HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA EPIC-213-83 - JB WRIGHT CORPORATION - THE COTTAGESJ.B.WRIGHT-
THE COTTAGES
\"W CORNER OF S. 152 "° ST.
& 57'" AVE. S.
EPIC- 213 -83
J. B. WRIGHT
CORPORATION
1111 THIRD AVE.. 7TH FLOOR
SEATTLE. WA 98101
(206) 682 -3577
HENRY D. CHUMNEY
GENERAL MANAGER
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT
st4ILA
1908
City of Tukwila
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila, Washington 98188
GROW WITH
IN THE LA
OF THE HAZEL
GOMEZ, SHELLEY D.
127 Bethel
Walla Walla, WA 99362
-Novi
_Ls1
MAR-1'84
52.
UV,' A Fi
96
i..;OM 27 13060931 03/06/8 q
RETURN TO SENDER
MOVED LEFT NO ADDRESS
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 : 1 1 1 1 l n 1 I I I It 1 f I I
CITY OF TUKWILA
Notice of Public Meeting of the
Tukwila Planning Commission
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Tukwila PLANNING COMMISSION has fixed the
8th day of March at 8:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers of Tukwila City
Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, Washington, as the time and
place for
A. DR-6-83, J.B. Wright Corp., requesting approval of 82 multiple family
units on 4.62 acre site.
Any and all interested persons are invited to attend.
Published: Record Chronicle, March 27, 1984
WAC 197 -11 -1350
DECLARATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE
Description of proposal 82 Multiple Family Units on 4.62 Acre Site
Proponent J.B. Wright Corp.
Location of proposal NW corner of S. 152nd St. & 57th Ave. S.
. Lead Agency City of Tukwila File Um. EPIC - 213 -83
This proposal has been determined not to have a probable significant
adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS)
is not required under RCW 43- 21C.020(c). This decision was made after
review by the lead agency of, a completed environmental checklist and other
information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to
the public on request.
Responsible official Rick Beeler
Position /title Acting Planning Director
Address and phone 6200 Southcenter Blvd., Tukwila, WA 98188 433 -1845
Date February 27, 1984 Signature
Published: Record Chronicle
Date: March 4, 1984
•
City of Tukw�
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila, Washington 98188-
�n01'
IN THE
OF THE HAZE
M
MCHUGH, JOE B.
15280 Macadam Rd. So. #203
Seattle, WA 98188
MAR sT
1C1••i 89 0711f78N1. 03/1i/Si
-44C117.: ELIVERABLE AS ADDRESSED
RETURN TO SENDER
UNAE:LE TO ktt !t 11ffff t f t t1hT'
ii a�ar�arFsr =.etii :r4t4.trirr {pcsi _
CITY OF TUKWILA
Notice of Public Meeting of the.
Tukwila Planning Commission
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Tukwila PLANNING COMMISSION has fixed the
8th day of March at 8:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers of Tukwila City
Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, Washington, as the time and
place for
A. DR -6 -83, J.B. Wright Corp., requesting approval of 82 multiple family
units on 4.62 acre site.
Any and all interested persons are invited to attend.
Published: Record Chronicle, March 27, 1984
WAC 197 -11 -1350
DECLARATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE
Description of proposal 82 Multiple Family Units on 4.62 Acre Site
Proponent J.B. Wright Corp.
Location of proposal NW corner of S. 152nd St. & 57th Ave. S.
Lead Agency City of Tukwila File No. EPIC - 213 -83
This proposal has been determined not to have a probable significant
adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS)
is not required under RCW 43- 21C.020(c). This decision was made after
review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other
information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to
the public on request.
Responsible official Rick Beeler
Position /title Acting Planning Director
Address and phone 6200 Southcenter Blvd., Tukwila., VGA 98188 433 -1845
Date February 27, 1984. Signature
Published: Record Chronicle
Date: March 4, 1984
•
City 'of Tukwila
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila Washington 98188
Gary L VanDusen, Mayor
March 22, 1984
HENRY D. CHUMNEY
J.B. Wright Corp.
1111 Third Ave.
7th Floor
Seattle, WA 98101
RE: The Cottages - EPIC - 213 -83
Dear Henry:
Following issuance by the City of the Final Declaration of Nonsignificance
for your project, RCW 43.21C provides for appeal of the City's decision.
To minimize your project's vulnerability to such an appeal, RCW 43.21C.080
contains a public notice to be published (enclosed).
Should you decide to utilize this notice, please publish in the "Record
Chronicle" on the same day for two consecutive weeks. Otherwise you may
use the alternative procedures in RCW 43.21C.080 (enclosed).
Respectf- ir11y5,
c reeler
Associate Planner
RB /blk
enclosure
43.21 B.250
Title 43 RCW: State Government Executive
regard to the consistency of the rules adopted pursuant
to RCW 43.21C.120 and with the rules and guidelines
adopted pursuant to RCW 43.21C.110 shall be initiated
by filing a petition for review with the pollution control
hearings board in accordance with rules of practice and
procedures promulgated by the hearings board.
(2) All challenges to the hearings board provided •un-
der this section shall be decided on the basis of con-
formance of rules, with the applicable rules and
guidelines adopted pursuant to RCW 43.21C.110. The
board may in its discretion require briefs, testimony, and
oral arguments.
(3) The decisions of the hearings board authorized
under this section shall be final. [ 1974 ex.s. c 179 § 9.]
Purpose -1974 ex.s. c 179: See note following RCW 43.21C.080.
Severability -1974 ex.s. c 179: See RCW 43.21C.910.
43.21B.260 Regulations and amendments of activated
air pollution control authorities Filing with hearings
board authorized Evidence. Activated air pollution
control authorities, established under chapter 70.94
RCW, may file certified copies of their regulations and
amendments thereto with the pollution control hearings
board of the state of Washington, and the •hearings
board shall take judicial note of the copies so filed and
the said regulations and amendments shall be received
and admitted, by reference, in all hearings before the
board, as prima facie evidence that such regulations and
amendments on file are in full force and effect. [ 1974
ex.s. c 69 § 5.]
43.21B.900 Savings—Other powers and duties not
affected Permits, standards not affected— Sever-
ability Effective date -1970 basic act. See notes
following RCW 43.21A.010.
Chapter 43.21C
STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY
Sections
43.21C.010 Purposes.
43.21 C.020 Legislative recognitions— Declaration-
Responsibility.
43.21C.030 Guidelines for state agencies, local governments -
Statements— Reports — Advice — Information.
43.21C.031 Significant impacts.
43.21C.035 Certain 'irrigation projects decisions exempt from RCW
43.21 C.030(2)(c).
43.21C.037 Application of RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c) to forest
practices.
43.21C.038 Application of RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c) to school
closures.
43.21C.040 Examination of laws, regulations, policies by state agen-
cies and local authorities — Report of deficiencies
and corrective measures.
43.21C.050 Specific statutory obligations not affected.
43.21C.060 Chapter supplementary— Conditioning or denial of
governmental action.
43.21C.075 Appeals.
43.21C.080 Notice of action by governmental agency —How pub-
licized— Form —Time limitation for commencing
challenge to action.
43.21C.087 List of filings required by RCW 43.21C.080.
43.21 C.090 Decision.of governmental agency to be accorded sub-
stantial weight.
[title 43 RCW —p 981
43.21 C.095
43.21C.110
43.21C.120
43.21C.130
43.21C.]35
43.21C.150
43.21C.160
43.21C.165
43.21C.170
43.21 C.175
43.21C.210
43.21 C.220
43.21C.230
43.21 C.300
43.21C.500
43.21C.900
43.21C.910
43.21C,911
43.21C.912
43.21C.913
43.21C.914
State environmental policy act rules to be accorded sub-
stantial deference.
Content of state environmental policy act rules.
Rules, ordinances, resolutions and regulations -
Adoption— Effective dates..
Model ordinances.
Authority of local governmental units to adopt rules,
guidelines and model ordinances by reference.
RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c) inapplicable when statement
previously prepared pursuant to national environmen -•
tal policy act.
Utilization of statement prepared under RCW 43.21C-
.030 to implement chapter 90.62 RCW — Utilization
of chapter 90.62 RCW procedures to satisfy RCW
43.21 C.030(2)(c).
Challenges to consistency of rules adopted pursuant to
RCW 43.21C.110 and 43.21C.160—Procedure-
Finality.
Council on environmental policy.
Council on environmental policy— Personnel.
Certain actions during state of emergency exempt from
chapter.
Incorporation of city or town exempt from chapter.
Development and adoption of plan under chapter 43.180
RCW exempt from. chapter.
Workshops — Handbook.
Exemption from this. chapter of emergency recovery op-
erations from Mt. Si. Helens eruption authorized —
Expiration of section.
Short title.
Severability-1974 ex.s. c 179:.
Section headings not part of law -1983 c 117. •
Applicability -19R3 c 117.
Severability - 1983 c 117.
Effective dates -1983 c 117.
43.21C.010 Purposes. The purposes of this chapter
are: (1) To declare a state policy which will encourage
productive and enjoyable harmony between man and his
environment; (2) to promote efforts which will prevent
or eliminate damage to the environment and biosphere;
(3) and stimulate the health and welfare of man; and (4)
to enrich the understanding of the-ecological systems
and natural resources important to the state and nation.
[ 1971 ex.s. c 109 § 1.]
43.21C.020 Legislative recognitions Declara-
tion Responsibility. (1) The legislature, recognizing
that man depends on his biologicalL and physical sur-
roundings for food, shelter, and other needs, and for
cultural enrichment as well; and recognizing further the
profound impact of man's activity on the interrelations
of all components of the natural environment, particu-
larly the profound influences of population . growth,
high - density urbanization„ industrial expansion, resource
utilization and exploitation, and new and expanding
technological advances and recognizing further the criti-
cal importance of restoring and maintaining environ-
mental quality to the overall welfare and development of
man, declares that it is the continuing, policy of the state
of Washington, in cooperation with federal and local
governments, and other concerned public and private or-
ganizations, to use all practicable means and measures, .
including financial and technical assistance, in a manner
calculated to: (a) Foster and promote the general wel-
fare; (b) to create and maintain conditions under which
man and nature can exist in productive harmony; and
(c) fulfill the social, economic, and other requirements
(1983 Ed.)
State Environmental Policy
of present and future generations of Washington
citizens.
(2) In order to carry out the policy set forth in this
chapter, it is the continuing responsibility of the state of
Washington and all agencies of the state to use all prac-
ticable means, consistent with other essential considera-
tions of state policy, to improve and coordinate plans,
functions, programs, and resources to the end that the
state and its citizens may: •
(a) Fulfill the responsibilities of each generation as
trustee of the environment for succeeding generations;
(b) Assure for all people of Washington safe, health-
ful, productive, and esthetically and culturally pleasing
surroundings;
(c) Attain the widest range of beneficial uses of the
environment without degradation, risk to health or
safety, or other undesirable and unintended
consequences;
(d) Preserve important historic, cultural, and natural
aspects of our national heritage;
(e) Maintain, wherever possible, an environment
which supports diversity and variety of individual choice;
(f) Achieve a balance between population and re-
source use which will permit high standards of living and
a wide sharing of life's amenities; and
(g) Enhance the quality of renewable resources and
approach the maximum attainable recycling of deplet-
able resources.
(3) The legislature recognizes that each person has a
fundamental and inalienable right to a healthful envi-
ronment and that each person has a responsibility to
contribute to the preservation and enhancement of the
environment. [ 1971 ex.s. c 109 § 2.]
43.21C.030 Guidelines for state agencies, local gov-
ernments— Statements Reports Advice
Information. The legislature authorizes and directs that,
to the fullest extent possible: (1) The policies, regula-
tions, and laws of the state of Washington shall be in-
terpreted and administered in accordance with the
policies set forth in this chapter, and (2) all branches of
government o1 this state, including state agencies, mu-
nicipal and public corporations, and counties shall:
(a) Utilize a systematic, interdisciplinary approach
which will insure the integrated use of the natural and
social , sciences and the environmental design arts in
planning and in decision making which may have an im-
pact on man's environment;
(b) Identify and develop methods and procedures, in
consultation with the department of ecology and the
ecological commission, which will insure that presently
unquantified environmental amenities and values will be
given appropriate consideration in decision making along
with economic and technical considerations;
(c) Include in every recommendation or report on
proposals for legislation and other major actions signifi-
cantly affecting the quality of the environment, a de-
tailed statement by the responsible official on:
. (i) the environmental impact of the proposed action;
(ii) any adverse environmental effects which cannot
be avoided should the proposal be implemented;
(1983 Ed.)
43.21C.031
(iii) alternatives to the proposed action;
(iv) the relationship between local short –term uses of
man's environment and the maintenance and enhance-
ment of long –term productivity; and
(v) any irreversible and irretrievable commitments of
resources which would be involved in the proposed action
should it be implemented;
(d) Prior to making any detailed statement, the re-
sponsible official shall consult with and obtain the com-
ments of any public agency which has jurisdiction by
law or special expertise with respect to any environmen-
tal impact involved. Copies of such statement and the
comments and views of the appropriate federal, province,
state, and local agencies, which are authorized to de-
velop and enforce environmental standards, shall be
made available to the governor, the department of ecol-
ogy, the ecological commission, and the public, and shall
accompany the proposal through the existing agency re-
view processes;
(e) Study, develop, and describe appropriate alterna-
tives to recommended courses of action in any proposal
which involves unresolved conflicts concerning alterna-
tive uses of available resources;
(f) Recognize the world -wide and long–range charac-
ter of environmental problems and:, where consistent
with state policy, lend appropriate support to initiatives,
resolutions, and programs designed to maximize interna-
tional cooperation in anticipating and preventing a de-
cline in the quality of mankind's world environment;
(g) Make available to the federal] :government, other
states, provinces of Canada, munici ... lities, institutions,
and individuals, advice and information useful in restor-
ing, maintaining, and enhancing the quality of the
environment;
(h) Initiate and utilize ecological information in the
planning and development of naturall .resource– oriented
projects. [ 1971 ex.s. c 109 § 3.]
43.21C.031 Significant impacts. An environmental
impact statement (the detailed statement required by
RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c)) shall be prepared on proposals
for legislation and other major actions having a probable
significant, adverse environmental impact. Actions cate-
gorically exempt under RCW 43.21 C_1 l 0(l)(a) do not
require environmental review or the preparation of an .
environmental impact statement under this chapter.
An environmental impact statement is required to an-
alyze only those probable adverse environmental impacts
which are significant. Beneficial environmental impacts
may be discussed. The responsible official shall consult
with agencies and the public to identify such impacts
and limit the scope of an environmental impact state-
ment. The subjects listed in RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c)
need not . be treated as separate sections of an environ-
mental impact statement. Discussions of significant
short –term and long –term environmental impacts, sig-
nificant irrevocable commitments of natural resources,
significant alternatives including mitiation measures,
and significant environmental impacts which cannot be
mitigated should be consolidated or included, as appli-
cable, in those sections of an enviroonmental impact
[Title 43 RCW —p 99]
43.21 C.03 Y
•
Title RCW: State Government Executive
statement where the responsible official decides they'
logically belong. [1983 c 117 § 1.]
43.21C.035 Certain irrigation projects decisions ex-
empt from RCW 43.21C.030(2Xc). Decisions pertaining
to applications for appropriation of fifty cubic feet of
water per second or less for irrigation projects promul-
gated by any person, private firm, private corporation or
private association without resort to subsidy by either
state or federal government pursuant to RCW 90.03.250
through 90.03.340, as now or hereafter amended, to be
used for agricultural irrigation shall not be subject to the
requirements of RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c), as now or
hereafter amended. [ 1974 ex.s. c 150 § 1.]
43.21C.037 Application of RCW 43.21C.030(2Xc) to
forest practices. (l) Decisions pertaining to applications
for Class I, II, and III forest practices, as defined by
rule of the forest practices board under RCW 76.09.050,
are not subject to the requirements of RCW
43.21C.030(2)(c) as now or hereafter amended. .
(2) When the applicable county, city, or town requires
a license in connection with any proposal involving forest
practices (a) on lands platted after January I, 1960, (b)
on lands being converted to another use, or (c) on lands
which, pursuant to RCW 76.09.070 as now or hereafter
amended, are not to be reforested because of the likeli-
hood of future conversion to urban development, then
the local government, rather than the . department of
natural resources, is responsible for any detailed state-
ment required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c).
(3) Those forest practices determined by rule of the
forest practices board to have a potential for a substan-
tial impact on the environment, and thus to be Class IV
practices, require an evaluation by the department of
natural resources as to whether or not a detailed state-
ment must be prepared pursuant to this chapter. The
evaluation shall be made within ten days from the date
the department receives the application. A Class IV for-
est practice application must be approved or disapproved
by the department within thirty calendar days from the
date the department receives the application, unless the
department determines that a detailed statement must
be made, in which case the application must be approved
or disapproved by the department within sixty days from
the date the department receives the application, unless -
the commissioner of public lands, through the promul-
gation of a formal order, determines that the process
cannot be completed within such period. This section
shall not be construed to prevent any local or regional
governmental entity from determining that a detailed
statement must be prepared for an action regarding a
Class IV forest practice taken by that governmental en-
tity concerning the land on which forest practices will be
conducted. [ 1983 c 117 § 2; 1981 c 290 § 1.)
43.21C.038 Application of RCW 43.21C.030(2Xc) to
school closures. Nothing in RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c)
shall be construed to require the preparation of an envi-
ronmental impact statement or the making of a thresh-
old determination for any decision or any action
[Title 43 RCW—p •1001
commenced subsequent to September 1, 1982, pertaining
to a plan, program, or decision for the closure of a
school or schools or for the school closure portion of any
broader policy, plan or program by a school district
board of directors. [1983 c 109 § 1.]
43.21C.040 Examination of laws, regulations, poli-
cies by state agencies and local authorities --- -Report of
deficiencies and corrective measures. All branches of
government of this state, including state agencies, mu-
nicipal and public corporations, and counties shall re-
view their present statutory authority, administrative
regulations, and current policies and procedures for the
purpose of determining whether there are any deficien-
cies or inconsistencies therein which prohibit full com -.
pliance with the purposes and provisions of this chapter
and shall propose to the governor not later than January
1, 1972, such measures as may be necessary to bring
their authority and policies in conformity with the in-
tent, purposes, and procedures set forth in this chapter.
[ 1971 ex.s. c 109 § 4.]
43.21C.050 Specific statutory obligations not af-
fected. Nothing in RCW. 43.21C.030 or 43.21C.040
shall in any way affect the specific statutory obligations
of any agency (1) to comply with criteria or standards of
environmental quality, (2) to coordinate or consult with
any other public agency, or (3) to act. or refrain from
acting contingent upon the recommendations or certifi-
cation of any other public agency. [1971 ex.s. c 109 § 5.]
43.21C.060 Chapter supplementary — Conditioning
or denial of governmental action. The policies and goals
set forth in this chapter are supplementary to those set
forth in existing authorizations of all` branches of gov-
ernment of this state, including state agencies, municipal
and public corporations, and counties. Any governmental
action• may be conditioned or denied pursuant to this
chapter: Provided, That such conditions or denials shall
be based upon policies identified by the appropriate gov-
ernmental authority and incorporated' into regulations,
plans, or codes which are formally designated by the
agency (or appropriate legislative body, in the case of
local government) as possible bases for the exercise of
authority pursuant to this chapter. Such designation
shall occur at the time specified by RCW 43.21C.120.
Such action may ,be conditioned only to mitigate specific
adverse environmental impacts which. are identified in
the environmental documents prepared under this chap-
ter. These conditions shall be stated in writing by the
decisionmaker. Mitigation measures shall be reasonable
and capable of being accomplished. In order to deny a
proposal under this chapter, an agency must find that:
(1) The proposal would result in significant adverse im-
pacts identified in a final or supplemental environmental
impact statement prepared under this chapter; and (2)
reasonable mitigation measures are insufficient to miti-
gate the identified impact. Except for permits and vari-
ances issued pursuant to chapter 90.58 RCW, when such
a governmental action, not requiring a. legislative deci-
sion, is conditioned or denied by a nonelected official of
(1983 Ed.)
State Environmental Policy
a local governmental agency,. the decision shall be ap-
pealable to the legislative authority'of the acting local
governmental agency unless that legislative authority
formally eliminates such appeals. Such appeals shall be
in accordance with procedures established for such ap-
peals by the legislative authority of the acting local gov-
ernmental agency. [ 1983 c 117 § 3; 1977 ex.s. c 278 § 2;
1971 ex.s. c 109 § 6.)
43.21C.075 Appeals. (1) Because a major purpose of
this chapter is to combine environmental considerations
with public decisions, any appeal brought under this
chapter shall be linked to a specific governmental action.
The State Environmental Policy Act provides a basis for
challe •
ance- with the substantive and procedural provisions of pr
this chapter. The State Environmental Policy Act is not se
intended to create a cause of action unrelated to a spe- tt
cific governmental action. de
(2) Unless otherwise provided by this section:
(a) Appeals under this chapter shall be of the govern-
mental action together with its accompanying environ-
mental determinations.
(b) Appeals of environmental. determinations made
(or lacking) under this chapter shall be commenced
within the time required to appeal the governmental ac-
tion which is subject to environmental review.
nging whether governmental action is in compli- u
w'
43.21C.0
(d) Shall provide that procedural determinatio;
made by the responsible official shall be entitled to su
stantial weight.
(4) If a person aggrieved by an agency action has tl
right to judicial appeal and if an agency has an appe
procedure, such person shall, prior to seeking any jud .
cial review, use such procedure if any .. such procedure i
available, unless expressly provided otherwise by stat
sta tute.
(5) RCW 43.210.080 establishes an optional "notice
of action" procedure which, if used, imposes a time pe
riod for appealing decisions under this chapter. Somc
statutes and ordinances contain time periods for ch
le
nging governmental actions which are subject to review
der this chapter, such as various local land use ap-
ovals (the "underlying governmental action"). This
ction does not modify any such time periods. Tliis sec -
on governs when a judicial appeal must be brought un-
r this chapter where a "notice of action' is used,
and /or where there is another time period which is re-
quired by statute or ordinance for challenging the un-
derlying governmental action. In this subsection, the
term "appeal" refers to a. judicial appeal only
(a) If there is a time period for appealing the under-
lying governmental action, appeals under this chapter.
shall be commenced within thirty days. The agency shall
give official notice stating- the dat
me-
(3) If an agency has a procedure for appeals of der
agency environmental determinations made under this der
chapter, such procedure: prig
(a) Shall not allow more than one agency appeal pro-
ceeding on a procedural determination (the adequacy of
a determination of significance /nonsignificance or of a
. final environmental impact statement), consistent with
any state statutory requirements for appeals to local leg-
islative bodies. The appeal proceeding on a determina-
tion of significance /nonsignificance may occur before
the agency's final decision on a proposed action. Such an
appeal shall also be allowed for a determination of
significance /nonsignificance which may be issued by the
agency. after supplemental review;
(b) Shall consolidate appeal of procedural issues and
of substantive determinations made under this chapter
(such as a decision to require particular mitigation mea-
sures or to deny a proposal) by providing for simulta-
neous appeal of an agency decision on a proposal and
any environmental determinations made under this
chapter, with the exception of the threshold determina-
tion appeal as provided in (a) .of this subsection or an
appeal to the local legislative authority under RCW 43-
.21 C.060 or other applicable state statutes;
(c) Shall provide for the preparation of a record for
use in any subsequent appeal proceedings, and shall pro-
vide for any subsequent appeal proceedings to be con-
ducted on the record, consistent with other applicable
law. An adequate record consists of findings and conclu-
sions, testimony under oath, and taped or written tran-
script. An electronically recorded transcript will suffice
for purposes of review under this paragraph; and
(1983 Ed.)
com-
ncing an appeal. If there.is an agency place for com-
subsection (3) of this g y proceeding un-
() section, the appellant shall .
r to commencing
jt>adfetal appeal, submit to the re-
sponsible official a notice; of intent to commence a judi-
cial appeal. This notice-. of intent shall be given within
the time period for commencing a. judicial appeal on the
underlying governmental action.
(b) A notice of action: ander RCW 43.21C_080 may
be used. If a notice of action is used, judicial appeals
shall be commenced within the time period specified by
RCW 43.21C.080, unless there is a time period for ap-
pealing the underlying governmental action in which
case (a) of this subsection: shall apply.
(c) Notwithstanding RCW 43.21C.080(1), if there is
a time period for appealing the underlying governmental
action, a notice of action may be published within such
time period.
(6)(a) Judicial review of an appeal decision made by
an agency under RCW 43.21C075(5) shall be on the
record, consistent with other applicable law.
(b) A taped or written transcript may be. used. If a
taped transcript is to be reviewed, a record shall identify
the location on the taped transcript of testimony and ev-
idence to be reviewed. Parties are encouraged to desig-
nate only those portions of the testimony, necessary to
present the issues raised on review, but if a party alleges
that a finding of fact is not supported by evidence, the
party should include in the record all evidence relevant
to the disputed finding. Any other party may designate
additional portions of the taped transcript relating to is-
sues raised on review. A p rely may provide a written
transcript of portions of' the i:erstimony at the party's own
expense or apply to that cot:- .: for an order requiring the
(Title 43 RCW—p 1011
43.2.1C.110
•
Title 43 RCW: State Government Executive
analyze only reasonable alternatives and probable ad-
verse environmental impacts which are significant, and
may analyze beneficial impacts.
(e) Rules and procedures for public notification of ac-
tions taken and documents prepared.
(f) Definition of terms relevant to the implementation
of this chapter including the establishment of a list. of
elements of the environment. Analysis of environmental
considerations under RCW 43.21C.030(2) may be re-
quired only for those subjects listed as elements of the
environment (or portions thereof). The list of elements
of •the environment shall consist of the "natural" and
"built" environment. The elements of the built environ-
ment shall consist of public services and utilities (such as
water, sewer, schools, fire and police protection), trans-
portation, environmental health (such as explosive mate-
rials and toxic waste), and land and shoreline use
(including housing, and a description of the relationships
with land use and shoreline plans and designations, in-
cluding population).
(g) Rules for determining the obligations and powers
under this chapter of two or more branches of govern-
ment involved in the same project significantly affecting
the quality of the environment. •
(h) Methods to assure adequate public awareness of
the preparation and issuance. of detailed statements re-
quired by RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c).
(i) To prepare rules for projects setting forth the time
limits within which the governmental entity responsible
for the action shall comply with the provisions of this
chapter.
(j) Rules for utilization of a detailed statement for
more than one action and rules improving environmental
analysis of nonproject proposals and encouraging better
interagency . coordination and integration between this
chapter and other environmental laws.
(k) Rules relating to actions which shall be exempt
from the provisions of this chapter in situations of
emergency.
(1) Rules relating to the use of environmental docu-
ments in planning and decisionmaking and the imple-
mentation of the substantive policies and requirements
of this chapter, including procedures for appeals under
this chapter.
(2) In exercising its powers, functions, and duties un-
der this section,_the department may:
(a) Consult with the state agencies and with represen-
tatives of science, industry, agriculture, labor, conserva-
tion organizations, state and local governments and
other groups, as it deems advisable; and
(b) Utilize, to the fullest extent possible, the services,
facilities, and information (including statistical informa-
tion) of public and private agencies, organizations, and
individuals, in order to avoid duplication of effort and
expense, overlap, or conflict with similar activities auth-
orized by law and performed by established agencies.
(3) Rules adopted pursuant to this section shall be
subject to the review procedures of RCW 34.04.070 and
34.04.080. [1983 c 117 § 7; 1974 ex.s. c 179 § 6.]
Purpose 1974 ex.s. c 1.79: See note following RCW 43.21C.080.
[Title 43 RCW —p 104]
43.21C.120 Rules, ordinances, resolutions and regu-
lations Adoption Effective. dates. (1) All agencies
of government of this state are directed, consistent with
rules and guidelines adopted under- RCW 43.21C.110,
including any revisions. to adopt rules pertaining to the
integration of the policies and procedures of this chapter.
(the state environmental policy act of 1971), into the
various programs under their jurisdiction for implemen-
tation. Designation of polices under RCW 43.21C.060.
and adoption of rules required under this section shall
take place not later than one hundred eighty days after
the effective date of rules and guidelines adopted pursu-
ant to RCW 43.21C.110, or after the establishment of
an agency, whichever shall occur later.
(2) Rules adopted by state agencies under subsection
(1) of this section shall be adopted in accordance with
the provisions of chapter 34.04 RCW and shall be sub-
ject to the review procedures of RCW 34.04.070 and
34.04.080.
(3) All public and municipal corporations, political
subdivisions, and counties of this state are directed, con-
sistent with rules and guidelines adopted under RCW
43.21C.110, including any revisions,. to adopt rules,
ordinances, or resolutions pertaining to the integration of
the policies and procedures of this chapter (the state en-
vironmental policy act of 1971), into the various pro-
grams under their jurisdiction for implementation.
Designation of policies under RCW 43_21C.060 and
adoption of the rules required under this section shall
take place not later than one hundred eighty days after
the effective date of rules and guidelines :. adopted pursu-
ant to RCW 43.21C.110, or after the establishment of
the governmental entity, whichever shall occur later.
(4) Ordinances or regulations adopted prior to the ef-
fective date of rules and guidelines adapted pursuant to
RCW 43.21C.110 shall continue to be effective until the
adoptions of any new or revised ordinances or regula-
tions which may be required: Provided, That revisions
required by this section as a result of rule changes under
RCW 43.21C.110 are made within the time limits spec-
ified by this section. [1983c 117 § 8; 1974 ex.s. c 179 §
8.]
Purpose -1974 ex.s. c 179: See note following RCW 43.21C.080.
43.21C.130 'Model ordinances. The department of
ecology, in consultation with concerned stale agencies,
shall with the assistance of the associations of county
prosecutors and city attorneys, the association of county
elected officials, the Washington state association of
counties, and the association of cities, draft model ordi-
nances for use by counties, cities and towns in drafting
their ordinances under this chapter. [1974 ex.s. c 179 §:
10.]
Purpose - -1974 ex.s. c 179: See note following RCW 43.21C.080.
43.21C.135 Authority of local governmental units to
adopt rules, guidelines and model ordinances by refer-
ence. (1) All public and municipal corporations, political
subdivisions, and counties of the state arc authorized to
(1983 Ed.)
State Environmental Policy 43.21C.300
adopt rules, ordinances, and resolutions which incorpo-
rate any of the following by reference to the appropriate
sections of the Washington Administrative Code:
(a) Rules and guidelines adopted under RCW
43.21C.110(1) in accordance with the administrative
procedure act, chapter 34.04 RCW;
(b) Model ordinances adopted by the department of
ecology under RCW 43.21C.130 in accordance with the
administrative procedure act, chapter 34.04 RCW.
(2) If any rule, ordinance, or resolution is adopted by
reference pursuant to subsection (1) of this section, any
publication of such rule, ordinance, or resolution shall be
accompanied by a summary of the contents of the sec-
tions of the Washington Administrative Code referred
to. Such summaries shall be provided to the adopting
units of local government by the department of ecology:
Provided, That any proposal for a rule, ordinance or
resolution 'which would adopt by reference rules and
guidelines or model ordinances pursuant to this section
shall be accompanied by the full text of the material to
be adopted which need not be published but shall be
maintained on file for public use and examination.
(3) Whenever any rule, ordinance, or resolution is
adopted by reference pursuant to subsection (1) of this
section, the corporation, political subdivision, or county
of the state adopting the rule, ordinance, or resolution
shall maintain on file for public use and examination not
less than three copies of the sections of the Washington
Administrative Code referred to. [1975 –'76 2nd ex.s. c
99 §1.]
43.21C.150 RCW 43.21C.030(2Xc) inapplicable when
statement previously prepared pursuant to national envi-
ronmental policy act. The requirements of RCW
43.21 C.030(2)(c) pertaining to the preparation of a de-
tailed statement by branches of government shall not
apply when an adequate detailed statement has been
previously prepared pursuant to the national environ-
mental policy act of 1969, in which event said prepared
statement may be utilized in lieu of a separately pre-
pared statement under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). [1975
1st ex.s. c 206 § 1; 1974 ex.s. c 179 § 12.)
Purpose -1974 ex.s. c 179: See note following RCW 43.21C.080.
43.21C.160 .Utilization of statement prepared under
RCW 43.21C.030 to implement chapter 90.62 RCW
Utilization of chapter 90.62 RCW procedures to satisfy
RCW 43.21C.030(2Xc). In the implementation of chapter
90.62 RCW (the Environmental Coordination Proce-
dures Act of 1973), the department of ecology, consis-
tent with guidelines adopted by the council shall adopt
rules which insure that one detailed statement prepared
under RCW 43.21C.030 may be utilized by all branches
of government participating in the processing of a
master application. Whenever the procedures established
pursuant to chapter 90.62 RCW are used, those proce-
dures shall be utilized wherever possible to satisfy the
procedural requirements of RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). The
time limits for challenges provided for in RCW
(1983 Ed.)
43.21C.080(2) shall be applicable when such procedures
are so utilized. [ 1974 ex.s. c 179 § 13.]
Purpose -1974 ex.s. c 179: See note following RCW 43.21C.080.
43.21C.165 Challenges to consistency of rules
adopted pursuant to RCW 43.21C.110 and 43.21C -•
.160— Procedure — Finality. See RCW 43.21 B.250.
43.21C.170 Council on environmental policy. The
legislature may establish a council on environmental
policy to review and assist in the implementation of this
chapter. [1983 c 117 § 6; 1974 ex_s. c 179 § 4. Formerly
RCW 43.21C.100.)
43.21C.175 Council on environmental policy
Personnel. The council may employ such personnel as
are necessary for the performances of its duties: [1974
ex.s. c 179 § 5. Formerly RCW 43.21C.105.)
43.21C.210 Certain actions during state of emer-
gency exempt from chapter. This chapter does not apply
to actions authorized by RCW 43.37.215 and 43.37.220
which are undertaken during a state of emergency de-
clared by the governor under RCW 43.06.210. [1981 c
278 § 4.]
43.21C.220 Incorporation of city or town exempt
from chapter. The incorporation. of a. city or town is ex-
empted from compliance with this chapter. [1982 c 220
§6.]
Severability-1982 c 220: Sex note fallowing RCW 36.93.100.
Incorporation proceedings exempt.: from clirap cr: RCW 36.93.170.
43.21C.230 Development and adoption of plan under
chapter 43.180 RCW exempt from chapter. This chapter
does not apply to the development or adoption of the
plan required to be developed and adopted under chapter
43.180 RCW. [1983 c 161 § 29.1
Severability— Effective dates -1983 a 161: See RCW
43.180.903 and 43.180.904.
43.21C.300 Workshops — Handbook. The depart-
ment of ecology shall conduct annual state –wide work-
shops and publish an annual state environmental policy
act handbook or supplement to assist persons in comply-
ing with the provisions of this chapter and the imple-
menting rules. The workshops and handbook shall
include, but not be limited to, measures to assist in
preparation, processing, and review of environmental .
documents, relevant court decisions affecting this chap-
ter or rules adopted under this chapter, legislative
changes to this chapter, administrative changes to the
rules, and any other information which will assist in or-
derly implementation of this chapter and rules.
The department shall develop the handbook and con-
duct the workshops in cooperation with, but not limited
to, state agencies, the association of Washington cities,
the Washington association of counties. educational in-
stitutions, and other groups or as; ociations interested in
the state environmental policy act 0983 c 117 § 9..].
[Title 43 RCW—p 105J
43.21C.500
Tit 3 RCW: State Government Executive
43.21C.500 Exemption from this chapter of emer-
gency recovery operations from Mt. St. Helens eruption
authorized Expiration of section. Emergency recov-
ery operations from the Mt. St. Helens eruption author-
ized by RCW 36.01.150, 43.01.200, and 43.01.210 may
be exempted by the applicable county legislative author-
ity from the requirements of the State Environmental
Policy Act of 1971, chapter 43.21C RCW, for opera-
tions within such county: Provided, That the applicable
legislative authority shall promptly notify the depart-
ment of ecology within five days of the emergency action
taken and the emergent nature of the problem. The no-
tification shall be made to the water resources regional
supervisor of the southwest region of the department of
ecology.
This section shall expire on June 30, 1988. [1983 1st
ex.s. c 1 § 4; 1982 c 7 § 5.]
Severability -1983 1st ex.s. c 1: See note following RCW
43.01.200.
Severability-1982 c 7: See note following RCW 36.01.150.
43.21C.900 Short title. This chapter shall be known
and may be cited as the "State Environmental Policy
Act of 1971". [ 1971 ex.s. c 109 § 7.]
• 43.21C.910 Severability 1974 ex.s. c 179. If any
provision of this 1974 amendatory act, or its application
to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the re-
mainder of the act, or the application of the provision to
other persons or circumstances is not affected. [1974
ex.s. c 179 § 16.)
43.21C.911 Section headings not part of law
1983 c 117. Section headings as used in this act do not
constitute any part of the law. [1983 c 117 § 14.]
43.21C.912 Applicability 1983 c 117. *Sections
3 and 4 of this act apply to agency decisions and to ap-
peal proceedings prospectively only and not retrospec-
tively. **Sections 1, 5, 6, 7, and 8 of this act may be
applied by agencies retrospectively.•[1983 c 117 § 15.]' -
Reviser's note: '(1) "Sections 3 and 4 of this act" consist of the 1983
c 117 amendment to RCW 43.21C.060 and the enactment of RCW
43.21 C.075, respectively.
"(2) "Sections 1, 5, 6, 7, and.8 of this act" consist of the enactment
of RCW 43.21C.031 and 43.21C.095 and the 1983 c 117 amendments
to RCW 43.21C.100, 43.21C.I10, and 43.21C.120, respectively.
43.21C.913 Severability 1983 c 117. If any pro-
vision of this act or its application to any person or cir-
cumstance is held invalid, the remainder of the act or
the application of the provision to other persons or cir-
cumstances is not affected. [1983 c 117 § 16.]
43.21C.914 Effective dates 1983 c 117. *(1)
Sections 1, 2, and 4 through 16 of this act are necessary
for the immediate preservation of the public peace,
health, and safety, the support of the state government
and its existing public institutions, and shall take effect
immediately.
* *(2) Section 3 of this act shall take effect one hun-
dred eighty days after the remainder of this act goes into
(Title 43 RCW—p 106)
effect under subsection (1) of this section. [ 1983 c 117 §
17.]
Reviser's note: '(1) "Sections 1, 2, and 4 through 16 of this act'
consist of the enactment of RCW 43.2IC.031, 43.21C.075, 43.21C-
.095, 43.21C.300, 43.21C.911, 43.21C.912, and 43.21C.913; the 1983
c 117 amendments to RCW 43.21C.037, 43.21C.100, 43.21C.110, and
43.21C.120; the repeal of RCW 43.21C.032, 43.21C.085, and 43.21C-
.140; the decodification of RCW 43.21C.070, .43.21C.200, 43.21C.202,
and 43.21C.204; and the recodification of RCW 43.21C.100 and 43-
.21C.105 as RCW 43.21C.170 and 43.21C.175, respectively. The ef-
fective date of these sections is April 23, 1983..
"(2) "Section 3 of this act" consists of the 1983 c 117 amendment
to RCW 43.21C.060. The effective date of this section is October 20,
1983.
Chapter 43.21E
GRASS BURNING RESEARCH ADVISORY
COMMITTEE
Sections
43.21E.010
43.21 E.020
43.21E.030
43.21 E.900
43.21E.905
43.21E.910
Committee created — Members.
Duties of committee.
Travel expenses.
Termination and dissolution of committee.
Reactivation of committee — Application of chapter.
Severability -1975 1st ex.s c 44-
Grass burning permits, etc.: RCW 70.94.650 through 70.94 656.
43.21E.010 Committee created Members. Within
thirty days of May 15, 1975 the director of the
Washington state department of ecology shall appoint a
grass burning research advisory committee consisting of
five voting members.
Two members shall be grass growers selected from the
area of the state east of the Cascade mountain range,
one representing irrigated and one representing dryland
growing areas. One member shall: ibe; a grass grower se-
lected from the area of the state: west of the Cascade
mountain range.. One member shallot be a representative
of the Washington state departmelxtt of agriculture, and
one member shall represent the puiblic, and may be se-
lected at large. The committee :shall select its own
chairman. The state department of. "•ecology shall provide
an ex officio, nonvoting member to) the committee to act
as secretary. [ 1975 1st ex.s. c 44 § 1.1
43.21 E.020 . Duties of committee. The grass burning
research advisory committee as provided for in RCW
43.21E.010 shall solicit and review research proposals
for reducing or to develop alternates to open burning of
grass fields. The committee shall advise and make rec-
ommendations to the director of the Washington state.
department of ecology regarding research priorities and
the expenditure of mandatory research; permit fees and
such other grass burning research funds that may be
provided by the legislature or from any other sources.
[1975 1st ex.s. c 44 § 2.] •
43.21E.030 Travel expenses. Travel expenses shall be
paid to the grass burning research advisory committee
,members not otherwise employed by the state for. meet-
ings called by the director of the department of ecology
in accordance with RCW 43.03.0 53 and 43.03.060 as
(1983 Ed.)
.Horton Dt'nnis & .tissociates, I�7c.
(Ton sil'lin,7 E,1 7i; Ctrs
'February .23, 984°
f!'/AR 8 79
8)
Mr. Dirk Jongejan, A.S.L.A.
Jongejan, Gerrard, & McNeal Inc.
23 - 103rd. Avenue N.E.
Bellevue, Washington 98004
SUBJECT: COTTAGES" OW REQUIREMENTS "THE�2
FEBRUARY 8TH LETTER
Dear Dirk:
As required by the Tukwila Fire Chief, paragraph three-on page two of
our letter to you dated February 8, 1984, is hereby revised to read as follows:
According to the Tukwila Fire Marshall, the only water requirements for the .
subject development is available fire flow at the development site equal to
2,500 gpm at a minimum residual pressure of 20 psi as long as the following
building conditions are met:.
1. No wood or other combustible materials shall be used as roofing
materials;
2. No point of any structure shall be located over 300 feet from any
hydrant (measured around building.corners);
3. All structures including carports shall be fully sprinklered;
If you need additional information, please call us.
Sincerely, _
HORTON DENNIS & ASSOCIATES,INC.
e
Alan E. Meyers, P.E.
Associate
AEM:gjn
cc: Mr. Phil Fraser, City of Tukwila
/- 1- � .. jj ACC. J] 1 r� )) i 1
1'13 3 Sl\t17 :-11.1'.. O11t17, L`L'iitt e,'l �7S17117(.11.017 '-�1�1��C`.'' • '701712 167 456
•
-(7
As At,"
‘I;e/ Zd2-4e71 e
• •
re)
",212--„6„
cr, s'e,/f/o
/
i
Ac,„_44-e,
6„e-
5J-,1.6 (4a)
/ea))
AFFSAVIT OF DISTRIPUTION
I, Becky L. Kent hereby declare that: Notice of Public Meeting
was mailed to each of the following addresses on January 25, 1984.
JOSEPH & SHARON CHANES
14709 56th Ave. So.
Tukwila, WA 98188
CLIFFORD SWEENEY
14949 57th Ave. So.
Tukwila, WA 98188
GEORGE GARRISON
10477 17th So.
Seattle, WA 98168
JOHN B. STRANDER
P.O. Box 88636
Tukwila, WA 98188
GRAYDON E. SMITH
13861 18th Ave. S.W.
Seattle, WA 98166
ESTATES ASSOCIATION
c/o Don Winton
1305 3rd Ave., Suite 600
Seattle, WA 98101
SYLVAN CADITZ
3201 S. Washington
Seattle, WA 98144
SOUTHCENTER VIEW CONDOMINIUMS
15210 Macadam Road South
Tukwila, WA 98188
ATTN: Homeowners Assoc.
(Hand delivered to #104)
CONDOMINIUM BUILDERS, INC.
Salant Rubin
19800 Pacific Highway So.
Seattle, WA 98188
MOO -M00 INVESTMENTS
8012 18th Ave. N.E.
Seattle, WA 98115
CHARLES SPAETH
9105 Bridgeport Way S.W.
Tacoma, WA 98499
Name of Project
File Number
CHAVES, SISTO CHARLES
4116 So. 262nd P1.
Kent, WA 98031
NAMES, CHARLES D.
3009 S.E. 5th
Renton, WA 98055
GOREN, DAVID M.
14600 N.E. 32nd #116
Bellevue, WA 98007
KASHIND, SHIRO
5020 48th Ave. S.
Seattle, WA 98118
EMPLOYEE TRANSFER CORP.
150 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 1985
Chicago, IL 60606
KING, NAOMI F.
P.O. Box 21633
Seattle, WA 98111
GROSSO, PAMELA C.
2340 43 E.
Seattle, WA 98112
OHARA, J. HARRY
15824 S.E. 70th
Renton, WA 98055
SPEER, WILLIAM M.
2804 67th S.E.
Mercer Island, WA 98040
STEIGER, MARILYN
2400 N.E. 9th
Renton, WA 98055
JONES, ALFRED
5772 S. 152nd
Seattle, WA 98188
Signature
MCHUGH, JOE B.
15280 Macadam Rd. So. #203
Seattle, WA 98188
GOMEZ, SHELLEY D.
127 Bethel
Walla Walla, WA 99362
914,cz
_i
1903 COPYRIGHT BY WASHINGTON REAL ES'ATE REGISTER, IP'C. SEATTLE, WASHINGTON (206) 282 -3359
WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE REGISTER BELIEVES THE INFORMATION BELOW TO BE CORRECT, BUT DOES NOT WARRANT ITS ACCURACY.
THIS INFORMATION IS LEASED FROM AND REMAINS THE PROPERTY OF WASHINGTON RE U_ ESTATE REGISTER, INC.
KING COUNTY PARCEL LIST BY ACCOUNT NUMBER PLATTED
788895 - SOUTHCENTER VIEW CONDO
ACCT -NO CANER NAME SITUS ADDRESS
MAILING ADDRESS
TUKWILA
LEVY Z USE W SALE -DATE PRICE
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
LOI*9LK G- Q- S- T- R
0010 -06 ROBINSON PAMELA J 15210 MACADAM RD 'S 2380 151 790406 39,700
15210 MACADAM RD S ND- 101 *TUKWILA WA 98188 WIT D-101*BLD D M -SW-23 -23-04 PCT OF VALUE 1.6288
1983 -86 EDIJION
* * * * *
LAND IMP TOTAL -AV //STY SOFT YR
yRS DEL $ "x ACREAGE y
3,600 45,400 49,000
488.78
0020 -04 CCUELL MARTIN S 15210 MACADAM RD • S 2380 151 7v0102 35,500
15210 MAC ADAM RD S #D-10? *SEATTLE 98188 UNIT D- 102*BLD D M -SW-23 -23-04 PCT OF VALUE 1.5628
3,400 40,400 43,800
436.91
0030 -02 ROBEN JOHN W 1521C MACAW' 1 RD S 2380 151 781211 26,000
Alli 15210 MACADAM R9 S ND- 103 *SEATTLE W 98188 WIT D- 103*BLD D M -SW-23 -?3-04 PCT OF VALUE 1.1446
IMMF40-00 GROSSO JOHN M TRUSTEE 15210 MACADAM RD S 2380 151- 790717 35,000
SCUT tPTER VIEW CONDO ASSOC *15210 M 98188 WIT.D- 104*9LD D M -SW-23 -23=04 PCT OF VALUE 1.5406
2,500 29,600 32,100
320.20
3,400 40,400 43,800
436.91
0050 -07 NU NA COPAL K 15210 MACADAM RD S
2380 15: 800402 34,200 2,50. 29,600 32,100
15210 MACADAM RD ND- 105 *SEATTLE WA '8198 WIT D- 1O5*t,-D D Pt-SW-23-23-0f PCT OF VALUE 1.1446
320.20
0060 -05 EA_CKSEN WILLIAM J ETAL 15210 MACADAM F'7 S 2380 151 781213 35,700
1521;: MACADAM RD S MD106 *SEATTLE WA 98188 WIT C- 106*BLD D M -94-23 -23-04 PCT OF VALE 1.5406
0070 -03 SPRAGUE JO FJ*E E
15210 MACADAM RC S MD 107 *TUKWILA WA 98188 WIT D- 105 *BLD 0 M -S4-23 -23-04 PCT. OF VALUE 1.1446
3,400 40,400 43,800
436.91
15210 MACADAM RD S 2380 151 781213 26,600
2,500 29,600 32.100
320.20
0080 -01 CARDS PEARL WINIFRED 15210 MACADAM RD S 2380 151 781213. 35,500
15210 MACADAM RD S MD1( SEATTLE WA 98188 WIT 0- 108*8LD 0 M -SW-23 -23-04 PCT OF VALUE 1.5406
3,400 4n 400 43.800
178.2'.
0090 -09 LASICH PHYLLIS A & KANOVAN 15210 MACADAM RD S 2380 151 781213 26,000
15210 MACADAM RD S ME109*SEATTL.E WA 98188 WIT D- 109*BLD D M -SW-23 -23-04 PCT OF•VALU 1.1446
2,500 29,600 32,100
320.20
0100 -07 ANDERSON T1- LMA S 15210 MACADAM RD S 2380 • 151 , "1 :7` 35,540 3,400.
15110 MAC ADAM RC S ND- 110 *SEATTLE 98188 WIT 0- 110*BLD 0 M• -SW-23 -23-04 PCT OF VALUE 1.5628
0110 -05 RISEL'IATO NICKOLAS J i 210 MACADAM RD S 2780 • 151 790102 • 26,000
15210 MACADAM RD S ND- 111 *SEATTLE W 98188 WIT D- 111+BLD D M- SLI•'3 -23-04 PCT OF VALUE 1.1446
20-03 CHAVES SIS1J CHARLES
40,400 43,800
436.91
2,500 29,600 32,100
320.20
15210 MAG )AM RD S 2380. 151 790102 34,950
4116 S 262ND PL*KENT WA 98031 WIT D- 112*BLD D M -SW-23 -23-04 PCT OF VALUE 1.5384
3,400 40,400 43,800
436.91
0130 -01 CONDOMINIUM BUILDERS INC 15210 MACADAM RD S 238C 151 781213 29,000 •
SALANT RLBIN*19800 PACIFIC HWY S*SEAT 98188 WIT D- 113*BLD D. M -SW-23 -23-04 PCT. OF•VALLE 1.2545. •
2.800. 29,600 32,400
323.19.
0140-09 MILLER MARIE 15210 MACADAM RD S 2386 151 791115 46,000
15210 MACADAM BLVD *TUCWILA WA 98188 WIT D- 201*BLD 0 M -SW-23 -23-04 PCT OF VALUE 1.7608
7150-06 CONDCMINILP1 BUILDERS INC 15210 r'.CADAM.RD S • 2380 151 790102 37,600
. SALANT RLBIN*19800 PACIFIC HWY S *SEAT 98188 WIT D- 202*0ILD D M -SW-23 -23-04 PCB OF VALUE 1.6288
3.900 46.400 50.300
501.75
3,600 42,100 . 45,700
45`.86'
0160 -04 RUIZ NICKOLAS R 15210 MACADAM RD S • 2380 151 790102 27,000
.N
15210 MACADAM RD S D- 203* SEATTLE W 98188 W.T D- 203*ELD D. M- 1-23 -23-04 PCT OF VALE 1.1885
'0170-02 OSGOOD ALAN G & GRAVER K E 15210 MACADAM RD S
15210 r4ACADAM RD S ND 204 *SEATTLE WA 99,8P! WIT D- 204*BLD D M -SW- ?3 -23-04 PCT. OF VALUE 1.5847
2,600 31,300 33.900
338.16
2380 151 - 78 218 36,600 3,500. 42,200 45,700
• 455.86
0180 -00 4:LT(TN STEVEN K 15210 MACADAM RD 5 2380:- '15' • • 781218 27,5)0 2,700 31,200 33,900
15210.MACADAM RD 5 ND205 *SEATTLE WA 98188 .UNIT r- 205*BLD D M+ -SW-23 -23-04 PCT OF VALUE 1.2105
538.16
0190 -08 SHI TOZAidA MIDORI . 15210 MACADAM RD • S 7380 151 . 790102 37,500 • 1,5J0. 42,200 . 45.700 •
,.15210 MACADAM Rd S MD206 *TUCWILA WA 98188 WIT 0- 206*BLD'D M -SW-23 -23-04 PCT OF, VALUE 1.5847 455.86
1983 COPYRIGHT BY WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE REGISTER, INC. SEATTLE, WASHINGTON (206) 282 -3359
WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE REGISTER PELIEVES THE INFORMA"ION BELOW TO BE CORRECT, BUT DOES NOT WARRANT ITS ACCURACY.
THIS INFORMATION IS LEASED FROM AND REMAINS TIE PRO;-ERTY OF WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE REGISTER, INC.
►. e..► �. ►. v ►
788895- SCJT!'CLNT.P VIEW CON'X
ACCT -NO OWNER NAPE--
MAILING ADDRESS
0200 -06 JOHNSTON ROBERT P
19{3 -p4 EpITI
TU)W.(LA
SITUS ADDRESS
VOL 26 PG 22
LEVY Z USE UN SALZ -DATE ?RICE LAND
LOT*ej,j( G- Q- 3- T- R LEGAL DESCRIPTION
15210 MACADAM RD S
.15210 MAC ADAM BLVD. AD 207 *TL4WILA W 98 88 UNIT D- 207*BLJ'D
1 0210 -J4 REID DONALD L • 15210 MACADAM RD S
15210 MACADAM RD S *SEATTLE WA 98198 UNIT D- 208*BLD D
- 2380 151 781218 27,600
M- SW -23-2> 34 PCT Of VALUr 1.1885
IMP TOTAL -AV //STY SOFT
YRS DE:. 83IAX /
2,600 31,300 33,900
338.16
2380 • 151- 790301 36,600
M- SW- 23- 23-04 PCT OF Vt _UE 1.5847
3,500 42,200 45,700
455.86
0220 -02 ISRAEL JACK L 15210 MACADAM RD S • 2380 151 790117
15210 MACADAM RD S D209*SEATTLE UA 98188 UNIT D-209*SLD D- PI-SW-23-25-04 PCT 230-00 READ JACK E 15210 MACADAM RD • S 2380 151 800122 46,000
15210 MACADON RD 40 210 *SEATTLE WA 98188 UNIT D- 210*BLD D M -SW-23 -23-04 PCT OF VALUE 1.5847
024}08 ISRAEL JERRY V 15210 MACAC.V1 RD S 2380 1S1. ' 78122/ 27,000
15210 MACADAM RD S ND- 211 *SEATTLE W 98183 UNIT D- 211*BLD D• M-S1- 23- 23-:#4 PCT OF VALUE 1.1885
27,000
1.1885
2,600 31',300 . 33,900
338.15
0250 -05 NAMES CHARLES D 15210 MACADAM RD S 2380 151'
.3009 SE 5TH*REMON WA 98055 UNIT D- 212*9LD D. 14-SW-23-23-04 PCT
02160 -03 GLIDDEN E,LEEN B 15210 MACADAM RD S
15210 MACADAM RD S DD- 213 *SEATTLE V 98188 UNIT D- 21'+BLD D
•
2380 151
M -SW-23 -23-04
PCT
781218 37,600:
OF VALUE 1.62288 •
781218 29.000
OF VALUE 1.2765.
3,500 42,200 45,700
455.86
2,600 31,300. 33.900
336.16
3,600 42.100 • 45,700
455.86
2.800 31.100 33.900
338.16
0270 -01 WARREN DAVID M 15210 MACADAM kJ 5'
15210 MACADAM RD S M. -301 *SEATTLE W 98188 UNIT D -30.1 *BL' D.
2380 1'�1 790102 42.700
M -SN-23 -2'-04 PCT OF V: LI E 1.8488-
4,200 48,600 52,800
526.68
47.300.: 51,200
510.72
0280-09 BASLER WILLIAM H 15210 MACADAM RD S.
15210 MACADAM RD S ND- 302 *SEA'7LE W 98188 UNIT D- 302*BLD
2380 ' 151 7901.11 •- - 40.700 3.900
M- SW-23- -23- -04 PCT OF VALUE 1.76
0290 07 STOKES III SAMUEL J 15210 MACADAM RD b
15210 MACADAM RD S ND303 *SEATTLE. WA 08188 1.1IT D- 303*BLD D
2380 151 :. • 790120 •'31,600 . 3.000. 35,200
M-W-23 -23-04 PCT OF VALUE 1.3646
38.200
381.05
0300 -05 CO DUPIWIUM GUILDERS INC 15210 MACADAM RD :5 •
SALANT RU SINf*19800 PACIFIC HWY S *SEAT 98188 UNIT D- 304*BW_D
310 -03 CONDOMINIUM BUILDERS INC • 15210 MACADAM RD' S •
SALANT HU.BIN*19800 PACIFIC HWY S *SEA1 98'88 UNIT D- 305*BLD D
0320 -01 STRUNG LEsTER RON 1521r MACADAM RD '5
15210 MACADAM RD S D- 306 *SEATTLE WA 98188 LNIT D- 306*BLD
2..530 -09 GOREN DAVID M 15210 MACADAM RD S
14600 NE 32ND I16*BELLEVLE WA 98007 UNIT D- 307•9LD D
2380: 151` 7906'1 '42,000.
D M -SW-23 -23-04 PCT OF VALUE 1.7608 •
3,900 47.300 51,200
510.72
' 2380' 151. 781218 31,500
M -SW-23 -23-04 PCT OF VALLE 1.3866
3,100 35,100 38,200
381.05
D
2380 151- 'A21101 43,000
M -SW-23 -23-04 PCT OF VALLE 1.76^8
3,900 47,300. 51,200
510.72
2380 151. '-'10(.113 38,950 *
M -SW-23 -23-04 PCT OF VALUE 1.11645
3.000 35.200 38.200
381.05.
0340 -07 CELAYA OCTAVIO 15210 MACADAM RD S
15210 MACADAM RD S ND- 308 *SEATTLE WA 98188 UNIT D- 308*BLD L; M -SW-23 -23-04 PCT
2380 ` 151 •
800117.. 42.500 -
OF V 1LLE 1.7167
3.800 47,400 51 200
510.72 •
030 -04 MOOD M00 INVESTP'ENTS • *15210 MACADAM .RD S.
8012 18TH AVE NE *SEATTLE WA 98115 UNIT 1- 309*ELD
2380 ' -151 ' 791211 .36.200
D...M -SW.'3 -23-04 PCT OF VALUE- 1.3646
3,000 35.200 38,200
381.05
036O-0' KASH INO SH I RO 15210 MACADAM RD 5. ' _ 2380 151', •
502(, 48TH AVE S *SEATTLE WA 9811P UNIT ,.- 310*B1.' r M-SW -23-23 "% .PCT
79041? • 42,500'
0: VALLE 1.7608
3,900 47,300 51,200
510.72
t. 70-00 HFCX ROBIN -L 1 _10 MACADAM RD' S 2380':. 151
?'
15 0 MACADAM RD S ND -311 *SEATTLE ' 1 60188 UNIT D- 311*BI_D 0"14-910-23.-23.-04 PCT
790102 31,000
OF VALLE 1.3646
3.000 . 35. =00 . . 38.200
381.05
0380 -08 REF SE JAMES l 15210 MAr ADAM RD 2380 • 151. . 790102' . • 41,000 4,000
15210 MACADAM RD 5 *0-31 2* SEA1' TLE W 98188 UN' T D- 31240 01.1,1510-2323.-04 PC t OF VALLE 1.8048 •
47.200
51.200.
510..72
•
1)83 COPYRIGHT BY WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE RZG.iTER, INC. SEATTLE, WASHINGTON (206) 282 -3359
WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE REGISTER BELIEVES THE INFL MATION BELOW.Tr) BE CORRECT, BUT'DOES NOT WARRANT ITS ACCURACY.
THIS INFOHMATION IS LEASED FROM AND REMAINS 1HE PROPERTY OF WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE REGISTER, INC.
KING COUNTY PARCEL LIST BY ACCCUNT NUMBER ''LATTED
788895- SWTHCENTER VIEW CONDO
ACCT -NO OWNER N ML
MAULING ADDRESS
TUCWILA VOL 26 PG 22
SITUS ADDRESS
LEVY Z USE UN SALE -DATE PRICE LAND
10T*xj( G- Q- S- T- R LEGAL DESCRIPTI.O4
0390 -06 HAYASHI TOM Y - 15210 MACACA/M RD S 2380 • 151 790509 34,20.
15280 MACADAM RD S D313 *TUKWILA WA 98148 UNIT D- 313*BLD D M -SW-23 -23-04 PCT OF VALUE 1.4086
1983 -84 ED LT IDr
IMP TOTAL AV //STY SOFT Y;
YRS DEL 83TAX ACREAGE y
3,100. 35,100 38,200
381.05
(Y00 -04 CQ_CriINIUM BUILDERS INC 15290 MACADAM RD.' S 2380 151. 790806 45,000
SALA•JT RUBIN*19800 PACIFIC HWY S +SEAT 5..;188 UN/T E- 101*BLD E M -SW-23 -23-04 PCT OF VALUE 1.7608
3,900 45,500 49,4,0
492.77
0410 -02 t."PLOYFE TRANSFER CORP 15280 MACADAM RD S • 2180 151.' :810107 53,333
150 S WACKER DR SUITE 1985 *CHICAGO IL 60606 UNIT E- 102*BLD E M- 94-23- 23-04 PCT OF VALUE 1 6706
3.700 45,100 48,800
486.78
KING NAOMI F
PO 80X 21633 *SEATTLE WA 98111
15280 MACADIII RD S • 2380 151 ° 790205 25,450.
UNIT E- 103*BLD E M- SW- 23- 23-04 PCT OF VALUE 1.2745
2,800 . 33,000 .35,800
357.11
0430 -08 BROWN DAVID M 15280 MACADAM RD S 2380. 151 781226 37,950
15280 MACADAM RD S NE -104 *SEATTLE W 98188 WIT E- 104*BLD E M -SW-23 -23-04 PCT OF VALUE.1.6706
3,700 45,100 48,800
0440 -06 STEWART WILLIAM M 15280 MACADA1 S
2380,. 151. 781220 29,450
15280 MACADAM RD S ME105 *SEJ.rTLE WA .98188 WIT E- 105*BLD E M -SW-23 -23-04 PCT OF VALE 1.1863
0450 -03 GROSSO PAMELA C •
2340 43RD E *SEATTLE WA 98112 WIT E- 106*8LD E M- S4-23 -23-04 PCT OF VALUE 1.7167
2.600 33,200 35,800
357.11
15280 ICADAM RD S 2386 151 '•790416 • 33,000 - 3,800
36.900 40.700
405.99
0460 -01 PFANNENSTIEL NORMA ' 15280 MACADAM RD 5 2380 ':' 151:
15110 MACADAM ?D S ME107 *SEATTLE WA 98188 WIT E -1C 8LD E M- SW-23- 23--04
790201 36.950 3,600
PCT OF VALUE 1.t5265
45,200 48.800
486.78
C'70-09 OHARA J HARRY
15824 SE :7OTH*RE'NTON WA 98055
15280 MA :ADAM RD-- S 2380 151 • 790205. 29.000.
• • WIT E- 108*BL0 E M- SW- 23- 23-04 PCT '1F F VALI,E. . .1.2765
2.800 33.000 35,800
357.11
0480 -C7 JENCINS N .AXTER . 15280 MACADAM RD. S 238„. 151 800326 . 50.000•
15280 MACADAM RD S *TUKWILA WA 98188 WIT E- 109*QLD C M- SW- 23- 23- 04.!CT OF VALUE 1.7167
3.800 45.000. 48,800
8808
0490 -05 KONO M 15280 'MACADAM RD S - 2380 151 790111• 40,000
15280 MACADAM RD 4E201 *TUKWI.A WA S'd188 WIT e- 201 *8LD E M -SW -2S -23-04 P_T OF VALUE 1.7146
3,800 .45,600 49.400
492.77
3 SPEER WILL/AM M 15280 MACADAM RD S . 2380 . 151 821130'. 51,000
2804 6i:H SE*l�EPCER IStfi WA 98040 WIT E- 202*BLD E M -SW-23 -23-04 PCT OF VALUE 1.7608
0510 -01 KING NAOIMI F
PD SOX 21633 *SEAT rLE Wt, 98111
15:110 MACADAM RD S 2380 . 151 `
• UNIT E- 2J3*8LD E M -SW-23 -23-04
. 790102 27,450
PCT OF VALUE 1.2745
3,900
44.300 48,200
480.80
2,800' 33,000 35,800
357.11
0520-09 FEL' ' R C 1ROLE A 15280 MACADAM RD ' 5 . 2380 151
15280 MACADAM RD S NE- 204* SEAT TLE 6/98t88 WIT E- 204*BLD E MF -SW-23 -23-04
• 790103 38,950.
PCT OF VALUE 1.7146
3.800 44.400 48,200
480.80
J530 -07 STEWART WILLIAM M 15280 MACADAM RD ` S ' 2380 151
15280 MACADAM RD S NE205 *SEATTLE WA 98188 WIT E- 205*8LD E M- S4- 23- 23 --04'
781220 29,450
PCT OF VALUE 1.2745
:,900 33,000 35,800
357.11
054C-C3. STEIGER MARILYN
2400 NE 9TH *RENTON WA 98055
15210 MACADAM RD • S
!NIT E- 20u*ELD E
2380 -.151
151
M -SW-23 -23-04
790111 114.950
. PCT OF VALUE 17146
4,800 44.400 48.200
480.80
0550 -02 MAIN CONSTANCE C • 15280 MACADAM RD • o • 2380 1.51. 790211 39,700
15290 MACADAM RD S NE207 *SEATTLE WA 981d8 • WIT E 207*8LD E M-541-23-23-04 PCT OF VALUE 1.7167
0560-00 Ka() KIKLE
3.800 44.400 48.200
480.80
15280 MACADAM RD S
15280 MACADAM RD ME208* TLKWIL : WA 98188 WIT E- 208*8LD E
2380. . 151. . 790111. 30,000
M- SW- 2's- 23-.04 PCT OF VALLE 1.2745
2.d00 33.000 35.800
357.11
0570-08 JONES ALFRED 15280 MACADAM RD S 2380•. 151. . 790913 ','45,500. . 3,800
5772 S 152ND *SEATTLE WA 98188 Wit.E- 209*BLD E 14-SW-23723-04. PCT or VALUE 1.7146
G::;13
44.400
48.200.`
480.80.
t.
► . G. .\ I
1983 COPYRIGHT BY WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE REGISTER, INC. SEATTLE, WASHINGTOJ (206) 282 -3359
WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE REGISTER BE'IEVES THE INFORMATION BELOW TO BE CORRECT, BUT DOES NOT WARRANT ITS ACCURAC..
THIS INFORMATION IS LEASED FROM AND REMAINS THE PROPERTY OF WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE REGISTER, INC.
e. .\
♦. .Y .
(0-TD
788895- `OUTHCENTER VIEW CONNO TUKWILA
ACC' -ND OWNER NAME
IIAILiNG ADDRESS LOT*
. 0580 -06 COW: INIUM BUILDERS INC 15280 MACADAM RD S
SALAMT RLBIN*19800 PACIFIC WY S *SEAT )8188 WIT E- 301*BLD E
SITUS ADDRESS
VOL 26 PG 22
'.EVY Z USE
UN SALE -DATE Pr I CE
2380 151 790516 45,000
M •SW-23 -23•04 PCT OF VALUE 1.7586
• LAND
1083 -84 EDITIC
IMP TOTAL AV A►STY SOFT r
YRS DEL 83 A)( ACREAGE
3,900 47,900 51,800
516.71
0590-04 MIC)4fl -I JOE B 15280 MACADAM PD S
15280 MAC DAM RD S ME30?*SEATTLE WA 78188 WIT E- 302.BLD E
2380 151 790119 47,200
M- SW- 23- 23--04 PCT. OF VALUE 1.8048 •
4,000 53,400 57,400
572.57
C600-0c NOBKS GERALD 15280 MACADAM RO S 2380 151. 7901.1 33,500.
15280 MACAUIVM RD S NE- 303 *SEATTLE 'J 98188 WIT E- 303*BLD E M -SW-23 -23-04 PCT OF VALL'' 1.3646
4610-00 HARRELL KITH DOUGLAS 15280 MACADAM RD S •2380 151 811218 49,950
15280 MAr'ADh ; RD + 1E-304 *SEATTLE WA 98188 • WIT E- 304*BLD E M -SW-23 -23-04 PC' OF VALUE 1.8048
3,000 38,400 41,4J0
412.97
4,000 53.400 57,400
572.57
0620 -08 GOMEZ SHELLEY D 15280 MACADAM RD S • 2380 151 790111. 33,500
127 B�THE...*WALLA WALLA WA 99362 WIT E- 305*BLD E M -SW-23 -23-04 PCT OF VALUE 1.3624
3,000 38,400 41,400
412.97
57,400
572.57.
0630 -0C 8RETT£'1 H C L AISAM1 15280 MACADAM RD S • 2380 '151 . 790111 • 46,500
15280 lACADAM RD NE306 *TLKWILA WA 9816F WIT E- 306*BLD E M- 23 -23-04 PCT OF VALLE.1.8348
4,000
53.400
0640 -04 WALKER ROBERT A 15280 MACADAM RD S 2380 151 .• 790119 46,200 •
15290 P:ACACAM RD S A9307•SEATTLE WA 98188 WIT E•307*BLD E M -SW-23 -23-04 PCT OF VALUE 1.7608
0650 -01 CONDOMINIUM BUILDER!' INC 15280 MACADAM RD S 2380 • 151 i',�O119 36,200
SALANT RBIN*19800 PACIFIC HWY S *SEAT.98188 WIT E- 308*BLD F..M- SW- 23- 23- 04.PCT OF VALUE 1.3646
3.900 53.500 57.400
572.57
3.000 38.400 41,400
412.97
0660 -09 IBLINGS CAROLYN J 15280 MACADMI RD S 2380 • 1'.1.• 790117. 41,130 .. 3.900. 53.500.
15280 MACADAM RD S NE- 309•.SEATTLE W 98188 WIT E- 309*BLD E M -SW-23 -23-04 PC' OF VALUE 1.7586 .
57.406
.• 572.57
788900 - SOUTHDALE ADD•
0005 -06 FRANK 1 B 1602 28ST
1602 28TH SE *ALiURN WA 98002
10-09 DOSS ED
SOUTH FORREST ROAD*WESTPORT WA 98595
0016 -03 DIAMOND T C
1702 281 '. 5T SE *ALBURN
1606 28ST
0120 1 SFD 1
1* c Ne•29•21.-05
AUBURN
7612
1,000 . 36,000 .53.000 1.0 990
459.19 .22
SE _ 0120 1 SFD 1
2 -3* S-NW-21 -21-05 2& W 10 FT 7F' 3
17.000 41,600 58,600 1.0 1460
507.71 ..23
1702 28ST
WA 98002
SE 0120 1 SFD 1 7612' 17.000
3-4* S■44d•29 •21 '05 E 75 FT OF 3 V W 20 FT OF 4
36.500 53.500 1.0 1030
463.52 .22
0020 -07 DELAJRFNTI PETER B 1706 28ST
'706 281)4 AVE SE *ALB J 4 WA 98002
0025 -02 BIRCH PERRY L
1710 28TH ST SE *A BURN WA 98002
0030 -05 GILT ^ROY M M
1714 28TH 5T SE *ALBLIRN WA 98u02
0Y'55 •00 EHRESMrN OSCAR 0
2712 T ST S E *ALBLAV. WA 98002
1710 28ST.
1714 28ST
2712 T ST
SE .0120 1 SFD 1 '71201
4* S- N41-29 -21-05 E 70 FT •
SE J120 1 SFD 1 780130
5* S -N9 -29 21-05
3/.500 . 17,000 43,000 60,000 1.0 1550
519.84 .16
32.000 17,000 36,000 53,000 1.0 990
459.19 .21
SE 0120 .1 SFD 1
6* S -Nd-29 -21-05
SE 012J 1 SFD 1 7505
7* S- NW1 -29 -21-05
17,000 36,000 53,000 1.0. 990
459.19 .34
17,000. 39,400 5c•,400 1.0 1280
488.65 .2C
0040 -03 JUMP GLENDOJ R 2710 T ST
2710 T 5T SE*AUBURN WA 98002
0045 -OR •EX'_EY LARRY ?708 T ST
2708 T STREET SE *ALBtf/J WA 98002 '
yE 012C 1 SFD•
8* S -N4-29-21 -05'
741014 21,000 17,000. *0,700. 56,700 1.0 13.0
491.25 . tt
0120, 1 SFD
9* S -N9-. 9 -21-05
17.000. 36,000 53.000 1.0 940
45.19 .1`
WAC 197 -11 -1360
DECLARATION OF SIGNIFIANCE
AND SCOPING NOTICE
Description of proposal 84 Multiple Family Units on 4.62 acre site
Proponent J.B. Wright Corp.
.Location of Proposal NW corner of S. 152nd St. & 57th Ave. S.
Lead Agency City of Tukwila File No. EPIC- 213 -83
EIS Required. This proposal has been determined to be likely to have a
significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact
statement (EIS) is required under RCW 42.21C.020(c) and is now being pre-
pared. An environmental checklist or other materials indicating likely
impacts can be reviewed at our offices.
Scoping. Agencies and members of the public are invited to comment on the
scope of the EIS. The method and deadline for giving us your comments is:
February 6, 1984, in writing to the responsible official.
Responsible Official Brad Collins
Position /Title Planning Director
Address and •Phone.6200 Southcenter Blvd:, Tukwila, WA 98188 433 -1845
Date 12- MN N Signature ). Co •.0
Published: Record Chronicle, January .g, 1984
WAC 197 -11 -1360
DECLARATION OF SIGNIFIANCE
AND SCOPING NOTICE
Description of proposal 84 Multiple Family Units on 4.62 acre site
Proponent J.B. Wright Corp.
Location of Proposal NW corner of S. 152nd St. & 57th Ave. S.
Lead Agency City of Tukwila File No. EPIC-213-83
EIS Required. This proposal has been determined to be likely to have a
significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact
statement (EIS) is required under RCW 42.21C.020(c) and is now being pre-
pared. An environmental checklist or other materials indicating likely
impacts can be reviewed at our offices.
Scopinq. Agencies and members of the public are invited to comment on the
scope of the EIS. The method and deadline for giving us your comments is:
February 6, 1984, in writing to the responsible official.
Responsible Official Brad Collins
Position /Title Planning Director
Address and Phone 6200 Southcenter Blvd., Tukwila, WA 98188 433 -1845
Published: Record Chronicle, January 15, 1984
.GQ(c.7-2A3 -as
e5 0-Aset, y
j e01-1 ' i `!1tw -D.t' _ 71-f& _5694 ENV II?trly/`+ENTitt, G Ec,K.vcSY _Fe2
.11415 fieJEc -T; MVO *17DtTcer44
I
110VOMP511, P°t°LtR■0 per, NiO •rFH
S � T " �T�� ,'s I, - -ce 4A\_A --, "
;O -t -r p°12: SPst- _ \ik(tLL l-N Intl 'E
a. 6 (3 144*) P M cIQJ D f '�PS'�L-�E A St c4. �l �l. c.tofi A -PVf1G
pa
�` Qd [l\APA " "C �- .lLCt xJt t8,1T,
C (.Si 442.E:
-�.. 5U$ 'PC1 -Psi.- L- SS OF (s1l,S .
OF \A“--41(4-1 lS i r,E \M f-tRto As S 1 U &Fl C3T..
2. fibtx)cig PieN T Std itCLS
AtOO A :st (i NR c3T AmOoKST cSF Tk
(s -td . —CWS /Z
3 4- lilt -L I T k0S lact°U1q:mC_ 5l Wi p1 c iT
Sq "C-E - i1 t WIL SPSL \24 I LL E ' T S.
VW-W. S1F3t €M . (Meta M t
S`(S'J -M IS t& PIMCire.R.Ss Bur kYsr "Tz=.
CONAMR.� 9 (L 1985 f ig8L.
4. svgs (P `ST I'o Ta sys'Q c_
(0 AT Pci2T1c& CF F Zc ' '(. " 5�►�S
or
L IzzocizrQ0 tkr- l.A T '?-QNA.sra0 5t.
5, 1-1 cQNlll -� )SINtE- eLery 10Q_TAFL S -
WE 'Ta skzer. . CEO m O&3S, tc 1 SCI u( \is-clztpscm U
t6.4.X SdcL LcopiTioU.S.
t If 12184
_ �GOI3C URR2O B . z Sit c` 'Ft -
THRESHOLD DETERMINATION
RIVER BEND OFFICE PARK (EPIC- 180 -82)
The proposed action is the issuance of a Shoreline Management Substantial
Development Permit to construct five office buildings of three stores each,
aggregating 384,000 square feet of floor area. The site is a 15.85
acre peninsula surrounded on three sides by the Green River and served with
public roadway access by the easterly terminus of Southcenter Boulevard.
The project environmental checklist was circulated to the various City
departments, and comments representing significant concerns in their areas
of expertise were received:
A) Recreation Department:
- Checklist Section 'II, Question 19
a) Drawing data insufficient to evaluate river trail system extension.
b) Status of recorded trail access easements around entire property
is not certain. -
c) Sidewalk access on Interurban Avenue and Southcenter Blvd. needed.
Police Department:
- Checklist Section II, Question 14b
a) Disagree with response indicating no impact upon or increased
demand for police services; traffic accidents associated with
increased volumes of project - related trips and significant
concentration of population anticipate higher demand for Police
services.
Fire Department:
- Checklist Section II, Question 14a
a) Minimum fire -flow requirements not yet verified.
Public Works Department:
- Checklist Section II, Question 3 (Water)
a). Storm water run -off volume /capacity and routing cannot be
determined from the information given. A miniature hydraulic
and flood water management study should be provided.
). Traffic study needs amplification and greater detail, especially
in discussion of mitigating solutions.
Planning Division:
- Checklist Section II, Question 2 (Air)
a) Checklist response is inadequate. Anticipated project - generated
CO levels not meaningful if not compared quantitatively to
existing and future conditions. Also other pollution components
ignored,
Page -2-
THRESHOLD DETERMINATAW
RIVER BEND OFFICE P (EPIC- 180 -82)
- Checklist Section II, Questions 4 & 5 (Flora/Fauna)
a). Alternatives to destruction of indigenous animal life and
habitat should be investigated, particularly, within the
shoreline environment.
- Checklist Section II, Question 7 (Light &.Glar.e)
a) Glare patterns reflected to public roadways . from building
surfaces should be investigated.
- Checklist Section II, Questions 11 & 12 (Population/Housing)
a) Project - related demand for housing within the community should be .
forecast and_ compared 'with avai l ab l i ty and historic vacancy
levels experienced in the community. Particular concern should
be given to potential, housing demand from ,lower- income - employees.
- Checklist Section II, Question 18 (Aesthetics)
a) Disagree with checklist response. Building; activity may
obstruct views of river and of adjacent hillsides; view corridor
analysis should be performed.
CONCLUSION
It appears that there are a number of topic areas which have not been
investigated to the level of adequacy expected under SEMA. In addition, the
Washington State Supreme Court, in its decision in the :4rway Hill v..
King County Council case (87 WN 2d. 267) articulated a series of criteria
under which a Declaration of Significance is obligatory:
1) Change of use type from existing use: In the present case, the
site is to be transformed from a vacant, unpopulated area to a
vehicle- intensive, population- intensive office c ►no lex..
) Scale of the project: The amount of floor area in the buildings,
and the amount of land -area to be paved for parking is substantial
both in absolute terms and relative to other office developments .
in the general vicinity.
Degree of change in use: As the only existing uses in the project
vicinity within the City limits are low - intensity recreation
oriented, the proposed office project represents a shift in the
present use configuration of the general vicinity.
For these reasons, a Declaration of Significance and requirement for an
Environmental Impact Statement in accordance with WAC- 197 -10 -350 is recommended.
In reference to the concerns identified in the Threshold Determination
Document, we suggest that the following additional elements from the list in
Section 11 of Ordinance 1211 be included in the River Bend Office Park
Draft E.I.S.
Page -3-
THRESHOLD DETERMINATAW
RIVER BEND OFFICE P (EPIC- 180 -82)
Elements (2) and (3): Ecomony /Tax Base
- The content should be focused on a cost /revenue analysis of extending
municipal services or upgrading existing services to this project site.
S/ q dh4y (2
b .vre/
JOHN R. EWING & ASSO4ES
622 South Central Avenue
KENT, WASHINGTON 98031
(206) 852 -6633
TO clay 04' Tu wr
'Tul<u 1L 98180
WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached ❑ Under separate cover via
dC 1TT (D IF UG°aQ. SE TTITaL
DATE
ATTENTION
RE:
JOB NO.
7 ,50f
ot,olleRch (
p0 ref o7
Q0 H.4 tcS
i'e(o mc-A/-
the following items:
❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans
❑ Samples
❑ Specifications
❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑
COPIES
DATE
NO.
DESCRIPTION
/
5 ,40 (.. 0 (4),) ,) cyx.rh
rn )
j
� ,'
7
d C.l nepS A pf d'- - Co
/ /
v/c t)
(o'7 poi I (ti-kt> -
--=,4f
,yi9s
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit
❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit
As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return
❑ For review and comment 0
❑ FOR BIDS DUE
copies for approval
copies for distribution
corrected prints
19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
REMARKS
COPY TO
PRODUCT 240-2 ( B/ Inc, Groton, sass. 01471.
SIGNED:
If enclosures are not as noted, kindly not' us at once.
G6Jr`�F... G.4221SON
104:77 177"
CLlFFO SW EE Y
1494 r ` -57", AuE; 5.
T4KiJrLA. kL4 9907
S Tri NDER
80X'+ BB (03�
TUK.41L•4 WA 'Q.606,7
.10_5.g f? SLA cI- t4NES•
14 &c + 709 5 • 3
• 7[:1KWILtt. ".WA. ;93188
'ATOON t`.'. 5('1 ITN
13t,61 18.74 AV / -- SGJ
5 47;TLE, 44.4 ((47G
Sari HGE.NT E R
VIEkI: :.CONDO.
'SEE ATTACHED
LIST.: FOg >.
OWNERSr1 ►P5
S. I52Nn_ .ST.
- -- 4ic.Gc
E 514TE5 : 4SSx_
0 70 . CoN .WINTON
1,305 3 2^ AVE..
SEATTLE. ..144 °18101 W
I,
+ Q-r
I=.
F
I r
.z70'
SYLVAN; , CAD ITZI
3201 L.. k)Aif++N ?0'.
SEATTLE 1,14 ..
C r.
;38,1 lur* AVE
SeAT.TL WA 98/40
JAN 2 4 1981
CITY OF TUKWILA. '.
'PLANNING DEPT..
7 C L07 / (.SEL r<•/l L, t1TEt7 JlrCS T. . /.. H 5/'E.ETS. �.
•
19,13 COPYRIGHT BY WASHINGTON' REAL EE•ATE REGISTER, IF'r. SEATTLE, WASHINGTON (206) 282 -3359
WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE REGISTER BELIEVES THE INFORMATION BELOW TO BE CORRECT, BUT DOES NOT. WARRANT ITS ACCURACY.
THIS INFORMATION IS LEASED FJ.O4 AND REMAINS iTHE PROPERTY 'OF WASHINGTON RE1L ESTATE REGISTER, INC.
1 iNG CC RHY PAR.CgL LIST BY ACCOUNT NLMBEH PLATTE
788895 - SOUTHCENTER VIEW` CONDO
ACCT-NO
TUKWI LA -
1963 -84 1:DIJION
* *. . * * *
CunER NAME - SITUS ADDRESS. LEVY ._I USE. UN SALE -DATE PRICE LAND IMP TOTAL -AV //STY SOFT YA
MAILING ADDRESS LOI* j( Cr- Q- S- 1- R LEGAL DESCRIPTION YRS DEL 83j'y['• ACRES b
15210' MACADPIM RD' 'S 2380 151 • - - 790406 39,700 3,600 • `:. 45,400 -. 49.000
0010 -06 ROBINSON PAMELA J
15210 MACADAM RD'S ND- 101 *TUKWILA WA 98188 UNIT D- 101*BLD D. MFSW •23 -23-04 PCT OF VALUE 1.6288
0020 -04 CONELL f :ARTIN S : .15210 MACADAM 'RD S
15210 MAC ADAM RD S ND-102 *SEATTLE 98188 UNIT D•102*8LD D
2380 '' .151 7v01G2 - 35,500 • 3,400.; 40,400• 43,800
14-SW-23 -2304 PCT OF VALUE 1:5628:
0030 -02 ROSEN JOHN W . 15210 MACAUA' 1 RD . S
15210 MACADAM RD S 4D- 103 *SEATTLE W 98188 WIT. D- 103*8LD-D
2380 • '`• 151 781211 . 26,000
M•SW -23 -?3-04 PC* OF VALUE 1:1446 .
2,500
436.91
29,600. 32,100
320.20
0040 -00 G R O S S O JOHN 14 .TRUSTEE 15210 MAMMA, RD'; S 2380 .151 =- :•2, •' • . 79071.7 - 35,000 .,
SOOT L:VTER VIEW CQ,DO ASSOC*15210 M 98188 UNIT: 0- 104*BLD D P1- 90-23- 23-04 PCT: OF VALUE 1.5406':'
3,400..
43,800
0050-07 MINA GOPAL K : 15210 MIW.CADAM RD :` ; S'. 2380 • :: -.15: - • a00402 .034:200 •' •
15210 MACADAM RD ND- 105 *SEATTLE WA 98188: UNIT D- 105*t,LD D • ..14- SW- 23- 23 -0' -. PCT OF VALID 1.1446 -
32,100`
320.20
0060 -05 Ea_CKSEN. WILL IAM J ETAL .:. 1.5210 MACADAM` F7:6 ' S '.: ; '_ ' :2380 151: •: 781213 :: '35,700.:
:1521 J . MACADAM RD S ND106 *SEATTLE WA 98188 -•7 UNIT' D- 106*BLD .D •.. MF- SW- 2323=04 .PCT., OF VAL.LL • 1.5406
3,600' 40,400.
43,800
0070 -03 SPRAGUE O ME E 15210 MACADAM, RD • S 2380 = ' ;' 151 78121
E ANNE 3 26,600
15210 MACADAM RC S ND 107 *TUKWIL A MLA 98188 , UNIT D-10i +NOD D , M- SW-23= 23-04'. PCT. OF . VALUE .1.1446
,
OE : 32,100
320.20
0080 -01 CAEREWOS PEARL WINIFRED : 15210 MACADAM RD' S. •` , :. .': 2380 - • ,. 1St'', 781213. 35,500
15210 MACADAM RD S ND1(. ',SEATTLE WA 98188 UNIT D7108*43L D D, 14--S41.-23-.23-04, PCT OF VALUE 1.5406
0090-09 LAS I CH PHYLLIS A & KANDVAN. . 15210 MACADAM RD' .. 5 .
15210 MACADAM RD S NE109*SEATTLE WA 98188 ' LINI T' D- 109*8LD 0
! 0100 -07 ANDERSON THELMA S - • - 15210 MAC1DAM RD • S ' . 2380 • 151:
:'.'-1207•1.-- 35,:.0
15210 MAC ADAM. RC S ND- 110 *SEATTLE 98188 WIT D- 110±9LD 0.. * -SW-23 -23-04 ?CT OP. VALUE 1.5628
0110 -05 RISELYATO NICKOLAS J •1 -210 MACADAM RD : S • '2780• 151'• ••• 790102 ' 26,000
15210 MACADAM RD S N)-111 *SEATTLE. W.-98188 UNIT . D -111 *9LD 0 ' M - S41••?3-23 -04 PCT, OF VALUE 1.1446
2380 151 • ' 781213... 26.000
M -S4H-23 -23•04 PCT OF VALUE 1.1446
,
43,800
178.2!. .
32,100. ••
320.20
3,400. 40,400 . 43,800.
436.91
2,500: • ; 29.600 ' 32,100
320.20
0120 -03 CHAVES SIS1J CHARLES
4116 S 26214) PL44r.ENT WA 98031
15210 MAC',0AM1 ' • S , 2380 151 790102. 34,950 . 3,400: 40,400 43.800
LNIT.D- 112*$LO D.'M -SW-23 -23-04 PCT OF VALUE 1.5384 436.91.
0130 -01 CONDOMINI154 BUILDERS INC • 15210 MACADAM RD., • S. 2380 151' •' 781213 29,000 2.800: 29,600 32.400 •
SALAMT RLBIN*19800 PACIFIC HIV S *SEAT 98188 WIT D- 113*BLD D. M SW -23 -23-04 PCT. OF- :VALUE 1:2545
323.19
1 014009 MILLER •ARIE 15210 MACADAM RD S . 238(. 1.51.. •.791115 46.000 3.900 • .46,400 50,300 '
15210 MACADAM BLVD *TUJCWILA WA 98188. WIT D- 201*BLD• D 14-SW-23 -23-04 PC:T OF VALUE 1.7608 .. - 501.75 .
')150-(76 CONDOMINIUM BUILDERS INC 15210 M-.CADAM RD `` . S. 2380 151- ='?" 790102 ' 37,600. 3,600 42,100 .• 4S.700
SALANT RLBIN*19800 PACIFIC HWY S *SEAT 98188 W1T D- 202*43LD D 047SW- 23- 23-04: PCi,OF' VALUE. 1.6288
45.86 • ..
E0160 -04 RUIZ NICKOLAS R 15210 MACADAM RD • S 2380 ` 151.` -: .790102 27.000 .'2.600 •: 31,300• 33,900
15210 MACADAM RD S ND- 203 *SEATT, E Y 98188 UNA T D- 203*ELD D -114 SW-23- 23-04 PCT OF VALUE 1.1885 338.16
0 0170 -02 OSG00D ALAN G & (RAVER K E 15210 MACADAM RD ' •-S - 2380:' 151 .' , 78 218 36.600'-
; ' . 15210 MACADAM RD S ND 204 *SEATTLE WA 917,14314-1 WIT D- 204*BLD : V-: M- Sill -?3- 23-04' PCT • OF : VALU' 1 .5847
.��1180 -00 H LT(N1 STEVEN K - . 15210 MACADAM' RD . 5 : :, 2380.r •15 .. '' T81218 ' 27.5..4 2.700 '•31;200 33.000
15210 MACADAM. RD S ND205 *SEAT t LE W 98188 • UNIT r- 205*8LD .D • M'- SW-23- 23-04 PCT OF VALUE, 1.2105 ;. 331.16 v_
3,500. • • :.42,200•
45.700
455.&
0190 -08• SHITOZAWA MIDORI • 15210 MACAD/1M RD ' S . 2380; ' •:. °:151 :' ' 790102 3T.500:
+t -s•.n „A,•Af1AA1 n c Mtirn iJ1 d W Cal RR IN!T e- 2Cki*9LD "• M- SW ■25- 233 -04 PCT OF VALUE '1 ::58.7
3;5%40; 42200;
•
.1983 COPYRIGHT BY WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE. REGISTER;; INC. SEATTLE; WASHINGTON (206) 282 -3359 •
WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE REGISTER ULIEVES THE INFORMATION BELOW TO BE CORRECT, BUT DOES NOT. WARRANT ITS ACCURACY.
THIS INFORMATION IS LEASED.FROM AND REMAINS T ;IE,PRMERTT_OF. WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE REGISTER, INC.'
•
19'3 -84 EDIT]
788895- SCJT)'C LNT A... V I EW '. CONIC' TUKWI LA ' VOI, 26 PG
ACCT -NO OWNER NAME - • SITUS AWIRESS LEW Z USE W .SALZ -DATE ?RICE
MAILING ADDRESS - ' LOT*ela G- G- S- T- R LEGAL DESCRIPTION'•
0200.06. JOHNSTON ROBERT. P • 15210 MACADPI RD S • 2380' 151 • 781218 . 27,600
• 15210 MAC ADAM BLVD. AID 207 *Tt,.CWILA w 98'88 WIT D- 207*9LJ D M- Sir - 23-2 -34 PCT OF VALLC 1.1885 •
2,600
IMP TOTAL /IV A'STY SOFT
YRS DEL 83TAX
31,300. • • 33,900 •
• 338.16
0210 -+4 RE ID DONALD L 15210 MACADAM RD S •2380 : ' • 151 • 790301 36,600 . •
15110 MACADAM RD S *SEATTLE • WA: 98198 WIT D- 208*BLD. 0 M• -SW■23 -23-04 PCT OF Vf -LE 1.5847
•..3,500 42.200 4455,705.80
6
0220 -02 ISRAEL JACK L 15210 MACADAM RD S `
15210 MACADAM RD S D209*SEATTLE UA 98188.,.. WIT D- 209*BLD D
`2380 .. 151. • • 790117 27,000• 2,600 31.300' 33,900 •
M ■SW-23 •23-04 PCT. OF VALUE 1.1885,.'
338.15
0230 -00 READ JACK E. - • 15210 MACADAM RD S
15210 MACADON fiD AD 210*SEATTLE WA 98188 . 'UNIT D- 210*BLD D
2380 • -151 '' 800122 46,000 ':3,500 • 42.100 • 45,700 le
141.-S1023-23-04 PCT OF VALUE 1.5847 '455.86
0244 -09 ISRAEL JERRY V 15210 MACACAM RD ' S` 2380 151. :;:: : 78122/ M . 27,000'.
15210 MACADAM RD S ADD -211 *SEATTLE wise 18A UNIT D-211 *BLD: D'• - SW- 23- 23-:.4 •PCT OF, VAUF 1.1885
- 31.300. . 33.900
336.16
0250 -05 NAMES CHARLES D _ 15210 MACADAM RD _ S. ... . 2380 . '•151 • ' 781218 • 37,600;
3009 SE 5TH*RENTON WI 98055 .• WIT D•212+A.D.D. M- 51-23•23-04 PCT OF.VALUE 1.6"88
'3.600 •42.100 45,700
455.86
02660.03 CLIDDEN EJLEEN B 15210 MACADAM RD 5 "_ 2380 151- : •: 781218 29,000.
15210 MACADAM RD S ADD- 213 *SEATTLE Ir' 98188 WIT D•217•sLI) O• M- SW-23•23•04 PCT OF VALUE 1.2765. ~'
0270 -01 iiARREN DAVID M 15210 MACADAM 10 S` 2380 -: 1'1 790102 42,700
15210 MACADAM RD S AU- 301 *SEATTLE W 98188 LNUT D- 301*BL7 D. M- SW- 23 -2''-(4 PCT OF WILE 1.8488
0280 -09 BASLER WILLIAM H - - 15210 MACADAM RD S .2380 ••`.151• . • . 790111: . '40.70(
15210 MACADAM RD S 1/1)- 302 *SEA ',•LE W 98188 WIT D- 302+13LD . 4..! MF ■923= -23-04 PCT OF VALUE 1..760E
0290 -07 STOKES III SAI" t1EL J • 15210 MACADAM RD • . S .
15210 MACADAM RD S 1/D303 *SEATTLE IAA °8188. ' LMT D- 303"8LD' D
3.900 47.300.: 51.200
510.72
2380 191 ' 790120 ; : '31.600' '3,000 • '• _ , 35.200 ' ° 38.200
381.05
M -SW■23 -23.04 PCT. OF VALUE 1.3646,
0300 -05 Ca' U4 ?!IUM LSIILDERS INC 15210 MACADAM RD ' ' S 2380 151 790E ' t- 42,OCJ. ,
SALAWT RUSINN9900 PACIFIC WY S *SEAT 98188 WIT D•304*8LD D • M- SW-23- 23-04 PCT OF VALUE 1.7608 •
3.900: . 47.300 • 51.200
510.72
0310
• -03 COPDOMINIIM BUILDERS INC : . 15210 MACADAM RD' S • 2380 ' 151 • -781218 31,500 _ 3.,100 '-35.100 38,200'.•. 410•
SALANT HL82N *19800 PACIFIC HWY S *SEAT 90488 WIT D- 305*9LD •D' MF- SW■23- 23-04 PCT OF VALUE - 13866 391.05
0320-01 STRLNK LESTER RON. 1521e MACADAM RD ' ` S ' 2380 • • 151 ' ' •• $12.1101.: 43,000
15210 MACADAM M S D- 306 *SEATTLE WA 98188 (.NIT D- 306*BLD D . M■SW--23 •23-04 PCT OF VALUE 1.76 ^8
1•330 -09 GOREN DAVID M . 15210 MACADAM RD 5 2380 151 • 10c 13 .. - .38.950.'. - 3.000 •• 35.200 " • 38,200
14600 NE 32ND I16*BELLEVIIE WA 98007. . . WIT D•307*8LD D 14- SW-23- 23-04 PCT Of VALUE 1.16 •
3,900 47,300 51,200
510.72
0340 -07 CELAYA OC T AV I O 15210 MACJIDIW RD S ..
15210 MACADAM RD S ADD- 308 *SEATTLE WA 98188. WIT D•308*8LD L
2380 • 151:. 800117: 42.500
/4-SW•23 •23-04 PCT OF , V NLUE 1:7167
2380•
381.05. •
3.800' 47,400 - 51 200
510:72
030 -04 MOD 100 INVESTMENTS 15210 MACADAM RD S',.
8012 18TH AVE NE*SEATTLE WA 98115 WIT r)- 309+pLD.'D
• "` . ,1.51 • ' ..791211: ' • ,36.200'
14 •SW='3 •23-04 • PCT OF VALUE' 1 ",3646
0366-0? KASH IMO 941R0 • 15210 MACADAM AO S.
502(. 48TH AVE S *SEATTLE W1 98113 . WIT v•310+BL. r
3.000• 35.200 • 38,200 .
• 381.05
`- 23116::: 1.5.1 -'; '.; , . 790412' .
M- SW- 23- 23}'."%. •PCT O. VALUE •.1.7608 .:
fro: ROBIN L 1 10 MAGAAi'1 RD' ` S . ; ;'` 2380 1 S1 '7'90102 31,000
�",- 15?'0- MACADAM RD S AD- 311 *SEATTLE• 'J d188 UNIT D■311*ALD .�MI■SW ■23 -23-04 PCT: OF. VALUE 1.3646•
3.90U . '.47,300 51,200 ;..
510.71.
31,_00 ..38.200 .
•
0380 -08 REFSE JAMES' L ' ; 15210 MAr ADAM RD .. ' `' , 4:2380. ?fit ,1.51 -* :.`� 794102 ;141.000,
' 15210 MACADAM RD S AVD- 312 *SEATTLE W 981813 W!r D- 312+81.0 D:, �4- SW- 23- 23- 04.PCI OF VAi.uF 1.8048
T.
.51:200
z�S10.7Z'
.4 ,... _. _.''C.. �. �..,e�iil.:.i,i�i.3 ..<Y "7A ..._E t' :t'„ �: +.,,•�'.i,.'.a:. iS.:'.s
1)83 COPYRIGHT BY WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE RZG.5TER, INC.•SEpTTLE, WASHINGTON (206) 282 -3359
WASHINGTON REAL 'ESTATE REGISTER BELIEVES THE INFLRMATION BELOW. TO BE CORRECT, BUT DOES NOT WARRANT ITS.ACCLRACY.
THIS INFOIM+VATION IS LEASED. FROM _AND .REMAINS THE PROPERTY OF WASHINGTON, REAL ESTATE REGISTER,
, ..
1.983 -84 EDLTIOI
788895- S0UTHCENTER VIEW CONDO.
ACCT-P,13 OWNER RAW
MATT tI:j ADDRE5
TUCWILA,
SITUS ADDRESS'
PG 22
Z USE 1R4 -SALE-DATE PRICE :
IMP '" TOTAL -AV #STY SOFT Y:
0390 -06 HAYASHI TCIM Y • ' 15210 *CACAM RD • S 2380 151 790509 ' • 34,20..' '. 3,100: ; ' 35,100 • 38,200
15280 MACADAM RD S D313 *TUcWILA WA 98188 WIT D- 313*BLD 0• M -SW-23 -23-04 PCT OF VALUE 1.4086 •.381.05
0400 -04 CO .INIIM BIJILDERS. INC - 15280 MACADAM •RD ' S' • •• 2380 151 ' • '790806 . 45,000 .3,900 . 45,500 , 49,4.8
SAL.1'1T RLBIM*'19800 PACIFIC HWY S +SEAT ,5';188 WIT .E- 101*8LD E M- SW-23- 23-04 PCT. OF VALUE .1.7608 492.77
0410 -02 E."PLOYFE TRANSFER CORP : 15280 MACADAM RD S , ' 2180 . 151 .810107 .- 53,333 .. 3,700 45,100 48,800
150 S WACKER DR SUITE 1985 *CHICAGO IL 60606 .WIT E- 102*BLD E 14-9W-23 -23-04 PCT OF VALUE 1 6700
0420 -00 KING NAOMI F
PO BOX 21633 *SEATTLE WA 98111 - • ...WIT E- 103*BLD E• M -SW-23 -23-04 PCT OF VALUE 1•.2745 •
486.78 ..
-.15280 MACADA.!1 RD S. ; • • • 2380 ' 151 :. • :z . 790205. , . 25,450
2,800 - 33,000 ` : >;35,800.
357.11
i ' 0430-08 BROWN DAVID M • " 15280 MACADAM RD .• S ''; 2380:::• 15.1' - ' :' " 781226.-- 37,950.1 • 3,7,010,.. 45,100 ., .48.800
15280 MACADAM RD S ME -108 *SEATTLE "W 98188 WIT E- 1047NOLD E M-SV- 23-23-06: PCT OF VALUE .1.6706 • "' • °` 70
0440 -06 STEWART WILLIAM M' -:: 15280 PI CftDAr1 :4),--:-:" - .:.',` -• 2380.- 151 • 781220 29.450
- 15280 MACADAM RD S ME105 *SEA•:rTLE' WA 98188 :WIT. E-105+BLD E- M -SW-23 -23-04 PC? OF VA�.LE 1 :1863
0450-03 GROSSO PAMELA C • .. :15280 MCADAM4 RIi ` v 2386. . :•151 .',. . 790416'._ 33.000`
- 2340 43RD E *SEATTLE WA 98112 :, : WIT: E 106*BLD (E.• .M -b1-23 -23-04 .PCT .OF• VALUE. 1 :7167:::;
33,e
'35,800
357.1.1
0460-01 PFMIENST IEL NORMA ' 15280 * MAGADAM' RD : S ' • ' ` 2380: ' 151- : 7 9020'1 `:, 36,950: 3,600 45, 200 ,'• .48,800.:'
15150 MACADAM ''D S ME107 *SEATTLE '{„y►. 96188 '' WIT E 1C: ILb E M -SW-23- 23-04' PCT OF VALUE .• 1.6265•
C "70 -09 OHARA J HARRY : ` 15280 NM::•ONM RD :; :' S , ; 2380 151: -: 790205, 29,000.
15824 SE :70TH*RENTON WA 98055` .:". _:UNIT. -E- 108+8.0 E . M -SW-23 -23-04 •
PCT. '1F VALUE .1.2765
'3,800
40,700 •
405.99.
486.78
' 2,8001 :• . 33,000 35,800
357.11
. 0480 -C7 JENKINS N .AXTER ' • -• • 15280 [MACADAM RD S : • 2380 • - .151. • ' :` 800326 50,000.
15280 MACADAM RD S *TUCWILA W4 98188 • 'WIT E- 109*BLD:E 'M- SW- 23- 23- 04.?CT• OF VALUE 1.7167 ^:
3.800.
45.01'' 48.800
486.78
0490-05 KOLA M .. 15280 MACADAM RD- ' S " 2380 151 790111' 40:000 3.800. :.45,600 ;' 49,400
15280 MACADAM RD ME201 *TUCWI _A WA S'd188 WIT c -201 *9LD E MI-SW-23-23-04 P_ T OF VALUE 1.7146 492.77
0506 -03 SPEER WILLIAM M 15280 MACADAM RD S • . 2380 • 151 821130 51,000 ' 3.900 . 44,300 • 48,200
2804 6: 'M SE*NEPCER ISLAND WA 98040 WIT E- 2S2*BLD E. ' M -SW-23 -23-04 PCT OF ' VALUE 1.7608 480.80 .
0510 --01 KING NAO'II F 13780 MACADAM RD S 2380: 151 790102 ' 27,450 ,. 2,800' . 33,000 35,800 •
PO BOX 21633 *SF.1TrLE 4K 98111 : WIT E- 203*6LD E. M -SW-23 -23-04 PCT OF VALUE' 1.2745, 357.11
0521) -09 FEL'''R CIROLE A 15280 MACADAM RD S:•' 2380''• - 151 : • 790103' 38,950...' 3.800 - 44.400 48.200
15280 MACADAM RD S ME- 204 *SEATTLE W 98188 WIT E- 204*BLD E. M- S1../- 23- 23- 04',PCT.OF VALUE 1.7146. 480.80
0530 -07 S TEWART WILLIAM M 15280 MACADAM RD S ' . 2380 151. ' .. 781220. ' 29,450 ` 2,800 33.000 35,800
15280 MACADAM RD S ME205 +SEATTLE WA 98188 WIT E- 205*431_D E M- SW- 23- 23 -0A•. PCT OF VALUE 1.2745
0540-C3 STEIGER MARILYN
2400 NE 9TH*) NTON WA 98055.
357.11
15210 MACADAM RD ' S` .: 2380 ' : 151 .- T90111 • 39:950 ,.800 .: ` 44.400 .. 48.200
%AZT E- 20u*ELD E • M-SW- 2323 -04 PCT OF VALUE 1' 7146
480.80
•
0550 -02 MAIN CONSTANCE C .15280 MACADAM RD 2380'',' 1.51 - 790211 ' 39.700
::. 15290 MAC ADM RD S ME207 *SEATTLE WA 981 d8 :.WIT E- 207+8. D E V, M-SW- 2323 -04 pct .OF VALUE .1.7167:
3.800• .. , 44.400 48.200
.480.80
•
05560 -00 KWO KIKUE • 15280 MACADAM RD- S 2380".•`: 151. . ' 790111 30.000
.15280 MACADAM ►ZD ME208 *TUCWIL: WA 98188. WIT- E- 208K3.D .E;' M- SW-2's -23-04 PCT OF VALUE 1.2745 • •
35.800
357.11'.'
0-08 JONES ALFRED"
3.800 44.40C,
5772 S 152AD45EATTLE W 98188: "; : WIT E 209*8LD E MF- SW- 2S- 23- 04 48 :PCT' ur VALUE 1 T146 '- `. �' .80 •,
• 15280 MACADAM RD S 2380 •151 •790913: -,1",45.500
1983 COPYRIGHT PY WASH.
ASHINL."ON REAL ESTATE REGISTER;'. INC.. SEATTLE, WASHINGTON (206) 82-5359' •
WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE REGISTER BE'ISVES THE INFORMATION BELOW:TO BE CORRECT., BUT DOES NOT WARRAN. ITS ACCUiAC
THIS INFORMATION IS LEASED, .FROM AND REMAINS THE PROPERTY OF WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE REGISTER, INC..,,
•. ,►
788895- `.OUTHCENTER VIEW CONDO.
ACCT -NO OAI'ER NAME
t iiILiNG ADDRESS
0580 -06 C1341)C INIUM BUILDERS INC 15280 MACADAM RD '. S
SALANT RLBRV IN*19800 PACIFIC H S*SEAT 78188 WIT E- 301+BLD E
amp
1483. -84 EDITIQ
TUKWILA -
.SITUS ADDRESS
VOL
.26.; ' PG 22
'_EW Z USE
2380 • 151
M- SW- 23- 23-04
UN SALE -DATE MICE LAM)
,. 1
790516 45,000
PCT OF VALUE 1.7586
LMP TOTAL -AV //STY SOFT Y
YRS DEL 83 1 Ax ACREACj
3,900 • 47,900 51,800
516.71
05S'0 -04 MCHU(i'I JOE 8 15290 MMC.ADN' RD • S
- 15280 MACA DAM RD S NE30? *.SEATTLE WA 78188 WIT 1 •302 BLD E
1600-Oc NOPPS CERALD • 15280 MACADAM 9') S ..:
15280 MACADAM RD S NE- 303 {SEATTLE '4 98188 WIT E-303*BLD E'
2380 • 151
* SW-23 -23-04
2380 151.
M -SW-23 -23-04
790119: '47,200
PCT OF VALLE 1.8048 •
4,000 '• 53,400 . 57,400
572.57
0610 -00 HARRELL L KcITH DOUGLAS . 15280 MACADAM RD S
1,280 MACADA ; RD NE- 304 *SEATTLE WA 98188 - WIT E•304*E1LD E
. 2380 ' :.151 '
M -SW-23 -25-04
790141' '33.500.. 3.000. . 38,400
PCT OF VALL'_ 1.3646 :.
'811218 ' 49,950,..- 4,000'
PC'' OF VALUE...1.8048. :.. . .
41,4,)0
412.97
53,400 . 57,400
572.57. •
0620 -08 GOEZ 9fLLEY 0.
127 BETHFi*WALLA WALLA WA 99362
15280 MACADAM RD • •- S 2380 . 151 • '90111;:' 33,500
WIT E- 305*BLD E M -SW-23 -23-04 PCT OF VALLE 1.3624 '
.:. 38,400
41,400
412.97
0630 -0C BRETTr1 H C 1Z HISAMI 15280 MACADAM Afl S' 2380 '151- 790111; - 46,500
15280 MACADAM RD NE306 *TWWIILA WA 9816P . . UNIT E•306*BLD. E' M- 23- 23-04. PCT OF VALUE. 1.8048
53,400 57,400'
572.57
0640 -04 WALKER ROBERT A 15280 MACADAM RD = :. S'
15280 P ACACAM RD 'S 49307 *SEATTLE . WA 98188. UNIT. E. 307*BLD
0650 -01 COMDCMINIUM BUILDER'''. INC .. : 15280 MACADAM RD ."
SALANT RUSIN*19900 PACIFIC HWY S *SEAT. 98188 W 308
I,T E- *9LD F.
2380 ,,.:•
M -SW-23 -23-04
2380 1TC.:
M -SW-23 -23-04
790119 46,200
PCT OF VALUE 1.7608
.3,900.
53,500-
57,400.
572.57
190119 -. 36,200
PCT OF VALUE 1.3646.
3,
41,400
412.97
0660 -09 IBLINGS•CAROLYN J '•15280 IPACADA01 RD ' S
15280 MACADAM RD S 416 - 309• - SEATTLE W 98188 WIT E•309*BLD
2380' ':•.1`.'11; 790117 '41,.130 "
M- S11- 23- 23 =04,. PC •: • OF VALUE .1.7586.
,
• 53.500'
57,406'
572.57
788900 - SOUTHDALE ADD:
0005 -06 FRANC 18 '. 1602 28ST.
1602 28TH SE *ALWFN WA 98002
0010 -09 DOSS ED 1606 '28ST-
. SOUTH FORREST R0AD*WtESTPORT WA 98595
AUBURN
SE 0120 ` 1 SFD: .-..1.•, .7612._
1* - S -0
.-29.. 215 ' •
SE • 0120 • 1 SFD 1
2-3* S-N61-2 1 -2105 2 Q► W 10 FT ' 7F' 3
* * * a,* * .*
17,000 . 36.000 53.000 1.0 990
459.19 .22
17,000
41,600 • 58,600 1.0 '
507.71 .23
0016 -03 DIMMIND T C 1702 28ST
1702 281' ST SE *N.BUFW WA 98002
SE ',: 0120 1 SFD 1 7612' .. 17.000
3-4* S -N1i -29-21 05 E 75 . FT OF 3 Qr W 20 FT OF , 4
36.500 53.500 1.0 1030 '
463.52 . •. .22
002O-07`DELAJRFNTI PETER 8 1706 28ST
706 28114 AVE SE *AL .R4 WA 98002'
0025 -02 BIRCH PERRY L . 1710 28ST
1710 28TH ST SE *AUBURN WA 98002
SE
4*
0120 1 SFD 1 . ..r71201: 3/,500 17,000.
S -004-29 -21-05 E 70 FT."
SE
5 *.
43.000 ' • 60.000 1.0 ' 1550 '
519.84' .16
0120 1 SFD 1 .' 780130 . 32,000 :•17,000'
S -41-29 -21-05
36.000 55,000 1.0 990
459.19 .21
0030 -05 GILT ^RDY M M 1714 28ST
1714 28T11 ST SE *AUBURN WA 981102
SE. •
0120' 1 SFD.
S-+129-21-G5
17,000
36.000. 53.000 •1.0..: 990
459.19 .34
(''35 -UO EHFESMAN OSCAR 0 2712 T, ST -
- 2712'1 ST S E *AUBUFN Wh 96002 ..
0040 -03 JUIP GLEi'DOV R
2710 T ST SE *ALBIRN WA 98002
X2710' T' ST ;
Ot]45 -(1A" EX'.EY LARRY' , . - 7708 T ST
"2708.
T. STREET SE *A./UNJ W1 99002 .m.
012J 1 SFD 1 • .7505. 17,000 .; 39.400•
7+ ..
S-084-29-21-05 .
.741014; :21.000 .11.000 '0.•.700
. 012c. ,-1. SFD :�: 4
54411 -29- 21-05,
54.9400 1.0 .1280
688.65 .20
- 56,7001.0 13.0
• 491.25 • ' '.18
0120.1
44,07.:9-2170.54Y; : !
.000 53-,00' 1.0 -; ,: 9�+0•
h «.':,4V`..19 .18
R
SUBJECT j c hgesavARM DATE I /Jct / it
MESSAGE p° 1-11? S (; aN )Q(s p v U
pNest.i.Sks 19(..c_ te)-0 0_3m vvi;wr
REPLY
VG I- hk T( (-1- �5 `T PR) i Lks . ?kt vio Ts -P6kAT of
moo, nor j (1,V /CA. Rnem�
i�N :t ct 3v �S° l O P'&4 F'i� . kit\k`` S � %i��iCE1 Wt.( (TL's ttU T-
REDTFORM ® 45 472
Div &oQ«\ T -114 -t`s, ��) c-i -A-N t\\e\pt�u `D EC 9v\E- v 0�
¥-k I lx,1 ri-csTk- i. Uri �o ►\-tA,). -.ii . ? • W`t LL, Nom- � is IN\ 6 s (w_, \iv\ A t \-_,
s c., )G D U . 0) C'6-k yj s3 c-Lts s - AktLCii u■,-, Etrmih, F>f l
tIr-. NOc'\IitV1 ' t- k W- (pu'rn<STty pi\ .<\if\ (c-(1DV t4T"iAz % A 1" \T `U -TTVAV 4-
N `T)kni=L; 91/1\14ti- 't i"W\N o-,; & 7A Y\l Ss 1 a'-■• MO( N-,4 .
N.1-0 1 Li> �-, (V� ' . - �v\'Pc- y8 ( pL �u (---ILL)--,
\ \V \C,+T v 1 � nDA-TE j_ %` -/
SEND PARTS 1 AND 3 WITH CARBON INTACT - POLY PAK. (50 SETS) 4P472
PART 3 WILL BE RETURNED WITH REPLY.
•
Lorton .Dennis (� Associates, .rnc.
Lonsu%tinq L:7►tginecrs
January 19, 1984
Shupe Holmberg, P.E., L.S.
John R. Ewing & Associates
622 South Central
Kent, Washington 98031
RE: Fireflow Analysis for "The Cottages"
HDA JOB 5194.0
N 1 9 1 9 8 4 'M UR
84
CITY OFFird,Cv`, LA
lu
Iii
tJ
JAM 1c2) 1984
Dear Shupe:
We have completed the computer analysis of fireflow for "The Cottages"
per your request. We have determined that the 2500 gpm required fireflow
is available at 20 psi residual pressure within the proposed development at
elevation 170+ feet assuming an 8" loop is constructed as shown on the atta-
ched piping layout. During the fireflow similation we assumed a background
flow for the entire Tukwila system of 2,900 gpm. During such a fire event,
inadequate pressures on top of North Hill would exist probably in a range of
5 to 12 psi.,
If you desire additional tests or information, please call us.
AEM:gjn
Enclosure
Sincerely,
HORTON DENNIS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Alan E. Meyers, P.E.
6133 Sixth Ave.. South, Seattle, Washington 98108 • Phone 767 -3456
•
Ir
1 1
` J. \M 19 1984
CITY OP i UKVJiLA t J)
PLANNING DEPT.
•1)
5. fs.2 5k
SGQfe
N d / er
O e u�
/Voile E /ey
nre, N tt m b ev-
1-e e`^ a
•
-27;774/1 �
1 es Z071/4 ,
T!�
84,01i1Y. 08.40.01.
EKS1 760C.N0501.97 A 84/ 8.D5-0 02.06.52. 84/01;18.
riidiiiiii111i3Qiuiiaiii/Iei
WATER DISTRIBUTIO
DATA FILE TUK 0
rJAN 19 1984
REF. NODE NODE LENGTH DIAMEJER_H. -.W ...�
NO. 1 2 Obi 01; COEFFV LA
1. PIPE ELEMENTS
(FT)
PLANNING DEPT.
1 1 2 4900.0 18.0 115.0
2 2 3 400.0 12.0 115.0
5 3 7 1800.0 12.0 115.0
6 6 7 900.0 12.0 115.0
7 7 8 1100.0 12.0 115.0
9 8 10 1300.0 12.0 115.0
10 10 11 750.0 8.0 115.0
11 11 12 200.0 6.0 115.0
12 12 15 800.0 6.0 115.0
13 13 20 250.0 8.0 115.0
14 13 14 750.0 6.0 115.0
15 14 15 150.0 6.0 115.0
17 10 16 1550.0 12.0 115.0
18 20 21 550.0 6.0 115.0
19 20. 29 1400.0 8.0 115.0
20 21 30 1400.0 6.0 115.0
151 23 24 250.0 6.0 115.0
150 22 23 200.0 6.0 115.0
137 108 110 600.0 12.0 115.0
149 64 69 500.0 12.0 115.0
148 117 118 1400.0 12.0 115.0
147 116 118 800.0 12.0 115.0
146 116 117 650.0 12.0 115.0
145 115 116 1350.0 12.0 115.0
144 115 117 700.0 12.0 115.0
143 112 115 1500.0 12.0 115.0
141 111 112 400.0 10.0 115.0
140 110 111 950.0 10.0 115.0
139 109 110 1400.0 10.0 115.0
138 104 109 700.0 10.0 115.0
136 106 108 800.0 12.0 115.0
135 107 108 700.0 12.0 115.0
134 105 107 800.0 10.0 115.0
133 105 106 700.0 12.0 115.0
132 119 106 1100.0 12.0 115.0
130 98 119 400.0 12.0 115.0
129 99 111 2300.0. 10.0 115.0
127 99 100 400.0 10.0 115.0
126 98. 99 900.0 12.0 115.0
125 95 104 2500.0 10.0 115.0
124. 96 95 950.0 10.0 115.0
123 94 96 600.0 10.0 115.0
122 93 94 950.0 10.0 115.0
121 93 95 600.0 10.0 115.0
120 97 98 800.0. 12.0 115.0
119 90 99 2100.0 12.0 115.0
118 90 100 2500.0 10.0 115.0
117 102 101 550.0 8.0 115.0
116 89 102 2300.0 10.0 115.0
115 87 92 900.0 8.0 115.0
114 86 91 1000.0 8.0 115.0
113 85 90 700.0 12.0 115.0
112 84 97 1950.0 12.0 115.0
111 83 93 1650.0 10.0 115.0
110 88 89 500.0 10.0 115.0
109 87 88 300.0 8.0 115.0
108 86 87 250.0 8.0 115.0
107 85 86 550.0 8.0 115.0
106 89 82 750.0 10.0 115.0
105 79 87 1100.0 8.0 115.0
104 78 85 900.0 12.0 115.0
103 84 85 1100.0 8.0 115.0
102 74 84 850.0 8.0 115.0
101 83 84 2000.0. 8.0 115.0
99 78 79 300.0 10.0 115.0
98 74 78 1100.0 8.0 115.0
97 77 78 300.0 12.0 115.0
JAN 19 1984
PLANNING DEPT.
102 74
101' 83
99 78
98 74
97 77
95 76
93 69
92 68
91 68
90 73
89 72
88. 71
87 71
86 70
85 70
84 67
83 65
82 ' 60
81 49
80 58
79 5?
78. 56
76 64
75 63
74 63
73 62
72 62
71 61
70 60
69 51
68 51
66 .49
65 48
64 48
62 45
61 44
60 '43
59 42
58 43
5? 42
56 41
55 38
54 34
53 33
52 42
•51 31
50 29
49 33
48 32
47 31
46 30
45 29
44 '35
43 38
42 39
41 37
40 36
39 35
38 28
3? 27
36 27
35 26
34 27
33 25
32 19
31 19
30 1?
29 17
28 16
27 25
26 24
25 24
24 26
23 22
22 15
21 14
3 3
4 4
8 .8
77 54
.94 75
IAA
10
84 8410
84 20
79 300.0
78 1100.0
?8 300.0
?? 200.0
76 700.0
69 1100.0
74 1150.0
74 450.0
73. 2050.0
72 700.0
73 2300.0
71 250.0
83 1300.0
70 500.0
66 350.0
65 1600.0
56 1600.0
59 1450.0
58 700.0
57 500.0
56 1250.0
64 450.0
54 950.0
63 800.0
54 2200.0
62 1100.0
61 2600.0
61 1000.0
52 800.0
50 350.0
49 1100.0
54 2300.0
46 1500.0.
48 1250.0
47 650.0
46 500.0
44 350.0
43 450.0
45 900.0
49 1600.0
44 1000.0
43 950.0
32 950.0
42 1400.0
41 900.0
34 400.0
33 450.0
32 400.0
31 450.0
30 500.0
38 600.0
39 500.0
40 300.0
39 650.0
37 1000.0
36. 150.0
35 600.0
34 900.0
33 650.0
27 400.0
28 600.0
28 '800.0
28 1200.0
18 150.0
19 300.0
18 150.0
17 150.0
17 450.0
25 600.0
26 300.0
32 650.0
31 1050.0
23 700.0
22 700.0
4 1200.0
5 2100.0
9 1700.0
55 600.0
76 450.0
01 c1I A
8.0
8.0
10.0
8.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
8.0
8.0
12.0
10.0
12.0
10.0
12.0
8.0
12.0
6.0
8.0
12.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
12.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
6.0
10.0
6.0
8.0
6.0
8.0
6.0
10.0
6.0
10.0
6.0
12.0
6.0
6.0
10.0
6.0
8.0
6.0.
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
12.0
10.0
10.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
12.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
6.0
12.0
6.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
4.0
4.0
12.0
6.0
8.0
o A
11:,.0
115.0
115.0
115.0
115.0
115.0
115.0
115.0.
115.0
115.0
115.0
115.0
115.0
115.0
115.0
1.15.0
115.0
115.0
115.0
115.0
115.0
115.0
115.0
115.0
115.0
115.0
115.0
115.0
115.0
115.0
115.0
115.0
115.0
115.0.
115.0
115.0
115.0
115.0
115.0
115.0
115.0
115.0
115.0
115.0
115.0
115.0
115.0
115.0
115.0
115.0
115.0
115.0
115.0
115.0
115.0
115.0
115.0
115.0
115.0
115.0
115.0
115.0
115.0
115.0
115.0
115.0
115.0
115.0
115.0
135.0
115.0
115.0
115.0
115.0
115.0
115.0
115.0
115.0
115.0
115.0
115.0
115 A
-Iij
JAN 19 1994
CI1'Y OF T'UI {e ".V ILA
PLANNING DEPT.
�' Ga 'U(1.0 0 i i J.�,�
3 3 4 1200.0 0 115.0 0
4 4 5 2100.0 4.9 115.0
8 8 9 1700.0 12.0 115.0
77 54 55 600.0 6.0 115.0
94 75 76 450.0 8.0 115.0
100 ?9 81 500.0 8.0 115.0
128 100 103 650.0 10.0 115.0
131 119. 114 900.0 10.0 115.0
142 112 113 400.0 10.0 115.0
172 180 181 375.0 8.0 115.0
171 180 46 1100.0 8.0 115.0
176 183 45 1320.0 6.0 115.0
175 183 51 480.0 6.0 115.0
174 182 183 200.0 8.0 120.0
173 181 182 150.0 8.0 120.0
170 51 180 100.0 8.0 115.0
2. OTHER ELEMENTS
RESERVOIRS
REF. NODE PRESSURE
N0. HEAD(FT)
1 1 345.0
2 77 336.0
3 61 320.0
4 66 190.0
3. NODE DATA
T7s
NO[IE ELEVATION EXTERNAL* KNOWN
NO. (FT) FLOW(GPM) PRESSIJRES(PSI)
1 15.0 UNK
2 10.0 .o
3 20.0 .0
6 15.0 -40.0
7 20.0 -10.0
8 20.0 -30.0
10 25.0 .0
11 78.0 -20.0
12 72.0 -40.0
13 110.0 -40.0
14 90.0 -30.0
15 67.0 -30.0
16 15.0 -30.0
17 15.0 .0
18 15.0 -20.0
19 15.0 .0
20 120.0 -30.0
21 160.0 -30.0
22 120.0 -40.0
23 80.0 -30.0
24 '0.0 -30.0
25 15.0 -30.0
26 108.0 -40.0
27 68.0 -30.0
28 17.0 -20.0
29 160.0 -30.0
30 203.0 -40.0
31 230.0 -40.0
32 170.0 -40.0
33 135.0 -30.0
34 117.0 -30.0
35 30.0 .0
36 20.0 -30.0
37 20.0 -20.0
38 30.0 -20.0
39 20.0 -30.0
40 20.0 .0
41 145.0 -40.0
42 240.0 -30.0
43 200.0 -30.0
44 205.0 -40.0
45 128.0 -60.0
46 274.0 -80.0
47 190.0 -20.0
48 183.0 -100.0
49 20.0 -40.0
50 10.0 .0
14m 191984
CITY 0_.``:r <,,
PLANNING DEPT.
4' 190.0 -20.0
48 183.0 -100.0
49 20.0 -40.0
50 10.0 .0
51 192.0 -40.0
52 135.0 -20.0
54 122.0 -40.0
56 35.0 -30.0
57 30.0 -20.0
58 20.0 -20.0
59 20.0 -30.0
60 120.0 -30.0
61 80.0 -30.0
62 50.0 -20.0
63 31.0 -30.0
64 50.0 .0
65 150.0 .0
66 170.0 UNK
67 40.0 UNK
68 24.0 -20.0
69 24.0 -20.0
70 50.0 .0
71 40.0 -30.0
72 40.0 -30.0
73 24.0 -30.0
74 24.0 -30.0
76 24.0 -30.0
71 24.0 UNK
78 24.0 -30.0
79 24.0 .0
82 20.0 -20.0
83 40.0 -30.0
84 25.0 -40.0
85 24.0 -30.0
86 20.0 -30.0
8? 20.0 .0
88 20.0 .0
89 20.0 -20.0
90 24.0 -60.0
91 20.0 -20.0
92 20.0 -20.0
93 30.0 -40.0
94 20.0 -20.0
95 30.0 -60.0
96 20.0 -20.0
97 20.0 .0
98 25.0 -60.0
99 24.0 -60.0
100 24.0 -60.0
101 25.0 -20.0
102 25.0 -20.0
104 25.0 -20.0
105 20.0 -20.0
106 20.0 -40.0
107 20.0 -20.0
108 2.0.0 -20.0
109 30.0 -40.0
110 30.0 -40.0
111 30.0 -20.0
112 30.0 -40.0
115 25.0 .0
116 25.0 -20.0
11? 25.0 -20.0
118 25.0 -20.0
119 20.0 .0
5 130.0 -20.0
4 30.0 -20.0
9 10.0 -10.0
55 105.0 .0
75 24.0 .0
81 24.0 .0
103 24.0 .0
113 25.0 -10.0
114 20.0 -20.0
180 200.0 -10.0
181 184.0 UNK
182 170.0 -1000.0
183 132.0 -10.0
•
R FOS. FOR INFLOY, NEG. FOR OUTFLOU
20.0
1
Y
•
11
•
•
•
•
kEUUES1 IGNORED - ILLIIV FORM
RE (I -
I.%ANALYZE RES
61 VARIABLES
61 1.00E +00 1.0000E +00 IIII1
1 5.89E-10 1.0000E +00 1.0000E +OPRINTO
ANALYSIS RESULTS FOR DATA FILE TUhwo
1. PIPE DATA
REF. FLOU VELOCITY FROM TO FRICTIONAL HEADLOSS(FI)
NO. (GPM) (FT /SEC) NODE NODE HEADLOSS(FT) 1t000F1 PIPE
1 1515.6 1.911 1 2 4.62 .944
2 1515.6 4.299 2 3 2.72 6.'9,'
5 1475.6 4.186 3 7 11.64 6.469
6 40.0 .113 7 6 .01 .008
7 1425.6 4.044 7 8 6.68 6.069
9 1385.6 3.931 8 10 7.49 5.758
10 485.3 3.098 10 11 4.4? `;.956
11 465.3 5.280 11 12 4.47 22.367
12 425.3 4.826 12 15 15.15 .18.940
13 263.8 1.684 13 2.0 .48 1.928
14 303.8 3.447 14 13 7.62 10.162
15 327.9 3.720 15 14 1.76 11.704
17 900.2 2.554 10 16 4.02 2.593
18 6.1 .069 20 21 .00 .007
19 227.7 1.453 20 29 2.06 1.468
20 23.9 .271 30 21 .13. .092
151 202.3 2.295 24 23 1.20 4.788
150 239.7 2.720 23 22 1.31 6.556
137 83.6 .237 108 110 .02 .032
149 2459.2 6.916 69 64 8.32 16.642
148 9.1 .026 117 118 .00 .001
147 10.9 .031 116 118 .00 .u01
146 5.9 .017 117 116 .00 .000
145 25.0 .071 115 116 .00 .003
144 35.0 .099 115 117 .00 .006
143 60.0 .170 112 115 .03 .u17
141 110.0 .449 111 112 .05 .129
140 18.4 .075 110 111 .00 .005
139 25.2 .103 110 109 .01 .008
138 14.8 .060 104 109 .00 .003
136 85.8 .243 106 108 .03 .034
135 17.8 .050 107 108 .00 .002
134 37.8 .154 105 107 .01 .018
133 57.8 .164 106 105 .01 .016
132 183.6 .521 119 106 .15 .137
130 203.6 .578 98 119 .07 .166
129 111.6 .456 99 111 .30 .133
127 56.6 .231 100 99 .02 .038
126 96.6 .274 99 98 .04 .042
125 34.8 .142 95 104 .04 .015
124 13.8 .056 96 95 .00 .003
123 33.8 .138 94 96 .01 .015
122 53.8 .220 93 94 .03 .034
121 81.0 .331 93 95 .04 .073
120 167.0 .474 97 98 .09 .115
119 211.7 .600 90 99 .37 .178
118 116.6 .476 90 100 .36 .144
117 20.0 .128 102 101 .01 .016
116 40.0 .163 89 102 .05 .020
115 20.0 .128 87 92 .01 .016
114 20.0 .128 86 91 .02 .016
113 388.2 1.101 85 90 .38 .547
112 167.0 .474 84 97 .22 .115
111 174.8 .714 83 93 .50 .304
110 80.0 .327 88 89 .04 .072
109 80.0 .511 87 88 .06 .212
108 54.0 .345 87 86 .03 .103
107 4.0 .026 86 85 .00 _ _ .001
106 20.0 .0b2 89 82 .u0 .006
105 154.0 .983 79 87 .78 .713
104 532.1 1.510 78 85 .88 .980
103 118.0 .753 85 84 .48 .435
102 96.5 .616 74 84 .25 .300
101 7.4 .047 84 83 .01 .0u3
11
;I) gi
!JA.P1 19 1981
CITY OF EsKtvJis_f\.
PLANKING DEPT.
•
•
0
IV/
106 20.0 .08 89 82
105 154.0 .983 79 87
104 532.1 1.510 78 85
103 118.0 .753 85 84
102 96.5 .616 74 84
101 7.4 .047 84 83
99 154.0 .629 78 79
98 185.5 1.184 78 74
97 901.7 2.558 77 78
95 2121.6 6.018 77 76
93 2091.6 5.933 76 69
92 387.6 2.474 68 69
91 407.6 2.601 74 68
90 348.5 .989 73 74
89 186.5 .762 72 73
88 216.5 .614. 71 72
87 192.1 .785 71 73
86 438.5 1.244 70 71
85 197.3 1.259 70 83
84 635.9 1.804 67 70
83 696.3 7.901 66 65
82 696.3 4.444 65 60
81 1187.5 3.369 56 49
80 30.0 .340 58 59
79 50.0 .319 57 58
78 70.0 .286 56 57
76 1287.5 3.652 64 56
75 1171.6 7.478 64 63
74 516.8 3.299 63 54
73 624.8 3.988 63 62
72 136.1 .868 54 62
71 740.9 4.729 62 61
70 666.3 4.253 60 61
69 1377.2 8.790 61 51
68 20.0 .227 51 52
66 .0 .000 50 49
65 342.5 3.886 49 48
64 340.8 2.175 54 48.
62 253.6 2.878 46 45
61 583.3 3.723 48 44
60 20.0 .227 43 47
59 1463.9 5.980 42 46
58 453.4 5.145 44 43
57 609.3 2.489 43 42
56 350.0 3.971 41 45
55 805.0 2.284 49 38
54 89.9 1.020 44 34
53 205.9 2.336 33 43
52 770.6 3.148 32 42
51 114.0 1.293 31 42
50 390.0 2.489 29 41
49 189.3 2.147 34 33
48 171.5 1.946 33 32
47 216.4 2.455 32 31
46 256.2 2.907 31 30
45 192.3 2.182 30 . 29
44 667.3 1.893 38 35
43 117.7 .481 38 39
42 .0 .000 39 40
41 87.7 .995 39 37
40 67.7 .432 37 36
39 37.7 .154 36 35
38 705.0 2.000 35 28
37. 129.4 1.468 27 34
36 218.1 2.475 27 33
35 173.4 1.968 27 26
34 550.9 6.252 28 27
33 412.5 4.680 28 25
32 278.4 .790 19 28
31 36.3 .103 18 19
30 242.1 .687 17 19
29 56.3 .639 17 18
28 870.2 2.469 16 17
27 571.9 6.489 17 25
26 954.3 3.898 25 24
25 722.1 2.950 24 26
24 855.5 3.495 26 32
23 193.8 2.199 22 31
22 67.4 .765 15 23
21 5.9 .067 22 14
3 40.0 1.091 3 4
..:.v U5 U..
. vv
.o0
. 78
. 88
.48
.25
. 01
.07
1.11
2.53
8.63
4.32
4.96
.20
.70
. 13
. 83
. 17
1.46
.68
16.50
18.58
6.93
. 20
. 06
. 03
6.28
13.69
6.36
7.60
1.25
22.14
27.84
41.02
. 05
.00
13.96
7.12
10.92
10.46
.04
7.75
7.46
1.38
11.89
3.37
1.07
4.70
4.49
2.32
3.58
1.69
1.59
2.17
3.34
2.18
.89
.07
. 00
.66
. 16
. 00
.99
1.89
3.58
1.44
18.34
14.32
.35
.00
. 07
.07
.37
14.74
4.21
1.26
3.73
4.65
.44
.00
�_AA
• 00 1
. 113
. 980
. 435
.300
. 003
.240
1.005
2.601
12.664
12.335
3.929
4.312
.448
. 342
. 186
.362
.685
1.12/
1.363
47.149
11.615
4.329
.140
.089
. 056
5.027
30.415
6.692
9.504
. 567
13.026
10.706
41.016
. 066
. 000
12.688
3.097
7.277
8.370
. 066
15.490
21.321
3.061
13.206
2.109
1.068
4.948
4.726
1.657
3.974
4.235
3.530
5.425
7 .416
4.362
1.490
. 146
.000
1.020
.156
. 018
1.650
2.095
5.507
3.602
30.5'2
17.894
. 296
.007
. 228
.450
2.436
32.753
7.019
4.190
5.734
4.425
.628'
.007
i_ i)o
28 954.3 3.895 25 24 4.21 ' 7.01'
25 722.1 2.950 24 26 1.26 4.190
24 855.5 3.495 26 32. 3.73 5.734
23 193.8 2.199 22 31 4.65 4.425
22 67.4 .765 15 23 .44 .628
21 5.9 .067 22 14 .00 .007
3 .40.0 1.021 3 4 2.06 1./20
4 20.0 .511 .4 5 1.00 .477
8 10.0 .028 8 9 .00 .901
77 .0 .000 54 55 .00 .000
94 .0 .000 76 75 .00 .000
100 .0 .000 79 81 .00 .000.
128 .0 .000 100 103 .00 .000
131 20.0 .082 119 114.' .00 .006
142 10.0 .041 112 113 .00 .002
172 1785.4 11.396 180 181 24.86 66..301
171 1130.3 7.214 46 180 31.30 28.458
176 543.6 6.168 45 183 39.36 29.821
175 652.1 7.399 51 183 20.04 41.756
174 1185.7 1.568 183 182 5.75 28.738
173 185.7 1.185 182 181 .14 .931
170 665.1 4.245 51 180 1.07 10.610
2. NODE DATA
NUDE PRESSURE EXTERNAL*
NO. (PSI) FLOW(GPM)
1 149.6 1515.6
2 149.7 .0
3 144.2 .0
4 139.0 -20.0
5 95.2 -20.0
6 141.3 -40.0
7 139.2 -10.0
8 136.3 -30.0
9 140.6 -10.0
10 130.9 .0
11 106.0 -20.0
12 106.6 -40.0
13 79.5 -40.0
14 91.5 -30.0
15 102.2 -30.0
16 133.5 -30.0
17 133.3 .0
18 133.3 -20.0
19 133.3 .0
20 75.0 -30.0
21 57.6 -30.0
22 78.5 -40.0
23 96.4 -30.0
24 101.2 -30.0
25 126.9 -30.0
26 84.2 -40.0
27 102.2 -30.0
29 56.7 -30.0
30 39.0 =40.0
34 80.1 -30.0
35 127.0 .0
36 131.4 -30.0
37 131.4 -20.0
38 127.4 -20.0
39 131.7 -30.0
40. 131.7 .0
41 61.7 -40.0
44 42.4 -40.0
45 63.9 -60.0
46 5.3 -80.0 mmata-'
47 45.7 -20.0
48 56.5 -100.0
50 137.6 .0
52 52.5 -20.0
55 93.4 .0
56 129.7 -30.0
57 131.9 -20.0
58 136.2 -20.0
59 ' 136.1 -30.0
60 88.8 -30.0
61 94.1 -30.0
62 116.7 -20.0
Al aaa_1 -ao_n
FfTF1
i-A N 1. 9 1984 i
CITY OF 'itjt(WiL A
PLANNING DEPT.
�ow `PrOSSIAPc oh
f orA 1
55 93.4
56 129.7
57 131.9
58 136.2
59 136.1
60 88.8
61 94.1.
62 116.7
63 128.3
64 125.9
65 83.9
66 82.4
67 138.7
6B 142.7
69 140.8
70 134.1
71 138.4
72 138.3
73 144.9
75 144.6
76 144.6
77 145.7
78 145.3
79 145.3
81 145.3
82 146.6
83 137.8
B6 146.7
88 ,146.7
B9 146.7
90 144.8
91 146.7
92 146.7
93 141.9
94 146.2
95 141.9
96 146.2
97 146.4
98 144.2
100 144.6
101 144.5
102 144.5
103 144.6
104 144.1
105 146.2
106 146.2
107 146.2
108 146.2
109 141.9
110 141.9
111 141.9
112 141.9
113 144.0
114 146.3
115 144.0
116 144.0
117 144.0
118 144.0
119 146.3
180 23.8
182 26.1
183 45.1
181 20.0
51 27.8
31 28.8
42 23.4
32 55.7
54 86.0
43 41.4
33 71.6
49 133.2
28 132.2
74 144.9
84 144.3
85 144.9
87 146.7
99 144.6
.:v.V.V
_3II:0
-20.0
-20.0
-30.0
-30.0
-30.0
-20.0
-30.0
.0
.0
696.3
635.9
-20.0
- 20.0
. 0
-30.0.
- 30.0
-30.0
. 0
-30.0
3023.3
-30.0
.0
. 0
-20.0
-30.0
-30.0
.0
-20.0
- 60.0
-20.0
-20.0
-40.0
-20.0
-60.0
-20.0
. 0
- 60.0
-60.0
-20.0
-20.0
.0
-20.0
-20.0
-40.0
-20.0
-20.0
-40.0
- 40.0
-20.0
-40.0
-10.0
-20.0
.0
-20.0
-20.0
-20.0
... .0-
-10.0
- 1000.0 j l
/.ICS / 8 A.
-40.0 511971., .»11l4ie � ir4
e �f S
-40.0 > .„ �° /�a e
-30.4 Y, V
-40.0 �. �/e ) 0 N'4fr1�
-40.0
-30.0
-30.0
-40.0
-20.0
-30.0
-40.0
- 30.0
. 0
-60.0
J,AN 19 1984
0-6'; i`l;tCl741LA
PLANNING DEP i .
4 PUS. FOR INFLOW, NEG. FOR OUTFLOW
1%1 40(44-s_m2
F {t* Lee-,
R fLt_. \NLt Offt.
SUBJECT , fuel - L 2_13
DATE ha /8+
00 imeN task- kp.\\pz As \t\ik..k_ P3 )(C2 C4 JaPt-
MESSAGE
I 14
Itt
QIL1 (PsO
•
comp. .tst _
\f( ) riPs\c- A (12-Z C(1 M-YTS
cc>__L\su2Rgs
REPLY -pill vv\•-f fLsT
SIGNED
■11111
,ieNtrifilk-Pia"
fkeWital
NT D1D _
-VD IkitDS OVA NTS .13-)1 TH-1.S P-tutt-uP
17137ForThr-7.4)0 4S 472
SIGNED
SEND PARTS 1 AND 3 WITH CARBON INTACT -
PART 3 WILL BE RETURNED WITH REPLY.
DATE
/t
POLY PAK (50 SETS) 4P472
JRE
January 6, 1984
Rick Beeler
Associate Planner
City of Tukwila
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila, . WA 98188
John R.euting & AssociatEs
civil ors -land suvEyors
JN 77505
CITY OF TUKWILA
PLANNING DEPT.
RE: DR -6 -83
The Cottages
Dear Rick:
Following is a response to concerns raised in our conversation of
January 5, 1984:
1. Fireflow and Pressure Supply:
This problem was identified in the study done by Horton Dennis in
1980. One of the solutions to the problem was to construct a 12 -inch
transmission main from the pump station on the north hill to the
Southcenter area. This transmission main will be constructed this
year.
The Cottages is a proposed 84 -unit apartment complex. Fireflow
requirements for this development are approximately 2500 gallons /
minute (the units will be sprinklered): Even with a 500 loss in
pressure for the overall water system, the fireflow requirements
for the project can still be met. The proposed water system for the
development would tie into the existing 8 -inch main in 57th and loop
through the project, tying into the 6 -inch main in 152nd. There is no
upgrading of main sizes proposed in the comprehensive water plan
for this area.
2. Cul -de -sac Requirements:
The Fire Marshall of the City of Tukwila.has requested 70 -foot-
diameter turnarounds for the proposed project or a looped driveway
system. It is not environmentally possible to impose these turn-
arounds on the steep slopes of the project. A decision has been made
to sprinkler the applicable buildings on the project so that these
requirements will no longer be necessary.
622 So.Central • KEnt, Washington 98031 • (206) 852 -6633
Rick Beeler
January 6, 1984
Page 2
3. Building Setbacks:
Normal frontyard setback requirements would be 30 feet. Eighty feet
west of the southwest property corner, on the south side of the street,
however, the La Vista Estates building is located approximately
10 feet off the property line. The three buildings of The Cottages that
are adjacent to 152nd are set back 16, 16, and 24 feet, respectively..
Because the other building in the area has a setback similar to
these, it is requested that an adjustment be made in the setback
requirement. If this is, not possible, the following adjustments, would
be made to the site plan with minimal overall effect:
Building 1: The offset for the building would be reduced
to comply with the 30 -foot setback.
Building 2: The building would either be relocated slightly
or two units on the south end of the building
would be eliminated.
Building 4: The building would be moved north about 6 feet
to comply with the setback.
In regards to the Building 7 rearyard setback, this building would be
moved slightly south and east to comply with the 20 -foot rearyard
setback requirement.
As it was stated before, these adjustments to the plan are minor and
be handled at the time of the final application for permits.
4. Grading in the Area of Building 4:
The construction for Building 4 will be either pile or pier and grade
beam per the approval of the soils engineer. This type of construction
was not identified on the grading plan and was a concern of the City.
5. Traffic:
The capacity of the streets in the area of the project is in the vicinity
of 5000 cars /day. The existing traffic counts for this area show a
daily traffic volume of approximately 1800 cars /day. It is obvious
that both 152nd and Macadam Rd. are substantially below capacity.
The area of concern expressed by the Police Department is in regards
to the intersection of 152nd and Macadam Rd. The traffic volume for
Rick Beeler
January 6, 1984
Page 3
Macadam Rd. is approximately 500 cars /day, with 152nd at approx-
imately 1250 /day. If the Police Department is concerned about the
intersection, they might want to consider stopping . traffic on
Macadam Rd. and allowing traffic on 152nd to have the right -of -way.
It is not felt that this is necessary because both streets are well
below capacity but it would answer the Police Department's concern.:
6. Tree Survey:
Regarding the survey by Horton Dennis, it would appear that they
picked up all of the significant trees. In the northeast corner of the
site, where there are some existing smaller alder trees, these will
be augmented by the planting of some evergreens but a substantial
portion of this area (approximately 20, 000 square feet) will be left
in its current state.
Should you have any further questions, please contact this office.
Sincerely,
JOHN R. EWING & ASSOCIATES
John R. Ewing, P.E. , L.S.
JRE:mlu
JRE 6
January 5, 1984
Rick Beeler
Associate Planner
City of Tukwila
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila, WA 98188
John ..Ewing & AssociatES
C,vd'EngllEEr's - land slr wyc r s:
3N 77505
RE: DR -6 -83
Item #6 of December 13, 1983 letter
Landscaping for J.B. Wright's project,
Dear Rick:
JAN 6 1984
CITY OF TtiKWIU1
PLANNING DEPT.
"The Cottages"
As you know, the predominant plant material on the site is the clumps
of and individual large maple trees with a mixture of some alder,
cottonwood, and cedar. The landscaping plan shows in detail the
existing trees on -site that will be removed by the construction of the .
buildings, parking areas, and grading. As many as possible of the
existing trees will be saved. They will be supplemented in the following
manner:
1. The west entry to the project will be landscaped with a com-
bination of flowering plums as a decorative tree and shore junipers
and golden pfitzers for a groundcover and soil stabilization on the cut
and fill slopes.
2. At the end of the entry, a series of photinia will be planted,
not only to act as an addition of colour but also as a defined terminus
for that particular parking area.
3. The fill slopes to the west of Buildings 4 and 5 will be planted
with English ivy, not only for appearance's sake but also as a method .
of eliminating the erosion potential on the 2 :1 fill slope., This will
also add a pleasing appearance to the project from the west as the
ivy will cascade over the rockwall as it matures.
4. On the road side of the pool and also along the parking area
adjacent to the pool, strawberry trees will be placed at 6 feet on
center. This is a fast - growing shrublike tree and will act as a
screening device for this area from the street as well as add colour
to the general area. The area around the pool will also be planted
with lawn and a mixture of Eastern hemlock, Douglas fir, and photinia .
which will augment the existing large maple trees.
622 So. CEntral KEnt, Washington 98031 • (206) 852-6633
Rick Beeler
January 5, 1984
Page 2
5. At the east entrance to the project, the area again will be
planted with flowering plums as a decorative tree and the slope
stabilized with golden pfitzers.
6. The area west of and below the rockwall. for Building 1
will be planted with a series of strawberry trees to act as a visual
barrier for the rockwall in that area.
7. In the area north of Buildings 8 and 9, the small cut slope
will be planted with ivy, with the area between the top of the bank
and the north property line augmented with a series of Douglas fir.
These firs will be placed in this area to add variety to existing
maples there.
8. At the east end of the site, the 2 :1 cut slope will be planted
with ivy.
9. The large cut slope northerly of Buildings. 1.0, 11, and 12
will be treated in the following manner: the slope will be cut at a
2 :1 slope and will be scarified at 90° to the slope; 4 inches of topsoil
will be placed on the slope; and it will be hydroseeded and covered
with jute matting. In consultation with Dave McNeal of Jongejan/
Gerrard /McNeal, Bellevue, it was felt that any trees on the slope
should be of a volunteer nature rather than try to impose them on the
slope.
As you can see, all the exposed slopes have been treated with either
planting of ivy and a variety of junipers or hydroseeding with jute
matting, which should preclude any problems with erosion on these
slopes. A variety of other types of plant material has been included
to augment the existing deciduous trees on -site.
Should you have any questions, please contact this office..
Sincerely,
JOHN R. EWING & ASSOCIATES
John R. Ewing, P.E. , L, S.
JRE:mlu
•
JRE
January 6, 1984
Rick Beeler
Associate Planner
City of Tukwila
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila, WA 98188
John R. Ewing & AssociatEs
civil EnginEErs- land survE fors
JN 77505
JAS! 6 1984
CITY'OF TUKWiLA
PLANNING DEPT.
RE: DR -6 -83
The Cottages
Dear Rick:
Following is a response to concerns raised in our conversation of
January 5, 1984: •
1. Fireflow and Pressure Supply:
This problem was identified in the study done by Horton Dennis in
1980. One of the solutions to the problem was to construct a 12 -inch
transmission main from the pump station on the north hill to the
Southcenter area. This transmission main will be constructed this
year.
The Cottages is a proposed 84 -unit apartment complex. Fireflow
requirements for this development are approximately 2500 gallons/
minute (the units will be sprinklered)•. Even with a 50% loss in
pressure for the overall water system, the fireflow requirements
for the project can still be met. The proposed water system for the
development would tie into the existing 8 =inch main in 57th and loop
through the project, tying into the 6 -inch main in 152nd. There is no
upgrading of main sizes proposed in the comprehensive water plan
for this area.
2. Cul -de -sac Requirements:
The Fire Marshall of the City of Tukwila has requested 70 -foot-
diameter turnarounds for the proposed project or a looped driveway
system. It is not environmentally possible to impose these turn-
arounds on the steep slopes of the project. A decision has been made
to sprinkler the applicable buildings on the project so that these
requirements will no longer be necessary.
622 5o. Central Kent, Washington 98031 • (206) 852 -6633
• •
Rick Beeler
January 6, 1984
Page 2
3. Building Setbacks:
Normal frontyard setback requirements would be 30 feet. Eighty feet
west of the southwest property corner, on the south side of the street,
however, the La Vista Estates building is located approximately
10 feet off the property line. The three buildings of The Cottages that
are adjacent to 152nd are set back 16, 16, and 24 feet, respectively.
Because the other building in the area has a setback similar to
these, it is requested that an adjustment be made in the setback
requirement. If this is not possible, the following adjustments would
be made to the site plan with minimal overall effect:
Building 1: The offset for the building would be reduced
to comply with the 30 -foot setback.
Building 2: The building would either be relocated slightly
or two units on the south end of the building
would be eliminated.
Building 4: The building would be moved north about 6 feet
to comply with the setback.
In regards to the Building 7 rearyard setback, this building would be
moved slightly south and east to comply with the 20 -foot rearyard
setback requirement.
As it was stated before, these adjustments to the plan are minor and
can be handled at the time of the final application for permits.
4. Grading in the Area of Building 4:
The construction for Building 4 will be either pile or pier and grade
beam per the approval of the soils engineer. This type of construction
was not identified on the grading plan and was a concern of the City.
5. Traffic:
The capacity of the streets in the area of the project is in the vicinity
of 5000 cars /day. The existing traffic counts for this area show a
daily traffic volume of approximately 1800 cars/day. It is obvious
that both 152nd and Macadam Rd. are substantially below capacity.
The area of concern expressed by the Police Department is in regards
to the intersection of 152nd and Macadam Rd. The traffic volume for
• •
Rick Beeler
January 6, 1984
Page 3
Macadam Rd. is approximately 500 cars/day, with 152nd at approx-
imately 1250 /day. If the Police Department is concerned about the
intersection, they might want to consider stopping traffic on
Macadam Rd. and allowing traffic on 152nd to have the right -of -way.
It is not felt that this is necessary because both streets are well
below capacity but it would answer the Police Department's concern.
6. Tree Survey:
Regarding the survey by Horton Dennis, it would appear that they
picked up all of the significant trees. In the northeast corner of the
site, where there are some existing smaller alder trees, these will
be augmented by the planting of some evergreens but a substantial
portion of this area (approximately 20, 000 square feet) will be left
in its current state.
Should you have any further questions, please contact this office.
Sincerely,
JOHN R. EWING & ASSOCIATES
IR 0, z'o,
John R. Ewing, P.E. , L.S.
JRE:mlu
JRE •
January 5, 1984
Rick Beeler
Associate Planner
City of Tukwila
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila, WA 98188
John R. Ewing & AssociatEs
Civil Eng4nEE rs - land 5/VW Ijc 's
JN 77505
JAN 6 1984]
CITY OF TUKWILA
PLANNING DEPT.
RE: DR -6 -83
Item #6 of December 13, 1983 letter
Landscaping for J.B. Wright's project, "The Cottages"
Dear Rick:
As you know, the predominant plant material on the site is the clumps
of and individual large maple trees with a mixture of some alder,
cottonwood, and cedar. The landscaping plan shows in detail the
existing trees on -site that will be removed by the construction of the
buildings, parking areas, and grading. As many as possible of the
existing trees will be saved. They, will be supplemented in the following
manner:
1. The west entry to the project will be landscaped with a com-
bination of flowering plums as a decorative tree and shore junipers
and golden pfitzers for a groundcover and soil stabilization on the cut
and fill slopes.
2. At the end of the entry, a series of photinia will be planted,
not only to act as an addition of colour but also as a defined terminus
for that particular parking area.
3. The fill slopes to the west of Buildings 4 and 5 will be planted
with English ivy, not only for appearance's sake but also as a method
of eliminating the erosion potential on the 2 :1 fill slope. This will
also add a pleasing appearance to the project from the west as the
ivy will cascade over the rockwall as it matures.
4. On the road side of the pool and also along the parking area
adjacent to the pool, strawberry trees will be placed at 6 feet on
center. This is a fast - growing shrublike tree and will act as a
screening device for this area from the street as well as add colour
to the general area. The area around the pool will also be planted
with lawn and a mixture of Eastern hemlock, Douglas fir, and photinia
which will augment the existing large maple trees.
622 So.CEntral KEnt, Washington 98031 • (206) 852 -6633
• •
Rick Beeler
January 5, 1984
Page 2
5. At the east entrance to the project, the area again will be
planted with flowering plums as a decorative tree and the slope
stabilized with golden pfitzers.
6. The area west of and below the rockwall for Building 1
will be planted with a series of strawberry trees to act as a visual
barrier for the rockwall in that area.
7. In the area north of Buildings 8 and 9, the small cut slope
will be planted with ivy, with the area between the top of the bank
and the north property line augmented with a series of Douglas fir.
These firs will be placed in this area to add variety to existing
maples there.
8. At the east end of the site, the 2:1 cut slope will be planted
with ivy.
9. The large cut slope northerly of Buildings 10, 11, and 12
will be treated in the following manner: the slope will be cut at a
2:1 slope and will be scarified at 90° to the slope; 4 inches of topsoil
will be placed on the slope; and it will be hydroseeded and covered
with jute matting. In consultation with Dave McNeal of Jongejan/
Gerrard /McNeal, Bellevue, it was felt that any trees on the slope
should be of a volunteer nature rather than try to impose them on the
slope.
As you can see, all the exposed slopes have been treated with either
planting of ivy and a variety of junipers or hydroseeding with jute
matting, which should preclude any problems with erosion on these
slopes. A variety of other types of plant material has been included
to augment the existing deciduous trees on -site.
Should you have any questions, please contact this office.
Sincerely,
JOHN R. EWING & ASSOCIATES
John R. Ewing, P.E. , L.S.
JRE : mlu
JRE
December 30, 1983
Rick Beeler
Associate Planner
City of Tukwila
6200 Southcenter Blvd.
Tukwila, WA 98188
RE: J.B. Wright Project on S 152nd
( "The Cottages ")
Dear Mr. Beeler:
John R. Ewing & AssociatEs
civirergn rs - land sur Eyors.
3N 77505
{8NEVgl_
'DEC 3 0 1983
CITY OF Tt;KWvILA
PLANNING DEPT.
Enclosed for your review are four copies of the revised grading plan
for J.B. Wright's proposed 84 -unit project on S 152nd St.
After reviewing the original grading plan and the soils report, we
decided to revise the site plan to minimize the amount of grading and
rockeries required. The revised grading plan has considerably less
excavation and fill required as well as fewer and smaller rockeries.
Buildings 6 -12 have been moved northwesterly and are now closer
together.. This opens up a large area in the northeast portion of
the site which will be left natural and which will serve as a buffer
between the trail on the east side of the site and the development.
The jacuzzi and pool will be located south of Building 3 and west of.
Building 2. The entire area between Buildings 2 and 3 is planned' as
recreation area and most of the proposed recreation. area (12,000
square feet) for the project will be located between these two buildings.
It is a central location and is relatively flat. The remaining
recreation facilities relative to Section 18.52.060 of' the code will
be located easterly of Building 12.
As many of the existing trees as possible will be saved but, with .
such a steep site and the constraints on parking lot and access road
grades, a number of trees will have to be removed. The site will be
landscaped and new trees will be planted to mitigate the removal of .
existing trees. The predominate species of trees on the site are
maple and alder. The majority of the new trees, will be evergreens
(Douglas fir, hemlock), although some decorative trees (birch,
flowering plum) are also planned.
622 So.CEntral • KEnt, Washington 98031 . (206) 852 -6633
Rick Beeler
December 30, 1983
Page 2
The latest topographical and substantial vegetation survey by Horton
Dennis & Associates (August, 1980) was utilized for the grading and
landscaping plans. This survey appears to be substantially correct.
S 152nd St. has been improved since the survey was performed so
the survey will need to be upgraded in this area prior to final grading
plan design. It is anticipated that this will result in only minor
modifications to the site entry since the on -site topography has not
changed.
It is not anticipated that this development will have a significant impact
on the groundwater. The excavations on the site will occur where
little or no groundwater was encountered. The major area in which
groundwater was encountered was near Buildings 2 and 4. These
buildings will be constructed using pilings, pier and grade beams,
or structural fill as recommended in the soils report and will have
only a minor effect on the groundwater in this area.
The alteration of the existing use of the site by the proposed land use
is consistent with the existing zoning and comprehensive plan. It
fits in well with the surrounding area, which is developed as
apartments.
The proposal will not block any views or vistas now open to the public
or adjacent properties. The site is steep but the building elevations
have been changed to "step" up or down within the building to better
fit the site and minimize the grading required. Again, by relocating
Buildings 6 -12, a large area in the northeast portion of the site will
be left natural and will serve as a buffer between the trail on the east
property line and the development.
Please call me at 852 -6633 if you have any questions on the new
grading plan. I would be happy to meet with you and discuss the
grading plan at your convenience.
Very truly yours,
JOHN R. EWING & ASSOCIATES
.5%
Shupe Holmberg, P. , L.S.
SH : mu
enc.
cc: Hank Chumney, J.B. Wright Corp.
CITY OF TUKWILA 3qP( (--
PERMIT NUMBER Z& 83 CNT NUMBER 3 -3
ROL MISER 3 N
es
CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM - PLAN CHECK ROUTING FORM
TO: D BLDG, C PLNG, III P,W. III FIRE r--1 POLICE PA R.
PROJECT . . \K t2i Cam . A/(
ADDRESS k\ki CSr25• /S2 45-7011
DATE TRANSMITTED 1 2 - 2 : 7 -23 , RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 4 - 3-54-
C.P.S. STAFF COORDINATOR P—icV.-- Z, RESPONSE RECEIVED
PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED OJECT PLANS AND RESPOND WITH APPROPRIATE
COMMENTS IN THE SPACE BELOW, INDICATE CRUCIAL CONCERNS BY CHECKING THE
BOX NEXT TO THE LINE(S) ON WHICH THAT CONCERN IS NOTED:
Ej \ • lae)10)\)-S (_,DI\--TAV fitcss q
1 1 2) -te r-4■1.1 \ r N r hr-s-
3) m us
4) o S'IMN Q v7=<< - 12 ftv
❑ -5) 171 -Oce- AC 0 I Cwt F1 ids
6) k O Ca llo...
•a�t� �C� c��� P(.o POLT1.. ? IOM. ".:.
Q `) kiJ R-5 P U AV E'VI'L 1►ol *
10) \\ A�0 sca c
11 ! as t - &] (Y\
1 �
d 12) •r r»A s) b7\•? ( e
J 1 13)
El 15)
D, R, C, REVIEW ..,____ . __ IA PLAN CHECK DATE I
PLAN RESUBMITTAL REQUESTED El COMMENTS PREPARED BY
PLAN APPROVED
vdi
C.P.S. FORM 2
•
JRE
December 21, 1983
TRAFFIC DISSERTATION
J.B. Wright Corp. Project
Traffic Volumes
John R.Ewing & AssociatES_
civil engineers - land surveyors
JN 77505
33N r rp
IDEC 2 3 1983
CITY O
PLANNIr.! crPT.
Estimates of current average traffic volumes in the project vicinity
were based on, traffic counts of traffic flows supplied by the City
of Tukwila.
Macadam road currently carries about 3300 vehicles per day (vpd)"
while S 152nd carries about 1200 vpd. These volumes are well ..
within the capacities .of two -lane roadways which can typically ..?
handle 5000 to 7000 vpd without experiencing unacceptable levels of
congestion or related traffic problems.
Trip Generations
Based on a trip generation rate of 6 vehicle trips per unit 'per 'day,
the additional traffic generated by this project would be about 500
trips per day. This added traffic volume would net appreciably
affect the level of service of the existing roadways in the immediate. -
area of the project.
•
SOILS IN VESTIGATION
for
84 APARTMENT UNITS
SOUTH 152 STREET, TUKWILA
by
EARTH SCIENCES
BOX 126 HOBART, WASHINGTON 98025
TEL: AREA 206 - 682 -6942
`� JIRIICal
EAF ITH SCIENCES E1RTOE1
December 22, 1983
Mr. Hank Chumney
j:13. Wright Company ;
1111 Third Avenue Building
Suite 700
.Seattle, Washington. 98101`
DEC 2 3- 1983
CETY OF TJKY LA
PLANNING. DEPT -- - :.
Re: Tukwila Apartment'. Project
Dear Mr: Chumney:
s.
On . your behalf, Mr.. Gordon "Pathmann of. John R. Ewing and`JAssociates authorized
me, to investigate and report on the subsurface at the " "site of 'an-84-unit-
apartment complex you are proposing to develop in Tukwila: I first'.discusse_
the project with Mr. Pathmann on December 2' and made a preliminary inspection
of the property at . that. time.` Authorization to proceed was given on
December 13;. the fieldwork, was completed on-December 19, : and the findings,
conclusions' andrecommendations,.are presented herein,;..'I:`understand' that the
report will be submitted along with other permit application documents to thee;
City of Tukwila and that it will also be used by the architect and the
structural engineer in developing grading and foundation plans. },;:;;
Introduction
The four -and- one- half -acre' site is moderately to steeply sioping over much of-
its area;: except for the southwest corner, it supports a dense growth of both
deciduous and conifer trees and ground vegetation.
South 152nd Street borders the south edge of the property and will provide they
only access. Unimproved 57th Avenue South right-of-way borders the site on
the east.
The 84 units will be divided between 12 buildings, as shown on page 6'of this
report: That plan was prepared from your December. 2, 1983, landscape plan .
prepared by Ewing and Associates.
The specific concerns raised by the City are summarized in a December 13, 1983:
letter to you; I have been provided with the first page of that letter. The
scope of my effort is to address those issues.
Mr. Hank Chumney
December 22, 1983
Page 2
Subsurface Conditions:.
Soil and'shallow groundwater conditions were explored by digging ten test pits
with a construction backhoe. Because of the steep slopes and the presence of
snow at the time, it was necessary to engage the services of a dozer to assist
the backhoe in getting to the desired test locations. An unsuccessful effort .
was made to maneuver the .backhoe , into the footprint areas of buildings nine. ;:
and ten. The dozer . did,, however, get,to.those areas and shallow exposures
opened by it were helpful and provided evidence that conditions are similar to
those at other test locations at high elevation. w
The various soil were examined and classified and the test: pits were
at - each.of.the test 'locations
are .presented on pages ..e7 to. 11..:A broad :. range of soi12types were :.found.
.,:
Bedrock exists at relatively shallow depth and was uncovered in several of the
test pits. The bedrock, consists variably of brown sandstone and of. tan I:,_'
siltstone....:The siltstone was observed to contain a small fraction of rounded
igneous pebbles..;: Note on the logs that the bedrock is:. described ',as . "hard";-
this. designation ;refers, to soil classification consistency and not', to geologic
nomenclature used for rock. .In practical terms, it appears that the bedrock.'
at shallow depths-can be excavated with,. conventional soil ,excavating;
te
Strategically above the bedrock is a residual soil which amountstoweathere
rock and which grades increasingly similar to the rock approaching, the contac
between:. the two The residual soil is characteristically brown or
reddish - brown in color and consists of silt and silt-sand mixture.:;...
Two .types of glacial soil were logged. The first; and oldest of these is
mixture of hard silt-clay which was found only at depth in test pit seven;
this. is the lowest elevation on the site. The second is glacial till which .
appears only at . scattered locations; it is a mixture of silt, sand, and gravel
and has engineering :properties which; are generally similar to weathered or,:;T
severely weathered. sandstone.,
Non - organic bogJ or similalr soft mud has been deposited in the trough which'`:
runs: east -west through .,buildings • one and two. This material appears; . to be, no
more .than one to two yards, in, thickness across the surface of part of the
south,side,of the property.: The soft .silt on silt -sand mixture.' referred to.:in.
pit _ number two i s : important -in .that . i t is moderately . compressible , and may,
require wasting, depending on the grading plan adopted.: It could be left ._1
it is covered over. with a sufficient thickness of engineered., fill. 2
Mr. Hank Chumney
December 22, 1983
Page 3
Organic topsoil also blankets the poor draining areas along the south side of
the property. Outside of those areas, topsoil is generally non- organic except .
for live roots.
The last, ° major soil type _ found is . uncontrolled fill. It :appears " -.to be
confined to the general vicinity of building four. It contains slash,
rubble and other components which make it highly unsuitable for' :..
direct or indirect support of improvements:.::
Minor groundwater seepage was observed: in several of the pits., some
of your ;construction: cuts :- wi 11 transect ' water-bearing': layers the' water
presence; for the most part,' wi.l l" be'-little more than a minor nuisance, :.during construction. " -: Ezcepti on ? i s 'at building four •where the quantity and :rate' of
flow from within and beneath. the fill will make It very difficult to excavate
to native soil 4 `..,A
Conclusions
Except - for`:erosion ' and sloughing such .:- as might. be 'associated with the it
uprooting:: of a large'. tree,' all slopes: are believed to be;'stable: at- thei
present inclinations This condition of'stability'could - be jeopardized- by any
several careless construction -practices. Principally, . the practices to be
include °;(1) the increasing of surface or: subsurface, :flow of water;
(2).- the 'increasing .' of weight 'on - the : shallow, steeply- sloping soi l sr. by the-: -
addition of= fills and (3) excavating into the slope in such a way °as to
permanently oversteepen or remove lateral support.: -• :: ° 'Except -for heeding these;
well-known; principles : of : good practice, I see nothing about the soil or
groundwater conditions which would seriously restrict development as: you':':
propose:.- So far ':as soil quality and related construction procedures are!,
concerned; the most favorable conditions exist at those locations farthest-
from 'South. 152nd Street; the most adverse conditions exist in the vicinities
of . buildings. four, „two,' and :'one, in that order. A pile foundation is
recommended for building four. Buildings one and two will probably be footing•.;
supported on compacted fill, but this will depend somewhat on the grading plan:'
which is now under' design. '::
Assuming that the recommendations herein are followed, there` should be no risk'
of slope stability which might be caused by the development. Occasional
isolated shallow disturbance of the type I referred to are to be expected with
or without - development. 'With respect to deep, large -scale slippage, the site
is believed to be stable and not warranting further -testing or analysis at
this time. I.' expect 'to review the grading plan and to coordinate with the ..
architects, structural engineers, and builders through the design and
construction phases. It is possible that additional work may. be advised at
some point along the way:
Mr. Hank Chumney
December 22, 1983
Page 4
Recommendations
Until the grading plan and preliminary architectural and structural drawings
are complete, my advice is, necessarily, general in nature. The following
remarks are intended as guidelines for developing the grading plan and .
retaining and foundation systems.
Most of the buildings and carports will be supported on conventional spread
footage. Where possible, those footings should bear on native soil rather..
than compacted fill: In no case should footings be placed on fill which steeper than 2i:1 (H to V) downslope from the footing or where the
underlying natural surface slopes steeper than 21:1. Where finished grade.'.
adjacent to footings or in the immediate downslope area will be steeper than
15 °, the footings should be buried deeper than the minimum 18 inches required
by code. The amount deeper will depend on terrain and soil conditions for the
location in point:. Exception would be made where the footings are poured on.:;"
bedrock. For preliminary design purposes, .I suggest that allowable bearing:,.
pressures of 2,500 pcf be assumed for inspected compacted fills and 4,000 pcf:
be assumed for those on native soil; obviously, some of the firmer materials-,.=
could support much higher loads. These figures are subject to my review of:,
the plans and,.inspection of foundation excavations before any concrete.: is
poured. ..
•
Because of low permeability within most of the soils, free draining imported.:
pea gravel or sandy gravel should be used as backfill behind retaining walls.
No grade change should be made which leaves permanent unretained slopes
steeper than existing slopes unless the finished slope is less than 11:1. You
and your designers should bear in mind that rockeries are not engineered
structures and,.strictly speaking, do not satisfy the "retention" requirement used in this report. That is not to say that rockeries would not suffice
and have useful application, but they are outside the categories of .
engineering and conservative design.
Where backwall areas are flat or within 20° of flat, lateral earth pressures
from native soil could be taken as 40 pcf equivalent fluid. That figure •
increases with backslope angle and dramatically so where the backslope exceeds
about 30 °. All walls should be provided with backwall footing drains.
On -site soils are moisture sensitive and are poorly suited for use as borrow
for compaction. They. are especially unsuitable if earthwork is to be done
during any but the driest of weather during summer months. Where structural'.,,
fills are used, it is essential that all related earthwork be under close...
engineer inspection. The inspector can certify whether the resultant fill can
support the designed loads, but he can do this only if he has actual knowledge
of the entire procedure as it is in progress.
Mr. Hank Chumney
December 22, 1983
Page 5
Please provide me with a copy of the grading plan when it is complete and have
the architect and structural engineers coordinate with me and provide me with
the relevant plans as they are drawn.
Yours very truly,
EARTH SCIENCES
mes
• 31-9801
4 copies submitte
JNE /mer.;, .z
S fs.
n
F``4 bP .. • •
4'. 11917,, c° p ' e_
w1:n „E� .° •. •
Gf a- i i c..- .c 74 it,
aB. WRIGHT s 84 UNIT APARTMENT PROJECT
•
SCALE IN FT.
SOUTH 152nd STREET
Mil DENOTES TEST PIT 0 DENOTES BUILDING NO
0 20 40 60 80 100
• . .
• • .
57 th. AVE. SOUTH
•
• • _ . • _ - - -
#1
TEST PIT LOGS
Dark brown topsoil with roots (soft)
1.8'> -.
Brown fine, sandy silt with gravel (weathered glacial till),
(medium to stiff)
J. B. Wright.
7.2'.-
Brown fine sandy silt (glacial till) (hardpan)
- Completed- 12- 19 -83; no groundwater encountered
2.8
Groundwater seepage
Gray silt and fine sandy. silt (soft)
Groundwater seepage+
Brown fine _ sandy,silt:(medium -to stiff).;-:
Brown fine sand (medium dense) (seepage throughout)
8.5' - Completed 12- 19 -83; severe sloughing
#3
0'
J. B. Wright
Dark brown topsoil with roots (soft)
1.6' -
Brown fine sandy silt with fine roots (soft to medium stiff)
4.0' -
• Brown fine sandy silt (stiff)
10.2' - Completed 12-19-83; no groundwater encountered.
0.6
Dark brown topsoil (soft)
•
. • •
Brown silty fine sand with gravel (weathered glacial till)
(Loose to dense) ,
6.0' -
Brown sandstone (Hard)-
6.8 - Completed 12-19-83; no groundwater encountered
• '• .
• -• •
#5
1.3'
3.1'
•
Dark brown topsoil (soft)
J. B. Wright
Brown fine sandy silt (soft to medium)
Brown fine sandy. silt (stiff)
Sandstone. boulders below 6'
7.1' -
Groundwater seepage
10.2' - Completed 12- 19 -83;,
Dark brown topsoil with roots (soft)
2.9
Brown fine sandy silt with sandstone fragments and fine roots
(Soft to medium
Brown sandstone boulders in matrix of fine sandy silt
(Hard, stiff)
9.0' - Completed 12- 19 -83; no groundwater encountered
#7
#8
0'
5.9'
•
Highly variable construction rubble, spoils, slash, and
mixed soils (fill) (soft /loose)
Flooding throughout
J. B. Wright
Brown silty clay (medium stiff)
9.4' = Completed 12- 19 -83; severe flooding
.. is
•
6.6'
Reddish brown fine sandy silt
•
Tan residual siltstone (hard)
9.8'- Completed 12- 19 -83; no groundwater encountered
#9
0
1.1'
• •
Dark brown topsoil with roots (soft)
Reddish brown fine sandy silt (soft to medium)
3.8' -
Reddish brown fine sandy silt with brown sandstone and
tan siltstone cobbles and boulders (stiff)
10.3' - Completed 12- 19 -83; no groundwater encountered
J. B. Wright
Dark brown topsoil (soft)
1.1' -
Brown fine sandy silt with sandstone boulders and fine roots.
(soft to medium stiff)
4.8' -
Brown fine sandy silt with sandstone boulders
(medium stiff to stiff)
9.1' -
Tan residual siltstone with rounded igneous pebbles (hard)
10.5' - Completed 12- 19 -83; no groundwater encountered
JRE
December 30, 1983
Rick Beeler
Associate Planner
City of Tukwila
6200 Southcenter Blvd.
Tukwila, WA 98188
RE: J.B. Wright Project on S 152nd
( "The Cottages ")
Dear Mr. Beeler:
John R. Ewing & AssociatEs
civil Engin€Ers - land SUINEiorS
JN 77505
CGS L �.1r i•�_.�!
10E0 3O 1983
CITY OF TUKWILA
PLANNING DEPT.
Enclosed for your review are four copies of the revised grading plan
for J.B. Wright's proposed 84 -unit project on S 152nd St.
After reviewing the original grading plan and the soils report, we
decided to revise the site plan to minimize the amount of grading and
rockeries required. The revised grading plan has considerably less
excavation and fill required as well as fewer and smaller rockeries.
Buildings 6 -12 have been'moved northwesterly and are now closer
together. This opens up a large area in the northeast portion of
the site which will be left natural and which will serve as a buffer
between the trail on the east side of the site and the development.
The jacuzzi and pool will be located south of Building 3 and west of
Building 2. The entire area between Buildings 2 and 3 is planned as
recreation area and most of the proposed recreation area (12,000
square feet) for -the project will be located between these two buildings.
It is a central location and is relatively flat. The remaining
recreation facilities relative to Section 18.52.060 of the code will
be located easterly of Building 12.
As many of the existing trees as possible will be saved but, with
such a steep site and the constraints on parking lot and access road
grades, a number of trees will have to be removed. The site will be
landscaped and new trees will be planted to mitigate the removal of
existing trees. The predominate species of trees on the site are
maple and alder. The majority of the new trees will be evergreens
(Douglas fir, hemlock), although some decorative trees (birch,
flowering plum) are also planned.
622 So. CEntral KEnt, Washington 98031 • (206) 852 -6633
+� •
Rick Beeler
December 30, 1983
Page 2
The latest topographical and substantial vegetation survey by Horton
Dennis & Associates (August, 1980) was utilized for the grading and
landscaping plans. This survey appears to be substantially correct.
S 152nd St. has been improved since the survey was performed so
the survey will need to be upgraded in this area prior to final grading
plan design. It is anticipated that this will result in only minor
modifications to the site entry since the on -site topography has not
changed.
It is not anticipated that this development will have a significant impact
on the groundwater. The excavations on the site will occur where
little or no groundwater was encountered. The major area in which
groundwater was encountered was near Buildings 2 and 4. These
buildings will be constructed using pilings, pier and grade beams,
or structural fill as recommended in the soils report and will have
only a minor effect on the groundwater in this area.
The alteration of the existing use of the site by the proposed land use
is consistent with the existing zoning and comprehensive plan. It
fits in well with the surrounding area, which is developed as
apartments.
The proposal will not block any views or vistas now open to the public
or adjacent properties. The site is steep but the building elevations
have been changed to "step" up or down within the building to better
fit the site and minimize the grading required. Again, by relocating
Buildings 6 -12, a large area in the northeast portion of the site will
be left natural and will serve as a buffer between the trail on the east
property line and the development.
Please call me at 852 -6633 if you have any questions on the new
grading plan. I would be happy to meet with you and discuss the
grading plan at your convenience.
Very truly yours,
JOHN R. EWING & ASSOCIATES
.5
Shupe Holmberg, P. . , L.S.
SH : mu
enc
cc: Hank Chumney, J.B. Wright Corp.
CITY OF TUKWILA ,: �P( �--
dii
PERMIT NUMBER 2. - °3 C 'NT ROL NUMBER 3 3 -395
CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM - PLAN CHECK ROUTING FORM
TO: BLDG, J PLNG, P,W, FIRE POLICE P.& R.
PROJECT T.:
ADDRESS 13\14 CQfl 2 S• /52 L3 s-T-
DATE TRANSMITTED I2- Z_ 23 , RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 1-3 841-
•
C.P.S. STAFF COORDINATOR 'Z Z, RESPONSE RECEIVED
PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACH D OJECT PLANS AND RESPOND WITH APPROPRIATE:•
COMMENTS IN THE SPACE BELOW, INDICATE CRUCIAL CONCERNS BY CHECKING: THE.
BOX NEXT TO THE LINE(S) ON WHICH THAT. CONCERN IS NOTED:
El
5:1
r�
1)
2)
3) �r
4)
5)
6) d `
7)
8)
9
10)
1
i
w>L.i L
�. .
i
s4
04-6 IS) (2&-"ZS
,F
/
ac-
/.'/
_I
-
Apyid177
s we keo
D, R, C. REVIEW R_____ . __
Cpl
REQUESTED
PLAN APPROVED '❑
PLAN CHECK DATE
COMMENTS PREPARED BY
•
•
C.P.S. FORM 2
ors
2=1- r
36) (Yo °3 . � 9/
E. pr
±xt:rt
:CITY OF TUKWILA .
PERMIT NUMBER 21.3---83 M TROL NUMBER 33 -3
CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM - PLAN CHECK ROUTING FORM
TO: 11 BLDG, C PLNG, 1 P,W, gl FIRE ri POLICE El :P.& R.
PROJECT v.', w.occof Cam . 1otA.z
ADDRESS M -1 arTi A z S
DATE TRANSMITTED 12-- 27 --c33 RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 1
C.P,S, STAFF COORDINATOR R- 15, RESPONSE RECEIVED,
PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED,, OJECT PLANS AND RESPOND WITH APPROPRIATE
COMMENTS IN THE SPACE BELOW, INDICATE CRUCIAL CONCERNS BY CHECKING THE
BOX NEXT TO THE LINE(S) ON WHICH THAT CONCERN IS NOTED:
1) Single - .point access is not acceptable. Driveways shall becirculating (looped)
) or shall be Cul- de -Sac'd at the ends with an unobstructed 70 foo.t'diameter
) turning - circle.
Driveway widths and radii are.too small as shown.. Minimum acceptable.:
widths shall be 20 feet and radii shall be 35.feet.
The complex as shown will be required to have all buildings fully
5 sprinkler - protected.
0 8)
El 9)
10)
11)
12)
-0 13)
El 14)
[I 15)
D. R, C. REVIEW REgtESTED N. PLAN CHECK DATE 11-24-�
PLAN RESUBMITTAL REQUESTED C COMMENTS PREPARED 5'`!
PLAN APPROVED El
C.P'.S. FORM 2
CITY OF TUKWILA< <--
PERMIT NUMBER Z 83. MITROL NUMBER 83 -3
CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM - PLAN CHECK ROUTING FORM
TO: vri BLDG, 1 PLNG, 111 P.W. III FIRE n POLICE RP.&R.
PROJECT, 3..F , 11.121 Ca2' ,PctitkA4ZOTS
ADDRESS iU t rZ., s. /5'7 51— ,571-11 ANiz S
DATE TRANSMITTED 12- 22? ---c33 RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 1-3-8+
C,P,S, STAFF COORDINATOR P-(J Z: RESPONSE RECEIVED
P 4JIrJ <k.
PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACH D OJECT PLANS AND RESPOND WITH APPROPRIATE
COMMENTS IN THE SPACE BELOW, INDICATE CRUCIAL CONCERNS BY CHECKING THE
BOX NEXT TO THE LINE(S) ON WHICH THAT CONCERN IS NOTED
1) ( i rum. r ,,J lilt/ 'S ? c i4= 2i r//
D• 2) s 6-s,
3) .¢,a), o.. c ' "7-'W.S :4/4 2• (4 y 4 & -
4) Wit, do £1' 4 y vLe --u -i 4OLe.e.-,114ti' l v.: 42.1161'
5) o ,t, 0 E l 4 ■e s t - w 4 12-At ,P / L r goo 9-iy� n 19.E
1 6) 4S/lo9 -1> /;- ,87z..� is
U. 7)
.8) •
[� 9)
10)
11)
12)
11
13)
14)
ri 15)
D.R.C. REVIEW .._____ . __ VS PLAN CHECK DATE / 3= g V
PLAN. RESUBMITTAL REQUESTED El COMMENTS PREPARED BY
PLAN APPROVED VA f ' /6/9-R tv 7 frill— FOB. 6,vswveTrat' C.P.S. FORM 2
/CITY OF TUKWILAi
•ERMIT NUMBER Z 83 CO VOL OL NUMBER 33-3557
CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM - PLAN CHECK ROUTING FORM
TO: BLDG, FIPLMG,
P.W. 0 FIR E . POLICE P.& R.
PROJECT ,S.Fr 0 COO ' M i-
A
ADDRESS k&i CSSR�. s•IS2 OD 46--)0-1.
/4z, S ,
DATE T
RANSMITTED 12- 2.1 --c33 , RESPONSE REQUESTED. BY 1 ° 3-8+
C.P,S. STAFF COORDINATOR Pt(- %, RESPONSE RECEIVED .
PLEASE REVIEW THE �
E ATTACHM ROJECT PLANS AND RESPOND WITH APPROPRIATE
COMMENTS IN THE SPACE BELOW. INDICATE CRUCIAL CONCERNS BY CHECKING THE
BOX 'NEXT TO THE LINE(S) ON WHICH THAT CONCERN IS NOTED:
1) l 4- -...:..J
2)7.1��;
8)
10)
Ell 11)
n 12)
13)_
Q 14),
15)
D.R.C. REVIEW REVESTED IN PLAN CHECK DATE
PLAN RESUBMITTAL REQUESTED CI
FLAIL APPROVED '❑
� IJSriniiL i�
/L).EC 2.0 J983..
t OF
PLANNING DEPT
COMMENTS PREPARED BY
0,a4
C.P.S. FORM 2
CITY OF TUKWILA a API c_ di
PERMIT NUMBER z&--83 ITN TROL NUMBER 33 -3
,ocz-� - X33
CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM - PLAN CHECK ROUTING FORM
TO: BLDG, 1 PLNG, 111 P.W. III FIRE t 1 POLICE !TA P.8': R.
PROJECT,., w.YZ.( C'Z. -pt�
ADD RESSJV CSSR.L ' /57 OD Sr q_c---)T1 ANz S-
DATE TRANSMITTED 12- 2? 23 , RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 1- 3-5+
C.P.S. STAFF COORDINATOR '-K-V-- %, RESPONSE RECEIVED
PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED,, OJECT PLANS AND RESPOND WITH APPROPRIATE:
COMMENTS IN THE SPACE BELOW, INDICATE CRUCIAL CONCERNS BY CHECKING THE
BOX NEXT TO THE LINE(S) ON WHICH THAT CONCERN IS NOTED:
LJu
2)_
El 3>
❑ 4)
❑ 5) _
❑ 6>
E1
III 12)
0 13)
[� 14)
15)
D. R, C, REVIEW l 121 DATE !/j%37?
PLAN RESUBMITTAL REQUESTED El COMMENTS PREPARED BY
PLAN APPROVED Ei c.P,B. FORM 2
®FT'ICE MEMO
CITY ®r TUKWILA
TO 6e5
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT: 3-j' j `J c1.k fC L:J `X
OILS TS Pl2s.��Z,1
1--12 -v * Ot ■S -fitS -m .)
tS PAC QL- 0/ '(t-j1 CA-1- is
CITY OF TUKWILA 4ill
PERMIT NUMBER 2t3,-83 C TROL NUMBER 83-395'
,orz, -c.-as
CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM - PLAN CHECK ROUTING FORM
T0: I1LDGI EEIILNG,,W, 111 FIRE POLICE P,& R.
PROJECT ,g, 1KYZIr (-co. -m Ts-
ADDRESS kAl ClitZ s t /5 7 13j) 5'j 5p6-2(111 HNte. , S ,
DATE TRANSMITTED IZ- 2 ? 23 RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 1-3-8+
C.P.S. STAFF COORDINATOR R(' t5. RESPONSE RECEIVED
PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED PROJECT PLANS AND RESPOND WITH APPROPRIATE
COMMENTS IN THE SPACE BELOW, INDICATE CRUCIAL CONCERNS BY CHECKING THE
BOX NEXT TO THE LINE(S) ON WHICH THAT CONCERN IS NOTED:
•
ll
2)
n 3)
Ej 4)
❑ 5>
11
6)
d 7)
8)
ri 9)
10)
11)
111• 2)
f--1 1• 3)
1 14)
El 1• 5)
D,R,C, REVIEW rD � PLAN CHECK DATE
PLAN RESUBMITTAL REQUESTED El COMMENTS PREPARED BY
PLAN APPROVED El c,P,S, FORM 2
•
JRE
December 21, 1983
TRAFFIC DISSERTATION
J.B. Wright Corp. Project
Traffic Volumes
John R. Ewing & AssociatEs
Civil Engineers - land survE Jots
JN 77505
?DEC 2 3 1983
LA
r- 'LANNW 17::2
Estimates of current average traffic volumes in the project vicinity
were based on traffic counts of traffic flows supplied by the City
of Tukwila.
Macadam road currently carries about 3300 vehicles 'per day (vpd)
while S 152nd carries about 1200 vpd. These volumes are well
within the capacities of two -lane roadways which can typically
handle 5000 to 7000 vpd without experiencing unacceptable levels of
congestion or related traffic problems.
Trip Generations
Based on a trip generation rate of 6 vehicle trips per unit per day,
the additional traffic generated by this project would be about 500
trips per day. This added traffic volume would not appreciably
affect the level of service of the existing roadways in the immediate
area of the project.
622 SaCEntral • KEnt, Washington 98031 • (206) 852 -6633
•
JRE
December 23, 1983
Rick Beeler
Associate Planner
City of Tukwila
6200 Southcenter Blvd.
Tukwila, WA 98188
RE: J.B. Wright.. Project on S 152nd
Dear Mr. Beeler:
Enclosed for your review are the following.:
4 copies of the proposed grading plan
4 copies of the landscape plan
4 copies of revised building elevations
1 copy of the soils report
l.copy of a traffic dissertation.
John R.Ewing & AssociatEs
civil EnginEErs -land survEyors
JN 77505'
The proposed grading plan calls for extensive excavation and
rockeries. In reviewing the site plan, it appears that, by moving
some buildings, we can eliminate a considerable amount of excav-
ation and rockeries.
We will have a revised grading plan by Wednesday, December 28,
and would like to go. over -it with you then if possible. I will be
available at any time on the 28th. Please call me at 852 -6633 to
let me know if you will be able to meet on the 28th.
Very truly yours,
JOHN R. EWING & ASSOCIATES
Shupe Holmberg, P.E. , L.S.
SH : mu
enc
cc: Hank Chumney, J.B. Wright Corp.
622 So. CEntral • KEnt, Washington 98031 • (206) 852 -6633
MAIL DISPATCH, INC.
P.O. BOX 12616 • SEATTLE, WA.98111
(206) 762-2541
No. 807595
ATE
Iz.r
u PIECES
WEIGHT
DESCRIPTION
DELIVERY CHARGES,
HIP E 3
1 6%
_.,P.i7✓ 7� ' f ;<W./ .
TIME
4BUS 1FRT CHARGES
‘2 ^
O 40' ,
AT R
AO
' J
6 �-
OTHER CHARGES
RIVE
TOTAL DUE
ONSIGNEE ,,jj F
/,�/,,,////"/ b
TIME
REMARKS
r
RIVER
�i
IGNATURE
SHIPPER DECLARES THE RELEASED VALUE OF THE
SHIPMENT TO BE 550.00, UNLESS A GREATER VALUE
IS DECLARED ON THIS RECEIPT.
❑ COURIER
❑ MAIL
❑ SPECIAL
❑ IRREGULARITY
❑ OTHER
SHIPPER
0
J
4IILA
•
sti City of Tukwila
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
o Tukwila Washington 98188
1908
Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor
December 13, 1983
Henry Chumney
J.B. Wright Corp.
1111 Third Ave.
7th Floor
Seattle, WA 98101
RE: So. 152nd St. Property - DR -6 -83
Dear Mr. Chumney:
Pursuant to our telephone conversation of December 12, 1983, herein is
summarized the additional environmental information needed to.complete
the environmental review required by the State Environmental Policy Act.
The environmental checklist submitted with your application to the Board
of Architectural Review either does not sufficiently explain the
following items or supplemental information is needed:
1. Geotechnical soil study and recommendations performed by a certified
siols engineer to include:
A. Underlying soils
B. Hydrology
C. Geology
D. Slope Stability
E. Load Bearing Capability
F. Possible Slippage
This engineer shall provide on -site supervision of the study and have
authority to expand its scope according to conditions found in the
field relative to the proposed site plan (Item 1, page 2).
2. Analysis of proposed recreation facilities relative to Section.
18.52.060, Tukwila'Municipal Code. (Item 19, page 8).
3. Evaluation of latest topographical and substantial vegitation survey
of Horton Dennis & Associates, August, 1980, for any revisions.
(Item.4, page 4).
4. Pursuant to the aformentioned soil analysis, evaluation of any change
or alteration of ground water flow or direction and any change in
quantity of groundwater by'excavation (Item 3, page 3).
5. Grading and excavation plan.
6. Description of the proposed landscaping relative to existing vegita-
tion (Item 4, page 4).
• •
7.• Description of the alteration of the existing use of the site by the .
proposed land use, and how the proposal fits the Comprehensive Plan
and existing zoning (Item 8, page 5).
8. Description of the amount of additional traffic that will be generated .
by the proposal, and how this volume compares with capacity of existing
City streets (Item 13, page 6).
9. Description of the visual change of the existing site by the proposal
relative to any views or vistas open to the public and /or adjacent
properties (the City owns a trail easment along the easterly bound-
ary of the site). In addition describe the overall aesthetics of the
proposal relative to the existing site (Item 19, page 8).
Upon submittal of all this information we will make every effort to
quickly complete our review and render the theshold determination.
I also discovered we need an addition $10.00 fee for the environmental
review.
If you have any questions, please call me at 433 -1845.
Respe
Rick Beeler
Associate Planner
RB:mlk
.18.52.050 -- 18.52.060
18.52.050 Landscape plan requirements. Detailed plans
for landscaping and screening shall be submitted with plans
for building and site improvements. Included in the plans
shall be type and location of plants and materials and the
location of sprinkling systems. Installation of the land-,
scaping and screening shall be completed prior to issuance
of the certificate of occupancy or within a reasonable period
of time determined by the planning director and stated on the
building permit. (Ord. 1247 §1(part), 1982).
18.52.060 Recreation space requirements. In all R -2,
R -3, F. -4 and RMH zoning districts, except those areas within
a planned residential development district, any proposed
multiple - family structure, complex, or development shall pro-
vide on the premises and for the use of the occupants a•minimum
.amount of recreation space according to the following provi-
sions _
(1) Required Area.
(A) For each proposed dwelling. unit in the multiple -
family complex or development. a minimum of two hundred square
feet.of..recreation..space shall be provided. -Any multiple -
.family structure,. complex, or development shall provide a
minimum ofone-thousand square feet of total recreation space;
(B) Hrhe.front, side, and rear yard setback areas
required by the applicable zoning district shall not qualify
as recreation space except that ten percent of the-required
landscape.areas, as shown in Section 18.52.020 of this title-:
may be permitted in the calculation of the total recreation
space;
(C) In the event the total area required under sub-
section (A) above is less than'three thousand square feet, that
portion required to be outdoors and uncovered shall be one
continuous parcel of land. -
:(2) Indoor or Covered - Space.
(A) No more than fifty percent of the-required
recreation space may be indoor or covered space;
(B) No more than fifty percent of the total required
recreation space may be used for single- purpose permanent
facilities such as swimming pools, tennis courts, and
similar facilities. -
(3) Uncovered Space.
(A) A minimum of fifty percent of the total required
recreation space shall be open or uncovered, up to one hundred
percent of the total requirement may be in open or uncovered
recreation space; .
(B) No more than fifty percent of the uncovered
recreation space requirement may be located on slopes greater
than four horizontal to one vertical (4:1) slope.
(4) General Requirements.
(A) Multiple- family complexes which provide dwelling
297 (Tukwila 8/82)
•
018.56.010--18.56.030
units with two or more bedrooms shall provide adequate recre-
ation space for children. Such space shall•be at least twenty -
five percent but not more than fifty percent of the total recre-
ation space required under subsection (1) above and shall be
designated, located, and maintained •in a safe condition;
(B) Adequate fencing, plant screening, or other
buffer shall separate the recreation space from parking areas,
driveways or public streets. (Ord. 1247 §1(part), 1982).
Chapter 18.56
OFF- STREET PARKING AND LOADING REGULATIONS
Sections:
18.56.010
18.56.020
18.56.030
18.56.040
18'.56.050
18.56.060
18.56.070
18:56.080
18.56.090
18.56.100
18.56.110
18.56.120
Purpose.
Chapter application.
Reduction of existing parking spaces.
General requirements.'
Required number of parking spaces.
Loading space requirements.
Cooperative parking facility.
Parking for the handicapped.
Compact car allowance.
Uses not specified.
Landscaping and screening.
Filing of plans.
18.56.010 Purpose. It is the purpose of this chapter .
to provide for adequate, convenient, and safe off- street
parking and loading areas for the different land uses de-
scribed in this'title. (Ord. 1247 §1.(part), 1982)..
18.56.020 Chapter application. Off- street parking and
loading spaces shall be provided as an accessory use in all
zones in accordance with-the requirements of this chapter at
the time any building or structure is erected, enlarged or at
the time there is a change in its. principal use. (Ord. 1247
§1(part), 1982)..
18.56.030 Reduction of existing parking spaces. Any
off - street parking area already in use or established here -
after, shall nct be reduced below the limits required by
this chapter by the construction of any addition to a build-
ing or structure nor by the erection of an additional build-
ing or structure .on the property. (Ord. 1247. §1(part), 1982).
298 (Tukwila 8/82)
A rmPsL Dos cp5okusr 1sSU avi fOl2 l S PP.pc sA'L
SVPA
L &Yt kSCs Fo12. \l.tR0M iVtZJ"Da L 1 SSUE_s 1 Z) a
...061a3 ol) f Ul,l._ LOV3121\A 1.d/U 13 YLE /- OC._1S(r,/U 1S W1� ,'•
(9012-WPINItt c...t... . - ii-k OlOCk C6LS►M) • sri-.
P 2
%-\t( i3S g(. l 6kNS h' (E- -i DeLE(D E L ll(ZONNt _
Iss s SI' d" -PSS 0/00R2.
COOSIn f2 Ps1l.cPP
5\(t rZc k t 1 P L c+ z U T 10 PitoIQrZ SS (Nikk p 10L-gt
(NSt 4 kI l CN C rrse-Q_c_c L CONS (Q YZ 1c51vs
F012 U J t lO�c_ ¥ L-PAW (.i
(9 NOlk)(-4 CMM I SScoO ..(Ats3P D( bf T E. S C41(L S E
puisN fioi2. VECiftc D �t U S P t 'SS Iti SeEUW L LC1 (SDI S,
,OL )T MSS 6F Ins ja :.>1 s\-2s1-z0 ems- Sis, I
ni-1 0 NOS
�-. C PLEf scsl t_._ ,tiskAttS oC TK. ict(Lc\rQa--N $Y ,
LS"YLITTA, Slt lL- e Sc.1.1 P'<19 SU131(14 t tr Off'
P•U6-u`(StS NO0 (zEz.6M mqv10.p ,LMS f5 N/ Vt12M ,
2, swp€_ situ oisLs I3'/ saLs ,
QUtUFlO CsEtr Ct1St
N =3- . 5, L .
THRESHOLD DETERMINADON: Wynn Rezone, S. ISzna yt.41Pric- I4/-bUT
PROPOSED PROJECT: 76 Units on 5.0 - acres in Condominium
Ownership - Request for Rezoning from R -1 to R -4
This threshold determination is limited in scope to the "legislative act"
of rezoning, and the resulting impacts from that decision. A separate
threshold determination, using the existing Environmental Data Base
contained in File EPIC - 147 -80, and such additional information as
required by the Responsible Official, will be made on the technical
particulars of any project proposed pursuant to the rezone action.
The subsequent, project- specific threshold determination may result in the
need to prepare an "Expanded Checklist" addressing specific impact areas,
or a full Environmental Impact Statement. This reasoning is based on
the Court's opinion in Ullock v. Bremerton, 17 Wn. App. 573, 565 p.2d
1179 (1977) which held that "non- project rezoning has been held not to
require an EIS as long as the (City) Council retains the authority to
require such an evaluation at the project permit stage."
IMPACT EVALUATION: Rezoning Action
The legislative action of rezoning the Wynn site will have its most
immediate effect on Section II -8 of the checklist: Land Use. The
applicants have responded correctly that the rezone proposal to multi-
family residential will have no significant associated impact. This
finding is supported by reference to the" Comprehensive Plan which calls
for intensified residential uses on the Wynn site. It is also noteworthy
that the proposed density of 15 D.U. /Ac. is significantly less than that
already existing on nearby multi-family parcels. For these reasons, it
is fair to conclude that the Wynn rezone will not alterEpresent or planned
land use patterns in the immediate vicinity, and will not require a major
policy commitment unanticipated by the Comprehensive Plan.
RECOMMENDATION
The proposed Wynn rezone should be granted a Declaration of Non- Significance,
with the stipulation that the City reserves'the option to require preparation
of an expanded Environmental Checklist (WAC- 197 -10 -360) or a complete
Environmental Impact Statement for any specifc project proposed subsequent
to the subject rezone.
CITY OF TUKWILA
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
r;
CITY €)F TUKWILA
This questionnaire must be completed and submitted with the application for �~
permit. This questionnaire must be completed by all persons applying for a
permit from the City of Tukwila, unless it is determined by the Responsible
Official that the permit is exempt or unless the applicant and Responsible
Official previously agree an Environmental Impact Statement needs to be completed.
A fee of $50.00 must accompany the filling of the Environmental Questionnaire
to cover costs of the threshold determination.
I. BACKGROUND
1. Name of Proponent: J.B. Wright Corp.
2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: 682 -3577
1111 3rd Ave. Bldg., #700, Seattle, WA 98101
3. Date Checklist Submitted: December 1, 1983
4. Agency Requiring Checklist: City of Tukwila Planning & Engineering Depts.
'5. Name of Proposal, if applicable:
6. Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal (including but not limited
to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give
an accurate understanding of its scope and nature):
Construction of approximately 84 living units of about 700 sq. ft. each
with covered parking_ & large natural or landscaped areas to be retained.
7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as
well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental im-
pacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate under-
standing of the environmental setting of the proposal):
Located at NW corner of S 152nd & 57th Ave. S, the 4.62 -acre site is
sloping to the SW & is covered with various hardwood trees & a few
conifers & low vegetation. The surrounding area is fully developed with
apartments or condominiums.
8. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal: April, 1984
9. List of all Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals Required for the
Proposal (federal, state and local):
(a) Rezone, conditional use, shoreline permit, etc. YES NO X
(b) King County Hydraulics Permit YES NO X
(c) Building permit YES X NO
• •
(d) Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Permit YES NO x
(e) Sewer hook up permit YES x NO
(f) Sign permit YES X NO
(g) Water hook up permit YES x NO
(h) Storm water system permit YES x NO
(i) Curb cut permit YES X NO
(j) Electrical permit (State of Washington) YES x NO
(k) Plumbing permit (King County) YES X NO
(1) Other: As required by City of Tukwila.
10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or futher activity
related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain:
No, only as shown on site plan,
11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by
your proposal? If yes, explain:
No.
12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro-
posal; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future
date, describe the nature of such application form:
Rezoned on February 10, 1981, City of Tukwila Ord. #1200, Planning
Dept. Master File #80 -38 -R.
II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
(Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required
1. Earth. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic
substructures?
(b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcover-
ing of the soil?
(c) Change in topography or ground surface relief fea-
tures?
(d) The destruction, covering or modification of any
unique geologic or physical features?
YES MAYBE NO
X
X
YES MAYBE NO
(e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils,
either on or off the site? X
(f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or
changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which
may modify the channel of a river or stream or the
bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake?
Explanation:
X
Soil movement & compaction will be required to develop the site. Soil con-
ditions will be addressed in future soils report & development plans, with
retention & design to City of Tukwila specifications.
2. Air. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air
quality? )C
(b) The creation of objectionable odors? X
(c) Alteration of air movement, moisture
or temperature, or any change in climate, either
locally or regionally? X
Explanation:
Air quality deterioration may occur with addition of new buildings (fireplaces,
etc.). Buildings themselves may have an effect on air movement over
present site conditions.
3. Water. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Changes in currents, or the course or direction
of water movements, in either marine or fresh
waters?
(b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns,
or the rate and amount of surface water runoff?
(c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters?
(d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water
body?
(e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration
of surface water quality, including but not limited
to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity?
(f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of
ground waters?
(g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either
through direct additions or withdrawals, or through
interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations?
X
X.
X
(h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either
through direct injection, or through the seepage
of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne
virus or bacteria, or other substances into the
ground waters?
YES MAYBE NO
(i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise avail-
able for public water supplies? X
Explanation:
Site development will change absorption rates but storm drainage & retention
will be addressed in a approved site grading & storm retention plan, de-
signed to City of Tukwila specifications.
4. Flora. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers
of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs,
grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)?
(b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or
endangered species of flora? X
(c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area,
or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of
existing species? X
(d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? X
Explanation:
Development of the site will reduce present flora but it will be replaced
with items on Landscape Plan designed to City of Tukwila specifications.
5. Fauna. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers
of any species of fauna (birds, land animals
including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic
organisms, insects or microfauna)?
(b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or
endangered species of fauna?
(c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an
area, or result in a barrier to the migration
or movement of fauna?
(d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife
habitat?
X
X
X
Explanation:
Fauna that is presently onsite will be forced to move during site development
or relocate to those areas left in their natural state onsite.
_A_
• •
YES MAYBE NO
6. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise.
levels? X
Explanation:
A temporary noise level increase will occur during site development.
Levels associated with residential neighborhoods will be present after
construction.
7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new
light or glare?
X
Explanation:
Light levels found in residential developments will be present upon
completion and occupancy of the site. Yard or parking lighting may also
be present.
8. Land. Use. Will the proposal result in the altera-
tion of the present or planned land use
of an area?
Explanation:
Property is currently zoned R -3 and R -4.
X
9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural
resources? X
(b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural
resource? X
Explanation:
10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an
explosion or the release of hazardous
substances (including, but not limited
to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radi-
ation) in the event of an accident or
upset conditions?
Explanation:
X
• •
YES MAYBE NO
11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location,
distribution, density, or growth rate
of the human population of an area?
Explanation:
With the addition of 84 living units, an increase in population, under
current zoning, will occur.
12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing,
or create a demand for additional housing?
Explanation:
84 new units will be provided to the area.
13. Transportation /Circulation. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Generation of additional vehicular movement?
(b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or
demand for new parking?
(c) Impact upon existing transportation systems?
(d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation
or movement of people and /or goods?
(e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic?
(f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles,
bicyclists or pedestrians?
Explanation:
X
X
X
X
X
Additional vehicular movement will occur with the new units. Parking
for onsite development will be provided.
14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon,
or result in a need for new or altered
governmental services in any of the
following areas:
(a) Fire protection?
(b) Police protection?
(c) Schools?
(d) Parks or other recreational facilities?
(e) Maintenance of public facilities, including
roads?
X
X
x
X
x
YES MAYBE NO
(f) Other governmental services? x.
Explanation:
Government services will be required for site development. Individual
agencies will be contacted for input on the job.
15. Energy. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy?
(b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or
require the development of new sources of
energy? X
Explanation:
Energy in the form of gas or electricity will be needed for the project.
16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for
new systems, or alterations to the
following utilities:
(a) Power or natural gas? x
(b) Communications systems? X
(c) Water? x
(d) Sewer or septic tanks? X
(e) Storm water drainage? x
(f) Solid waste and disposal? x
Explanation:
The above utilities will be needed for occupancy. Onsite and - -if required- -
offsite extension of said utilities will be done by the owner, at no expense
to the City of Tukwila.
17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the crea-
tion of any health hazard or potential
health hazard (excluding mental health)?
Explanation:
X
YES MAYBE NO
'18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in.the obstruc-
tion of any scenic vista or view open to
the public, or will the proposal result
in the creation of an aesthetically of-
fensive site open to public view?
Explanation:
Site will be landscaped to provide a pleasing visual environment in the area.
19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact
upon the quality or quantity of exist-
ing recreational opportunities?
Explanation:
20. Archeological /Histroical. Will the proposal result in
an• alteration of a signifi-
cant archeological or his -
torical site, structure,
object or building?
Explanation:
CERTIFICATION BY APPLICANT:
I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above
information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency
may withdraw any declaration of non - significance that it might issue in
reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation
or willful lack full disclosure on my part.
December 1 1983
Signature and Title Date
Gordon T. Pathmann, PLS
JOHN R. EWING & ASSOCIATES
622 South Central Avenue
KENT. WASHINGTON 98031
-8-
x
l,llY U. IUKNILJ
-'' GERM T NUMBER � 138? . C'T ROL NUtEER. 8E- 35
CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM - PLAN CHECK ROUTING FORMR'� ��'
TO: BLDG; PLNG, 1/- P,W, FIRE 11 POLICE P,8 P,
PROJECT L St R: L S • C S 4:‘2-
t
ADDRESS k l (0yZ ( 5 )1 Sri, o/k 1 f2 /op
DATE. TRANSMITTED . RESPONSE REQUESTED BY [Z-7 -8
C, P, S, STAFF COORDINATOR pct_ I • •RESPONSE RECEIVED
PLEASE REVIEW. THE ATTACHED PROJECT PLANS AND RESPOND WITH APPROPRIATE
COMMENTS IN THE SPACE BELOW, INDICATE CRUCIAL CONCERNS BY CHECKING-THE'
BOX NEXT TO THE LINE(S) ON WHICH. THAT CONCERN IS NOTED:
II
1) INATEll Av4 it 31(rr-j c t n ?/off( /1,(PlitV
2) O. wi11t& sr,1VjTl
3)
T . 4)
5)
6)
7. 7)
8)
9)
10)
11)
12)
13)
14)
1
1
15)
,
R. C, • .REVIEW REQUESTED
PLAN RESUBMITTAL REQUESTED
PLAN CHECK DATE
COMMENTS PREPARED BY j W, /43
ni AM ncnnnurr, F-1 C,P,S, FORM 2
CITY OF TUKWILA C-
•ERMIT NUMBER 2-41-8? C• ROL NUMBER -3 (437
CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM - PLAN CHECK ROUTING FORM
TO: BLDG, PLNG, P,W, i (FIRE POLICE P,& R,
PROJECT P .sc'R teoik�� Pf �Z'Z 0A)ITS 4(L`2—
ADDRESS �� � �� ?moo s
l
DATE. TRANSMITTED �R_ -� 3 . RESPONSE REQUESTED BY t/17-a 3
C, P, S, STAFF COORDINATOR ie l( 1;5, -RESPONSE RECEIVED
PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED PROJECT PLANS AND RESPOND WITH APPROPRIATE
COMMENTS IN THE SPACE BELOW, INDICATE CRUCIAL CONCERNS BY CHECKING.THE
BOX NEXT TO THE LINE(S) ON WHICH. THAT CONCERN IS NOTED:
1)12- P 161 6ILS S eK (T 7)1( (.kf
2)
3) r t_,VNL ( YL C rPsfg 1X692-3.0k, Q4-7 -80
4) COMAS D€ \rn 3(.1 LS (Z. Y C -t, LLUF
5)4b0t cPcr \(SS A emO
6) ■Ac OC- S O\iese. 2. s (ls- C 3 ' CWO
7)
1
1
1
1tledr I4b . 1.
a e ►.
1
8) t'sKci_pI_ C3, 1 K_ Gonda •`S4" CslA S1 O yY T S Scaio•
• 9)� 1k 66sectpm04 r,t -i(i ic)ds
10) IDYL 5C1 (.L .
11)1 -P OF \(t12sikS M 0 II CZJM CPU
12)
13)
14)
I 1 15)
,tit . tt.
D,R,C, REVIEW REQUESTED
PLAN CHECK DATE %2.--9' -83
PLAN RESUBMITTAL REQUESTED COMMENTS PREPARED BY
Di AM M !' DDf \Pri
C.P.S. FORM 2
LILL Ui I UN 1 LR• .
- - �ERMIT NUMBER 2-13- ? • Ca'ROL MAZER 83-
CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM - • PLAN CHECK ROUTING FORM R.KI Cae-'
. r""
TO: BLDG, PLNG, P,W, FIRE I POLICE P,& R.
PROJECT t fit fib. • C S 4 ( S
ADDRESS &3'4 (p► �2 5")'m , Se . �v►)ik 15-2. At) s-r. .
DATE. TRANSMITTED Z- —ate RESPONSE REQUESTED BY (2- 7 7
C, P, S. STAFF COORDINATOR F.(( • •RESPONSE RECEIVED
PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED PROJECT PLANS AND RESPOND WITH. APPROPRIATE
COMMENTS IN THE.SPACE BELOW, INDICATE CRUCIAL CONCERNS BY CHECKING-THE.
BOX •NEXT TO ;JHE LINES) ON WHICH..THAT CONCERN IS NOTED:
.5;491e— P6;11 1— /9 cc e- 5 5
iZcceir��y /�, —
�) cr ;vc.+ -it, x103 It - -I'vE4;4 r94; a /gyp
) , si- ,1 r; e4i �' , - 'T yr ��;,�a Jr'Oo i
5'3 . f9 . � /7i h i ►t b .
Cots; al ergd / c- 7�/1s v . '�- • py S�
f" j e- .S ✓14 M fi71 e d
"Qt.; ai c o j fi o; i. 7 W
I3>
14) [rj 1R3
s
15) (- • 1�,.1r ...:� .. /LA
D,R,C, REVIEW REQUESTED
PLAN RESUBMITTAL REQUESTED
ni nl•I ACnonuc i ( I
PLAN CHECK DATE Z -
COMMENTS PREPARED BY
FCRM 2
PERMIT NUMBER � -1S'g? CONTROL NL ER a3- 3 ?5
CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM -PLAN CHECK ROUTING FOR!
TO:
PROJECT
ADDRESS 0\44 (* MY? 5 )Th
DATE. TRANSMITTED_ (2 --6
C . P , S , STAFF COORDINATOR r4( C
BLDG;
Li
PLNG
/ti°a�
P.W.
it & k
FIRE
41■.
POLICE J P.& R.
C S (30 “2 etcrES
s.
kNa, Ste ; L)A i 5Z MD s-r,
. RESPONSE REQUESTED BY (R- 7 -8
feeet. -RESPONSE RECEIVEDl� h Pi_
PLEASE REVIEW. THE ATTACHED PROJECT PLANS AND RESPOND WITH APPROPRIATE
COMMENTS IN THE SPACE BELOW, INDICATE CRUCIAL CONCERNS BY CHECKING. THE
BOX NEXT TO_,THE LINE(S) ON WHICH. THAT CONCERN IS NOTED:
i
r-
i
1
i
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
7)
9) •
10) I f-ti.5 Pge "/ �S r X 4 F[�t1
� .
11) R 6) r. 1 t -{ t uoctib C2tA &, %n -Part Dcr1YL-
12)
j i , ,-- e rbk "i1-177-,0 �� ie � J
13)
. 2e C�c - JJ e 7—Le
14) IISL,br) LAisiot9 S/790 A s
15)
D. R, C,REVIEW REQUESTED
PLAN RESUBMITTAL REQUESTED
CI E J CIPPPfl \/ 1) 1
PLAN CHECK DATE
COMMENTS PREPARED BY
�CRNI 2
LfIY Ui . ‘"��-
GERMIT NUMBER 213--8 . C•T, ROL NUt''E-R o3- 5
t3. \N-kyr CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM -.PLAN CHECK ROUTING FORM �t� ���'
TO:
PROJECT
ADDRESS t (Ov�2 5")
BLDG,
P
Ella A
LNG,
P,W,
L
Al At it,
FIRE 1 POLICED, P,
C SCWS 2
sa
DATE. TRANSMITTED ate • RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 7 _83
C, P, S. STAFF COORDINATOR F.(C IC • if?, -RESPONSE RECEIVED
PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED PROJECT PLANS AND RESPOND WITH APPROPRIATE
COMMENTS IN THE SPACE BELOW, INDICATE CRUCIAL CONCERNS BY CHECKING- THE
BOX NEXT TO THE LINE(S) ON WHICH. THAT CONCERN IS NOTED:
1 1
„v_
PI 2)�fr
3)
4)
5)
6)
1
-e--- 1,4o v.�. r /
. 7)
c-
o /
D�-•O r
13) 1 -// 4
o?
i / , el !�~� i`fr'LCC�Y� (1L /ice LlQ i`1
1 15)
.i -e t= GvG.•-? /
D, R, C, •REVIEW REQUESTED
PLAN RESUBMITTAL REQUESTED
1..1 ACDDn\ICii 1
et-
PLAN CHECK DATE
COMMENTS PREPA°FT 3Y =� �
C,P,S. FOPM 2
L1IY Ui 1Ui 1UA . eiERM I T NUMBER - I3 -.8.? • C TROL NUt BER CENTRE PERiMIT SYSTEM - PLAN CHECK ROUTING FORM
PROJECT
ADDRESS . '3't (O►Z2 5) 1 P4a, SeN, DD/ 15Z AO s '.
DATE. TRANSMITTED .RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 1-2_77-7-7
STAFF COORDINATOR WC,- 15, . .RESPONSE RECEIVED
PLNG,
P,W,
FIRE
POLICE'
P.& R,
PLEASE REVIEW. THE ATTACHED PROJECT PLANS AND RESPOND WITH APPROPRIATE -
COMMENTS IN THE.SPACE BELOW, INDICATE CRUCIAL CONCERNS BY CHECKING.THE
BOX NEXT TO.,THE LINECS) ON WHICH.THAT CONCERN IS NOTED:
1) .� _ �z �,�-c� %�w� . /O'J ,,
2)
X
1
1 1
3) . L
4) '10--
5) •
5)
[ 15)
D , R , C , REV I EW REQUESTED
PI AN RESUBMITTAL REQUESTED
•
DI AM ACGRn1 /FI1
PLAN CHECK DATE /1-- f - L3 •
COMMENTS PREPARED BY c
C.P.S. FORM 2
•
__.13 315
• .-
'Ow ifi 6TANA '0X
t yr, Lt. _L•o'
IC L..L \7 I-. ■•• ,`"
• 3-0•0_ka ,,,•2 \Or. cocomcro...,
• at:r.14,.7 t-4I"C/7 t',-=c0 -7/1 7 .-cr=tra
....a0) • c=i•o-ti c -O-O? a 1,100:4 • -
107 awo'n 1 747rra..i. .7 r:C..1;1.„71 Cla 0C ea./
• rg',or-..c acl al -Iv, '1.4:a 1V1-$ -a-"7-k4
J
9 cutlyso...1
' r .' 1 .: '4 '''' !'... 1, •,.. '.,D .i. / : ,
I I 1
,
1 • ( -- . —..___ .________ J
On ZS/ . or }-3 kid, i IA \ IP 11 ti(U
- . ,. I.
--...„.,.,
I '* • 4,,5-..%'-t.,
".. ..
• - : z--- • :-.4._ •-' • c:-...LE.,! (...;..!•.\'-`.. _. _ ' ,(.-0,
;.j.• ,. • ) , . 71
•* \
....., . o 9
,
.
.. ...,. .
. ;.; (1 ' °( ' .;:l•
i ( _,>,---------- \ I )
/......)
i * • - ) r,..c.y!THF..-' \‘
' • '. --) - -(-, •-' C;', 1
!,..--i-- re'j,--- ,--
,. ... ,
.--..,-
Iftc__N/Liv-
,..r....-2 s_r\---
,rii
....v
sr.> •-•
.- • —••••,
C IC
I G7. .•••• I
01
`at' • `G. CI:,
1
c
)47,
r.t.ra.mb-p
C•cr,77•Xi
( •-• Trt— L:"----'2/. ----'!--c
/1"r\--,-1 vi-
\
.5 -^. v_i 0 ..
-., f .,, -) k• -4
[LT
I
/
\ \ I
\ 1 ‘
.... "- -I \ '1 ! I
7— . - - T._ 1 , -.- ..
., ( '
/ .\•., (.-- .--- •
TT'
ot>2.
- -
-•
\r°
f • ri
\ •
••• \ •
• %
7
- - — • .. -s
... --°.4--------
..... ---..,..._
■ ... • • • • • • • . . . . •
. _ ----- ----..........,.. . 0 ...
:1, \L■cl
,-
Tia;1
•
,.'?::.,,.!, .:„, ... ..„
..._.
......„.... tv k.,,,.--n, /., •. -........_,
....:
6):
„........s......
7 ,..-.„ ---q—' .
....._ N - ..?\ (":0•
... „.
-... ---.................
Oh', ,,--.....
--''N./\ rS \
\ SP: v. C. i • • . . I. t.' 1."*
\ \ \ . \ \ :-..t.....:, i • k. .
cm \ ' \ \ \
s----..,..... \
...'"' \,.....„
pt.? .
-.... \
....'.....N \'•••
•••.... riiiiiillrir!_i,rliCrn.d. . "
) ncor. tC72 ( al \ Sj 1,^- • 'Cif '‘; 7‘' *
..
l•
\ \
_ .
'.. ° c• 1.',....
/ r-,....-41 C • ICift-4
a. %,'',IC ,s . ,. \ vv.. • st,
\ \
• i / ? (
•
;--
-.I
iit / \\
.. • \
l/
\ . ..
". '''....
. 1..s. . s
. .„...,
• ( ..\ \ •.' '
-t•:\)
\ .
/..c/
\
\
•
r .1
•
6'1
,ef • ;1,
t •■
•
CITY OF TUKWILA . OPIC_
•ERMIT NUMBER 213-83. C( ROL NUMBER o3- 3K'
CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM - PLAN CHECK ROUTING FORM RI CCP'
PROJECT
L.
PLNG,
L
i C l!_ k •.
POLICE
•
ADDRESS kS (vZ 5)'m 12-, ,O»52
DATE. TRANSMITTED__12 —=5---cs ? . RESPONSE REQUESTED BY [ — `) --87
C, P. S. STAFF COORDINATOR .(C • 15, •RESPONSE RECEIVED
PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED PROJECT PLANS AND RESPOND WITH APPROPRIATE
COMMENTS IN THE.SPACE BELOW, INDICATE CRUCIAL CONCERNS BY CHECKING.THE
BOX NEXT TO.,THE LINE(S) ON WHICH.THAT CONCERN IS NOTED:
1--1 1)
n 2)
E , 3)
n
4)
n 5)
1
6)
H 7)
n 8)
1
i
9)
10)
T1 11)
r- 12)
n 13)
14)
15)
D, R, C,REVIEW REQUESTED
PLAN RESUBf•1ITTAL REQUESTED
Di AM LAPPPf \/fri 1 I
PLAN CHECK DATE
F-- COMMENTS PREPARED BY
C,P,S, FORM 2
CITY OF TUKWILA
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
DEC 021983
CITY OF TUKWILA
PLANNING DEPT.
This questionnaire must be completed and submitted with the application for
permit. This questionnaire must be completed by all persons applying for a
permit from the City of Tukwila, unless it is determined by the Responsible
Official that the permit is exempt or unless the applicant and Responsible
Official previously agree an Environmental Impact Statement needs to be completed.
A fee of $50.00 must accompany the filling of the Environmental Questionnaire
to cover costs of the threshold determination.
I. BACKGROUND
1. Name of Proponent: J.B. Wright Corp.
1=19C-213- S3
2. Address. and Phone Number of Proponent: 682 -3577
1111 3rd Ave. Bldg., #700, Seattle, WA 98101
3. Date Checklist Submitted:
December 1, 1983
4. Agency Requiring Checklist: City of Tukwila Planning & Engineering Depts.
5. Name of Proposal, if applicable:
6. Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal (including but not limited
to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give
an accurate understanding of its scope and nature):
Construction of approximately 84 living units of about 700 sq. ft. each
with covered parking & large natural or landscaped areas to be retained.
7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as
well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental im-
pacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate under-
standing of the environmental setting of the proposal):
Located at NW corner of S 152nd & 57th Ave. S, the 4.62 -acre site is
sloping to the SW & is covered with various hardwood trees & a few
conifers & low vegetation. The surrounding area is fully developed with
a artments or condominiums.
8. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal: April, 1984
9. List of all Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals Required for the
Proposal (federal, state and local):
(a) Rezone, conditional use, shoreline permit, etc.
(b) King County Hydraulics Permit
(c) Building permit
YES NO X
YES NO X
YES X NO
• •
(d) Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Permit YES NO x
(e) Sewer hook up permit YES x NO
(f) Sign permit YES X NO
(g) Water hook up permit YES x NO
(h) Storm water system permit YES x NO
(i) Curb cut permit YES x NO
(j) Electrical permit (State of Washington) YES x NO
(k) Plumbing permit (King County) YES x NO
(1) Other: As required by City of Tukwila.
10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or futher activity
related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain:
No, only as shown on site plan.
11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by
your proposal? If yes, explain:
No.
12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro-
posal; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future
date, describe the nature of such application form:
Rezoned on February 10, 1981, City of Tukwila Ord. #1200,' Planning
Dept. Master File #80 -38 -R.
II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
(Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required)
1. Earth. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic
substructures?
YES MAYBE NO
(b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcover-
ing of the soil? x
(c) Change in topography or ground surface relief fea-
tures? x
(d) The destruction, covering or modification of any
unique geologic or physical features?
-2-
x
X
•
YES MAYBE NO
(e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils,
either on or off the site? X
(f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or
changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which
may modify the channel of a river or stream or the
bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake?
Explanation:
x
Soil movement & compaction will be required to develop the site. Soil con-
ditions will be addressed in future soils report & development plans, with
retention & design to City of Tukwila specifications.
2. Air. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air
quality? x
(b) The creation of objectionable odors? x
(c) Alteration of air movement, moisture
or temperature, or any change in climate, either
locally or regionally? x
Explanation:
Air quality deterioration may occur with addition of new buildings (fireplaces,
etc.). Buildings themselves may have an effect on air movement over
present site conditions.
3. Water. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Changes in currents, or the course or direction
of water movements, in either marine or fresh
waters? x
(b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns,
or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? X
(c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? X
(d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water
body? X
(e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration
of surface water quality, including but not limited
to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X
(f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of
ground waters?
(g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either
through direct additions or withdrawals, or through
interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations?
-3-
X.
x
YES MAYBE NO
(h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either
through direct injection, or through the seepage
of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne
virus or bacteria, or other substances into the
ground waters?
(i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise avail-
able for public water supplies?
x
Explanation:
Site development will change absorption rates but storm drainage & retention
will be addressed in a approved site grading & storm retention plan, de-
signed to City of Tukwila specifications.:.
4. Flora. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers
of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs,
grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)?
(b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or
endangered species of flora?
(c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area,
or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of
existing species?
x
x
x
(d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? x
Explanation:
Development of the site will reduce present flora but it will be replaced
with items on Landscape Plan designed to City of Tukwila specifications.
5. Fauna. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers
of any species of fauna (birds, land animals
including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic
organisms, insects or microfauna)?
(b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or
endangered species of fauna?
(c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an
area, or result in a barrier to the migration
or movement of fauna?
x
X
(d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife
habitat?
Explanation:
Fauna that is presently onsite will be forced to move during site development
or relocate to those areas left in their natural state onsite.
-4-
YES MAYBE NO
6. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise
levels? x
Explanation:
A temporary noise level increase will occur during site development.
Levels associated with residential neighborhoods will be present after
construction.
7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new
light or glare? x
Explanation:
Light levels found in residential developments will be present upon
completion and occupancy of the site. Yard or parking lighting may also
be present.
8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in the altera-
tion of the present or planned land use
of an area?
Explanation:
Property is currently zoned R -3 and R -4.
x
9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural
resources? x
(b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural
resource? x
Explanation:
10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an
explosion or the release of hazardous
substances (including, but not limited
to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radi-
ation) in the event of an accident or
upset conditions?
Explanation:
x
YES MAYBE NO
11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location,
distribution, density, or growth rate
of the human population of an area?
Explanation:
With the addition of 84 living units, an increase in population, under
current zoning, will occur.
12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing,
or create a demand for additional housing?
Explanation:
84 new units will be provided to the area.
x
13. Transportation /Circulation. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? X
(b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or
demand for new parking? x
(c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? x
(d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation
or movement of people and /or goods? x
(e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? x
(f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles,
bicyclists or pedestrians? x
Explanation:
Additional vehicular movement will occur with the new units. Parking
for onsite development will be provided.
14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon,
or result in a need for new or altered
governmental services in any of the
following areas:
(a) Fire protection? x
(b) Police protection?
(c) Schools?
(d) Parks or other recreational facilities?
(e) Maintenance of public facilities, including
roads?
X
x.
X
x
YES MAYBE NO
(f) Other governmental services? X
Explanation:
Government services will be required for site development. Individual
agencies will be contacted for input on the job,.
15. Energy. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy?
(b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or
require the development of new sources of
energy? X
Explanation:
Energy in the form of gas or electricity will be needed for the project.
16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for
new systems, or alterations to the
following utilities:
(a) Power or natural gas? x
(b) Communications systems? X
(c) Water? x
(d) Sewer or septic tanks? X
(e) Storm water drainage? X
(f) Solid waste and disposal? X
Explanation:
The above utilities will be needed for occupancy. Onsite and - -if required- -
offsite extension of said utilities will be done by the owner, at no expense
to the City of Tukwila..
17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the crea-
tion of any health hazard or potential
health hazard (excluding mental health)?
Explanation:
X
1 •
YES MAYBE NO
'18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruc-
tion of any scenic vista or view open to
the public, or will the proposal result
in the creation of an aesthetically of-
fensive site open to public view?
Explanation:
X
Site will be landscaped to provide a pleasing visual environment in the area.
19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact
upon the quality or quantity of exist-
ing recreational opportunities?
Explanation:
20. Archeological /Histroical. Will the proposal result in
an alteration of a signifi-
cant archeological or his-
torical site, structure,
object or building?
Explanation:
CERTIFICATION BY APPLICANT:
I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above
information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency
may withdraw any declaration of non - significance that it might issue in
reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation
or willful lack full disclosure on my part.
December 1 1983
Signature and Title Date
Gordon T. Pathmann, PLS
JOHN R. EWING & ASSOCIATES
622 South Central Avenue
KENT, WASHINGTON 98031
-8-
X
X__
CITY OF TUKWILA
•
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
7119MIOWEM
DEC 02 1983
CITY OF TUKW LA
PLANNING DEPT.
This questionnaire must be completed and submitted with the application for
permit. This questionnaire must be completed by all persons applying for a
permit from the City of Tukwila, unless it is determined by the Responsible
Official that the permit is exempt or unless the applicant and Responsible
Official previously agree an Environmental Impact Statement needs to be completed.
A fee of $50.00 must accompany the filling of the Environmental Questionnaire
to cover costs of the threshold determination.
I. BACKGROUND
1. Name of Proponent: J.B. Wright Corp.
-?..1 3- S3
2. Address and Phone Number. of Proponent: 682 -3577
1111 3rd Ave. Bldg., #700, Seattle, WA 98101
3. Date Checklist Submitted: December 1, 1983
4. Agency Requiring Checklist: City of Tukwila Planning & Engineering Depts.
5. Name of Proposal, if applicable:
6. Nature and Brief Description of the .Proposal .(including but not limited
to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give
an accurate understanding of its scope and nature):
Construction of approximately 84 living units of about 700 sq.ft. each
with covered parking & large natural or landscaped areas to be retained.
7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as
well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental im-
pacts, . including any other information needed to give an accurate under-
standing of the environmental setting of the proposal):
Located at NW corner of S 152nd & 57th Ave. S, the 4.62 -acre site is
sloping to the SW & is covered with various hardwood trees & a few
conifers & low vegetation. The surrounding area is fully developed with
a artments or condominiums.
8. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal: April, 1984
9. List of all Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals Required for the
Proposal (federal, state and local):
(a) Rezone, conditional use, shoreline permit, etc.
(b) King County Hydraulics Permit
(c) Building permit
YES NO X
YES NO X
YES X NO
•1 ,
•
•
(d) Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Permit YES NO X
(e) Sewer hook up permit YES X NO
(f) Sign permit •YES X NO
(g) Water hook up permit YES X NO
(h) Storm water system permit YES x NO
(i) Curb cut permit YES X NO
(j) Electrical permit (State of Washington) YES x NO
(k) Plumbing permit (King County) YES X NO
(1) Other: As required by City of Tukwila.
10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or futher activity
related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain:
No. only as shown on site plan.
11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by
• your proposal? If yes, explain: •
No.
12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro -.
posal; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future
date, describe the nature of such application form:
Rezoned on February 10, 1981, City of Tukwila Ord. #1200,' Planning
Dept. Master File #80 -38 -R.
II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
(Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required)
1. Earth. Will the proposal result in:,
(a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic
substructures?
(b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcover-
ing of the soil?
(c). Change in topography or ground surface-relief fea-
tures?
(d) The destruction, covering or modification of any
unique geologic or physical features?
0-2-
YES MAYBE NQ
x
X
X
•
YES MAYBE. NO
(e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, -
either on or off the site? X
(f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or
changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which
may modify the channel of a river or stream or the .
bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake?
Explanation:
X
Soil movement & compaction will be required to develop the site.. Soil con -
ditions will be addressed in future soils report & development plans, with
retention & design to City of Tukwila specifications.
2. Air. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air
quality? X
(b) The creation of objectionable odors? X
(c) Alteration of air movement, moisture
or temperature, or any change in climate, either
locally or regionally? X
Explanation:
Air quality deterioration may occur with addition of new buildings (fireplaces,
etc.). Buildings themselves may have an effect on air movement over .
present site conditions.
3. Water. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Changes in currents, or the course or direction
of water movements, in either marine or fresh
waters?
(b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns,
or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? X
(c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters?
(d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water
body?
(e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration .
of surface water quality, including but not limited
to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity?
(f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of
ground waters?
(g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either
through direct additions or withdrawals, or through
interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations?
-3-
X
X
X
YES MAYBE NO
(h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either
through direct injection, or through the seepage
of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne
virus or bacteria, or other substances into the
ground waters?
X
(1) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise avail-
able for public water supplies? X
Explanation:
Site development will change absorption rates but storm drainage & retention
will be addressed in a approved site grading & storm retention plan, de-
signed to City of Tukwila specifications:
4. Flora. Will the proposal result in:
. (a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers
of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, .
grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)?
(b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or
endangered species of flora? x
(c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area,
or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of
existing species? x
(d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? x
Explanation:
Development of the site will reduce present flora but it will be replaced
with items on Landscape Plan designed to City of Tukwila specifications.
5. Fauna. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers
of any species of fauna (birds, land animals
including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic
organisms, insects or microfauna)?
(b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or
endangered species . of fauna?
(c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an
area, or result in a barrier to the migration
or movement of fauna?
(d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife
habitat?
x
X
Explanation:
Fauna that is presently onsite will be forced to move during site development
w .. ....1 w .... 4.. 4.. 4L ....
..... 7 _ ta' 2 • _ . _ _ .
•
YES MAYBE NO
6. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise
levels? X
Explanation:
A temporary noise level increase will occur during site development.
Levels associated with residential neighborhoods will be present after
construction.
7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new
light or glare? X
Explanation:
Light levels found in residential developments will be present upon
completion and occupancy of the site. Yard or parking lighting may also
be present.
8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in the altera-
tion of the present or planned land use
of an area?
Explanation:
Property is currently zoned R -3 and R -4.
9. Natural Resources. Will'the proposal result in:
(a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural
resources?
(b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural
resource?
Explanation:
10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an
explosion or the release of hazardous
substances (including, but not limited
to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radi-
ation) in the event of . an accident or
upset conditions?
Explanation:
11. Population.
Will the proposal alter the location,.
distribution, density, or growth rate
of the human population of an area?
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
With the addition of 84 living units, an increase in population, under
current zoning, will occur.
12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, .
or create a demand for additional housing?
Explanation:
84 new units will be provided to the area.
13. Transportation /Circulation. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Generation of additional vehicular movement?
(b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or
demand for new parking?
(c) Impact upon existing transportation systems?
(d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation
or movement of people and /or goods?
(e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic?
(f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles,
bicyclists or pedestrians?
Explanation:
Additional vehicular movement will occur with the new units. Parking
for onsite development will be provided.
X
X
14. . Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon,
or result in a need for new or altered
governmental services in any of the
following areas:
(a) Fire protection?
(b) Police protection?
(c) Schools?
•
(d) Parks or other recreational facilities?
(e) Maintenance of public facilities, including
roads?
YES MAYBE NO
(f) Other governmental services? X
Explanation:
Government services will be required for site development. Individual
agencies will be contacted for input on the job.
15. Energy. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy?
(b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or
require the development of new sources of
energy?
Explanation:
Energy in the form of gas or electricity will be needed for the project.
16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for
new systems, or alterations to the
following utilities:
(a) Power or natural gas?
(b) Communications systems?
(c) Water?
(d) Sewer or septic tanks?
(e) Storm water drainage?
(f) Solid waste and disposal?
Explanation:
The above utilities will be needed for occupancy. Onsite and - -if required- -
offsite extension of said utilities will be done by the owner, at no expense
to the City of Tukwila.
17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the crea-
tion of any health hazard or potential
health hazard (excluding mental health)?
Explanation:
YES MAYBE NO
'18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruc-
tion of any scenic vista or view open to
the public, or will the proposal result
in the creation of an aesthetically of-
fensive site open to public view?
Explanation:
X
. Site will be landscaped to provide a pleasing visual environment in the area.
19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact
upon the quality or quantity of exist-
ing recreational opportunities?
Explanation:
20. Archeological /Histroical. Will the proposal result in
an alteration of a signifi-
cant archeological or his-
torical site, structure,
object or building?
Explanation:.
CERTIFICATION BY APPLICANT:
I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above
information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency
may withdraw any declaration of non - significance that it might issue in
reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation
or willful lack ull disclosure on my part.
December 1 1983
Signature and Title Date
Gordon T. Pathrnann, PLS
JOHN R. EWING & ASSOCIATES
622 South Central Avenue
KENT. WASHINGTON 98031
City o•
f Tukwila
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila Washington 98188
Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor
MEMORANDUM
TO: Rick Beeler, Associate Planner
FROM: Phil Fraser, Senior Engineer
DATE: 2/23/84
tl
IFEB 231984
CITY OF'
PLANNING DEPT.
SUBJECT: ADDITIONAL WATER SYSTEM ANALYSES FOR "THE COTTAGES" DEVELOPMENT
Per my discussion with Alan Meyers of Horton Dennis & Associates on 2/23/84,
paragraph three on page 2 of his 2/8/84 report is to be
ammeded as follows:
Add: "...20 psi, as long as the following building conditions are
met:
1) No wood or other cumbustible materials shall be used
as roofing materials
2) No point of any structure shall be located over 300 1.f. from
any hydrant.(measured around building corners).
3) All structures, including carports 'shall be fully sprinkled."
Paragraph 4 on page 2 is OK
These changes to the report are per Alan Meyers discussion with Chief Crawley
on 2/22/84.
Analysing the test results, I provide the following: Test One on page l.of
the report indicatessthat the maximum instantenous demand flow of 30 psi.:.
required by the State has been met. (No emergency /No fire flows). Under
existing conditions 31 psi exists, ising Meyers judgement of 4,680 gpm
(see Comp Plan, Appendix H). Per my phone conversation with Alan Meyers
of 2/23/84, the gpm increase estimated by Alan at 100 gpm through the
additionsof the Cottage. Development will not create a significant change
above and beyond the existing conditions, and is therefore, not forseen
as arproblem.
The fireflow simulation at Cottage Apartments produces flows which are
all above "o" psi; or reguarded as positive pressures - for both the
new development and existing developments at the top of the north hill.
This meets the primary requirement of Tukwila Fire Department. Alan
sees no other requirements that must be met.
A single fire event is the only condi t,ion<Mr. Meyers cons!i ders ; calculating
for simultaneous fire events is not,normally considered. Per the first test
on page 1, 31 psi at top of hill under existing conditions is above 20 psi
minimum required by Fire Marshall, to allow new developments
Therefore, the recommendation to build the 12" main per the
Meyer's report is considered appropriate. However, per our
last paragraph in
2/23/84 phone
• •
2
2/23/84
conversation the construction of the 12" main as part of this development
is not required to meet minimum requirements for water needs for the development,
nor for mittgating impacts as impacts are not identified as significant,
causing flows to go below minimum requirements as previously stated.
I still recommend that the developer provide his schedule for construction;
and, included in that schedule, the contractor provide the anticipated
schedule for the construction of the 12" interceptor main by the City.
Alan Meyers will revise his report accordingly, and transmit to the City.
Concurrance: Chief Crawley
?gz/x/
cc. Chief Crawley
Alan Meyers, HD
Cottages Development File
Enclosure (1)
orton Dennis & Associates, Inc.
Consulting 'Engineers
February 8, 1984
Mr. Dirk Jongejan, A.S.L.A.
JONGEJAN, GERRARD, & McNEAL INC.
23 - 103rd. Avenue S.E.
Bellevue, Washington 98004
SUBJECT: ADDITIONAL WATER SYSTEM
ANALYSES FOR "THE COTTAGES"
DEVELOPMENT IN TUKWILA, WASHINGTON
Dear Dirk:_
.,L.
//arm sv i3J
(s10—
Per..your notice to proceed dated February 2, 1984, we . have . completed ad-
ditional.analyses of the Tukwila Water System as required by Mr. Phil Fraser
of Tukwila's "Public Works Department. .
As shown in the test.results,.listed below,.` during. maximum instantaneous
demand flow conditions.;: of 4,680 gpm in the_Tukwila,.system, residual,pressure
on top of North Hill,equals:.31 psi. Under the same conditions with a;fire
flow of 2,500 gpm at "The Cottages" added, the - pressure on top of North Hill
equals 9 psi. After the 12" water main from Southcenter to North Hill is added,
the pressure on top.of North,. Hi 1 1 equals 26 :psi.. ..
RESULTS OF COMPUTER SIMULATED FIREFLOWS ON TUKWILA WATER SYSTEM
Test Condition Flow and Residual Pressures
1. Peak flow condition for
Tukwila Water System; No
fireflow but background
flow = 4,680 gpm.
2. Peak flow condition plus
fireflow at "The Cottages"
of 2,500 gpm.
3. Test No. 2 with Proposed 12"
water main from Southcenter
to 'forth Hill added.
At "The Cottages" At Top of North Hill
(NODE 46)
Q = 130 gpm.
P = 70 psi.
Q = 2500 gpm.
P= 32 psi.
Q = 2500 gpm.
P = 56 psi.
Q = 30 gpm.
P = 31 psi.
Q = 30 gpm.
P= 9 psi.
Q = 30 9pm.
P= 26 psi.
6133 Sixth Ave. South, Seattle, Washington 08108 • Phone 767- 3456
•
Mr. Dirk Jongejan, A.S.L.A. 2
JONGEJAN, GERRARD, & McNEAL INC,
According to current Washington State Standards,* the following pressures
shall be provided in all water distribution systems:
"New public water systems Or additions to existing systems shall provide a
design quantity of water at a positive pressure of at least 30 psi (200 KPA)
under maximum instantaneous demand flow conditions measured at the water meter
or at the property line of the premises when meters are not used. When a
system is being designed to provide fireflows, a positive pressure shall be
maintained throughout the system under fireflow conditions at the water meter
or at the property line."
According
subject develop
2,500 gpm at a
the Tukwila Fire Marshall, the only water requirement for the
nt is available fireflow at the development site equal to
nimum residual pressure of 20 psi.
on r test results, and the above minimum state standards, the ex-
isting Tukwila er System is adequate to serve the proposed development while
providing the mini m required 30 psi during maximum instantaneous demand flow
conditions, and posi ive pressures throughout the system during the required
• eflow of 2,500 gp .
While tstruction of the proposed
Hill is not required to meet minimum State
we strongly urge the City to construct the
current Comprehensive Water Plan, in order
North Hill.
12" main .from Southcenter to North
standards for the subject development,
proposed main, as shown in Tukwila's
to upgrade the City's water system on
If you desire additional tests or information, please call us.
AEM:gjn
Enclosure:
cc: Mr. Phil Fraser
City of Tukwila
Sincerely,
HORTON, DENNIS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Alan E. Meyers, P.E.
* Rules and Regulations of the. State. Board of Health regarding Public Water.
Systems, Revised, August, 1983.
Horton Dennis & Associates, Inc. . Consulting Engineers . Seattle, Washington
Mr. Dirk Jongejan, A.S.L.A.
JONGEJAN, GERRARD, & McNEAL INC.
According to current Washington State Standards,* the following pressures
shall be provided in all water distribution systems:
"New public water systems or additions to existing systems shall provide a
design quantity of water at a positive pressure of at least 30 psi (200 KPA)
under maximum instantaneous demand flow conditions measured at the water meter
or at the property line of the premises when meters are not used. When a
system is being designed to provide fireflows, a positive pressure shall be
maintained throughout the system under fireflow conditions at the water meter
or at the property line."
According to the Tukwila Fire Marshall, the only water requirement for the
subject development is available fireflow at the development site equal to
2,500 gpm at a minimum residual pressure of 20 psi.
Based on our test results, and the above minimum state standards, the ex-
isting Tukwila Water System is adequate to serve the proposed development while
providing the minimum required 30 psi during maximum instantaneous demand flow
conditions, and positive pressures throughout the system during the required
fireflow of 2,500 gpm.
While the construction of the proposed 12" main from Southcenter to North
Hill is not required to meet minimum State standards for the subject development,
we strongly urge the City to construct the proposed main, as shown in Tukwila's
current Comprehensive Water Plan, in order to upgrade the City's water system on
North Hill.
If you desire additional tests or information, please call us.
Sincerely, .
HORTON, DENNIS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
14-re-14.-
Alan E. Meyers, P.E.
AEM:gjn
Enclosure
cc: Mr. Phil Fraser
City of Tukwila
* Rules and Regulations of the State Board of Health regarding Public Water
Systems, Revised, August, 1983.
Horton Dennis & Associates, Inc. • Consulting Engineers • Seattle, Washington
.,
•
•
Horton Dennis & Associates, Inc.
Consulting Engineers
February 8, 1984
Mr. Dirk Jongejan, A.S.L.A.
JONGEJAN, GERRARD, & McNEAL INC.
23 - 103rd. Avenue S.E.
Bellevue, Washington 98004
SUBJECT: ADDITIONAL WATER SYSTEM
ANALYSES FOR "THE COTTAGES"
DEVELOPMENT IN TUKWILA, WASHINGTON
Dear Dirk:
pLANNINC1 DEPT:.
Per your notice to proceed dated February 2, 1984, we have completed ad-
ditional analyses of the Tukwila Water System as required by Mr. Phil Fraser
of Tukwila's Public Works Department.
As shown in the test results listed below, during maximum instantaneous
demand flow conditions of 4,680 gpm in the Tukwila system, residual pressure
on top of North Hill equals 31 psi. Under the same conditions with a fire -
flow of 2,500 gpm at "The Cottages" added, the pressure on top of North Hill
equals 9 psi. After the 12" water main from Southcenter to North Hill is added,
the pressure on top of North Hill equals 26 psi.
RESULTS OF COMPUTER SIMULATED FIREFLOWS ON TUKWILA WATER SYSTEM
Test Condition Flow and Residual Pressures
1. Peak flow condition for
Tukwila Water System; No
fireflow but background
flow = 4,680 gpm.
2. Peak flow condition plus
fireflow at "The Cottages"
of 2,500 gpm.
3. Test No. 2 with Proposed 12"
water main from Southcenter
to North Hill added.
At "The Cottages" At Top of North Hill
(NODE 46)
Q = 130 gpm.
P = 70 psi.
Q = 2500 gpm.
P= 32 psi.
Q = 2500 gpm.
P = 56 psi.
Q = 30 gpm.
P = 31 psi.
Q = 30 gpm.
P= 9 psi.
Q = 30 gpm.
P = 26 psi.
6133 Sixth Ave. South, Seattle, Washington 98108 • Phone 767-3456
City of Tukwila
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila Washington 98188
February 9, 1984
HENRY D. CHUMNEY
J.B. Wright Corp.
1111 Third Ave., Fifth Floor
Seattle,WA 98101
RE: The Cottages - Environmental Impact Statement Scoping - EPIC-213-83
Dear Mr. Chumney:
Attached are the two responses we received pursuant to the January 12,
1984, Declaration of Significance and Scoping Notice. Additional infor-
mation was sent February 6, 1984, to the Department of Ecology, therefore
their letter of January 27, 1984, may be supplemented by more comments.
Pending receipt of comments from D.O.E. we envision the scope of the draft
EIS to include:
1. Modification of existing topography.
2. Discharges and /or potential impacts to surface and /or ground; water,
including mitigation measures, due to storm water and other. impacts.
3. Removal of existing substantial /significant vegetation.
4. Evaluation of the existing water supply and sanitary sewer system com-
patibilities and impacts thereon from the project.
5. Compatibility with the Comprehensive Plan, particularly the policy on .
slope development.
6. Impact upon present and planned land use in the area and quantity of
multiple family residential units.
These areas, and others you feel appropriate, are to be included' in the
draft E.I.S.
If you have any questions please call me at 433 -1845.
Respectf
Rick Beeler
Associate Planner
RB /blk
City of Tukwila
% 6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila Washington 98188
Gary L VanDusen, Mayor
February 6, 1984
BARBARA J. RITCHIE
Environmental Review Section.
Department of Ecology
Mail Stop PV -11
Olympia, WA 98504
RE: J.B. Wright Corporation Development
Dear Ms. Ritchie:
•
Enclosed is additional information on this development proposal, which
hopefully will be sufficient to fully respond to the Declaration, of
Significance and Scoping Notice.
If you have any questions please contact me at 433 -1845.
Respec 11
Ri Beeler
Associate Planner
RB /blk
•
MOO MOO INVESTMENTS
8012 - 18TH AVE. N.E.
SEATTLE, WA 98115
206 -722 -6111, 206 - 523 -0774
CITY dF uKv L '
T L AliNG
ebruary 1, 1984
lei
- N
Mr. Brad Collins
Planning Director
6200 Southcenter Blvd.
Tukwila, Washington 98188
Dear Mr. Collins:
We are owners of a condominium at Southcenter View Condominiums.
It is our opinion there is an over abundance of multiple
dwellings in the area now and there definitely would be an
adverse impact on the environmept.
We are against any more Multiple Family Units being built.
Sincerely,
Moo 0o Investments
itHM 5301)
al.12 lam AVE.
Fqtrar,
a? 12,5111,
r
•
Mr. Brad Collins
Planning Director
6200 Southcenter Blvd.
Tukwila, W4. 98188
JOHN SPELLMAN
Governor
STATE OF WASHINGTON
DEPARTMENT OF ECOLO
Mail Stop PV -11 • Olympia, Washington 98504
January 27, 1984
Mr. Brad Collins
Tukwila Planning Department
6200 Southcenter Blvd.
Tukwila, WA 98188
!JAN 3 1 1984
CITY OF Tu :iwijt,
PLANNING DEPT.
Reference: 84 Units on 4.62 Acres, J.B. Wright Corporation
Dear Mr. Collins:
Your scoping notice for the above referenced project did not contain
enough information for us to evaluate this project and determine which
permits, if any, will be required from the Department of Ecology.
However, we do have the following general areas of concern.
1. Any discharges or potential impacts to surface and /or ground
water should be identified along with possible mitigation measures.
This would include storm water runoff, septic tank /drainfields, work in
or near a stream, etc.
DONALD W. MOOS
Director
2. The source of water supply and method of sewage disposal should
be evaluated along with any impacts to existing systems.
I hope this information will assist you in preparing the environmental
impact statement. If you have any questions, please call me at (206)
459 -6025.
Sincerely,
Barbara J. Ritchie
Environmental Review Section
BJR:pp
• 640•(P)
eo•/
• eV22. ..
AlWie
3•B• wnr.
EGtSE
PAVEM
52'W
Gonna. L /NE /
57Q ET
�E•
'a' '9,PAV
N/73,600 r
SURVEYOR'S NOTES'
1. Boundary and Street Margin Lines OS 5h0wn,
hereon are approximate pcndMo reso /upon
of street Canlcr/Me5 and Traci Boundaries /n
Gonjunctiari with 0/y. of Tukwila Street
Improvement Prof
2.(P)• Dimension..fram face of P /ot of
. Brookvolc Gorden Tract's, Vol. /O, . br)e 47.
0 BEACH 'MARK U05 COMPANY.
BM 354-33-1, LARGE DP .SPIKE
UP 07' ON WESTERLY FACE GUY
RILE W /TH L /60in 30' NORTHERLY
Of 5 /SZnd' ST. OV EAST WE
OF . MACADAM: ROAD EL.. 1/4.64
Horton Dennis .f5• A'ssociates, Inc.
SURVEY OF HAROLD WYNN PROPERTY
FOR R. W THO12PE ASSOCIATES'
Aseic -K% 8o .
TREE SURVEY? 5'CON70U12 INTERVAL
TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING OF LOT 2/,
BROOKVILLE GARDEN TQAC75,VOL/Op47
1
I, Becky L. Kent
1 Notice of Public Meeting
AFFIlliVIT OF DISTRIB' TION
hereby declare that: 1 I Notice of Public Hearing
1 1
Notice of Application for Shoreline Management
Substantial Development Permit [T Declaration of Non- Signifiance.
was mailed to each of the following addresses on March 1, 1984 , 1984.
JOSEPH & SHARON CHANES
14709 56th Ave. So.
Tukwila, WA 98188
CLIFFORD SWEENEY
14949 57th Ave. So.
Tukwila, WA 98188
GEORGE GARRISON
10477 17th So.
Seattle, WA 98168
JOHN B. STRANDER
P.O. Box 88636
Tukwila, WA 98188
GRAYDON E. SMITH
13861 18th Ave. S.W.
Seattle, WA 98166
ESTATES ASSOCIATION
c/o Don Winton
1305 3rd Ave., Suite 600
Seattle, WA 98101
SYLVAN CADITZ
3201 S. Washington
Seattle, WA 98144
SOUTHCENTER VIEW CONDOMINIUMS
15210 Macadam Road South
Tukwila, WA 98188
ATTN: Homeowners Assoc.
CONDOMINIUM BUILDERS, INC.
Salant Rubin
19800 Pacific Highway So.
Seattle, WA 98188
CHAVES, SISTO CHARLES
4116 So. 262nd P1.
Kent, WA 98031
NAMES, CHARLES D.
3009 S.E. 5th
Renton, WA 98055
GOREN, DAVID M.
14600 N.E. 32nd #116
Bellevue, WA 98007
KASHIND, SHIRO
5020 48th Ave. S.
Seattle, WA 98118
EMPLOYEE TRANSFER CORP.
150 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 1985
Chicago, IL 60606
KING, NAOMI F.
P.O. Box 21633
Seattle, WA 98111
GROSSO, PAMELA C.
2340 43 E.
Seattle, WA 98112
OHARA, J. HARRY
15824 S.E. 70th
Renton, WA 98055
SPEER, WILLIAM M.
2804 67th S.E.
Mercer Island, WA 98040
Name of Project J.B. Wright Corp.
File Number EPIC - 213 -83
MCHUGH, JOE B.
15280 Macadam Rd. So. #203
Seattle, WA 98188
GOMEZ, SHELLEY D.
127 Bethel
Walla Walla, WA 99362
J.B. WRIGHT CORP.
1111 Third Ave., 7th F1.
Seattle, WA 98101
MOO -MOO INVESTMENTS
8012 18th Ave. N.E.
Seattle, WA 98115
CHARLES SPAETH
9105 Bridgeport Way S.W.
Tacoma, WA 98499
STEIGER, MARILYN
2400 N.E. 9th
Renton, WA 98055
JONES, ALFRED
5772 S. 152nd
Seattle, WA 98188
WAC 197 -11 -1350
Q
DECLARATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE
Description of proposal 80 Multiple Family Units on 4.62 Acre Site
Proponent J.B. Wright Corp.
Location of proposal NW corner of S. 152nd St. & 57th Ave. S.
Lead Agency City of Tukwila File No. EPIC - 213 -83
This proposal has been determined not to have a probable significant
adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS)
is not required under RCW 43- 21C.020(c). This decision was made after
review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other
information on file with the lead agency and is conditioned upon compliance
with the Tukwila Board of Architectural Review decision. This information
is available to the public on request. The Declaration of Non - Significance
is being issued subject to:
1) No wood or other combustible materials shall be used as roofing
materials.
2) No point of any structure shall be located over 300 lineal feet from
any hydrant (measured around building corners).
3) All structures, including carports, shall be fully sprinkled.
4) Existing topography shall be maintained as much as possible except as
approved by the Tukwila Board of Architectural Review.
5) Public Works Department review and approval of storm water drainage
system which is to be tied into the City's storm water system.
6) Existing vegetation will be maintained as much as possible, except as
approved by the Board of Architectural Review.
7) Timing of the development will be coordinated with the Public Works
Department relative to the existing water supply and sanitary sewer
system capabilities of the City.
8) Compliance with all other applicable provisions of the City of Tukwila
ordinances and regulations.
Responsible official Rick Beeler
Position /title Acting Planning Director
Address and phone 6200 Southcenter Blvd., Tukwila, ,���18;, 433 -1845
Date February 27, 1984 Signature
Published: Record Chronicle Date: March 4, 1984
•
City of Tukwila
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila Washington 98188
Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor
MEMORANDUM
TO: FILE - 213 -83, The Cottages
FROM: Ri el cting Planning Director
DATE: February 24, 1984
SUBJECT: Withdrawl of the Declaration of Significance Issued January 12, 1984
A Declaration of Significance and Scoping Notice was issued January 12,
1984. Upon expiration of the public input period contained in the afore-
mentioned I issued a letter of February 9, 1984 to the proponent stipu-
lating the EIS was to include these six items:
1) Modification of existing topography.
2) Discharges and /or potential impacts to surface and /or ground water,
including mitigation measures, due to storm water and other impacts.
3) Removal of existing substantial /significant vegetation.
4) Evaluation of the existing water supply and sanitary sewer system com-
patibilities and impacts thereon from the project.
5) Compatibility with the Comprehensive Plan, particularly the policy on
slope development.
6) Impact upon present and planned land use in the area and quantity of
multiple family residential units.
On February 23, 1984, Phil Fraser, Senior Engineer, submitted a memorandum
pursuant to the water system analysis of February 8, 1984 performed by
Horton Dennis and Associates. The conclusions of this study were that fire
flow and water supply system capabilities were adequate in the area and to
the development provided:
1) No wood or other combustible materials shall be used as roofing
materials.
2) No point of any structure shall be located over 300 lineal feet from
any hydrant (measured around building corners).
Page -2-
TO: FILE EPIC-11,-83, The Cottages
FROM: Rick Beeler, Acting Planning Director
DATE: February 24, 1984
SUBJECT: Withdrawl of the Declaration of Significance Issued January 12, 1984
3) All structures, including carports, shall be fully sprinkled.
Discussions with Brad Collins previously concerning the Declaration of
Significance focused on the two significant issues of the water system
capability and the development on slopes exceeding 20 %. Phil Fraser's
conclusions appeared to have satisfactorily removed the need for further
evaluation of the existing water supply and the potential significant
impact to uphill properties on the same water supply system.
Conversations with Larry Hard, City Attorney in transition, on February 23,
1984 indicated regarding the Comprehensive Plan Policy on discouraging
development over 20% slopes that the City is unable to automatically
require an environmental impact statement for developments on such slopes.
Imposing an E.I.S. on such properties with over 20% slope as an automatic
procedure must be based not on the mere slope but on other environmental
considerations such as underlining soils and geology. Available infor-
mation indicates the underlying soils and geology of the site did not raise
significant impacts as a result of development.
Therefore the water supply and slope issue appear to be less significant
than predicted and thought when issuing the Declaration of Significance.
The remaining four items mentioned in the February 9, 1984 letter were to
the best of my recollection items that in themselves did not constitute
significant impacts but that were being requested to be included in the
E.I.S. for further information and /or divulging of the information already
contained in the file. These items in themselves did not support con-
tinuing to require an E.I.S.
Divulging of the herein identified impacts which produce less than a signi-
ficant affect on the environment is not deemed to be necessary to
accomplish through the environmental impact statement. This memorandum
should suffice the SEPA requirements as documentation that the SEPA
requirements have been met. If the impacts had been significant, then of
course divulging those impacts would have been required through the EIS
process.
Based on the above the Declaration of Significance is hereby withdrawn and a
Declaration of Non - Significance is being issued subject to:
1) No wood or other combustible materials shall be used as roofing
materials.
2) No point of any structure shall be located over 300 lineal feet from
any hydrant (measured around building corners).
3) All structures, including carports, shall be fully sprinkled.
Page -3-
TO: FILE EPIC -4 -83, The Cottages
FROM: Rick Beeler, Acting Planning Director
DATE: February 24, 1984
SUBJECT: Withdrawl of the Declaration of Significance Issued January 12, 1984
4) Existing topography shall be maintained as much as possible except as
approved by the Tukwila Board of Architectural Review.
5) Public Works Department review and approval of storm water drainage
system which is to be tied into the City's storm water system.
6) Existing vegetation will be maintained as much as possible, except as
approved by the Board of Architectural Review.
7) Timing of the development will be coordinated with the Public Works
Department relative to the existing water supply and sanitary sewer
system capabilities of the City.
8) Compliance with all other applicable provisions of the City of Tukwila
ordinances and regulations.
RB /blk
WAC 197-11-1360
DECLARATION OF SIGNIFIANCE
AND SCOPING NOTICE
Description of proposal 84 Multiple Family Units on 4.62 acre site
Proponent J.B. Wright Corp.
Location of Proposal NW corner of S. 152nd St. & 57th Ave. S.
Lead Agency City of Tukwila File No. EPIC-213-83
EIS Required. This proposal has been determined to be likely to have a
significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact .
statement (EIS) is required. under RCW 42.21C.020(c) and is now being pre-
pared. An environmental checklist or other materials indicating likely
impacts can be reviewed at our offices.
Scopinq. Agencies and members of the public are invited to comment on the -
scope of the EIS. The method and deadline for giving us your comments is:-
February 6, 1984, in writing to the responsible official.
Responsible Official Brad Collins
Position/Title Planning Director
Address and Phone 6200 Southcenter Blvd., Tukwila, WA 98188 • 433-1845
Date
11 1184 Signature
Published: Record Chronicle, January 15, 1984
e 216.8r!'rCOAIR,W CeeCi enva•
•.000 A••(�. -T`T.
(RR OAq moo)
PM fts.
. -
at.:a
1,„,
jt �r
,j71.1
.v.14/60 4 DP0 a 39,
'1
•
rmcouvvhow, .ur, pi
l9►.(t,o.. wr.wn/n.ry...' 8. io. /5Z "o? ,iT..
vgF wrw+, naurow /ate+ y.r ,,,,i'':; MaocrAMO. •evN blip .uM.ra
ipros vtoliArnnAla iemed." w.% rz erorasiole 404 .
Q ~Vol t+•INNI /tI1(ir fi,"44 41"1 ' ` ''' i s
fV$ ofi+eno'" �WMN
1wnM[II t►
JOHN N, (WINO AND ASSOCIAtt!
L'M_ IIp,IuI N • %AM IIL*VI V $
mine
TAINAJNYCAO
Nte\wAIN1Utom 11.11 PSI •IItt
s.wRIar
THE COTTAaE5
comit
WAC 197-11-1360
DECLARATION OF SIGNIFIANCE
AND SCOPING NOTICE
Description of proposal 84 Multiple Family Units on 4.62 acre site
• Proponent J.B. Wright Corp.
.Location of Proposal NW corner of S. 152nd St. & 57th Ave. S.
•Lead Agency City of Tukwila File No. EPIC-213-83
EIS Required. This proposal has been determined to be likely to have a'
significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact
statement (EIS) is required. under RCW 42.21C.020(c) and is now being pre-
. pared. An environmental checklist or other materials indicating likely -
impacts can be reviewed at our offices. - - - - -
Scopinq. Agencies and members of the public are .invited to comment on the
-scope of the EIS. The method and deadline for giving us your comments Is: -
February 6, 1984, in writing to the responsible official-
Responsible Official Brad Collins
Position/Title Planning Director
Address and Phone 6200 Southcenter Blvd., Tukwila, WA 98188 433-1845
Date 12- 118'1 Signature
Published: Record Chronicle, January 15, 1984
caoaJ U& of ' .
r•.000 -' .M. •
(t•!rl dl4 I�pp1
.\
,t••a •..L On r.•r71ab
11•f•s•1•• r•?l YlD.
j1 a on
)
01.60•14,4. yes* or 'L^eR or° ♦ Z' yes*
M eesr.t rni< •11e1• AJ t
~b•. ' .�
•
• r•..... \�\
•
�si
e
'j1r,• N1
1 a•
:4 woo
•
`'•.
D
IN)% raihe.A/Wint AN 1'M
RluoorWOn Rpev{Il /owy �.
'NM M1eeae+•nu11/Ir:1 611
e brecto• r+mne! co W.4.., /Nan) ».a°w
yr WM,rovtMA /"le rlr• . •
•ee► w+dil i►ni 1 P * (r«at
e %wan a IVOI/ (4•4461 *AS", tal
15Z" °''1.
11010
•
.
E
Fortran IR . .
it JOHN 11. tWINO AND ASSOCIATts. : i'
CIVIL wsaseer.. • • LAND wnvaeM ' ! : ,,
imismetei ' 1111!111.11)
,Wn` / 1
`�.le■ub
i
• '1
"
'
1
'' ,
i
vamp
..1.8. WRIGNT
•
!• THE • COTTAGES
.
•
lam Iowa, **am Mm1
tw•'
Me•
r� .M
1 •
.um wa.e... Otratw
,......Y• ..�.°_.,.
OK •
.0
r.!. w
--
DIM /NOCh. . Iea.HYlr
ltloaE1/
•
CITY OF TUKWILA
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
LUMIDWD
DEC 021983
CITY OF TUKWILA
PLANNING DEPT.
This questionnaire must be completed and submitted with the application for
permit. This questionnaire must be completed by all persons applying for a
permit from the City of Tukwila, unless it is determined by the Responsible
Official that the permit is exempt or unless the applicant and Responsible
Official previously agree an Environmental Impact Statement needs to be completed.
A fee of $50.00 must accompany the filling of the Environmental Questionnaire .
to cover costs of the threshold determination.
I. BACKGROUND
1. Name of Proponent: J.B. Wright Corp.
L--23- �3
2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: 682 -3577
1111 3rd Ave. Bldg., #700, Seattle, WA 98101
3. Date Checklist Submitted: December 1, 1983
4. Agency Requiring Checklist: City of Tukwila Planning & Engineering Depts.
5. Name of Proposal, if applicable:
6. Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal .(including but not limited
to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give .
an accurate understanding of its scope and nature):
Construction of approximately 84 living units of about 700 sq. ft. each
with covered parking & large natural' or landscaped areas to be retained.
7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as
well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental im
• pacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate under-
standing of the environmental setting of the proposal):
Located at NW corner of S 152nd & 57th Ave. S, the 4.62 -acre site is
sloping to the SW & is covered with various hardwood trees & a few
conifers & low vegetation. The surrounding area is fully developed with
a artments or condominiums.
8. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal: April, 1984 .
9. List of all Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals Required for the.
Proposal (federal, state and local):
(a) Rezone, conditional use, shoreline permit, etc. YES NO X
(b) King County Hydraulics Permit YES NO X
(c) Building permit . YES :K NO
...
(d) Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Permit YES NO X
(e) Sewer hook up permit YES X NO
(f) Sign permit . YES X NO
(g) Water hook up permit YES X NO
(h) Storm water system permit YES x NO
(i) Curb cut permit YES X NO
(j) Electrical permit (State of Washington) YES X NO
(k) Plumbing permit (King County) ' YES X NO
(1) Other: As required by City of Tukwila.
10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or futher activity
related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain:
No. only as shown on site plan._
11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered,by
your proposal? If yes, explain:
No.
12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro -
posal; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future
date, describe the nature of such application form:
Rezoned: on February 10, 1981, City of Tukwila Or& #1200,' Planning
Dept. Master File #80 -38 -R.
II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
(Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required
YES MAYBE NO
1. Earth. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic
substructures? X
(b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcover-
ing of the soil? X
(c) Change in topography or ground surface relief fea-
tures? X
(d) The destruction, covering or modification of any
unique geologic or physical features?
-2-
X
(e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils,
either on or off the site ?. ,.
(f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or
changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which .
may modify the channel of a river or stream or the
bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake?
Explanation:
YES MAYBE NO
X
Soil movement & compaction will be required to ,develop the site. Soil con-
ditions will be addressed in future soils report & development plans, with
retention & design to City of Tukwila specifications.
2. Air. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air
quality?
(b) The creation of objectionable odors?
(c) Alteration of air movement, moisture
or temperature, or any change in climate, either
locally or regionally?
Explanation:
X
Air quality deterioration may occur with addition of new buildings (fireplaces,.
etc.). Buildings themselves may have an effect on air movement over
present site conditions.
3. Water. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Changes in currents, or the course or direction
of water movements, in either marine or fresh
waters?
(b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns,
or the rate and amount of surface water runoff?
(c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters?
(d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water
body?
(e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration .
of surface water quality, including but not limited
to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity?
(f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of
ground waters?
(g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either
through direct additions or withdrawals, or through
interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations?
-3
X
X
X
X
............................... .........................••
............ ..............................
..................................................... ...............................
................
................................ .. . ... 7777 -- 7777 ---- ..........- -_....
........................... .. ............................................. •----------------- - - -M =�
.............................
...........1
•••.• •••...... •
......................... ...............................
.........
YES MAYBE: NO
(h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either
through direct injection, or through the seepage
of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne
virus or bacteria, or other substances into the
ground waters?
(i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise avail-
able for public water supplies?
Explanation:
Site development will change absorption rates but storm drainage & retention
will be addressed in a approved site grading & storm retention plan, de-
signed to City of Tukwila specifications.
4. Flora. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers
of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs,
grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)?
(b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or
endangered species of flora?
(c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area,
or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of
existing species? X
X
(d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop?
Explanation:
X
Development of the site will reduce present flora but it will be replaced .
with items on Landscape Plan designed to City of Tukwila specifications.
5. Fauna. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers
of any species of fauna (birds, land animals
including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic
organisms, insects or microfauna)?
(b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or
endangered species of fauna?
(c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an
area, or result in a barrier to the migration
or movement of fauna?
(d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife
habitat?
X
Explanation:
Fauna that is presently onsite will be forced to move during site development
or relocate to those areas left in their natural state onsite.
-4-
YES MAYBE NO
Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise
levels?
Explanation:
A temporary noise level increase will occur during site development.
Levels associated with residential neighborhoods will be present after
construction.
7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new
light or glare?
Explanation:
Light levels found in residential developments will be present upon
completion and occupancy of the site. Yard or parking lighting may also
be present.
8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in the altera-
tion of the present or planned land use
of an area?
Explanation:
Property is currently zoned R -3 and R-4.
9. Natural Resources. Will*the proposal result in:
(a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural.
resources?
(b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural
resource?
Explanation:
10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an .
explosion or the release of hazardous
substances (including, but not limited
to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radi-
ation) in the event of an accident or
upset conditions?
Explanation:
11. Population.
Explanation:
Will the proposal alter the location,
distribution, density, or growth rate
of the human population of an area?
• YES MAYBE NO
With the addition of 84 living units, an increase in population, under
current zoning, will occur.
12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing,
or create a demand for additional housing?
Explanation:
84 new units will be provided to the area.
13. Transportation /Circulation. Will the proposal result: in:
(a) Generation of additional vehicular' movement?
(b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or
demand for new parking?
(c) Impact upon existing transportation systems?
(d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation
or movement of people and /or goods?
(e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic?
(f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles,.
bicyclists or pedestrians?
X
X
Explanation:
Additional vehicular movement will occur with the new units. Parking
for onsite development will be provided.
14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon,
or result in a need for new or altered
governmental services in any of the
following areas:
(a) Fire protection?
(b) Police protection?
(c) Schools?
(d) Parks or other recreational facilities?
(e) Maintenance of public facilities, including
roads?
X
x
X
X
(f) Other governmental services?
Explanation:
YES MAYBE NO
X
Government services will be required for site development. Individual
agencies will be contacted for input on the job.
15. Energy. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy?
(b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or
require the development of new sources of
energy?
Explanation:
Energy in the form of gas or electricity will be needed for the project..
16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for
new systems, or alterations to the
following utilities:
(a) Power or natural gas?
(b) Communications systems?
(c) Water?
(d) Sewer or septic tanks?
(e) Storm water drainage?
(f) Solid waste and disposal?
Explanation:
The above utilities will be needed for occupancy. Onsite and - -if required- -
offsite extension of said utilities will be done by the owner,, at no expense
to the City of Tukwila.
X
17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the crea-
tion of any health hazard or potential
health hazard (excluding mental health)?
Explanation:
X
'18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruc-
tion of any scenic vista or view open to
the public, or will the proposal result .
in the creation of an aesthetically of-
fensive site open to public view?
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
Site will be landscaped to provide a pleasing visual environment in the area.
19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact
upon the quality or quantity of exist-
ing recreational opportunities?
Explanation:
20. Archeological /Histroical. Will the proposal result in
an alteration of a signifi-
cant archeological or his-
torical site, structure,
object or building?
Explanation:
CERTIFICATION BY APPLICANT:
I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above
information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency
may withdraw any declaration of non - significance that it might issue in
reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation
or willful lack • ull disclosure on my part.
December 1 1983
Signature and Title Date
Gordon T. Pathmann, PLS
JOHN R. EWING & ASSOCIATES
622 South Central Avenue
KENT, WASHINGTON 98031
-8-
X
EMPLOYEE TRANSFER CORP.
150 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 1985
Chicago, IL 60606
7'7— 71
'' '
"rievZot
WAC 197 -11 -1360
DECLARATION OF SIGNIFIANCE
AND SCOPING NOTICE
Description of proposal 84 Multiple Family Units on 4.62 acre site
Proponent J.B. Wright Corp.
Location of Proposal NW corner of S. 152nd St. & 57th Awe. S.
Lead Agency City of Tukwila
File No. EP1- 213 -83
EIS Required. This proposal has been determined to be likely to have a
significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact
statement (EIS) is required. under RCW 42.21C.020(c) and is now being pre-
pared. An environmental checklist or other materials indicating likely.
impacts can be reviewed at our offices.
Scopinq. Agencies and members of the public are .invited to comment on. the
scope of the EIS. The method and deadline for giving; us your comments is:
February 6, 1984, in writing to the responsible official-
Responsible Official Brad Collins
Pos.ition/Title Planning Director
Address and Phone 6200 Southcenter Blvd., Tukwila, WA 98188 433 -1845
Date 12- , 118"-f Signature
Published: Record Chronicle, January 15, 1984
i•.••' assn ,.a oenoItTw.•
.
\-
1. \
• WM. 'b
*am •••••ow►•a.
NIL n m
lfsa •aa rr ~CLEO
,. •0••••••• .I.L 1•d\ •• I. M
fie. Ga
RI RlfJi,1'0.1+•'logy .. C. 440.
M f:1 ••IL
•
•
•
RANT LIST ';'•
p kilt GNIGINNIPS /wd "f'
Qra►u/ wrro J 1 /ww i rw ,
pp.
.0Am, vonovesr, '
Veht exaDAUVWSan Ir,1•
nut V CM/,hhMn.' I ip4
newer btlA »IU4IW/e1wt (1►
fool "11Poisivi/inttrA
011111•1•11 *MOM MOM.
AllirrecesiPotf" a /+w, -wqw,
crj4 w 'N Pountuiveitio Tr
• anrti spmi.A41110falibmovispoistit
wroui i04111,04fra,Iusii4sorri
1 MI haocrrimo. mv,v, Wt. N
;: • rea».n 1/0•41
1
'rang n ...
• JOHN A.tWINO AND ASSOC'Atts
KUN1ysfQN 11110411111.11111
1
.
'
1 I
v•nn
J.8. WRIT
•
is �d�
, • ; " THE COT TAG, 5
,�„ IMaL,LOw fen
•
�••
M.y
s .
IMOD •»4La,... raw.
amt "
Lu
14.
i
etneNteh, ' 101140th... kwle.uh
NIIs
Vtft eo+niA
1
CITY OF TUKWILA
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
tEC 02 1983
CITY OF TUKWILA
PLANNING DEPT.
This questionnaire must be completed and submitted with the application for
permit. This questionnaire must be completed by all persons applying for a
permit from the City of Tukwila, unless it is determined by the Responsible
Official that the permit is exempt or unless the applicant and Responsible
Official previously agree an Environmental Impact Statement needs to be completed.
A fee of $50.00 must accompany the filling of the Environmental- Questionnaire
to cover costs of the threshold determination.
I. BACKGROUND
1. Name of Proponent: J.B. Wright Corp.
2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: 682 -3577
L- -2t3- e3
1111 3rd Ave. Bldg., #700, Seattle, WA 98101
3. Date Checklist Submitted: December 1, 1983
4. Agency Requiring Checklist: City of Tukwila Planning & Engineering Depts.
5. Name of. Proposal, if applicable:
6. Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal .(including but not limited
to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give .
an accurate understanding of its scope and nature):
Construction of approximately 84 living units of abut 700 sq. ft. each
with covered parking & large natural' or landscaped areas to be retained.
7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the, proposal, as
well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental im-
pacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate under-
standing of the environmental setting of the proposal):
Located at NW corner of S 152nd & 57th Ave. S, the 4.62 -acre site is
sloping to the SW & is covered with various hardwood trees & a few
conifers & low vegetation. The surrounding area is fully developed with
a artments or condominiums.
8. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal: April, 1984
9. List of all Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals Required for the
Proposal (federal, state and local):
(a) Rezone, conditional use, shoreline permit, etc. YES NO X
(b) King County Hydraulics Permit YES NO X
(c) Building permit 0 YES X NO
(d) Puget Sound Air'Pollution Control Permit YES NO X
(e) Sewer hook up permit YES X NO
(f) Sign permit YES X NO
(g) Water hook up permit YES X NO
(h) Storm water system permit • YES x NO
(i) Curb cut permit YES X NO
(j) Electrical permit (State of Washington) YES X NO
(k) Plumbing permit (King County) :YES X NO
(1) Other: As required by City of Tukwila.
10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or futher activity'
related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain:
No. only as shown on site plan.
11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by
your proposal? If yes, explain:
No.
12. Attach any other application form that has been completed' regarding the pro -
posal; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future
date, describe the nature of such application form: -
Rezoned on February 10, 1981, City of Tukwila Ord. #1200,' planning
Dept. Master File #80 -38 -R.
II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
(Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required
YES MAYBE NO
. Earth. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes, in geologic
substructures?
(b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcover-
ing of the soil? g
(c) Change in topography or ground surface relief fea-
tures? g
(d) The destruction, covering or modification of any
unique geologic or physical features?
-2-
X
(e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils,
either on or off the site?
(f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or
changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which
may modify the channel of a river or stream or the
bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake?
Explanation:
YES MAYBE NO
x
Soil movement & compaction will be required to develop the site.. Soil con-
ditions will be addressed in future soils report & development plans, with
retention & design to City of Tukwila specifications.
2. Air. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air
quality?
(b) The creation of objectionable odors?
(c) Alteration of air movement, moisture
or temperature, or any change in climate, either
locally or regionally?
Explanation:
X
Air quality deterioration may occur with addition of new buildings. (fireplaces,
etc.). Buildings themselves may have an effect on air movement over
present site conditions.
3. Water. Will the proposal result in:.
(a) Changes in currents, or the course or direction
of water movements, in either marine or fresh
waters?
(b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns,
or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? X
(c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? X
(d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water
body? X.
(e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration
of surface water quality, including but not limited
to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X
(f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of
ground waters?
(g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either
through direct additions or withdrawals, or through=
interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations?
-3
X
a
. .. :77 . ............. 77:7 . ,,,,,,, , .. ....... .. ..... • .• 7:•"—• .......
• • .... .....
..... • ....... ... ..... . •
• ...... .
11.
........
s
A
................................. .....................................
.................................. . :7:77 ........................
............................
• ................ ---• ........... ............... .................................
• ............................................................... •• ........... -••••••-•-••••••••-•-•-•-•-•-•••••
:7777 ............... :
• .. • ... • .......... • •
.............................. .............. .....................................
• ............. : ................. : ............................................ .......... ........... . 7 7 " " " • •• • " " • " • "
. ......... 7 ................ . . 7.
" ........ 7. ......... . ... ........ ... :7771 ... ..... ...... .. ....................................
-
• ....... • ............ • •••••••• • • ...... • • ...............
7.7 ....... .......... . " . .. " ... ............. 7.7 ........... " ..... ...........
.........
. 777 . 77 ................. . : ....... 777:777:777777 .......... .... . . .... . ... ... ....... . . ....... ........ --7•• .................. ......................... "•"-- " .......... : ..... •
..................... . . .. :."
............. ........................
........................ • • ..... • • • • • • • • • • . . •
. . . . . . . ..........
•
...................................... .
-------.-----
• ..... • •• •
. . ................ .. ....... .......77.
• • •• • • • • • .... •• • . • •• • •• • • • •••• •-••••-••• ............................... ^ ......... • ...... .......
.......... ..
• 7 " ' • ... "." ' . . ' ' • " • ..... . •-` . ... • •
....... .....
-• .................................................... ................................. , ............. .................
..... • • • • ... ..... •••••• • ... •
...... . ....... . .
• .... ••••-• ....... •.• • • • • ..... • .............
........... • ..
...
• • • • • • • • • • • •
• • ..................................
.. . : . 7-7 . ..... . .. ........
............... ................ .•.
..... • --• •
. ... • • • ...
• • ...
...... . ................
• • .......
....
..... ..........
•••• ......... ............................ • ........
............................................................
. . . ...... ........ ........... . . ...... ........ 7 ........... ........ .........................
..... ^-^^.- .....
.. •
• ........ • • ......... •- •
•
...
.... • ...... ::!: 7: • •
. . .•. . . . . ... . 7,7 ... . : .. :7:- . . r::.. 7.. . .......
• • • • • ...... • .• • • • •- • • ................... • .................
. • • • • ... •••
........... ......... . ..... .. . . ......................... ......
•• . • ••: . • • .... • • •• • •• • • .... •• •
•••• • ................................
• . . . .•:.7.-::: • : ............ •::: ........... • ... : . - • • - -• : • - ..... • - • • • • " • • • • • ......... • ... ... .. .. ..... .... .. . .... . • . 71 .......... .. .. .. 7 ... ... .. ..... . . . 7 .......
. . . . 7 .... ....... ........ .......... ...... . : . ....... . . ... ..... . ....... : . .. ..... 7! . . ..... 17 .
(h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either
through direct injection, or through the seepage
of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne
virus or bacteria, or other substances into the
ground waters?
(i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise avail-
able for public water supplies?
YES MAYBE NO
X
X
Explanation:
Site development will change absorption rates but storm drainage & retention
will be addressed in a approved site grading & storm retention plan, de-
signed to City of Tukwila specificationE:
4. Flora. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers
of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs,,
grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)?
(b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or
endangered species of flora?
(c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, .
or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of
existing species?
(d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop?
Explanation:
X
Development of the site will reduce present flora but it will be replaced .
with items on Landscape Plan designed to City of Tukwila specifications.
5. Fauna. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers
of any species of fauna (birds, land animals
including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic
organisms, insects or microfauna)?
(b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or
endangered species of fauna?
(c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an
area, or result in a barrier to the migration
or movement of fauna?
(d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife
habitat?
X
X
X
Explanation:
Fauna that is presently onsite will be forced to move during site development
or relocate to those areas left in their natural state onsite.
-4-
'6. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise
levels?
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
A temporary noise level increase will occur during site development.,.
Levels associated with residential neighborhoods will be present after
construction.
7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new
light or glare? x
Explanation:
Light levels found in residential developments will be present upon
completion and occupancy of the site. Yard or parking lighting may also
be present.
8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in the altera-
tion of the present or planned land use .
of an area?
Explanation:
Property is currently zoned R -3 and R -4.
9. Natural Resources. Will'the proposal result, in:
(a) .Increase in the rate of use of any natural
resources?
(b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural
resource?
Explanation:
10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an
explosion or the release of hazardous
substances (including, but not limited
to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radi-
ation) in the event of, an accident or
upset conditions?
Explanation:
x
11. Population.
Explanation:
Will the proposal alter the location,
distribution, density, or growth rate
of the human population of an area?
YES MAYBE NO
With the addition of 84 living units, an increase in population, under
current zoning, will occur.
12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, .
or create a demand for additional housing?
Explanation:
84 new units will be provided to the area.
13. Transportation /Circulation. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? -
(b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or
demand for new parking?
(c) Impact upon existing transportation systems?
(d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation
or movement of people and /or goods ?.
(e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic?
(f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles,
bicyclists or pedestrians?
Explanation:
Additional vehicular movement will occur with the new units. Parking
for onsite development will be provided.
X
14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon,,
or result in a need for new or altered
governmental services in any of the
following areas:
(a) Fire protection?
(b) Police protection?
(c) Schools?
(d) Parks or other recreational facilities?
(e) Maintenance of public facilities, including
roads?
YES MAYBE. NO
(f) Other governmental services? )C
Explanation:
Government services will be required for site development. Individual
agencies will be contacted for input on the job.
15. Energy. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X
(b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or
require the development of new sources of
energy?
Explanation:
Energy in the form of gas or electricity will be needed for the project.
16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for
new systems, or alterations to the
following utilities:
(a) Power or natural. gas?
(b) Communications systems? .
(c) .Water?
(d) Sewer or septic tanks?
(e) Storm water drainage?
(f) Solid waste and disposal?
Explanation:
The above utilities will be needed for occupancy. Onsite and--if required- -
offsite extension of said utilities will be done by the owner, at no expense
to the City of Tukwila.
X
X
X
17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the crea -.
tion of any health hazard or potential
health hazard (excluding mental health)?
Explanation:
YES MAYBE NO
'18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruc-
tion of any scenic vista or view open to
the public, or will the proposal result .
in the creation of an aesthetically of-
fensive site open to public view?
Explanation:
X
. Site will be landscaped to provide a pleasing visual environment in the area.
19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact
upon the quality or quantity of exist-
ing recreational opportunities?
Explanation:
20. Archeological /Histroical. Will the proposal result in
an alteration of a signifi-
cant archeological or his -
torical site, structure,
object or building?
Explanation:
CERTIFICATION BY APPLICANT:
I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the, above
information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency
may withdraw any declaration of non - significance that it might issue in
reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation
or willful lack ull disclosure on my part.
December 1 1983
Signature and Title Date
Gordon T. Pathmann, PLS
JOHN R. EWING & ASSOCIATES
622 South Central Avenue
KENT. WASHINGTON 98031
-8-
X
JON 72 072767N1 01/27/84
RETURN TO SENDER
NOT DELIVERABLE AS ADDRESSED
UNABLE TO FORWARD
JONES
5772 S—�
Seattle-, -. _
x.x
TOC Z ' P /LL
.
\'TOPE STd1�ILL1JSTl(.}J "clue. z'i cur
WI.L. e6 44.Nura.EE7 Y:
02 .4C,ASi YING• r.. F_�'yTp'�E °l0. 10 TNG
OF CLI
IZi a.ocjI 4" OL IDP_011- G+
(3) I- yc, � Yn ycPB
1. )COVET? YT T�OpE HTJ lUTE
1- IATfWC
•
C40
@r'41111
CO+IIRGID
3•03'
Li) ,R URGIKA11 /Vir6 Np e "
..1`J SE',1NA ?AQYRIFERP( PAPer birch
a. } /OZ'JIiS vi TgE.U�/ -4t .i,v.
• r + �)PRP,XINUS A/prA /pePy., *Sh
-AF-JA rXL,OENTALi/-a/Weste • n larch
_. , • •,61?._)uib izENUlD10ec. /a Akir:)..0 fen...
F.NDZ. N•OEJTICd-41) v.65+ern w) i }e pine
s6JO0r5L)c, A^ENSIEZII /70 . fir
• J T J&) *IFTEIY.o°a t= P1 /hpttevn
hembck
OI-ND1.
• '
I • I k \ \''.
g ? is . /5Z ",o iT. . $
PFC'05Tn?r1-r-O5 couoy- ipe.w, / -iAiri . +araaniG .
N NW rl
WtID PGA/Ira- 1A ,9rAre
•,i,. 7+PJES siN60we..0M /Fed firmerir5-cuvrpnt .
▪ JPKUNIUNI OJATUM /E,CaraG1 hNCklebevvy
S' EbFA I.fr./N
STATE OF
WASHINGTON
REGISTERED
LANDSCAPE AR T(CT
•
r l• FO" •
E[CI 7[nI
earl. 19 1984
tETY Gf TL'ar. ��A
PNANNING DEPT.
REPARED.BY, ..
JOHN R. EWING AND ASSOCIATES
CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYORS
ENT. WASHINGTON
DATE
/2 -3-83
aCCGO PC21J1 -+GI. Q-3- 0 NOTE
OWNER.
. B WRIGI -1T
PROLE
(206)852 -6633
. 77 SOS.
DESCRIPTION
DRAWN. BY
CHECKED BY
SHEET CONTENT -
LA,UDiGAPE PLAN!
GR. GARAGE FLGOR ELEVA77ON
FG : P /ASE51-1E0 : GRADE ELE1147 /0N
---iso -= EX /571NG ;GROUND CON7OUR
NEW F /41l51-1ED GRADE CON7OUR
NCI. F7N/5F1EO 5RTT 5LEVAT /ON.
L..I ROCKERY
NOTE :GiIG (III �7�21
70Fb • EX/5T /NG TREE LGC,AT /OA/5 .4/e it 9 i9p4I
FROM TORX.RAPNY . MAP 8Y.
OE.VM /5 ' ASSCC/ATES.
PLANNING CCf*T.
PREPARED. BY
JOHN R. EWING AND ASSOCIATES.
CIVIL ENGINEERING •- LAND SURVEYORS'
J. 8 d.// /G/-/T
KENT.' WASHINGTON
GRAD /M . PLAN•
tic��15T.' �P�G
°S RHDI¢ /m
o) I�TCrvJC
o-e -ar• \� 00°
PDEA.11 TSUf A "YIeur.ESSI I
• TxIC A'- Co.wIADE1115
JULIIPeR.VS' OD IFHRTA
PHOTIIJIA FR8. e..RI
• TR4vAE�1 L•Ai a'..
PAVIDIAw1A
PRUI.IU �: CJ�.RAjIFCSLA
E4cTULA • PAPYRI FeFiA
.PIOUS- JfLVESTRIS •
ALL PLAl.7T MATERIAL TO 0E A:AiJ 3iA�.lOAR Dom, "'
Tp••OIL,- PLAIJTED 0E.0 5 IL' OEPM TREE L.4. E.R 4 R GALL (ALLDF fld.5
FERrILILER.- AGRIFoRrt RTAB LETS Z.0-IO -5
AsIALY-NS e. MFG. RATC7. COI ECAUAL)
MULCH PLALITE.D LI/L" C)EIPTH COURSE GRADE MARK GRIPS.
.. STAKE HARDWbODS 'WITH 511- IGI -E' L'I[ Z" 'STAK -E. d PLEKIBLE TIE�Z. T�j� ..
C.01- IIPER�. TO 6EI"�ILI, -fo' HIGH' ATTIME OF WC,. ,n(�a( -� r� If�1
IJARDWOCO> SHALL ESE t-AILI. LiCAUPEFt. AT P- A.1JTILI .TIME. IrR1 L5�JILB.�IL�I!1
DATE
/Z-2-65
PREPARED -BY •• JOHN R: EWING.AND ASSOCIATES
CIVIL ENGINEERING - LAND SURVEYORS
KENT. WASHINGTON
REV. NO
DESCRIPTION -
DRAWN BY. •
• 6AB-I ..
OWNER.-
_.). Ei WRIGNT
(206)852 -6633
CHECKED BY
try
11
:41v141.4 r /Far../E, •L. 4R0.0 p• 28,10'
15UILDIN6I'5 G -rkzu 12
9
UNIT TYPE'C'
W4
Co
4446 PL_
aP.
0
kgvv E--6x0r.rt - 29.IO'...
y
0
1 L!
/ pia. J444-t: 4240e. („e4.-04 .1,2.9391M
13d 1.C'1).1 N > 1-11-WT T f?E..`.8,
II
'SEC 2 19831
cm up r.;R:;i�n
PLANNING. DEPT.
)._C`3.. y
rn
neE a H.a. eR
aoacl:RVCNn
11111111111
IIIIIIIIIIIU•
11111111111
11111111111 IME
y. NO. 3
I76'. No: 3
N 8r 45'19'w
= :EXISTINCI. TREE.
(EXIST/NCI 'PLANT MATEZIALS.5AS£D ON
•JoN4E)AN- GER.ZARDl'Mc NEAL
'PLAN OF.-7 /la /al/
PLANTI'N4 ''INSTRUCTIONS.
1: D16 ALL PLANTIN4 .HALES TWICE: AS W
AS:. DEEP A5. SYSTEM -AT PLANTINi
2,: SET THE PLANT AT:..THE SAME DEPTN
GROwINCT AT PR.EVIOUSLY, NEVEK .DE
3• BACK -FILL USING, MI
ROTTED :BAKNYAND :MANO .(N
2/-3 TdP5a .: •
4, STAKE. ALL. UPRIGHT PLANTS. '(SE A
STAKES 70 HOLD T+t£. PLANT FOR
I E AND TWICE
TIME.:
5 IT WAS
(?E?
(t VOLUME) :
(7 FRESH)..
12 RAP JZ1ATE
TD 2 YEARS.
639 05'. ". .. s l CO NO. $ r .
f' L_ A "1- LIST
g0TAIJICAt COMMOIJ
WAGER CIRCII.f@4.TUM / VINE' MAPLE (3 O(t MORE tkunkS) . S - (y. H7.
Co1orJEA'1l LLCTEUS/ r�AR�IEiI - (WEU.'$CAI•ILHFQ
ARG104A "p'ILDS UV • U14.-A 1,E41:6ERKI.. '. .
. PII•NUS MC KOLA l NESff¢rJ - v•MITE PME
Vacc.WUM Oveturt /EVE.RCrREErJ'_ HucKLE&Ek1:'
L'
CIStuS HYORIOUS/ WHITE RGL'KROSE-
- FRA><II•a1S LATIFOL A/ ORE,O,J ASH
J..
PSEUD016u61, MEOZIESI I /DCU4 -. FIR_ .. .
poput.us fz ur.oloES /4ueuNy AsP'EN
/. TSLC�A HET`c05Pr•riu/ wesitZ4 HENI.0.44.
> AREurIS uNEDO'r.OMPACTA'%COM1PACt STPAwaFXRr TQEC. J3� fro"
AGER RU&91M/ RED MARE 213' CAL•
SLCOt/NC'1
4. 250 •3
. sc, no. 3
5'2!C '1441
MiElKOW
SEP 12,19)i-41.
„CITY OF
PLANNING DEPT.
J.B.: WRIGHT CORPORATION
1111 THIRD AVENUE - . SEATTLE, .WASH 98101.,
VER ....
-Title :':
LANDSCAPE PLAN
1433
M A'I NN'
.f 2.000 NO. 3
r.i. oeo 44Ra ss
11111111111
11111111111 pi
IIIIIIIIIII
11111111111
mlmuuel m
mlll➢III
o'
IIIIIIUIII
MS" ✓-
76 NO. 3 '
8r45. 14 "W.
NO, 3
EX. = E)C'15TI NCL'''TREE'.
(t :sTINc1 PLANT MATEIUALS 3A5E1z, ON
)oNGEJAN- 4E,2RARD• Mc NEAL .
CLAN OF /.IG /84) ..
P n T
koraw1Ca / 1,11,1CfJ 11aME:'
-> Af--F K .;IRCit14Tu4 /VINE it-E: (?- Ok• MOrE tk'LI�K�i.
--+ " C,OTJIJ EA • 1Ef1' Le•�TE.u' >/: IAf E.:6 - (\✓EU, GAILHEV �
ARC10.00 -1YLO - JVA uRSI / bE.Ji1t6E1 1 i •
•PIIJJS MflCOLA WHITE PIN£. 1, FUL.1- ):
v4CUNUM OA ATOM / EVERG(:E6.1.' HUCKt.G6E1;Cr:, • ,
.. CrS1uS NYORIGJt. /' WNITE- RCi:KP.O�E
FRAYINUS LATIFOLA/ ORE6014 A6H
F�ELIDC1 =U4A 1.1.7 II
—); FOPu L.u6 - em JI.:JIUES /CeJOVNA •. EI.1
PLANTING IN5TRUCTIONS.
1. D14'ALL PLANTINCI HOLE5 TWICE A5 WIDE AND TWICE:
45.1 DEEP A5 ROT. SYSTEM -AT PLAtITIN6I TIME.
'21 SET _TRE PLANT. AT THE SAME 'DEPTH -A5 IT WAS
.GROININ¢'.AT PIZEV.IOUSLY, NEVER" DEEPER
3. BACK- FILL ()SIN h THE FOLLOW IN CI MIX On' VOLUME:
1/.3 BARNYAND. MANOR.E (NOT FRESH)
2/3 TaPSCFIL
�(.
STAKE ALL UPRIGHT PLANTS. USE ARPROPRIATE_
STAKES 7T0 .HOLT> 7-1-1E -PLANT FOR IITO 2 YEARS.,
T=.LC � r♦ET,PHru >/ ..Ir1teN- .:rEM�.<:..K ;
> P.R &:1✓ uNE A.. J MPA:1A•/ otAPACt •
FACER .Rue RI / RED MBE •
:Lf:t'NI GIl • - .
r.d, MT::.
4' • 1.11..
• 1 (311115+
r ('r
Br . CEO:
Plum AJ4., / -. 12 f v: +.1 L...i - L'n'ii F'..' 2 ':.y: '. �4{•.('
REVISION
CiCINFTt n
DESIGNED
DRAWN
EP 12 1984E
f_.
pTY-
'Q
PLANNING L'c'PT
J.B. WRIGHT . CORPORATION
1111 THIRD AVENUE -.
'SEATTLE, WASH 98101
A
DATE :7/6/84
LANDSCAPE 'PLAN
JOB NO.
1433
sHak
is- •;x
-EXI:ST.INc PLANT : MATE ALS TU MAI1� \C •
• PI(LIV AOFA - -
f 2.000. NO. 3
rE..LY •
nRE .:uHEDE
rbRILCOTA��
IIIIIIIIIII
IIIII�I � v2c
IIIIIIIIIII
11111111111 1M
JAGuzzI
IIIIIIIII
I
IIIIIIIIII
—. `..75 NO. 3
N 8745' 19 °W
63505' _ ! 0 v0.
7r; No. 3
EX: = E)crSTING' TREE .
(cXI5T(NCi SLANT MATERIRL5 BASED ON
JoNGE)AN - GEP ,41ZI MrNEAL
ViAN OF. T / 81)
F. L._ A LIST ..
TAIJIi A L C MM!kI -GH-
>.. lk "CIU4jJrA / VUJE MAPLE -. (•, CA! MOVE r r
L4/ 7EU S/ E4Rn4(,1-1EO
4JICT0518p}I11LO., uvA JK.1/
> :r11-111Y., MoufGOUA I NE•fEC J • \VHITE r'* (FuH..)
• . VAccJ.IUM oV 4
ATU/EVE4C,LEEJ! HU(.KLE &ERLr
c - ,CISTu Hi DRIG U4/ WHITE RGL",KRQE
FRA+TWJUS LATIWOL IA/ ORE, ON ASH
—• pEUfX',T-u4n> r„1EI.1z ,FIR -
'w' .a
: ( - Poru,uS 1RFJ1Uu0IDV. /QJOL'uNG
FLANTIN4 INSTRUCTIONS
1r
D14 ALL PLANTINLj' HOLES : TWICE As WIDF AND TWICE
A5 .1 EEP A5 R.00T SYSTEM: AT FLA/VTIN4 ':'TIME..
SET THE PLANT AT THE SAME DEPTH WAS
GROVyiN(T'AT PREVIOUSLY, NEVEK. DEEPER
3• BACK -'FILL US)/4 T1-3E FcL..L0W?P4c MI)' (131' VOLUME):
V3 ' gOTTEI EAI?NYAND MANURE. (NOT FRESH);
3. 'T'OPSO' 11—
9. STAKE ALL UPRIGHT PLANTS'.:. (15E AP-PRopRIATE
STAKES TO HOLT) 74-It PLANT FOR 1 fO 2 YEAR5.
u.Imo+17'
r1c
By
Isy ' ref
Gk0 APPR,
REVISION
> a1;Rf'J Urlt
• .Jrl 'A. ir+jYdLT TV ,V�u'r:• Tk�z
ISEP i 1984 I,
•
PLANWNG LEFT
DESIGNED'
DRAWN
CHECKED_
APPROVED
For:
J.B: WRIGHT '_CORPORATION
'1111 THIRD AVENUE .
SEATTLE, WASH.. 98101.
aNrE. 7/8/84
SCALE
MORE.
VERT,
N /A
TIfle :
LANDSCAPE PLAN
SHEET
JOS NO.
1433.
II
0111111111
11111111111
N 87 °45..19 "W . 635.05'
BOTANICAL/COMMON NAME SIZE - ':DESCRIPTION
Fraxinus 1 tifolialOregon Ash 6 9. Caliper Well Branched NOTE:
- -
-- - - - This plan provides additional landscape information to landscape Ran. C-1
by Jongelen Gerrard and.McNeal and is not to supercedo or change the
- - originally approved landscape plan in any way: Ace ci rcinatum /Vine Maple: . 6" Caliper Clump - .
N0. DATE - I. .9V - CKD.
APPR
REVISION'
Barghausen:
Consulting;': Engineers Inc.
Land Planning, Survey 'Engineering Specialists
6625 So. 190th. St.. Sulte 102•Koot, Wash. 98022•(2061'872 -5522 '
For:
J.B. ,' WRIGHT CORPORATION
1111 THIRD AVENUE
SEATTLE'; WASH 98101
DESIGNED DM.
DRAWN D
ClarCKED m
"Dr�6
APPRWE'61
Dpi 7/6/86
SCALE
VERT.
RECEIVED
CRY OF TUKWILA
4.' JUL 171984
i BUILDING DEPT.
Title :_:
ADDENDUM. TO ,SHEET -.L- I.
THE. COTTAGES- TUKWILA.
LANDSCAPE PLAN
SHEET.
EX:15T INcc PLANT :MATERIALS
TO : RE V1A_IN:
H• ✓ EcC.-
1 ".20'
0 .
MOM 11011111. 04,11
ROJGH 44RA SS
HYOFO SfrF O
IIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIII
11111111111
11111111111
IIIIIIIIIII1®1.�
11111111111 ®1,
1.7S No. 3 ,
N 871'45'19"W
635.05
EX :• _ . EXI5T1 N "h TREE'
(Z-XI$TINCI -PLANT MATEPJAL'S BASED atv
joN4E)AN- G1EI:RARD' -Mc NEAL
VLAN OF.'1 /1G /Bq -
• p�aNT.
L�sT
g-PiAIJIGAL /COFIMCIJ 4AHE
�F3 •CIRCIIJAjuN+1' /.VINE 4&PLE (!,'oft MORE rRUNJKE),
COTOIJEASTER.: LAt.TEUS /fAkaEYI tb•/ELL &QNJGHE171..
ARurostAn4-rLOS UVA-URS1 /.,,6EJW6ERRY'.
.. PIUUS. :MOI•ITICOLA'. NESjERIJ WHrtE PIFIE:
■ncciuuM OVATUM /EwER[,REE)1'NUi.KLE6EI.Kf
CISTUS :HYORID'JS /• 'WHITE - 'RCX.KROSE
FRA ,C•UB LATIFOLLA/'OREC.00 ASH; '
• EEUOOrsU6A -. MEIJ21EStl /Cxlua FIR
poruLus :jREraULosOes /QuntlR+v.
PLANTI N4 INSTRUCTIONS
1. DkG,ALL PLANT/N4 1-10LES .TWICE :AS WIDE AND TWICE.
A5 DEEP A5 RdT SYSTEM AT - PLAPITIN4r TIME..
SET .THE PLANT AT THE SAME DEPTH AS IT WAS
GROWINC-•.AT PIZEVIDUSLY, NEVER DEEPER
3 BACK - .FILL. USJNii THE FatLOWIN4 MIX' (13Y VOLUME)
V3 ROTTEI BARNYAND'MANU (NOT ..FRESH)
2 ; / 3 TOF5cr I L .`
9. STAKE ALL' UPRIGHT : .PLANTS USE: ,APPROPRIATE
5T-AKES 70 HOLD T•¢.IE. PLANT Fag 1 TD: 2 YE-AR-5.
TSI A HETE.J.O'It(LLA/ {Tya.- IJEH. -:-K
AR &J FUS UNEOU 'IpMPAC.AiCOMPAE-r.;.TEAWIM••'RT TREE
I ° I 1 1984 I . •
- PLANNING GFPT.
W. OATE BY CKO. APPR.
REVISION
For:
J.B. WRIGHT : CORPORATION
nil THIRD AVENUE
SEATTLE, 'WASH 98101
CHECKED
APPROVEV
DArE 7/6/84
SCALE :
HZ.
I` = ZO•
' VERT :
CERTI,-
Title :
LANDSCAPE.' PLAN
JOB to
,�.. t . ;3n
JUL 3 0.19841
FLANNING DEPT.
x�1QlC•YIF
..»
tout ME
PAM K4
Cf,3f. Boma RoaO /T
UT FIST
.• % :PFLTO4TAfM(L UV P* j tiawi mama iG
Npj10NF■ AatAFCLIA /Armfr+ yore
iF- l ES Jv /Feel float( in ai It
UPACCJNIUW DJATUM/ EeY9 -so Nu4k{eE,t
LI41 -IT FIXTURE
• PUMP5TER ENCLOSURE
STATE Or
WASHINGTON
•
RECIAERfD
.LANDSCAPE AR _TUT
PREPARED BY
OWNER
DATE
2/284 ,.
JOHN R. EWING AND ASSOCIATES
CIVIL ENGINEERING - LAND SURVEYORS
PROLE
Total Number of Units - 80
Number of Parking Spaces Provided -
Covered - 82
Open - 58
Total 140
s
Equal to 1.75 Cars '/ Unit
_3. B. WRIGNT
ADD® PYwrw4, C1' ID 6407E
eft axeE2+. eevt=ED TEEE N33.
DESCRIPTION
KENT. WASHINGTON
DESIGNED BY
(206) 852 -6633
DRAWN BY
GUN
CHECKED BY
SHEET CONTENT.
Landscape / Site Plan
I ".20' •
11111111111
11111111111M o
11111111111
O =a IIIIIIIIIII V
Gees
Fly,�v:r. <eo
75 NO.3
75 No. 3
N 87°45' 19°W
! 0 0 NO• 6
250 NO, 3'...
t.. NO. 3
_ EXI5TINCI .:T1?EE'
(ckr5Tlroci 'PLANT MATEEIAL'S 13J5ED- ON,
JONGE)AN- gEI`2ARD•'Mc NEAL'
Vt. AN OF 7./ IO /Bi)
1. D!4 .ALL. PLANT/ N4:'HOLES TWICE AS WIDE. AND TWICE'.
A5 . DEEP . A5 Zoo SYSTEM AT PLANTING . TIME
▪ SET THE 'PLANT AT THE "SAME- DEPTH A5' 17' WT15
GRUWlN¢.AT P2EVIOUSLY) NEVEK DEEPER
• BACK- FILL USINh THE FOLLQWINCI."MI>c .(13Y VOLUME):
%a �OTTE -D 13Al2NYAND. mANUzz (NOT FIZ -SH)
2/3 .TOP5Q' I L '
•. STAKE ALL UVRIGHT `PLANTS: `U5i AP-PRo.PQIATE
5 r-AKHS TO HOLD Ta-1 PLANT:: °FcR 1 TO 2 YEARS.
P 1. A :HT: L LsT
501- AIJIGAL /60I41,46'}i 04I -1E
-,AG IRGMArUN1 / VINE MAPLE (2 OR MORE .T-RUIJK''. - .5.,-Cs. HT.
GolONEASTEP... LACTEU'/ .17ARUET1 -(WEu- B(2406HE-0) •'S=4' i1-r • AR 1OSTAPI -17 LOf UVA- UR'.I/ WSEAK E>ER ✓Y . - :•I- '(EAR -,i ..g O.-c.
. F'141US..MO.Ii�IGOLA /'NES(EOJJ• WHITE - .01-LE _ (FJI -L-) 4-S • HT
• VAGCINUM OVATLIM /EVERGIZEENI- HUGKLE&ERKri 2x-SO HT
CISTJS.HYORIG'JS/ WHITE ROGKRO5E - .. 18"24' •H
FRA II,ILIs. :LATIFotw/ OIZEE,ON ASH • 124uv '(>U4A•: MEOZIESII 7DW4. FIR - .12-5-..HT ..
POPULJS TR JLOIDES /QUA <JNG' 4. f -iU
4 -Iv CAL
I 811s 1q•-
NO. DATE •
2j ANI Tr
I'c -CS.9L
'REVISION
-"•O AITNTL 2 "-3 "Zip
TSW.Ta ,HETEi�oPHYLL4/ weST[¢N / -1 D .
AR&JTub Up4W. �iJJMPACA jGOMPACT at1W RT -FEE
AGER• RtJ IJM /REO:.MAPLE'
J:B. WRIGHT CORPORATION
1111 THIRD AVENUE •
SEATTLE, WASH . 98101 - -
Title :
Pil(rNHC -C'YT. •
LANDSCAPE PLAN
snn
GRASS
I •1 � � , �.1
11111111111
11111111111
11111111111
1111191111
Hv✓voscGO
IIIIIIIIIII
Ao itsiimrw /II it
= i 76 NO '3.,_
- f 7.5 No. 3'
' N 87045' 19"W • 635.05
f . 1 00 N0, ,
25oAAo, _
EX. = EXISTING! .'TREE
.(EX■STING 'PLANT:MATEPIALS .M5ED
JaNGE)AN- EP_¢ARD-Mc -NEAL
PLAN OF -7 / I G/ es-t):. . .
PLANT' N4 INSTRUCTIONS
1, DIG ALL PLANTIN4;HOLES TWICE A5.'WIDE'AND TWICE
A5 DEEP "A5 ROOT SYSTEM AT PLANTING TIME.
E, SET 11-IE..PLANT. AT THE SAME: DEPTH A5.IT WAS
GROVIN¢ AT - P2EVIdUSLY; .NEVER DEEPER.
S. BACK -FILL ()SIN ti .THE FOLLOW INCA.- MIX (13Y VOLUME):
I/3 R.oTTEb BAPKIYAND MANO (NOTTRESH)`
2,13 T0P50 I L
4, . STAKE ALL UPRIG.1-1T PLANTS:. ;U5E AP-127OPRIATE
STAKES TO HOL7> T44 PLANT .`FGR 1 TD 2 YEAR5.
-' - _ACF2, CIRCI -&Tut4 / VINE HAF1- - (3 OR. MORE tRUhIKS) 5 -Co' HT •
COT011EAGTER LAG'(EUS/ FARaEYi :•(v /ELL bRANGH EP) ?'- 4 .HiT
ARcrOSTAPN /LOS UVA- UR•"I/ 6EARF.E.R1 -1- .
F11-/US h1QJ l (COLA' '6 f -QN_ viHRE PWE (Fuu.-
� vbWUNUH ovAtuM /EVE4242EEw1-- HUGKLE &E2K {:
-� GISTUS HYDRIOUS/ ■4I1E 12(X,KK06E •
FRA'NUs- .LITwo A /oREbotI
FsEUGGu6,A, N1EIIZ.IESi1 /
'( DUu4. FIR
POPuLUS TIZEMUuoIPES /QuAKINE, Aspsnl
Tat o. HETEKOPHYLLA /. w0biEw?J
V - - -> - AREUTUS' VHDD !CJMPAGTA /COHPACr $FA\VE RY .TeEe
AGER RUaRUM R60' 'MAPLE . .
>(..'O .C.
4 -S HT. .
141
42-S' HT
3i Arofr. A, A It F12 SFFDI AiIYM1TL 2 ' } +atL 4 Afti
REVISION •
q'•s' Hr.
3(4" r-IT.
"GAL;
DESIGNED
DRAWN
CHECKED
APPROVER
DA 7 /9 /84'
,pr 'sec Dumas
n- -�. /Z• MT.
•
!AUG 2 =' 1989
CITY
PLANNING DEPT.
•J.B. WRIGHT CORPORATION
-1111 THIRD AVENUE
SEATTLE, WASH. 98101.
Title :
LANDSCAPE PLAN
FG • 2o/ 0
FG•200 0
"s• �
•/97.Lb
GF • /84.75
Mi • COV RX 1 1
• COVERED
/NRRIA.G.
GF= .3.0O
GF= /84.00
STOP 2 +l
GUT SLOPE
.1/5T. EDGE' Of 1104OJ
eY/ST. sKCUALX -L _ —
LEGEAID
20' OLJY APPROACH
50. /5 2 AT) ST.
OF = GARAGE FLOOR 'ELEV47/O/J
FF = F /AI /5/4E0 P7-00P ,ELEVATION
. FG - F /A/ /51-1E0 GRADE. ELE VAT/CA/
- -/50 -- = -Ex757/u.G 'G. OO/JD COARCr1R ..
—/50— = A/EW F /A1/5HE.0 GRACIE CLWR7uU
1,12k1 //��( � - = /EAI F /A/ /5 -lED 51,07" ELEVA77OA/'
JOHN R. EWING AND ASSOCIATES
CIVIL ENGINEERING - LAND SURVEYORS
12 -2283
KENT. WASHINGTON
DESIGNED BY
IJS
(206)852 -6633
!VOTE
TORO f EX/5T/VG TREE LOG4T/OA/5 'FROM
7OFOGRAPHY MAP BY HORTON LIEN/-/ /5
c A550GATE5.
J. S. !,/R /G/-/T
SOUTH /52ND ST.
DESCRIPTION
DRAWN BY
AAA
•
70P•,
2:/
\ITG/7
TOE
FILL
GF • /63.75,'.
TOE
2/
FI[L
.M 4ZZ
cn
N
LEGEIVD
O.
' .s11Y APPROACH •
APPRLI4C1-1
. GF • G4RY.E FLcOR' ELEVATION
FF • - •.F /N/5NEC,.FIOIGIP OLEVATION
.FG FLV /SHED GRADE' ELeVAT /ON.
- - /d0 -- EX /STIA.G G6t UNO .CONTOEI.e
—150— _ N/A./ • F /N/5HEJ GRAOC C.GN/TOUR
®.. • ANEW F /N /5. EO .SPOT. ELEVA7)GW
-- --• wt4 CA2 '?1M Q(...; 14(09:
PREPARED. BY
RcvIY Gtx . La. ; GRADWG. Efc'
DESCRIPTION
CHECKED DATE
ERTROWEii
3 91993
CITY G. 7v,;■ LA
PLANNING DEPT
NOTE: - ..
TORO f EX /5T7NG TREE .LOCAT /ON5 F/'0/1
TOFiDGRAPNY MAP ElY NORTON IDEA/N /5
i ASSOC /ATES.
OWNER
JOHN R. EWING AND ASSOCIATES
CIVIL ENGINEERING - LAND. SURVEYORS
KENT; WASHINGTON
DESIGNED BY
LJ5 h1 •
J. B. /.4, /GHT
(206)852 -6633
CHECKED BY
:A,/5/ -I
702 2: / PAL
ALL TO W. A.ALI 3TALIGAR OD.
.TOPSOIL- PLAWI'EO EEDS' 1Z" OEPTI -1 TREE PIT } I�LARGER T-IA11 ROQC ESALL(ALLDIF2EC-TIO•,.)
FER (LILER - AGP FORrt PLA-rnwJG TAESLET AJ.JALY515 'E I-tFYa..RATC�. (OR EQUAL
MULL- PWLITEDAREA�' Z)/L" OE•PH IdUROE GRADE p0.F2K 01.11 PO ...
OTAKE I-)AROV•bOO WITFt 0141r LE L "K Z" DTAKE 4 PLEKIBLE
GOw11FER0 TO ESE MW. 1-IIG1-1 ATTIrtE OF R-AJ.ITL -IC. •
. . � LR
%5WIRDvJCCOAENE WL "CALIPER APLALTILI .Tuna. � --
DATE
/2-3-83
JOB NO.
BY
JOHN R. EWING AND ASSOCIATES
CIVIL ENGINEERING - LAND SURVEYORS
KENT.: WIASHINGTON
PROJECT
�.B.. WR1Gb -IT
(208) 852 -6633
CHECKED BY
77505-
SHEET CONTENT.
LAiJDiGAPE . PLAk/
DESCRIPTION
EX 15T: PLANT MATETZ1ALS '
�. TO` REMAIN
EX I STIN (i 'PLANT MATERIALS ?O REMAIN
2otJGN CCROSS
N YOPC SEEC '.\
11111111111
11111111111 � oo:,.,, ,' Aro
�O ® f1 >
11111111111
11111111111. _
Ip' .-
• S'
11111111111
sIII!!11111 :•:
•
$ i75No.3
EX. = E?∎15T1NL TREE ..:
(°XisTIN[l v/.ANT MATEPJRLS P.A5E : aN
JoN14E)AN- GIE�2Al2D- Mc NE&L
1l. AN or'/ /I /.51)
N 87•45', 19•W .
t 5t — NO 3
HT ". LIST
^--�` - POfAIJICAL /COMMON F:144-1E: I
NFQ CIRCINATUNI VWE 1 (d pLE (7, OR MORE TRUIJKSi,
CO'(ot.lE ASTER;. L.ACTEUS /. ('AR•EYI - WELL BRAFFGHEV)
.AR-1OsTAp41'LO uva -uRsl/ ISEORE,Er
i' = =->• PII)US 'I••1 IGOLA" NEsiERI4 W4I1E pittq.
VACCiNue Cya1UM /EVE1242EEJJ HutxyEBERRY
®' c — CISTUS HYORII u / WHITE R
ITE R[xOSE
FRA><INUS LATI501_1A OREL oA ASH
PLANT( N4. INSTRUCTIONS .:
1.-DIG ALL PLANT/ N/6 HOLES :TWICE -A5 :WIDE AND TWICE.
A5. DEEP A5 .1Z0OT. SYSTEM AT "PL ANTI N6 TIME:, ..
Z, SET- THE . PLANT AT THE .`SAME _; DEPTH AS IT -INA5
GROVIN(- AT P8EV'IOUSLY;'NEVER DEEPER
3• BACK =FILL US1N61 THE ..FOLLOW/Pi C1..MO's (13Y VOLUME)
.:%3 ROTTED. • BAPNYAND .MANURE .(NOT 'TRESH)'
2,13..TOP5P I L...
.9: STAKE ALL 'UPRIGHT- PLANTS. `..USE .APFROPRJATE ..'
5T- ORES,. TO H & LT, . -fl-J PLANT FOR .1 TO 2 YEARS.
pSEUO6T5U4A ME1•12IE11 /DOU4• FIR
pOPULUS "(j<EMuLA1DES /Qu�64G 44E4
sY
i g O N1b
...1"."1"-.1'.• 119841•
CITY OF Ttiw LA'
PLANNING DEPi•. •
ED DATE BT' clm. APPR.
. • REVISION
TSLCTA HETEkOPHYLLA/ wESiRN
AREuTusuNEW 'COMPACIA /(AMPACr TRAsv p' -rime'
CESIDIED
DRAWN ' ..
CHECKED .
APPROJEp .
y E 7 /B /B4
For:
J.B. WRIGHT CORPORATION
1111 THIRD .AVENUE
SEATTLE, WASH. 98101
SCALE.
HORZ •
vERr
SHEET
I OF
JOB LO.
o
I
•
eSEINEgEitainOMMZWIEr
\_
...1
6.40 pp iF..
C%,4 ®6G Roap'
PLANT LIST
•' a*, 4¢GIN TLLIv1 / Va..iB
ULA ��NppIC ..
DET TRW, S )/ peblflyl
/ c�XNU6 NuITAu.q /.4o4.,e doniwaid_ • .
Nepocintus LLATPOu•/Dter, as
IAxiA ocubEµTP;us/weste�+ lard,
WPIX-US llettn LDIOE6 /Quak , , Iefi
PRC705Tfl'rW5 coLUMPJP* /rtavi nanzalita•
- � NY°4A AGUIRX.- IA; /O-e v' .y-Are
(APES SPW60iNP1)w /Eed Flowero.5 wwant
. VPiCSJHIUW OVATUM/ Es■efyfatn hNTYJeI e
IMM
EMI
EMI
Emirtmg
CCOED FMSL11-IG1, Q44-IG60 NOTE
®M.Eel LANDSCAPE. DE7AR -7
ST ATE Or
WASHINGTON
• RI CIS IRIS
' •IAMDSCARS ARy1U TUT
I
EMI
MIME
■ AI
N7N
I -6- M
-- PA' , BY
JOHN R. EWING AND ASSOCIATES
CIVIL ENGINEERING - LAND SURVEYORS
KENT, WASHINGTON
DESIGNED BY
GIIN
•WN •
WRIG 1Y
DRAWN BY
GA_ IN
(206).852-6633
CHECKED BY...
•
THE CDT TALE 5
LA i JD i.APE PLAN!
Toe 2�i JFRL
CONHlie-0
G EFCO
PA= KI
ME Z.I PILL
G %,=f. HLY. G Rpb
PLf7NT UST
(>{- FrEL,4CjRLIr.W,T1yY� / V r Np?
O9ETUCA R°1PYPJFERFt/ *ye, birth
•
CaRNUla uurTAU.q /,NAta2 don�vYed
Pze'q US LATPOUA /CI eAf• ash
LARIX,LYLIOENTNLIVWestew, ILrch
C> R2P0a5S TKSPAOLOIOF1a/QWnkol Aran
0 PINUS •49•A COLA/ YASJEY., ..bite pme
PSEUODTSUXP1 Ir,ENSezili Gou,o�. fir
19,J6P) FIEtEROPHYLLPI/Waste,",
■embLk.
Oe• A24.- 0621,M r- UK ANP1 /'1A,r i nAnzAnItA
JAMI-16•41P, AC Or3 /Ora?, y■re
a)gES sft.suINEUN, /Red
/AC,UNIUNI OJATUN / huOVebed.
LIGHT FIXTURE
H'f:JROSEEDEO (.E,%5
BTA�E OF
WAS. NGTON
R(GI TIRED
LANDSCAPE ARCS)MT
SxDE.O LAWN
APPROVAL
DATE
2/28/84
JOB NO
PREPARED BY
JOHN R. EWING AND ASSOCIATES
6F.••'
ENGINEERING •LAND SURVEYORS
1206) 852 -6633
t5•v.
5. M
KENTJ:WASHINGTON
DESIGNED BY
»SOS
NEV. NO.
CHECKED
DRAWN BY
G/UN
CHECKED BY
Total Number of Units - 80
Number of Parking Spaces Provided -
J Covered - 82
Open - 58
934 Total 140
DEPT
• Equal to 1.75 Cars / Unit
G3INOW
'FEB 291
CITT t.'
OF }_
PLANNINC C
OWNER
.8. WRIGI-IT
SHEET CON EN
Landscape / Site Plan
i=rnnnmmim
v',ji u!'
toy
.I.�... +_.o •rot
7a .
' 610 00
7/R•/]6.0
AC./ 71O -
STEP
7/.41/76.5 .. \
•
•
7Ka /640
7 /.f1/rl
GF )34 z5
2
FILL
5 E
• PARKING
GF. /83.75
GF= /3QO
JACUZZI -.
FG =/83.60
/52N0 5T.
. LEGE/U
20' ,GIP /VEklAY
APP/a14CH
•. - GP. GARAGE FLOOR Ede vAT/OA/
PG, F /N/51-/ED ACc ELEVA7/ AJ
- -150 -- EX /571N6 GROUA70 CON7OUle
NEN F /N /SHEO GR4OE - CON7OUR.
® NEW F /N /51,-/E0 S7YT/ ELE VA7 /OAl
' 'ROCKERY
TAc • TOP OF ROGKERty, ELEVA770A1
NOTE*
TORO EX /ST /MG TREE LOC..4T /OA/5 ARE'
FA:S2M TOPCGRAPNY /4 AP BY /L'LPTOA/
0E/UA/ /5 I 455COIATE5.
DATE •
12 22-83
REV /Se ROCKER C5
RE V/3! BCC* LCC.; GRAD/.W, £IC
DESCRIPTION
/2.X•83
PREPARED BY - -. -Y /,�' �'6.�Gt;•;.,
JOHN R.SWING -AND ASSOCIATES
CIVIL ENGINEERIINEERI
NG'- LAND SURVEYORS
KENT.WASHINGTON
DESIGNED BY
.A/5N
. 3lua�Y '."w'l,ai'C < %F'.s,:�3iII....�J , a o .... i... •w'L. +.,:ir.',
PROJECT
(206) 852 -6633
CHECKED BY...
SHEET CONTENT
affit
l
Cs) u.. =-
c )COVeE!
77Te 2: I FILL
- P 21
CUr OcAr_
PLP\NT LIST
yro PRCT0TA1171.05 COLUM*)?8J / 1Air1
0+ (CEA URGINATIrn / Vird Mpple : . 'c 32 toptha 1W 0,6m - A / oreop. 5rare•
O.6ETUI1 P fF1FFF77 /.{nrCll 2
iWE S SAN.6UNEJI/fed f- loweri.5 L•uvrant
PIPW6 NYJTICOL/ v4Gi9m wi”te me •
Vhan411" NATUM/ Svereyraen W.g.141 ev +y
COR•!)5 Qu TALUI/ iJ1tF+.fl . ,
lIry n1
i /In�!E
�So . /5Z ' 377 ...
T�PIXINU6 L(1TPbUA/0, ash ll PSEUOOTSLWA M`FJ 151EZ11 /Doug. fir
t(J9) !1ETEKOpitYIJ.I /wecterv( DATE
tALIA OCL 7ENTAUywestxm larch hew1o41` . /2 -3 43
... ! • =cep °" a. C}WYID NOTE
. . JOB NO. 2 farm.$ o t.a+OtcaPE »QAdA . ' . eL-AG
FDPUI -OS TRENWEDIOF� /GE,.,Ak;vr� JSpen . 77505 1 Amen per, 218 'MEE IQs. EHIA
Micros 1R1 t 'r oleo Me.iA w1>Arezmite,
HYDROSEapeD • 0,05S
�DEO L%MJ
-OFSCRIPTION
1 -.3-a4
RECIST
IAKOSCAPE A EREO
PREPARED BY
JOHN R. EWING AND ASSOCIATES
CIVIL ENGINEERING - LANO SURVEYORS
OWNER
PROJECT.
J . B. WRIGN.T
KENT, WASHINGTON. - (206)852 -8833
DESIGNED BY
GAIN
DRAWN BY
GAJN
CHECKED BY'
SHEET CONTENT
LARJDitAPE .PLAki
gSrti'Vr
2 UNr4
8ra44
18 A)
(4 CO
y2 Nn 11f2es: T
• - 51TC A.¢c" 4. g5 • • ." • gT u rr4 a Ib nu /•
R 3 9 i, goa Q1 . 31 uNrt' a IL Du/a.
R 4 I I .4pp (b9- 32)
P20. Po SG 0 UFirfh
RTi 29 UNIT* -W;' 4 -cr.9,
R4. :b .VNIT5 IN Lx �+
434 ,-tare•:.
EDw1N .:R.._GAMOli
AeU4 IT ELT
4c 1931tc.Av. 4E.
145AG2.0A14 , WA 9go27
r
JACUZZI:
•174.0
FILL
'SLOPE '
OF • /84.75
COVERED •
'P 4RRIA.G
2:/..
FILL
OPE
GP= /84.00
GF. / 3.Q0
TOP
z:/
\cuT
LEGEND
50. /52A1e'
GF = G4RAGE. FLOOR. - ELEVATION
FF • -FIN1514E0. FLOOR ELEVATION..' •
FG - FIN /5HE0 GR405. ELEVATION
GA37UND CON7C ./R : ... .
—150 — NEW FINIEHE.O GRACIE 'Ca /TOUR
= NEW FIN /SHED SPOT ELEVA77OA/
coca- eockzer.
ROTE,
7087 r EXISTING TREE
7ORt5GRAPNY MAP /3Y MO
i A55OC/A7E5.
J
T/ A/5 F/roM)j
To F. N95‘31
CITY tiF TUYeUL.4
PLANNING DEPT.
DATE
/2 -2Z 83
REV. NO.
' DESCRIPTION
PREPARED BY
JOHN R. EWING AND ASSOCIATES
CIVIL ENGINEERING - LAND SURVEYORS'
•
OWNER
B. b✓R /G/ -/T.
ROJE
KENT. WASHINGTON (206) 852 -6633
DESIGNED BY .
.1.JS H
DRAWN BY
CHECKED BY ",
A/5 1-/
DATE.
/Z -2753
JOB. NO,
77S0S
REV. NO
DESCRIPTION'
BY CHECKED .DATE
ALL PL'AUT HATERIAL TO 5e :A:A1:1 3TALIDAR Dom ' '
TpPSOIL- .PLAwJTED Et,F_S -12 DEP1'•H • TREE •in- 5 1' LARGER THPJ.1 Rear ESAL.L(A6.LDIREG.TIpp15)
FERnuLER - PlRIFORM" PLAJZTw16 TABLET''" LO -1D -5 ALIALY515- E M .. R4TC7 , (OR ELIUAL)'
HUL.C41 PLAN MTEC, ARP1i. L I /L'pEP IA CdURSE GRADE BARK CHIP. ,
STAKE HAFtOWI00D5 NY1•H' 511:a I_E L "K Z" STAKE 4 F'LEKIBLE TIES -•
•.COI- II•E.RS Tb BE MILD. G'I HIGH 47-1-IrlE OF R_AJ.rr, ,
1-1ARIDWOCO7 SI-&LL BE HILT L "CALIPER AT PLA/JTILIC TII.1E,,,
PREPARED BY
JOHN R. EWING AND ASSOCIATES
CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYORS
KENT. WASHINGTON
DESIGNED BY
GtiN
•
Gig «0�9L�
1983
.
CITY T0.,, ALA •
• �iF
PLANNING DEPT:' '
(206)852 -6633
CHECKED BY
• r
! i7!` �„'^ �:! �+'` M' si�+ ii! �-0"_' �cao, xfrh% es-' 4; r� ;r•xns�r�grso�r.�vta!ms.�, -.�. —f. eas7.:3"•:xF
- -;
C] .
b U1
u,..0
,.4 u
1 I
• k
.....•i.. _.':.r.�.+ {ire.,.
SECTION A
SCALE 1 18th ' : /'4'
N p.
GEog6E, G424150N
10477 i7 ?l, 5..
5CA1TLE .WA 981/08
CLIFF0r?D - c14EEN1 Y
14941 37ri„ AVE, S; Q
7UKWIt:4,`
1�1A 98067`. r
JCLSEPM- * S(I.nERGM :CHAnt.ES
14 -i09 564, S.
71.1Kwlt -A , Wq ; 93Ieb
G tAYDON E SM 171
1386,1. 1574 Av-
S aTTLE rJ.4: 98/6;6
SC :17NGEN7E. R
v1Ekl : CONDO.
(SEE ATTACHE-D-
UST FOR
\ C. ") ERSH■pS ):
cojD oG60
ES-IA-M.5 459X. -
e/ Corr INTON
1305 Sgt, Ave.. Sc.tf[ 600,
SEATTLE 1.44 078101
GA Y'ON. g. , ,-5 p�11 i1
13861 18iTM AVE .. S44
s>✓ATTLE w4 981IoG,
SYLVAN CA ITZ
3201 s:.WASNINGl•
SEATTLE. 1k1A• -0 98.144 v 02
_ 01'Z I
alN RSNIPS - .1A1l7NIN,r 3C0 ` 6i
IITHE. COTTAGES "
F .
1 -23 84
SG41 -e. j u °,. l0
{;LAC EE
iI arl 2 41984
CITY.OF TUKWI A
PLANNING'.DEPT.
TOC E +/
F2L
TOP
2'/
f •/74.G2-
TOE
'FILL-
RKING \
G,c
COVERED
,IARKIA.G'.
GF= 3.00
2:/
FILL
LOPE
tireiirta
LEGEA/D
GF a G4R•AGC •FLGCR ELEV4T /OA/
FF FIN /SA/ED FTLI2P ELEVATION,
MFG - F/N /SHCSJ GRADE ELEVATIOA/
—130 -- . EY /5T7M: 'GROUND . COAI7OUR
—150—,c A/EW F /A/ /5HEO GRADS OGUTOUR
® a NEW F /AJISHED SIDT ELEVA710A/ _
CO23. ROCXERY
TOPD f EXISTING TREE LocAT /DNS FA-OM
TOFOGRAPHy MAP BY HORTOA/ DENN /5
c ASSOCIATES.
PREPARED BY
JOHN R.EWING AND 'ASSOCIATES
CIVIL ENGINEERING - -LAND SURVEYORS
KENT. WASHINGTON - - - (206)852 -6633
REVISE SLQ . LOC. , GRAD'MG.'E7C ..
DESCRIPTION
/ -5-•4
12.3043
DRAWN BY
C
CHECKED BY.
• A/51 -/
NEM
NR /GHT
1JAN 5 1984
CITY OF TUKWILA
PLANNING DEPT.
ItROJECT
SHEET CONTENT.
TOE 2: i F/ LL
0 3 -10\ ZO'I
yTOP 1:I CUT .
x f
it M i X 4-
r �
TOP eI CLA\
ever. .1 Ro.o
A MEJJiE 1y 11 ..
T3UGP. CA1.1ADE1.151. .
ALL FLA1.1T I'IATERIATLJ BE A.ALI 3TAI- JDO.RD�.
TCP301L. - PLJ LTED E�EDS 12.' OEPM1d ' TREE. LARGER TI.A11 RCpr MALL (ALLDII TIgAJ)
FERTIULER - AGRIFORPI F_AA1Tw1G TABLETD L0-10 -5 ALAL'f IS E HFT.a. RAT'C. CDR. F/1I AL)
_ MULG4 PLAI.ITED AREAS Litz? DEPTN COIRDE CaRACE BA_RIC CI -IP,S. ..
3TAKJ= NAR.Cele X1 ` I•IITJ • ✓t- - 'L 9 - �_ I e_ -
C01- uFrERD TD BE MIIJ. HIG -) ATTIHE OP FI..I>✓-.IT1..IC T
IAJAROvJOCOD GIAAL1 0E MILA. L ^Cp,L1PETt AT PLAIJT11 -1G
AY61>'LS tJ. EOO W OIG�
-2t
rJAI M-8j.
CITY OF TUKWILA,.
PLANNING OUT.
/2 -383
2
2COED PA2Y.Wy, p-o-,A D NOTE
LA OSAPE nETAtl_S
7H•
CE
t -6. 64
ADDED - DIZEIL-/. 2B ED TPE 105-
DESCRIPTION
EJ-IK
1 -3 -p4
BY CHECKED DATE
PREPARED BY . • .._
JOHN R. EWING AND ASSOCIATES
CIVIL ENGINEERING - LAND SURVEYORS
KENT. WASHINGTON
DESIGNED BY:
OWNER
�. e. wRiGNT
PROJECT
(208)832 -6833
CHECKED BY
RIT@
kitchen.
unit A fireplace units A & B
.4210, u6s4r, KAN
zeo t'z I":54N/5r; - -
45R404:: 4.444al.E. ROO fly _ 00 0
1 .ri,>pn.irs. CrIT/ - '
laundry
— laundry
buildings
485
Kntral
cr'1.-ia.L.L. 7
••. eacrtr..44-• coomere
eft
•
,
ax-1.04.:nuti rm.) ..
- - ...
■ . da Wa5014rTE ---- -
SICIMA lrl.) .
•1. 4 945 WDO0
(Tyr)
otRat %woo*
PirJectrawaganm
en.‘. A.- •
. n7.-7- • ,
low wall to kftchen
interior elevations
elevation
nor e
front •
•
-'13t. • • 0.•.:
dates
eft elevation
o : fright side elevation
- sauce ^ asorwi r sualu s amF lM) 1R'' -4: 2-one4 trtto wt./y --a/sr vtar
kitchen units C &. D , fireplace unit D¢y rt5
/_4 G I Fu.'
tF ® i.
•
1V
inewsummimum
MIRi*OR
111711!1
front elevation
V-7Ap r ;KAr>
[T] D - aru:?i P w - asiNcr -i
4,. left elevation
4,
unit. C
linen closet. -�
at bath
2.4 has 1400P ---- j
.5R1
t _ _ tea\ L
. % na it
SIM. - DOUAI-7 SWNGLE RLi9F (f,
I., ,... w1G «N (na., rear _.
/ -- A WOit suLM L Pa►'I'P)
,/ wow,.. RAO
.- `• r
buildings I &3
• ;2&6
elevations.
0111 •1111e•111m1
�I�l�ll�e� IR
Ievations ,; i811 I�
4/ . g
L:E N. •
•
CITY. GF T K\ ALA •,
PLANNING DEPT..:
•
fJ
FLA T
CAT're05 coLuvW"41/ -tawi .anzanitA
• q39 wroroP40, AwirCLA / &Car yare
FIteS SANEAANIELINN/Ced Anaerwt wvols.
VACCJNI)M OMTUNI/F.4e.voratt■ M1404elyer."
ir,"411%
iigCrOclIalrMYLD AVCIPV Mai MAN.JOIekl
itfoROSeEczo 04055 '
Le1.44
LIGO-cr 'FIXTURE
•
•TTTT 0.
•• • WAsuiNGYON . • •
• • UMW= • '
. • LANOSCAPI AR TCCT .
Total Number of Wks - 80
Nanber of Parking Spaces Provided -
Covered - 82
Open - 88
Total 140
JOHN R. EWING AND ASSOCIATES
CIVIL ENGINEERING - LAND SURVEYORS
i.8. WRIG1-47
•
. .
• • • (206/ S52-6633
THE_ COTTAGES
:14
•-6- 04
. Landscape / Site Plan
• 71; f•kZ,. • ••
•
• •
f 10o0 No. 3
MY020 SEW \
• uunum ;�
�J "1
essmasidlaNSifalv-
IIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIII
-� i r pll1�-►
\.../ FrZtyfi; II
�.. - vr►
EaSpjr,,
s i75 NO. 3
' t 116 No; 3 _ . N 67.46' 19'w
eX15TINlI TREE
(rc15T,N(1. 96ANT MATEWJAL5 BASED, :' CN
GE1t1zARD• Mc.NE1L.. "..
VtA N : Or 1/ Lc/ B9)
ANON
°FLANTI N4 INSTRUCTIONS
t D14 ALL PLANTIN4. :HOLES TWICE AS, WIDE AND .TWICE.
A5 DEEP A5 ROOT SYSTEM AT PLANTIN(.) TIME.
2,' SET 1'74E . PLANT AT TI-1E SAME DEPTH AS 1T WAS
GROWIN(r AT PZEV ioUSLY, NEVER DEEPER
3• BACK- FILL .U51N4 THE FOL- LcWINCI MIX (3'r ..VOLUME):.
%3 2OT.TED 13AAWYAND. MANURE (NOT FRESH)'
2,3 TOP$G I L
4.. STAKE ALL. UPR14HT. PLANTS. USE APP20PIZ ATE:
5TA. KE5 To HOLTU T;-IE . PLANT' Fog 1 TD 2' YEARS.
OGElt' ORnsait M / VINE MAPLE ". (;.OR MORE r k5)
COres4EAS1E2 uu.1V.i,5/ p,RD.,EII <,/ELL. BRbJc EO)
ARG.TOSTAA.KL05 IVA- URS1/ BEARKERRY •
. —. pluus MO..rticoxa / :" rsu: wHrtE P*+E. (FULL)
-� VACCINUM Ov&1tr /EIER4REEiJ . I cxrr LEBERRI
—•''. CIS1US 4YOROU:/ RXKROSE '
FRoiNuS LAM41-10./ ORElaO .1 ASH
SUts IgENZIESIr/00..14 ,FIR
> ' POPu,.us jtinw.o oes /QuAK. Nr .ispa,J
_ •IET; O9 /`-.ff.1tPN Hf•.1t..:X wf.
nRlutue WEco _:c∎IPACTA' jcowtrAcr: TiAwdeRgY Mag xJ :'3C -', ,+T
re PUT
BY cxu NP'R
O VAGIED
MANN
CNIECICED
• w
Dng ?/E/84
For:
J.B. WRIGHT CORPORATION
1111 THIRD, AVENUE
SEATTLE, WASH .. 96101 '. -
YQE' •
N /A
•
Title :
LANDSCAPE
SITE
\J LL
DEC 2 1983
CITY OF TUKWILA
PLANNING DEPT.
151 .T.(Zr
A vieo vkb4.
4. 1,,,•3 ^ • 87..4.7,
s
4 I1cC • 14 U34TS ( 1. '$7.)
PrZO P0 ; 04 rig-, 3
rZ,7 28 Or-437/ ...I 1
FZ b %Jr.; ITO rA-car.•.
84
K INC.;
84 =7-r
4Z TTJE ll 0 Lope')
126. TVTAI.•
i21.)<Skiaki13$ °.4
)Nil F.
17" >
• • A(... 4-Y•
vv. .1e,c, 27
.43 — tAc.t
•
1
4; :46.11• 065CL/R.-16 0ORAT.Ja
v..1000 -TYP
;PEER 4-..40 ))
4240.00
E.J(I"ST.
(1()
\\ , A RED
n.. `,„
\ 2 \
\-.- / ' • ' \ ---"- \ - \
-. • • q •
s e - ---- ---
) . / 'GO
' L., • ,------___
• • ;" •
r• •
, -1_,
4 •
...)
•
,
\ 1
1
• 1 ••• _
1' ?
_ •)
_
\ \
\ \
% / \ \
h.\
-
1)0
.1,•••."1
..)
It=t;\r-lt,
,r,f)
\
L'?
1
'4-1)
• N-41
1.1
L
s-
-I
. -
f
Le ° o Sk
tj
(
L
° 5
'
Ok...,..447-4.5
EAJTE.R.4
Pk141,11..11A.
11R.A.JAR5.1.-lAk.k
PLU
1 C-ANOE. 6.1R.C1-4
£ tt_rteL_
01.4.-kAIDE-.-15‘5
PA,..04.G.,-.1 A
PROP,/ 5 GARA-5.4M.R.
eka.rk...._A. PAP 7R.11.e_R.4,
C.; 6 4 6
64
G• 64 6
15'16 L (+Ag-
e i545
t54E3
4, 0A15
APPPOWd.
ATE
Z- Z-63
azt-ws
mei NO
r
in. /5Z"0 3T
EC _,?. 1983
- P LAN N G--D PT,
DESCRIPTION BY CHECKED
L
cr."
\ 2,-- 4
FIR,AL TD TE A ALI ZTAK.JOAROO.
TOP504._ - PLC.-11E40 (.5'•14.05 12.. C36.P.6./ -rRwe. fPST•b 1' LAJPIar-R TI-LALL ROM' e3ALL. (Ai 3.-Cortrs
rer.inuEera - A-..R.IF0Rek3 FL:Q.1VI r-3G TArerLLTD E0-10-5 A.,..iAt..yot5 W. MFG. RAT. (014.ecauA).)
riutx.w. p A4T.D ARP Z. VT." Oe.prm C3Rosoe 63AR.K.Ci•41PD.
3Tra.sca. 1-I.A.FLOWO00 m 6TX3LE 4 PLE/416.1-6. TIE-6.
ae. AT-Tie-16
14.13.ROK.ICC:Oz Z:C.A.L.IFV-FIL 4,T F4..-Ab..ITILICA
DATE
JRE
PREPARED BY
JOHN R. EWING AND ASSOCIATES
CIVIL tNGINEERING • LAND SURVEYORS
KENT. WASHINGTON
DESIGNED BY
GAJI-1
(2061852-6633
DRAWN BY
CHECKED BY
9
VVRIGNT
RUC
nou-n-, i5z,u0
SHEET CONTENT
LAAJDicAPE PLAAJ
SHEET
1l1� �� �I �t .�
�tt��I
WA,
2 3.19B
.CITY Or:1�( iLA:
::� PLANNiNG MPT::
�►OSlc' �.. i�'P(�'4�I�IG
P1-i74 3 s1■ , \v
4/12. Roc.)
0 1��
r
•
.;.J ?N 231984
CITY- OF 'IL�c� "lily
PLANNING DEPT.
.--1: #:: poi.�.-r
0
.t-- unto.. tea W muan' ica
74, %war.
•L 41LLT% Q[O rA1Cir4 •uu/,
. • lir TL'L1 rrep.1Y- I.S b ?W.IVNQ
. Ib Vl: rii rsa / L .
i
GOU[1l 02
filloRPe, t A- �Gi¢
PITLIMINaRwG(NN PLAN