The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSEPA EPIC-170-81 - MODERN SKYLINES - GREEN RIVER OFFICE BUILDINGGREEN RIVER OFFICE COMPLEX MODERN SKYLINES SOUTHCENTER BLVD EPIC - 170 -81 CITY OF TUKWILA OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FINAL DECLARATION OF NON- SIGNIFICANCE Description of proposal Office Complex Proponent Modern Skylines, Inc. Location of Proposal Easterly terminus - Southcenter Blvd. Lead Agency City of Tukwila File No. EPIC. 170 -81 This proposal has been determined to (b((Wnot have) a significant adverse impact upon the environment. An EIS OW(/is not) required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental, checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Responsible Official Mark Caughey • Position /Title Acting Planning Director Date 21 P $) Signature COMMENTS: 1) Applicant shall participate equitably in the costs of upgrading intersection signal equipment in the project vicinity to offset the increased traffic volumes associated with this development. 2) Control of short -term air quality impacts associated with construction of the project shall be controlled by Regulation 1. as published by P.S.A.P.C.A. On -site exterior light- fixtures shall be shielded so as to eliminate glare into Fort Dent Park. lance mueller & associates architects September 9, 1981 :Mr. Mark Caughey CLTY OF TUKWILA 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 Re: GREEN RIVER OFFICE COMPLEX • SEP 101981 CITY OF TUKWItA PLANNIN t ' PT. • Dear Mark, The following information is provided in response to your letter of July 31, 1981 concerning the Shorelines Applica- tion for;The Green River Office Complex: TRAFFIC AND AIR QUALITY Additional traffic generated by-The Green River Office Complex is :anticipated to be 300 cars (A.M. peak hours) and 273 cars • 'MM. peak hours) with a weekday total of 1521 vehicles through the intersection of SR -181 and Southcenter Boulevard.* this represents a 430% 'increase in tr,.affi ci nto the 'Fort Deht Entrance' lanes in-the morning and a 220% increase in traffic exiting through the intersection. Since the intersection (number.of lanes, curbs. and traffic sig- nals) has been designed for the anticipated traffic load assoc- iated with land zone C -2, the most logical solution to mitigate the additional traffic is to add.a signaling phase, which would allow easier access into and out,of The Fort Dent Complex. * Entranco Engineers, Transportation Improvement Plan, October 1979, Table 9. 130 lakeside • suite f • seattle, washington 96122 (208) 325 -2553 lance mueller alai CBI • associates: robert olsohewsky, eileen furney a washington corporation furnishing architectural services by and under the supervision of registered architects Iance mueller & associates architects September 9,1981 Mr. Mark Caughey CITY OF TUKWILA Page Two CHECKLIST ITEM II -2a We feel that with a weekday traffic load of 1521 vehicles, which would produce a carbon monoxide count of .57 parts /million will be insignificant. (Permissible .count 9.parts /million.) The "•Certai;n Pollution Components" or dust to which you refer in your letter would be decreased after construction. This decrease . would be .attributed to the fact that we are 'sealing' the exist - ing vacant lot.with asphalt paving and building. During construction, dust emission would be controlled by water and chemical: surface spraying, cleaning street after each day.'s . work and limiting ydust and mud from truck tires, as recommended by the Puget Sound Control Agency. RECREATION Glare from solar reflection will not encroach on Fort Dent Park in their present alignment. At night, the parking lot willlbe lamped with 250 watt high. pressure sodium on twenty foot standards which will provide a uniform light with a minimum of 1/2 footcandles. Between standards, a photometric quality of the proposed fixture will not produce glare outside the office area. In discussion with The Green River Investor's managing general partner, Jerry B. Sheets, we have not solidified our final design concepts at this preliminary stage. We have given consideration to provide showers and lockers, possibly on the main floor of each office building. Furthermore, we are considering:integrating the City of Tukwila's . river access easement into the office development by use of coordinated landscaping, branch walkways and park benches. 130 lakeside • suite f • seattie, washington 98122 (206) 325 -2553 lance mueller ala, csi • associates: robert oischewsky, elleen furney a washington corporation furnishing architectural services by and under the supervision of registered architects lance mueller & associates architects • September 9', 1981 Mr. Mark Caughey CITY OF TUKWILA Page Three If there are any further questions or information needed concerning The Green River Office Complex Shorelines Application, please con - tact me. Sincerely, LANCE MUELLER &_ASSOCIATES /ARCHITECTS 04010' Roger Carlson RC /f enclosure cc.: Mr. John'Melin .Mr. Jerry B. Sheets 130 lakeside • suite f • seattle. weshington 913122 [209) 325-2663 lance mueller ale. cal • associatess robert olsohewsky, elleen furney a washington corporation furnishing .architectural services by and under the supervision of registered architects ROGER L. SHIDLER GEORGE w MCBROOM WILLIAM H. GATES WILLIAM F. BALDWIN JAMES R. IRWIN JAMES C. MIDOLEBROOKS RICHARD B. DODO FREDERICK R055 BOUNDY WILLIAM H. NEUKOM JAMES L. FLETCHER DAVID T. MCDONALD PATRICIA J. PARKS DALE K. ROUNDY GARY D. HUFF WILLIAM A. BUTLER DAVID H. BINNEY ROBERT A. ESHELMAN CONSTANCE L. PROCTOR SHI • R McBROOM, GATES & BALDWIN A. PROFESSIONAL SERVICE CORPORATION LAW OFFICES 1000 NORTON BUILDING SEATTLE. WASHINGTON 98104 Mr. Mark Caughey Assistant Planner City of Tukwila Office of Community Development 6230 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, Washington 98188 Re: Short Plat (MF No. 79 -7 -SS) Dear Mark: 1206! 223 -4666 3 --z4 - o\o► -- Q I am enclosing a copy of the Quit Claim Deed from John Melin to the City of Tukwila conveying the 20 -foot strip along the entire frontage of Parcel 2 on the Green River. If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to call me. JLF:pm cc: Mr_ John Melin ENC: f ,D'-^,N SKYLINES raUG 2 6 1981 r- s - r•' Sincerely yours, James L. Fletcher SEP 1 2 1279 7908230299 1% EXCISE TAX NOT REOUIRED King Co. Records D:vi;ion Depuy DEDICATION AND CONVEYANCE John T. Melin, as Grantor, does by these presents hereby dedicate, convey and quit claim to-the City of Tukwila, as a gift, all interest in and to the foilcwing - described real estate situated in King County, Washington: All that certain real property situate in the City of Tukwila, County of King, State of Washington, being a portion of the west 1/2, of Section 24,T. 23 N., R 4 E., W.M., and being more particularly described as follows: The northwesterly and northeasterly 20 feet of Parcel 2 of said parcel is shown on Short Plat 79 -7 -SS in the City of Tukwila, filed for record under Auditor's File No. ']/0 k.)./ 3713 This is a deed of gift. No revenue stamps required. STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss. COUNTY OF K I N G ) On this 15th day of August, 1979, before me, a Notary ruu „� in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared John T. Melin, to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he signed and sealed the same as his free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. GIVEN under my hand and official se certificate first above written. ru.rn m■ •.rn.n .t ■rs.q- R nr TRANSA0.1EH'CA TITLE INSURANCE: ('U?II'.KY PARK PLACE H UII.UI VI:, .I •IN FLCKIR 1?00 SICTII AVENUE 6N AVENUE AT UNI\"E It.ITY STREET SEATTLE. WASIWIAGTUN tieIU2 the day and year in this i NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, re:idinu At Seattle. WIN Tukwila Administration 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 433 -1845 Office of Community Development LA0*.Lra • 31 August 1979 Western Athletic Clubs, Inc. 150 Greenwich San Francisco, CA 94111 RE: RECORDATION OF SHORT PLAT (MF #79 -7 -SS) This morning's mail delivery to city hall brought us the original recor- dation of Short Plat 79 -7 -SS; however, we note that this document differs significantly from the approvals granted for this application by the City of Tukwila Short Subdivision Committee at its July 27, 1979 meeting. Specifically, the diagram on sheet 7 of 7 fails to depict a 20' river trail dedication along the entire frontage of parcel 2 on the Green River watercourse. The short plat diagram prepared by Wilsey and Ham, Inc. dated 23 February 1979 which was approved subsequently by the Short Sub- division Committee clearly depicts the subject trail dedication on parcel 2, extending from its mutual boundary with parcel 3 to the entry road of Fort Dent Park. We ask your cooperation in pursuing the necessary procedures to amend the current error in recordation, and to furnish a recorded original of the amended document to complete our files. Processing of building permits or development privileges cannot go forward until the city staff receives evidence of a correctly recorded short plat. Please feel welcome to call upon us for assistance or further information. Sincerely, CITY OF4UKW MC /ckh ark Caug Assista cc: Wilsey and Ham Shidler, McBroom, Gates, Baldwin MF #79 -7 -SS L'D R ?I KYUNE3 t.t, AUG 2 6 1981 y Planner SEP 6 1979 *ILA 47 City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 • 1908 Frank Todd, Mayor 31 July 1981 Modern Skylines, Inc. 1818 Westlake Ave. N. Seattle, WA 98109 Attn: Jerry Sheets Subject: Green River Office Complex - SEPA Review The Environmental Checklist which you submitted in support of your application for a Shoreline "Management Substantial Development Permit for the proposed office project has been circulated to the various departments of city govelanent and their comments received. In accor- dance with Section WAC- 197- 10- 330(a) of the State Environmental Policy Act Guidelines, we hereby request that you provide the following additional information or. amplification of checklist responses: Traffic and Air Quality The Public Works Department has requested that a minor traffic study be prepared discussing the impact of this project on the immedi- ately- surrounding street network. The report should cover such topics as the anticipated impact of project - related traffic on peak -hour intersection capacities for Interurban Avenue, and safety mitigation Treasures needed to offset those impacts. Your response to checklist item II -2a anticipates air quality degradation'from project - related traffic. This impact should be quan- tified and mitigating measures suggested, as your project is located in,an area of non- compliance With state standards for certain_pollu- tion-components. Please provide this. data as an adjunct'to the project traffic report. Recreation The Recreation Department disagrees with your "no" response to checklist item II -19, and requests additional information on the following topics: - Methods by which light /glare from building into Fort Dent Park Will be controlled. Page -2- Modern Skylines, Inc. 31 July 1981 - Means by which a connecting linkage can be established between the 20' wide river access easment on the parcel to the west of the subject site and the Fort Dent Park entry roadway. - Provisions made within the project for private recreation space to lessen user impact on Fort Dent Park. Lighting The Tukwila Police Department has requested additional information on the project's parking area lighting concept. Please indicate on the site diagram the location of all exterior fixtures, and provide basic specifications on the equipment to be used. The foregoing information is needed by this office to make a final threshold determination for the Green River Office Complex Project. As you know, SERA clearance must be obtained before the City can approve the pending application for a Shoreline Permit. Therefore, timely completion of this research effort will minimize delay in processing of.development approvals. Tukwila lanning Department M k Caughey Associate Planner MC /blk. City of Tukwii. 6200 So: thcenter Boukevard Tukwila \leshiry,on 98188 PLANNING DEPARTMENT TRANSMITTAL DATE OF TRANSMITTAL 7 / dUC.r / 81 TO: E BUILDING DEPT. ❑ POLICE DEPT. n FIRE DEPT. n RECREATION DEPT. PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. ❑ G25-ut cZNat of G6MPLgNA PROJECT: L Ch tn. '. u,,....,, 'JUC 8 1981 LOCATION: E-TLY - J t W US - • BLVD The above mentioned applicant has submitted the following plans or materials for the above reference project: Environmental Checklist _ °reliminary Plat in Environmental Impact State - fFinal Plat ment ❑ Site /Development P1ans 1 1Rezone Request. ❑ Shoreline Permit Applications Variance Request Conditional Use Permit ❑ Other: Appl icati,on The attached materials are sent to you for your review and comment. The Planning Dept. needs your comments to satisfy review procedures and to complete the project file. Please use the space provided below for your comments or attach a separate sheet. Requested response date: li / J (JL'f / 81 Review Department comments: 712-AF1( GTl1 .j 1NO \cf T \Nlr \` \O ilcaS oN4 'CD - 1 UAI (S`IY� 'SV�; . �� N C:,- (14\4 11ar(� ,pcp S S 1S C_iI3X.a CI `) �? , I .d►uAkIS\ a..?l (DN.) i N -P'kD J Z-q- 10)A! AY,nILMT' - a.,• Date: /f•I 3 /s J City of Tukwil, 62D3 So;j:tr:enter Boulevard of Tukwila Wastiington 98188 PLANNING DEPARTMENT T R A N S M I T T A L JU L`� DATE OF TRAt�Sh�ITTAL / / 8l TO: PROJECT: ❑ BUILDING DEPT. ❑ PO ICE DEPT. ❑ FIRE DEPT. RECREATION DEPT. ❑ PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. ❑ G t? F i RIVEt RIVE oFFi(� GbMPL. g.`ic LOCATION: EsrL'f TEXAki Nus- ocrIC• t5t.V17 .The above mentioned applicant has submitted the following plans or materials for the above reference project: IZIEnvironmental Checklist E Preliminary Plat ❑ Environmental Impact State - I lFinal Plat ment ❑ Site /Development Plans fl Rezone Request. ❑ Shoreline Permit Application, )Variance Request ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Other: Application The attached materials are sent to you for your review and comment. The Planning Dept. needs your comments to satisfy review procedures and to complete the project file. Please use the space provided below for your comments or attach a separate sheet. Requested response date: 11 / NCI / ei Re vi ew Department comments : � fir- �� ,'�e.- �/ _rya, sn� Gv 2 �e,P �°de5 Owe e�+fdv�.C/ ci . Goya �_ G f"� A - 0 e t d _t:; v try /��- 0...%�+- / 1 E-Cif/ !I/ ..-t - L�/•��' H— 2--��Y 2 �G�-J- G o ACC -call -/ — '— E2.�. _ .s 2 �/) , p Di /�c� car �d �- ✓ e e �. �- {e _ `le ✓ !'Q - ;7�� C� r- � %��/' �� G -e .- - ice. —1/ Q „ • o� -��- -�� Date: 7' / 7 - �� *: ;1908 City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 Police Department 433 -1808 COMMENTS RE: GREEN RIVER.OFFI'CE COMPLEX 1 It is the consensus of P.D. officers that the entrance /exit to the proposed project is not adequate for proper and safe traffic.flow. With the addition of the'second office build- ing proposed (under separate permit) and. considering Fort Dent traffic it is generally felt that a traffic problem will be created with the driveway design as shown. It is-of concern that the landscaping, foliage, etc. is of a low or non - concealing nature so that patrol officers can better perform a routine visual inspection in their crime prevention function. Additionally, the ability to drive completely around the complex is important. 3) Adequate building and parking lot illumination is of'concern- copy of print did. not include enough information to properly evaluate this aspect. City of Tukwi 6200 Sou:h:.enter Boulevard Tukwi:a Washington 98188 PLANNING DEPARTMENT T R A N S M I T T A L DATE OF TRANSMITTAL 7 / JUL''� / &I TO: PROJECT: ['BUILDING DEPT. FIRE DEPT. ❑ PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. 1 ❑ POLICE DEPT. RECREATION DEPT. G25.su oPFIGE. 46 AJ LaNA LOCATION: T Z, I rq us- socrg LNG' The above mentioned applicant has submitted the following plans or materials for the above reference project: Environmental Checklist ❑ Preliminary Plat E Environmental Impact State - U Final Plat ment ❑Site /Development Plans ❑Rezone Request. ❑Shoreline Permit Application ❑ Variance Request ❑Conditional Use Permit [I]Other: Application The attached materials are sent to you for /your review and comment. The Planning Dept. needs your comments to satisfy review procedures and to complete the project file. Please use the space provided below for your comments or attach a separate sheet. Requested response date: 11 / JOGI / 81 Review Department comments: Problems may be experienced in providing the necessary fire flow, without special consideration for on site water storage. If necessary this could be worked out at the time the building permit is processed. a„• Hubert H. Crawley Date:. July, 8, 1981 • n City of Tukwil. 6200 Sou center Boulevard Tukv,'i a 11'ashLigtton 93188 PLANNING DEPARTMENT TRANSMITTAL • DATE OF TRANSMITTAL ? ' / / 8( TO: Q UILDING DEPT. ❑ POLICE DEPT. ❑ FIRE DEPT. ❑ RECREATION DEPT. n PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. ❑ PROJECT: ptvst cf1=10E Ge APt,.P?4 LOCATION: E s T L - f -rEe U N Q ' - 6oalt . '3 W 17 The above mentioned applicant has submitted the following plans or materials for the above reference project: Environmental Checklist EPreliminary Plat [I: r Environmental Impact State - I Final Plat ment ❑ Site /Development Plans f Rezone ;Request_ ❑ Shoreline Permit Application7 Variance Request ❑ Other: ❑ Conditional Use Permit Application The attached materials are sent to you for your review and comment. The Planning Dept. needs your comments to satisfy review procedures and to complete the project file. Please use the space provided below for your comments or attach a separate sheet. Requested response date: 11 / J0L`1 / e Review.Depariment comments: Cut- vc ,1 C Z-(-, 0 Of S c-, gt p,D . 4 4 - Y 1 3 1. ti,t o E Q c)- T E T S,c R vk i CRz J'l 9 1- ?.1 FC'i C T /14T 44A- y aG c v R ej ti v- R H(6-11- OLLA /5 / Y C'F F is T- a -�� Date: 44.e.e4, X/ 7 City of Tukwil 6200 South; enter Boulevard Tukwila 11,1ashington 98188 PLANNING DEPARTMENT TRANSMITTAL DATE OF TRANSMITTAL ? / dUL'Y / 81 TO: PROJECT: • ❑ BUILDING DEPT. ❑ POLICE DEPT. ❑ FIRE DEPT. ❑ RECREATION DEPT. ❑ PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. ❑ Gtr t Ziv-4 0E G6MPI.E.y LOCATION: E5fl ( MOO toGTQ• BLVD The above mentioned applicant has submitted the following plans or materials for the above reference project: 12Environmenta1 Checklist ❑Preliminary Plat ❑ Environmental Impact State- ❑ Final Plat ment ❑ Site /Development Plans ❑ Rezone Request [1] Shoreline Permit Application❑ Variance Request ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Other: Application The attached materials are sent to you for your review and comment. The Planning Dept. needs your comments to satisfy review procedures and to complete the project file. Please use the space provided below for your comments or attach a separate sheet. Requested response date: 11 / Juor / ei Review Department comments: By: Date: CITY OF TUKWILA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM This questionnaire must be completed and submitted with the application for permit. This questionnaire must be completed by all persons applying for a permit from the City of Tukwila, unless it is determined by the Responsible Official that the permit is exempt or unless the applicant and Responsible Official previously agree an Environmental Impact Statement needs to be completed. A fee of $50.00 must accompany the filling of the Environmental Questionnaire to cover costs of the threshold determination. I. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent: GREEN RIVER INVESTORS 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: 1818 WESTLAKE AVE. N. SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98109 (206) 283 -8706 3. Date Checklist Submitted: 4. Agency Requiring Checklist: PLANNING DEPT., CITY OF TUKWILA 5. Name of Proposal, if applicable: OFFICE BUILDING 6. Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature): THREE STORY, 65,000 S.F. OFFICE BUILDING WITH REFLECTIVE GLASS EXTERIOR AND 202+ PARKING SPACES. 7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental im- pacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate under- standing of the environmental setting of the proposal): NORTHEAST CORNER OF SOUTHCENTER BLVD. AND FORT DENT ACCESS ROAD, APPROX. 1/2 BLOCK NORTH OF INTERURBAN AVE. BOUNDED ON THE WEST BY THE GREEN RIVER. 8. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal: MAY, 1982 9. List of all Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals Required for the Proposal (federal, state and local): (a) Rezone, conditional use, shoreline permit, etc. YES X N0_ (b) King County Hydraulics Permit YES X NO (c) Building permit .YES X NO (d) Puget Sed Air Pollution Control Perm, (e) Sewer hook up permit (f) Sign permit (g) Water hook up permit (h) Storm water system permit (i) Curb cut permit (j) Electrical permit (State of Washington) (k) Plumbing permit (King County) (1) Other: YES NO X YES X NO YESX NO YESX NO YESX NO YESX NO YESX NO YESX NO 10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or futher activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain: NO 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain: NO 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some futur( date, describe the nature of such application form: II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? (b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcover- ing of the soil? (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief fea- tures? (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? -2- YES MAYBE NO X X X X YES MAYBE NO (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? X (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? X Explanation: Normal clearing and grading will occur over the size for building and parking with excavation for footings and structural fill under building. 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? X (b) The creation of objectionable odors? X (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? X Explanation: Additional vehicular traffic generated by normal office building functions will create a minor decrease in air quality. 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? X (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? X (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? X (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? X (e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? X (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an ar-ifer by cuts or excavations? X -3- • • YES MAYBE NO (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection,, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates; detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? X (i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise avail- able for public water' supplies? X Explanation: Run -off from building and parking will be retained on site and discharge at a rate equal to its natural flow into the storm sewer. 4. Flora. Will the proposal result in: (a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? _ (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? X (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? X (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? X Explanation: Field grass and a stand of alder will be replaced by trees, shrubs, and lawn native to the northwest will be installed per code. 5. Fauna. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? X (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? X (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? Z( _ (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? X Explanation: Small field animals and birds nesting in the. trees and field will be displaced. -4- • • YES MAYBE NO 6. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? X Explanation:. 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? X Explanation: Parking lights and lights from the building. Low glare fixtures will be used. There will also be increased glare due to the glass surfaces of the structures, with minimum impact on surrounding locations. 8. Land'Use. Will the proposal result in the altera- tion of the present or planned land use of an area? Explanation: 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? Explanation: 10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radi- ation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? Explanation: X X X X YES MAYBE NO 11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? Explanation: Impact on population depends on future tenants of the project and their. present location. X 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? X Explanation: See explanation #11. 13. Transportation /Circulation. Will the proposal result in: (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? (b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? .(c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and /or goods? (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? X Explanation: Additional motor vehicle movement normally associated with the office building function and the inter- action with bicyclists and pedestrians will be mitigated by the existing barrier of Interurban Avenue and the fact the Southcenter Blvd. terminates in a culdesac X 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: (a) Fire protection? (b) Police protection? (c) Schools? (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? (e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? -6- X X X X X X (f) • • Other governmental services? Explanation: A minor increase in fire protection, police and government services could be expected but would be well within anticipated growth. 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? Explanation: There will be energy demand typical of office building use. YES MAYBE NO X X X 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: ta) Power or natural gas? X (b) Communications systems? X (c) Water? X (d) Sewer or septic tanks? X (e) Storm water drainage? X (f) Solid waste and disposal? X Explanation: 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the crea- tion of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? Explanation: • • 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruc- tion of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically of- fensive site open to public view? Explanation: 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of exist- ing recreational opportunities? Explanation: 20. Archeological /Histroical. Will the proposal result in an alteration of a signifi- cant archeological or his- torical site, structure, object or building? Explanation: CERTIFICATION BY APPLICANT: YES MAYBE NO I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non - significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. 7. I.81 Si gnat e and Title Date LANCE MUELLER & ASSOC. /ARCH. x X )d 4 .0* 0,40 00'6° Mei *".110- ""'el Iht II% IC, ip,e4,4_)1 • 'm/0s W. 1.4.11o.rawrs7,. BITE PLAN de' 114.•■•• Itwst-HP-r, Na• 1.100z1 PROJECT STATISTICS Lc e• CORI. ar..10 C. % vIcax■t 0' 104. A MkOF C1C1k .•• t.r00 bP ra at ) .313. 2 a 1- w a 4 E . J 111 • 0 A a P-1 11 a a 2 P•••3 11 33 0 111 Is 2 0 m itt r m Is 0 li ___•wt-o. , ______ ■■•■50+_•_•A;o: lg..: .._. i - _• ....., v L-_-_- _____ , . 1 ...... r 0 IS i ,!! -_---1 u I- 1. P 1 ---- , f 1 I N ---P ______ 00.,.., 1 tnir Hegsw3t:t•itectis a ale 130 1.0m6410 • ••••••••• wee•. •010••3 no eimm mono Thal GREEN RIVER INVESTORS BUILDING TUKV/ILA. WAISMiNCITON J1111111V M. as-mare - CIENCIFIAL MANACOINUI PARTNER s) 1 GA ■ #t jl;ffflifl(Ifff(I =1;'flf` -'I t(ij`f'Ij('!` :r I 1 1 , 111 '�j!!{I!I!II.Ilg li j �',!!;1;1t f1l:. EII ppi .1 . #a ::;i! ?'1 1 1iij �,nl11! (., $ 1 Ohl d.! i!i= .1 4�I�ti(j i,! 1 I i Mi.11illilllll 1.('jh blJ't i •I!1 I t'-! Ii !', (f' !` riff; I' # j I ' lil• i ii 1 I p.11� s p¢ 1 !! !1 • %,< I 3 1 A L_— is 1 r• ? \'1.. 13 \\ , Z \ 13- .1 \ I I 1; , r ±.I Iy b • /1 .4 Ia I Ip 8 I I I I i I / , /,' ti 4 / .1:, fry / a 4` d 2 47 // J / In 5' 4 A N.. .r r SITE PLAN PARCELS 1&2 GREEN RIVER INVESTORS TUKWIL , WSnu.unrnu lf= .id k Q"St t..4 R.r 111.6 v-o' +sre.a- 0 rs- dss(y.A- E — and OFe2N FIvUR se.s a..d "^ " yr GF. 4 Rave& aao Hr "u�^F ur GReeH N`/e$- se aad \MN YIL 4- Green rh/ER F -. p!pk - ro -o is r tad GREet1 i v-..lc CIO p•.. riy .07a p.P G;CEEH F,/eir-• M J SHORELINE PROFILES HO'fE S; l Mfs.+ 11161I 6.4.V flmM •'�r►1�.weo pY F..1O oAINTY OaP..RTMaNT •F s MlN w....4o1aHT t ToroaF.wrd. o of ..l nm$ Fenlvsra .arM WO.SlirIC HAM', OW./ 1'4 , ..,n- ool -fn.a� f > n` .1aa O '..aLa. 1.0..1 . FRY IN. RY M1..R . fl .VT6 J J 0 at w a 0 2 0 1 P -4