Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Permit L09-025 - WOZNIAK PAUL / CRICKET COMMUNICATIONS - WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS
PAUL WOZNIAK CRICKET COMMUNICATIONS Type II Wireless TELECOMMUNICATIONS Embassy Suites 15920 WVH L09 -025 Page 1 of 2 Brandon Miles - FW: Request to Cancel Application (L09 -026) From: "Noah Grodzin" To: "Brandon Miles" Date: 08/20/2009 6:52 PM Subject: FW: Request to Cancel Application (L09 -026) Brandon; Please cancel the pending previously submitted application L09 -026. Thank you - Noah Grodzin noah.grodzin(a�cascadiapm.com Site Acquisition Specialist Cascadia PM LLC T: 360.567.3794 M:971.285.6645 F: 360.397.7289 From: Brandon Miles [mailto:bmiles @ci.tukwila.wa.us] Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2009 5:14 PM To: Noah Grodzin Subject: Permit Fee Refund Noah- With regards to refunding of permit fees. You would be entitled to a refund on some fees paid on the building permit (D09 -085). Please send a request for a refund to the following address: Permit Center City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Blvd, Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 A refund cannot be granted for the land use application since the City has spent a considerable amount of time file : / /C:\ temp\ XPgrpwise \4A8D9B7Btuk- mail6300 -po 100130796C114A671 \GW }00001.... 08/26/2009 Page 2 of 2 reviewing the application. If you could please send me an email or letter requesting to cancel the pending application that would be appreciated. As I noted on the phone, if you could push the antenna further from the roofline I think that would allow it to be better screened from view. Let me know if you have any questions. Regards, Brandon Brandon J. Miles Senior Planner Department of Community Development City of Tukwila tel (206) 431 -3684 fax (206) 431 -3665 bmiles @ci.tukwila.wa.us file: / /C:\ temp\ XPgrpwise \4A8D9B7Btuk- mail6300 -po 10013 0796C 114A671 \GW } 00001.... 08/26/2009 • City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor Department of Community Development NOTICE OF DECISION TO: Paul Wozniak on behalf of Cricket Communications, Applicant Embassy Suites, Owner King County Assessor, Accounting Division Washington State Department of Ecology Jack Pace, Director August 3, 2009 This letter serves as a notice of decision and is issued pursuant to TMC 18.104.170 on the following project and permit approval. Project File Number: Applicant: Type of Permit Applied for: Project Description: Location: Associated Files: Comprehensive Plan Designation/Zoning District: I. PROJECT INFORMATION L09 -025 Paul Wozniak on behalf of Cricket Communications Type II (Administrative) Wireless Communications Permit The applicant is requesting approval of a type II Wireless Facilities Permit to replace six antennas at the Embassy Suites Building with six new antennas. These antennas will be considered "non - concealed". Additionally, the applicant will add additional ground equipment for the wireless communication facility (WCF) on the roof top. 15920 West Valley Hwy None Tukwila Urban Center (TUC) Created by Brandon Miles H: \Wireless Permits \Type II \Cricket \Notice of Decision.doc 6300 Southcenter Boulevard. Suite #100 • Tukwila. Washington 98188 • Phone: 206- 431 -3670 • Fax: 206- 431 -3665 II. DECISION SEPA Determination: The City SEPA Responsible Official has previously determined that the project is exempt from SEPA review and has not required the submittal of a SEPA Checklist. Decision on Substantive Permit: The Community Development Director has determined that the application for a TYPE II WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS PERMIT does comply with applicable City and state code requirements and has approved that application, subject to any conditions which are set forth in the Decision based on the findings and conclusions contained in the staff report dated July 14, 2009. The following conditions have been placed on this project: 1. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall provide sufficient proof that ALL existing antennas at the project site are being used. The applicant shall identify the provider using the antennas and each provider shall have a business license as required by TMC 18.58.070 (2). If the antennas are not being used they shall be removed pursuant to TMC 18.58.190 and all supporting infrastructure shall also be removed. 2. Prior to final approval of the building permit, Cricket shall secure a business license from the City of Tukwila for this specific location. III. YOUR APPEAL RIGHTS The Decision on this Permit Application is a Type 2 decision pursuant to Tukwila Municipal Code §18.104.010. One administrative appeal to the Hearing Examiner of the Decision on the Permit itself is permitted. A party who is not satisfied with the outcome of the administrative appeal process may file an appeal in King County Superior Court from the Hearing Examiner decision. IV. PROCEDURES AND TIME FOR APPEALING In order to appeal the Community Development Director's decision on the Permit Application, a written notice of appeal must be filed with the Department of Community Development within 14 days of the issuance of this Decision, that is by August 17, 2009. The requirements for such appeals are set forth in Tukwila Municipal Code 18.116. All appeal materials shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development. Appeal materials MUST include: 1. The name of the appealing party. 2. The address and phone number of the appealing party; and if the appealing party is a corporation, association or other group, the address and phone number of a contact person authorized to receive notices on the appealing party's behalf. 3. A statement identifying the decision being appealed and the alleged errors in the decision, including any specific challenge to an MDNS. Created by Brandon Miles H: \Wireless Permits \Type II \Cricket \Notice of Decision.doc 4. The Notice of Appeal shall identify (a) the specific errors of fact or errors in application of the law in the decision being appealed; (b) the harm suffered or anticipated by the appellant, and (c) the relief sought. The scope of an appeal shall be limited to matters or issues raised in the Notice of Appeal. 5. Appeal fee as outlined in current fee resolution. V. INSPECTION OF INFORMATION ON THE APPLICATION Project materials including the application, any staff reports, and other studies related to the permits are available for inspection at the Tukwila Department of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100, Tukwila, Washington 98188 from Monday through Friday between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. The project planner is Brandon Miles, who may be contacted at 206 - 431 -3684 for further information. Property owners affected by this decision may request a change in valuation for their property tax purposes. Contact the King County Assessor's Office for further information regarding property tax valuation changes. The notice board must be removed at the expiration of the appeal period if no appeal is filed. Department of Community D City of Tukwila pment Created by Brandon Miles H: \Wireless Permits \Type II\Cricket \Notice of Decision.doc • STAFF REPORT TO THE DIRECTOR PREPARED July 14, 2009 NOTIFICATION: Notification was mailed to potential impacted agencies on June 29, 2009. Public Notice is not required for a type II application. FILE NUMBER: L09 -025 APPLICANT: Paul Wozniak on behalf of Cricket Communications OWNER: Embassy Suites REQUEST: Approval of a type II Wireless Facilities Permit to install a wireless communication facility on existing commercial building. LOCATION: 15920 West Valley Hwy ASSOCIATED PERMITS: OTHER KNOWN PERMITS: Building Permit and Electrical Permits SEPA DETERMINATION: Exempt COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Tukwila Urban Center (TUC) ZONE DESIGNATION: Tukwila Urban Center (TUC) STAFF: Brandon J. Miles, Senior Planner ATTACHMENTS: A. Applicant's Narrative B. Construction Plans C. Photo Simulations FINDINGS Vicinity /Site Information • Staff Report to the Planning Commission L05 -045 NEXTEL at 44th Ave S Page 2 of 8 Project Description The applicant is requesting approval of a type II Wireless Facilities Permit to replace six antennas at the Embassy Suites Building with six new antennas. These antennas will be considered "non- concealed ". Additionally, the applicant will add additional ground equipment for the wireless communication facility (WCF) on the roof top. Typically replacing antennas with like antennas would be exempt from land use permit review by the City. However, since new ground equipment is being installed on the rooftop review of the application as a type II application is required. Existing Development The property is zoned Tukwila Urban Center (TUC). A 94 foot tall hotel building is located on the site which is occupied by Embassy Suites. There is also associated parking located on the site. The applicant has proposed to replace antennas that were previously approved for Metricom Communication in 2000 (L2000 -008). According to the applicant the Metricom facility is no longer be utilized and is abandoned. The application does not propose to remove the remnants of the old facility. Surrounding Land Uses All surrounding properties are zoned Tukwila Urban Center. A hotel is located to the south of the project site; West Valley Hwy is located to the east; Longacres Way is located to the north; and the railroad is located to the east. BACKGROUND In 2006, the City adopted a Wireless Facilities Chapter (TMC 18.71) to the Zoning Code. The chapter provides specific location and design requirements for the placement of WCF within the City of Tukwila. Location Selection Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) provides a hierarchy of appropriate locations within the City. Generally, co- locations and utilizing existing structures are favored over the development of new standalone WCF within the City. The applicant has chosen to install a non - concealed WCF on an existing commercial building in a commercial zone. In most cases the City prefers that a concealed mounted antenna be used, however given the large size of the building compared to the size of the antennas, the applicant is proposing to install non - concealed antennas. Additionally, the applicant is proposing to replace existing antennas for a facility that the City had previously approved in 2000. H: \Wireless Permits \Type II \Cricket \Type II staff report.doc III. WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITY CRITERIA (TMC 18.58) General Design Standards (TMC 18.58.070) The City provides general design standards for the placement of WCF within the City of Tukwila. The following are the general design standards for all WCF within the City: Table 1 General Design Project Project Not Applicable Notes: Standards does comply does not comply 1. Generators must comply with TMC 8.22 regarding noise. The applicant has not proposed a generator. 2.Business License Requirement ,/ The applicant has noted that Cricket Communications has an administrative office in the City and has a business license for that location. An additional business license will need to be obtained for this location. The purpose of obtaining a business license is that in case of an emergency City staff knows who to contact. 3. Only safety signage must be placed on the WCF %( 4. Accommodations for parking for maintenance personnel must be provided. 1/ There are existing parking stalls on the site that provide sufficient parking for the proposed WCF. 5. Towers shall maintain a galvanized steel finish. ,/ B. Miles Page 3 H: \Wireless Permits \Type II \Cricket \Type II staff report.doc 07/16/2009 • 6. The design of all buildings and ancillary structures shall use materials, colors, textures, screening, and landscaping that will blend the tower facilities to the natural setting and built environment. Project Project V The applicant is not proposing to install a tower. 7. Antennas shall have the same color scheme as the structure they are located on. V does The antennas will be painted to match the color of the existing antennas on the building. 8. WCF poles and towers shall only have safety lights if required by a government agency. ,/ not comply 1. Due to the size of the building and the proposed location of No lighting is proposed. 9. No advertising is ' permitted on WCF V The applicant has proposed to replace antennas on a six story 10. Each service provider shall be limited to an equipment enclosure of 360 square feet. V The applicant has proposed to install a small enclosure behind the parapets of the existing building. Request to Use Non - Concealed Building Attached WCF in Lieu of a Concealed Building Attached WCF (TMC 18.58.140) The applicant has proposed to use a non - concealed building WCF in lieu of using a concealed building attachment. Under the City's hierarchy of preferred WCF facilities type, a concealed WCF is preferred over a non - concealed. However, the City has recognized that in some cases using a concealed WCF is not practical and in some cases can have a greater aesthetic impact than if a non - concealed facility was used. The City allows an applicant to request to use a non - concealed WCF is lieu of a concealed under the following requirements: Table 2 Concealed vs. Non Project Project Not Applicable Notes: Concealed Criteria does comply does not comply 1. Due to the size of the building and the proposed location of V The applicant has proposed to replace antennas on a six story B. Miles Page 4 H: \Wireless Permits \Type II\Cricket \Type II staff report.doc 07/16/2009 • the antennas, the visual impact of the exposed antennas will be minimal in relation to the building. Project does comply Project does Not building within the City. This hotel building is one of the tallest in the City and within the Urban Center. To top of rooftop parapet the building has a height of almost 95 feet. The applicant has proposed flush mounts for the antennas. The antennas will be six feet tall and will be painted to match the color of the existing building. 2. Cables are concealed from view and any visible cables are reduced in visibility by sheathing or painting to match the building where they are located. N/ Applicable Cables and wires for the proposed antennas will be placed below the building's existing parapet walls 3. Cabinet equipment is adequately screened from view. ./ 1. The proposed All cabinet equipment will be placed below the existing parapet walls of the building. 4. Due to the style or design of the building, the use of a concealed facility would reduce the visual appearance of the building. The maximum height within Any Any method of screening would add visual clutter to the building and would not be practical given the size of the building. Specific Design Standards for Non - Concealed Building Mounted WCF (TMC 18.58.110) TMC 18.58.110 provides specific design standards for the placement of non - concealed building mounted WCF within the City. A review of the specific design criteria is provided below: Table 3 Specific Design Project does comply Project does Not Notes: Standards for non- not comply Applicable concealed WCF 1. The proposed V The maximum height within B. Miles Page 5 H: \Wireless Permits \Type II\Cricket \Type II staff report.doc 07/16/2009 • • facility must meet the height requirements of the applicable zoning category. If the building where the facility is located is at or above the maximum height requirements, the antennas are permitted to extend to a maximum of 3 feet above the existing roof line. Non - concealed building mounted facilities shall not qualify as a "Rooftop Appurtenances under TMC 18.50.080. the TUC zone is 115 feet. The existing building as a height to parapet wall of approximately 95 feet. The antennas will not extend about the highest parapet wall. 2. The first preference for any proposed facility is to utilize flush - mounted antennas. Nonflush- mounted antennas may be used when their visual impact will be negated by the scale of the antennas to the building. "Shrouds" are not required unless they provide a better visual appearances than exposed antennas. Antennas shall be painted to match the color scheme of the building(s). 1/ _ The applicant has proposed to install flush mounted antennas. 3. Feed lines and cables should be 1/ Feed lines will be located below the parapet walls. B. Miles Page 6 H: \Wireless Permits \Type II \Cricket \Type II staff report.doc 07/16/2009 located below the parapet of the rooftop. If the feed lines and cables must be visible, they must be painted to match the color scheme of the building(s). 4. If cabinet equipment cannot be located within the building where the wireless communication facilities will be located, then it must be located on the rooftop of the building. �/ All cabinet equipment will be placed below the parapet walls. CONCLUSIONS 1. As demonstrated in Tables 1, 2 and 3 the project meets all applicable development standards for the proposed type of WCF. 2. Potentially dangerous cabinet equipment will be secured from the public by placing it on the rooftop of the building. 3. The proposed use of a non - concealed attached WCF is appropriate given the building size and design. Additionally, the overall size of the building will assist in screening the antennas from view. 4. No noise will be generated from the new antennas. All ground equipment has been placed indoors and the applicant is not proposing to install a generator. 5. The proposed project is in keeping with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan. 6. The applicant will be required to obtain development permits from the City's Building Division for the proposed construction. 7. Cricket Communications does not have a business license for this specific location as required by TMC 18.58.070 (2). However, one can easily be obtained from the City. The purpose of the business license requirement is so that City staff has contact information for the actual entity utilizing the WCF. 8. As noted, the applicant will be utilizing a facility that was previously approved by the City in 2000. The applicant has proposed to replace some of the antennas from that were approved for MetroCom. TMC 18.58.190 provides requirements for the removal of abandoned wireless communication facilities. B. Miles Page 7 07/16/2009 H: \Wireless Permits \Type II \Cricket \Type II staff report.doc • DECISION The application is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall provide sufficient proof that ALL existing antennas at the project site are being used. The applicant shall identify the provider using the antennas and each provider shall have a business license as required by TMC 18.58.070 (2). If the antennas are not being used they shall be removed pursuant to TMC 18.58.190 and all supporting infrastructure shall also be removed. 2. Prior to final approval of the building permit, Cricket shall secure a business license from the City of Tukwila for this specific location. B. Miles Page 8 H: \Wireless Permits \Type II \Cricket \Type II staffreport.doc 07/16/2009 • City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director NOTICE OF APPLICATION DATED June 29, 2009 The following applications have been submitted to the City of Tukwila Department of Community Development for review and decision. APPLICANT: Paul Wozniak on behalf of Cricket Communications. AGENT: Paul Wozniak LOCATION: 15920 West Valley Hwy OWNER OF THE PROPERTY: Embassy Suites Hotel FILE NUMBERS: L09 -025 PROPOSAL: Cricket Communications has submitted a Type II Wireless Communication Facility (WCF) permit to install six antennas at the Embassy Suites Hotel site located on West Valley Hwy. Cricket will replace antennas that were previously approved in 2000 for MetroCom, thus the net number of antennas will remain unchanged. A small equipment area will be located along the rooftop behind the existing parapet walls. OTHER REQUIRED PERMITS: Building Permit, City of Tukwila, Electrical Permits, City of Tukwila OTHER PERMITS THAT MAY BE REQUIRED: Unknown These files can be reviewed at the Department of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA. Please call (206) 431 -3670 to ensure that the file(s) will be available. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 0 Tukwila, Washington 98188 0 Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 0 Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 • • OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT You can submit comments on this application. You must submit your comments regarding the Conditional Use Permit in writing to the Department of Community Development by 5:00 p.m. on July 13, 2009. The Director will not act on the permit until the comment period has been completed. If you have questions about this proposal contact Brandon J. Miles, Planner -in- charge of this project at (206) 431 -3684 or by email at bmilesna,ci.tukwila.wa.us. Anyone who submits written comments will become parties of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. Please send comments to: City of Tukwila Planning Attn: Brandon J. Miles 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 APPEALS You may request a copy of any decision by the Director on this project or obtain information on your appeal rights by contacting the Department of Community Development at (206)- 431 -3670. The Director's decision may be appealed to the City's Hearing Examiner. DATE OF APPLICATION: May 21, 2009 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: June 19, 2009 NOTICE OF APPLICATION: June 29, 2009 Location of Proposed Project I. at* a 1 ulna' u: na' a w Dept. Of Community Development AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION I, _Teri Svedahl HEREBY DECLARE THAT: Notice of Public Hearing Project Number: L09 -025 Determination of Non - Significance Brandon Miles Notice of Public Meeting f' / i/rig,Ariai Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice Board of Appeals Agenda Packet Notice of Action Planning Commission Agenda Packet Official Notice Short Subdivision Agenda X Notice of Application Shoreline Mgmt Permit Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit _ _ FAX To Seattle Times Classifieds Mail: Gail Muller Classifieds PO Box 70 - Seattle WA 98111 Other: Was mailed to each of the addresses listed/attached on this _29 day of _June in the year 2009 W: \USERS \TERIWFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION.DOC Project Name: Paul Wozniak /Cricket Communications Project Number: L09 -025 Mailing requested by: Brandon Miles Mailer's signature: f' / i/rig,Ariai W: \USERS \TERIWFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION.DOC CHECKLIST: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW /SHORELINE PERMIT MAILINGS FEDERAL AGENCIES ( ) U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS ( ) FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION ( ) DEPT OF FISH & WILDLIFE ( ) U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY () U.S. DEPT OF H.U.D. ( ) NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE WASHINGTON STATE AGENCIES ( ) OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY XRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT ( ) DEPT NATURAL RESOURCES ( ) OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR ( ) DEPT OF COMM. TRADE & ECONOMIC DEV. ( )'DEPT OF FISHERIES & WILDLIFE KING COUNTY AGENCIES ( ) BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD ( ) FIRE DISTRICT #11 ( ) FIRE DISTRICT #2 ( ) K.C. WASTEWATER TREATMENT DIVISION ( ) K.C. DEPT OF PARKS & REC " \K.C. ASSESSOR'S OFFICE ( ) TUKWILA SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) TUKWILA LIBRARY ( ) RENTON LIBRARY ( ) KENT LIBRARY ( ) CITY OF SEATTLE LIBRARY IN) QWEST ( ) SEATTLE CITY LIGHT sNZ PUGET SOUND ENERGY ()HIGHLINE WATER DISTRICT ( ) SEATTLE WATER DEPARTMENT ( ) COMCAST SCHOOLS /LIBRARIES UTILITIES CITY AGENC • S ( ) KENT PLANNING DEPT ( ) TUKWILA CITY DEPARTMENTS: ( ) PUBLIC WORKS () FIRE () POLICE ( ) FINANCE ( ) PLANNING ( ) BUILDING () PARKS & REC. () MAYOR ( ) CITY CLERK OTHER LOCAL AGENCIES () PUGET SOUND REGIONAL COUNCIL ( ) SW K C CHAMBER OF COMMERCE () MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE ( ) CULTURAL RESOURCES PROGRAM ** ( ) FISHERIES PROGRAM** ( ) WILDLIFE PROGRAM **Send SEPA Checklist and full set of plans w/ NOA MEDIA ( ) SEATTLE TIMES () SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL P:\ADMINISTRATIVE \FORMS \CHECKLIST.DOC ( ) DEPT OF SOCIAL & HEALTH SERV. \6) DEPT OF ECOLOGY, SHORELAND DIV, NW Regional Office ( ) DEPT OF ECOLOGY, SEPA DIVISION* ( ) OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL * SEND CHKLIST W/ DETERMINATIONS * SEND SITE MAPS WITH DECISION () HEALTH DEPT ( ) PORT OF SEATTLE ( ) K.C. DEV & ENVIR SERVICES -SEPA INFO CNTR () K.C. TRANSIT DIVISION - SEPA OFFICIAL ( ) K.C. LAND & WATER RESOURCES ( ) FOSTER LIBRARY () K C PUBLIC LIBRARY ( ) HIGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) SEATTLE SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) OLYMPIC PIPELINE ( ) VAL -VUE SEWER DISTRICT ( ) WATER DISTRICT #20 ( ) WATER DISTRICT #125 () CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC WORKS () BRYN MAWR - LAKERIDGE SEWER/WATER DISTRICT RENTON PLANNING DEPT () ITY OF SEA -TAC ( ) CITY OF BURIEN ( ) TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS ( ) TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS ( ) CITY OF SEATTLE - SEPA INFO CENTER - DCLU ( ) STRATEGIC PLANNING OFFICE* * NOTICE OF ALL SEATTLE RELATED PLNG PROJ. ( ) DUWAMISH INDIAN TRIBE* () P.S. AIR POLLUTION CLEAN AGENCY �J SOUND TRANSIT ( DUWAMISH RIVER CLEAN -UP COALITION* * SEND NOTICE OF ALL APPLICATIONS ON DUWAMISH RIVER () HIGHLINE TIMES ( ) CI.TUKWILA.WA.US.WWW PUBLIC NOTICE MAILINGS FOR • OR PERMITS SEPA MAILINGS Mail to: (comment period starts on date of mailing) Dept. of Ecology Environmental Review Section *Applicant *Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list) *My parties of record * send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination KC Transit Division — SEPA Official would like to receive information about all projects that might affect transit demand Send These Documents to DOE: SEPA Determination (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report, usu. with MDNS) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Drawings /Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed or sent to newspaper) SHORELINE MAILINGS: Notice of Application for a Substantial Development Permit must be mailed to owners and to property owners within 500 feet of subject property, comments are due 30 days after the notice of application is mailed/posted. The notice of Application for Shoreline Substantial Development Permit must include a statement that any person desiring to submit " written comments on the application or desiring to receive notification of the final decision on the application may do so within 30 days of the notice of application. If a hearing will be held on the application, the hearing notice must include the information that written comments may be submitted, or oral presentation made at the hearing. Notice is sent to the NW Regional Office Shorelands & Environmental Assistance Program. Shoreline Permit Notice of Decision: Mail to: (within 8 days of decision; 21 -day appeal period begins date received by DOE) Department of Ecology Shorelands Section, NW Regional Office State Attorney General *Applicant *Indian Tribes *Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list). *My parties of record * send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination Send These Documents to DOE and Attorney General: Permit Data Sheet Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report or memo) Shoreline Permit Application Form (filled out by applicant) Drawings /Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) - Site plan, with mean high water mark & improvements — Cross - sections of site with structures & shoreline - Grading Plan - Vicinity map SEPA determination (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report or memo) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Any background studies related to impacts on shoreline Notice of Application Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed) P: W DMINISTRATIVE \FORMS \CHECKLIST. DOC • City of f Tukwila "Department of Community Development File Number LAND USE PERMIT ROUTING FORM TO: \Building ❑ Planning LNPublic Works Fire Dept. ❑ Police Dept. ❑ Parks /Rec Project Address: s69..) d" 6/.0.14., V c ittk 114/1 Date transmitted: /�_ V( �f7I9'J Response requested by: p 11 et to e1 Staff coordinator: Date response received: ' 61146 COMMENTS Vi�7( ICv'lea ail d! c,L) iii(J(Sj perel, f osielic.lvti L., )70o — '97-2 ❑ DRC review requested ❑ Plan submittal requested ❑ Plan approved Plan check date: Comments prepared by: aJ/U194 • RECEiltED City of f Tukwila JUN 2 5 2009 'Department of Community Develo TUKWIL pmig3iLIC WOA RKS File Number 1_061-?2c LAND USE PERMIT ROUTING FORM TO: Building ❑ Planning Public Works? Fire Dept. ❑ Police Dept. ❑ Parks /Rec Project I,_..t `-'� . Address: i 5C1 )_) Li-All v iii i i w Date transmitted: 64).4-71161 Response requested by: p c 1 � .1t) Staff coordinator:Ilf� Date response received: COMMENTS P) tel( ttieVetea Wjojti5 pue0- oftpli(41)4. P(A) Iwo nw emw,.w-&,ch ❑ DRC review requested ❑ Plan submittal requested Plan check date: 29 o91 Comments prepared by: ❑ Plan approved • :City of Tukwila 'Department of Community Development File Number L-.9q-)2c LAND USE PERMIT ROUTING FORM TO: Id Building ❑ Planning NNPublic Works ? Fire Dept. ❑ Police Dept. ❑ Parks /Rec Project: Address: I5C�� "W�1t1 (1'I Date transmitted: ��"- U(D 1'6) Response requested by: �-�p a l t t — `) Staff coordinator: t-:;. ,. t ; Date response received: COMMENTS P) for `f,1 t r' At kcjid W QJt's4J P frA'i ..fluVie)f � �i Al d Ylii CON ( . /� ��' l� �� ''7 ZOc 247 Piv ❑ DRC review requested Plan submittal requested ❑ Plan approved Plan check date: Comments prepared by: Q3/14/44 • Ci% of Tukwila "Department of Community Development File Number TO: k3uilding ❑ Planning LNPublic Works ❑ Police Dept. ❑ Parks/Rec Project: Address: Date transmitted: U( 1.4)1-2 .) Response requested by: 7 t 't `) Staff coordinator:` -- J; " 6, , 1 l f"7 Date response received: 1 4 f 7( iEr(veit,1 I' COMMENTS G,p! LJ wNtioS65 ik1", Cr{tplic- e)y A/6 Col vv,..w A-5` q 44 ❑ DRC review requested ❑ Plan submittal requested ❑ Plan approved Plan check date: Comments .re•ared b : Q7 /14/C4 TO: City of Tukwila Planning Department FM: Paul Wozniak 3615 38th Avenue West Seattle, WA 98199 206 - 252 -0699 RE: Type II Application Cricket Communication's SEA -019 -A (Embassy Suites) 15920 West Valley Highway List of Materials Submitted RECEIVED MAY 2 0 2009' COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT • One Copy: Application Check List • 5 Copies: Application Form • Four Sets of plans • Application Fee • Sign Fee • Mailing Label Fee • Five B &W Photo -sims • One Color Photo -sim • One RF signed report • SEPA N/A • There are no sensitive area studies of proposed mitigation. • No materials board is being submitted since this is a proposed flush mounted paint to match application. • No landscape plan is being submitted since this is a roof installation. • Letter from RF engineer attached. Cricket Proposal: Cricket Communication is a new wireless telecommunications company that is building their network at this time. As part of building that network, Cricket has decided to take over the abundant (previously approved by the City of Tukwila) MetroCom site. Cricket will be using the existing wall mounts at three locations, removing the MetroCom antennas and install two antennas at each location for a total of six antennas. Like the existing antennas, they will be flush mounted, be no higher then the wall they are attached to, and be painted to match the color of the building wall. Since the MetroCom site met code and we are duplicating their installation that was approved by the City, we contend that the Cricket installation also meets the wireless communication code of the City. • • Wireless Communication Requirements 1. NOISE - There is no generator proposed. 2. BUSINESS LICENSE REQUIRED — Cricket Communication already has an operational office and associated business License on file with the City of Tukwila. 3. SIGNS — Only safety signs will be posted. No other signs are proposed. 4. PARKING — A technician visits a site once a month. Upon surveying the hotel parking lots, there has been at least 100 vacant stall upon each site visit. 5. FINISH — This is not a tower location, but a roof top installation. 6. DESIGN — The design of this site is to match and reuse existing MetroCom flush mounted site that has been approved by the City of Tukwila. In addition, proposed antennas will be below the existing height of walls to which they will be attached. 7. COLOR — Antennas will be painted to match existing wall color that was previously approved by the City of Tukwila's MetroCom installation. 8. LIGHTING — No lighting is proposed. 9. ADVERTISING — No advertising is proposed. 10. EQUIPMENT ENCLOSURE — Equipment is located on the roof and is screened by the existing roof parapet. Section 18.58.110: Please see plans and photo -sims. This proposal meets all requirements of this section. ULS License - AWS, 1710 - 1755/211155 MHz bands License - WQGD676 lecket Licensee (Reauc... Page 1 of 2 vac Federal -;( ,- Communications Commission FCC Home 1 Search 1 Updates 1 E- Filing 1 Initiatives i For Consumers ( Find People Universal Licensing System FCC > WTB > ULS > Online Systems > License Search MAY 2 0 2009 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ULS License AWS, 1710 - 1755/2110 -2155 MHz bands License - WQGD676 - Cricket Licensee (Reauction), Inc. New Search t Printable Page Ili Reference Copy -+ Map License MAIN CaII Sign Status Market Market Submarket ADMIN MARKET WQGD676 Active CMA020 - Seattle- Everett, WA 0 Dates Grant 12/18/2006 Effective 12/18/2006 Buildout Deadlines 1st Notification Dates 1st Licensee FRN 0009927922 (View Ownership Filing) Licensee Cricket Licensee (Reauction), Inc. 10307 Pacific Center Court San Diego, CA 92121 ATTN Robert J. Irving Contact Latham & Watkins LLP James 11 Barker 555 Eleventh Street NW Suite 1000 Washington, DC 20004 Radio Service Auth Type Channel Block Associated Frequencies (MHz) Expiration Cancellation 2nd 2nd Type FCC Site Map 0 AW - AWS, 1710 - 1755/2110 -2155 MHz bands Regular A 001710.00000000 - 001720.00000000 002110.00000000 - 002120.00000000 12/18/2021 Corporation P: (858)882 -6048 F:(858)882-6080 E:rirving@cricketcommunications.com P:(202)637 -2200 F:(202)637 -2201 E:jim.barker @Iw.com http:// wireless2. fcc .gov/U1sApp[UlsSearch/license jsp ?licKey= 2867821 HELP 1/16/2009 ULS License - AWS, 1710 - 1755/2, -2155 MHz bands License - WQGD67.ricket Licensee (Reauc... Page 2 of 2 Ownership and Qualifications Radio Service Type Mobile Regulatory Status Common Carrier Interconnected Yes Alien Ownership The Applicant answered "No" to each of the Alien Ownership questions. Basic Qualifications The Applicant answered No to each of the Basic Qualification questions. Tribal Land Bidding Credits This license did not have tribal land bidding credits. Demographics Race Ethnicity Gender ULS Help ULS Glossary - FAQ - Online Help - Technical Support - Licensing Support ULS Online Systems CORES - ULS Online Filing - License Search - Application Search - Archive License Search About ULS Privacy Statement - About ULS - ULS Home Basic Search By Call Sign = L SEARCH ) FCC 1 Wireless 1 ULS 1 CORES Help 1 Tech Support Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street SW Washington, DC 20554 Phone: 1- 877 -480 -3201 TTY: 1- 717 - 338 -2824 Submit Help Request http:// wireless2. fcc .gov/UlsApp/U1sSearch/license jsp ?IicKey= 2867821 1/16/2009 1111:1 - ME NM IM DI 00 IR II X1..1 •111 EXISTING VIEW ° SEA - 019 -A- EMBASSY SUITES VIEW 2 D KDC ARCHITECTS.ENGINEERS, P.C. 4720 200TH STREET SW SUITE 200 LYNNWOOD, WA 98036 PHONE: 425.670.8651 FAX: 425.712.0846 RECEIVED MAY 20 2009 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED VIEW c � corc''bTrons, INC SEA - 019 -A- EMBASSY SUITES VIEW 3 1111E1 ®_ ® 0 U I FKDC nut • m ARCHITECTS.ENGINEERS, P.C. 4720 200TH STREET SW SUITE 200 ®� 11 11 FAX NE.00D425.712.0846 EXISTING VIEW crld(et RECEIVED MAY 20 2009' COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED VIEW corsa 1Trcz5T'rons, INC • • TO: City of Tukwila Planning Department FM: Paul Wozniak 3615 38th Avenue West Seattle, WA 98199 206 - 252 -0699 RE: Type II Application Cricket Communication's SEA - 019 -A (Embassy Suites) 15920 West Valley Highway List of Materials Submitted • One Copy: Application Check List • 5 Copies: Application Form • Four Sets of plans • Application Fee • Sign Fee • Mailing Label Fee • Five B &W Photo -sims • One Color Photo -sim • One RF signed report • SEPA N/A • There are no sensitive area studies of proposed mitigation. • No materials board is being submitted since this is a proposed flush mounted paint to match application. • No landscape plan is being submitted since this is a roof installation. • Letter from RF engineer attached. Cricket Proposal: Cricket Communication is a new wireless telecommunications company that is building their network at this time. As part of building that network, Cricket has decided to take over the abundant (previously approved by the City of Tukwila) MetroCom site. Cricket will be using the existing wall mounts at three locations, removing the MetroCom antennas and install two antennas at each location for a total of six antennas. Like the existing antennas, they will be flush mounted, be no higher then the wall they are attached to, and be painted to match the color of the building wall. Since the MetroCom site met code and we are duplicating their installation that was approved by the City, we contend that the Cricket installation also meets the wireless communication code of the City. • Wireless Communication Requirements 1. NOISE - There is no generator proposed. 2. BUSINESS LICENSE REQUIRED — Cricket Communication already has an operational office and associated business License on file with the City of Tukwila. 3. SIGNS — Only safety signs will be posted. No other signs are proposed. 4. PARKING — A technician visits a site once a month. Upon surveying the hotel parking lots, there has been at least 100 vacant stall upon each site visit. 5. FINISH — This is not a tower location, but a roof top installation. 6. DESIGN — The design of this site is to match and reuse existing MetroCom flush mounted site that has been approved by the City of Tukwila. In addition, proposed antennas will be below the existing height of walls to which they will be attached. 7. COLOR — Antennas will be painted to match existing wall color that was previously approved by the City of Tukwila's MetroCom installation. 8. LIGHTING — No lighting is proposed. 9. ADVERTISING — No advertising is proposed. 10. EQUIPMENT ENCLOSURE — Equipment is located on the roof and is screened by the existing roof parapet. Section 18.58.110: Please see plans and photo -sims. This proposal meets all requirements of this section. • City of Tukwila • Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 Tukwila, Washington 98188 Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 Fax: 206 -431 -3665 Web site: http: / /www.ci.tukwila.wa.us RECEIPT Pa.naj( sir RE ANT IVED Parcel No.: 0005800024 Permit Number: L09 -025 Address: 15920 WEST VALLEY HY TUKW Status: PENDING Suite No: Applied Date: 05/21/2009 Applicant: PAUL WOZNIAK Issue Date: Receipt No.: R09 -00755 Initials: CPL User ID: 1661 Payment Amount: $110.00 Payment Date: 05/21/2009 09:23 AM Balance: $90.00 Payee: PARTIAL PAYMENT OF PUBLIC MAILING FEE TRANSACTION LIST: Type Method Descriptio Amount Payment Check 01148 110.00 Authorization No. ACCOUNT ITEM LIST: Description Account Code Current Pmts MAPS /PUBLIC /MAILING 000/341.500 110.00 Total: $110.00 doc: Receiot -06 Printed: 05 -21 -2009 sitescfe rF compliance experts 200 North Glebe Road, Suite 1000, Arlington, VA 22203 -3728 703.276.1100 • 703.276.1 169 fax infoasitesafe.com • www.sitesafe.com RECEWED MAY 2 0 2009 COMMUNiTi DEVELOPMENT Cricket Communications Site ID - SEA -019 -A Site Name - Embassy Suite Site Compliance Report 15920 West Valley Highway Seattle, WA 98188 King County Site visit date: March 3, 2009 Site survey by: Matt Dickson Report generated date: March 6, 2009 Report by: Kobi Thompson Site is conditionally compliant with FCC Rules based on General Public Maximum Permissible Exposure Level. © 2009 Sitesofe, Inc. Arlington, VA David Charles Cotton, Jr. Registered Professional Engineer (Electrical) State of Washington, 45004 GI 0 U rn ■ 0 13 CI G1 0 GI la to 13 d 19 0 0 0 0 0 L3 6 0 Ei B Gi C1 13 0 CI CI 0 0 CI CI ® ®0 V. m CI 0 CI 0 0 U I, CI 0 E3 13 8 0 0 13 0 f2 o 0 sae rf compliance experts Cricket Communications SEA -019 -A - Embassy Suite Radio Frequency (RF) Site Compliance Report 15920 West Valley Highway, Seattle, WA 98188 200 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1000 • Arlington, VA 22203 -3728 703.276.1100 • Info@sitesafe.com • rf Complionce experts Table of Contents 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 1 .1 PURPOSE OF REPORT 1 1.2 STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE 1 1.3 ACTIONS FOR SITE COMPLIANCE & SAFETY RECOMMENDATIONS 2 2 SITE DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS 3 2.1 SITE ACCESS PROCEDURES 3 2.2 TRANSMITTING ANTENNA INVENTORY 3 3 ANTENNA INVENTORY AND PICTURES 5 3.1 SITE MEASUREMENTS COLLECTED 13 3.2 RF EMISSIONS DIAGRAMS 15 4 FIELD TECHNICIAN CERTIFICATION 17 5 ENGINEER CERTIFICATION 18 APPENDIX A - STATEMENT OF LIMITING CONDITIONS 19 APPENDIX B - ASSUMPTIONS AND DEFINITIONS 20 ASSUMPTIONS 20 GENERAL MODEL ASSUMPTIONS 20 USE OF GENERIC ANTENNAS 20 DEFINITIONS 21 APPENDIX C - RULES & REGULATIONS 22 EXPLANATION OF APPLICABLE RULES AND REGULATIONS 22 OCCUPATIONAL ENVIRONMENT EXPLAINED 22 APPENDIX D - GENERAL SAFETY RECOMMENDATIONS 23 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 23 200 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1000 • Arlington, VA 22203 -3728 703.276.1100 • Info@sitesale.com Alsitesue rf compliance 1 Executive Summary • 1.1 Purpose of Report Cricket Communications has contracted with Sitesafe, Inc. (Sitesafe), an independent Radio Frequency (RF) regulatory and engineering consulting firm, to determine whether the communications site, SEA -019 -A - Embassy Suite, located at 15920 West Valley Highway, Seattle, WA, is in compliance with Federal Communication Commission (FCC) Rules and Regulations for RF emissions. Sitesafe's field personnel visited SEA -019 -A - Embassy Suite on March 3, 2009. This report contains a detailed summary of the RF environment at the site including: • photographs of the site; • diagram of the site; • inventory of the make / model of all transmitting antennas found on the site (where possible); • tabulation of any Maximum Permissible Exposure ( "MPE ") measurements taken on the site, as applicable; and • theoretical MPE based on modeling. This report addresses exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields in accordance with the FCC Rules and Regulations for all individuals, classified in two groups, "Occupational" and "General Public." All computer modeling and analytical methods have been performed in accordance with the FCC's Office of Engineering and Technology Bulletin 65 ( "OET Bulletin 65 "), Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, Edition 97 -01, published August 1997. This document specifically addresses compliance of Cricket Communications's transmitting facilities independently and in relation to all collocated transmitting facilities, which together constitute the RF environment at the site. If you have any questions regarding RF safety and regulatory compliance, please do not hesitate to contact Sitesafe's Customer Support Department at (703) 276- 1 100. 1.2 Statement of Compliance Upon evaluation of the cumulative RF emission levels from all operators at this site, and a thorough review of site access procedures, hazard signage and visible antenna locations, Sitesafe has determined that: This site is conditionally compliant with the FCC rules and regulations, as described in OET Bulletin 65. Cricket Communications is predicted to contribute greater than 5% of the maximum permissible exposure (MPE) based on theoretical modeling using parameters supplied by the client. 200 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1000 • Arlington, VA 22203 -3728 703.276.1100 • Info@sitesafe.com Page 1 • sirs rrf core lance experts The compliance determination is based on General Public MPE levels due to predicted and measured levels, RF signage placement, proposed antenna inventory, and the level of restricted access to the antennas at the site. Any deviation from the Cricket Communications proposed deployment plan could result in the site being rendered non - compliant. 1.3 Actions for Site Compliance R. Safety Recommendations Based on common industry practice and our understanding of FCC and OSHA requirements, this section provides a statement of recommendations for site compliance. RF alert signage recommendations have been proposed based on existing measurements and theoretical analysis of MPE levels. Barrier locations have been identified where required for compliance and /or Cricket Communications policy. Barriers can consist of locked doors, fencing, railing, rope, chain, paint striping or tape, combined with RF alert signage. This site is conditionally compliant with the FCC rules and regulations. In its field visit, Sitesafe documented the presence and location of signs and barriers. Areas that require action in order to meet corporate policy are listed below. No action means the location is compliant with the company policy. Site Access Locations No action required. Alpha Sector Location Install antennas in accordance with proposed Cricket Communications deployment plan. Beta Sector Location Install antennas in accordance with proposed Cricket Communications deployment plan. Gamma Sector Location Install antennas in accordance with proposed Cricket Communications deployment plan. Keep a copy of this report available for all persons who must access the site. They should read this report and be aware of the potential hazards with regards to RF and MPE limits. 200 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1000 • Arlington, VA 22203 -3728 703.276.1100 • info@sitesafe.com Page 2 • • sitesa e rf Compliance experts 2 Site Description and Analysis A site visit was conducted on March 3, 2009 at approximately 10:00 AM. At that time, a diagram of the site was verified, obtained or produced, of the locations of all accessible antennas on site. These antennas were recorded and photographed, and the transmitting operator's power and antenna types were verified or collected. 2.1 Site Access Procedures The following general information was gathered regarding site access at the facility. Site access was locked at the time of the site visit. Building Engineer was required to unlock the door for Sitesafe field personnel. There was no RF Advisory signage posted at any site access point. Figure 1: Site Access 2.2 Transmitting Antenna Inventory The Antenna Inventory shows all transmitting antennas on the site (see Section 3). This inventory was verified on site, and was utilized by Sitesafe to perform software modeling of RF emissions. The inventory coincides with the site diagrams in this report, identifying each antenna's location at SEA -019 -A - Embassy Suite. The collected antenna information includes the following information: 200 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1000 • Arlington, VA 22203 -3728 703.276.1100 • Info@sltesafe.com Page 3 • o . 3 rf torpliortce experts • Licensee or Operator name • Frequency or frequency band • Transmitter power- Effective Radiated Power ( "ERP "), or Equivalent Isotropic Radiated Power ( "EIRP ") in Watts • Antenna manufacturer make, model, and gain For other carriers at this site, the use of "Generic" as an antenna model, or "Unknown" for an operator means the information with regard to carrier, their FCC license and /or antenna information was not available nor could it be secured while on site. Equipment, antenna models and nominal transmit power were used for modeling, based on past experience with radio service providers. 200 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1000 • Arlington, VA 22203 -3728 703.276.1100 • info@sitesate.com Page 4 "41,SI�C` rf Compliance expert s 3 Antenna Inventory and Pictures The following antenna inventory and representative photographs, on this and the following page, were obtained or verified during the site visit and were utilized to create the site model diagrams: Table 1: Antenna Inventory Antenna Number Operated By TX Freq. (MHz) ERP! (Watts) Antenna Gain (dBd) 1 Cricket Communications (Proposed) 2110 1708 17.10 Andrew HBX- 6517DS -VTM 115' 166' 16' 2 Cricket Communications (Proposed) 2110 1708 17.10 Andrew HBX- 6517DS -VTM 59' 43' 22' 3 Cricket Communications (Proposed) 2110 1708 17.10 Andrew HBX- 6517DS -VTM 41' 53' 22' 4 Metricom 900/2400 4/4 4.80/12.90 Hirschman E -5930 71' 172' 11' 5 Metricom 900/2400 4/4 4.80/12.90 Hirschman E -5930 80' 171' 11' 6 Metricom 900/2400 4/4 4.80/12.90 Hirschman E -5930 84' 172' 11' 7 Metricom 900/2400 4/4 4.80/12.90 Hirschman E -5930 120' 119' 11' 8 Metricom 900/2400 4/4 4.80/12.90 Hirschman E -5930 120' 113' 11' 9 Metricom 900/2400 4/4 4.80/12.90 Hirschman E -5930 120' 109' 11' 10 Metricom 900/2400 4/4 4.80/12.90 Hirschman E -5930 64' 49' 20' Metricom 900/2400 4/4 4.80/12.90 Hirschman E -5930 51' 44' 20' 12 Metricom 900/2400 4/4 4.80/12.90 Hirschman E -5930 48' 47' 20' 13 Metricom 900/2400 4/4 4.80/12.90 Hirschman E -5930 28' 55' 11' 14 Metricom 900/2400 4/4 4.80/12.90 Hirschman E -5930 28' 58' 11' 15 Metricom 900/2400 4/4 4.80/12.90 Hirschman E -5930 28' 64' 11' 200 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1000 • Arlington, VA 22203 -3728 703.276.1100 • info@sitesafe.com Page 5 sesu�e NOTE: X, Y and Z indicate relative position of the antenna to the origin location on the site, displayed in the model results diagram. Specifically, the Z reference indicates antenna height above the main site level unless otherwise indicated. ERP values provided by the client and used in the modeling may be greater than are currently deployed. For other carriers at this site the use of "Generic" as an antenna model or "Unknown" for an operator means the information with regard to carrier, their FCC license and /or antenna information was not available nor could it be secured while on site. Equipment, antenna models and nominal transmit power were used for modeling, based on past experience with radio service providers. 200 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1000 • Arlington, VA 22203 -3728 703.276.1100 • Info@sltesafe.com Page 6 Figure 2: Cricket Communications Proposed Alpha Sector Location - Antenna #1 Figure 3: Cricket Communications Proposed Beta Sector Location - Antenna #2 200 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1000 • Arlington, VA 22203 -3728 703.276.1100 • info@sitesafe.com Page 7 • site Figure 4: Cricket Communications Proposed Gamma Sector Location - Antenna #3 Figure 5: Cricket Communications Proposed Equipment Location 200 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1000 • Arlington, VA 22203 -3728 703.276.1100 • info@sitesafe.com Page 8 • • Figure 6: Metricom Sector Antennas #4 through #6 Figure 7: Metricom Sector Antennas #7 through #9 200 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1000 • Arlington, VA 22203 -3728 703.276.1100 • info@sitesafe.com Page 9 Figure 8: Metricom Sector Antennas #10 through #12 Figure 9: Metricom Sector Antennas #13 through #15 200 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1000 • Arlington, VA 22203 -3728 703.276.1100 • info@sitesafe.com Page 10 • Slt • Figure 10: Penthouse Access Ladder Figure 11: Penthouse 1 Overview 200 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1000 • Arlington, VA 22203 -3728 703.276.1100 • info@sitesafe.com Page 11 • Figure 12: Penthouse 2 Overview Figure 13: Rooftop Overview 200 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1000 • Arlington, VA 22203 -3728 703.276.1100 • info@sitesafe.com Page 12 • :SIsire rf torirpliance Etxperts 3.1 Site Measurements Collected This section provides a summary of the measurements collected at the site. Actual measurements locations at which these data points were collected are included in the RF emission diagram provided in Section 3.2 of this report. Measurements collected include both maximum and spatial average values. The spatial averaging technique involves measuring the average power density over the dimensions of a typical human body. . The measurements below were obtained from accessible areas located at the site at the time of Sitesafe's visit. Whenever possible, measurements are taken in front of the antenna in the transmitting direction. However, because of the antenna configuration at this site, specific emissions could not be discerned from nearby facilities, and no attempt was made to determine power density levels from a specific transmitting antenna. Highest Measured Occupational Level: <1% This value is equal to: Highest General Public Level: <5 %. Table 2: Spatial Average and Maximum Occupational Measurements Measurements Points Spatial Average Maximum Measurements Points Spatial Average Maximum M1 <1 % <1 % M8 <1 % <1 M2 <1% <1% M9 <1% <1% M3 <1 % <1 % M10 <1 % <1 % M4 <1% <1% M11 <1% <1% M5 <1 % <1 % M12 <1 % <1 % M6 <1 % <1 % M13 <1 % <1 % M7 <1% <1% M14 <1% <1% Meters and probes available for RF surveys have limited accuracy. The NARDA probes used by Sitesafe are no exception and have an isotropic response in power of ±0.75 dB from the standard and a minimum rated measurement range of 0.3% to 0.6% depending on whether the probe used read up to 300% or 600% of the Occupational MPE limit respectively. For this reason, all measurements below 1% are identified as <1% in our reports. Measurements provide a view of MPE percentage levels at the site at the time of Sitesafe's visit and are used to validate modeling results. Theoretical modeling is used for determining compliance and the percentage of MPE contribution, unless measured results exceed predictive modeling. An RF Emission diagram has been included in section 3.2 of this document. Spatial average measurements locations are displayed in this diagram: The locations of measurements in the,,RF Emission diagram can be cross referenced with Table 2 (above) to determine the actual measurement per location. 200 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1000 • Arlington, VA 22203 -3728 703.276.1100 • lnfo@sfesafe.com Page 13 X11_ SI rf compliance experts Figure 14: Highest Occupational Reading 200 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1000 • Arlington, VA 22203 -3728 703.276.1100 • Info@sltesafe.com Page 14 • • i\1 sitei: rr ceraipliance ex .p its 3.2 RF Emissions Diagrams The RF emission diagram(s) below display theoretical spatially averaged percentage of the Maximum Permissible Exposure for all systems at the site unless otherwise noted. These diagrams use modeling as proscribed in OET -65 and assumptions detailed in Appendix B. The key at the bottom of each diagram indicates if percentages displayed are referenced to FCC Occupational or General Population Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) limits. Color coding on the diagram is as follows: • Areas indicated as Gray are at 5% of the MPE limits or below. • Green represents areas predicted to be between 5% and 20% of the MPE limits. • Yellow represents areas predicted to be between 20% and 100% of the MPE limits. • Red areas indicated predicted levels greater than 100% of the MPE limits. General Population diagrams are specified when an area is not accessed controlled; i.e. personnel that do not meet Occupational or RF Safety trained criteria, could gain access. If trained occupational personnel require access to areas that are delineated as Red or above 100% of the limit, Sitesafe recommends that they utilize the proper personal protection equipment (RF monitors), coordinate with the carriers to reduce or shutdown power, or make real -time power density measurements with the appropriate power density meter to determine real - time MPE levels. This will allow the personnel to ensure that their work area is within exposure limits. The key at the bottom also indicates the level or height of the modeling with respect to the main level. The origin is typically referenced to the main rooftop level, or ground level for a structure without access to the antenna level. For example: Average from 0 feet above to 6 feet above origin and Average from 20 feet above to 26 feet above origin The first indicates modeling at the main rooftop (or ground) level averaged over 6 feet. The second indicates modeling at a higher level (possibly a penthouse level) of 20 feet averaged over 6 feet. Abbreviations used in the RF Emissions Diagrams PH = # #' Penthouse at ## feet above main roof M ## Measurement ## taken during a site visit 200 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1000 • Arlington, VA 22203 -3728 703.276.1100 • info@sitesafe.com Page 15 • • sir f conpli CA nce experts As discussed in Section 3.1, site measurement locations for spatial average measurements collected at the time of Sitesafe's visit have been added to the RF emissions diagram. While the software modeling represents theoretical MPE levels based on the assumption(s) detailed above, the site measurement data is a snapshot of MPE levels, and dependent on transmitter duty cycle, system implementation and emissions from other RF sources at nearby antenna sites. Additional Information in the RF Emissions Diagrams Key The RF Emission Diagram provides indications of RF signage and locked doors. The table below lists the abbreviations used to indicate locked doors, signs and barriers: •` "'` ,; Table 3,RF. Signage and BarrierKeji;. "�r 3 „',� w , �It f ;.RF Signage, , .,.:.,.„t ls� , ., ?fir '�'6FF' i9�';A'i.I6X• 1K u) � .t � TBarrie ' :..�..� Type Existing Location Recommended Location Type Existing Location Recommended Location Notice NE NR Locked Door LE LR Caution CE CR Fencing Rope Chain RE RR Warning WE WR Paint Stripes As discussed in Section 3.1, site measurements collected at the time of Sitesafe's visit have been added to the Software Modeling Diagram. While the software modeling represents theoretical MPE levels based on the assumption detailed above, the site measurement data is a snapshot of MPE levels, and dependent on transmitter duty cycle, system implementation and emissions from other RF sources at nearby antenna sites. 200 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1000 • Arlington, VA 22203 -3728 703.276.1100 • Info@sltesate.com Page 16 • • RF Emissions Diagram for: Embassy Suite Main Level is www.sitesafe.com Sitesafe ID# 33561 Site Name: Embassy Suite % of FCC Public Exposure Limit Average from 0 feet above to 6 feet above origin ® 100 < =X 20 < =X <100 5< =X<20 X < =5 ru1.rLrt.ru Feet 20 0 20 40 Grid Size is 10.0 • • RF Emissions Diagram for: Embassy Suite PHI Level Este-de www.sitesafe.com Sitesafe ID# 33561 Site Name: Embassy Suite 1131=1*. mum. ImprolMevlbroi*Ilro relJemtnale■ by MY* pommel 1111•WaTC Wm*. AMON % of FCC Public Exposure Limit Average from 13 feet above to 19 feet above origin ffi 100 <= X (- 20 < =X <100 5 < =X<20 X< =5 Feet 20 0 20 40 Grid Size is 10.0 • • RF Emissions Diagram for: Embassy Suite PH2 Level Mstescic www.sitesafe.com Sitesafe ID# 33561 Site Name: Embassy Suite b�mYa�bw� lion ~�Ma�4e��� dish= ....Urevabble x ;s % of FCC Public Exposure Limit Average from 22 feet above to 28 feet above origin 100 <= X (- 20< =X <100 5 < =X <20 3 X< =5 Feet nnrtnru 20 0 20 40 Grid Size is 10.0 RF Emissions Diagram for: Embassy Suite Cricket Communications Contribution - Main Level 111111111111111 •• • , Estes:R-1 www.sitesafe.com Sitesafe ID# 33561 Site Name: Embassy Suite 060.1se oware fesulb Ma. paw,. Conlad am... nobel..s*so (AM M.. Mad int WU*, MOO % of FCC Public Exposure Limit Average from 0 feet above to 6 feet above origin 100 <= x {-- 20<=X<100 [1] 5<=X<20 X<= 5 Feet 20 0 20 40 Grid Size is 10.0 • • RF Emissions Diagram for: Embassy Suite Cricket Communications Contribution - PHI Level 1S `.;are www.sitesafe.com Sitesafe ID# 33561 Site Name: Embassy Suite % of FCC Public Exposure Limit Average from 13 feet above to 19 feet above origin 100< =X 20 < =X <100 5< =X<20 X< =5 Feet nnrwu 20 0 20 40 Grid Size is 10.0 • • >►_?111,J �1.`r r� rf camptitsnee experts 4 Field Technician Certification I, Matt Dickson, state: That I am an employee of Sitesafe, Inc., in Arlington, Virginia, which provides RF compliance services to clients in the wireless communications industry; and That I have successfully completed RF Safety Awareness training, am aware of the hazards and, therefore, can be exposed to RF fields classified for "Occupational" exposure; That I am familiar with the Rules and Regulations of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) as well as the regulations of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), both in general and specifically as they apply to the FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radio - frequency Radiation; and That I have been trained in the proper use of measurement equipment, and have successfully completed Sitesafe training in policy, procedure and proper site measurement and modeling; and That.I performed survey measurements of the RF environment at the site identified as SEA -019 -A - Embassy Suite on March 3, 2009 at 10:00 AM in order to determine where there might be electromagnetic energy that is in excess of both the Controlled Environment and Uncontrolled Environment levels; and That the survey measurements were performed with a Narda Microwave, model '8718B -10 field intensity meter (serial number 01908) and a Narda Microwave, model A8724D field intensity probe, (serial number 11013) calibrated on 10/22/2007; and That I have prepared this Site Compliance Report and believe it to be true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and based on data gathered. By: Matt Dickson 200 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1000 • Arlington, VA 22203 -3728 703.276.1100 • info@sitesafe.com Page 17 • 1 1 h- siren �...... ._. _ , .._ rf compliance Experts 5 Engineer Certification The professional engineer whose seal appears on the cover of this document hereby certifies and affirms that: I am registered as a Professional Engineer in the jurisdiction indicated in the professional engineering stamp on the cover of this document; and That I am an employee of Sitesafe, Inc., in Arlington, Virginia, at which place the staff and I provide RF compliance services to clients in the wireless communications industry; and That I am thoroughly familiar with the and Regulations of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) as well as the regulations of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), both in general and specifically as they apply to the FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radio - frequency Radiation; and That survey measurements of the site environment of the site identified as SEA - 019-A - Embassy Suite have been performed in order to determine where there might be electromagnetic energy that is in excess of both the Controlled Environment and Uncontrolled Environment levels; and That I have thoroughly reviewed this Site Compliance Report and believe it to be true and accurate to the best of my knowledge as assembled by and attested to by Kobi Thompson. March 6, 2009 200 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1000 • Arlington, VA 22203 -3728 703.276.1100 • Info@sitesate.com Page 18 • :►11.1 ��1�� .. '� rf cornplicirce experts Appendix A - Statement of Limiting Conditions Sitesafe field personnel visited the site and collected data with regard to the RF environment. Sitesafe will not be responsible for matters of a legal nature that affect the site or property. The property was visited under the premise that it is under responsible ownership and management and our client has the legal right to conduct business at this facility. Due to the complexity of some wireless sites, Sitesafe performed this visit and created this report utilizing best industry practices and due diligence. Sitesafe cannot be held accountable or responsible for anomalies or discrepancies due to actual site conditions (i.e., mislabeling of antennas or equipment, inaccessible cable runs, inaccessible antennas or equipment, etc.) or information or data supplied by Cricket Communications, the site manager, or their affiliates, subcontractors or assigns. Sitesafe has provided computer generated model(s) in this Site Compliance Report to show approximate dimensions of the site, and the model is included to assist the reader of the compliance report to visualize the site area, and to provide supporting documentation for Sitesafe's recommendations. Sitesafe may note in the Site Compliance Report any adverse physical conditions, such as needed repairs, observed during the survey of the subject property or that Sitesafe became aware of during the normal research involved in performing this survey. Sitesafe will not be responsible for any such conditions that do exist or for any engineering or testing that might be required to discover whether such conditions exist. Because Sitesafe is not an expert in the field of mechanical engineering or building maintenance, the Site Compliance Report must not be considered a structural or physical engineering report. Sitesafe obtained information used in this Site Compliance Report from sources that Sitesafe considers reliable and believes them to be true and correct. Sitesafe does not assume any responsibility for the accuracy of such items that were furnished by other parties. When conflicts in information occur between data provided by a second party and physical data collected by Sitesafe, the physical data will be used. 200 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1000 • Arlington, VA 22203 -3728 703.276.1100 • Info@sitesafe.com Page 19 • • lsire r r c o €41pliohce Appendix B — Assumptions and Definitions Assumptions experts General Model Assumptions In this site compliance report, it is assumed that all antennas are operating at full power at all times. Software modeling was performed for all transmitting antennas located on the site. Sitesafe has further assumed a 100% duty cycle and maximum radiated power. The site has been modeled with these assumptions to show the maximum RF energy density. Sitesafe believes this to be a worst -case analysis, based on best available data. Areas modeled to predict emissions greater than 100% of the applicable MPE level may not actually occur, but are shown as a worst -case prediction that could be realized real time. Sitesafe believes these areas to be safe for entry by occupationally trained personnel utilizing appropriate personal protective equipment (in most cases, a personal monitor). Thus, at any time, if power density measurements were made, we believe the real - time measurements would indicate levels below those depicted in the RF emission diagram(s) in this report. By modeling in this way, Sitesafe has conservatively shown exclusion areas - areas that should not be entered without the use of a personal monitor, carriers reducing power, or performing real -time measurements to indicate real -time exposure levels. Use of Generic Antennas For the purposes of this report, the use of "Generic" as an antenna model, or "Unknown" for an operator means the information about a carrier, their FCC license and /or antenna information was not provided and could not be obtained while on site. In the event of unknown information, Sitesafe will use our industry specific knowledge of equipment, antenna models, and transmit power to model the site. If more specific information can be obtained for the unknown measurement criteria, Sitesafe recommends remodeling of the site utilizing the more complete and accurate data. Information about similar facilities is used when the service is identified and associated with a particular antenna. If no information is available regarding the transmitting service associated with an unidentified antenna, using the antenna manufacturer's published data regarding the antenna's physical characteristics makes more conservative assumptions. Where the frequency is unknown, Sitesafe uses the closest frequency in the antenna's range that corresponds to the highest Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE), resulting in a conservative analysis. 200 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1000 • Arlington, VA 22203 -3728 703.276.1100 • Info@sitesafe.com Page 20 • • r( compliance expert...s Definitions Occupational /Controlled Environment - defined by the FCC, as an area where Radio Frequency Radiation (RFR) exposure may occur to persons who are aware of the potential for exposure as a condition of employment or specific activity and can exercise control over their exposure. General Population /Uncontrolled Environment - defined by the FCC, as an area where RFR exposure may occur to persons who are unaware of the potential for exposure and who have no cont rol of their exposure. Effective Radiated Power (ERP) - In a given direction, the relative gain of a transmitting antenna with respect to the maximum directivity of a half wave dipole multiplied by the net power accepted by the antenna from the connecting transmitter. Equivalent Isotropic Radiated Power (EIRP) - The product of the power supplied to the antenna and the antenna gain in a given direction relative to an isotropic antenna. Transmitter Power Output (TPO) - The radio frequency output power of a transmitter's final radio frequency stage as measured at the output terminal while connected to a load. Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) - The rms and peak electric and magnetic field strength, their squares, or the plane -wave equivalent power densities associated with these fields to which a person may exposed without harmful effect and with acceptable safety factor. Duty Cycle - The percent of pulse duration to the pulse period of a periodic pulse train. Also, may be a measure of the temporal transmission characteristic of an intermittently transmitting RF source such as a paging antenna by dividing average transmission duration by the average period for transmission. A duty cycle of 100% corresponds to continuous operation. 200 N. Glebe Road • suite 1000 • Arlington, VA 22203 -3728 703.276.1100 • info@sitesafe.com Page 21 • • it rr ccirnpliunccy oxper Appendix C - Rules & Regulations Explanation of Applicable Rules and Regulations The FCC has set forth guidelines in OET Bulletin 65 for human exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields. Specific regulations regarding this topic are listed in Part 1, Subpart I, of Title 47 in the Code of Federal Regulations. Currently, there are two different levels of MPE - General Public MPE and Occupational MPE. An individual classified as Occupational can be defined as an individual who has received appropriate RF training and meets the conditions outlined below. General Public is defined as anyone who does not meet the conditions of being Occupational. FCC and OSHA Rules and Regulations define compliance in terms of total exposure to total RF energy, regardless of location of or proximity to the sources of energy. It is the responsibility of all licensees to ensure these guidelines are maintained at all times. It is the ongoing responsibility of all licensees composing the site to maintain ongoing compliance with FCC rules and regulations. Individual licensees that contribute less than 5% MPE to any total area out of compliance are not responsible for corrective actions. OSHA has adopted and enforces the FCC's exposure guidelines. A building owner or site manager can use this report as part of an overall RF Health and Safety Policy. It is important for building owners /site managers to identify areas in excess of the General Population MPE and ensure that only persons qualified as Occupational are granted access to those areas. Occupational Environment Explained The FCC definition of Occupational exposure limits apply to persons who: • are exposed to RF energy as a consequence of their employment; • have been made aware of the possibility of exposure; and • can exercise control over their exposure. OSHA guidelines go further to state that persons must complete RF Safety Awareness training and must be trained in the use of appropriate personal protective equipment. In order to consider this site an Occupational Environment, the site must be controlled to prevent access by any individuals classified as the General Public. Compliance is also maintained when any non - occupational individuals (the General Public) are prevented from accessing areas indicated as Red or Yellow in the attached RF Emissions diagram. In addition, a person must be aware of the RF environment into which they are entering. This can be accomplished by an RF Safety Awareness class, and by appropriate written documentation such as this Site Compliance Report. All Cricket Communications employees who require access to this site must complete RF Safety Awareness training and must be trained in the use of appropriate personal protective equipment. 200 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1000 • Arlington, VA 22203 -3728 703.276.1100 • infoltsitesafe.com Page 22 • AI sire a . rf compliance. experts Appendix D - General Safety Recommendations • The following are general recommendations appropriate for any site with accessible areas in excess of 100% General Public MPE. These recommendations are not specific to this site. These are safety recommendations appropriate for typical site management, building management, and other tenant operations. 1. All individuals needing access to the main site (or the area indicated to be in excess of General Public MPE) should wear a personal RF Exposure monitor, successfully complete proper RF Safety Awareness training, and have and be trained in the use of appropriate personal protective equipment. 2. All individuals needing access to the main site should be instructed to read and obey all posted placards and signs. 3. The site should be routinely inspected and this or similar report updated with the addition of any antennas or upon any changes to the RF environment including: • adding new antennas that may have been located on the site • removing of any existing. antennas • changes in the radiating power or number of RF emitters 4. Post the appropriate NOTICE,CAUTIO N, or WARNING sign at the main site access point(s) and other locations as required. Note: Please refer to RF Exposure Diagrams in Appendix B, to inform everyone who has access to this site that beyond posted signs there may be levels in excess of the limits prescribed by the FCC. The signs below are examples of signs meeting FCC guidelines. •o mat Fr, irrartiwie: ,Calio. mitt. iitati 00044.414,4040.• 10.. .. ... i. •ar 4r • 5. Ensure that the site door remains locked (or appropriately controlled) to deny access to the general public if deemed as policy by the building /site owner. Additional Information Additional RF information is available by visiting both www.Sitesafe.com and www.fcc.gov /oet /rfsafety. OSHA has additional information available at: http: / /www.osha- slc.gov /SLTC /radiofrequencyradiation. 200 N. Glebe Road • Suite 1000 • Arlington, VA 22203 -3728 703.276.1100 • info@sitesafe.com Page 23 5.c.: A A 411100-y 03.+6.5 • RECEIVED MAY 20 2009 CITY OF Tt./.10)/ XL A COMMUNI I Y Department of Comnuozity. DEVELOPMENT • PeYelOWlieftt 6300 .SOutheenter BoUlevarc4 *4 98188 Telephone: (200 431-3670T4X PO6) 4314e,e.s &Ina& tu'kplan@ti.tukvVila.wams AFADAVITOF OWNEASHIE) AND HOLD'HARMLESS :PERIVIISSION TO .ENTERPROPERTY STATE OE WASHINGTON ss. COUNTY :OE "gTh.la TherunderSignedibeinviilly sWom andtippn oatIrStates:astolloWs: 1. Laintlie owner whieh.iS the stihjeetelfthis.applitatii* Alt statements' Containediti.theapplications haveheen prepared:qv-Me ormy agents..aridi aretruean&correctiethe bestiotniy. knovileage.; .3. Theapplicationis beinpubmitted.witlymylatowledge and. consent 4. Owier graritslhe.,City, its =plum. agents; engineers .c gptractors (g..otlker reprelentatives.therightteenter uPorQ*neetireal: property located at' t612.b \1■1 . Seckiate lNA4Bliabb . for the putp'oSe Of 'application review, forthe littiitedtirnenecessary tecompletelliat purpose: 5. Owner agrees tehold.theCity-..harmlesslor any less.or damage to persons or.propertToccurring,"on tht,private:.propeily during the City '..s ..entry, upon, theproperty, unless the loss or-damage:Is the reitilt thsol enegligence offhe. City., Noe.responsiVenessm a City informatien reqUest-forainety (90) or more days,.shall be cause to cancel the application(s) without Te.ftia0:9fIf01, EXEC 1TTEDfatil-Ae-2,4->i, :(oi„ty) WA (state); oh, MAectn. n • tAktme AkAPcmAD-4,4 0,(514A1 titApjAcivA evabaccA&Attio/a;i■ • (Print KartIvIAb ac.6%-1S.1.;tits 462,1 v5z126 W. Site NAT4 (Address) .61.Eses 426 221 '6(?Azt- (PligiteNuinber) - 1/40?-1-rwaiN gnatare). -On this day personally appeared, beforenie 74'.4 z(/es--Al to me known: to he.--the inliMu1wh e executed the:fore,gpin&instrumerit .and acknowledged that isteshe sined the same 4V/her voluntary. act and deed for the uses and ;pliryose4 mentionedtherein. BEFOREWON / 00auaii,.; 4DAY OF •229:0 SUEEWEEDANDSW.ORNTO ss -.? • ecANEL 4,9...4;r • 3 .‘„olAnk • = P u st-w c3 1, 40080.,eussos YEUBLIC in and-fbr e.StatebriVashington residing Zile - •my tomriiissiori expies: 5 .)-t) a."' CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E -mail: tukplan @ci.tukwila.wa.us RECEIVED MAY 2 0 2009' COMMUNITY DEVELOPi'4EHT WIRELESS TELE- COMMUNICATION FACILITIES NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: S e /q - 1 S -/q E r 1 S5y Su tte 5 LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. 5q as West- VG-1 ley 1-kwy LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS (this information may be found on your tax statement). 00 os g o - oo aA DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR : The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the owner /applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City, to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: P YA `C�K Address: 3615 3S- /9 ve, %J cr, F5-77? Phone: ean6 - a 5 a - 7c FAX: E -mail: D l G. ec..0 k Gc. e-fi Signature: Cc 4-,, 2 Date: cj /) ,2, 9 APPLICATION FOR STAFF USE ONLY Permits Plus Type P-WCF Planner: File Number: ���✓ • I .- Application Complete (Date: ) Project File Number: Application Incomplete (Date: ) Other File Numbers: NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: S e /q - 1 S -/q E r 1 S5y Su tte 5 LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. 5q as West- VG-1 ley 1-kwy LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS (this information may be found on your tax statement). 00 os g o - oo aA DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR : The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the owner /applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City, to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: P YA `C�K Address: 3615 3S- /9 ve, %J cr, F5-77? Phone: ean6 - a 5 a - 7c FAX: E -mail: D l G. ec..0 k Gc. e-fi Signature: Cc 4-,, 2 Date: cj /) ,2, 9 SHEET INDEX MORGUE& T -1 TITLE SHEET A -1 OVERALL SITE PLAN AND NOTES A -1.1 ROOFTOP SITE PLAN AND NOTES A -2 ENLARGED EQUIPMENT PLAN, PROPOSED ANTENNA PLAN AND NOTES A -3 PROPOSED WEST ELEVATION A -4 PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION A -5 PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION A -6 PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION PROJECT DIRECTORY APPLICANT;, CRICKET COMMUNICATIONS, INC. 555 WEST ANDOVER PARK TUKWILA, WA. 98188 CONTACT: NORRIS BACHO OFFICE: (509) 227 -5032 APPLICANT AGENT; POWDER RIVER 16520 SE 28TH ST. BELLEVUE, WA 98008 CONTACT: PAUL WOZNIAK 3615 38 AVE SEATTLE, WA. 98199 PHONE: (206) 252 -0699 ARCHITECT /ELECTRICAL ENGINEER: KDC ARCHITECTS 4720 200TH STREET SW., SUITE 200 LYNNWOOD, WA 98036 CONTACT: ERIC CAMP PHONE: (425) 670 -8651 FAX: (425) 712 -0846 PROJECT INFORMATION WASHINGTON STATE CODE COMPIJANCE; 2006 IBC, STANDARDS AND AMENDMENTS —WAC 51 -50; 2006 IMC, STANDARDS AND AMENDMENTS —WAC 51 -52; 2006 IFC, STANDARDS AND AMENDMENTS —WAC 51 -54; 2006 UPC, STANDARDS AND AMENDMENTS —WAC 51 -56, 51 -57. SITE NAME; EMBASSY SUITES SITE NUMBER: SEA—Z19 —A SITE ADDRESS: 15920 W. VALLEY HWY. SEATTLE, WA. 98188 LAND OWNER; KOAR — SEATAC PARTNERS LP 370 AMAPOLA AVE #210 TORRANCE, CA. 90501 JURISDICTION' ZONING: PARCEL NUMBER; PARCEL AREA: LAI: LONG; POWER; tP�tHIO��.N.nr�E�: TELCO: PHONE: TUKWILA TUC 000580 -0024 3.28 (ACRES) 47 -27'- 36.63 "N 122' -14' -37.71 -N 26.5' (AMSL) SEATTLE CITY LIGHTS 1- 866 - 298 -1471 QWEST 1- 800 - 777 -9594 PROJECT DESCRIPTION; THIS PROPOSAL IS FOR THE INSTALLATION OF (1) PROPOSED CRICKET OUTDOOR EQUIPMENT CABINET MOUNTED ON PROPOSED I —BEAMS AT EXISTING ROOFTOP WITH (6) PROPOSED ANTENNAS (2 PER SECTOR) MOUNTED AT EXISTING PENTHOUSE WALL crick'etn communications SITE NAME: EMBASSY SUITES SITE NUMBER: SEA -019 -A NEW EQUIPMENT AND NEW ANTENNAS AT EXISTING BUILDING ROOFTOP LEGAL DESCRIPTION MEADER HENRY -D C #46 POR OF HENRY MEADER DONATION CLAIM NO 46 IN SW 1/4 OF SEC 24 -23 -04 LY E OF ELY W OF STATE HWY NO 51A (SR 181) KNOWN AS WEST' VALLEY HWY & W OF WLY LN OF PUGET SOUND POWER & UGHT CO R/W SEA -TAC PSE RR 5 OF 5 LN OF RD ESMT KNOWN AS S 158TH ST & ALSO KNOWN AS LONGACRES WAY & N OF A LN 446.38 FT 5 & PLL WHEN MEAS AT R/A TO SD 5 LN OF S 158TH ST - -- PER CRY OF TUKWILA BOUNARY UNE ADJ NO 88 -4 -BIA RECORDING NO 8809301116 - -- LESS 6.50 FT LY SLY & PLL MEAS AT R/A TO S UNE OF SOUTH 158TH ST CONTRACTOR NOTE THE ARCHTIECTS GINEERS HAVE MADE EVERY EFFORT TO SET FORTH IN THE CONSTRUCTION AND CONTRACT DOCUMENTS THE COMPLETE SCOPE OF WORK. CONTRACTORS BIDDING THE ARE NEVERTHELESS CAUTIONED THAT MINOR OMISSIONS OR ERRORS IN THE DRAWINGS AND OR SPECIFICATIONS SHALL NOT EXCUSE SAID CONTRACTOR (F�RROM COMPLETING THE PROJECT AND IMPROVEMENTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE INTENT OF THESE DOCUMENTS. THE BIDDER SHALL BEAR THE RESPONSIBILITY OF NOTIFYING DISCREPANCIES THE ARCHITECT/ENGINEER NTRACTO SHALLOPRI� THE MORE CONFLICTS. OR ORFXTENSIVE WORK,UUNLESS THE CONTRACTOR'S PROPOSAL. IN THE EVENT OF 1 GENERAL NOTES 1. DRAWINGS ARE NOT TO BE SCALED, WRITTEN DIMENSIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE. AND THIS SET OF PLANS IS INTENDED TO BE USED FOR DIAGRAMMATIC PURPOSED ONLY, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. TIE GENERAL CONTRACTOR'S SCOPE OF WORK SHALL INCLUDE FURNISHING ALL MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT. LABOR, AND ANYTHING ELSE DEEMED NECESSARY TO COMPLETE INSTALLATIONS AS DESCRIBED HEREIN. 2. PRIOR TO THE SUBMISSION OF BIDS, THE CONTRACTORS INVOLVED SHALL VISIT THE JOB SITE AND FAMILIARIZE THEMSELVES WITH ALL CONDITIONS AFFECTING THE NEW PROJECT. WITH THE CONSTRUCTION AND CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. FIELD CONDITIONS MID CONFIRM THAT THE PROJECT MAY BE ACCOMPLISHED AS SHOWN PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION. ANY ERRORS, OMISSIONS, OR DISCREPANCIES ARE TO BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT /ENGINEER IN WRITING. 3. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL RECEJVE WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION TO PROCEED WITH CONSTRUCTION PRIOR TO STARTING WORK ON ANY RDA NOT CLEARLY DEFINED BY THE CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS /CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPERVISE AND DIRECT THE PROJECT DESCRIBED HEREIN. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION MEANS, METHODS. TECHNIQUES, SEQUENCES A40 PROCEURES AND FOR COORDINATING ALL PORTIONS OF ME WORK UNDER THE CONTRACT. 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ALL EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS ACCORDING TO MANUFACTURER'S/ VENDOR'S SPECIFICATIONS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE OR WHERE LOCAL CODES OR ORDINANCES TAKE PRECEDENCE 6. ALL WORK PERFORMED ON PROJECT AND MATERIALS INSTALLED SHALL BE IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPUCABLE CODES. REGULATIONS, 140 ORDINANCES. CONTRACTOR SHALL GIVE ALL NOTICES AND COMPLY WITH ALL LAWS. ORDINANCES. RULES. REGULATIONS AND LAWFUL ORDERS OF ANY PUBLIC AUTHORITY. MUNICIPAL AND UTILITY COMPANY SPECIFICATIONS, AND LOCAL AND STATE JURISDICTIONAL CODES BEARING ON THE PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK. 7. THE STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS OF THIS PROJECT SITE/FACIUTY ARE NOT TO BE ALTERED BY THIS CONSTRUCTION PROJECT UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE 8. ANTENNA SUPPORTING POLE IS UNDER A SEPARATE CONTRACT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSIST ANTENNA INSTILLATION SUB - CONTRACTOR W TERMS OF COORDINATION AND SITE ACCESS. ERECTION SUB - CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROTECTION OF PERSONNEL AND PROPERTY FROM HAZARDOUS EXPOSURE TO OVERHEAD DANGERS. 9. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE AT THE PROJECT 5RE A FULL SET OF CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS UPDATED WITH THE LATEST REVISIONS AND ADDENDA OR CLARIFICATIONS FOR THE 115E BY ALL PERSONNEL INVOLVED WITH 111E PROJECT. 10. DETAILS INCLUDED HERON ARE INTENDED TO SHOW END RESULT OF DESIGN. MINOR MODIFICATIONS MAY BE REQUIRED TO SUIT JOB CONDITIONS OR SITUATIONS, AND SUCH MODOFICATLONS SHALL BE INCLUDED AS PART OF THE SCOPE OF WORK. 11. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE NECESSARY PROVISIONS TO PROTECT DGSING IMPROVEMENTS, EASEMENTS. PAVING. CURBING, ETC. DURING CONSTRUCTION UPON COMPLETION OF WORK. CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR ANY DAMAGE THAT MAY HAVE OCCURRED DUE TO CONSTRUCTION ON OR ABOUT THE PROPERTY. 12. CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE THE GENERAL WORK AREA 15 KEPT CLEW AND HAZARD FREE DURING CONTRUCTION AND DISPOSE OF ALL DIRT, DEBRIS. RUBBISH AND REMOVE EQUIPMENT NOT SPECIFIED AS REMAINING ON THE PROPERTY. PREMISES SHALL BE LEFT IN CLEAN CONDITION AND FREE FROM PAINT SPOTS, DUST, OR SMUDGES OF ANY NATURE. APPROVALS /ISSUE DATES SITE ALPHA NO: DATE ISSUED AS PLANS PREPARED BY: Preliminary r. Preliminary- Revised Zoning - Special Use .Permit Application PEN PM Pr IIIIr Construction Permit Application MX ! I 1 Issued for Zoning /Construction KDC Issued for Construction Issued Zoning & Construction Permit 4720 LYNNWOOD. As Built/Record Set For Owner and Engineering Approval FAX: 425.712.0866 THE FOLLOWING PARTIES HEREBY APPROVE AND ACCEPT THESE DOCUMENTS AND AUTHORIZE THE CONTRACTOR TO PROCEED WRH THE CONSTRUCTION DESCRIBED HEREIN. ALL DOCUMENTS ARE SUBJECT TO REVIEW BY THE LOCAL BUILDING DEPARTMENT AND MAY IMPOSE CHANGES OR BUILDING MODIFICATIONS LCW PROP: LCW R.F.: MAY 2 0 2009' DATE' DEVEL.OPL'1].E.I4T LCW NETCFS: LCW CONS..: INTERCONNECT: LCW SITE DEV. PROPERTY DATE - DATE DATE DATE BY DATE MGR.' DATE' OWNER. DATE. CRW PARTIAL BUILDING PERSPECTIVE SYMBOLS LIST AO- 64--n ELEVATION NUMBER SHEET NUMBER DETAIL NUMBER SHEET NUMBER SECTION NUMBER SHEET NUMBER —E —E- - T —T- - G—G— [N] (E] PROPERTY UN ELECTRICAL SERVICE TELCO SERVICE GROUNDING NEW EXISTING ELECTRIC METER ELECTRICAL WIRING (TURNING UP) ELECTRICAL WIRING (TURNING DOWN) BACKBOARD tLV RECEPTACLE SPECIAL RECEPTACLE 4 QUADRAPLEX RECEPTACLE BMA GROUND GROUND - ATTACHMENT DRIVING DIRECTIONS DISOLLSP21110..71=Mg_htsmatlatta.thipszt Road name changes to S 170th St 142 yds Toke Ramp (LEFT) onto Local road(s) 0.7 mi Freeways Take Ramp (RIGHT) onto SR -518 1.8 mi Wa -518 / 1 -5 / 1 -405 / Seattle / Tacoma Road name changes to 1- 4050.9 mi 1 -405 / Renton / Bellevue At exit 1, tum RIGHT onto Ramp 0.2 mi Wo -181 / W. Valley Hwy. / Tukwila Take Ramp (RIGHT) onto SR -181 [W Valley Hwy] 0.3 mi Arrive 15920 W Valley Hwy, Seattle. WA 98188 CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY Not for disclosure outside CRICKET COMMUNICATIONS without permission. VICINITY MAP PLANS PREPARED FOR: id iunic< PLANS PREPARED BY: r. ilimm —. r r PEN PM Pr IIIIr MI PI PI I MX ! I 1 • i i 1 KDC ARCHITECTS.ENGINEERS, P.C. 4720 LYNNWOOD. 200111 STREET SW SUITE 200 WA 98036 PHONE: 425.670.8651 FAX: 425.712.0866 UCENSURE: RECEIVED MAY 2 0 2009' COMW1UN'sT1 DEVEL.OPL'1].E.I4T DATE: 03/10/2009 DRAWN BY: CRW CHECKED BY: EJC REVISIONS DATE DESCRIPTION BY 01/19 2009 ISSUED FOR 90X ZD REVIEW CRW 03/10 2009 ISSUED FOR ZONING SUBMITTAL CRW PROJECT: SEA-01 9-A EMBASY SUITES 15920 WEST VALLEY HWY SEATTLE, WA. 98188 • PROPERTY LINE LONGACRES WAY PROPOSED PROJECT AREA SEE • • • • • 119' -4'* TO PROPOSED • • CRICKET ANTENNAS PR5PER17uNE OVERALL SITE PLAN 0 166' -9'± 10 PROPOSED i I _ PROPERTY UNE CRICKET ANTENNAS ,C LE FOR 2036: 1'= 40' -0' SCALE FOR 11X17: 1' = 90' -0' 0 40' 80' PROPERTY UNE I I 1 8 I' la � � 1 � � I PROPE1Z11' UNE 20' 60' NORTH 1 I I PROPERTY UNE E E NOTES O1 EXISTING SIDEWALK O EXISTING MECHANICAL YARD O3 EXISTING SUN DECK O4 EXISTING TRASH AREA ENEAAL NOTES THIS IS NOT A SITE SURVEY. ALL PROPERTY BOUNDARIES, ORIENTATION OF TRUE NORTH AND STREET HALF - WIDTHS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED FROM A TAX PARCEL MAP AND ARE APPROXIMATE. PAINT NOTE PROPOSED CABLE TRAY, ANTENNAS, ANTENNA MOUNTS AND ALL MOUNTING HARDWARE TO BE PAINTED, TO MATCH EXISTING BUILDING BUILDING POWER TO ORIGINATE FROM EXISTING ROOM AT THE 9TH FLOOR VERIFY POWER ROUTING WITH BUILDING LANDLORD TELCO TO ORIGINATE FROM EXISTING ROOM AT THE 9TH FLOOR VERIFY TELCO ROUTING WITH BUILDING LANDLORD O \330 30/ 270 j 240 210 ti 12 90— MAGNETIC DEC =NATION PLANS PREPARED FOR: id iunicc PLANS PREPARED BY: r R ..■.. Rte, — P'. Pm - Pr 11 Fr MI II 1 I Milli KDC ARCHITEE .ENGINEERS, P.C. 4720 200TH STREET SW SUITE 200 LYNNWOOD. WA98036 PHONE: 425.670.6651 FAX 425.712.0616 =CENSURE: MAY 20 2009 COMMUNITY ®EVELOPidetr DATE: 03/10/2009 DRAWN BY: CRW CHECKED BY: EJC REVISIONS DATE DESCRIPTION BY 01/19 2009 ISSUED FOR 90% ZD REVIEW CRW 03/10 2009 ISSUED FOR ZONING SUBMITTAL CRW PROJECT: SEA-01 9-A EMBASY SUITES 15920 WEST VALLEY HWY SEATTLE, WA. 98188 A..1 0 0 0 0 1IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIVII (111111 0 0 ■ 0 0 0 0 0 0 CI 0 0 0 M • • 0 0 0 ❑ ❑ 0 0 0 • 0 • • •• ❑ 011 0 0 0 0 ❑ 0 J KEYED <2> PROPOSED CRICKET CABLE TRAY MOUNTED ON PROPOSED PVC SLEEPERS AT EXISTING UPPER ROOFTOP OPROPOSED CRICKET (4) 1 -5/8' COAX CABLES ROUTED WITHIN PROPOSED CABLE TRAY (APPROX. 120't) O} PROPOSED CRICKET (8) 1 -5/B' COAX CABLES ROUTED WITHIN PROPOSED CABLE TRAY (APPROX. 140't) O4 EXISTING UPPER ROOFTOP OEXISTING PARAPET WALL AT UPPER ROOFTOP (HIEGHT VARIES) OEXISTING ELEVATOR PENTHOUSE AT UPPER ROOFTOP O7 EXISTING SKY -UGHTS AT UPPER ROOFTOP OEXISTING LOWER ROOFTOP W /GRAVEL (GRAVEL NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY) OEXISTING A/C UNIT (2 TOTAL) <> EXISTING MECHANICAL VENTS AT LOWER ROOFTOP <> EXISTING GUTTER WITH DOWN SPOUT (TYPICAL) <> DUSTING DAVIT BASE (TYPICAL) <> EXISTING ACCESS LADDER FROM LOWER ROOFTOP TO UPPER ROOFTOP <2> EXISTING ANTENNA (3 TOTAL) MOUNTED TO AN EXISTING ANTENNA FLUSH MOUNT (3 TOTAL) <> EXISTING ANTENNA FLUSH MOUNT (UN- OCCUPIED) <> EXISTING PARAPET WALL AT LOWER ROOFTOP (APPROX. 7' -5't HIGH) <> EXISTING TRASH CHUTE CAP AT LOWER ROOFTOP <> EXISTING 'PLENUM AREA BELOW <> EXISTING 100AMP PANEL TO BE UPGRADED TO 200AMP <> EXISTING TELCO DEMARCATION GENERAL NOTES . THIS Is NOT A SITE SURVEY. ALL PROPERTY BOUNDARIES. ORIENTATION OF TRUE NORTH AND STREET HALF-WIDTHS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED FROM A TAX PARCEL MAP AND ARE APPROXIMATE. pAINT NOW PROPOSED CABLE TRAY AND ALL MOUNTING HARDWARE TO BE PAINTED TO MATCH EXISTING BUILDING BUILDING ROOFTOP SITE PLAN SCALE FOR 24x36: 1'= 1O' -0' SCALE FOR I1 %17: 1' = 330 30 So0 ? 6 270 90 1 %210 180 150 \* MAGNETIC DECLINATION 0 10' 20' 5' 15' NORTH PLANS PREPARED FOR: id iunicc PLANS PREPARED BY: r— — f r mil' Poi Pt mi Ii MN MI I III • • 1 KIMI 1 KDC ARCHITECTS.ENGINEERS, P.C. 4720 200TH STREET SW SURE 200 LYNNWOOD. WA 98006 PHONE 425.670.6651 FAX 425.712.0846 1 1 1 UCENSURE: MAY 2 0 2009 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE: 03/10/2009 DRAWN BY: CRW CHECKED BY: EJC REVISIONS DATE DESCRIPTION BY 01/19 2009 ISSUED FOR 90R ZD REVIEW CRW 03/10 2009 ISSUED FOR ZONING SUBMITTAL CRY, PROJECT: SEA-01 9-A EMBASY SUITES 15920 WEST VALLEY HWY SEATTLE, WA. 98188 A-1 ■ 1 SCALE FOR 2406: 3/B'= 1' -0' SCALE FOR 11X17: 3/16' = 1' -01 m 0 .iI / mod 2'-8' 2' -4' 4 O la 30' -r • 0 0 4> 0 4 • 4\ 0 (n 0 0 • ENLARGED EQUIPMENT PLAN 0 2' 4' 1' 3' NORTH 0l • PROPOSED ANTENNA PLAN "'". FOR 24x36: 1/2•= 1'-0' SCALE FOR 11817: 1/4' = 1' -0• 0' 2' 4' 1' 3' NORTH KEY YD NOTES.. OPROPOSED CRICKET OUTDOOR EQUIPMENT CABINET. MOUNTED ON PROPOSED I- BEAMS (PER- STRUCTURALS) AT EXISTING LOWER ROOFTOP OPROPOSED CRICKET SUPPORT RACK. MOUNTED TO PROPOSED I -BEAMS (PER- STRUCTURALS) PROPOSED CRICKET VERTICAL CABLE TRAY MOUNTED TO EXISTING EXTERIOR WALL (PER- STRUCTURALS) OPROPOSED CRICKET GPS ANTENNA MOUNTED TO VERTICAL CABLE TRAY O PROPOSED CRICKET (6) 1 -5/8• COAX CABLES ROUTED WITHIN PROPOSED CABLE TRAY (SEE 1/A -1.1 FOR CONTINUATION) <> PROPOSED CRICKET CABLE TRAY MOUNTED ON PROPOSED PVC SLEEPERS AT EXISTING UPPER ROOFTOP (SEE 1/A -1.1 FOR CONTINUATION) <>PROPOSED CRICKET (2) 1 -5/8' COAX CABLES ROUTED WITHIN PROPOSED CABLE TRAY (SEE 1/A -1.1 FOR CONTINUATION) OPROPOSED CRICKET (4) 1 -5/8' COAX CABLES ROUTED WITHIN PROPOSED CABLE TRAY (SEE 1/A -1.1 FOR CONTINUATION) <> PROPOSED CRICKET 6' -0' HIGH ANTENNA MOUNTED TO PROPOSED ANTENNA PIPE MOUNT AT DOSING FLUSH MOUNT 1p EXISTING ANTENNA FLUSH MOUNT AT EXISTING EXTERIOR ROOFTOP WALL 11 PROPOSED CRICKET 6' -0' HIGH ANTENNA (2 TOTAL, 1 PER SECTOR '2' & '3D. MOUNTED TO EXISTING ANTENNA FLUSH MOUNT AT DOSTING PENTHOUSE <C> EXISTING ELEVATOR PENTHOUSE AT UPPER ROOFTOP 13 EXISTING ANTENNA (2 TOTAL) MOUNTED TO AN EXISTING ANTENNA FLUSH MOUNT (2 TOTAL) AT PENTHOUSE 1q EXISTING ANTENNA FLUSH MOUNT (UN- OCCUPIED) (2 TOTAL) .C> EXISTING LOWER ROOFTOP W /GRAVEL (GRAVEL NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY) .C> EXISTING A/C UNIT AT LOWER ROOFTOP <C> EXISTING GUTTER WITH DOWN SPOUT (TYPICAL) 18 EXISTING PARAPET WALL AT LOWER ROOFTOP (APPROX. 7' -5•t HIGH) 19 EXISTING MECHANICAL VENTS AT LOWER ROOFTOP <> EXISTING DAVIT BASE (TYPICAL) <> EXISTING EXTERIOR WALL 2 EXISTING ANTENNA /ANTENNA PIPE MOUNT TO BE REMOVED 23 PROPOSED CRICKET ANTENNA FLUSH MOUNT (3 TOTAL, 1 PER SECTOR) GENERA ..NOTES TNLS 15 NOT A SITE SURVEY. ALL PROPERTY BOUNDARIES, ORIENTATION OF TRUE NORTH AND STREET HALF - WIDTHS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED FROM A TAX PARCEL MAP AND ARE APPROXIMATE. Mail= PROPOSED CABLE TRAY, ANTENNAS. ANTENNA MOUNTS AND ALL MOUNTING HARDWARE TO BE PAINTED, TO MATCH EXISTING BUILDING BUILDING . NA INFORMATION id iunic< MNT POS "V''' ANT. MFO MIENNA MODEL MECH• DOWNITLT A(D G)H (DEG) COAX RUNS FEEDUNE — COAX LENGTH TOP JUMPER LENGTH BOTTOM JUMPER LENGTH COLOR COOS RAD CENTER SECTOR '1• A MID 1X /RX 'ANDREW' HBX- 6517DS -VTM p• 0' 2 1 -5 /WO 120' -0•t 6' -O• 6' -0• YELLOW 89' -3•4 SECTOR '1' C MID TX /RX 'ANDREW HBX- 6517DS -VTM p• 0' 2 1 -5/8.0 120' -0't 6' -0• 6' -0' YELLOW 89' -3't SECTOR '2' D MID 1X /RX 'ANDREW HBX- 6517DS -VIM a 120 2 1 -5/8'0 140' -0•4 6'-0' 6' -0' RED 94' -11•2 SECTOR '2' F MID TX /RX 'ANDREW HBX- 6517DS -VTM p• 120 2 1 -5/8'0 140' -0•t 6' -0' 6' -0' RED s4' -11.4 SECTOR '3• 0 MID TX /RX ANDREW HBX- 6517DS -VITA 0• 240' 2 1 -5/8'0 140' -O'± 6'-O' 6' -0• GREEN 94' -11'2 SECTOR '3' 1 MID TX /RX 'ANDREW' HBX- 6517DS -VIM 0• 240' 2 1 -5/8'0 140' -0•t 6'-0' 6' -O• GREEN 94' -11•4 ANTENNA DIMENSIONS ANTENNA MANUFACTURER ANTENNA MODEL WIDTH HDGHT DEPTH DUWETER 'ANDREW HBX- 6517DS -VTM 6.5' (166.0mm) 74.9' (1902.Omm) 3.3' (83.Omm) - PLANS PREPARED FOR: id iunic< PLANS PREPARED BY: II=- It Pir P_ 111 I •• X I y u u I KDC ARCFIRECTS.ENGINEERS, P.0 Q 1 I 1 4720 2001H MEET SW SURE 200 LYNNWOO,, WA 916036 PHOTO': 425.670.6651 FAX 421712.0646 LICENSURE: r E ENFD MAY 2 0 2009 OOMMUNiTY DEVELOPMENT DATE: 03/10/2009 DRAWN BY: CRW CHECKED BY: EJC REVISIONS DATE DESCRIPTION BY 01/19 2009 ISSUED FOR 90X ZD REVIEW CRW 03/10 2009 ISSUED FOR ZONING SUBMITTAL CRW PROJECT: SEA-01 9-A EMBASY SUITES 15920 WEST VALLEY HWY SEATTLE, WA. 98188 A-2 T.O. PROPOSED CRICKET ANTENNAS & T.O. EXISTING ELEVATOR PENTHOUSE & EXISTING ANTENNAS 98' -0't QED NOTES <> EXISTING PARAPET WALL AT UPPER ROOFTOP OEXISTING ELEVATOR PENTHOUSE AT UPPER ROOFTOP OEXISTING ANTENNA (2 TOTAL) MOUNTED TO AN EXISTING ANTENNA FLUSH MOUNT (2 TOTAL) AT PENTHOUSE O4 EXISTING ANTENNA FLUSH MOUNT (UN— OCCUPIED) (2 TOTAL) AT PENTHOUSE O EXISTING A/C UNIT OEXISTING ANTENNA (3 TOTAL) MOUNTED TO AN EXISTING ANTENNA FLUSH MOUNT (3 TOTAL) O7 EXISTING PARAPET WALL AT LOWER ROOFTOP (APPROX. 7' -5'± HIGH) O8 EXISTING EMBASSY SUITES BUILDING OPROPOSED CRICKET 6' -0' HIGH ANTENNA MOUNTED TO EXISTING ANTENNA FLUSH MOUNT <> PROPOSED CRICKET 6' -0' HIGH ANTENNA (2 TOTAL. 1 PER SECTOR 2 & '31. MOUNTED TO EXISTING ANTENNA FLUSH MOUNT AT EXISTING PENTHOUSE 11 EXISTING ACCESS LADDER FROM LOWER ROOFTOP TO UPPER ROOFTOP 0 92' -5't C L OF PROPOSED CRICKET ANTENNA 89' -3't C.L. OF PROPOSED CRICKET ANTENNA 43 94' -11't T.O. EXISTING UPPER ROOFTOP PARAPET WALL & EXISTING ANTENNAS 1 1 1 1 11 11 �!��S�ai4.@ mmuum N1 Nom __1 .in MINN gin 11111 M■1 MINE 11111 ■ ■■ 1111 1111 1 nflr ■U■ 1•I MOM ■■■■ fii)GRADE 0 " -0' (26' -0" AFASQ PROPOSED WEST ELEVATION SCALE FOR 24x36: 1'- 10' -0' SCALE FOR 11X17: 1' - 20' -0' 20' 15' ! „s 89' -5'± T.O. LOWER ROOFTOP PARAPET WALL 83' -9'3 T.O. EXISTING LOWER ROOFTOP GRADE0' -0' (26' -0' AMSL) PLANS PREPARED FOR: id iunic< PLANS PREPARED BY: 111.11 Mr PK IL PI. 1111 PI 1. 1111 ui l • ui 1 KDC ARCHTiECTS.ENGINEERS, P.C. 4720 2001H STREET SW SUITE 200 LYNNWOOD, WA 90036 PHONE: 425.670.6631 MX 425.712.0646 F I 1 UCENSURE: MAY 2 0 2009 commuNiTY D ELOPYr ENT DATE: 03/10/2009 DRAWN BY: CRW CHECKED BY: EJC REVISIONS DATE DESCRIPTION BY 01/19 2009 ISSUED FOR 90% ZD REVIEW CRW 03/10 2009 ISSUED FOR ZONING SUBMITTAL CRW PROJECT: SEA-01 9-A EMBASY SUITES 15920 WEST VALLEY HWY SEATTLE, WA. 98188 A-3 T.O. PROPOSED CRICKET ANTENNAS & T.O. EXISTING ELEVATOR PENTHOUSE & EXISTING ANTENNAS 98 -0 KEYED NOTES OEXISTING PARAPET WALL AT UPPER ROOFTOP OEXISTING ELEVATOR PENTHOUSE AT UPPER ROOFTOP OEXISTING ANTENNA (2 TOTAL) MOUNTED TO AN EXISTING ANTENNA FLUSH MOUNT (2 TOTAL) AT PENTHOUSE OEXISTING ANTENNA FLUSH MOUNT (UN- OCCUPIED) (2 TOTAL) AT PENTHOUSE OEXISTING A/C UNIT O EXISTING GUTTER WITH DOWN SPOUT (TYPICAL) OEXISTING ANTENNA (3 TOTAL) MOUNTED TO AN EXISTING ANTENNA FLUSH MOUNT (3 TOTAL) ODUSTING PARAPET WALL AT LOWER ROOFTOP (APPROX. 7' -5'± HIGH) OEXISTING EMBASSY SUITES BUILDING <> PROPOSED CRICKET OUTDOOR EQUIPMENT CABINET. MOUNTED ON PROPOSED I -BEAMS (PER- SATRUCTURALS) AT EXISTING LOWER ROOFTOP <> PROPOSED CRICKET VERTICAL CABLE TRAY MOUNTED TO EXISTING EXTERIOR WALL (PER- SATRUC1URALS) <> PROPOSED CRICKET (6) 1 -5/8' COAX CABLES ROUTED WITHIN PROPOSED CABLE TRAY <> PROPOSED CRICKET GPS ANTENNA MOUNTED TO VERTICAL CABLE TRAY <> PROPOSED CRICKET 6' -0• HIGH ANTENNA MOUNTED TO EXISTING ANTENNA FLUSH MOUNT <C> PROPOSED CRICKET 6' -0' HIGH ANTENNA (2 TOTAL. 1 PER SECTOR 2 & '3'). MOUNTED TO EXISTING ANTENNA FLUSH MOUNT AT EXISTING PENTHOUSE T.O. PROPOSED CRICKET ANTENNA 92' -5'± C.L OF PROPOSED CRICKET ANTENNA 89' -3'* T.O. EXISTING UPPER ROOFTOP PARAPET WALL & EXISTING ANTENNAS 89' -5't T.O. LOWER ROOFTOP PARAPET WALL 83' -9•* 1111 1 E 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 e IMMO MINE MINIM MIEN hill ■off■■ 11111 ■ ■■ 11111 ■ ■■ H■.I KM lr T Num 1 ■� �1� 111111 ITi 1111 II 1 Mall MI 1 1 1 11 1111 I■■ A mum mum mum ■iii■ ,II. ■ SO GRADE 0 " -O" (26' -0" ■■ ■■ N■ II II ■M KIM MI III ■ • PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION (SCALE FOR 24x36: 1•= 10' -0• SCALE FOR 11917: 1• = 20' -0• 0 10' 20' 5' 15' GRADE 0" -0" (26' -0" AMSL) O 1PLANS PREPARED FOR: IC iunicc PLANS PREPARED BY: 1111111•11MV /IOW - IIIIIm Mr Mr Pi 11111111 I II NMI i y u i KDC ARQIITECTS.ENGINEERS, P.C. 4720 200TH STREET SIN SUITE 200 LYNNWOOD, WA91036 PHOEBE: 425.670.8651 F#X 42&712.0846 P 1 I I UCENSURE: RECEIVE 0 MAY 2 0 2009 COMM LINTY DEVELOPMENT DATE: 03/10/2009 DRAWN BY: CRW CHECKED BY: EJC REVISIONS DATE DESCRIPTION BY 01/19 2009 ISSUED FOR 90% ZD REVIEW CRW 03/10 2009 ISSUED FOR ZONING SUBMITTAL Cam, PROJECT: SEA -019 -A EMBASY SUITES 15920 WEST VALLEY HWY SEATTLE, WA. 98188 A..4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 • -NOTE OEXISTING PARAPET WALL AT UPPER ROOFTOP OEXISTING ELEVATOR PENTHOUSE AT UPPER ROOFTOP O3 DIMING A/C UNIT O4 EXISTING ANTENNA (2 TOTAL) MOUNTED TO AN COSTING ANTENNA FLUSH MOUNT (2 TOTAL) OEXISTING PARAPET WALL AT LOWER ROOFTOP (APPROX. 7' -5'± HIGH) OEXISTING EMBASSY SURES BUILDING OPROPOSED CRICKET OUTDOOR EQUIPMENT CABINET, MOUNTED ON PROPOSED I -BEAMS (PER- SATRUCTURALS) AT EXISTING LOWER ROOFTOP OPROPOSED CRICKET VERTICAL CABLE TRAY MOUNTED TO EXISTING EXTERIOR WALL (PER - SATRUCTURALS) O PROPOSED CRICKET GPS ANTENNA MOUNTED TO VERTICAL CABLE TRAY <> PROPOSED CRICKET 6' -0' HIGH ANTENNA MOUNTED TO EXISTING ANTENNA FLUSH MOUNT <> EXISTING ACCESS LADDER FROM LOWER ROOFTOP TO UPPER ROOFTOP T.O. PROPOSED CRICKET ANTENNAS & T.O. EXISTING ELEVATOR PENTHOUSE & EXISTING ANTENNAS 98' -0't C.L. OF PROPOSED CRICKET ANTENNA 94' -11'* h J 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 E F 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 fliGRADE 0 " -0' (26. -0' AMSL) I I , 1 1■. Irnrnrrr T.O. PROPOSED CRICKET ANTENNA 92' -5't C.L OF PROPOSED CRICKET ANTENNA 89 -3't T.O. EXISTING UPPER ROOFTOP PARAPET WALL At EXISTING ANTENNAS 89' -5'f T.O. LOWER ROOFTOP PARAPET WALL 83' -9't T.O. EXISTING LOWER ROOFTOP 45 PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION Q 10' 20' (SCALE FOR 24x36: 10' -0' SCALE FOR 11917: 1' 5' 15' GRADE0 " -0" 126' -0' AMSL) PLANS PREPARED FOR: id iunic< PLANS PREPARED BY: pli. — P■•• per • PM — Pr R PIN III Or Ii ..i N .111 KDC ARCHRECTS.ENGINEERS, P.C. 4720 2001H STREET SW SUITE 200 LYNNW000. WA99036 PH0NE 425.6709651 FATE 425712.0846 F 1 1 1 UCENSURE: RFCE!VED MAY 2 0 2009 frQLMMUNiTY @i= `ELOPtulEi 1T DATE: 03/10/2009 DRAWN 8Y: CRW CHECKED BY: EJC REVISIONS DATE DESCRIPTION BY 01/19 2009 ISSUED FOR 90S ZD REVIEW CRW 03/10 2009 ISSUED FOR ZONING SUBMITTAL CRW PROJECT: SEA-01 9-A EMBASY SUITES 15920 WEST VALLEY HWY SEATTLE, WA. 98188 A-5 KEYED NOTES O7 EXISTING PARAPET WALL AT UPPER ROOFTOP O EXISTING ELEVATOR PENTHOUSE AT UPPER ROOFTOP OEXISTING ANTENNA (2 TOTAL) MOUNTED TO AN EXISTING ANTENNA FLUSH MOUNT (2 TOTAL) AT PENTHOUSE 4 OEXISTING ANTENNA FLUSH MOUNT (UN- OCCUPIED) (2 TOTAL) AT PENTHOUSE ' EXISTING A/C UNIT OEXISTING PARAPET WALL AT LOWER ROOFTOP (APPROX. 7' -5'± HIGH) OEXISTING EMBASSY SUITES BUILDING O8 PROPOSED CRICKET OUTDOOR EQUIPMENT CABINET. MOUNTED ON PROPOSED I -BEAMS (PER- SATRUCTURALS) AT EXISTING LOWER ROOFTOP OPROPOSED CRICKET VERTICAL CABLE TRAY MOUNTED TO EXISTING EXTERIOR WALL (PER - SATRUCTURALS) <> PROPOSED CRICKET GPS ANTENNA MOUNTED TO VERTICAL CABLE TRAY <> PROPOSED CRICKET 6' -0' HIGH ANTENNA (2 TOTAL. 1 PER SECTOR 2 & "3"). MOUNTED TO EXISTING ANTENNA FLUSH MOUNT AT EXISTING PENTHOUSE <> EXISTING ACCESS LADDER FROM LOWER ROOFTOP TO UPPER ROOFTOP T.O. PROPOSED CRICKET ANTENNAS & T.O. EXISTING ELEVATOR PENTHOUSE & EXISTING ANTENNAS • 94' -11 "± T.O. EXISTING UPPER ROOFTOP PARAPET WALL & EXISTING ANTENNAS 89' -5 "± T.O. LOWER ROOFTOP PARAPET WALL 83. -9.± v: PLANS PREPARED FOR: id iunic< PLANS PREPARED BY: ICI - tom• Ti F_ PM. IM Pr Pi MI I. 1111 u • III I MI R I I KDC ARCHFIECTS.ENGINEERS, P.C. 4720 200Th STREET SW SUITE 200 LYNN OD, WA 98036 MOM 425.670.8651 FAX 425.712.0846 r I 1 1 1 UCENSURE: � TSa t a. >. i . 12 0 20091 :. roivf:UNiTY VELQPA1{iENT DATE: 03/10/2009 DRAWN BY: CRW CHECKED BY: EJC REVISIONS DATE DESCRIPTION BY 01/19 2009 ISSUED FOR 90% ZD REVIEW CRW 03/10 2009 ISSUED FOR ZONING SUBMITTAL CRW PROJECT: SEA-01 9-A EMBASY SUITES 15920 WEST VALLEY HWY SEATTLE, WA. 98188 A-6