The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSEPA EPIC-136-80 - HANSEN HANSEN & JOHNSON - RECORDS STATIONERSRECORDS STATIONERS 17000 WEST VALLEY HWY EPIC- 136 -80 CITY OF;TUKWILA OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT itR- Oli4StDIFINAL DECLARATION OF tG+ W t etINON -S I GN I F I CA JCE Description of proposal Proponent Location of Proposal Lead Agency Building Permit - Stationery Retail Outlet Hansen, Hansen & Johnson 17000 West Valley Highway City of Tukwila File No EPIC- 136 -80 This proposal has been determined to (4. e/not have) a significant adverse im- pact upon the environment. An EIS (is /is not) required under RCW 43.21C.030(2) (c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of, a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Responsible Official Position /Title Date 6 May 1980 Mark Caughey Acting Planning Director COMMENTS: Signature 1) Prior to issuance of building permits, applicants shall obtain Board of Architectural Review approval of site, building elevation and materials, and landscaping plans for the subject proposal. CITY OF TUKWILA • ENV I RO MENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE REVIEW FORM PROJECT NAME: -4:40 gulp Wr10)3 PROJECT ADDRESS: WF..ST IS.1.111 Hwy ADJAc • TU M 415 4 Ls . APL`( SI 2 MA,-1 $ O.. T14 AA) KS /. 1. DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: (date) (reviewer) ❑ Building: by: ❑ Engineering: by: ❑ Fire:IZCG by: 9 P1 nri 1 j. 'i- 2,- _ JD by: C3 Police: by: • 2. ANY PERTINENT COMMENTS: ter s16 e-e- O.�a o w� .mow 0S- {,c . - 6(. /1-4. ■ ity of Tukwila •:: Planning Division 6200 Southcenter Boulevard . :.:-Tukwila, Washington 98188 433 -1845 Office:of Community Development~. Hansen, Hansen & Johnson 1006 Fryar Avenue Sumner, WA.' 98390 Re:'. Proposed Record Stationery Story Enclosed is a copy of the negative threshold determination for this project, relieving you of the need to complete.an Environmental Impact- Statement. Note, however, that as a condition of the grant of non- significance, the project plans must be reviewed and approved by the Tukwila Board of. Architectural Review. Application--forms for the.B.A.R. are enclosed, and are .self- explanatory.: .The Board's agenda for 29 May 1980 is still open. _Applications for that meeting must be received in completed form by 21 May 1980. ... Otherwise, the next available agenda date is 26 June 1980. Please direct any questions to my attention.. MC /mkb Enclosure TUKWILA NING DEPARTMENT Ma k Caughey Acting Planning Director CITY OF TUKWILA ENV I R•1EUTAL QUESTIONNAIRE' REV* FORM PROJECT NAME: rtge.O 1zv Sr.:11O 05Z S PROJECT ADDRESS: 14w4 ADJ4c. ji) uA f tit4(v_ie44L$ PLtik ¢. -PL. -t 51 2 MAH 8 0) haitcs / 1. DEPARTMENAL REVIEW: (date) (reviewer) t3uilding: by: ( ngineering: by: Fire: SEAYr 4 3 by: -B i iarriui- mg:V.EG . by: 6Police: by: 2. ANY PERTINENT COMMENTS: rr CITY OF TUKWILA ai ENV I RO 1ENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE REV I v FO RPM] PROJECT NAME: f2eGO tr-12 -'TAT1 E.Z S PROJECT ADDRESS: )E..5T vAt .- T kw ti AD 044 . 11) SIGN `( kt4j '14Ls z MAGI $ 0) ¶MASKS • 1. DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: (date) (reviewer) f i1ding: „Z)// ? by: a? ,/e.),., ❑ Engineering: / by: ❑ Fire: by: ❑ Planning: by: ❑.Police: by: 2. ANY PERTINENT COMMENTS: _ — V 1 / 1 V 1 1 U ENV I ROVEi e_ QUESTIONNAIRE REVIEW •N PROJECT NAME: R° RD Tlv}JZS PROJECT ADDRESS: WE-s( kwy 4DJ46. TO si-oN -f i-t4j 4Ls -,PWc P_E. F -L_ P...PL`t 151 Z MA'f 80) 1- Ks �. 1. DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW: ❑ Building: by: CEngineering: 4'/ 2y 7pc, by: ❑ Fire: by: ❑ Planning: by: °\){G • Police: by: r7'!7-7,lt -°'1' � - L. ,I. 2. ANY P T COMMENTS: NV A � c s:uP--> 12,6-1,4.4 »' - Po 11'1-v.l cc/- (ts/R) f-11(:L. sroC /c 1.i/a'/vCro- OGt q,1. f Z,C _ 7 Aov )0e Cam/ ( 7U 7111ApCg Si?- rZ 1i9i J 7)-c ii- / s t )L O elp CS to 9 .H (date) (reviewer) CL/2ij cur PYL,v ii w1LL (h Ut- "t the i; r; APR 2 4 '1880 /Z-S ,3E- ar etrie,0 RePt>tr ADemar-6- Teu 7YU gPPU &,G' Zts . Z t: �� w/ �L/2 ] S �( —� �, C7 k3Tco., 3� cf ►.� • City of Tukwila Fire Department TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: Hubert H. Crawley Fire Chief • OFFICE MEMO Planning Department Fire Department Environmental Questionnaire Review Form for Record Stationers April 25, 1980 Building size is different from what is declared on the Environmental Questionnaire Review Form. This building should represent no impact on the fire department, provided that we are not on a call when a. fire alarm is recieved from this building. Hubert H. Crawley Fire Chief City.of Tukwila Fire Department, 444 Andover Park East, Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 575 -4404 l CITY OF TUKVdILA VV 41109° ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA APR 18 j91r This questionnaire must be completed and submitted with the appliPAP %PM permit. This questionnaire must be completed by all persons = .applying for a permit from the City of Tukwila, unless it is determined by the Responsible Official that the-permit is exempt or unless the applicant and Responsible Official previously agree an Environmental Impact Statement needs to be completed. A fee of $50.00 must accompany the filling of the Environmental Questionnaire to cover costs of the threshold determination. I. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent: Hansen, Hansen & Johnson (Architect & Contractor) 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: 1006 Fryar Avenue, Sumner, Washington 98390 (For Owner: Charles Ruud) 3. Date Checklist Submitted: 4. Agency Requiring Checklist: 5. Name of Proposal, if applicable: Record Stationery & Office Supply 6. Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an•accurate understanding of its scope and nature): A new metal office & warehouse building with10,700.,square feet.with 25 on site asphalt covered parking spaces. 7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental im- pacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate under- standing of the environmental setting of the proposal): Tall grass & weed covered area. Between Stoneway Sand & Gravel Company and Cello Bag Company on West Valley Highway. 8. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal: 9 months after start of constructio 9. List of all Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals Required for the Proposal (federal, state and local): (a) Rezone, conditional use, shoreline permit, etc. YES NO X (b) King County Hydraulics Permit YES NO X (c) Building permit YES X NO (a) Puget Sound. Pollution Control Permit 410 YES' NO x (e) Sewer hook up permit YESX NO (f) Sign permit YES NO x ('g) Water, hook up permit YES x NO (h) Storm water system permit YES NO X (i) Curb cut permit YES NO x (j) Electrical permit (State of Washington) YESX NO (k) Plumbing permit (King County) YESX NO (1) Other: 10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or futher activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain: NO. 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by 'your proposal? If yes, explain: NO. 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date; describe the nature of such application form: Building Permit attached. II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? (b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcover- ing of the soil? (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief fea- tures? (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features ?.. -2- YES MAYBE NO (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: The soil conditions on the site require a preloading to compact soil tb an acceptable bearing capacity. 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambientair quality? (b) The creation of objectionable odors? (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? Explanation: 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? X (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? — (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? (e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? _ (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? _ (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? _ -3- x x x x x x •. • (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? (i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise avail- able for public water supplies? Explanation: • YES MAYBE NO Due to new building and new asphalt parking areas, the surface water conditions have been altered. This situation has been corrected by an Engineered retension system tied to the City Storm System. 4. Flora. Will the proposal result in: (a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, micrQflora and aquatic plants)? (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? X Explanation: 5. Fauna. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? Explanation: • • YES MAYBE NO 6. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? x Explanation: Maybe during construction by construction equ,Lpment, this would only be temporary. There should be no substantial increase with intended use. 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? x- Explanation: 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in the altera- tion of the present or planned land use of an area? Explanation: 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? ExpTanati on : 10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radi- ation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? Explanation: x x • YES MAYBE NO r1. 11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? X Explanation: 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? Explanation: 13. Transportation /Circulation. Will the proposal result in: (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? (b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and /or goods? (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? Explanation: There will be minimal increase in vehicular traffic which should not generate any problems to existing traffic flow. On site parking has been provided suf- ficiently to handle employees and customers. x 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: (a) Fire protection? (b) Police protection? (c) Schools? (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? (e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? x x x x (f) Other governmental services? Explanation: Additional building in area. 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? Explanation: 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: (a) Power or natural gas? (b) Communications systems? (c) Water? (d) Sewer or septic tanks? (e) Storm water drainage? (f) Solid waste and disposal? Explanation: New service to building. 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the crea- tion of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? Explanation: YES MAYBE NO X x x x 'It 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the o bs ruc- tion of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will, the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically of- fensive site open to public view? Explanation: 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of exist- ing recreational opportunities? Explanation: 20. Archeological /Histroical. Will the proposal result in an alteration of a signifi- cant archeological or his- torical site, structure, object or building? Explanation: CERTIFICATION BY APPLICANT: YES MAYBE NO-- I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information. is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non - significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. (Architect) 4/- /7-- � ) Signature and Title Date x x x