HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA EPIC-183-82 - WESTERN PACIFIC PROPERTIES - ANNEXATION AND REZONEWESTERN PACIFIC
PROPERTIES
S 135 PL @ 48' AVE S
EPIC- 183 -82
CITY OF TUKWILA
OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
FINAL
DECLARATION OF NON- SIGNiIFICANCE
Description of proposal Annexation and Rezone
Proponent
Western Pacific Properties, Inc.
Location of Proposal
S. 135th-Pl. @ 48th Ave. So.
City of Tukwila EPIC - 183 -82
Lead Agency File No.
This proposal has been determined toI (1X84 /not have) a significant
adverse impact upon the environment. An EIS (It /is not) required
under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review
by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other
information on file with the lead agency.
Responsible Official Brad Collins
Position /Title
Planning Director
Date AIr �r1• (°fig y
COMMENTS:
Signature
• •
THRESHOLD DETERMINATION
WESTERN.PACIFL.0 PROPERTIES ANNEXATION AND REZONE
The proposed action.- is a petition to annex to the City 3.19 acres of
territory contiguous to the Northwesterly corporate limits and to establish
appropriate city zoning classification which will take effect upon annexa-
tion. The proposed boundary completes the city limits for that block
generally bounded by S. 135th P1., S. 134th St. and 48th Avenue South.
Interagency circulation of the checklist resulted in the following
comments:
- Building Division:
1) Protective covenants on M -1 uses may be necessary to protect adjoining
residential neighborhood from anticipated impacts.
- Fire Department
1) No problems forseen, but water supply and emergency access will be of
concern for future development.
- Park /Recreation
1) Favors annexation; inform of future development.
- Police Department
1) No appreciableL,impacts anticipated.
- Public Works
1) Roadways and sewer /utility infrastructure may be inadequate to service
future development or the annexation area.
Recommendation on Proposed Annexation:
It appears that the proposed addition to the City limits :represents
a logical and unburdensome addition to local service capabilities. The
legislative act of annexation presents nodiscernable environmental impact;
a Declaration of Non - Significance is recommended.
Recommendation on Proposed Zoning:
Two alternative zoning classifications are suggested for the Planning
Commission's consideration, in consideration of the Comprehensive Plan's
suggested "industrial" use classification for the site. By designating the
site M -1 (light industry)., a minimum front yard setback requirement of
25' would be required, while under C -M (industrial park) zoning, the
requirement would double. In either case, landscaping requirements would
increase by 50% for those frontages across from single - residential use
areas. Height and bulk restrictions would remain the same in each case.
As the legislative act of establishing appropriate zoning has negligible
environmental impacts and as the impacts of industrial zoning in this area,
Page -2-
Threshold Determina
Western Pacific Prop ties Annexation and Rezone
•
consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, have been addressed already in
the Comprehensive Plan's E.I.S., a Declaration of Non - Significance is
recommended.
MC /blk
CITY OF TUKWILA
11/PERMIT NUMBER Cf' ROL NUMBER 82 -113
CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM - PLAN CHECK ROUTING FORM
TO:
•
BLDG,
•
PLNG. P.W. III FIRE r--1 POLICE III P.& R.
PROJECT Western Pacific Properties Annexation
ADDRESS MacAdam Road @ S. 134th St.
DATE TRANSMITTED. 7 Aline 1982
RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 18 June 1982,
C.P.S. STAFF COORDINATOR Mark - Planning RESPONSE RECEIVED
PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED PROJECT PLANS AND RESPOND WITH APPROPRIATE
COMMENTS IN THE SPACE BELOW. INDICATE CRUCIAL CONCERNS BY CHECKING THE
BOX NEXT TO THE LINE(S) ON WHICH THAT CONCERN IS NOTED:
1) 1 NUJ T141. C.rr•i P& uu.) t fb(L Pto(lg
2) _-��-T 1v� D 11kam- or . 7414P4k;r 1 -Tti-151) 1mPPS
3) I' lr.om 4 S 0V V-uilO wr./s Ste• -kk.St
`r•-1 S"1 S Ps 1 X1 1''r C-/AC- '- 94714 1Q,t`(M VA.SiS
oN s PGI\t 4'\„C1/4■_ ( F 1 Az- L S P r' (4>-
7) r-c-11_ f)vt S.
8) S PZy - - s4 9101414r1X) Ab w - . 140 P407109
9).. g.0 !C
10) ..
11)
• 12)
13)
14)
15)
D.R.C. REVIEW REQUESTED • PLAN CHECK DATE
PLAN RESUBMITTAL REQUESTED
•
COMMENTS PREPARED BY
C.P.S. FORM 2
CITY OF TUKWI LA 110 S . g6`,.��pl��.
PERMIT NUMBER , CONTROL NUMBER 82 -113
CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM - PLAN CHECK ROUTING FORM
TO: El BLDG, III PLNG, III P.W. 1 FIRE POLICE 11 P,& R.
PROJECT Western Pacific. Properties Annexation
ADDRESS MacAdam Road @ S. 134th St.
DATE TRANSMITTED; 7 June 19R2 RESPONSE REQUESTED BY , 18 June 198L
C,P, S. STAFF COORDINATOR Mark - Planning RESPONSE RECEIVED
PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED PROJECT PLANS AND RESPOND WITH APPROPRIATE
COMMENTS IN THE SPACE BELOW, INDICATE CRUCIAL CONCERNS BY CHECKING THE
BOX NEXT TO THE LINE(S) ON WHICH THAT CONCERN IS NOTED:
•
1), No talczik oN cJo \�ca sex 0„_es• ti1/43Kio.)
.2) If b„,.�.N�S� C.,,.rre,rJ�VJ Av.- fN•44S ,,)\roor NsT cov•C3
E:1 3) CA. aaq) nt- 1)\r'' s ham.. -�._. beev.� �•int� cccQ •
4).
fl5)
El 6)
d 7)
fl8)
.9).
10)
11)
III 12)
E:1 13)
[::1 14)
[1:j 15)
D,R,C, REVIEW REQUESTED
PLAN RESUBMITTAL REQUESTED
•
PLAN CHECK DATE
COMMENTS PREPARED BY
C.P.S. FORM 2
CITY OF TUKWILA
PERMIT NUMBER C•ROL NUMBER 82 -113
CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM - PLAN CHECK ROUTING FORM
TO:
•
BLDG.,
•
PLNG, III P , W , 1 FIRE POLICE P,& R.
PROJECT western Pacific Properties Annexation
ADDRESS MacAdam Road @ S. 134th St.
DATE TRANSMITTED . 7 June 19£12
C, P, S, STAFF COORDINATOR Mark - Planning
RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 18 June 1982
RESPONSE RECEIVED
PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED PROJECT PLANS AND RESPOND WITH APPROPRIATE
COMMENTS IN THE SPACE BELOW, INDICATE CRUCIAL CONCERNS BY CHECKING THE
BOX NEXT TO THE LINE(S) ON WHICH THAT CONCERN IS NOTED:
■
a
1), f -,
2)
3)
`f) A i�os�
-
fl8)
5
9)
10)
[]
11)
5
12)
13)
14)
a 15),
D,R,C, REVIEW REQUESTED I PLAN CHECK DATE
PLAN RESUBMITTAL REQUESTED III COMMENTS PREPARED BY
C.P.S. 3:42
FORM 2
CITY OF TUKWILA
410PERMIT NUMBER' , C•ROL NUMBER.
82 -113
CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM - PLAN CHECK ROUTING FORM
TO:
•
BLDG, C PLNG, r--1 P,W. FIRE r--1 POLICE
PROJECT We tern Pacifir Properties Annexation
ADDRESS MacAdam Road @ S. 134th St.
DATE TRANSMITTED 7 JunP 1982
•
PAR.
RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 18 June 1982_
C.P.S. STAFF COORDINATOR Mark - Planning RESPONSE RECEIVED
PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED PROJECT PLANS AND RESPOND WITH APPROPRIATE
COMMENTS IN THE SPACE BELOW, INDICATE CRUCIAL CONCERNS BY CHECKING THE
BOX NEXT TO THE LINE(S) ON WHICH THAT CONCERN IS NOTED:
•
1) No particular problems foreseen pertaining to annexation.
Future development of the site will involve providing adequate
❑ 2)
El 3)
4)
❑ 5)
❑ 6)
7)
[] 8)
water supply and emergency vehicle access, depending upon the
extent and nature of any development upon the site.
9)
1111 10)
ll)
a
12)
13)
Ei 14)
Q 15)
D,R,C, REVIEW REQUESTED
PLAN RESUBMITTAL REQUESTED
•
PLAN CHECK DATE 6;` v--
COMMENTS PREPARED BY C22
C,P,S, FORM 2
CITY OF TUKWILA
PERMIT NUMBER . C•ROL NUMBER 82 -113
CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM PLAN CHECK ROUTING FORM
TO: BLDG, • PLNG, III P.W. III FIRE r--1 POLICE III P,& R.
PROJECT, Western Pacifica Properties Annexation
ADDRESS MacAdam Road @ S. 134th St.
DATE TRANSMITTED, 7 JUliP 1982 RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 18 June 1982_
C.P.S. STAFF COORDINATOR Mark - Planning
RESPONSE RECEIVED
PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED PROJECT PLANS AND RESPOND WITH APPROPRIATE
COMMENTS IN THE SPACE BELOW, INDICATE CRUCIAL CONCERNS BY CHECKING THE
BOX NEXT TO THE LINE(S) ON WHICH THAT CONCERN IS NOTED:
•
1) ,:i�iz.ee,e-
El 2) st /.3,57,tet
Ell 3)
4)
5)
6)
7) .-
8)
9)
10)
LI 11)
El
s
?
4
.1 12)
D 13)
14)
El 15)
D.R.C. REVIEW REQUESTED III PLAN CHECK DATE
PLAN RESUBMITTAL REQUESTED III COMMENTS PREPARED BY
f /7? 2-
C,P,S, FORM 2
CITY OF TUKWILA
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
This questionnaire must be completed and submitted with the application for
permit. This questionnaire must be completed by all persons applying for a
permit from the City of Tukwila, unless it is determined by the Responsible
Official that the permit is exempt or unless the applicant and Responsible
Official previously agree an Environmental Impact Statement needs to be completed.
A fee f $50.00 ust accompany the filling of the Environmental Questionnaire
to cov of the threshold determination.
I. BACKGROUND
1. Name of Proponent: Western Pacific Properties, Inc. - Matt Little
2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: 13975 Interurban Avenue South.
Tukwila, Wa., 98168 241 -1616
3. Date Checklist Submitted:
4. Agency Requiring Checklist: Tukwila Planning Department /City Council
5. Name of Proposal, if applicable:
•
.6. Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal (including but not limited
to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give
an accurate understanding of its scope and nature):
The three property owners represented through Western Pacific Properties, Inc
wish to annex into the Cit of Tukwila and be included under s
.ue 1111!
Comprehensive Land Use Planning Map (Tukwila plannirtg AreB 1975
7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as
well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental im-
pacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate under-
standing of the environmental setting of the proposal):
These properties are just outside present City of Tukwila City Limits between
134th and 135th Street South, South of Fostoria Park warehouse complex
8. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal:
9. List of all Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals Required for the
Proposal (federal, state and local):
(a) Rezone, conditional use, shoreline permit, etc. YES x NO
(b) King County Hydraulics Permit YES NO x
(c) Building permit YES NO x
(d) Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Permit YES NO x
(e) Sewer hook up permit YES. NO x
(f) Sign permit YES NO x
(g) Water hook up permit YES NO x.
(h) Storm water system permit YES . NO x
(i) Curb cut permit ' YES NO x
(j) Electrical permit (State of Washington) YES NO x
(k) Plumbing permit (King County) YES NO x
(1) Other:
10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or futher activity
related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain:
No
11. Do you know of any plans by. others which may affect the property covered by
your proposal? If yes, explain:
No
12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro-
posal; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future
date, describe the nature of such application form:
II. ENVIRONM•1ENTAL IMPACTS
(Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required)
1.
Earth. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic
substructures?
(b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcover-
ing of the soil?
(c) Change in topography or ground surface relief fea-
tures?
(d) The destruction, covering or modification of any
unique geologic or physical features?
YES MAYBE NO
x
x
(e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils,
either on or off the site?
(f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or
changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which
may modify the channel of a river or stream or the
bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake?
Explanation:
2. Air. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air.
quality?
(b)' The creation of'objectionable odors?
(c) Alteration of air movement, moisture
or temperature, or any change in climate, either
locally or regionally?
Explanation:
3. Water. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Changes in currents, or the course or direction
of water movements, in either marine or fresh
waters?
(b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns,
Dr the rate and amount of surface water runoff?
(c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters?
(d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water
body?
(e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration
of surface water quality, including but not limited
to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity?
(f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of
ground waters?
(g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either
through direct additions or withdrawals, or through
interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations?
YES MAYBE NO
x
x
x
x
x
•
YES MAYBE NO
(h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either
through direct injection, or through the seepage
of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne
virus or bacteria, or other substances into the
ground waters? x
(1) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise avail-
able for public water supplies? x
Explanation:
4. Flora. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers
of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs,
grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)?
(b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or .
endangered species of flora?
(c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area,
or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of
existing species?
(d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop?
Explanation:
x
x
x
x
5. Fauna. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers
of any species of fauna (birds, land animals
including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic
organisms, insects or microfauna)? x
(b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or
endangered species of fauna? x
(c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an
area, or result in a barrier to the migration
or movement of . fauna?
(d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife
habitat?
Explanation:
6. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise
levels?
Explanation:_
7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new
light or glare?
Explanation:
8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in the altera-
tion of the present or planned land use
of an area?
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation• After annexation and rezone the planned land use will
a under the Tukwila Planning Department Comprehensive Land Use
Planning Area Map 1975 M -1 Light Industry
9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural
resources?
(b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural
resource?
Explanation:
10. Risk of. Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an .
explosion or the release �f hazardous
substances (including, but not limited
to, oil, pesticides,.chemicals or radi-
ation) in the event of an accident or
upset conditions?
Explanation:
x
x
x
11. Population.
Explanation:
Will the proposal alter the location,
distribution, density, or growth rate
of the human population of an area?
12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing,
or create a demand for additional housing?
YES MAYBE NO
x
Explanation: Once the property is annexed and rezoned under the
1975 City of Tukwila Planning Area Map the property at 4534 South
134th will become a conforming duplex under the Cascade Zoning rules.
13. Transportation /Circulation. Will the proposal result in:
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles,
bicyclists or pedestrians ?.
Explanation: There may be a demand for one or possibly two additional
parking spaces if the property at 4534 South 134th is used as a duplex.
There is ample space to park the additional automobiles off the street on
the adjacent lot.
Generation of additional vehicular movement?
Effects on existing parking facilities, or
demand for new parking ? ,
Impact upon existing transportation systems?
Alterations to present patterns of circulation
or movement of people and /or goods?
Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic?
x
x
x
14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon,
or result in a need for'new or altered
governmental services in any of the
following areas:
(a) Fire protection?
(b) Police protection?
(c) Schools?
(d) Parks or other recreational facilities?
(e) Maintenance of public facilities, including
roads?
x
x
x
x
x
•
YES MAYBE NO
(f) Other governmental services? x
Explanation:
The Fire and Police protection will fall under the status of
City of Tukwila after annexation.
15. Energy. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? x
(b). Demand upon existing sources of energy, or
require the development of new sources of
energy? x
Explanation:
16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for
new systems, or alterations to the
following utilities:
(a) Power or natural gas?
(b) Communications systems?
(c) Water?
(d) Sewer or septic tanks?
(e) Storm water drainage?
(f) Solid waste and disposal?
Explanation:
17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the crea-
tion of any health hazard or potential
health hazard (excluding mental health)?
Explanation:
• •
18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruc-
tion of any scenic vista or view open to
the public, or will the proposal result
in the creation of an aesthetically of-
fensive site open to public view?
Explanation:
19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact
upon the quality or quantity of exist-
ing recreational opportunities?
Explanation:
20. Archeological /Histroical. Will the proposal result in
an alteration of a signifi-
cant archeological or his-
torical site, structure,
object or building?
Explanation:
YES MAYBE NO
CERTIFICATION BY APPLICANT:
I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above'
information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency
may withdraw any declaration of non - significance that it might issue in
reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation
or willful lack of full disclosure on my part.
Signature and Title Date
x
x
x