HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOW 2017-02-27 Item 4B - Public Safety Plan - Facilities Draft Siting CriteriaCOUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS
Initials
Meeting Date
Prepared by,
Mayor's review
Cox, it re Pien,
02/27/17
CO
Safety Plan Facilities Draft
Siting Criteria
a lion
02/27/17
Motion
Date
❑ Resolution
A11g Date
❑ Bid Award
A1lg Date
❑ Public I-featrrtg
Mtg Dale
❑ Other
Mg Date
C.1'1'I,GORY 14 Dii
•
• Ordinance
A1lg Dale
kits
ITEM INFORMATION
ITEM No.
4.B.
189
STAFF SPONSOR: RACHEL BIANCHI
ORici .11. AC;1:NDA DA 2/27/17
AGENDA ITEM TITLE
Public
Safety Plan Facilities Draft
Siting Criteria
a lion
02/27/17
Motion
Date
❑ Resolution
A11g Date
❑ Bid Award
A1lg Date
❑ Public I-featrrtg
Mtg Dale
❑ Other
Mg Date
C.1'1'I,GORY 14 Dii
•
• Ordinance
A1lg Dale
kits
1118 Date
SPONSOR ❑Council
❑HR ❑DCD
Fire TS ❑P&R ❑Police ❑P1I7 ❑Court
►1Major
•Tirana
SPONSOR'S The Council is asked to provide feedback on the draft criteria prior to the Open House on
SUMMARY March 18, 2017.
RI:1'1LAVED 13Y ❑ C.O.W. Mtg. ❑ CDN Comm ❑ Finance Comm. 131 Public Safety Comm.
❑ Trans &Infrastracturc ❑ Arts Comm. ® Parks Comm. ❑ Planning Comm.
DATE: 2/21/17 COMMITTEE CI -IAIR: MCLEOD
RECOMMENDATIONS:
SPONSOR/ADMIN.
COMMITTEE
Communications Division
Unanimous Approval; Forward to C.O.W.
COST IMPACT / FUND SOURCE
Ex1 i :ND'. 'LIRE REQUIRI,D AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED
$
Fund Source:
Comments:
MTG. DATE
RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION
02/27/17
MTG. DATE
ATTACHMENTS
02/27/17
informational Memorandum dated 02/15/17
Shiels Obletz Johnsen Memo, updated after PS Com. in strike -thru underlined format
Siting Criteria Matrix, updated after PS Committee
Minutes from the Public Safety Committee meeting of 2/21/17
189
City of Tukwila
Allan Ekberg, Mayor
INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
TO: Public Safety Committee
FROM: Rachel Bianchi, Communications and Government Relations Manager
CC: Mayor Ekberg
DATE: February 15, 2017
SUBJECT: Public Safety Plan facilities draft siting criteria
ISSUE
As the City continues to implement the Public Safety Plan the Council must ultimately approve
the siting criteria for the various facilities listed in the plan. Prior to Council approval, the City
wishes to share the draft criteria with the public for their feedback. As presented in the Public
Involvement Plan to Council on Monday, February 13, 2017, the open house on Saturday,
March 18 will initiate such outreach. As such, staff wishes to have Council feedback on the
draft criteria prior to the open house.
The Council will have additional opportunities to refine the draft criteria once feedback from the
community on the draft criteria has been received. Staff will then present Council with an
overview of that feedback and ultimately Council will approve the final criteria.
BACKGROUND
Based on the work done to date, interviews with key staff and their own expertise, the City's
Project Management consultants, Shiels Obletz Johnsen prepared the attached memo and
criteria matrix for Council review.
RECOMMENDATION
The Committee is asked to provide feedback to staff on the draft criteria and forward the matter
to the Committee of the Whole meeting on February 27, 2017, which is the last Committee of
the Whole meeting prior to the Open House. The Council will have additional opportunities to
refine the criteria after the public outreach and before finalizing the document.
ATTACHMENTS
Shiels Obletz Johnsen Memo
Siting Criteria Matrix
191
192
s
0
J
TO:
MEM- ORANDUM
Tukwila City Council
CC: Tukwila Mayor Allan Ekberg
FROM: D.J. Baxter
Shiels Obletz Johnsen
DATE: February 27, 2017
SUBJECT: DRAFT Site Selection Criteria for Public Safety Plan Facilities
Shiels l Obletz l Johnsen
Building upon the previous work that the City of Tukwila has done, SOJ has begun to hone a set of
screening criteria to guide the selection and purchase of properties to house Tukwiia's new public
safety facilities. Previous work through the multi -year Facilities Needs Assessment study, as well
as public input gathered at three open houses held last summer on siting these facilities, has
informed this draft screening criteria.
In November of 2014, the City Council was presented with the following seven criteria for
evaluating facility alternatives, which served as the guiding principles for the development of the
facilities recommendation associated with the Public Safety Plan. These criteria remain relevant
today and are incorporated into our overall siting effort. They include, in order of priority
determined by the facilities committee:
• Benefit to Public Safety
• Commitment to Customer Service
• Ensuring the Efficient Delivery of Customer Service
• Containing Development Costs
• Mindfulness of Ongoing Operations Expenses
• Importance of Location
• Significance of Flexibility
The Council's Public Safety Committee recently recommended the clarification that, among other
things, "Containing Development Costs" should include ensuring that the city can deliver all of the
promised facilities within the agreed -upon budget. No site or facility should be allowed to
jeopardize the City's ability to fund all of the facilities contemplated in the Public Safety Plan. In
800 Fifth Avenue 1 Suite 41301 Seattle, WA 98104 I T 206.838.3700 1 sojsea.com
193
Tukwila Public Safety Plan - Site Selection Criteria
February 27, 2017
Page 2
addition, during the public engagement process held prior to the Council's decision to place the
Public Safety Bond on the ballot, participants and in- person and on -line open houses were asked to
provide their feedback on siting considerations for both the Justice Center and Public Works
facilities. Because siting fire stations is a data - driven process focused on ensuring equitable
response times across the City, the focus was kept on the Justice Center and Public Works facility.
Below is a list of the public's priorities, in order, associated with siting these two facilities:
Justice Center
1. Expandability to accommodate future needs
ii. Security for the public and the staff
iii. Nearby transit access
iv. Opportunity to enhance a neighborhood
v. Cost of the overall facility
vi. Sustainabi1ity /environmental concerns
Public Works Facility
i. Expandability to accommodate future needs
Sustainability /environnnental concerns
iii. Opportunity to enhance a neighborhood
iv. Central location
v. Access to new public spaces
vi. Facilities sharing a site
All of this preliminary work has gone into the development of the draft siting criteria for these
facilities. The next step is to share the draft criteria with the public to get their feedback prior to the
Council approving the final criteria. Once approved by the City Council, these criteria will enable
city staff to compare the attributes of various potential properties, and ensure that selected sites
meet the city's operational requirements and maximize conformity with the city's policy objectives
and the desires of the general public. While existing City -owned sites will be evaluated, such as
the Newporter site and existing City Hall campus, it is critical that the sites ultimately selected
meet the criteria developed for each facility. The criteria are divided into three categories:
1. Operational requirements, as developed by the city staff who will be using the new
facilities;
2. Policy objectives or guidance, as expressed in the city's adopted plans and input from the
city council; and
3. Public and neighborhood desires, which will be gathered from a robust public
engagement effort led by the SOJ team.
This memo articulates and describes the criteria developed to date for the Justice Center, and two
fire stations (station 51's location has already been determined), and preliminary criteria for the
Public Works facility to be built pursuant to the city's Public Safety Plan and Bond.
To identify the operational requirements of the Justice Center and the Fire Stations, SOJ developed
a list of questions and issues for consideration by the city's professional staff. SOJ interviewed the
194
Tukwila Public Safety Plan - Site Selection Criteria
February 27, 2017
Page 3
Police Chief: the Court Administrator, and the Fire Chief to ensure a complete understanding of
any operational requirements for these facilities that might bear on site selection. The preliminary
siting criteria for the Public Works facility have been previously developed and are fairly
comprehensive, though additional staff interviews are scheduled in the near future. Many of the
city's operational requirements occur within the proposed facility, and bear more directly on the
design of the new building. Those requirements will be addressed by the selected architects, in
close coordination with the city staff.
Some operational requirements, however, directly influence the selection of an appropriate site for
one of the new facilities. The criteria discussed in this memo and the attached scoring matrix focus
on those considerations that would affect the size, configuration, or location of an appropriate
parcel for each facility.
Building on the Facilities Needs Assessment, community input to date, SOJ's understanding of the
typical needs of a Justice Center and Fire Stations, and our interviews with city staff, we have
developed the following screening criteria for each of the facilities. The preliminary siting criteria
for the Public Works facility have been previously developed and are also included below. Again,
these criteria relate only to the requirements needed for each facility to serve its intended function,
in essence, the "must have" features as they relate to siting. Additional discussions on
programming will come at a later date. The city's policy guidance and additional desires of the
public will be added at later dates, after discussions with the City Council, and after the next round
of public outreach.
As possible sites for each facility are identified, SOJ, city staff, and the city's real estate broker
will use the final approved criteria to evaluate and select sites for further consideration. Upon
selection of a "short list" of options, the team will bring properties to the Mayor and City Council
for consideration.
Below is a list of the proposed criteria for operational requirements, along with descriptions, where
needed. These criteria also form the basis for the attached scoring matrix, where sites can be
compared side -by -side to evaluate their relative merits,
Justice Center:
The Justice Center will provide a new headquarters for the Tukwila Police Department and Court
facilities for the City Courts. The Police Department currently has its offices and needed facilities
spread among several buildings, and suffers significant inefficiencies as a result. The new Justice
Center provides the opportunity to consolidate a wide array of police needs to better serve the
Tukwila community, including administration and office space, evidence storage, booking, holding
cells, equipment storage (both indoor and outdoor), and secure parking for police vehicles and
equipment. The Justice Center will also serve as the City's Emergency Operations Center (EOC)
during a disaster or other event, and therefore must be fully survivable, include off-grid power and
communications, and have multiple access points for vehicles.
The Courts portion of the Justice Center will include new office and administration spaces, a new
courtroom, meeting rooms for attorneys and defendants, a secure private entrance for court staff
195
Tukwila Public Safety Plan - Site Selection Criteria
February 27, 2017
Page 4
that is separate from the Police entrance, and secure parking for court staff. Court staff and police
both report a need for a 50- person meeting room, with flexible seating configurations, that could
be available for city or community functions.
The Justice Center will be a significant multi -use facility, which will require a large, specialized
building and large amounts of public and secured private parking. Given the Levels of daily activity
on this site and the needed access for the public, the location must have easy access to high -
frequency public transit, and be easy to access by car, transit, and on foot. This level of activity
also presents an opportunity for the building to positively transform a neighborhood and act as a
catalyst for other nearby investment. Site selection should consider opportunities for surrounding
private investment, as well as the availability of additional adjacent parcels to accommodate future
growth.
1. City Operational Requirements
a. Police Requirements
i. Building Footprint and Requirements
Many of the Police Department's operational requirements relate to the interior of
the building, and those will be addressed by the architecture team during the
programming and design process. Some of these interior considerations, however,
will bear on the site itself. Naturally, the building's footprint and massing will
influence the appropriateness of a site, and its need for basement space, and how
that space is used will make soil conditions and water table issues relevant. This
criterion will try to encapsulate all site- related considerations that emanate from the
size and configuration of the building itself. If the building footprint cannot fit on
the potential site it would be automatically eliminated.
ii. Parking: Secure Parking for Police Vehicles
The Police Department needs secure space for approximately 80 vehicles during the
day. These include staff vehicles and patrol cars.
iii. Parking: Secure Parking for Police Equipment
The Police Department also operates numerous specialized pieces of equipment,
which also need secure parking. These vehicles need secure storage space and
access to "shore power," to keep batteries charged.
iv. Parking: Evidence Vehicles (optional)
While most of the Police Department's evidence may be stored indoors in a secure
evidence facility, vehicles themselves are often held as evidence. Therefore, a
secure impound lot is required to ensure the preservation of evidence needed in the
prosecution of crimes. This function is currently handled off -site, and may continue
to be handled at a separate location. Having it co- located with the Justice Center
would add convenience for the Police Department, but is not essential.
v. Outdoor Training Area
In order to accommodate the various programmatic needs of the Police Department,
196
Tukwila Public Safely Plan - Site Selection Criteria
February 27, 2017
Page 5
a flexible outdoor area that could be used for training, gathering, and other uses will
provide needed space while maximizing the development's flexibility.
vi. Emergency Operations Center (EOC): Space for Microwave Communications
Equipment
Wireless communications is an essential component to daily operations, and
becomes even more acutely needed during a disaster. Large transmitters and
repeaters can sometimes be located on the roof of a building, but this will depend
on space needs and building design. In the absence of a roof location, these would
need to be located in a secure area on the ground, again affected the needed size and
shape of the parcel.
vii. Emergency Operations Center (EOC): Seismic and Flood Plain
The location and geotechnical features — particularly soils — of the site will be
essential considerations to ensure the EOC's ability to survive a large -scale natural
disaster.
viii. Emergency Operations Center: Fuel Storage for Emergency Generator
An EOC facility will need to be able to continue operating for a prescribed period
of time without access to the electrical grid. Therefore, all "survivable" facilities of
this kind require backup electrical generators, which are typically powered by diesel
fuel. Depending on the desired "off-grid" operating time, storage of the needed
diesel fuel will require additional space and a secure location for the fuel tank.
ix. Access Points: Minimum of Two Streets
Because of the concentration of police vehicles at this site, the property selected
must have access to more than one public street, to ensure that the blockage of one
street cannot trap all of the police resources. Ideally. more access points would be
available. but two are required, at a minimum.
x. Proximity of High Frequency Transit
For staff, visitors, and those interacting with the Police Department, access to the
regional transit system will be essential. The site should be within a short walking
distance (less than Vt mile) from at least two bus routes with high frequency service.
Location proximate to the LINK light rail station would also be a plus, but not
required if the bus access and service levels are satisfactory.
b. Court Requirements:
i. Building Footprint and Requirements
Many of the Court's operational requirements relate to the interior of the building,
and those will be addressed by the architecture team during the programming and
design process. Some of these interior considerations, however, will bear on the site
itself. Naturally, the building's footprint and massing will influence the
appropriateness of a site, and its need for basement space, and how that space is
used, will make soil conditions and water table issues relevant. This criterion will
197
Tukwila Public Safety Plan - Site Selection Criteria
February 27, 2017
Page 6
try to encapsulate all site - related considerations that emanate from the size and
configuration of the building itself. If the building footprint cannot fit on the
potential site it would be automatically eliminated.
Public Parking Needs: Approximately 150 spaces
On each of the three days per week when the court is in session (Monday,
Wednesday, Thursday), the Court handles approximately 130 matters. Each of these
will involve a varied group of participants, including the defendant, defense and
prosecuting attorneys, family members, and witnesses for both sides. To
accommodate these participants in each matter handled, the Justice Center will need
public parking capacity for approximately 150 vehicles.
iii. Secure Parking for Staff & Judge: 10 spaces
Because the judge and court staff members handle criminal cases, a secure parking
facility is essential for the safe arrival and departure of court staff. This means a
parking area that is not accessible to the general public, and is physically connected
to a secure entrance to the building. Court staff would prefer that this entrance be
separate from the entrance used by police.
iv. Community /Meeting room for up to 50 people
The Justice Center will host a wide array of functions that will require a meeting
room to accommodate approximately 50 people. Examples include classes, press
briefings, community meetings, and disaster coordination. Ideally, such a room will
have a flexible seating configuration, and have direct access to the outdoors, so it
can be used during off-hours when the remainder of the building is closed. This
space would be shared with the Police Department and could be used as a
community space.
v. Proximity of High Frequency Transit
For staff, visitors, and those interacting with the Court, access to the regional transit
system will be essential. The site should be within a short walking distance (less
than 1/4 mile) from at least two bus routes with high frequency service. Location
proximate to the LINK. light rail station would also be a plus, but not required if the
bus access and service levels are satisfactory.
2. City Policy Requirements /Guidance:
a. Benefit to Public Safety
b. Commitment to Customer Service
c. Ensuring the Efficient Delivery of Customer Service
d. Containing Development Costs
e. Mindfulness of Ongoing Operations Expenses
f. Importance of Location
g. Significance of Flexibility
h. Catalytic Effect
The Justice Center will serve a large number of city staff members and the general public
198
Tukwila Public Safety Plan - Site Selection Criteria
February 27, 2017
Page 7
on a daily basis. This facility has the ability to positively impact a neighborhood and serve
as a transformational anchor development. As a center of civic activity, the Justice Center
could catalyze private development nearby. Site selection should consider the availability
and proximity of private investment opportunities that might enhance the positive effects of
the Justice Center.
Opportunities for Future Growth and Expansion
Like all of the facilities being built with the Public Safety Bond, the Justice Center will
need to serve the city's needs well into the future. Given the robust growth being
experienced throughout the Seattle metropolitan area, the City of Tukwila's 30-year
planning horizon should include realistic estimates of the city's growth opportunities. Site
selection for the Justice Center should consider the ability of the site or nearby parcels to
accommodate additional capacity as the city grows.
Location of Utilities and Infrastructure
Location will be influenced by the availability of surrounding utilities, as well as
supporting infrastructure to ensure adequate provision of service to the facility.
k. Ongoing Operating Expenses
The City desires to contain ongoing operating expenses as a goal of the Public Safety Plan.
Therefore, all sites shall be reviewed according to potential ongoing operating expenses.
I. Opportunities for Innovation
Site selection for each facility should consider any space or location needs that will enable
Tukwila's staff to pursue accepted best practices, and to adopt innovative approaches to
achieving efficiency and effectiveness in serving the public.
Fire Stations:
Selection of the sites for two new fire stations (52, and 54; the location of 51 has already been
determined) will necessarily be a data - driven exercise, with the highest priority placed on
providing the best possible response times in an equitable distribution to the entire city. The .
response time data will be generated by FACETS Consulting, a specialist in public safety and
crisis response services. This information will be provided in the Spring of 2017. in the form of
GIS polygons that identify geographic areas within which each station may be located to provide
the needed response times. This information will take into account future growth, so that the city
is adequately planning for the generational nature of these new facilities. Within those
geographic areas, the selection criteria developed here, which are based on input from the Fire
Department, the City Council, and the public, will provide further guidance to the site selection
process. The evaluation of each potential site against a common set of criteria will enable the city
to pursue properties that meet the core operational requirements for the fire stations and
maximize each site's ability to also meet city policy objectives and the public's desires for the
community.
1. City Operational Requirements
199
Tukwila Public Safety Plan - Site Selection Criteria
February 27, 2017
Page 8
a. Response Time — Location within Polygon
First and most important selection criterion for any of the fire station sites will be
location within one of the recommended response time polygons.
b. Parcel Size
The primary driver, after locations based on response time, will be parcel size and
access. The parcel will need to be large enough to accommodate the station itself
and pull - through equipment movements, with outdoor staging aprons for fire
apparatus at both the entry and exit sides of the vehicle bays.
c. Parking Needs
Each parcel will need to be able to accommodate vehicle parking for firefighters
and public visitors, as well as some outdoor equipment storage. including the Fire
Department's numerous special- purpose trailers and boats. Indoor storage will
also be needed for specialized equipment.
d. Multiple Vehicle Entry Points
Each site will also require multiple access points from at least two public streets.
e. EOC Standards
While the EOC will be housed in the Justice Center, site conditions must also
meet the standards of an Emergency Operations Center for soil and seismic
stability, and location outside flood plain areas, to ensure the facility can continue
to operate fully during a disaster. Each site must have a location for an emergency
backup generator and associated fuel storage.
f. Neighborhood Considerations
In some locations, adjacent property users may be sensitive to fire station
operations The Fire Department is able to modify its response operations to
minimize evening disruptions for neighboring homes or businesses.
g-
Location of Utilities and Infrastructure
Location will be influenced by the availability of surrounding utilities, as well as
supporting infrastructure to ensure adequate provision of service to the facility.
h. Ongoing Operating Expenses
The City desires to contain ongoing operating expenses as a goal of the Public
Safety Plan. Therefore, all sites shall be reviewed according to potential ongoing
operating expenses.
Opportunities for Innovation
Site selection for each facility should consider any space or location needs that will
enable Tukwila's staff to pursue accented best practices. and to adopt innovative
approaches to achieving efficiency and effectiveness in serving the public.
200
Tukwila Public Safely Plan - Site Selection Criteria
February 27, 2017
Page 9
Public Works Facility
Preliminary criteria for selecting the Public Works facility were developed through the Facilities
Needs Assessment process previously undertaken by the City. This foundational work provides
us with a significant understanding of what is needed for this facility.
1. City Operational Requirements
a. Building Footprint and Requirements
Many of Public Works operational requirements are already known and directly
relate to the site's footprint. The Facilities Needs Assessment identified that a 10 to
15 acre site is needed, with a minimum of 8 to 10 acres of usable land, with areas
for bin storage, covered vehicle storage, repair shop, offices, secure staff parking,
public parking, maintenance shop, specialized equipment storage and outdoor
storage for various materials.
b. Location
As an essential public facility and public safety response facility, the site must be
located outside of the mapped floodplain and flood ways and outside of areas with
soils prone to liquefaction. As an industrial facility, the siting process must be
cognizant of zoning to ensure the facility is located in an appropriate area, such as a
neighborhood zoned light industrial. As a single facility that serves the entire city,
consideration must be given to the site allowing for efficient service delivery
throughout Tukwila.
c. Reserve Power, Fuel Storage
The site must include area for backup power and fuel storage to ensure seamless
delivery of service during an incident that may affect power and other utilities.
d. Expansion Capability
Siting considerations must take into account the ability for the facility to grow as
the City's Public Works needs increase over time with additional development and
residents.
e. Location of Utilities and Infrastructure
Location will be influenced by the availability of surrounding utilities, as well as
supporting infrastructure to ensure adequate provision of service to the facility.
f. Ongoing Operating Expenses
The City desires to contain ongoing operating expenses as a goal of the Public
Safety Plan. Therefore, all sites shall be reviewed according to potential ongoing
operating expenses.
g.
Opportunities for Innovation
Site selection for each facility should consider any space or location needs that will
enable Tukwila's staff to pursue accepted best practices, and to adopt innovative
approaches to achieving efficiency and effectiveness in serving the public.
201
Site Selection Criteria, v.3
Public Safety Plan Facilities
Justice Center Criteria
v
`
v
EVALUATION CRITERIA - JUSTICE CENTER
IMSite Alternatives - Justice Center
#1
#2
#3
#4
85
#6
#7
#8
#9
For Illustration Only
Example Site
3900 S Example Street
1. City Operational Requirements - Must Have
Scores for
a. Police Requirements
Illustration
i. Parcel accommodates building footprint & requiremen%
Only
ii. Secure parking for 80 PD vehicles
2
iii. Secure parking for PD equipment
9
iv. Secure parking for evidence vehicles (optional)
v. Outdoor training area
2
vi. EOC Requirement: microwave communications equip
7
vii. EOC Requirement: seismic, flood plain
viii. EOC Req: fuel storage for emergency generator
7
ix. Multiple access points, min 2 streets
7
x. Proximity of high frequency transit
9
b. Court Requirements
i. Parcel accommodates building footprint & requirements
ii. Public parking needs: 150 spaces
iii. Secure parking for staff /judge: 10 spaces
iv. Community /meeting room for 50, flex configuration
v. High Frequency Transit - scored above
above
above
above
above
above
above
above
above
above
Subtotal out of possible 140:
43
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2. City Policy Requirements /Guidance
a. Benefit to Public Safety
b. Commitment to Customer Service
c. Ensuring the Efficient Delivery of Customer Service
d. Containing Development Costs
- Ensure ability to deliver all promised facilities
e. Mindfulness of Ongoing Operations Expenses
f. Importance of Location
g. Significance of Flexibility
h. Opportunity to catalyze private developments
i. Opportunities for future expansion
j. Location of utilities and infrastructure
k. Ongoing operating expenses
I. Opportunities for innovation
Subtotal:
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3. Public Desires
i. Expandability to accommodate future needs
ii. Security for the public and the staff
iii. Nearby transit access
iv. Opportunity to enhance a neighborhood
v. Cost of the overall facility
vi. Sustainability /environmental concerns
Subtotal:
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total Score
43
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
L
4. Site Details
a. Existing Building?
YES
b. Parcel Size
120,000
c. Building size
45,000
d. Parking capacity - public
175
e. Parking capacity - secure
20
f. Walking distance to transit (feet)
675
g. Transit frequency (every xx minutes)
15
5. Costs
a. Purchase Option - applied to purch price, not in total
b. Purchase Price
$5,699,000
c. Due Diligence
d. Site Modifications
e. Building Modifications
f. New Construction
Total Costs
$5,699,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$o
Legend:
® Unfavorable
4 -6 Neutral
14 Favorable
Ideal
203
204
Site Selection Criteria, v.3
Public Safety Plan Facilities
Fire Station Criteria
Fl
-o
v
m
EVALUATION CRITERIA - FIRE STATIONS
Site
Alternatives - Fire Stations
Station 52
Station 54
91
92
93
94
95
96
For Illustration Only
Example Site
3900 S Example Street
1. City Operational Requirements - Must Have
a. Location within Response Time Polygon
10
b. Parcel Size
2
c. Parking Needs
9
d. Multiple Entry Points
10
e. EOC Standards
2
f. Neighborhood Considerations
7
g. Location of utilities and infrastructure
h. Ongoing operating expenses
Subtotal out of possible 60:
40
0
0
0
0
0
2. City Policy Requirements /Guidance
a. Benefit to Public Safety
b. Commitment to Customer Service
c. Ensuring the Efficient Delivery of Customer Service
d. Containing Development Costs
- Ensure ability to deliver all promised facilities
e. Mindfulness of Ongoing Operations Expenses
f. Importance of Location
g. Significance of Flexibility
h. Opportunities for innovation
Subtotal:
0
0
0
0
0
0
3. Public Desires
Subtotal:
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total Score' 40
0
0
I 0
0
0
4. Site Details
a. Parcel Size
43,560
b. Building size
12,500
c. Parking capacity - public
15
d. Parking capacity - equipment
4
5. Costs
a. Purchase Option - applied to purch price, not in total
b. Purchase Price
$1,500,000
c. Due Diligence
d. Site Modifications
e. Building Modifications
f. New Construction
Total Costs
$1,500,000
$0
SO
$0
$0
$0
Legend:
Unfavorable
4-6 Neutral
Favorable
Ideal
205
206
Site Selection Criteria, v.3
Public Safety Plan Facilities
Public Works Facility Criteria
o a
a
v
in
EVALUATION CRITERIA - PUBLIC WORKS FACILITY
gl Site Alternatives - Public Works Facility
91
#2
#3
#4
#5
#6
For Illustration Only
Example Site
3900 S Example Street
Al
1. City Operational Requirements - Must Have
a. Building footprint and requirements
10
b. Location
2
c. Reserve power, fuel storage
9
d. Expansion capability
10
e. Location of utilities and infrastructure
2
f. Ongoing operating expenses
7
Subtotal out of possible 60:
40
0
0
0
0
0
2. City Policy Requirements /Guidance
a. Benefit to Public Safety
b. Commitment to Customer Service
c. Ensuring the Efficient Delivery of Customer Service
d. Containing Development Costs
- Ensure ability to deliver all promised facilities
e. Mindfulness of Ongoing Operations Expenses
f. Importance of Location
g. Significance of Flexibility
h. Opportunities for innovation
Subtotal:
0
0
0
0
0
0
3. Public Desires
i. Expandability to accommodate future needs
ii. Sustainability /environmental concerns
iii. Opportunity to enhance a neighborhood
iv. Central location
v. Access to new public spaces
vi. Facilities sharing a site
Subtotal:
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total Score! 40
0
0
0
0
0
4. Site Details
a. Parcel Size
225,000
b. Building size
n/a
c. Parking capacity - public
27
d. Parking capacity - equipment
13
5. Costs
a. Purchase Option - applied to purch price, not in total
b. Purchase Price
$2,600,000
c. Due Diligence
d. Site Modifications
e. Building Modifications
f. New Construction
Total Costs
$2,600,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Legend:
1 -3 Unfavorable
4 -6 Neutral
7 -9 Favorable
Ideal
207
208
City of Tukwila
City Council Public Safety Committee
PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE
Meeting Minutes
February 21, 2017 - 5:30 p.m. - Hazelnut Conference Room - City Hall
Councilmembers: Thomas McLeod, Chair; Joe Duffie, De'Sean Quinn
Staff: David Cline, Chuck Woolley, Bob Giberson, Rachel Bianchi, Bruce Linton, Mike
Villa, Jay Wittwer, Mark Dunlap, Laurel Humphrey
Guests: Carrie Holmes and D.J. Baxter, Shiels Obletz Johnsen
CALL TO ORDER: Committee Chair McLeod called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m.
I. ANNOUNCEMENT
II. BUSINESS AGENDA
A. Ordinance: Destruction of Forfeited Firearms
Staff is seeking Council approval of an ordinance that would amend Tukwila Municipal Code
Section 8.11.030 to allow for used, out of warranty, or unserviceable firearms to be returned to
the manufacturer through an authorized "buy back" program." This would be in addition to
destruction of firearms when appropriate, and the reduction in price due to the trade -in would
result in cost savings to the city. The Committee was in favor of the proposal contingent on
written clarity from the manufacturers regarding the disposition of the returned firearms,
expressing concern about former City guns ending up in criminal scenarios. UNANIMOUS
APPROVAL PENDING REQUEST INFORMATION. FORWARD TO FEBRUARY 27, 2017
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE.
B. Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS)
Staff updated the Committee on a new Police Department policy related to Unmanned Aircraft
Systems (UAS) and requested to purchase equipment for a UAS pilot program in the amount of
$39,000. PD would like to pilot the use of UAS to enhance search and rescue, reconstruct crime
scenes, respond to incidents, improve situational awareness and safety, and assess damage
during disaster response. The PD policy addresses definitions, procedures, restrictions,
reporting, recording, and privacy. The Committee asked clarifying questions and due to time
restrictions requested that the item return for further discussion. RETURN TO MARCH 6, 2017
PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE.
C. Public Safety Plan Draft Facilities Siting Criteria
Staff is seeking Council approval of the siting criteria to be used for the various facilities include
in the Public Safety Plan. If approved by Council, the draft criteria will be shared with the public
at the Open House to be held on March 18, 2017 at Station 54, 10:00 a.m. - 12 noon. Once
feedback from the public is collected the Council will be asked to weigh in further and
209
Public Safety Committee Minutes February2l, 2017
ultimately adopt final criteria. The criteria is outlined in the memo from Shiels Obletz Johnsen
and formatted in matrices that will be used as scoring sheets for each potential site. Criteria
include city operational requirements (including the affected departments), city policy
requirements, public desires, site details, and costs. Councilmember Quinn requested the
addition of "innovation" under city policy requirements and "containing development costs to
ensure all facilities are built" under costs. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL WITH REQUESTED
ADDTIONS. FORWARD TO FEBRUARY 27, 2017 COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE.
D. Framework for Public Safety Plan Siting Advisory Committee
Staff is seeking Council approval of a framework for the Siting Advisory Committee associated
with the Public Safety Plan. The Committee had previously recommended a framework to the
Committee of the Whole, which sent it back to Committee for additional review. The revised
draft is presented in Charter format and includes additional details on the committee's
responsibility, additional language regarding ethics and limitations, and updates the
appointments to reflect three members to be appointed by Council and one by the Mayor. The
Committee recommended that when the bylaws are developed by the Siting Advisory
Committee they further address potential conflicts of interest. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL.
FORWARD TO FEBRUARY 27, 2017 COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE.
E. Format of Monthly Public Safety Plan Report to Council
Staff is seeking Council approval of a format for a monthly report to the Council on the Public
Safety Plan. The proposal includes status updates, upcoming activities, and a rolling annual
calendar. The report will be included in the agenda packet of the first Regular Meeting of every
month in hopes of keeping Council well - informed throughout the complex projects. The
Committee approved the format and Councilmember Duffie suggested minimizing the use of
acronyms as this will be available to the public. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO
FEBRUARY 27, 2017 COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE.
F. 2016 4th Quarter Police Department Report
This item will be rescheduled to the March 6, 2017 Public Safety Committee meeting.
III. MISCELLANEOUS
Adjourned 6:46 p.m.
�`'r Committee Chair Approval
Minutes by LH
210