Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
REG 2017-03-06 COMPLETE AGENDA PACKET
Tukwila City Council Agenda • ❖ REGULAR MEETING ❖ Allan Ekberg, Mayor Counci /members: • :- Joe Duffie • :- Verna Seal David Cline, City Administrator Kathy Hougardy • :- De'Sean Quinn Dennis Robertson, Council President Kate Kruller • :- Thomas McLeod Monday, March 6, 2017; 7:00 PM • Ord #2523 • Res #1906 1. CALL TO ORDER / PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE / ROLL CALL 2. SPECIAL a. New employee introductions: PRESENTATIONS - Police Department: Oath of Office to Officer Howard Kim (Badge #228); Amairani Uribe - Beltran, Washington Service Corps Volunteer Officer - Fire Department: Joseph Paglia and Michael Tappert, Entry Level Firefighters - Community Development: Jaclyn Adams, Admin Support Tech; Maxwell Baker, Assistant Planner; Lindsay Brown, Assistant Planner; Lauri Dunning, Code Enforcement Officer; Lee Sipe, Building Inspector III; Lori Solberg, Half -time Admin Support Tech — Rental Housing - Communications: Mia Navarro, Community Engagement Manager - Finance: Sherry Wright, Senior Fiscal Coordinator - Human Resources: Sara Valdez, Human Resources Analyst - Parks & Recreation Department: Olena Perry, Volunteer & Event Specialist b. Update on "The Loop" sewer project. Dana Dick, Manager, Valley View Sewer District. 3. PUBLIC At this time, you are invited to comment on items not included on this agenda COMMENTS (please limit your comments to five minutes per person). To comment on an item listed on this agenda, please save your comments until the issue is presented for discussion. (Refer to back of agenda page for additional information.) 4. CONSENT a. Approval of Minutes: 2/21/17 (Regular) AGENDA b. Approval of Vouchers c. Accept as complete the Tukwila Urban Center (TUC) Transit Center/ Pg.7 Andover Park West Street and Water Projects (contract #13 -209) with Road Construction Northwest, Inc.; authorize release of retainage, subject to the standard claim and lien release procedures (final cost of project, including retainage: $6,260,795.43). [Reviewed and forwarded to Consent by the Transportation and Infrastructure Committee on 2128117] d. Authorize the Mayor to sign a contract for on -call engineering support Pg.25 services with TranTech Engineering, LLC, for the 2017 Bridge Program in the amount of $90,000.00. [Reviewed and forwarded to Consent by the Transportation and Infrastructure Committee on 2128117] e. Authorize the Mayor to sign Supplemental Agreement No. 16 to Pg.45 contract #07 -123 with KPFF for the Baker Boulevard Non - Motorized Improvements Project in the amount of $77,798.67. [Reviewed and forwarded to Consent by the Transportation and Infrastructur Committee on 2128117] IL_ (continued...) REGULAR MEETING Monday, March 6, 2017 Page 2 5. UNFINISHED a. A resolution adopting the Green Tukwila 20 -Year Plan for the City of Pg.63 BUSINESS Tukwila. b. Three ordinances updating landscaping regulations: Pg.67 (1) An ordinance adding a new definition related to trees to be Pg.69 codified in Tukwila Municipal Code Chapter 18.06; amending various ordinances as codified in Chapter 18.52 of the Tukwila Municipal Code to recodify various sections and to establish new landscape requirements; repealing various ordinance sections to eliminate existing Tukwila Municipal Code Sections 18.52.035 and 18.52.040. (2) An ordinance amending Ordinance Nos. 2199 §18, 1872 §14 Pg.93 (part) and 1853 §4 to relocate certain sections of the Tukwila Municipal Code from the Landscape Requirements chapter to the Supplemental Development Standards chapter. (3) An ordinance amending Ordinance Nos. 2199 §18 and 1872 §14 Pg.97 (part), as codified at Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) Section 18.52.060, 'Recreation Space Requirements," to remove that section from TMC Chapter 18.52 and add 'Recreation Space Requirements" to TMC Chapters 18.12 and 18.14. 6. NEW BUSINESS a. Authorize the Mayor to sign a lease agreement with Davenport Pg.103 Group /Dell Client System in an amount not to exceed $400,000.00. b. An ordinance establishing regulations prohibiting residential rental Pg.123 discrimination, to be codified at Tukwila Municipal Code Chapter 8.47. 7. REPORTS a. Mayor b. City Council c. Staff - City Administrator Report Pg.137 d. City Attorney e. Council Analyst S. MISCELLANEOUS 9. EXECUTIVE SESSION — Collective Bargaining — Pursuant to RCW 42.30.140(4)(a) — 90 minutes QPiease bring your Collective Bargaining notebooks. 10. ADJOURNMENT Tukwila City Hall is ADA accessible. Reasonable accommodations are available at public hearings with advance notice to the City Clerk's Office (206- 433 -1800 or TukwilaCityClerk @TukwilaWA.gov). This agenda is available at www.tukwilawa.gov, and in alternate formats with advance notice for those with disabilities. Tukwila Council meetings are audio /video taped (available at www.tukwilawa.gov) IL HOW TO TESTIFY When recognized by the Presiding Officer to address the Council, please go to the podium and state your name and address clearly for the record. Please observe the basic rules of courtesy when speaking and limit your comments to 5 minutes. The Council appreciates hearing from citizens and members of the public, and may not be able to answer questions or respond during the meeting. PUBLIC COMMENTS Members of the public are given the opportunity to address the Council on items that are NOT included on the agenda during PUBLIC COMMENTS. Please limit your comments to 5 minutes. If you have a comment on an Agenda item, please wait until that item comes up for discussion to speak on that topic. SPECIAL MEETINGS /EXECUTIVE SESSIONS Special Meetings may be called at any time with proper public notice. Procedures followed are the same as those used in Regular Council meetings. Executive Sessions may be called to inform the Council of pending legal action, financial, or personnel matters as prescribed by law. Executive Sessions are not open to the public. PUBLIC HEARINGS Public Hearings are required by law before the Council can take action on matters affecting the public interest such as land -use laws, annexations, rezone requests, public safety issues, etc. Section 2.04.150 of the Tukwila Municipal Code states the following guidelines for Public Hearings: The proponent shall speak first and is allowed 15 minutes for a presentation. 2. The opponent is then allowed 15 minutes to make a presentation. 3. Each side is then allowed 5 minutes for rebuttal. 4. Members of the public who wish to address the Council may speak for 5 minutes each. No one may speak a second time until everyone wishing to speak has spoken. 5. After each speaker has spoken, the Council may question the speaker. Each speaker can respond to the question, but may not engage in further debate at that time. 6. After the Public Hearing is closed and during the Council meeting, the Council may choose to discuss the issue among themselves, or defer the discussion to a future Council meeting, without further public testimony. Council action may only be taken during Regular or Special Meetings. COUNCIL MEETING SCHEDULE No Council meetings are scheduled on the 5th Monday of the month unless prior public notification is given. Regular Meetings - The Mayor, elected by the people to a four -year term, presides at all Regular Council Meetings held on the 1 st and 3rd Mondays of each month at 7:00 p.m. and Special Meetings. Official Council action in the form of formal motions, adopting of resolutions and passing of ordinances can only be taken at Regular or Special Council meetings. Committee of the Whole Meetings - Councilmembers are elected for a four -year term. The Council President is elected by the Councilmembers to preside at all Committee of the Whole meetings for a one -year term. Committee of the Whole meetings are held the 2nd and 4th Mondays at 7:00 p.m. Issues discussed there are forwarded to Regular or Special Council meetings for official action. Presentation to Tukwila City Council MARCH 6, 2017 N Agenda 1. History of The Loop Sewer Project 2. Funding Status 3. Project Status • t� T tor 9"i'` a _ w 3 ;F i _ 42ND - PROJECT • _ t Asit r ,riort. ,.1: 1 { E. i A. =ti Sewer Service Agreement 15-115 Council Approval 5i 18(15 VALLEY VIEW SEWER DISTRICT .AND CITY OF TUKWILA SEWER SERVICE AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into by and between VALLEY VIEW 05WRR DISTRICT, King County, Washington (`District') and he CI FY Op TUKWILA, Washington ( "City ") each a Washington municipal corporation (collectively the "Parties" and individually a RECITALS A. The City, a non-charter code city operating wider Title 35A RCW, and the District, a sewer district operating under Tide 57 RCW, both own and operate sewer enlleetio systems within their respective sewer service areas. B. Pursuant to 12CW 754. 11.040, RCW 35.67300, RCW 57.08.0005(12), and Chapter 3934 RCW, the Parties areamhorized to cooperate with each other to provide sower services in a manner that sill best satisfy the geographic, planning, economic, financing and development interests of the Patties. C. An area of the City botmded generally by South 160 0 Street 42' Avenue South, State Route 518, and 5l' Avenac South, and commonly referred to as the loop area ("T.00p Area "), currently is not seined by a public sewer system. The Loop Area is not within the boundaries gibe District. D. Pursuant to RCW 3700.003(9), the District is authorized to acquire, construct. rate sewer systems_ both within the District and outside the District. Pursuant the District bas adopted a comprehensive pisn that includes most of the Loop senice area. E. he City is designing and planning a slecetprojeet on 42 avenue South, in the vicinity 005001 zoop Arca, with construction anticipated in 2016. In conjunction with this street project, the: District is designing and planning an eight -itch sewer pipe and a manhole, together with appurtenances, at approximately 42'd Avenue South and State Rnute 518 ( "District Project"). The District Project, combined salt es-tensions and facilities, would provide sewer service to the Loop Area l0 contrast the nearest City manhole to the Loop Area is approximately 2,000 feet Fast of We Loop Arai. R The Loop Area is within the City's 0000001 Sewer Comprehensive Plant. However, construction of a sewer system in the Loop Ar00 is a lour priority for the City, as the native soils in the Loop Ana are sufficient to infiltrate vcastewarer for a majority of the on -site sewer systems m the Loop Area The City anticipates that several lar¢0lots within the Loop Area will he developed in the near future, before the City has cons a saver spsfem in the Loop Area. 4as3 ? 08,119(WOt -t- /'ta� I6 /A//{t) Sewer Service Agreement The District is willing to constrain and install the District Project, and to e and plan fix sewer service to the Loop Area, as long ac the City supports the 3. District as Sewer Service Provider. Upon becoming the provider of sewer service for the Loop Area, the District shall have the sole responsibility, power and authority to construct, condemn, purchase, acquire, maintain and operate the sewer system, together with any additions, extensions and betterments thereto. The District further shall have the sole responsibility, power and authority to fix, alter, regulate and control the charges and rates. Any District work in the City streets or right -of -way shall be subject to City ordinances, rules and regulations. After the District has become the provider of sewer service, property owners who connect to the sewer system shall be District customers, and shall be subject to all District laws and regulations. and regulations. 4. Sewer Connection Ordinance. Upon request of the Distrwt,the City shall present to the Tukwila City Council an ordinance that requires the owners of ropertp and buildings in the Loop Area to connect to the District's sewer system and to pay the District's sewYt connection charges, in accordance with terms and conditions that arc similar to Tukwila Ordinance No_ 2007 at Exhibit C but flat axe established by the District. 5. Effi.are Date. The effective date of this Agreement shall be the date on which the tact person of both Parties has executed this Agreement. The tenn of this Agreement shall be 1660,1.31 m.s,, —2— ntzlevA i f .� • •• (:)-) 4 _ . :,, lib 500 CFU /100 m 10/13/15 290 CFU /100 mL 10/13/15 • -, t r 4 Iv Gilliam Creek Outfall to Green River 1700 CFU /100 mL 10/5/15 830 CFU /100 mL 10/13/15 230 CFU /100 mL 10/13/15 4900 CFU /100 m 10/13/15 ..4 320 CFU /100 m 4/9/15 Funding Applied for State Revolving Fund /Centennial Clean Water Fund money in 2015 Public meetings held on: ▪ July 15, 2015 (at Valley View) ▪ August 31 , 2015 (at Valley View) ▪ September 10, 2015 (at Valley View) ▪ October 12th, 2015 (Tukwila Council chambers) ▪ July 20, 2016 (at Valley View) ▪ Ongoing one -on -one meetings with property owners as part of the design process r�% co Funding Top Three State Revolving Fund /Centennial Clean Water Fund Applications (out of 155) Rank Score Agency Project Cost 1 945.0 Valley View (MRS /Hilltop) $2,166,000 2 942.5 City of Toppenish $1,246,000 3 927.5 Valley View (The Loop) $4,779,200* funding offered as a 0.10% loan • Funding 2017 Supplemental Budgets District 33 Legislators: Senator Karen Keiser Representative Mia Gregerson Representative Tina Orwell T,W1 AV CA r�% Funding Top Three State Revolving Fund /Centennial Clean Water Fund Applications (out of 155) Rank Score Agency Project Cost 1 945.0 Valley View (MRS /Hilltop) $2,166,000 2 942.5 City of Toppenish $1,246,000 3 927.5 Valley View (The Loop) $4,779,200* funding offered as a 0.10% loan r�% Funding 2017 -2019 Biennial Budget g Senator Karen Keiser, District 33, Ways and Means Committee District 11 Legislators Q Senator Bob Hasegawa a Representative Zack Hudgins Representative Steve Bergquist E N Funding Governor's Proposed Budget Released December 2016 NEW SECTION. Sec. 3066. FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY 2017 -19 Centennial Clean Water Program (30000705) Appropriation: 2017 2018 Total Biennia Source of Funds State Building Construction Account $25,000,000 $25,000,000 $50,000,000 . $250,000,000 Additional Non - Construction Costs w King County Treatment Capacity Charge currently $8,912.91 Valley View General Facility charge $4,033 r�% Additional Non - Construction Costs 2016 CDBG Capital Applications for 2017 Funds Proposal Title Performance Measures Request Minimum Request Recommen ded Award Ranking JRC Approved South Sub - Region - Estimated Funds Available $803,919 Diocese of Olympia — New Roots 60 People $ 60,000 $ 32,000 $ 60,000 1 $60,000 Tukwila Minor Home 65 Repair * ** Households $125,000 $100,000 $125,000 2 $125,000 Valley View Sewer District 20 Special Assessments *, ** Households $301,080 $ 0 $280,919 3 $280,919 Highline StartZone Microenterprise 92 Persons $110,000 $92,000 $110,000 4 $110,000 Burien Lakeview Park 2,116 Playground & ADA accessibility Persons $228,195 $208,195 $228,000 5 $228,000 Sub- Region Total $824,275 $803,919 $803,919 * If available funds are higher than projected this project will receive additional funding up to the maximum request. ** If available funds are lower than projected, this project will be reduced. * ** Any remaining additional funds will go to Tukwila Minor Home Repair. nsitym Project Construction Status 01 Current plan for construction in 2018 dependent on: • Funding: may not know until July of 2017, or until State Budget is approved. • Sewer District Commissioners' decision on moving forward after further discussions with project area residents. Finalizing design and easement acquisition. • Permitting through the City of Tukwila, Fisheries, WSDOT, Army Corps of Engineers. r�% Questions? alley ��er_ COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS ---------------------------- - - - - -- Initial c Meeliq Date Prepared b y 10,1 q y% i- I M ' review Council review 03/06/17 BG.W, ❑ Resolution Aftg Dale ❑ Ordinance Altg Dale ❑ Bid.A ward Aftg Date ❑ Public Heatin ,g All ,g Date n 011)er Ali Date SPONSOR ❑ Council ❑ Major ❑ HR ❑ DCD ❑ Finance [:] Fire ❑ IT ❑ P&R ❑ Police ❑ PV SPONSOR'S The contract with Road Construction Northwest is complete for the Tukwila Urban Center SUMMARY Transit Center and Andover Park West Street and Water Improvements. This contract built a new on-street Transit Center and provided corridor reconstruction and water main replacement on APW from Tukwila Pkwy to Strander Blvd. Change orders and unit price under-runs totaled $220,987.93. Council is being asked to accept and finalize the contract with Road Construction NW in the amount of $6,260,795.43. Ri,'A,1FAy,T'1I) BY ❑ cow mtg. ❑ CA&P Cmte ❑ F&S Cmte ❑ Transportation Cmte F_j Utilities Cmte ❑ Arts Comm. ❑ Parks Comm. F-1 Planning Comm. DATE: 02/28/17 COMMITTEE CHAIR: KATE KRULLER RECOMMENDATIONS: SPONSOR/ADMIN. Public Works COMMH -"BI Unanimous Approval; Forward to Regular Consent Agenda COST IMPACT / FUND SOURCE ExM7,NDITURI: REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED $6,260,795.43 $6,943,136.00 $0.00 Fund Source: 104 ARTERIAL STREETS & 401 WATER Cominents: MTG. DATE RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION 03/06/17 ITEM INFORMATION ITEMNO, 4.C. CAS NUMBER: I STAFFSPONSOik: BOB GIBERSON ORI(;IN.\],A(;I�NI).\D.\-I'I,': 03/06/17 A(,,I,'NI),\ I'n;'Ni Trri,i Tukwila Urban Center Transit Center & Andover Park West Street & Water Contract Completion and Acceptance C,\'I'[,"(,()RY F-1 Discussion Altg Date Z Motion AlIg Date 03106117 ❑ Resolution Aftg Dale ❑ Ordinance Altg Dale ❑ Bid.A ward Aftg Date ❑ Public Heatin ,g All ,g Date n 011)er Ali Date SPONSOR ❑ Council ❑ Major ❑ HR ❑ DCD ❑ Finance [:] Fire ❑ IT ❑ P&R ❑ Police ❑ PV SPONSOR'S The contract with Road Construction Northwest is complete for the Tukwila Urban Center SUMMARY Transit Center and Andover Park West Street and Water Improvements. This contract built a new on-street Transit Center and provided corridor reconstruction and water main replacement on APW from Tukwila Pkwy to Strander Blvd. Change orders and unit price under-runs totaled $220,987.93. Council is being asked to accept and finalize the contract with Road Construction NW in the amount of $6,260,795.43. Ri,'A,1FAy,T'1I) BY ❑ cow mtg. ❑ CA&P Cmte ❑ F&S Cmte ❑ Transportation Cmte F_j Utilities Cmte ❑ Arts Comm. ❑ Parks Comm. F-1 Planning Comm. DATE: 02/28/17 COMMITTEE CHAIR: KATE KRULLER RECOMMENDATIONS: SPONSOR/ADMIN. Public Works COMMH -"BI Unanimous Approval; Forward to Regular Consent Agenda COST IMPACT / FUND SOURCE ExM7,NDITURI: REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED $6,260,795.43 $6,943,136.00 $0.00 Fund Source: 104 ARTERIAL STREETS & 401 WATER Cominents: MTG. DATE RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION 03/06/17 MTG. DATE ATTACHMENTS 03/06/17 Informational Memorandum dated 02/24/17 State of WA Depart of Revenue Notice of Completion 13-209 Minutes from the Transportation & Infrastructure Committee meeting of 02/28/17 17 1 T{}: FROM: BY: CC: DATE: ity of Tukwila Allan Ekberg, Mayor Public Works Department - Bob Giberson, Director INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM Transportation and Infrastructure Committee Bob Giberson, Public Works Director /�x�\ |4c_, Peter Lau, Senior Program Manager Mayor Ekberg February 24, 2017 SUBJECT: Tukwila Urban Center Transit Center/Andover Park West Street and Water Proiects Project Nos. 90610402, 98810404 and 99840105, Contract No. 13-209 Contract Completion and Acceptance ISSUE Accept construction contract as complete and authorize release of retainugo. BACKGROUND The Notice to Proceed for Contract Number 13-209 with Road Construction Northwest, Inc. of Renton, Washington was issued on February 10'2O14. This construction project buib8Dewon-stnaettranSitCenter and provided corridor reconstruction and water main replacement on Andover Park West from Tukwila Parkway toStnaDd8rBoulevard. DISCUSSION The TUC Transit Center construction project vvaophvoice|k/oonnp|atedonAoh|3.2D15.Theextendedhnne for closeout was due to the Contractor's Request for Equitable Adjustment to Contract Price for $63 .691.67 and eventually agreed toa$2O0.00O.00change order settlement. FINANCIAL IMPACT The construction budget for the TUC Transit Center and Andover Park Improvements was $G,S43.136.0O. Twenty change orders were executed in an amount of $365,311.40, including the $200,000.00 settlement change order. Unit price under-runs were mainly due to the collective under-utilization of some bid items on asphalt, concrete, utility trenching, atnm[funa| oni|' and explorative excavation hJv:e accounts. Retainuge is being held by the City in the amount of$3OS'O78.l2. RECOMMENDATION Council is being asked to formally accept the Tukwila Urban Center Transit Center/Andover Park West Street and Water Projects vvdhRoadCOnsdmVctiODNoMhvveSt'|nc.inth9@mountof$6.2GO'7A5.43ao complete, and authorize the release of retainage subject to standard claim and lien release procedures, and to consider this item on the Consent Agenda at the March 6, 2017 Regular Council Meeting. Attachment: Notice of Completion, Contract #13-2O WAPW EngTROJECTSWRWaRS*oiects\Transit Center - mwmnstructionamoseouflnf"Memo Transit Center close out, 022417 gl docx Expenses Construction Contract Amount (pre-tax ) $5,960,574.00 Change Order Nos. 1ho20 305.311.40 Unit Price Under-runs (144.323.47) VVA State Sales Tax 79�33.50 Total Contract Amount RECOMMENDATION Council is being asked to formally accept the Tukwila Urban Center Transit Center/Andover Park West Street and Water Projects vvdhRoadCOnsdmVctiODNoMhvveSt'|nc.inth9@mountof$6.2GO'7A5.43ao complete, and authorize the release of retainage subject to standard claim and lien release procedures, and to consider this item on the Consent Agenda at the March 6, 2017 Regular Council Meeting. Attachment: Notice of Completion, Contract #13-2O WAPW EngTROJECTSWRWaRS*oiects\Transit Center - mwmnstructionamoseouflnf"Memo Transit Center close out, 022417 gl docx 20 STA LYJ Original Revised# NOTICE OF COMPLETION OF PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT Date: February 21, 2017 Contractor's U131 Number: 602286010 Name & Mailing Address of Public Agency Department Use Only City of Tukwila Assigned to: 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 Date Assigned: lUB1 Number: 179000208 Notice is hereby vaiven relative to the completion of contract or project described below Pro.ject Name Contract Number 113-209 Job Order Contracting TUC Transit Center, Andover Park West St and Water Projects Amount Retained $ ❑ Yes V No Description of Work Done/include Jobsite Address(es) Construction of a new on-street transit center, corridor reconstruction and water main replacement, on Andover Park West from Tukwila Parkway to Strander Boulevard. Federally funded transportation project? V Yes ❑ No (if yes, provide Contract Bond Statement below) Contractor's Name E-mail Address Affidavit 1D* Road Construction Northwest, Inc. lanthony@rcnw.com- 1695955 Contractor Address Telephone # 2500 East Valley Road, Suite C-3, Renton, WA 98057 425-251-1636 If Retainage is not withheld, please select one of the following and List Surety's Name & Bond Number. [:1 Retainage Bond ❑ Contract/Payment bond (valid for federally funded transportation projects) Name: I Bond Number: Date Contract Awarded Date Work Commenced Date Work Completed Date Work Accepted November 18, 2013 February 10, 2014 April 3, 2015 1 Were Subcontracters used on this project? If so, please complete Addendum A. VYes ❑ No I Affidavit lD* - No L&I release will be granted until all affidavits are listed. Contract Amount Additions + Reductions Sub-Total Amount of Sales Tax 9.5 (If varicus rates apply, please send a breakdown) TOTAL $ 5,960,574.00 $ 365,311.40 $ 144,323.47 $ 6,181,561.93 $ 79233.50 $ 6,260,795.43 Liquidated Damages $ 0.00 Amount Disbursed $ 5,951,717.31 Amount Retained $ 309,078.12 NOTE: These two totals must be eatial TOTAL $ 6,260,795.43 Comments: A.— Note: The Disbursing Officer m4 submit this completed notice immediately after acceptance of the work done under this contract. NO PAYMENT SHALI, BE MADE FROM RETAINED FUNDS until receipt of all release certificates. jSubmitting Form: Please submit the completed form by email to all three agencies below. Contact Name: Diane Jaber Title: Fiscal Specialist Email Address: c1iane.jaber(LDtukwilawa.gov ,&vA,0"1j Department of Revenue 00 wash ington State Qqmrtmenl of 44 Works Section 1, Labor & Industries TPublic (360) 704-5650 Contract Release 'a PWC@dor.wa.gov (855) 545-8163, option # 4 ContractRelease@ L NLWA. GOV REV 31 0020e (4/28/14) F215-038-000 04-2014 Phone Number: (206) 433-1871 X 1871 ,fir - Employment Security Department Registration, Inquiry, Standards & Coordination Unit (360) 902-9450 publicworks@esd.wa.gov 21 Addendum A: Please List all Subcontractors and Sub-tiers Below This addendum can be submitted in other formats. Provide known affidavits at this time. No L&I release will be granted until all affidavits are listed. I Subcontractor's Name: IJBI Number: (Required) Affidavid ID' 3 Kings Environmental, Inc. 601705284 514229 All American Waterproofing & Spray, Inc. 603337577 536815 American Surveying & Engineering, LLC 603226051 575809 Castle Walls, LLC 602074096 572933 City Transfer, Inc. 173005384 572890 Deamor Associates, Inc. 600533061 567206 Evergreen Concrete Cutting, Inc. 601605667 556598 Finishing Touch Masonry/RST SO, LLC 602849928 563211 Lakeside Industries, Inc. 601106847 553982 Lloyd Enterprises, Inc. 171004642 549492 Miles Sand & Gravel Company 171004760 585863 & 585864 North American Terrazzo, Inc. 602573180 586739 Quilceda Paving & Construction, Inc. 602254384 563828 Reece Trucking/Excavating, Inc. 602893954 573488 West Coast Wire Rope/Rigging, Inc. 601293533 571423 Salinas Construction, Inc. 600316188 610367 Western Crane, Inc. 911726358 600475 Skyline Landscape, LLC 6030182D9 629643 Best Parking Lot Cleaning, Inc. 601901928 582965 Bravo Environmental NW, Inc. 602946216 582937 Ralph's Concrete Pumping 578085430 583576 Stripe Rite, Inc. 601048084 580790 Transportation Systems, Inc. 602726209 579733 Salinas Sawing & Sealing, Inc. 601717158 582184 Insta-Fab Co, Inc. 601766692 692512 For tax assistance or to request this document in an alternate format, please call 1-800-647-7706. Teletype (TTY) users may use the Washington Relay Service by calling 711. REV 31 0020e Addendum (04/28/14) F215-038-000 04-2014 M City Council Transportation & Infrastructure Committee TRANSPORTATION & INFRASTRUCTURE COMMITTEE Meeting Minutes Februory28, 2017- 5:30 p.m. - Foster Conference Room, 6300 Building Councilmembers: Kate Kruller, Chair; Joe Duffie, De'Sean Quinn Staff: Bruce Linton, Pat Brodin, Gail Labanara, Robin Tischmak, David Cline, Peter Lau, Bob Giberson, Steve Carstens, Laurel Humphrey CALL TO ORDER: Chair Kruller called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. I. PRESENTATIONS II. BUSINESSAGENDA There was consensus to consider unmanned aircraft systems'as the first order of business. A. Staff updated the Committee on a new Police Department policy related to Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) and a request pendingwith the Public Safety Committee to purchase equipment for a UAS pilot program in the amount of $39,040. PD would like to pilot the use of UAS to enhance search and rescue, reconstruct crime scenes, respond to incidents, improve situational awareness and safety, and assess damage during disaster response. The PD policy addresses definitions, procedures, restrictions, reporting, recording, and privacy. Councilmember Quinn asked questions, relating to use by other jurisdictions and expressed concern about; public notifications and the expense with regard to other departmental priorities. Duffle ,requested a demonstration if the purchase is approved. Chair Kruller expressed support with an expectation of vigilance about privacy and civil liberties. The item is returning to the Public'afety Committee for further review. DISCUSSION ONLY. B. Contract Completion: Transit Center /Andover Park West Street and Water Proiects Staff is seeking Council approval of contract completion and release of retainage to Road Construction Northwest, jnc. in the amount of $6,260,795.43 for the Tukwila Urban Center Transit Center /Andover Park West Street and Water Projects. This project constructed a new on- street transit center and provided corridor reconstruction and water main replacement on Andover Park West from Tukwila Parkway to Strander Boulevard. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO MARCH 6, 2017 REGULAR CONSENT AGENDA. C. Engineering Support Services Contract: 2017 Bridge Program Staff is seeking Council approval of a contract with TranTech Engineering, LLC in the amount of $90,000.00 for on -call engineering support services for the 2017 Bridge Program. TranTech was selected due to their familiarity with the City's bridge program, and will provide services 23 24 COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS Initials Meefin g Date Pre.pared L La 's review Council review 03/06/17 BG 'yor ❑ Ordinance ltg Dale F-1 Bid�avard At g Dale F-1 Public Hearing Altg Date ❑ Otber Mtg Date SPONSOR ❑ Council ❑ Mayor ❑ HR ❑ DCD ❑ Finance ❑ Fire ❑ IT ❑ P&R ❑ Police Z PV SI)ONSOR'S This contract will provide on-call engineering support services for the 2017 Annual Bridge SUIMNIARY Program. TranTech Engineering will assist with the new bridge load rating requirements, grant applications, and additional work needed to complete the maintenance on the S 119th St Pedestrian Bridge. TranTech was selected as the firm that best met the bridge requirements. Council is being asked to approve the on-call engineering contract with TranTech Engineering in the amount of $90,000.00. Ri s v I E"WI ?"D BY El cow Mtg. ❑ CA&P Cmte ❑ F&S Cmte Z Transportation Cmte F-1 Utilities Cmte EjArts Comm. F-1 Parks Comm. F-1 Planning Comm. DATE: 02/28/17 COMMITTEE CIINIR: KATE KRULLER RECOMMENDATIONS: SPONSOR/At),MIN. Public Works Department C(),NIN1"1-1T1'F Unanimous Approval; Forward to Consent Agenda COST IMPACT / FUND SOURCE Exi,rMATURF, Ri,'1(,)u1RF'1 AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED $90,000.00 $270,000.00 $0.00 Fund Source: 104 ARTERIAL STREETS & BRIDGES (PAGES 19, 2017 CI P) Comments: MTG. DATE RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION 03/06/17 ITEMNO. 25 FS - I'I\FFSPONSoR: BOB GIBERSON �ORI(;INA],A(;I,"Nl),\D,\'I'I,": 03/06/17 A(;i,'1r14'tx 1'n,"Ni Tn'j,i; 2017 Annual Bridge Program On-Call Engineering Support Services with TranTech Engineering, LLC. Cx1'I:("()1zY ❑ Discussion M/ g Dale Z Motion Al�g Date 03106117 ❑ Resolution M�g Date ❑ Ordinance ltg Dale F-1 Bid�avard At g Dale F-1 Public Hearing Altg Date ❑ Otber Mtg Date SPONSOR ❑ Council ❑ Mayor ❑ HR ❑ DCD ❑ Finance ❑ Fire ❑ IT ❑ P&R ❑ Police Z PV SI)ONSOR'S This contract will provide on-call engineering support services for the 2017 Annual Bridge SUIMNIARY Program. TranTech Engineering will assist with the new bridge load rating requirements, grant applications, and additional work needed to complete the maintenance on the S 119th St Pedestrian Bridge. TranTech was selected as the firm that best met the bridge requirements. Council is being asked to approve the on-call engineering contract with TranTech Engineering in the amount of $90,000.00. Ri s v I E"WI ?"D BY El cow Mtg. ❑ CA&P Cmte ❑ F&S Cmte Z Transportation Cmte F-1 Utilities Cmte EjArts Comm. F-1 Parks Comm. F-1 Planning Comm. DATE: 02/28/17 COMMITTEE CIINIR: KATE KRULLER RECOMMENDATIONS: SPONSOR/At),MIN. Public Works Department C(),NIN1"1-1T1'F Unanimous Approval; Forward to Consent Agenda COST IMPACT / FUND SOURCE Exi,rMATURF, Ri,'1(,)u1RF'1 AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED $90,000.00 $270,000.00 $0.00 Fund Source: 104 ARTERIAL STREETS & BRIDGES (PAGES 19, 2017 CI P) Comments: MTG. DATE RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION 03/06/17 MTG. DATE ATTACHMENTS 03/06/17 Informational Memorandum dated 02/24/17 Page 19, 2017 CIP Consultant Agreement, Scope of Work, and Fee Minutes from the Transportation & Infrastructure Committee meeting of 02/28/17 25 26 City of Tukwila Allen Ekberg, Mayor TO: Transportation and Infrastructure Committee FROM: Bob Giberson, Public Works Director 40a By: Steve Carstens, P.E., Sr. Program Manager CC: Mayor Ekberg DATE: February 24, 2017 SUBJECT: 2017 Bridge Program — Bridge Repairs/Maintenance Project No. 91710402 On-Call Engineering Support Services ISSUE Approve an On-Call Engineering Support Services contract with TranTech Engineering, LLC (TranTech) for the 2017 Bridge Program. BACKGROUND There are several issues effecting the Annual Bridge Program this year. The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) has adopted new bridge load rating requirements that take effect within two years and necessitate updating our existing bridge inventory load ratings. The Bridge Replacement Advisory Committee (BRAC) has grant funding applications due in mid-April 2017 and the City has two structures that may be eligible for this funding. The S 119th St Pedestrian bridge also requires additional work to complete its maintenance. DISCUSSION Tukwila has selected TranTech to provide support services for the 2017 Bridge Program through an on-call services scope of work. TranTech was selected based on their extensive familiarity with the City's bridge program. This contract will allow the City to address the new FHWA requirements, BRAC grant applications, and complete maintenance on the S 119th St Pedestrian Bridge. FISCAL IMPACT TranTech has provided an estimated cost of $90,000.00 to perform the work as outlined in the attached scope of work. The remaining 2017 Bridge Program funds have been analyzed and the estimated project costs are within budget. TranTech Enaineerina On-Call Services Bridge Load Rating Updates S 119th St Pedestrian Bridge BRAC Funding Assistance Misc. Bridge Support Totals Proposed Contract 2017 Budge $41,000.00 19,000.00 15,000.00 15,000.00 $ 90.0442 RECOMMENDATION Council is being asked to approve the contract with TranTech Engineering, LLC for the 2017 Bridge Program in the amount of $90,000.00 and consider this item on the Consent Agenda at the March 6, 2017 Regular Meeting. Attachments: Page 19, 2017 CIP Trantech Contract with Scope and Cost Estimate WAPW I:ng\IIROJI-,CTS\A- RW & RS ProjectABridge Inspection ProgramsViridge Inspections 2017 (91610402)\02 - Trantech tasks\InIb Memo Trantech 022417 g1sb.docx 27 W.* CITY OFTUNWILA CAPITAL PROJECT SUMMARY 2017 to 2022 PROJECT: Annual Bridge Inspections and Repairs P^ojecNv exx10402 DESCRIPTION: Ongoing program of bi-annual inspections, repairs, painting and rehabilitation of the 22 City bridges. Federally required program identifies safety or repair needs in the early stages to minimize hazards and JUSTIFICATION: costs. The number of bridge inspections necessary each year can vary year to year. Inspection frequencies vary from bridge to bridge and King County has provided some inspection services. STATUS: Construction projects will be determined from inspection reports and noted defidencies/pmb|ems. MA|NT. IMPACT: Reduces maintenance costs. COMMENT: Ongoing project, only one year actua|s are shown in the first column. FINANCIAL Through eoUm^tmd (in $000's) 2015 2016 2017 201 2019 000n mo»l xonu npvomn Tnru/ EXPENSES Design 79 40 40 45 45 45 55 55 55 459 Const. Mgmt. 30 30 40 40 40 50 50 50 330 Construction 118 200 200 250 250 250 300 300 300 2,168 TOTAL EXPENSES 197 270 270 335 335 335 405 405 .405 2,957 FUND SOURCES Awarded Grant Proposed Grant 0 Mitigation Actual 0 Mitigation Expected 0 City Oper. Revenue 197 270 270 335 335 335 405 405 405 2,957 TOTAL SOURCES 197 270 270 335 335 335 405 405 405 2,957 2017 2022 Capital Improvement Program 19 30 City of Tukwiia V 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila WA 98188 ILA11 CONSULTANT AGREEMENT FOR BRIDGE PROGRAM ENGINEERING SUPPORT SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT is coicccd into hekvocn the City of Tukwila, Washington, hereinafter referred tnus ^1ho City", audTcan7ccb Engineering, LLC, hereinafter referred \ooe "the Consultant", in, consideration of the mutual benefits, terms, and conditions hereinafter specified. l. Proiect Designation. The Consultant is retained by the City ioperform Engineering services io connection with the project \iUcJDridgeProgramEngiuCeriug Support Project. 2. Scope of Services. The Consultant uRocca to perform the services, identified on Exhibit "A" attached hereto, iocLodiu� the provision of all labor, materials, equipment and supplies. 3. This Agreement shall bcinfull force and effect for u period commencing upon execution and ending August 31. 2010, uolcoo annnc[ \ccouiuutcd under the provisions hereinafter specified. Work under this Agvc000cni shall commence upon written notice by the City to the Consultant toproceed. The Consultant shall perform all services and provide all work product required pursuant tothis Agreement uolater than August 3|,20\K unless uu extension of such time im granted inwriting bY the City. 4. Paymen . The Conso{iuui ybui1 be paid by the City for completed vvnck and for services ncodcrcd under this Agzcczueni as [oUovvo: A. 9uynoeut for the work provided by the Consultant abul| be made as provided on Exhibit `^B" attached bcreto, provided that the total oroount of payment to the Consultant shall not exceed $90.000.00 without express vvcd1cu modification of the Agreement signed by the City. B. The C0oyukuot may submit vouchers t0 the City once per rnondz during the progress of the work for pm1iu| payment for that pm1imu of the project completed to date. Such vouchers will be checked by the City and, upon approval thereof, payment shall be made in the Consultant iu the amount approved. C. Final payment of any balance due the Consultant of the total coo1cuc\ price cucocd will be made promptly upon its uaccctuionocut and verification hy the City after the completion of the work under this Agreement and its acceptance by the City. D. 9uyoncuL as provided in this acoiioo shall be [u]] compensation for work performed, services rendered, and for all cnuicriu|s, supplies, equipment and incidentals necessary to complete the work. E. The Consultant's records and accounts pertaining to this f\gccccuout are to be kept available for inspection by repccocn(u\ivcy of the City and the state of Washington for a period of three (3) years after final puycucota. Copies oboD be made available upon request. 5. Ownership and Use of Documents. All documents, drawings, specifications and other materials produced by the Consultant in connection with the services rendered under this Agreement shall be the property of the City whether the project for which they are made is executed or not. The Consultant shall be permitted to retain copies, Including reproducible copies, of drawings and specifications for information, reference and use in connection with the Consultant's endeavors. The Consultant shall not be responsible for any use of the said documents, drawings, specifications or other materials by the City on any project other than the project specified in this Agreement. 6. Compliance with Laws. The Consultant shall, in performing the services contemplated by this Agreement, faithfully observe and comply with all federal, state, and local laws, ordinances and regulations, applicable to the services rendered under this Agreement. 7. Indemnification. The Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers harmless from any and all claims, injuries, damages, losses or suits including attorney fees, arising out of or resulting from the acts, errors or omissions of the Consultant in performance of this Agreement, except for injuries and damages caused by the sole negligence of the City. Should a court of competent jurisdiction determine that this Agreement is subject to RCW 4.24.115, then, in the event of liability for damages arising out of bodily injury to persons or damages to property caused by or resulting from the concurrent negligence of the Consultant and the City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers, the Consultant's liability hereunder shall be only to the extent of the Consultant's negligence. It is further specifically and expressly understood that the indemnification provided herein constitutes the Consultant's waiver of immunity under Industrial Insurance, Title 51 RCW, solely for the purposes of this indemnification. This waiver has been mutually negotiated by the parties. The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. 8. Insurance. The Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damage to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, its agents, representatives, or employees. Consultant's maintenance of insurance as required by the agreement shall not be construed to limit the liability of the Consultant to the coverage provided by such insurance, or otherwise limit the City's recourse to any remedy available at law or in equity. A. Minimum Amounts and Scope of Insurance. Consultant shall obtain insurance of the types and with the limits described below: CA revised : 1-2013 32 1. Automobile Liability insurance with a minimum combined single limit for bodily injury and property damage of $1,000,000 per accident. Automobile Liability insurance shall cover all owned, non-owned, hired and leased vehicles. Coverage shall be written on Insurance Services Office (ISO) form CA 00 01 or a substitute form providing equivalent liability coverage. If necessary, the policy shall be endorsed to provide contractual liability coverage. Page 2 2. Commercial General Liability insurance with limits no less than $1,000,000 each occurrence, $2,000,000 general aggregate. Commercial General Liability insurance shall be written on ISO occurrence form CG 00 01 and shall cover liability arising from premises, operations, independent contractors and personal injury and advertising injury. The City shall be named as an insured under the Consultant's Commercial General Liability insurance policy with respect to the work performed for the City. 3. Workers' Compensation coverage as required by the Industrial Insurance laws of the State of Washington. 4. Professional Liability with limits no less than $1,000,000 per claim and $1,000,000 policy aggregate limit. Professional Liability insurance shall be appropriate to the Consultant's profession. B. Other Insurance Provision. The Consultant's Automobile Liability and Commercial General Liability insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain that they shall be primary insurance with respect to the City. Any Insurance, self-insurance, or insurance pool coverage maintained by the City shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not be contributed or combined with it. C. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best rating of not less than A:VII. D. Verification of Coverage. Consultant shall furnish the City with original certificates and a copy of the amendatory endorsements, including but not necessarily limited to the additional insured endorsement, evidencing the insurance requirements of the Consultant before commencement of the work. Certificates of coverage and endorsements as required by this section shall be delivered to the City within fifteen (15) days of execution of this Agreement. E. Notice of Cancellation. The Consultant shall provide the City with written notice of any policy cancellation, within two business days of their receipt of such notice. F. Failure to Maintain Insurance. Failure on the part of the Consultant to maintain the insurance as required shall constitute a material breach of contract, upon which the City may, after giving five business days notice to the Consultant to correct the breach, immediately terminate the contract or, at its discretion, procure or renew such insurance and pay any and all premiums in connection therewith, with any sums so expended to be repaid to the City on demand, or at the sole discretion of the City, offset against funds due the Consultant from the City. 9. Independent Contractor. The Consultant and the City agree that the Consultant is an independent contractor with respect to the services provided pursuant to this Agreement. Nothing in this Agreement shall be considered to create the relationship of employer and employee between the parties hereto. Neither the Consultant nor any employee of the Consultant shall be entitled to any benefits accorded City employees by virtue of the services provided under this Agreement. The City shall not be responsible for withholding or otherwise deducting federal income tax or social security or for contributing to the state industrial insurance program, otherwise assuming the duties of an employer with respect to the Consultant, or any employee of the Consultant. CA revised : 1-2013 Page 3 33 14 "D. Covenant Against Continizent Fees. The Consultant warrants that he has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bonafide employee working solely for the Consultant, to solicit or secure this contract, and that lie has not paid or agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bonafide employee working solely for the Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gifts, or any other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this contract. For breach or violation of this warrant, the City shall have the right to annul this contract without liability, or in its discretion to deduct from the contract price or consideration, or otherwise recover, the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or contingent fee. 11, Discrimination Prohibited. The Consultant, with regard to the work performed by it under this Agreement, will not discriminate on the grounds of race, religion, creed, color, national origin, age, veteran status, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, marital status, political affiliation or the presence of any disability in the selection and retention of employees or procurement of materials or supplies. 12. Assignment. The Consultant shall not sublet or assign any of the services covered by this Agreement without the express written consent of the City. 13. Non-Waiver. Waiver by the City of any provision of this Agreement or any time limitation provided for in this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other provision. 14. Termination. A. The City reserves the right to terminate this Agreement at any time by giving ten (10) days written notice to the Consultant. B. In the event of the death of a member, partner or officer of the Consultant, or any of its supervisory personnel assigned to the project, the surviving members of the Consultant hereby agree to complete the work under the terms of this Agreement, if requested to do 0 so by the City. This section shall not be a bar to renegotiations of this Agreement between surviving members of the Consultant and the City, if the City so chooses. 15. Applicable Law; Venue; Attorney's Fees. This Agreement shall be subject to, and the Consultant shall at all times comply with, all applicable federal, state and local laws, regulations, and rules, including the provisions of the City of Tukwila Municipal Code and ordinances of the City of Tukwila. In the event any suit, arbitration, or other proceeding is instituted to enforce any term of this Agreement, the parties specifically understand and agree that venue shall be properly laid in King County, Washington. The prevailing party in any such action shall be entitled to its attorney's fees and costs of suit. Venue for any action arising from or related to this Agreement shall be exclusively in King County Superior Court. 16. Severability and Survival. If any term, condition or provision of this Agreement is declared void or unenforceable or limited in its application or effect, such event shall not affect any other provisions hereof and all other provisions shall remain fully enforceable. The provisions of this Agreement, which by their sense and context are reasonably intended to survive the completion, expiration or cancellation of this Agreement, shall survive termination of this Agreement. C� CA revised : 1-2013 34 Page 4 17. Notices. Notices to the City of Tukwila shall be sent to the following address: City Clerk City of Tukwila 6200 Soutlicenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 Notices to Consultant shall be sent to the following address: TranTech Engineering, LLC 12011 NE 1St Street, Suite 305 Bellevue, WA 980 18. Entire Agreement; Modification. This Agreement, together with attachments or addenda, represents the entire and integrated Agreement between the City and the Consultant and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations, or agreements written or oral. No amendment or modification of this Agreement shall be of any force or effect unless it is in writing and signed by the parties. DATED this day of 20 CITY OF TUKWILA CONSULTANT By: Mayor, Allan Ekberg Printed Name: Grant D Griffin Title: Senior Engineer Attest/Authenticated: Approved as to Form: City Clerk, Christy O'Flaherty Office of the City Attorney CA revised: 1-2013 Page 5 35 36 SCOPE 007WORK lPRAN7PEK~H Engineering D� ^��� ~-^~~�~ Program ~~^^g+^^~~^"^�g `^upu^~"" City of Tukwila, WA The City of Tukwila has identified several tasks necessary for the advancement of their Citywide Bridge in 2017. These tusk* include providing an in-depth hands-on inspection of the I 191h Street Pedestrian Bridge and preparing a feasibility study for repair options. This tasks also ino}odcx working with Tukwila to dcto,cuiuiog repair and coating options for that bridge as well as for the [rcco {liver Pedestrian and Utility Bridge. Other tasks include providing F}llVA required updates to existing load ratings ousix structures, providing support for the development of bridge funding caudidaio, and for providing miscellaneous engineering support for tasks as identified by the City. All work shall be in accordance with WSDOT/ FHWA procedures and requirements and with the requirements of the National Bridge Inspection Standards (NBIS) where applicable. SCIIRD0[[ The contract ybu]l remain in effect for 18 months, hovvcvcr, ivabo will be completed per the schedule listed under each specific task onpeuiu|iy v/bccc specific deadlines control. The management budget is allocated accordingly. Throughout the Conduct of these activities, there will be u dose coordination between TRANTECH Engineering, LLC (TRANTECH) and the City of Tukwila (City). TRANTECH will manage the activities to ensure timeliness of required submittals. SCOPE 01' WORK —T[(AIMCAK.M)PRWk('0 The task items listed below will bc performed by TRANTECH for the City. Task I —Tiniber Pedestrian Bridge Feasibility Study The two timber pedestrian bridges mentioned above are iu need o[ maintenance. 70ANTECfl will provide uu assessment of both hddgcsfor use us the City decides vvho1maintenance activities to include in a future maintenance contract. The I 191 Street Pedestrian has u failing paint aYakeco and is suffering from weather related deterioration that has caused localized rot. The Bridge has recently undergone timber girder repairs with more work slated for spring and summer 2Ai7.7RANTECB will provide uhands- on inspection of the l |gm Street Pedestrian Bridge, u condition ussox*cncut, and u capacity analysis. The analysis will be used to determine if there is sufficient capacity for continued Tukwila Bricl�cpro�nmEn�uuuro� Support — SCOPE 0P\fORK Tk&NTBCBBNGlI4BB0NG Pu�c l service o[L[additional rehabilitation is needed to attain u safe load carrying capacity. The analysis will also assess the feasibility of future repairs. The Green River Pedestrian and Utility Bdd�cvvuorepaired and protected iva20O7n`uiuiooancc onubuut but its timber elements are currently in need o[nocoubng. TflANTECEI will use existing inspection information and will perform u routine inspection o[ the bridge to determine ifany additional repairs are necessary prior to the recoating process. 1.1 Do Inspection The substructure of the I 191h Street Bridge has not had a recent underdeck and substructure inspection. TRANTECH will provide a hands-on inspection of the underside of the deck, floor system, and piers by use o[ rope assisted climbing. The condition of the elements will be evaluated and updated io the W8Bl8 Bridge Inspection Software. The resulting condition information will \beo be utilized in Task 1.2 to calculate the current capacity of the bridge. The in-depth condition assessment will also be reported in the resulting feasibility report listed below ua the Task l deliverable. 1.2 Bridge Load Rating TRAND1ECB will provide u bridge load rating ofthe )[um Street Pedestrian Bridge using the results of the in-depth inspection completed iu Task l.|. This as-repaired capacity will take into account the maintenance work done to date. This load rating will assess the current adequacy of the bridge for continued service as well as the feasibility for repairs that may add dead load such as deck overlay options yet to be determined. The initial scope of the load rating is assumed to be for usuperstructure rating only. The scope of the load rating may he expanded toinclude the substructure if deemed necessary after the inspection and by additional scope and budged as approved by the City. TRANTECH will assess any new deterioration found on the Green River Pedestrian and Utility Bridge using analytical tools and information made available by our previous work done during the 2007 repair and coating contract. It is assumed that climbing of this bridge is not necessary based oo the relatively recent rehabilitation contract. It is also assumed that the current load rating is still valid and that no update is necessary. A load rating update will be performed if deemed necessary and by additional scope and budged as approved by the City. Io the case that any o{ either Bridge's critical elements have load carrying dcfioieocy,viob1c strengthening means will be proposed as part of Task Section 1.3. 1.3 Repair and Strengthening Options TRAN�[ECH will provide a report presenting the results 0fthe inspection and structural analysis based Oo the activities described io Task Sections i.| and l.7. This report will provide Tukw'ila with necessary decision making information about the feasibility of possible repair options. The report will also indicate if all cken)cnt capacities are greater than the demand allowing the City to choose rehabilitation activities that will include only "element protection measures" for service life extension. As a non-NBI bridge, federal requirements do not apply. TRANTECH will work Tukwila DridueProgram Engineering Support — SCOPE OFWORK Puye2 T8ANTBCBBN0JNEB0NO with the city to determine the level of service that meets Tukwila's needs. As noted above, condition information will also be updated in the WSBIS bridge inspection software for reference during future routine inspections. 8/4 Additional Services The initial scope o[ this task iak` assess the feasibility u[ repair options for both bridge and to work, with the []\y to determine the best repair and protective coating methods. Once these decisions are made, TRANTECH can prepare the documents necessary to for a PS&E bid package suitable for advertisement uywell os additional professional services upon request. A partial list m[additional services is provided below. These additional services are not included io this scope of work, but TRANTECH can readily provide these services with a supplemental scope and fee. • Substructure Load Rating of the l/ 9th Street Pedestrian Bridge • Load Rating Update for the Green River Pedestrian and Utility Bridge • Bid Assistance • Construction Engineering Support • Construction Management • Bridge Inspection Services /]elivurub/ex for Task / ' Timber Pedestrian Bridge },e, x8i//ty So^/v Au electronic copy of the l|om Street Bridge Feasibility Study Report Two Paper copies of the 1l9th Street Bridge Feasibility Study Report Task 2—yxu/d Rating l}y(lu1ca Eight Tukwila owned bridges were identified uaneeding Specialized Hauling \/chjc|e(3BPV) �Tvvoof those bridges have had tbebload rating with six bridges remaining. The services in this task include utilization ofthe as-built and inventory inspection data to perform Load Factor Rating (LFR) per current WSDOT and FHWA standards including checks. All rating activates will include ratings for Specialized Hauling Vehicles (8}{\/) and emergency vehicle ratings rating requirements per the FHWA memorandum titled "Load Rating for the FAST Act's Emergency Vohicles" dated November 3 2016. The following are the bridges identified for load rating as part of this tusk: 0 T\lKWTLA 5;8outhceo1erBoulevard 0 TlJKWILA 6; Foster 56 mAueuoc * TUKWILA 8; Grady Way w TlJKWlLA g; East Marginal TYoy 0 T(]&WTLA 15; Tukwila International Boulevard Tukwi|a8rid�uPm�un B��n�cdu�8uppou— SCOPE OF\uOKK 78AN7ECRBNG[NBBBJNO 0 TUKWILA 2 1; Fort Dent Park There are provisions included in this Task to provide the emergency vehicle ratings for the two bdd�exrated ck the end of2O]8. The Load Rating Reports will consist of: � A Bridge 8nhnn Summary Sheet reflecting the lowest rating factor, bnjodin� superstructure components. 7bcyunonaryaboctahuJ\hcstun)ncdundaigocd by a professional engineer licensed in the S\u1c of Washington. • /\ brief report of any potential anomalies in the ratings and uo explanation u[ the cause of any rating factor below l.(l • Hard copy ofcoulyoicr output fi)cx used for rating, and any other calculations or special analysis required. • A complete xc{ of plans for the bridge. • A [Z) which contains the final versions of all input and output files, and other calculations created iuperfooniogLbeloudmUiog. • All reports shall bc bound io/\ccopo:ss'typcbinders. /\ paper copy *f generated reports will bc prepared and submitted tn the City. Quality Assurance Program is an integral part of our work plan. It includes the following: m Competent and experienced will perform all calculations. prior The load rating will be thoroughly reviewed and checked by experienced personnel to submittal. / r Task 2 - lmmf6b/iu^ //voh/e/ Signed hard copies ofoUkxzd rating reports for each bridge will besubmitted to the City on or before December 31, 2017 as required by the FHWA's Memorandum on Load Rating of Specialized Hauling Vehicles dated November 15, 2013. Task 2 Assumptions and [sc!oy|ons TRANTECH will work from the as-built plans and the inventory inspection report to provide the most accurate condition for the load rating calculations. Existing load rating analysis will be reviewed and utilized oz the extent possible. Some existing load analysis may beo[ little ocno use for the update process requiring a complete re-rating. Tukwila Brid�cPrn�rum�n�nu�rn�8uppou— SCOPE OF\�OD}( TRANTBCBBNOlNBBDING �� Page 4 w No substructure load rating iy performed. /\n estimate of cost for performing Load Rating services oo the identified structures ispresented in Exhibit B. Yu^k 3— Bridge Replacement/ Rehabilitation Funding 'ks*iyLaocu }\ Federal Bridge Program Call for Projects buabcooudvc[ducd.Taxk3mmusiAsofasaistiogtbo City in the development of a bridge replace rnent/rehabi I itati on application package toh submitted to Bridge Replacement Advisory Committee (BRAC) for the 42"d Avenue South Truss in Allentown. Preliminary funding support uou\yoio has been performed over the last few years. T0ANTECH will uxaiyt the City in assembling and, if necessary, updating the existing construction estimates and analysis. TRANTECH will provide u 10% seismic retrofit design for the Boeing Access Road over Airport Way Bridge as directed bythe City. An estimated cost for this work will also will also be provided for submittal as uSoisoio Program project for funding consideration. TRANTECB will provide overall assistance for the initial submittal package preparation per the Call for Projects requirements and deadlines. Also included, will bc continued support through the spring and summer candidate review period and through the funding meeting in the Fall of 2017. 1'ask 4— Miscellaneous Bdd�pu�mmSup�d TKANlE(-H yhuU poovidcnuisceUuocouscooinccdo�xuppo�undur the direction o[ the City ofTukv/ilu's Project Manager. /\nhcipu1cd work, Will inr|udC (usks usynciutcd niih the construction phase o[(be 0ocino, Access Road Brid'-c BchubUi|uiion and the Major Muintcuancc*n 3 D[id�cyZO|��u1ccta,Tukv/i|uDddgc ProgoaouLay�su*idcnii6cdhythe Ciiy, and oibcrpnqcc\y as needed. Tukwila Bhdue Program Engineering Suppnn— SCOPBOPWORK Page TDANTBCBBNGINBBRNG Exhibit B - Consultant Fee Determination City of Tukwila On-call Engineering Services Timber Ped Bridge Feasibility Study Load Rating Updates Funding Assistance Misc. Bridge Prog Support Grand Total 42 $ 19,000 $ 41,000 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 90,000 City Council Transportation & Infrastructure Committee TRANSPORTATION & INFRASTRUCTURE COMMITTEE Meeting Minutes Februory28, 2017- 5:30 p.m. - Foster Conference Room, 6300 Building Councilmembers: Kate Kruller, Chair; Joe Duffie, De'Sean Quinn Staff: Bruce Linton, Pat Brodin, Gail Labanara, Robin Ti Bob Giberson, Steve Carstens, Laurel Humphrey CALL TO ORDER: Chair Kruller called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. I. PRESENTATIONS II. BUSINESSAGENDA There was consensus to consider unmanned aircraft A. a David Cline, Peter Lau, he first order of business. Staff updated the Committee on a new Police Department policy related to Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) and a request pendingwith the Public Safety Committee to purchase equipment for a UAS pilot program in the amount of $39,040. PD would like to pilot the use of UAS to enhance search and rescue, reconstruct crime scenes, respond to incidents, improve situational awareness and safety, and assess damage during disaster response. The PD policy addresses definitions, procedures, restrictions, reporting, recording, and privacy. Councilmember Quinn asked questions, relating to use by other jurisdictions and expressed concern about; public notifications and the expense with regard to other departmental priorities. Duffle ,requested a demonstration if the purchase is approved. Chair Kruller expressed support with an expectation of vigilance about privacy and civil liberties. The item is returning to the Public'afety Committee for further review. DISCUSSION ONLY. Staff is seeking Council approval of contract completion and release of retainage to Road Construction Northwest, lnc. in the amount of $6,260,795.43 for the Tukwila Urban Center Transit Center /Andover Park West Street and Water Projects. This project constructed a new on- street transit center and provided corridor reconstruction and water main replacement on Andover Park West from Tukwila Parkway to Strander Boulevard. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO MARCH 6, 2017 REGULAR CONSENT AGENDA. C. Engineering Support Services Contract: 2017 Bridge Program Staff is seeking Council approval of a contract with TranTech Engineering, LLC in the amount of $90,000.00 for on -call engineering support services for the 2017 Bridge Program. TranTech was selected due to their familiarity with the City's bridge program, and will provide services 43 Transportation & Infrastructure Committee Minutes ......................................................... ............................... February 28, 2017 relating to new Federal Highway Administration requirements, Bridge Replacement Advisory Committee grant applications, and maintenance on the South 11V Street Pedestrian Bridge. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO MARCH 6, 2017 REGULAR CONSENT AGENDA. D. Supplemental Agreement: Baker Boulevard Non - Motorized Improvements Staff is seeking Council approval of Supplemental Agreement No. 16 with KPFF Consulting Engineers in the amount of $77,798.67 for engineering design services for the Baker Boulevard Non - Motorized Improvement Project. KPFF designed the TUC Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Project and construction is underway. $1 million in grant funding from King County will allow the Cityto complete the originally planned bike lanes and road diet on Baker Boulevard as well as sidewalk improvements on Christensen Road, which had been eliminated from the Pedestrian Bridge Project due to lack of funding. This supplement will allow KPFF to incorporate the new Baker Blvd improvements with the existing design. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO MARCH 6, 2017 REGULAR CONSENTAGENDA. III. SCATBd IV. MISCELLANEOUS The Transportation .. COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS lnifial,f Meefil�g Date Pre ared b M Is reviOW Council review 03/06/17 BG ITEMNO. 4.E. 45 STAFF SPONSOR: BOB GIBERSON �OIZI(,INAI,A(;I?Ni),\D,\,i,i,": 03/06/17 I A(;FIND. ITEM Trrj,j Baker Boulevard Non-Motorized Improvements Supplemental Agreement No. 16 with KPFF Consulting Engineers CXIT'GORY ❑ Discussion Aft Date Z Motion Atg Date 03106117 ❑ Resolution Atg Date ❑ Ordinance Mig Date ❑ Bid,,bvard Mt g Dale ❑ Public hearing At g Date ❑ Other Jlltg Di, SPONSOR ❑ Council ❑ Mayor ❑ I IR ❑ DCD [:] 1;inance [:] Fire [_1 IT [:] P& R [:] Police Z PIE" SPONSOR'S Contract No. 07-123 with KPFF Consulting Engineers provided design for the TUC SUMMARY Pedestrian/ Bicycle Bridge. Part of the design included the Green River Trail and new sidewalks on Christensen Rd. With additional King County grant funds for Baker Blvd Non- Motorized Improvements, the most cost effective way to design the additional work and incorporate the existing design was to Supplement KPFFs contract. Council is being asked to approve KPFFs Supplement No. 16 to Contract No. 07-123 in the amount of $77,798.67. Rj,'1vii,'1wi,'1i) By ❑ cow mtg. ❑ CA&P Cmte [:] F&S Cmte Z Transportation Cmte ❑ Utilities Cmte ❑ Arts Comm. ❑ Parks Comm. ❑ Planning Comm. DATE: 02/28/17 COMMIT'17FE CHAIR: KATE KRULLER RECOMMENDATIONS: SPONSOR/Ai),MIN. Public Works Department CoMm"f"T"I" Unanimous Approval; Forward to Consent Agenda COST IMPACT / FUND SOURCE Exi,i,"NDITURF Rj,"QUIRVID AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED $77,798.67 $100,000.00 $0.00 Fund Source: 104 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (PAGE 15, 2017 CIP) Comments: MTG. DATE RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION 03/06/17 MTG. DATE ATTACHMENTS 03/06/17 Informational Memorandum dated 02/24/17 Page 15, 2017 CIP KPFF Supplemental Agreement No. 16 to Contract No. 07-123 Minutes from the Transportation & Infrastructure Committee meeting of 02/28/17 45 .r. City of Tukwila Allan Ekberg, Mayor TO: Transportation and Infrastructure Committee FROM: Bob Gibermon, Public Works Director /0 BY: Cyndy Knighton, Senior Program Manager CC: Mayor Ekberg DATE: February 24, 2017 SUBJECT: Baker Boulevard Non-Motorized Improvements Project No. 9161@4O9, Contract No. 07-123 Supplemental Agreement No. 16 ISSUE Approve Supplemental Agreement No. 16 with KPFF for engineering design services for the Baker Boulevard Non-Motorized Improvement Project. BACKGROUND KPFF has completed the design of the TUC e Bridge Project (Ped Bridge) and the construction Uf the bridge iS underway. AS part Df the Pgd Bridge Project, deoignofMleGreenRivnrTn3i|8nd new sidewalks on Christensen Road were completed. Due to funding limitations, construction along the trail and the wide sidewalks on Christensen Road were removed from the construction bid documents. DISCUSSION Design of Baker Boulevard to include bike lanes and reduce the travel lanes to one in each direction (Baker Road Diet) was included in the initial design contract with KPFF, but the design was never advanced to the 100% level as funding was reallocated to unexpected needs for the Ped Bridge design and permitting. At the time the Ped Bridge project waaneahngdgSignCODlp|edion'KingCountvP@rhS8OdR8Cr8@1iOn[]iviSion approached Tukwila with $1 million in County trail levee funds that could be used to design and construct the Baker Road Diet and the sidewalk improvements along Christensen Road. The interagency agreement between Tukwila and King County was approved by Council on December 5, 2016. A new project, Baker Boulevard Non-Motorized Improvements, was created in the 2017-2022 CIP to encompass the improvements into a single project. Supplemental Agreement No. 16 to KPFF's Contract 07-123 was negotiated as the most cost effective and expeditious way to have the design completed on Baker Boulevard and incorporated with the design work already completed for the Green River Trail and Christensen Road. FINANCIAL IMPACT The additional costs for the Baker Boulevard design work and the packaging into a bid-ready document is S77.798.67 and ie less than the $1OO.000 budgeted for design in the 2O17C|P. RECOMMENDATION Council is being asked to approve Supplemental Agreement No. 16 with KPFF for the Baker Boulevard Non-Motorized Improvement Project inthgumountof$77.7S8.G7andconaiderthiaitemonthnConeard Agenda 8[ the March 8.2017 Regular meeting. Attachments: Pogo 15.2017 [xP KPFF Supplemental Agreement No. 16 w:\pweng\pmjeom\a'nw&mprN*cts\baxo blvd non-motorized (9101O4oe)\info memo kp#ouppw1speU22^1rgl.donx CITY OFTUKVVLA CAPITAL PROJECT SUMMARY 2017 to 2022 PROJECT: Baker Blvd Non-Motorized Improvements Project No. 91810*09 Design and construct non-motorized improvements on Baker Blvd from Andover Park West to Christensen Rd, DESCRIPTION: including bike lanes with a proposed road diet. Project will also construct previously designed non-motorized improvement on Christensen Rd from Baker Blvd 1n the Green River trail. JUSTIFICATION: Improve non-motorized connections between the Tukwila Transit Center and Tukwila Station, STATUS: New project for the 2017-2O22C|P. MA|NT IMPACT: Minimal impuct, project includes new sidewalk trail and pavement markings. Pn4e�ioa component of the TUC�OD Pedestrian |mpmveman�, Gmntfunding by the King Cnun�Dept ���x0�NT� � of Natural Resources and Parks. FINANCIAL Through Estimated ,.-°"""'-. ."~= vv^* v^17 vn^n ,o,n no»o 2o2i noxu usvomo TOTAL EXPENSES Design 100 100 Const, Mgmt. 120 120 Construction 780 780 TOTAL EXPENSES 01 01 1,000 1 0 1 01 01 01 01 01 1,000 FUND SOURCES Awarded Grant 0 King County 1,000 1,000 Mitigation Actual 0 Traffic Impact Fees 0 TOTAL SOURCES 0 01 1,000 01 01 01 0 01 0 1 1,000 Project Location 2017 rncc Capital Improvement Program 15 We 50 iddlhk "�` Washington State A Department of Transportation Supplemental Agreement Organization and Address KPFF Consulting Engineers Number 16 1601 Fifth Avenue, Suite 1600 Seattle, WA 98101 Original Agreement Number 07 -123 (p) Phone: (206) 622 -5822 Project Number Execution Date Completion Date 05 -RW03 December 31, 2017 Project Title New Maximum Amount Payable Tukwila Urban Center, Ped /Bicycle Bridge PSE $ 2,153,200.32 Description of Work PS &E for the Baker Boulevard Road Diet & Christensen Road Improvements. The Local Agency of the City of Tukwila desires to supplement the agreement entered into with KPFF Consulting Engineers and executed on and identified as Agreement No. 07 -123 All provisions in the basic agreement remain in effect except as expressly modified by this supplement. The changes to the agreement are described as follows: Section 1, SCOPE OF WORK, is hereby changed to read: See attached scope of work. Section IV, TIME FOR BEGINNING AND COMPLETION, is amended to chanae the number of calendar days for completion of the work to read: Contract completion date remains as December 31, 2017. III Section V, PAYMENT, shall be amended as follows: This supplement increases the contract value by $77,798.67, increasing the previously authorized maximum amount payable to $2,153,200.32. as set forth in the attached Exhibit A, and by this reference made a part of this supplement. If you concur with this supplement and agree to the changes as stated above, please sign in the appropriate spaces below and return to this office for final action. David K. McMullen, P.E By. KPFF Principal /Project Manager By: City of Tukwila Consultant Signature DOT Form 140 -063 EF Revised 9/2005 Approving Authority Signature Date 51 Baker Blvd Road Diet & Christensen Road Improvements Plan, Specification and Cost Estimate (PSE) Scope of Work PROJECT DESCRIPTION & OBJECTIVES KPFF is currently under contract with the City of Tukwila (City) for the Plans, Specifications and Cost Estimate (PS&E) Phase of the Tukwila Urban Center Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge project. This supplement provides additional services related to: • Creating a new set of Plans, Specifications and Cost Estimate (PS&E) combining the following previously designed elements: 1. Sidewalk, landscaping and illumination improvements from the intersection of the Green River Trail (GRT) and Christensen Rd south toward and including the intersection of Baker Blvd and Christensen Rd. 2. Channelization, roadway signing and striping work of Baker Blvd from the intersection of Christensen Rd west toward the intersection of Andover Park W including signal, and ITS modifications at Andover Park E. SCOPE OF WORK The following is a scope of work for additional design services in support of this project's PSE Phase. Task No. 1.0 Project Management and Administration Task No. 1.10 - Project Management, Coordination & Invoicing Team members shall provide continuous internal project management and project team coordination. Team members shall prepare monthly invoices for work completed. KPFF shall compile the invoices into a single document to be submitted to the City. Task No. 1.20 — Team Meetings Team members shall meet internally to discuss project reorganization and design issues. Two meetings assumed. 52 Task No 2.0 Right-of-Way and Additional Survey Services: Task No. 2.10 Review Title Reports & Update Easements KPG shall provide a review of previous City construction projects to verify easements for sidewalks along Baker and Andover Park E. Easements shall be added to the base map. Files from the past projects showing easements shall be provided by the City. KPG shall update the existing base map to include new curb ramps for the east/west directions at the intersection of Baker Blvd and Andover Park E that are to be installed in conjunction with water main and sewer replacements under a separate project. CARD files for this shall be provided by the City. Note: With the exception of the new ramps, survey for Baker Blvd and Christensen has been completed, including existing illumination, signal poles, cabinets, and signal loops. No underground utilities have been located. Underground utility locates are not anticipated under this task. Deliverables Updated Survey Project Base Map with sidewalk easements and updated curb ramps. Task No 3.0 Preparation of Contract Documents (PS&E) Task No. 3.10 - Repackaging Plans & Incorporating Signal Modifications KPFF and KPG shall assist the City in determining the Baker roadway striping, including design of protected bicycle facilities, as outlined in the King County Parks and Recreation and City of Tukwila, Mobility Connections Facilities Agreement for Baker Blvd and Christensen Road, approved 12/05/16. North- south curb ramps will be upgraded to current City standards Work includes modification of existing signal design at the intersection of Andover Park E and Baker Blvd, field review of existing signal equipment/conduit/wiring, video detection installation, loop abandonment, APS push button installation, push button landing area compliance field verification, coordination with City for new installation of East/West curb ramps (associated with Andover Park E Water Main and Sewer replacement project), countdown pedestrian heads, electrical wiring pole adjustments, ITS raceway verification/ design and signal controller upgrades. Work also includes the redesign of current plans based on reuse of existing electrical service cabinet at the intersection of Christensen Road and Green River Trail access point. This does not include relocation modifications to the existing controller service cabinets. 53 Page 3 54 KPFF and KPG shall repackage current design plans incorporating any aforementioned modifications into a complete set of Plans for submittal to the City. Task No. 3.20 - Update Quantities, Cost Estimate & Specifications KPFF and KPG shall update and/or calculate bid item quantities for the work shown in the Plans. An updated cost estimate shall be provided based upon these quantities and review of current bid tabulations provided by the City. A summary of quantities and a cost estimate shall be provided to the City for the Draft Final and Final/Bid PS&E packages (see Task 3.30). KPFF and KPG shall provide a complete Specifications package including Divisions 1 through 10 and front end proposal documents. The specifications shall be per the 2016 WSDOT Standard Specifications including any necessary City special provisions. The City shall provide a specification and proposal boilerplate for and any required forms associated with state and/or federal funding. Specifications shall be provided to the City for the Draft Final and Final/Bid PS&E packages (see Task 3.30). Task 3.30 - Submittal Preparation (Draft Final & Final/Bid) KPFF and KPG shall prepare and submit a Draft Final and Final/Bid PS&E package described above to the City. The Draft Final submittal shall be prepared and submitted to the City for review and comment. Comments received shall be discussed and responses to comments shall be generated for City review and agreement. The Draft Final PS&E package shall be modified as required based upon these comments and a Final/Bid submittal shall be generated The Final/Bid PS&E package shall be stamped, sealed and submitted to the City for inclusion in the bid package. Assumptions • No additional storm drainage report work is included. The Storm Drainage Report for the Tukwila Urban Center Bicycle/Bridge Project is assumed to be adequate for permitting approval for this construction package. • WSDOT MEF documentation for curb ramp layout is not included. • No additional permitting effort is included. • No additional right-of-way acquisition is included at this time. Additional acquisition may be necessary for ideal curb ramp layout at the intersection of Baker Blvd and Andover Park E. Deliverables • Plans and details to be included in Draft Final and Final/Bid level submittal set (3 hardcopies, I electronic). Page 4 0 • Cover Sheet & Index • Legend and abbreviations (1) sheet • Horizontal control (1) plan sheet • TESC (4) plan and detail sheets • Site prep (3) plan sheets • Typical section (3) sheets • Roadway plan/profile (3) sheets • Roadway details (3) sheets • Drainage and utility (2) plan sheets • Channelization and signing (3) plan sheets • Channelization and signing (1) detail sheet • Pedestrian detour (1) plan sheet • Signal/Illumination (6) plan and detail sheets • Urban design (5) plan and detail sheets • Planting design (3) plan and detail sheets • Irrigation (3) plan and detail sheets Quantities and Cost Estimate to be included in Draft Final and Final/Bid submittals (3 hardcopies, I electronic) Project Specifications to be included in Draft Final and Final/Bid submittal (Electronic copies for Draft Final and Final/Bid, 3 hardcopies for Final/Bid) 55 EXHIBIT E-1 KPFF Consulting Engineers CONSULTANT FEE DETERMINATION SUMMARY OF COST Tukwila Urban Center Package #1: Baker & Christensen Improvements Classification Total Hours X Rate = Cost Principal / Tech. Specialist Project Manager Senior Engineer Design Engineer Prof. Land Surveyor Project Surveyor Survey Crew CADD Technician Coordinator / Admin Overhead (OH) Cost OH Rate x DSC of Fixed Fee (FF) FF Rate x DSC of Reimbursables Mileage Reprographics Subcontract (Blank) Subtotal 8.00 X $64.43 = $515.44 96.00 X $58.20 = $5,587.20 0.00 X $45.00 = $0.00 152.00 X $38.08 = $5,788.16 0.00 X $42.00 = $0.00 0.00 X $32.00 = $0.00 0.00 X $65.00 = $0.00 89.00 X $33.00 = $2,937.00 12.00 X $27.30 = $327.60 DSC Subtotal $15,155.40 137.52% X $15,155.40 = $20,841.71 30.00% X $15,155.40 = $4,546.62 (## Miles x $0.565/mile) (## Sheets x $X.xx/sheet) (Sub Name & Task) (Allowance) $0.00 Subconsultant Costs (See Exhibit G) $37,254.95 IGRAND TOTAL: $77,798.67 56 COST ESTIMATE: Tukwila Urban Center Package #1: Baker & Christensen Improvements 57 EXHIBIT G-1 KPG CONSULTANT FEE DETERMINATION SUMMARY OF COST Tukwila Urban Center Package #1: Baker & Christensen Improvements Classification Total Hours X Rate = Cost Senior E/LA Project E/S LA/Eng Design Technician Survey Crew Office Admin. Overhead (OH) Cost OH Rate x DSC of Fixed Fee (FF) FF Rate x DSC of Reimbursables Mileage Reprographics Subcontract (Blank) Subtotal 70.00 X $56.97 = $3,987.90 100.00 X $44.59 = $4,459.00. - 56.00 X $40.38 = $2,261.28. 104.00 X $26.44 = $2,749.76 8.00 X $47.12 = $376.96 3.00 X $31.25 = $93.75. 0.00 X = $0.00 0.00 X = $0.00. DSC Subtotal $13,928.65 136.21% X $13,928.65 = $18,972.70 30.00% X $13,928.65 = $4,178.60 (## Miles x $0.565/mile) (## Sheets x $X.xx/sheet) (Sub Name & Task) (Allowance) $175.00 ISubconsultant Total: $37,254.95 11 y COST ESTIMATE: Tukwila Urban Center Package #1: Baker & Christensen Improvements February 21 2017 KPG L KPG Tukwila Urban Center Package #1: Senior Design Survey Office 1 E /LA Piclect E /5; LNEng ,Technician Grew Admin. 0.00 0.00 Baker & Christensen Improvements MULTIPLIER: Item I SCOPE OF WORK $56.97 $44.59; $40.38 $26.44 'i. $47.12 $31.25 $0.00 ',, $0.00 2.6621 1 Project Management and Administration 1.10 Management, Coordination & Invoicing 10 '.. 3 $1,766 1.20 'Team Meetin gs 12 $1,820 Labor Subtotal: 22 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 $3,586 2 Right-of-Way and Additional Sume Services 210 IRReviZ Title Reports and update easements for Baker Blvd & Andover a 8 8 $2,173 Labor Subtotal: 4 0 0 8 8 i 0 0 0 $2,173 .=63 $100 3 Preparation of Contract Documents PS &E 3.10 Repackaging Current Plans with Signal Modifications 32 80 40 80 $24280 3.20 Update Quantities, Cost Estimate & Specifications - 8 16 12 $4 403 3.30 Submittal Pre amtion (Draft Final &Final /Bid) 4 4 a 1s $2,638 Labor Subtotal: 44 100 56 96 0 0 0 0 $31,321 sum: Sum: 59 MI, 1, Transportation & Infrastructure Committee Minutes ......................................................... ............................... February 28, 2017 relating to new Federal Highway Administration requirements, Bridge Replacement Advisory Committee grant applications, and maintenance on the South 119' Street Pedestrian Bridge. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO MARCH 6, 2017 REGULAR CONSENT AGENDA. D. Supplemental Agreement: Baker Boulevard Non - Motorized Improvements Staff is seeking Council approval of Supplemental Agreement No. 16 with KPFF Consulting Engineers in the amount of $77,798.67 for engineering design services for the Baker Boulevard Non- Motorized Improvement Project. KPFF designed the TUC Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Project and construction is underway. $1 million in grant funding from King County will allow the Cityto complete the originally planned bike lanes and road diet on Baker Boulevard as well as sidewalk improvements on Christensen Road, which had been eliminated from the Pedestrian Bridge Project due to lack of funding. This supplement will allow KPFF to incorporate the new Baker Blvd improvements with the existing design. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO MARCH 6, 2017 REGULAR CONSENTAGENDA. III. SCATBd IV. MISCELLANEOUS The Transportation 61 62 COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS - -- - - - - -I nilials Meeliq Dale Prepared by Mqyors 'evi ,jew w Council review 02/27/17 RE (C DLK 03/06/17 RE F-1 0115er Al1� Dale I) L R S11()NS0R'S Review and adoption by resolution of the Green Tukwila 20-Year Stewardship Plan. StTNINIA10' Ri-xji,'Iwt,:i-) BY ❑ C.O.W. Mtg. Z CDN Comm ❑ Finance Comm. ❑ Public Safety Comm. F-1"Trans &Infrastructure F-1 Arts Comm. ❑ Parks Comm. F-1 Planning Comm. DATE: 2/13/17 COMMI'l-FEE CI IATR: HoUGARDY RECOMMENDATIONS: SPONSOR/ADMIN. Parks & Recreation Unanimous Approval; Forward to Committee of the Whole COST IMPACT / FUND SOURCE Y'XI1FNDI1'LJRI," RI,(2U11zI,'D AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED $ $30,000 $ Fund Source: 000.15.576.800.41.00 Comments: $30,000 budeted each year for restoration /stewardship MTG. DATE RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION 2/27/17 ITEM INFORMATION ITEM NO. 5.A. --Tsr, XF1,SPONsoit: ROBERT EATON 1 U1tiGIN,1L 2/27/17 A(,,i;NDA VITNITITLE, Presentation of the Green Tukwila 20-Year Stewardship Plan for adoption by resolution Cx1'r(;o1�Y Z Di, -Ils,),ion A 1tg Dale 2127113 ❑ Motion Aftg bate ❑ Resolution A 1tg Daie 316117 ❑ Ordinance Ajlg Dale F-1 Bid,,bvard A1/,9 Da/0 F-1 Public I Tearing t1lg Dale F-1 0115er Al1� Dale S110NSOR ❑Counil ❑]Mqyor ❑11R ❑])(,'I) ❑I`inance E] 1,ire ❑TS ❑/'(/--K ❑Police ❑PIVl' ❑(,ourt S11()NS0R'S Review and adoption by resolution of the Green Tukwila 20-Year Stewardship Plan. StTNINIA10' Ri-xji,'Iwt,:i-) BY ❑ C.O.W. Mtg. Z CDN Comm ❑ Finance Comm. ❑ Public Safety Comm. F-1"Trans &Infrastructure F-1 Arts Comm. ❑ Parks Comm. F-1 Planning Comm. DATE: 2/13/17 COMMI'l-FEE CI IATR: HoUGARDY RECOMMENDATIONS: SPONSOR/ADMIN. Parks & Recreation Unanimous Approval; Forward to Committee of the Whole COST IMPACT / FUND SOURCE Y'XI1FNDI1'LJRI," RI,(2U11zI,'D AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED $ $30,000 $ Fund Source: 000.15.576.800.41.00 Comments: $30,000 budeted each year for restoration /stewardship MTG. DATE RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION 2/27/17 MTG. DATE ATTACHMENTS 2/27/17 Informational Memo dated 2/8/17, to include spreadsheet on costs requested by CDN DRAFT Resolution Green Tukwila 20-Year Stewardship Plan Minutes from the CDN meeting of 2/13/17 3/6/17 Resolution in final form 63 •l City of Tukwila Washington Resolution No. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING THE GREEN TUKWILA 20-YEAR PLAN FOR THE CITY OF TUKWILA. WHEREAS, the City of Tukwila, through the Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan, has identified the importance and value of: sustaining green and open space in the City, seeking opportunities for land conservation, enhancing the urban tree canopy, and providing more environmental education; and WHEREAS, the City of Tukwila Parks & Recreation Department desires to partner with the public and local businesses on volunteer stewardship restoration-projects within the City that directly benefit those who work, live, and play in the City of Tukwila; and WHEREAS, City staff and the Park Commission have completed review and modification of the Green Tukwila 20-Year Plan ("the Plan"), and have forwarded the Plan to the City Council for review and adoption; and WHEREAS, the Plan was created after solicitation and receipt of public input via multiple outreach methods; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: The Green Tukwila 20-Year Plan, attached hereto as Exhibit A, is hereby adopted. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, at a Regular Meeting thereof this day of 2017. ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: Christy O'Flaherty, MMC, City Clerk Rachel B. Turpin, City Attorney Attachment: Exhibit A — Green Tukwila 20-Year Plan Dennis Robertson, Council President Filed with the City Clerk: Passed by the City Council: Resolution Number: WkWord ProcessingResolutionsMopt Green Tukwila 20-Year Plan 2-7-17 RE:bjs Page 1 of 1 65 M. 111ilials Meeliq Dalt, Prepared by I ��Yo r's reviem Council review 02/27/17 CPL , I," " I iJL 03/06/17 CPL °'°� LR SPONSOR'S Update landscaping code to be consistent with Comprehensive Plan urban SUMMARY forestry/ landscaping goals/policies. Key provisions include: updated standards for plant materials; requiring parking lot landscaping in heaving industrial areas but allowing flexibility in its location; requiring and giving credit for retaining significant trees; establishing maintenance and pruning standards; establishing landscaping modification criteria; and establishing financial penalties for violations of the Chapter. Ri:lvii,,wj?t:) ii), ❑ C-0-W. Mtg. Z CDN Conan ❑ Finance Comm. ❑ Public Safety Comm. ❑Trans &Infrastructure [:] arts Corm. [:] Parks Cornin. F-1 Planning Coturn. DATE: 02/13/17 COMMIT.FFIECHAIR: HOUGARDY RECOMMENDATIONS: S11()NSoii /Ai),N1IN. Department of Community Development COMM "I"" F Forward to the C.O.W. COST IMPACT / FUND SOURCE ExIll:NI)YFURF AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED $0 $0 $0 Fund Source: Comments: MTG. DATE RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION 02/27/17 ITEM INFORMATION ITEM NO. -TS, I'AFFSPONSOR: CAROL LUMB 0RI(;INAj, A(',FNt),\ D,\,ri,,1: 2/27/17 Update of Landscaping Code CXVF(;(CRY ® Discussion ,Alt ,g Dale 02127117 ❑ Motion 11)� Date F-1 Resolution Al/,g Dale Z Ordinance Al�g 1)(ite 0316117 ❑ Bid.,,hpard Ali Dale Z Public 1-16,afiji Altg Dale 2127117 ❑ 01her All ,g Date SIVNSORR ❑('ouncil ❑Mqyor ❑ffR ZDCD ❑Vinaiice E] Fire ❑73' ❑11&12 ❑llolice ❑PWI ❑Courl SPONSOR'S Update landscaping code to be consistent with Comprehensive Plan urban SUMMARY forestry/ landscaping goals/policies. Key provisions include: updated standards for plant materials; requiring parking lot landscaping in heaving industrial areas but allowing flexibility in its location; requiring and giving credit for retaining significant trees; establishing maintenance and pruning standards; establishing landscaping modification criteria; and establishing financial penalties for violations of the Chapter. Ri:lvii,,wj?t:) ii), ❑ C-0-W. Mtg. Z CDN Conan ❑ Finance Comm. ❑ Public Safety Comm. ❑Trans &Infrastructure [:] arts Corm. [:] Parks Cornin. F-1 Planning Coturn. DATE: 02/13/17 COMMIT.FFIECHAIR: HOUGARDY RECOMMENDATIONS: S11()NSoii /Ai),N1IN. Department of Community Development COMM "I"" F Forward to the C.O.W. COST IMPACT / FUND SOURCE ExIll:NI)YFURF AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED $0 $0 $0 Fund Source: Comments: MTG. DATE RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION 02/27/17 MTG. DATE ATTACHMENTS 02/27/17 Informational Memorandum dated 02/07/17, w/ Attachments A-] Minutes from the CDN Meeting of 2/13/17 Planning Commission Minutes 03/6/17 Ordinances (3) **NOTE: 3 words "or specimen shrubs" were added to the housekeeping changes in the 1st ordinance (18.52), Page 22 of the ordinance, Table B. These words were intended to be included and were referenced in last week's packet in Attachment B, page 22 67 RN AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, ADDING A NEW DEFINITION RELATED TO TREES TO BE CODIFIED IN TUKWILA MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 18.06; AMENDING VARIOUS ORDINANCES AS CODIFIED IN CHAPTER 18.52 OF THE TUKWILA MUNICIPAL CODE TO RECODIFY VARIOUS SECTIONS AND TO ESTABLISH NEW LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS; REPEALING VARIOUS ORDINANCE SECTIONS TO ELIMINATE EXISTING TUKWILA MUNICIPAL CODE SECTIONS 18.52.035 AND 18.52.040; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Tukwila's current landscaping standards were adopted in 1999, with minor amendments since that time; and WHEREAS, new Comprehensive Plan goals and policies establish tree canopy goals for all zoning districts; and WHEREAS, the Comprehensive Plan recognizes trees for their benefits to the environment, urban infrastructure and their aesthetic value; and WHEREAS, Tukwila's streetscapes and landscaped areas should be sustainable and attractive and its urban forest healthy, diverse and safe; and WHEREAS, the Comprehensive Plan developed to require diversity of tree species species already present in the vicinity; and directs that new landscape standards be in landscape plantings and consideration of WHEREAS, the Comprehensive Plan requires the establishment of minimum standards and specifications to ensure long-term tree health for street trees and required landscape trees including minimum soil volume, soil quality, plant quality, planting techniques, irrigation, mulching, and tree pruning; and W: Word Processing\Ordinances\Landscaping Code update-TMC 18.52 strike-thru 2-28-17 CL:bjs Page 1 of 23 •.1-01 WHEREAS, the Comprehensive Plan directs that flexibility be included in the landscape code to promote increased tree planting and reward the preservation of existing healthy trees; and WHEREAS, the Comprehensive Plan directs that opportunities be identified to increase tree canopy in parking lot landscaping; and WHEREAS, the Comprehensive Plan requires that criteria be established for professional assessment and corrective actions by property owners who damage code- required landscaping, street trees, or other required trees by topping, poor pruning practices or root disturbance; and WHEREAS, it is important that required replacement trees at maturity have equivalent or larger canopies than the removed trees, except where existing or future infrastructure and/or public or private utilities impede the planting of large trees; and WHEREAS, where required trees cannot be accommodated on-site, procedures for off-site planting of replacement trees or payment into a dedicated tree replacement fund should be established; and WHEREAS, increasing the amount of tree canopy throughout the City supports the low impact development goals of the Comprehensive Plan and the City's National Pollution Discharge Elimination System permit; and WHEREAS, the Tukwila Tree and Environment Advisory Committee, composed of citizens, business representatives, environmental professionals and City officials, met in September and October 2016 to review and provide guidance on landscaping regulations, which were forwarded to the Tukwila Planning Commission for review; and WHEREAS, on November 10, 2016, the Tukwila Planning Commission, following adequate public notice, held a public hearing to receive testimony concerning amending the Tukwila Municipal Code and at that meeting adopted a motion recommending the proposed changes; and WHEREAS, on November 15, 2016, the City's State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Responsible Official issued a Determination of Non-Significance on the proposed amendments; and WHEREAS, in accordance with RCW 36.70A.106 and WAC 365-196-630, a notice of intent to adopt the proposed revised development regulations was sent to the State of Washington Department of Commerce and to other state agencies to allow for a review and comment period, which comment period ended prior to adoption of this ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Tukwila City Council, following adequate public notice, held a public hearing on February 27, 2017, to receive testimony concerning the recommendations of the Planning Commission; W: Word Processing\OrdinanceskLandscaping Code update-TMC 18.52 strike-thru 2-28-17 CL:bjs Page 2 of 23 NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. TMC Section Adopted. A new section is hereby added to TMC Chapter 18.06, "Definitions," as follows: Defective Tree "Defective Tree" means a tree that meets all of the following criteria: 1. A tree with a combination of structural defects and/or disease that makes it subject to a high probability of failure; and 2. A tree in proximity to moderate to high frequency targets (persons or property that can be damaged by tree failure); and 3. The hazard condition of the tree cannot be lessened with reasonable and proper arboricultural practices nor can the target be removed. Section 2. TMC Chapter 18.06, "Definitions," Amended. Ordinance No. 1758 §1 (part), as codified in TMC Chapter 18.06, "Definitions," under the subparagraph entitled "Hazardous Tree," is hereby amended to read as follows: Hazardous Tree See "Defective Tree." Section 3. Chapter Title. Ordinance No. 1872 §14 (part), as codified at Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) Chapter 18.52, is hereby amended to retitle the chapter as follows: CHAPTER 18.52 LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS Sections: 18.52.010 Purpose 18.52.020 Landscaping Types 18.52.030 Perimeter and Parking Lot Landscaping Requirements by Zone District 18.52.040 Screening and Visibility 18.52.050 Significant Tree Retention 18.52.060 Plant Material Requirements and Tree Standards 18.52.070 Soil Preparation, Planting and Irrigation 18.52.080 Maintenance and Pruning 18.52.090 Landscape Plan Requirements 18.52.100 Request for Landscape Modifications 18.52.110 Violations Section 4. Repealer. Ordinance Nos. 2442 §2, 2251 §63, 2235 §14 and 1872 §14 (part), as codified at TMC Section 18.52.035, are hereby repealed. W: Word Processing\Ordinances\Landscaping Code update-TMC 18.52 strike-thru 2-28-17 CL:bjs Page 3 of 23 71 Section 5. Repealer. Ordinance Nos. 2251 §64 and 1872 §14 (part), as codified at TIVIC Section 18.52.040, are hereby repealed. Section 6. TIVIC 18.52.010 Amended. Ordinance No. 1872 §14 (part), as codified at TIVIC Section 18.52.010, "Purpose," is hereby amended to read as follows: 18.52.010 Purpose The purpose of this chapter is to establish minimum requirements for landscaping to: • Implement the Urban Forestry Comprehensive Plan goals and policies by increasing tree canopy throughout the City to improve air quality; promote the health of residents, visitors and employees; and reduce heat islands and stormwater flows. • Support the low impact development goals of the Comprehensive Plan and the City's National Pollution Discharge Elimination System permit. • Promote safety. • Provide screening between incompatible land uses. • Mitigate the adverse effects of development on the environment. • Improve the visual environment for both residents and nonresidents. • Regulate the protection of existing landscaping. • Establish requirements for the long-term maintenance of required landscaping. • Establish procedures for modifying landscaping requirements and penalties for violations of the landscaping code. Section 7. TIVIC 18.52.030 Amended and Recodified to TIVIC 18.52.020. Ordinance Nos. 2251 §62 and Ord. 1872 §14 (part), as codified at TIVIC Section 18.52.030, "Perimeter Landscape Types," are hereby amended to recodify this section as TIVIC Section 18.52.020, which shall read as follows: 18.52.020 Landscaping Types A. General Standards for All Landscaping Types. 1. Trees. a. Trees shall be spaced based on the stature tree selected (small, medium or large stature of tree), excluding curb cuts and spaced regularly, except where there are conflicts with utilities. b. Large and medium stature tree species are required, per the Tukwila Approved Tree List, except where there is insufficient planting area (due to proximity to a building, street light, above or below ground utility, etc.) or the planned tree location does not permit this size tree at maturity. W: Word Processing\Ordinances\Landscaping Code update-TMC 18.52 strike-thru 2-28-17 CL:bjs Page 4 of 23 72 2. Shrubs. Shrubs shall be spaced based on the mature size of the plant material selected and shall achieve a continuous vertical layer within 3 years. The shrubs will provide 4 feet clearance when mature when adjacent to any fire hydrant or fire department connection. 3. Groundcover. a. Sufficient live groundcovers of varying heights, colors and textures to cover, within 3 years, 100% of the yard area not needed for trees and shrubs. b. If grass is being used as the groundcover, a 4-foot diameter ring of bark mulch is required around each tree. 4. Bioretention may be used as a Type I or 11 landscape perimeter, provided the intent of the screen is achieved. To support bioretention facility function and plant survival, flexibility in plant materials and placement shall be allowed, provided public safety is not compromised. 5. The amount of landscaping on commercially-zoned properties may be reduced by 15% if buildings are moved to the front of the site with no parking between the building and the front landscaping, to create a more pedestrian-friendly site design. B. Type I — Light Perimeter Screening. 1. The purpose of Type I landscaping is to enhance Tukwila's streetscapes, provide a light visual separation between uses and zoning districts, screen parking areas, and allow views to building entryways and signage. 2. Plant materials shall consist of the following: a. Trees: A mix of deciduous and evergreen trees. b. One shrub per 7 linear feet. c. Groundcover. C. Type 11 — Moderate Perimeter Screening. 1. The purpose of Type 11 landscaping is to enhance Tukwila's streetscapes, provide a moderate visual separation between uses and zoning districts, screen blank building walls and parking areas, and allow views to building entryways and signage. 2. Plant materials shall consist of the following: a. Trees: A mix of deciduous and evergreen trees. b. One shrub per 4 linear feet, excluding curb cuts. c. Groundcover. D. Type III — Heavy Perimeter Screening. 1. The purpose of Type III landscaping is to provide extensive visual separation along property lines between highly incompatible development, such as warehousing and residential uses. W: Word Processing\Ordinances\Landscaping Code update-TMC 18.52 strike-thru 2-28-17 CL:bjs Page 5 of 23 73 2. Plant materials shall consist of the following: a. Trees consisting of at least 50% evergreen along the applicable property line (75% along property line adjacent to residential uses). b. Privacy screen utilizing evergreen shrubs, screening walls or fences (up to 7 feet tall). c. Groundcover. E. Parking Lot Landscaping. This landscaping is required to mitigate adverse impacts created by parking lots such as noise, glare, stormwater run-off, and increased heat and to improve their physical appearance. 1. Trees shall be evenly distributed throughout the parking lot. Planting in continuous, landscaped planting strips between rows of parking is encouraged. Surface water management design may also be combined with landscaping in parking lots. In industrial districts (C/LI, LI, HI, MIC/L, MIC/H), clustering of interior parking lot landscaping may be permitted to accommodate site usage. 2. Landscape islands. a. Landscape islands must be a minimum of 6 feet wide, exclusive of overhang, and a minimum of 100 square feet in area. All landscaped areas must be protected from damage by vehicles through the use of curbs, tire stops, or other protection techniques. b. Landscape islands shall be placed at the ends of each row of parking to protect parked vehicles from turning movements of other vehicles. c. The number and stature of trees shall be based on the area available in the landscape island. A minimum of one large stature evergreen or deciduous tree or two medium stature trees are required for every 100 square feet of landscaped island, with the remaining area to contain a combination of shrubs, living groundcover, and mulch. Cl. For parking lots adjacent to public or private streets, if landscape islands are designed into the parking lot layout to divide continuous rows of parking stalls, the islands must be placed at minimum spacing of 1 for every 10 parking spaces. For parking areas located behind buildings or otherwise screened from public or private streets or public spaces, if landscape islands are used, islands shall be placed at a minimum of 1 for every 15 parking stalls. 1 3. Bioretention, which includes trees, shrubs and groundcover, may be used to meet interior parking lot landscaping requirements. The bioretention facility must be designed by a professional trained or certified in low impact development techniques as set forth in TIVIC Chapter 14.30. All bioretention facilities must be protected by curbing to prevent vehicle damage to the facility and for public safety. W: Word ProGessing\Ordinances\Landscaping Code update-TMC 18.52 strike-thru 2-28-17 CL:bjs Page 6 of 23 4. Vehicular Overhang. a. Vehicle overhang into any landscaping area shall not exceed two feet. b. No plant material greater than 12 inches in height shall be located within two feet of the curb or other protective barrier in landscape areas adjacent to parking spaces and vehicle use areas. c. Raised curbs or curb stops shall be used around the landscape islands or bioretention facilities to prevent plant material from being struck by automobiles. Where bioretention is used, curb cuts shall be placed to allow stormwater runoff from adjacent pavements to enter the bioretention system. 5. Pervious pavement shall be used, where feasible, including parking spaces and pedestrian paths. 6. Parking lot landscape design shall accommodate pedestrian circulation. F. Street Trees in the Public Frontage. 1. Street tree spacing. a. Street tree spacing in the public frontage shall be as specified in TMC Section 18.52.060.6.2. based on the stature size of the tree. b. Spacing must also consider sight distance at intersections, driveway locations, and utility conflicts as specified in TMC Section 18.52.060.B.3. c. Street trees in the public frontage shall be planted using the following general spacing standards: (1) At least 3-1/2 feet back from the face of the curb. front for access). (2) At least 5 feet from underground utility lines. (3) At least 10 feet from utility poles. (4) At least 7-1/2 feet from driveways. (5) At least 3 feet from pad-mounted transformers (except 10 feet in (6) At least 4 feet from fire hydrants and connections. d. Planting and lighting plans shall be coordinated so that trees are not planted in locations where they will obstruct existing or planned street or site lighting, while maintaining appropriate spacing and allowing for their size and spread at maturity. e. Planting plans shall consider the location of existing or planned signage to avoid future conflicts with mature trees and landscaping. 2. Tree grates. a. Tree grates are not encouraged, but when used, shall be designed so that sections of grate can be removed incrementally as the tree matures and shall be designed to avoid accumulation of trash. W: Word Processing\Ordinances\Landscaping Code update-TMC 18.52 strike-thru 2-28-17 CL:bjs Page 7 of 23 75 b. When used, tree grates and landscaped tree wells shall be a minimum 36 square feet in size (6' x U). Tree well size may be adjusted to comply with ADA standards on narrower sidewalks. See TIVIC Section 18.52.070.A.1., "Soil Preparation and Planting," for structural soil requirements. Root barriers may be installed at the curb face if structural soils are not used. 3. Maintenance and Pruning. a. Street trees are subject to the planting, maintenance, and removal standards and Best Management Practices (BMPs) as adopted by the International Society of Arboriculture, as it now reads and as hereafter amended. Street trees planted prior to the adoption of the most current tree planting standards shall be exempt from these planting standards but are still subject to current removal and maintenance standards. b. The following standards apply to street tree maintenance: (1) Street trees shall be maintained consistent with International Society of Arboriculture BMPs. (2) Street trees shall be maintained in a manner that does not impede public street or sidewalk traffic, consistent with the specifications in the Public Works Infrastructure Design Manual, including: streets. (a) 8 feet of clearance above public sidewalks. (b) 13 feet of clearance above public local and neighborhood (c) 15 feet of clearance above public collector streets. (d) 18 feet of clearance above public arterial streets. (3) Street trees shall be maintained so as not to become a defective tree as per the definition in TIVIC Chapter 18.06. 4. Trees planted in a median shall be appropriate for the planting environment and meet the following requirements: a. Trees shall be consistent with previously approved median tree plans, given space constraints for roots and branches at maturity. b. Median plantings shall provide adequate species diversity Citywide and reasonable resistance to pests and diseases. c. Columnar trees may be considered for median plantings to avoid conflicts with vehicles and utilities. d. Structural soils shall be used to avoid the need for root barriers and to ensure the success of the median plantings. e. Any median tree that is removed must be replaced within the same median unless spacing constraints exist. Replacement trees shall be of the same stature or greater at maturity as the removed tree, consistent with other space considerations. W: Word Processing\Ordinances\Landscaping Code update-TMC 18.52 strike-thru 2-28-17 CL:bjs Page 8 of 23 76 Section 8. TMC 18.52.020 Amended and Recodified to TMC 18.52.030. Ordinance Nos. 2442 §1, 2251 §61, 2235 §13 and 1872 §14 (part), as codified at TMC Section 18.52.020, "Perimeter Landscaping Requirements by Zone District," are hereby amended to recodify this section as TMC Section 18.52.030, which shall read as follows: 18.52.030 Perimeter and Parking Lot Landscaping Requirements by Zone District In the various zone districts of the City, landscaping in the front, rear and side yards and parking lots shall be provided as established by the various zone district chapters of this title. These requirements are summarized in the following table (Table A), except for Tukwila Urban Center (TUC) requirements, which are listed in TMC Chapter 18.28. TABLE A — Perimeter and Parking Lot Landscaping Requirements by Zone District ZONING FRONT YARD LANDSCAPE LANDSCAPE LANDSCAPE LANDSCAPE LANDSCAPING DISTRICTS (SECOND TYPE FOR FOR SIDE FOR REAR TYPE FOR FOR FRONT) FRONTS YARD YARD SIDE/REAR PARKING LOTS (linear feet) (linear feet) (linear feet) (square feet) ILDR 152 Type 10 10 Type 20 per stall for (for uses other non-residential than uses; 15 per residential) stall if parking is placed behind building MDR 151, 2.11 Type 10 10 Type Same as LDR HDR 151,2,11 Type 10 10 Type Same asLDR MUO 15 (12,5)211 Type 17 64 64,11 Type 17 20 per stall adjacent to street; 15 per stall if parking is placed behind building 0 15(12.5)2 Type 17 64 64 Type 17 Same as MUO RCC 20(10)2,3 Type 17 64 loll Type 11 Same as MUO NCC 104,11 Type 17,13 04 04,11 Type 11 Same as MUO RC 10 Type 113 64 04 Type 118 Same as MUO RCM 10 Type 1 64 04 Type 118 Same as MUO C/LI 15 Type 16 65,12 05,12 Type 118 15 per stall; 10 per stall for parking placed behind buildinq LI 152 Type 11 04,12 04,12 Type 111 15 per stall; 10 per stall for parking placed behind building HI 152 Type 11 04,12 04,12 Type 111 15 per stall_ MIC/L 105 Type 11 05,12 05,12 Type 111 10 per stall MIC/H 105 Type 11 05,12 05,12 Type 111 10 per stall W: Word Processing\Ordinances\Landscaping Code update -TMC 18,52 strike-thru 2-28-17 CL:bjs Page 9 of 23 77 ZONING FRONT YARD LANDSCAPE LANDSCAPE LANDSCAPE LANDSCAPE LANDSCAPING DISTRICTS (SECOND TYPE FOR FOR SIDE FOR REAR TYPE FOR FOR FRONT) FRONTS YARD YARD SIDE/REAR PARKING LOTS (linear feet) (linear feet) _ (linear feet) (square feet TUC — See TIVIC Chapter 18.28 TVs 152,3 Type II 04 04 Type III Same as C/LI TSO 152,9 Type 010 010 Type III Same as C/LI Notes: 1. Minimum required front yard landscaped areas in the MDR and HDR zones may have up to 20% of their required landscape area developed for pedestrian and transit facilities subject to the approval criteria in TIVIC Section 18.52.100.B. 2. In order to provide flexibility of the site design while still providing the full amount of landscaping required by code, the front yard landscape width may be divided into a perimeter strip and one or more other landscape areas between the building and the front property line if the perimeter strip is a minimum of 10 feet and the landscape materials are sufficient to provide landscaping along the perimeter and screening of the building mass. 3. Required landscaping may include a mix of plant materials, pedestrian amenities and features, outdoor caf6-type seating and similar features, subject tothe approval criteria in TMC Section 18.52.100.B. Bioretention may also be used as required landscaping subject to the approval criteria in TIVIC Section 18.52.100.E. Required plant materials will be reduced in proportion to the amount of perimeter area devoted to pedestrian-oriented space. 4. Increased to 10 feet if any portion of the yard is within 50 feet of LDR, MDR 5. Increased to 15 feet if any portion of the yard is within 50 feet of LDR, MDR 6. Increased to Type 11 if the front yard contains truck loading bays, service areas or outdoor storage. 7. Increased to Type 11 if any portion of the yard is within 50 feet of LDR, MDR or HDR. 8. Increased to Type III if any portion of the yard is within 50 feet of LDR, MDR or HDR. 9. Only required along public streets. 10. Increased to 10 feet if adjacent to residential uses or non-TSO zoning. 11. In the MDR and HDR districts and other districts where multifamily development is permitted, a community garden may be substituted for some or all of the landscaping. In order to qualify, a partnership with a nonprofit (501(c)(3)) with community garden expertise is required to provide training, tools and assistance to apartment residents. Partnership with the nonprofit with gardening expertise is required throughout the life of the garden. If the community garden is abandoned, the required landscaping must be installed. If the garden is located in the front landscaping, a minimum of 5 feet of landscaping must be placed between the garden and the street. W: Word Processing\Ordinances\Landscaping Code update-TIVIC 18.52 strike-thru 2-28-17 CL:bjs Page 10 of 23 12. To accommodate the types of uses found in the C/Ll, LI, HI and MIC districts, landscaping may be clustered to permit truck movements or to accommodate other uses commonly found in these districts if the criteria in TMC Section 18.52.100.D are met. 13. For NCC and RC zoned parcels in the Tukwila International Boulevard District, the front landscaping may be reduced or eliminated if buildings are brought out to the street edge to form a continuous building wall, and if a primary entrance from the front sidewalk as well as from off-street parking areas is provided. Section 9. Regulations Established. A new TMC Section 18.52.040, "Screening and Visibility," is hereby established to read as follows: 18.52.040 Screening and Visibility A. Screening. 1. Screening of outdoor storage, mechanical equipment and garbage storage areas and fences: a. Outdoor storage shall be screened from abutting public and private streets and from adjacent properties. Such screens shall be a minimum of 8 feet high and not less than 60% of the height of the material stored. The screens shall be specified on the plot plan and approved by the Community Development Director. In the MDR and HDR zones, outdoor storage shall be fully screened from all public roadways and adjacent parcels with a high obscuring structure equal in height to the stored objects and with a solid screen of exterior landscaping. b. Ground level mechanical equipment and garbage storage areas shall be screened with evergreen plant materials and/or fences or masonry walls. c. Fences. All fences shall be placed on the interior side of any required perimeter landscaping. 2. A mix of evergreen trees and evergreen shrubs shall be used to screen blank walls. 3. Evergreen shrubs and evergreen trees shall be used for screening along rear property lines, around solid waste/recycling areas, utility cabinets and mechanical equipment, and to obscure grillwork and fencing associated with subsurface parking garages. Evergreen shrubs and trees shall be pruned so that 18 inches visibility at the base is maintained. B. Visibility. 1. Design of new landscaping and maintenance of existing landscaping shall consider Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) principals and visibility for safety and views. Appropriate plant species shall be specified to avoid the need for excessive maintenance pruning. W: Word Processing\Ordinances\Landscaping Code update-TMC 18.52 strike-thru 2-28-17 CL:bjs Page 11 of 23 We, 2. Landscaping shall not obstruct views from or into building windows, the driveway, sidewalk or street. Landscape design shall allow for surveillance from streets and buildings and avoid creating areas that might harbor criminal activity. 3. Landscaping at crosswalks and other locations where vehicles and pedestrians intersect must not block pedestrians' and drivers' views. 4. In general, deciduous trees with open branching structures are recommended to ensure visibility to retail establishments. More substantial shade trees or evergreens are recommended in front of private residences. Section 10. Regulations Established. A new TIVIC Section 18.52.050, "Significant Tree Retention," is hereby established to read as follows: 18.52.050 Significant Tree Retention A. All significant trees located within any required landscape area that are not dead, dying, diseased, or a nuisance species, as identified in the Tukwila Approved Tree List, and that do not pose a safety hazard or conflict with overhead utility lines as determined by the City or an ISA certified arborist, shall be retained and protected during construction with temporary fencing or other enclosure, as appropriate to the site and following Best Management Practices for tree protection (see TIVIC Chapter 18.54). B. Retained significant trees may be counted towards required landscaping. For each 2% of effective canopy cover provided by preserved trees incorporated into a development plan, a 2% reduction in the minimum landscape requirement may be granted. No more than 20% of the minimum landscape requirement may be reduced for any one development. Approval is required per TIVIC Section 18.52.100. C. The area designated for protection will vary based on the tree's diameter, species, age, and the characteristics of the planted area, and Best Management Practices for protection shall be utilized (see TIVIC Chapter 18.54). Property owners may be required to furnish a report by an ISA certified arborist to document a tree's condition if a tree is to be retained. The Director may require that an ISA certified arborist be retained to supervise tree protection during construction. Grade changes around existing trees within the critical root zone are not allowed. Section 11. Regulations Established. A new TIVIC Section 18.52.060, "Plant Material Requirements and Tree Standards," is hereby established to read as follows: 18.52.060 Plant Material Requirements and Tree Standards A. Plant Material Requirements. 1. Plants shall meet the American Standard for Nursery Plant Stock (American Nursery and Landscape Association-ANLA) (ANSI Z60.1) as it now reads and as hereafter amended, and shall be healthy, vigorous and well-formed, with well- developed, fibrous root systems, free from dead branches or roots. Plants shall be free from damage caused by temperature extremes, pre-planting or on-site storage, lack of W: Word Processing\Ordinances\Landscaping Code update-TMC 18.52 strike-thru 2-28-17 CL:bjs Page 12 of 23 Firs, or excess moisture, insects, disease, and mechanical injury. Plants in leaf shall be well foliated and of good color. Plants shall be habituated to outdoor environmental conditions (i.e. hardened-off). 2. Evergreen trees shall be a minimum of 6 feet in height at time of planting. 3. Deciduous trees shall have at least a 2-inch caliper at time of planting as measured 4.5 feet from the ground, determined according to the American Standard for Nursery Stock as it now reads and as hereafter amended. 4. Shrubs shall be at least 18 inches in height, and full and bushy at time of planting. 5. New plant materials shall include native species or non-native species with lower water requirements and that are adapted to the climatic conditions of the Puget Sound Region. There must be a diversity of tree and shrub genus and species in the site landscaping, taking into account species in existing development around the site. a. If there are more than 8 required trees, no more than 40 percent may be of one species. b. If there are more than 24 required trees, no more than 20 percent may be of one species. c. If there are more than 25 required shrubs, no more than 50 percent may be of one species. 6. Any species that is listed on the State of Washington or King County noxious weed lists or otherwise known to be a nuisance or invasive shall not be planted. 7. Plant materials shall be selected that reinforce the landscape design concept, and are appropriate to their location in terms of hardiness, cultural requirements, tolerance to urban conditions, maintenance needs and growth characteristics. 8. The classification of plant material as trees, shrubs and evergreens shall be as listed in the Hortus Third, A Concise Dictionary of Plants Cultivated in the U.S. and Canada, as it now reads and as hereafter amended. 9. Plant material requirements for bioretention facilities shall be in accordance with the City's Bioretention Plant List, unless approved by staff. 10. Non-developed site areas, such as utility easements, shall be landscaped and/or treated with erosion control planting or surfacing such as evergreens, groundcover, shrubs, trees, sod or a combination of similar materials. In areas with overhead utility lines, no shrubs or trees shall be allowed that could mature over 20 feet in height. Trees should not be planted within 10 feet of underground utilities, such as power, water, sewer or storm drainage pipes. B. Tree Standards. 1. Tree species shall be appropriate for the planting environment as determined by the Department Director in consultation with the City environmentalist and shall seek to achieve a balance of the following: W: Word Processing\Ordinances\Landscaping Code update-TMC 18.52 strike-thru 2-28-17 CLbis Page 13 of 23 Plant List. a. Consistency with Tukwila Approved Tree List or the City's Bioretention b. Compatibility with space constraints for roots and branches at maturity. c. Adequate species diversity Citywide and reasonable resistance to pests and diseases. 2. Trees shall be provided adequate spacing from new and existing trees according to the following standards wherever possible: a. Trees categorized as small stature on the tree list shall be spaced no greater than 20 feet on center and not closer than 15 feet on center from other newly planted or existing trees. b. Trees categorized as medium stature on the tree list shall be spaced no greater than 30 feet on center and not closer than 20 feet on center from other newly planted or any existing trees. c. Trees categorized as large stature on the tree list shall be spaced no greater than 40 feet on center and not closer than 30 feet on center from other newly planted or existing trees. d. Any tree determined to have a mature spread of less than 20 feet (a columnar or fastigiate variety) is discouraged except under specific conditions and shall be considered a small stature tree and spaced accordingly. 3. Trees shall be placed according to the following standards: a. Small stature trees shall be planted with the center of their trunks a minimum of 2 feet from any hard surface paving. b. Medium stature trees shall be planted with the center of their trunks a minimum of 2.5 feet from any hard surface paving. c. Large stature trees shall be planted with the center of their trunks a minimum of 3 feet from any hard surface paving. d. Trees shall generally be planted a minimum of: (1) 4 feet on center from any fire hydrant, above-ground utility or utility (2) 2 feet on center from any underground utility; (3) 5 feet on center from a street light standard; (4) 20 feet from a street intersection; however, a greater or lesser corner setback may be required based on an analysis of traffic and pedestrian safety impacts. (5) 5 to 10 feet from building foundations depending on species. 4. Where there are overhead utility lines, the tree species selected shall be of a type which, at full maturity, will not interfere with the lines or require pruning to maintain necessary clearances. W: Word Processing\Ordinances\Landscaping Code update-TMC 18.52 strike-thru 2-28-17 CL:bjs Page 14 of 23 M. 5. Root barriers may be installed according to the manufacturer's specifications when a tree is planted within 5 feet of any hard surface paving or utility feature and in areas where structural soil is not required, subject to approval by the Department Director in consultation with the City's environmentalist. 6. Low water usage species are encouraged in order to minimize future irrigation requirements, except where site conditions within the required landscape areas ensure adequate moisture for growth. 7. Shade trees should be planted to shade buildings' east- and west-facing windows to provide a balance between summer cooling and winter heating through solar gain. Section 12. Regulations Established. A new TIVIC Section 18.52.070, "Soil Preparation, Planting and Irrigation," is hereby established to read as follows: 18.52.070 Soil Preparation, Planting and Irrigation A. Soil Preparation and Planting. 1. For landscaping in sidewalks and parking lots, or in limited areas of soil volume, structural soils (Cornell University product or similar) must be used to a preferred depth of 36 inches to promote tree root growth and provide structural support to the paved area. Minimum soil volumes for tree roots shall be 750 cubic feet per tree (see specifications and sample plans for CU-Structural Soils). Trees and other landscape materials shall be planted according to specifications in "CU Structural Soils — A Comprehensive Guide," as it now reads and as hereafter amended, or using current Best Management Practices (BMPs) as approved by the Director. Suspended pavement systems (Silva Cells or similar) may also be used if approved by the Director. 2. For soil preparation in bioretention areas, existing soils must be protected from compaction. Bioretention soil media must be prepared in accordance with standard specifications of the Surface Water Design Manual, adopted in accordance with TIVIC Chapter 14.301 to promote a proper functioning bioretention system. These specifications shall be adhered to regardless of whether a stormwater permit is required from the City. 3. For all other plantings (such as large planting areas where soil volumes are adequate for healthy root growth), soils must be prepared for planting in accordance with BMP T5.13, "Post Construction Soil Quality and Depth," from the Washington Department of Ecology Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington (as it now reads and as hereafter amended), regardless of whether a stormwater permit is required by the City. 4. The applicant will be required to schedule an inspection by the City of the planting areas prior to planting to ensure soils are properly prepared. Soil must be amended, tilled and prepped to a depth of at least 12 inches. W: Word Processing\Ordinances\Landscaping Code update-TMC 18.52 strike-thru 2-28-17 CL:bjs Page 15 of 23 M. 5. Installation of landscape plants must comply with BMPs including: a. Planting holes that are the same depth as the size of the root ball and two to three times wider than the root ball. b. Root balls of potted and balled and burlapped (B&B) plants must be loosened and pruned as necessary to ensure there are no encircling roots prior to planting. All burlap and all straps or wire baskets must be removed from B&B plants prior to planting. c. The top of the root flare, where the roots and the trunk begin, should be placed at grade. The root ball shall not extend above the soil surface and the flare shall not be covered by soil or mulch. d. If using mulch around trees and shrubs, maintain at least a 6-inch mulch-free ring around the base of the tree trunks and woody stems of shrubs. If using mulch around groundcovers until they become established, mulch shall not be placed over the crowns of perennial plants. B. Irrigation. 1. The intent of this standard is to ensure that plants will survive the critical establishment period when they are most vulnerable due to lack of watering and to ensure their long term viability. 2. All required plantings must be served by a permanent automatic irrigation system, unless approved by the Director. a. Irrigation shall be designed to conserve water by using the best practical management techniques available, including BMPs, for daily timing of irrigation to optimize water infiltration and conservation. These techniques may include, but not be limited to: drip irrigation (where appropriate) to minimize evaporation loss, moisture sensors to prevent irrigation during rainy periods, automatic controllers to ensure proper duration of watering, sprinkler head selection and spacing designed to minimize overspray, and separate zones for turf and other landscaping and for full sun exposure and shady areas to meet watering needs of different sections of the landscape. b. Exceptions to the irrigation requirement may be approved by the Director, such as xeriscaping (i.e., low water usage plantings), plantings approved for low impact development techniques, established indigenous plant material, or landscapes where natural appearance is acceptable or desirable to the City. However, those exceptions will require temporary irrigation until established. 3. All temporary irrigation must be removed at the end of the 3-year plant establishment period. W: Word Processing\Ordinances\Landscaping Code update-TMC 18.52 strike-thru 2-28-17 CL:bjs Page 16 of 23 RE Section 13. Regulations Established. A new TMC Section 18.52.080, "Maintenance and Pruning," is hereby established to read as follows: 18.52.080 Maintenance and Pruning A. Any landscaping required by this chapter shall be retained and maintained by the property owner for the life of the development in conformance with the intent of the approved landscape plan and this chapter. Maintenance shall also include keeping all planting areas free of weeds and trash and replacing any unhealthy or dead plant materials. B. Green roofs or rooftop gardens shall be maintained to industry standards and any dead or dying plant material replaced. C. Pruning of trees and shrubs is only allowed for the health of the plant material, to maintain sight distances or sight lines, or if interfering with overhead utilities. All pruning must be done in accordance with American National Standards Institute (ANSI) A-300 specifications, as it now reads and as hereafter amended. D. No tree planted by a property owner or the City to fulfill landscape requirements, or any existing tree, may be topped or removed without prior approval from the City. Any tree topped or removed without approval shall be subject to code enforcement action per TMC Chapter 8.45 in addition to the requirements of TMC Section 18.52.110, "Violations." E. Private property owners shall collect and properly dispose of all landscaping debris. Private property landscaping debris shall not be placed or blown into the public right-of-way for City collection. Violations will be subject to code enforcement action per TMC Chapter 8.45. F. As trees along the street frontages mature, they shall be limbed up, using proper ISA pruning techniques, to a minimum height of 8 to 18 feet depending on location of tree (over sidewalk, adjacent to road, etc.) to allow adequate visibility and clearance for vehicles. Trees may be pruned to improve views of signage and entryways by using such techniques as windowing, thinning, and limbing up; however, no more than 1/4 of the canopy may be removed within any 2-year period. All pruning shall be done in accordance with ANSI Standard A-300 specifications, as it now reads and as hereafter amended. G. Trees may only be pruned to lower their height to prevent interference with an overhead utility line with prior approval by the Director. The pruning must be carried out under the direction of an ISA certified arborist. The crown shall be maintained to at least 2/3 the height of the tree prior to pruning. Otherwise, trees shall not be topped. W: Word Processing\Ordinances\Landscaping Code update-TMC 18.52 strike-thru 2-28-17 CL:bjs Page 17 of 23 F.*R, Section 14. TMC 18.52.050 Amended and Recodified to TMC 18.52.090. Ordinance Nos. 2368 §53, 2251 §65, 1971 §19 and 1872 §14 (part), as codified at TMC Section 18.52.050, "Landscape Plan Requirements," are hereby amended to recodify this section as TMC Section 18.52.090, which shall read as follows: 18.52.090 Landscape Plan Requirements A. Landscape plan design shall take into consideration the mature size of proposed landscape materials to minimize the future need for pruning (i.e. placement such that mature trees and shrubs will not cause problems for foundations, obscure signage, grow too close to overhead or underground utility lines, obstruct views of traffic, etc.). B. A Washington State licensed landscape architect or other accredited landscape design professional shall prepare the landscape plans in accordance with the standards herein. Detailed plans for landscaping and screening shall be submitted with plans for building and site improvements. The plans shall, at a minimum, include the type, quantity, spacing and location of plants and materials; typical planting details; soil amend ment/i nsta I lation - tree protection details as applicable; and the location of irrigation systems and significant trees within 20 feet of the property line on adjacent properties. Underground and at-ground utilities shall be shown on the plans so that planting conflicts are avoided. A detailed list of items to be included on the landscape plan is available in the Landscape Plan handout, available on-line or at the offices of the Department of Community Development. C. Installation of the landscaping and screening shall be completed and a Landscaping Declaration submitted by the owner or owner's agent prior to issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. Any plant substitutions shall be noted on the Declaration. If necessary, due to weather conditions or construction scheduling, the installation may be postponed to the next planting season (October — April) if approved by the Director and stated on the building permit. A performance assurance device equal to 150% of the cost of the labor and materials must be provided to the City before the deferral is approved. Section 15. Regulations Established. A new TMC Section 18.52.100, "Request for Landscape Modifications," is hereby established to read as follows: 18.52.100 Request for Landscape Modifications A. The following modifications to the requirements of this chapter may be considered either as a Type 2, Special Permission Director decision, or through design review if the project is subject to that process. 1. Modifications to the requirements of Type 1, 11, or III landscaping, including but not limited to the use of the landscape area for pedestrian and transit facilities, landscape planters, rooftop gardens or green roofs, terraced planters or green walls, or revisions to existing landscaping. W: Word Processing\Ordinances\Landscaping Code update-TMC 18.52 strike-thru 2-28-17 CL:bjs Page 18 of 23 W. 2. Clustering and/or averaging of required landscaping. The landscape perimeter may be clustered if the total required square footage is achieved, unless the landscaping requirement has been increased due to proximity to LDR, MDR or HDR. In addition, up to 50% of the perimeter landscaping may be relocated to the interior parking to provide more flexibility for site organization. 3. Substitution of bioretention facility for required landscaping for Type I or 11 landscaping. Landscaping in a bioretention facility that includes trees, shrubs and groundcover may be counted up to 100% towards required landscaping depending on the location, type of bioretention facility proposed and proposed use. 4. Credit for retained significant trees towards landscaping requirement. B. The following criteria apply to requests to modify required landscaping. Modifications to landscaping requirements may be approved only if the following criteria are met: 1. The modification or revision does not reduce the landscaping to the point that activities on the site become a nuisance to neighbors; and 2. The modification or revision does not diminish the quality of the site landscape as a whole; and 3. One or more of the following are met: a. The modification or revision more effectively screens parking areas and blank building walls; or b. The modification or revision enables significant trees or existing built features to be retained; or c. The modification or revision is used to reduce the number of driveways and curb cuts and allow joint use of parking facilities between neighboring businesses; or d. The modification or revision is used to incorporate pedestrian or transit facilities; or e. The modification is for properties in the NCC or RC districts along Tukwila International Boulevard, where the buildings are brought out to the street edge and a primary entrance from the front sidewalk as well as from off-street parking areas is provided; or f. The modification is to incorporate alternative forms of landscaping such as landscape planters, rooftop gardens, green roof, terraced planters or green walls; or g. The modification is to incorporate a community garden, subject to the provisions of TIVIC Section 18.52.030, Note 11. W: Word ProGessing\Ordinances\Landscaping Code update-TMC 18.52 strike-thru 2-28-17 CL:bjs Page 19 of 23 F-*YA C. Revisions to existing landscaping may be approved only if the following criteria are met: 1. The modification or revision does not reduce the landscaping to the point that activities on the site become a nuisance to neighbors; and 2. The modification or revision does not diminish the quality of the site landscape as a whole; and either a. Proposed vegetation removal, replacement, and any mitigation measures proposed are consistent with the purpose and intent given in this chapter; or b. The granting of an exception or standard reduction will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or injurious to other property in the vicinity. 3. In addition, if trees are removed due to conflicts with utilities, these trees shall be replaced based on the tree replacement table (Table C) in TIVIC Chapter 18.52.110. D. Clustering or perimeter averaging of landscaping may be considered if: 1. It does not diminish the quality of the site landscape as a whole; and 2. It does not create a nuisance to adjacent properties; and 3. If adjacent to residential development, the impacts from clustering are minimized; and 4. One or more of the following criteria are met: a. Clustering or perimeter averaging of plant material allows more effective use of the industrial property; or b. Clustering or perimeter averaging of landscaping enables significant trees to be retained; or c. Clustering or perimeter averaging is used to reduce the number of driveways and curb cuts and/or allow joint use of parking facilities between neighboring businesses; or d. Clustering or perimeter averaging avoids future conflicts with signage. E. Landscaping in a bioretention facility, which includes trees, shrubs, and groundcovers as identified on the City's approved Bioretention Plant List and as regulated in TIVIC Chapter 14.30, may be counted up to 100% towards required Type I or Type 11 landscaping. Bioretention facilities shall not be counted towards required Type III landscaping. All of the following criteria must be met: 1. The bioretention facility has been designed by a professional trained or certified in low impact development techniques; and 2. The landscaping meets the screening requirements of the specified landscape type; and 3. Public safety concerns have been addressed; and W: Word Processing\Ordinances\Landscaping Code update-TMC 18.52 strike-thru 2-28-17 CL:bjs Page 20 of 23 F-M* 4. The number of trees required by the landscape type are provided. F. Retained significant trees. 1. Credit for retained significant trees may be counted towards required landscaping if the following criteria are met: a. Assessment of trees by an ISA certified arborist as to tree health, value of the trees and the likelihood of survivability during and after construction is provided; and b. Retention of tree(s) supports the Tukwila Comprehensive Plan urban tree canopy goals and policies; and c. A financial assurance is posted based on 50% of the value of the retained tree(s) to ensure tree replacement should the retained trees be damaged or die as a result of construction impacts. The financial assurance shall be retained for three years. 2. The value of the significant tree(s) to be retained, as determined by an ISA certified arborist, shall be posted on the tree prior to site preparation and retained throughout the construction of the project. Section 16. Regulations Established. A new TMC Section 18.52.110, "Violations," is hereby established to read as follows: 18.52.110 Violations A. Violations. The following actions shall be considered a violation of this chapter: 1. Any removal or damage of landscaping that is required by this chapter. 2. Topping or excessive pruning of trees or shrubs, except as explicitly allowed by this chapter. 3. Failure to replace dead landscaping materials. B. Penalties. In addition to any other penalties or other enforcement actions, any person who fails to comply with the provisions of this chapter also shall be subject to a civil penalty assessed against the property owns violator as set forth herein. Each unlawfully removed or damaged tree shall constitute a separate violation. 1. The amount of the penalty shall be assessed based on Table B below. The Director may elect not to seek penalties or may reduce the penalties if he/she determines the circumstances do not warrant imposition of any or all of the civil penalties. 2. Penalties are in addition to the restoration of removed plant materials through the remedial measures listed in TMC Section 18.52.110.C. W: Word Processing\Ordinances\Landscaping Code update-TMC 18.52 strike-thru 2-28-17 CL:bjs Page 21 of 23 Me 3. It shall not be a defense to the prosecution for a failure to obtain a permit required by this chapter that a contractor, subcontractor, person with responsibility on the site or person authorizing or directing the work erroneously believes a permit was issued to the property owner or any other person. TABLE B — Fines Type of Violation Allowable Fines per Violation Removal or damage of trees or $1,000 per tree, or up to the marketable value specimen shrubs without applying for of each tree removed or damaged as and obtaining required City approval determined by an ISA certified arborist. C. Remedial Measures. In addition to the penalties provided in TIVIC Section 18.52.110.13, the Director shall require any person conducting work in violation of this chapter to mitigate the impacts of unauthorized work by carrying out remedial measures. 1. Any illegal removal of required trees shall be subject to obtaining a tree permit and replacement with trees that meet or exceed the functional value of the removed trees. In addition, any shrubs and groundcover removed without City approval shall be replaced. 2. To replace the tree canopy lost due to the tree removal, additional trees must be planted on-site. Payment may be made into the City's Tree Fund if the number of replacement trees cannot be accommodated on-site. The number of replacement trees required will be based on the size of the tree(s) removed as stated in Table C. TABLE C — Tree Replacement Requirements Diameter* of Tree Removed (*measured at height of 4.5 feet from the ground) Number of Replacement Trees Required 4-6 inches (single trunk) OR 2 inches (any trunk of a multi-trunk tree) 3 Over 6-8 inches 4 Over 8-20 inches 6 Over 20 inches 8 D. Enforcement. It shall be the duty of the Community Development Director to enforce this chapter pursuant to the terms and conditions of TIVIC Chapter 8.45 or as otherwise allowed by law. W: Word Processing\Ordinances\Landscaping Code update-TIVIC 18.52 strike-thru 2-28-17 CL:bjs Page 22 of 23 •s, E. Inspection Access. 1. For the purposes of inspection for compliance with the provisions of a permit or this chapter, authorized representatives of the Community Development Director may enter all sites for which a permit has been issued. 2. Upon completion of all requirements of a permit, the applicant shall request a final inspection by contacting the planner of record. The permit process is complete upon final approval by an authorized representative of the Community Development Director. Section 17. Corrections by City Clerk or Code Reviser. Upon approval of the City Attorney, the City Clerk and the code reviser are authorized to make necessary corrections to this ordinance, including the correction of clerical errors; references to other local, state or federal laws, codes, rules, or regulations; or ordinance numbering and section/subsection numbering. Section 18. Severability. If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance or its application to any person or situation should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional for any reason by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of the remaining portions of this ordinance or its application to any other person or situation. Section 19. Effective Date. This ordinance or a summary thereof shall be published in the official newspaper of the City, and shall take effect and be in full force five days after passage and publication as provided by law. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, at a Regular Meeting thereof this day of 12017. ATTEST/AUTH E NTI CATE D: Christy O'Flaherty, MMC, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM BY: Rachel B. Turpin, City Attorney Allan Ekberg, Mayor Filed with the City Clerk:_ Passed by the City Council: Published: Effective Date: Ordinance Number: W: Word Processing\Ordinances\Landscaping Code update-TMC 18.52 strike-thru 2-28-17 CL:bjs Page 23 of 23 IN 92 City of Tukwila Washington Ordinance No. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, AMENDING ORDINANCE NOS. 2199 §18, 1872 §14 (PART) AND 1853 §4 TO RELOCATE CERTAIN SECTIONS OF THE TUKWILA MUNICIPAL CODE FROM THE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS CHAPTER TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS CHAPTER; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, regulations related to recreation space, lighting, recycling storage space for residential and non-residential uses and design of collection points for garbage and recycling containers are located in Tukwila Municipal Code Chapter 18.52, the landscaping chapter of the Zoning Code; and WHEREAS, the landscaping chapter of the Zoning Code is being completely revised to include only landscaping-related regulations and to exclude regulations related to non- landscaping issues; and WHEREAS, regulations related to lighting, recycling storage space for residential and non-residential uses and design of collection points for garbage and recycling containers are better located in the Supplemental Development Standards chapter of the Zoning Code; and WHEREAS, the Tukwila Tree and Environment Advisory Committee, composed of citizens, business representatives, environmental professionals and City officials, met in September and October 2016 to review and provide guidance on landscaping regulations, which were forwarded to the Tukwila Planning Commission for review; and WHEREAS, on November 10, 2016, the Tukwila Planning Commission, following adequate public notice, held a public hearing to receive testimony concerning amending the Tukwila Municipal Code and at that meeting adopted a motion recommending the proposed changes; and W: Word ProGessing\Ordinances\Recodify sections out of Landscape Code 2-28-17.doc CL:bjs Page 1 of 4 93 WHEREAS, on November 15, 2016, the City's State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Responsible Official issued a Determination of Non-Significance on the proposed amendments; and WHEREAS, in accordance with RCW 36.70A.106 and WAC 365-196-630, a notice of intent to adopt the proposed revised development regulations was sent to the State of Washington Department of Commerce and to other state agencies to allow for a review and comment period, which comment period ended prior to adoption of this ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Tukwila City Council, following adequate public notice, held a public hearing on February 27, 2017, to receive testimony concerning the recommendations of the Planning Commission; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. TIVIC Section 18.50.100 Deleted. Ordinance No. 1853 §4, as codified at TIVIC Section 18.50.100, "MIC/L and MIC/H Site Lighting Standards", is hereby amended to delete the section from Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) Chapter 18.50. Section 2. TIVIC Section 18.52.065 Recodified. Ordinance No. 1872 §14 (part), as codified at TIVIC Section 18.52.065, "Lighting," is hereby amended to recodify this section as TIVIC Section 18.50.170, which shall read as follows: 18.50.170 Lighting Standards A. Parking and loading areas shall include lighting capable of providing adequate illumination for security and safety. Lighting standards shall be in scale with the height and use of the associated structure. Any illumination, including security lighting, shall be directed away from adjoining properties and public rights-of-way. B. In the MDR and HDR zones, porches, alcoves and pedestrian circulation walkways shall be provided with low level safety lighting. Pedestrian walkways and sidewalks may be lighted with lighting bollards. C. MIC/L and MIC/H. The following site lighting standards shall apply to portions of developments within 100 feet of the Tukwila Manufacturing/Industrial Center boundary as defined in the 1995 Comprehensive Plan: 1. The minimum light levels in parking areas, paths between the building and street or parking areas shall be 1 foot candle; 2. The maximum ratio of average:minimum light level shall be 4:1 for illuminated grounds, 3. Maximum illumination at the property line shall be 2 foot candies; 4. Lights shall be shielded to eliminate direct off-site illumination; and 5. General grounds need not be lighted. W: Word Processing \Ord in a nces\Recod ify sections out of Landscape Code 2-28-17.doc 94 CL:bjs Page 2 of 4 D. Variation from these standards may be granted by the Director of the Department of Community Development based on technical unfeasibility or safety considerations. Section 3. TMC Section 18.52.070 Amended and Recodified. Ordinance No. 1872 §14 (part), as codified at TMC Section 18.52.070, "Recycling Storage Space for Residential Uses," is hereby amended to recodify this section as TMC Section 18.50.180, which shall read as follows: 18.50.180 Recycling Storage Space for Residential Uses Apartment and condominium developments over six units shall provide 1-1/2 square feet of recycling storage space per dwelling unit, which shall be located in collection points as follows: 1. No dwelling unit within the development shall be more than 200 feet from a collection point. 2. Collection points shall be located so that hauling trucks do not obstruct pedestrian or vehicle traffic on-site, or project into any public right-of-way. 3. Collection points shall not be located in any required setback or landscape area. Section 4. TMC Section 18.52.080 Recodified. Ordinance No. 1872 §14 (part), as codified at TMC Section 18.52.080, "Recycling Storage Space for Non-Residential Uses," is hereby amended to recodify this section as TMC Section 18.50.185, which shall read as follows: 18.50.185 Recycling Storage Space for Non-Residential Uses A. Recycling storage space for non-residential uses shall be provided at the rate of at least: 1. Two square feet per every 1,000 square feet of building gross floor area in office, medical, professional, public facility, school and institutional developments. 2. Three square feet per every 1,000 square feet of building gross floor area in manufacturing, industrial and other non-residential uses not specifically mentioned in these requirements. 3. Five square feet per every 1,000 square feet of building gross floor area in retail developments. B. Outdoor collection points shall not be located in any required setback or landscape area. C. Collection points shall be located in a manner so that hauling trucks do not obstruct pedestrian or vehicle traffic on-site, or project into any public right-of-way. W: Word Process ing\Ord ina nces\Recod ify sections out of Landscape Code 2-28-17.doc CL:bjs Page 3 of 4 95 Section 5. TMC Section 18.52.090 Recodified. Ordinance No. 1872 §14 (part), as codified at TMC Section 18.52.090, "Design of Collection Points for Garbage and Recycling Containers," is hereby amended to recodify this section as TMC Section 18.50.190, which shall read as follows: 18.50.190 Design of Collection Points for Garbage and Recycling Containers Residential and non-residential collection points shall be designed as follows: 1. An opaque wall or fence of sufficient size and height to provide complete screening shall enclose any outside collection point. Architectural design shall be consistent with the design of the primary structure(s) on the site. 2. Collection points shall be identified by signs not to exceed two square feet. 3. Weather protection of recyclables and garbage shall be ensured by using weather-proof containers or by providing a roof over the storage area. Section 6. Corrections by City Clerk or Code Reviser. Upon approval of the City Attorney, the City Clerk and the code reviser are authorized to make necessary corrections to this ordinance, including the correction of clerical errors; references to other local, state or federal laws, codes, rules, or regulations; or ordinance numbering and section/subsection numbering. Section 7. Severability. If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance or its application to any person or situation should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional for any reason by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of the remaining portions of this ordinance or its application to any other person or situation. Section 8. Effective Date. This ordinance or a summary thereof shall be published in the official newspaper of the City, and shall take effect and be in full force five days after passage and publication as provided by law. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, at a Regular Meeting thereof this day of 12017. ATTEST /AUTHENTICATED: Christy O'Flaherty, MMC, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM BY: Rachel B. Turpin, City Attorney Allan Ekberg, Mayor Filed with the City Clerk:_ Passed by the City Council: Published: Effective Date: Ordinance Number: W: Word Processing\Ordinances\Recodify sections out of Landscape Code 2-28-17.doc 96 CL:bjs Page 4 of 4 City of Tukwila Washington Ordinance No. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, AMENDING ORDINANCE NOS. 2199 §18 AND 1872 §14 (PART), AS CODIFIED AT TUKWILA MUNICIPAL CODE (TMC) SECTION 18.52.060, "RECREATION SPACE REQUIREMENTS," TO REMOVE THAT SECTION FROM TMC CHAPTER 18.52 AND ADD "RECREATION SPACE REQUIREMENTS" TO TMC CHAPTERS 18.12 AND 18.14; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, regulations related to recreation space required in multi-family zoning districts are located in TMC Chapter 18.52, the landscaping chapter of the Zoning Code; and WHEREAS, the landscaping chapter of the Zoning Code is being revised to include only landscaping-related regulations and to exclude regulations related to non-landscaping issues; and WHEREAS, the recreation space regulations for multi-family development are better suited to codification in the Medium Density and High Density Residential District chapters of the Zoning Code; and WHEREAS, the Tukwila Tree and Environment Advisory Committee, composed of citizens, business representatives, environmental professionals and City officials, met in September and October 2016 to review and provide guidance on landscaping regulations, which were forwarded to the Tukwila Planning Commission for review; and WHEREAS, on November 10, 2016, the Tukwila Planning Commission, following adequate public notice, held a public hearing to receive testimony concerning amending the Tukwila Municipal Code and at that meeting adopted a motion recommending the proposed changes; and WHEREAS, on November 15, 2016, the City's State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Responsible Official issued a Determination of Non-Significance on the proposed amendments; and W: Word Processing\Ordinances\Recreation Space Requirements section moved 1-20-17 CL:bjs Page 1 of 5 97 WHEREAS, in accordance with RCW 36.70A.106 and WAC 365-196-630, a notice of intent to adopt the proposed revised development regulations was sent to the State of Washington Department of Commerce and to other state agencies to allow for a review and comment period, which comment period ended prior to adoption of this ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Tukwila City Council, following adequate public notice, held a public hearing on February 27, 2017, to receive testimony concerning the recommendations of the Planning Commission; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. TMC Section 18.52.060 Deleted. Ordinance Nos. 2199 §18 and 1872 §14 (part), as codified at TMC Section 18.52.060, "Recreation Space Requirements", are hereby amended to delete the section from Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) Chapter 18.52. Section 2. Regulations Established. TMC Section 18.12.030, "Recreation Space Requirements", is hereby established to read as follows: 18.12.030 Recreation Space Requirements In the MDR zoning district, any proposed multiple-family structure, complex or development shall provide, on the premises and for the use of the occupants, a minimum amount of recreation space according to the following provisions: Required Area. a. For each proposed dwelling unit in the multiple-family development and detached zero-lot-line type of development, a minimum of 400 square feet (100 square feet for senior citizen housing) of recreation space shall be provided. Any multiple-family structure, complex or development shall provide a minimum of 1,000 square feet of total recreation space. b. Townhouse units shall provide at least 250 square feet of the 400 square feet of recreation space as private, ground level open space measuring not less than 10 feet in any dimension. c. The front, side and rear yard setback areas required by the applicable zoning district shall not qualify as recreation space. However, these setback areas can qualify as recreation space for townhouses if they are incorporated into private open space with a minimum dimension of 10 feet on all sides. 2. Indoor or Covered Space. a. No more than 50% of the required recreation space may be indoor or covered space in standard multi-family developments. Senior citizen housing must have at least 20% indoor or covered space. W: Word Processing\Ordinances\Recreation Space Requirements section moved 1-20-17 98 CL:bjs Page 2 of 5 b. The Board of Architectural Review may grant a maximum of two square feet of recreation space for each one square foot of extensively improved indoor recreation space provided. Interior facility improvements would include a full range of weight machines, sauna, hot tub, large screen television and the like. 3. Uncovered Space. a. A minimum of 50% of the total required recreation space shall be open or uncovered, up to 100% of the total requirement may be in open or uncovered recreation space in standard multi-family developments. Senior citizen housing allows up to 80% of recreation space to be outdoors and has no minimum outdoor space requirement. b. Recreation space shall not exceed a 4% slope in any direction unless it is determined that the proposed space design clearly facilitates and encourages the anticipated use as endorsed by the Director. c. The Board of Architectural Review may grant a maximum credit of two square feet of recreation space for each one square foot of outdoor pool and surrounding deck area. 4. General Requirements. a. Multiple-family complexes (except senior citizen housing, detached zero-lot-line and townhouses with nine or fewer units), which provide dwelling units with two or more bedrooms, shall provide adequate recreation space for children with at least one space for the 5- to- 12- year -old group. Such space shall be at least 25% but not more than 50% of the total recreation space required under TIVIC Section 18.12.030 (1), and shall be designated, located and maintained in a safe condition. b. Adequate fencing, plant screening or other buffer shall separate the recreation space from parking areas, driveways or public streets. c. The anticipated use of all required recreation areas shall be specified and designed to clearly accommodate that use. Section 3. Regulations Established. TIVIC Section 18.14.030, "Recreation Space Requirements", is hereby established to read as follows: 18.14.030 Recreation Space Requirements In the HDR zoning district, any proposed multiple-family structure, complex or development shall provide, on the premises and for the use of the occupants, a minimum amount of recreation space according to the following provisions: Required Area. a. For each proposed dwelling unit in the multiple-family development and detached zero-lot-line type of development, a minimum of 400 square feet (100 square feet for senior citizen housing) of recreation space shall be provided. Any multiple-family structure, complex or development shall provide a minimum of 1,000 square feet of total recreation space. W: Word Processing\Ordinances\Recreation Space Requirements section moved 1-20-17 CL:bjs Page 3 of 5 99 b. Townhouse units shall provide at least 250 square feet of the 400 square feet of recreation space as private, ground level open space measuring not less than 10 feet in any dimension. c. The front, side and rear yard setback areas required by the applicable zoning district shall not qualify as recreation space. However, these setback areas can qualify as recreation space for townhouses if they are incorporated into private open space with a minimum dimension of 10 feet on all sides. 2. Indoor or Covered Space. a. No more than 50% of the required recreation space may be indoor or covered space in standard multi-family developments. Senior citizen housing must have at least 20% indoor or covered space. b. The Board of Architectural Review may grant a maximum of two square feet of recreation space for each one square foot of extensively improved indoor recreation space provided. Interior facility improvements would include a full range of weight machines, sauna, hot tub, large screen television and the like. 3. Uncovered Space. a. A minimum of 50% of the total required recreation space shall be open or uncovered, up to 100% of the total requirement may be in open or uncovered recreation space in standard multi-family developments. Senior citizen housing allows up to 80% of recreation space to be outdoors and has no minimum outdoor space requirement. b. Recreation space shall not exceed a 4% slope in any direction unless it is determined that the proposed space design clearly facilitates and encourages the anticipated use as endorsed by the Director. c. The Board of Architectural Review may grant a maximum credit of two square feet of recreation space for each one square foot of outdoor pool and surrounding deck area. 4. General Requirements. a. Multiple-family complexes (except senior citizen housing, detached zero-lot-line and townhouses with nine or fewer units), which provide dwelling units with two or more bedrooms, shall provide adequate recreation space for children with at least one space for the 5- to -12- year -old group. Such space shall be at least 25% but not more than 50% of the total recreation space required under TIVIC Section 18.14.030 (1), and shall be designated, located and maintained in a safe condition. b. Adequate fencing, plant screening or other buffer shall separate the recreation space from parking areas, driveways or public streets. c. The anticipated use of all required recreation areas shall be specified and designed to clearly accommodate that use. W: Word ProGessing\Ordinances\Recreation Space Requirements section moved 1-20-17 Page 4 of 5 100 CL:bjs Section 4. Corrections by City Clerk or Code Reviser. Upon approval of the City Attorney, the City Clerk and the code reviser are authorized to make necessary corrections to this ordinance, including the correction of clerical errors; references to other local, state or federal laws, codes, rules, or regulations; or ordinance numbering and section/subsection numbering. Section 5. Severability. If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance or its application to any person or situation should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional for any reason by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of the remaining portions of this ordinance or its application to any other person or situation. Section 6. Effective Date. This ordinance or a summary thereof shall be published in the official newspaper of the City, and shall take effect and be in full force five days after passage and publication as provided by law. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, at a Regular Meeting thereof this day of 12017. ATTEST/AUTH E NTI CATE D: Christy O'Flaherty, MMC, City Clerk Rachel B. Turpin, City Attorney Allan Ekberg, Mayor Filed with the City Clerk: Passed by the City Council: Published: Effective Date: Ordinance Number: W: Word Process ing\O rd in an ces\Recreatio n Space Requirements section moved 1-20-17 CL:bjs Page 5 of 5 101 102 COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS ----- --- --------------------- - - - - -I nitialr Meeting Dale Prepared by Ma ,ors review Council review 03/06/17 TS ITEM NO. 103 SPONSOR: JOSEPH TODD 03/06/17 A(,&I'NDA I'll,"WIT11H Approval of Dell computer lease contract Cxi'I"("(')1tY Z Discussion Al g Date 316117 Z Motion Aftg Date 03106117 ❑ Reiolution Mtg Date ❑ Ordinance Mtn Date F-1 Bid.Aww-d Ali g Dale ❑ Public.Heatin g Mtn Date ❑ Other 0 / Mtn Date yor E]HR E]DCD E]Pinance [:]Fire Z7)' E]P&1� )o1i , )fV/ 'ou - SPONSOR ❑Council ❑Ma 1:11 c6 Ell ❑0C �t SP()NS0IZ'S The City of Tukwila is replacing its out dated desktop comptuing systems with new Dell SUINIMAJy leased laptops. This will provide the City of Tukwila with refresh infrastructure to handle modern cloud and computer based applications, which burden our current systems. This Lease will put the City on a 3 year refresh cycle for enuser computing systems. Ri,x[FIWFA) BY ❑ C.O.W. Mtg. F-1 CDN Comm Z P'inance Comm. ❑ Public Safety Comm. F-1 Trans &Infrastructure [:] Arts Comm. F-1 Parks Comm. F-1 Planning Comm. DATE: 2/22/17 COMMITTEE CI-1AIR: SEAL RECOMMENDATIONS: SPONSOR /ADMIN. Technology and Innovations Services Department Unanimous Approval; Forward to March 6 New Business COST IMPACT / FUND SOURCE PXPFND1'1'UW,'1 Rl QUIM,'D AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED $400,000 $450,000 $ Fund Source: Comments: MTG. DATE RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION 3/6/17 MTG. DATE ATTACHMENTS 3/6/17 Informational Memorandum dated February 28, 2017 (New memo after FIN Com.) Dell Lease documents Minutes from the Finance Committee meeting of 2/22/17 103 104 City of Tukwila Allan Ekberg, Mayor INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM TO: City Council FROM: TIS Department BY: Joseph Todd, Technology and Innovation Services Director CC: Mayor Ekberg DATE: 02/28/2017 SUBJECT: Dell Computer Lease Contract for Dell Products ISSUE The attached three-year lease will provide computer replacements for all city employees, including devices in fire and police vehicles. The City Council authorized funding for replacement of employee computers in the 2017/2018 budget at $150,000 per year. The annual cost for this lease will be $123,467.53. This will be a 3-year total of $370,402.59 with an option to purchase the equipment for $29,543.41 at the end of the Lease BACKGROUND As part of the 2016 Technology and Innovation Services Strategic Plan, the City proposed a three-year replacement or refresh program for all computing devices. The current equipment is approximately on a five-year replacement cycle, with some older equipment still in use. In talking to vendors and other technology departments as well as researching best industry practices, it was determined that the most cost-effective method would be to lease the equipment, rather than purchase. This provides better overall services to the end user. And the lease schedule will ensure that the City can meet the demands of modern desktop and cloud software, and ensure that the City stays current with desktop computing systems. DISCUSSION In December of 2016 the City Council approved the Technology and Innovations Services Department's 2017 — 2018 biennial budget. Included was $150,000 annually allocated to refresh our systems on the three-year lease cycle. This $150,000 budget amount is listed on page 248 of the 2017-2018 Adopted Budget under line item — "000.12518.880.45.00 Rental — Technology Refresh." The attached Dell Client System Agreement with Davenport Group (the local Dell Service Provider) will replace all of the City's desktop computing assets including Fire and Police in-car computing. The agreement covers the new computing devices and provides four key services: • Factory imaging of devices before they leave Dell, which means departmental software will be installed before the devices are shipped to the City, freeing up staff time; • Next-day air replacement of broken or malfunctioning devices, leaving the burden to Dell to deal with these issues and not City staff; • Dell premium dedicated onsite services for device deployment and help ticket services associated with these devices; and • Device tagging and asset management services. 105 INFORMATIONAL MEMO Page 2 Moving to the lease system will allow for significantly greater efficiencies throughout the City, particularly for staff working on out-of-date machines. The additional staff time that will be realized by Technology and Innovation Services through this contract will allow for greater service to our clients throughout the City. Summary of Lease Terms The following is a quick summary of the terms of the lease: This is a Fair Market Value Lease. The options for the equipment at the end of the lease are as follows: • Exercise the option to purchase the products at the then fair market value up to or less than the full lease contract price of $399,946.00. • Return all products to lessor at the lessee's expense. • Renew the lease on a month to month or fixed term basis. Equipment covered under the lease: Item Notes Details Units Cost Equipment E5570 Laptops (for use at Dell Latitude E5570 214 most office locations) 7202 36 Rugged laptops Dell Latitude 12 36 (for use in police and fire Rugged 7202 vehicles) 7275 Laptops (2 in 1 Dell Latitude 7275 2-in- 14 devices for more mobile 1 users) Additional "Docking Stations" for Dell E-port 246 Equipment devices to be used in replicator and key conjunction with monitors boards with USB and/or keyboards 3.0 • 214 Dell E-port replicator with USB 3.0 • 36 Dell Keyboard Cover with Kickstand for Latitude 12 Rugged Tablet 14 Dell Dock — WD1 5 with 130W Adatper Total Equipment Cost $370,402.59 Purchase Purchase Computers at $29,543.41 0 Option: fair market value at end of ease Total Lease Contract 399.946.00 106 DCouncil Agenda lterns\Technology Servicesllnfornerno_delljease contract—v4.dou INFORMATIONAL MEMO Page 3 FINANCIAL IMPACT The total lease contract is up to $399,946.00 over three years. Our actual annual payment will be $123,467.53 a total of $370,402.59 over 3 years. At the end of the lease we will have the option to keep the devices and pay the fair market value of the devices up to or less than $29,543.41. If we choose this option, the total lease contract will be $399,946.00 RECOMMENDATION The Council is being asked to authorize the Mayor to sign a three-year lease agreement with Dell Computer for $399,946.00 ATTACHMENTS Davenport Group and Dell Lease Agreement Davenport Group and Dell — Detailed Dell Client System for City of Tukwila reference no. MDIRQ1019-01 LCouncil Agenda IternsJechnology ServicesMornerno—dell—lease contract—V4.dou 107 WT.* Prepared �Foiir�: Tukwila' WA Joseph Todd February 28, 2017 Thank you for giving Dell Financial Services LL[. ("DFS] the opportunity to provide a technology financing solution. Enclosed isa financing proposal for your new technology needs. VVe look forward kz discussing this opportunity in further detail with you. |f you have any questions, please contact nneat the phone number or email address below. MD|RQ1O48 March 30, 2017 Personal Property "raxes(11PIPT) wIKKappKy tmthIslease. Payments: Annual Consolidation: Monthly Payments Due: Advance Interim Rent: None Rate Factor 3 End of Term Options: Fair Market Value (FMV) Lease: ~ Exercise the option to purchase the products at the then fair market value. ~ Return all products to lessor at the lessee's expense. • Renew the lease on a month to month or fixed term basis. Tiffany Collins Financial Solutions Representative IDeKV| Financial Services office + 1512 723-7225 Tiffany Col 1i ns(d-) Dell. com Page 1of2 1O� '°� I February 28, 2017 7 PURCHASE ORDER: The Purchase Order must be made out to Dell Financial Services L.L.C., One Dell Way, RR8-23, Round Rock, TX 78682. The Purchase Order will need to include the quote number' quantity and description of the equipment. Please be sure to indicate that the PD is for a lease order and shows the type of lease, the term length, and payment frequency. The date of the lease quote referenced should beincluded. Please be sure to include any applicable shipping costs as a line item and include your address as the SHIP TO destination. INSURANCE: The risk of loss on the equipment is borne solely by the Lessee. Lessee shall be required to purchase and maintain during the Term (i) comprehensive public liability insurance naming Lessor as additional insured,- and (ii) "all-risk" physical damage insurance in a minimum amount of the Purchase Price, naming DFS as first loss payee. APPROPRIATION COVENANT: The Lease will contain an appropriation of funds clause. The Lessee will covenant that it shall do all things legally within its power to obtain and maintain funds from which the payments may be paid. |n addition toa duly executed Agreement, other documents asreasonably requested by DFS may be required, such as but not limited to, opinions of counsel, IRS tax exemption forms (if applicable), and audited financials. economics PROPOSAL VALIDITY / APPROVALS: This is a proposal based upon market conditions and is valid for 30 days, is subject to final credit approval, review of the of the ch and execution of mutually acceptable documentation. Page 2 of 2 11O ''° davenportgroup P.i epa ire d For, City of Tukwila, WA Joseph Todd 6300 Southcenter Blvd Tukwila, WA 98188 us joseph.todd@tukwilawa.gov Summary 0 rlw o t e 11 n f o r rn (Y,. Iu � �t i <) n: Quote Number: MDIR01019-01 Date: 2/14/2017 Quote Expiration: 2/4/2017 Dell Latitude E5570 SubTotal $282,480.00 Latitude 12 Rugged 7202 SubTotal $98,496.00 Latitude 7275 2-in-1 SubTotal $18,970.00 davenportgroup 214 Dell Latitude E5570 6th Generation Intel Corgi7-6G0OU (Dual Core, 2.6GHz,4MB cache) Windows Professional English, French, Spanish 64bit (Includes Windows 10 Pro License) Dell Latitude E557C\CTO Internal Dual Pointing Backlit Keyboard (US-English) Internal Keyboard Shroud 10G.E557Q NoOut-ofBand Systems Management 16GB(2xMGB)2133MHzDDR4Memory 50O{]B(7\200 Rpm) Serial AT/\ Hard Drive |mbe| Dual Band Wireless 8260 (802.11ac)\N/B|uetomth Intel Rapid Storage Technology Nm Wireless WAN Card Primary 4-cell 62W/HR Battery 39.6cnn(75.5")FHDn92Ox1O8O0 Touch LCD with Camera (VViGiGcomnpatib|e) No Fingerprint Reader and No Smart Card Reader (Contact andContact|ess) Adobe Reader 1l Dell Data Protection I Protected Workspace Dell(TM) Digital Delivery Cirrus Client Windows 10 Pro 0S Recovery G4bk-[jVD VS Power Cord 9Q Watt ACAdaptor NoDDPIESSSoftware Dell Data Protection Encryption Personal Edition Digital Delivery Dg|| ProGuppmrt for Software, Dell Data Protection Encryption Personal Edition, 3Year Dell Limited Hardware Warranty -3Years $1,225.00 $262,150.00 davenportgroup ProSupport: 7x24 Technical Support - 3 Years ProSupport: Next Business Day Onsite - 3 Years Custom Asset Tag Image Load - Custom Image, Fac tory Install Configuration Services - Custo m, Laser Etching,Factory Insta 11 214 Dell E-Port Replicator with USB 3.0 Dell Latitude E5570 SubTotal 36 Latitude 12 Rugged 7202 Intel Core M-5Y71 processor Win 10 Pro 64 English, French, Spanish Intel Core M-5Y71 Processor with 8GB Memory and Dedicated GPS 11.6 HD (1366x768) Outdoor- Readable Glove-Capable Touchscreen with Gorilla Glass 8GB 1600MHz LPDDR3 Memory 128G SSD Latitude, Rugged 2-cell (26Wh) Lithium Ion Secondary Battery 2MP HD Webcam / 8MP Rear Camera with Flash and Dual Microphones Intel 7265AC Dual-Band 2x2 802.11 ac WiFi Wireless LAN card bracket No Wireless WAN Card No Out-of-Band Systems Management Intel Dual Band Wireless 7265 802.11ac Wi-Fi + BT 4.0 LE Driver E5 Power Cord (US) Dell Rugged Tablet Dock 2-cell (26Wh) Lithium Ion Primary Battery Dell Power Manager Kickstart Product Registration Platform Quickset, 7202 $95.00 $20,330.00 $282,480.00 $2,441.00 $87,876.00 davenportgroup SupportAssist 45 Watt 3Pin AC Adapter Flex 2 ProSupport: Next Business Day Onsite - 3 Years Dell Limited Hardware Warranty - 3 Years ProSupport: 7x24 Technical Support - 3 Years Accidental Damage Service - 3 Years Keep Your Hard Drive - 3 Years 36 Dell Keyboard Cover with Kickstand for the Latitude 12 Rugged Tablet $295.00 $10,620.00 Latitude 12 Rugged 7202 SubTotal $98,496.00 Continued On Next Page • a venportg ro uP 14 Latitude 7275 2-in-1 $1,250.00 $17,500.00 Dell Latitude 7275, CTO 6th Generation Intel Core m7-6Y75 Processor (4M Cache, up to 3.10) Win 10 Pro 64 English, French, Spanish Intel Core m7 Processor Base with 8GB RAM, WLAN Only Microsoft(R) Office 30 Days Trial SupportAssist Latitude 12 Premier Keyboard Dock Cover Internal US English Owerty Backlit Keyboard 82 Keys 31.8cm (12.5") FHD (1920x1080) Touch 8GB DDR31- 1600MHz Memory M.2 128GB SATA Class 20 Solid State Drive No Out-of-Band Systems Management Intel 8260 Dual band 2x2 802.11ac 2.4/5GHz + Bluetooth 4.1 No Mobile Broadband E5 Power Cord for 3-pin Adapter (US/China) 30 Watt AC Adapter Dell Adapter USB-C to USB-A 3.0 Primary 2-Cell (30Whr) battery Dell Premier Magnetic Folio for Mobility keyboard+system No DDPIESS Software Dell Data Protection Encryption Personal Edition Digital Delivery Dell ProSupport for Software, Dell Data Protection Encryption Personal Edition, 3 Year BTO Standard Shipment (M) Dell Latitude 7275 Flex 3 System back Cover to support Non DS4, Non-Keyssa, WLAN Dell Limited Hardware Warranty Plus Service - 3 Years ProSupport: 7x24 Technical Support - 3 Years davenportgroup ProSupport: Next Business Day Onsite - 3 Years Custom Asset Tag Image Load - Custom Image, Fac tory Install 14 Dell Dock - WD15 with 130W Adapter $105.00 $1,470.00 Latitude 7275 2-in-1 SubTotal $18,970.00 Continued On Next Page davenportgroup davenportgroup Terms and Conditions Terms Of payment are Net lS days from GhipDl8Ot. Un|eSS Oth8[VYiSe agreed upon. Applicable tax and shipping will be included On your invoice. We reserve the right to CaDCe| orders arising from pricing Or Other errors. We will assess O late fee Of 1.5 percent per DlVDth On all arnOUntS received after that time. The terms of this proposal are subject tO credit approval. Thank you for your business. 120 FINANCE COMMITTEE Meeting Minutes City Council Finance Committee Februory22, 2017- 5:30 p.m. - Hazelnut Conference Room, City Hall Councilmembers: Verna Seal, Chair; Kathy Hougardy, Thomas McLeod Staff: David Cline, Peggy McCarthy, Stephanie Brown, Erika Eddins, Joseph Todd, Gail Labanara, Craig Zellerhoff, Laurel Humphrey CALL TO ORDER: Chair Seal called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. I. PRESENTATIONS II. BUSINESSAGENDA A. Lease Agreement: Dell Computers Staff is seeking Council approval of a contract with the Davenport Group in the amount of $397,750.00 to lease Dell computing systems for City employees on a three year "refresh" cycle. In the past, the City has purchased computer equipment leading to inefficiencies and productivity losses due to aging systems unable to keep up with changing technologies. The Council previously authorized $450,000 for this in the adopted budget and the lowered price is a result of negotiations. Computers that are relatively new and in good working order will be used at front counter /service areas in the City. The Committee discussed the proposal and requested clarifying information be added to the memo and attachments regarding the actual contract price and budgetary context. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO MARCH 6, 2017 REGULAR MEETING (NEW BUSINESS) B. Employee Compensation Policy The City Council desires to review and possibly modify the City Council's Compensation Policy, adopted via Resolution 1796. Staff is seeking clarity and direction on the appropriate background, research and phasing for a successful process. Suggestions from staff include a compensation trend overview, comparable cities, timing and process for non - represented compensation, benefits structure, and a discussion on how the current policy has been working. Additional items from the Committee are summarized as follows: • Can non - represented and represented employees be aligned more fairly? • Summary of outcomes from the non - represented employee committee • Update on status of union negotiations • Review of decision band methodology, including how it is working • Reevaluate policy to avoid salary compression • Are the comparable cities (jurisdictions +/- 50% of Tukwila's A /V) still a fair measure? 121 122 COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS ---------------------------- - - - - -- Initials --------------------------------- ( ITEMNO. Meelin,g Dale Pre ll)ared bly Ma yor's review ew Council rows) 03/06/17 LH L ITEM INFORMATION 123 ',\FF SPONSOR: LAUREL HumPHREY 3/6/17 A(,,FNI)A ITFIMIT11H, Source of Income Discrimination Ordinance C"\,I,r1("()1tY Z Disclusion Mtn Dale 316117 ❑ Motion MIS Dale ❑ Resolution Altg Dale Z Ordinance 1 Ctg Daie.316117 ❑ Bid,1122wrd 111g Dale ❑ Public I leafiq A 1tg Date ❑ Other Al(g Date SPONSOR ❑C'Ounil ❑M�I)Vr ❑1IR ❑DCD ❑Vil)(1n6v ❑l"ire EI'1'3' ❑P&R ❑l'olice ❑PIF El or SP()NS0R'S Source of Income Discrimination (SOID) Legislation is a mechanism to prevent landlords from denying tenancy to renters based solely on their use of housing assistance vouchers such as Section 8 and VASH. The Council is asked to consider enacting this policy in Tukwila. ❑ C.O.W. Mtg. Z CDN Comm ❑ Finance Comm. ❑ Public Safety Comm. F-1"Trans &Infrastructure [:] Arts Comm. ❑ Parks Comm. ❑ Planning Comm. DATE: 2/27/17 COMMITTEE CHAIR: HOUGARDY RECOMMENDATIONS: SPONSOR/ADNIIN. WIN",\ UYI] `11,1' Unanimous Approval; Forward to 3/6 New Business COST IMPACT / FUND SOURCE AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED Fund Source: Comments: MTG. DATE RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION 3/6/17 MTG. DATE ATTACHMENTS 3/6/17 Informational Memorandum dated 2/17/17 Ordinance Housing Development Consortium Local Policy Toolkit Excerpt on SOID Washington Low Income Housing Alliance Policy Information Page Minutes from the CDN Committee meeting of 2/27/17 123 124 City of Tukwila Allan Ekberg, Mayor TO: Community Development and Neighborhoods Committee FROM: Laurel Humphrey, Council Analyst CC: Mayor Ekberg DATE: February 17, 2017 SUBJECT- An Ordinance Prohibiting Source of Income Discrimination in Rental Housing ISSUE Source of Income Discrimination (SOID) Legislation is a mechanism used by many cities and states to prevent landlords from denying tenancy to renters based solely on the fact that their income includes government housing subsidies e.g., Section 8 and HUD-VASH (Veterans Affairs Supportive Housing) vouchers. The 2016 Community Affairs and Parks Committee was briefed on SOID legislation and gave staff direction to return in 2017 with a proposal for further consideration. House Bill 1633, currently in play in the State Legislature, would ban source of income discrimination on a state level. DISCUSSION In Tukwila, the average asking rent for 800 sf has increased 14% since 2015, 41% since 2007, and the current rental occupancy rate is 96.7%. (Source: CoStar) Incomes have not kept pace with this increasingly competitive housing market, and families or individuals receiving housing subsidies are subject to discrimination by landlords. While the Fair Housing Act prohibits discrimination based on race, national origin, religion, etc., it is legal for a landlord to discriminate against type of income unless specifically prohibited by a jurisdiction. Some cities are responding by enacting laws to prevent this discrimination and thereby helping to decrease barriers to housing access for vulnerable residents. Washington agencies that have enacted SOID legislation include King County, Renton, Redmond, Kirkland, Tumwater, Bellevue, Seattle, Vancouver, and Kent. Seattle, Vancouver, and Kent's ordinances prohibit discrimination on the basis of all types of housing assistance while the others in the list are targeted only to Section 8 vouchers. The City of Renton enacted emergency legislation on November 7, 2016 in response to actions taken by certain landlords who gave notice to all Section 8 tenants that their leases would not be renewed. The eviction notices in question were rescinded or extended due in part to the swift response by the City. The 2016 Community Affairs and Parks Committee gave direction to develop an ordinance with an expanded definition of income to include other types of assistance beyond Section 8. If a City implements SOID legislation, a landlord may still use legal and fair screening criteria on applicants, and can still reject tenants who do not have enough income to meet the rental payment or who have a negative rental history. In addition, the 2016 Washington State Legislature directed the Department of Commerce to develop a mitigation program to provide financial assistance to landlords who have had units damaged by tenants who use Section 8 vouchers. However, this program is only available in jurisdictions that have adopted SOID legislation. 125 Page 2 The attached draft ordinance proposes a new chapter in the Tukwila Municipal Code entitled "Fair Housing Regulations." The chapter title is purposely broad so that future housing related regulations could be added under this section if directed by Council. The draft defines "source of income" to include legally-derived income from social security, supplemental security, retirement programs, or federal, state, local or nonprofit administered benefit or subsidy programs. It establishes exceptions, gives enforcement authority to the Department of Planning and Development, and sets civil penalties for violations. It is important to consider impact to the Code Enforcement staff's workload in light of the recent significant expansion of pest control requirements along with other competing priorities. RECOMMENDATION The City of Tukwila's Strategic Plan includes a goal of "A solid foundation for all Tukwila residents." One of the adopted budget priorities for 2017-2018 is to "encourage healthy, safe and affordable housing." Adoption of this ordinance would provide another tool to combat housing instability in Tukwila. Staff is seeking Committee review of the draft ordinance with a recommendation to the March 27, 2017 Committee of the Whole for further discussion. If approved by the Committee of the Whole, the final proposed ordinance will be presented at the April 3, 2017 Regular Meeting for possible action. ATTACHMENTS • Draft ordinance • Housing Development Consortium Local Policy Toolkit — SOID excerpt • Washington Low Income Housing Alliance Policy Information Page WA2017 Info MemoslSourceofincomememo20l7.docx 126 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS PROHIBITING RESIDENTIAL RENTAL DISCRIMINATION, TO BE CODIFIED AT TUKWILA MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 8.47; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Tukwila and all communities in King County are experiencing an unprecedented demand for rental housing units; and WHEREAS, there are government programs that assist families, the elderly, veterans and people with disabilities through financial subsidies that allow them to afford decent and safe housing in the private market; and WHEREAS, a significant number of people have difficulty securing adequate rental housing without such financial assistance, and it is essential to ensure housing is available to those families and individuals; and WHEREAS, it has come to the City Council's attention that in a housing market such as King County's, families and individuals using rental subsidies are subject to denial of housing; and WHEREAS, when people lose their homes as a result of income-source-based discrimination, there is an increased risk of homelessness, and children can experience disruptions to education and social development; and WHEREAS, practices of discrimination on the basis of participation in housing subsidy programs are a matter of local concern and contrary to the public welfare, health, peace and safety of Tukwila residents; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: W: Word Processing\Ordinances\ResidentiaI rental discrimination prohibited 2-15-17.doc LH:bjs Page 1 of 4 127 Section 1. Regulations Established. Tukwila Municipal Code Chapter 8.47, "Fair Housing Regulations," is hereby established to read as follows: Section 2. Regulations Established. TIVIC Section 8.47.010, "Source of Income Discrimination Prohibited," is hereby established to read as follows: 8.47.010 Source of Income Discrimination Prohibited No property owner, property manager, landlord or agent who rents or leases rental units may refuse to rent or lease a rental unit to any tenant or prospective tenant, or otherwise discriminate or retaliate against that person, solely on the basis that the person proposes to pay a portion of the rent from a source of income as defined in this chapter. Section 3. Regulations Established. TIVIC Section 8.47.020, "Definitions," is hereby established to read as follows: 8.47.020 Definitions For purposes of this chapter, the following words or phrases shall have the meaning prescribed as follows: 1. "Source of income" includes legally-derived income from social security; supplemental security income; other retirement programs; or any federal, state, local, or nonprofit administered benefit or subsidy programs, including housing assistance, public assistance and general assistance programs. 2. Other terms used in this chapter shall be defined as set forth in Tukwila Municipal Code Chapter 5.06, "Residential Rental Business License and Inspection Program." Section 4. Regulations Established. TMC Section 8.47.030, "Applicability," is hereby established to read as follows: 8.47.030 Applicability Nothing in this chapter will apply if the rental unit does not qualify for participation in the tenant's "source of income" program, although any property owner or manager that refuses to rent a rental unit to a person on this basis must notify that person in writing of the reasons why the rental unit is ineligible. Refusal to allow a health and safety inspection of the W: Word Processing\Ordinances\ResidentiaI rental discrimination prohibited 2-15-17.doc LH:bjs Page 2 of 4 1 -*� CHAPTER 8.47 FAIR HOUSING REGULATIONS Sections: 8.47.010 Source of Income Discrimination Prohibited 8.47.020 Definitions 8.47.030 Applicability 8.47.040 Exceptions 8.47.050 Enforcement 8.47.060 Penalties Section 2. Regulations Established. TIVIC Section 8.47.010, "Source of Income Discrimination Prohibited," is hereby established to read as follows: 8.47.010 Source of Income Discrimination Prohibited No property owner, property manager, landlord or agent who rents or leases rental units may refuse to rent or lease a rental unit to any tenant or prospective tenant, or otherwise discriminate or retaliate against that person, solely on the basis that the person proposes to pay a portion of the rent from a source of income as defined in this chapter. Section 3. Regulations Established. TIVIC Section 8.47.020, "Definitions," is hereby established to read as follows: 8.47.020 Definitions For purposes of this chapter, the following words or phrases shall have the meaning prescribed as follows: 1. "Source of income" includes legally-derived income from social security; supplemental security income; other retirement programs; or any federal, state, local, or nonprofit administered benefit or subsidy programs, including housing assistance, public assistance and general assistance programs. 2. Other terms used in this chapter shall be defined as set forth in Tukwila Municipal Code Chapter 5.06, "Residential Rental Business License and Inspection Program." Section 4. Regulations Established. TMC Section 8.47.030, "Applicability," is hereby established to read as follows: 8.47.030 Applicability Nothing in this chapter will apply if the rental unit does not qualify for participation in the tenant's "source of income" program, although any property owner or manager that refuses to rent a rental unit to a person on this basis must notify that person in writing of the reasons why the rental unit is ineligible. Refusal to allow a health and safety inspection of the W: Word Processing\Ordinances\ResidentiaI rental discrimination prohibited 2-15-17.doc LH:bjs Page 2 of 4 1 -*� property by a public housing authority shall not be considered a legitimate basis for refusing to rent due to program ineligibility. Section 5. Regulations Established. TIVIC Section 8.47.040, "Exceptions," is hereby established to read as follows: 8.47.040 Exceptions Nothing in this chapter shall: 1. Apply if the tenant's source of income is pre-scheduled to terminate during the term of the initial lease; 2. Apply to the renting, subrenting, leasing or subleasing of a portion of a single- family dwelling, wherein the owner or person entitled to possession thereof maintains a permanent residence, home or abode therein; 3. Prohibit a religious organization, association, or society, or any nonprofit institution or organization operated, supervised or controlled by or in conjunction with a religious organization, association or society, from limiting the rental or occupancy of dwellings it owns or operates for other than a commercial purpose to persons of the same religion, or from giving preference to such persons, unless membership in such religion is restricted on the basis of race, color, national origin or other illegal discriminatory basis; 4. Be construed to prohibit treating people with a disability more favorably than people who do not have a disability; or 5. Be construed to protect criminal conduct or prohibit any person from limiting the rental or occupancy of a dwelling based on the use of force, threats, or violent behavior by an occupant or prospective occupant. Section 6. Regulations Established. TIVIC Section 8.47.050, "Enforcement," is hereby established to read as follows: 8.47.050 Enforcement The provisions of TIVIC Section 8.45.050 shall be adopted by reference herein, and shall apply to violations of this chapter. Section 7. Regulations Established. TIVIC Section 8.47.060, "Penalties," is hereby established to read as follows: 8.47.060 Penalties A. Any person violating or failing to comply with the provisions of this chapter may be issued a civil infraction citation pursuant to TIVIC Section 8.45.050.C. Each civil infraction shall carry with it a monetary penalty of $1,000 for the first violation, and $2,500 for the second violation by the same person within a two-year period. W: Word Processing\Ordinances\ResidentiaI rental discrimination prohibited 2-15-17.doc LH:bjs Page 3 of 4 129 B. Any order imposing a civil penalty pursuant to TMC Section 8.47.060.A. shall summarize the factual and legal basis for the violation and notify the recipient of the right to appeal the penalty pursuant to TMC Section 8.45.090. Section 8. Corrections by City Clerk or Code Reviser. Upon approval of the City Attorney, the City Clerk and the code reviser are authorized to make necessary corrections to this ordinance, including the correction of clerical errors; references to other local, state or federal laws, codes, rules, or regulations; or ordinance numbering and section/subsection numbering. Section 9. Severabillity. If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance or its application to any person or situation should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional for any reason by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of the remaining portions of this ordinance or its application to any other person or situation. Section 10. Effective Date. This ordinance or a summary thereof shall be published in the official newspaper of the City, and shall take effect and be in full force five days after passage and publication as provided by law. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, at a Regular Meeting thereof this day of 2017. ATTEST/AUTH E NTI CATE D: Christy O'Flaherty, MMC, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM BY: Rachel B. Turpin, City Attorney Allan Ekberg, Mayor Filed with the City Clerk: Passed by the City Council: Published: Effective Date: Ordinance Number: W: Word ProGessing\Ordinances\ResidentiaI rental discrimination prohibited 2-15-17.doc LH:bjs 130 Page 4 of 4 E: 1111111111111111 11111111111 111111111 11111 11� 111 1i I 1111111 111� Description |ua competitive housing market, Section 8voucher holders and people whose primary income comes from public assistance often face discrimination iu the private market, making it difficult for them to access housing. Source of Income Discrimination (S01D) disproportionately affects African Americans, who make up the majority of Section 8 voucher recipients iu Washington State, uy well as people with disabilities, veterans, and elderly people. Under the Fair Housing Act and the it is already illegal for landlords to discriminate based on gender, race, ethnicity, religion, tanuUia| status and other characteristics. Local and state legislation to prevent discrimination based ou source of income can decrease barriers to accessing housing. */ Expands antidischmination laws � Increases access tohousing for vulnerable and very low income residents V Increases success ofpublic benefit programs ,' Target Population: SD%AMI& Below Benefits This policy ensures that people already facing high barriers to housing are not discriminated against and have access to available housing that they can afford. A 2001 study showed that Section 8 voucher holders experience higher success rates in areas with SCID Protection legislation in place..' Without SOID protection, many public benefit programs cannot achieve their goals of stabilizing individuals and preventing homelessness. Agencies that work with Section 8 voucher holders in South King County report au increase io difficulty for their clients finding housing iu the tight rental market of2O16. Recently io Renton, at least 65 families, many of whom were long-time renters in their units, received notice that their apartment complexes would no longer accept vouchers from any tenants, and the families would need to move oUt2. The difficulty of locating permanent housing even for individuals and families who have both a voucher and money available for move in expenses can put a strain on local shelter systems that are already atcapacity». ConsidmobonsforImplemmtubon This policy is relatively easy to enact from a technical perspective. However, the policy will likely face political opposition from the property owner and management community, When implementing, it is important to consider how that ordinance will be enforced and what consequences landlords may face if they violate the ordinance. Advocates iu Washington State have been working for many years to pass S0lD legislation at the state level. z Meryl Finkel and Larry evmn "Study on Section 8 Voucher Success Rates: Volume I Quantitative Study of Success Rates In Metropolitan Auas,^xbt^mucauvns,Cambridge, MA, 2001, Lio tA Li In � ',,.---_� Redmond: After one of Redmond's large property owners, a national company called Archstone, terminated tenancies of all their Section 8 voucher holders throughout the country, theTenants Union and the Northwest lustice Project started organizing tofiobt for the tenants who lost housing. Archstone responded to the public pressure and reinstated the residents, however only three of the residents returned to Archstone housing, one after temporarily being homeless. After this incident, Redmond City Council recognized the importance of protecting residents in their city against source of income discrimination. In February 2012, Redmond City Council went on to pass Ordinance 2645 which bans discrimination against Section 8 voucher holders. Enacted Ordinances (see city municipal codex ordinance text) Redmond (Ordinance 2645): "No personal shall refuse 10 rent a dwelling unit to any rental applicant solely on the basis that the applicant proposes to rent such unit pursuant to a Section 8 voucher or certificate issued under the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 (42 USC 1437(F)); provided this section shall only apply with respect to a Section 8 certificate if the monthly rent on such residential unit is within the allowable rent as established by the Department of Housing and Urban Deve|opnnoot" Seattle (Ordinance 125114): "...it is illegal in The City of Seattle to discriminate against any person because of race, color, creed, religion, ancestry, national origin, age, sex, marital status, parental status, sexual orientation, gender identity, political ideology, honorably discharged veteran or military status, participation in a section 8 or other subsidy program, alternative source of income, the presence of any disability, or the use of a trained dog guide or service animal by a disabled person." "..."Alternative source of income" means lawful, verifiable income derived from sources other than ways, salaries, or other compensation for employment. It includes but is not limited to monies derived from Social Security benefits, supplemental security income, unemployment benefits, other retirement programs, child support, the Aged, Blind or Disabled Cash Assistance Program, Refugee Cash Assistance, and any federal, state, local government, private, or nonprofit-administered benefit pcoArano.^ Vxmcmuver(VM|C 8.45): "No person shall refuse to rent a dwelling unit to any rental applicant on the basis that the applicant proposes to rent such unit with a "source of income" as defined in this Chapter .......... Source of income" includes income derived from social security, supplemental security income, other retirement programs, and any federal, state, local, or nonprofit-administered benefit or subsidy programs, including housing assistance, public assistance, and general assistance programs. "Source of income" does not include income derived in an illegal manner." Resources • Martha. What do We Know About HousinLy Choice Voucher PM2ratn Location OuLcomes: A Review ot'ReceriL Literature. What Works Collaborative. Aug. Z02O. • Finkel, Meryl, and Larry Buron. "Study on Section 8 Voucher Success Rates: Volume I Quantitative Study nf Success Rates ln Metropolitan Areus.^ Cambridge, MA: 20Vl. • Poverty & Race Research Action Council. Expanding Choice: Practical StrateE�ies for Ruj1j( inp�a Discrimination. Updated March 3U1S. • Washington Low Income Housing Alliance. "Provide IUscZ1milatiol.^ Ian. ZJ'Z01S. • Tenants Union uf Washington State, "Source ofIncome ." Accesse I Sept- 1), 2015 �w Housilng A111fliance This discrimination prevents economic & housing mobility. When landlords refuse to rent to housing subsidy holders, this decreases choices for tenants on public assistance & dashes their hopes of escaping low- opportunity neighborhoods. This practice also clusters low- income communities, making it difficult for them to break cycles of poverty. These laws work. Martha Galvez's 2011 study, "Defining Choice in the Housing Choice Voucher Program..." found that households on public assistance were unevenly dis- tributed in a manner similar to black residential segregation. Also average neighborhood poverty rates for voucher holders were lower in areas with source of income discrimination laws in place. Spotlight on Clark County "Something like 300 households in Clark County, including 90 families with children, qualified for private - market rental vouchers in the year after the new Housing Solutions Cen- ter opened its doors in March 2013 — but then couldn't find a landlord who'd accept them." Housing Solutions Center in Vancou- ver found that "...even with vouchers in hand, only 56 percent of house- holds found a landlord willing to rent to them." The Columbian, July 27, 2014 Cities & municipalities across Washington already protect these vulnerable tenants. • Bellevue • Kirkland • Redmond • King County • Seattle Including these states: California, Connecticut, District of Columbia, Maine, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Jersey, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Oregon. Utah, Vermont, and Wisconsin. Provide Choice & Mobility for Renters: Outlaw Discrimination Landlords shouldn't be allowed to discriminate against renters who pay with housing subsidies. Track our advocacy on these issues on Twitter using this hashtag: #SOID2075 How you pay for your home shouldn't prevent you from having one. In a home search, many vulnerable individuals and families face discrimination by landlords unwilling to rent to Housing Choice (Section 8) voucher holders. Also, seniors, veterans, and people with disabilities receiving other legal sources of income (e.g. government and nonprofit subsidies) face similar discrimination. Already, several municipalities in Washington and many states have adopted laws prohibiting housing discrimination based on source of income (see sidebar). These protections are crucial to maximizing a family's ability to secure a safe and healthy home when paying with a housing subsidy or other legal sources of income other than those from current employment. Discriminating against tenants who pay with a subsidy further harms already vulnerable people. In most of Washington, landlords can and often do refuse to rent to people with Section 8 vouchers. Whatever their reasons, this ultimately results in huge disparities. Veterans, people with disabilities, & seniors on public assistance often face much longer home searches or are unable to find an appropriate home at all. Discriminating against tenants who pay with housing vouchers is often a cover -up for racial discrimination. Source of income discrimination disproportionately affects African American communities. Both federal & local policies over time have led to huge racial disparities in African fis vaulted ceilings, rtc, American communities, preventing opportunities for utility room, and baths, economic mobility and safe, healthy, affordable homes. Thus, a red porches front a nd baM in Parkland/St disproportionately high percentage of voucher recipients are cul de sac; txat�a�t °� °I °� � �'�� Ors African American. In many cities, discrimination against Section 8 vouchers is often a cover up for discrimination on Pelted services or offers basis of race. This discrimination is also a loophole in the screenshot of a craigslist ad for a rental home in nation's fair housing law that prohibits housing Tacoma taken on 10/10/14. discrimination based on race, national origin, religion, etc. The new owner of Jon and Kelly Penfold's rental home started investigating his tenants'finances. When he discovered Jon was using a HOPWA Voucher to help pay rent, he tried to make them move out, despite Jon and Kelly always paying their rent on time. Jon described the full kitchen as very important to maintaining his health. After continued harassment from the landlord, Jon and Kelly felt they had no choice but to move. What is the legislative solution? Pass legislation to prevent landlords from denying tenancy based solely on the grounds of the tenant relying on a subsidy or "public subsidy" (e.g. Housing Choice voucher, SSI, etc.) to pay all or a portion of their rent. Landlords could still reject tenants who do not have enough income /resources to meet the monthly rental payment and could still deny tenancy on legal grounds Updated 1/23/2015 equally applied to all applicants. More information: www,wNha,oir9 or Director of Policy & Advocacy Michele Thomas at 206.442.9455 x205 or at niry lwld OwN fI 134 Community Development & Neighborhoods Minutes ......................................................... ............................... February 27, 2017 B. South King Housing & Homelessness Partnership 2016 Annual Report Joy Scott, South King County Housing Planner, presented the 2016 Year End Report of the South King Housing and Homelessness Partnership. The presentation included background, members /funders, housing data, convenings, goals, collaboration and opportunities. Ms. Scott also distributed draft South King County Housing & Homelessness Goals for 2017 and offered assistance with future policy recommendations and /or data gathering. Councilmember Kruller requested additional information on regional /County efforts on addressing veteran homelessness. INFORMATION ONLY. C. Ordinance: Establishing Regulations Prohibiting Residential Rental` Discrimination Staff is seeking Council approval of an ordinance that would prevent landlords from denying tenancy to renters based solely on the fact that their 'Income includes government housing subsidies like Section 8 and HUD -VASH vouchers. The housing market inTukwila and King County is increasingly competitive with rising rents and limited vacancy, and families and individuals with housing subsidies are subject to discrimination. The proposed ordinance adds a new chapter, "Fair Housing Regulations," to the Municipal Code, defines source of income to include multiple subsidy programs, gives enforcement authority to the Department of Planning and Development, and sets civil penalties for violations: Chair Hougardy noted the importance of communicating with the rental housing community on legislation such as this and referenced a comment letter received from the Washington Multi- Family Housing Association. WMFHA asked, "if the unit fails inspection and the owner does rratwant to make necessary repairs according to Housing Authority standards, what happens ?" Ms. Hyla stated that in jurisdictions with SOID in place, if a landlord has a legitimate business reason for not making the repair, e.g. insufficient finances, the ordinance does not apply because that is not a case of discriminating against the tenant. If a landlord purposely made the unit not pass to avoid this then it could be discriminatory and the ordinance clarifies that "refusal to allow a health and safety inspection of the property by a public housing authority shall not be considered a legitimate basis for refusing to rent due to program ineligibility." The Committee members discussed the proposal and asked clarifying questi©ns. They expressed support for the proposed civil penalty of $1,000 for the first violation and $2,500 for the second within a two -year period. They also discussed implementation timing and the need to notify the rental housing community. Staff agreed to send a letter to the property owner'and landlord community as well as post information on the City webite. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO MARCH 6, 2017 REGULAR MEETING AGENDA. II. MISCELLANEOUS Adjourned 6:49 p.m. Committee Chair Approval Minutes by LH 135 136 1 ♦N R ♦: 1 The City of opportunity, the community of choice TO: Mayor Ekberg Councilmembers FROM: David Cline, City Administrator DATE: March 1, 2017 SUBJECT: Report for March 6, 2017 Regular Council Meeting Allan w "' Mayor The City Administrator Report is meant to provide the Council, staff and community an update on the activities of the City and on issues that concern Tukwila. Please let me know if you have any questions or need additional information about any of the following items. Intergovernmental Update • AWC City Action Days: Mayor Ekberg, Council President Robertson, Councilmembers Duffie, Hougardy, Kruller and McLeod, City Administrator David Cline and Communications and Government Relations Manager Rachel Bianchi attended AWC'sAnnual City Action Days conference in Olympia February 15 and 16. • Rotary Training: As the Incoming President for the Southcenter Rotary, City Administrator David Cline participated in a three -day conference on February 24, 25, 26 focused on strategic planning and goals for the upcoming year. The Southcenter Rotary has been serving the community since 1968 and meets every Thursday at 12 p.m. at the ACME Bowl. • King County City Administrators /Managers Meeting: At this monthly meeting on March 1st, there were presentations and discussion on the following topics: o Association of Washington Cities —AWC CEO and staff members provided a legislative update. There was a good discussion on SB 5827, the bill regarding LTAC definitions, which the City Council on Monday, February 27, agreed to oppose. Several cities were supportive of Tukwila's position. o Local Government Fellows —Four recent Master in Public Administration graduates discussed their current fellowships in the cities of Bellevue, Tacoma, Burien and Issaquah /Snoqualmie. Each discussed howthey were able to provide value to their communities and support each city's support for next generation opportunities for public servants. This is an area that Tukwila may explore to see if it is a cost - effective way to meet the City's workplan goals. o King County Proposed Arts and Culture Levy — Sung Yang, Deputy Executive for Policy, Planning and Public Affairs, provided information on the proposed Arts and Culture Levy that is planned for a possible King County election in August 2017. If approved, this o.10/6 addition to sales tax would provide approximately $65 million per year to regional and local cultural arts program. 137 City Administrator's Report March 1, 2017 Page 2 o Sound Cities Association —Deanna Dawson provided an update on the many SCA activities from the PIC agenda, the networking dinners, and the cooperative relationships with local officials. Community Events • 85° Bakery Ribbon Cutting: On February 24 Mayor Ekberg participated in the ribbon cutting ceremony forthe 85° Bakery located in the Southcenter Mall. • Tukwila Community Center HERO Gala: The Parks and Recreation department hosted the HERO Gala on February 25 celebrating loth anniversary of the Tukwila Community Center, while raising money for the H.E.R.O Scholarship Fund which helps to reduce or alleviate Parks programs registration fees for Tukwila's children and families. 70 people attended the event, including Mayor Ekberg, Councilmembers Hougardy, Kruller, McLeod and Seal, several boards and commission members, longtime community members and former employees. III. Public Safety Plan • Public Safety Plan Implementation: Project Management and staff completed the RFQ for real estate brokerage services to assist in identifying potential sites for public safety facilities and drafted fire station architect and engineering contract (to go to Public Safety March 20 and eventually full council). Staff continues to prepare for the March 18 open house at Station 54 from 10:00 to 12:00. IV. Staff Updates Public Safety • Bulldog Academy: February 23 was Week 3 of the Bulldog Academy at Foster High School. Kg Officer Frank and Kg Detective Sturgill both came and presented to approximately 25 students. The class discussed case law, criminal procedure, "cool" stories, and duties of a Kg officer specific to their field. Both officers provided hands -on demonstrations for the students. Officer Frank showed the students outside how he trains Ace to obey out in the field and the students ran with Officer Frank as Ace tracked and captured Detective Kunsmann hiding behind the high school portables. Detective Sturgill hid drug decoys throughout the classroom and showed the students how Apollo differs as a narcotics canine from a tracking canine. Project Updates • Tukwila Village: The King County Library System has announced it will open the new Tukwila Library in late April. Specific details will be forthcoming. • Southcenter Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge: On the west side of Green River, the contractor continues work on Abutment 1 and the deck for Span 1 is being formed. Away from the project site, welding and fabrication of the steel bridge continues. • BAR Bridge Rehab: The project has received construction authorization from WSDOT and the bid opening date is scheduled for March 15. • w .. m . 138 City Administrator's Report March 1, 2017 Page 3 • 2o17 Annual Bridge Program: 13 bridge inspections are required to be performed this year. Every week during April, bridge inspections will be occurring in various areas throughout the City. Information about impacts to the locations will be posted on our website as there may be some impacts to traffic by temporary lane closures. • Moody's Credit Rating: The City received an increase in its Moody's Credit Rating, from Al to Aa3. This is a huge accomplishment and brings the City into the "High Grade" rating category. • SCAT Board Meeting: On February 21 Community Development staff attended the SCAT Board meeting with Councilmember Hougardy. The meeting focused on three topics: PSRC's update to Transportation 204o, discussion of the Puget Sound Gateway Program comprised of two projects, SR 5og and SR167 and the SeaTac International Airport's update to its Master Plan. • Regional Transit Committee Meeting: On February 23 Community Development staff attended the Regional Transit Committee with Councilmember Hougardy. King County Metro provided a presentation on the draft Workplan for the Metro Connects Development Program. The Technical Advisory Committee for Metro Connects will meet in mid -March to begin working with Metro on the Metro Connects Development Program, looking at established regional construction projects and potential opportunities for alignment of projects in Metro Connects with these projects. • w .. m . 139 Upcoming Meetings & Events March 2017 6th (Monday) 7th (Tuesday) 8th (Wednesday) 9th (Thursday) 1.0th (Friday) 11th (Saturday) ➢ Civil Service > Finance Cmte, ➢ Park Fundraiser for Council Chat Commission, 5:30 PM Commission, Tukwila Parks & 10:00 AM to 5:00 PM (Hazelnut 5:30 PM Recreation Youth 12:00 NOON (Hazelnut Conference (Community Scholarship Stop by and informally Conference Room) Room) Center) (HERO) Fund. talk with a Tukwila City Dine at the Habit Councilmember about Burger Grill today anything on your mind ➢ Public Safety ➢ Library between 11:00 AM regarding Tukwila- Cmte, Advisory and 9:00 PM, Billy Baroo's 5:30 PM Board, Present the HERO (13500 Interurban (Hazelnut 7:00 PM Fund flyer Ave. S) Conference Room) (Community (available from Center) Parks & Recreation) Coffee with a Cop and 20% of the 10:00 AM - 2:00 PM ➢ New Employee proceeds will be Share your concerns and Reception donated! ask questions. 6:30 PM Starbucks (City Hall lobby) (333 Strander Blvd.) ➢ COPCAB, ➢ City Council 6:30 PM ( Duwamish EarthCorps Regular Mtg., Conference Duwamish River 7:00 PM Room) Work Party (Council (Community Center) Chambers) 10:00 AM to 2:00 PM Volunteer space is limited. Visit the website to sign up, https://www.earLheorps.org/ volunteer /event/a0E800000 00RGSNEA5/ 13th (Monday) 14th (Tuesday) 15th (Wednesday) 16th (Thursday) 17th (Friday) 18th (Saturday) ➢ Community > Transportation ➢ Arts Y Tukwila Duwamish Hill Development & & Infrastructure Commission, Historical Preserve Work Neighborhoods Cmte., 5:00 PM Society, Party Cmte., 5:30 PM (Community 7:00 PM 9:00 AM -12:00 PM 5:30 PM (Foster Center) (Tukwila (3800 S 115'h St.) (Hazelnut Conference Heritage & httnsI /forterra.org/event Conference Room) Room) Cultural Center, 14475 59h Ave Public Safety Plan ➢ Tukwila S.) Open House and ➢ G:.cil International Pancake Breakfast Boulevard 10:00 AM - 12:00 PM Action Cmte, (Fire Station 54, 4237 S. the ]ile Mt due 7:00 PM 1441h St.) Cancelled to (Valley View Join us to learn about lack of uorum. q Sewer Dist., safety improvements, 3460 S 148th) tour Fire Station 54, enjoy a pancake breakfast & share your thoughts. Child care and child friendly activities will be provided. January 10 thru April 20: Free income tax preparation assistance available at Tukwila Community Center (TCC). On Tuesdays/Thursdays 5:00 - 8:00 PM, and Saturdays 10:00 AM - 2:00 PM. Visit www.uwkc.org /taxhelp or call 211. NOTE. Tax help will not be available at TCC March 20 -26 ➢Arts Commission: 3rd Wed., 5:00 PM, Tukwila Community Center. Contact Dave Johnson at 206- 767 -2308. ➢ Civil Service Commission: 1st Mon., 5:00 PM, Hazelnut Conf. Room. Contact Sara Valdez at 206 -431 -2187. ➢Community Development and Neighborhoods Committee: 2nd & 4th Mon., 5:30 PM, Hazelnut Conf. Room. ➢ COPCAB (Community Oriented Policing Citizens Adv. Board): 2nd Thurs., 6:30 PM, Duwamish Conference Room. Contact Chris Portman at 206- 431 -219.7 ➢ Equity & Diversity Commission: 1st Thurs., 5:15 PM, hazelnut Conf. Room. Contact Cheryl Thompson at 206 - 433 -1850. ➢Finance Committee: 1 st & 3rd 'rues., 5:30 PM, Hazelnut Conf. Room. (A) An amendment to the contract with bond counsel. (B) Job Shadow and Internship program. ➢ L.ibrary Advisory Board: 1 st Tues., 7:00 PM, Community Center. Contact Shannon Fisher at 206 - 767 -2312. ➢Park Commission: 2nd Wed., 5:30 PM, Community Center. Contact Robert Eaton at 206- 767 -2332. ➢Planning Commission/Board of Architectural Review: 4" Thurs., 6:30 PM, Council Chambers at City Hall. Contact Wynetta Bivens at 206- 431 -3670. )+Public Safety Committee: 1st & 3rd Mon., 5:30 PM, Hazelnut Conf. Room. (A) Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems (sUAS). (B) 2016 411 Quarter Police Department Report. ➢Transportation and Infrastructure Committee: 2nd & 4th Tues., 5:30 PM, Foster Conf. Room. 140 ➢Tukwila Historical Society: 3rd Thurs., 7:00 PM, Tukwila Heritage & Cultural Center, 14475 59th Avenue S. Contact Louise Jones -Brown at 206 - 244 -4478. Tentative Agenda Schedule MONTH MEETING 1 - MEETING 2 MEETING 3 MEETING 4 REGULAR C.O.W. REGULAR C.O.W. March 6 13 20 27 See agenda packet Meeting cancelled due to Special Presentations7 Special Issues: Property tax cover sheet for this lack of quorum. - Boards and week's agenda: increases. Commissions March 6,2017 Regular Bailey Stober, Legislation: — Meeting. King Con n ty Ordinances and 1 Assessor's Office Resolution updating GET-IT the Tukwila (Government Municipal Code Electronic pertaining to City Transparency Boards and Initiative for Commissions, Tukwila) Phase I - High- retrieval permit files. 141