HomeMy WebLinkAboutREG 2017-04-17 Item 5D - Agreement - Riverton Creek Flapgate Removal Design with Otak Inc for $105,363COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS
--------------------------------- 4nifials
Aleefi,g Date
Pre. ared by
Mayor's rem . ex
Council review
04/17/17
BG
❑ Reolufion
Altg Dale
F-1 Ordinance
Altg Date
❑ Bid z1mard
Altg Date
❑ Public Hearing
Aftg Date
EJ Olher
A ltg Date
SPONSOR ❑ Council ❑ Mayor ❑ HR ❑ DCD E] Finance ❑ Fire ❑ IT ❑ P&R ❑ Police ZPV
SPONSOR'S Council is being asked to approve the design and permitting agreement with Otak, Inc. for
SUMMARY the Riverton Creek Flapgate Removal Project. Otak was selected from four consulting
firms. This project has a goal of restoring salmon access to Riverton Creek through the
removal of culverts and flapgates at the mouth, which are currently a partial barrier to
salmon migration. Council is being asked to approve Otak's consultant agreement for
$105,363.00.
KFAIIEW,"D BY ❑ cow Mtg. ❑ CA&P Cmte ❑ F&S Cmte Z Transportation Cmte
F-1 Utilities Cmte ❑ Arts Comm. F-1 Parks Comm. ❑ Planning Comm.
DATE: 04/11/17 COMMIl-fEE CHAIR: KATE KRULLER
RECOMMENDATIONS:
SPONSOR/At),NiIN. -Public Works
COMM Unanimous Approval; Forward to Regular Consent Agenda
COST IMPACT / FUND SOURCE
Exi,i,'INDITUR I;' Rl,"QUIREA) AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED
$105,363.00 $108,000.00 $0.00
Fund Source: 412 SURFACE WATER FUND (PAGE 108, 2017 CIP)
Comments:
MTG.DATEI
RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION
04/17/17
ITEM NO.
5.D.
CAS NuNIBEIR:
STAFF SPONSOR: BOB GIBERSON
04/17/17
Riverton Creek Flapgate Removal Project
Design Agreement with Otak, Inc.
CATF,GORY ❑ Difcuf.fion
Aft
,g Date
Z Motion
All
,g Date 04117117
❑ Reolufion
Altg Dale
F-1 Ordinance
Altg Date
❑ Bid z1mard
Altg Date
❑ Public Hearing
Aftg Date
EJ Olher
A ltg Date
SPONSOR ❑ Council ❑ Mayor ❑ HR ❑ DCD E] Finance ❑ Fire ❑ IT ❑ P&R ❑ Police ZPV
SPONSOR'S Council is being asked to approve the design and permitting agreement with Otak, Inc. for
SUMMARY the Riverton Creek Flapgate Removal Project. Otak was selected from four consulting
firms. This project has a goal of restoring salmon access to Riverton Creek through the
removal of culverts and flapgates at the mouth, which are currently a partial barrier to
salmon migration. Council is being asked to approve Otak's consultant agreement for
$105,363.00.
KFAIIEW,"D BY ❑ cow Mtg. ❑ CA&P Cmte ❑ F&S Cmte Z Transportation Cmte
F-1 Utilities Cmte ❑ Arts Comm. F-1 Parks Comm. ❑ Planning Comm.
DATE: 04/11/17 COMMIl-fEE CHAIR: KATE KRULLER
RECOMMENDATIONS:
SPONSOR/At),NiIN. -Public Works
COMM Unanimous Approval; Forward to Regular Consent Agenda
COST IMPACT / FUND SOURCE
Exi,i,'INDITUR I;' Rl,"QUIREA) AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED
$105,363.00 $108,000.00 $0.00
Fund Source: 412 SURFACE WATER FUND (PAGE 108, 2017 CIP)
Comments:
MTG.DATEI
RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION
04/17/17
MTG. DATE
ATTACHMENTS
04/17/17
Informational Memorandum dated 04/07/17
Location map
2017 CIP, page 108
Otak Consultant Agreement
Minutes from the Transportation & Infrastructure Committee meeting of 4/11/17
129
130
City of Tukwila
Allan Ekberg, Mayor
INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
TO: Transportation & Infrastructure Committe
FROM: Bob Giberson, Public Works Director,
7
BY: Mike Perfetti, Habitat Project Manager
CC: Mayor Ekberg
DATE: April 07, 2017
SUBJECT: Riverton Creek Flapgate Removal
Project No. 99830103
Consultant Selection and Agreement
ISSUE
Approve OTAK, Inc. to design the Riverton Creek Flapgate Removal Project.
BACKGROUND
The Riverton Creek Flapgate Removal Project began in 1999 with the goal of restoring salmon access to Riverton Creek
through the removal of culverts and flapgates at the mouth, which are a partial barrier to salmon migration. Early work
included project feasibility and preliminary design plans, which could be used to apply for project grant funding. Now, with
committed City funding and two grant applications pending approval, City staff would like to resume project design and
permitting.
DISCUSSION
The current MRSC Consultant Roster was reviewed and four firms were short-listed to submit proposals. The firms were:
DEA; Herrera; OTAK; and Parametrix. The proposals were reviewed and scored against stated criteria by a panel of three
staff members. OTAK received the highest score and was selected as the firm that best met the project's requirements.
OTAK was also recently contracted by the City to assist with the City's NPDES Phase 11 — Low Impact Development (LID)
code update.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
After negotiations, OTAK will provide design and permitting services for the Riverton Creek Flapgate Removal Project for a
fee of $105,363.00 and the 2017 CIP has $108,000.00 budgeted. There is also a 2016 Puget Sound Acquisition and
Restoration (PSAR) grant awaiting a state appropriation of up to $551,070.00, which is anticipated to become available
following the current legislative session.
RECOMMENDATION
Council is being asked to approve the design consultant agreement with OTAK, Inc. in the amount of $105,363.00 for the
Riverton Creek Flapgate Removal Project and consider this item on the Consent Agenda at the April 17, 2017 Regular
Meeting.
Attachments: Location Map
2017 CIP, Page 108
Consultant Agreement
WAPW Eng\PROJECTS\A- DR Projects\Riverton Flap Gate Removal (99830103 98-DR03)\Consuftant SelectiomPhase 2\scophg\1nfo Memo Otak PE 040717 gi SM.docx 131
132
j
3771
420 .0
va 4
QUM
us
on
.14
amm
IV-Mon
VICINITY MAP
NOT TOSCALE
PROJECT
SITE
133
CITY OFTUKWILA CAPITAL PROJECT SUMMARY
2017 to 2022
PROJECT: Riverton Creek Flap Gate Removal Project No. 89831O3
EXPENSES
R�������d�p����������|��s�.��o���c���
�
����R|POON'
install trail bridge over new channel, restore/revegetate 200 feet of creek channel and 450 ft. of pond shoreline,
nom � Increase reeringhobi�andino�oaeOood refuge in |owerDuwaminh River. Improve
JUSTIFICATION:
'
fish access to Riverton Creek and enhance salmon rearing and resting area.
Design at7U%comp|edonin2O11wbha Salmon Recovery Funding Board gmntof$42.5OO and $3O.UOU
STATUS:
'
from People for Puget Sound. Construction iu grant dependent.
K8A|NT.|K8PACT:
Expected to increase maintenance.
108
roposed grants indudeState & Federal habitat grants. Project used as mitigation for East Marginal Way
COMMENT:
'
Pipe Replacement Project and HPAContro|#1337O3-1 requires work 1obe completed by June 11.2O19.
FINANCIAL
Through Estimated
/inSuuu'n)
2015 2016 2017 2018 201e 2020 2021 2022 BEYOND TOTAL
EXPENSES
Design
114
10
108
232
Const, Mgmt.
100
100
Construction
650
650
TOTAL EXPENSES
114
10
108
1 750
0
01
01
0
1 01
982
FUND SOURCES
Awarded Grant
72
72
Proposed Grant
550
550
Mitigation Actual
0
Mitigation Expected
0
TOTAL SOURCES
114
10
108
750
0
0
0
01
0
982
1342m/r'20xu Capital Improvement Program 108
City of Tukwila Contract
Number
82OOSnuthcenter Boulevard, Tukwila VVA981O8
CONSULTANT AGREEMENT FOR
DESIGN & PERMITTING SERVICES
THIS AGREEMENT is entered into between the City of Tukwila, VVaohin0hon, hereinafter
referred tO8S "the Citv"' and OTAK' hereinafter referred tooa "the {}UDSVbant". in consideration of
the mutual benefits, terms, and conditions hereinafter specified.
Proiect Designation. The Consultant is retained by the City to perform design and
permitting services in connection with the project titled RivertVn Creek F|8pg8t8 Removal
Scope of Services. The Consultant agrees to perform the services, identified on Exhibit ^A"
attached hereto, including the provision of all labor, [ngLeho|s. equipment and supplies.
3. This Agreement shall be in full force and
effect for a period commencing upon execution and ending within 305 calendar days, un|aoS
sooner terminated under the provisions hereinafter specified. VVOrh under this Agreement
shall commence upon written notice by the City to the Consultant to proceed.
4. Payment. The Consultant shall be paid by the City for completed work and for services
rendered under this Agreement as follows:
A. Payment for the work provided by the Consultant shall be made as provided on Exhibit
^B^ attached hereto, provided that the total amount of payment to the Consultant shall
not exceed $105.363.00 without express written modification of the Agreement signed
by the City.
B. The Consultant may submit vouchers to the City once per month during the progress of
the work for partial payment for that portion Of the project completed to date. Such
vouchers will be Checked by the City and' upon approval thenaOf, payment shall be
made tO the Consultant |n the amount approved.
C. Final payment of any balance due the Consultant of the total contract pho8 earned will
be mode promptly upon its ascertainment and verification by the City after the
completion of the work under this Agreement and its acceptance by the City.
D. Poynlerd as provided in this section oh8U he full compensation for work oerfonned,
services r8ndened, and for all mateha|n. supplies, equipment and incidentals necessary
to complete the work.
E. The Consultant's records and accounts pertaining to this Agreement are to be kept
8v8i|ob|0 for inspection by representatives of the City and the state of Washington for
period of three (3) yaonS after hOR| payments. Copies ShgU be made available upon
5. Ownership and Use of Documents. All donunlents, dravvngo, specifications and other
nn3tmh8|S produced by the Consultant in connection with the services rendered under this
Agreement Gho|| be the property of the City whether the project for which they are made is
executed or OU1. The Consultant shall be permitted to retain C0piea, including reproducible
copies, of drawings and specifications for information, reference and use in connection with
the Consultant's endeavors. The Consultant Sho|| not be responsible for any use of the said
documents, dravvingS. specifications or other materials by the City on any project other than
the project speoifi8dinthisAgr8enoent.
O. Compliance with Laws. The Consultant shall, in performing the services contemplated by
this Agreement, faithfully ObSen/a and comply with all federal, state, and |ooe| |ovvs.
ordinances and regulations, applicable to the services rendered under this Agreement.
7. Indemnification. The Consultant shall defend. indemnify and hold the City, its officers,
0ffin|o|S, employees and volunteers hgrnn|8SS from any and all C|8inls, injuries, damages,
losses or suits including attorney fees, arising out OfOrresulting from the a[tS, errors or
omissions of the Consultant in performance of this Agreement, except for injuries and
damages caused hy the sole negligence of the City.
Should a court of competent jurisdiction determine that this Agreement is subject to RCVV
4.24.115' UleO, in the event Of liability for damages arising out ofbodily injury to p8rSVne or
dGnnayeS to property caused by or r8SU|Ung from the concurrent negligence of the
Consultant and the City, its OffioerS. Vffioi8|S' ennp|Oyeea, and volunteers, the Consultant's
liability hereunder shall be only to the extent of the Consultant's negligence. It is further
specifically and expressly understood that the indemnification provided herein constitutes the
Consultant's waiver of immunity under Industrial Insurance, Title 51 RCVV, S0|e|y for the
purposes of this indemnification. This waiver has been mutually negotiated by the parties.
The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement.
The Consultant shall pn]Cuns and maintain for the duration of the Agreement,
insurance against doinne for injuries to persons or damage to property which may arise from
or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, its agents,
representatives, or employees. Consultant's maintenance of insurance as required by the
agreement She|| not be construed to limit the liability of the Consultant to the coverage
provided by such insurance, or otherwise limit the City's recourse to any remedy available at
law orin equity.
A. Minimum Amounts and Scope of Insurance. Consultant shall obtain insurance ofthe
types and with the limits described below:
CA revised :1-2Oa
1. Automobile LiabilitV insurance with a nnininnunn combined single limit for bodily
injury and property damage of $1.000.000 per accident. Automobile Liability
insurance shall cover all Uvvned, non-nvvned, hired and leased vehicles.
Coverage ShoU be written on Insurance Services Office (ISO) form CA0OO1 or
substitute form providing equivalent liability coverage. If necessary, the policy
shall be endorsed to provide contractual liability coverage.
2. Commercial General Liability insurance with |innh3 no less than $1,000,000 each
occurrence, $2,000.000 general aggregate. Connnn8rCie| General Liability
insurance shall be written on ISO occurrence form CG 00 01 and shall cover
liability arising from pn3[niSea. Open8tiDns, independent contractors and personal
injury and advertising injury. The City 3h8U be named GS an insured under the
Consultant's Commercial General Liability insurance policy with respect to the
work performed for the City.
3. coverage as required by the Industrial Insurance laws Of
the State ofWashington.
4. Professional Liability with limits no less than $1.000.000 per C|8inn and
$1.000,000 policy aggregate limit. Professional Liability insurance shall be
appropriate to the Consultant's profession.
B. Other Insurance Provision. The Consultant's Automobile Liability and Commercial
Gene/a| Liability insurance policies one t0 cont8in. Or be endorsed to contain that they
shall be primary insurance with respect tOthe City. Any Insurance, ee|f-inSuronne, or
insurance pool coverage maintained by the City shall be axoeSg of the Consultant's
insurance and shall not be contributed Or combined with it.
C. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with e oVrnentA.K8.
Best rating of not less than A:V||.
D. Verification of Coverage. Consultant shall furnish the City with original certificates and
a copy of the amendatory Rnd0nsern8Dts, including but not necessarily limited to the
additional insured endOrSenn8Dt, evidencing the insurance requirements of the
Consultant before commencement of the work. Certificates Of coverage and
endorsements as required by this s8CdVn shall be delivered to the City within fifteen (15)
days of execution 0f this Agreement.
E. Notice of Cancellation. The Consultant shall provide the City with written notice of any
policy cancellation, within two business days of their receipt of such notice.
F. Failure to Maintain Insurance. Failure on the part of the Consultant to maintain the
insurance as required shall constitute 8 nnateh8| breach of contract, upon which the City
nlay, after giving five business days' notice to the Consultant to oOrn8ot the breach,
immediately terminate the contract or, at its diSCnetioO, procure or renew such insurance
and pay any and all premiums in connection therewith, with any sums sD expended tO be
repaid t0 the City on d8nn8nd. or at the S0|e discretion of the City. offset against funds
due the Consultant from the City.
9. Independent Contractor. The Consultant and the City agree that the Consultant is an
'.dependent contractor with neSp8[d to the services provided pursuant to this Agreement.
Nothing in this Agna8nnen1 ShoU be considered to create the relationship of employer and
employee between the parties hereto. Neither the Consultant nor any employee of the
Consultant shall be entitled to any benefits accorded City employees by virtue of the services
provided under this Agreement. The City shall not be responsible for withholding or
otherwise deducting federal income tax or social aaourih/ or for contributing to the state
industrial insurance program, otherwise assuming the duties of an employer with respect to
the Consultant, or any employee of the Consultant.
10. The Consultant vvonantsthathehomnoten�p|ovedor
retained any company or pereon. other than a bonofide employee working an|8|y for the
CoDSV|tnDt. to solicit 0r secure this contract, and that he has not paid 0r agreed to pay any
COnnp8ny Or person, other than 8 bOnafide employee working oO|e|y for the C0nsu|t8nt, any
hee, conDnniaSi0n, p8rCeOtage, brokerage fee' gifts, or any other consideration contingent
upon or resulting from the award or making of this contract. For breach or violation Of this
warrant, the City shall have the right to annul this contract without liability, or in its discretion
to deduct from the contract price Orconsideration, or otherwise recover, the full amount of
such fee, COmDliSSioD' percentage, brokerage fee. gdt. or contingent fee.
11. Discrimination Prohibited. The Consultant, with regard to the vv0[k performed by it under
this t discriminate on the grounds of r8Ca. [8|ig|0n. Creed. Co|o[' national
origin, -age, veteran Stotus, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, marital statVe, pU|idn8|
affiliation or the presence of any disability in the selection and retention of employees or
procurement ofmaterials or supplies.
Cx revised :1-20J
Page 3
12. Assignment. The Consultant shall not sublet Or assign any of the services covered by this
Agreement without the express written consent of the City.
13. VVoiv8[ by the City Of any provision of this Agreement or any time limitation
provided for in this Agreement Sh8U not constitute a waiver of any other provision.
14.
A. The City reserves the right to terminate this Agreement at any time bv giving ten (10
days written notice to the Consultant.
B. In the event of the death of a nnembur, partner or officer of the Consultant, or any of its
supervisory personnel assigned to the project, the surviving members of the Consultant
hereby agree to C0mp|8t8 the work under the terms of this AQr9emeDt, if requested to
do so by the City. This section shall not be o bar to renegotiations of this Agreement
between surviving members Uf the Consultant and the City, if the City sochooses.
15. This Agreement shall be subject to, and the
Consultant shall at all tinn8S comply with, all applicable federal, State and |0co| |8vvs,
ragu|adioOS, and rV|eS. including the provisions Of the {}Uv of Tukwila Municipal Code and
ordinances of the City Of Tukwila. In the even[ any suit. arbitration, or other proceeding is
instituted to enforce any term of this Agreenn0nt, the parties specifically understand and
agree that venue shall be properly laid in King CVunh/, Washington. The prevailing p8dx in
any such action shall be entitled to its attorney's fees and costs ofsuit. Venue for any action
arising from 0[ related to this Agreement shall be exclusively in King County Superior Court.
16. Severability and Survival. |f any term, condition or provision of this Agreement iadeclared
void or unenforceable or |innK8d in its application or effect, such event shall not affect any
Other provisions hereof and RU other provisions shall remain fully enforceable. The
provisions of this AgF8enn8nt, which by their sense and context are reasonably intended to
survive the COnnp|8h0n' expiration Or cancellation of this AgF8Snnent, shall survive termination
Vf this Agreement.
17. Notices. Notices tO the City of Tukwila shall be sent to the following address:
City Clerk
{}ih/ of Tukwila
O2OO8outhcenterBoulevard
Tukvvi|o, WA 88188
Notices tu Consultant shall be sent to the following address:
11241 Willows Road NE Suite 2OO
Redmond, WA 98052
18. This Agreement, together with attachments or addenda,
represents the entire and integrated Agreement between the City and the Consultant and
supersedes all prior negotiations, representations, or agreements written or oral. No
amendment or modification of this Agreement shall be of any force or effect unless it is in
writing and signed by the parties.
CA revised : 1-203
Page
DATED this
CITY OF TUKWILA
Allan Ekberg, Mayor
City Clerk, Christy O'Flaherty
Cx revised : 1e013
day of
2U
CONSULTANT
By: PhntedNa»le:
--------
Title:
Approved as to Form:
Office of the City Attorney
Page
140
Exhibit A - Scope of Work
Riverton Creek Flapgate Removal Project
City of Tukwila
April 03, 2017
Otak Project No. 32740
Introduction and Background
Tukwila has adopted policies to identify and restore habitat and ecological function along the
Duwarmsh River where restoration can succeed with existing conditions and adjacent uses. The
removal of flapgates and perched culverts at the outlet of Riverton Creek is a key opportunity to
remove a fish barrier and re -open a historical stream outfall and restore rearing and migrating habitat
C�
adjacent to the Duwamish.
For this project, the City is requesting Otak to finalize the design of the Riverton Creek Flap Gate
Removal improvements initiated by a previous consultant working for the City. This will include
taking the 75-percent design to final design and preparing construction documents, updating
environmental assessment reports and technical supporting documents, and providing technical
support to obtain permits. This project may also include construction support services.
Based on our discussions with the City, the project will be accomplished in two phases — Phase 1 -
Intake Review and Charter Meeting, Phase 2 - Permitting and Final Design. If construction support
or other supplemental services are requested, a supplement will be submitted to add Phase 3
services. This scope of work describes activities within the first two phases — initially with broad
terms, and then with specific tasks for each phase.
Phase I —Intake Review and Charter Meeting
The first step we will take is performing a detailed review of the 75-percent design including all
reports and supporting documentation made available by the City. This review will include a field
visit to assess the existing conditions and note any discrepancies from the data and descriptions
from the 75-percent design which was performed from 2009-2011. The Intake Review will also
include development of a simple Permitting Strategy Plan that identifies all regulatory requirements
and design criteria for various agencies so that pertnitability of all project elements can be
confirmed. After the Intake Review, we will facilitate a project Charter Meeting with Tukwila to
assess how project challenges have been addressed as part of the completed existing design (75-
C, I
percent level) and what will need to be addressed by the Otak team.
After the Charter Meeting has been completed, but prior to completion of Phase 1, Otak will review
the scope of work for Phase 2 and, if required and authorized by the City, make any adjustments in
the scope, schedule and budget for City review and contract processing. Upon completion of Phase
141
Exhibit /\-1 Scope ofWork
Continued
1` u contract supplement will be prepared, if necessary, to carry the project into final Jes4zo and
construction document preparation. {)tak win not proceed beyond Phase 1--Iotacc Review and
C harter Meeting without authorization of the (,try.
Phase 7—PprOlittin~ Permitting Final Design
Iu phase 2,(}tuk will bring the 75-percent plans completed by another consultant up to a 100-
percent complete construction documents, including plans, specifications, and construction cost
estimate (PS&E).
Project C . ^
The City will designate the project parameters aud design criteria. Reports and nkaun, to the cstcot
feasible, shall hc developed 6o accordance with the latest edition and amendments uaof the date of
the Notice to Proceed, nf the following- documents. Changes 6z any design standards or
requirements after work has bcgun may result in Extra Work.
City of Tukwila
^ Citvuflj�kn��Ju£cus�nctnrcI} i uodCononucdnoStuuducds201O
' ~
°
City uf Tukwila Development Guideline and Design and Construction Standards
0 City of Tukwila Comprehensive Plans, including Sewer, Water, Surface Water and Land Use
King County
* King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDNI) 2016
Washington State Aquatic Habitat Guidelines Program
• Stream }Lubitat Restoration Guidelines 2O|2
• Integrated Streambank Protection Guidelines 2002
Washington State Department of Fish and \A/N|ife (VV[>FW
0 Water Crossing Design Guidelines 2013
Washington State Department o{Transportation (VVS[JOT)
• Washington State Department of Transportation Standard Specifications for Road, Bridge, and
Municipal Construction (1\441-10) 2016
• Standard Plans for Road, Bridge, and Municipal CousczoctiooUy21-U1\
United States Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration(FHWA)
° Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices [Aue amended and approved 6vW5IJ(JI
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO)
(::\LJuczn\soaun\2kpp[)u1u\Locx)\Mlcz000 ozucy}ntecoct
Files \Coutcut8ndook\ll|lI1/\P60\fVvcztoo Creek ;lan,utc Removal S(lWU4OJ17docx 2
Exhibit A-1 Scope oFWork
Continued
IJRf'D Bridge Design Specifications, yourdhEdition, 2U07 and the current Interims
A Policy oo Geometric Design of and Streets, 5= 2004
11 1
Guide for the Development o[ Bicycle Facilities 1999
�r�i Schedule
,4 |
..~�<�����//(�wU.e
The preliminary project schedule will be developed upon notice to proceed for the project uud
updated as changes occur. The anticipated major milestones are:
Phase Milestone
l Intake Review
1 Charter Meeting
1 5u6o6aai000�Toiot Aquatic Resource Permit Application 0z\QT\A\
2 Preparation ofl0O'perccot Plans, Specifications, and Estimate
The duration oF the reviews h, the City, `WSD()l�WDFW. Ecology, and the Corps uf
gineers
i En
will 6o provided io the project schedule. Mutually agreeable changes to the project schedule, rvbctbcz
initiated by the City or Otak, may be the basis for adjustments in the project budget.
|tBF05 and Services to Be Furnished by the City
The City will provide the following items and services to ()txk that will facilitate the engineering
design and preparation nF the construction Jocnozmmt for work within the limits ofthe project.
Duak is entitled to rely mx the accuracy and completeness ofthis and other data furnished and
represented 6y the City and others, including but not limited to survey, and hydrologic and hydraulic
analyses.
• i\vxUob|c as-built drawings and information on other projects io the immediate vicinity.
• TOPOgraphic survey needed for the project in AutoCAD format (2007 or compatible), includine,
Field locates of utility markings, sensitive area delineation flags, potholes and boring locations.
Included io the survey work provided by the City will bo any 6ut6ycoctryozunderwater
surveying required for the project.
• Boundary mapping including right-of-way determination and property 600s adjacent to project
vicinity.
• Final stamped and signed right-of-nnypluo'buxedoupropomedpzojcctnccdodctcruincd6ydhc
Consultant.
• Rights-of-entry upon all lands occcaxazy for the per6ort-nxncc of the n/uzk` including official
notices to property owners and agencies.
• Timely rcv6cn/e of()tuk submittals at the 000tuuUv ugrccJ upon 6mce set Dozd6 in the project
schedule and the consolidation of all review comments by others onto one review set prior to
return toOtak.
Payment of all application reviews and/or permit fees.
C:\Dmco\xusuo\Anpl)utu\Locu|\&{kzoeo Internet
pOeo\Cou tent. Outlook \BDl1.\ P60\KivcrtouCzcck I'lopgate Removal SOW 040J17.Jocx 3
Exhibit A-1 Scope of Work
Continued
Compilation, reproduction, and distribution of Bid Documents to potential bidders and
interested parties.
Mailing list preparation and distribution cost for public notices.
Advertisement for Bid
PHASE I—INTAKE REVIEW AND CHARTER MEETING
Task I — Project Management(Phases I and 2)
1.1 Project Management and Coordination
Otak will manage contract issues, coordinate execution of the project, and meet periodically with the
City project manager and City staff. Some of the tasks include:
• Preparing a work plan.
• Conducting a kickoff meeting at the beginning of the project.
• Meeting with the City project manager and/or staff periodically.
• Modify Phase 2 services of the project, if required and authorized by the City.
2-\ project work plan will be prepared and a kickoff meeting held at the start of the project to define
project goals and design criteria, and to discuss project approach, process and schedule with the
design team. A project schedule (MS Project) will be developed and maintained as part of this task.
Otak's project manager will provide direction to the project team, including subconsultants, and
conduct project coordination meetings with appropriate task leaders. The project manager will
monitor the project planned budget versus actual progress and take corrective actions if necessary.
Otak will prepare and submit monthly invoices and a brief progress report to reflect progress over
the last billing period and anticipated activities over the next billing Period.
1.2 Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC)
The project work will receive quality checks at appropriate junctures in the progress. Specifically, the
design plans, cost estimates, technical memoranda, and reports will be reviewed by at least one
senior design team member with knowledge of the subject matter and by Otak's Project Manager/
Principal in Charge.
Assumptions:
1. Otak's Project Manager will meet face to face with the City Project Manager and or Project
Engineer on as- needed basis. For budget purposes, Otak will assume four meetings, excluding
kick-off meeting; one meeting will be held at Otak's office. Meeting time for the Project
Manager and Principal In Charge is budgeted under this task. Meeting time for other design
team members is budgeted under the tasks each works on.
C:\ Users \susan \AppData \Local \Microsoft \Windows \Temporary Internet
144 Files \Content. Outlook\ IIH I l.AP60\Riverton Creek Flapgate Removal SOW 040317.docx 4
].._.�'xlubit A-1 Scope of Work
Continued
2. Internal project team coordination meetings will be held on a monthly basis during the project
duration. These meetings will be in addition to the coordination meetings held with the City, but
budgeted as part of the specific work tasks.
3. QA/QC will be required for review of plan sheets, specifications, cost estimates, and technical
memoranda. Calculations for structures and hydrologic and hydraulic modeling are provided by
Tukwila and are not included in this scope of set-vices, if need calculations will be provided as an
additional service.
4. Phases 1 and 2 will be completed in three (3) months.
Deliverables:
1. Monthly Invoices and Progress Reports.
2. Project Work Plan.
3. Meeting summary notes.
Task 2 — Intake Review
2.1 Review Existing Data
Otak will gather information pertinent to the project and review the base map prepared by the City
for project use. Some of the tasks include the following:
• Conduct a site visit to become familiar with the site conditions and take photographs, gather
field measurements, and record observations.
• Coordinate with the City to collect available information pertinent to the project, including the
following documents prepared in association with the 75-percent plans:
o Critical Areas Assessment for Riverton Creek Flap Gate Removal Project
Riverton Creek Flap Gate Removal Hydraulic Analysis
o Riverton Creek Flap Gate Removal Project- Flood Prevention Feasibility Study
o Riverton Creek F lap Gate Removal Project- Preliminary Stream Enhancement Plan
o Report- Geotechnical Engineering Services Proposed pacific Highway South Bridge
o Riverton Creek Flap Gate Removal Project Wall Strengthening Feasibility Study
King County Assessor's Map
75-percent PS&F',
Concept plan
• Request: additional information as needed for project use.
2.2 Site Reconnaissance
Otak will perform site reconnaissance to confirm the characterizations and delineations shown in
the existing project reports are still valid, and that these are sufficient to support the permit
1 a
applications. The following features will be included in the reconnaissance:
• Confirmation of previously conducted wetland delineation and characterization.
• Confirmation of Stream habitat conditions.
C:\ Users \susan \AppData \Local \Microsoft \Windows \Temporary Internet
Files \Content. Outlook\ HHT 1 AP60\Riverton Creek Flapgate Removal SOW 040317.docx 5 145
Exhibit A-I Scope of Work
Continued
Confirmation of Existing surficial conditions.
Confirmation of Retaining wall conditions.
2.3 Intake Review Memo and Develop Design Criteria
Otak will document the design criteria for stream restoration, bridge, retaining walls, storn-1 drainage,
trails and utilities in a technical memorandum for review and comment by the City prior to the
Charter Meeting. The City's comments will be incorporated into the intake memorandum during
Phase 2.
2.4 Develop Permitting Strategy Plan
Otak will identify all regulatory requirements for various agencies so that the applications for permits
from local, state, and federal agencies can be completed. Otak will identify what additional studies
and drawings that need to be completed to submit permit applications. These additional studies and
drawing details will be documented in a technical memorandum for review and comment by the City
Prior to the Charter Meeting. This task will also include pre-application meetings with the US Army
Corps of Engineers (COE), the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW), and
representatives of the Native American Tribes presumably the Muckleshoots Tribes (Tribes).
Deliverables:
1. Intake Review and Design Criteria technical memorandum
2. Permitting Strategy Plan technical memorandum
Assumptions:
1. The City will provide the base map and 75-percent plans in AutoCAD format (2007 or
compatible), and will provide additional survey to pick up delineation flags, center-line of stream
flags, etc. as necessary to complete the project.
2. The City will provide the existing information and requirements relevant to the project as
available, including as-built drawings and information on utilities.
3. Project management Phase 1 and 2 is 6-month duration.
Task 3 — Coordination Meetings
Otak will facilitate a project charter session with City staff to assess how the project goals and
challenges have been addressed through the existing reports and the existing 75-percent plans. We
will discuss our understanding of the design criteria (I'ask 2.3) and our proposed permitting strategy
(2.4). We will present our recommendations for completing the permit applications (Fask 4.1) based
on these discussions, including any additional studies that may be required for these permit
applications. Otak will prepare meeting minutes summarizing the discussions and decisions made
during the meeting, and actions items noting the person responsible and the anticipated schedule for
(::\Users\susan\.Appl.Data\Local\Mlcrosoft \Wltidows\Tetnpor,,try Internet
146 Files \Content. Outlook\HH I l.AP60\Riverton Creek Flapgate Removal SOW 040317.docx 6
Exhibit A-I Scope of Work
Continued
completion. A Draft of the Meeting Minutes will be circulated, and revisions incorporated into the
Final Minutes.
Otak will attend one permit pre-application meeting in the field with representatives from permitting
agencies and WSDOT.
Deliverables:
1. Meeting Agenda.
2. Draft and Final Meeting Minutes.
Assumptions:
1. The City will provide Est of requested attendees and send out invitations to them.
2. The City will provide a suitable meeting room, with audio-visual equipment.
PHASE 2—PERMITTING AND FINAL DESIGN
The scope and fee for this task will be updated, if necessary and authorized by the City, after the
Phase 1 Intake Review and Charter Meeting is completed.
Task 4 — Permitting, Environmental Review and Coordination
The objective of this task is to identify and assist with acquiring all the permits, environmental
review and coordination required for this project. Permitting and regulatory compliance will be done
in parallel with design development. Any additional studies necessary to complete the permit
-ni
applications will be considered additional work and an amendment will be submitted i 1
f requested by
the City.
I
4.1 DARPA Preparation
Otak will provide project specific information for a joint Aquatic Resources Permit Application
(DARPA) for the project based on the existing 75-percent design stage. The JARPA and existing
Critical Areas Report will be used to apply for and support a Washington State Department of Fish
and Wildlife (WDFW) Streamlined Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) for a fish habitat
enhancement project. The City will prepare the complete application and manage the submittal.
4.2 Specific Project Information Form (SPIF)
C:\Users\susan\.AppData\l,ocal\Microsoft \Windows\'.f'empora,ry Internet
1-'I'lcs\Content.Outlook\HHI I AP60\Riverton Creek Flapgate Removal SOW 040317.docx 7 147
Exhibit i\-1 Scope nfWork
Continued
Iu order to comply with the Act (ESA)'{}tuk will prepare u Specific Project
Information Form (SPTR`per the Programmatic Biological Assessment (PBA) for Restoration
Actions iu Washington State and associated Biological Opinion
4.3 Cultural Resources
()tok will review the cultural and historic resource investigation completed for the Tukwila
International Boulevard bridge project. That investigation uzu?nccdtobo supplemented to include
the City's project. {[ additional cultural resource investigation ix required, thutwozkniD6eiudodcd
iou supplement submitted to the City, if requested.
4.4 Ecology Construction StnrmVVaterG8Oera| Permit
0tak will prepare u Notice of Intent /NDDtobusubnuitted electronically to the Washington State
Department o[Ecology. The Consultant will prepare uBtozowmncz Pollution Prevention Plan
(SWPPP) for the project for the project construction site.
4.5 Wetland Delineation
Otak will field verify the wetland delineation prepared ma part of previous workmnducted6or the
project's critical oceuo uuoceocucnt, and will update site conditions byconducting uvvcdund
delineation for the project. {)tnk biologists willcouJncto`rcdxnJdclincxtinuom the Colpumr
/7n�gixxxm|Vdxaxd)1)xlivru/iom&fanxo//1987\oa amended, and the Rxmioxu/j'u»plenixx//v the Co9)/o/
L �xxxm|plet6md/>r&vxudox Manual: DpeVvno/loxx/u/xzT/i/&ncand CoaslRmiox(201C),uo required by
the City o[ Tukwila, Washington Department of Ecology, and the D.5. Army Corps *fEngineers.
Weiland ratings for project wetlands will bc determined using both the 2004 xIlale Wletiv d
Ru6xvJm/�x�rD7�x�rn m per 1�uknilu��nuicipol(�ode (783C) 18.45.05O[B),usn/uDuathe
updated n,Vlale Ve&xndKo/in v�no���rDT�o�n, xUBzoby'2O14. Weiland buffer
n/iJd6a will determined pczI&1C 1845.0508}\. (}tukrvBl collect field data to xDory for
characterization and designation of watercourses and Ge6 and wildlife conservation areas in the
project vicinity, and will establish buffers for these critical areas per]]\{C 18.45.100 and 18.45.150.
Otak will prepare ucritical report for the project, including wetlands, watercourses, and fish and
wildlife conservation areas.
4,6 Agency Meetings
0tak will attend meetings with City staff and representatives from regulatory agencies and interested
tribal representatives. Field meetings will be conducted to explain project goals undob'cctiveo`
project design, uodtu facilitate the permitting and regulatory compliance pzoccxu.Ihcfizetficld
meeting, ubcz the pzc-=ppGcuduo meeting, will be dct,zodncd upon completion of the intake zcviov
and charter coccdoX. preferable after the 7596 plans have been updated. A, second meeting will bc
schedule with the rcgulatory agencies, at Otak or Tukwila's office, to review the 90% plans.
C:\LJacra\ausuu\&nnZ}atu\IxocJ\Miccuao ozuzTIotcrue1
FJes\ Content. (}u8uok\/IF{I1/\P60\IliveztnuCrccbPlap&utc Removal SOW 040317.docx
Exhibit A-1 Scope o[Work
Continued
4.7 Permit Support
(}txkv/B| support to the City for communications with state and federal permitting and
rcpola/oz7 ogcucico` as well as any interested tribal zcpzcacotadrcs' for the duration of the project.
This task includes addressing all comments and answering questions concerning euriroucorotu]
documentation and pczodt application materials.
Deliverables:
1. List uf all permits, environmental review and special studies required tofioulizc design and
construct this project.
2. Field meeting summary memorandum for each one /GlectrmoicPZ)[l.
]. One draft and one 8nu) Critical Areas Dq,ort (Electronic Microsoft Word and PI)F` and 6u,d
paper copies as needed by each pezoz6.
4. One draft and one final of joint Aquatic Resources Permit Application UARPA) supporting
drawings (Electronic PDF, and hard paper copies as needed by each periTilt).
5. One draft and one final of Specific Project Information Form (SPIl) (ElcctzoodcMiczomoft
Word and PZ}F, and hard paper copies um needed by each pecmdt).
6. Application (NOD for Ecology Construction Stormwutcz General Permit submitted oo-Huc.
8W9I,P submitted to the City.
7. ()oc draft and fioulapplication package for each permit and environmental review (Electronic
Pl)F uud hard paper copies as needed by each pennih.
Assumptions:
i The City will bc the main point of contact with the perimitting agencies.
2. This task does not include geotechnical exploration and analysis.
3. The Critical Areas Report for this tusk includes weHouda' otrcuzns and odzcz fia6 and wildlife
habitat conservation -areas, and will not include information and analysis associated with
frequently flooded areas, geologically buzucdouourcuo`und/oru fezruchazgcuzouu.
4. J'6c project will be designed and qualify as a Fish Enhancement Project and will receive a
otccuroluuJ BydcuoBc Project Approval OBPA\, per Regulatory Code of Washington ]lCW
77.55.101 and Washington State Department o[ Fish and Wildlife.
5. z\so Fish Enhancement Project, the project will 6u exempted from the requirements of5LlP/t'
and oo6EPz\ environmental checklist will bc prepared uo part of this scope. I[8EPAiu
required, then the City will prepare the 8EiPA documents based wo design documents prepared
by(}tuk under the tasks 6z the approved scope ofservices.
6. The project may require \ocu]/CityofIukw8x\peroita'6zcloc8ugczidculozcxoozd6uuocc
compliance, shoreline permits, flood hazard pertnits, and other relevant local permits.
.App6cx6onmand support documentation for local permits will not 6e prepared ux part oEthis
scope, if required, Tukwila will complete and submit the required local permit applications.
[:\LJoczx\nnaun\/\pyL}ota\L/cul\M6cz000H oruzyIotccoct
Files \Coutent.(}odook\lgBI1'{P8O\Rivcrtou Creek |quo*u1c Removal SOW U4O]17.docx 9
Ex6Ubit/\-1 Scope ofWork
Continued
The JARPA and the Specific Project Information Form (SPIF) will be used to obtain ESA
compliance and to support the application for u Department of the Army (Section 404\
Nationwide 27 permit from the Corps ofEngineers.
The project will be designed to meet the criteria of one or more of the restoration actions
outlined in the Programmatic Biological Assessment (,BA) for Keotozudoo Actions in
Washington State and associated Biological (}pioiou 00i()p\.
/\u individual Biological �vu}oatiouozBiolo cul.AoscasrnuotniDnor6epzcpozcdospazto[tbi
xcopc.
l0. The Army Corps of Engineers, NxdoouJ&{ur6ncFi6e6cyScrvicc`audlJ.8.Fis6uudW3d6fe
Service will concur that the project cuccts the criteria of one or more of the restoration ocd000
outlined in 8zcI`D8/Bi<)p.
11. The project will result in a No Effect or a May.Affect, Not Likely to Adversely Affect
determination for listed Ge6 species that may occur in the project action uzou.
12. The project will not require compensatory wetland oz stream mitigation, uodnocoonpcosutozy
mitigation plan is included in this scope.
)3.z1monitoring plan for post-construction project performance win not be prepared uou
component nf this scope.
14. The project will not require an individual Section 401 Water Quality Certification frocu
Wuobiogtoo5tutcZ}cpurtoentofBcologyABcnlom6.Ilon/evcc,6cologyniDroccb/ct6c
project's JARPA application so that they can make an official determination that no Ecology
permits are required for the project.
15. Ecology Construction Stozmwutez General Pcrodt will burequired.
16. The Consultant is not responsible for transfer of coverage for the Construction Stormwater
General Permit for the project.
17. The Consultant is expected to follow up and address any comments that may arise in the permit
review process.
18. Riverton Creek stream characterization will bc taken from the czis6og[ri6col.Azcum /1socsococot
and the cxim� 8Uc�unu[iu6uoccoocut Plan for the project.
19. There will be up to two field meetings with City atu8[ rcpzcscutodvcs 6cocu permitting agencies,
and tribal organizations.
20. Any additional studies identified during the Charter Meeting will be completed nodczIasb14.
T��� � — �'D�| F���8'�D
_— _ .�
This is based uuupdating the plan sheeting providedk,]'ukw8u for the 75% complete plans. Plans
will bu reviewed during the Intake Review and Charter Meeting (Phase 1: Tasks 2and 3) to
determine if additional sheets are needed to provide u complete project 66] package. If necessary,
the scope and fee estimate for this task will 6o revisited and u supplement will be
aubzoitted for the work to provide additional sheets.
C:\\Jyua\suaoo\,\npI)uco N,Ucr000ft\Wlndon'a Internet
�Jcs\Conteut.()udomk\|ll{I1/\P60\Bivcrcou Creek ylupgutc Removal SOW O4U317.docx 10
Exhibit A-1 Scope ofWork
Continued
Plans will bc submitted utthe 1 and Final O}k]Sct design levels for review
and comment hv the City. Each submittal will bu provided to the City 6o.od[ format ozother
reproducible electronic format. When the 1 design Plan set has been approved by the
(im�{}tukniD provide u6zD-sizc pdf set, sealed hvuWashington state registered 9zobcsuioxnu
En*i,ocz /p[D, Structural Engineer (SF]' Professional Landscape Architect O`TA\, or Professional
Land Surveyor (PLS) as appropriate, with electronic files in AutoCAD.
After the City has reviewed the 9O'pczccutsubmittals, umeeting will be held utthe City todiscuss
review cumnucotx. ()tuk'a project ozuougez and up to t6zcu designers will attend. The preliminary
sheet list used to codmu,c the budget for this task is based up ouupdating only the 16 plan x6cctx
provided by the City for the 75'porccut design, ndt6t6cxdJid000f2s6ccto for details.
5.1 Final Design and P|8O3S68�tS/|8Undn�pd �h��tn
. . .
1. General Plan Sheets (3 sheets)
{)tuk will update the cover sheet and the construction staging plan pcovznu6w2\zkn6lu
showing
table of contents, vicinity map, and existing conditions survey 6oac,oup and staging plan. (}t:kwill
also a new plan sheet, which includes a legend, abbreviations pencral construction notes.
2, Construction Traffic Control Trail Detour and Staging Plan (I sheet)
(}tuk will update the existing 75 -p czceotdesign p �nstoGuul� cn�nauud details showing the
route and s for closing of Green River Trail between Tukwila International Boulevard ut
South 112 'h Street and East Marginal Way at South 126''Street. {}tub will prepare a final plan
showing the construction staging urcumuoducx66ccootzolzoqui/crocote. Detailed traffic control
plans will be prepared by the Contractor during construction for approval by the City.
]. Temporary Erosion and Sediment Control Design (2 sheets)
{)tub nil update the existing 75'pczccut design plans tn finalize plans and details showing the
temporary erosion and sediment controls for protecting the water quality nfRiverton Creek and the
Duwamish River during construction. These drawings can be used for the Stormwater Pollution
Prevention Plan.
4 Creek Grading, Trail Restoration, and Bank Armoring Design (5 sheets)
Otak will update the grading plans and details for restoring a stable stream channel and Ooodnlaiu`
with scour counter-measures and habitat features, this will include grading the DooJnlaiu' creek
buokFuUchunocl,unJxlon/8on/c6uouclnudcrtbcocn/bzidgc'uudrviDiucludcchuooulaLubBir7
and habitat enhancement features including live Vegetation (included Ln Task O.1.8\. Large Woody
I)cbcio O.V7D\, riprap scour counter-measures including dcta8u..lhe �Trudizg design will
compliment and 6r to the slope protection u]ouX the south side of the [)owurn6o6 River.
C:\[]ocn\ sus un\'\pp[}utu\I/ooJ\ Micros o lotcznct
yIlco\Cou tent. (-)oduub\Fl}fI1'\960\Rivcr\no Creek lgop&xtc Removal SOW 040317Jocs 11
Exhibit A-1 Scope of Work
Continued
Otak will prepare landscaping plans and details for rcvegetation of Riverton Creek and for edge
restoration along Green River Trail. Decorative features added to the bridge or retaining walls will
be detailed on the bridge or wall plans.
5 Bridge Design (4 sheets)
Otak will update the bridge plans for construction of Green River Trail Bridge over Riverton Creek.
The plans will include the following information:
• Bridge layout and roadway profile.
• General notes, design criteria and material specifications.
• Consti-Liction sequence of new bridge.
• Foundation type, dimensions and details.
• I)esIL),-n details and dimensions of the bridge and structural components, including bridge
abutments, superstructure framing and deck, bearing details, and pedestrian railings.
• Attachment details for utilities on the bridge and transitions.
• Concrete finishing, and aesthetic features of bridge (as required).
6 Retaining Wall Design (3 sheets)
Otak will update the design and details for the retrofit of the sheet pile wall along Tukwila
International Boulevard Bridge approach. Based on the 75-percent design, it is anticipated that the
retrofit will consist of tie-back anchors extending behind the wan into the roadway approach fill.
In addition, it is estimated that there will be two new structural walls, one at each corner of the north
side of the bridge. Based on the existing 75-percent design, the existing retaining wall on the south
side will be utilized to the extent feasible to support the Riverton Creek Grading. The new wall
system will be either cantilevered or attached to the bridge foundation.
A computer-modeled visualization of the proposed project will be prepared to assist with public
outreach efforts.
Deliverables:
1. Stamped structural calculations sealed by a Washington state registered SE.
2. Stamped plan sheets as described in the estimated sheet list below.
3. Electronic copy of AutoCAD files.
Assumptions:
1. Green River Trail will be closed to pedestrian and bicycle traffic for the duration of the project.
No staged construction will be necessary.
2. The Contractor will design temporary structures required during construction.
C:\LJsers\susan\AppData\l,ocal\Microsoft \Windows\'I'emporary Internet
152 Files \Content. Outlook\ HHI 1 AP60\Riverton Creek Flapgate Removal SOW 040317.docx 12
Exhibit A -1 Scope of Work
Continued
5.2 Specifications
Otak will provide specified General Special Provisions (GSP) and project-specific Special Provisions
for Divisions 2 — 10, as necessary, to supplement the WSDOT/APWA Standard Specifications for
Road, Bridge and Municipal Construction. Otak will also review Division 1 of the Contract
Provisions for the project, prepared by the City, and provide comments and revisions as necessary.
Otak will prepare an estimated construction schedule to determine the number of working days for
the construction contract, for review by the City at approximately the 90 percent design level.
Assumptions:
1. The City will provide the boilerplate for the Proposal and Division 1 of the Contract Provisions,
and seal that portion of the Contract Provisions.
2. Specifications will be based on the 2016 edition of WSDOT/APWA Standard Specifications for
Road, Bridge and Municipal Construction, current amendments, City requirements, and General
Special Provisions.
3. This scope assumes that the project will be advertised for bid before April 2018 such that the
2016 edition of the Standard Specifications will be used.
Deliverables:
Special Provisions at 100-percent design (pdf format and MS Word format)., sealed by a
Washington state registered PE.
Estimated construction schedule, draft and final in Microsoft Project (.mpp and pdf format).
5.3 Construction Cost Estimates
Otak will compile the quantities and estimated construction cost (i.e., engineer's estimate) at 90-
and 100- percent level design for submittal to the City. The estimate will be prepared using
historical unit prices from the WSDOT Unit Bid Analysis, City of Tukwila's recent projects, as
appropriate, and other pertinent data. The water main bid items will be separated into a separate
bid schedule for sales tax assessment.
Deliverables:
1. Construction Cost Estimate at 100-percent design (.pdf and MS Excel spreadsheet format).
2. Quantity calculations, with assumptions noted, at 100-percent design (.pdf format).
SUPPLEMENTAL SERVICES (Not Included in Authorized Contract)
Otak has identified the following potential supplemental services that may be required by the City or
permitting agencies. If requested by Tukwila, detailed scope and fee will be submitted for any
supplemental services which could include:
C:\ Users \susan \AppData \Local \Microsoft \Windows \Temporary Internet
Files \Content. Outlook\ H H I I AP60\Riverton Creek Flapgate Removal SOW 040317.docx 13 153
Exhibit A-1 Scope of Work
Continued
• Geotechnical Exploration and Analysis
• Utility Coordination
• Design Report
• Stream Hydrologic and Hydraulic Analyses to Support Final Design
• Structural Design to Support final "inal Design
• Construction Support Services
• Supplemental Survey and Easement Documentation.
• Supplemental Studies to Support Permit Requirements.
• Cultural Resources Investigation and Reporting.
• Public Meetings and Stakeholder Coordination.
• Grant Application Assistance
(::\Users\susan\AppData\l.-,oc-,tl\Mlcrosoft \Windows\'I'emporaiy Internet
154 Files \Content. Outlook\ HH I 1AP60\Riverton Creek Flapgate Removal SOW 040317.docx 14
Exhibit B - Fee Estimate
City of Tukwila - Riverton Creek Flapgate Removal Project
Otak, Inc., Project 32740
Task Description
Phase 1 - Intake Review and Charter Meeting
Task 1 Project Management (6 -mo for Phases 1 and 2) - 3 months
1.1 Project Management and Coordination
1.2 Quality Assurance /Quality Control
Task 2 Intake Review
2.1 Review Existing Data
2.2 Site Reconnaissance
2.3 Intake Review and Develop Design Criteria
2.4 Develop Premitting Strategy Plan
Trail
Structural
Environmental
Water Resource
Stream Assessment
Landscape CADD
u..
5
Admire
Geotech
$3,939
$3,939
$4,134
$1,343
$1,33_7
$2,418
$1,070
$1,800
$1,343
$3,137_.
$2,418
$1,070
Task 3
Coordination Meetings 2 14
$3,546
Phase 1 Total Hours 10 76 4 19 4
Total Labor Cost, including Overhead and Profit 8 2,346 $ 10,252 $ - $ 757 $ 2,507 $ $ 531 $
Direct Expenses
Phase 1 Project Total
ermitting and Final Design
Phase 2 -' Phase. 1, if needed)
Task 4 Permitting, Environmental Review and Coordination
4.1 JARPA Preparation
4.2 Specific Project Information Form (SPIF)
4.3 Cultural Resources
4.4 Ecology Construction Stormwater General Permit
4.5 Wetland Delineation
4.6 Agency Meetings
4.7 Permit Support
54 56 104
4 8 16
6
24 32 72
8 8
12 8
$ - $ - $
2 16 131
$ - $ 271 $ - $ - $ 1,122
$1,800 $
19,586
$534 -; $ 534
17,786 $ 534 $ 1,800 $ 20,120
244 $22,803
34 $2,967
22 ;$1,647
2 .x$265___..___
22 $2,064
128 $11,330
16 $2,000
20 $2,530
$2 967
$1,647
$265
$2,064
$11,330
$2,000
$2,530
Task 5 Final Design
5.1 Design and Plans (to finalize existing 16 sheets)
5.2 Specifications - all new specifications based on template provided
5.3 Construction Cost Estimates (updating Estimate and quant provided)
Phase 2 Total Hours
Total Labor Cost, including Overhead and Profit
Direct Expenses
Phase 2 Project Total
2
2
2
44
26
14
6 88
$ 1,408 $ 11,871 $
14
12
14
56
12
18
60
56
28
4
28
24
10
6
250
60 198
86
40 88 54 56 104 144 18 4 8 62 12 28 66 778
$ 5,279 $ 9,160 $ 7,164 $ 6,569 $ 6,344 $ 15,205 $ 1,557 $ 677 $ 1,354 $ 8,409 $ 1,126 $ 2,007 $ 4,630
Project Total Hours (Phases 1 -2) 16 164 4 59 88 58 56 104 144 18 4 8 64 12 28 82 909
Billing Rate (including OH and Profit) 235 135 169 189 132 104 133 117 61 106 87 169 169 136 94 72 70
Total Labor Cost, including Overhead and Profit $ 3,754 $ 22,124 $ - $ 757 $ 7,786 $ 9,160
$ 7,695 $ 6,569 $ 6,344 $ 15,205 $ 1,557 $ 677 $ 1,354 $ 8,680 $ 1,126 $ 2,007 $ 5,752
Direct Expenses
Project Total (Phases 1 -2)
\ contract \32740 - Riverton Creek Flapgate Removal budget 040317
$28,815
520,750
$10,392
82,760
$2,483
82,760. $ 2,483 $
$28,815
$20,750
$10,392
82,760
2,483
85,243
100,547
$1,800
102,346
3,016 $ 3,016
100,547 $ 3,016 $ 1,800 $ 105,363
4/0/2017
156
3
3
City Council Transportation & Infrastructure Committee
TRANSPORTATION & INFRASTRUCTURE COMMITTEE
Meeting Minutes
April 11, 2017 - 5:30 p.m. - Foster Conference Room, 6300 Building
Councilmembers: Kate Kruller, Chair; Joe Duffie, De'Sean Quinn
Staff: Bob Giberson, Robin Tischmak, Gail Labanara,
Laurel Humphrey
CALL TO ORDER: Chair Kruller called the meeting to order
U
Staff is seeking Council approval of Supplet
amount of $180,387.80 for construction ma
to School Phase II Project. This project will
the Cascade View Elementary student walk
construction management services as a sur
agreement will be split between the 2017 0
APPROVAL. FORWARD TO APRIL 24.2017
p.m.
Sorensen, Ryan Larson,
I Agreement No. 2 with KPG, Inc. in the
ient services for the Cascade View Safe Routes
rust a roundabout and sidewalks in areas of
ite. This agreement will allow KPG to provide
2ntto the design contract. Funds far this
and Small Drainage programs. UNANIMOUS
MITT EE OF THE WHOLE.
The Transportation Committee Meeting adjourned at 5:45 p.m.
Committee Chair Approval
157