Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA EPIC-161-81 - FORT DENT OFFICE ASSOCIATES - OFFICE BUILDINGOFFICE BUILDING SOUTHCENTER BLVD @ FORT DENT PARK EPIC- 161 -81 CITY OF TUKWILA OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FINAL DECLARATION OF NON- SIGNIFICANCE Description of proposal Proponent Office Building Fort Dent Office Associates Location of Proposal Southcenter Blvd. @ Fort Dent Park Lead Agency City of Tukwila File No. EPIC- 161 -81 This proposal has been determined to PENWnot have) a significant adverse impact upon the environment. An EI:S 019t/is not) required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Responsible Official Position /Title Date COMMENTS: Brad Collins Planning Director 18 May 1981 Signature (A. Stipulations of the Declaration of Non- Significance as follows: 1) Adequacy of exterior security lighting subject to approval of the Tukwila Police Department prior to issuance of Building Permit. 2) Building Permit application to include hydraulic study analyzing ade- . quacy of on -site storm drainage system and impacts on city - maintained drainage facilities. 4) Building Permit. Application to include an intersection capacity analy- sis shall reference the findings of the City's Master Plan prepared by Entranco .. *ILA I 4 City of Tukwila 1909 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 Frank Todd, Mayor MEMORANDUM TO: Brad Collins, Planning Director FROM: Mark Caughey, Associate Planner DATE: 18 May 1981 SUBJECT: Threshold Determination - Fort Dent Office Assoc. (EPIC- 16 -81) Project Description The proposed development is a three -story office building on 2.4 acres with surface -level parking adjacent to the Green River. The applicants are seeking a Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit to facilitate construction of the project. The building itself is 35' high, with 2 1/2 additional parapet freeboard to act as a screen for roof -top mechanical equipment. Discussion The proposed office use is consistent both with the site's existing M-1 zoning and its "camiercial" Comprehensive Plan. designation. Thus, the pro - ject is of an' "infilling" nature, the impacts of which are those commonly anticipated with development of the Tukwila valley floor: Traffic genera- tion and hydrology. The recommended Declaration of Non - Significance con- tains stipulations addressing these. impact areas. The following statement of findings pertain to the stipulations: 1) Security Lighting "Adequacy of exterior security lighting subject to approval of the Tukwila Police Department prior to issuance of Building Permit." a) Impact Mitigation: Enhance business security through adequate on -site lighting. b) Comprehensive Plan Reference: While no specific policy on lighting of . city. business areas is mentioned in the Comprehen- sive Plan, object 4, policy 6 of the "Residential" element of the document speaks:to adequacy of lighting as a means of pro- rooting motorist and pedestrian safety. The same principles reasonably apply to business areas as well. 2) Storm Drainage Page -2- 0 Brad Collins "Building Permit application to include an intersection capacity analysis for SR- 181 /Southcenter Blvd junction; said analysis shall reference the findings of the City's Master Plan prepared by Entranco." a) Impact Mitigation: Achieve adequate control of project's sur- face water run -off and minimize adverse incremental effects on City's drainage system. b) Comprehensive Plan Reference: "Transportation /utilities ", objective 6, policy 2 (encourage structural /retention storm water control facility); objective 6, policy 4 (control peak flow funoff at rates simulating natural conditons). 3) Traffic Management "Building Permit application to include hydraulic study analyzing adequacy of on -site storm drainage systan and impacts on City - maintained drainage facilities." a) Impact Mitigation: Maintain safe, orderly traffic flow on City's major arterial routes. b) Comprehensive Plan Reference: "Transportation /Utility" element., section 1, objective 1 (establish safe, efficient circulation systan which promotes desired development pattern). MC/blk City of Ti 6200 Southcenter Boule IIPS 'TUSemila Washington 98188 PLANNING DEPARTMENT TRANSMITTAL DATE OF TRANSMITTAL 3 / #647C/ 81. TO: ❑ BUILDING DEPT. ❑ POLICE DEPT. ,JEEIIIRE DEPT. ❑RECREATION DEPT... ❑ PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. ❑ PROJECT: FeK•r 1 - rf 419=14:36 8t.c2&• LOCATION: EsTL(. -MKMI NUS - soGTR. 6t.V17 The above mentioned applicant has submitted the following plans or materials for the above reference project: ,DEnvironmental Checklist ❑Preliminary Plat ❑Environmental Impact State- ❑Final Plat ment ❑Site /Development Plans ❑Rezone Request Shoreline Permit Application Variance Request ❑Other: ['Conditional Use Permit Application The attached materials are sent to you for your review and comment. The Planning Dept. needs your comments to satisfy review procedures and to complete the project file. Please use the space provided below for your comments or attach a separate sheet. Requested response date: Ia / o.rK r 81. Review Department comments:' This building will put additional strain on the limited resources of the fire department. We presently do.not'have the capacity to handle.a major incident within this structure. B Hubert H. Crawley Date April 7, 1981 Y: • PLANNING DEPARTMENT TRANSMITTAL DATE OF TRANSMITTAL 3 / AO( / 8) TO: PROJECT: LOCATION: kltAiltrre) /l\lN/ ❑ BUILDING DEPT. Af POLICE DEPT. ❑ FIRE DEPT. ❑ RECREATION DEPT. ❑ PUBLIC WORKS DEPT.. ❑ r°Rr n1:41- ovrnGs esit-r ¶M 1 N U 5- SOG S3LV t' The above mentioned applicant has submitted the following plans or materials for the above reference project: JEnvironmental Checklist ❑Preliminary Plat ❑Environmental Impact State- ❑Final Plat ment ❑Site /Development Plans ❑Rezone Request 'Shoreline Permit Application Variance Request ['Conditional Use Permit ❑Other: Application The attached materials are sent to you for your review and comment. The Planning Dept. needs your comments to satisfy review procedures and to complete the project file. Please use the space provided below for your comments or attach a separate sheet. Requested response date: 147 / Ap12 %81 Review Department comments: 69 Re- rIe ss e4-ek- M/411 poste i tal abs4-- c-Jic, Cf , ,.5 re fec- ;o ai, iI a N —4os , ,uo L I c c, e .5e, /4/ E is e AflfI"Wcpcl 6aj -S corv'OO-- i sr css . /:4/.,,s-P FG • .b %1 I _ ,c /eGk AY— _ . Ao • OII -c /d0 C4 /Zs o S • e • / 8/ //3 '� Gd .vG ��c�r /e .. o r BPS S Rc, t , II Ui i) ✓! fa.J IJ ,.+ A- ! Ce. 0✓� t7/4-p . ' t -5e««, .�. r7 Ll �, i u ,TI4k_/,,5 10_1- tee, Inc J-e,zs ,a dv .n btd5 fete, e.fei 11 By: f, ,CQ. Date: 4/7/k/ PLANNING DEPARTMENT TRANSMITTAL DATE OF TRANSMITTAL 3 / / 8l TO: PROJECT: LOCATION: ❑ BUILDING DEPT. ❑ POLICE DEPT. ❑ FIRE DEPT. RECREATION DEPT.. ❑ PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. ❑ EST=( TE N V S — sc>✓j'lz, g-V o The above mentioned applicant has submitted the following plans or materials for the above reference project: Environmental Checklist ❑Preliminary Plat ❑Environmental Impact State- ❑Final Plat ment ❑ Site /Development Plans ❑Rezone Request Shoreline Permit Application❑ Variance Request ❑Conditional Use Permit ❑Other: Application The attached materials are sent to you for your review and comment. The Planning Dept. needs your comments to satisfy review procedures and to complete the project file. Please use the space provided below for your comments or attach a separate sheet. Requested response date: t / A4'! r 81 Review Department comments: e //Y � O /s- eJ /CJ /fll la /� -70,e0 el rP" a �// Lti /T�. /- L1l rem .T ��r flu ����: x..11 f��,TC� r/La e f .r2k42 v�-o . - zti� �'��� _7:02 a dlo t a , mil,' c a��/� p �G�� rf . /cz v -a ∎^_e-4� - � A` ^42 s h p t,, A<t.' By. � .. Date: /j/ City of Tukw; 6200 Southcenter Tukwila Washington 98188 PLANNING DEPARTMENT TRANSMITTAL DATE OF TRANSMITTAL 3 / A / 81 TO: PROJECT: LOCATION: pr',K., r-' r n r 'r- r) ... ... 'APR' 3' 1981' ❑ BUILDING DEPT. ❑ POLICE DEPT. ❑ FIRE DEPT. ❑ RECREATION DEPT. ,UBLIC WORKS DEPT. ❑ zT t ry ©rri'- ✓ �Lt7 . ES"fl.-( 't1 MINUS - soc`l . SL> i7. The above mentioned applicant has submitted the following plans or materials for the above reference project: i Environmental Checklist ❑Preliminary Plat ❑ Environmental Impact State- ❑Final Plat ment ❑ Site /Development Plans ORezone Request Shoreline Permit Application Variance Request ❑Conditional Use Permit ❑Other: Application The attached materials are sent to you for your review and comment. The Planning Dept. needs your comments to satisfy review procedures and to complete the project file. Please use the space provided below for your comments or attach a separate sheet. Requested response date: 10 / 6412 / 81 Review Department comments: 0\KLIADIEn 1 N' Am- tc v0 P L Tr lNMQV1tv D tN1v -TV) SiZ- -1 St l s D O'Ni1k C,o' 'Pl T- \NAI)1t� 4r-33 "N 3 1 a..S,S `n . )). CJalkuu L stooN 03- Db sit d `P IV 'FLA- _ saVN 2\ (1'4E D5Trktra i ti\Ert -y t s -t-lt,L sis . 1f i s C\( . S i�� use , 1- fj i s LN t 4 hJ -CVrI 11 AuJ ySIS �� s b tu.s (�1��1� �-U M u vs �'S (�r ' �Pr \L� L v 1 - s i ri{311. U1 �- o By: Date: �tv ` v`CSS -cv �� '(v11s >._11)\b S 6 }3 Z PLANNING DEPARTMENT TRANSMITTAL DATE. OF TRANSMITTAL ' 3 / Q4l2 TO: PROJECT: 81 BUILDING DEPT. dLJ POLICE DEPT. FIRE DEPT. RECREATION DEPT.__ PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. ❑ Fair 'DENT' o fete 13.47(0. LOCATION: Es(L'-f rtM t 1 U S - 5oej g . et-VD The above mentioned applicant has submitted the following plans or materials for the above reference project: ICJ Environmental Checklist DPreliminary Plat ❑Environmental Impact State- ❑Final Plat ment ❑Site /Development Plans ❑Rezone Request Shoreline Permit Application❑ Variance Request ❑Conditional Use Permit ❑Other: Application The attached materials are sent to you for your review and comment. The Planning Dept. needs your comments to satisfy review procedures and to complete the project file. Please use the space provided below for your comments or attach a separate sheet. Requested response date: '16 / Review Department comments:" CITY OF TUKWILA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM This questionnaire must be completed and submitted with the application for permit. This questionnaire must be completed by all persons applying for a permit from the City of Tukwila, unless it is determined by the Responsible Official that the permit is exempt or unless the applicant and Responsible Official previously agree an Environmental Impact Statement needs to be completed. A fee of $50.00 must accompany the filling of the Environmental Questionnaire to cover costs of the threshold determination. I. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent: FORT DENT OFFICEr,ASSOCIATES_, 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: 1818 WESTLAKE AVE. N. SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98109 (206) 283 -8706 3. Date Checklist Submitted: My *C u 31, 1981 4. Agency Requiring Checklist: Cali of Tuk.wIL& 5. Name of Proposal, if applicable: FORT_DENT OFFICE BUILDING 6. Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature): t;i;;`°') THREE STORY, 58,200 ;S.F. OFFICE BUILDING WITH REFLECTIVE GLASS EXTERIOR y-c AND 180 +' PARKING SPACES. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as well as the extent`of the'land area affected by any environmental im- pacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate under- standing of the environmental setting of the proposal): NORTHWEST CORNER OF SOUTHCENTER BLVD. AND FORT DENT ACCESS ROAD, APPROX. 1/2 BLOCK NORTH OF INTERURBAN AVE. BOUNDED ON THE WEST BY THE GREEN RIVER. • 8. Estimated Date for. Completion of the Proposal: DECEMBER, 1982 9. List of all Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals Required for the Proposal (federal, state and local): • (a) Rezone, conditional use, shoreline permit, etc. YES X NO (b) King County Hydraulics Permit YES X NO (c) Building permit YES X NO___ (d) Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Permit (e) Sewer hook up permit (f) Sign permit (g) Water hook up permit (h) Storm water system permit (i) Curb cut permit (j) Electrical permit (State of Washington) (k) Plumbing permit (King County) (1) Other: YES NO X YES X NO YES.X NO YES X NO YES X NO YES X NO YES X NO YES X NO 10. Do you have any plans.,for future additions, expansion, or'futher activity related to or connected'with this proposal ?' If yes, explain: NO 11. Do you know of any,plansfby others•1.,which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain: NO 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: _ II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe ",answers are required) 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? .YES. MAYBE NO X (b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcover- ing of the soil? X (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief fea- tures? X (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? X -2- • • YES MAYBE NO (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? X (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? iX Explanation: Normal clearing and grading will occur over the size for building and parking with excavation for footings and structural fill under building. 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? X (b) The creation of objectionable odors? X (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any dhange'''i n cl imafe,' either locally or regionally? X Explanation: Additional vehicular traffic generated by normal office building functions will create a minor decrease in air quality. 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? X X (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? X ---(d)—Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? X _ (e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X _ (f) (9) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an ao =lifer by cuts or excavations? -3- X X • • (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? (i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise avail- able for public water supplies? Explanation: Run -off from building and parking will be retained on site and discharge at a rate . equal to its natural flow into the storm sewer. ' YES MAYBE NO X •X. 4. Flora. Will the proposal result in: (a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, .rare or endangered species of flora? X (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? X _ (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? X Explanation: Field grass and a stand of alder will be replaced by trees, shrubs, and lawn native to the northwest will be installed per code. 5.- Fauna: Will the' :proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? X (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? X (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? X Explanation: Small field animals and birds nesting in the trees and field will be displaced. -4- YES MAYBE NO 6. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? X Explanation: 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? X Explanation: Parking lights and lights from the building. Low glare fixtures will be used. There will also be increased glare due to the glass surfaces of the structures, with minimum impact on surrounding locations. 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in the altera- tion of the present or planned land use of an area? Explanation: 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? Explanation: 10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radi- ation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? Explanation: -5- X X • • 11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? Explanation: Impact on population depends on future tenants of the project and their present location. YES MAYBE NO X 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? X Explanation: See explariation #11., 13. Transportation /Circulation. Will the proposal result in: (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? X (b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? X (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and /or goods? (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? X Explanation: Additional motor vehicle movement normally associ ated,.Wh,, the office building function and the inter- action with bicyclists and pedestrians will be mitigated by the existing barrier of Interurban Avenue and the fact the Southcenter Blvd. terminates in a culdesac 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a !need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: (a) Fire protection? (b) Police protection? (c) Schools? (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? (e) Maintenance Qf public facilities, including roads? -6- X X X X x . ' • • • YES MAYBE NO (f) Other governmental services? X Explanation: A minor increase in fire protection, police and government services could be expected but would be well within anticipated growth. 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? Explanation: There will be energy demand typical of office building use. 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: X (a) Power or natural gas? X (b) Communications systems? X (c) Water? X (d) Sewer or septic tanks? X (e) Storm water drainage? X (f) Solid waste and disposal? X Explanation: 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the crea- tion of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? Explanation: -7- X 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruc- tion of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically of- fensive site open to public view? Explanation: 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of exist- ing recreational opportunities? Explanation: 20. Archeological /Histroical. Will the proposal result in an alteration of a signifi- cant archeological or his- torical site, structure, object or building? Explanation: CERTIFICATION BY APPLICANT: YES MAYBE NO " I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non - significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. . 3/ z / Signature and Title Date L4 N ccf Rdirc467L A cso -8- X X X `lfr: ice: 1 Alit-1171A 0.1106 �- W160.11.e,•.",N /.. r .000'11 1 0e1••111,e1 weD71• oe L. •1 0a6 e• e3OL I : 00.'a 1� O"T .. 00,1 00 CIO 1.1 le1J s¢oav Vl <73y`c7 VI- d'Ificd O cr0 I./a'7Vn ■9000 Y 1T 11Oe1hI•e7 . p11,1 a..1 >Ia • ., •oQ • -.vv. P:4 .a .,pal Orpiney R•••11,19 ■•• 091 ll.eea 11199l/(r,, Upew •M1'1M.1 i, L• vn n eeo•1r 11. e. 001.0 9 To0T0 :wow grir,nsd o rlor ire1•1 1a+•■■•ws -wl1:13 r+ol•nalls•.ov 1-0 'swJf» s��ls�lvls 1�?ro LII,'ur6■.61 ._ . •►%19 Ar.4 F++ay- lava 1 .L133/1A .��oi ®Jr�a..r�lil11f11�����. .. •,,N�tJO11��1.� ��1 �n1o��Lr:!f/1� \sumo mu 01 1191rAlM ■; �����������f!• ��l ilr a��i�i��rnrir�� r���lf��i� ®r��i /���r��� � �� ■•�:wer' /��� ��.r�I��/w. • � ®nf�sn .ts �ff��s� .a, �rfr b Earl /f�ff��R �;Eca■� g.m 11 1111111111111111==1141111111111111 Amor 1111CommmE= 111a26.1111i111o1111.!.:Ilr: FA: ::21111,/1.11 •min Moo ..mans :iOSrIiii....11111i.111111111111111CWallI. ■IrIialli —L,• • / /nib : �� /■: %.'�.�� ��..�►� CZ 1-1.1.1dON NOW OWS OW worrlIZOMMEI1,fnZEIE it ti' ari rr a ' , --ti ii_ 11 — - - - - -. Ilia limi1I II1! ;i 114« -� t.� :plant i - i_n ' ii mar •1 il I, n!! !!!;',ill lq4 I!Ii it ' ill i,!ijIIit•. j�,�4�'w91K N: . 'r .® s11q `,,1; ::,i1IAil 5 �!g hi( "! ,I!\L�L iz a/ n 1. i®3� .a. 6':Ilii iu:al P! liI!I'i't{l•!l!I . I �11 ! i�ltlr! 1d I 1 •'I' JIIIiIIiJ'L,!!I !;II!'l! I!ii!, tinrJ�•l'r ono �! 616a1� ®��i�� itil 1 • a II IIG .I'I III i! !1!I, hl H1l0S 111 IIIr'o' 1 �,r?+ w ,il' !uu!ill!!.t!({:i ®.es areffil!i:r.i. au..0 ON ioo rmll.ww lili;I.I;•� uIt •,, jiii vip;;;Ij1 '�liln '!''f I!i �: �ilil !Ill: 951.44 thc- 16nnue - -•d VI CS Sim. MU mg, .711)./. u • - $,OL BWILA01:14:1 EINrignaOHEI ID-NOLLann a-Nauman! r.i. 1:-- --1••• ...Z.' __L _ 0-1YOU.Manr :a 11 i „o...1•011w, .... -Pir., 11,1"10 P.n." xi) YU*, swg17, 1 ri 1 --- — — --T— %LAW 127•11110 ImaPtLI- n- • . 91.4raltir I i DinOLLMIlla TY. 4;•• /' 0.0114.0 t ori -•Wc:Lwp* .1,4110U,0011.. 1.41/4.1 1112.,117 ISM _ 1 . N.N.• oa, wwWwwn •••11117,•1.4 -VOW - 1.,,V11114,/ - • 0.1110,1.011101.1 SCITUAN C1P1911•9110 11.1•11 loP4M1,1 10 07,11.1.0.171 NOLLOBEI -rivm 11014.1WICCW I COON 0 r -..'.....A.1.1110•11111••■■• • • Senna” •• 111J 11,••••1 1.0 ifIrfe•cl yogyee, • mm, 4 emem./1.0 MTN .1 Soavi le 9.1Unortdrs *cola Chit 0. 1(.0,111 II. — a • 4001 .7—W-04. 00 001 .• • "XV ,M• 1.0 of ',pip .0004,1 no' ,140, 181.1 .101 1,1,97 1001-111.2 _ ' - vs , • rzny tolp Jr. pal • .1.1.et 1-1.1 fr .7.44W •$a.