The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSEPA EPIC-209-83 - FEWEL / MCAVOY & ASSOCIATES - 139TH STREET VACATIONFEWEL STREET VACATION S. 139'" ST & INTERURBAN AVE. S. EPIG209 -83 WESTERN PACIFIC PROPERTIES, INC. Commercial Brokerage Company December 12, 1983 Mr. Rick Beeler City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, Washington 98188 RE: Notice of Action, Vacation of S. 139th Dear Rick: Per our recent conversation, I have enclosed a photocopy of the notice of action published in the Daily Record Chronicle for your records. Should you have any questions, please call. incerely, TERN PACIFIC PROPERTIES, INC. s rdinator En ] iu ] U . . 1 9 i .. DEC 13 1983 CITY OF '1"UKL ii..A PLANNING DEPT. 13975 Interurban Avenue South • Seattle, Washington 98168 • (206) 241 -1616 Affidavit of Publication STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING ss. Cindy Strupp being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says that she is the ... ch.ief .. clank of THE DAILY RECORD CHRONICLE, a newspaper published six (6) times a week. That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published in the English language continually as a newspaper published four (4) times a week in Kent, King County, Washington, and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper. That the Daily Record Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the County in which it is published, to -wit, King County, Washington. That the annexed is a Notice:. of...Aetian. as it was published in regular issues (and not in supplement form of said newspaper) once each issue for a period two of consecutive issues, commencing on the 20thdayof November 19 8 3 , and ending the 27taayof November ,19 63, both dates inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its sub- scribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of $ 63 • 67which has been paid in full at the rate of per folio of one hundred words for the first insertion and per folio of one hundred words for each subsequent insertion. Subscribed and sworn to before me this November , i9 8$ Chief Clegt 27t13 day of licNotice` ., :; Public .NoticE ;challenge such action on the cord Chronicle Nover !grounds .of fiance ::20 and 27, 1983. R8811 'with the provisions of chap. - !ter of, 43.21C RCW (State ; Environmental Policy Act) ;shall be.commenced within 130 days or.be barred. The .action taken by the .City. of Tukwila, notice . of lwhich is hereby.given, was (-as follows: . •1 • • (1) Adoption of Ordinance No. 1302. • (2) For the vacation of a portion of South 139th Street s'at the intersection with In -. tterurban Avenue South. (3) Pertinent documents may be .examined during regular - business hours at office Of the City Clerk, City of Tukwila, 8200 South - center .Boulevard, Tukwila; `. :NE OF ACTION • Wa., 98188. OTICBY THE . • Proponents: • •:CITY OFTUKWILA• ' Fewel- McAvoy 8 :'As -' Pursuant to the provision soclates, Inc., et al ;of Chapter 43.21C RCW, 7095 SW Sandburg Road, 'notice is hereby given that: • Portland, OR 97223 The City of Tukwila did on By: WESTERN PACIFIC ;November 7, 1983, take the' PROPERTIES, INC. 'faction described below. , • Donald A. Moody, Inc. - • Any action to set aside, Agent :enjoin, review. or otherwise • :; Published in the Daily Re- Notary Public in and fe t'he State of Washington, residing at }F,=t>King County. Federal tda — Passed by the Legislature, 1955, known as Senate Bill 281, effective June 9th, 1955. — Western Union Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures, adopted by the newspapers of the State. 4 VN •87 Revised 5/82 WAC 197 -11 -1350 • DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Description of proposal Street Vacation Proponent Fewel - McAvoy & Associates, Inc. Location of proposal So. 139th St. at intersection with Interurban Ave. So. Lead agency City of Tukwila File No. EPIC- 209 -83 This proposal has been determined not to have a probably significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS)' is not required under RCW 43- 21C.020(c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. Responsible official Bradley J. Collins Position /title Planning Director Address and phone 6200 Southcenter Blvd., Tukwila, WA 98188 433-1845 Date November 7, 1983 Signature ce_Qp„ • CITY OF TUKWILA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BY THE TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Tukwila City Council will conduct a Public Hearing on the 10th day of October, 1983, at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers of Tukwila City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, to consider the following: THE STREET VACATION OF THAT PORTION OF SOUTH 139TH STREET EXTENDING 90 FEET WESTERLY OF INTERURBAN AVENUE. Any and all interested persons are invited to be present to voice approval, disapproval, or opinions on same. CITY OF TUKWILA Maxine Anderson . City Clerk . Published Record Chronicle 9/25/83 & 3 copies posted on the site on 9/21/83 . • t_._ a9 •• ' S. 139th ry z,," .i L...t -Lp� ^!j A I.0 C•til Tt/a�r►.L.� C/T -r _ 139 s ^a• •'( ;I I • CITY OF TUKWILA . PERMIT NUMBER . . (iV i ROL NUMBER CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM - PLAN CHECK ROUTING FORM TO: BLDG, PLNG. P,W, PROJECT F- erv-e.,'� UG -��ht1 ADDRESS 1) 5G DATE. TRANSMITTED II/ C,P,S, STAFF COORDINATOR 'PAP FIRE POLICE • P,& R, RESPONSE REQUEST BY JI /ti/ RESPONSE RECEIV PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED PROJECT PLANS AND RESPOND WITH APPROPRIATE • COMMENTS IN THE. SPACE BELOW, INDICATE CRUCIAL CONCERNS BY CHECKING.THE BOX NEXT TO THE LINE(S) ON WHICH.THAT CONCERN IS NOTED: r n� 1 1) 7\19 C-eir fttio,\/1 2) 3) 5) 6) 7) 8) 9) 10) 11) 12) 13) 14> 15) ,R,C,*REVIEW REQUESTED PLAN CHECK . DP,TE l I J r°(.93 PLAN RESUB!IITTAL REQUESTED 1 1 COMMENTS PREPARED B C.P.S. FORM 2 cf-a 3 -Li a • • CITY OF TUKWILA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM Vii[ 7[ MOV 3 1983 CITY OF TUKWILA PLANNING DEPT. This questionnaire must be completed and submitted with the application for permit. This questionnaire must be completed by all persons applying for a permit from the City of Tukwila, unless it is determined by the Responsible Official that the permit is exempt or unless the applicant and Responsible Official previously agree an Environmental Impact Statement needs to be completed. A fee of $50.00 must accompany the filling of the Environmental Questionnaire to cover costs of the threshold determination. I. BACKGROUND Fewel- McAvoy & Associates, Inc. 1. Name of Proponent: (Harris, Moody, Bloonquist - Donald A. Pbody Managing Partner) 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: 7095 SW SahOburg Pd., Portland, OR.. 97223 3. Date Checklist Submitted: November 2, 1953 4. Agency Requiring Checklist: City of Tukwila 5. Name of »Proposal, if applicable: South 139th Street. vacation 6. Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature): Vacation of a parcel of undeveloped roadway. 7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental im- pacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate under- standing of the environmental setting of the proposal): South 139th Street at the intersection of Interurban Avenue South on the West side of Interurban. This property involved constitutes approximately 20' by 90' in area. 8. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal: November 7, 1983 9. List of all Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals Required for the Proposal (federal, state and .local): (a) Rezone, conditional use, shoreline permit, etc. :YES NO x (b) -.King County Hydraulics Permit YES NO x (c) Building permit YES NO x (d) Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Permit (e) Sewer hook up permit (f) Sign permit (g) Water hook up permit (h) Storm water system permit (i) Curb cut permit (j) Electrical permit (State of Washington) (k) Plumbing permit (King County) (1) Other: YES NO x YES NO x YES NO x YES NO x YES NO x YES NO x YES NO x YES NO x 10. Do you have any plans for future additions', expansion, or futher activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain: No 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain: Yes. At the present time a new building is nearing completion adjoining subject site. The area involved will, upon City approval, be involved. 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro - posal; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: NONE II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? (b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcover- ing of the soil? (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief fea- tures? (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? YES MAYBE NO • • YES MAYBE NO (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? x (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? Explanation: 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? (b) The creation of objectionable odors? (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? Explanation: 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? .(c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? (e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? -3- x x x x x YES MAYBE NO (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? (i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise avail- able for public water supplies? Explanation: 4. Flora. Will the proposal result in: (a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? x (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? x (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? x (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? x Explanation: 5. Fauna. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? Explanation: YES MAYBE. NO 6. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? x Explanation: 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? Explanation: 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in the altera- tion of the present or planned land use of an area? Explanation: 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? Explanation: 10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radi- ation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? Explanation: x X x 11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? Explanation: 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? Explanation: 13. Transportation /Circulation. Will the proposal result in: (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? (b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and /or goods? (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? YES MAYBE- NO x x x x x x x x Explanation: At the present time, subject property interferes with the circulation of parking in the area, surrounding the adjacent building. Circulation could be obtained with this vacation. 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: (a) Fire protection? x (b) Police protection? x (c) Schools? x (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? x (e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? x • • (f) Other governmental services? Explanation: 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? Explanation: YES MAYBE. NO x 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: (a) Power or natural gas? x (b) Communications systems? x (c) Water? x (d) Sewer or septic tanks? x (e) Storm water drainage? x (f) Solid waste and disposal? X Explanation: 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the crea- tion of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental' health)? Explanation: x • 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruc- tion of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically of- fensive site open to public view? Explanation: 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of exist- ing recreational opportunities? Explanation: 20. Archeological /Histroical. Will the proposal result in an alteration of a signifi- cant archeological or his- torical site, structure, object or building? Explanation: CERTIFICATION BY APPLICANT: YES MAYBE NO I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete.: It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non - significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Fewel- McAw.; s. i. -s, Inc. III (Harris, o• 4 =- • ++% St) . /1,A% Sig ature and T tle Date Donald A. .•dy, Managing Partner November 2, 1983 -8- x CITY OF TUKWILA •ERMIT NUMBER - • C•TROL NUMBER CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM PLAN -CHECK ROUTING FORM TO: 1 1 BLDG, PLNG, P , W, PROJECT F-e u., -e1, .454-r c_ I/G i:3 J ADDRESS 6r7 i) T4C! DATE. TRANSMITTED /0 C,P,S, STAFF COORDINATOR PAP FIRE POLICE P,& R, .RESPONSE REQUES D BY 1 /N RESPONSE RECEIV PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED PROJECT PLANS AND RESPOND WITH APPROPRIATE • COMMENTS IN THE.SPACE BELOW, INDICATE CRUCIAL CONCERNS BY CHECKING.THE BOX NEXT TO THE LINE(S) ON WHICH.THAT CONCERN IS NOTED: 11 i 4) 5) 6) 7) 8) 9) 10) 11) 12) 13>� J 14) 15) D, R, C, REVIEW REQUESTED PLAN RESUBMITTAL REQUESTED n TLHI !f�ATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. FORM 2 CITY OF TUKWILA •RMIT NUMBER . C•ROL NUMBER CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM - PLAN CHECK ROUTING FORM TO: -I BLDG. PLNG, P,W, PROJECT F- exv -e-1, 7'i C Vaco(vt ADDRESS -•- .. '� DATE. TRANSMITTED 91/ C.P.S. STAFF COORDINATOR OOP • FIRE POLICE jp,a R. .RESPONSE REQUEST RESPONSE RECEIV PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED PROJECT PLANS AND RESPOND WITH APPROPRIATE - COiMMENTS IN THE SPACE BELOW, INDICATE CRUCIAL CONCERNS BY CHECKING-THE BOX NEXT TO THE LINES) ON WHICH.THAT CONCERN IS NOTED: 1 1 1 1 1 1) 2) . 3). 4) 5) . 6) 7) 8) 9) 10) 11) 12) 13) 14) 15) D, R, C, 'REVIEW REQUESTED PLAN RESIIBMITTAL REQUESTED PLAN CHECK DATE /(///77 COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. FARM 2 CITY OF TUKWILA (FERMIT NUMBER, - -C ROL NUrMBER, 35-c5141,- CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM - PLAN CHECK ROUTING FORM i'ad. . TO: BLDG, I L PLNG, ' P.W. .- FIRE POLICE LI P,& R. PROJECT Fei v 'rime- I/QCQ.�i ADDRESS_ ) DATE. TRANSMITTED 11 /z . .RESPONSE REQUEST C,P,S, STAFF COORDINATORif RESPONSE RECEIV PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED PROJECT PLANS AND RESPOND WITH APPROPRIATE • COMMENTS IN THE SPACE BELOW, INDICATE CRUCIAL CONCERNS BY CHECKING•THE BOX NEXT TO THE LINE(S) ON WHICH.THAT CONCERN IS NOTED: In 1 ) . 2) 3) 4) ri 5) 6) n» 8) 9) 10) 11) 12) FT 13) 14) 1 15) f 1 1 1 1 • D, R, C,REVIEW REQUESTED PLAN RESUBMITTAL REQUESTED DIM t'RPPf11 /Fii 177 PLAN CHECK DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY C,P,S, FORM 2 CITY OF TUKWILA •ERMIT NUMBER- . C•TROL NUMBER S� 3- CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM - PLAN CHECK ROUTING FORM TO: BLDG. i PLNG, P,W, PROJECT Fe u)-e,l, t5-trez ADDRESS ) 5Q DATE. TRANSMITTED 90 C.P.S. STAFF COORDINATOR 61.E FIRE POLICE P,8, R. . RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 11/4/ RESPONSE RECEIVED PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED PROJECT PLANS AND RESPOND WITH APPROPRIATE • COMMENTS IN THE SPACE BELOW, INDICATE CRUCIAL CONCERNS BY CHECKING.THE BOX NEXT TO THE LINE(S) ON WHICH.THAT CONCERN IS NOTED: %1 o God oPtiel Sv9 yes - AV /'o or I . 2) 3) 4) 5) 1 1 Il 6) El 7) i N • , R, C, REVIEW REQUESTED PLAN RESUBMITTAL REQUESTED PLAN CHECK DATE )1-4 - 3 COMMENTS PREPARED BY v C.P.S. Fr.PM 2 LIIY Ui lUKty1LR ERMIT NUMBER . C i ROL NUrBER 2 3 CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM.- PLAN CHECK ROUTING FORM TO: 11 BLDG. PLNG, 11 P.W. 1 1 FIRE 1 - POLICE P,g R4 PROJECT F�.W-e. , VG-C 4J ADDRESS ) 50'x' DATE. TRANSMITTED 10 • - . RESPONSE REQUES I C. P, S, STAFF COORDINATOR ,fir RESPONSE RECEIV PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED PROJECT PLANS AND RESPOND_ WITH APPROPRIATE COMMENTS IN THE. SPACE BELOW, INDICATE CRUCIAL CONCERNS BY CHECKING-THE BOX NEXT TO THE LINE(S) ON WHICH.THAT CONCERN IS NOTED: Fl 1) ri 2) El 3) 4) FI.5) 6) in 7) 8) 1 1 9) • 10) N -0 t i J 7144 /r WOL A ,.' AcL urn £- D,R,C,"REVIEW REQUESTED PLAN RESUBMITTAL REQUESTED 1 • PLAN CHECK DATE 1/ COMMENTS PREPARED BY wAr.f..3 r---1 f .P.s. Ff1?M 2 G'1�Ff 3-3'a� CITY OF TUKWILA • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM D NOV 3 1983 CITY OF TUKWILA PLANNING DEPT. This questionnaire must be completed and submitted with the application for permit. This questionnaire must be completed by all persons applying for a permit from the City of Tukwila, unless it is determined by the Responsible Official that the permit is exempt or unless the applicant and Responsible Official previously agree an Environmental Impact Statement needs to be completed. A fee of $50.00 must accompany the filling of the Environmental Questionnaire to cover costs of the threshold determination. I. BACKGROUND Fewel- Mc.Avoy & Associates, Inc. 1. Name of Proponent: (Harris, Moody, Bloomquist - Donald A. Moody Managing Partner) 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: 7095 sw Sarieburg Pd., Portland, OR. 97223 3. Date Checklist Submitted: November 2, 1953 4. Agency Requiring Checklist: City of Tukwila 5. Name of ,Proposal, if applicable: South 139th Street Vacation 6. Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature): Vacation of a parcel of undeveloped roadway. 7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental im- pacts, including any other_ information needed to give an accurate under- standing of the environmental setting of the proposal): South 139th Street at the intersection of Interurban Avenue South on the West side of Interurban. This property involved constitutes approximately 20' by 90' in area, 8. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal: November 7, 1983 9. List of all Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals Required for the Proposal (federal, state and local): (a) Rezone, conditional use, shoreline permit, etc. YES NO x (b). King County Hydraulics Permit YES NO x (c) Building permit YES NO x • • (d) Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Permit YES NO x (e) Sewer hook up permit YES NO x (f) Sign permit YES NO x Water hook u (g) up permit YES NO x (h) Storm water system permit YES NO x (i) Curb cut permit YES NO x (j) Electrical permit (State of Washington) YES NO x (k) Plumbing permit (King County) YES NO x (1) Other: 10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or futher activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain: No 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain: Yes. At the present time a new building is nearing completion adjoining subject site. The area involved will, upon City approval, be involved. 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: NONE II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? YES MAYBE NO x (b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcover- n,. of the soil? x X (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any x (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief fea- tures? • unique geologic or physical features? 2- YES MAYBE NO (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? x (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? Explanation: 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? (b) The creation of objectionable odors? (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? Explanation: 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? (e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? -3- x x x x x (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? (i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise avail- able for public water supplies? Explanation: 4. Flora. Will the proposal result in: (a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? YES MAYBE NO (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? x Explanation: 5. Fauna. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? Explanation: x • • YES MAYBE NO 6. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? Explanation: 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? Explanation: 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in the altera- tion of the present or planned land use of an area? Explanation: 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? Explanation: 10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radi- ation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? Explanation: x X x 11. Population. Explanation: Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? Explanation: 13. Transportation /Circulation. Will the proposal result in: (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? (b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and /or goods? (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? YES MAYBE NO x x x x x x x Explanation: At the present time, subject property interferes with the circulation of parking in the area .surrounding the adjacent building. Circulation could be obtained with this vacation. 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: (a) Fire protection? (b) Police protection? (c) Schools? (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? (e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? YES MAYBE NO (f) Other governmental services? x Explanation: 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? Explanation: x x 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: (a) Power or natural gas? x (b) Communications systems? x (c) Water? x (d) Sewer or septic tanks? x (e) Storm water drainage? x (f) Solid waste and disposal? x Explanation: 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the crea- tion of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental' health)? Explanation: x • • YES MAYBE NO 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruc- tion of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically of- fensive site open to public view? Explanation: 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of exist- ing recreational opportunities? Explanation: 20. Archeological /Histroical. Will the proposal result in an alteration of a signifi- cant archeological or his- torical site, structure, object or building? Explanation: CERTIFICATION BY APPLICANT: I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non - significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Fewe1 -MCA (Harris, e s. 1• y; iii, C.•,ri l Sig ature and T tle • Date Donald A. y, Managing Partner s, Inc. st) November 2, 1983 -8- x