The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSEPA EPIC-ND-3 - BOWERS MANUFACTURING - MACHINE SHOPBOWERS MFG MACHINE SHOP 13032 INTERURBAN AV S EPIGND -3 • Frank Todd Mayor CITY ®F TU K IL 6230 SOUTHCENTER BLVD. TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 98067 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Mr. Bill Beagles 3029 Cloverfield Olympia, Washington 98501 Dear Mr. Beagles: 15 October 1975 The Environmental Questionnaire completed by you for the proposed machine shop to be located at 13032 Interurban Avenue has been reviewed by all appropriate municipal offices and has determined the proposed action has no significant environmental impact. Thus, an Environmental Impact State- ment is not required and requirements of the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) have been fulfilled. Should you have any questions, please contact me at 242 -2177. Sincerely, Gary Crutchfield Assistant Planner GC /cw cc: Bldg Dir Ping Dir • • Frank Todd, Mayor CITY or TUK`r °F'ILA 6230 SOUTHCENTER BLVD. TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 98067 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Mr. John J. Kinkella 6212 Lake Grove Avenue SW Tacoma, Washington 98499 Dear Mr. Kinkella: 10 September 1975 This office has reviewed the revised site plan submitted on 2 September 1975 with respect to the proposed building in Tukwila. Several deficiencies in the site plan have been noted and are explained below. 1. The site plan should be of a smaller scale so as to more distinctly show such dimensions as parking stall size, surrounding properties, distance to streets, etc. 2. The site plan does not identify any access to public right -of -way and shows parking located outside the property lines. 3. No legal description has been submitted. Legal description should include description of property, access to public right -of -way and any easements. 4. The site plan depicts no utilities in association with the project. The Public Works Department requires grade, location and size of all sanitary and storm sewer as well as water lines. The information enumerated above is required to create a useable site plan for the purpose of building permit application review. Should you have any questions regarding this matter please do not hesitate to contact me at. 242 -2177 at your convenience. Sincerely, ary Crchfield Assista t Planner GC /cw cc: Bldg Dir Ping Dir Office Engr ( JOHN J. KINKELLA A.I.A.( ARCHITECT & ASSOCIATES egnmomminmigailingli • TACOMA, WASHINGTON 98499 • 6212 LAKE GROVE AVE. S.W. PHONE 584-1534 M E S S A G E R E P L Y T❑ r- Mr. Gary Crutchfield Assistant—Planner--- City of Tukwila 6230- Southcenter -Bhvd Tukwila, Washington DATE .2. September - 1.9.7.5__ Dear Mr. Crutchfield Enclosed .please find Environmental Questi.onnaire._ptus .2 copies. of plot plan for office building in Tukwila for your approval. If you have any • es_t'_•ns, pl •as- .call.. Y, DATE BY Form N.R73fg The Drow ng Board, Inc., Box 505, DoIIos, 'Texas INSTRUCTIONS TO SENDER: 1. KEEP YELLOW COPY. 2. SEND WHITE ANO PINK COPIES WITH CARBON INTACT. SIGNED INSTRUCTIONS TO RECEIVER: I. WRITE REPLY. ... DETACH DIUS, KEEP PINK COPY, RETURN WHITL. COPY TO SENDER. CITY OF TUKWILA CERTIFICATION BY APPLICANT: I hereby certify that the sheet is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. June 24, 1975 l and Title Date Sig�iature an Project Name :&-72,S 1/1 /ditr a.: e D )7'u/l.J 1GA, (� &s AI_ 98/6G Project Address: BELOW THIS LINE FOR CITY USE ONLY ACTION BY OTHER DEPARTMENTS :. Check one 1. Date of Review: Building .by: r (+) or (-) Planning 7' S "%s by: / (-r' ( +) or Engineering by: (+) or ( -) Police by: ( +) or ( -) Fire by ( +) or ( -) 2. Agency review of environmental checklist determined that: ':The project is exempt by definition. The project has no significant environmental impact and application / should be processed without further consideration of environmental affects. The project has significant environmental impact and a complete environ mental impact statement must be prepared prior to further action for permit. More specific information is needed to determine impact. � � 0/15/2S . Signature re and. itle Responsible Official Date .' Applicant was notified of decision on: 'by Date Staff Person by Letter, phone In accordance with Washington State Environmental Policy Act and City of Tukwila Ordinance No. 759. ( +) Means recommend a full environmental impact statement be done. ( -). Means recommend a full environmental impact statement not be done. CITY OF -TUKWILA ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE This questionnaire must be completed by all persons applying for a permit from the city of Tukwila., unless it is determined by the Responsible Official that an environmental assessment or full impact statement is required. Other forms have been developed for single - family home applications and legislation proposals. BACKGROUND DATA: 1. Name of applicant: J tJ. 23-E 44 L S 3f ' N. 3029 CLova/qF / "G.d .o.e.•, vsso/ 2. Address and phone of Applicant: 5P1/23- 978 0 3. Project name: owd /11A-6, /Ac/1,AJ �. i3L 4) � A O ,YAG'iS'- T'. Y'o" /03-028 JC.cr7e,e:.ai I3 iJ AL'-6.- 4. Project location:. TuKwit.A) - sN : 98,C Co 5. Nature and brief description of proposal: . o.v c 2 6 T,= T/4-T- t4-90 Gv / TA/ . . /O /2 Or-WICE /4)763 Rd is 6. Estimated completion date: c "3&V . .2o /5rVr 7. Do' you'have any plans for future expansion, if yes please explain: • ,Co7 AT I i/1iS 4 /Aye . 8.' What other governmental permits are required prior to completion of this project? (a) Rezone, conditional use, substantial development, etc. YES NO ii (b)vKing County Hydrplics Permit YES-I/ NO (c) Building permit YES f' NO (d) Puget Sound Air Pollution Control. Permit YES ' NO kw (e),--Sewer _ hook up permit YES P0"-NO (f) Sign permit YES NOV (g) ✓Water hook up permit YES ✓ NO (h). Storm water system permit YES NO (i) Curb cut permit YES NO ✓ (j). Electrical permit (State of Washington) YES ✓ NO (k) Plumbing permit (King County) YES 10 NO (1) Other 9. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain: ,tJo, 10. Agency requiring checklist: City of Tukwila, Department - 11. Accepted by agency on: , by: (to be filled in by city upon receipt of checklist) ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required.) Yes . Maybe Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in any changes in geologic sub - structures: (b) .Disruptions, displacements or overcovering of the soils: (c) Change in topography_or ground surface relief features? (d) The destruction, covering, or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or in changes in siltation, deposition, or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed . of the ocean or any bay, .. inlet or lake? Explanation: Air. Will the proposal . result in: (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? (b) The creation of objectionable odors? (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or in any change in climate, either locally or regionally? Explanation: Water. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the amount of surface water run- off? (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any watercourse? (e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of sur- face :water quality, including temperature or turbidity? (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an acquifer by cuts or excavations? (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seep- age of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances .into the ground waters? Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? (i) Explanation: 4111es Maybe No • Flora. Will the proposal result in: (a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, micro -flora and aquatic plants)? (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a bar- rier to the normal replenishment of existing species? Explanation: Fauna.. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including rep - tiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects, or micro - fauna)? (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? (d) Deterioration to existing wildlife habitat? Explanation: Noise. Will the proposal increase exist- ing noise levels? Explanation: Yes Maybe • Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? Explanation:/' Land Use. Will . the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land' use of an area? Explanation: Natural Resources. Will the proposal re- sult in: . (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resource? (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable nat- ural resource? Explanation: Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? Explanation: Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? Explanation: Yes Maybe • Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing availability, or create a demand for additional housing? Explanation: Transportation /Circulation. Will the pro- posal result in: (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? (b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and /or goods? (e) Alterations to waterborne or air traffic? Explanation: Local Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new services in any of the following areas: (a) Fire protection? (b) Police protection? (c) Schools? (d) Parks? (e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? Other governmental services? (f) Explanation: Yes Maybe • • . Energy. Will the proposal result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? Explanation: Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the follow- ing utilities: (a) Power or natural gas? (b) . Communications systems? (c) Water? (d) Sewer or septic tanks? (e) Storm water drainage? (f) Solid waste and disposal? Explanation: Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential . health hazard (excluding mental health)? Explanation: Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? Explanation: Yes Maybe • Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of ex- isting recreational opportunities? Explanation: Archeological /Historical. Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site? Explanation: Revenue. Will the proposal cause a signifi- cant.increase in city revenues? Explanation: Employment. Will the proposal create a significant amount of new jobs? Explanation: Yes Maybe u.1 t D,I N. G7