HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA EPIC-184-82 - CITY OF TUKWILA - FOSTER PARK ANNEXATIONFOSTER PARK ANNEXATION
EPIG184 -82
CITY OF TUKWILA
OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
FINAL
DECLARATION OF NON - SIGNIFICANCE
Description of proposal Annexation of Contiguous Territory
Proponent City of Tukwila
Location of Proposal 51st and 52nd Ayes So. between 137th and 139th Sts.
Lead Agency City of Tukwila File No. EPIC- 184 -82
This proposal has been determined to P»/not have) a significant
adverse impact upon the environment. An EI.S (Ax/is not) required
under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review
by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other
information on file with the lead agency.
Responsible Official Brad Collins
Position /Title
Planning Director
Date 1 July 1982 Signature 6'115 £ ,
COMMENTS:
CITY OF TUKWILA
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
This questionnaire must be completed and submitted with the application for
permit. This questionnaire must be completed by all persons applying for a
permit from the City of Tukwila, unless it is determined by the Responsible
Official that the permit is exempt or unless the applicant and ,Responsible'
Official previously agree an Environmental Impact Statement needs to be completed.
A fee of $50.00 must accompany the filling of the Environmental Questionnaire
to cover costs of the threshold. determination.
. BACKGROUND
1. Name of Proponent: City of Tukwila
2. .Address and Phone Number of Proponent: City Hall
6200 Southcenter.Blvd., Tukwila, WA 98188 433 -1800
3. Date Checklist Submitted: June 15, 1982
4. Agency Requiring Checklist: Tukwila Planning Department
5. Name of Proposal, if applicable: Foster Park Annexation -
6. Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal (including but not limited
to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give
an accurate understanding of its scope and nature):
The proposal involves the annexation of J. Foster Memorial Park into the
Z City of Tukwila, located between 51st Ave. So. and 53rd Ave. So..and
7. Location, of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as
well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental im-
pacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate under-
standing of the environmental setting of the proposal):
Total of 5 acres of. park land. Tmprovements limited to parking area, backstop
and play equipment. Property owned by the Southcente School District.
8. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal: Fall /Wi:nter 1982
9. List of all Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals Required for the
Proposal (federal, state and local):
(a) Rezone, conditional use, shoreline permit, etc. YES NOX
(b) King County Hydraulics Permit YES. NO X
(c) Building permit YES NO .X
(d) Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Permit
(e) Sewer hook up permit
(f) Sign permit
(g) Water hook up permit
(h) Storm water system permit
(i) Curb cut permit
(j) Electrical permit (State of Washington)
(k) Plumbing permit (King County)
(1) Other: None
YES NO X
YES NO X
YES NO X
YES NO X
YES NO X
YES NO X
YES NO X
YES NO X
10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or futher activity
related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain:
None involving annexation. Physical improvements to the park streets,
sewer and water lines may take place in the future.
11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by
your proposal? If yes, explain:
No.
12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro-
posal; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future
date, describe the nature of such application form:
N.A.
II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
(Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required)
1. Earth. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic
substructures?
(b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcover-
ing of the soil?
(c) Change in topography or ground surface relief fea-
tures?
(d) The destruction, covering or modification of any
unique geologic or physical features?
YES MAYBE NO
X
X
X
X
(e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils,
either on or off the site?
(f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or
changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which
may modify the channel of.a river or stream or the
bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake?
Explanation:
2. Air. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air
quality?
(b) The creation of objectionable odors?
. (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture
or temperature, or any change in climate, either
locally or regionally?
Explanation:
3. Water. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Changes in currents, or the course or direction
of water movements, in either marine or fresh
waters?
(b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns,
or the rate and amount of surface water runoff?
(c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters?
(d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water
body?
(e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration
of surface water quality, including but not limited
to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity?
(f)
(g)
Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of
ground waters?
Change in the quantity of ground waters, either
through direct additions or withdrawals, or through
interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations?
-3-
YES MAYBE NO
X
X
• •
YES MAYBE NO
(h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either
through direct injection, or through the seepage
of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne
virus or bacteria, or other substances into the
ground waters? X
(i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise avail-
able for public water supplies? X
Explanation:
4. Flora. Will the proposal result in:
. (a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers
of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs,
grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)?
(b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or
endangered species of flora?
(c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area,
or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of
existing species?
(d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop?
Explanation:
X
X
5.' Fauna. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers
of any species of fauna (birds, land animals
including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic
organisms, insects or microfauna)? X
(b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or
endangered species of fauna? X
(c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an
area, or result in a barrier to the migration X
or movement of fauna? —
(d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife
habitat?
Explanation:
6. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise
levels?
Explanation:
7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new
light or glare?
Explanation: Once the area is annexed into the City the
Police Department would like additional street
lighting. Annexation just on its own will
have no effect.
8.. Land Use. Will the proposal result in the altera-
tion of the present or planned land use
of an area?
Explanation:
9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural
resources?
(b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural
resource?
Escpl anati on:
10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an
explosion or the release of hazardous
substances (including, but not limited
to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radi-
ation) in the event of an accident or
upset conditions?
Explanation:
YES MAYBE NO
X
X
X
X
X
• •
11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location,
distribution, density, or growth rate
of the human population of an area?
Explanation:
12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing,
or create a demand for additional housing?
Explanation:
13. Transportation /Circulation. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Generation of additional vehicular movement?
(b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or
demand for new parking?
(c) Impact upon existing transportation.systems?
(d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation
or. movement of people and /or goods?
(e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic?
(f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles,
bicyclists or pedestrians?
Explanation: 13.b City parking requirements may be
deffierent thatn the coun,tys!
Annexation may affect the required
number of stalls, however, there should
be no immediate affect.
14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon,
or result in a need for new or altered
governmental services in any of the
following areas:
(a) Fire protection?
(b) Police protection?
(c) Schools?
(d) Parks or other recreational facilities?
(e) Maintenance of public facilities, including
roads?
YES MAYBE NO
X
X
YES MAYBE NO
(f) Other governmental services? X
Explanation:
15. Energy. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy?
(b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or
require the development of new sources of
energy?
Explanation:
16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for
new systems, or alterations to the
following utilities:
(a) Power or natural gas?
(b) Communications systems?
(c) Water?
(d) Sewer or septic tanks?
(e) Storm water drainage?
(f) Splid waste and disposal?
Explanation:
17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the crea-
tion of any health hazard or potential
health hazard (excluding mental health)?
Explanation:
X
•
18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the.obstruc-
tion of any scenic vista or view open to
the public, or will the proposal result.
in the creation of an aesthetically of-
fensive site open to public view?
Explanation:
19. Recreation. Will the. proposal result in an impact
upon the quality or quantity of exist-
ing recreational opportunities?
Explanation: The quality of the recreation programs con-
ducted at the park will impro.ve.as the Police.
Department will be able to enforce Tukwila's
park and public safety codes. Fire and emergency
services will also be enhanced by better service
provided by the Tukwila Fire Department.
20. Archeological /Histroical. Will the proposal result in
an alteration of a signifi-
cant archeological or his-
torical site, structure,
object or building?
YES MAYBE . NO
X.
Explanation:
CERTIFICATION BY APPLICANT:
I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above
information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency
may withdraw any declaration of non - significance that it might issue in
reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation
or willful lack of full disclosure on my part.
Signature and Title Date
X
TO: Planning Department. ATTN:Mark
From: Patrick J. Lowery, Chief of Police.
Sgt. S.L. Robinson
Date: June 25,1982
Subject:
Environmental Check List Form Completion for Annexation of
Foster Memorial Park.
Message:
Section II. Subsection 1: No impact to Police Department.
2: No impact to Police Department.
3: No impact to Police Department.
4: No impact to Police Department.
5: No impact to Police Department.
6: No impact to Police Department. *.
7: Additional lighting will be re-
commended by Police Department
for Security purposes. This will
increase light /glare but is ness-
esary.
8: No impact to Police Department.
9: No impact to Police Department.
10: No impact to Police Department.
11: NO impact to Police Department.
12: No impact to Police Department.
13: If the park continues to be used
as it is currently, there will
not be any additional burden that
does not already exist. However,
the purposed use of the upper
portion as two little league
fields will have a noticible im-
pact on traffic (both pedestrian
and vehicular). Additional park-
ing will be require with the ex-
pansion.
14. Tukwila Police Department is
currently responding to city
parks (in and out of the city)
when called and are required to
stand by for a King County
to handle the paper work. The
few incidents which have occurred
in the park could have been han-
dled by Tukwila Police Department
with little or no impact to
other Police Services.
1111TY OF TUKWIlJ1
*PERMIT NUMBER - AROL NUMBER
CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM - PLAN CHECK ROUTING FORM
TO: III BLDG, C PLNG. 1ISW, III FIRE r--1 POLICE III P,& R.
PROJECT f-L, PN1-00
ADDRESS 51 _r 4kJE S. rM1.11
DATE TRANSMITTED 23 JUWE e - RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 1 • JULY 81%
C.P.S. STAFF COORDINATOR, K- ENO' & RESPONSE RECEIVED
PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED PROJECT PLANS AND RESPOND WITH APPROPRIATE
COMMENTS IN THE SPACE BELOW, INDICATE CRUCIAL CONCERNS BY CHECKING THE
BOX NEXT TO THE LINE(S) ON WHICH THAT CONCERN IS NOTED:
•
E1
n
ET
1)
.2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
9)
10)
11)
12)
13)
14)
15)
C �I1`'1 w L+LU
AYr O.1, 172, -w ac 1'ti
a\ S ct\V S. Ti -
IMP Ph ()UM,
iNcad)1t
D.R.C. REVIEW REQUESTED
•
PLAN RESUBMITTAL REQUESTED
•
PLAN CHECK DATE a ci
COMMENTS PREPARED BY
C,P.S, FORM 2
CITY OF TUKWILA
"PERMIT NUMBER C(SROL NUMBER
CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM - PLAN CHECK ROUTING FORM
TO: III BLDG. • PLNGI III P.W. G FIRE ri POLICE 1 P.& R.
PROJECT, F �, •14. J 11A)
ADDRESS 51 sr ,y,lE S. r3,114. �.�..
DATE TRANSMITTED 23 J0141! 87- RESPONSE REQUESTED BY, JUL''C SZ
C.P.S. STAFF COORDINATOR. Pain‹- 4 ' 6 RESPONSE RECEIVED
PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED PROJECT PLANS AND RESPOND WITH APPROPRIATE
COMMENTS IN THE SPAC€ BELOW; INDICATE CRUCIAL CONCERNS BY CHECKING THE
BOX NEXT TO THE LINE(S) ON WHICH THAT CONCERN IS NOTED:
•
1)
El 2)
El 3)
p 4>
❑ 5)
8)
El 9)
10)
El 11)
•
12)
Ei 13)
14)
EI 15)
#0 /
N\
D.R.C. REVIEW REQUESTED 1 PLAN CHECK DATE, g .Z
PLAN RESUBMITTAL REQUESTED • COMMENTS PREPARED BY
CIP,SI FORM 2
CITY OF TUKWILA
PERMIT NUMBER - •iROL NUMBER
CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM - PLAN CHECK ROUTING FORM
TO: BLDG, 1 PLNG, III P.W. 1 FIRE r--1 POLICE III P.& R.
PROJECT PN*144 ,auNm,,Qa I .)
ADDRESS, 5t S-T AVE. Q 's. (39 �'.
DATE TRANSMITTED 1/3 -M-'E t57- , RESPONSE REQUESTED BY I .014 .82
C.P.S. STAFF COORDINATOR, /<- 4'b RESPONSE RECEIVED
PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED PROJECT PLANS AND RESPOND WITH APPROPRIATE
COMMENTS IN THE SPACE BELOW, INDICATE CRUCIAL CONCERNS BY CHECKING THE
BOX NEXT TO THE LINE(S) ON WHICH THAT CONCERN IS NOTED:
El 1) /t/ L Y % 7 i o .,t/ ii-'PZ4-0 7'v 14144/1- ,4--
2) foe-Kb-T- o►f- d' (,va= Cc'v,•vT
3)
El 4)
E] 5)
Q 6)
[� 7)
8)
09)
10)
11)
12)
Fr 13)
14)
Q 15)
D.R.C. REVIEW REQUESTED P 1 PLAN CHECK DATE
PLAN RESUBMITTAL REQUESTED El COMMENTS PREPARED BY
C,P,S, FORM 2
$136TH'
m '$�
a.2
/9.0''•
//2
/065i.
Poved
Poved
x /025 S
1/225
/325,
142ND
ST. 14/.0
•
2/2.01
tiB51161‘1011IR /63.0
166 59 1
R
x 2030
144TH