Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA EPIC-197-82 - GENERAL ELECTRIC (GE) - SATELLITE ANTENNA STATION (CUP)GE CO. -CUP EARTH STATION SATELLITE ANTENNA 401 TUKWILA PY EPIC - 197 -82 �w«A � Tukwila 7 City ofTu _0 6200 Southcenter Boulevard ▪ Tukwila Washington 98188 • 1908 Gary L VanDusen, Mayor 16 November 1982 • General Electric Co. 401 N. Washington St. Rockville, MD 20850 Attn: Gerry Way .SUBJECT: Application EPIC - 197 -82 Enclosed is a copy of the Declaration. of. Non- Significance for the requested • conditional use permit.to operate an earth. satellite antenna station at 401 Tukwila Parkway. The final declaration fulfills your project's obligations under the Washington State Environmental Policy Act. We appreciate your cooperation. TUKW'ILA NNING DEPARTMENT Mark Caughey Associate Planner MC /blk CITY OF TUKWILA OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FINAL DECLARATION OF NON - SIGNIFICANCE Description of proposal Proponent Earth. Satellite Antenna Station General Electric Company Location of'Proposal Lead Agency. 401 Tukwila Parkway City of Tukwila File No. EPIC - 197 -82 This proposal has been determined to Offiark /not have) a significant adverse impact upon the environment. An EIS OW/is not) required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency.. Responsible Official Position /Title Brad Collins., Planning Director Date 1tierv'+., 11 6982 Signature COMMENTS: Control of any emitted radiation of any measureable frequency or wavelength shall be maintained wi'thi'n safe limits as established for this type of facility, and shall be documented to the respon- sible official's satisfaction prior to construction. • • THRESHOLD DETERMINATION G.E. Earth Station - (EPIC- 197 -82) Proposed Action The proposed action is a request for approval of a conditional use permit per TMC 18.64.020(1) to install an exterior, ground -based dish antenna and freestanding equipment at the southerly edge of the site at 401 Tukwila Parkway. The antenna structure is to be thirty -one feet high, and will be placed within a secure enclosure. Checklist Review The project has been reviewed extensively in the context of the staff report prepared for application 82 -19 -CUP, and the checklist has been routed for intra - agency comment. Two areas of concern are noted: A) Recreation (Checklist Section II, Item 19) - The Recreation Department, after field investigation, has determined that the facility will have no physical encroachment on the adjacent baseball playfield. B) Human Health (Checklist Section II, Item 17) - From the specifications literature supplied with the conditional use permit application, it appears that there may be radiation emissions of an electromagnetic or radio- frequency nature present. The impli- cations of this radiation potential. in terms of exposure to persons using the ballfield or working nearby is not clear. It should be investigated and mitigated if necessary before construction proceeds. Recommendation A Declaration of Non-Significance should be approved for this proposal, subject to verification at the building permit stage that radiation levels are confined within established safety limits. AGENDA ITEM INTRODUCTION isNovember 18, 1982 CITY OF TUKWILA PLANNING DIVISION PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT • 82 -19 -CUP G.E. Co. Earth Satellite Antenna The General Electric.Company is requesting approval of a conditional use permit to install an exterior, ground -based dish antenna and freestanding equipment room on vacant land at the sourtherly edge of their existing warehouse site at 401 Tukwila Parkway. The antenna is to become part of the company's orbital satellite voice -grade international network telephone system. Exhibit "A" depicts the proposed communication: system in conceptual form. FINDINGS 1) The proposed communication satellite antenna and equipment complex will be located on vacant property immediately west of the existing G.E. Company baseball field. The City's recreation director has determined that the equipment will be positioned so as to avoid physical encroachment on the baseball play -area. 2) The proposed site is zoned C -M (Industrial system falls under the general conditional Section 18.64.020(1). Park); the satellite antenna use permit requirement of TMC 3) Maximum height of the proposed antenna is 31 feet; the equipment room is of single -floor design. As the basic structural height limitation in this geographic area is 115' per TMC 18.50.030, the proposed project is consistent with zoning contraints. 4) Minimum setback standards for the C -M zone have been far exceeded in the project description. 5) A Declaration of Non - significance under provisions of the. State Environmental Policy Act has been granted by the responsible official for this project. The antenna perimeter will be enclosed with a chain -link fence and security lighting will be provided per police department specifications. Page -2- Planning Commission 82 -19 -CUP G.E. Co. Ea Satellite Attenna November 18, 1982 CONCLUSIONS TMC Section 18.64.050 specified the criteria to be used by the Planning Commission in deciding to grant a conditional.use permit; our response to each criteria is as follows: (1) The proposed use will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity of the proposed use or in the district in which the subject property is situated; Response: The proposed equipment will be placed in a remote area of the G.E. site and will have minimal apparent exposure to the public at large due to its distance from public thoroughfares. Unresolved topic of concern to staff is the potential health hazard which the antenna system presents1if any,from emission of radio - frequency and electromagnetic radiation. We are concerned particularly with affects of proximity and exposure to the system by persons using the adjacent recreation field. It is expected that the applicants will be prepared to demonstrate the radiation safety of this system at the Public Hearing. (2) The proposed use shall meet or exceed the performance standards that are required in the district it will occupy; Response: The proposed project is generally consistent with the established light - industrial use characteristics of the Andover Industrial Park area. (3) The proposed development shall be compatible generally with the surrounding land uses in terms of traffic and pedestrian circulation, building and site design; Response: The proposed communications center is umanned except during periods of maintenance activity and will have no pact on traffic circulation. Although the equipment is situated some di r ance away from a public travel -way, we suggest that the appearance of the chain -link enclosure and the non - descript equipment building would be enhanced by perimeter landscape. (4) The proposed use shall be in keeping with the goals and policies of the comprehensive ... , -land use policy plan; Response: While the comprehensive plan is largely silent on the matter of siting communication equipment, it does allude to the wisdom of encouraging uses which are supportive to existing industrial activities. With adequate protection of its surroundings from any hazardous radiation emission, the project should be viewed as consistent with the comprehensive plan. Page -3- Planning Commission 82 -19 =CUP G.E, Co, Ea ,Satellite.Attenna November 18, 1982 (5) A ZZ measures have been taken to minimize the possible adverse impacts which the proposed use may have on the area in which it is located. Response: The following steps have been, or will be taken, to insure that the proposed communications system will intergrate successfully with its surroundings: 1) Provisions of approved security fencing and .lighting. 2) Adequate separation to prevent interference with on -going use of the adjoining baseball field. 3) Significant separation of the facility from public travelways. 4) Control of R.F. or electromagnetic radiation within accepted safety limits. 5) Undergrounding of power and transmission cable linkages. RECOMMENDATION... Staff recommends approval of application 82 -19 -CUP for installation and use of an earth satellite communication antenna and equipment facility as depicted on Exhibits B, C, and D and subject to the following conditions: 1). Perimeter landscaping shall be installed prior to final inspection of the facility., subject to staff approval. 2) Control of any emitted radiation of any measureable frequency or wavelength shall be maintained within safe limits as established for this type of facility. 3) Emergency power equipment, such as a gasoline- powered generator, shall be installed in an enclosed structure so as to control noise propagation. 4) The conditional use permit is issued for the benefit of General Electric Company.•.or its corporate subsidiaries and is not transferrable. The Planning Commission shall reserve the right to review the conditional use permit.on an .annual basis to. assure compliance with the terms thereof. . MCfblk CITY OF TUKWILA * RMIT NUMBER -COOL NUMBER - — CENTRAL PERMIT. SYSTEM - PLAN CHECK ROUTING FORM TO: BLDG. PLNG, j P,W, r J FIRE 1 POLICE P,& R. PROJECT 6,E. e. 6•&RIM CP. • ADDRESS ANDDVEtt .. Q Tx, ple.virf DATE TRANSMITTED 10 " RESPONSE. REQUESTED BY 1)-5 C.P.S. STAFF COORDINATOR Nom RESPONSE RECEIVED, PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED PROJECT PLANS AND RESPOND WITH APPROPRIATE COMMENTS IN THE SPACE BELOW, INDICATE CRUCIAL CONCERNS BY CHECKING THE BOX NEXT TO THE LINE(S) ON WHICH THAT CONCERN IS NOTED: 1 1 n 8) n 9) 10) 12) 1- 1 ri 13) ri 14) 15) D, R, C, REVIEW REQUESTED –~ PLAN RESUBMI TTA�L REQUESTED FI 1 1 PLAN CHECK DATE I I fc7 COMMENTS PREPARED BY W)CAIIIPPP C,P.,S, FORM 2 CITY OF TUKWILA . J •RMIT NUMBER -COOL NUMBER — CENTRAL PERMIT. SYSTEM - PLAN CHECK ROUTING FORM TO: 1 BLDG, PROJECT ADDRESS. PLNG, DATE TRANSMITTED P, W, FIRE .e. U•411t 'T6 • POLICE P.& R. p49OVER. 1E. @ 1Ub • PkW`f 10- V7 RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 11- C,P,S, STAFF COORDINATOR Mao: RESPONSE RECEIVED PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED. PROJECT PLANS. AND RESPOND WITH APPROPRIATE COMMENTS IN THE SPACE BELOW,. INDICATE CRUCIAL CONCERNS BY CHECKING THE BOX NEXT TO THE LINE(S) ON WHICH THAT CONCERN IS NOTED: F-1 1) /TO anKAA.eet, 171 2) f--1 3) - El 4) E71 5) .. 1 1 D.R.C. REVIEW REQUESTED P PLAN CHECK DATE (ei6---2-72--,F2____ COMMENTS PREPARED BY 42.-)2;4g. C,P,S, FORM 2 PLAN RESUBMITTAL REQUESTED DI AN APPPIMUI • CITY OF TUKWILA . ORMIT NUMBER - C01114 NUMBER - — CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM -PLAN CHECK ROUTING FORM TO: El BLDG. ri PLNG. PROJECT ADDRESS P.W. 1 1 0. u0 1. FIRE eat POLICE R. 44-417c'.J . @ T )K . nwy DATE TRANSMITTED 10- 21 RESPONSE REQUESTED BY .4t- 57 U.S. S. STAFF COORDINATOR P"-W. RESPONSE RECEIVED PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED PROJECT PLANS AND RESPOND WITH APPROPRIATE COMMENTS IN THE SPACE BELOW, INDICATE CRUCIAL CONCERNS BY CHECKING THE BOX NEXT TO THE LINE(S) ON WHICH THAT CONCERN IS'NOTED: EILTODErl n n 1 1) 2) 3) 4) 20/. L :`� 5) 1-4"-� 6) 7) -4' Pa— C71-- e," m s�� f. ,ce_ .. �- o 8) Q �iL s� 1 C v�L / !/ /e 9) /;1- 10) D.R.C. REVIEW REQUESTED P .PLAN CHECK DATE air fi /a /14°:� PLAN' RESUBMITTAL REQUESTED fl COMMENTS PREPARED BY DI nfJ L<PPRn�IRTI I [ C,P,S, FORM CITY OF TUKWILA . litRMIT NUMBER – CCIe,OL NUhiBER, - — — CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM – PLAN CHECK ROUTING FORM TO: r BLDG. PLNG. PROJECT ADDRESS DATE TRANSMITTED G. e. GO p.NVOVtt P.W. j FIRE POLICE E4-TE114 '611.11454-) E. 11)14, • PKv‘`f P.& R. 10 - 2.1 RESPONSE REQUESTED BY II- S C.P.S. STAFF COORDINATOR Amu: RESPONSE RECEIVED PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED PROJECT PLANS AND RESPOND WITH APPROPRIATE COMMENTS IN THE SPACE BELOW,. INDICATE CRUCIAL CONCERNS BY CHECKING THE BOX NEXT TO THE LINE(S) ON WHICH THAT CONCERN IS NOTED: 1-1 1) VIA-0 it r--1 2) f--1 3) ri 4) Ft 6) Ai "Le-e/t- f- fl8) n 9) n 10) ii) ni 12) ri 13) I r 15) D.R.C. REVIEW REQUESTED 0 PLAN CHECK DATE PLAN RESUBMITTAL REQUESTED I-- , COMMENTS PREPARED BY DI l!fd APPRn1/Pri I t CITY OF TUKWILA . RMIT NUMBER - CC , . , OL NU CENTRAL PERMIT. SYSTEM - PLAN CHECK ROUTING FORM TO: PROJECT ADDRESS BLDG, PLNG, P,W, FIRE G•g. co •1 STA. 4N17over. "•. @ 1UK, PKWY P,& R. DATE TRANSMITTED 1d ' z- RESPONSE REQUESTED BY II- 5. C, P, S, STAFF COORDINATOR µ'°'RK RESPONSE RECEIVED PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED PROJECT PLANS AND RESPOND WITH APPROPRIATE COMMENTS IN THE SPACE BELOW, INDICATE CRUCIAL CONCERNS BY CHECKING THE BOX NEXT TO THE LINECS) ON WHICH THAT CONCERN IS NOTED: n 1) 0 (9__S.. " iZe). ( (PN1 Usti Li fl 2) (.4/6-� . (V4AhAlblAiT --'‘ FT 3) 97,--1S -to ii c .Li .'tom _'7 s fl4) ,,iY(�.�C_ w.0 -xis r--% t___ S) LI 6) L]n Li 8) 1-1 9) I. j 10) 1 D, R, C, REVIEW REQUESTED n PLAN CHECK DATE /4C?0 PLAN RESUBMITTAL REQUESTED COMMENTS PREPARED BY �o� :. < C, P., S , FORM 2 PI t U APPR(1VPVi PI • • CITY OF TUKWILA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM This questionnaire must be completed and submitted with the application for. permit. This questionnaire must be completed by all persons applying for a permit from the City of Tukwila, unless it is determined by the Responsible Official that the permit is exempt or unless the applicant and Responsible Official previously agree an Environmental Impact Statement needs to be completed. A fee of $50.00 must accompany the filling of the Environmental Questionnaire to cover costs of the threshold determination. I. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent: GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY 401 North Washington Street 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: Rockville, Maryland 20850 3. Date Checklist Submitted: October 15, 1982- 4. Agency Requiring Checklist: PLANNING COMMISSION 5. Name of Proposal, if applicable: Satellite (Dish) Antenna Installation 6. Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature): Installation of a 7.7. Meter.Dish Antenna on vacant land owned by General Electric Company_, r_ 4b`l _�Tukwill- a^Pa.r.-kway, r. -'. Tukwilla. Installation will include_01me„- ,torv_bui_ldin9 Location of Proposal (describe the quit }ment hehte- ---- -- well as the extent of the land area affected by any envirui,,.._-_ - r on slab. pacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate under- __ standing of the environmental setting of the proposal): Property is Industrial Park /Light Industry area. Unit and equipment shelter will be located on flat weeded land, ,southwest corner of lot, 60'east of RR tracks, 40'north of southern lot boundry. 8. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal: February 1983 9. List of all Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals Required for the Proposal (federal, state and local): (a) wamu conditional use, stmelAmmximmmdiloalkX YES X NO (b) King County Hydraulics Permit YES NO,� (c) Building permit General Contractor will apply. YES x NO • • (d) Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Permit (e) Sewer hook up permit (f) Sign permit (g) Water hook up permit (h) Storm water system permit (i) Curb cut permit (j) Electrical permit (State of Washington) (k) Plumbing permit (King County) (1) Other: UNMANNED SITE YES NO X YES . N0 x YES NO x YES NO X YES NO X YES NO x YES X NO YES NO X 10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or futher activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain: None 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain: None 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature -of such application form: None II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS - (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) .Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? (b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcover- ing of the soil? SLAB /FOUNDATION PREPARATION ONLY (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief.fea- tures? (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? YES MAYBE NO x x • (.e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the., channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? Explanation: 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? POSSIBLE INSTALLATION OF SMALL STANDBY ENGINE GENERATOR UNIT. (b)' The creation of objectionable odors? (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? Explanation: YES MAYBE NO x x x 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, Dr the rate and amount of surface water runoff? x (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? X (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? (e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? x (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? • x (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? x (h) • • Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? (i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise avail- able for public water supplies? Explanation: 4. Flora. Will the proposal result in: (a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or . endangered species of flora? (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? Explanation: 5. Fauna. Will the proposal result in: (a). Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? Explanation: YES MAYBE NO x x x x • 6. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? Explanation: YES MAYBE N0 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? SITE WILL BE ILLUMINATED FOR SECURITY REASONS - Low level lighting Explanation: 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in the altera- tion of the present or planned land use of an area? Explanation: 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? Explanation: 10: Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radi- ation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? Explanation: X • • 11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? Explanation: 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? Explanation: 13. Transportation /Circulation. Will the proposal result in: (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? (b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and /or goods? (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? Explanation: 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for'new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: (a) Fire protection? (b) Police protection? (c) Schools? (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? (e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? YES MAYBE NO x x x x (f) Other governmental services? Explanation: 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? (b). Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? Explanation: 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: (a) Power or natural gas? (b) Communications systems? (c) Water? (d) Sewer or septic tanks? (e) Storm water drainage? (f) Solid waste and disposal? Explanation: 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the crea- tion of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? Explanation: YES MAYBE NO rAA6 efr tom° x x x • YES MAYBE NO 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruc- tion of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically of- fensive site open to public view? Explanation: 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact . upon the quality or quantity of exist- ing recreational opportunities? Explanation: 20. Archeological /Histroical. Will the proposal result in an alteration of a signifi- cant archeological or his - torical site, structure, object or building? Explanation: CERTIFICATION BY APPLICANT: I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency . may withdraw any declaration of non - significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. /4 , d 2__ Signature a•. Title Date GENERAL ELECT IC INFORMATION SERVICES COMPANY MANAGER, CO •UTER CENTERS FACILITIES r -8- x x x BS SATELLITE BUSINESS SYSTEMS TELCO ROUTING APPROXIMATE VOCATION Or POWER ENTRANCE S'ea -N- 4.•1 ; 7I 4 i; FACILITIES _ LAPPROXIMATE LOCATION or TELCO .41KMPAndird/7/41%.4/4/4/4111:41:InadriffIlal _ _ ; •ar? r • - THIS SECTION OF THE TELCO AND PNER '1 CZNVEYANCE WILL BE RUN IN SEPARATE CONDUIT 1 TIGHT ID ROOF. TRUSSES AND WEST WALL. ALTERNATE' INTE WOULD BE 14 CONDUIT 14 _ THE WAREHOUSE AND IE RAILROAD SPUR. A CCtY,E14 TRENCH BETWEEN THE WIT WALL Or - T D . EXTENT OF DISTURBANCE TO CUSTOMER WAREHOUSING ACTIVITIES SHOULD BE CONSIDEREQ. • WAREHOUSE FACILITY AT SOW TUKWILA PKWY irLIKWILA, WA. REARN00110 POWER CONVEYANCE APPROXIMATELY 575' IELCO CONVEYANCE APPROXIMATELY 650' EXTERIOR IS APPROXIMATELY 451N BURIED CONDUIT .__-- INTERIOR IS APPROXIMATELY 30 UNDER RAISED FLOOR / • '•--- . • 1TL " 1 --J 7. • •I a DI - .44.c '.fl...s 11: 1:Cc V, CIZ- %Lel. US-6 1 er•••••:•r!* — •• -4: • IS SECTION OF THE TELCO AND POWER CONVEYANCE _•C ;se+ • LL BE RLM IN CONDUIT IN A COMMON TRECN. 7,t7.1 17 1 NE4LY BOUT, FREE STANDING. PRE-ENGINEERED BUILDING FOR SES EQUIPMENT ROOMS. • ";a:11.71.154d/47;.,7?/... 9'.:1etr .1 1::14Y.a11,11 ,1 Oda.: -,/ ■ 4> • --XEc 7:6 ANTENNA WITH SINGLE SHELTER R DISCONNECTS 41. r- 47;4- • (4 IFL PULL ear 44, ,‘ 411.,_,,,.... . * ,., u. - -..71.-.er-.‘v ^ , "c vs .z tr 4.? _ _ ___ e . 0 * •4, • c., ... ___ ID e ... .• E. . 1 7 .....-1 .r. 1'4. \ 4, 4Ne 064Verit T., • V, VV;4 e . / r. .,... qp. I i. i; s. 4. &.t-aicaad - • Customer tIFNFRAI Fl FCTRIC COMPANY • Location SEATTLE, WA.