Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPS 2017-06-19 COMPLETE AGENDA PACKETCity of Tukwila Public Safety Committee O Thomas McLeod, Chair O Joe Duffie O De'Sean Quinn Please note special start time for this meeting. 4 AGENDA Distribution: Recommended Action T. McLeod Mayor Ekberg J. Duffle D. Cline D. Quinn C. O'Flaherty D. Robertson L. Humphrey MONDAY, JUNE 19, 2017 — 5:00 PM HAZELNUT CONFERENCE ROOM (At east entrance of City Hall) Item Recommended Action Page 1. PRESENTATION(S) 2. BUSINESS AGENDA a. Discussion on location of Fire Station 51 (FAQ). a. Committee consideration/ Pg.1 Laurel Humphrey, Council Analyst decision. b. An ordinance relating to trespass warnings on City b. Forward to 6/26 C.O.W. Pg.7 property. and 7/17 Regular Mtg. Mike Uilla, Police Chief c. Police Department body camera program. c. Forward to 6/26 C.O.W. Pg.17 Rick Mitchell, Acting Deputy Police Chief and 7/17 Regular Mtg . d. Discussion on Public Safety Plan sustainability goals. d. Forward to 6/26 C.O.W. Pg.37 [Continued from 5/15 Public Safety Committee meeting.] for consensus. Rachel Bianchi, Communications and Government Relations Manager 3. ANNOUNCEMENTS 4. MISCELLANEOUS Next Scheduled Meeting: Monday, June 26, 2017 [Special Meeting] SThe City of Tukwila strives to accommodate individuals with disabilities. Please contact the City Clerk's Office at 206 - 433 -1800 ( TukwilaCityClerk (a)TukwilaWA.aov) for assistance. City OT I UKwila Allan Ekberg, Mayor TO: Public Safety Committee FROM: Laurel Humphrey, Council Analyst CC: Mayor Ekberg DATE: May 8, 2017 SUBJECT: Public Safety Plan — Location of Fire Station 51 ISSUE The Public Safety Committee requested a document summarizing why the location for Station 51 has already been identified in the Public Safety Plan, pursuant to the 2009 Deve'lopment Agreement with Segale Properties, LLC. DISCUSSION The location for Station 51 has already been established to be the intersection of Southcenter Parkway and South 180th Street. This is pursuant to a Development Agreement (and subsequent amendments/addenda) that was signed in 2009 as part of the plan to annex and develop the Tukwila South area. The land is subject to a deed restriction that only allows the property to be used for a fire station. The property is also encumbered by a Puget Sound Energy easement as a result of relocating a high pressure gas line, The Committee requested a high-level summary that could be shared with the public to help clarify any concerns or misconceptions about why the City plans to build Station 51 at this location. RECOMMENDATION Staff is seeking Committee feedback on the FAQ, and if it is satisfactory it will be posted on the Public Safety Plan website and distributed to the full Council. ATTACHMENTS • Draft FAQ • Fire Administration Memo dated April 21, 2017 , Lli'M, Public Safety Plan — Fire Station 51 Location 0" JO_ rk k, Frequently Asked Questions Why is the location of Fire Station 51 already established in the Public Safety Plan? In 2010, the City of Tukwila annexed approximately 259 acres of land bordered by & 18V1 Street, the Green River, S. 204t' Street, and Orillia Road/1-5 for an area of future development to be known as Tukwila South. To prepare for this annexation, the City entered into a 2009 Development Agreement with Segale Properties, LLC to detail mutually agreed upon rules for land use and to plan for City services and infrastructure for the new area of the city, To plan for future fire service, the Agreement provided that Segale would donate up to three acres • land to the City for placement of a fire station. (Attachment I Page 14) Why will Fire Station 51 be located at the intersection of Southcenter Parkway and South 180th Street? This location was determined after detailed analysis that included a study performed by TCA, a national leader in fire station location and design, as well as Tukwila Fire Department internal analysis. The site meets the site selection criteria outlined in the Development Agreement and is well-suited to address the additional 8 million square feet of future growth planned for Tukwila south. The location's easy access north and south onto Southcenter Parkway means that both Tukwila South development and commercial areas to the north can be served with adequate response times. (Attachment 2, Page 14) What was the site selection criteria outlined in the Development Agreement? 1) The ability to accommodate a 25,000 gs,f building, parking and outdoor storage; 2) Level topography; 3) rectilinear site; 4) clear title; 5) soils capable of bearing the load of the proposed station 6) direct access onto an arterial street; and 7) located near South 1 801h Street but outside the shoreline environment. (Attachment 1, Page 14) Is the location safe for a fire station? A geotechnical study conducted in 2012 found that the site was suitable based upon subsurface exploration, site observations, laboratory testing, and engineering, analyses. Additionally, the original S. 178t" Street was realigned at a lower, safer grade in 2013, (Attachment 2, Page 29, 31) Does the City have the option to not locate Fire Station 51 at this site? No, because there is a deed restriction on the property that means if it is not used to construct a station it will revert to its original ownership. In addition, under a separate 2014 agreement, the City will collect $4.75 million from egale to finance, design, construct and operate a fire station. The money cannot be used for any other purpose and there is a potential that the City would have to refund some portion of that total, The City would also have to pay Puget Sound Energy $3.75 million to terminate an easement related to the relocation of a high-pressure gas line that was moved as part of the street realignment, (Attachment 2, Page 14) Have the locations of Fire Stations 52 and 54 already been determined? The City contracted with Facets ConSUlt�qp, to analyze and recommend locations for Stations 52 and based upon optimum fire service response times city,wide. The report is scheduled to be delivered the City Council in June. Where will the Fire Department Headquarters be located? The City has not yet determined the location of the Department Headquarters. 0 City Of Tukwila ...... . ......... . Allan Ekberg, Mayor TO: Public Safety Committee CC: Mayor Ekberg FROM: Jay C. Wittwer, Fire Chief and Chris Flores, Assistant Fire Chief DATE: April 21, 2017 SUBJECT, Location of Fire Station 51 per the Tukwila South Development Agreement BACKGROUND In 2009 the Ci4 of Tukwila entered into an a • reement with Spqnlp Prnntzrties LLC with re Il —ar III e r� I NN 1 VRI 6-21 IRJ I IN q I t=R I 9117A AIN W I IRmA Vljjf. I I A DISCUSSION The current Tukwila Fire Department Administration has reviewed the documents developed by TCA, the City's consultant, from 2009 and 2013, titled Headquarters Fire Station Location Analysis. We further reviewed other City documents related to the Development Agreement between the City of Tukwila and Segale Properhes LLC relevant to the Tukwila South Development. Fire Administration concurs that the currently identified location for a relocated Fire Station 51 is a well-suited location for a fire station. Furthermore, the Tukwila Fire Department Administration concurs with the memorandum dated April 7, 2017, authored by Rachel Turpin, City Attorney, and titled Tukwila South Fire Station Property, in its entirety. I Ile -09 INFORMATIONAL MEMO Page 2 Finally, in response to a question raised • Councilmember Kruller at the April 12, 201 Committee • the Whole, there is no requirement that the Fire Department Headquarters I lcat at Station 51 in Tukwila Valley Suth. The locatin of Headquarters has t betermine• at thiis, time. • ed • • no e d d - a 0 u ki - VIII 111091 1 Is I n. City of Tukwila A16h —Ekberg, Mayor INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM TO: Public Safety Committee FROM: Mike Villa, Chief of Police Rick Mitchell, A/Deputy Chief of Police BY: Kraig Boyd, Sergeant Community Police Team Cc: Mayor Ekberg DATE: June 5, 2017 SUBJECT: Criminal Trespass Ordinance for City Property. ISSUE The Council is being asked to consider and approve a Trespass Ordinance for City Property. BACKGROUND The Tukwila Police Department has received several complaints regarding criminal behavior in the city parks and on city property. Currently the Trespass ordinance for city property is enforceable, by civil infraction only. Surrounding agencies have trespass ordinances on city property that include a means for appeal and are enforceable as a misdemeanor after a warning is given, and violated. DISCUSSION The result of reduced penalties for constant criminal trespass violations is constant violation of park rules due to reduced enforcement options. Neighbors, citizens, and patron of our city parks and property have expressed safety and health concerns, as well as the exposure to criminal, or dangerous behavior. The ability to appropriately address persons not abiding by the rules of the parks as well as other city property, backed by criminal enforcement would reduce criminal behavior and on city property, and increase safe usage of the parks by citizens. Concerns have been raised that this ordinance would unfairly target the homeless. The intent of the ordinance is to ensure that city property is clean and safe for all users. The intent is to create greater enforcement tools to guarantee the rights of all citizens to use city property as intended by designi. Use of the property is open to all if the rules of the property are observed and followed. It is not the intent of this ordinance to deny access to any individual or group. The ordinance has been reviewed and approved by the City Attorney. FINANCIAL IMPACT None. RECOMMENDATION The Council is being asked to forward the Trespass Ordinance to the June 26, 2017 Committee of the Whole meeting and subsequent, July 17, 2017 Regular meeting, ATTACHMENTS Ordinance VA Rl DRAFT WHEREAS, the City recognizes that members of the public have legitimate interests and rights regarding the use and enjoyment of City owned or operated property, as well as certain rights protected by the United States Constitution and the Washington State Constitution and laws, includ g, but not limited to, the right to petition the government, the right to assembly, and the right to access sources of information,i and WHEREAS, there is a demonstrated need for the City to adopt a legally sound process for being able to exclude from City property individuals whose behavior is dangerous, unsafe, illegal, or unreasonably disruptive to other users; and WHEREAS, the City desires to provide a specific method for the, issuance of trespass warnings to such individuals, including placing limitations on trespass warnings and providing procedures for such individuals to promptly appeal the issuance of trespass warning d WHEREAS, this ordinance is enacted as an exercise • the City's authority to protect and preserve the public health, safety, and' welfare, while recognizing the rights M f individual's to engage in legitimate activities that may occur on City property; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Chapter 8.23 of the Tukwila Municipal Code Established. A chapter of the Tukwila Municipal Code entitled "'Trespass Warnings on City Property," to be codified as Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) Chapter 8.23, is hereby established to read as follows. W Word Processing\Ordinances\Trespass warnings on City property 4-11-17 RBT:bjs Page 1 of 7 Sections: 8.2M10 Purpose, Authority, and Applicabili 8.23.020 Definitions 823,030 Trespass Warnings on City Propiel Section 2. Regulations Established. TMC Section 8.23.010, "Purpose', Authority, ?,nd Applicability," is hereby established to read as folloI A. The purpose of this chapter is to adopt a legally sound process for being able to exclude from City owned • operated property individuals whose behavior is dangerous, unsafe, illegal, • unreasonably disruptive to other users. It is further the purpose of this chapter to provide for a specific method to allow for the issuance of trespass warnings to such individuals, including placing limiitations on trespass warnings and providing procedures for such individuals to promptly appeal the issuance of trespass warnings in order to protect their right to engage in legitimate activities protected by the state and federal constitutions. # w w z- W; Word Processing0rdinancesMespass warnings on City property 4-11-17 RBT:bjs Page 2 of 7 M 1. Threatening another person by communicating either directly or indirectly to another person the intent to cause bodily injury in the future to the person threatened or to any other person; • 2. Selling or using alcohol or drugs; or 3. Threatening or harassing behavior (e.g., fighting or threatening to fight, brandishing a weapon, stalking, verbally threatening to harm others or their property); or 4. Assaulting staff or other patrons,, or 5. Sexual misconduct or harassment (e.g., indecent exposure, offensive touching, sexual acts). C. Behavior that is "unreasonably disruptive to other users" is behavior that is not constitutionally protected and that, in cons,ideration • the nature, scope, use and purpose of the property in question, unreasonably interferes with others' use and enjoyment of said property. Examples of behavior that may unreasonably interfere with others' use and enjoyment of City property include, but are not limited to, any of the following- 1111ril1r;r1w, IM M= 2. Unreasonably loud vocal expression or unreasonably boisterous physical behavior; or 3. Using electronic or other communication devices in a manner that is unreasonably disruptive to others; or 4. Unreasonably interfering with the free passage of stafi or patrons in or on City property; or 5. Behavior that is unreasonably inconsistent with the use for wh ich the City property was designed and intended to be used (e.g., bathing, shaving, or washing clothes in a public bathroom or skateboarding in a pub parking area or plaza). D. Any constitutionally protected action or speech is excluded from the prohibited behavior listed in this section. Section 4. Regulations Established. TIVIC Section 8.23.030i, "Trespass Warnings on City Property," is hereby established to read as follows: 8.23.030 Trespass Warnings on City Property ► Officers of the Tukwila Police Department shall be empowered to issue a trespass warning to any individual who the officer has probable cause to believe has violated any City ordinance, state statute, or government rule or regulation relating to or prohibiting conduct that is dangerous, illegal, or unreasonably disruptive to other users of City property, as defined in TIVIC Section 8.23.020, while such individual is on • within any City property, as more specifically set forth in TIVIC Section 8,23.010. C W: Word Processing\OrdinanceskTrespass warnings on City property 4-11-17 RBT:bjs Page 3 of 7 11 B. Trespass warnings may be delivered in person to the offender or If' first class mail to the offender at the offender's last known address. C. The offender need not be charged, tried, or convicted of any crime or infraction in order for the trespass warning to be issued or be effective. The warning may be based upon observation by a police officer or a City or other government employee or may be based upon a civilian report that would ordinarily be relied upon by police officers in the determination of probable cause. ww W if V W V V • W mn��� #�p 1. A person receiving a trespass warning for an expulsion of 7 days, or longer, may file, an appeal to have the trespass warning rescinded or the duration of the expulsion shortened. 2. The appeal must be in writing, provide the appellant's current address, and sha,ll be accompanied by a copy of the trespass warning that is being appealed. 3. The written notice of appeal must be sent to the City Administrator and postmarked no later than 7 calendar days after the issuance of the trespass warning. W: Word ProcessingkOrdinancesMespass warnings on City property 4.11-17 RBT:bjs Page 4 of 7 12 4. The trespass warning shall remain in effect during the pendency of any administrative or judicial proceeding. MM a. Notify the appellant of the, hearing date, time, and location; • Conduct a hearing within 30 calendar days of receipt of the notice • M••` r c. Issue a ruling upholding, rescinding, or shortening the d'uration of the expulsion set forth in the trespass warning no, later than 5 business days after the hearing. 2, The Hearing Official may consider a sworn report • a declaration under penalty of perjury as authorized by RCW 9A.72�.085, written by the officer who issued the trespass warning • • the person upon whose observation the trespass warning was based, without further evidentiary foundation, as prima facie evidence that the offender committed the violation as described. This evidence creates a rebuttable presumption that the violation occurred and the burden thereafter rests with the appellant to overcome the presumption. Such sworn reports or declarations may be considered either in addition to or in lieu of the live testimony • the officer who issued the trespass warning or by the person upon whose observation the trespass warning was based. 3, The Hearing Official shall consider the trespass warning and may consider any written or oral sworn testimony • the appellant or witnesses, as well as pictorial or demonstrative evidence offered by the appellant that the Hearing Official considers relevant and trustworthy. The Hearing Official' may consider information that would not be admissible under the evidence rules in a court of law. 4. The Hearing Official may issue subpoenas for the attendance of witnesses and the production of documents, and shall administer individual oaths to witnesses. The Hearing Official shall not issue a subpoena for the attendance of a witness at the request of the appellant unless the request is accompanied by the fee required by RCW 5.56.010 for a witness in district court, The appellant shall be responsible for serving any subpoena, issued at the appellant's request. • W: Word ProcessingV Clrdinances\Trespass warnings on City property 4-11-17 RBT°bjs Page 5 of 7 13 of this section, "good cause" to rescind, shorten or modify a trespass warnling shall be found where: a. The alleged offender demonstrates to the satisfaction • the Hearing Official or his/her designee that his or her conduct was intended to be e�xpressive conN uct protected by the First Amendment; • b. The offender was not given prior warning that the conduct in question was subject to a trespass warning; • c. The trespass warning was based solely upon the statement of a third party, was not observed personally by the issuing officer or a city or other government employee, would not ordinarily be relied upon by police officers in the determination of probable cause, and the alleged offender claims that he or she did not commit the action for which he or she was warned; or M. In the judgment of the Hearing Official, the circumstances warrant a modification or rescission of the trespass warning. The Hearing Official shall rescind the trespass warning if, considering all the circumstances, he • she finds that reasonable minds could differ • the question of whether the conduct in question was unreasonably disruptive to others • the same City property at t at time. EEMEMEMIN w w W qP W W W w w w w 4 I • 14 M. ys and who accordingly has had the right to a hearing regarding the trespass warning may be arrested for trespassing and is g • a misdemeanor, whiich shall be punishable by a fine of up to $1,000 and/or imprisonment for a term not to exceed 90 M.ys. M. The Chief of Police • his/her designee may upon request authorize an individual who has received a trespass warning in accordance with this chapter to enter City property to exercise his or her First Amendment rights • to conduct government business, if there is no other reasonable alternative, location to exercise such rights or conduct such business. Such authorization must be in writing and specify the duration M f the authorization and any conditions thereof. Section 5. Corrections by City Clerk or Code Reviser. 1p on approval of the City Attorney, the City Clerk and the code reviser are authorized to make necessary corrections to this ordinance, including the correction of clerical errors- references to 7 M ther local, state or federal laws, codes, rulesi, or regulations; • ordinance numbering and sectioni/subsection numbering, Section 6. Severability. If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance or its application to any person or situation should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional for any reason by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invaliM ity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of the remaininM portions of this ordinance or its application to any other person or situation, Section 7. Effective Date. This ordinance or a summary thereof shall be pub,lished in the o al newspaper of the City, and shall take effect and be in full force five days ?,fter passage and publication as provided by law. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, at a Regular Meeting thereof this _ day of , 2017 Uys F-�' I N� Christy O'Flaherty, IVIMC, City Clerk 1=� Filed with the City Clerk: Passed by the City Council- Published: Effective Date: Ordinance Number: W: Word Processing\Ordinances\Trespass warnings on City property 4-11-17 RBT:bjs 15 17 City of Tukwila . . .................... .......... . .... . Allan Ekberg, Mayor INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM TO Public Safety Committee FROM: Mike Villa, Chief of Police BY: Rick Mitchell, Acting Deputy Chief of Police CC: Mayor Ekberg DATE: June 14, 2017 SUBJECT: Tukwila Police Department Body Camera Program !j0L#1v1#11vTj all NIZZOIGIO DISCUSSION The purpose of the body cameras is for increased public safety, officer safety, enhanced recall of incidents and scenes, and increased transparency and accountability from the police department. 0. Oa .86 0 OM mll dalIF1110 1111offolog g=- I a1z] v Folso. w-11 wmsd Izzolzal. 114111ZININ 11-mv, [ZIT'm L*j!'r4qW1 froff; g1*191(gle MW 17 INFORMATIONAL MEMO Page 2 comprehensive policy to address these concerns. The policy has been reviewed and approved by the City Attorney and agreed to by the Tukwila Police Officers Guild. gmm — v IrIcalue OF era9e ua i y, improve s ora and capacity, retrieval, and reproduction capability. The maintenance, installation, and storage capability of the new equipment and software has shown to have a positive impact • the fleet and technology services departments as well, as compared to our current system. As part • the agreement, the department will have unlimited replacement warranty for any equipment failure on any of the 3 pieces • equipment purchased for the life of the contract, The company will provide upgrades on all equipment every 2.5 years with the latest technology as part • the agreement, The pilot programs were extremely successful using the Axon Enterprise technology and evuivment. Based on the assessment and outcomes of the vilot -trovram, the-d-er#artment woult like to purchase the equipment detailed above, There is no other company that can provide these three pieces of integrated equipment, Additionally, the contract with Axon provides cloud storage and retrieval of all of our video. This is a sole source and is not required to go out for an RFP. FINANCIAL IMPACT The department currently spends approximately $60,000 per year on average on our current video system and CED/Taser replacement. $50,,000 for the current video system replacement and repairs, and $10,000 per year for CED replacement. if the purchase is approved, the new system will involve 29 new vehicle video systems, 50 body cameras for all uniformed personnel, and 50 new CED's (Tasers) for an additional $40,000 per year. The total cost of the program will be 111 #11r the 5-year agreement. $153,352.00 the first year due to capital and equipment purchase costs, and $98,892.00 for the following 4 years. The department will use existing funds within our budget supplemented by seizure funds to pay for the capital equipment costs and licensing in 2017-2018. The department will budget for the additional $40,000 per year beginning with the 2019-2020 budget RECOMMENDATION The Council is being asked to authorize the Mayor to sign a contract with AXON Enterprise Inc. a new video swstem and new CED devices (Tasers), Secondly, the Council is being asked to authorize the Police Department to use a combination of existing funds and seizure, funds totaling $153,352 in 2017 and $98,892 ir 2018 to fund the acquisition. ATTACHMENTS Power point presentation. WA2017 Into Mernos�Body Cams,doc 18 TUKWILA POLICE DEPARTMENT BODY/ VEHICLE CAMERA PROGRAM PURCHASE APPROVAL • Request council approval for purchase and signing of contract with AXON Enterprises to outfit all vehicles and uniformed officers with video cameras. • As part of the agreement, this purchase will also provide the department with 50 new Conductive Electrical Devices (CED's), commonly known as Tasers. BODY CAMERA PROGRAMS INCREASE IN US • Controversial incidents /shootings, public demand for information /answers. • Increased scrutiny /accountability for police agencies. • Our need for better equipment capability, lower liability, lower complaints, and uses of force. • Many states currently debating /drafting legislation requiring LE agencies to wear them. It is inevitable that this will likely be required equipment by law enforcement in the near future. • Our department's problems with current system's performance /capability, as compared to the cost for that system. • Over 300 law enforcement agencies nationwide already use them. Purpose of the Cameras • Public Safety. • Officer Safety. • Reconstruction and recall of incidents and scenes. • Details of any incident from several vantage points from the officers and vehicles on scene. • Transparency /Accountability. • Additional ability to identify performance and /or training issues. • Job satisfaction. Research/ Case Studies on Impacts Rialto, CA- • Complaints against officers dropped 88 percent. • Use of Force by officers dropped 59 percent. • Significant decrease in civil and criminal cases. Orlando, FL- • Complaints against officers dropped 65 percent • Use of Force by officers dropped 53 percent • Significant decrease in civil and criminal cases Benefits to having the cameras • Lowers violence /confrontations against police officers . • Lower amounts of complaints, frivolous complaints. • Increased guilty pleas on criminal investigations ( reduced prosecution and defense resource /labor hours). • Lower time spent on Internal Investigations. • Lower litigations, and costs. • Lowers medical costs, L and I claims. (less confrontations) • Less impact on Fleet and TS (resources and labor hours). Tukwila PD Pilot Program — 2016 • Established Policy - national best practice, model policy from IACP, DOJ, other agencies. Reached agreement with unions. • 5 officers wore body cameras May —July 2016. • 5 officers, 5 vehicles (dash cameras) — December 2016 present, one of the first in WA state, piloting this specific equipment. • Both pilots were very successful. • Minimal issues problems installation, gathering video, through reproduction. • Officer /department feedback positive. Comparison- Axon Body Cameras versus current system. • Better /smaller technology • Improved coverage on incidents from all vantage points • Significantly better video quality. • Significantly improved storage, reproduction, and delivery. (discs versus link, cloud storage, etc.) • 3 pieces of equipment, body cam, vehicle, taser (CED),Iatest technology. • Upgrades on all equipment every 2.5 years, with the latest technology. • Cloud based, no additional technology infrastructure costs. • Current system, one TS employee spent 50 -70 percent of his time. Privacy / Public Disclosure • WA HB 2362, Public Disclosure requirements /protections. • Department policy already established when officers can and cannot record. • Department policy also dictates when officers are required to record. • WA 2 party consent state (may record when in official duty or in investigative purpose). • Records manager will determine what is produced based on applicable state and federal law. • Body Camera Policy reviewed /approved by the City Attorney. Current system video quality Axon in car video system quality Axon video body camera quality Investment /Costs • Capital costs • Licensing and storage costs • Public Disclosure Requests (labor /resources) • We currently spend approximately $60,000 per year for our current system (20- 25 in car camera systems, CED/Taser replacement) • $100,000 per year average for 50 officers cameras, 29 in car cameras, 50 new CED's (Tasers). • 153,352.00 first year capital cost includes equipment purchase. Department will use seizure funds to cover capital costs, 2018 cost increase ($40,000.00) • 98,892.00 for the following 4 years. • Possible amendment request of 40,000 per year to future budget cycles. AXON /Evidence.com Program Costs PC Hardware /Software /Services Price 74003 Axon FLEETw /Signal (2 camera) $ - 74001 AXON Body 2 $ 399.00 Evidence.com 6 -Bay Dock -All cameras $ 1,495.00 6 Bay Dock TAP $ 216.00 Officer Safety License (1 Year) $ 1,188.00 Unlimited License (1 Year) $ 948.00 Professional License (1 Year) $ 468.00 Standard License (1 Year) $ 300.00 Basic License (1 Year) $ 180.00 FLEET Unlimited License (1 Year) $ 1,188.00 RMS Integration License (User /Year) $ 180.00 85055 Axon Full Services (PS) $ 15,000.00 Taser CEW X26P or X2 KIT **All quotes are based on the agency making the purchase of the actual cameras and associated licenses. The mock quotations built with this tool are not legally binding. Officer S et Program u t §t Amount 29 50 19,950,00 10 $ 14,950.00 10 in #udod 50 $ 59,400.00 A 5 2,340.00 15 2,700,00 29 $ 34,452.00 A 0 $ 1 $ 15.000,00 50 Included 2017 $ 153,352.00 2018 $ 98.8_2.00 2019 $ 98,892,00 202 8,8 2, = 2021 $ 98,892,00 Total $ 548,920;00 Cameras & docks purchased in YR 1 Camera Warranty for length of contract TAP Camera Upgrade at 2.5 & 5yrs TAP Dock Upgrade at 2.5 & 5yrs Unlimited AXON Device Storage 20 GB /Licenses Non -Axon storage Docking Station Warranty 5 yr coverage All Pro -level Access to E.com CEWs, Holsters, Batteries& Warranties Included in the agreement • Unlimited replacement warranty for any equipment failure on all three devices. • Upgrades every 2.5 years with latest /newer technology. • Local support, AXON technical support in Seattle • Current system support, Houston. SUMMARY • Better quality equipment, newest technology. • Better performing technology and equipment. • Better storage and reproduction ability. • Minimal increase in investment /costs. Types of Body Worn Cameras • Glasses • Mounted on uniform shirt or pockets Vehicle /Equipment Demo City of Tukwila ... . ................ . ........... Allan Ekberg, Mayor TO: Public Safety Committee FROM: Rachel Bianchi, Communications and Government Relations Manager CC: Mayor Ekberg DATE: May 31, 2017 SUBJECT: Sustainability Goals for Fire Station Construction ISSUE With the assistance of Weinstein A+U, the Committee had an initial discussion on May 15, 2017 regarding potential sustainability goals associated with the construction of three new fire station. Staff is seeking direction from the Committee as to next steps, BACKGROUND The Weinstein A+U memo provided a comprehensive took at various • routes -w City could take regarding sustaina• ility in design and construction of the fire station rogra The memo covered potential certification programs such as LEED, examples of projec in neighboring jurisdictions that were cered, and alternatives to certification. The memo also included a recommendation section that indicated that funding will be a N river in the "intensity" of the City's sustainabi�lity goals, Per the discussion in committee on May 15, 2017, it was acknowledged that the costs of certification ailone can be in the $100,000 range, depending on which certification one Is seeking, and' that doesn't include the hard costs associated with constructing to that certification, Pursuing certification — such as LEED gold status — is one route for the City • consider to achieve its sustainability goals, However, staff is mindful as to the budget implications associated with this choice. The Pacific Northwest is known for its strong building, energy and other codes that positively affect sustainability-related issues. The City has a "do nothing" option that would still produce buildings that are mindful • energy and water use and have relatively low impacts on the environment. 12 However, the City also has the opportunity to find a more sustaina• ly middle • • • oo b • o d o o roun"I that is cnscius f cst ut als frwar-thinking in lng-term investments that cu save natural and financial resources. For instance, focus on energy efficiency woul have a positive impact on the long-term maintenance and operations budget of eac building, while also saving environmental impacts associated with operating an inefficient HVAC system. RECOMMENDATION Due to the budget implications associated with certification, and acknowledgement of the City's long-term desire to steward the environment and community, staff recommends the City choose the latter option of a sustainable middle ground. By providing Weinstein A+U with specific direction as to identifying sustainable features that will produce long-term financial and environmental savings, the City can have a 31 INFORMATIONAL MEMO Page 2 meaningful impact over the life of these bu�ildings, This direction will require Weinstien A+U and sub consultants to have a sustainabil Ity charrette and assess project sustainability elements at Schematic Design, Design Development, Construction Documents and project completion stages. Project fees outside of construction costs associated with this sustainability efforts range from $40,000 - $60,000. The Council is being asked to provide consensus on the above approach at the June 26, 2017 Committee • the Whole meeting. ATTACHMENTS Weinstein A+U Sustainability Memo W;QOV Info MemWSusta inability Memo 2 FINALdoc 38 EVALUATING THIRD PARTY GREEN BUILDING CERTIFICATION FO0TWKW|LARRE STATIONS MAY 9,20,17 Submitted by Weinstein A +U in collaboration with O'Brien and Company Introduction According to the Tukwila Comprehensive Plan, published )n2Dl5, the City uf Tukwila desires brbea community that prioritizes livability for its residents and responsible environmental stewardship for the benefit of future generations. |nthe execution of the Public Safety Program, the City now has a unique opportunity ho embody those priorities hmaset of buildings that will continue to serve Tukwila for the next 50 years or more. The design team for the new Tukwila Fire Stations, led by architecture firm Weinstein A+U,is delighted io assist the City incrafting new buildings that embody the cuibureoy the City, in addition to optimizing the operations of the Tukwila Fire Department. The design team recognizes that the City already has many critical goals directly related to susta|oab)|ity, such as low building operating costs, the use of materials that will continue toperform and be attractive for the |ifespanof the buildings, and promoting the health of the city's waterways, 0y choosing to fund high-performance buildings, not only will Tukwila support a healthier environment for all and save money over the life of the buildingis, but it will also provide resilient, restorative facilities for its first-responclers. A building that operates with minimal energy input will have an enhanced ability %o function in the event ofa natural disaster m, fuel shortage, running much longer than a conventional buHding when forced to use a back-up generator, Buildings that incorporate quality day||ghLUng strategies and high indoor air quality standards have been demonstrated to improve both the physical and mental health of their occupants, increasing worker productivity and reducing the number of sick days taken by employees. Lastly, cities that are growing at a rate such as Tukwila's have an opportunity to influence the quality of that growth by setting a good example with their public facilities. High-performance public buildings can be advertised as saving tax-payers money in the lmmgi term, but they can also further educate constituents about the varied benefits of sustainable design, inspiring consumers - and by extensiom, private developers - to value suistainable strategies in all types mfconstruction. Given the many benefits of choosing to pursue high sustainability goals for new public buildings, the purpose of this memo is to help the Tukwila City Council understand how Green Building Certification could help achieve those goals on their new fire stations, as well as adding further value to these projects. Why consider third party certification? Third party certification ofaproject's green building features provides three main benefits: accountability, public recognition, and better building performance. Accountability means that an owner can use third party certification to hold the design and construction team to established standards, and receive verification that those standards were met by an impartial outside entity. This leads to a transparency and comparability that allows public owners to communicate to constituents and stakeholders that they are providing a building of a certain standard, which can be compared to projects provided by other public entities using the s,ame certification system. The most direct value for owners from using a third-party certification is driving better building performance, Many certification programs are comprehensive, requiring projects to address numlMp|e environmental issues to a certain level in order to earn certification. This acts as a driver for owners and project teams to identify ways to improve all aspects of environmental sustainability addressed in a certification program. Third party certification also provides an additional, impartial metric for evaluating individual strategies for a project, allowing teams to determine which strategies will best achieve a given performance threshold within a project budget. Alternatives to third-party certification Third-party certification has an additional cost to the project and c�n, sometimes require projects to implement strategies that are not the best #t, There are other tools om owner can use tm achieve the accountability and building performance that third-party certifications provide. These tools can also be used in conjunction with a third-party certification tu assure a successful certification; however, they do not provide the same ability to promote a, project's achievements, or to understand how the project is performing compared to similar projects. • Contracting methods: Integrated Project Delivery, Design/Build with performance guarantee • Decision-making tools: Life-Cycle Cost Analysis and EnepgyBenchmark|mg • Verification tools: Monitoring-based commissioning, building envelope commissioning, Energy Star Portfolio Manager Regional Precedents Since third-party certifications for green building began to show up in the market in the late 1990s, many government entities of all sizes have looked to these outside resources to help set consistent, impartial standards for achieving environmental, climate, and performance goals for the assets they build and manage. According 10 the US Green Building Council's PubUic Policy Library, there are Currently 215 government policies in the US requiring some sort of green building certification for public buildings (searched 0510312017). These, stretch from the federal level to small and large cities and are in the East, South, Midwest, Southwest, and Western parts of the country. The following section highlights some of those policies relevant to the Pacific Northwest region, Federal, State, and LocadAxuoicipm/ Certification Requirements Federal Executive Order 13423, adopted in 2007, requires federal agencies to meet high-performance and sustainable building goals. Those goals have been translated into federal guidelines by the General Services Administration, who has endorsed both LEED and a version of Green Globes as tools for agencies tm prove compliance with the guidelines. Since 2OO5, Washington State has required that all major tad|ityprojectsofpub|icagenciea^ecei*ing funding ina state capitaU budget, or projects financed through afimancimg contract, be designed, constructed, and certified to at least the LEED Silver standard. RCW 39.35.Q40 also requires these projects to conduct a life-cycle cost analysis to evaluate energy efficiency options. King County's 2013 update to the Green Building and Sustainable Development Ordinance requires all eligible new construction projects to strive for LEED Platinum certification or, for non LEED-eligible projects, the highest level of certification available onan internal sustainable infrastructure scorecard or other approved third-party certification. Other approved programs include Built Green, Evergreen Sustainable Development Standard, Salmon Safe, and Living Building Challenge. City of Seattle's Sustainable Buildings and Sites Policy for municipal facilities requires new construction and major renovations 5,000 square feet or greater to meet LEED Gold, as well as key nil performance requirements for energy and water efficiency, waste diversion, and bicycle facilities. Seattle also has several private-sector incentive programs in place that provide fast track permitting, additional FAR, and additional height. The cities of Kirkland, Shoreline, Lynnwood, Bothell, Newcastle, and Redmond all have private-sector incentive programs for green building (fast-tnack permitting |s the most comrnon), but nmpolicy requirements for municipal buildings. Issaquah has Resolution 2084-ll, which requires LEEO Silver Vr Built-green 4-star. Non-applicable building types must refer to those systems for applicable green building practices but do not have to pursue certification. Certification Status for Fire Stations Locally and Nationally LEEDisbv far the most common certification pnog ram used bvagencies and municipalities for fire stations and related facilities. There are over 30}LEED certified fire facilities internationally and another 3OOregistered. Seventeen of the certified projects are in Washington, primarily inSeattle. Olympia, Vancouver, and Issaquah also have certified fire stations. Green Globes has a handful of certified fire stations across the US, none in Washington. Overall Green Globes has certified 53 buildings in Washington nf all types, many owned by federal agencies. Seattle Fire Station 2O, completed m20l4`is the highest rated LEED Platinum Fire Station certified. It is 9,400 sf with space for two apparatus and features a solar PV array, green stormwater infrastructure, durable low-maintenance materials, and high-efficiency glazing for daylight, sound control, and energy efficiency. |n2Q16|t earned the FJf.R.O. Honor and Seattle Design Excellence Awards. ° City of Eagan Public Safety Center in Minnesota was the first Green Globes certified fire station in 2011. The 38,0OOs[ building combined two, previous fire stations into one centralized location and also serves asa training center and dorm for volunteer fire fighters. It features aground source heat pump, dav|ighting and LED lights, and recycled materials. ~ City of Olympia Fire Station 4 was also completed |n20ll and earned LEED Gold. It is13,37Dst including some administrative space, and features aggressive insulation, heat exchangers, and a highly efficient HVAC system along with functional clayUghtimg design. This project won the National Fire Chief Station Style First Place award. When evaluating use of a third-party certification program, it is important to consider that there are a variety of options, including the most common system, Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEEU) by the U5 Green Building Council. Some address green building across multiple categories and some focus on one aspect of sustainability that may align best with an owner's goals. Comprehensive Environmento/Sustoinbility Certifications BfD ° Most widely recognized and accepted program; used by most municipal, county, and state policies for green building. ° Estimated $85,000 to $125,000 in administrative costs and certification fees per building, Some efficiencies for projects desigmedandbui8tatthesanmehnnebythesanmeteanns. wu��u/ �� ���' ° The latest version, LEEDv4, has a number of new credits that can drive better building performance, such as those for integrative process, whole building life-cycle assessment, green stormwater infrastructure, and advanced commissioning. ° LEED certification for similar buildings are likely to be one level lower in Version 4 than it would have been |n the previous version, e.g' L£EDv3 Gold building =LEEDv4 Silver building Green Globes • Criteria substantially similar to LEED, except no prerequisites and includes the ability' to determine which credit categories are applicable. • Uses surveys and on-site verification tnease documentation requirements. Access toverifier via phone and e-mail during design. • Estimated $60,000 - $80,000 in administration, verification, and certification fees. • All features of the program are required for LBC certification, and the features from three of six categories are required for Petal certification. Net Zero certification is available for buildings that produce l0S46of the energy they use Vnaw annual basis. • Requirements are high, e.g' net zero energy or net zero water, which results |nahigh performing building. - Performance verified after one year of continuous operations. ° $1S/]DO-$Z5,08Uin certification fees. Additional administrative costs could exceed LEGD costs. Certificutions Specific tomn Environmental Attribute Salmon Safe • Unique local program focused on regional issues of storm water management, water quality, habkatamd&sndscapenoanagement. • Requires recertification every five years to maintain recognition, Requirements customized in agreement between certifier and organization receiving certification. On-site verification. • Fees variable a�nd grants sometimes available. Less cost than LEEQ and Green G�obes. Energy Star • National, federal benchmadking program for buUd'ing energy and water efficiency, • Based an one year of performance data, verified bvamengineer. • No certification fees. Costs for verification, negotiated with verifier, ° New standard focused on health and weUbeimg. Developed and run bv for-profit "B° corporation with support from the US Green Building Council (also manages LEEO)and International Living Future Institute (also manages LBC). * Compatible with LEED and L8C, with a segment of overlapping requirements. * $,25,00O in certifications fees. Administrative costs stiII unknown. Recommendations Since the values of the City of Tukwila and the functional needs of the Tukwila Fire Department are both supported by the construction of high-performance fire stations, the design team strongly suggests that the City incorporate sustainability goals into it's Public Safety Program. The intensity of those goals and the decision how (or if) to certify those buildings will be largely determined by the available funding, In order to meet those goals, regardless of whether a third-party certification system is used: • Set specific measurable objectives for bui8d�ing performance and develop owner's project requirements (OPR) early )n the design phase. • Establish a fair method of verifying results to hold the project team accountable for achieving the project goals and requirements. • Engage commissioning professionals for both building systems and building envelope commissioning. Consider ongoing, monitoring-based commissioning. • Use Energy Star Portfolio Manager to benchmark and track building performance. Consider Energy Star building certification. |n considering whether to use a third-party certification system: • Understand how your project goals and desired suytaimabi|ity strategies align with what the system measures. Projects that follow the steps above and craft a strong approach to green building often are very easy tm certify, requiring limited adjustments mr additions to what was already planned. • Articulate what makes a certification valuable to this project soitisdearwxhatrheprmcessshou|d achieve - additional accountability, tools for public recognition and reporting, a higher level of building performance, etc. • Decide as early as possible if YOU Will proceed with a: certification to allow the project team to integrate the standards in the system into the design from the beginning. This minimizes possible additional costs for redesigning and backtracking tocoU;ect information. Timeline While it is most efficient for a design team to have established sustainability goals, to work with when going into the programming phase for a new building, we understand that the City mfTukwib^s priorities for it's new fire stations are still evolving. Before moving forward into the schematic design phase of the first station \n August 2Ol7, the programmatic needs and desires of both the fire department and city will need to be reconciled with the budgets that have been established for all three stations. Given that there is likely to be some modification of either budget or building scope that comes out of that reconciliation process, we recommend adding a desired level of sustainability performance lo that decision matrix. In order to facilitate those decisions, the clesign team will strive to organize our final building programs and subsequent cost enalysis into a set of options that will help the City choose which level of spending best aligns with it's highest priorities, For the City's part, it will be crucial to understand and finalize their priorities in the coming weeks so that a final decision on scope and budget can be made efficiently during the budget reconciliation period, which is currently scheduled for July 2017. �V xyu/z/ FIN Public Safety Committee Minutes .... ........ __ ......... ....... ... ____ ........ ........ ..... . ............. ...... . _ . , _ - - May 15, 2017 and reporting will fall on the construction contractor and construction management team on the projects, associated with implementation of a formal community workforce agreement, Since local/DBE hire is a Council priority, the Councit should make the decision about whether to direct resources to it. He restated an interest in finding a template agreement that could work in Tukwila. Councilmember McLeod asked how a 10-mile radius was decided for the local hire Uilot Q01i JJQ iiijoiijid JJIJ i J;,-j 'S is, 2! g4�*i %11 _Ili giltv W "I'A ill , ii ti i • from other jurisdictions. Councilmember Duffie spoke in favor of the proposal as a starting point for the City, The Committee did not reach a co on and requested that this topic return at a future meeting. RETURN TO COMMITTEE. C. Discussion on Public Safety Plan Susta inabilit oaks Staff is seeking direction from the Committee on sustainability goals and strategies with regard to the Public Safety Plan buildings program, The architect hired to design the three fire stations, Weinstein A+U, prepared information for the Committee on various options relating to sustainability goals including third party certification, energy benchmarking, life-cycle cost analysis, verification tools, and more. Weinstein A+U strongly recommends that the City incorporate sustainability goals into its buildings but decision making around this will be determined by available funding. They recommend that sustainability goats be factored into decision-making around the same time as programmatic features, since choices made in both areas will impact budget availability. Staff will work with Chair McLeod on direction for next steps for engaging the Committee and Council on this topic. RETURN TO COMMITTEE. D. Public 5afety Plan - Location of Fire Station 51 This item was postponed due to time constraints. E. 2017 111 Quarter Police Department Rgport: Chief Villa updated the Committee on items of interest from the Ill quarter of 2017, including staffing, recognitions, community outreach, significant operations, and events. The Committee requested a future update on the Police Department Strategic Plan, INFORMATION ONLY. aw— Committee Chair Approval Minutes by LH EV,