Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTIC 2017-08-15 COMPLETE AGENDA PACKETCity of Tukwila Transportation and Infrastructure Committee ❖ Kate Kruller, Chair ❖ Joe Duffie ❖ De'Sean Quinn Distribution: K. Kruller J. Duffie D. Quinn D. Robertson Mayor Ekberg D. Cline L. Humphrey B. Giberson R. Tischmak G. Labanara P. Brodin R. Turpin A. Youn Clerk File Copy 2 Extra Place pkt pdf on Z:\Trans & Infra Agendas e-mail cover to: A. Le, C. O'Flaherty, K. Kruller, D. Robertson, D. Almberg, B. Saxton, S. Norris, L. Humphrey AGENDA TUESDAY, AUGUST 15, 2017 — 5:30 PM FOSTER CONFERENCE ROOM — 6300 BUILDING Item Recommended Action Page 1. PRESENTATION(S) 2. BUSINESS AGENDA a) Transportation Demand Management Plan a) Information Only Pg. 1 Plan Update b) 2018 Overlay and Repair Program b) Forward to 8/21/17 Pg. 19 Design Consultant Selection and Agreement Regular Consent Agenda c) Tukwila Comprehensive Plan c) Forward to 8/28/17 C.O.W. Pg. 33 Transportation Element Update and 9/5/17 Regular d) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) d) Committee Approval Pg. 55 Municipal Stormwater Capacity Grant Application 3. SCATBd 4. MISCELLANEOUS 5. ANNOUNCEMENTS Future Agendas: Next Scheduled Meeting: Tuesday, August 29, 2017 S. The City of Tukwila strives to accommodate individuals with disabilities. Please contact the Public Works Department at 206-433-0179 for assistance. TO: FROM: BY: City of Tukwila Allan Ekberg, Mayor INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM Transportation and Infrastructure Committee Jack Pace, Department of Community Development Director Valerie Lonneman, TDM Coordinator Maggie Lubov, CTR Coordinator CC: Mayor Ekberg DATE: August 11, 2017 SUBJECT: Transportation Demand Management Plan ISSUE Staff are currently circulating a draft version of the Transportation Demand Management (TD Plan for review among City staff and partner agencies. Staff will bring the final draft to the Committee in September for review and consideration for adoption by resolution. BACKGROUND Tukwila's TDM Program continues to strive to improve non drive -alone transportation options in Tukwila. The program has expanded its scope in recent years to encompass more than commute trips, in keeping with State and Federal direction. The TDM Plan provides guidance for the City's TDM Program and our partners to enhance and expand transportation access for everyone who lives, works, or spends time in Tukwila. The Tukwila TDM Plan: Provides background information on the Program for future implementers Outlines the current focus of the Tukwila TDM Program Suggests strategies for enhancing the Tukwila TDM Program in the future In a field that is rapidly changing, the Tukwila Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Plan will provide structure for the Program, while allowing it to be nimble and develop new approaches to outreach, programming, performance methodology, and scope in the years to come. DISCUSSION The draft plan is available on SharePoint to anyone who would like the opportunity to review it prior to the September Transportation and Infrastructure Committee meeting. FINANCIAL IMPACT The TDM Plan is being developed through the CTR Allocation, with no impact to the General Fund, RECOMMENDATION Information Only. ATTACHMENTS TDM Plan Executive Summary (Draft) 1 City of Tul Transportation Demand Manage erg Plan 2017-2024 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY [The Executive Summary will be incorporated into the final TDM Plan] 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Tukwila Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Plan provides an overview of past TDM activities conducted through the City of Tukwila TDM Program (formerly the Commute Trip Reduction Program) and outlines potential for future growth. Tukwila is a centrally located city in the Puget Sound region that is easily accessed by private motor vehicles and some transit lines, yet is divided by geographic and infrastructure barriers, making it difficult to navigate by bike or foot. Tukwila's relatively large daytime population (between 150,000 and 170,000 compared to 20,000 nighttime/residential population in a 2012 estimate') is largely due to its regionally -designated commercial and manufacturing/industrial centers. The geographic features and influx of daytime employees and visitors to the city pose unique challenges and opportunities for mobility management. The TDM Program offers support to encourage those who live, work, and/or spend time in Tukwila to try new modes of travel and take advantage of services, amenities, and infrastructure, such as the new bicycle and pedestrian bridge (to open in fall/winter 2017), which will span the Green-Duwamish River, connecting Tukwila Station to the Urban Center. In this way, the TDM Program can help improve mobility and connectivity in the Urban Center, Tukwila International Boulevard, and the city as a whole, as envisioned in the City's Comprehensive Plan (adopted in 1995, revised in 2015). Tukwila is a city in which a variety of transportation options are widely known and easy to access. Active transportation by foot or bike is easy, safe, and commonplace, and transit and car sharing provide increased flexibility and spontaneity to mobility. Despite increased population density and an expanding commercial sector, the widely adopted use of alternative transportation modes helps mitigate vehicular congestion on main arterials and regional connectors, allowing for efficient use of roadways for freight, transit, and other vehicles. As a result, Tukwila is able to achieve its greenhouse gas emissions reduction goals and the city and region benefit from improved air quality. 'City of Tukwila Strategic Plan, 2012 3 Purpose of the P an The Tukwila Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Plan provides guidance for the City's TDM Program and our partners to enhance and expand transportation access for everyone who lives, works, or spends time in Tukwila. The Tukwila TDM Plan: • Provides background information on the Program for future implementers • Outlines the current focus of the Tukwila TDM Program • Suggests strategies for enhancing the Tukwila TDM Program in the future Why coes Tu<wi a neer a IDM P an? Tukwila is one of many Puget Sound jurisdictions experiencing rapid and sustained growth. As the transportation networks in Tukwila and the Puget Sound region strain to keep up with demand, TDM offers an alternative approach to help people travel around the region without widening roads. This method has many positive externalities beyond improving the efficiency of transportation systems and saving capital funds, including improved quality of life, public health benefits, and reduced greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Benefits of TDM TDM offers supplemental transportation management strategies that can positively impact all of the following objectives,2 often without modifying the transportation network or provision of services: • Congestion Reduction • Road & Parking Savings • Consumer Savings (vehicle and fuel costs) • Transportation Mode Choice • Road Safety • Environmental Protection • Efficient Land Use • Community Livability Regulatory or infrastructure expansion strategies to manage demand often do not meet all of these objectives, and indeed may be counterproductive. For example, widening roads does not positively affect any of the objectives listed above other than congestion reduction, which is often short-lived'. The degree to which these objectives are supported by TDM programs is determined by which TDM strategies are implemented in a given area or community. Potential strategies include: • Improve the transportation options available to consumers • Educate and provide incentives use alternative modes and reduce drive -alone travel • Expand/improve bicycling and pedestrian infrastructure • Support strategic land use objectives (create compact, connected urban neighborhoods) • Reduce the need for travel through transportation substitutes (e.g. flex schedule, telework) 2 TDM Encyclopedia, Impact Evaluation Table https://www.vtpi.org/tdm/tdm5l.htm accessed June 6, 2017 3 Generated Traffic and Induced Travel: Implications for Transport Planning Victoria Transport Policy Institute, April 20, 2017 4 • Support policy and institutional reforms (e.g. parking management, road pricing systems) TDM implementers are limited as to which strategies they can implement depending on the organization's size, mission, and funding sources and on what strategies are appropriate based on the characteristics of the area(s) they serve. Some TDM strategies have been be excluded from the Tukwila TDM Plan for this reason; other strategies were modified as necessary. For example, the Tukwila TDM Program is not a transportation service provider and therefore does not directly influence service provision, however staff engage with existing service providers to express the needs of the community and advocate for improvements to service. ETEMN 5 policy =ramewor< The need for improved mobility in Tukwila has been addressed in various City plans and strategies. The Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) and Growth and Transportation Efficiency Center (GTEC) Plans laid the foundation for the TDM Plan. TDM -supportive policy is also included in many other City documents including the Tukwila Strategic Plan, Comprehensive Plan, Walk and Roll Plan, Southcenter Subarea Plan, Transit Plan, and the Shoreline Master Program. Additional support for policies that enhance non -drive - alone mobility is found in City analysis of greenhouse gas emissions. The Tukwila TDM Plan expands on the work of these plans by identifying near-term strategies that the TDM Program can implement to contribute to alleviating congestion and improving air quality in the City. Goal & Overview oObjectives/Strategies Overarching Mission of the Tukwila TDM Plan: Expand the focus of the Tukwila TDM Program to address all trips in order to increase the percentage of non -drive alone trips, reduce vehicle miles traveled and greenhouse gas emissions, and promote the use of non -motorized transportation in Tukwila and the region as they experience growth. Goals of the Tukwila TDM Plan: • Strategy 1.1 Enhance awareness of the Tukwila/South King County Transportation Options TDM Program. • Strategy 1.2 Implement best practices in the TDM field as feasible. • Strategy 1.3 Maintain thorough and easily accessible records to build on past efforts and increase competitiveness for funding. • Strategy 1.4 Develop and strengthen partnerships to expand services and leverage funding. • Strategy 2.1 Refine outreach strategies to improve participation and outcomes. • Strategy 2.2 Collaborate with advocacy groups, employers, and City departments to enhance active transportation programming and infrastructure in Tukwila. • Strategy 3.1 Advocate for improved transit service for all. 6 P • Strategy 3.2 Improve first- and last -mile connections. • Strategy 3.3 Address inequities in the transportation system. an Hp ementation The Tukwila TDM Plan emphasizes a flexible approach to TDM implementation to allow for adaptation to an ever -evolving transportation network and best management practices. Appendix D of the TDM Plan, "Tukwila TDM Plan Implementation and Annual Review Table" outlines levels of implementation for the strategies based on three funding -level scenarios. The Plan was adopted by Resolution and may be updated as necessary through the addition or revision of appendices. In order to minimize time taken away from program implementation it is recommended that the Plan be updated within the eight-year Plan horizon in the following ways: • Annually: Complete implementation and annual review table as a tool to track progress and develop work plans • Four-year midpoint (2020): revise implementation table to update implementation actions based on current conditions Conc USI©n Tukwila's TDM Program has expanded its scope in recent years to encompass more than commute trips, in keeping with State and Federal direction. In a field that is rapidly changing, the TDM Plan will provide structure for the Program, while allowing it to be nimble and develop new approaches to outreach, programming, performance methodology, and scope. 7 Tukwila TDM Plan Implementation and Annual Review Table u Fu H t e taD e tnrouugnouut uummD emer tatvon for. d'eas on iOV-\ eva uat on score an" ua y to trac<mFD l Program en trance the TD l rogram. DroPless over thine, Strategy 1.1 Enhance awareness of the Tukwila/South King County Transportation Options TDM Program ) ofilkoki Implementation Actions by Funding Level (activities for medium and high-level funding build on lower -levels) Evaluation Score Tactics Low: CTR allocation only Moderate: CTR allocation + additional funding (2+ FTE) High: CTR allocation + additional funding (3+ FTE) (1 for low, 2 for moderate, 3 for high) Employ a variety of outreach tactics including in-person, media outlets, and web presence Commute Trip Reduction Outreach; miscellaneous transportation services Participation in many community and other events; maintain updated City website TDM Page and City social media sites Robust outreach program for all trips; independent program website developed; use of printed media and radio to promote programs/incentives Provide internal reports on events, achievements, programs Bi -weekly report Grant -required analysis and reporting; circulate internally and use for grant applications; supplemental implementation checklist (annually) Additional data analysis/research conducted re: program status, achievements, and performance measurement Present aspects of the program to Council/Commissions as appropriate Present for renewal of WSDOT allocation or as necessary for CTR ordinance updates Occasional presentations to inform commissions on program elements Regular reports on program performance w Strategy 1.2 Implement best practices in the TDM field as feasible Implementation Actions by Funding Level Tactics Low: CTR allocation only Moderate: CTR allocation + additional funding (2+ FTE) High: CTR allocation + additional funding (3+ FTE) Review and assess data regularly throughout program implementation and adjust strategies as appropriate Biennial assessment of CTR site surveys; Encouragement and support for more robust employer programs; Review Rideshareonline.com (or other trip logging platform) data annually; Include flexible language in grant/funding applications that allows for changes in implementation and performance assessment over time Review additional transportation data regularly, collect and assess qualitative feedback at events, require mini -grant recipients to report on use of amenities, require any sub -contractors to report feedback regularly; Incorporate feedback to improve ongoing outreach/implementation Develop new measurement methodologies to enhance analysis and inform innovative implementation techniques Apply behavior change models Stay up to date through newsletters, meetings and apply as feasible into work with ETCs Research best methods and apply as feasible into program Develop robust strategies to incorporate into outreach Apply multi -modal level of service (LOS) methodologies Provide CTR survey data to inform infrastructure project prioritization Advocate for use of multi- modal LOS as a measurement tool Assist with the development of multi -modal LOS methodology for City; incorporate into TDM Program data collection and analysis Strategy 1.3 Maintain thorough and easily accessible records to build on past efforts and increase competitiveness for funding Implementation Actions by Funding Level Tactics Low: CTR allocation only Moderate: CTR allocation + additional funding (2+ FTE) High: CTR allocation + additional funding (3+ FTE) Maintain an organized record of programs including qualitative and quantitative data and success of performance measures Maintain an organized catalog of CTR site survey data; Make a record of work/discussion with employers to enhance programs for institutional knowledge Ensure that required reports are thorough (include both quantitative and qualitative data) and organized Develop regular reports to track progress Highlight the relationship of the TDM Program elements to City and regional goals, priorities, and initiatives Reference supportive City documents (e.g. Comprehensive Plan, Walk and Roll Plan, CTR Plan, GTEC Plan, Transit Plan, etc.) in reports to CTR Board and CTR Program Work Plans Reference supportive City documents in presentations to elected officials, in grant applications, and in other relevant documents Conduct analysis of City goals, priorities, strategies, initiatives, etc. to inform Program implementation; Advocate for TDM-related elements to be included in capital planning and other City programs Catalogue old documents for reference Maintain an organized catalog of grant applications, reports, and other deliverables Collaborate with relevant City departments Collaborate with Planning Division to identify and regulate CTR-affected employers and TMP sites Collaborate with Public Works, Parks, Economic Development, Planning, and others on small capital improvement program implementation; Participate in multi-departmental transportation meetings Engage with relevant departments/divisions in negotiation and advocacy to transportation service providers and other mobility- related agencies; expand conversations with other departments to coordinate efforts and encourage implementation of larger capital projects - trail projects, bike lanes, wayfinding plan; seek grant funding that can help implement projects from other departments Strategy 1.4 Develop and strengthen partnerships to expand services and leverage funding Implementation Actions by Funding Level Tactics Low: CTR allocation only Moderate: CTR allocation + additional funding (2+ FTE) High: CTR allocation + additional funding (3+ FTE) Explore opportunities to implement regional TDM initiatives at a local level Maintain relationships with regional implementers and collaborate as feasible on training, resources, etc. Develop partnerships with agencies to implement portions of regional grants (e.g. Regional Mobility Grants); Expand TDM to other jurisdictions as feasible Robust implementation of regional grants; Explore formation of a Transportation Management Association Contract with social service agencies to provide targeted outreach, education, and assistance N/A Develop modest partnerships to enhance implementation (e.g. Hopelink Diverse Communities Contract with one employee) Sub-contract for larger project components and more robust implementation as feasible (e.g. sub-contract with agency to employ several staff) Collaborate with transportation providers on outreach and expansion of services within Tukwila and South King County Establish communication channels with outreach staff (from Sound Transit and King County Metro) to coordinate outreach and help spread service announcements, etc. (e.g. invite ORCATo Go and Lift staff to all outreach events to coordinate services) Develop opportunities to enhance communication between transportation provider staff and community members (e.g. community meetings, resource fairs, etc.) Expand partnerships to provide complimentary active transportation infrastructure Participate in national, state, and local organizations, and in implementer groups Participation in TAG, TDM Steering Committee, WSRO, and ACT (attend meetings, limited conferences), subscribe to agency newsletters, TDM listsery Enhanced participation in TAG, TDM Steering Committee, South King County Mobility Coalition, WSRO, and ACT (working groups, some conferences, etc.) Engage with transportation- related non-profits, city commissions, community organizations Average Score for Goal 1 (add scores from each tactic and divide by 14) /14 = 10, 00000211moure fir�rt�mrri Strategy 2.1 Refine outreach strategies to improve participation and outcomes Implementation Actions by Funding Level Evaluation Score Tactics Low: CTR allocation only Scoring: 1 for low, 2 for moderate, 3 for high High: CTR allocation + additional funding (3+ FTE) Scoring: 1 for low, 2 for moderate, 3 for high Conduct general public outreach Attend City and community events to provide transportation information as feasible Partner to host and attend events/resource fairs Perform targeted site -visits to smaller community groups (e.g. Churches, neighborhood groups, etc.) Provide TDM training and services to employers, organizations, schools, etc. Focus on CTR -affected sites Provide a menu of TDM services for smaller organizations and publicize widely Develop relationships with contacts at agencies and learn about potential for TDM activities at individual sites Practice authentic engagement (i.e. develop relationships with stakeholders, feedback loops, etc.) As feasible Engage at community -led events, provide the results of surveys to participants, and incorporate community feedback into future programs as feasible Dedicate outreach staff for this purpose Strategy 2.2 Collaborate with advocacy groups, employers, and City departments to enhance active transportation programming and infrastructure in Tukwila Implementation Actions by Funding Level Tactics Low: CTR allocation only Moderate: CTR allocation + additional funding (2+ FTE) High: CTR allocation + additional funding (3+ FTE) Implement small capital improvements as feasible N/A Allocate a portion of the funding to small capital improvements (e.g. mini -grant program, leverage city projects, etc.) Expand small capital improvements budget as feasible; if administering mini - grant program, accept applications on a rolling basis to allow time for word-of- mouth to solicit participation Improve non -motorized wayfinding throughout the city, with a focus on the Urban Center and Tukwila International Boulevard Encourage employers to make signage improvements around their facilities Explore opportunities to install wayfinding signs; coordinate with Economic Development Dept. on signage in the TUC Assist with implementation of recommendations in the Walk and Roll Plan, Street Smart Duwamish TMA Way -Finding, and CTR Plan Support biking/pedestrian events Forward announcements for rides/walks and events to ETCs Amplify outreach regarding rides/walks and events throughout Tukwila and South King County; host stations and attend events as feasible (e.g. Bike Everywhere Day Celebration Station) Sponsor/coordinate events Solicit feedback on barriers to active transportation Include active transportation questions in biennial CTR program report Include questions in surveys to general public and non -CTR affected sites Conduct outreach along bike routes, collaborate with active transportation advocacy organizations to assess needs and barriers Average Score for Goal 2 (add scores from each tactic and divide by 7) /7 = Strategy 3.1 Advocate for improved transit service for all 11th ordoliu Implementation Actions by Funding Level Evaluation Score Tactics Low: CTR allocation only Moderate: CTR allocation + additional funding (2+ FTE) High: CTR allocation + additional funding (3+ FTE) Scoring: 1 for low, 2 for moderate, 3 for high Apply for or support applications/requests for alternative service provision Provide letter(s) of support Assist others with application/program development and implementation as feasible Apply as lead applicant or joint applicant, or provide higher level of support for planning and implementation Gather information regarding the demand for service improvements and relay to transportation providers Record information from outreach and CTR survey Partner with social service agencies to assess needs and barriers; include relevant questions in Program surveys Work with transportation providers to identify funding and develop services to address needs and barriers Strategy 3.2 Improve first- and last -mile connections Implementation Actions by Funding Level Tactics Low: CTR allocation only Moderate: CTR allocation + additional funding (2+ FTE) High: CTR allocation + additional funding (3+ FTE) Explore potential for and promote bike shares, vanpool/carpool, ridesharing options, shuttles, etc. Provide information on third - party transportation services to ETCs Collaborate with other City Divisions to solicit enhanced service provision in Tukwila (e.g. Lyft/Uber) Develop tailored ridesharing apps for employers or locations Provide resources to enhance public awareness of options Provide information to ETCs and others about existing alternative transportation modes and how to use them Advocate for real-time arrival display at all bus stops; Partner with transit agencies and others to provide real- time transportation information displays throughout the city (e.g. Transit Screen display) Fund real-time transportation options information screens; develop Tukwila-specific printed transportation materials (e.g. bike/walk map) and distribute widely Strategy 3.3 Address inequities in the transportation system Implementation Actions by Funding Level Tactics Low: CTR allocation only Moderate: CTR allocation + additional funding (2+ FTE) High: CTR allocation + additional funding (3+ FTE) Identify and address specific barriers to transportation resources/services to historically underserved and vulnerable populations Encourage ETCs to identify and address barriers to mode choice (e.g. ADA compliance, active transportation facilities, individualized trip planning, etc.) Engage in City work on transportation equity; partner with social service agencies (e.g. Hopelink) to improve equitable design of programs Sub-contract with equity professional to assess barriers and develop strategies for addressing inequities in mobility within Tukwila Advance pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure improvement projects; ensure that all skill and ability levels are provided for Ensure that any site improvements are ADA accessible and encourage employers to consider all levels of comfort and ability in provision of workplace amenities and services Advocate for improvements that meet the needs of all comfort levels and abilities (such as multi-lingual wayfinding signage, separated bike facilities, connectivity, etc.) Engage with various City departments to design and install active transportation infrastructure Continually refine outreach strategies to improve participation rates of special needs and vulnerable populations Work with ETCs to provide a range of assistance/amenities to ensure that the schedules and unique needs of all employees are considered in programming Assess outreach/programming data to determine what demographics are not participating at levels that represent their population and implement varied approaches to try to improve participation rates Use an equity lens framework to apply to all aspects of planning and implementation; Develop programs/incentives that reach target populations Average Score for Goal 3 (add scores from each tactic and divide by 7) /7 = ter scoring and uaveIIrua itII' g t e scores for euac n tactllc, use tie fo owing to assess w iere funding and priority Have been placed thus ear and IHekp determine tlHe program's direction for the coming year, Goal 1: Establish the Tukwila TDM Program as a visible, customer focused, and results -oriented program. Average score: Areas of strength: Weaknesses: Threats: Opportunities: General comments: Goal 2: Enhance the provision of information about travel choices to all who live, work, or spend time in Tukwila. Average score: Areas of strength: Weaknesses: Threats: Opportunities: General comments: Goal 3: Improve equitable access to transportation options in Tukwila and the region. Average score: Areas of strength: Weaknesses: Threats: Opportunities: General comments: City of Tukwila Public Works Department - Bob Giberson, Director INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM TO: Transportation and Infrastructure Committee FROM: Bob Giberson, Public Works Director BY: CC: David Sorensen, Project Manager Mayor Ekberg DATE: August 11, 2017 SUBJECT: 2018 Overla and Re Pro.ram Project No. 91810401 Design Consultant Selection and Agreement Allan Ekberg, Mayor ISSUE Execute a contract with KPG, Inc. (KPG) to provide design services for the 2018 Overlay and Repair Program. BACKGROUND Three engineering firms were evaluated to provide design services for the 2018 Overlay and Repair Program (see attached scoring & selection matrix). All of the firms offer baseline qualifications, however KPG provides a unique blend of knowledge and understanding of the City's overlay program that provides efficiency and benefits which cannot be matched at this time by any other firm KPG has also performed very well providing construction management services, DISCUSSION KPG has provided a contract, scope of work, and fee estimate to complete design of the 2018 Overlay and Repair Program and advertise for construction bids. Starting the design phase earlier in the year for a projected construction advertisement date of March 1, 2018, should provide a more favorable bidding climate. Preliminary Locations in Design Contract — See attached vicinity map, FISCAL IMPACT 2018 Design Contract KPG Contract $113,703.07 2017 Remaining 2018 Design Budget Design Budget $30,000,00 $150,000.00 RECOMMENDATION Council is being asked to approve the design contract with KPG, Inc. for the 2018 Overlay and Repair Program in the amount of $113,703,07and consider this item on the Consent Agenda at the August 21, 2017 Regular Meeting. Attachments: Consultant Selection Scoring Scoing Matrix Vicinity Map Page 18, 2017 CIP Consultant Agreement, Scope Drk arul Fee Estimate PW EngtPRO,*'CTSIA, RN/ P, fiS ProfeclOMItual Oiiy. plr Programs018 Ovenay & Repair Program (91e10401)10esign‘Dosign Cwrsultant Seledan1To TCIInfoMerno Sesign Consult Sclection VOittou 19 ou 'Dd 'Consultant with the highest score is ranked the best. II 'Staff; Dave Sorensen II Selection Date: 7/27117 I- I Selected Consultant: KPG, Inc, 0,1 2018 Overlay Program - Contract for Design Services = ± c 2 o Paving Project Design and Construction Management Experience with the City.0 0 Knowledge of Tukwila Standards and Procedures 1 1 Environmental Experience 4 5 Experience with Similar Projects. 3 4 Traffic Control Design Expertise. 4 5 Experienced Design Project Manager. 3 4 Small Scale Project Experience. 4 2 Utilities Coordination Experience. 4 4 Storm water, Drainage, and Detention Design. 4 4 Public Outreach Experience. 3 3 !Survey Crew In -House. I 3 5 !TOTALS 1331371 IFor each category, highest score is 5 (with the lowest or worst score 1) 20 2018 Overlay Program Vicinity Map CITY OF TUK I A CAPITAL PROJECT SUMMARY 2017 to 2022 PROJECT: Annual Overlay and Repair Program Project No 9xx10401 DESCRIPTION: Select, design and construct asphalt and concrete pavement overlays of arterial and residential streets, JUSTIFICATION: Preserve and maintain the street structure in a safe and useable state by resurfacing before failure which also minimizes costs. Some individual sites may be coordinated with water, sewer, and surface water projects. STATUS: Each year various sections of roadway throughout the City are designed and constructed for asphalt overlay MAINT. IMPACT: Reduces annual maintenance COMMENT: FINANCIAL (in $000's) Ongoing project, Only one year actuals shown in first column Through Estimated 2015 2016 2 7 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 BEYOND TOTAL EXPENSES Design 123 135 150 150 175 175 200 200 200 1,608 Land (R/VV) 0 Const Mgmt. 276 175 200 200 225 225 250 250 275 2,076 Construction 1,289 1,260 1,050 1,050 1,330 1,340 1,350 1,350 1,375 11,394 TOTAL EXPENSES 1,688 1,570 1,400 1,400 1,730 1,740 1,800 1,800 1,850 14,978 FUND SOURCES Awarded Grant 0 Proposed Grant 0 Mitigation Actual 0 Mitigation Expected 0 City Oper. Revenue 1,688 1,570 1.400 1,400 1,730 1,740 1,800 1,800 1,850 14,978 TOTAL SOURCES 1,688 1,570 1,400 1,400 1,730 1,740 1,800 1,800 1,850 14,978 2017 - 2022 Capital improvement Program 18 22 City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila A Contract Number: CONSULTANT AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT is entered into between the City of Tukwila, Washington, hereinafter referred to as "the City", and KPG, Inc., hereinafter referred to as "the Consultant", in consideration of the mutual benefits, terms, and conditions hereinafter specified. Project Designation. The Consultant is retained by the City to perform engineering services in connection with the project titled '2018 Overlay Program'. 2. Scope of Services. The Consultant agrees to perform the services, identified on Exhibit "A" attached hereto, including the provision of all labor, materials, equipment and supplies. 3. Duration of Agreement; Time for Performance. This Agreement shall be in full force and effect for a period commencing upon execution and ending August 31, 2018, unless sooner terminated under the provisions hereinafter specified. Work under this Agreement shall commence upon written notice by the City to the Consultant to proceed. The Consultant shall perform all services and provide all work product required pursuant to this Agreement no later than August 31, 2018 unless an extension of such time is granted in writing by the City. 4. Payment. The Consultant shall be paid by the City for completed work and for services rendered under this Agreement as follows: A. Payment for the work provided by the Consultant shall be made as provided on Exhibit "B" attached hereto, provided that the total amount of payment to the Consultant shall not exceed $113,703.07 without express written modification of the Agreement signed by the City. B. The Consultant may submit vouchers to the City once per month during the progress of the work for partial payment for that portion of the. project completed to date. Such vouchers will be checked by the City and, upon approval thereof, payment shall be made to the Consultant in the amount approved. C. Final payment of any balance due the Consultant of the total contract price earned will be made promptly upon its ascertainment and verification by the City after the completion of the work under this Agreement and its acceptance by the City. D. Payment as provided in this section shall be full compensation for work performed, services rendered, and for all materials, supplies, equipment and incidentals necessary to complete the work. E. The Consultant's records and accounts pertaining to this Agreement are to be kept available for inspection by representatives of the City and the state of Washington for a period of three (3) years after final payments. Copies shall be made available upon request. 23 5. Ownership and Use of Documents. All documents, drawings, specifications and other materials produced by the Consultant in connection with the services rendered under this Agreement shall be the property of the City whether the project for which they are made is executed or not. The Consultant shall be permitted to retain copies, including reproducible copies, of drawings and specifications for information, reference and use in connection with the Consultant's endeavors. The Consultant shall not be responsible for any use of the said documents, drawings, specifications or other materials by the City on any project other than the project specified in this Agreement. 6. Compliance with Laws. The Consultant shall, in performing the services contemplated by this Agreement, faithfully observe and comply with all federal, state, and local laws, ordinances and regulations, applicable to the services rendered under this Agreement. 7. Indemnification. The Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers harmless from any and all claims, injuries, damages, losses or suits including attorney fees, arising out of or resulting from the acts, errors or omissions of the Consultant in performance of this Agreement, except for injuries and damages caused by the sole negligence of the City. Should a court of competent jurisdiction determine that this Agreement is subject to RCW 4.24.115, then, in the event of liability for damages arising out of bodily injury to persons or damages to property caused by or resulting from the concurrent negligence of the Consultant and the City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers, the Consultant's liability hereunder shall be only to the extent of the Consultant's negligence. It is further specifically and expressly understood that the indemnification provided herein constitutes the Consultant's waiver of immunity under Industrial Insurance, Title 51 RCW, solely for the purposes of this indemnification. This waiver has been mutually negotiated by the parties. The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. 8. Insurance. The Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damage to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, its agents, representatives, or employees. Consultant's maintenance of insurance as required by the agreement shall not be construed to limit the liability of the Consultant to the coverage provided by such insurance, or otherwise limit the City's recourse to any remedy available at law or in equity. A. Minimum Amounts and Scope of Insurance. Consultant btain insurance of the types and with the limits described below: 1. Automobile Liabilit% insurance with a minimum combined single limit for bodily injury and property damage of $1,000,000 per accident. Automobile Liability insurance shall cover all owned, non -owned, hired and leased vehicles. Coverage shall be written on Insurance Services Office (ISO) form CA 00 01 or a substitute form providing equivalent liability coverage. If necessary, the policy shall be endorsed to provide contractual liability coverage. CA revised : 1-2013 Page 2 24 2Commercial General Liability insurance with limits no less than $1,000,000 each occurrence, $2,000,000 general aggregate. Commercial General Liability insurance shall be written on ISO occurrence form CG 00 01 and shall cover liability arising from premises, operations, independent contractors and personal injury and advertising injury. The City shall be named as an insured under the Consultant's Commercial General Liability insurance policy with respect to the work performed for the City. 3 Workers' Compensation coverage as required by the Industrial Insurance laws of the State of Washington. 4, Professional Liability with limits no less than $1,000,000 per claim and $1,000,000 policy aggregate limit. Professional Liability insurance shall be appropriate to the Consultant's profession. B. Other Insurance Provision. The Consultant's Automobile Liability and Commercial General Liability insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain that they shall be primary insurance with respect to the City. Any Insurance, self-insurance, or insurance pool coverage maintained by the City shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not be contributed or combined with it. C. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best rating of not less than A:VI!, D. Verification of Coverage. Consultant shall furnish the City with original certificates and a copy of the amendatory endorsements, including but not necessarily limited to the additional insured endorsement, evidencing the insurance requirements of the Consultant before commencement of the work. Certificates of coverage and endorsements as required by this section shall be delivered to the City within fifteen (15) days of execution of this Agreement. E. Notice of Cancellation. The Consultant shall provide the City with written notice of any policy cancellation, within two business days of their receipt of such notice. F. Failure to Maintain Insurance. Failure on the part of the Consultant to maintain the insurance as required shall constitute a material breach of contract, upon which the City may, after giving five business days notice to the Consultant to correct the breach, immediately terminate the contract or, at its discretion, procure or renew such insurance and pay any and all premiums in connection therewith, with any sums so expended to be repaid to the City on demand, or at the sole discretion of the City, offset against funds due the Consultant from the City. 9. hide endent Contractor. The Consultant and the City agree that the Consultant is an independent contractor with respect to the services provided pursuant to this Agreement. Nothing in this Agreement shall be considered to create the relationship of employer and employee between the parties hereto. Neither the Consultant nor any employee of the Consultant shall be entitled to any benefits accorded City employees by virtue of the services provided under this Agreement. The City shall not be responsible for withholding or otherwise deducting federal income tax or social security or for contributing to the state industrial insurance program, otherwise assuming the duties of an employer with respect to the Consultant, or any employee of the Consultant. CA revised : 1-2013 Page 3 25 10. Covenant Against Contingent Fees. The Consultant warrants that he has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bonafide employee working solely for the Consultant, to solicit or secure this contract, and that he has not paid or agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bonafide employee working solely for the Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gifts, or any other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this contract. For breach or violation of this warrant, the City shall have the right to annul this contract without liability, or in its discretion to deduct from the contract price or consideration, or otherwise recover, the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or contingent fee. IL Discrimination Prohibited. The Consultant, with regard to the work performed by it under this Agreement, will riot discriminate on the grounds of race, religion, creed, color, national origin, age, veteran status, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, marital status, political affiliation or the presence of any disability in the selection and retention of employees or procurement of materials or supplies, 12. Assignment. The Consultant shall not sublet or assign any of the services covered by this Agreement without the express written consent of the City. 13, Non -Waiver. Waiver by the City of any provision of this Agreement or any time limitation provided for in this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other provision, 14. Termination. A. The City reserves the right to terminate this Agreement at any e by giving ten (10) days written notice to the Consultant. B. In the event of the death of a member, partner or officer of the Consultant, or any of its supervisory personnel assigned to the project, the surviving members of the Consultant hereby agree to complete the work under the terms of this Agreement, if requested to do so by the City. This section shall not be a bar to renegotiations of this Agreement between surviving members of the Consultant and the City, if the City so chooses. 15. Applicable Law; Venue Attornev's Fees. This Agreement shall be subject to, and the Consultant shall at all times comply with, all applicable federal, state and local laws, regulations, and rules, including the provisions of the City of Tukwila Municipal Code and ordinances of the City of Tukwila. In the event any suit, arbitration, or other proceeding is instituted to enforce any term of this Agreement, the parties specifically understand and agree that venue shall be properly laid in King County, Washington. The prevailing party in any such action shall be entitled to its attorney's fees and costs of suit. Venue for any action arising from or related to this Agreement shall be exclusively in King County Superior Court. 16. Severability and Survival. If any term, condition or provision of this Agreement is declared void or unenforceable or limited in its application or effect, such event shall not affect any other provisions hereof and all other provisions shall remain fully enforceable. The provisions of this Agreement, which by their sense and context are reasonably intended to survive the completion, expiration or cancellation of this Agreement, shall survive termination of this Agreement. CA revised Page 4 26 17. Notices. Notices to the City of Tukwila shall he sent to the following address: City Clerk City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 Notices to Consultant shall be sent to the following address: KPG 753 91h Avenue North Seattle, WA 98109 18. Entire Agreement; Modification. This Agreement, together with attachments or addenda, represents the entire and integrated Agreement between the City and the Consultant and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations, or agreements written or oral. No amendment or modification of this Agreement shall be of any force or effect unless it is in writing and signed by the parties. DATED this day of CITY OF TIJKWILA Mayor, Allan Ekberg 2017. CONSULTANT By: Printed Name:Nelson Davis KPG Title: Principal Attest/Authenticated: Approved as to Form: City Clerk, Christy O'Flaherty CA revised . 1-2013 Office of the City Attorney Page 5 27 EXHIBIT A City of Tukwila 2018 Overlay Program Scope of Work August 1, 2017 The Consultant shall prepare final Plans, Specifications and Estimates for the 2018 Overlay Program. Specific projects will be determined from the following list of candidate streets: o Southcenter Boulevard o S 128th Street o S 133rd Street o 5151Avenue S o 58th Ave S o W Marginal PI o W Marginal PI Macadam to T -Line Bridge as budget allows Military Road to approx. 650East S 134th PI to East Marginal Way S 137th Street to S 1381" Street Interurban to S 142nd Street S 102nd to north City limit Cecile Moses Park to S 102nd Street Project base maps were substantially completed in 2017 with additional detail required for channelization and ADA compliance on Southcenter Boulevard and S 133rd Street. The Consultant shall provide all necessary field reviews, base mapping, and utility notification required to complete final bid documents for the 2018 Overlay Program. The Consultant shall also prepare the bid tabulation, check low bidder (2) references, and provide a recommendation for award to the City, The 2018 Overlay Program will be bid as a single bid package as budget allows. Projects may be re -prioritized or deferred to a future overlay program based on available budget and other considerations, Detailed estimates will be prepared at the 90% design to verify the final project list to be included in the 2018 Overlay Program. The City of Tukwila may require other services of the consultant. These services could include additional design, right of way, environmental documentation, construction phase services, or other work tasks not included in the scope of work. At the time these services are required, the Consultant will provide the City with a detailed scope of work and an hour and fee estimate. The Consultant will not proceed with the work until the City has authorized the work and issued a Notice to Proceed. City of Tukwila 2018 Overlay Program Page 1 o 4 KPG, Inc August 2017 28 Assumptions for the 2018 Overlay Program Bid Package Roadway and utility casting mapping will be based on aerial photography, GIS, and field reviews by the Consultant. Topographic field survey may be required for ADA ramp improvements and will be performed by the Consultant as required. Typically, only surface utilities requiring adjustment to grade will be shown. No utility upgrades are anticipated in the project design. Drainage & Water Quality Reports will not be required. Geotechnical Engineering services will be required for West Marginal Place subgrade requirements only. Environmental Documentation will not be required. Deliverables 90% review submittal with Plans, Specifications, and Estimate (6 copies) Routing of 90% Plans to utilities for review and comment. Bid Documents and Engineer's Estimate for 2018 Overlay Program 10 sets of Plans (11" X 17") and specifications for the Bid Documents. Coordinate upload of Plans and Specifications to Builders Exchange. Bid Analysis and recommendation for award. SCOPE OF WORK TASK 1 — 2018 OVERLAY PROGRAM 1.1 The Consultant shall provide continuous project management and administration for the duration of the Project. (Estimate 6 months). • Hold project coordination meetings with the City to update progress and review submittals. Assume (4) meetings. • The Consultant shall provide monthly status reports and billings. • The Consultant shall provide independent QA/QC reviews by senior in- house staff of all deliverables prior to submittal to the City. 1.2 The Consultant shall field review base maps that were prepared in 2017 for accuracy. Topographic survey will be utilized only at ADA ramp locations where and complex channelization only on S l33rd Street and Southcenter Parkway. 1.3The Consultant shall prepare 90% and final Plans for the proposed improvements including the following: City of Tukwila 2018 Overlay Program Page 2 of 4 KPG, Inc, August 2017 29 Plans shall be prepared with such provisions in such detail as to permit field layout and construction within a degree of accuracy acceptable to the City and per industry standards. It is assumed there will be approximately thirty (30) plan sheets at 1"=20' scale full size (22" X 34"), 1"=40' at reduced scale (11"X 17"). Typical sections and details will be prepared for items not available as standard details from the City, State, or WSDOT standard drawings. Plans will identify curb ramp replacement limits and pedestrian push button modifications in accordance with ADA requirements. The plans shall illustrate complete details of construction of the proposed improvements including limits of construction and removals, utility adjustments, surfacing depths and details, and applicable channelization and signing for the segments selected for final design. Plans and specifications will include required criteria for traffic control plans and pedestrian traffic control during construction. Criteria will be developed in collaboration with the City. The Consultant shall perform site walkthroughs with the City maintenance staff to determine extent of roadway improvements / resurfacing (Estimate 2 meetings) and to prioritize candidate streets within the available budget. Pavement sections will be determined through consultation with the City's maintenance staff and previous experience. No geotechnical investigations are anticipated for pavement design. West Marginal Place will be evaluated for subgrade stabilization (cement treated base or similar) by a geotechnical engineer and requirements incorporated into the contract documents. 1.4 The Consultant shall calculate quantities and prepare Engineers Estimate of Probable Construction Cost for each review submittal and the Bid Documents. Projects will be prioritized in collaboration with the City following the 90% Submittal to determine final project segments. 1,5The Consultant shall prepare the Contract Specification per 2016 WSDOT Standard Specifications for the 90% Review Submittal and the Bid Documents. 1.6 The Consultant shall distribute 90% review submittals to franchise utility owners fo adjustments within the Project limits. 1.7The Consultant shall assist the City with Project Advertisement and Award by uploading plans and specifications to bxwa.com, preparing addenda, bid tabulation, and recommendation for award. City of Tukwila KPG, Inc, 2018 Overlay Program Page 3 of 4 August 2017 30 TASK 2— FORT DENT PARK PARKING/ACCESS REPAIRS 2.1 The Consultant shall prepare base maps and design for overlay/reconstruction improvements in the Fort Dent Park area, Overlay plans for Fort Dent Park will be included in a separate bid schedule and bid as part of the 2018 overlay program. Limits of repairs will be determined in collaboration with the City to achieve an approximate $100,000 construction budget. City of Tukwila 2018 Overlay Program Page 4 of 4 KPG, August 2017 31 HOUR AND FEE ESTIMATE Project: City of Tukwila 2017 Overlay Program EXHIBIT B I PG • Arch ic.ettare * Landscapit A rehitcc*c** • eikail Engirt., -ring * Task Description Labor Hour Estimate Total Fee Project I Senior Manager Engineer $ 182.01 I 5 145.83 Project Design i1 CAD i Engineer Engineer Technician $ 119.33 I 5 103.69 1 S 87.97 Const j Survey Inspector Crew 104.80 ! $ 165.47 Senior Admin $ 112.71 Office Admin $ 58.11 Fee Task 1 - 2017 Overlay Pro ram 1.1 Management and administration (estimate 6 months) 8 8 o a 24 0 0 20 0 10 0MEM0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 85 0 16 2,597.27 ; 13356.58 S 35,182.19 1,2 Prepare Project Base Maps 2 1 8 8 40 1.3 Prepare 90% and Final Plans 16 F 40 100 80 60 , 1,4 Project Cost Estimates (90%, Final) 4 8 16 24 16J 05 4 7,700.22 1.5 Project Specifications 4 24 16 24 0 16 8 4 0 0 0 8 8,75 .06 1.6 Utility Coordination 2 1 4 40 8 8 0 0 0 4 1 7,485.34 1.7 Project Advertisement and Award 4 4 12 12 8 0 0 0 4 Reimbursable - Mileage , 1 . 0 Reimbursable - Reproduction 1,500E00 Reimbursable - Geotechnical Review i 20.000,00 Reimbursable - Traffic Control 2,500_00 Task Total 40 80 I 200 i 180 120 0 30 6 40 101,902.28 Task 2 - Fort Dent Parking I Access Repairs 2.1 Alt analysis / Prepare plans, specs and estimate 4 1 8 40 24 24 1 0 0 2 I 4 I. $ 11,725.79 Reimbursable - Mileage 1 $ 50.00 Reimbursable - Reproductioni S 25.00 Task Total 4 1 8 40 . 1 24 i 24 0 0 2 4 . 1 $ 11,800.79 Total Estimated Fee: $ i13703.07 8/1/2017 City of Tukwila Allan Ekberg, May Public Works Department - Bob Giberson, Director INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM TO. Transportation and Infrastructure Commi FROM: Bob Giberson, Public Works Director BY: Robin Tischmak, City Engineer CC: Mayor Ekberg DATE. Augustll, 2017 SUBJECT: Tukwila Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element Update ISSUE Approve updates to the Transportation Element of Tukwila's Comprehensive Plan. BACKGROUND In 2010 the Public Works Department initiated an effort to update the Transportation Element (Chapter 13) of the Tukwila Comprehensive Plan. The effort included a traffic modeling effort that included projected household and employment growth throughout the City through the year 2030. This effort was in conjunction with an overall update to the Comprehensive Plan. Subsequently, the Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC) provided updated growth data that reflected the 2008-2009 recession. The updated growth data showed a small reduction for projected household growth and a significant reduction in projected employment (nearly 50%). DISCUSSION The review by PSRC identified discrepancies within Tukwila's Plan that indicated conflicting growth information between different chapters of the plan as well as a differing projected end year. The modeling effort projected through year 2030 while the remainder of the plan projected through year 2031. PSRC requested that the City run a revised model update that reflected the updated growth data as well as the 2031 horizon year. Attached are the proposed revisions for consideration and approval. FINANCIAL IMPACT There is no financial impact. RECOMMENDATION Council is being asked to accept the attached Transportation Element revisions and forward this item for discussion at the August 28, 2017 Committee of the Whole Meeting and subsequent September 5, 2017 Regular Council Meeting. Attachments: Fehr & Peers Cover Memorandum Transportation Element in Track Changes Mode W:PW EnMPROJECTSIA- RW& RS P(OjeClOrans Element Comp Plan (90510406)tInfo Memo TI p Elemen pdaie GM1117,doo 33 �-� � �� ������ �� N K- �� �� /� �- �� �� �� �� July 28, 2017 Laura Be'amin Associate Planner, Growth Management Planning Puget Sound Regional Council |be-° min pc.oro 206-464-7134 Subjec City of Tukwila - Response to Co ent on Assumed Land Use Growth in the Comprehensive Plan Review Dear Liz: The Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC) reviewed the City of Tukwila's draft Comprehensive Plan Elements in 2013 and identified that the land use growth forecast by 2031 in the Transportation Element was higher than current (2016) PSRC growth assumptions. 9SRCs review noted that the employment growth for the City of Tukwila is almost double the current forecast of 15.500 job growth between 2010 and 2031, The discrepancy in the land use growth allocation occurred because the City of Tukwila updated the Transportation Element between 2010 and 2012, in part because of a major planned development in the southern portion of the city that could potentially impact the long-term transportation needs for the City, At that time, the PSRC regional land use forecasts had not yet been adjusted to account for the magnitude of the 2008-2009 recession and resulting slowdown in the real estate market. The other elements of the Tukwila Comprehensive Plan were updated during the 2013-2015 period and incorporated the more recent (lower) growth forecasts from the PSRC, In response to this comment, the City hired Fehr & Peers to reallocate land use growth to be consistent with current PSRC Land Use Vision and to re -run the City's travel demand model, Key � The 2031 forecasted traffic volumes are not expected to grow as much within the City compared to the previous analysis (VMT is lower by three percent), • Most of the forecasted traffic volume decreases are in the Tukwila South area, where growth is not as rapid as was previously anticipated and where most of the employment growth was reduced. 10014mAvenue |SI Act 4120 I Sea�le.,wA9064I (206)576-4220 Fax (206 _76-4225 wwwfehrandpeers.com 34 L Benjamin July 28, 2017 Page 2 of 2 No changes are recommended to the proposed transportation capital improvement projects. Most of the proposed transportation improvement pjects are recommended to remain as they were proposed for reasons beyond expanding capacity, including breaking up large blocks for more walkable/bikeable neighborhoods, and filling in missing gaps in the pedestrian and bicycle networks, The large roadway projects to facilitate growth in Tukwila South were completed by the developer in the 2010-2012 timeframe. Attached is a memo detailing the analysis to reallocate land use growth to be consistent current forecasts, as well as two maps that illustrate the distribution of household and employment growth by 2031 within the City. If you have any gue tions or c ents, please fee f -e give me a call at 206-576-4226 Sincerely, FEHR & PEERS Carmen Kwan Transportation Engineer/Planner ana-0veu Attach men : • Tukwila 2031 Land Use Revison—Trave e and Modeling Response to PSRC Comments Memo 35 36 PURPOSE The Transportation Element establishes Tukwila's transportation goals and policies for the 20 -year planning period. It provides direction for transpoitation decisions regarding annual plan updates, including: ✓ The Six -Year Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP); ✓ The Six -Year Capital Improvement Program and Financial Plannin odel (CIP/F ✓ The biennial budget; and ✓ Infrastructure Design and Construction Standards. It is key in supporting community livability and economic vitality, as prioritized in Tukwila's Strategic Plan. It also provides guidance for development review and approval, land use and zoning decisions, and continuing transportation and maintenance programs. The Transportation Element establishes a basis for decision-making that is consistent with Washington's Growth Management ActKing County's Countywide Planning Policies, and the Puget Sound Regional Council's (PSRC) Transportation 2040. The specific requirements of each of these plans fulfilled bthe City of Tk U Transportation Element Background the Comprehensive Plan Update (hereafter referred to in this element as the Background Report), and summarized herein. The Transportation Background Report, \ValI.. md Poll Non motorizedTukwila Transit Netwu'kP|an'Co/CTR)Program land Plan, Growth and Transportation Elfirioncy Center (TEC) PImn, the annua||y-updatedsix-yearTranspnrtadon|nnprovennentPlan/oix' year CIP/FPM, and the budget are all adopted by reference in the Tukwila Comprehensive Plan. ISSUES «~»������ Tukwila's diverse transportation system includes freeways, highways, arterial streets, access streets, bus, light rail, commuter rail transit service, Amtrak passenger rail service, sidewalks, trails and neighborhood footpaths. In addition, Sea -Tac International Airport and Boeing Field provide air transportation for general, commercial and business aviation. The Duwamish River provides water access to Elliott Bay and beyond. The City's road and rail network enables freight and rail transportation within and through the city. Future Tukwila transportation system additions include Bus Rapid Transit. A detailed inventory of the existing transportation system in Tukwila is contained in the Background Report (Fehr& Peers, May 2ozz). The mjor transportation issues facing Tukwila include the following: U Physical and geographic barriers that challenge connectivity throughout the City. Physical barriers include the valley wall, the Green/Duwamish River, and highways that separate portions of the City from each other, increasing emergency services response times and cost. Residents value quiet neighborhood streets that exist in an incomplete or disconnected street system. With relatively few "through" streets, many vehicles use the streets that do connect, burdening the adjacent properties and residents. The large volume of vehicles on through -streets also makes it more difficult to walk to destinations such as schools, libraries or shopping. u Limited funding to satisfy competing priorities. 37 Increasing connectivity is very costly given the need to acquire new rights-of-way,conducting engineering studies and design, and construction costs. — Criteria for granfunding are most often targeted to Tukwila's Urban Center or the Manufacturing/Industrial Center because these are the locations where significant employment and residential growth are planned and are supported by regional plans. There are unmet needs in other areas of the City, including streets that do not meet City standards, and it is unlikely that the roads would be improved by new development in these already developed areas. u Reliance on regional agencies, such as the Port of ea e, Metro and Sound Transit, to serve local needs. GOALS OLICIES AND ��' "��o��o�� ^�^�^� �� RATEGU�S The Ti anspoitation Element supports the c:ity' I and Use Element. ft demonstrates how the City will maintain and preserve the existing network as well as address dficieric.ies, while demonstrating how planned growth will be accommodated over the next 20 years per the Office of Financial Management (OFK4)and PSR[forecasts. I he household and job forecasts for Tukwila are for an additional 4j46o4 8ao households and 'obsbytheyear with most of that occur ring in the Southcerrter, 1 ukwila International Boulevard and Tukwila South mixed-use commercial areas To plan for land use and transportation changes associated with this growth, these households and jobs are assigned to Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZs) based on the availability of vacant and redevelopable lands (Maps 13 -land 13-4. Employment forecasts in the Transportation Element and used for the Transportation Demand Model —that include -rit6-7olc sou additional jobs from 2010-26-3&29“tiarc pe-o-f4y-deoble-thE,---gfomW developed using employment forecast information available at the time. Since then, the employment forecast fRas-be,,paiwas, revised downward significantly due to the effects of the great recession on the regional economy. ri addition, current forecasts are based to a greater degree on adopted King County Growth Targets for lukwila. ,/,.�� 38 43411215.11N7111131 Projected Household Growth by Traffic Analysis Zone 2010-2030 Legend LTD CityLimits Household Growth 0-15 16-50 51 -100 101 -200 201 and above Map 13-1: Projected Household Growth TUKWILA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - 2015 PAGE 13-5 39 Revised Map 13-1: Projected Household Growth Projected Household Growth by o ru:-? 2010-2031 Legend OM -I •_pity Limits Household Growth 0-15 16 - 50 51 - 100 101 -200 201 and abve Page 13-5 40 Projected Employment Growth by Traffic Analysis Zone 2010-2030 Map 13-2: Projected Employment Growth TUKWILA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - 2015 Legend [7:3 CityLimits Employment Growth 0-50 51 - 200 201 - 450 451 -1500 1501 and above PAGE 13-6 41 Revised Map 13-2: Projected Employment Growth Projected EmployrrieHt (M:ri h v lyi 2.o ri 201 0-2031 Legend Employment Growth ED 050 J51-100 101 - 200 201 - 450 451 and above Page 13-6 42 6 WHAT IS TRANSPORTATION CONCURRENCY? The Wahington State Growth Management Acrequires the City to ensure that transportation programs, projects and services needed to serve growth are regionally coordinated, and are in place either when new development occurs orwithin six years. This is done to make sure the City can provide the transportation improvements needed to maintain its adopted standards of service and so that conditions do not degrade with the addition of the new households and workers in the City. TUKWILA COMPREHENSIVEpLAN— entation Strategies Implement sidewalk ordinance. Implement subdivision ordinance, Implement Street Network Plan. Emergency vehicle criteria in street design standards. Prioritize neighborhood quality design features when reducing street facilities (e.g., removal of one lane of parking before removal of sidewalk), Traffic Calming Progra Develop methods to incentivize and encourage coordinated development between adjacent commercial properties, including shared driveways and direct vehicular access between parking lots, The prgrowth numberin Tukwila and surrounding areas were used in the Background Report for the Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan Update to anticipate traffic volumes and levels of service in delete- 2030 (and add 2031 The Level of Service (LOS) analysis is one of the ways the City plans and budgets for future transportation pr'ects. The City balances the fiscal constraints of its financing plan for transportation programs and projects with planned growth and existing needs. To do this, Tukwlla monitors LOS on arterial streets to examine the existing performance of the sysem and anticipated impacts of planned land use growth, to determine what adjustments will need to be made to maintain adapted LOS standards concurrent with new development. Properly applied and monitored, LOS standards for the transportation network ensure that mobility, vitality and quality of life forthe city is maintained. For the delete '2D30 nd add 2031) planning horizon, significant new capacity will be required to accommodate future growth throughout the city, although the mjority of the project capacity needs are in the Southcenter area, PAGE n3'� 43 TIW 7'2 7\C -71 N RTATI RELATED INFORMATION Trans o tation Back round Re ort yy4k and Roll Non -motorized Transportation Plan Commute TiiiRfiecLuct,ion kCIRI prooraman4 Plan Growth and Trans .ortation Efficiency Center iGTE2 Plan TukwilaTranst Network Plan ADD: Fehr & Peers 12/30/2016 Memo on Tukwila 2031 Land Use Revision - Travel Demand Modeling ResQonse to PSRC Comments TUKWILA COMPREHENsIVE PLAN - 2015 PAGE 13-30 44 K -D ��� ����K�K-U��'-� PE �� �� �� ��U�����Q�������U��� ����.°"������������.�" Date: December 30, 2016 To: Robin Tischrnak and Bob Giberson, City of Tukwila From: Carmen Kwan and Chris Breiland, Fehr & Peers Subject: Tukwila 2031 Land Use Revision — Travel Demand Modeling Response to PSRC Comments 6-0498 The Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC) reviewed the City of Tukwilas draftComprehensive Plan Elements in 2013 and identified that the land use growth forecast by 2031 in the Transportation Element was higher than current PSRC growth assumptions. In response to this comment, the forecast land use growth was revised to be consistent with PSRC assumptions and the City's travel demand model was re'mn.This document details the analysis process and summarizes the new model results, The transportation capital improvement projects previously proposed were also reviewed to identify if any changes in the project list would be necessary based on the new growth forecasts. BACKGROUND The City of Tukwila updated the Trnsportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan between 2010 and 2Ol2.inpart because ofamajor p|unneddeve|opmentinthexouthernpordonoftheciLy(hat could potentially impact the long-term transportation needs for the City, At that time, the PSRC regional land use forecasts had not yet been adjusted to account for the magnitude of the 2008- 2009 recession and resulting slowdown in the real estate market nationwide. In general, the earlier PSRC land use forecasts predicted more growth by 2031 than the current (2016) land use forecasts. The other elements of the Tukwila Comprehensive Plan were updated during the 2013-2015 period and incorporated the more recent (lower) growth forecasts from the PSRC. The rest of this memorandum describes the method used to align the Transportation Element growth forecasts with the rest of the Comprehensive Plan. _______ 10014mAvenue I Suite 4120|Seattle, WA 98154|(206)576-4220 I Fax (206) 576-4225 45 City of Tukwila December 30, 2016 Page 2 of 5 ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY The previous analysis completed for the Transportation Element assumed a growth of 27,665 jobs and 4,905 households by 2031, PSRC's review noted that this employment growth for the City of Tukwila is almost double the current forecast of 15,500 job growth between 2010 and 2031. PSRC also forecasts a slightly lower number of households in the city by 2031 (4,800 new households), Land Use Revision In response to these comments, the 2031 land use assumptions were revised and the City's travel demand model was re -run to evaluate how traffic forecasts would change from the previous 2031 analysis (prepared with the higher growth forecasts). Key assumptions are listed below: Land use forecasts were revised to match the Land Use Vision (LUV l) Dataset, the most recent land use forecasts released by the PSRC in September 2015, � Land use growth assumptions in the Southcenter Subarea of Tukwila remained relatively consistent with the Southcenter Regional Growth Center EIS analysis prepared in 2014. Growth was adjusted elsewhere in the City based on the LUV,1 Dataset. A summary of the assumed land use growth is presented in Table 1. The revised 203I forecasts show that the land use assumptions are consistent with PSRC growth assumptions of 4,800 households and 15.500 jobs between 20I0 and ZO31.The revised 203I land use has a decrease of 105 households and 14,140 jobs compared to the previous analysis. Land use growth assumptions by TAZ are in Attachment A. TABLE 1. C OF LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS Scenario 2013 Base Year Revised 2031 Forecasts Total Households and Jobs Growth from 2010 7,435 Househlds, 47,540 Jobs +35 Households 12,200 Households, +4,800 Housholds, 61,070 Jobs +15,500 Jobs 2010 to 2013 household arid job growth etimates are from P5RCs Covered Employment Estimates and Resideoti Building Permit Summaries. Source: City of Tukwila. PSRC, Fehr & Peers, 2016 46 City of Tukwila December 30, 2016 Page ]of5 MODELING RESULTS The City's travel demand model was re -run with the revised land use growth assumptions described earlier. An example travel demand model difference plot of the change in PM peak hour traffic volume per travel lane is shown in Figure 1. The green bars show a decrease in vehicle traffic and the red bars show an increase in vehicle traffic compared to the previous 2031 analysis. FIGURE 1.203IT VEL DEMAND MODEL DIFFERENCE PLOT )111412 RI )11111).J111401)111.)s„)))..„.)).11))). ----- 41114 11')11` tlefit St 14-41-1-144:414444-11414101414116) -14 4: 41-44"- 4f1)14,), Ei/A11814111,44 Source: Fehr & Peers, 2016. '0 441011 F�� 47 City of Tukwila December 30, 2016 Page 4 of 5 Whi|edlenoisSomemode|^noime"inthediffereme plot results where some routes have minor increase or decrease in vehicle volumes compared to before, the overall observations from the new travel model runs are summarized below, � The 203]. forecasted traffic volumes are not expected to grow as much within the City of Tukwila compared to the previous analysis. The slightly lower vehicle traffic growth is reasonable based on the reduction of approximately 14'100 jobs and 100 households throughout the City by 2031 compared to the previous analysis. The new 2031 model run's slightly lower traffic growth is minor as there is only a three percent decrease in vehicle - miles -travelled (VMT) on City streets during the PM period compared to the previous analysis (excluding freeways) w Most of the forecasted traffic volume decreases are south of 180th Street. This is expected as the growth near Southcenter Regional Growth Center did not change much from the earlier analysis, and most of the employment reduction was in the Tukwila South area, where growth is not as rapid as was anticipated in the earlier forecasts, Overall, City staff felt this area had the least amount of momentum for growth compared to the rest of the City. ° No changes are recommended to the proposed transportation capital improvement projects. A review of the previously recommended projects was completed based on the newmode| run resuko.lngenera|'a||thep ects identified in the Transportation Element are recommended to remain because: o Most u{the street extension projects vvererocommendad to reduce block size and improve mobility for all modes. These projects would improve street grid connecdvity, improve the walkability by breaking up large b|ocks, and potentially improve emergency response times, While there is a minor decrease in vehicle volumes in the new model run compared to the previous resu|ts, projects are recommended to remain to help the City achieve the desired urban form and street network connectivity pattern. n Intersection improvements at various intersections such as adding turn pockets are still recommended as the model shows that turning volumes that triggered the additional turn lanes will not decrease enough to eliminate the need for the additional lanes. o Many pr'ectswe,eidendf|edtoenhancmpede»tr|anand/nrb|cy«|efad||dey,VVh||e growth is slightly lower with the new land use forecasts, the need for a 48 City of Tukwila December 30, 2016 Page 6of5 comprehensive and connective pede nd bicycle network is not altered by the revised land use forecasts. CONCLUSION A new travel model run was completed with revised 203I land use growth reallocated to be consistent with PSR['s vision of 15,500 new jobs and 4L800 new households between 20I0 and 2031 in Tukwila. Based on the results of the new travel model run, no changes to the Transportation Element project list are recommended. While the traffic growth by 2031 is not expected to be as high as the previous analysis (VMT is lower by three percent), most of the proposed transportation improvement projects are recommended to remain as they were proposed for reasons beyond expanding capacity, including breaking up large blocks for more walkable/bikeable neighborhoods, and filling in missing gaps in the pedestrian and bicycle networks. Attachment: Attachment A: Land Use Totals by T TAZ Map 49 Attachment A: Land Use Assumptions and TAZ Map Revised City of Tukwila Travel Demand Model Land Use New 2031 Revision City of Tukwlla Households Employment 2013 Base Year 7,435 12,340 47,540 75,205 Old 2031 Land Use Previous 2013 - 2031 Growth 4,905 27,665 New 2031 Revision 12,200 61,070 2010 - 2013 Growth (PSRC Estimates 35 1,970 2013-2O3OGrowth 4,765 13,530 010 - 2030 Total Growth 4,800 15,500 Subarea TAZ x TOTALS 2013 ase Tear 7,435 47,540 HH EMP 0 6,166 0 734 1 0 12,200 61,070 Total HH Total EMP 217 7,754 136 866 426 984 old 2031Land Use 12,340 75,205 Total HH Total EMP 224 7,754 140 866 426 984 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 518 378 749 551 931 1,004 0 1,063 2 702 0 1,172 0 559 0 1 4 113 1,080 563 271 604 1,139 316 181 248 255 928 713 1,100 1,115 86 525 111 281 155 143 302 229 143 143 160 148 312 236 148 148 0 0 0 1 332 291 192 0 0 1,131 1,106 1,645 626 339 672 1,206 367 270 278 358 1,088 781 1,328 1,165 603 531 144 282 343 300 198 3 0 0 113 113 156 1,104 596 1,131 1,106 1,645 626 339 672 1,206 551 270 278 358 1,152 781 1,325 3,552 3,552 596 270 281 32 8 950 8 1,108 , 33 88 128 100 287 100 353 34 558 370 588 371 588 529 35 132 5 228 6 200 36 224 56 234 56 224 56 50 51 37 5 0 83 0 68 38 127 6 205 17 489 13 188 252 384 6 472 39 40 214 353 252 13 273 353 93 41 271 188 323 188 304 268 42 162 75 225 199 212 184 43 95 35 49 7 132 102 81 1 124 96 78 7 44 45 66 6 35 136 540 12 41 128 508 6 36 46 475 47 18 239 34 314 32 311 48 123 279 267 141 192 299 537 176 168 308 518 170 49 50 85 8 179 8 148 8 51 52 158 149 18 150169 216 18 170 192 176 164 18 179 151 53 114 42 149 161 54 89 40 148 44 152 40 55 56 98 158 18 17 184 18 194 160 18 247 224 200 57 188 58 222 105 216 128 221 2 58 59 64 158 2 22 120 3 201 35 220 22 60 61 20 34 721 12 20 116 949 12. 20 96 945 12 62 112 4 222 4 184 4 63 64104 65 77 71 234 52 135 102 119 81 315 52 333 100 116 100 306 92 389 66 0 3,125 0 3,365 275 0 404 3,351 277 67 392 274 414 68 0 0 0 0 69 109 1 140 156 2 4 172 152 1 4 70 128 4 71 41 5 107 12 104 5 7213 35 78 35 76 35 73 0. _ 250 0 860 0 1,200 74 15 2,341 13 2,391 15 2,381. 2,532 327 75 10 1,582 9 12 1,,825 308 10 13 76 13 101 77 0 807 0 850 3,444 213 0 0 0 847 3,490 394 78 0 2,540 0 0 79 0 213 80 0 500 0 502 0 500 81 0 3610 6,110 1'7 958 6,976 0 17 1,312 7,061 83 17 103 16 2 52 607 113 3,552 104 0 0 34 605 78 3,552 51 Traffic Anelyals Zttea (TAZ) City orTokwlla Polonlial Anne Arca N NOT TO SCALE FEHR t PEERS rrtl�ateu� t 0510P 4.4,2E IMIe i.00TJ...Y. -Tier CITY OF TUKWILA TRANSPORTATION AREAZONE (TAZ) MAP FIGUAE A=1 52 Legend L..; City Limits Household Growth n0-15 16-50 51 - 100 IIIII 101 - 200 - 201 and abve 53 Legend Employment Growth I1 0-50 © 51 - 100 101 -200 - 201 - 450 451 and above 54 City of Tukwila Public Works Department - Bob Giberson, Director INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM TO: Transportation and Infrastructure Committe FROM: Bob Giberson, Public Works Direct() BY: Greg Villanueva, NPDES Coordinator CC: Mayor Ekberg DATE: August 11, 2017 Allan Ekberg, Mayor SUBJECT: National F'ollutant Discharge Elimination System Program (NPDES) Project No. 99341210 Department of Ecology (DOE) 2017-19 Municipal Stormwater Capacity Grant ISSUE Grant application approval for the 2017-2019 Municipal StormwaterCapacity-Building Grant for NPDES and stormwater project funding, BACKGROUND The 2017 State Legislature has provided funding in the amount of $50,000 for local vern ants covered by a municipal stormwater permit. ANALYSIS DOE has notified Tukwila that Stormwater Capacity Grants will be awarded to all NPDES municipal permittees requesting funding through the State's Ecology's Administration of Grants & Loans (EAGL) web -base management system. All projects must support compliance with NPDES Phase I or Phase II municipal stormwater permit programs. Applications must be submitted by August 18, 2017. FISCAL IMPACT This is a non-matching grant nd the expected outcome will be to receive $50,000, RECOMMENDATION Transportation and Infrastructure Committee is being asked to approve submission of the $50,000 grant application for the 2017-2019 Municipal Stormwater Capacity Grant, Attachments: FY2017-19 Municipal Stormwater oacity- uilding Grants Funding Guidelines WI:itSiotetPtiN CommonSiiPW EngtPRO EC S.A X PICVICI5MPOES Program 09341210)12017 2019 Capacity GlanIttrito Mem 2017-19 Capacity Grant App.docx 55 Introduction The Washington Department of Ecology (Ecology) is soliciting requests for funding assistance for the implementation of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Municipal Stormwater General Permits in Washington state including: a Phase I Municipal Stormwater General Permit • Western Washington Phase II Municipal Stormwater General Permit • Eastern Washington Phase II Municipal Stormwater General Permit Funding for this program is provided to Ecology by the 2017 Washington State Legislature. Total funding available to each eligible recipient is $50,000 This non-competitive grant program is available only to cities and counties covered by a municipal stormwater permit. Ports, universities, school or drainage districts, state agencies covered by municipal stormwater permits, or other secondary permittees are not eligible to directly receive this funding. For information on local governments covered by the permits and permit requirements, see Ecology's website at: bitt ://wvvw.e a. ov/ o rams/w /stormwater/i unici al/index.html Funding program purpose This grant program will provide financial assistance to Phase 1 and Phase 11 local governments for projects that benefit stormwater management programs and implementation of NPDES municipal stormwater permit programs NOTE: Capital construction projects are not eligible for funding through this grant progra Applicant eligibility This is a non-competitive grant program open to cities or counties in Washington State covered by a Phase 1 or Phase 11 Municipal Stormwater General Permit. Ports, universities, school districts, drainage districts, state agencies, or other secondary permittees are not eligible to apply directly for this funding program but may partner with a permitted city or county. In order to ensure that I) Ecology has sufficient funding available to reimburse grant expenses, and 2) Ecology water quality dollars are maximized over the biennia and do not remain obligated to projects that will not be requesting reimbursements for the full value of the grant award, eligibility may be suspended for communities that have not spent capacity funding awarded in prior biennia. 56 Local governments receiving funding under other Ecology stormwater grant programs are not precluded from receiving these capacity -building funds. Grant ceiling and match Grant funding ceilings have been set by Ecology at $50,000 per eligible recipient. There are no match requirements, and grant awards will cover 100 percent of eligible costs of the grant offer amount. Program schedule Important Information All applications for funding must be submitted electronically via the EAGL system, New users must register for a Secure Access Washington (SAW) account prior to beginning the application process. New user account approval may take up to two weeks. EAGL will not accept applications after 4:59 on August 18, 2017. 5:00 pm, August 18, 2017 August 29, 2017 Prior to October 24, 2017 January 30, 2018 March 31, 2019 Prior to April 31, 2019 Key Project Dates Deadline to request funding Funding agreement available in EAGL for recipient signature Recipients must sign and return funding agreement to Ecology First Progress report due (covers June December 2017) Last day to incur eligible expenses. Final payment request must be submitted in EAGL. Eligible project expenses All projects must support compliance with Phase 1 or Phase 11 municipal stormwater programs. The following is a list of eligible projects. 1) Public education and outreach activities, including stewardship activities. 2 57