HomeMy WebLinkAboutPSPSAC 2017-07-26 Item 6B - Siting Process, Criteria and Potential PropertiesCOUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS
Initials
Meeting Date
Prepared 6y
Mayor's review
Council review
07/10/17
RB
Gil' C
171..0&
❑ Ordinance
Mtg Date
❑ BidAsvard
Mtg Date
❑ Public Hearing
Mtg Date
❑ Other
Mtg Date
CATEGORY II Discussion
Mtg Date
SPONSOR ❑Council
❑HR ❑DCD Finance Fire ❑TS ❑P &R ❑Police ❑Ply ❑Court
II Mayor
SPONSOR'S Staff and our program management team wish to provide the Council with an update on
SUMMARY the siting process for the Public Safety Plan, as well as key target dates and outcomes.
ITEM INFORMATION
ITEM No.
1 ®5
STAFF SPONSOR: RACHEL BIANCHI
ORIGINAL AGENDA DATE: 07/10/17
AGENDA ITEM TITLE
Public Safety Plan Siting Update
07/10/17
❑ Motion
Mtg Date
❑ Resolution
Mtg Date
❑ Ordinance
Mtg Date
❑ BidAsvard
Mtg Date
❑ Public Hearing
Mtg Date
❑ Other
Mtg Date
CATEGORY II Discussion
Mtg Date
SPONSOR ❑Council
❑HR ❑DCD Finance Fire ❑TS ❑P &R ❑Police ❑Ply ❑Court
II Mayor
SPONSOR'S Staff and our program management team wish to provide the Council with an update on
SUMMARY the siting process for the Public Safety Plan, as well as key target dates and outcomes.
REVIEWED BY ❑ C.O.W. Mtg. ❑ CDN Comm ❑ Finance Comm.
❑ Trans &Infrastructure ❑ Arts Comm. ❑ Parks Comm.
DATE: N/A COMMITTEE CHAIR:
II Public Safety Comm.
❑ Planning Comm.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
SPONSOR /ADMIN.
COMMITTEE
Mayor's Office
COST IMPACT / FUND SOURCE
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED
$ $
Fund Source:
Comments:
MTG. DATE
RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION
07/10/17
MTG. DATE
ATTACHMENTS
07/10/17
Informational Memorandum dated 06/29/17
Draft Site Selection process
Site celertinn criteria matrix (3) approved thru consensus at 5/22 C.O.W.
1 ®5
TO:
FROM:
CC:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City of Tukwila
Allan Ekberg, Mayor
INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
City Council — Committee of the Whole
Rachel Bianchi, Communications and Government Relations Manager
Mayor Ekberg
June 29, 2017
Public Safety Plan Site Acquisition Process Update
ISSUE
To secure sites for the new facilities proposed by the Public Safety Plan, the City has engaged
Shiels Obletz Johnsen (SOJ) and Heartland, LLC, to lead the City's land search and acquisition
process. The Administration proposed to provide an update to the Council on the progress
made thus far, and the schedule for future activities.
BACKGROUND
Pursuant to Site Selection Criteria approved by the Council, and with the guidance of the
FACETS report, SOJ and Heartland have begun the process to identify possible sites for the
City's new public facilities, including the Justice Center, Fire Stations 52 and 54, and the Public
Works Shop. The Siting Advisory Committee (SAC) will monitor and guide the process. SOJ
and Heartland will attend the SAC'S meetings each month to provide updates and incorporate
the Committee's input. Based on early consultation with City staff and the operational needs of
these facilities, Heartland has developed a map showing the general search areas for each
facility. SOJ will share the proposed sequence of activities related to land acquisition. This
includes a recommendation for the following Council review dates:
July 10:
August 7:
August 10:
September 5:
September 5:
September --
November:
Overview presentation on Site Selection Process and Search Area Map.
Potential executive session meeting for review and input on Medium
List of properties.
Open House #2 at Fire Station 54
Potential executive session to review and approve Short List of
properties.
Potential open session to consider Eminent Domain resolution for
Short List properties. Authorize broker to begin negotiations.
Potential regular executive session meetings to discuss deal terms on
particular properties.
RECOMMENDATION
The Council is asked to provide any feedback on the search areas and activity schedule.
ATTACHMENTS
Map of search areas
Site Selection Process
42 107
Public Works Area
FIRE
STATION
#53
NMI
City of Tukwila
SEARCH AREA
r A
Justice
Center
Area
Justice Center
Fire Station
Public Works
Fire Station Area
518
405
Justice
Center
Area
PLANNED
FIRE STATION #51
Tukwila Public Safety Plan
Draft Site Selection Process, v. 6 (rev. 6/28/17)
May 2017:
1. Broker selection, NTP.
June 2017:
2. Collect and analyze parcel, environmental, listing and other data in a GIS platform
3. Import FACETS data
July 2017:
4. SOJ & Heartland work with City staff to generate "Long List" of site options. Initial screening
against Operational Requirements to create "Medium List."
5. July 10, 7 pm: SOJ and Heartland provide overview presentation on site selection
process /progress to Council.
6. July 10 — August 7: Additional analysis and data collection on Medium List. Measure against
Council- approved screening criteria.
7. July 26, 6 :00 pm: SOJ and Heartland present site selection criteria and process to Siting
Advisory Committee.
August 2017:
8. August 7, 7 pm: Potential City Council Executive Session to present Medium List for review
and input.
9. August 8 — September 5: Heartland develop rough cost estimates for top - ranked properties.
10. August 10, 5:30 -7:30 pm: Open House #2 at Fire Station 54
11. August 23, 6 :00 pm: Update and consultation with Siting Advisory Committee.
September 2017:
12. September 5: 7:00 pm: Potential City Council Executive Session to review Short List
13. September 5: City Council may consider, in open session, and adopt Eminent Domain
resolutions for all Short List Properties. Authorize Heartland to begin negotiations with property
owners.
14. September 2716:011 pm: Update and consultation with Siting Advisory Committee.
September — November:
15. Heartland to initiate negotiations with selected property owners.
a. Potential regular discussions with City Council in Executive Session.
16. Heartland work with City's legal counsel to draft negotiated purchase and sale agreements
44 111
15- May -17
Red Indicates Essential Component
EVALUATION CRITERIA - FIRE STATIONS
1. City Operational Requirements - Must Have
a. Location within Response Time Polygon
b. Parcel Size, Environmental Conditions
c. Parking Needs
d. Multiple Entry Points
Site Selection Criteria, v.6
Public Safety Plan Facilities
Fire Station Criteria
Site Alternatives - Fire Stations
Station 52 Station 54
#1
For Illustration only
CU
Lu
3900 S Example Street
Illustration
5
5
2 #3 #4 #5
6
e. Site meets same standards required for an EOC
f. Neighborhood Considerations
g. Location of utilities and infrastructure
h. Ongoing operating expenses
Subtotal out of possible 16:
2. City Policy Requirements /Guidance
a. Benefit to Public Safety
b. Commitment to Customer Service
c. Ensuring the Efficient Delivery of Customer Service
d. Containing Development Costs
- Ensure ability to deliver all promised facilities
e. Mindfulness of Ongoing Operations Expenses
f. Importance of Location
g. Significance of Flexibility
h. Opportunities for innovation
Subtotal:
3. Public Desires
a. Include meeting rooms available to community
b. Make fire stations easier to find
4. Site Details
a. Parcel Size
b. Building size
Subtotal:
Total Score
c. Parking capacity public
d. Parking capacity - equipment
5. Costs
a. Purchase Option - applied to purch price, not in total
b. Purchase Price
43,560
12,500
c. Due Diligence
d. Site Modifications
e. Building Modifications
f. New Construction
$1,500,000
Total Costs
$1,500,000
Legend: Requirements
Mil NO
5 Acceptable
Optimal
Policy/Public
1 -3 Unfavorable
4 -6 Neutral
7 -9 Favorable
113
45
0
0
46
15- May -17
Red Indicates Essential Component
Site Address
EVALUATION CRITERIA - JUSTICE CENTER
Site Selection Criteria, v.6
Public Safety Plan Facilities
Justice Center Criteria
Site Alternatives - Justice Center
City Operational Requirements - Must Have
a. Police Requirements
#1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 149
For Illustration Only
Illustration
Only
. Parcel accommodates building footprint, space
requirements, environmental conditions
ii. Secure parking for 80 PD vehicles
iii. Secure parking for PD equipment
iv. Secure parking for evidence vehicles (optional)
v. Outdoor training area
vi. EOC Requirement: microwave communications equip
vii. EOC Requirement: seismic, flood plain
viii. EOC Req: fuel storage for emergency generator
ix. Multiple access points, min 2 streets
x. Proximity of high frequency transit
b. Court Requirements
i. Parcel accommodates building footprint & requirements
ii. Public parking needs: 150 spaces
iii. Secure parking for staff /judge: 15 spaces
iv. Community /meeting room for 50, flex configuration
v. High Frequency Transit - scored above
5
5
0
above
above
Subtotal out of possible 28: 65
2. City Policy Requirements /Guidance
a. Benefit to Public Safety
b. Commitment to Customer Service
c. Ensuring the Efficient Delivery of Customer Service
d. Containing Development Costs
- Ensure ability to deliver all promised facilities
e. Mindfulness of Ongoing Operations Expenses
f. Importance of Location
g. Significance of Flexibility
h. Opportunity to catalyze private developments
i. Opportunities for future expansion
j. Location of utilities and infrastructure
k. Ongoing operating expenses
1. Opportunities for innovation
3. Public Desires
i. Expandability to accommodate future needs
Subtotal:
ii. Security for the public and the staff
iii. Nearby transit access
iv. Opportunity to enhance a neighborhood
v. Cost of the overall facility
vi. Sustainabilityfenvironmental concerns
vii. Conference rooms available to the public
viii. Close to roadways, city buildings, businesses
ix. Far from residential areas
Subtotal:
Total Score
4. Site Details
a. Existing Building?
b. Parcel Size
c. Building size
d. Parking capacity - public
e. Parking capacity secure
. walking distance to transit (feet)
g. Transit frequency (every xx minutes)
5. Costs
0
0
0
65
YES
120,000
45,000
175
20
675
15
0
0
above
above
above
above
above
above
0
above
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
a. Purchase Option - applied to purch price, not in total
b. Purchase Price
c. Due Diligence
d. Site Modifications
e. Building Modifications
f. New Construction
$5,699,000
Total Costs $5,699,004 $0
$o $o $0 $0
Legend: Requirements Policy /Public
NO 1 -3 Unfavorable
5 Acceptable 4 -6 Neutral
Optimal 7 -9 Favorable
115
Site Selection Criteria, v.6
Public Safety Plan Facilities
Public Works Facility Criteria
15- May -17 Site Alternatives - Public Works Facility
Red Indicates Essential Component
EVALUATION CRITERIA - PUBLIC WORKS FACILITY
1. City Operational Requirements - Must Have
a. Parcel accommodates building footprint, space
requirements, environmental conditions
b. Location
c. Reserve power, fuel storage
d. Expansion capability
e. Location of utilities and infrastructure
f. Ongoing operating expenses
g. Site meets same standards required for an EOC
h. Adequate Parking
#1
Example Site
3900 S Example Street
2 #3 #4 #5 #E
Illustration
Only
Subtotal out of possible 14: 39
2. City Policy Requirements /Guidance
a. Benefit to Public Safety
b. Commitment to Customer Service
c. Ensuring the Efficient Delivery of Customer Service
d. Containing Development Costs
- Ensure ability to deliver all promised facilities
e. Mindfulness of Ongoing Operations Expenses
f. Importance of Location
g. Significance of Flexibility
h. Opportunities for innovation
Subtotal:
3. Public Desires
i. Expandability to accommodate future needs
ii. Sustainability /environmental concerns
iii. Opportunity to enhance a neighborhood
iv. Central location
v. Access to new public spaces
vi. Facilities sharing a site
Subtotal:
Total Score
39
4. Site Details
a. Parcel Size
225,000
b. Building size
c. Parking capacity - public
n/a
27
d. Parking capacity - equipment
13
5. Costs
a. Purchase Option - applied to purch price, not in total
b. Purchase Price
c. Due Diligence
$2,600,000
d. Site Modifications
e. Building Modifications
. New Construction
Total Costs $2,600,000
Legend: Requirements Policy /Public
NO 1 -3 Unfavorable
S Acceptable 4 -6 Neutral
Optimal 7 -9 Favorable
117
47