Section 18.38.070, "Design Review," Amended. Ordinance
Nos. 2005 §14 and 1758 §1 (part), as codified at TMC Section 18.38.070, are hereby
amended to read as follows:
18.38.070 Design Review
Administrative design review is required for all new office development and other
developments within 300 feet of residential districts or within 200 feet of the
Green /Duwamish River.
Section 10. Severability. If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause
or phrase of this ordinance or its application to any person or situation should be held to
be invalid or unconstitutional for any reason by a court of competent jurisdiction, such
invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of the
remaining portions of this ordinance or its application to any other person or situation.
Section 11. Effective Date. This ordinance or a summary thereof shall be
published in the official newspaper of the City, and shall take effect and be in full force
five days after passage and publication as provided by law.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, at
a Regular Meeting thereof this day of 2011.
ATTEST /AUTHENTICATED:
Christy O'Flaherty, CMC, City Clerk Jim Haggerton, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM BY: Filed with the City Clerk:
Passed by the City Council:
Published:
Effective Date:
Shelley M. Kerslake, City Attorney Ordinance Number:
W: Word Processing \Ordinances \MIC -TMC Zoning Map Amended strike -thru 6 -6 -11
RF:bis Page 12 of 12
128
City ®f Tukwila a Community Affairs and _Parks Committee
COMMUNITY AFFAIRS AND PARKS COMMITTEE
Meeting Minutes
May 23, 2011— 5: 00 p. m.; Conference Room #3
PRESENT
Councilmembers: De'Sean Quinn, Acting Chair; Joe Duffle and Allan Ekberg (sitting in for Verna Seal)
Staff: Jack Pace, Nora Gierloff, Brandon Miles, and Kimberly Matej
Guests: Jami Balint, Segale Legal Counsel
CALL TO ORDER: Acting Committee Chair Quinn called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m.
I. PRESENTATIONS
No presentations.
II. BUSINESS AGENDA
A. Livhtina /Ener2v Uivrades: Potential for Additional Grant Funding
Staff is seeking Committee approval to submit a request to the Washington State Department of Commerce
for additional grant funding for lighting /energy upgrades; and if funding is awarded, to forward an
amendment to the current agreement to accept additional funds directly to the June 13 COW for discussion.
At the February 22, 2011, regular meeting, the Council approved a grant agreement with Washington
State Department of General Administration in the amount of $163,904 for the design and completion
of energy /lighting upgrades at various City facilities. Those upgrades are almost complete and the
Department of Commerce has notified the City that additional grant monies may be available due to
some entities not being able to utilize their grant funds.
If the City receives additional funding, it would likely be under $50,000. The projects eligible for
energy /lighting upgrades include: parking lot lights at City Hall and the 6300 Building; indoor lights at
Old City Hall outdoor lights at Tukwila Park, Bicentennial Park and the Golf Course, and installation
of occupancy sensors in various locations.
Committee Member Quinn requested that staff provide an end of implementation report that outlines
results and cost savings of the energy /lighting upgrades. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL, APPLY FOR
ADDITIONAL FUNDS. FORWARD TO JUNE 13 COW FOR DISCUSSION, IF NECESSARY.
B. Interlocal Agreement: Kent/Tukwila Permitting for Tukwila South Wetland Area
Staff is seeking Council approval to enter into an interlocal agreement with the City of Kent to grant the
City of Tukwila permitting authority relative to a wetland mitigation area associated with the Tukwila South
project. Since the project's mitigation site is located within Kent's jurisdiction, an interlocal agreement is
necessary.
The Kent City Council has already authorized this permitting authority which will allow the applicant
Segale Properties) to facilitate permitting through one city rather than two different jurisdictions.
Additionally, permitting through Tukwila will provide that applicant with the constancy of utilizing the
same parameters as those being followed for the Tukwila South project. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL,,
FORWARD TO JUNE 13 COW FOR DISCUSSION
C. Comprehensive Plan Update: Manufacturing Industrial Center
Staff is seeking full Council approval to update the City's Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code
regulations relating to the Manufacturing Industrial Center (MIC). This recommended update, as per staff
129
Communitv Affairs Parks Committee Minutes Mav 23, 2011 Paue 2
and Planning Commission review, was conducted as part of the periodic review and update of the City's
Comprehensive Plan as required by the Growth Management Act. The timing for this update is also driven
by the current moratorium for issuing certain non industrial use permits, which expires on July 1, 2011.
After reviewing the background report and public involvement as well as preparation and input on the
issues and opportunities report, staff explained the Planning Commission recommended changes for the
MIC. These changes parallel staff recommendation and staff concurs. A summary of the Planning
Commission recommendations are summarized in Attachment F of the Committee agenda packet beginning
on page 117.
The draft ordinances reflect the Planning Commission changes. There will be a few additional
housekeeping changes to the ordinances in the COW packet. Committee Members complemented staff on
their thorough and efficient work on this process especially under the stringent time restrictions of the
current moratorium. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL,. FORWARD TO .DUNE 13 COW FOR
DISCUSSION PUBLIC HEARING.
D. Duwamish Hill Preserve Update
At the request of Committee Chair Seal and as information only, staff provided an overview of the
acquisition, description, development and future of the historical Duwamish Hill Preserve.
INFORMATION ONLY.
E. Parks Recreation Events Calendar
As an information only item, Committee Members reviewed the Parks Recreation calendar for June and
July. INFORMATION ONLY.
III. MISCELLANEOUS
Meeting adjourned at 5:47 p.m.
Next meeting: Monday, June 13, 2011 5:00 p.m. Conference Room #3
Committee Chair Approval
Minutes by KAM. Reviewed by NG.
130
COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS
Initialr ITEMNO.
Meeting Date Prepared by May view Council review
06/13/11 DT
�i 06/20/11 i DT
ITEM INFORMATION
1 CAS NUMBER: 11-058 I STAFF SPONSOR: DON TOMASO 0RIG INAI, AGENDA DAT 06/13/11
AGE *NDA tI'I M TITLE Fireworks Permit for City's Family Fun at the Fort 4th of July Event.
C X17 ;GORY ®Dircuuion ®Motion ❑Resolution E] Ordinance ❑BidAzvard ❑Public Hearing Other
Aft g Date 06/13/11 Mtg Date 06/20/11 Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date tl•1tg Date Mtg Date
SPONSOR Council [:]Mayor HR DCD Finance Fire IT P&R Police PIV
SPONSOR'S This is the public display permit for the City Sponsored Fireworks show at Starfire Sports
SUMMARY complex. This is the same pyrotechnician that has done the show for the City since the City
took over the sponsorship of this event.
RI',VIEWED BY COW Mtg. CA &P Cmte F &S Cmte Transportation Cmte
Utilities Cmte Arts Comm. Parks Comm. Planning Comm.
DATE: 06/07/11 COMMITTEE CHAIR: HOUGARDY
RECOMMENDATIONS:
SPONSOR /ADMIN. Approve Permit
COMMITTEE Unanimous Approval; Forward to Committee of the Whole
COST IMPACT FUND SOURCE
EYPENDPTURE REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED
$0
Fund Source:
Coinments:
MTG. DATE I RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION
06/13/11
MTG. DATE j ATTACHMENTS
06/13/11 Informational Memorandum dated 6/1/11
Copy of Permit Conditions
Memo to Chief Olivas outlining the permit review
Site Map
Proposal showing insurance amount, with copies of pyrotechnic license
Minutes from the Finance and Safety Committee Meeting of 6/7/11
131
132
r City of Tukwila
a Jim Haggerton, Mayor
INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor Haggerton
Finance Safety Committee
FROM: Don Tomaso, Fire Marshal
DATE: June 1, 2011
SUBJECT: Tukwila's Family Fourth event on July 4, 2011
ISSUE
The City has received an application for public fire works display at Starfire Sports
complex in conjunction with the City sponsored Tukwila's Family Fourth Event. The
event is held in the northwest corner of the complex, with the fireworks being
discharged from the northeast corner of the complex.
BACKGROUND
Tukwila Municipal Code 8.12.20 regulates Fireworks within the City in addition to RCW
70.77. TMC requires that the City Council approve all Public Displays under TMC
8.12.20.b.
The application was received more than 14 days prior to the proposed display and has
been investigated by the Fire Marshal's Office and found to comply with the
requirements listed in RCW 70.77. This will be the ninth year we have allowed displays
at this location with the same pyrotechnician.
Given the location of the display the Fire Marshal's office will require the same safety
conditions as in previous years to mitigate potential fallout and crowd control issues. In
addition, we will again this year require two additional fire watch personnel to be on the
Seattle Sounder Foot Ball Club sports turf field. Last year we covered the sports turf
with large plastic tarps and flooded those with water. We had one 6" aerial shell break
early and showered flaming fireworks onto the protected field and the water
extinguished all but two pieces of pyrotechnic material. This resulted in a small scorch
mark that occurred to the sports turf. This damage was easily repaired at no cost to the
City. We will require that the sport turf fields be covered with the tarps again this year
and then we will flood the area with water.
Tom Whitacre, the pyro technician has changed suppliers for the show this year to
Eagle Fireworks with offices in Kent and Chehalis. The previous supplier was
Entertainment Fire Works based out of Thurston County.
133
INFORMATIONAL MEMO
Page 2
ANALYSIS
This event has been very successful for the City and citizens that attend, with
attendance increasing each year. There have been no major emergency events in
previous years in regard to fire or aid calls. We have experienced the normal type of
minor fire and aid calls typical for crowds of this size.
RECOMMENDATION
The Council is being asked to consider this item at the June 13, 2011 Committee of the
Whole meeting and subsequent June 20, 2011 Regular Meeting.
ATTACHMENTS
Copy of Permit Conditions
Memo to Chief Olivas outlining the permit review
Site Map
Proposal showing insurance amount, with copies of pyrotechnic license
WA2011 Info MemosTireworksPermit.doc
134
�J��itlA; lLq�'
Go of Tukwila Jim Ha,ggerton, Mayor
:'2 Fire Department Nicholas J. Olivas, Fire Chief
1908
FIREWORKS PERMIT CONDITIONS
To: Mr. Tom Whitacre
From: B /C. Tomaso
Re: July 4 Fireworks display
Date: June 1, 2011
1. Notify Washington State Patrol at 425 649 -4658.
2. Notify FAA specialist at 425 227 -2536 or 425 227 -2500.
3. Notify BNSF railroad resources at 1- 800 832 -5452, 2 hours prior to display time.
4. Establish Safety perimeter a minimum of 30 minutes prior to display start.
5. Have discharge monitors in visible uniform clothing.
6. No Pyrotechnics to be brought to site prior to the day of the display.
7. All personnel inside the safety perimeter shall use Personnel Protective equipment as
outlined in NFPA 1123.
8. Only Pyrotechnicians and Fire Watch personnel will be within the safety perimeter.
9. Portable fire extinguishers shall be in place, prior to unloading of pyrotechnics from
transport vehicle. (2A 20 BC Minimum Size)
10.4 Tukwila Police officers shall be on site a minimum of 30 minutes prior to the start of
.the display for crowd control and shall remain for a minimum of 30 minutes past the end
Headquarters Station: 444 Andover Park East Tukwila, Washington 98188 Phone: 206 -575 -4404 Fax: 206 -575 -4439
135
City of Tukwila
Page 2
of the display or the crowd disperses. (2 additional Tukwila Police officers shall be
available to respond to the site if requested.)
11. Tukwila Fire Department shall inspect mortar racks prior to loading of any pyrotechnic
shells.
12. Tukwila Fire Department shall inspect all static displays upon completion of set up.
13. Two Tukwila Fire Department apparatus shall be on location prior to the start of the
display. (One will be an overtime staffed Engine)
14. Two additional overtime firefighters will be the designated fire watch personnel assigned
to the Seattle Sounder FC practice fields.
15. The Seattle Sounder FC practice fields shall be covered with plastic tarps with seams
taped and flooded with water to extinguish hot debris falling on the fields.
16. Any breech of the safety perimeter shall suspend the display until the perimeter is
cleared and reestablished.
17. Upon completion of the display, the fallout area shall be checked for unexploded shells.
Cleaning of debris, if not practical on the night of the event shall be at first light the next
day.
18. No combustible materials shall be stored inside the safety perimeter.
Headquarters Station: 444 Andover Park East Tukwila, Washington 98188 di Phone: 206 -575 -4404 Fax: 206 -575 -4439
136
City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor
�O
2 Fire Department Nicholas J. Olivas, Fire Chief
1908
Date: June 1, 2011
To: Chief Olivas
From: B/C Tomaso
Re: Public Fire Works Display Permit
I have reviewed the permit application information provided by Mr. Tom Whitacre, who
has applied for the permit for a public fireworks display at the Starfire Sports Complex,
14600 Starfire Way. Mr. Whitacre is a licensed Pyrotechnic Operator with the State of
Washington and with the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Fire Arms. The State
Department of licensing also licenses Mr. Whitacre to transport fire works.
The display will be held in conjunction with the City's planned event on the 4 of July,
"Family Fun at the Fort being organized by the Parks and Recreation Department. This
will be a 35 to 40 minute show starting at approximately 2200 hours. The fireworks will
be transported to the site in the AM of July 4 and will be under the required supervision
until they are discharged. The mortar tubes and other equipment will be brought to the
location on July 2 3
The application was reviewed to WAC 212 -17 and accepted industry standards, and we
find everything is within these guidelines.
I do have some concerns this year regarding the railroad right of way, Seattle
Sounders FC practice fields and the limited access this allows. In addition, a portion of
the fallout area includes a portion of a commercial property within the City of Renton. I
have contacted Renton Fire Officials and have not received a response at the time of
this memo. Last year the Renton Fire Marshal approved our plan, which is the same as
in previous years.
Crowd control can be a potential issue, as the crowd that assembles to watch the fire
works show has increased each and every year. Last year the traffic leaving the site
was .managed with the available Tukwila Police on site and available patrol units. To
mitigate these issues I believe the following measures should be done:
Headquarters Station: 444 Andover Park East Tukwila, Washington 98188 Phone: 206 -575 -4404 e Fax: 206 -575 -4439
137
City of Tukwila
Page 2
Stage two fire apparatus at the site: one apparatus on each side of the Railroad right
of way. Apparatus shall be out of service during the display and for 30 minutes
following the display.
Cover the Seattle sounder FC practice fields with plastic tarps, tape the seams and
flood with water. This will allow hot debris to land in water which should extinguish it
immediately and should reduce the risk of damage to the fields.
Stage two firefighters in the Seattle Sounder FC practice fields as fire watch personnel
with portable extinguishers, 1 3 /4 hand lines and a Blitzfire.
Have Tukwila Police provide crowd control during the public display. A minimum of 4
officers will be required. Provide traffic control to the Fort Dent Way and Interurban Ave
intersection to expedite traffic flow. (2 additional Tukwila Police shall be available to
respond to the site if requested.)
Comply with Fire Works Permit Conditions attached.
Headquarters Station: 444 Andover Park East Tukwila, Washington 98188 Phone: 206 -575 -4404 s Fax: 206 -575 -4439
138
z
r
r
A Washington ran -profit corpa!at €an
s X11 "r i j l 11
r s
Mcerr `tl e."'^'.�„�� �Z•.' s i !4 s M ,�gypp
tl eye �Y k «tl !f .CS�"nsP .r.. 'M...:
S ectators
1. t fy f
AR
F Yt
00 sr i+ areye
y y if t d
N
Fire Works Discharge and
Restricted Area
139
140
EXC ELLEN CE I14\ FIREWORKS
C
Year After Year
e agle. P Oa Bois 16,45 a e'n'n Y'�7
T
Agreement for Fireworks Shoes
Eagle imwerks, Ine., agrees to- provide CITY OF TUMTILA, WA (TUTJILA-! S FAMILY FOURTH AT THE FORT)
a (reworks show on JULY 4 2011 lo'cated at 1 ST&RFIRE WAY, TUY%.WILA, WA
The will commence at approimately 10: 00 ISH. or when. dark, whichever is later.
In the event of poor weather, as would cause unsafe f rung cba#Boris the -sfi ®vii =-nay be rescheduled or cancelled
by agreement of the:_sporartd the pyrotechuician in charge. lf it is necessary to reschedule the show�, it will be
within 60 days`oftfie original date.
Crovd cosa9arol shah -lie tie xespobiiiity o£the spoiesor: a evertfinade#e.cr ®wd c®asaolit
cause±unsafe f ring conditions, the show will be stopped by the pyfotechniciari ian� filiie situation is �r ecte
Insurance coverage for the show wdi be provided by Eagle Fireworks, Inc., in the amount of
PONE MILLION 00 /lOO; .;dollars G aid coverage shall be for public liability and properfty damage as
provided by state law and local ordinance.
The show shall consist ofnot less than PER LIST aerial shells, tus ('NINE 36 shot 2.,5" NIULTI SHOTS
SHOW LIST 82 311 SALUTES, 102 SHELLS, 138 -41t SHELL 9G-5 SHELLS, 64 -6" SHEL1b,
ONE DOZEN 1e4U P 1U1;1'1 =UIO
P
The cost ofthe. show will be TEN 'THOUSAND.,: 00 /100 dollars. The sponsor also agrees to provide
POLICE FIRE PROTECTi-01v FORK Llr"1' ror set -up clean -up.
A deposit of do liars vM- e.required, payable by The balance
shall be pAid -to Eagles ll imwarhs, Lme" as follows: Vithia 10 days after show.
All-past -due accounts will be charged a mordMy service fee of LS
'Wthe 6901 that a permit for the show is denied.by- �helocal authority -having jurisdiction, the deposit shall be
ref amded: within ten days of such denial.. This�emutaet shall be considered void upoln,receipt by the sponsor of the
refunded deposit. All parties agree to act in good faith.
for *see work, in& Spomors Bate
MANUFACTURER DIRECT IMPORTER OF DISPLAY FIREWORKS
141
Responsive choking
a, Adult and Child,
i Perform abdominal thrusts until the h. i In z
s �AA t foreign object Is expelled or the victim L C
zi �'Jr b g becomes unresponsive, ey w` x
LL F 1 O: �r p Lp v i9
Unresponsive choking yr v o V
Adult/ Child/ infant o v
6p Open airway. Remove the object If you 5. m i w v z N m see It. Begin CPR.'Each time the airway 3 Q L ,L z L
zP rye a a Is open for.rescue breaths, lodk.foe an (7 r o
object In the v(ctim's throat. If you see Z v E
U; w v yr U. Q
v N e It, remove It. Do not blindly sweep your o L
oo
finger through an Infant or child's throat. a
a O a r a s o 9 o g
L. c U)
p Z a ce O o Q1 a
Ems-. O 3 i u U m^ J
s� j q J y Responsive Choking o;s v° x
n r s 2 W r L cn L u,
e a6 Infant r x j v, Zr u U i b T¢ o v>
4 S 9 3 Give 5 blows /slaps between shoulder 0 v N❑❑ a N `m
3 s q d �s blades with enough force to expel the w< u r c U X Y a s
object. r 3 o a"
Give 5 downward chest thrusts below IL v' a o m
Y the nipple line with enough force to n y iv w -4-
ti 1 1
expel the object o r a
Repeat back blows and chest thrusts O e °1(`
g 5! until the foreign object.is expelled or the <.Z rti o rE u
a
r
Infant becomes unresponsive. Q� r
j��',±L FL r {r+�r' arilrt( {*il 7� t
•3 f ;7i�i, Gr2•r1
of��X..'df`" ;a Yw "4 i' 7 A .j z r'J2�� i ti 5 a•; t v
ELI t
Z _t �o �r• r i. .Q— r. 'ice a f rrj' 1
F`1, c 2 k eel u H t +-r
ns r 1 t HIM
Y,' r'�s`>z' y F t~ a r sits z y 4 r`"�'�.r �ti.�'�„•�+`��
N
w i it t°dIB10 3 w LI F U r ri r {iQ df r E9
G f 1 IL" )rte I Y' M
l r 'x
M ro _4 c �n z J kG 7 y ti>; h Lit p z3„,!• 1 i
�.r 7 ?G'�. -,a... u( t j v Vl J! O `'t l O �,".�z l��,•� r... k y'�• t fire
f 7� W S ',r. Z r h .O a.+ t i t iy'D r d •tiJ' f 1 SJ,�,�k.
�I r O W "+7 i y'•� i, C I 7 1 f� 1 q 1 �s C
gq
C J ai d
A
YJ
/YdI
r-• U 4 .��r00�� ?,9Jf- y(nff4dS� 0 51
O F
t J V Nom, rn t f4, k F
142
City of Tukwila
h. Finance and Safety Committee
FINANCE AND SAFETY COMMITTEE
Meeting Minutes
June 7, 2011— 5: 00 p.m.; Conference Room #3
PRESENT
Councilmembers: Kathy Hougardy, Chair; Joan Hernandez and Dennis Robertson
Staff. Don Tomaso, Shawn Hunstock, Nick Olivas Mike Villa and Joyce Trantina
Others: Chuck Parrish
CALL TO ORDER: Chair Hougardy called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m.
L PRESENTATIONS No presentations.
IL BUSINESS AGENDA
A. Fireworks Permit: Annual 4ch of Julv Celebration
As required by the Tukwila Municipal Code, staff is seeking full Council approval of a Fireworks Permit
Application submitted by Mr. Tom Whitacre for the fireworks display at the City's annual 4` of July
celebration at Fort Dent. Mr. Whitacre has provided the fireworks display for the past eight years without
incident. Mr. Whitacre will be using a different fireworks supplier this year, but there is no concern
regarding quality or level of service. The Fire Department will continue to utilize fire watch personnel as
in previous years to ensure any fireworks debris that falls on the practice fields are dealt with promptly.
In response to budgetary concerns, Committee Members recalled the amount of discussion this particular
event received during budget review, and commented that savings as a result of budget reductions are /will
be reflected in Parks and Recreation. This Committee requested staff report back on the total costs and
related expenses for this event when possible. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO JUNE 13
COW FOR DISCUSSION.
B. Update: Revenue Generating Reaulatory License (RGRL) Fee
Based on previous Committee request, staff provided additional information regarding non profit
organizations that are exempt from paying the RGRL fee, rental licenses and RGRL fees, and court
interpreters and RGRL fees. Staff summarized other provisions that apply exceptions /exemptions for non-
profit organizations, including an exemption of business license fees.
Per staff calculations, if all businesses that hold non profit exemption status in the City were assessed the
RGRL fee, the City would have received over $145,000 in additional RGRL fee revenue. Many of these
businesses employ over 4,000 employees. The second largest employer in the City is included in this
exemption and does not pay the RGRL fee. Staff reminded the Committee that one of the primary
purposes of Council implementation of the RGRL fee was to fund, in part, transportation related
expenditures. Many of the non -profit businesses impact transportation related infrastructure in the City by
their large number of employees, peak hour trips, and generated traffic volume.
After discussion, the Committee requested additional information from staff regarding estimated fee
impacts on implementing employee thresholds to define RGRL exemptions for non profit businesses.
Specifically, they requested threshold calculations when these exempt organizations have more than 20,
50, 75 or 100 employees. Additionally, based on information provided by Court staff, Committee
members would like to see an RGRL exemption included in the ordinance for language interpreters.
In response to how RGRL revenues are utilized by the City, Committee Chair Hougardy stated that
Council previously discussed utilizing a shareholders group to recommend /identify fund/project use of
143
144
CO UNcm AGENDA SYNOPSIS
Initials ITEM.NO.
Meeting Date Prepared by Ma iem Council review
C
06/13/11 7P-
i 06/20/11 I JP
4
ITEM INFORMATION
CASNUMBE'R. 11-059 STAFF SPONSOR: MINNIE DHALIWAL IORIGINAL AGENDA DATE: 6/13/11
AGENDA ITEM TITLE Interlocal Agreement with the City of Kent regarding permitting for the Tukwila
South wetland mitigation site.
CX11--'GORY Discussion Motion Resolution Ordinance BidAward Public Hearing Other
A4tg Date 06113111 Mtg Date 06120111 A4tg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date
SPONSOR Council Mayor HR DCD Finance Fire IT P&'R Police PWI
SPONSOR'S The approved mitigation plan of the Tukwila South Project includes mitigation of Wetland
SUMMITRY 11 that lies south of South 204 Street in the City of Kent. This interlocal gives Tukwila the
permitting authority for the wetland mitigation area and the processing of a boundary line
adjustment of the drainage district parcel that crosses jurisdictional boundaries.
Ri;IVIEWBD BY COW Mtg. CA &P Cmte F &S Cmte Transportation Cmte
Utilities Cmte Arts Comm. Parks Comm. Planning Comm.
DATE: 05/23/11 COMMITTEE CHAIR: SEAL
RECOMMENDATIONS:
SPONSOR /ADMIN. Department of Community Development
COMMITTEE Unanimous Approval; Forward to Committee of the Whole
COST IMPACT FUND SOURCE
EYPF?NDITURE REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED
Fund Source:
Comments:
J MTG. DATE J RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION
06/13/11
J MTG. DATE J ATTACHMENTS
06/13/11 Informational Memorandum dated 05/17/11
Site Maps
interlocal Agreement with the City of Kent along with Exhibit A
Minutes from the Community Affairs and Parks Committee meeting of 05123/11
06/20/11
145
146
City of Tukwila
Jim Haggerton, Mayor
INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor Haggerton
Community Affairs and Parks Committee
FROM: Jack Pace, Community Development Director
DATE: May 17, 2011
SUBJECT: Interlocal Agreement with the City of Kent regarding permitting for the
Tukwila South wetland mitigation site
ISSUE
Should the City of Tukwila enter into an interlocal agreement with the City of Kent to assume
permitting authority for the Tukwila South wetland mitigation site?
BACKGROUND
The Tukwila South Project consists of approximately 512 acres generally bounded by S 180
Street on the north, S. 204` Street on the south, Orillia Road and 1 -5 on the west and the Green
River on the east. Roughly half of the Tukwila South Master Plan property was in King County
and was annexed into the City of Tukwila in 2009 (Ordinance 2241). The property owner,
Segale Properties LLC, intends to develop the property consistent with the Tukwila South
Master Plan (Ordinance 2234) as adopted with the Development Agreement (Ordinance 2233).
A Draft Environmental Impact Statement was prepared to evaluate different development
scenarios and a Final Environmental Impact Statement was issued in July 2005.
The Tukwila City Council approved the designation of the Tukwila South Property as a Sensitive
Area Master Plan Overlay district (Ordinance 2238). This allows for sensitive area alterations
and mitigation on an area wide basis as opposed to preservation of existing individual wetlands,
watercourses and their buffers, as long as the mitigation results in improvements to water
quality, fish and wildlife habitat and hydrology beyond those that would occur through the
standard application of the provisions of the City's sensitive area regulations. Detailed review of
wetland, watercourse and fisheries mitigation was carried out as part of the Sensitive Areas
Master Plan permit and a decision was issued on September 1, 2010. This included approval of
filling of individual wetlands and four Type 2 streams in exchange for restoration of Johnson
Creek with a fish friendly floodgate, restoration and enhancement of two wetlands (Wetlands 10
and 11), and development of an off channel habitat area in the Green River.
DISCUSSION
Wetland 11 lies outside the City of Tukwila boundaries, with a large portion of it being in the City
of Kent and the remainder in unincorporated King County. It is currently a large undeveloped
parcel located on the south side of S 204` Street. The proposed mitigation work in the City of
Kent would require a separate grade and fill permit from Kent. However since the majority of the
Tukwila South project lies within the city limits of Tukwila and substantial review has been done
by Tukwila on the proposed mitigation, Kent City Council has authorized its Mayor to enter into
147
INFORMATIONAL MEMO
Page 2
this interlocal agreement with the City of Tukwila granting permitting authority to Tukwila for the
wetland mitigation area.
Additionally the project involves relocating and enhancing a reach of Johnson Creek, which is
currently ditched, and installing a fish friendly flap gate to allow year round fish access to the
stream. Johnson Creek is currently located within a parcel that was owned by the King County
Drainage District No 2. Segale Properties has acquired that parcel, which extends into the
jurisdictions of Tukwila, Kent and King County. As part of its mitigation work Segale Properties
shall relocate the portion of the existing Johnson Creek within Tukwila's jurisdiction to a new
area adjacent to the northern boundary of S. 204 Street. The east fork of the drainage ditch
within Kent's jurisdiction shall remain unaffected. This interlocal agreement gives Tukwila the
authority to process the boundary line adjustment for the drainage ditch parcel.
Entering into this interlocal agreement will provide greater consistency for the Tukwila South
project. Also, it will be more efficient for one city to be the lead agency reviewing and monitoring
the wetland mitigation, as opposed to requiring the applicant to obtain separate permits from
different jurisdictions.
RECOMMENDATION
The Community Affairs and Parks Committee is being asked to forward the attached interlocal
agreement with Kent to the Committee of the Whole on June 13, 2011. The City Council will
then consider this item at the June 20, 2011, Regular Meeting and decide whether to authorize
the Mayor to sign the interlocal agreement.
ATTACHMENTS
Site Maps
Interlocal Agreement with Kent
MD 5 -18 -2011
WA2011 Info Memosbterlocal with Kent InfoMemo to CAP.doc
148
4
t
M a fin(
N
a
a�
Nf
F �P
Mv.,,
10 1 Le
Jurisdictional Boundaries
�u
Project Site
So urce Walker b I A�soomm N t;
sa ��ioz
Figure 1 Tukwila South
Site Map Project EIS
149
150
f
r I f� 'C 1, V w 1 'u4�,� ��tt i, r
PQ!
r, ri fti`, n, k' "u�W.�, of {t 3, 't�4, k I ss�rx t ,t t _Vsr; fr� t1� l i t rr yyf y t' +,':n -:'app v a
moan
T
S. I 11 Y iF ,1 T
IK,
w'� V u fa„)'�� alta i ii v s �',,SS(� 1�.N t ,�Y {idi' 1 i��r "f')
q/��� ii�xt>Yr'��"u1'��,Y ��l��y,� „>E',” 1 j "RIM-
"my
I"A
oil
A mp _pw
s t �Y Y ,t �t>I h t 21 1c^ n '��ww w w
S
Aft
I N
u CN
c: v2,
151
152
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF TUKWILA
AND THE CITY OF KENT GRANTING PERMITTING AUTHORITY TO TUKWILA
FOR THE TUKWILA SOUTH WETLAND MITIGATION AREA
THIS INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT "the Agreement is entered into by and between
the CITY OF TUKWILA, a State of Washington municipal corporation "Tukwila and the
CITY OF KENT, a State of Washington municipal corporation "Kent and in conformity with
Chapter 39.34, Revised Code of Washington "RCW
RECITALS
WHEREAS, Segale Properties LLC is the proponent of a mixed -use development
project, located within the City of Tukwila, commonly referred to as the "Tukwila South
Project and
WHEREAS, as mitigation for certain elements of the Tukwila South Project, Segale
Properties LLC is required to implement a wetland mitigation plan, which plan has been
approved by the City of Tukwila; and
WHEREAS, the majority of the Tukwila South Project is in the City of Tukwila,
however, a portion of the area identified as a wetland mitigation area for the Tukwila South
project is within the jurisdictional limits of the City of Kent. The subject wetland mitigation area
is described in Exhibit A, attached and incorporated herein by reference "Wetland Mitigation
Area and
WHEREAS, pursuant to a separate agreement, Segale Properties LLC has acquired fee
simple interest in and to the drainage ditch previously owned by King County Drainage District
No. 2 (the "District which drainage ditch is a single parcel located within the Wetland
Mitigation Area and extends into the jurisdictions of Tukwila, Kent and King County. As part of
its mitigation work, Segale Properties LLC shall relocate the portion of the existing Johnson
Creek ditch-north of S. 204 Street and within Tukwila's jurisdiction to a new area adjacent to
the northern boundary of S. 204 Street. The east fork of the drainage ditch within Kent's
jurisdiction shall remain unaffected. Upon completion of the above described revisions, Segale
Properties is required pursuant to its agreement with the District to transfer and convey to the
District the fee simple interest in and to the revised drainage ditch; and
WHEREAS, Tukwila and Kent agree that granting permitting authority to Tukwila on
behalf of Kent for the Wetland Mitigation Area will provide greater consistency for the Tukwila
South project and cost efficiencies for both parties; and
WHEREAS, this Agreement is authorized by the Interlocal Cooperation Act, RCW
39.34;
Page 1
153
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the following recitals and the mutual promises
and covenants contained herein, it is agreed as follows:
AGREEMENT
1. Pumose of Interlocal Agreement. The purpose of this Agreement is to provide an
efficient permitting and monitoring process for the Wetland Mitigation Area to avoid the
inherent uncertainty of two separate review processes.
2. Review and Decision Making Process for Permitting and Approvals Needed for the
Wetland Mitigation Area.
2.1 Kent shall be responsible for issuing and inspecting any right -of -way or
utility permits for the Wetland Mitigation Area. Tukwila shall be solely responsible for
receiving, processing, enforcing, and monitoring all other permits or applications for the Wetland
Mitigation Area pursuant to the Tukwila Municipal Code and any pertinent state and federal
statutes. Tukwila shall verify that the applicant has obtained all state and federal permits required
for the Wetland Mitigation Area.
2.2 Tukwila shall require that the applicant record a Sensitive Area Easement,
in a form and manner approved by Kent, containing all critical areas and critical area buffers in
the Wetland Mitigation Area in accordance with Kent City Code 11.06.640. The Sensitive Area
Easement shall allow the District's continued use, repair and maintenance of the drainage ditch
located on parcel number 0322049049.
2.3 Tukwila shall notify Kent when Tukwila sends the project work in the
Wetland Mitigation Area to final acceptance and closeout and begins the monitoring and
maintenance periods.
2.4 Tukwila shall send Kent copies of the following items:
2.4.1 Any permits or approvals issued by Tukwila, state or federal
agencies for the Wetland Mitigation Area.
2.4.2 Any pre construction meeting notices for the Wetland Mitigation
Area.
2.4.3 Any communication regarding construction and installation
schedule for the Wetland Mitigation Area.
2.4.4 All critical areas mitigation monitoring reports for the Wetland
Mitigation Area.
2.5 For applications that require public notice, Tukwila must include Kent on
Page 2
154
the list of agencies who will receive notice. Response to the notice will be required for Kent to
be a party of record.
2.6 Tukwila's processing and review of permits and applications for the
Wetland Mitigation Area shall include but not be limited to: rendering decisions to approve,
condition, or deny such applications; conducting inspections; issuing correction notices, permit
extensions and completion of extensions; approving final construction; and evaluating
compliance with approved conditions.
2.7 Tukwila shall process the boundary line adjustment application to be filed
by Segale Properties LLC to effect the changes discussed in the fourth recital, provided however,
nothing herein shall require either Tukwila or Kent to secure King County's consent to the
proposed boundary line adjustment.
2.8 Appeals of any decisions by Tukwila shall be processed by Tukwila pursuant
to applicable Tukwila Municipal Code provisions.
3. Duration and Termination. This Agreement shall begin upon written execution by
both parties and will continue until terminated. Either party may terminate this Agreement by
providing written notice of such intent to terminate at least ninety (90) days prior to the
termination date. Upon termination of this Agreement Tukwila shall provide Kent with a copy
of the files and records of all permit applications received or processed under this Agreement. In
the event of termination, Tukwila agrees to provide any further information or assistance
regarding the Tukwila South project or the Wetland Mitigation Area as Kent may thereinafter
reasonably require. Upon termination, Tukwila shall not be required to assign any portion of its
rights, if any, in performance bonds or other surety pertaining to construction or maintenance
activities to be undertaken in the Wetland Mitigation Area to Kent; provided, however, that
nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to preclude Kent, upon termination, from requiring
Segale Properties LLC to submit a performance bond or other surety pertaining to construction
or maintenance activities to be undertaken in the Wetland Mitigation Area directly to Kent, in
accordance with applicable provisions of the Kent City Code, including, but not limited to Kent
City Code Section 11.06.570.
4. Indemnification.
4.1. Tukwila shall indemnify and hold harmless Kent and its officers, agents,
employees, and elected officials or any of them from any and all claims, actions, suits, liability,
loss, costs, expenses and damages of any nature whatsoever by any reason of or arising out of
any act or omission of Tukwila, its officers, agents, employees and elected officials, or any of
them relating to or arising out of the performance of this Agreement. In the event that any suit
based upon such a claim, action, loss or damage is brought against Kent, Tukwila shall defend
the same at its sole cost and expense, provided that Tukwila retains the right to participate in said
suit if any principle of governmental or public law is involved; and if final judgment be rendered
against Kent or its officers, agents, employees and elected officials, or any of them, or jointly
against Kent and Tukwila and their respective officers, agents, employees and elected officials,
or any of them, Tukwila shall satisfy the same.
Page 3
155
4.2. Kent shall indemnify and hold harmless Tukwila and its officers, agents,
employees and elected officials, or any of them, from any and all claims, actions, suits, liability,
loss, costs, expenses and damages of any nature whatsoever, by any reason of or arising out of
any act or omission of Kent, its officers, agents, employees and elected officials, or any of them,
relating to or arising out of the performance of this Agreement. In the event that any suit based
upon such a claim, action, loss or damage is brought against Tukwila, Kent shall defend the same
at its sole cost and expense; provided that Kent retains the right to participate in said suit if any
principle of governmental or public law is involved; and if final judgment be rendered against
Tukwila or its officers, agents, employees and elected officials, or any of them, or jointly against
Tukwila and Kent and their respective officers, agents, employees and elected officials, or any of
them, Kent shall satisfy the same.
5. Dispute Resolution. It is the parties' intent to resolve any disputes relating to the
interpretation or application of this Agreement informally through discussions at the staff level
with the respective departmental Directors and Administrators. In the event disputes cannot be
resolved informally at the staff level, resolution shall be sought by each city's City Administrator
or Chief Administrative Officer, as the case may be, within thirty (30) days of written notice
from either party of a failure to resolve the dispute at the staff level, and if unsuccessful, then the
parties agree to submit the dispute to non binding mediation/dispute resolution. The
mediation/dispute resolution process shall be determined via mutual agreement of the parties and
the selection of a Mediator must be jointly agreed upon by the parties. Venue for any action
relating to the interpretation or enforcement of this Agreement shall be solely in King County
Superior Court.
6. Independent Contractor. Each party to this Agreement is an independent contractor
with respect to the subject matter herein. Nothing in this Agreement shall make any employee of
Tukwila an employee of Kent, and vice versa, for any purpose, including, but not limited to, for
withholding of taxes, payment of benefits, worker's compensation pursuant to Title 51 RCW, or
any other rights or privileges accorded to either party's employee by virtue of their employment.
At all times pertinent hereto, employees of Tukwila are acting as Tukwila employees and
employees of Kent are acting as Kent employees.
7. Partial Invalidity. Whenever possible, each provision of this Agreement shall be
interpreted in such a manner as to be effective and valid under applicable law. Any provisions of
this Agreement which shall prove to be invalid, void or illegal shall in no way affect, impair or
invalidate any other provisions hereof, and such other provisions shall remain in full force and
effect.
8. Assimability. The rights, duties and obligations of either party to this Agreement may
not be assigned to any third party without the prior written consent of the other party, which
consent shall not be unreasonably withheld.
9. No Third -Partv Rights. Except as expressly provided herein, nothing in this
Agreement shall be construed to permit anyone other than the parties hereto and their successors
and assigns to rely upon the covenants and agreements herein contained nor to give any such
Page 4
156
third party a cause of action (as a third -party beneficiary or otherwise) on account of any
nonperformance hereunder.
10. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the
parties hereto and no other verbal or written assurance or promise by any party hereto is effective
or binding unless included in this Agreement. Proposed changes that are mutually agreed to shall
be incorporated by a written amendment hereto.
11. Filing With Auditor. This Agreement shall be filed with the King County Auditor
pursuant to RCW 39.34.040.
CITY OF TUKWILA CITY OF KENT
By: By:
Mayor Jim Haggerton Mayor Suzette Cooke
Exhibit A Legal Description of Wetland Mitigation Area in the City of Kent
Page 5
157
158
EXHIBIT A
Legal Description of Wetland Mitigation Area
Parcel "A TPN 0322049102
Beginning at a stone monument which is the southeast corner of Section 3, Township 22 North,
Range 4 East, W.M., in King County, Washington;
thence S89 °36'00 "W, along the south line of said Section 3, a distance of 1326.60 feet to the
TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence S89 °36'00 "W, along said section line, 866.40 feet;
thence N26 °08'00 "E 1477.50 feet to the south line of South 204 Street; thence S89 °37'00 "E,
along said road, 791.30 feet; thence S35 °36'00 "W 973.80 feet, along the west bank of drainage
ditch; thence S00 °38'00 "W 522.90 feet, along the west bank of drainage ditch, to the POINT OF
BEGINNING.
Parcel `B Portion of TPN 0322049049
Together with those 30 and 40 foot strips lying within the southeast quarter of Section 3,
Township 22 North, Range 4 East, W.M., condemned on the 7 th of October, 1905 for drainage
ditch right of way for benefit of Drainage District Number 2 in King County Superior Court
Cause Number 47302.
159
City ®f Tukwila
sti
Community Affairs and Parks Committee
COMMUNITY AFFAIRS AND PARKS COMMITTEE
Meeting Minutes
May 23, 2011 5:00 p.nz.; Conference Roonz #3
PRESENT
Councilmembers: De'Sean Quinn, Acting Chair; Joe Duffie and Allan Ekberg (sitting in for Verna Seal)
Staff: Jack Pace, Nora Gierloff, Brandon Miles and Kimberly Matej
Guests: Jami Balint, Segale Legal Counsel
CALL TO ORDER: Acting Committee Chair Quinn called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m.
I. PRESENTATIONS
No presentations.
II. BUSINESS AGENDA
A. Liahtine /Eneriav UDRrades: Potential for Additional Grant Funding
Staff is seeking Committee approval to submit a request to the Washington State Department of Commerce
for additional grant funding for lighting /energy upgrades; and if funding is awarded, to forward an
amendment to the current agreement to accept additional funds directly to the June 13 COW for discussion.
At the February 22, 2011, regular meeting, the Council approved a grant agreement with Washington
State Department of General Administration in the amount of $163,904 for the design and completion
of energy /lighting upgrades at various City facilities. Those upgrades are almost complete and the
Department of Commerce has notified the City that additional grant monies may be available due to
some entities not being able to utilize their grant fiends.
If the City receives additional funding, it would likely be under $50,000. The projects eligible for
energy /lighting upgrades include: parking lot lights at City Hall and the 6300 Building; indoor lights at
Old City Hall; outdoor lights at Tukwila Park, Bicentennial Park and the Golf Course; and installation
of occupancy sensors in various locations.
Committee Member Quinn requested that staff provide an end of implementation report that outlines
results and cost savings of the energy /lighting upgrades. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL, APPLY FOR
ADDITIONAL FUNDS. FORWARD TO JUNE 13 COW FOR DISCUSSION, IF NECESSARY.
B. Interlocal Agreement: Kent/Tukwila PernlittM2 for Tukwila South Wetland Area
Staff is seeking Council approval to enter into an interlocal agreement with the City of Kent to grant the
City of Tukwila permitting authority relative to a wetland mitigation area associated with the Tukwila South
project. Since the project's mitigation site is located within Kent's jurisdiction, an interlocal agreement is
necessary.
The Kent City Council has already authorized this permitting authority which will allow the applicant
(Segale Properties) to facilitate permitting through one city rather than two different jurisdictions.
Additionally, permitting through Tukwila will provide that applicant with the constancy of utilizing the
same parameters as those being followed for the Tukwila South project. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL.
FORWARD TO JUNE 13 COW FOR DISCUSSION
C. Comprehensive Plan Ui)date: Manufacturing Industrial Center
Staff is seeking full Council approval to update the City's Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code
regulations relating to the Manufacturing Industrial Center (MIC). This recommended update, as per staff
160
CO UNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS
Initials ITEM NO.
Meeting Date Prepared by Mayo 'n Council review
�r I
06/13/11 I BG
I Al
r 06/20/11 I BG
ITEM INFORMATION
TAFF SPONSOR: BOB GIBERSON I ORIGINAL AGENDA ATE:
CAS NUMBER: 1 1 06� STAFF A D 6 13 11
AGENDA ITEM TITLE Bid Award for Interurban Ave South Gravity Sewer Project
CATEGORY Disczu Motion Resolution Ordinance Bid Award Public Hearing Other
Mtg Date 06/13/11 Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date 06120111 Mtg Date Mtg Date
SPONSOR Council Mayor Adm Svcs DCD Finance Fire Legal P&R Police PW
SPONSOR This project will remove Sewer Pump Station No. 7 and replace it with sewer pipe fed by
SUMMARY gravity along Interurban Ave South. The project was advertised for bids on April 14 and 21
and 5 bids were opened on April 28, 2011. The low bid of $746,176.80 was from R.L. Alia
Company. Alia's references have been checked and found to be satisfactory. Council is
being asked to award this construction contract to R.L. Alia Company in the amount of
$746,176.80.
REVIEWED BY COW Mtg. CA &P Cmte F &S Cmte Transportation Cmte
Utilities Cmte Arts Comm. Parks Comm. Planning Comm.
DATE: 5/24/11 COMMITTEE CHAIR: DE'SEAN QUINN
RECOMMENDATIONS:
SPONSOR /ADMIN. Public Works
COMMITTEE Unanimous Approval; Forward to Committee of the Whole
COST IMPACT F. VND SOURCE
EXPENDI'T'URE REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED
$746,176.80 $923,000.00 $0.00
Fund Source: 402 SEWER FUND (PAGE 120, 121, 2011 CIP PAGE 277, 2011 -2012 BUDGET)
Comments:
WTG.DATE-1 RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION
6/13/11
6/20/11
WO DATE ATTACHMENTS
6/13/11 Informational Memorandum dated 5/20/11
Map of construction area
Bid Tabulation
[Minutes from the Utilities Committee meeting of 05/24/11
6/20/11
I
161
162
City of Tukwila
Jim Haggerton, Mayor
INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor Haggerton
UTILITIES COMMITTEE
FROM: Public Works Director
DATE: May 20, 2011
SUBJECT: Interurban Avenue South Gravity Sewer
Project No. 90440208
Bid Award
ISSUE
Award the bid for the Interurban Avenue South Gravity Sewer Project (see attached map for project location).
BACKGROUND
The sewer system on Interurban Avenue South was installed in 1967 under L.I.D. No. 12. The present condition of the
sewer lift station is very poor and the proposed project will eliminate the need for the lift station, reducing city
maintenance staff time since pumps will not be required and the system will operate strictly by gravity.
ANALYSIS
The project was advertised for bids on April 14 and 21 and 5 bids were opened April 28, 2011. The bids were
reviewed and tabulated and one error was found in the sales tax in the amount of $0.02 for Titan Earthworks,
LCC. R. L. Alia Company submitted the apparent low bid with $746,176.80. R.L. Alia's references have been
checked and found to be satisfactory. The Engineer's estimate was $680,000.00.
Expenditures Fundinq Budget
Bid Award Contract Alia 746,176.80 Construction 750,000.00
Contingency (11 82,079.45 2011 Sewer Repair 75,000.00
360 Networks Conduit Relocation 20,000.00 Station Painting 15,000.00
Construction Mgmt (10 74,617.68 Construction Mgmt 80,000.00
Repair of Sewer Mains 3.000.00
Total 922,873.93 Total 923 000.00
The project budget includes $75,000 from the 2011 C.I.P. line item for the Annual Sewer Repair Program, $15,000
from the Sewer Utility for pump station painting (402.01.535.800.48.01) and $3,000 from the Sewer Utility for repairs
(402.01.535.800.48.03). The use of the funds from other line items is required because of the poor condition of the
existing lift station. If the lift station should fail, the cost of the repairs will be at a very high cost.
When the 2011 -2016 budget process was completed in August of 2010, the project construction budget was
$750,000.00. This past winter the price of diesel fuel increased 38 gasoline increased 26% and PVC pipe increased
61 All of these price increases would account for the higher construction bid.
RECOMMENDATION
The Council is being asked to award the construction of the Interurban Avenue South Gravity Sewer Project to the R.L.
Alia Company in the amount of $746,176.80 and consider this item at the June 13, 2011 Committee of the Whole and
subsequent June 20, 2011 Regular Meeting.
Attachments: Map
Bid Tabulation
WAPW EngTROJECTSW SW Projects104sw08 Interurban Sewer UpgradesVnfo Menw Bid Award 050211 gl- sb.doc
163
164
14 t� t
It N 1
j ttr
t
OP
t �g
tt vet
Ah
tY f i �lr
`s
t
k 1V
i.,
1
f rl
N Photo Date: 2009
w E Interurban Ave S Gravity Sewer
s
Work Zone
Not to Scale 5
166
9 8 8 8 8 S 8 9 8 8 8 8 g 8 8 g 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 g S 8 8 9 8 8 92. Cl)
m m N S n ci
Oc t
a N N N N- N N N N N- N N N N N- N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N«
8 8 8 8 8 S 8 8 9 m m N««
F m
'o a
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
8 8 8 m 8 8 8 6 8 6 8 6 8 6 8
N 8 S m m S w m n
8 —o
o S
a N N N N N N N N— N N N N— N N N NNN N N N N N Nw W
N
p N N N N N N N N N N N N .n N N
8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 S 8 m S O
3 �a
8888 8888 T �o
z 8 8 4 2 a
m
o a N N N N N
i N N N N N N N N N N m N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
a o 8 9 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 g S m S S S m 8
g d w m ry n m d m m d m 8 n N m m 8 m w m m w«« m m m w m
-g 888 g g g 88 8889 8 8898 o
S S 8 8 m m 8 8 8 2 8 d m m n m S d e m w S
d e
a °n
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N m N N N N N N N N N N N N m N N NN N
m a g 6
m n m m g m m 1 m N m w m m m n I d
m m d w m N m ry w n $o r
Q
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 d 8 8 8 8 8 8 9 9 8 9 8
w m m m m N d^ m m m ry o
m n N9 r
'a
8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 9 9 9 8 8 8 9 8 8 8
o
o z
oiizoara. °z z „z�° z
a a a
Fa aoa a¢a o N a a a G
m m
3 o S G i a i
o zo a a o
S o Y a 3 o a f a z
a 3 S W 3 w m
m i x 8 i
f z z a i a w 6 0 5 i a 5 o
o LL o i N a N a
_d m f —3 8888 8888 8888 8888
z
167
City of Tukwila
Utilities Committee
UTILITIES COMMITTEE
Meeting Minutes
May 24, 2011 5:00 p.m. Conference Room #1
PRESENT De'Sean Quinn, Chair; Dennis Robertson and Kathy Hougardy
Staff: Bob Giberson, Frank Iriarte, Robin Tischmak, Mike Cusick, and Gail Labanara
CALL TO ORDER: Committee Chair Quinn called the meeting to order at 5:01 p.m.
I. PRESENTATIONS
No Presentations
II. BUSINESS AGENDA
A. Bid Award: Interurban Avenue South Gravity Sewer
Staff is seeking full Council approval to award a bid in the amount of $746,176.80 to R.L. Alia
Company for the construction of the Interurban Avenue South Gravity Sewer project. This project
will eliminate Pump Station No. 7, and replace it with sewer pipe fed by gravity. The removal of the
pump station will lower maintenance costs and the gravity sewer Iine is expected to last
approximately 50 years.
Staff discussed receiving high bids and Committee Member Robertson inquired if this project was
the best use of the limited sewer funds that are available. Mike Cusick stated that the bidding climate
is starting to worsen due to recent fuel price increases and the lack of raw materials (that may be
going to rebuild Japan after the earthquake). Smaller contractors are also having problems securing
bid bonds. However, not going through with this project poses a greater risk if the sewer pumps
should break down, which would result in an emergency repairs that could cost approximately
$500,000 to $750,000.
The project's contingency is only I I% but staff is looking at a potential change in the project. that
would reduce costs. If the project costs increase over contingency, staff will return to Council and
look at the Sewer's Ending Fund Balance or a possible interfund loan. Committee Chair Quinn
questioned the effect of the gravity sewer in case of a flood and the response was that it would be the
same liability as the pump station. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO JUNE 13 COW
FOR DISCUSSION.
III. MISCELLANEOUS
B. Update on Southcenter Pkwy Extension and TUC Access (Klickitat) projects.
Meeting adjourned at 5:29 p.m.
Next meeting: Tuesday, June 14, 2011 5:00 p.m. Conf. Room No. 1.
40 Committee Chair Approval
Minutes by.GL, Reviewed by 8G, MC and KAM.
168
Co uNcm AGENDA SYNOPSIS
Initialr R EM NO.
x;. I Meetiun� Date Prepared by o,�' Mayor rev Council review
06/13/11 I B
06/20/11 I BG
ITER.INFOR
i MATION
CAS NUMBER: I 1 —061 ST SPONSOR: BOB GIBERSON I ORIGINAL AGENDA DATE: 6/13/11
AGENDA ITEM TITLE Resolution adopting the Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program 2012 2017
CATEGORY Discussion Motion Resolution Ordinance BidAzvard Public Hearing Other
Mtg Date 06113111 Mtg Date tlltg Date 06120111 Aftg Date Mtg Date Wtg Date 06120111 Mtg Date
SPONSOR Council Mayor Adm Svcs DCD ❑Finance ❑Fire ❑Legal PAR ❑Police ®PWI
SPONSOR'S The Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) is required by RCW to be updated
SUMNIARY annually. The TIP is primarily a finanical planning document for projects competing for
grants. A Public Hearing is scheduled on June 20, 2011 for the 2012 2017 TIP. After the
Public Hearing, the TIP is adopted by resolution and is then incorporated into the Regional
and State TIPs.
REVIEWED BY COW Mtg. CA &P Cmte F &S Cmte Transportation Cmte
Utilities Cmte Arts Comm. Parks Comm. Planning Comm.
DATE: 6/06/11 COMMITTEE CHAIR: JOAN HERNANDEZ
RECOMMENDATIONS:
SPONSOR/ADMIN. Public Works
COMMITTEE Unanimous Approval; Forward to Committee of the Whole
COST IMPACT SOURCE
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED
$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Fund Source:
Comments:
4
Yr
MTG DATE 'RECOfZD' OF. COUNCIL. ACTION
6/13/11
6/20/11
`NITG ,;,DATE ,TT/�CHMENTS`
Y 1 4
6113/11 Informational Memorandum dated 6/03/11
Draft Resolution
Draft 2012 2017 TIP Spreadsheet
Current Adopted 2011 2016 TIP
Minutes from the Transportation Committee meeting of 06/06/11
6/20/11
169
170
City of Tukwila
Jim Haggerton, Mayor
INF ®RIVIATI ®IVAL MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor Haggerton
Transportation Committ ee
FROM: Public Works Director,
DATE: June 3, 2011
SUBJECT: Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program (2012 -2017)
ISSUE
Annual update of the Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program for the years 2012 2017.
BACKGROUND
The Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) is updated annually as required by RCW. The TIP
is adopted by resolution after a public hearing at the local agency level and incorporated into the
regional and state TIPS. The TIP is primarily a financial planning document for projects competing
for grants. Any project submitted for federal grant funding must be included in the local, regional
and state adopted TIPs.
The TIP is a rolling plan showing various funding sources: grants, developer, and local funds.
Projects "roll" as funds or stages occur (design report, final design, and construction).
Tukwila's TIP and Capital Improvement Program (CIP) list many of the same transportation related
projects. The TIP lists only those transportation- related projects planned within the next six years
that are deemed regionally significant. The City's CIP lists transportation projects planned in the
next six years and beyond, as well as water, sewer, surface water, and capital facilities. The TIP is
required to be adopted by July 1 on an annual basis, while the CIP is prepared during summer /fall
in conjunction with the City's budget preparation. Differences between the two may be due to
priority changes, funding availability changes, or other factors that normally occur during the time
between adoptions of each document.
ACTION TAKEN
The attached spreadsheet is the "Draft" 2012 2017 TIP and was created by modifying the 2011
2016 TIP to add or remove projects, adjust project costs, and reprioritize the list of projects.
Deleted: Southcenter Parkway Extension and Tukwila Urban Center Access (Klickitat).
RECOMMENDATION
The Council is being asked. to approve the resolution for the 2012 -2017 Six -Year Transportation
Improvement Program and consider this item at the June 13, 2011 Committee of the Whole and
subsequent June 20, 2010 Regular Meeting with a Public Hearing.
Attachments: Resolution
2012 2017 "Draft" Transportatiorr Improvement Program (TIP) Spreadsheet
Current Adopted 2011 2016 TIP
W:\PW Eng \PROJECTS\A- RW RS Projects \TIP \tip2012 memo.docx
171
172
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA,
WASHINGTON, ADOPTING A_ SIX -YEAR TRANSPORTATION
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (2012- 2017), AND DIRECTING THE SAME
TO BE FILED WITH THE STATE SECRETARY OF TRANSPORTATION
AND THE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT BOARD.
WHEREAS, pursuant to the requirements of RCW Chapters 35.77 and 47.26 as
amended, the City Council of the City of Tukwila has previously adopted a
Transportation Improvement Program and thereafter periodically modified said
Transportation Improvement Program by resolution; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the work accomplished under said
program, determined current and future City street and arterial needs and, based upon
these findings, has prepared a Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program for the
ensuing six calendar years (2012- 2017); and
WHEREAS, on June 20, 2011, a public hearing was held regarding the City's Six
Year Transportation Improvement Program;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA,
WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Program Adopted. A six -year Transportation Improvement Program
for the calendar years 2012 -2017 is hereby adopted.
Section 2. Filing of Program. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to
file "a copy of this resolution, together with the exhibit attached hereto, with the
Secretary of Transportation and the Transportation Improvement Board of the State of
Washington.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON,
at a Regular Meeting thereof this day of 2011.
ATTEST/ AUTHENTICATED:
Alan Ekberg, Council President
Christy O'Flaherty, CMC, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM BY:
Filed with the City Clerk:
Passed by the City Council:
Office of the City Attorney Resolution Number:
Exhibit: City of Tukwila' s Six -Year Transportation
Improvement Program from 2012 to 2017
w: \pw eng \projects \a rw rs projects\ tip\ tip resolution 2012- 2017.docx Page 1 of 1
173
174
O O (D O O O O O N ED N N O 0 0 0 0 0 (n 0 0 (n V 0 0 0 00
M V N (D V 00 V (D O M M O r- O O n O O r- V O O 00 O 00
V r 00 O I- V r (D (D (n Lf) M r O r (D CO co O r O r N r (D
r (D O r M r O Nr- M
N r
0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
a) 0 0 v co (D 0 LO C\j 0 0 0 C)
O N
Q) to r r to M r r N
O W cn
N U c
N O (D LO LO L0 0 0 Lr) co O O O LO
C O O C) a0 N LO I- I-- N V N O M M N
7 O M O N O V N M to U')
r r if) O
O r
Z
0
0 Lo CD LO
f- N Q)
U- W V
m
CO
CO o co
co
co 0 00
a) a
O N N
N
LL
O O V O O Lo O c D I- r- r- (n O O o 0 U) 0 0 U) V 0 0 0 O O 0)
J 0) CO N (D r- M V N V O I- (C) to O O N Q) O O f- V M O O� h
Q V r O O V V r oo (O M D CO r (D r r V (n O O (D N (D N N r N (D
O r 0 i'- O to r r r M V r M O M V
N N Cl)
r
F
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 (n O O LO V o 0 0 0 0 h
r (n to Cl) CO O O O N O O O N V M O O r
ti N M r O O M CO r r V 0 0 (D N (D N N r L
r r r r M r r V M O V M CO
O r N N n
N
O O O O o 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cl) 0
O N
O f0 00
Q r
O O
N N
C
U O O r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a)
O W N (Q ((7 (f) O
O cM-- r r N
N
C
U) O O ,r- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (D N
0 N (D r L LO
r M (D
U O r
O N
O
a_ O o 0 0 0 LO N 0 0 0 0 N O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 M C
M
N r V M (D V 0
(O C Y
O O U
N Y
W
(D U) Co 0 0 W O W I� (C) (n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O T Qen
O Lc) O LO V (D (D r V r O N Lo O o0 3 N
N N I- M M r V r r tD
r r r V r M cu Q
O cu
N C
ro
O
r. Q) V O 0 0 (D 07 O O N M V (n M f- CO O N M V LO (D I- W O V V
Q r r r r N N N N N N N N co M M M M M M M Cl) V V V LO Y
N O O
a.
a)
d T Q)
ro 0)
E c 0) O C O 3: 'O W C O N
C i. m O Y> O
CL `o)Q- Em cU) ca o a F- a cQ E(n��
P O (roi E U >,-0 (%n 0) a) N D a) m a) a`) U) o
d ro -Y co ro Q) a) a) (n L r E m> O (D Q) O N
m "(n 3 N C C N U) LL 1 O Q T -O E C (6
r m
Q) 0 -0 m� "o 0 D o o a j a Q (A Y� O
c a) d F Y O cn m Z a m Q� ro (D 0 0 m ro i O
N o m m 0 E w M E c (n 0 3 o a
U U .a`.) 0 V N (D O m C U C `O r ro 0 (n ro a 0 ui
UJ Lr) N H 0 ro a m C, ro ow Y� m m a a)�
U 0 c a) n m Y ro(n c< o- UQmatS (n
H LU 0� >�a 0 =D mcp c c a) ro��w t
LL 0 mQ O c 65 a-'i ro m- a) U
co cu cn m w -0 W
0) �'w c�� �v 0 o a`)p cYroa?Y(D �.cno�v a) O
T) c o O c O c CU c c r (a z) O U
Z Q m f— Q cn Q cn w F- H F- U) i— cn z (n u) c7 a.
0
N O r N M V LO (D I- M O ON N N N N N N N N
r r N M V (f7 (D I� co Q) r r r r r r r r r
CD
175
E
L T 'o N Z a
0 N w V Q V
O N
W W W W
C T N U O
O LL W
O m m
c Z s 2. m fl.
r o N
T, C d
O 0 c o r y v m ui
L N o m e M
Q Q 2 th O.
E
W
0 O o c o n
O 41 -4
U. o x
N X
L tD
Q G N
N o c
m
t7 O
d)
L v E c 1i
Q E
x o N l
(n o m a
U 0 a N 2 F
a J c 0 0
c o UIiU 0
m N
H {L A N N O M O
a a
lL Z• Z N
O C
U
d LL LL LL a v"i
oaf o O
m m m f m m m N
0 N
ase4d loafad m l Q F I. C H I a¢ 0 F 0 F 0 H a F
s-p-o A an nl I F-a0 I �timo. C7 3: -wn 0 ah ;t 000
LL LL
416.0 lelol m
ui
sn1e1S I'� I m O_ l a U) (L 0_
(s)ad,(i a l o 10 0 0 0 0
lua wanmdwf
A ry rn
G z
17 u 1 I o
o
o S^ m s a
F U aw` E 0 3� m� n NE Fa
o o
Cc o. o� og m ti o aim .c a_' _a3
CL
1. °A a
E c o°c a¢ v m m u q Z
E a Z q o$ BS c a a c� y r p�
O 1= m qEm ¢m of E' m NLT o°
An m` a
c waa`nmo e� gma'„ mq t
Y SIN od 3ci ju: °Eac Eat
L F- r a
w aagwnN I I o
A N N M a V7 O r
3 O (luoud c
0
z Z sseIO I rn v I v o m
a U U leuollound
176
N
C
o Z
z m
z
w
LU
CS1 O N T W m N
Q N N
G. tD
LL O a
t U
cc
S.
Q Q d J N O N~
O
CL
N
Q N
to
C J ur p
Lo
ro o
d�a
7
U m N
N LL LL. LL N O N f6
h
�aloid `0la r3aN ,�t7am1 -3 1 o�
ase4d l o°o I
o MillIR
saP
I N
6. I I N
418ua1 te7
l N o v
N M
sntal5 i o
r E
luewanoad
O u
R a 8 o C m m
n w
ai
si
c
m G o o E o
E d 0 z ro a Eo asp dN ¢sad
c in
an o
cf. oY a m� qN� I �g o3
K
o .3 0 d v
a, x �I M C`. 1 I rn
r a4WnN N m
bUt4ild I m
c m
Ip�und
Q U
N
G
O
Z N
N
N_
J
o Y 117 y
Z 1 Ui U N
LU
Is
o N 0
w/ 'o,
Z O
L
7 dp N .01 N N N
N
o
ck. r u.
1 J
T
y a N •A v 9 tr1 G O �I p�
`p O
bN"
N
2 1 b V N O-
3
'0
LL O
a
cn w
sladAi
1UaWa WdW{ ro
L r
to
C o 1 o c EF a o i mm a�gE N
26 mmm,A
ods o o d'•� 33a $a o r' =s xs`� 1= m
m
c
d
N W
N O d U O 1
O q
r,
E r F
m
3 'o o ssQtO r
c Z a„ l euo!1�u n d
A� a 0 U
RS o ac m^ Z p
r N .O Qo N, z a z a z
O 04 N
m
Q m n v W w W w W N
D m a c' U U U U U 3
O
C o 0 0 0
N Z
E O O O ip N N N N
p c m aFio N N N
T- o C o N
0 c) 6 2 0 r U v m y
i
N 0 m u c
Q. Q N W dl
mQ a
E D
C O o r0 N n
R W m
o
m o
C is r ii
C C N-
N J c N
N
x o m LL
S
D
o ii
V N
0 mam
r
LL d
O
O)
p a d a
d NIL U N m
O LL LL
J
asENd leafad m l a H a F a a H a
saPO3 A11111f1 nl 3r0u 0 amr3 a ar3m 3rma 3ra
LL
416u01 le101 aO o N o
snlels I I a a a a d a
(s)adAl
lua —wdwl 0 0 0 0 0
e o
o zw
yaj m m n a m LL y 3 m N
C
l0 m 'v E a
r U y w
Y a z D 0 d
E c S
ai a
O o d E 0.
a Z¢ a e� z o
Ic
o
o o
v LL v a c.N e$ 3 m ism m'm m mv`Oi LLo r
G N a d N m O NU mq �A
of s n cov od U6 ui u: m�E m �Em_ zY E� 3 m E �Em �H
c c� d oE �nm °v
N F-
N
m jagwnN N I N N N N N N N
3 d /1!Joud t
o Z
Z o
d
U U leuopoun j
179
N
C
O
D
'LS
d
N
O
1 1 Z CL
0
N
td Lo p tiU��� w N
Y T N U v
A
O N mI� and I uY k o N
E
r c
O O o N N d
N d
Q,
u
e
o
d
o
YC
N
7 9 A D N
Y W pi V o L r f
o LL
c
y 7
LL
v v a�u.0 f
o w r
1
r
m� y
aseUd 1 °afad u a N r 3
0
F
saPO� At4tPt C
G
y16ua'1 tatol a
�I d
smstS
tuawa.A o
N
O m
O
ae m
1: 2-A Z R p cn m u 3
m
N Q
I to
q m
p r Y O C$ a d o d
v_
r l s" aa gwntJ a 1
1 3 Z Z ssel�
Q U
City of Tukwila
F
Transportation Committee
TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE
Meeting Minutes
June 6, 2011— 5: 00 p.m. Conference Rooin I
PRESENT
Councilmembers: Joan Hernandez, Chair; Joe Duffie and Verna Seal
Staff: Bob Giberson, Frank Iriarte, Robin Tischmak, Cyndy Knighton, and Gail Labanara
CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order at 5:02 p.m.
I. PRESENTATIONS
No presentations.
II. BUSINESS AGENDA
A. Annual Update to Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program 2012 -2017
Staff is seeking Council adoption, via resolution, of the 2012 -2017 Six -Year Transportation Improvement
Program (TIP). The TIP is a list of regionally significant transportation projects that have grant funding
potential. This list does not commit the City to implement or construct any project.
An annual update to the TIP is required by the Revised Code of Washington (RCW). This annual rolling
program is generally modified to reflect the City's CIP, as the two are updated at different times of the year.
Differences between the two plans are often based on and reflective of the time between the adoptions of
each document as well as changes in priority and funding availability
There are no additions to the 2012 -2017 TIP; however, the Southcenter Parkway Extension and Tukwila
Urban Center Access (Klickitat) projects will be deleted as they are under construction and no future grant
funding will be sought. Committee Member Duffie suggested that 53` Avenue South be added as it is a
safety issue for schoolchildren (which is listed as the first project under Residential Improvements, page 5,
2011 CIP). Robin Tischmak stated that 53` Avenue South is mistakenly classified on the State's maps and
Cyndy Knighton will research if 53` Avenue South could possibly receive grant funding. A public hearing
is scheduled for the June 20 Regular meeting. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO JUNE 13
COW FOR DISCUSSION.
III. SCATBd
There was no SCATBd Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) meeting last week (this has been the 4` month of
cancellations). SCATBd staff also did not complete the minutes as King County staff changes have caused
SCATBd to be a lower priority. INFORMATION ONLY.
IV. MISCELLANEOUS
No Miscellaneous items.
Meeting adjourned at 5:25p. in.
Next meeting: Monday, June 20, 2011 5:00 p.m. Conference Room 1
Committee Chair Approval
Minutes by GL. Reviewed by BG and KAM.
181
182
Co uNuL A GENDA SYNOPSIS
Initials IT EMNO.
Meeting Date Prepared by M i eviev Council review
w I 06/13/11 I KAM
06/20/11 I KAM I,
I I I I I
ITEM INFORMATION
CAS NUMBER: 1 1 -0 62 I ORIGINAL AGENDA DATE: JUNE 13, 2011
AGP.ND, 1'1- 'M TITLE Draft Resolution expressing support for the August 16, 2011 ballot measure to form
a Tukwila Pool Metropolitan Park District.
CATF -'GORY Discussion Motion Resolution Ordinance Bid Award Public Hearing Other
Mtg Date 06113111 AV Date Mtg Date 06120111 Mtg Date il4tg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date
SPONSOR Council Mayor Adm Svcs DCD Finance Fire Legal P &R Police PW
SPONSOR'S Staff has prepared a DRAFT resolution in support of the August 16, 2011 ballot measure to
SUMMARY form a Tukwila Pool Metropolitan Park District. This resolution was prepared per the
request of the City Council at the April 18 Regular City Council meeting.
RI v11-;WE3D BY COW Mtg. CA &P Cmte F &S Cmte Transportation Cmte
Utilities Cmte Arts Comm. Parks Comm. Planning Comm.
DATE:
RECOMMENDATIONS:
SPONSOR/ADMIN. Council
COMMIT"IBE
COST,;IMPACT %.FUND SOURCE
EXPENDITURE. REQUIlZI -D AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED
Fund Source:
Comments:
MTG. DATE RECORD OF COUNCILACTION
6/13/11
I MTG.DATEI ATTACHMENTS'
06/13/11 Draft Resolution
183
184
DRAFT
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, EXPRESSING ITS COLLECTIVE
POSITION SUPPORTING A BALLOT MEASURE AUTHORIZING
THE FORMATION OF THE TUKWILA POOL METROPOLITAN
PARK DISTRICT.
WHEREAS, a ballot measure authorizing the formation of the Tukwila Pool
Metropolitan Park District will be on the August 16, 2011, primary election ballot; and
WHEREAS, the Tukwila City Council requested the King County Elections Director
place the above measure on the primary election ballot by way of City of Tukwila
Resolution No. 1738; and
WHEREAS, the express purpose of forming the Tukwila Pool Metropolitan Park
District is to generate funds for acquisitions, maintenance, operation and capital
improvements for the pool facility located within the boundaries of the City of Tukwila;
and
WHEREAS, without a Tukwila Pool Metropolitan Park District, the current Tukwila
City Pool will be forced to cease operations in September 2011, as the City no longer
has the resources to manage, maintain and operate a pool; and
WHEREAS, the Tukwila City Council collectively believes the Tukwila City Pool
provides a benefit to Tukwila and surrounding communities as a multigenerational
facility that offers health and recreation benefits to all ages and enhances the quality of
life; and
WHEREAS, swimming and other aquatic exercises provide health benefits such as
cardiovascular endurance, muscular strength, flexibility and weight management; and
the low impact nature of swimming related activities also results in very little risk of
injury, is accessible to all age and weight groups as well as all skill and fitness levels,
and is shown to reduce stress and leave the participant feeling relaxed and refreshed,
and
W: \Word Processing \Resolutions \Pool Park District Supporting Ballot Measure 6 -6 -11
KM:bjs Page 1 of 2
185
WHEREAS, the Tukwila City Council believes that ceasing operation of the Tukwila
City Pool will adversely affect the well -being of all current and future aquatic facility
users, as well as reduce the opportunity to teach swimming as a life- saving skill;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA,
WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
The Tukwila City Council, by majority vote, hereby expresses support of the
formation of the Tukwila Pool Metropolitan Park District.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, at
a Regular Meeting thereof this day of 2011.
ATTEST /AUTHENTICATED:
Christy O'Flaherty, CMC, City Clerk Allan Ekberg, Council President
APPROVED AS TO FORM BY:
Filed with the City Clerk:
Passed by the City Council:
Resolution Number:
Shelley M. Kerslake, City Attorney
W: \Word Processing \Resolutions \Pool Park District Supporting Ballot Measure 6 -6 -11
KM:bjs Page 2 of 2
186
ITpco.ming Air din s c� Events
L
dune X01
13th lMonday) 1'4th .(Tuesday) -15th (Wednesd`ay)' 16th (T;hursda' j;m ;:17th `(Friday.)`. $th.,(S6turday)
Community Utilities Cmte, Parks Tukwila Volunteer Work
Affairs Parks 5:00 PM Commission, Historical Party
Cmte, (CR #1) 5:30 PM Society, 10:00 AM 1:00 PM
5: 00 PM (Community 7:00 PM Duwamish Hill
(CR 93) Tukwila Center) (Tukwila Heritage
International
Cultural Preserve
Boulevard Center, 14475 For information and
Library 59 Ave S.) registration visit
City Council Action Cmte, Advisory www.cascadel and. ora
Committee of 7:00 PM Board, (or call 206- 905- 6931).
the Whole Mtg., (Community 7:00 PM TukAaRtorcaBociet
7:00 PM Centel) (Foster Library)
TUKWILA DAYS
(Council
Chambers) Tukwila Pool is k :..gin KIDS FESTIVAL
hosting the World's (Cascade View Park)
Largest Swimmin. 12:00 4:00 PM
Lesson! Help us set There will be free
a world records entertainment,
Call to sign up at exhibits, arts crafts,
206 267 -2350 art show and a
community resource
fair!
Tukwila Days Kids
Closet
(Foster High School)
12:00 4:00 PM
Annual Baby and Kids
rummage sale.
Purchase a space for
$25.00, or come shop!
Sign up at the Tukwila
Community Center
30{t {Moiiilayj r21AVTA.eiday) t22iidr 'ednesd'ap) ..23rd'(TFiursday)� �{tfi (I raUay) 2 th9(Sat rlay)"
Transportation Finance COPCAB, Open House Tukwila Int'l. Blvd.
Cmte, Safety Cmte, 6:30 PM Lake to Sound Action Cmte's
5:00 PM 5:00 PM (CR 95) Trail Trash Pickup Day
(CR #1) (CR 43) (Starfire meeting 9:00 10:00 AM
room at Fort Dent
Council oint School Park 14800
City
Regular ncil Board City Starfire Way) For location contact
Council Meeting 5:00 7:00 PM Rick at
7:00 PM 6:00 8:00 PM For additional
(Council Tukwila Community information contact rickCforschler.org
Chambers) Center Jason Rich at 206-
263 -4314 Tukwila Historical
Society First
Planning Annual Gala and
Commission Auction
6:30 PM Held at Billy Baroo's
(Council at Foster Golf Course
Chambers) 3:00 -9:00 PM
www.brownpaaer
tickets.coin
➢City Council Committee of Whole (C.O.W.) Meeting: 2nd 4th Mon., 7:00 PM, Council Chambers at City Hall.
City Council Regular Meeting: 1st 3rd Mon., 7:00 PM, Council Chambers at City Hall.
Civil Service Commission: 1 st Mon., 5:00 PM, Conf. Room 43. Contact Human Resources at 206- 431 -2187
Community Affairs Parks Committee: 2nd 4th Mon., 5:00 PM, Conf Room 93. (A) Contract amendment Past Fonnard NW
Cultural Services. (B) Update on Lake to Sound Trail Project. (C) Code Enforcement Update.
➢COPCAB (Community Oriented Policing Citizens Adv. Board): 4th Wed., 6:30 PM, Conf. Rm 45. Phi Huynh (206- 433 7175).
Equity Diversity Commission: 1 st Thurs., 5:15 PM, Conf. Room #3. Contact Joyce Trantina at 206 433 -1850.
➢Finance Safety Committee: 1st 3rd Tues., 5:00 PM, Conf. Room #3.
➢Human Services Advisory Brd: 2nd Fri. of odd months, 10:00 AM, Human Services Office. Contact Evie Boylan at 206- 433 -7180.
Library Advisory Board: 3rd Wed., 7:00 PM, Foster Library. Contact Stephanie Gardner at 206 767 -2342.
Lodging Tax Advisory Committee: Every other month (or as scheduled), 12:00 NOON. Contact Katherine Kertzman at 206 -575 -2489.
Parks Commission: 3rd Wed., 5:30 PM, Senior Game Room at Community Center. Contact Stephanie Gardner at 206- 767 -2342.
➢Planning Commission /Board of Architectural Review: 4th Thurs., except 2nd Thursday in Nov. Dec., 6:30 PM,
Council Chambers at City Hall. Contact 6V)metta Bivensat206- 431 -3670.
➢Transportation Committee: Ist 3rd Mon., 5:00 PM, Conf. Room #1.
➢Tukwila Historical Society: 3rd Thurs., 7:00 PM Tukwila Heritage Cultural Center, 14475 59 °i Avenue S. Contact Pat Brodie at
206- 433 -1861.
Utilities Committee: 2nd 4th Tues., 5:00 PM, Conf. Room 4 1. 6114111 rrreeting has been cancelled. 187
Tentative Agenda Schedule
:MONTH MEET. G 1= MEET ETI
ING 2 MENG.3 MIFETING 4
REGULAIZ COW :REGULAR
June 6 13 20 27
See agenda packet Special Presentations: Public Hearing:
cover sheet for this Financial Status Report Shoreline Master
week's agenda on 15f Quarter 2011 Program Four
(June 13, 2011 Community Schools ordinances
Committee of the 1%ole Collaboration Update
Meeting)
Bid Award: Special Issues:
Bid Award for the Shoreline Master
Interurban Avenue Program Four
South Gravity Sewer ordinances
Contract amendment
Past Forward NW
Public Hearing: Cultural Services
2012-2017
Transportation
Improvement Program
Unfinished Business:
201.2-2017
Transportation
Improvement Program
Fireworks Permit for
City's July 4 Event
Comprehensive Plan
Amendments
Additional grant
funding for lighting
upgrades
Interlocal Agreement
with Kent regarding
Tukwila South
permitting authority
A resolution in support
of the ballot measure
on the formation of a
Metropolitan Park
District for the Tukwila
Pool
July 5 (Tuesday) 11 18 25
4th Special Presentations: Special Issues:
Independence Day Swearing in of Heart health
(City offices closed) Sergeants Bisson and presentation
Mettlin
Sound Mental Health
Update
Unfinished Business:
Shoreline Master
Program Four
ordinances
Contract amendment
Past Forward NW
Cultural Services
188