The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSEPA E99-0015 - SILVER DOLLAR CASINO - PARKING LOTSILVER DOLLAR CASINO PAVING EXISTING PARKING LOT & CREATION OF NEW PARKING SPACES 14027 INTERURBAN AVE. S. E99-0015 ) City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard • Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433-1800 MEMORANDUM TO. 6- 1 I — bf) FROM 6-ditigt ktANNV DATE. 5 - SUBJECT: C>fLUV (a,t/ tD (2. ci 1 — (15 -d -Co \,e LI p1.00i !Lai( es. -C(A. ()ICA" -1 — eAVA.Lsk OA) {-1V 64, (1.144tirciti-k rtzetuvie4. $7i10 u-&t(ct('H— 094 -17 4q ret,tiv .14N-i/N rwlek_1 a4C1-1-t&Aritt, vitto-f\ av4.., (kik Stuckt b1 too fr" Notzt.tAra...4„-- 1A, ‘-`:'pL euithtuutta--A aAck >rainit 14,4_ bocac--,L, itt Auk. to .tek. 1-gt towaxi-11 ReA-9,v- frift-tou 116 cc 'k -2L111/ CITY OF TUKWILA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431-3670 AFFIDAVIT OF INSTALLATION AND POSTING OF PUBLIC State of Washington County of King City of Tukwila -F'OIZVIATIO\ SIG\(S) I TIM I, 2 -le (Print Name) understand that Section 18.104.110 of the Tukwila Municipal Code requires me to post the property no later than fourteen (14) days following the issuance of the Notice of Completeness. I certify that on 1- - 9 1 the Public Notice Board(s) in accordance with Section1 4.11 and other applicable guidelines were posted on the property located at 140a1 inter .10r 7M 5 so as to be clearly seen from each right -of -way providing primary vehicular access to the property for application file number-�_a - (')C') 5 SUBSCRIBED AND SWOIU4 to before me this /S day of DAN VESSELS JR. STATE OF WASHINGTON NOTARY •-•— PUBLIC VY COMUISS1OM MIRES 3-13-01 Affiant (Applicant Signature) ,19 Sly NOTARY PUBLII in and for the State of Washington residing at -techOst My commission expires on 3.13.0/ I AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION 4)e46 Notice of Public Hearing Notice of Public Meeting Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet and Scoping Notice hereby declare that: etermination of Non- , significance Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance Determination of Significance fl Board of Appeals Agenda Packet Planning Commission Agenda Packet Short Subdivision Agenda Packet Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit Shoreline Management Permit IlNotice of Action Official Notice Other Other was mailed to each of the following addresses on 7 -7 -?7 Name of Project c/d1C" 444g)Signature 444j File Number 9'---0169/5 N/0/4: ( ) • • CHECKLIST: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW/SHORELINE PERMIT MAILINGS U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS FEDERAL HIGHWAY 'ADMINISTRATION DEPT OF FISH & WILDLIFE OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT DEPT NATURAL RESOURCES OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR DEPT OF COMM. TRADE & ECONOMIC DEV. DEPT OF FISHERIES & WILDLIFE W FEDERAL AGENCIES HIGT ( ) U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ( ) U.S. DEPT OF H.U.D. ( ) K.C. PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEV. ( ') BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD ( ) FIRE DISTRICT #11 ( ) FIRE DISTRICT #2 ( ) K.C. WATER POLLUTION CNTRL SEPA OFFCL TUKWILA SCHOOL DISTRICT TUKWILA'LIBRARIES RENTON LIBRARY KENT LIBRARY CITY OF SEATTLE LIBRARY U S WEST SEATTLE CITY LIGHT PUGET SOUND ENERGY HIGHLINE WATER DISTRICT SEATTLE WATER DEPARTMENT TCI CABLEVISION OLYMPIC PIPELINE. CENT PLANNING DEPT TUKWILA CITY DEPARTME •PUBLIC WORKS ( POLICE /- PLANNING (pA ( ) PARKS & REC. ( ) CITY CLERK S: (X) FIRE ( ) FINANCE ( ) BUILDING ( ) MAYOR PUGET SOUND REGIONAL COUNCIL P.S. AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY SW K C CHAMBER OF COMMERCE MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE DUWAMISH INDIAN TRIBE ( ) SEATTLE TIMES 07/09/98 C:WP51DATA\CHKLIST E°11-ooi5 \ \ ;� DEPT OF SOCIAL &._HEALTH SERV. DEPT OF ECOLOGY, SHORELIND DIV DEPT OF ECOLOGY, SEPA DIVISION;. ( (� ) OFFICE_,OF-ATTORNEY GENERAL _ i * SEND CHKLIST W/ DETERMINATIONS * SEND SITE MAPS WITH DECISION KING COUNTY AGENCIES K.C. DEPT OF PARKS (/ ) HEALTH DEPT PORT, OF SEATTLE KV &.ENVIR SERVICES-SEPA INFO CNTR .C. TRANSIT DIVISION - S PA OFF IAL CO SCHOOLS/LIBRARIES Ur`k. " HIGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT K C PUBLIC LIBRARY SEATTLE MUNI REF LIBRARY SEATTLE SCHOOL DISTRICT ).`RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT UTILITIES PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT VAL-VUE SEWER DISTRICT WATER DISTRICT #20 WATER DISTRICT #125 CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC WORKS RAINIER VISTA SKYWAY CITY AGENCIES ( ) RENTON PLANNING DEPT ( ) CITY OF SEA -TAC ( ) CITY OF BURIEN ( ) TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS ( ) TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS ( ) CITY OF SEATTLE - SEPA INFO CENTER - DCLU ( ) SEATTLE OFFICE OF MGMNT & PLANNING* * NOTICE OF ALL SEATTLE RELATED PLNG PROJ. OTHER LOCAL AGENCIES ( ) METRO ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING DIV. OFFICE/INDUSTRIAL 5,000 GSF OR MORE RESIDENTIAL 50 UNITS OR MORE RETAIL 30,000 GSF OR MORE MEDIA, YlaLQ a -Q o ut,rco.6 -7 DO A 44' aZp c� �gin4- 5aa CITY OF TUKWILA DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: PAVING OF THE EXISTING PARKING LOT AND CREATION OF A 104 TOTAL PARKING SPACES ASSOCIATED WITH SILVER DOLLAR CASINO. PROPONENT: CHENG NAN LIN LOCATION OF PROPOSAL,INCLUDING STREET ADDRESS, IF. ANY: ADDRESS: 14027 INTERURBAN AV S PARCEL NO: 336590-0830 SEC/TWN/RNG:' LEAD AGENCY: CITY OF TUKWILA FILE NO: E99-0015 The City has determined that the proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on theenvironment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required- under RCW 43.21c.030(2)(c). This decision was made after 'review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. *1**.k**4(********-k***.**********k********.k*k4,4*A******.kA*A*****-414k****A****** This determination is final and signed this 1 dav of 19941. Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official City of Tukwila. (206) 431-3670 6300 Southcenter Boulevard' Tukwila, WA 98188 Copies of the proce.dwi'es. for SEPA appeals are available with the Department of Community Development. City of Tukwila Department of Community Development APPLICANT: Tim and Michael Isziey Silver Dollar Casino 14027 Interurban Avenue South Tukwila, Washington 98168 VIA FAX 206-433-1118 and U.S. Mail RE: SEPA Determination (E99-0015) Silver Dollar Casino Parking Lot at 14027 Interurban Avenue South Gentlemen: PROPERTY OWNER: Marcus C. Lin 4066 173rd Place S.E. Bellevue, Washington 98008 VIA U.S. MAIL John W. Rants, Mayor Steve Lancaster, Director A SEPA Determination of Non -Significance was issued for the above -referenced project on July 7, 1999 (attached). The 15 -day SEPA appeal period expires on July 22, 1999. The attached SEPA memo identifies several deficiencies in the materials you have submitted to date. During technical review for the remaining parking lot permits, the City will provide specific written comments regarding these deficiencies as well as the steps needed to correct them. Sincerely, .lam Deborah Ritter Assistant Planner cc: Steve Lancaster, Director, Community Development Jim Morrow, Director, Public Works Nick Olivas, Assistant Chief, Fire Jill Mosqueda, Associate Engineer, Public Works Gary Schulz, Urban Environmentalist 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 4313670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 • City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director MEMORANDUM TO: Deb Ritter, Assistant Planner FROM: Gary Schulz, Urban Environmentalist DATE: July 6, 1999 RE: Silver Dollar #E99-0015 — SEPA, Wetland Restoration & Buffer Reduction for Proposed Parking Lot Improvements. I have reviewed the current wetland mitigation plan submittal completed by Talasaea Consultants (Wetland Restoration & Buffer Enhancement Plan dated 6/8/99). Regardless of SEPA issues, the project is subject to sensitive area regulations and compliance. The current mitigation plan is designed to resolve both buffer reduction and restoration impacts to on-site and off-site areas. My comments are as follows: 1 The wetland boundary delineation was conducted By Talasaea in April, 1999. Given the amount of past disturbance, the boundary appears correct as it is determined by fill material. However, it is likely that wetland soils are present under some of the fill placed for temporary parking. 2. The Wetland Restoration & Buffer Enhancement Plan is not complete to approve as a final plan. Some additional information is needed combined with plan detail revisions. Buffer reduction - As we discussed, the current parking lot layout has reduced the buffer setback to less than 25 feet in several locations. This is not allowed by the SAO and must be corrected. Wetland restoration - The design is appropriate and mostly complete; however, a measured calculation of the off-site wetland area to be restored is needed. This square footage will allow the total number of plants to be determined for the landscape contract and performance security. Wetland performance - The proposed monitoring and maintenance period of three years is acceptable. An estimate or actual contract cost for installing the total number of plants will need to be submitted for approval prior to final permitting. Also, the related bond or other form of security will also need to be submitted before the permit can issued. The standard used by the City for performance bonding or cash assignments is 150 percent. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 • • • Silver Dollar Memo July 6, 1999 Page 2 Mitigation timing — At a minimum, the wetland restoration and buffer enhancement should be fully completed prior to final permitting. However, the SAO states that "Where feasible, compensatory mitigation projects shall be completed prior to activities that will permanently disturb wetlands and immediately after activities that will temporarily disturb wetlands....and shall be completed prior to use or occupancy of the activity." (TMC 18.45.080 C. e.) The definition of Compensatory Mitigation "means replacing project -induced wetland and buffer losses or impacts..." This definition includes restoration, creation, and enhancement actions. Depending on the time of year the project permit is near issuance, the City could require the mitigation work to be implemented before the project is permitted. Ideally the time of year would be around the month of October. Also, the performance amount could be lowered after the mitigation is complete. Cc: Steve Lancaster, DCD Director Jack Pace, Planning Manager Jim Morrow, PW Director • City of Tukwila • John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community ID evelopment Steve Lancaster, Director To: Steve Lancaster From: Deborah Ritter Date: July 1, 1999 Re: MEMORANDUM E99-0015 (SEPA Determination) Silver Dollar Casino 14027 Interurban Avenue South Parking Lot Improvements Project Description: This SEPA review is for parking lot improvements at the Silver Dollar Casino. The site, is approximately 63,000 square feet in size and is currently comprised of a 4,531 square foot building and parking lot containing approximately 95 parking spaces. A Type 2 wetland has been delineated in the southwestern portion of the site and extends off-site, in a westerly direction, for approximately 40 feet. The parking lot is primarily gravel surfaced (39,490 s.f.) with a portion of existing pavement (17,755 s.f.) along the north side of the property. The proposed improvements include the paving of the gravel portion of the parking lot and the creation of 104 striped parking spaces. Agencies with Jurisdiction: None. Summary of Primary. Impacts: • Earth The majority of the site is generally level. The Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly the Soil Conservation Service) has mapped the entire site as "Urban Land" (Ur). 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 0 Tukwila, Washington 98188 ° (206) 431-3670 0 Fax (206) 431-3665 ! • E99-0015 Silver Dollar Casino Parking Lot Improvements July 1, 1999 Page 2 The southwestern portion of the site is considered to be an area of potential geologic instability and is designated Class 3. A Class 3 area is described as having high landslide potential and includes areas sloping between 20% and 40% which are underlain by relatively impermeable soils or by bedrock. This Class 3 area continues off-site and encompasses the steep slope running parallel to the Silver Dollar's west property line. The site will be graded and approximately 50 to 100 cubic yards of select fill may be imported during the construction of the parking lot improvements. An erosion control plan will be employed during construction. • Air Dust and exhaust emissions will be generated during construction, with watering as necessary to control dust. • Water Per the Wetland Restoration and Buffer Enhancement Report (dated April 22, 1999 and revised June 9, 1999), a Type 2 wetland has been delineated at the southwestern portion of the site. This wetland extends beyond the site, in a westerly direction, approximately 40 feet. The applicant has requested a reduction in the on-site wetland buffer from 50 to 25 feet in width under a Type 2, Special Permission Application. According to the above -referenced wetland report, existing vegetation was cleared in portions of the wetland (both on and off-site) prior to January 1999. The cleared vegetation included black cottonwood, red alder, blackberry and reed canarygrass. The wetland report included a Wetland Restoration and Buffer Enhancement Plan (dated June 8, 1999), showing the location of the wetland buffer boundary. This buffer is less than 25 feet in width in several places. Corrections must be made to the wetland plan establishing a minimum buffer that is 25 feet in width at all points. Additionally, the Parking Lot Paving Plan prepared by Resco, Inc. (dated April 7, 1999) shows the proposed parking lot improvements encroaching into the above - referenced wetland buffer. These encroachments occur at the south and southwest perimeter of the proposed parking lot. Corrections must be made to the paving plan to resolve the encroachment problems. These corrections will • • E99-0015 Silver Dollar Casino Parking Lot Improvements July 1, 1999 Page 3 be a condition of the associated land altering permit (required for construction of the parking lot). All cleared portions of the wetland are to be restored with native plantings, as referenced in the report. Approval of the request for a reduction in the wetland buffer and approval of the wetland report must be provided prior to implementation of the wetland restoration. Said restoration will be a condition of the associated land altering permit (required for construction of the parking lot). The amount of impervious surface created by the paving of the parking lot will increase from 22,286 square feet (existing) to 53,599 square feet (proposed). The project requires surface water treatment which has been approved by the Public Works Department and designed to King County Surface Water Design Manual standards. • Plants Nearly the entire site appears to have been historically filled and is currently largely devoid of vegetation. Vegetation within the uncleared portion of the on- site wetland (southwestern corner of the property) is dominated by red -osier dogwood, Himalayan blackberry, reed canarygrass and black cottonwood trees. • Animals • No endangered or threatened wildlife species have been identified at the site. The Wetland Restoration and Buffer Enhancement Report documents the presence of American crow, American robin and eastern gray squirrel. Energy/Natural Resources Not applicable. Environmental Health Noise generated by construction equipment will occur on a short-term basis. The hours of construction will comply with the City's noise ordinance. • • E99-0015 Silver Dollar Casino Parking Lot Improvements July 1, 1999 Page 4 • Land/Shoreline Use The project is located in the Regional Commercial Mixed -Use zone (RCM). The RCM zone continues north and south of the property along Interurban Avenue. The property to the west is zoned Low Density Residential (LDR) and the property to the southwest is zoned High Density Residential (HDR). There is an existing single-family dwelling at the southeast corner of the property, which is legally non -conforming. Housing No housing is proposed nor will any residential structures be removed. Aesthetics The proposal is not subject to Board of Review design review and standards. Landscaping in and around the parking lot will be required as a condition of the land altering permit. Wetland restoration and wetland buffer enhancement will also be required as a condition of the land altering permit. Light and Glare Site lighting will be provided by new "no glare" light standards. Recreation Not applicable. Historic and Cultural Preservation No known places or landmarks. Transportation The project is located on Interurban Avenue South, a four -lane public roadway serving commercial traffic. Metro bus service is available along this street. The project proposal identifies an increase in the number of available parking stalls from 95 to 104. The project is expected to generate between 250 and 600 vehicular trips, with peak volumes occurring on Fridays and Saturdays. • 1 E99-0015 Silver Dollar Casino Parking Lot Improvements July 1, 1999 Page 5 The Parking Lot Paving Plan prepared by Resco, Inc. (dated April 7, 1999) shows six parking spaces along the western side of the existing building. The Fire Department requires a fire lane in this area for emergency access and will not allow the placement of spaces in this location. Corrections must be made to the paving plan to reflect the removal of these six parking spaces. These corrections to the paving plan will be a condition of the associated land altering permit (required for construction of the parking lot). • Public Services No increase in public services is expected. • Utilities Project will not increase demand on the utility systems. Recommendation: Determination of Non -Significance. CITY OF TUKWILA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431-3670 AFFIDAVIT OF INSTALLATION AND pOSTII\ G OF PUBLIC IIS-F'ORVIATION SIG's (S) State of Washington County of King City of Tukwila I •I I Nl -3 - I e-1 . (Print Name) understand that Section 18.104.11'0 of the Tukwila Municipal Code requires me to post the property no later than fourteen (14) days following the issuance of the Notice of Completeness. I certify that on G / 181 q't the Public Notice Board(s) in accordance with Section 18.104.110 and other applicable guidelines were posted on the property located at 1410.2 -7 z,. 17 rofbr i ofitx S so as to be clearly seen from each right -of -way providing primary vehicular access to the property for application file number E° V" 0 0 IS SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this LJ day of DAN VESSELS JR. STATE OF WASHINGTON NOTARY—.-- PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 3-13-01 Affiant (Applicant Siture) ,19 9S' NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington residing at My commission expires on 3730/ AFFIDAVIT Notice of Public Hearing Notice of Public Meeting Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet Board of Appeals Agenda Packet Planning Commission Agenda Packet fShort Subdivision Agenda Packet OF DISTRIBUTION hereby declare that: Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit Shoreline Management Permit Determination of Non- significance Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice Notice of Action Official Notice Other Other was mailed to each of the following addresses on " `<r /,11 o�ec Name of _n_r /.i4d-414;-€1S i cu /� ratre ,/ File Number 79'007`5 L 9y-o�i� • • CHECKLIST: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW/SHORELINE PERMIT MAILINGS ›al U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS ( ) FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION ( ) DEPT OF FISH & WILDLIFE OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT DEPT NATURAL RESOURCES OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR DEPT OF COMM. TRADE & ECONOMIC DEV. DEPT OF FISHERIES & WILDLIFE K.C. PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEV. BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD FIRE DISTRICT,#11 FIRE DISTRICT #2 K.C. WATER POLLUTION CNTRL SEPA TUKWILA SCHOOL DISTRICT TUKWILA LIBRARIES RENTON LIBRARY KENT LIBRARY CITY OF SEATTLE LIBRARY U S WEST SEATTLE CITY LIGHT PUGET SOUND ENERGY HIGHLINE WATER DISTRICT SEATTLE WATER DEPARTMENT TCI CABLEVISION OLYMPIC PIPELINE PLANNING DEPT TUKWILA CITY DEPARTM PUBLIC WORKS POLICE PLANNINGG PARKS & REC. CITY CLERK FIRE FINANCE BUILDING MAYOR FEDERAL AGENCIES ( ) U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ( ) U.S. DEPT OF H.U.D. WASHINGTON STATE AGENCIES OFFCL PUGET SOUND REGIONAL COUNCIL P.S. AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY SW K C CHAMBER OF COMMERCE MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE DUWAMISH INDIAN TRIBE, ( ) SEATTLE TIMES 07/09/98 C:WP51DATA\CHKLIST DEPT.OF SOCIAL & HEALTH SERV. DEPT OF ECOLOGY, SHORELIND DIV DEPT OF ECOLOGY, SEPA DIVISION* OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL * SEND CHKLIST W/ DETERMINATIONS * SEND SITE MAPS WITH DECISION KING COUNTY AGENCIES Lai -0045 ( ) K.C. DEPT OF PARKS ( ) HEALTH DEPT PORT OF SEATTLE ' ›Q K.C.DEV & ENVIR SERVICES-SEPA INFO CNTR i (y) K.C. TRANSIT DIVISION - SEPA OFFICIAL \ C?( kG LA n �/'� SCHQOLS)IBRARIES 1- 4ca-- K�-S O (,�, rL * HIGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT K C PUBLIC LIBRARY SEATTLE MUNI REF LIBRARY SEATTLE SCHOOL DISTRICT RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT UTILITIES PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT VAL-VUE SEWER DISTRICT WATER DISTRICT #20 WATER DISTRICT #125 CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC WORKS RAINIER VISTA SKYWAY CITY AGENCIES ( ) RENTON PLANNING DEPT ( ) CITY OF SEA -TAC ( ) CITY OF BURIEN ( ) TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS ( ) TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS ( ) CITY OF SEATTLE - SEPA INFO CENTER - DCLU ( ) SEATTLE OFFICE OF MGMNT & PLANNING* * NOTICE OF ALL SEATTLE RELATED PLNG PROJ. OTHER LOCAL AGENCIES METRO ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING DIV. OFFICE/INDUSTRIAL 5,000 GSF OR MORE RESIDENTIAL 50 UNITS OR MORE RETAIL 30,000 GSF OR MORE MEDIA Pincfai fie. t f alt► rcLQ (Z¢,d ou.rc2, 2 KP Co nc_ d— Luat4 awr'c213 OAU &SLOn_ 100 Cjp Ak,* ZZ od lea clg► 04 - 500& • City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director NOTICE OF APPLICATION DATED JUNE 18, 1999 ' The following application has been submitted to the City of Tukwila Department of Community Development for review and decision. APPLICANT: Mike Iszley on behalf of Marcus C. Lin LOCATION: Silver Dollar Casino 14027 Interurban Avenue South, Tukwila FILE NUMBERS: E99-0015 (SEPA Determination) PROPOSAL: Paving and delineation of 104 parking spaces in the existing parking lot. OTHER REQUIRED Special Permission — Reduction of Wetland Buffer, PERMITS: City of Tukwila Land Altering Permit, City of Tukwila These files can be reviewed at the Department of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA. Please call (206) 431-3670 to ensure that the file(s) will be available. OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT You can submit comments on this application. You must submit your comments in writing to the Department of Community Development by 5:00 p.m. on July 2, 1999. If you have questions about this proposal contact Deborah Ritter, the Planner in charge of this file at (206) 431-3663. Anyone who submits written comments will become parties of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 • -- .0010 - .4000 10. r•1r.p n 1,3•••2 •••••KI n.:..s.•4 .un f.vD INTFI'UI 87iN A VE ,SO. `8 R 5, (1.1.• r••61 n 1 Cann.: t•.[ 1 4 at n.1 lr1# 0w •11 0.11,01 allneo, ..,m, rqr CO, O MV # .D: DM•n1 A✓ .0411 00•1=U1 161111:6 GE ARE. MDE SPREAD. 141 116,115 0 r MS10,1,1 PAM fitsw.1 r.p 41 v1a 0' onr•.: ...0..1 11.1 G• p. ac 0,411 10,1 MIKA= ea 1.7 r V't ro Kfl 1 aA..111•A I. A wrP w••.,D+ nA 0( rut r., U) rte_ _�-�N / 1 \ I ,i . 1 1 • E_ QUILDING SITE PLAN SCALE: r - 20.-0" 300.00' 50.00 Url•.c rt.0 �...,,l.•••. 00000 f t LEGEND '00,0010 0,00 •n .•1t n▪ enr Y 00.00 • r,00110., 4 0,0000 1/00000 000.00,110 .01.4.0 010,10.011 PARKING SPACES •.,,•4.0.4..1 1000 - r 1.'011 N••4 •11 ,t• ..w41 9131,45_ 104,00000 0,00,f. OKA IV. n.wq.� 11" w 10•11,0 • ,1 rr,,11401 1! 1 5016 •nn, Maw nto1(D SOC -1 1 v . • City of Tukwila • John W. Rants, Mayor Fire Department Thomas P. Keefe, Fire Chief To Deb Ritter From: Chief Olivas Subject: Silver Dollar asino Parking Date: June 15, 1999 Currently, we have vehicular access around the Silver Dollar Casino. The access on the North Side is Marginal, 15 feet wide (hi -lighted in pink); the access on the West side (hi - lighted in yellow) is fairly wide open. The addition of the curb islands and six spaces behind the building will have a negative impact on our access; we will not approve of those spaces or the associated curbing. Contact me if you have any questions regarding our position on this matter. Headquarters Station: 444 Andover Park East • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: (206) 575-4404 • Fax (206) 575-4439 • vJLA, (/AArc_ a; City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor • Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director June 11, 1999 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION APPLICANT: Tim and Michael Iszley Silver Dollar Casino 14027 Interurban Avenue South Tukwila, Washington 98168 VIA FAX 206-433-1118 and U.S. Mail RE: SEPA Determination (E99-0015) Silver Dollar Casino Parking Lot at 14027 Interurban Avenue South Gentlemen: PROPERTY OWNER: Marcus C. Lin 4066 173rd Place S.E. Bellevue, Washington 98008 VIA U.S. MAIL Your application for the above -referenced permit was found to be complete on June 11, 1999 for the purposes of meeting state mandated time requirements. As you know, the project has been assigned to Deborah Ritter. The next step is for you to install the notice board on the site and obtain a laminated copy of the Notice of Application to post on the board. The Notice of Application must be posted on the notice board on or before June 25, 1999 (14 days from the date of this letter). The Notice will be available at DCD. Please contact Deborah Ritter so you can make arrangements to pick-up the Notice. After installing the sign with the laminated Notice, you need to return a signed and notarized Affidavit of Posting to our office (copy enclosed). This determination of complete application does not preclude the ability of the City to require that you submit additional plans or information, if in our estimation such information is necessary to ensure the project meets the substantive requirements .of the City or to complete the review process. If you have any questions, please contact me at 206-431-3663. Sincerely, --1.1(Dcr-cit_. a-04— JI- Deborah Ritter Assistant Planner cc: Joanna Spencer, Associate Engineer,, Public Works Gary Schulz, Urban Environmentalist Nick Olivas, Assistant Fire Chief 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 • Type of Action: Parking Lot Paving Project Name: Silver Dollar Casino Site Address: 14027 Interurban Avenue South Applicant: Tim Iszley SIGNS NOW TUKWILA (425) 271-5465 $150.00 COST FOR SIGN $150.00 COST TO INSTALL SIGN CAN DO IT IN 4 WORKING DAYS FROM TIME INFORMATION RECEIVED RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA JUN 1 1 1999 PERMIT CENTER City of Tukwila Department ofCommunity MEMO TO: Brenda Holt Tammy Beck Jason Jones Joanna Spencer Vernon Umetsu FROM: Deb Ritter"------ DATE: June 11, 1999 RE: Silver Dollar Casino 14027 Interurban Avenue South Property Owner and Parcel Numbers John W. Rants, Mayor evelopment Steve Lancaster, Director Tim Iszley provided documentation today that he is not the owner of the property referenced above. Per the Property Owner Declaration, the actual owners are: Marcus C. Lin (aka Cheng Nan Lin) and Grace C F Lin 4066 173rd Place S.E. Bellevue, WA 98008 (425) 746-0404 These are the four Parcel Numbers associated with the Silver Dollar and its parking lot: 336590-0830 336590-0845 336590-0850 336590-0855 I have corrected this information in Sierra for all of the pending files. PLEASE NOTE: Starting today, please include Mr. Lin as a carbon copy on all correspondence connected with the Silver Dollar. cc: Jack Pace Jim Morrow Rhonda Berry 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 ° Tukwila, Washington 98188 ° (206) 431-3670 0 Fax (206) 431-3665 • City of Tukwila Department of Community Development File Number E-6q-0©►s sEPR LAND USE PERMIT ROUTING FORM TO: ❑ Building g ,L. Public Works [X Fire Dept. ❑ Police Dept. ❑ Parks/Rec Project: r —Do t`o a.cctsi,n O eati not Lot Address: Ino 6.1 `r1f-e�cl l,rVJi,Li') 0�1 in l9 -e.. l -f..L. Date .transmitted: ► -q 6 l Response requested by: �9 � I n (4ech nt C.A- ,� Staff(( coordinator: Date response received: COMMENTS -This G ‘n conne6 ofl uurkr) fir-/vovciJ(NR LoAs-mq tot nn W \c1 cx11 a o.P,. t c\ n u V ‘--)-k- a QO fo tO i&i90\corasuwall mak. 5c°Ib reavoAtcn WfActn& lu e2 \I to,. UL aQ m I st D A . te. akt-i-j\ Y . Per ►rn MOcrou3, d\sc)r\uc\ c &tit,(\ e. U. x © okc-ot I S ilv iil0 ,► ,•. D dl -.0 \ 4D � C.�I L S Gl (1 1`l ? (c+v0 A -uv. U\) ‘ 1/4QA-occitcQ ,no GO 7:51 SQA -0 aaA . (Re).m cna c'e, ) ra'o., 4 -n -(Aa) 6.0 4 -13\0 v i 61 d,l voc1S ee f ©r L 12 - ct - 3(g flcuA If* c/omkAiwns Pt - w mnaitAt9vu Mfilfft0 c& -10 -c (AWNS N -'• � o6bne)r- 1.5 n (not- Sive,r 0441— . ❑ DRC review requested ❑ Plan submittal requested ❑ Plan approved Plan check date: Comments prepared by: 03/14/94 • RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA JUN 1 1 1999 Mechanical & Civil Engineering PERMIT CENTER 13232 - 138th Ave. S.E. Renton, WA 98059 (206) 228-4244 FAX (206) 228-4292 June 10, 1999 City Of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100 Tukwila, Washington 98188 PH: (206)431-3670 Attn: Deborah Ritter RE: Silver Dollar Casino Dear Deborah: I have attached all of the items that you requested in your letter of May 24, 1999. The enclosed items include: 1. Completed SEPA checklist, signed. 2. Six copies of environmental checklist, signed. 3. Six sets of full size plans. 4. One high quality 8 1/2" x 11" set of reduced plans. 5. The present occupants of the property are purchasing it from Cheng Nan. Cheng Nan is aware of the work in progress and has signed an attached "Property Owner Declaration". 6. Property Owner Declaration is attached. 7. King County Assessors maps of SW 14-23-4 and SE 14-23-4 are attached. Properties within 500 feet are indicated. 8. Two sets of mailing labels (property owners and tenants) are attached. 9. Sign, as indicated, will be ordered sometime between 6/14/99 and 6/18/99. WETLAND: Four sets of completed wetland report along with a mitigation plan or "Buffer Enhancement Plan", are enclosed. Special Permission application fee will be paid at submittal. Washington State registered mechanical and civil engineering corporation • 1 D. Ritter 6/10/99 Page Two DRAINAGE ISSUES: Drainage issues are addressed on the plans and within the four Technical Information reports attached. Property falls under the threshold requiring storage (as addressed in report). However, oil water separators have been added. PARKING: As requested, a drawing showing the second floor area, which was formerly an apartment, is enclosed. While this space remains unaltered, it is being used as an office area. Hence, parking spaces must be designated for this space as required by City of Tukwila. The City requires 3 parking spaces for every 1000 square feet of usable office floor space. The total available second floor area is 1,398 square feet. Therefore 4 parking spaces are required. Hence, as indicated in your letter, the required spaces would be: 95 existing spaces + 4 required office spaces = 99 Total Spaces. Since 104 spaces are proposed, there are 5 spaces more than the minimum required. Please call me if you have any questions relating to this submittal or this project. cerely, Enclosures: as noted Copy: M. & T. Iszley ichard E. Stuth, P.E. CITY 0 UKWILA • 4111 Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431-3670 RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA JUN 1 1 1999 PERMIT CENTER $EPA APPLICATION CHECKLIST ..lanner� Odr3 (ddke� Receipt Number FOR STAFF USE_ONLY` Fife Number: 1 Cross-reference files: Applicant notified.of incomplete: application 'Applicant;notified:otcompfete application:. -11 megl-oa. `' z(Q:.. Notice of application issued:: NAMEOFPROJECTIDEVELOPMENT: Silver Dollar Casino B. LOCATION[ OFPROJECTIDEVELOPMEMC_ (addressandaccessvrs 14027 Interurban Ave. So. Tukwila, WA 98168 Quarter: S.W. Section: 14 Township: 23 Range: 4 E . (This information may be found on your tax statement) PROJECTDESCRIPTION: Paving and delineation of parking spaced for the existing Silver Dollar Casino parking lot NAME: Mike Iszley 14027 Interurban Ave. So. ADDRESS' Tukwila, WA 98168 PHONE: (206) 241 -9526 -EXT 24 SIGNATURE: 3�i-- Q DATE: FROM : FAX NO. i iw � ea • y� lerd ! lb'PM TWA ?CD/PW May. 25 1999 11:27AM P2 P.7/18 D. PROPERTY OWNER DECLARATION The undersigned makes the following statements based upon personal knowledge: 1 1 am the current owner of the property whim is the subject of this application. 2. Ail Statements contained in the application are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. 3 The application is being submitted with my knowledge and consent_ 4. 1 understand that conditions of approval, which the City and applicant have jointly agreed may not be completed prior to final approval of the construction (e.g., ftnai building permit approval) wiq be incorporated into an agreement to Co executed and recorCed against the property prior to issuance of any construction permits. i declare under penalty of perfury under the laws of the State of Washington and the United States of America that the foregoing stator ent is true and Correct. pdfil.raoe.- [Alex 1n-111 a �&'q, c��`h�� .464e , 0wo —rnru u I u Nettetrj, nn DLfro (Phone Number) Use additional sheets as needed for all property owner signatures. RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA JUN 1 1 1999 PERMIT CENTER City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director May 24, 1999 Tim and Michael Iszley Silver Dollar Casino 14027 Interurban Avenue South Tukwila, Washington 98168 VIA FAX 206-433-1118 and U.S. MAIL Re: SEPA review (E99-0015), Special Permission request, wetland, excess drainage and parking issues Silver Dollar Casino 14027 Interurban Avenue South, Tukwila Gentlemen: We have received and reviewed your documentation for the above -referenced application, submitted to us on April 28, 1999. We have the following comments. Your application has been found to be incomplete. In order to continue processing your application there are additional items that must be submitted to the Department of Community Development. These items are listed below. SEPA APPLICATION: �1. A completed environmental review (SEPA) application which has been signed and dated by the applicant (attached). The application form submitted to us was not completed. v"2. Six copies of the completed environmental checklists all of which have been signed and dated. The checklists you submitted did not contain a signature or a date. -3. Six sets of the full size plans needed to clearly describe the proposed action. v4. One high quality 8-1/2" x 11" reduction of one set of the above -referenced plans. �5. On April 4, 1999, we received the latest property ownership information from the King County Assessor's Office. As of that date, neither you nor "Little Nevada Inc." appear as owners of record for any of the parcels associated with the Silver Dollar (336590-0830, 336590-0845 and 336590-0850). According to King County's records the owners are Lin Cheng Nan and Grace C. F. Nan (see attached). Please provide proof of ownership for these three parcels. \76. The current owners of the property must complete and return the attached Property Owner Declaration. —7. King County Assessors map(s) showing the location of all properties within 500 feet of the subject property. Please refer to Attachment A (enclosed) for information relating to this requirement. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 Tim and Michael Iszley May 24, 1999 E98-0015 (SEPA) Page 2 • 8. One set of mailing labels for all property owners and tenants (including residents and businesses) within 500 feet of the subject property. (Note: each unit in multiple -family buildings such as condos and apartments must be included). Please refer to Attachment A (enclosed) for information relating to this requirement. 9. A 4' x 4' public notice board will be required on site within 14 days of the Department determining that a complete application has been received. Please refer to Attachment B (enclosed) for information relating to this requirement. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS As a courtesy, we are providing you with a preliminary list of items that will be required during the technical review phase of the SEPA permit processing. Although this list is not exhaustive, you may want to begin assembling these items now in order to prevent future processing delays. WETLAND: As you know from your conversations with Gary Schulz, Tukwila Urban Environmentalist, there are wetland disturbance issues, both on and off the site. These issues will be dealt with during the technical review phase of your SEPA application. As part of your SEPA application packet, you submitted a wetland report (dated April 22, 1999) prepared by Talasaea Consultants. This report proposes that the 50 -foot buffer associated with the project's Type 2 wetland be reduced to 25 feet in width. This aspect of your proposal will require approval by the Director of Community Development. The review is a Type 2, Special Permission decision. The special permission review must be completed before a SEPA Determination will be issued by the Department of Community Development. Under TMC 18.435.040(4)(a) "any buffer reduction proposal must demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Director that it will not result in direct or indirect, short-term or long-term adverse impacts to wetlands and watercourses ... ". We are enclosing a copy of that part of the code for your reference. Your proposal for a reduction in the wetland buffer must be accompanied by documentation that can be used to evaluate your request. Please provide the following documentation to apply for special permission review: Written request to reduce the Type 2 wetland buffer by 50% (from 50 feet to 25 feet in width). «-2. Four copies of a Buffer Enhancement Plan. �3. Special Permission application fee of $200.00. • . Tim and Michael Iszley May 24, 1999 E98-0015 (SEPA) Page 3 • EXCESS DRAINAGE ISSUES: Per Jason Jones' letter to you of January 4, 1999 (attached), you must use a detention facility which has been approved by the Public Works Department and designed to King County Surface vi\V ' Oa Water Design Manual standards. After water quality parameters have been met, this water can "then be accepted in storm drains. As you were advised in January, any discharge of drainage water directly or indirectly into storm drains without the use of an approved._detention facility is an illegal activity. PARKING REQUIREMENTS: The required number of parking spaces is determined by the type of uses they are supporting. You are proposing 104 parking spaces in your plan to develop the Silver Dollar's parking lot (95 of which are already existing). We will consider these 95 spaces to be "grandfathered" for the purposes of calculating parking for the existing restaurant and tavern uses. v However, there has been a change in use on the second floor of the Silver Dollar (from apartment to office). To determine how many additional parking spaces will be required for that office use, you will be asked to submit a dimensioned and scaled plan of the second floor. This request will be made during our technical review phase. The number of additional parking spaces required will be added to the existing 95 spaces. The resulting sum will represent the total number of required spaces for the Silver Dollar parking lot. NEXT STEP: Upon receipt of the required SEPA items listed above, the City will continue processing your SEPA application. The SEPA application will expire if we do not receive the requested items referenced above within 90 days of this letter's date, unless an extension is granted pursuant to Section 18.104.070(E) of the Tukwila Municipal Code. If you should have any questions regarding the within, please do not hesitate to contact me at 206-431-3663. Sincerely, Deborah Ritter Assistant Planner Enclosures cc: Joanna Spencer, Public Works Jim Morrow, Director, Public Works Gary Schulz, Urban Environmentalist Jason Jones, Code Enforcement Brenda Holt, Permit Coordinator i°F CITY Or TUKWIL.�A �lKwrtA Department of Community DevelopmentsFR 2 8 1999 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA FieSigteNTER Telephone: (206) 431-3670 APR 23 � �9 1 SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS To submit for-SEPA review, provide the items listed above to the Planning Division at 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Room 100. ❑ 6 copies of the completed and signed environmental checklist. You may use the City's pre-printed form or you may re -type the questions on your computer. If you choose to re -type the form into your computer, be sure to do so accurately. Mistakes or omissions will increase the review time. ❑ 6 sets of the full size plans needed to clearly describe the proposed action: El One set of plans reduced to 8.5" x 11". ❑ Four copies of supporting studies. ❑ One copy of the checklist application. ❑ One set of mailing labels for all properties 500' from the subject property. (See address label worksheet.) ❑ $325 filing fee. COMPLETING THE CHECKLIST The checklist contains several pages of questions which you are asked to answer. It covers a comprehensive set of topics. As a result, several of the questions may not apply to your project. If a particular question does not apply, simply write N/A underneath. HOWEVER, be aware that many questions apply despite appearing not to. Care needs to be taken in reading and answering the questions to ensure the appropriate response is provided. It is important that accurate and clear information be provided. You may not know all of the answers. Answer each question to the best of your ability. If we find an answer to be insufficient, the City may contact you to ask for more information. Sometimes, after reviewing the checklist, the City will ask you provide additional studies or information. Commonly requested information includes traffic analysis, site topography, soils studies and tree surveys. RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA CITY OSI UKWILA APf 8 1999 RECE VED Department of Community Developme t 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WAEWI'M'ER APR 2 39 Telephone: (206) 431-3670 199 DEVELOPMENT SEPA APPLICATION CHECKLIST FOR STAFF USEONLY` Planner: File Number: Receipt: Number:: Cross-reference. files Applicant notified.of incomplete application: 'Applicantnotified.of complete application:: 'Notice of application issued:.. A NAMEOEPROJECTIDEVELOPMENT: Silver Dollar Casino B. LrOCATIONOFPROJECTIDEVEL:OPMENT: (address and access= 14027 Interurban Ave. So. Tukwila, WA 98168 Quarter: S.W. Section: 14 Township: 23 Range: 4 E. (This information may be found on your tax statement) C . PROJECTOESCRIPTION. Paving and delineation of parking spaced for the existing Silver Dollar Casino parking lot 2 NAME: Mike Iszley 14027 Interurban Ave. So. ADDRESS' PHONE: (206) 241 -9526 -EXT 24 SIGNATURE: DATE: • • ENVERON ENTAL C3ECKLTST Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instruction for Applicants: This environmental checklist .asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. The City uses this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the City staff can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attached any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The City may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: Nonproject proposals refer to actions which are different or broader than a single site specific development project, such as plans, policies and programs. Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply". In addition, complete the supplemental sheet for nonproject actions (part D). For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project", "applicant", and "property or site" should read as "proposal", "proposer", and "affected geographic area", respectively. • • Control No. Epic File No. Fee325 Receipt No. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Silver Dollar Casino, Parking Lot 2. Name of applicant: Mike Iszley 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Mike Iszlev, (206) 241-9626 Ext 24 4. Date checklist prepared: 4/20/99 5. Agency requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): f Tukwila 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. There are- no ilaediatp plans for ar3r3 i t i ons or future changes 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. ThPrP ig a wetland Report attached that was prepared by Talasaea 1'nnci,l tang 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. I don't believe that there are aby other related projects that would im•act this •ro'ect other than the •ro•osed future sidewalks which have been shown on this design. -9- 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. The only permit t>.at will hp rarj ired City of Tukwila 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Section requires a complete description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized here. Thi c_ nr�; A-� ��n sist-s of pa;o g that porter—S-ilvei nol 1 ar Casino parking lot that is not presently paw-- ____ irrcludee GameGi-nrm drain features, curbs and plantcr areas. The total new _pavement area will -be 31,072 surc feet ix ar-a. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica- tions related to this checklist. The project is located. at t -hp existing Silver 14027 Interurban Ave_ Sn_, Tukwila, wA 9R1613 In the SW 1/4 aJ Ser.. 14, Twp 91, P 4 F_ 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? The project is not irL a map ed_sensitive area -3- • TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 6. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, oTtrer • b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 0.5% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Sabdy gravelly loam d. Are there surface indications or history.of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti- ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Evaluation for Agency Use Only There may he 50 to 100 cubic yards cdf ccicat fill impnrter1 tr make grades. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. g• II di be done in the of erosion. sHmmer, there is 11 ity About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Approx. 859- 1 1 • 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would' be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. Not applirah1 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. v 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No -6- Evaluation for Agency Use Only • • b. Ground: Evaluation for Agency Use Only 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities,, if known. No, groundwater will not be imparted 2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sour- ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. Site is served by sanitary sewers c. Water Runoff (including. storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. •- -- - - - -- = = -rge storm waters to—the e is - system in Ints.r rbnAa e-. T -hero :ill be no detention but the system wi4l feature _oil/water separators,- -7-- • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Surface water will be conveyed only. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other _ evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs grass _ pasture _ crop or grain _ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other _ water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? None will be removed. Planter strips and islands will be provided in the parking lot. (see design drawingsL c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known -8- • d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Tlie si..Le wil l .red Lui e plan L_Lily 5 tL i45 and planter areas within the parking lot. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None/ Not applicable _0_ Evaluation for Agency Use Only 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solor) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. 1•;iectric & natural gas b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Not applicable to this proposal 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Not applirahlP to this proposal_ 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ- mental health hazards, if any: c:ctl)le Evaluation for Agency Use Only • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? rher•e is traffic noise buETt does not impact this prnjPet 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short- term or a long-term basis (for example: traf- fic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Thcrc will be no L.ha,ige. Tlris piujc:L is only the pasting of an exis Liny paw kiiiy lot. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Not applicablc. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? �; te: pre- ontlr-a Cacine Si -1-.P North: Casino Sita suthome b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. NO. c. Describe any structures on the site. ■ • . . • . . - • . . -11- • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N.A. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Yes. Wetland as shown on Wetland Report. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? one k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Not applicable 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com- patible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The ptojcct docs not change the land use. -12- • 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing? Nvne. NuL applicable. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eli- minated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing. _.Mone_ Not applicable. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None_ Nnt .pplir blp 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? NQt applicable Evaluation for Agency Use Only re proposed. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts,' if any: None. The project will improve the local aesthetics. Evaluation for Agency Use Only 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Some parking lot lighting will be added. The lights will be "no glare" and will only be used after sunset. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: No glare lights will hp ucPd 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational oppor- tunities are in the immediate vicinity? None. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Nonc. Not applicablc. -14- • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro- posed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None known. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Nnt- a��l i rab1P 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed accss to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Interurban AVP. Sn _ , MP1-ro bu sPs b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes Metro c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? 104 -15- • Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). u. One dLivewdy will be deleted. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. 250 to 600 Peaks would be Friday and Saturday) g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor- tation impacts, if any: None 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Nu. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Nuiit. N.A. 16. Utilities currently available at the site: servic septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. A11 utilities arc prc3cntly existing. C. Signature The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Date Submitted: J.v Q 9- 6/cr/(1 PLEASE CONTINUE TO THE NEXT PAGE. -17- Evaluation for Agency Use Only i • TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT O. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not imple- mented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Si- rm water run—a.ff will incr-ease by a negligible gnantity Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: None 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life? No impart_ plants in Punters will be added. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life are: Evaluation for Agency Use Only • • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Nut app 11C:dblu. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resourses are: Not app l i -c a.b lam. 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks,. wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? See Wetland report included int is submetal. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: Wetland mitigation per the attached wetland report. 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, inclduing whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? Not applicable. • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts area: Not applicable. How does the proposal conform to the Tukwila Shoreline Master Plan? Not appJicah1A 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Should have no impact since the Casino already exists. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: Not applicdble. 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of -the environment. No. -20- • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 8. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? No. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: Nnt- app1 ; cab-] -21- TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON PROJECT PROPOSALS The .objectives and the alternative means of reaching the objectives for a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the aforegoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This information provides a general overall perspective of the proposed action in the context of the environmental infor- mation provided and the submitted plans, documents, suppor- tive information, studies, etc. 1. What are the objective(s) of the proposal? The project consists of paving an existing gravel parking lot. It will include some storm drain conveyance work and wetland mitigation. 2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these objectives? I know of no reasonablo alternativo to paving the parking lot. 3. Please.compare the alternative means and indicate the preferred course of action: Not applicable Evaluation for Agency Use Only Evaluation for Agency Use Only 4. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila -Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? No. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: app1ic at)1e -23- • Evaluation for Agency Use Only h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Nut_ app liI cblC (bee f above) 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Not applicable b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: une/Iiut. dpp1Jed�)1C 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year- round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. The only seasonal surface water is a wetland to the t- > n bccn addrcsscd in the attached wetland report. -5- • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Control No. Epic File No. RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA APR 2 8 1999 Fee ._5 Receipt No. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: S/A.t,e 4 (eilLs/h/O 2. Name of applicant: /9)44i /s74:41-/ 3. Address and phone number„of applicant and contact person: 7`� /NC(�� A, so, /Z/,vILA-u24 4. Date checklist prepared: r)y 5. Agency requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): /�Pim..e rAr-Vci.� 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. 8. List any environmental information you know about that ha been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. /% 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. • .. '' • • 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. 2N. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized here. aIL_o lgG 1-0 7 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica- tions related to this checkli t. i.'o 7 /A/r& ,P6�1N / 4ot-wizA,Gu%J TecoKe 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Us/��icy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? -3- • • TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT B.' ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth Evaluation for Agency Use Only a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other FL-AT— b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural ,soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. 4/0 e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti- ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. 1,iu A eilte / / �t FLS /s /ig /�/ is ' , / 4NN 5 6-/PA0A-L f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construct' , or use? If so, generally describe. ✓C/ g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? /04.,.976 -4- • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only h. Proposed measures to reduce or control ero on, or other impacts to the earth, if any: /4 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. f)7l/1l9'Q / F h f' /gels r pce,fl/YG �a'# .Ci -R (anew( b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control,emissions or other impacts to air, if any: ,W/B'- 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year- round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, ,ta4e what stream or river it flows into. -5- • • 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, pleas describe and attach available plans. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would. be affected. Indicate the source of fill material . /GD 104I TZWAW S 4) Will .the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. 57,2/14 /7,4 //r5 To 0/2 /iv s rfr SFO 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. /VO 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. . ,��/"( -6- Evaluation for Agency Use Only • • b. Ground: Evaluation for Agency Use Only 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. /Z.'t 2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sour- ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or h •`ns the system(s) are expected to serve. I �/ c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this ller flow into other waters? If so, describe. AW 44w*17bAQ oGL�cT�D / (PtM f3A-5" y — ?,�-A-77FAA ___ /lira 41794 PiP(P__d_ r C/1 M° -ro -7- Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surfa waters? If so, generally describe. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: 4149l L424 -T/ c 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: z'deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, .0(5/ AA) evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs grass pasture crop or grain _ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other )‹-other types of vegetation /AAC-4 s5 ./I/LS b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? c. List threatened or endangered s ecies known to be on or near the site. -8- • • d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: 1/rte 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endanger d, precies known to be on or near the site. / c. Is the site part explain. migration route? If so, d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: theYz Evaluation for Agency Use Only • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, color) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will beused r heating, manufacturing, etc. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent,roperties? If so, generally describe. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to r ce or control energy impacts, if any: 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental• health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire, and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a results of this proposal? If so, describe. 1) Describe special emerg services that might be required. • 2) Proposed measures to reduce or con ro) environ- mental health hazards, if any: -10- • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short- term or a long-term basis (for example: traf- fic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site./2(7L 3) ite./Z(7L 3) Proposed measures to reduc >or control noise impacts, if any: 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? / 9{-Qit i/�C(,. %y -- /1 `0W-ZAa.- - 6-r EL a -r P_g b. Has the site been for agriculture? If so, describe. /L/ c. Describe any structures on the site. -11- • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will a tructures be demolished? If so, what? e. What is t1e 1. rent 7ooning^classification of the site? f. What is the curren�oehensive plan designation of the site? lnA If applicable, what is'the current shop,l,iiijilaster g. program designation of the site? h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmental)bsensitive" area? If so, specify. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 12 /604e AWie /( cc f- 2' Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? /L_ j• k. Proposed measures to or reduce displacement impacts, if any: 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com- patible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: fii L/t arcliI)P -12- • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate wh her high, middle, or low-income housing? b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eli- minated? Indicate whethler high, middle, or low- income housing. c. Proposed measures to educe or control housing impacts, if any: 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal„ extior building material(s) proposed? b. What views in the immediat vicinity would be altered or obstructed?___�� c. Proposed measures to redu - or control aesthetic impacts, if any: -13- • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? I�kQ�t time of day would it mainly occur? b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard? interfere with views? c. What existing off-site sources light or glare may affect your proposal? // d. Proposed measures to reduce o control light and glare impacts, if any: 12. Recreation. a. What designed and informal recreational ,.oppbr- tunities are in the immediate vicinity? ,t -A_ b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to b provided by the project or applicant, if any:/ -14- Evaluation for Agency Use Only 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro- posed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or4ne) to the site? If so, generally describe. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultur importance known to be on or next to the site._ c. Proposed me es -to reduce or control impacts, if any: �/�� 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed accss to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. //?//(Av fo 5PP? kl T7 G Gs p414;6 rv11-5 b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? if -gr': At 11. dal c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? -15- • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). 4/0 e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. /1,re) f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when . peak volumes would occur. (r .noet) p (r). W CpAkk can • Fier 57 -,- A'f& g. Proposed measures to reduce .or control transpor- tation impacts, if any:, 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. ✓7/P5 b. Proposed measures to reduce or control 'irect impacts on public services, if any. c4Z -16- 16. Utilities a. Circ - lities • • tl g!!e aer _ •-, sep�ic sys em, S rcp2W S iEze,-/EA b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. C. Signature The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Date Submitted: PLEASE CONTINUE TO THE NEXT PAGE. -17- Evaluation for Agency Use Only • • TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT Evaluation for Agency Use Only D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not imple- mented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Cow ,'j iN 7? f' 4',(' S M7-10G-�2ce nMGT'' PA -a -AO )'i` pA'4IKS lot G' eo,Yr&t- kk'- WARS, Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: 2. How would the proposal be likely to affec plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life? Proposed measures to protect or conserv- plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life are: -18- • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 3. How would the proposal be ely to deplete energy or natural resources? Proposed measures to protect oor/c:onserve energy and natural recourses are: 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wjlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Proposed measures to protect s resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, inclduing whether it would allow or encourage land or shorfll uses incompatible with existing plans? -19- • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts area: 4// -A - How does the proposal conform to the Tukwila Shoreline Master Plan?ag- 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demand transportation or public services and utilities? Proposedmeas/t1 to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or req it ments for the protection of -the environment. .44/- -20- • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 8. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Picy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? 4/ Proposed e are: to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) 721- • i TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT Evaluation for Agency Use Only E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON PROJECT PROPOSALS The objectives and the alternative means of reaching the objectives for a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the aforegoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This information provides a general overall perspective of the proposed action in the context of the environmental infor- mation provided and the submitted plans, documents, suppor- tive information, studies, etc. 1. What are the objective(s) of the proposal? Pii'ttii /PDQ/%I�( �m 7" 2. Pik' 7` 2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these objectives? /t/f? 3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the preferred course of action: X.- -22- • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 4. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use P licy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? Proposed res to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: -23- • CITY OF TUKWILA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431-3670 ADDRESS LABEL REQUIREMENTS The City of Tukwila requires that neighboring residents, businesses and property owners be notified of certain types of pending applications in order to encourage citizen participation in the land use process. Applicants are therefore required to submit the following materials: • Mailing labels listing the owners of record for all property within 500 feet of the boundaries (not the center) of the applicant's site (2 sets or 3 sets if SEPA review is required). • Mailing labels listing the residents or businesses of any property within 500 feet of the property if they are different from the land owners (2 sets or 3 sets if SEPA review is required). • One copy of an assessor's map(s) showing the boundaries of the subject property and the 500 foot radius. ' i2211D ST ;= :-.123ND ST Property owner names and addresses can be obtained from the King County Department of Assessment located on the 7th floor of the King County Administration Building, Room 700, 500 Fourth Avenue, Seattle. To compile the information require: • Obtain the assessor's map(s) which contain(s) your property and all neighboring properties within 500 feet (See example diagram). You may use the mans on file in the Assessor's Office or purchase a set from the King County Department of Public Works Map Counter on the 9th floor of the Administration Building. Purchased reaps must be ordered several hours in advance of the time you would like to pick them up. • After securing the assessor's maps, obtain a "Real Estate Inquiry Batch Request Sheet" from the Department of Assessment. On this form provide the tax account number for each affected property as shown on the assessor's map(s) and submit the completed form to the Department of Assessment with the appropriate fee. Applicants can request that the information be printed in mailing label form or on standard paper. To obtain occupants/resident/business names and addresses, consult the Kroll snaps located in the Tukwila Department of Community Development and then visit the site to determine resident names and unit numbers. The information on the mailing labels may refer to "Resident" or "Tenant", with the proper mailing address, if the specific name is unknown. POTACHMENT Bo CITY OF TUKWILA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431-3670 PUBLIC INFORMATION SIGNS Public Information Signs are intended to make the public aware of land use and development actions which are being considered by the City and to facilitate timely and effective public participation in the review process. SIGN INSTALLATION AND SPECIFICATIONS Sign Size and Placement The sign(s) shall be4'x4' in size, placed no closer than five (5) feet from the right-of-way at the mid -point of the more heavily traveled public street fronting the property (see Figure 1). A minimum of one sign is required at each project site. Additional signs may be required for larger sites or for properties with several street frontages. The signs) cannot be located within the clear vision area (site triangle) depicted in Figure 2. The sign shall be prepared using the official templates provided in this packet or attachable letters. Hand lettered signs are not acceptable. Signs meeting the established criteria may be obtained from any professional sign company. Signs Now in Tukwila (206) 271-5465 and Fast Signs in Seattle (206) 368-7331 are two sign companies providing this service. You may consult the yellow pages to obtain quotes from other sign companies. Sign Content Include the following information on your sign(s) (see Figure 1 for correct layout). • The title "Notice of Land Use Action". • Type of land use or development action which is proposed. • Name of the proposed project. • Address of project site. • Name of the Applicant. • City of Tukwila logo (copy attached). • City of Tukwila address and phone number. • A graphic or written description of the site boundaries, and space for the Notice of Application and Notice of Public Hearing. ••• Additional information as the Director of Community Development may determine to be necessary to adequately notify the public of the pending land use application. 7/2/96 4' 1 4' NOTICE OF LAND USE ACTION Type of Action: Project Name: Site Address: Applicant: She Map 21'x14' Hallos of ApplIcallon 6.5' x 14' L.eln.r.a Public Nalco 11.6' x 14' L.mhrW TO SUBMIT COMMENTS OR OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT TllE PROJECT PLANNER AT (200) 431.3670 ktwso Manning Depolmen1 0700 $o-8 ca 4 WI. kkoks WA 9810/ See Figure 4 for a copy of the City seal. Top of Notice Sign shall be 7' to 9' above grade 7 to 9 feet SIGN MATERIALS — Use 4'x4'x12' Post — Use 4'x4' Plywood — Use 1/2" x 3" GaIv. Lag Bolts W/ Washers SIGN LETTERINQ — Use Helvetica Lettering. — Black Lettering on White Background for all but the Board Title. — Red Lettering on White Background for the Board Title "Notice of Land Use Action". — Logo 8 Inch Diameter — See Figure 3 for lettering sizes and placement PUBLIC NOTICE BOARD EXAMPLE TaPosts should be placed 2' 6" no less than 2 feet 1 6 Inches below grade. w z Baker Street Nonce Son shell be bcaled at hie midpoint of the sxe sheet honlope PUBLIC NOTICE BOARD SIGN LOCATION EXAMPLE • • RESPONSIBILITY OF THE APPLICANT The applicant shall be solely responsible for the construction, installation, maintenance and removal of the notification signs) and the associated costs. The sign(s) shall be erected no later than fourteen (14) days after the Department of Community Development has issues the Notice of Completeness and will remain erected until the date specified by the Department. The applicant shall sign an affidavit, stating that the sign (s) were installed and posted in accordance with all City codes and ordinances. The affidavit of postingshall be submitted to the Department of Community Development by the applicant within fourteen (14) days following the issuance of the notice of completeness . If the sign is made illegible, removed or otherwise destroyed prior to the date of the final public hearing or final action by the City of Tukwila, the applicant is responsible for the immediate replacement of the sign. Failure to maintain the notice board in good condition is cause for the discontinuance of the review of the application until the notice board is replaced and remains in place for a specified time period. RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT The Department shall provide the applicant with all information necessary for the installation of the public notification board. These materials include a copy of the City logo, size and material requirements, andillustrated examples of a posting board. The Department will also determine the type of decision being rendered for this application and specify to the applicant the duration of the posting period. The Department shall post the Notice of Hearing on any posted notice board(s) erected pursuant to TMC 18.104.110 at least 14 days prior to any public hearings on Type 3, 4 and 5 decisions, open record appealhearings on Type 2 decisions and closed appeal hearings on Type 4 decisions.. No signs or sign supports which obscure vision between the heights of 3 and 10 feet within 40 feet of the intersection of streets or driveways will be allowed. SIGN 1-I 1,I SIGN 0 Figure #2 7/2/96 4 8" Dia 2.75" (Lettering, Red) NOTICE OF LAND USS ACTION 1908 // 1.5" (Lettering) Type of Action: Project Name: Site Address: Applicant; Site Map (11" x 14") (Boxes included on sign) Notice of Application (8.5" x 14") (8.5" x 14") (8.5" x 14") 1.5" (Lettering) TO SUBMIT COMMENTS OR OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE PROJECT PLANNER AT (206) 431-3670 Tukwila Planning Division 6300 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 1.0" (Lettering) Figure #3 • • Figure #4 DECISION TYPE ON-SITE POSTING PERIODS DURATION OF POSTING PERIOD Type 2 decision Type 3; 4 or 6'dRcl Via? For any project requiring — a Shoriine Substantial Development Permit => f : iy%3 �=•;iF:.'�SyS't.rx6; i'��:t: taks'�'Y1�iH' i`1 it • 0019.1141,64.051 6 W9 ems! (For protects triggering SEPA review, posting shall lake place within 14 days atter noltce of completeness until the later of (1) 14 days after the Issuance of a decision, or (2) the date of any admlNslrative appeal ` hearing. 1_1>CThe Public Notice Board shall be posted for a minimum of 30 days. REMOVAL OF POSTING BOARD Applicant Is responsible for removing the posting board In a timely matter in accordance with the time limit described In the "Duration of Posting Period" section. 6/2 7/96 • • • City of Tukwila • 6200 Southcenter Boulevard • Tukwila, Washington 98188 Silver Dollar Casino Attn.: Mr. Tim Iszley/Mr. Steve Schneider 14027 Interurban Avenue South Tukwila, WA 98168 John W Rants, Mayor January 4, 1999 RE: Permit Application Status/Wetland Issue/Drainage Solutions (RFA 98-262) Dear Mr. Iszley/Mr. Schneider: • Here is an update/summary of the information I have compiled to date. As I have informed you, I fully intend to help you resolve several issues (Permit for Parking Lot/Wetland Procedures/SEPA/Excess Drainage Water Pumping) that impede your permit approval. Please understand that it is important to gather as much information as possible that will affect your situation. Once I have compiled this information, I will inform you of the current status of your project. In addition, I will provide you with the necessary steps to take in order to expedite your permits. After speaking with the appropriate individuals regarding your situation, I have determined that the following issues must be addressed: PARKING LOT PAVEMENT AND PERMITS In order to get your plans reviewed further, you must inform the Dept. of Community Development Planning staff of how many parking spaces are currently at this location that are marked and in regular use. You must also be more clear as to how many parking spaces will be added as a result of paving the parking lot. This information was unclear to our Planning staff and requires clarification. Upon supplying this information, you will then receive a more detailed description of what is needed to facilitate this from DCD staff. (Please note: If you wish to add more than 40 newly marked parking stalls, a SEPA Checklist must be completed and submitted for City of Tukwila and State of Washington review.) WETLAND/SENSITIVE AREAS DISTURBANCE The Western portion of the project site has recently been disturbed. City staff has identified wetland characteristics on this portion of the property. This information was presented in the June 1998 Pre -Application meeting (see enclosed PRE98-037), and during a site visit conducted on Friday, December 18, 1998 with Code Enforcement staff. Phone: (206) 433-1800 • City Hall Fax. (206) 433-1833 Silver Dollar Casino Mr. Tim Iszley/Mr. Steve Schneider January 4, 1999 Page Two WETLAND/SENSITIVE AREAS DISTURBANCE (Cont.) The recent disturbance may have affected a wetland area. A wetland assessment will be required to determine all wetland area on the project site and potential impacts from clearing activities. In addition, a SEPA Checklist (see enclosed) will also be required because of observed wetland impacts. SEPA review is required whenever a project has the potential to affect "lands covered by water." (Note: You may hire your own certified soils/biologist/analyst to contest the presence of a wetland. However, you could potentially lengthen the overall process, and increase your total project costs. ) PUMPING OF EXCESS DRAINAGE INTO STORM DRAINS You have provided us with photographic evidence of pumping excess drainage water directly and indirectly into Interurban Avenue South storm drains. As 1 have informed you, this is an illegal activity without detention/siltration controls to remove any excess soils or automotive runoff from the water. In order for you to continue pumping this excess drainage from your site, you must use a City of Tukwila Dept. of Public Works approved detention apparatus to house the initial drain water. After the soils and automotive runoff have been removed, this water can be accepted down storm drains. I hope the above provides you with some insight on some of the obstacles slowing down the issuance of your permit. I provide it with a good faith effort to assist you. I also trust that you will give us your full cooperation in helping us resolve these issues. If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to call me at (206) 431-3682. Sincerely, Jason W. Jones cc: John McFarland, City Administrator Rhonda Berry, Asst. City Administrator Steve Lancaster, Dir. of Community Development Brian Shelton, City Engineer Gary Schulz, Urban Environmentalist City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard • Tukwila, Washington 98188 Date of Notice: Name: Street: City: CORRECTION NOTICE December 7, 1998 Carl Rice Silver Dollar Casino 14027 Interurban Ave. S. Tukwila, WA 98178 Location of Violation: 14027 Interurban Ave. S. Tukwila, WA 98178 Date of Inspection: December 3, 1998 (RFA 98-262) John W Rants, Mayor An inspection of the above revealed the following violation of the Tukwila Municipal Code: DESCRIPTION OF VIOLATION: Substantial clearing of vegetation to the west of building in designated wetland area without permit. [TMC 16.54.060, 16.54.170, 16.54.200, and 18.45.080(a)(b)(h)] CORRECTIVE ACTION: Develop/implement replanting plan to restore altered wetland area. Our records (King County Assessor's records) identify you as the person responsible for this property. As such, you must take the above described corrective action by December 21, 1998 or a Notice of Civil Violation may be issued and you will be assessed monetary penalties of up to $100 for each of the first five days that a violation exists and up to $500 for each subsequent day the violation continues, pursuant to the Tukwila Municipal Code Chapter 8.45 "Civil Violations, Enforcement and Abatement." If you have any questions, please contact the Code Enforcement Office at 206-431-3682 during my office hours of 8:30-10:00 a.m. and 3:30-5:00 p.m. Your cooperation will be greatly appreciated. Sincerely, 23. Jason W. Jones Code Enforcement Officer JWJ/bw Phone: (206) 433-1800 • City Hall Fax (206) 433-1833 16.54.060 Mandatory standards. All land -altering activity shall be undertaken in accordance with the following mandatory standards: (1) Permit required - No person shall initiate any land -altering activity under any circumstances as prescribed in this chapter without first obtaining a permit, except as specifically exempted by TMC 16.54.150. (2) Plan required - All work must be performed in accordance with a sequence shown on an approved land -altering plan or a revised sequence as may be determined by the Public Works Director. (3) Control zone - No land -altering activity shall be permitted adjacent to a sensitive area and its buffer without a control zone which restricts all siltation and/or other adverse impacts associated with the land -altering activity from intruding upon such sensitive area and its buffer. (4) Sedimentation and erosion control devices - If any land -altering activity involves a surface area comprising more than 6,000 square feet, the person conducting the land -altering activity shall employ sedimentation and erosion control devices andpractices sufficient to retain all sediment generated by the land -altering activity within the boundaries of the site during construction. (5) Ground cover - Within 30 days following the completion of construction or development on any site, the owner shall plant all required vegetative cover in quantities sufficient to minimize erosion upon maturity and complete all non -vegetative groundcover. (6) Design standards - Unless specified in this chapter, or in the City development standards, all sediment retention and erosion control devices shall be designed in accordance with the King County, Washington, Surface Water Design Manual, King County Public Works Department, Surface Water Management Division, January, 1990, or as amended. (Ord. 1591 ,¢2.1, 1991) ©1997 Code Publishing, Inc. Page 1 16.54.170 Permit - Enforcement. If, through inspection or other means, it is determined that a person engaged in land -altering activity has failed to comply with the approved land -altering plan and/or other permit conditions, any or all of the enforcement actions prescribed in this chapter may be initiated. When permit violations are identified, a notice of violation shall beserved upon that person by registered or certified mail or other means. The notice shall set forth the measures necessary to achieve compliance with the plan, specify the time period to commence and complete corrections, and indicate the consequences for failure to correct the violation. (1) Any land -altering permit issued by the City may be suspended or revoked, after written notice is given to the permittee, for any of the following reasons: (A) Any violation(s) of the conditions of the permit: (B) Changes in site runoff characteristics upon which the permit is granted: (C) Construction not in accordance with the approved plans: (D) Noncompliance with correction notice(s) or stop work order(s) issued for erosion or sediment controls; (E) An immediate danger exists in a downstream area or adjacent property as determined by the Public Works Director. (2) In addition to the action under subsection (1), the Public Works Director may post a site with a "stop work" order directing that all land -altering activity cease immediately. The issuance of a stop work order may include any "discretionary conditions" or "standard requirements" which must be fulfilled before work under the land -altering permit may continue. (3) No person shall continue or permit the continuance of work in an area covered by a stop work order, except work required to correct an imminent safety hazard as prescribed by the Public Works Director. (4) The cost of any corrective measures shall be borne by the developer, owner or permittee applicant. (Ord 1591 §2.11, 1991) ©1997 Code Publishing, Inc. Page 1 16.54.200 Clearing. All clearing of vegetation shall conform to the specifications of this chapter and those set forth in the development standards (on file at the Public Works Department) unless otherwise exempt. (1) Clearing shall be restricted to the extent necessary to develop the site. The extent of such clearing shall be approved by the Public Works Director and shall be delineated on the approved site plans. (2) Clearing in a designated sensitive area or its buffer shall conform to the conditions and restrictions prescribed by review processes in the Department of Community Development and the City's development standards. (Ord 1591 §3.2, 1991) ©1997 Code Publishing, Inc. Page 1 18.45.080 Uses and standards. A. General Uses - The uses set forth in this entire section, including subsections A through H, and the following general uses, may be located within a sensitive area or buffer, subject to the provisions of TMC 21.04 and of this section: 1. Maintenance and repair of existing uses and facilities provided no alteration or additional fill materials will be placed or heavy construction equipment used in the sensitive area or buffer: 2. Nondestructive education and research: 3. Passive recreation and open space; 4. Maintenance and repair of essential streets, roads, rights-of-way, or utilities: 5. Actions to remedy the effects of emergencies that threaten the public health, safety or welfare. B. Permitted Uses Subject To Administrative Review- The following uses may be permitted only after administrative review and approval by the Director: 1. Maintenance and repair of existing uses and facilities where alteration or additional fill materials will be placed or heavy construction equipment used: 2. Construction of new essential streets and roads, rights-of-way and utilities: 3.. New surface water discharges to wetlands or watercourses or their buffers from detention facilities, presettlement ponds or other surface water management structures may be allowed provided that the discharge meets the clean water standards of RCW 90.48 and WAC 173.200 and 173.201 as amended, and does not increase the rate of flow to the wetland or watercourse beyond the level of the existing rate: 4. Regional stormwater detention areas may be allowed if use results in no decrease in rating of resource and enhances existing values and functions. Design shall be subject to the standards of this section and other applicable City standards: 5. Enhancement or other mitigation including landscaping. C. Wetlands 1. General. a. No use or development may occur in a Type 1 and Type 2 wetland or its buffer except as specifically allowed by TMC 18.45.080A, 080B and 080H. Any use or development allowed is subject to the standards of this section. b. Only isolated Type 3 wetlands can be altered or relocated, and then only with the permission of the Director. A mitigation or enhancement plan must be developed and must comply with the standards of compensatory mitigation required in this chapter. c. Mitigation plans shall be completed for any proposals for dredging, filling, alterations and relocation of wetland habitat allowed in TMC 18.45.080A, 080B and 080H. 2. Compensatory Mitigation. a. The mitigation plan shall be developed as part of a sensitive area study by a specialist approved by the Director. Wetland and/or buffer alteration or relocation may be allowed only when a mitigation plan clearly demonstrates that the changes would be an improvement of wetland and buffer quantitative and qualitative functions. The plan shall follow the performance standards of this chapter and show how water quality, wildlife and fish habitat, and general wetland quality would be improved. b. In order to achieve the City's goal of no net loss of wetland functions and acreage, alteration of wetlands will require the applicant to provide a restoration, enhancement or creation plan to compensate for the impacts to the wetland and will compensate at a ratio of 1.5 to 1. c. Mitigation Location. (1) On-site compensation, shall be provided, except where the applicant can demonstrate that: (a) The hydrology and ecosystem of the original wetland and those who benefit from the hydrology and ecosystem will not be damaged by the on-site loss; and (b)On-site compensation is not scientifically feasible due to problems with hydrology, soils, waves or other factors; or (c) Compensation is not practical due to potentially adverse impact from surrounding ©1997 Code Publishing, Inc. Page 1 • the importance of the site is declared to be marginal or not of use to the scientific community, development shall be allowed on the site. Development shall not begin on such a site until the Director gives approval. H. Permitted Uses Subject to Exception Approval. Other uses may be permitted upon receiving a reasonable use exception pursuant to TMC 18.45.115. A use permitted through a reasonable use exception shall conform to the procedures of this chapter and be consistent with the underlying zoning. (Ord. 1758 5C1(part), 1995) ©1997 Code Publishing, Inc. Page 10 mum c ..n.c s NAT .NT i cwm AL OAS NSA AT OW. WOW INTERUJWAN AVE. SO. 8 MST..,GL T TaaTAB. ISM OTT OF TAMP 30 0,1GETAA Ma/ ACROSS SOM. 9R mxT4 pEp191 AS -MAT RI. SEE �i,.f 0A. IGNTING GLARE. NIDE SPREAD. NN LIGHTS O O ASPHALTKW PAN AN ) GE IAN LE LAS m.p4Tm CIL M LEIiiATILOW' TO CAME o[iaari iUNIE m MIST ELEVATION. .40 OE lalla SEPATEATOI KA OCTAL SPE 1 S44'50'3 300.00' 50.00' BUILDING SITE PLAN SCALE: 1' = 20'-0" COSMO MCC OTAINOAS LOCA. SOYA SET 00,00,19119EY ALL 991111 LEGEND MST..sE ._ PROPOSIM PPE MEGS FLOIr GA UNE .1.u1. TTA. 19417, N N.To. SPOT ELSIELIVSIING SPOT ELEV. 90411069 PIPPOSED PARKING SPACES - ma.o roams. As Nor) TOTAL .u.p) AREAS PNO I'N'S.°:AEA AM •t2m'VTJSI.0 SUMO WAS. MUM PAPNO LETT PAWL ISM 91 1E..SO. TT. ..,T m ,T. Tv,¢. EN rt. non m TT. R EC E E,nD APR 2 3-399 DEVELOPMEs f 2 a Y L1 Ia' z DATE .nom USA.N Tn [NECKED Doc. Na SDC -1 or !!311430 11Wli3d (1)7Sla-1 blt° • • )2(WJ1}U2 • • rN C • •••••... •• •..•..•.•••••• b0) d lA I i4 ? )CEJ �- 4J00/ 3 1.•••.• • •• • • • • • T. _i• `� • Nie • ...•. 44 0[V 4-a 0f1 v��Y1 1 >i 2' /4/ •