HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA EPIC-ND-4 - NORDSTROM - 59,000 SF DISTRIBUTION CENTER ADDITIONNORDSTROM
DISTRIBUTIONCENTER
1201 ANDOVER PARK EAST
EPIC -ND -4
5eF
•
Frank Todd, Mayor
CITY Dr T U `'=y'`ILA
6230 SOUTHCENTER BLVD.
'TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 98067
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
William C. Schaible
Victor 0. Gray & Company
2100 - 5th Avenue Building
Seattle, Washington 98121
Dear Mr. Schaible:
23 October 1975
The Environmental Questionnaire completed by you for the proposed building
addition to the Nordstrom Distribution Center located on Andover Park East
in Tukwila has been reviewed by all appropriate municipal offices and has .
determined the proposed action has no significant environmental impact.
Thus, an Environmental Impact Statement is not required and requirements
of the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) have been fulfilled.
Should you have any questions, please contact me at 242 -2177.
Sincerel
ary rutc field
Assistant; /Planner
GC /cw
cc: Bldg Dir
Ping Dir
•
CERTIFICATION BY APPLICANT:
• June 24, 1975
CITY OF TUKWILA
I hereby certify that the information furnished in this environmental checklist
sheet is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
VICTOR 0. GRAY & COMPANY, INC.
A/4;4 C
Signature and Title
Associate
9TZTJatey7S
Project Name: Addition & Additions to Nordstrom Distribution Center No. 99
Project Address: 12 @1 Andover Park East
BELOW THIS LINE FOR CITY USE ONLY
ACTION BY OTHER: DEPARTMENTS: Check one
1. ' Date of Review: Building by:
Planning j3 d2,..1,-- 7s- by: • . ,��,, ( +) or
Engineering 2 3. 2,J '75 by: /Z,e% ( +) or ((
Police by: ( +) or ( -)
by
( +) or ( -)
Fire
2. Agency review of environmental checklist determined that:
'The project is exempt by definition..
/\ The project has no significant environmental impact and application
should be processed without further consideration of environmental affects.
The project has significant environmental impact and a complete environs
mental impact statement must be prepared prior to further action for permit.
More specific information is needed to determine impact.
)( S'-751614,g,4
Signature and. Title of Responsible Offi
3. 'Applicant was notified of de ision of
93 CletAaA. Vyr by
Date
al
/V1/3/7.C.
D o •
Staff 'e`' son
by ,Z1.Zt-
Letter, phone
In accordance with Washington State Environmental Policy Act and City of Tukwila.
Ordinance No. 759.
Means recommend a full environmental•impact statement be done.
Means recommend a full environmental impact statement not'be done:
CITY OF TUKWILA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE
This questionnaire must be completed by all persons applying for a permit
from the city of Tukwila., unless it is determined by the Responsible Official
that an environmental assessment or full impact statement is required. Other
forms have been developed for single - family home applications and legislation
proposals.
BACKGROUND DATA:
1. Name of applicant: VICTOR 0. GRAY & COMPANY, TNC_
2. Address and phone of. Applicant: 2100 5TH AVE.; Seattle, Wa. 98121 - 62377950
3. Project name: Addition and Alterations to Nordstrom n;grrih»tinr Center No. 99
4. Project location: -1201 Andover Park East
5. Nature and brief description of proposal: Add 59,000 sq. ft. ±' to building
and alter interior of existing building
. Estimated completion date: January, 1976
7. Do you have any plans for future expansion, if yes please explain:
This is the expansion allowed for at the time of existing constnuction
8.' What other governmental permits are required prior to completion of this
project?
(a) Rezone, conditional use, substantial development, etc. YES NO x
(b) King County Hydrolics Permit YES NO x
(c) Building. permit YES x NO
(d) Puget Sound Air Pollution Control. Permit YES NO x
(e) Sewer hook up permit YES NO X
(f) Sign permit YES NO x
(g) Water hook up permit YES NO x
(h) Storm water system permit YES NO x
(i) Curb cut permit YES NO x
(j) Electrical permit (State of Washington) YES x NO
(k) Plumbing permit (King County) YES x, NO
(1) Other
9. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by
your proposal? If yes, explain: No
10. Agency requiring checklist: City of Tukwila, Department -
11. Accepted by agency on: by:
(to be filled in by city upon receipt of checklist)
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
(Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required.)
Yes .Maybe
Earth. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Unstable earth conditions or in
any changes in geologic sub -
structures: x
(b) Disruptions, displacements
or overcovering of the soils: x
(c) Change in topography or ground
surface relief features? x
(d) The destruction, covering, or
modification of any unique
geologic or physical features?
(e) Any increase in wind or water
erosion of soils, either on
or off the site?
(f) Changes in deposition or
erosion of beach sands, or
in changes in siltation,
deposition, or erosion which
may modify the channel of a
river or stream or the bed of
the ocean or any bay, inlet
or lake?
Explanation: ;
Air. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Air emissions or deterioration
of ambient air quality?
(b) The creation of objectionable
odors?
(c) Alteration of air movement,
moisture or temperature, or
in any change in climate,
either locally or regionally?
Explanation:
x
x
x
•
Water. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Changes in currents, or the
course or direction of water
movements, in either marine
or fresh waters?
(b) Changes in absorption rates,
drainage patterns, or, the
amount of surface water run-
off?
(c) Alterations to the course or
flow of flood waters?
(d) Change in the amount of surface
water in any watercourse?
(e) Discharge into surface waters,
or in any alteration of sur-
face water quality, including .
temperature or turbidity?
(f) Alteration of the direction or
rate of flow of ground waters?
(g) Change in the quantity of
ground waters, either through
direct additions or withdrawals,
or through interception of an
acquifer by cuts or excavations?
(h) Deterioration in ground water
quality, either through direct
injection, or through the seep-
age of leachate, phosphates,
detergents, waterborne virus
or bacteria, or other substances
into the ground waters?
(i) Reduction in the amount of water
otherwise available for public
water supplies?
�es Maybe .
x
x
x
x
Explanation:
(b) Original design accounted for these changes due to any future expansion.
(a)
The change in amount of surface water will be minimal with the time of
concentration slightly earlier. This was allowed for in original design
for future expansion.
{
•
Flora. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Change in the diversity of species,
or numbers of any species of flora.
(including trees, shrubs, grass,
crops, micro -flora and aquatic
plants)?
(b) Reduction of the numbers of any
unique, rare or endangered species
of flora?
(c) Introduction of new species of
flora into an area, or in a bar-
rier to the normal replenishment of
existing species?
Yes Maybe
x
x
Explanation:
(a) More parking necessary. However, only existing rye grass ground cover
will be removed in surcharge fill areas.
Fauna. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Changes in the diversity of species,
or numbers of any species of fauna
(birds, land animals including rep -
tiles, fish and shellfish, benthic
organisms, insects, or micro - fauna)?
Reduction of the numbers of any
unique, rare or endangered species
of fauna?
(b)
(c) Introduction of new species of fauna
into an area, or result in a barrier
to the migration or movement of fauna?
(d) Deterioration to existing wildlife
habitat?
Explanation:
Noise. Will the proposal increase exist-
ing noise levels?
Explanation:
x
x•
4;
•
Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce
new light or glare?
Explanation:i'
Land Use. Will the proposal result in the
alteration of the present or planned land
use of an area?
Explanation:
Natural Resources. Will the proposal re-
sult in:
(a) Increase in the rate of use of any
natural resource?
(b) Depletion of any nonrenewable nat-
ural resource?
Explanation:...
Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve
a risk of an explosion or the release of
hazardous substances (including, but not
limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or
radiation) in the event of an accident or
upset conditions?
Explanation:
Population. Will the proposal alter the
location, distribution, density, or growth
rate of the human population of an area?
Explanation:
Yes Maybe
x
x
x
x
•
Housing. Will the proposal affect existing
housing avai- lability, or create a demand for
additional housing?
Explanation:
Transportation /Circulation. Will the pro-
posal result in:
(a) Generation of additional vehicular
movement?
(b) Effects on existing parking facilities,
or demand for new parking?
(c) Impact upon existing transportation
systems?
(d) Alterations to present patterns of
circulation or movement of people
and /or goods?
(e) Alterations to waterborne or air
traffic?.
Yes Maybe No
x
Explanation:
(a) Approximately 62.cars.
(b) We are increasing facilities to accommodate expansion.
Local Services. Will the proposal have an
effect upon, or result in a need for new
services in any of the following areas:
(a) Fire protection ?,
(b) Police protection?
(c) Schools?
(d) Parks?
(e) Maintenance of public facilities,
including roads?
(f) Other governmental services?
Explanation:
x
x
• •
Energy. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or
energy?
(b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, .
or require the development of new
sources of energy?
Explanation:
Yes Maybe
x
(b). Small increase required for electrical energy and gas.
Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need
for new systems, or alterations to the follow-
ing utilities:
(a) Power or natural gas?
(b) .Communications systems?
(c) Water?
(d) Sewer or septic tanks?
(e) Storm water drainage?
(f) Solid waste and disposal?
Explanation:
Human Health. Will the proposal result in the
creation of any health hazard or potential .
health hazard (excluding mental health)?
Explanation:
Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the
obstruction of any Scenic vista or view open
to the public, or will the proposal result
in the creation of an aesthetically offensive
site open to public view?
Explanation:
x
x
•x
x
x
Recreation. Will the proposal result in an
impact upon the quality or quantity of ex-
isting recreational opportunities?
Explanation:
Archeological /Historical. Will the proposal
result in an alteration of a significant
archeological or historical site?
Explanation:
Revenue. Will the proposal cause a signifi -.
•
cant increase in city revenues?
Explanation:
Increased tax revenue due to $500,000. improvement.
Employment. Will the proposal create a
significant amount of new jobs?
Explanation:
Will create 30 - 50 new jobs.
Yes Maybe No
x
x
x