HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit L09-046 - NELSON STEVE / SEGALE PROPERTIES - SPECIAL PERMISSION FLAT ROOFSECURITY RESIDENCE SPECIAL PERMISSION FLAT ROOF
Segale Properties
5811 SEGALE PARK DR C
L09 -046
September 14, 2009
•
City of Tukwila
Jim Haggerton, Mayor
Department of Community Development
NOTICE OF DECISION
TO: Steve Nelson
Segale Properties
5811 Segale Park Drive C
Tukwila, WA 98188
Jack Pace, Director
This letter serves as a notice of decision and is issued pursuant to TMC 18.104.170. This notice is approved subject to the
decision criteria and conclusions that follow.
I. PROJECT INFORMATION
Project File Number: L09 -046
Associated File Numbers: D09 -088: Building Permit for a Single Family Residence
Applicant: Steve Nelson of Segale Properties
Type of Permit Applied for: Special Permission Director, Single Family Design Standard Exception, Roof
Pitch Flatter than 5:12
Project Description:
Request for Special Permission to allow a flat roof pitch as part of new
construction of a security residence /caretaker's home. The proposed residence is
in an industrial park with a design and style consistent with the main building and
surrounding development.
Location: 5811 Segale Park Drive, Building 981
Comprehensive Plan Designation/
Zoning District: HI
Vicinity /Site Information:
The proposed single - family home is to serve as a security residence /caretaker's home on the site of a preexisting industrial
park. There are no other residential structures or residential zoning in the immediate area. The location of the proposed
residence will be approximately 200' from the public right -of -way and more than 200' from the Green River. It will be
located behind a custom metal fence and landscaping. The neighboring buildings have flat roofs and smooth concrete
walls. The proposed architecture of the security residence mimics the surrounding architecture in massing, color,
materials, and style.
Decisional Criteria:
According to Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) 18.50.050 (6) Single Family Dwelling Design Standards require a
minimum roof pitch of 5:12. Upon approval as a Type 2 decision, according to TMC 18.50.55 a roof pitch flatter than
5:12 may be permitted when:
a. The proposed roof pitch is consistent with the style of the house (for example modern, southwestern);
SM
HABuildings\L09 -046 SP RoofPitch.doc
Page 1 of 3 09/11/2009
6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665
• •
b. If a flat roof is proposed, the top of the parapet may not exceed 25 feet in height;
c. If a sloped roof is proposed, it must have at least 24 -inch eaves; and
d. The house exhibits a high degree of design quality, including a mix of exterior materials, detailing, articulation and
modulation.
Since the proposed roof is flat, this application qualifies for review as a Type 2 decision. The residence is styled to mimic
the horizontal lines of the buildings that comprise the surrounding industrial park. The surrounding buildings have flat
roofs and neither peak roofed structures or residential building materials are used within the industrial park. The top of
the parapet is 14' -6" high. A cornice element emulates the coping on the main building; bronze glass mirrors the glazing
in the main building; exterior wall finishes will appear similar to the main building and the proposed colors are used
elsewhere on the site.
Conclusions:
1. The proposed roof pitch is consistent with the industrial park in which it is located and consistent with the
surrounding development.
2. The top of the parapet is 14'-6"; less than the 25' required in the code.
3. The proposed roof is not sloped.
4. The proposed home exhibits a design that is in keeping with the surrounding industrial uses. It has a style and a
scale that is visually consistent with the surrounding development and that will be visually unobtrusive.
The proposed roof meets the criteria to approve a roof pitch flatter than 5:12.
II. DECISION
SEPA Determination:
The City SEPA Responsible Official has previously determined that this application does not require a SEPA threshold
determination because it is categorically exempt.
Decision on Substantive Permit:
The Community Development Director has determined that the application for a Single Family Design Standard
Exception does comply with applicable City and state code requirements and has approved this application, subject to any
conditions which are set forth in the Decision.
III. YOUR APPEAL RIGHTS
The Decision on this Permit Application is a Type 2 decision pursuant to Tukwila Municipal Code § 18.104.010. Other
land use applications related to this project may still be pending.
A party who is not satisfied with the outcome of the administrative appeal process may file an appeal in King County
Superior Court from the Planning Commission decision.
IV. PROCEDURES AND TIME FOR APPEALING
In order to appeal the Community Development Director's decision on the Permit Application, a written notice of appeal
must be filed with the Department of Community Development within 14 days of the issuance of this Decision, which is
by September 28, 2009.
The requirements for such appeals are set forth in Tukwila Municipal Code 18.116. All appeal materials shall be
submitted to the Department of Community Development. Appeal materials MUST include:
1. The name of the appealing party.
SM
H:\Buildings1,09 -046 SP RoofPitch.doc
Page 2 of 3 09/11/2009
2. The address and phone number of the appealing party; and if the appealing party is a corporation, association or
other group, the address and phone number of a contact person authorized to receive notices on the appealing party's
behalf.
3. A statement identifying the decision being appealed and the alleged errors in the decision, including any specific
challenge to an MDNS.
4. The Notice of Appeal shall identify (a) the specific errors of fact or errors in application of the law in the decision
being appealed; (b) the harm suffered or anticipated by the appellant, and (c) the relief sought. The scope of an appeal
shall be limited to matters or issues raised in the Notice of Appeal.
V. APPEAL HEARINGS PROCESS
Any administrative appeal regarding the Permit shall be conducted as an open record hearing before the Planning
Commission based on the testimony and documentary evidence presented at the open record hearing. The Planning
Commission decision on the appeal is the City's final decision.
Any party wishing to challenge the Planning Commission decision on this application must file an appeal pursuant to the
procedures and time limitations set forth in RCW 36.70C. An appeal challenging a DNS, an MDNS or an EIS may be
included in such an appeal. If no appeal of the Planning Commission decision is properly filed in Superior Court within
such time limit, the Decision on this permit will be final.
VI. INSPECTION OF INFORMATION ON THE APPLICATION
Project materials including the application, any staff reports, and other studies related to the permits are available for
inspection at the Tukwila Department of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100, Tukwila,
Washington 98188 from Monday through Friday between 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. The project planner is Stacy
MacGregor, who may be contacted at 206 - 433 -7141, for further information.
Property owners affected by this decision may request a change in valuation for their property tax purposes. Contact the
King County Assessor's Office for further information regarding property tax valuation changes.
Department of Community Development
City of Tukwila
SM
H:\Buildings\LO9 -046 SP RoofPitch.doc
Page 3 of 3 09/11/2009
DATE:
PROJECT:
PERMIT NO:
• •
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT COMMENTS
July 7, 2009
Security Residence
5811 Segale Pk Drive C
D09 -088
PLAN REVIEWER: Contact Joanna Spencer (206) 431 -2440 if you have any questions regarding the
following comments.
1) Please label all the utility lines (including pipe sizes /materials) that will fall under the perimeter
of the proposed building.
2) Show sections of proposed spread footing foundation(s) in relationship to the existing utility
line(s).
3) Are there any areas where the pipe will be penetrating the foundation footing? If yes, please
show a pipe penetration detail.
4) Have your geotechnical engineer evaluate the influence of proposed foundation on the integrity
of the existing utility lines and submit his finding in writing. Public Works will not allow a
building foundation that has an adverse impact on the existing utility lines.
5) Owner shall execute the attached King County Sewer Use Certificate. I have attached both
Residential and Non- Residential forms. Please contact Unice Versstegen , Water Quality
Coordinator, King County Metro at (206) 684 -1740 to determine which form shall be applicable
for your proposal.
H: Joanna/D09 -088
• •
6. The front door faces north; demonstrate that adequate clearance is provided between the front
door and the landscaping/fence to the north. The entrance stairs face west, away from the
parking area and the location from which personal would arrive. This doesn't make sense.
• RECEtVM
CITY OF TUKWILA SEP 02 2009
pt EN
Department of Community Developme Et.COMMoiPMr SPECIAL
Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 PERMISSION
E -mail: tukplan @ci.tukwila.wa.us DIRECTOR
6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188
APPLICATION
FOR STAFF USE ONLY Permits Plus Type: P-SP
Planner: at-O.C.A3
File Number: LIP — 0410
Application Complete (Date:
)
Project File Number:
Application Incomplete (Date:
)
Other File Numbers:
NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: SSGu/7_1 R a9A- -,0 6
LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s),
block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection.
fell /mac anuE G
LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS (this information may be found on your tax statement).
3523 -044 /-'I5
DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR :
The individual who:
• has decision making authority on behalf of the owner /applicant in meetings with City staff,
• has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development
standards, and
• is the primary contact with the City to whom all notices and reports will be sent.
Name: STEVE 5E6. A E Re- opf:/Zi155
Address: 65 I/ G.54 4<ti.41 P9ILlc ,0124 v6 G
Phone: 204 5'7 20o0 FAX: aOt. 575 /837
E -mail: sA/C: 1.60 Iv a 58441-EP2oPE/2.17E5. G OM
Signature:
Date: 7—/ -07
•
LANCE MUELLER & ASSOCIATES
A R C H I T E C T S
August 31, 2009
AI A
Stacy MacGregor
Planning Department
City of Tukwila
6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100
Tukwila, WA 98188
RECEIVED
SEP 0 2 2009'
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
RE: Security Residence -5811 Segale Park Dr, C, Application # D09 -088
Dear Stacy,
We received your plan review comments dated July 8, 2009. We have attached our response
comments below.
Below I have addressed each numeric comment on your letter. I use the same numeral below as
your letter.
1. Please see attached Special Permission Director Application package.
2. Please see attached revised site plan /cover sheet A1.0 for required parking statistics.
3. No landscaping will be displaced by this project.
4. Please see attached Special Permission Director Application package.
5. Please see attached Special Permission Director Application package.
6. Please see attached revised site plan /cover sheet A1.0 for added dimensions at north and
west faceoff proposed structure in relation to the existing fence. There is adequate room for
the security guard to enter the residence from the southwest corner of the unit. The
motorized gate makes entering the unit from the northeast corner impractical.
We hope the attached response will satisfy your concerns. If you have any questions or concerns
regarding the corrected plans, please call me to discuss. I can be reached at 206 - 325 -2553.
Thank you very much,
Harold Christensen
Architect
Lance Mueller & Associates
130 Lakeside Suite 250 Seattle, WA 98122 (206) 325 -2553 Fax (206) 328 -0554
Architecture Planning Space Planning Interiors
1
• •
RECEIVED
SEP 0 2 2009
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
July 8, 2009
Steve Nelson
PO Box 88028
Tukwila, WA 98138
RE: CORRECTION LETTER #1
Development Permit Application Number D09 -088
Security Residence — 5811 Segale Park Dr C
Dear Mr. Nelson,
This letter is to inform you of corrections that must be addressed before your development permit(s) can
be approved. All correction requests from each department must be addressed at the same time and
reflected on your drawings. I have enclosed comments from the Planning and Public Works
Departments. At this time the Building and Fire Departments have no comments.
Planning Department: Stacy MacGregor at 206 433 -7166 if you have questions regarding
the attached memo.
Public Works Department: Joanna Spencer at 206 431 -2440 if you have questions regarding the
attached memo.
Please address the attached comments in an itemized format with applicable revised plans,
specifications, and /or other documentation. The City requires that four (4) complete sets of revised
plans, specifications and /or other documentation be resubmitted with the appropriate revision
block.
In order to better expedite your resubmittal, a `Revision Submittal Sheet' must accompany every
resubmittal. I have enclosed one for your convenience. I have also enclosed a Non - Residential Sewer
Use Certification that must be completed prior to issuance of the permit. Corrections /revisions must be
made in person and will not be accepted through the mail or by a messenger service.
If you have any questions, please contact me at (206) 431 -3670.
Sincerely,
Jennifer Marshall
Permit Technician
end
File No. D09 -090
T:\Links\Docs\D09- 088 \D09 -088 Correction Letter #1.DOC
DATE:.
APPLICANT:
RE:
ADDRESS:
PLANNING DIVISION COMMENTS
.June 16, 2009
Security Residence (Segale)
D09 -088
5811 Segale Park Dr C
The plans as submitted are not approved. Please review the following comments listed below and submit
your revisions accordingly. If you have any questions on the requested revision, Stacy MacGregor is the
planner assigned to the file and can be reached at 206 - 433 -7166.
1. Please explain this project. The site has gone through design review and this proposal is a
modification to the design that the director has approved. What is the intended use, how and
when will the building be occupied, why is it necessary? A security shelter or staff is a more
common approach; how will the site be protected with the creation of a residence and how does
enabling your security staff to sleep further the security of the site?
2. Show the number of parking stalls on the site. Explain the uses of the existing building and the
amount of floor area the uses occupy so that parking needs can be verified.
3. Will any landscaping be displaced or impacted from the project or construction? If any
landscaping is lost or impacted, provide a landscape plan that shows how the affected
landscaping is replaced on the site.
4. Single - family dwellings are not allowed to have flat roofs and must meet the requirements of
TMC 18.50.050
All new single - family dwellings, except those that are part of an approved Housing
Options Demonstration Program, constructed under building permits submitted to the
City after August 19, 2005, must:
1. be set upon a permanent foundation, with the space from the bottom of the home to the
ground enclosed by concrete or an approved concrete product that can be either load
bearing or decorative;
2. if a manufactured home, be comprised of at least two fully - enclosed parallel sections,
each of not less than 12 feet wide by 36 feet long;
3. be thermally equivalent to the State's energy code;
4. have exterior siding that is residential in appearance including, but not limited to,
wood clapboards, shingles or shakes, brick, conventional vinyl siding, fiber- cement
siding, wood- composite panels, aluminum siding or similar materials. Materials such as
smooth, ribbed or corrugated metal or plastic panels are not acceptable;
5. have the front door facing the front or second front yard, if the lot is at least 40 feet
wide; and
6. have a roofing material that is residential in appearance including, but not limited to,
wood shakes or shingles, standing seam metal, asphalt composition shingles or tile, with
a minimum roof pitch of 5:12.
5. A flat -roof exception can be applied for but the building must meet the following criteria. It
does not appear that this exception will be granted. An application is required.
The design standards required at 18.50.050 (5) and (6) may be modified by the DCD
Director as a Type 2 Special Permission decision.
1. The criteria for approval of a roof pitch flatter than 5:12 are as follows:
a. The proposed roof pitch is consistent with the style of the house (for example modern,
southwestern);
b. If a flat roof is proposed, the top of the parapet may not exceed 25 feet in height;
c. If a sloped roof is proposed, it must have at least 24 -inch eaves; and
d. The house exhibits a high degree of design quality, including a mix of exterior
materials, detailing, articulation and modulation.
LANCE f'flUELLER & ASSOCIATES
A R C H I T E C T S
Memorandum
AI A
Date: 8 -26 -09
To: Nora Shriner
CC: Steve Nelson
From: Bob Fadden— Lance Mueller & Associates
RECEIVED
SEP 0 2 2009
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
Job No. 09 -178
Re: Special Directors permission for Permit No. D09 -088 - Segale Security Guard Residence at 5811
Segale Park Drive C
Dear Nora,
Attached are the materials for submission to the director which request "Special Permission Director" for an
exception to TMC 18.50.050 (6) which says:
"have a roofing material that is residential in appearance including, but not limited to, wood shakes or shingles,
standing seam metal, asphalt shingles or tile, with a minimum pitch of 5:12."
These materials are as follows:
"Exhibit A"
Partial Site Plan — Indicates building location an photo location
"Exhibit B"
Colored Building Elevations
"Exhibit C"
Building Wall Section
"Exhibit D"
View from Segale Park Drive C — Elevation of the building inserted to scale into photo 4
"Exhibit E ".
View from interior of parking lot looking at secured parking area with building inserted.
"Exhibit F"
"Photo Book"
"Exhibit G"
"Request for Modification for Security Guard Residence"
"Exhibit H"
"Scalable Site Plan
"Exhibit P"
"Scalable Elevations"
The materials attached are provided to support the written request for SPECIAL PERMISSION DIRECTOR of
SINGLE - FAMILY DESIGN STANDARDS EXCEPTIONS. If you have any questions or require additional
information to grant this request please contact us.
Cordially,
Bob Fadden
130 Lakeside Ave. • Suite 250 • Seattle, WA • 98122 • . (206) 325 -2553 • Fax (206) 328 -0554
SEGALE PROPERITES
SECURITY RESIDENCE
BUILDING 981
TUKWILA, WASHINGTON
LANCE MUELLER & ASSOCIATES
A R C H I T E C T S • AI A
130 LAKESIDE ^ SEATTLE, WA 98122 ^ 206 325 2553
SITE PLAN
NORTH
EXISTING BUILDING
5835 SEGALE PARK DRIVE C
•
12
SECURITY
'RESIDENCE
1
10
SEGALE;PARK DRIVE C
9 -,5
•
RECEIVED
!SEP 02 2009
COMMUNITY
(DEVELOPMENT
0.111110 SINEW
EXHIBIT A
i
•
•
•
O
SOUTH ELEVATION
0
•
•
EAST ELEVATION
0
WEST ELEVATION
SEGALE PROPERITES
SECURITY RESIDENCE
BUILDING 981
TUKWILA, WASHINGTON
NORTH ELEVATION
LANCE
MUELLER
& ASSOCIATES
A R C H
I; T E C T 6 • A I A
RECEIVED
1 SEP 0 2 2009
COMMUNtlY
DEVELOPMENT
130 LAKESIDE SEATTLE, WA 98122 206 325 2553
EXHIBIT B
0 118IHX3
m
n
c c
c
nr
•
v �
> Z�
CI) m
Z CO
• 03 umw.
"v
O rn
Z Z
0
rn
ZZ 1.96 NM `3111V3S ° 13OIS3)1V1 O£ l
£SSZ SZ£ 90Z
m
S31I2:13dOlId 31VO3S
3
c
r
D
z
0
m
c
m
r
m
CO
N
24 GA. PREFINISHED METAL
COPING — PAINTED
INSLL. VINYL
CASEMENT WINDOWS
7/�
SELF FURRING MET
DUPONT TYVEX
5/8"
Q3AI3332I
00
N
3" CEMENT PLASTER ON
GALV. METAL LATH ON
COMMERCIAL WRAP ON
CDX PL''WD. SHEATHING
R21 GATT INSULATION
- CONC. FNDN.
WALL
R38 CLG.
INSULATION
WALL SECTION
UNDISTURBED
NATIVE SOILS
/
•
•
•
R30 BATT FLOOR
INSULATION
0
0
•
PHOTO BOOK
EXHIBIT F
SEGALE PROPERITES
SECURITY RESIDENCE
BUILDING 981
TUKWILA, WASHINGTON
LANCE MUELLER 6, ASSOCIATES
A R C H I T E C T S • A 1 A
130 LAKESIDE • SEATTLE, WA 98122 • 206 325 2553
1
1
.• .141, .1;1I1I1 1lw iiiiuh'1111111 Ily
1111I1 III
N
illll!1 111
• •
"Exhibit G"
SPECIAL PERMISSION DIRECTOR
SINGLE- FAMILY DESIGN STANDARDS EXCEPTIONS
Request for Modification for Security Guard Residence
8 -25 -09
The design standards required at TMC 18.50.050 (5) and (6) may be modified by the DCD
Director as Type 2 Special permission. This request for modification is for TMC section
18.50.050 (6) which says:
"have a roofing material that is residential in appearance including, but not limited to,
wood shakes or shingles, standing seam metal, asphalt shingles or tile, with a minimum
pitch of 5:12."
The criterion for the modification is outlined in TMC section 18.50.050, Single - Family Design
Standard Exceptions which says:
1. The criteria for approval of a roof pitch flatter than 5:12 are as follows:
a. The proposed roof pitch is consistent with the style of house (for example
modern, southwestern).
b. If a flat roof is proposed, the top of the parapet may not exceed 25 feet in
height.
c. If a sloped roof is proposed, it must have at least 24 inch eaves; and
d. The house exhibits a high degree of design quality, including a mix of exterior
materials, detailing, articulation and modulation.
Compliance to the Objective of Single Family Design Standards
The TMC specifies in section 18.50.050, Single Family Dwelling Design Standards items 1 to 6,
provides general guidelines for residence design. The goal of the guidelines are to promote in
single family environments a design character that "feels residential" but allow each building to
have its own individuality and provide the option for special design and circumstances to be
accommodated.
To accomplish this the goal the TMC prescriptively requires premanufactured homes to have the
same appearance as site -built housing, have building entries facing the street, have building
materials to be of residential character, and roofs to have minimum slopes. To encourage
individuality it allows for a variety of residential materials to be used, does not restrict color and
limits the use of some materials that would be appropriate only in a special design.
The code does not specifically deal with the design compatibility of residences that are placed
within other zones that are accessory uses to the main use. In those circumstances, to achieve
design consistency with the general use, exceptions are necessary.
Project Back Ground
Segale Business Park in or to provide after hours and weekends security requires a residence
for a security guard on site. To house this person they are proposing constructing a site built
residence that will be located within a secured area of the site where vehicles are parked.
The zoning code in affect at the time of application allows caretaker residence within this zoning
and doesn't prohibit that residence from being a free standing structure. It is necessary to have
the security building within the area that requires after hour's supervision.
A property caretaker's main function is to be on site to oversee the property during and after
business hours. After hour's supervision of a property is a part of the caretaker's normal duties.
The residence is proposed to be located in the side yard of a building they occupy at 5811 Segale
Park Drive C. The exact location is within a secured parking area that is about 200 feet from the
street and over two hundred feet from the Shoreline of the Green River.
This secured area is separated from the adjacent parking area by a custom metal fence. This
fence is placed between capped concrete columns which are spaced so they have a rhythm that is
similar to the building elements.
Two layers of landscaping are provided in front of the fence, one at the fence and the other at the
street. This planting largely screens the view of the parking area however; it contributes to the
need for security after hours because the area is no longer visible. This is illustrated in photos 1
through 4 of Exhibit F "Photo Book ".
The general architecture of an industrial park is dramatically different than a residential area.
The buildings have strong horizontal lines that are visually modulated by landscaping and are
rectilinear forms. Surfaces are smooth concrete, painted, and the glazing areas have bronze glass
set in dark bronze metal frames.
The character of the neighboring buildings is shown in photo's 1, 6, 7, and 8. These neighboring
buildings have generally smooth surfaces with flat roofs including the fuel island canopy shown
in photo 2.
Within this area of the industrial park there are no peaked roof structures or residential material.
If such material and shapes where used they would be obtrusive and inconsistent with the overall
design of buildings in the neighborhood.
Proposed Building
The proposed building is constructed with a smooth exterior surface, a roof overhang and a small
parapet above the roof as shown in exhibit B. At the top of the parapet is a small cornice
element that emulates the coping on the main building and in the walls below are windows that
allow the resident to observe the secured parking area.
The building is designed to have a terminating element that reinforces the buildings rectilinear
form which is shown in exhibit C. This facade was created for three reasons, first to give the
building sufficient mass, second to establish a strong horizontal appearance, and third to screen
mechanical equipment.
The exterior building surface is smooth so when painted it will have a similar appearance as the
main building and match in color the adjacent columns that support the fence. The building
colors, which are the same as the columns, main building, and the color of the glazing, are shown
on the attached exhibit B.
•
The building as a shown on exhibit A, "Site Plan", is located behind the security fence and
screened by landscaping as shown on exhibit E. As shown on exhibit D, the only part of the
residence that is visible from the street is the upper three feet of the building facade.
As a result, the building design and location is compatible with the main building and consistent
with its surrounding structures.
Consistency to Criteria for Approval
The design standards are largely written to address residences in single family zoning. They
however can be interpreted to apply to industrial areas through "consistency with adjoining
structures and there compatibility with them" which is the underlying principal of design review
within zoning code. This allows the director to achieve the intent of the code which is to make a
residence appear consistent with there surroundings.
For this project a roof with a pitch of less than 5:12 is appropriate because:
a. The proposed flat pitch is consistent with the style of buildings that surround it and
introducing another form would not promote design consistency.
b. The parapet above the roof is 1'- 4" and the top of the facade parapet is 14' -6" which
is less than 25 feet.
c. The roof is not sloped so the eaves are not required to be 24 inches
d. The guard residence has a degree of design quality appropriate to the neighborhood.
The building design elements are selected to promote visual consistency and be at the
correct scale for its surroundings. Existing landscaping on the site is provided that
will buffer any visual impacts.
Based on the consistency of the design with its surrounding we request a special exception to
allow a roof slope of less than 5:12 based on the fact that the roof pitch proposed is appropriate
for the style of building.
k M \-
th
INV=
ROPERTY
LINE
LS
EXISTING
•.6ANITARY-
S EWER LI N
'SEGALE PARK DRIVE C
LS
31'-4 1/2"
LS
11
EX F" Pic
I 1,
X
— F -
LS
EXISTING WATER
LINE
EXISTING FIRE
HYDRANT
188' -5 9/16"
'cr.)
o ni m
0
3
(z)
0C t
M
—4
44:0
EXISTING]
,STORM --
DRAINAGE
SYSTN
' . .
EXISTI&G. C ,
TYPE 2 (4 " DIA)
RIM= .2790
INVFz-19.52
(1 8"J/S)
EXISTING - -
PARKING AREA
LS
—7\
PROPOSEDV\SECURITY
RESIDENCE
LS
31' 13/16"
LS
EXIST. SAN MH
RIM=31.1
INV=23 71( ")
INV=23.338")
3'-1
LJ
— —
EXISTING LANDSCAPING (LS)
LS
EXISTING
SEGALE
PROPERTIES
ENTRY
EXISTING SEGALE
PROPERTIES
BUILDING 981
LS EXISTING SECURITY FENCING
. W/ ROLLING GATES
CONNECT NEW RESIDENCE TO
\.MAIN BUILDING WATER,
\ \ ELECTRICITY AND GAS.
95'-4 3
CONNECT NEW RESIDENCE
'SANITARY SEWER TO EXISTING
..„. LINE BELOW.
16." ..00F OVERHANGS RESIDENCE
18" ON ALL SIDES.
ENLARGED SITE PLAN AT SECURITY RESIDENCE
Scale: 1"=30'.-0"
SEGALE PROPERITES
SECURITY RESIDENCE
BUILDING 981
TUKWILA, WASHINGTON
LANCE MUELLER & ASSOCIATES
A R CHITEC TS • AIA
130 LAKESIDE • SEATTLE, WA 98122 • 206 325 2553
EXHIBIT H
•
•
•
EAST ELEVATION efr
woria
0
Q
cipp„
0
WEST ELEVATION
NORTH ELEVATION
1—
L1_ • • •
6T 0 11.25■
�— 5. -7 1/2'
1
24:x2 _SCREENED_CRAWLSPASE_
ACCESS ( MIN, 18'x24')
DOWNSPOUT W/
OVERFLOW SCUPPER
2. -0'
6' CURB 0
ASPHALT PAVING
`24 GA. PREFINISHED METAL
/ COPING - PAINTED
EXISTG ASPHALT
PAVING
SOUTH 'ELEVATION
\LINSUL VINYL
CASEMENT WINDOWS
SCREENED CRAWLSPACE VENT
CONC. FNDN.
WALL
PROVIDE SPLASHBLOCK
C ASPHALT PAVING
SEGALE PROPERITES
SECURITY RESIDENCE
BUILDING 981
TUKWILA, WASHINGTON
LANCE MUELLER & ASSOCIATES
A R C H I T E C T S • A I A
130 LAKESIDE • SEATTLE, WA 98122 • 206 325 2553
•
•
•
•
EXHIBIT I