Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA EPIC-195-82 - CAMPANELLA GROUP - CEDARWOOD HABITATCEDARWOOD HABITAT CAMPANELLA GROUP EPIG195 -82 City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 Frank Todd, Mayor 16 December 1981 Group V Partnership c/o Chia Development Corp. 2001 Western Ave. #241 Seattle, WA 98121 Attn: Felix Campanella, A.I.A. SUBJECT: Tukwila Square Habitat Building Permit After reviewing the development plan set submitted in conjunction with the subject building permit application, we.note certain items which require modification in order to conform to stipulations of the Board of Architectural Review :: A) Driveway entries on 56th Ave. So. must be relocated to a point at least 20' distant from property corners. B) Trash enclosure locations must be shown on sht. A -1; a con- struction detail describing the dimensions and material of the trash enclosure structure must be included in the plan set. Sheets A -1, G -1 and.L -1 should be revised to depict location of a public sidewalk on 56th Ave. So., per Ordinances 1158, 1217 and 1233. D) Modify section- drawings on.sheet A -6 to reflect use of wood shingle'or shake roofing materials. E) Modify elevation drawings, sheet A -4, to reflect enclosed carports. Modify sheets A -1, G -1 and L -1 to comply with minimum 10' wide planting strip inside property line from 56th Ave. So.' G) Modify sheets A -1'and G -1 to depict pedestrian access to Interurban Avenue from the residential portion of the project without passage through the office buildings below. Page -2- Group V 16 •December 1981 A copy of the Board's findings as stated at their meeting of 12 November 1981 is attached. Also enclosed is a copy of the Declaration of Environmental Non - Significance for the residential portion only of Tukwila Square Habitat; please note: the stipulations contained therein. If you have any questions about these matters, please call me at 433 -1849. • TukwilaiPlanning Department Mark Caughey Associate Planner MC /blk xc: Ping. Dir. CITY OF TUKWILA OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FINAL DECLARATION OF NON- SIGNIFICANCE Description of proposal 28 Condominium Dwelling Units Proponent Group V Partnership - Campanella Group Location of Proposal 56th Ave. S. @ S. 139th St. Lead Agency City of Tukwila File No. EPIC - 195 -32 This proposal has been determined to ( /not have) a significant adverse impact upon the environment. An EIS ( /is not) required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Responsible Official Brad Collins Position /Title Planning Director Date boa-em-AALI lG, l5Zc COMMENTS: Signature 1) This Declaration of Non - Significance pertains only to the residential portion of the Tukwila Square Habitat Project.' 2) Final approval of driveway locations, sidewalk configuration and roadway surface improvements shall be granted by the Public Works Department prior to starting construction. DICE MEMO CITY OF TU KWI LA TO: Planning FROM: Sgt. Robinson DATE: 11/23/81 SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST The 28 units will require additional patrol from Police Department and increased traffic in residential area. Lighting appears to be adequate. Slope to Access on 56th will be steep which may cause limited vision entering onto main road. All site hardening codes should be enforced. 1908 City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 Frank Todd, Mayor November 12, 1981 Via Planning /Building Dept. Group 5 3718 Pacific Highway East Tacoma, WA 98424 RE: Cedarwood Habitat Dear Sirs: The review of the site plans for the Cedarwood Habitat, sheets 1 through 6 has been provided by the Public Works Department with the following comments. This approval is for buildings #1 through #7. Required permits recognized by the Public Works Department to be applied for and obtained 24 hours prior to construction, are as follows: Temporary desitation ponds and drainage facilities will be covered through a grading permit. Private Sanitary Side Sewers -.The sanitary sewer pipes shall be either PVC (schedule #35 minimum) with 36" of cover minimum or concrete pipe with 12" of cover minimum. Provide cleanouts at all buildings, bends and joints for sanitary side sewers. Permit fees for each building to be determined at the time of application for permits. All lines to be tested, per inspector in field. Sanitary Sewer Main Extension - All sanitary sewer main extensions shall remain private and be provided with a minimum 2% grade. Prior to construction of sanitary mains a,idetail of manhole and profile of all sanitary sewer mains shall be submitted to the Public Works Deaprtment (4 sets) for review approval. Sanitary sewer mains shall be built per APWA standards. Include in detail Ex. 12" force main elevation. Permit fee - $25.00. Domestic Water Meters - Water meters shall be provided in the public right -of -way or through easements. Executed easement documents are required with application for water meter permit. Water meter permits cover installation by the City for service line from the main to and including the water meter. Permit fee for each service /meter shall be determined at the time of application for permits. Page -2- ' Group 5 November 12, 1981 • Storm Drains - Storm drainage plan review and permit is through King County Hydraulics. All pipe shall be 8" minimum, shall be corregated metal pipe or concrete pipe, shall be 12" minimum cover. All open ended pipe shall be equipped with trash racks and /or inlet structures at points intercepting open ditches. Storm pipe over 20% grade shall be Ductile Iron Pipe and provided with anchors spaces at 20 1.f. and /or downhill of each bell and spigot joint. At the outfall structure, minimum rip -rap rock diameter shall be 6 ". Rip -rap shall be provided in such a manner as to extend 15 1.f. beyond end of outfall and to a minimum depth of 3 feet throughout. This rip -rap shall key in the out - fall pipe. Curb Cut /Access /Sidewalk Permit - Curb Cut /Access /Sidewalk Street Use Permit Fee - $25.00. Adjacent to property in the public right -of -way of 56th Avenue South, a concrete sidewalk /curb /gutter /concrete driveway aprons shall be provided in such a manner as to allow for final develop- ment of 56th Avenue in the future. These amenities to the public right -of -way shall be provided per the final alignment /profile of 56th Avenue South and provided per the T.M.C., Public Works Standard Plans and Public Works Department design requirements. Prior to commencement with this work, a plan shall be developed and sent to the City (6 copies) for review and approval. Fire Loop /Hydrants - Fire loop /hydrants, if required, and access shall be provided per the requirements of insurance underwriters and the Tukwila Fire Department. Per Tukwila Municipal Code 14.04.250, fire protections services must be separately metered from domestic water meter. Sprinkler vaults are to be located outside of easements or public right -of -way. For all water mains three inches diameter and greater, blocking shall be provided at all junctions, bends, ends, and at all hydrants. Hydrants and sprinkler vaults, as required, shall be per the City of Tukwila Standard Plans: A) At all fire hydrants: A valve 3' to 10' from the hydrant. All .lines to be tested per inspector in field. Irrigation Sprinkler Permit - If applicable, 4 sets of irrigation plans shall be submitted for review and approval by the Public Works Depart- ment. Permit Fee - $25.00. If you have any questions please don't hesitate to call me at this office (433- 1850). Sincerely, Phillip Fraser Senior Engineer PF /blk TUKWILA SQUARE Legal Description PARCEL 1 That portion of the Stephen Foster Donation Claim No. 38, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W. M., in King County, Washington, described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the Westerly line of the Puget Sound Electric Railway with the south line of said Donation Land Claim; thence along said westerly line north 45 °00'00" west,561 feet, more or less, to a point 397 feet southerly from its intersection with the southerly line of an 18-foot lane (now known as South 137th Street); thence south 65 °00'00" west,211 feet, more or less to a point which is 128 feet,north 65 °00'00" east from the easterly margin of Lemon Road (56th Avenue South) as established March 9, 1906; thence south 45 °49'00" east,85 feet; thence south 65 °00'00" west, 128 feet to a point on said road margin which is south 45 °49'00" east, 541.25 feet from the southerly margin of said 18 foot roadway; thence along.said Lemon Road (56th Avenue South) south 45 °49'00" east,273.53 feet, more or less, to the south line of said Donation Land Claim; thence east along the south line of said tract,444.50 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning; EXCEPT the easterly 60 feet in width heretofore conveyed to King County for road, and EXCEPT all that portion lying southwesterly of a line parallel with and 133.50 feet northeasterly of, as measured at right angle to the aforesaid northeasterly margin of Lemon Road (AKA 56th Avenue South). Together with A tract of land in that portion of the Stephen Foster Donation Claim No. 38, in Section 14, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian, in King County, Washington, described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the southerly line of South 137th Street (formerly Lemon Road).produced north 74 °04'00" east and the northeasterly line of 56th Avenue South (formerly Lemon Road) which point is described as the point of beginning in that certain correction deed, dated December 26, 1903, and recorded January 22, 1904 in Volume 362 of Deeds, page 625, records of the Auditor of King County, State of Washington, thence north 74 °04'00 ",east along said southerly line of South 137th Street (formerly Lemon Road) produced 125 feet to the true point of beginning; thence continuing north 74 °04'00" east,180.204 feet to the southwesterly line of Interurban Avenue South, a State Highway; thence south 44 °51'00" east along said southwesterly line, 407.32 feet; thence.south 65 °58'45" west,161.64 feet; thence north 45 °49'00" west,437.44.feet to the true point of beginning; EXCEPT all that portion lying southwesterly of a line parallel with, and 133.50 feet northeasterly of, -as measured at right angles to the aforesaid northeasterly margin of Lemon Road (AKA 56th Avenue South). • • PARCEL 2 A tract of land in that portion of the Stephen Foster Donation Claim No. 38, in Section 14, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian, in King County, Washington described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the southerly line of South 137th Street (formerly Lemon Road) produced North 74 °04'00" east and the northeasterly line of 56th Avenue South (formerly Lemon Road), which point is described as the point of beginning in that certain cor- rection deed dated December 26, 1903, and recorded January 22, 1904, in Volume 362 of Deeds, page 625, records of the Auditor of King County, State of Washington; thence south 45 °49'00" east along said northeasterly line of 56th Avenue South,275 feet to the true point of beginning; thence north 74° 04' 00" east,125 feet; thence south 45 °49'00" east,162.435 feet; thence south 65 °58'45" west,115.96 feet; thence north 45 °49'00" west,181.25 feet to the true point of beginning. Together with That portion of the Donation Land Claim of Stephen Foster, designated as Claim No. 38, being parts of Sections 14 and 15 in Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W. M., in King County, Washington described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the south line of said Donation Claim No. 38 with the easterly line of Lemon Road, which point is 926.45 feet south and 1,499.40 feet east of the West Quarter corner of Section 14 of said Township and Range; thence northwesterly along said road line, 365 feet, more or less, to a point which is South 45 °49'00" east,456.25 feet from the south line of an 18 foot lane known as East Avenue and the true point of beginning of the tract herein described; thence south 45 °49'00" east, along the easterly line of said Lemon Road, 85 feet; thence north 65 °00'00" east,128 feet; thence north 45 °49'00" west,85 feet; thence south 65 °00'00" west,128 feet to the true point of beginning. Together with That portion of the Stephen Foster Donation Claim No. 38, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W. M., in King County, Washington, described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the westerly line of the Puget Sound Electric Railway with the south line of said Donation Land Claim; thence along said westerly line north 45 °00'00" west,561 feet, more or less, to a point 397 feet southerly from its inter :section with the southerly line of an 18 foot lane (now known as South 137th Street); thence south 65 °00'00" west,211 feet, more or less, to a point which is 128 feet, north 65 °00'00" east from the easterly margin of Lemon Road (56th Avenue South) as established March 9, 1906; thence south 45 °49'00" east 85 feet; thence south 65 °00'00" west,128 feet to a point on said road margin which is south 45 °49'00 "east,541.25 feet from the southerly margin. of said 18 foot roadway; thence along said Lemon Road (56th Avenue South), south 45 °49'00" east,273.53 feet, more or less, to the south line of said Donation Land Claim; thence east along the south line of said tract,444.50 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning; EXCEPT the easterly 60 feet in wirrh heretofore conveyed to King County for road, and EXCEPT all that portion lying northeasterly of a line parallel with, and 133.50 feet northeasterly of, as measured at right angle to the aforesaid northeasterly margin of Lemon Road (AKA 56th Avenue South). Together with A tract of land in that portion of the Stephen Foster Donation Claim No. 38, in Section 14, Township 23 NOrth, Range 4 East, Williamette Meridian, in King County, Washington, described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the southerly line of South 137th Street (formerly Lemon Road) produced north 74° 04' 00" east and the northeasterly line of 56th Avenue South (formerly Lemon Road) which point is described as the point of beginning in that certain correction deed, dated December 26, 1903, and recorded January 22, 1904, in Volume 362 of Deeds, page 625, records of the Auditor of King County, State of Washington, thence north 74 °04'00" east along said southerly line of South 137th Street (formerly Lemon Road) produced 125 feet to the true point of beginning; thence continuing north 74 °04'00" east 180.204 feet to the southwesterly line of Interurban Avenue South, a State Highway; thence south 44 °51'00" east along said southwesterly line.407.32 feet; thence south 65 °58'45" west,161.64 feet; thence north 45 °49'00" west,437.44 feet to the true point of beginning; EXCEPT all that portion lying northeasterly of a line parallel with, and 133.50 feet northeasterly of,as measured at right angles to the aforesaid northeasterly margin of Lemon Road (AKA 56th Avenue South). A .,' • • GEORGE J. LINDSAY, P.E. Consulting Engineer 2527 2 j-! th Ave. E. Sumner, WA 98390 863 -6850 October 23, 1981 Mr. Mark Coffey City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwilla, Washington RE: Cedarwood Habitat Dear Mark: Attached are Temporary Sedimentation and Erosion Control (TSECP), Storm and Grading, and Sanitary Sewer Plans for the above - referenced project. Also enclosed is a 1 " =20' Architect's Grading Plan for the entire 4.55 acres, as well as tributary drainage maps for the offsite drainage. As we discussed earlier, it is our intention to develop only the upper section which covers approximately 1.95 acres. The TSECP has been developed to permit grading of the entire site and it becomes more feasible to develop the lower section as per the approval site plan. The other utility plans reflect only the needs of the upper area to be developed. Once we proceed with development of the lower section, we will forward the additional plans on to you for your review. We have been in contact with Francis Gonn of the Army Corps of Engineers. According to him, Corps permits are not necessary. He is preparing a letter to that effect and we will forward it on to you when it becomes available. Your cooperation and assistance in expediting the review so we can obtain the desired grading permits, would be greatly appreciated. GJL:sl Enclosures cc: R. R. Tydings <• GEORGE J. LINDSAS.E. Consulting Engineer 2527 211th Ave. E. SUMNER, WASHINGTON 98390 Phone 863 -6850 JOB CltM- ? W . > 14/YB►TAT SHEET NO 1 OF CALCULATED BY DATE CHECKED BY DATE SCALE CE. HAQb- 1. �izoPEi:T- Di KAIDAS lor' Pfvr2CrZL 1. C NO i To zCAA 'U IL SIC,TlOK PRODUCT 2041 ( a / Inc, Groton, Mm 01471. GEORGE J. LINDSA..E. Consulting Engineer 2527 211th Ave. E. SUMNER, WASHINGTON 98390 Phone 863 -6850 JOB ND (T)AR n D 'I4/}i31TAT- SHEET NO. OF CALCULATED BY G. :+- L. DATE CHECKED BY DATE SCALE tF WQo °, hzi -T T. - (ONO LAM 1NUM CM` LE_Y.- .- JOYR d IG-rL. ECISTkO. 1.95 AcRIF,s; `'IlRSIq...T 1 G.Roc MA UNDRIVIILLoPr'c.o rC � - )0.15. lDzVrzLoPiz6 �1eTd2 .= Q 65. %oR, ?vJU k At3oUL LOWigR,. vtAu -Z P�tO O. ZO fotz BY Pte. P ? .:A. Y 3 i �� L n o w T 1 1 i Z V�1 tv � S I t i c' I . IT .1S TO Rr �M A- N 1 NNt A . N fATU R AL 5ThT�, . iv 10T .RTticirt, p ltili ° TaEAl 11i.W WeTo rl -(b) ri5'- X7/103-}- - 18.8.5 °o %uMf... Pr (A) ib I3 ` 3rtorti G12c3 p I A STA RE, j V� .O- Src (G= ID.Onn.iq �-. 1 /3,o- '%rc.. = IQ 7.Z 1.(10 3EA e. 10.72 .M!►.1 - i, 58 iht/-trd.. -� QAMusT. = zc (g-) - Q RI P wrt RQ Q T ! -Z9 (0.I ) + 046(0, t5) I.zs8 iN ri = O.46 Q By pm [oc.(o..zo)j.1.i/I1-Q= a. 2.0‘ QS6 . QA-Dat.T. = a 440•Zae. - 0. ZO8 & &. _ 0. c QO = QAI ' / 0. Z. o e = 0. Z.3.13. 5,/Ac, I mi.' / / 2 Curz.(Finn2..) 1.z9 (0.85) (Sup. 10 It) T- Z5 + 1162 = - Z5 i- 17,6Z - 87 Z.8 -- zs.00 = 6z. z8 rv(4. Po 0. z313 IO1) _ \4 = ZUzo T.- 40.Qo T = ZZZQ ((Z•z -.40(0...z.313)( 6z.z8) T1- Z5 87. Z8 4) -0S ?- z5 - . 5(6. z.5 = 144. 00 4/Ae 1436, op (I.Z9)(0,8s) )574.55 1) 5TbEZAe(L.. CmLVitrz7" Si Ir ec . . umZ. -t ip. MAN tkO_iS - 53+ N j/ 3 fJ o j-1 Q 3 15 . A3 Afs� lr\l.0 �R.r.L - 574..58 -- 95.43 = 477.. 15 r suMti_ Z6',iCrnP 'To 7 W y-w- zo9. zZ , j ti A&T al eF WAIL, n2.1 CAN tTlO�( Qj.' 0 ,Z q, I h .�. /� = QPLLOL DD 'tom yl/ 0..(0Z tJ1Z = O.453 _ . 0 . f o. (2(64.4)(4. io) = o. o g.s l O. 1008 PRODUCT 204.1( e % ant. Gmtan. Mm 0147I. OFFSITE DRAINAGE REVIEW DISCUSSION: The drainage basin tributary to the site was reviewed on October 13 and 14. The attached map reflects the basic flow patterns and tributary drainage areas. Areas All A2 and A are tributary to the south property line of the subject property. In all . cases, water is routed or channeled by ditches, culverts, etc. to a common point "C ". The runoffs,isJthen carried by tightline along the south property line and on to Inter- urban Ave. by a closed system. This system then continues across Interurban Ave. and on to the Green River. Areas A4 and A5 are tributary to several culverts and /or ditches along Interurban Ave'. The final drainage course is via the line identified by Line A -B on the enclosed map. As can be seen, the proposed site is void of any sizeable tributary drainage. Therefore, the hydraulics analysis should not be impacted by offsite drainage. The two systems from the site appear to have adequate capacity to handle the current drainage. However, when consideration was given to the time necessary to refine and asbuilt the offsite out - fall system, the decision was made to provide onsite storm retention. R. R. TYDINGS, INC. CAMPANELLA PROJECT ri PHOTO #1 - Looks southwest across the property from the north side of Inter- urban Ave. Note the sanitary sewer manhole in the center of the photo. PHOTO #2 - Taken on the north side of Interurban Ave., shows the outfall drainage ditch which flows east to another outfall ditch and then to the Green River. Note the 8.0+ foot deep ditch. The manholes in the background are set at or near 160 ft. which is the 100 year flood plain elevation. Location of photo is near easterly outfall cul- vert for the proposed project. 9 PHOTO #3 - Taken along the northerly outfall ditch which is interconnected with the ditches as shown in Photo #2. Note the capacity of the ditch and the outfall structure which flows northeast to the Green River. TYPICAL DRAINAGE SWALES TYPICAL GRADE STALE. (no.o) (N i- TO ALE) (Foz D(TCN VELOCITIES 3 5 - �• /i LINE DITCH BoTroM wm� �:° �•+ Z 1.P EPA OF Q UA�]ZY sPALLS =-=° m� �'% I.0 W►IN TYPICAL LINED SWALE. (rproo 35 (IyoT To scAtE) 4E.c. FoR DITCH VELoCITItS •} 3 0.5 0.5' 0.5 0.5 TYPICAL SEDIMENTATION POND DETAIL ( &oT TO SCALE) " WASHED GRAVEL PERFORATED R45C2 FP%. • EAR_TN BE KA • -,. �( •••.\\'/ OuTFAtL P►Pr =. (TIG►#TLWNE') OUTLET TO EXISTING DE L7 ittt oR CULVEitT. DEPTH To ACCOM1DATE. A,' AcWZ. of .POTENT IAL.ZUNOFE ALTERNATIVE `A • • STEEL FENCE POST 5' LEGTH x4 ° tt1 ADZ 4 1(x4 "- 10/10 �n1.W,F. W1TZ� TO RRSiS ERO3I ON CONTROL FENCING Ft m L FAeRic, SmP12-D HThDtE.Q -14/ELL TAMPED L3Acx.F► LL. �1LTZZ FAZRAG ,v' wi, BAIUN,G WIRE_ / / -O Z4)(4' READEZ. WELDED WI(Z.Ez, FARKIC. STLLL F CZ �osis A LTERNATIVE B' • GEURZGE J L1N1 :S11Y, Y,E. Consulting Engineer 2527 211th Ave. E. Sumner, til'A• 98390' 863- 65() October 6, 1981 Mr. Thomas Mueller. Army Corps of Engineers 4735 F. Marginal Way South Seattle, Washington RE : Campanella Development Cedarwood Habitat ?)ear Tom: Attached are preliminary plans for a proposed housing development located to the south of Interurban Ave., between South 137th to South 139th Street. It is our intention to construct seven four -piex housing units" along the upper slopes of the existing site. ''he lower portion of the property, or the northern section, will remain undeveloped at this time. The drainage will be designed to flow north to and under Interurban Ave. The design will utilize the existing culvert structures already in place. The water will then flow east and north via existing culverts air ditches to the Green River, We have been in contact with King County, the Washington State Dept. of Highways, and the City of ukwila regarding applicable permits or design criteria. We were advised by King County that wp might want to consult the Corps of Engineers to see if they are aware of any concerns or design criteria. We are requesting a review of our proposal to determine if any special conditions exist, or if we would need any permits from the Corpos'of. Engineers prior to commencing with construction. Your d, .'very tru11y, • GEORGE ' J, LIN')SAY, P.E. GJL:sl Attachment cc: R. R. wings JOHN SPELLMAN Governor STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Office of District Administrator • D-1, 6431 Corson Ave. So., C -81410 • Seattle, Washington 98108 October 5, 1981 George Lindsey P.E. 2527 211th.Ave. East Sumner, Wa 98390 Dear Sir: SR 181 between the Green River Interchange and Foster Interchange was . improved in 1969 under contract 8649. Work consisted of widening to four lanes with a two way left turn lane and included storm sewers. Drainage areas outside of SR 181 were analyzed as single family res- idential with a C factor of 0.55 (hilly, greater than 10% slope). This information was obtained from hydraulic calculations currently held at our Headquarters Hydraulic section. Storm sewers trunks, laterals and ditch for this class highway ( "Other ") are designed for a 10 year reoccurrance interval storm. We hope this information will be of assistance to you. If you have any questions, please contact R. Johnson at 764 -4289. Very truly yours, T. R. BURKE, P.E. District Location Engineer RJ:db DUANE BERENTSON Secretary D. L. HOFFMAN, P.E. District Design Engineer City .of i'ukriIL 6200 South enter Boulevard PLANNING DEPARTMENT Tukwila Was.hington 98188 TRANSMITTAL DATE OF TRANSMITTAL 9 / Nave 8 TO: ❑BUILDING DEPT. XOLICE DEPT. ❑ FIRE DEPT. ❑ RECREATION ❑ PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. ❑ PROJECT: GE. PMWOOD K4ati'AT LOCATION: IN "."- ��)E % SGr= p.;) s The above "mentioned applicant has submitted the following plans or materials for the above refer nce project: Environmental Checklist ❑ Preliminary Plat ❑Environmental Impact State- ❑Final Plat ment ❑:S4 . f llegelapment .P.lans.. ❑Rezone Request. J Shoreline Permit Application❑ Variance Request ❑Conditional Use Permit ❑Other: Application The attached materials are sent to you for your review and comment. The Planning Dept. needs your comments to satisfy review procedures and to complete the project file. Please use the space provided below for your comments or attach a separate sheet. Requested response date: la / }6V / 9t Review Department comments: •.J )er 4. Q... %, J City of TukwIll 6200 South;.enter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 PLANNING DEPARTMENT TRANSMITTAL DATE OF TRANSMITTAL 9 / N W / 81 (//f/f4 3 • TO: ❑ BUILDING DEPT. ❑ POLICE DEPT. ❑ FIRE DEPT. ❑ RECREATION DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. ❑ PROJECT: RMSITAT LOCATION: IHtt1 5L pv s The above mentioned applicant has submitted the following plans or materials for the above refer nce project: Environmental Checklist ❑ Preliminary Mat ❑ Environmental Impact State- ❑Final Plat ment ❑ Site /Development Plans. ❑ Rezone Request. ❑ Shoreline Permit Applications Variance Request ['Conditional Use Permit ❑Other: Application The attached materials are sent to you for your review and comment. The Planning Dept. needs your comments to satisfy review procedures and to complete the project file. Please use. the space provided below for your comments or attach a separate sheet. Requested response date: I / IL6V / 81 Review Department comments: LINbroz. 1-rot c't Mss ' poc�lat� LW v10 - of R. ►ata.., suswot-. Zb ►toancum- Pt • 'PIFA IT L - I~.» - 147ts fl cnDy 5f sott c viatica" -rte Pu ce-i L w,71.U.s V0 140' e n _ i �aL ICZ • tL. 1 UK) MM4Eu -nu.) s`ts'Tt7nn? tti'DQ(110"evl . •C(LATFic. pvbO&{S1ciY0tit.At. NN' a' rk■t,y . M'.y 1tN S G 6 tye. 'S . -r,, kLU›..J„ Awns Putwt&. G. 'Pck tt v 44 -C -° `I_cs" Dht› , .4r s mv.otri.tts t... .L 1 R tai % 1,0,._ ot.` %1153' % Wailillitt ttODk'1 k vA Ai hirmitaw.. RY Ptt131q <<+ i Gow.m t s ot., Y1.10`■ 4113 (0.) — skcbi h P P i'u' W... 1k S (1,-.•L`l f3 a • • p6h1.t W tninit y t... NftiruAvs , t ertVbiv, p 140T Rtrl 7 tZ-13v11�ni o6 A NOV P 1q °1 M,,y ?% 41t�. P l MI Cul tenet r . 4J': "� ,1(1 v e 1 n2 +o• ,: Frank TO( City of Tul�wilo r kJ Mayor Fire Department Fire Hubert H. Crawley Al Pieper Building Department City of Tukwila Re: Tukwila Square Habitat Dear Al, November 13, 1981 In reviewing'the• above mentioned project plans, please note the following items: 1. Walls are to be fire - stopped per UBC Section 2517(f). 2. Automatic fire - sprinklers are required in the carport /storage areas. Drawings prepared by a licensed sprinkler engineer shall be submitted to the Tukwila Fire Department for approval prior to construction. 3. Fire extinguishers shall be provided per NFPA #10, as a minimum requirement. (One 23 pound A11- Purpose dry chemical extinguisher shall be installed in each living unit.) 4. Fire hydrants are required as detailed in Ordinance #729. (Plans as submitted do not show hydrant locations.) Please include these comments in your review of the above- mentioned project. Sincerely, The Tukwila Fire Prevention Bureau cc:TFD file Planning Department'/ City of Tukwila Fire Department, 444 Andover Park East, Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 575 -4404 `0ytLA Y4 .City of Tukwil' 6200 South; enter Boulevard J Tukwi:a Mshington 98188 19 0 PLANNING DEPARTMENT TRANSMITTAL DATE OF TRANSMITTAL 9 /1-16V•/ S I TO: PROJECT: ❑ BUILDING DEPT. ❑ FIRE DEPT. ❑ PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. GE-t7P,M0Or 46,1317 .T POLICE DEPT. ECREATION DEPT. LOCATION: I14 tWQ..> M k\je % 50 Av s The above mentioned applicant has submitted the following plans or materials for the above refer nce project: Environmental Checklist ❑ Preliminary Plat ❑ Environmental Impact State- ❑Final Plat ment ❑ Site /Development Plans ❑ Rezone Request- ❑ Shoreline Permit Application❑ Variance Request []Conditional Use Permit ❑ Other:. Application The attached materials are sent to you for your review and comment. The Planning Dept. needs your comments to satisfy review procedures and to complete the project file. Please use the space provided below for your comments or attach a separate sheet. • Requested response date: 16 / �la� / el Review Department comments: 77,„,„_ yiEr /' 4/42— rJGS //a -�°i -I _/>4 d P _g/ S R(//s -..¢ d i'`_ —.t i GG[Jd'L ✓� ien ✓ b-"- •• �. j s «� d l 6, : c ia : c- a A.- c�,. J� -- r f ��k d �r'. u�l v4 u s- �r-� C a �.o c-,- .••••• ;s �m e��l� (-rF cv�v �!'. G�ia/1 �i o i �f➢�S vt� rGo- 6-4.• % _. 1906 City of Tuk�tir�No 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Wash i ,on 98188 PLANNING DEPARTMENT TRANSMITTAL DATE OF TRANSMITTAL 9 / Nav / 8 i TO: BUILDING DEPT. ❑ FIRE DEPT. ❑ PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. ❑ POLICE DEPT. ❑ RECREATION DEPT. PROJECT: GF.DA':Noor Rktsrlovr LOCATION: t,w % SOLI Av S The above mentioned applicant has submitted the following plans or materials for the above refer nce project: Environmental Checklist ❑Preliminary Plat ❑ Environmental Impact State- ❑Final Plat ment ❑Site /Development Plans ❑Rezone Request. ['Shoreline Permit Application❑ Variance Request ['Conditional Use Permit DOther: Application The attached materials are sent to you for your review and comment. The Planning Dept. needs your comments to satisfy review procedures and to complete the project file. Please use the space provided below for your comments or attach a separate sheet. Requested response date: 16 / 4 V / 81 Review Department comments: n� +o• 'lire 9 /y�� /908 0 City. of Tukwi: 6200 South: enter Boulevard PLANNING DEPARTMENT Tukwila Washington 98188 TRANSMITTAL DATE OF TRANSMITTAL 9 /1.46V / 81 TO: ❑ BUILDING DEPT. ❑ POLICE DEPT. ❑ FIRE DEPT. ❑ RECREATION DEPT. ❑ PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. ❑ PROJECT: GEOPOJOOD HAtsrrAT LOCATION: 114TraAMA644 iN ey SLR= pv S The above mentioned applicant has submitted the following plans or materials for the above refer nce project: Environmental Checklist ❑ Preliminary Plat ❑ Environmental Impact State- ❑ Final Plat ment ❑ Site /Development Plans ❑ Rezone Request- ❑ Shoreline Permit Application❑ Variance Request ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑Other: Application The attached materials are sent to you for your review and comment. The Planning Dept. needs your comments to satisfy review procedures and to complete the project file. Please use the space provided below for your comments or attach a separate sheet. Requested response date: l6 / NoV / 81. Review Department comments: Bv: _ Date: CITY OF TUKWILA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM This questionnaire must be completed and submitted with the application for permit. This questionnaire must be completed by all persons applying for a permit from the City of Tukwila, unless-it is determined by the Responsible Official that the permit is exempt or unless the applicant and Responsible Official previously agree an Environmental Impact Statement .needs to be completed. A fee of S50.00 must accompany the filling of the Environmental Questionnaire to cover costs of the threshold determination. I. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent: Felix M. Campanella /dba CMB Development Corporation 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: Market Place One, 2001 Western Ave. Suite 241, Seattle, Washington 98121 3. Date Checklist Submitted: November :4.,-.:1981 4. Agency Requiring Checklist: City of Tukwila, Washington 5. Name of Proposal , i f ar)pl icable: Tukwila_ Square Habitat (Condominiums) 6. Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal (including but not limited to its size, 'general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature): See attached Page 7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental im- pacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate under - standing of the environmental setting of the proposal): See attached Pave 8. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal: August 1982 9. List of all Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals Required for the Proposal (federal, state and local): (a) Rezone, conditional use, shoreline permit,. etc.., (b) King County Hydraulics Permit: (c) Building permit .Y ES, x.k; Answer to Question Number 6 This proposal is to construct a garden type condominium project containing a total of 28 units which will be constructed on the "upper shelf" fronting on 56th Avenue South and will be designed in a four -plex townhouse style configuration. Each four -plex building of approximately 36 feet by 67 feet will contain four two - bedroom units, four carports and four storage rooms. The general design character of the project reflexts extensive use of wood, (all siding will be cedar) ,. sloping roofs with rustic shingles, balconies and open space. Generous landscaping will be provided utilizing the existing trees on the site. Answer to Question number 7 The project side is located between Interurban Avenue and 56th Avenue south; and between the extension of South 137th Street and South 139th Street. The area surrounding the project side is of mixed use. To the north east across Interurban Avenue is the Foster. Golf ,Course (owned by the City of Tukwila) ; to the southwest across 56th Avenue South is the Terrace Apartment complex. On the southeast and along Interurban Avenue is a mixture of commercial, retail, multifamily and some single family residences. Along 56th Place South are existing singe family; units. To the northwest along 56th Avenue South and South 137th Street. are . a. mixture, of duplex, apartments and some single family units. The existing trees on the site will be retained as much as possible. The land use area distribution is shown on the accompaning table. (d) Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Permit (e) Sewer hook up permit (f) Sign permit (g) Water hook up permit (h) Storm water system permit (i) Curb cut permit (j) Electrical permit (State of Washington) (k) Plumbing permit (King County) (1) Other: None YES NOxx YES'cx NO_ YES NOxx YES x NO YES NOCX YES. NOxx Y E S X' . NO YESCX NO 10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or futher activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain: None 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain: None 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such, application form: II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? (b) Disruptions; displacements, compaction or overcover- ing of the soil? )Change in topography or ground surface relief fea- tures? (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any YES MAYBE NO xx xx xx xx 1 • 1. EARTH Explanation to (b).and (c) Dis,Jruption.of soils and changes in topography area part of a building program for the development of this site. Cuts and fills will be balanced and the miniumum "import" and "export" will take place. Soils engineers have been retained for this work, their report is complete and is on record with the City of Tukwila. To the fullest extent possible, the site work will be done in accordance with the City of Tukwila's Land Use Plan. 1 • (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? Explanation: Explanation to (b) and (e) on attached page 2.. Air. Will the proposal result in: (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? (b) The creation of objectionable odors? (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? Explanation: 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? YES MAYBE NO (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? XX (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? (e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? XX (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or 'through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? -3- XX XX XX XX XX XX XX 1 • 3. WATER Explanation to (b) and (f) (b) The construction of buildings and required parking change the absorption rate. This will be mitigated by connecting all storm ,sewer lines to an approved storm water retention system or discharge all storm water into the Green River. This option will be evaluated.by the developer and the City of Tukwila and implemented accordingly. (f) Ground water flow may be affected by buildings. This condition will be mitigated by adequate footing.dr'.a.ins. and gravel around all building structures. These drains will be connected to a system as described in (b) above. (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? (i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise avail- able for public water supplies? XX YES MAYBE NO XX Explanation: explanation to (b) and (f) on attached page 4. Flora. Will the proposal result in: (a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? XX (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species. of flora? (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? Explanation: (a) Some trees, Shrubs, etc will have to be removed to construct the project. As many existing trees, shrubs,etc. as possible will be retained. To supplment the existing vegatation on the site. a_completetiaridscape_ :plan:-will :be implemented 'for.:the total project. XX XX 5. Fauna. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals . including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? (b) Reduction of the numbers. of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? , XX Explanation: 1 YES MAYBE NO 6. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? XX Explanation: 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? Explanation: Explanation to Seven on the attached page 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in the altera- tion of the present or planned land use of an area? Explanation: 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? Explanation: 10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radi- ation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? Explanation: -5- XX XX • XX 1 • 7. LIGHT AND GLARE The proposed project will produce new light by the introduction of living units. Such light sources will be from area illumination which will be "down light" of subdued intensity. Light from autos -will be screened from streets and adjoining areas by landscaping screens and landscaped berms. The building themselves will be colored in. brown earth tones which will produce little if any glare. All windows will be bronze toned insulated glass. 11. Population. Explanation: • Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? Explanation: 13. Transportation /Circulation. Will the proposal result in: (a) ,Generation of additional vehicular movement? (b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and /or goods? (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? Explanation: Explanation to (a) on attached page. 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: (a) Fire protection? (b) Police protection? (c) Schools? (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? (e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? YES MAYBE NO XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX 13. TRANSPORTATION /CIRCULATION' (a) Additional vehicular traffic will be created by virtue of added dwelling units in the area. However, traffic count studies conducted by the City of Tukwila on 56th Avenue South show that capacity of that street is well above that which is required to service the subject project. Also, discussions and review with the City's traffic engineer.regarding 56th Avenue South and Interurban Avenue has resulted in approval of ingress and egress from the subject project as shown on the plans. • -YES MAYBE NO (f) Other governmental services? XX Explanation: 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new,sources of energy? Explanation: 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: (a) Power or natural gas? (b) Communications systems? (c) Water? (d) Sewer or septic tanks? (e) Storm water drainage? (f) Solid waste and disposal? Explanation: 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the crea- tion of any health hazard or potential health hazard '(excluding mental health)? Explanation: XX XX XX XX XX XX • • 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruc- tion of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically of- " fensive site open to public view? Explanation: 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of exist- ing recreational opportunities? Explanation: 20. Archeological /Histroical. Will the proposal result in an alteration of a signifi cant archeological or his - torical site, structure, object or building? Explanation: YES MAYBE NO CERTIFICATION BY APPLICANT: I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non - significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or i lful lack of full disclosure on my part. " . ature. and Title Date 4 November 1981 xx xx xx A._ —._. • •000CI•1C• . INC NEC agpgAR G O FASO' ON l•NB:Ni. • Iw13.'l' TION I IIR STATE 01 4CSMIN0I1141' torn 00110 �. 11 7, i;