The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPS 2017-05-15 Item 2A - Public Safety Plan - Facilities Final Siting CriteriaCity of Tukwila Allan Ekberg, Mayor INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM TO: Public Safety Committee FROM: Bob Giberson, Public Works Director /PA CC: Mayor Ekberg DATE: May 12, 2017 SUBJECT: Public Safety Plan Facilities Final Siting Criteria ISSUE Staff is seeking consensus from the Committee and Council on the final siting criteria matrix associated with the Public Safety Plan buildings program. BACKGROUND The draft siting criteria was presented to the Committee on February 21, 2017 and at the Open House on March 18, 2017. In addition, Heartland LLC, the selected real estate brokerage consultant, has reviewed and concurred with this final siting criteria matrix. RECOMMENDATION Staff is asking for the Committee's consensus on the final siting criteria matrix and forward this to the May 22, 2017 Committee of the Whole meeting for consensus. ATTACHMENTS Final Siting Criteria Matrix 1 Site Selection Criteria, v.6 Public Safety Plan Facilities Justice Center Criteria 10- May -17 Red Indicates Essential Component u, 2 -a Q v in EVALUATION CRITERIA - JUSTICE CENTER Site Alternatives - Justice Center #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 #9 For Illustration Only Example Site 3900 S Example Street 1. City Operational Requirements - Must Have Illustration a. Police Requirements Only Parcel accommodates building footprint, space requirements, environmental conditions ii. Secure parking for 80 PD vehicles iii. Secure parking for PD equipment 1 1 iv. Secure parking for evidence vehicles (optional) v. Outdoor training area 0 1 2 2 2 vi. EOC Requirement: microwave communications equip vii. EOC Requirement: seismic, flood plain viii. EOC Req: fuel storage for emergency generator ix. Multiple access points, min 2 streets x. Proximity of high frequency transit b. Court Requirements i. Parcel accommodates building footprint & requirements 1 ii. Public parking needs: 150 spaces iii. Secure parking for staff /judge: 15 spaces 1 iv. Community /meeting room for 50, flex configuration W— 2 v. High Frequency Transit - scored above above above above above above above above above above Subtotal out of possible 28: 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2. City Policy Requirements /Guidance a. Benefit to Public Safety b. Commitment to Customer Service c. Ensuring the Efficient Delivery of Customer Service d. Containing Development Costs - Ensure ability to deliver all promised facilities e. Mindfulness of Ongoing Operations Expenses f. Importance of Location g. Significance of Flexibility h. Opportunity to catalyze private developments i. Opportunities for future expansion j. Location of utilities and infrastructure k. Ongoing operating expenses I. Opportunities for innovation Subtotal: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3. Public Desires i. Expandability to accommodate future needs ii. Security for the public and the staff iii. Nearby transit access iv. Opportunity to enhance a neighborhood v. Cost of the overall facility vi. Sustainability /environmental concerns vii. Accessibility to Tukwila Community Center vii. Conference rooms available to the public viii. Close to roadways, city buildings, businesses ix. Far from residential areas Subtotal: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Score 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4. Site Details a. Existing Building? YES b. Parcel Size 120,000 c. Building size 45,000 d. Parking capacity - public 175 e. Parking capacity - secure 20 f. Walking distance to transit (feet) 675 g. Transit frequency (every xx minutes) 15 5. Costs a. Purchase Option - applied to purch price, not in total b. Purchase Price $5,699,000 c. Due Diligence d. Site Modifications e. Building Modifications f. New Construction Total Costs $5,699,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Legend: Requirements 0 1 2 NO Acceptable Optimal Policy /Public Unfavorable Neutral Favorable 1 -3 4 -6 7 -9 3 4 Site Selection Criteria, v.6 Public Safety Plan Facilities Fire Station Criteria 10- May -17 Red Indicates Essential Component E' Q -. EVALUATION CRITERIA - FIRE STATIONS Site Alternatives - Fire Stations I Station 52 Station 54 #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 For Illustration Only Example Site 3900 S Example Street 1. City Operational Requirements - Must Have Illustration a. Location within Response Time Polygon Only 1 1 b. Parcel Size, Environmental Conditions c. Parking Needs d. Multiple Entry Points e. Site meets same standards required for an EOC 1 f. Neighborhood Considerations g. Location of utilities and infrastructure h. Ongoing operating expenses Subtotal out of possible 16: 9 0 0 0 0 0 2. City Policy Requirements /Guidance a. Benefit to Public Safety b. Commitment to Customer Service c. Ensuring the Efficient Delivery of Customer Service d. Containing Development Costs - Ensure ability to deliver all promised facilities e. Mindfulness of Ongoing Operations Expenses f. Importance of Location g. Significance of Flexibility h. Opportunities for innovation Subtotal: 0 0 0 0 0 0 3. Public Desires a. Include meeting rooms available to community b. Make fire stations easier to find Subtotal: 0 0 0 0 0 0 TotalScorel 9 0 0 I 0 0 0 4. Site Details a. Parcel Size 43,560 b. Building size 12,500 c. Parking capacity - public 15 d. Parking capacity - equipment 4 5. Costs a. Purchase Option - applied to purch price, not in total b. Purchase Price $1,500,000 c. Due Diligence d. Site Modifications e. Building Modifications f. New Construction Total Costs $1,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Legend: Requirements NO Acceptable Optimal 1 Policy /Public Unfavorable Neutral Favorable 1 -3 4 -6 7 -9 5 Site Selection Criteria, v.6 Public Safety Plan Facilities Public Works Facility Criteria 10- May -17 Red Indicates Essential Component v 0 Q .i .i EVALUATION CRITERIA - PUBLIC WORKS FACILITY Site Alternatives Public Works Facility #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 For Illustration Only Example Site 3900 S Example Street 1. City Operational Requirements - Must Have Illustration a. Parcel accommodates building footprint, space requirements, environmental conditions Only 1 b. Location c. Reserve power, fuel storage d. Expansion capability 1 2 2 2 e. Location of utilities and infrastructure f. Ongoing operating expenses g. Site meets same standards required for an EOC h. Adequate Parking Subtotal out of possible 14: 8 0 0 0 0 0 2. City Policy Requirements /Guidance a. Benefit to Public Safety b. Commitment to Customer Service c. Ensuring the Efficient Delivery of Customer Service d. Containing Development Costs - Ensure ability to deliver all promised facilities e. Mindfulness of Ongoing Operations Expenses f. Importance of Location g. Significance of Flexibility h. Opportunities for innovation Subtotal: 0 0 0 0 0 0 3. Public Desires i. Expandability to accommodate future needs ii. Sustainability /environmental concerns iii. Opportunity to enhance a neighborhood iv. Central location v. Access to new public spaces vi. Facilities sharing a site vii. Consider proximity to schools for training oppys Subtotal: 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Score! 8 0 0 0 0 0 4. Site Details a. Parcel Size 225,000 b. Building size n/a c. Parking capacity - public 27 d. Parking capacity - equipment 13 5. Costs a. Purchase Option - applied to purch price, not in total b. Purchase Price $2,600,000 c. Due Diligence d. Site Modifications e. Building Modifications f. New Construction Total Costs $2,600,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Legend: Requirements NO Acceptable Optimal 1 Policy /Public Unfavorable Neutral Favorable 1 -3 4 -6 7 -9 7