HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA EPIC-169-81 - SCHNEIDER - 65TH AVENUE SOUTH REZONESCHNEIDER REZONE
65 ' AVE S
C SOUTHCENTER BLVD
EPIG169 -81
CITY OF TUKWILA
OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
FINAL
DECLARATION OF NON - SIGNIFICANCE
Description of proposal . Rezone of 0.62 acres from R -1 to C -1
Proponent G.E. Schneider
Location of Proposal
Lead Agency
65th Ave. 0 Southcenter Blvd.
City of Tukwila
File No.
EPIC - 169 -81
This proposal has been determined to (ICoXp /not have) a significant
adverse impact upon the environment. An EIS ( j/is not) required
under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review
by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other
information on file with the lead agency.
Responsible Official Mark Caughey
Position /Title Acting Planning Director
Date
15 sr, 81 Signature
COMMENTS:
This Declaration of Non - Significance is issued only for the legislative action
of changing the zoning classification of the subject site. The. City reserves
the option to conduct a separate environmental review for any project proposed
subsequent to the rezone action.
City of Tukw4*
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila Washington 98188
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
TRANSMITTAL
DATE OF TRANSMITTAL 7 / 2 / 81
TO:
PROJECT:
LOCATION:
❑ BUILDING DEPT.
❑ FIRE DEPT.
❑ PUBLIC WORKS DEPT.
scNUk v xt-zo.W
❑ POLICE DEPT.
C R CREATION DEPT.
9
SOTh ENj'E1Z. 11,1r`J (55
The above mentioned applicant has submitted the following plans or materials
for the above reference project:
environmental Checklist E Preliminary Plat
❑Environmental Impact State- C Final Plat
ment
❑Site /Development Plans ❑Rezone Request
(l Shoreline Permit Applicationfl Variance Request
❑Conditional Use Permit ❑Other:
Application
The attached materials are sent to you for your review and comment. The
Planning Dept. needs your comments to satisfy review procedures and to
complete the project file.
Please use the space provided below for your comments or attach a separate
sheet.
Requested response date: 13 /J01.,1/4( /81
Review Department comments: „L.
j
■C • J 5 � f � � ! 1 / .' ( a .1_06 C, • v�
�. cow :.c�..rti
>14"
/ L i e" ,L Al ...1 �e� / u- !^,Q .r.- ib -'�`Z e o-.-a ...r, riY i \o .1 f ✓ r7
T 1 - 5�- JeeKgr e, .SJ
p cis / {r♦ y0 ���✓
s -; /1K..
/ t1 3 -"
rrre
By:
Date:
.r
— C
S"' • c-G J -. -
4
•
HS
1908
City of Tukwill
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
oTukwila Washington 98188
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
TRANSMITTAL
DATE OF TRANSMITTAL 7 / 2 / 81
•
-
TO: ❑ BUILDING DEPT. I POLICE DEPT.
❑ FIRE DEPT. ❑ RECREATION DEPT.
' ❑ PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. ❑
PROJECT: SGNUtWert 2E-20}.15--
LOCATION: souxMGEN'j'EC 6LVt7 (' 65 twr
The above mentioned applicant has submitted the following plans or materials
for the above reference project:
.Environmental Checklist ❑ Preliminary Plat
❑ Environmental Impact State- ❑Final Plat
ment
❑._Site /De■elopment Plans. DRezone Request-
❑Shoreline Permit Application❑ Variance Request
['Conditional Use Permit ❑Other:
Application
The attached materials are sent to you for your review and comment. The
Planning Dept. needs your comments to satisfy review procedures and to
complete the project file.
Please use the space provided below for your comments or attach a separate
sheet. .lcc j /OW Requested response date: 13 / JUL`{ / 81
i
Review Department comments: / _' A i ±i.
S 1/.. /
/�,.�.[ ♦.∎ L. • • - • • 1_ _ A 'LL•� L&. . �� _ / /.
/ / f , t //
Alipoirwor jfirmiNnromarawri
/ //
By: L )194)(44,2 Date: Q---e ., /
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
TRANSMITTAL
DATE OF TRANSMITTAL 7 / 2 / 81
TO:
PROJECT:
❑ BUILDING DEPT. ❑ POLICE DEPT.
FIRE DEPT. ❑ RECREATION DEPT °.
❑ PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. ❑
scc1-114 eve2 uE-ZON�
LOCATION: Sc)v7}46eNT6c. 65-1/-
UE
The above mentioned applicant has submitted the following plans or materials
for the above reference project:
.Environmental Checklist ❑ Preliminary Plat
n Environmental Impact State- s Final Plat
ment
❑ Site /Development Plans ❑ Rezone Request-
0 Shoreline Permit Applications Variance Request
❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑Other:
Application
The attached materials are sent to you for your review and comment. The
Planning Dept. needs your comments to satisfy review procedures and to
complete the project file.
Please use the space provided below for your comments or attach a separate
sheet.
Requested response date: 13 /301:( / 81
Review Department Comments: Present users of the office building are violating
the agreement made at the time that building was built, in that they are driving
from the office parking lot onto Southcenter Blvd. The only exit and egress
approved to the building was on 65th Avenue. This problems should be taken care
of prior to allowing addition building space. The traffic hazards created by
tenants using unauthorized excess is growing daily.
Special consideration will have to be given to the location of the fire
hydrant serving that location. Even though it is within allowable limits for
distance, it is not.logical that the hydrant can he used to serve the proposed
building. A new fire hydrant 1 have to be located of the same level as the
new building and close t t p vi ed egress and exit ways, for use by fire apparatus
By: (6iu�� �� Date: July 6, 1981
City of Tukwir
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila Washington 98188
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
TRANSMITTAL
DATE OF TRANSMITTAL 7 / 2 / 81
TO: LJ BUILDING DEPT. ❑POLICE DEPT.
❑ FIRE DEPT. ❑ RECREATION DEPT.
❑ PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. ❑
PROJECT: S k-114 17E+2
LOCATION: sovTxc.E>`Tf,st. TSLAA7 (95 svt:
The above mentioned applicant has submitted the following plans or materials
for the above reference project:
environmental Checklist ❑Preliminary Plat
n Environmental Impact State- ❑Final Plat
ment
❑ Site /Development Plans ❑Rezone Request
['Shoreline Permit Application Variance Request
['Conditional Use Permit ❑ Other:
Application
The attached materials are sent to you for your review and comment. The
Planning Dept. needs your comments to satisfy review procedures and to
complete the project file.
Please use the space provided below for your comments or attach a separate
sheet.
Requested response date: 13 / JOU1' / 61
Review Department comments:
�¢ CC¢S.S TO -S/T iS q , s7 /ati45z.t;
•/) SG 0 f b- 4'34 % Z4,5l VL- C4f-.(o t- rio./t/
!3t-
Sv 66 FL At Sht c, ,/ C- Cl'i °SS
S' FCC /0u E Lfi1'4 -i/ 0.44E 8 L— Svi3 i77Fv /=�R
RE--(e/Z14., ,¢GSo DZ-7■4 /L t 4.•/0 S1740(444,6--
,¢GCASS To S' oU7 f/ CE -4-jL/ /36. VD
By: ai
Date: )/ 9 f/
k :yv; tt_a
City of iuik\Ir —'
Z 6200 Southcenter Boulevard
o Tukwila Washington 98188
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
TRANSMITTAL
DATE OF TRANSMITTAL 7 / 2 / 8I
TO:
PROJECT:
J.
I�
I
2 .,fig
❑ BUILDING DEPT. ❑ POLICE DEPT.
❑ FIRE DEPT. ❑ RECREATION DEPT.
I7I PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. ❑
sGN u t w Et2 2e-7-014
LOCATION: svuTF{Gi1TEsr.. tS1.:4-7 (95 �, >»
The above mentioned applicant has submitted the following plans or materials
for the above reference project:
;EiGvironmental Checklist - ❑Preliminary Plat
❑Environmental Impact State- ❑Final Plat
ment
❑Site /Development Plans ❑Rezone Request
❑ Shoreline Permit Application❑ Variance Request
❑Conditional Use Permit ❑Other:
Application
The attached materials are sent to you for your review and comment. The
Planning Dept. needs your comments to satisfy review procedures and to
complete the project file.
Please use the space provided below for your comments or attach a separate
sheet.
Requested response date: 13 / JUI,`.( /81
Review Department. comments: N j.r C"^& • / tr.4 o{Ip jA G spum
C_� tcbACT---:l C. S ADvt - Thaarm N[ y ttN OILS 7TAW:11 �,
44111 ` , l° 174
3ACC T (LDS fVY Soul- y
(1,6L-itar NJ* ,11 AS
3 I\ cl\AscsNo.1.- 11\1 TDIVvr-oPri, le) P \M6,(, (La Pot3
J, Date:
By: — - / ( 3 /
Q
Cit y of Tukwilk
6200 Southcenter Boulevard PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Tukwila Washington 98188 .
TRANSMITTAL
DATE OF TRANSMITTAL 7 / 2 / 8�
TO:
PROJECT:
s
BUILDING DEPT. E NuLICE DEPT.
a iRE DEPT. ❑ RECREATION DEPT.
agUBLIC WORKS DEPT. ❑
scNutWert zoN _
LOCATION: SoUnicehgtt. 15Wt7 (P (95x- vE
The above mentioned applicant has submitted the following plans or materials
for the above reference project:
.nvironmental Checklist - ❑ Preliminary Plat
❑Environmental Impact State -. ❑Final Plat
ment
❑Site /Development Plans ❑Rezone Request
['Shoreline Permit Application❑ Variance Request
['Conditional Use Permit ❑Other:
Application
The attached materials are sent to you for your review and comment. The
Planning Dept. needs your comments to satisfy review procedures and to
complete the project file.
Please use the space provided below for your comments or attach a separate
sheet.
Requested response date: 13 / JQL'( / 81
Review Department comments:
By: Date:
CITY OF TUKWILA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE
This questionnaire must be completed by all persons applying for a permit
from the city of Tukwila, unless it is determined by the Responsible Official ,
that an environmental assessment or full impact statement is required. Other
forms have been developed for single - family home applications and legislation
proposals.
BACKGROUND DATA:
1. Name of applicant: GERALD E. SCHINEIDER
2. Address and phone of Applicant: 6510 Southcenter Blvd.. Tukwila. WA 98188 248 -24
3. Project name: Schneider Office Building Rezone
4. Project location: fronting Southcenter Blvd. between 65th Avenue So. & 68th Ave.
5. Nature and brief description of proposal:
rezone from R -1 -7 -2 to office
6. Estimated completion date: Winter of 1982
7. Do you have any plans for future expansion, if yes please explain: no
8. What other governmental permits are required prior to completion of this
project?
(a) Rezone, conditional use, substantial development, etc. YES x NO
(b) King County Hydrolics Permit YES- NO x
(c) Building permit YES x NO
(d) Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Permit YES NO x
(e) Sewer hook up permit YES x NO__
(f) Sign permit YES x NO___
(g) Water hook up permit YES x NO___
(h) Storm water system permit YES x NO__
(i) Curb cut permit
YES NO x
(j) Electrical permit (State of Washington) YES x NO___
(k) Plumbing permit (King County) YES x NO__
(1) Other grading permit
9. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by
your proposal? If yes, explain:
10. Agency requiring checklist: City of Tukwila, Department -
11. Accepted by agency on: by:
(to be filled in by city upon receipt of checklist)
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
(Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required.)
Yes Maybe No
Earth. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Unstable earth conditions or in
any changes in geologic sub-
structures:
(b) Disruptions, displacements
•or overcovering of the soils:
(c) Change.. in topography or ground
surface relief features?
(d) The destruction, covering, or
modification of any unique
geologic or physical features?
(e) Any increase in wind or water
erosion of soils, either on
or off the site?
(f) Changes in deposition or
erosion of beach sands, or
in changes in siltation,
deposition, or erosion which
may modify the channel of a
river or stream or the bed of
.the ocean or any bay, inlet
or lake?
Explanation: (b)(c) approx. 2000 cy of earth movement will cause temporary dis-
ruption & permanent modification of existing topography in order to achieve final
lines & grades of proposed office structure & associated parking, rockeries & land-
scape surfaces. (e) erosion of soils will be of temporary nature during constructic
until drainage system, landscape & ground cover is replentished.
Air. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Air emissions or deterioration
of ambient air quality?
.(b) The creation of objectionable
odors?
x
x
x
x
(c) Alteration of air movement,
moisture or temperature, or
in any change in climate, •
either locally or regionally?
Explanation:
(a)(b) dust & objectional odors could reduce air quality temporarily during
construction, but not above level normal to this type of construction.
Water. Will the proposal result i
(a) Changes in currents, or the
. course or direction of water
movements, in either marine
or fresh waters?
(b) Changes in absorption rates,
drainage patterns, or the
amount of surface water run-
off?
(c) Alterations to the course or
flow of flood waters?
(d) Change in the amount of surface
water in any watercourse?
(e) Discharge into surface waters,
or in any alteration of sur-
face water quality, including
temperature or turbidity?
(f) Alteration of the direction or
rate of flow of ground waters?
(g) Change in the quantity of
ground waters, either through
direct additions or withdrawals,
or through interception of an
acquifer by cuts or excavations?
(h) Deterioration in ground water
quality, either through direct
injection, or through the seep -
age of leachate, phosphates,
detergents, waterborne virus
or bacteria, or other substances
into the ground waters?
(i) Reduction in the amount of water
otherwise available for public
water supplies?
• fes Maybe No
x
x
x
x
x
Explanation:
(b) existing absorption rates, & drainage runoff will be modified to some extent
by addition of roofs, ac parking & other hard surfaces. Surface runoff will be
collected & channeled to existing storm drainage system.
Flora. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Change in the diversity of species,
or numbers of any species of flora
(including trees, shrubs, grass,
crops, micro -flora and aquatic
plants)?
(b) Reduction of the numbers of any
unique, rare or endangered species
of flora?
(c) Introduction of new species of
flora into an area, or in a bar-
rier to the normal replenishment of
existing species?
Yes Maybe No
x
x
Explanation:
(a) earth work to accomodate office & parking will require removal of most trees,
shrubs, berries and weeds.
(c) landscaping will reduce the regeneration of existing natural flora not consistei
Fauna.. Will the proposal result in: with planned landscaping.
(a) Changes in the diversity of species,
or numbers of any species of fauna
(birds, land animals including rep-
tiles, fish and shellfish, benthic
organisms, insects, or micro- fauna)?
(b) Reduction of the numbers of any
unique, rare or endangered species
of fauna?
(c) Introduction of new species of fauna
into an area, or result in a.barrier
to the migration or movement of fauna?
(d) Deterioration to existing wildlife
habitat?
x
x
x
x
Explanation: (a)(d) loss of dense covered areas of brush, berries and unused gr
areas could result in the decreased concentration & diversity of small animals, rod
and reptiles.
Noise. Will the proposal increase exist-
ing noise levels?
Explanation:
Temporary construction noise can be expected during normal working hours. Increase
auto use to new office could contribute to noise level, however, it is not anticipa
to be significant because of the existing adjacent freeway noise.
Yes Maybe- No
Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce
new light or glare? x
Explanation:
Increase autos at office site & office will produce light as required for safety
and convenience.
Land Use. Will the proposal result in the
alteration of the present or planned land
use of an area?
Explanation:
Natural Resources. Will the proposal re-
sult in:
(a) Increase in the rate of use of any
natural resource?
(b) Depletion of any nonrenewable nat-
ural resource?
x
x
Explanation:
(b) decrease open space as required to develope site for office and parking
Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve
a risk of an explosion or the release of
hazardous substances (including, but not
limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or
radiation) in the event of an accident or
upset conditions?
Explanation:
Population. Will the proposal alter the
location, distribution, density, or growth
rate of the human population of an area?
•x
x
Explanation:
Present zoning is R- 1 -7 -2, single family residence. Comprehensive plan recommends
office zoning.
Housing. Will the proposal affect existing
housing availability, or create a demand for
additional housing?
•
Yes Maybe No
x
Explanation:
It could lead some office occupants to relocate residences to Tukwila area..
Transportation /Circulation. Will the pro-
posal result in:
(a) Generation of additional vehicular
movement?
(b) Effects on existing parking facilities,
or demand for new parking? —
(c) Impact upon existing transportation
systems? x
(d) Alterations to present patterns of
circulation or movement of people
and /or goods? —
x
x
(e) Alterations to waterborne or air
traffic?
Explanation:
(a) increase auto movement at intersection of 65th Avenue So. & Southcenter Blvd.
At peak hours, probably 25 to 30 /hour. (c) some occupants could use bus-system
which serves the area.
Local Services. Will the proposal have an
effect upon, or result in a need for new
services in any of the following areas:
(a) Fire protection? x
(b) Police protection?
(c) Schools?
(d) Parks?
(e) Maintenance of public facilities,
including roads?
Other.governmental services? _
(f)
Explanation:
x
x
(a) through (e) proposal includes the use of existing city services and facilities.
Enemy. Will the proposal result in:
(a} Use of substantial amounts of fuel or
energy?
(b) Demand upon existing sources of energy,
or require the development of new
sources of energy?
Explanation:
Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need
for new systems, or alterations to the follow-
ing utilities:
(a) Power or natural gas?
(b) Communications systems?
(c) Water ?.
(d) Sewer or septic tanks?
(e) Storm water drainage?
(f) Solid waste and disposal?
Explanation:
Proposal will require connection to existing facilities.
Yes - Maybe No
x
x
x
Human Health. Will the proposal result in the
creation of any health hazard or potential .
health hazard (excluding mental health)?
Explanation:
Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the
obstruction of any scenic vista or view open
to the public, or will the proposal result
in the creation of an aesthetically offensive
site open to public view?
Explanation:
x
x
x
•
•
Recreation. Will the proposal result in an
impact upon the quality or quantity of ex-
) isting recreational opportunities?
Explanation:
Archeological /Historical. Will the proposal .
result in an alteration of a significant .
archeological or historical site?
Explanation:
Revenue. Will the proposal cause a signifi-
cant increase in city revenues?
Yes Maybe No
x
x
x
Explanation:
Not significantly, but contributes to taxable base & contributes to steady
growth of business community.
Employment. Will the proposal create a
significant amount of new jobs?
Explanation:
x
Indirectly contribute to goods and services as required by occupants in addition
to maintenance and. 'operation of building and grounds.
DESCRIPTION
That portion of W. H. Gilliams donation claim no. 40, in sec. 23N., R.4 E., W.M., in
King County, Washington.
Beginning of the S. W. cor. of tract 28 of the Interurban Add. to Seattle, according
to the plat recorded In volume 10 of plats, page 55, in K. C..Wo.; thence S 89°
47' 00" E along the S line of said tract 28, 22; thence S24 °25'00 "E 65'to
the true point of beginning; thence S 68 °00'00" W 156; thence S 37 °00'00"
W 120, more or less to the E margin of 65 th Ave. S.; thence S.E. along said E
margin 70 more or less to its intersection with the N margin of State Highway
Road No. 1I; thence E along said N margin 270, more or less to a point from
which the true point of beginning bears N 24 °25'00" W, thence N 24 °25'00"
W 113', more or less to the true point of beginning;
--zzA
F
12-7-0 1.-1 .
Fig►- -I -1.Z
1l1l
I/ /II / /1,1/1,,1/
f f 1j11
If1///ggllgg
iii ••• I /I UUI u g IIg1 _
1 /,,tf/ltf/
// 11 //I r 0/ I / 1 1 11 /1, 1 // /I 1/ //I/ 1 /1111/
Iu /Iii/ // //gull //iti/Jrr r11j1
lljll /fl
sit
SCALE' /APO'
i
�i %ice i� L%.
E-
-
SITE PLAN
AREA CALCULATION
.or uu•o,u3 SC rr.
!OM [00.11(4. V40 SO r r.
Jr II.. STALLS,. .1,000 f0 /r.
LEGEND
.a..cer
• [., :,.. ,crew
--- .„<rwe ca.ra.n
- - MO•OXO CON,OCrte
DESCRIPTION
TUKW /LA OFF /CE BUILDING
7'
AREA CALCULATION
TOTAL LOT AREA+ 27,153 SO: FT.
.BLDG., COVERAGE: 6,140 SO. FT.
Vin.. 37 PARKING STALLS „II PER 1,000 SO. FT.
LEGEND
BOUNDARY - •
o .. EXISTING REBAR .:
BUILDING -
-- EXISTING CONTOURS
PROPOSED. CONTOURS '
DESCRIPTION
That portion of Wt 6✓mWm donation cbYn no.40, 00.o 05, 7.23 N. N.4E., W Y., b K, C. Wa.
Bapb*q at. 5.1k em. al bad 20.Ure. wwbm Add to 3ealtle, 0em+dnp70 tN pmt reema.d
.duns Ka of 0.4,P4114 53, to 0. C. ,W0.; menu 3139° 47.00`E monp Ow 5 leW of sad bad 28,22;_
awns, 524° 25.00" E.65'to tn■ true mint of 009bnraa; Mayo 5 6B° 00' Od' W.1561 thence
557°00' 00`W 120', more or -less to rue E roman 0.65 m RW. S.; thnce S.E. romp sad E loath 70'
rope o- loss tolls 'nle,Mlm °111. (hi Wen.* of Stone 1400way Road no. II; 00000 6' along said N
mnpn 27O,ihore or' less t00•ponl horn ahIc0I00 true polar of bapmiiq- boat 0124 °2500
tMncs
111.24 °25'00''W 113, more or lnslo.inn polnl 01 b.omvp;
CROSS SECTION A-A