HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA EPIC-162-81 - CITY OF TUKWILA - 59TH AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS59'" STREET IMPROVEMENTS
EPIC - 162-81
•
CITY OF TUKWILA
OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
FINAL
DECLARATION OF NON- SIGNIFICANCE
Description of proposal Street Improvements with Undercrounding
Proponent
City of Tukwila
Location of Proposal Along 59th Avenue S., S. 144th Street and S. 142nd
Street (see attached vicinity map)
Lead Agency city of Tukwila File No.
This proposal has been determined to (have /not have) a significant
adverse impact upon the environment. An EIS (is /is not). required
under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review
by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other
information on file with the lead agency.
Responsible Official Mr. Ted Uomoto
Position /Title
Director of Public Works
Date 4/9/81 Signature
COMMENTS:
• •
CITY OF TUKWILA
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
This questionnaire must be completed and submitted with the application for
permit. This questionnaire must be completed by all persons applying for a
permit from the City of Tukwila, unless it is determined by the Responsible
Official that the permit is exempt or unless the applicant and Responsible
Official previously agree an Environmental Impact Statement needs to be completed.
A fee of $50.00 must accompany the filling of the Environmental Questionnaire
to cover costs of the threshold determination.
I. BACKGROUND
1. Name of Proponent: City of Tukwila
2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: 6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila, WA
3. Date Checklist Submitted: 4/13/81
4. Agency Requiring Checklist:
5. Name of Proposal, if applicable:, 1980 Street Improvement Project
6. Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal (including but not limited
to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give
an accurate understanding of its scope and nature):
Street improvements_with undergrounding along 59th Avenue S., S. 144th
Street and S. 142nd Street, including new pavement, curbs /gutters, drainage
dnd siclewalKs.
7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as
well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental im-
pacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate under-
standing of the environmental setting of the proposal):
This area is primarily single family residential including one apartment
complex, the City library and the fire station.
8. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal: ;,A ..gust 19R1
9. List of all Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals Required for the
Proposal (federal, state and local):
(a) Rezone, conditional use, shoreline permit, etc. YES NO x
(b) King County Hydraulics Permit YES NO x
(c) Building permit YES NO x
• 1
(d) Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Permit
(e) Sewer hook up permit
(f) Sign permit
(g) Water hook up permit
(h) Storm water system permit
(i) Curb cut permit
(j) Electrical permit (State of Washington)
(k) Plumbing permit (King County)
(1) Other: N/A
YES NO x
YES NO x
YES NO x
YES NO x
YES NO x
YES NO x
YES x NO
YES NO_IL
10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or futher activity
related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain:
Section II of the complete street improvement project is proposedn•for'
budget17.in;y1282 .= in
11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by
your proposal? If yes, explain:
None
12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro-
posal; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future
date., describe the nature of such application form:
N/A
II. ENV I RONMENTAL IMPACTS
(Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required)
YES MAYBE NO
1. Earth. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic
substructures? x
(b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcover-
ing of the soil? x
(c) Change in topography or ground surface relief fea-
tures?
x
(d) The destruction, covering or modification of any
unique geologic or physical features? X
(e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils,
either on or off the site?
(f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or
changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which
may modify the channel of a river or stream or the
bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake?
Explanation:
Displacement will occur for rockeries, lane widening,
and sidewalks. '
2. Air. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air
quality?
(b) The creation of objectionable odors?
(c) Alteration of air movement, moisture
or temperature, or any change in climate, either
locally or regionally?
Explanation:
Construction related emissions will create
minor deterioration of air quality.
YES . MAYBE NO
x
x
x
x
3. Water. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Changes in currents, or the course or direction
of water movements, in either marine or fresh
waters? x
(b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns,
Dr the rate and amount of surface water runoff? x
(c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters?
(d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water
body? x
(e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration
of surface water quality, including but not limited
to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? x
(f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of
ground waters? x
(g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either
through direct additions or withdrawals, or through
interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations?
• •
YES MAYBE NO
(h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either
through direct injection, or through the seepage
of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne
virus or bacteria, or other substances into the
ground waters?
(i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise avail-
able for public water supplies? x
Explanation:
Minimal change in absorption rates will occur
due to added impervious surface. Not a significant
impact.
4. Flora. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers
of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs,
grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? X
(b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or .
endangered species of flora? x
(c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area,
or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of
existing species? X
(d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop?
Explanation:
5. Fauna. Will the proposal result in:
(a). Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers
of any species of fauna (birds, land animals
including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic
organisms, insects or microfauna)?
(b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or
endangered species of fauna?
(c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an
area, or result in a barrier to the migration
or movement of fauna?
(d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife
habitat?
x
x
x
Explanation:
Some changes in trees, shrubs, sodding and beautibark er requirements
of adjacent property owners. All other disrupted plantings replaced
in kind.
•
• •
6. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise
levels?
Explanation:
During construction phase only and in accordance with
OSHA /WISHA laws and the Tukwila Municipal Code.
YES MAYBE NO
x
7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new
light or glare? _x
Explanation:
8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in the altera-
tion of the present or planned land use
of an area?
Explanation:
9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural
resources?
(b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural
resource?
Explanation:
10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an
explosion or the release of hazardous
substances (including, but not limited
to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radi-
ation) in the event of an accident or
upset conditions?
Explanation:
x
• •
11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location,
distribution, density, or growth rate
of the human population of an area?
Explanation:
12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing,
or create a demand for additional housing?
Explanation:
YES MAYBE NO
x
x
13. Transportation /Circulation. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? x
(b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or
demand for new parking? X
(c) Impact upon existing transportation systems?
(d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation
or movement of people and /or goods? X
(e) Alterations. to waterborne, rail or air traffic? x
(f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles,
bicyclists or pedestrians? x
Explanation:
14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon,
or result in a need for new or altered
governmental services in any of the
following areas:
(a) Fire protection?
(b) Police protection? _
(c) Schools? _
(d) Parks or other recreational facilities?
(e) Maintenance of public facilities, including
roads? x
YES MAYBE NO
(f) Other governmental services? x
Explanation:
Proposed project will increase the amount of road, sidewalk,
and rockery maintenance.
15. Energy. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? x
(b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or
require the development of new sources of
energy? x
Explanation:
16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for
new systems, or alterations to the
following utilities:
(a) Power or natural gas? x
(b) Communications systems? x
(c) Water?
(d) Sewer or septic tanks?
(e) Storm water drainage?
(f) Solid waste and disposal?
Explanation:
Undergrounding for power, telephone and T.V. is required and
added storm drainage has been added within the street project.
No new utilities outside the project site required.
x
' 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the crea-
tion of any health hazard or potential
health hazard (excluding mental health)?
Explanation:
x
x
•
• •
18. Aesthetics.' Will the proposal result in the obstruc-
tion of any scenic vista or view open to
the public, or will the proposal result
in the creation of an aesthetically of-
fensive site open to public view?
Explanation:
19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact
upon the quality or quantity of exist-
ing recreational opportunities?
Explanation:
20. Archeological /Histroical. Will the proposal result in
an alteration of a signifi-
cant archeological or his -
torical site, structure,
object or building?
Explanation:
CERTIFICATION BY APPLICANT:
YES MAYBE NO
I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above
information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency
may withdraw any declaration of non - significance that it might issue in
reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation
or willful lack of full disclosure on my part.
. l7,.-J 9Q.
4� /7
Signature and Title X4.4" ice. Date