HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA EPIC-FD-93 - MA SEGALE - SEGALE ANNEXATIONSEGALE ANNEXATION
Contiguous To City Limits
Along 57 °' Ave S
EPIC -FD -93
CITY OF TUKWILA
OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
/FINAL
DECLARATION OF "NON -S I GN I F I CAi10E
Description of proposal
Segale Annexation
Proponent Mario Segale
Location of Proposal Contiguous to city limits along 57th Avenue South
Lead Agency City of Tukwila File No. EPIC -FD -93
This proposal has been determined to ( not have) a significant adverse im-
pact upon the environment. An EIS (11/is not) required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)
(c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a completed
environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency.
Responsible Official Kjell Stoknes
Position /Title
Date
Director, Office of Community Development
22 May 1979
COMMENTS:
Signature
•
i
EXOBIT 3
DECLARATION OF NON- SIGNIFICANCE
CITY OF TUKWILA
OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
PROPOSED /FINAL
DECLARATIOil OF SIGNIFICANCE /'JON - SIGNIFICANCE
Description of proposal
Proponent
Sega1e AnnPxatinn (Proposed)
Mario Segale
Location of Proposal Contiguous to city limits along 57th Avenue! S
Lead Agency City of Tukwila
File No. RPTC- FD -9';
This proposal has been determined to (have /not have) a significant adverse im-
pact upon the environment. An EIS (is /is not) required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)
(c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a completed.
environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency.
Responsible Official Kjell Stoknes
Position /Title
Director, Office of Community Development
Date 25 February 1979 Signature
COMMENTS:
1
4 1 I T ur I U I\ Y4 1 LH
ENV I ROMEEJTAL QUESTIONNAIRE REV IO FORM
PROJECT NAME:
PROJECT ADDRESS:
DATE ACCEPTED FOR FILING:
Segale Annexation
On west side of Southcenter Parkway south Segale shops
16 February 1979
1. DEPARTM TAL REVIEW: (date) (reviewer)
,
Building: ,flail. // / 77 ' by: oz-e I- -)
/
❑ Engineering: by:
❑ Fire: by:
❑ Planning: by:
❑ Police: by:
2. ANY PERTINENT COMMENTS:
Tiff £14/5 11/ / G-ti T
w' 4-T(-1-1441 A ,v i RA I I— R H,13 a ll -ti a ,v S / 7 t
h/ 4 A:ti y 91,1-Rs w; G L l3 L= ,4 4/0 .Ai C 0.4/
/l/ii 57 CT(JI�L
- . L 1 T Ur T UI\ri 1 LH
ENVI RI1ENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE REV. FORM
PROJECT NAME: Segale Annexation (1(1Do2)
PROJECT ADDRESS: On west side of Southcente.r Parkway south Segale shops
DATE ACCEPTED FOR FILING: 16 February 1979
1. DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: (date) (reviewer)
❑ ilding: by:
Engineering: ►���i� by: 5 \1k
❑ Fire: by:
❑ Planning: by:
❑ Police: by:
2. ANY PERTINENT COMMENTS:
ur I UI\YV1 LH
ENVIR '1EFJTAL QUESTIONNAIRE REVIIII FORM
PROJECT NAME:
PROJECT ADDRESS:
Segale Annexation
On west side of Southcenter. Parkway south Segale shops
DATE ACCEPTED FOR FILING: 16 February 1979
1. DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: (date) (reviewer)
❑ Building: by:
❑ gineering: by:
Fire: February 27, 1979', b : rt A. Coley
❑ Planning: b
❑ Police: by:
2. ANY PERTINENT COMMENTS:
Agree with the comments ooritained in the review. form.
CITY OF TUKWILA
EHTAL QUESTIONNAIRE O NA I RE REV I T
EJ VIRO'�M FORM
�
PROJECT NAME:
PROJECT ADDRESS:
DATE ACCEPTED'FOR FILING:
Segale Annexation
On west side of Southcenter Parkway south Segale shops
16 February 1979
1. DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: (date) (reviewer)
❑ Building: by:
❑ Engineering: by:
CE)Fire: by:
Planning: by:
❑ Police: by:
2. ANY PERTINENT COMMENTS:
eD st,r1 a/a7J7c
ENVIR IEf1TAL QUESTIONNAIRE REVII FORM
PROJECT NAME:
PROJECT ADDRESS:
DATE ACCEPTED FOR FILING:
Segale Annexation
On west side of Southcenter Parkway south Segale shops
16 February 1979
1. DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: (date) (reviewer)
❑ Building: by:
❑ Engineering: by:
❑ Fire: by:
❑ anning: by:
Police: 7F by:
2. ANY PERTINENT COMMENTS:
Ala No i4,21 :
• CITY OF TUKWILA •
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
This questionnaire must be completed and submitted with the application for
permit. This questionnaire must be completed by all persons applying for a
permit from the City of Tukwila, unless it is determined by the Responsible
Official that the permit is exempt or unless the applicant and Responsible
Official previously agree an Environmental Impact Statement needs to be completed.
A fee of $50.00 must accompany the filling -of the Environmental Questionnaire
to cover costs of the threshold determination.
I. BACKGROUND
1. Name of Proponent: M. A. SEGALE, INC.
2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent:. 18010 Southcenter Parkway
P. O. Box 88050, Tukwila, Washington 98188
3. Date Checklist Submitted: February 16, 19 79 2'I w
a1,
City of Tukwila - Planning Department
4. Agency Requiring Checklist:
5. Name of Proposal, if applicable: M. A. Segale, Inc. Annexation
6. Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal (including but not limited
to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give
an accurate understanding of its scope and nature):
Annexation of a 2.1 acre parcel of property adjacent to south
Tukwila city limits - includes zoning classification and
assumption of city's bonded indebtedness.
7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as
well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental im-
pacts, including any other.information needed to give an accurate under-
standing of the environmental setting of the proposal):
Property is industrial zoned, adjacent to industrial zoned
property to north and south. To west is hillside zoned SE,
and to east is roadway. Property has watchman's resident and
bank facility located thereon
8. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal: 2 - 3 months.
9. List of all Permits,' Licenses or Government Approvals Required for the
Proposal (federal, state and local):
Original zoning designation
(a) •Rezone,/conditional use, shoreline permit, etc. YES x NO
(b) King County Hydraulics Permit YES NO x
(c) Building permit YES NO x
•
(d) Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Permit YES NO x
(e) Sewer hook up permit YES NO x
(f) Sign permit YES NO x
(g) Water hook up permit YES NO x
(h) Storm water system permit YES NO x
(i) Curb cut permit YES NO x
(j) Electrical permit (State of Washington) YES NO x
(k) Plumbing permit (King County) YES NO x
(1) Other: N/A
10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or futher activity
related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain:
N/A
11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by
your proposal? If yes, explain:
No.
12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro-
posal; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future
date, describe the nature of such application form:
Attached is a copy of Notice of Intent to Annex.
Annexation petition will be filed.
II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
(Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required)
1. Earth. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic
substructures?
YES MAYBE NO
x
(b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcover-
ing of the soil? x
(c) Change in topography or ground surface relief fea-
tures? x
(d) The destruction, covering or modification of any
unique geologic or physical features?
-2-
X
YES MAYBE NO
(e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils,
either on or off the site? X
(f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands; or
changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which
may modify the channel of a river or stream or the
bed of the ocean or . any bay, inlet or lake?
Explanation:
2. Air. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air
quality? X
(b) The creation of objectionable odors? x
(c) Alteration of air movement, moisture
or temperature, or any change in climate, either
locally or regionally? X
Explanation:
3. Water. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Changes in currents, or the course or direction
of water movements, in either marine or fresh
waters? X
(b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns,
or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? X
(c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? x
(d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water
body? X
(e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration
of surface water quality, including but not limited
to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity?
(f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of
ground waters?
(g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either
through direct additions or withdrawals, or through
interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations?
-3-
x
• •
YES MAYBE NO
(h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either
through direct injection, or through the seepage
of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne
virus or bacteria, or other substances into the
ground waters? x
(i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise avail-
able for public water supplies?
Explanation:
4. Flora. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers
of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs,
grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)?
) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or
endangered species of flora?
(c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area,
or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of
existing species?
(
(d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop?
Explanation:
5. Fauna. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers
of any species of fauna (birds, land animals
including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic
organisms, insects or microfauna)? x
(b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or
endangered species of fauna? x
(c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an
area, or result in a barrier to the migration
or movement of fauna?
(d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife
habitat? x
Explanation:
•
YES MAYBE NO
6. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise
levels? x
Explanation:
7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new
light or glare? x
Explanation:
8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in the altera-
tion of the present or planned land use
of an area?
Explanation:
9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural
resources?
(b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural
resource?
Explanation:
10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an
explosion or the release of hazardous
substances (including, but not limited
to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radi-
ation) in the event of an accident or
upset conditions?
Explanation:
x
11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location,
distribution, density, or growth rate
of the human population of an area?
Explanation:
YES MAYBE NO
12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing,
or create a demand for additional housing? x
Explanation: It will add the watchman's resident as
another home in Tukwila.
x
13. Transportation /Circulation. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? x
(b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or
demand for new parking? X
(c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? x
(d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation
or movement of people and /or goods? x
(e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? X
(f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles,
bicyclists or pedestrians? x
Explanation:
14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon,
or result in a need for new or altered
governmental services in any of the
following areas:
(a) Fire protection? x (See explanation
(b) Police protection? X (See explanatioi
(c) Schools? X
(d) Parks or other recreational facilities? X
(e) Maintenance of public facilities, including
roads? X
(f)
• •
YES MAYBE NO
Other governmental services?
Explanation: Area is. 2.1 acres. The police and fire
department presently patrol and protect to the north
line of this property. There will be no appreciable
effect upon these services. City will, of course, have
to govern this area. Assessed valuation of property
is $43,200. Property will also absorb part of existing bonded
15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: indebtedness of city.
(a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? x
X
(b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or
require the development of new sources of
energy?
Explanation:
16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for
new systems, or alterations to the
following utilities:
X
(a) Power or natural gas? X
(b) Communications systems?
(c) Water?
(d) Sewer or septic tanks? X
(e) Storm water drainage? x
(f) Solid waste and disposal? X
Explanation:
17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the crea-
tion of any health hazard or potential
health hazard (excluding mental health)?
Explanation:
• •
18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruc-
tion of any scenic vista or view open to
the public, or will the proposal result
in the creation of an aesthetically of-
fensive site open to public view?
Explanation:
19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact
upon the quality or quantity of exist-
ing recreational opportunities?
Explanation:
20. Archeological /Histroical. Will the proposal result in
an alteration of a signifi-
cant archeological or his-
torical site, structure,
object or building?
Explanation:
CERTIFICATION BY APPLICANT:
YES MAYBE NO
I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above
information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency
may withdraw any declaration of non - significance that it might issue in
reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation
or willful lack of full disclosure on my part.
M. A. SEGALE,
February 16, 1979
Signatu - and Title Date