HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA EPIC-ND-28 - LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT #28 (LID)LID 28
EPIGND -28
CITY OF TUKWIL.A
June 24, 19/S
CERTIFICATION BY APPLICANT: •
I hereby certify that the information furnishenhis environmental checklist
•
sheet is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
JJ�N� �� �, July 21, 1976
Steve Hall Pu lic Wo ks Director pate
Signature and Title
Project Name: L.I.D. 28
Project Address: South 152nd St. East of Macadam Road
BELOW THIS LINE FOR CITY USE ONLY
ACTION.BY OTHER- DEPARTMENTS:
1. Date of Review: Building
Planning
Engineering
Police
Fire
1 -24 -1b
7 /v/i
by:
by:
by:
by:
by:
-Check one
( +) or ( -)
( +) or (e
( +) or (r
( +) or ( -)
( +) or ( -)
2. Agency review of environmental checklist determined that:
';The project is exempt by definition.
The project has no significant environmental impact and application
should be processed without further consideration of environmental affects
The project has significant environmental xxoxctoafurthex action for permi
mental impact statement must be p p prior
specific information is needed to determine impact.
Si.natu e and: Title .of Responsible Official
3. Applicant was notified of decision on:
'by
Date
Staff Person
by
Letter, phone
In accordance with Washington State Environmental Policy Act and City of Tukwila
Ordinance No. 759.
-t -) Means recommend a full environmental impact statement be'done.
( Means recommend a full environmental impact statement not.he done:
CITY OF TUKWILA 4
ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE
This questionnaire must be completed by all persons applying for a permit
from the city of Tukwila., unless it is determined by the Responsible Official
that an environmental assessment or full impact statement is required. Other
forms have been developed for single - family home applications and legislation
proposals.
BACKGROUND DATA: • .
1. Name of applicant: City of Tukwila. Department of Public Wnrks
2. Address and phone of Applicant: 6230 Southcenter Blvd. 242 -2177
3. Project name: L.I.D. 28
•
4. Project location: South 152nd Street
5. Nature and brief description of proposal: Widen & Construct curbs, gutters
storm drain, sidewalks, street lights, sewer, water, r /w.
6. Estimated completion date: February 1977
7. Do you have any plans for future expansion, if yes please explain: NO
8. What other governmental permits are required prior to completion of this
project? . •
(a) Rezone, conditional use, substantial development, etc. YES NO X
1 YES • . NO X
(b) King County Hydr�olicsPermit
(c) Building permit YES NO X
(d) Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Permit _ YES NO X
(e) Sewer. hookup permit
YES • NO X
(f) Sign permit YES NO X
(g) Water hook up permit YES NO X
(h) Storm water system permit YES NO X
(i) Curb cut permit YES NO X
(j) Electrical permit (State of Washington)- Street Lighting YES X NO
(k) Plumbing permit (King County)
YES N0. X
(1) Other 0
9. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by
your proposal? If yes, explain: NO
10. Agency requiring checklist: City of Tukwila, Department -
11. Accepted by agency on: July 20, 1976 by: Kjell Stoknes
(to be filled in by city upon receipt of checklist)
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
(Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required.)
Yes No
Earth. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Unstable earth conditions or in
•any changes in geologic sub -
structures:
(b) Disruptions, displacements
or overcovering of the soils:
(c) Change in topography or ground
surface relief features?
(d) The destruction, covering, or
modification of any unique
geologic or physical features?
(e) Any increase in wind or water
erosion of soils, either on
or off the site?
(f) Changes in deposition or
erosion of beach sands, or
in changes in siltation,
deposition, or erosion which
may modify the channel of a
river or stream or the bed of
the ocean . or any bay, inlet
or lake?
Explanation: (b)& (c)
X
X
Cutting hillside for roadway section east of 57th on.north'side of south ridge.
Air. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Air emissions or deterioration
of ambient air quality?
(b) The creation of objectionable
odors?
(c) Alteration of air movement,
moisture or temperature, or
in any change in climate, •
either locally or regionally?
Explanation:
X
X
Water. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Changes in currents, or the
course or direction of water
movements, in either marine
or fresh waters?
(b) Changes in absorption rates,
drainage patterns, or the
amount of surface water run -
off?
(c) Alterations to the course or
flow of flood waters?
(d) Change in the amount of surface
water in any watercourse?
(e) Discharge into surface waters,
or in any alteration of sur-
face.'water quality, including
temperature or turbidity?
(f) Alteration of the direction "or
rate of flow of ground waters?
(g) Change in the quantity of
ground waters, either through
direct additions or withdrawals,
or through interception of an
acquifer by cuts or excavations?
(h) Deterioration in ground water
quality, either through direct
injection, or through the seep -
age of leachate, phosphates,
detergents, waterborne virus
or bacteria, or other substances
into the ground waters?
(i
) Reduction in the amount of water
otherwise available for public
water. supplies?
Explanation:
(b) By replacing a portion of natural earth
increase within the roadway prison.
(g) Pavement areas will not return groundwaters
reducing the groundwater amount slightly.
Yes
X
with pavement,
Maybe
X
X
X
runoff rate will
through adsorbtion, thus
ID Yes 'Maybe No
• Flora. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Change in the diversity of species,
or numbers of any species of flora
(including trees, shrubs, grass,
crops, micro-flora and aquatic
plants)? X
(b) Reduction of the numbers of any
unique, rare or endangered species
of flora?
(c) Introduction of new species of
• flora into an area, or in a bar-
rier to the normal replenishment of
existing species? • X
Explanation: '
• 4) Rola 0.044 oiit I Ka+ Coe. (4.1)&61e, rCiblVAI:AlitAA"T- dJ424.0 Sfede4 ;
Fauna.' Will •the proposal result in:
• (a) Changes in the diversity of species,
or numbers of any species of fauna
(birds, land animals including rep-
tiles, fish and shellfish, benthic
organisms, insects, or micro-fauna)?
(b) Reduction of the numbers of any
unique, rare or endangered species
of fauna?
(c) Introduction of new species of fauna
into an area, or result in a barrier
to the migration or movement of fauna?
• (d) Deterioration to existing wildlife
habitat? Pond (marsh)
__X_
X
Explanation:
(Some marsh area may need to be filled. 'Observations indicate no significant
wildlife present.)
Noise.- Will the proposal increase exist-
ing noise levels?
Explanation:
East of 57th Avenue south only where .a road does not currently exist, from
construction activity first and traffic after construction.
•
Yes • Maybe • No
Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce
new light or glare? X x
Explanation:
Land Use. Will the proposal result in the
alteration of the present or planned land'
use of an area? -� X
Explanation: ' u.ce `{ ,tti4 — �4: Gc 4 re4,41 . Vi144..or .4.� 4-
n�°`�'1 'ts (-Yew— R_ i� .4,, ,,,,,,.,s. +,'P 1.c. - f�,�u.1 dot -4°
.. . yt,3or�e
t'.l.'D. AssissplamOcs.
Natural Resources. Will the proposal re-
sult in:
(a) Increase in the rate of use of any
natural resource?
(b) Depletion of any nonrenewable nat-
ural resource?
Explanation:.
Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve
a risk of an explosion or the release of
hazardous substances (including, but not
limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or
radiation) in the event of an accident or .
upset conditions?
Explanation:
Population. Will the proposal alter the
location, distribution, density, or growth
rate of the human population of an area? .
•X
Explanation:
Consistent with housing increase to present land uses allowed.
X
Yes Maybe No
Housing. Will the proposal affect existing
housing availability, or create a demand for
additional housing? X —
Explanation:
Will open currently multiple family dwelling zoned land to access, thus
allowing for an increased availability of land for housing.
Transportation /Circulation. Will the pro-
posal result in,:
(a) Generation of additional vehicular Consistent with housing above.
movement?
(b) Effects on existing parking facilities,
or demand for new parking?
(c) Impact upon existing transportation
systems?
(d) Alterations to present patterns of
circulation or movement of people
and /or goods?
(e) Alterations to waterborne or air
traffic?
X
Explanation: •
(a) & (b) SEE Housing, Above (additional apartment development will generate
more traffic and demand_new parking areas on private land)
Local Services. Will the proposal have an
effect upon, or result in a need for new
services in any of the following areas:
(a) Fire protection?
(b) Police protection?
(c) Schools? _
(d) Parks?
(e) Maintenance of public facilities;
,including roads?
(f) Other'governmental services?
Explanation:
(a), (b), (c), (d) & (f) potential indirect impact-of project if properties,
adjacent to it develops. All services presently are adequate to handle full
development.
(e) The public facilities to be installed by this project must be maintained
and can be. with existing personnel and equipment.
-5-
Energy. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or
energy?
Demand upon existing sources of energy,
or require the development of new
• sources of energy?
(b)
Explanation:
Utilities. Will "the proposal result in a need
for new systems, or alterations to the follow-
ing utilities:
(a) Power or natural gas ?.
(b) .Communications systems?
(c) Water? -
(d) Sewer or septic tanks?
(e) Storm water drainage?
(f) Solid waste and disposal?
Explanation:
Services to the area this project is to provide these which in turn may
encourage'land development and the use of these services (systems).:
Yes Maybe No
• )X
X
Human Health. Will the proposal result. in the
creation of any health hazard or potential
health hazard (excluding mental health)?
Explanation:
In fact will relieve a potential hazard to an inadequate access road to
several apartment complexes during winter months.
Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the
obstruction of any scenic vista or view open
to the public, or will the proposal result
in the creation of an aesthetically offensive
site open to public view?
Explanation:
Yes Maybe
Recreation. Will the proposal result in an
impact upon the quality or quantity of ex- K X
isting recreational opportunities?
Explanation: 64,m it 44- i caat' 041 1eleatr4L Ia 4s 146.4611.
p �4106 aar rases * a - s P r '1 es.ti Cv ti
Pro -1 t d P
t ri
&Lt.. 4c, 1.141:r irr W eew. vuzu ..
Archeological /Historical. Will the proposal
result in an alteration of a significant
archeological or historical site?
Explanation:
Revenue. Will the proposal cause a signifi-
cant increase in city revenues?
Explanation:
Employment. Will the proposal create a
significant amount of new jobs?
. Explanation:
X
DATE
1973
ACTION
LIC ,'2E
Smith purchased Harrison property.
11 Feb. 1974 Smith /Harrison petition. Council to vacate So. 152nd. .
14 Feb. File environmental-information, G. Smith to R: B. Hanson.
19 Feb. Letter responding to Smith environmental assessment.- mentioned LID.
Assessment summary by.Crutchfield'mentions sewer /water /road.
11 April 'Hearing - Conin:ission OK's .street vacation:. (1)New•50': right -of -way. (2)cul. -de -sac. (3)Countil resoluti
22 April Council directs attorney:,:.to..draft. resolution in accordance'with:Planning Commission's recommendations.
6 May Council tabled action with..request of Public Works Dept.'re:.further research on new right -of -way
• alignment & legal description. Tabled LID resolution and vacation ordinance.
11 August 1975 Diary - Visited Smith excavation and shut down for excessive, unpermitted cuts.
13 August .Crutchfield reviewing Public Works.request in memo.
14 August .
18 August
19 August
27 August
27 August
• 3 Sept.
8 Sept.
20 Oct. ,
20 Nov.
15 Dec.
Memo, . Hall to Ruppert - Re: Right -of -way relocation 'cuts by Smith 7 unauthorized, UBC allows 3' without
permit.
Letter - Stoknes to Smith listing staff requirements prior.t
developers agreement.
1975 staff guidelines written down. .
Letter to Mayor from Hall_.re: .vacation of 152nd,
of intent, resolution for.professional services.
Attorney OK'd first building.permit - source: diary.
Diary - Reviewed 152nd realignment with Smith in.field and.OK.'d same, also discussed site utilities & Ci1
requirements for apartment. complex.
issuance of building permit --reiterates
rededication of..152nd /57th 5 feet; request resolution
First permit issued to Smith.
Ord. 949, vacating So. 152nd.
URS contract signed for professional. services.
Resolution 507 passed forming LID #28.
5 Jan. 1976 Preliminary - assessment roll hearing. - Hall reviewed LID background, much discussion on equitability of
assessments. .
19 Jan. First reading of ordinance. Clerk Shirlee Kinney read letters of protest. Discussion, Ord. read. Right -
of -way, paving, grading, widening sidewalks, curbs, gutters, installing storm.drainage, sanitary sewers,
water. Referred to COW, 26 Jan. 76.
DATE
ACTION
• LID #28
26 Jan. 1976 COW - Rediscussed needs of LID #28 and reasons for same. Hall mentioned two alternatives and said he
would discuss them with City Attorney.
9 Feb. COW - .Discussed alternatives 1 & 2.for assessment methods; discussed "late comers agreement ". .Directed
by Council to investigate City participation & "late comers agreement" with City Attorney for next.
Council meeting.
17 Feb. Attorney.Hard.discussed late comers.agreement;.Mr. Dobson asked about EIS ? - No. Hill said Hall said
no water or sewer would be installed on .152nd.from
new ordinance encompassing alternate42.
1 March Second.reading. of.Ordinance much..discussion, including.alternate #3; alternate #3 adopted by
Ordinance 963.
. July Environmental. 9 uestionnaire requested by.City Attorney signed by Stoknes; determined no significant
impact.
Macadam to. 57th.7:discussion; directed to draw up