Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA E99-0026 - PARKWAY SUPERCENTER - PHASE II EXPANSIONPARKWAY SUPERCENTER PHASE 11 BUILDING EXPANSION FOR 'BEST BUY' STORE & ADDITIONAL PARKING 17380 SOUTHCENTER PKWY E99-0026 City of Tukwila John W Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director PLANNING. DIVISION COMMENTS DATE: January 13, 2000 APPLICANT: MBK Northwest RE: MI2000-004, Parkway Supercenter — Minkler Property ADDRESS: Minkler, just east of Southcenter Parkway Please review the following comments listed below and submit your revisions accordingly. If you have any questions on the requested revisions, Carol Lumb is'the planner assigned to the file and can be reached at 206-431-3661. 1. No permit can be issued for this project until a) permission is given by the current owners to allow construction of a parking lot on their parcel, or b) proof is provided that MBK Northwest has purchased the site. This issue must be cleared up as soon as possible. 2. Fifteen (15) feet of landscaping is required along Minkler Blvd., per the landscaping requirements of the Tukwila Urban Center zoning district. 3. The landscaping plan for the parking lot must be revised to meet the landscaping code, which was amended. in June, 1999. A copy of the ordinance adopting the changes is attached. Please see TMC 18.52.035, Interior Parking Lot Landscaping Requirement, items 3 and 4 and TMC 18.52.040, General Landscape and Screening Requirements. A copy of the parking lot site plan is attached with the portions of the parking lot subject to TMC 18.52.035 3.a. and 3.b. identified. 4. When the landscaping plan is resubmitted, please include the landscaping square footage calculations to illustrate compliance with the landscaping code. Attachments: Ordinance 1872 , Marked -up Site Plan Landscaping Declaration cc: Nora Gierloff, Associate Planner c:\carol\general\mi2000-004.doc 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 CITY OF TUKWILA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING MBK Northwest has filed a revision to the approved design for the Parkway Supercenter Development located at the east side of Southcenter Parkway north and south of S. 180th Street. The revision would combine and expand three existing tenant spaces in the northeast corner of the development in order to accommodate a 45,000 sf Best Buy store. An additional vacant triangular parcel of land adjacent to Minkler, east of the development, will be developed for additional parking. Permits applied for include: Design Review Revision Other known required permits include: Building Permits Hauling Permit A new environmental checklist has been submitted with the permits identified above. FILES AVAILABLE' FOR PUBLIC REVIEW ". The project files are available at the. City of Tukwila. To view the files, you may request them at the counter at the Department of Community Development (DCD), located at 6300 Southcenter Boulevard #100. Project Files include: L98-0014 Original Design Review L97-0063 Phase II Design Review E97-0034 Original SEPA Environmental Review E99-0026 New SEPA Environmental Review D99-0293 Tenant Improvement Permit You are invited to comment on the project at the public hearing before the Board of Architectural Review, scheduled for October 28, 1999 at 7:00 p.m. The hearing will be held in the City Council Chambers at City Hall. The hearing is subject to change. You may confirm the time and date by calling Nora Gierloff at the Department of Community Development at (206) 433-7141. For further information on this proposal, contact the project planner Nora Gierloff at (206) 433-7141 orvisit our offices at 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100, Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Notice of Hearing Issued: 10/14/99 AFFIDAVIT Notice Q.Natice of Public Fearing of Public Meeting Beard of Adjustment. Agenda Packet a Beard of Appeals Agenda Packet Planning Commission Agenda Packet. Q Short Subdivision Agenda Packet OF- D I S T R..I B IIT I O N hereby declare that: O Ncti ce of Application far Shoreline Management Permit QShoreline Management Permit Determination of Non—...... / s i gni f is anc e N;tieated..Determinatian af. Nonsignificance _J Determination of Significance -and Scop i ng..,Notice Notice af Action Official Notice Other Other was mailed to each of the following addresses on Name of Project File Number E---99:()6,-, (� Signature CHECKLIST: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW/SHORELINE PERMIT MAILINGS ( ) U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS ( ) FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION ( ) DEPT OF FISH & WILDLIFE OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT DEPT NATURAL RESOURCES OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR DEPT OF COMM. TRADE & ECONOMIC DEV. DEPT OF FISHERIES & WILDLIFE FEDERAL AGENCIES ( ) U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ( ) U.S. DEPT OF H.U.D. WASHINGTON STATE AGENCIES K.C. PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEV. BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD FIRE DISTRICT #11 FIRE DISTRICT #2 K.C. WATER POLLUTION CNTRL SEPA OFFCL TUKWILA SCHOOL DISTRICT TUKWILA LIBRARIES RENTON LIBRARY KENT LIBRARY CITY OF SEATTLE LIBRARY U S WEST SEATTLE CITY LIGHT PUGET SOUND ENERGY HIGHLINE WATER DISTRICT SEATTLE WATER DEPARTMENT TCI CABLEVISION OLYMPIC PIPELINE KENT PLANNING DEPT TUKWILA CITY DEPARTMENTS: ( ) PUBLIC WORKS ( ) ( ) POLICE ( ) ( ) PLANNING ( ) ( ) PARKS & REC. ( ) ( ) CITY CLERK FIRE FINANCE BUILDING MAYOR ( ) PUGET SOUND REGIONAL COUNCIL ( ) P.S: AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY ( ) SW K C CHAMBER OF COMMERCE (, ) MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE ( ) DUWAMISH INDIAN TRIBE ( ) SEATTLE TIMES 07/09/98 C:WP51DATA\CHKLIST ( ) DEPT OF SOCIAL & HEALTH SERV. ( ) DEPT OF ECOLOGY, SHORELIND DIV (V) DEPT OF ECOLOGY, SEPA DIVISION* ( ) OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL * SEND CHKLIST W/ DETERMINATIONS * SEND SITE MAPS WITH DECISION KING COUNTY AGENCIES K.C. DEPT OF PARKS HEALTH DEPT PORT OF SEATTLE K.C.DEV & ENVIR SERVICES-SEPA INFO CNTR K.C. TRANSIT DIVISION - SEPA OFFICIAL SCHOOLS/LIBRARIES HIGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT K C PUBLIC LIBRARY SEATTLE MUNI REF LIBRARY SEATTLE SCHOOL DISTRICT RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT UTILITIES PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT VAL-VUE SEWER DISTRICT WATER DISTRICT #20 WATER DISTRICT *125 CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC WORKS RAINIER VISTA SKYWAY CITY AGENCIES RENTON PLANNING DEPT CITY OF SEA -TAC CITY OF BURIEN TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS CITY OF SEATTLE - SEPA INFO CENTER - DCLU SEATTLE OFFICE OF MGMNT & PLANNING* * NOTICE OF ALL SEATTLE RELATED PLNG PROJ. OTHER LOCAL AGENCIES ( METRO ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING DIV. OFFICE/INDUSTRIAL 5,000 GSF OR MORE RESIDENTIAL 50 UNITS OR MORE RETAIL 30,000 GSF OR MORE • • Please mail notice to: Party of Record: Matthew B. Straight Oseran, Hahn, Spring & Watts 10900 N.E. Fourth Street #850 Bellevue, WA 98004 Applicant: Roger Stange Benner Stange Assoc. 5000 S.W. Meadows Rd Suite 430 Lake Oswego, OR 97035 CITY OF TUKWILA DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: EXPANSION OF EXISTING BLDG FOR A 45,000 S.F. "BEST BUY" AND ADDITION OF A PARKING AREA ALONG MINKLER. PROPONENT: MBK NORTHWEST LOCATION OF PROPOSAL, INCLUDING STREET ADDRESS:,IF,ANY: ADDRESS: 17380SOUTHCENTER PY PARCEL NO: 262304-9079 SEC/TWN/RNG: LEAD AGENCY:,CITY OF 'TUKWILA :,FILE, NO': E99,-0026 The City has!determined'-that,the proposal does not. have a probable significant; adverse impact ori -the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is..:n-ot required under RCW 43.21c.`030(2) (c). This decision was made after review ofa completed environmental checklist checklist arid other information .-on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public onrequest. r *******************,**.************************************u***.,******�********* This determination is`fina,l and<signed,thi•s 199f . Steve Lancaster;' Responsible Official City of Tukwila, (206) 431-3670 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA'': '98188' day of dC-'OP's' Copies of the procedures for SEPA-appeals are Department of Community Development • available;%:w;i th the City of T7L1lkWli 2 John W Rants, Mayor Department of Community , 'evelopment Steve Lancaster, Director MEMORANDUM TO: Jack Pace FROM: Nora Gierloff0\ RE: SEPA - Parkway Supercenter Redevelopment DATE: October 20, 1999 Project File No. E99-0026 Project Description: The project would combine and expand three existing tenant spaces in the northeast corner of the Parkway Supercenter Development in order to accommodate a 45,000 sf Best Buy store. An additional vacant triangular parcel of land adjacent to Minkler, east of the development, will be developed for additional parking. Agencies With Jurisdiction: Washington State Department of Ecology Comments to SEPA Checklist: A comment letter was received from representatives of the Upland Drive Business Park Condominium with the following concerns: 1. The Condominium vigorously contests and denies the right of the applicant to utilize any portion of the Upland Drive Business Park Condominium for parking, ingress and egress, or any other purpose. Response: 1. No permits will be issued for the area in question or any building expansion that would require additional parking spaces until the ownership issue is resolved to the City's satisfaction. Summary of Primary Impacts: 1. Earth — Preload soil will be removed from a building site on the South Lot and stockpiled on a lot behind the Ethan Allen store before being placed as preload on the Best Buy expansion site. Minor soil erosion during preloading, transportation or construction is a possibility, but the sites are predominantly flat and this should be easily controlled. No negative earth impacts are expected to result from the project. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 0 Tukwila, Washington 98188 0 (206) 431-3670 0 Fax (206) 431-3665 2. Air - There will be exhaust emissions from construction equipment and trucks carrying the building debris, fill soil and construction materials during the project. The project's air emissions when complete will consist of automotive traffic to and from the site. A trip generation report was submitted as part of the previous environmental review and no new trips are expected due to the remodel. 3. Water - A Class 3 watercourse is located on the stockpile lot, but is not expected to be affected by these actions. Oil/water separators for the new parking area will be added to the storm drainage system as required by Tukwila's Storm and Surface Water Ordinance. No hazardous wastes are expected to be released during or after construction. 4. Plants - The existing landscaping on the project will be retained. Landscaping will be installed in the new parking lot according the Board of Architectural Review's approved landscape plan and the City's landscape code. No significant vegetation exists in the stockpile area. 5. Animals - The sites do not contain significant animal habitat. 6. Energy and Natural Resources - The project will require energy for construction equipment, vehicles coming to the site and building operation after completion. The project will be required to meet current energy codes. 7. Environmental Health - Construction equipment operation will need to comply with Tukwila's noise ordinance. 8. Land and Shoreline Use - The proposed project will not affect the shoreline. 9. Housing - The proposal will not result in a change to the housing supply. 10. Aesthetics - The project is subject to the design review process including a hearing before the Board of Architectural Review. The building permit drawings must agree with the BAR approved design. 11. Light and Glare - Additional site lighting will be provided by new light standards, but offsite lighting will be modest. The project is located in a commercial area and the additional lighting will enhance safety without causing negative impacts. 12. Recreation - The proposal will not affect recreational facilities. 13. Historical and Cultural Preservation - The site is not known to have any historical or cultural significance. 14. Transportation - A trip generation study was submitted along with the previous checklist for the overall center remodel and expansion. This project is largely a retail to retail tenant improvement and is not expected to generate additional trips. The number of parking spaces provided will be • • increased to accommodate the 9,800 sf expansion of the Best Buy store. The site will continue to be served by public transit and the existing transit waiting areas shall be retained. 15. Public Services - The project will not significantly increase demand on public services. 16. Utilities - The project will relocate some on site utilities outside of the Best Buy building pad. Utility use is not expected to significantly increase. Recommended Threshold Determination: Determination of non -significance. Linda A. Cade James H. Clark Gerald M. Hahn Thomas M. Hansen Robert C. Kelley Ralph Maimon September 14, 1999 • • OSERAN, HAHN, SPRING & WATTS, P.S. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 10900 N.E. Fourth Street #850 Bellevue, Washington 98004 Telephgpe • (425) 455-3900 Facsimile ♦ (425) 455-9201 Ms. Brenda Holt Ms. Nora Gierloff City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 Tukwila, WA 98188 M. Edward Spring Matthew B. Straight David M. Tall Charles E. Watts Of Counsel: Michel P. Stern Victor Van Valin VIA FAX TRANSMISSION (206) 431-3665 Re: Response to City of Tukwila Notice of Application - PROJECT FILE E99-0026 AND D99-0026 WE ARE WRITING to you on behalf of our client, Mr. Joe Carol and Robert Weaver, on behalf of the Upland Park Business Park Condominium Association. The proposed location of additional offsite parking for the proposed Parkway Super Center, as described in the above file, is located on the Upland Drive Business Park Condo- minium. The Condominium Association vigorously contests and denies any right of the applicant to utilize any portion of the Upland Drive Business Park Condominium for parking, ingress and egress, or any other purpose. Please see the attached letter which sets forth in detail the legal bases for such objection. Any attempt to use any portion of the Upland Drive Business Park Condominium for parking, ingress and egress or any other purposes related to the proposed Parkway Super Center will be contested through legal action on all of the bases set,Vrth in the attached letter. Any responses on this matter should be sent to the undersigned. Very truly yours, Matthew B. Straig t mstraight@oseranhahn.com MBS/yp Enclosure F:\MBS\Upland Drive\tukwila.1.doc 09/14/99 (y SEP -14-1999 15:33 Linda A. Cade James H. Clark Gerald M. Hahn Thomas M. Hansen Robert C. Kelley Ralph Maimon September 14, 1999 •ERN HAHN LAW FIRM • 425 462 7114 P. 03/05 OSERAN, HAHN, SPRING & WATTS, P.S. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 10900 N.E. Fourth Street 11850 Bellevue, Washington 98004 Telephone + (425) 455-3900 Facsimile • (425) 455-9201 Mr. Kelly Garvey 33438 First Way South Federal Way, WA 98003 RE: Upland Drive Dear Mr. Garvey: M. Edward Spring Matthew B. Straight David M. Tall Charles E. Watts Of Counsel: Michel P. Stern 'Vic -tor Van Valin I am in Bob Kelley's office and I am writing to you regarding Unit K, Upland Drive Business Park Condominium. We understand you are their agent and will send a copy of this letter to them. Mr. Kelley referred the matter to me because I am a specialist in condominium law. I have participated in the formation of over two hundred (200) condominium projects and represent numerous associations. I have reviewed the Declaration for Upland Drive Business Park Condominium and the related documents regarding the proposed change in use of Unit K. I understand Unit K is in the process of being sold. I am astonished by your assertion in a recent letter that the Declaration was reviewed by the buyer's attorney and found consistent with the intended use of Unit K as a parking lot for neighboring property. Either that is a flat misstatement, or these attorneys know nothing about condominium law. 1. The current owner of Unit K cannot be sold and used for a parking lot or related use for the following reasons: 2. Unit K has never been constructed in the Twenty years since the Condominium was formed. The right to construct the building which was shown as Unit K in the Survey map was purportedly reserved in the Declaration as a development right. This condominium was created under the old condominium statute, R.C.W. 64.32. There is no provision in that statute for reserving a perpetual right of the Declarant to build improvements within the condominium sometime in the future. The Declaration specified no time within which those improvements must be built. The F_1MBS1Upland Drivelearvey.1.doc 09/14/99 (y) SEP -14-1999 15:34 Mr. Kelly Garvey September 14, 1999 Page 2 41iERAN HAHN LAW FIRM • 425 462 7114 P.04/05 failure to specify such time violates Washington law and renders this provision invalid as violating the rule against perpetuities. 3. The Developer's sale of all of the other units in the condominium before the construction of Unit K violated Washington law. R.C.W. 64.32.100 required that all units must be certified "as built" before ay units could be sold. Accordingly, when the developer sold the original units in 1979, it waived the right to construct Unit K, despite the provisions of the Declaration. This is also consistent with the way we understand dues have been assessed at the condominium since inception. We understand that the owner of Unit K has never paid any dues to the Association, despite the provisions of the Declaration requiring it to pay 18.992% of all common expenses. 4. Even if the developer still had the right- to construct Unit K, which we believe it does not, the developer does not have the right to change Unit K to be anything other than as is required in the Declaration and shown on the Survey Map and Plans, Section 1(b) of the Declaration specifically states that Unit K is a 12,000 foot building. The exterior perimeter of Unit K is shown on the Survey Map and Plans recorded with the Declaration The Declaration is quite specific as to what is permitted and what must be built in Unit K. The proposed changing of Unit K from the specified building to instead be a parking lot for neighboring property is absolutely contrary to the permitted uses by the Declaration. 5. The Survey Map and Plans clearly delineate the exterior dimensions of Units K, where it is identified as Building 3. Everywhere outside of that building footprint constitutes common area of the Condominium project. The Declaration and R.C.W.- 64.32 provide that each unit owner in the Condominium own undivided tenancy in common interests in those common areas. The current owner of Unit K does not have the right to unilaterally give rights to any third party, including a neighboring land owner, to use any portion of those common areas. This is consistent with R.C.W. 64.32.050(4) prohibits a unit owner from using the common areas for any purpose which hinders or encroaches upon the use and enjoyment of those common areas by other unit owners. 5. The statute and Declaration provide that the common areas are to be managed through the Board on behalf of all Unit owners. No one Unit owner has the right to make any agreements or allow any third party to use any part of the common areas. The Board will not give permission to the neighboring property owner to either (a) cross over any common areas or (b) use any common areas for parking purposes. We assume this letter will settle the matter, and the owner of Unit K will abandon this attempt to allow neighboring property to use part of the condominium for parking purposes. if not, we will recommend that the Association immediately commence legal F:1MBS\Upland Drlvel®arvey.l.doc 09/14/99 (y) EP -14-1999 15:34 Mr. Kelly Garvey September 14, 1999 Page 3 GERAN HAHN LAID FIRM • 425 462 7114 P.05/05 action to enjoin that illegal and improper action, all as permitted under R.C.W. 64.32.060. If you or the owner of Unit K desires to respond to this letter, please do so to the undersigned. Very truly yours, Matthew B. Straig matts@oseranhahn. MBS/yp F:1MBs1Upland ortve\ arvey.l.doc 09/14/99 (y) TOTAL P.05 • City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster Director September 8, 1999 Roger Stange Benner Stange Associates Architects 5000 SW Meadows Road#430 Lake Oswego, OR 97035 RE: Parkway Supercenter SEPA E99-0026 Dear Roger, I have reviewed your SEPA application and have the following revision comments. Section A 1. Item 11 should mention removal of the pre -load from the South Lot, storage of the pre -load, and reuse on the Best Buy site. 2. Item 12 should mention the South Lot and the fill storage site. 3. Item 13, there is a Class 3 watercourse and steep slopes on the fill storage site. Section B 4. Item 1, include descriptions of the fill storage site in your answers. 5. Item 3 a. 1, fill storage site has a Type 3 watercourse. 6. Item 3 a. 2 and 3, will the fill be placed within 200 feet of the watercourse? 7. Item 8 h, see response to Item 13 above. The Public Works revision comments have been consolidated with comments on the land altering permit. I am enclosing a copy, please address them in your resubmittals. If you have any additional questions or comments, please call me at (206) 431-3670. Sincerely, Nora Gierloff Associate Planner Enclosures CC: Jim Morrow, PW Director C:\Nora's Files\PARKWAYS\SEPA Revisions.doc "6300 Southcenter Boulevard Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 FILE: APPLICANT: ADDRESS:: DATE: PLAN REVIEWER: SEPA REVIEW COMMENTS LAND ALTERING COMMENTS PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT E99-0026 D99-0293 MBK Northwest Parkway Supercenter/Best Buy 17380 Southcenter Parkway September 3, 1999 Jim Morrow: Telephone (206) 433-0179 The Public Works Department has completed its review of the SEPA Checklist and the site/civil plans. The Applicant needs to make the necessary corrections, resubmit a new set of plans, and return the "redlines." Based upon this review, the following comments are provided. General Comments 1. The plans and documentation accompanying the permit application E99-0026 and D99-0293 are deemed incomplete and unsatisfactory. 2. The SEPA submittal (E99-0026) and the Land Altering/Utilities submittal (D99- 0293) are not coordinated and supportive of each other. The Land Altering plans do not include the proposed development of the additional parking area to the:. northeast - along Minkler Avenue. Additionally, the SEPAA submittal mentions that 3,500 cubic yards of fill material will be removed from the site south of 180th Avenue, temporarily stockpiled on a vacant piece of property behind the existing Ethan Allen building, and then used as pre -loading material -for the proposed. new Best Buy building. Yet there are no temporary erosion control plans for the Ethan Allen stockpiling site included with the Land Altering package. 3. The proposed project is complex enough to warrant separate plans for each phase of the work. Too much work is being shown on a single plan sheet. Therefore the following set of plans should be submitted: A. Project Information/Cover Sheet/Parcel Plan that will show: • Vicinity map with scale and north arrow. • Area of site shown. _ • • • Impervious area listed as a percentage of gross area. • Existing property lines and difnensions. • ' Existing and/or proposed easements and right-of-way lines. • Project name, Table of Contents, Phone Number of "One Call" utility locator, City's Public Works Department-pre- construction/inspection notification phone number, name and number of surveyor, name and number of engineer, name and number of owner/agent. • Legal description; etc. B. Site Plan to include: • All natural and proposed drainage collection and conveyance • systems with catch basins numbered. • Property area development. • Right -of -Way layout. • Street names • Indicate units of measurement for all slopes as either % or ft/ft. • The City's standard -General and Drainage notes that apply to the plan shall be provided on the sheet. • Cut and fill quantities of proposed site work. C. Temporary Erosion Control Plan to include: • Pre -load for Best Buy. • Drainage and collection systems (Ethan Allen site too) D. Grading and Paving Plan E. Drainage/Sewer/Water Plan 4. A geotechnical report that addresses: • Scope of work; site conditions; structural fill; retaining walls; foundation support; foundation settlement; slab -on -grade support; pavement design considerations; and drainage considerations. 5. A drainage control report is• needed -that addresses drainage for the new building and the new parking area. Pre -Load Plan, Sheet 1 of 3 1. •A note on the plan refers the contractor (Which contractor?) to the geotechnical • engineering report prepared by Geotechnical Engineering Services. Why is this note on the plan? Why is the contractor being asked to refer to the geotechnical report? What's the specific concern or issue? • • 2. What is the -Vertical Datum .- should be either,KCAS or NGVD-29. 3. The proposed building footprint appears to be larger than the area being pre- loaded. The pre -load area should exceed the building footprint by 5 feet. Important: See next comment. 4. A note on the plan states that the new utilities are to be installed before the pre- load pad is constructed. It appears that if the pre -load pad is increased in size to exceed the footprint of the building that there is a chance that the pre -load pad will also cover the new utility lines. If this is the_case, there is a possibility that the new utility lines may incur damage due to settlement. 5. Although there is a note that a filter fabric fence is to be installed at the toe of the pre -load pad, where will the surface water drain should it rain? The plan needs to show a collection system and drainage path as part of the temporary erosion control plan. King County Surface Design Manual calls for mulching to cover disturbed areas that will remain unworked for more than two days during the rainy season - Refer to Appendix D, pages 8 and 9 for more detail. Pre -load pad needs to be covered with mulch. Utility Relocation Plan, Sheet 2 of 3 1. There is a note on the plan that states the contractor must maintain fire service to adjacent buildings. How will this be accomplished? 2. Show a profile of the sanitary sewer lines and the water lines to ensure that there is a minimum of 18 vertical inches separating them. 3. There are three sanitary sewermanholes that need to be brought up to City standards. They are circled on the plan. 4. There is a water line in the north section of the project area with a valve between the existing building and the water main. Are the valve and the entire line to be removed? On this same line where it currently connects to the water main, a new - valve and thrust block are to be installed. 5. Two valves are to be installed on the new water lines that enter the new building. 6. Catch basins need to be numbered sequentially. 7. A Type II catch basin is needed in lieu of the specified Type I at approximately the midpoint of the building. It is circled on the plan. 8. Show sanitary sewer line slopes. . • TESC and Construction Notes and Details, Sheet 3 of 3 1. A detail for a Catch Basin Insert is shown, but on the previous sheets there is no indication as to where this detail applies. Indicate on the new temporary erosion control plan those catch basins that are to be protected with the insert. Recommendations 1. SEPA - Since the SEPA Checklist mentions moving 3,500 cubic yards of earth from Parcel C to the Ethan Allen site (temporary storage) and then to the Best Buy site for the pre -load pad, the Applicant needs to submit a Temporary Erosion Control Plan (Plan Sheet) for the Ethan Allen site. Further, the Temporary Erosion Control Plan for the Best Buy site is considered inadequate — see above comments. These two plans are needed before a SEPA recommendation can be made. 2. Land Altering — Permit D99-0293 .is denied pending submittal of the corrections. AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION ..*. Notice of Public Hearing •••••••• Notice of Publia.:Meeting Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet. Board of Appeals Agenda Packet: Planning Commission Agenda Packet Short Subdivision Agenda. Packet hereby declare that: LiNotice of Application far - Shoreline Management Permit Shoreline Management Permit ...•••••••• _iDetermlnation of significance IMitigated Determination of. Nonsignificance Determination of Significance and. Scoping Notice Notice -of Action Official Notice [L,e<herA44/1 Other was mailed to each of the following addresses on Name of Project th6i Sicnature 619-voso,Dv--oso;6 File Number • • CHECKLIST: ENVIRONMENTAL-REVIEW/SHORELINE PERMIT MAILINGS ( ) U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS ( ) FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION ( ) DEPT OF FISH & WILDLIFE OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT DEPT NATURAL RESOURCES OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR DEPT OF COMM. TRADE & ECONOMIC DEV. DEPT OF FISHERIES & WILDLIFE FEDERAL AGENCIES ( ) U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL .PROTECTION AGENCY ( ) U.S. DEPT OF H.U.D. WASHINGTON STATE AGENCIES K.C. PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEV. BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD FIRE DISTRICT #11 FIRE DISTRICT'#2 - K.C. WATER POLLUTION CNTRL SEPA-OFFCL ( ) TUKWILA SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) TUKWILA LIBRARIES ( ) RENTON LIBRARY , (. ) KENT LIBRARY (� ) CITY OF SEATTLE LIBRARY U S WEST SEATTLE CITY LIGHT PUGET SOUND ENERGY HIGHLINE WATER DISTRICT SEATTLE WATER DEPARTMENT TCI CABLEVISION OLYMPIC PIPELINE ( ) KENT PLANNING DEPT ( TUKWILA CITY DEPARTMENTS: PUBLIC WORKS POLICE PLANNING PARKS & REC. CITY CLERK ( ) ( ) ( ) FIRE FINANCE BUILDING MAYOR PUGET SOUND REGIONAL COUNCIL P.S. AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY . SW K C CHAMBER OF COMMERCE MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE DUWAMISH INDIAN TRIBE ( ) SEATTLE TIMES 07/09/98 C:WPS1DATA\CHKLIST ( ) DEPT OF SOCIAL & HEALTH SERV. ( ) DEPT.OF ECOLOGY, SHORELIND DIV (bC) DEPT OF ECOLOGY, SEPA DIVISION* ( ) OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL * SEND CHKLIST W/ DETERMINATIONS * SEND•SITE MAPS WITH DECISION KING COUNTY AGENCIES K.C. DEPT OF PARKS HEALTH DEPT PORT OF SEATTLE. K.C.DEV & ENVIR SERVICES-SEPA INFO CNTR K.C. TRANSIT DIVISION..- SEPA OFFICIAL SCHOOLS/LIBRARIES HIGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT K C PUBLIC LIBRARY SEATTLE MUNI REF LIBRARY SEATTLE SCHOOL DISTRICT RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT UTILITIES PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT VAL-VUE SEWER DISTRICT WATER DISTRICT #20 WATER DISTRICT #125 CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC WORKS RAINIER VISTA SKYWAY CITY AGENCIES RENTON PLANNING DEPT CITY OF SEA -TAC CITY OF BURIEN TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS CITY OF SEATTLE - SEPA,INFO CENTER - DCLU SEATTLE OFFICE OF MGMNT & PLANNING* * NOTICE OF ALL SEATTLE RELATED PLNG PROJ. OTHER LOCAL AGENCIES ( ) METRO ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING DIV. OFFICE/INDUSTRIAL 5,000 GSF OR MORE RESIDENTIAL 50 UNITS OR MORE RETAIL 30,000 GSF OR MORE 2 vis- S A 1j8.-ek ss cxi ` 5'O DO 6. l, -U, fit,( vis 2 7L 60 r.eL/3 ) l�G- c , 0iZ 97036 CITY OF TUKWILA NOTICE OF APPLICATION PROJECT INFORMATION MBK Northwest has filed applications for development of a 45,000 square foot Best Buy store and new 90 car parking lot to be located at the northeast corner -of the Parkway Supercenter development, 17300 Southcenter Parkway. Permits applied for include: E99-0026 SEPA Environmental Review D99-0026 Building Permit FILES AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC REVIEW The project files are available at the City of Tukwila. To view the files, you may request them at the counter at the Department of Community Development (DCD), located _at 6300 Southcenter Boulevard #100. Project Files include: E99-0026 SEPA Environmental Review D99-0026 Building Permit OPPORTUNITYFOR PUBLIC COMMENT Your written comments on the project are requested. They must be delivered to DCD at the address above or postmarked no later than 5:00 P.M., September 15th, 1999. APPEALS You may request a copy,of any decision, information on hearings, and your appeal rights by calling DCD at (206) 431-3670. For further information on this proposal, contact Nora Gierloff at (206) 431-3670 or visit our offices at 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100, Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. ` • Application Filed: 8/19/1999 Notice of Completeness Issued: 8/27/1999 Notice of Application Issued: 9/1/1999 PARKWAY S(J PEEFIG r•Fr EXISTING SITE } Stockpile Fil AREA OF IMPROVEMENTS II BENNER STANG E 44 ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS. PC 3000 RW. MEADOWS. SUITE 450 LAKE OSWE00. OR 07015 (503) 670-0231 FAX. 307/470-0235 MK MBK NORTHWEST 4949 S.W. MEADOWS ROAD. SUITE 675 'LAKE OSWEGO, OREGON 97035 503 / 636.2800 JAM ASSOC I & JBM ASSOC. I 2500 SAND HILL ROAD # 240 MENLO PARK, CALIFORNIA 94025 LA PIANTA LTD. PARTNERSHIP P.O. BOX 88050 Tukwila, Washington 98138 LA PIANTA LTD. PARTNERSHIP P.O. BOX 88050 Tukwila, Washington 98138 LA PIANTA D PARTNERSHIP P.O. BOX 880 Tukwila, Was ft on 98138 Warren & Lorraine Walsh 364 Upland Drive Seattle, Washington James Lund 378 Upland Drive Seattle, Washington 98188 Joseph Carrol 350 Upland Drive Seattle, Washington 98188 TWO NINE THREE & FOUR LTD 1325 4TH AVENUE #1940 Seattle, Washington 98101 LA PIANTA P.O. BOX 880 Tukwila, Was ARTNERSHIP n 98138 LA PIANTLTJ '. PARTNERSHIP P.O. BOX 8 Tukwila, Wagton 98138 LA PIANTA L i 1 r D PARTNERSHIP P.O. BOX 8805 ► Tukwila, Was • gt• ' 98138 ARGELAN & WEAVER ASSOCIATES 6521 115t Place, S.E. Bellevue, Washington 98006 Clarence & Doris Friesen 11131 S.E. 57th Street Bellevue, Washington 98006 Michael & Tsuchin Forrester 15445 S.E. Fairwood Boulevard Renton, Washington 98058 Ella May (Tr) Sanders 10808 11th Avenue N.E. Seattle. Washington 98125 Oregon Masabi Boeing 1325 4th Avenue #1940 Seattle, Washington 98101 Clarence & Doris Friesen 11131 S.E. 57th Street Bellevue, Washington 98006 Don Coombs 1325 4t Avenue #1940 Seattle, Washington 98101 Clarence Friesen 11131 S.E. 57th Street Bellevue, Washington 98006 R01.1 -,h INC. 808 Howell Street Seattle, Washington 98101 Oregon Ma bi oeing 1325 4t Aven #1940 Seattle, Was n. 98101 LA PI P.O. BOX Tukwila, LTD. PARTNERSHIP 050 gton 98138 LA PIA LTD. PARTNERSHIP P.O. BOX 050 Tukwila, W s ' gton 98138 LA PI LTD. PARTNERSHIP P.O. BOX 50 Tukwila, W$ sh ngton 98138 Sinclair & Carol Weymiller 30231 23rd Avenue S.W. Federal Way, Washington 98023 Oregon Masab oeing James L d 1325 4h Avenu #1940 378 d Drive Seattle, Was ' n 98101 Seattle, Kington 98188 Masoa Mikami P.O. Box 256 Dublin, Ohio. 43017 Masoa Mikami 401 rd Avenue #110 Seattle, Washington 98104 PHOENIX INSUR & CENTER PLACE 401 rd Avenue # 110 Seattle, Washington 98104 CASTELLO LAND CO INC -- 54 Dawson Street Seattle, Washington 98134 Mario Segale 18010 Southcenter Parkway Tukwila, Washington 98188 SCHOENBACHLER ENTERP LLC 106 110d' Place S.E. Bellevue, Washington 98004 SHOENBACHLER ENTERP> LLC 13265 Northup Way # 11 Bellevue, Washington 9/8005 LEVITZ FURNITURE DoRP 212 High Street Pottstown, Pennsylvania 19464 SPIEKER PROPERTIES # 185 LTD 915 1186 Avenue S.E. #110 Bellevue, Washington 98005 TWO NINE THREE & FOUR 1325 4`11 Avenue #110 Seattle, Washington. 98101 JAMESTOWN 16 LP 17405 Southcenter Parkway Tukwila, Washington 98188 PHOENIX INS & CENTER PLACE 401 rd Avenue S th #110 Seattle, Washin on 8104 J C PENNY CO.INC #9509.1 P.O.Box 10001 Dallas, Texas 75301 Ray & Madeline Flink 18059 South Central Parkway Seattle, Washington 98188 Mario Seagle P.O. Box 88050 Tukwila, Washington 98138 SEATTLE FIRST NATL. BANK P.O. Box 3877 Seattle, Washington 98124 LEVITS FURNITURE COR5P 211 Hgh Street Pottstown, Pennsylvania 19464 J C PE C1, INC #9509.1 P.O. Box 10 Dallas, Texas 01 JAMESTOWN 16 LP 17555 Southcenter Parkway Tukwila, Washington 98188 Ray & Madeline Flink 18059 South Center Parkway Seattle, Washington 98188 SCHOENBAC ENTERP LLC SPEIKE ROPERTIES #185 LTD 13256 Northup w # 11 915 118th nue S.E. #110 Bellevue, Washin o 98005 Bellevue, as on 98005 TRI -LAND CORPORATION 1325 4TH Avenue #1940 Seattle, Washington 98101 JAME'O 16 LP 17405 So center Parkway Tukwila, gton 98188 Roy Martin 5665 S. 178th Street Seattle, Washington 98188 WACO ENTERPRISE 1205 Andover Park West Tukwila, Washington 98188 SPEIKE' ; ROPERTIES # 185 LTD pPIEONIX INS CENTER PLACE 915' 118th � enue S.E. #110 401 2nd Avenue South #110 Bellevue, a •' gton 98005 Seattle, Washingto 98104 Oregon Masabi Boeing 1325 4h Avenue #1940 Seattle, Washington 98101 CASTELLO LAND CO INC P.O. Box 40629 Bellevue, Washington 98015 Mario A Segel P.O. Box 88046 Seattle, Washington 98138 MBK NORTHWEST 7690 S.W. Mohawk Street Tualatin, Oregon 97062 SCHOENBACHLER ENT LLC 6728 134th Court N.E. Redmond, Washington 98052 BA PROPERTIES INC 333 South Beaudry, 21st Floor Los Angeles, Callifornia 90017 American National Insurance 3903 Bellaire Boulevard 'Houston, Texas 77025 • • C & F PROPERTIES LLC 370 Upland Drive Tukwila; Washington 98188 William & Glenn Santo 354 Upland Drive Tukwila, Washington 98188. J.E. Jones 3119 S.W. 319`s Place Federal Way, Washington 98023 ROPPE, INC. 4700 42nd Avenue S.W. Suite 4 Seattle, Washington 98116 SAFEWORKS PROPERTIES LC 1404 Central Avenue South Kent, Washington 98032 • • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Purpose of Checklist: ORIGINAL The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21 RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from your proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. The city uses this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposals are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the City staff can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposals or its environmental effects. The City may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of Checklist for Nonproiect Proposals: Nonproject proposals refer to actions which are different or broader than a single site specific development project, such as plans, policies and programs. Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." In addition, complete the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions (Part D). For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. 7320.001 [AS/jss] • City of Tukwila - Department of Community Development August 27, 1999 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION Roger Stange Benner Stange Associates Architects 5000 SW Meadows Road #430 Lake Oswego, OR 97035 RE: Parkway Supercenter SEPA E99-0026 Dear Roger, John W. Rants, Mayor Steve Lancaster, Director Your application for SEPA review of the Best Buy preload,: construction and parking lot located at 17380 Southcenter Parkway has been found to be complete on August 27th for the purposes of meeting state mandated time requirements. The next step is for you to install the notice board on. the site within 14 days of the date of this letter. Once you have notified me that the notice board has been installed I will post it with a laminated copy of the Notice of Application and the comment period will start. This determination of complete application does not preclude the ability of the City to require that you submit additional plans or information, if in our estimation such information is necessary to ensure the project meets the substantive requirements of the City or to complete the review process. This notice of complete application applies only to the permits identified above. If you have any questions please call me at (206) 433-7141. Sincerely, dim`" Nora Gierloff Associate Planner cc: Jim Morrow, Public Works Director C:\Nora's Files\PARKWAYS\SEPA Complete.doc 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 • CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431-3670 CITY OEFEIV� ILA AUG 19 1999 PERMIT CENTER FOR STAFFUSE_ONL:Y. 'tanner . : ecerpf: Number::.: LLApplicant nottf ed::of incbmpletelapplication: _Applicant not•ified.ofcomplete application:: File Number: Cross-reference files: Nonce of apPlicatron.issued:. A:..NAMEOEPROJECT(DEVELOPMENT: PJL) Surerceni-o�-- B. LOCATION OFPROJECT%EVELOPMENT:(addressand accessorsparcelnumber(s)) Miepr tr27114 So�1 6r ViLui h'3 So ( Pot& ,)2304-�o Quarter: Section: ownship: Range: (This information may be found on your tax statement) C. PROJECTDESCRIPTION:.` 19144 dor Li -0)064 eq ADDRESS: PHONE: SIGNATURE: 42 DATE: O • • Control No. Epic File No. Fee $ Receipt No. CITY OF TUKWILA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST OUR JOB NO. 7320 A. BACKGROUND INFORMATION 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Parkway Supercenter 2. Name of Applicant: Roger Stange 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 5000 S.W. Meadows Road, Suite 430 Lake Oswego, Oregon 97035 Telephone: (503) 670-0234 Contact: Roger Stange 4. Date checklist prepared: August 18, 1999 Revised September 28, 1999 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Commence Demolition: September 1999 Begin Construction: September 1999 Completion of Construction: July 2000 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No plans for future additions, expansion, or future activity related to or connected with this proposal are proposed. See attached site plan for proposed improvements. 7320.001 [AS/jss] • • 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly, related to this proposal. See original SEPA Checklist submittal dated September 1997 (attached). 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. To the best of our knowledge, no similar applications are pending. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. • Approval and permit from City of Tukwila Public Works Department and Community Development Department Approval of State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Approval from City of Tukwila for temporary erosion control measures 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal. and should not be summarized here. This Phase II expansion consists of the removal of the removal of 57 parking stalls and the addition of 90 parking stalls within an additional parcel along Minkler Avenue adjoining Parkway Supercenter. In addition, the original Parkway Supercenter will be renovated with approximately 9,800 square feet of building area for a new Best Buy. This proposal also includes the removal of existing excess material from Tukwila South Lot to a storage area located behind the existing Ethan Allen vacant lot and pre- load of the proposed Best Buy expansion. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The Parkway Supercenter is at the corner of Minkler Avenue and Southcenter Parkway. The additional land for the parking lot is along Minkler Avenue adjacent to Parkway Supercenter along the east property line. The storage area for excess material is located behind the Ethan Allen store located on the west side of Southcenter Parkway. The location of the South Lot is at the southeast corner of the intersection of Southcenter Parkway and South 180th Street. 7320.001 [AS/jss] • • 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? The storage site behind the Ethan Allen store is located within 200 feet of an existing water course. No disturbance is proposed to this existing water course. The balance of the proposed project is within the Southcenter Shopping Mall. 7320.001 [AS/jss] • EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other: The site within Parkway Supercenter has gentle slopes of 2 percent. The existing storage lot behind the Ethan Allen store has some slopes exceeding 40 percent. No work is proposed within the steep slopes of this site. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? Two percent for the site within Parkway Supercenter (Best Buy) and 40 percent within the storage site, behind Ethan Allen. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Virtually 100 percent of the site is existing asphalt pavement and buildings. The pavement and structures are placed on 2 feet to 10 feet of imported granular fill over silt alluvium (silt and sand). The existing soil in the storage site consists of gravelly sand loom. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. Presence of loose sands below the water table may make the site subject to long term settlement. Organic soils have caused settlement on the west side of Southcenter Parkway, but is not present on the east. side of the street. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Approximately 3,500 cubic yards of soil will be relocated from the site south of South 180th Street and moved behind the existing Ethan Allen building, west of Southcenter Parkway and then relocated east of the Parkway Supercenter for Best Buy. Upon completion, the soil will be moved out of the city. 7320.001 [AS/jss] • s EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. g. Some erosion could occur during construction. However, due to the limited areas of disturbance, gentle slopes, and the localized drainage basins, typical erosion control methods should be adequate for this project (hay bales). About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 90% Impervious h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Hay bales, catch basin protection, and sediment fence barriers. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Dust may be caused during demolition and construction equipment will emit some fumes. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: *Demolition is proposed to commence September 1999, during the rainy season, which will reduce dust. *The type of construction 7320.001 [AS/jss] • • EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT equipment is limited to conventional equipment, which state regulations regulate for emission control. 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No surface water body exists in the immediate vicinity of the portion of the project within Parkway Supercenter. An existing Type 3 water course is located adjacent to the storage lot behind the Ethan Allen building. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described water? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. An existing Type 3 water course is adjacent to the storage lot behind the Ethan Allen building. No work activity is proposed in the water course, although the proposed fill shall be within 200 feet of this water course. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. No fill or dredge material is proposed to be placed or removed from the existing water course located within the storage lot. Approximately 1,000 cubic yards of material shall be stored outside and adjacent to the water course. 7320.001 [AS/jss] • • EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. Within the site east of Southcenter Parkway, additional paving will be added as indicated on the attached drawings. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the types of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. Does not apply. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems,the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. Does not apply. 7320.001 [AS/jss] • • EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT c. Water Runoff (including stormwater): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including stormwater) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Water runoff will be contributed from stormwater collected from building roofs and paved surfaces. The water will be collected into on-site drainage systems and connected to public drainage systems to the north of the site. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: The existing storm structures will be upgraded to provide oil/water separation of building roof and asphalt parking stormwater. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs X grass _ pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other X other types of vegetation: blackberry 7320.001 [AS/jss] • • EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? The site currently has only weeds. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Unknown. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: New landscaping will be designed to match with surrounding areas and meet the requirements of the City of Tukwila Municipal Code. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds an animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other. None observed mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other. None observed fish, bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other. Does not apply. b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None that we are aware of. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Not that we are aware of. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: The site vicinity is fully developed and the area does not support wildlife. 7320.001 [AS/jss] EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. The use of energy will be consistent with the existing conditions. Energy uses will consist of electric and natural gas for commercial uses, including heating and lighting. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: New construction and areas of renovation will be updated to meet current energy codes. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No environmental health hazards or toxic chemicals exist. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Not applicable. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Not applicable. 7320.001 [AS/jss] • • EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT b. Noise: 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? None. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Construction noise consisting primarily of construction vehicles. Hours of operation are unknown at this time. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Retail Commercial. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Development of the Parkway Plaza began in the early 1970s. The property was used for agricultural purposes prior to development of the shopping center. c. Describe any structures on the site. Fully developed shopping center. 7320.001 [AS/jss] • • EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Yes. Areas of existing buildings, buildings' site improvements. See demolition plan. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Tukwila Urban Center (TUC) f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation for the site? Tukwila Urban Center (TUC) g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not applicable. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. J• An existing Type 3 water course is located within 200 feet of the storage lot behind the Ethan Allen store. A temporary erosion and sedimentation control plan is prepared for this site to protect the existing water course. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Does not apply. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? Does not apply. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Does not apply. 7320.001 [AS/jss] • • EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The proposed development consists of upgrades and renovation to the existing shopping center with no changes to the land uses and plans. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Does not apply. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Does not apply. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Does not apply. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? Proposed Structure Height: 50 feet Exterior Material: Concrete Masonite and Synthetic Plaster b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None. 7320.001 [AS/jss] • • EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: The project renovation will create a more unified design while retaining the individual identification of each tenant. The existing facades will be removed and new pedestrian canopies and entries are proposed throughout the project, as indicated on the building design. 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposals produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? The only light produced will be from the existing and new parking lot lighting. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Existing parking lot lights do not interfere with any views or create any glare. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? No areas of off-site light sources affect this proposal. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: All new light fixtures proposed will contain baffles and shields to avoid off-site glare. 12. Recreation a. What designation and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Shopping/Retail. 7320.001 [AS/jss] • • EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. Does not apply. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Does not apply. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state or local preservation registers to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. Does not apply. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Does not apply. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on-site plans, if any: The property is located on Minkler Boulevard. The site is served by I- 5 directly west. Driveway access to the site is along Southcenter Parkway and the surrounding roads will match the existing. 7320.001 [AS/jss] • • EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? The site is served by Metro Transit. Bus No. 155 runs along Southcenter Parkway adjacent to the west frontage of the site. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? The original SEPA Application for Parkway Supercenter was approved for 2,687 parking stalls. With the additional 34 stalls over what is being removed by the building expansion, the total number of parking stalls at the Parkway Supercenter will be 2,655. This is 22 stalls less than the original approval. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No, not that we are aware of. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. g. Unknown. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Pedestrian access to existing bus routes and bicycle parking. 7320.001 [AS/jss] • • EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. The proposed use of the site will not change (retail center), and the building' s construction materials will also remain the same. Therefore, there will not be an increased need for public services. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any: None. 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other: Storm Drainage. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utilities providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Existing site utilities will be re-routed as necessary to accommodate the new structures. The City of Tukwila will provide public storm, sanitary, and water to the site. Electricity and natural gas is provided by Puget Sound Energy. Telecommunications is provided by U.S. West Communications. Cable is provided by Cable Vision of Washington. 7320.001 [AS/jss] • • EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: sak Date Submitted: fO — 5 - I [ PLEASE CONTINUE TO THE NEXT PAGE 7320.001 [AS/jss] • • EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (Do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent of the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal that would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plans, animals, fish, or marine life? Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? 7320.001 [AS/jss] • • EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: How does the proposal conform to the Tukwila Shoreline Master Plan? 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. 8. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what policies of the Plan? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: 7320.001 [AS/jss] • EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NONPROJECT PROPOSALS The objectives and the alternative means of reaching the objectives for a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the foregoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This information provides a general overall perspective of the proposed action in the context of the environmental information provided and the submitted plans, documents, supportive information, studies, etc. 1. What are the objective(s) of the proposal? 2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these objectives? 3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the preferred course of action: 4. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what policies of the Plan? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: 7320.001 [AS/jss] • • Control No. Epic File No. Fee325 Receipt No. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: 2. Name of applicant: Roger Stange Parkway Supercenter 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: ( 903) 670-0234 5000 S.W. Meadows Road, Suite 430, Dake 0swegQ, OR 9.7035 4. Date checklist prepared: August 18, 1999 5. Agency requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Commence Demolition - September 1999 Begin Construction - September 1999 Completion of Construction - July 2000 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No plans for future additions, expansion', or future activity related to. or connected with this proposal, are proposed. See attached site plan for proposed improvements. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. See original SPPA submittal dated September 1997 (attached). 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. To the best of our knowledge, no similar app]is-a+ons are pending. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. - Approval and permit from City of Tukwila public- Works Department and A •• • - -.. u- • 11 11 1- - sou -s • . 11 - . - - Approval from City of Tukwila fnr FPmpnrary Prpsi_Qn control measures. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized here. This Phase I expansion consists of the rgmoval of 57 parkiag_stalls and the addition of 90 parking stalls within an additional parcel along Minkler Avenue adjoining Parkway Supercenter. In addition, the original Parkway Supercenter will be renovated with approx. 9,800 s.f. of building area for a new Best Buy. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica- tions related to this checklist. The Parkway Supercenter is at the corner of Mink Pr gi nn ana Southcenter Parkway. The additional land for the parking int is along-Minkler Avenue adjacent to Parkway Supercjnter alnng the east property line. 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? Not to our knowledge. The site is an existing shopping_ma-Li-.-- -- -3- • • TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT Evaluation for Agency Use Only B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other The site has gentle slopes toward existing onsite drainage structures. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? Two percent (2%) c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Virtually 100°% of the site is existing asphalt pave- ment and buildings. The pavement and structures are placed on 2-10' of imported granular fill over silt alluvium (silt and sand). d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. Presence of loose sands below the water table may make the site subject to long term settlement. Organic soils has caused settlement on the west side of Southcenter Parkway, but is not present on the east side of the street. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti- ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Approximately 3,500 cubic yards of soil will be relocated from the site south of 180th Avenue moved behind the existing Ethan Allen building west of Southcenter and then relocated east of the Parkway Supercenter for Best Buy. Upon completion, the soil will be f Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, moved out of the City construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Some erosion could ocrur during r•nnstrnctinn. However, due to the limited areas of dis- turbance, gentle slopes and the localized drainage basins, typical erosion control methods should be adequate for this project (hay bales). g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 90% impervious. • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Hay bales, catch basin protection, and sediment fence barriers. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Dust may be caused durincl demolition and construction equipment will emit some fumes. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: *Demol i tion is proposed to commence September 1999, during rain season, which will reduce dust. *The type of construction equipment is limited to conventional equipment, which are regu- lated by state Regulations for emission control. 3 Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year- round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Does not apply. • • 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Does not apply. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. noes not apply_ 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. Within the site east of Parkway additional paving will be added as indicated on attached drawings. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. Evaluation for Agency Use Only • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. Does not apply. 2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sour- ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. Does not apply. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Water run-off will be contributed from storm water collected from building roofs and paved surfaces. The water will be collected into on-site drainage systems and. connected to public drainage systems to the north of the site. • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: The existing storm structures will be upgraded to provide oil/water separation of building roof and asphalt parking storm water. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: _ deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs x grass pasture _ crop or grain _ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other X other types of vegetation (blackberry) b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? The site currently has on1 y we.e..ds. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Unknown. • • d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: New landscaping_will be designed to match with surrounding areas and meet requirements of the Tukwila Municipal code. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: None obs ryed mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: —None cihQPYVcr7 fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None hat w a P awar c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. .�T9��hat wP arP warp of —_— d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any:_ ll ai to and th area d0 not su,,,,nrt w � '-- • Evaluation for Agency Use Only • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solor) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. The use of energy will be consistent with the existing conditions. Energy use ill consist of electric and natural gas for commercial uses including heating and lighting. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: New construction and areas of renovation will be updated to meet current energy codes. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. N2 environm-nt_a1 health hazards or toxic chemicals exist. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. N/A 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ- mental health hazards, if any: N/A • • b. Noise Evaluation for Agency Use Only 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? None. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short- term or a long-term basis (for example: traf- fic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Construction noise consisting primarily of construction vehicles. Hours of operation is unknown at this time. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Retail commercial. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Development of the Parkway Plaza began in the early 1970's. The property was used for agricultural purposes prior to development of the shopping center. c. Describe any structures on the site. Fully developed shopping center. -11- • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Yes. Areas of PxiSting hnildiags, buildings' site improvements. See demolition plan. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Tukwila Urban Center (T.U.C.) f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Tukwila Urban Center (T.T1_r_ ) g• If applicable, what is the current shoreline master programdesignation of the site? N/A h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Does not apply. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? Does not apply. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Does not apply. 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com- patible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The proposed development ronsi sts of upgrades and renovation to existing shopping center with no changes to the land uses and plans. • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing? Does not apply. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eli- minated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing. Does not apply. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Does not apply. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? 50 fDet. Concrete masonite, synthetic plaster. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: The project renovation will create a more unified design while retaining individual identification for each tenant. Existing facades will be removed and new pedestrian canopies and entries are proposed throughout the project as indicated on the building design. • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Tha nnly light produced will b' from existing and new parking lot lighting. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? do not inter- fere with any views or create any glare. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? No areas of off-site light sources affect this proposal. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: All new light fixtures proposed will con- tain baffles and shields to avoid off-site glare. 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational oppor- tunities are in the immediate vicinity? Shopping/Retail. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. Does not apply. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Does not apply. • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro- posed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. Does not apply. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Does not apply_ 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed accss to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The property is located on Mikler Boulevard. The site is served hy T-5 directly west Driveway access to the site along South - center Parkway and surrounding rnadc will match existing. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit Stop? The site is served hy Metro Transit. Bus No. 155 runs along South - center Parkway adjacent to the west frontage of the site. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? The original SEPA application for Parkway was approved for 2,687 parking stalls. With the additional 34 stalls over what is being removed by the building expansion, the total number of parking stalls at Park- way will be 2,655. This is 22 stalls less than the original approval. • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No, not that we are aware of. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Unknown. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor- tation impacts, if any: Pedestrian access to existing bus routes and bicycle parking. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. The proposed use of the site will not change (retail center), and the building's construction materials will also'remaih the same. Therefore, there will not be increased need for public services. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None. -16- • •valuation for Agency Use Only 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. Storm drainage. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed.' Existing site utilities will be re-routed as necessary to accommodate the new structures. The City of Tukwila will provide public storm, sanitary and water to the site. Electricity and natural gas is provided by Puget Sound Power. Telecommunications is provided by USl4est Communications. Cable is C. Signature provided by the Cable VIsion of Washington. The above answers my knowledge. I relying on them to Signature: Date Submitted: .r• ue and complete •:rstand that the omits decision. A 4 .4,4/._44 Act. \ fillITS:71 ,.. e best of agency is PLEASE CONTINUE TO THE NEXT PAGE. -17- WATERCOURSE RATING FORM - CITY OF TUKWILA INSTREAM ELEMENTS Width of watercourse (OHWM) >5 feet Score =3 1 to 5 feet Score = 2 <1 foot Score = 1 Score 2 Channel capacity Ample, no overbank Adequate, slight evidence Insufficient flows of overbank flows overbank flows common Score=3 Score=1 • Score =0 Score 1 Channel stability No scour or downcutting Score =3 Slight scour or downcutting (<25% of channel) Score = 1 Obvious scour or downcutting Score = -1 Moderate scour or downcutting ( 25 to 50% of channel) Score = 0 Score 1 Fish use Salmonids present Score = 3 Potential for migratory salmonid use Score = 2 No potential for salmonids and little potential for restoration Score = 0 Potential for stocked salmonids but other species present Score = 1 Score x 2 = 0 Fish habitat Spawning, rearing, and Two of three habitat overwintering types present Score = 3 Score = 2 Rearing or overwintering habitat present Score = 1 Score 0 Channel is rocked stormwater outfall; only 50' long. Date 9/24/90 Watercourse 11 26-1 From W. of Southcenter Pkwv. To W. of Southcenter Pkwy. TOTAL INSTREAM SCORE 4 • • CORRIDOR FEATURES Corridor Quality pg. 2 LEFT B ANK RIGHT BANK Width of unmaintained vegetation from OHWM J.eft Bank Right Bank >50 feet 25 to 50 feet 5 to 25 feet Score = 3 Score = 2 Score = 1 Subscore 0 Subscore 3 Vegetation diversity High diversity, Open forest or shrubs Single layer multi -layered with understory with minimal diversity Score = 3 Score = 2 Score = 1 Subscore _ Subscore 3 For each bank, multiply the subscores of the above two elements to determine total scores Total Total Score 0 Score 9 Corridor Barrier Function Dense forest or shrub 100 to 75% Score = 3 Dense forest or shrub 50 to 75% Score = 2 Dense forest or shrub 25 to 50% Score = 1 Score 0 Score 1 Surrounding land use Immediately outside of corridor (multiply percentage of area in each catagory) Forested Score = 3 Shrub or unmaintained grassland Score = 2 Active agriculture or pasture Score= 1 urban: urban: residential/maintained lawns industrial/commercial Score = -1 Score = -2 Score 1 Score 3 TOTAL CORRIDOR SCORE Add "A" for Enhancement Potential (Briefly describe) ADD INSTREAM ELEMENT TO DETERMINE TOTAL REACH SCORE Score 1 Score 13 Score 4 Score 4 SCORE 5 SCORE 17 • F'J\Ithz!VV1e\y F="�RCENTEFZ +1,000,000 (WITH OVER 1 MILE OF FRONTAGE ALONG SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY) ENTERTAINMENT ACT III THEATRE 12 SCREENS 2.200 SEATS RESTAURANTS RED ROBIN STANFORD'S CUCINA CUCINA APPLEBEE'S NEWPORT BAY CLAIM JUMPER'S TONY ROMAS WINNERS AZTECA MAJOR RETAILERS GART SPORTS OLD NAVY BABIES 'R' US COMP USA LONG'S DRUG ROSS COST PLUS MICHAEL'S KRAUSE'S THE BON PARTY CITY SHOE PAVILION ZANY BRAINY USA BABY ANNA'S LINENS CATHERINES CAMERA'S WEST SPRINT PCS SHANE CO, ETHAN ALLEN THE SPORT'S AUTH. BORDERS OFFICEMAX o LINENS 'N' THINGSE 1 = o PTSMART = I� LEVITZ J J,==,111111111111I11111111111111111u11i1:I1I11111I1II1III✓ n1 IIIIIIin111ii GART sports am_ V. COST PIZ •0000 +3000... 111111 1111 III III I 1 q 1111 1 RE CITY OF TUKWILA AUG 1 S bd PERMIT CENTER II111(IIIII BORDERS 30035 ..0 1.1./SSCIQ SP. BENNER STANGE ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS, P S000 SW. MEADOWS. S 430 LAKE OSWEOO.OR 970 (503) 670-0234 FAX. MSK MBK NORTHWEST 4949 S.W. MEADOWS ROAD, SUITE 675 LAKE OSWEGO, OREGON 97035 503 / 636-2800 PARKWAY 3 J R EXISTING SITE AREA OF IMPROVEMENTS Stockpile Fil .40 `M71111 ad BENNER STANGE ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS. PC 5000 S.W. MEADOWS. SURE 430 LACE OSWEOO. OR 37035 (503) 670.0234 ENC 503/6700233 M)K MBK NORTHWEST 4949 S.W. MEADOWS ROAD, SUITE 675 LAKE OSWEGO, OREGON 97035 503 / 636.2800 RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA AU6 191999 PERMIT CENTER 1 C PEINER STANCE ASSOCIATES DEMOLITION PLAN \--1 9,0100 p R T • PROJECT NO 979h - DRI/J1+ DATE 09/24 PARKWAY UF' NT�R MJK TUKWILA, WASHINGTON MBK NORTHWEST 1 A2 EeNER STANCE A.SSOCIATES .000611E00049 . feati.co axes teml ooa v 1 OADING Mug ELDFOrgaffifill. 26,289 S.F. 144.-6 PROPOSED CROWN BOOKS 15,058 S.F. PROPOSED OLD NAVY 15,000 S.F. 115'-4" FUTURE STARS 5.200 SF. AMERICA'S BEST CONTACT AND EYE GLASSES -- -AQ028F VACANT 2.000 S.F. VACANT 4.000 SF. TENANT 12.036 SF. EVAN'S MUSIC 4,000 SF. WILD BIRD UNLIMfTED HOUSE OF CLOCKS I�I�{�L _IIH��f YI�\ut L 11✓® 11 oil Y m 0000 bI a'd I 1111 xl w GO G® G@ n O n u n U n O n U n n O 0 x0 40 E 0 U LOADING tEig 116 PROPOSED Aggihrj q 0U,426 SP. 17S-4" LOADING' LOADINO PROPOSED COMP eZa 25,600 S.F. 146' & G@ 0@ 32 n n PROPOSED HOME PURGE xa;: ICa 1•ois 45,000 S.F. 160' 00 n U 0 J ( (E) SITE SIGN TWIN 7,856 S.F. RETAIL PAD 8,000 S.F. TENANT 30,483 S.F. 00 U I (E) SIGN 00 PATO ®ccccc cccccc cc cc ccc of I Illillllllllill Q 6 O PARTIAL SITE PLAN 0,1,11 • PARKWAY B BUF•aRCI•JI-FRM)K TUKWILA, WASHINGTON MBK NORTHWEST 0 PROJECT NO. 97111 - DR3/JW DATE : 09/24/61 A3 TENANT 30.483 S.F. . ■ rOA NCI IF :OADN10 r r I LOAD.JO rOgal PROPOSED BABIES 'R' US , 39,051 S.F. RO) DEEM FOE LESS 26,271 S.F. 1 TENANT 12,377 S.F. COST PLUS WORLD MARKET 16,800 S.F. 22,200 S.F. -a SLEEP COUNTR'4 I 2000 8F. USA BABY 8,400 S F 1111111111 f KRAUSE'S Sofa Factory 21.200 S.F -1111111111 I11lu I ■ ■ I ! THE ■ 40,240 ■ • 168' X928 APPLEBEE S 5.903 BF. (E) SIGN (E) SIGN STANCE ASSOr-LATES ALACMITECTII PG 1 LACE 008.00, 0> 88208 ArtflECA 200' R C. PARKWAY SUP FICENT�R M)K TUKWILA, WASHINGTON MBK NORTHWEST PROJECT O. ' 97E1 - OR3/JAW 1 DATE ' 09/20/971 A4 IAATCHLJsre SHEET me is «N El In 0 L III IIII 1111111o ND 71 0 1 1 1 ort;1b 14'11 1 1 F. D.' w tii 4 Anac III 8 - IM1I QI / n Id mm Nn 1•1 OM LI J .LL I_I ! 11111111111111i JIIII111 11111111Lk 1[111 11111111111 IIIII111U1111111 1 MATCHUNE SHEET Aa 1111111111111111711111 L 2 31-0 0 6 G G C 2 212 77120 2 2 GIG G1G C G CICIC G 0 0 1 9. a D. r ®� .JO< d SOUTH 180TH t e C'i 2 c1 2 G cic1c1c1c °101°1 11114:C: G 212 GG °IGI 1°l°L — 2 G 1:03 ---------,L - 9 6 SOUTH 180TH STREET 9 oT ® • 1 I Cx r 0 n • 1 1' yiEE SHEET • AREA 'B' i 6FSHE 4 :i...i� -411 'I T H sgANZaf --4. SEE SHEET A4 AREA 'C' AREA 'A' ... �r..T BE/NER STANCE ASSOCIATES un 9wm aA 1 OEASEMENT PLAN • MICAS O R T r/ - AREA 'Bi' PARKWAY SUP�RC�NT�FR M)K TUKWILA, WASHINGTON MBK NORTHWEST PROJECT NO. 971n - ORE/JM DATE , 09/24/97 A6 In. Mar 0[1.010 P H Nig OM 1 _ 4 MOTO NM A ••••• A — TI.TOTA11 OLUNG SKI Oa - 011.01.100,04 ()WEST ELEVATION (NORTH) CIA TT COT1.4.94 0121Tr40 OTC TA., VP Hab. 111111111111111111111111 1111111111111111111 0+.• ALLSAWA TALL ATOtl. • OD NAVY CADA OTV At COAT tbot ()WEST ELEVATION rrl 00.0 I ®WEST ELEVATION FM MGT OVT6O) TOSS Mit ron teat 0167S MOTTCTIT xrvases TOM FACTOTT ®WEST ELEVATION (SOUTH T. KW 011 SOP 03LNITIT F'AFRKWAY BUPRC5N-T-R TUKWILA, WASHINGTON MBK NORTHWEST UST INOT • • A7 SAD DLAS SCIAS.S .a=ZLIWZ=D SIDSTO4 CAOA ES.. PAWS iz - Ifini4M111111:101- - -11FROWIPPIIIIERIEVIMMII ROM • ®SOUTH ELEVATION (NORTH) !SAID...a whal fl_ NAME 6 CANOPY W/ PEW ENTRY STRUCTURES • AO ADANA 00a. r-- ®NORTH ELEVATION • NORTH WING EX.11 cost hew hurt RA rtapa WM CAI mew sCGAIONS TOM DETED1.0 CAC IA DOASIS ®TYPICAL BACK ELEVATION 13ENER STANCE ASSOCIATES A1....114.s. Da 40.1.00. 1 \••• 000a DEW ADA OA% [MAO ISIDS. RAW AO KAA 111Ka4T • IT • • NZ MA 00.131 PARKWAY SUPIRC1•1-1-FR TUKWILA, WASHINGTON MBK NORTHWEST A8 — - — - - —e1 ExS TiNG LANDSCAPE TO REMAIN 1111111111111111k CID I 111111 I I 177,7=t, MATCH LINE - SEE SHEET L2.1 co Cam 111110/8" 'um ins a % • 40 A _ • • PA 00 -411, 111 ea— : . ... . 'w 41) )1 CuaC! a sk /4/2/16 /Mb Inoworm=•"=•,7 CV J.. ,iiSOMMENFMNILI•rl SEE - -------------------- ---------- DE IGN REVIE SIJBMITTAI. PEIA NCRTNwEST 7600 Sw no..., SI 111.1I1,11, OflG5 Q'T' • ....0 PARRWAE SLNERCENTER LANDSCAPE CONCEPT PLAN (NORTH SECTION) • Revrtive0 LELA. 0, No Creco80 BY: c.• J08 No. • Armorer,: L1.1 MATCH LINE 1111.111177 1 [—I Iriininiriini - 11 I =-4 I 11 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 111 1 1 1 I 11 I 111 11 1 Ill&n__;•11 11 11 1 11111 111 1 11 1 1 1 111 I 1 I 1 I 11 1 1.416 n M Q Q 11 7 --] Ca CI ia 71 iII0 0•01,,_,I [----- 1 .S TRIG LANOSC E . TO REMAIN 1119141ft 1 Ir."- — I itirj311WIVJ eVi \ 1 ll P WO __ _ _ __ s ..-_ ,- i , - „ ,;•110°I. ------e ------ _---- I- -- - --- IiI0-Se-Paill-171--7--7..-i --- --- ------; ---/- ?* ....,_ ___ ___ _ - _ ____ ---------- 11------- -,_ \ . < \ \ I / \ aft et, w 110 es, cot - . elAN't ANO Lt1)310111-11i - - - - „,k - Nitre rA iii-OrgiTIO ___ LA.1 FOR PLANT LEGEND DESIGN REVIEW SUBMITTAL r.11111BiS NIA NCRTNWIST 7000 SW M0%.$* SI TuNAON OREG. VD: • PARAWAT StPERCENTER LANDSCAPE CONCEPT ALM (CENTER SECTIO.) • AT15-1.),1= RE.wooL 0N.4.11, C.meo EIT: Joo No. L2.1 111111111M1 ....�...:. v. .+ . .� ,. a► 4.. nom.ob.elt 441' `' `ice )1J$V4 7910 %Pr '1- r44, LL c 1IHHIIII II11 I 11111 I I.�1 -SEE BHEET LA - .10./LEGEND DESIGN REVIEW SUBMITTAL N011THWYST 1000 SW NO..... ST. TO.I.n.. 01 004 970, • PARKWAY StPERCENTER LANDSCAPE CONCEIT RAN (SOUTH SECTION) • RevR.aa ZDNA.Euu r .ecDT: • 4nnKu. ce'=�c... L3.1 LEGEND C)— MYR ENTRY ACCENT TREES ir co I rower.. Yo. • Bow marrwr• C)-- STREET TREES 12. co., Ay Sr.! yy • yr yoyr Ydi ILYsi fly Or • Orows Yr. 1,1:>— SITE ENTRY ACCENT TREES Or coo.1 N'- Foo, ..Hoor • oH.....• ....Ho. -Ho .....- .oHooHooH• Wow • Yr yrs... 0— PARSING LOT TREES 11. coo. LH...Ho AL.. loo.................... Ho, ..... o— DRovE AISLE ACCENT TREES 12. ‘•,1 0,0•10 11.41 • •Ten ton.. 9••,•• Now' 0— PAO ACCEml TREES ir COI MoryBY Yro moony Wry*. SITE SCREEN NED?! lopop..crol.. oHNH LopoL000.• oarsHeCHH 177-A-- DROVE AISLE ACCENT PLANTwO 12.3. con. !Ewa.. *nor." Tow. wawo FOUNIDALIZH OLAIrWO Bow Herons.• C:nos WTH•Twonr. -- ACCENT SHRUBS 12144• D onnne rano*. V..* I maHes• Ow.e. • NftwoontEn am. 11111111111111111t I" I — LOW COLORFUL PLANTINGIE cont HaTn 0.••• • Take...THe *HT an GOECrime. •HT•oH 11•TITHH . I 'C.a ▪ eMO, • Ens. j.... ....HT Ewe"... '• CH*HT•TH' • 'CH• ..... ' — WATER OUALITY FACILITY ▪ OnHowl • C-8..• 4..•• • • •••• BOP • r ..... — SEEDED LAWN ( • ) — ExiSTR40 TREES TO REMAIN MOM 041. ..... 00. MO 110 • DESIGN REVIEW SUBMITTAL NAIUIPAS Man NORTHWEST 700 SW MOWN,. ST, THAT,,. OREG., UN, • PARTWAY SLPERCENTER ELMO LEGEND • REVISKWIL DEurog Br no °rota. Br cr. •K• NO. rnT • Arte, F-74 a 4.7- L4.1 111 ! ' /.51111,11:11 t 111 I I ! TI'l 1 I ti,1 ;11111-14J_ 44. SIS! Ls. ata.., os twn DAdA MAre-AI LAdAr 64.11114. ern) taro cow.d.tr..0., .141 • GRAPHIC SCALE (Z) - cAir G3OATCHLINE Sea' _co,- 2 • "HA, .4-"L C44 972 c.c.. 6. ...x (..,( ..o. APPROVALS: PARKWAY SUPERCENTER TUKWILLA, WASHINOTON PRELIMINARY GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN C111.1•1X1111 P1IPECI Cladioa. kp,ff ay... ay... III 6.w. MTN •VI. 14•11m. 0.11. X,X1X. 110.2117-11111 1:00•1 10 • [Am.., XXX Oat WO. OM Mt .0 M. OCII•Ill • 11•010.14 13.411:11 I. WI. 4611. {0XX 01.30 XV XXX . DAR 1X11011101 Mg .9 ,1,14 MAP DMA 1.11.21..116•1. MI6 MS. INII. fLeffl RCVS.. DDAVIAKIDA • ...... DAD ...... APPROVALS: PARKWAY SUPERCENTER TULWILLA. WASHINGTON . kp.ff r PRELIMINARY SAD • GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN INDAsi Dr AXA .., ,....-c,„.. or PACTA D.01. pax Coro.n. IADIreers DATA ODIDADD CA 1/4 ADC NM 1,-04LCAM DATA DAMTKO Do bst kol• re—OAID. ay UDC 111 lID. ArT11 AVG Dulls MO Peri.. 0••••A •710.6 .0.1-21742/1 . ...., DISDera. orm90“ OM M.. DAP DATA AV./ DOMIZA ADA. MCC EA. 1..... I4-.1 Lj. RN. cs Care) DM= d,r.SEC .....___04[020r. n.. YAP o•i• DESK•4111 0, XXX APPROVALS: 101141204. oocA KC Pia. om.. w.+ PARKWAY SUPERCENTER TUCWILLA, WASHINGTON kpff t.nra W.v. mvne •ve w. •no. PRELIMINARY GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN ex's : ii,;1,. i m�,A4 IiII;Ill" AWA•ors' EX✓>r !.S sLAVDr �..wr�A. cr r. arA+Pc CnrJ 44e44 u M•.1 D m n IOA TCPOL ONE ti GRAPHIC SCALE • - Roib-60 CB • ••••'T• • ••n *> APPROVALS: PARKWAY SUPERCENTER . WASHINOTON PRELIMINARY GRADINO & DRAINAGE PLAN S. .. 4444 04444cD ICI kp f f 44 Dmicon 414 DA414 ^� 41. OM. a 1/4 lir.... 4-0440^TUIWILLA u,• 444 4 04 444/14---0440 ^.. __. 10114 D..,... 44444 .. rrTn Are ;�"••• .... 0444. nrnw w•..^aa., .n wn w. rm. WAD DATA 44444 �, �. DQ ,o.. aNS. EU/LO/HO AREAS 2w s .r W, 5w,0 S033('0(' ® 50w0 s00..r "CC T (?) COW SWAM( ,Le, ® ...co sw..r rt[, ,2.,00 sawn .rr. (al ,35 250 50A..S a. ,04.,0 SWAP( ,re, (5) 06..530 5003.0 ,rr, SHEET 2 OF i 0 50 000 200 SHEET 5 OF 7 MA TCHLINE `.-i'-;'' 0303: i ::Y,.�"^�7_-----.:...i(, _moi ' -i SCREE TOR'S CERTIFICATE M Mar � ixe 111:213. 4.M 0n SV,K2-77 M 1 000 !,/ Ir µi,12 0000 .x¢ASrt ,rtNt ,. 3 .. 5 4 )'SAL „ rr ,.,(s( .. DA IX0/, , ro 0030 .,w (AS worm .. .r,..w 30.00 .N0 . n5rcr w i•L 0.rt 003,5 a.rmu,w,t •c32si::K. 5rM/, T.S. 4,3 ,5,d • S0r7EET 4 O6' 7 SHEET 5 OF 7' SURE!T NOTES 2 033 1,1•101C•045,33* nn0 033 ,23 ..000:w.(z00,0 ce 2L 0.33. x00'20 03.,5,0 •.w 305 ,0 0033003 400.,0 ., 30 C. ,*CAS iM me ac 011 4.10 , . 50 ,nem Or YC 25 0n: smrt w.rs •33 33., ..n 17:1=+cws,0wc'1a,°uwx.ww 0„ nw.s .w f s0t 0 5 Dor•,• 21W,LM w 50M4r OW F..n) •s =res n. now w...... 2011.0094.00.0, . ..r ww(N,0 ro ,3 ,vgype0 TOC CCM aSi;" X h[0 ,wff orCKs '" IX .03[0 wux[x wroar. wv C. ((VISION l3((( .(r,w e.=<N(.r5 TO •.Mm3 0. C. . .COLO .e,...xO «r4 .. csr (.,o..0. SA x SO, ,., ,Ku S. res .0. 0 .00,0 e.SL.Lxr NOR w swr[r 2 ALFA 1 ACSNI LAND =LE SURVEYPARKWAY' SUPERCENTEN LOCATED IN PORTIONS OF SECTIONS 26 & 35. T. 23 N., R. 4 E.. W.N. CHADWICK & WINTERS CO LAND SUR EEYINC, INC. .3„ STOWS. P13001 032.3^114. 3(2041(00-35(( 1111.01 PROJEC 0 9,- CON SNddT r OF l • SCALP 06110. ;,112 • , ! ; ;1!•fl ' I :; • "I t I a • EASEMENT NOTE MKT (.3.1•10.IS POP LW...LP. PO.. uPG. ....ft E. AS ASA Rtal•OrRS .0 8.1.2909.18 •Pt 90011.4 .tSO. EASCPCNIV FOP LPOSPCPC..0 \MON PAPCL1S It • < PS PPP RECOROCRS 84.290970. PPS NOt .PrOt. rl tS Mr../ Dont t•C S•SE...., CENtERLAW DESC..15 ARE tr. reA01E. A. ...MP( [ANNOY 01: -00.7.01-0 t0 ErE PORE. EASEMENT DETA§L ALM I ACM I LAM MILE SURVEY PANITUFA SUPERCENTEN LOCATED IN PORTIONS OF SECTIONS 26 & 35. T. 23 N.. R 4 E. W.M. CHADWICK & WINTERS LAND SURVE YINC, INC. dOtt PTO. PAI POPS.. 7.1.11.17 7,0.1 PHONE \ PAX. (706) 610-2346 MVPS" I. frl,03S. CUPP, . • wiser 0/ • 1 �/�'1� ��/�� M �/}� so D OF SURVEY »7 7� f7 AC7 OU (J U UOU V OF nv N�7/7(oo UM//S�� SM C0 LSMU�(1�1�f� U'TLry/o�U�/lS9�77✓C7�7�JLM-i/l/C SS, o 23 No, U l!a 4 E., 1W oGE U U! COMFY, U 9 L%L%!i-i.I �U I IJI_:.7 TOU V SCALE: 1 •=200' 0 100 200 LEGEND 400 SW CORNER SEC. 26 CALCULATED POSITION (SEE SHEET 6 OF 8) - - 221 1.54_- 2 67'4557- w MINKLER BLVD_ 0> SW CORNER SEC. 26 CALCULATED Po51n0N (SEE SHEET •) FOUND MONUMENT IN 140N. CASE N 08'42' W. 1.58 11. FROM 5E1 MONUMENT A/ FOUND RE6AR & CAP STAMPED `L5 15656' SE CORNER SEC. 26 CALCULATED POSITION (SEE SHEET 6 OF 8) _ 2484.61 N 87'44'06' w 2624.96•_--________ O SET 5/8' REBAR WITH YELLOW PLASTIC SURVEYOR'S IDENTIFICATION CAP STAMPED •WINTERS, L.S. 18104' ' D SET TACK WITH BRASS WASHER STAMPED 'LS 18104' IN LEAD 6 FOUND MONUMENT (TYPE & FALLINGS AS NOTED) CURVE TABLE CURVE C1 C2 RADIUS 919.37' 35.00' LINE TABLE LINE 1.3 L4 LENGTH 210.77' 36.60' DIRECTION DISTANCE N 87'55'02' W N 87'50'09" w N 87'50'57' W N 01'08'35" E 140,18' 140.16' 177.29' 265,66' DELTA 13'08'08' 59'55'22' 119 S. EASEMENT NOTE THREE EASEMENTS FOR UNDERGROUND POWER UPON PARCEL E. AS PER RECORDERS NO. 6411290968. ARE NOT SHOWN HEREON. ALSO, Twp EASEMENTS FOR UNDERGROUND POWER UPON PARCELS 8 & C. AS PER RECORDERS NO, 8411290970, ARE NOT SHOWN HEREON. IT 15 MY OPININION THAT THE EASEMENT CENTERLINE DESCRIPTIONS ARE TOO VAGUE. AND THEREFORE CANNOT BE RE -CONSTRUCTED SUFFICIENTLY TO BE DISPLAYED HEREON 180TH ST. SHEET 4 OF 8 CHAD WICK & WINTERS PROJECT 0 LAND SURVEYING, INC. 4011 STONE WAY NORTH. SEATTLE. WA. 98103 PHONE \ FAX: (206) 632-3366 68-2033 DRAWING: RDS-DEDCC CLIENT 6.8 T.T. 1 1 • • �/Q'7� MOWN M ���—/�,-��7 `a�G 7L RECORD SURVEY /-�� /7 /� T7 A U O�U UOU V OF E S U/2 SEC /5V 0 Ulla '4 ma To /SCJ U Vo9 U La '-1/ E., VV aUI/U. KINGS COUNTY, WASHINGTON NORM SCALE I'=100' 0 50 100 dam. XP..IrG. =INSULTING ENGINEERS FOUND RR SPINE N 78' w 033 FT. TWO. CALCULATED \ -- ----.- 009 n7N N 8735'02" • 218.09' 3 r0040RR 5,102 37 0 7402' C. 1.21 27. FROM SET 40N04ENT N 8735'07" • 220.00' N 87.50'57• • N 873009' 140.18 i- FOUND TACK IN LEAD 5 82' W. 0.54 FT. FR047 CALCD PO900N R • 107.24' 41.90' 200 r0 00 1. 01A. IRON PIPE *TN CAP STAMPED 158271" ATS 40'E. 0.58 2T. 2ROIL CALCD POO n0N F w 1/4 COR. SEC. 35 CALCULA RD P0900N (SEE (NEST 6 OF 8) 76'03" w 2571.09 LINE TABLE LINE DIRECTION DISTANCE LI N 01'51'39" E 50.00' 12 N 59'25'27" E 74.23' L3 N 15"51'30' E 63.77' F C- 767814' R- saw' . L - 66.99' 80 N 88.0257. 6 134.49' 1 LEGEND OO SET 5/8" REBAR WITH YELLOW PLASTIC SURVEYOR'S IDENTIFICATION CAP STAMPED "WINTERS, L.S. 18104' CI SET TACK WITH BRASS WASHER 5244.4PED LS 18104 IN LEAD FOUND MONUMENT (TYPE & FALLINGS AS NOTED) O SET RAILROAD SPIKE N 873009• N 424.80' CENTER OF SEC. 35 CALCULATED P0060N (SEE SHEET 6 LY 8) FOUN0 I. 012.. IRON PIPE MIN CAP STAMPED 15 8271' AT N 33' E. 0.23 FT FRO. CALCULA IED PO9n0N. 591.99' N 8756'03' w - F07ND RR SPIRE 47 5 150E. 010 FT. FROM CALCD PO9RON / MOUND TACK IN LEAD 5 57' 6, 0.14 FI, FRO. CALCD PO5100N E 1/4 COR. SEC. 35 I CALCULATED P09001 (STT SHEET 6 Or 8) .__ _ _ 2083 :0' U 26 75 08' SHEET 5 OF 8 CHAD WICK do WINTERS LAND SURVEYING, INC. 4011 STONE RAY NORTH. SEATTLE. •A. 98103 PHONE \ FAX- (206) 632-3366 PROJec7 9: 97-7035 DRAW NC: 405-20040 CLIENT. %�% �% %� �/?�%%� RECORD D�%�jOF7%S57�/UURVEY�� J� �% AONU !/OU U O!/ (1 U ULS -ca W2 Ma LSV l:.f U 111 (//LS & C0 N/N/9 U o D U Ua U Uu e E., Elk KM COMFY, [ ASHineeTOM PARCEL .E: AREA A. 1,291,468 50. F7. THAT PORTION OF 1HE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF M£ SOUTHWEST QUARTER; AND OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 26, TOWNSHIP 23 NORM .RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN "(INC COUNTY, WASHINGTON; AND OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST OUARTER; AND OF THE NORTHEAST WARIER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 35. TOY.NSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W,M„ 1N KING COUN7Y, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 35: THENCE 50UR1 87'44'08" EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER A DISTANCE OF 740.76 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BECINNINC; THENCE SOUTH 0274'12" WEST PARALLEL TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER A DISTANCE OF 894,23 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE O7' DIE SOUTH 430 FEET OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF ME NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 35: THENCE NORTH 87'5009" ,WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE A DISTANCE OF 140.16 FEET TO THE EAST' LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID 'SECTION 35; THENCE NORTH 8750'57' WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE' SOUTH 430 FEET OF SAID NORTHEAST WARIER OF ME NORTHWEST QUARTER A DISTANCE OF 177.29 FEET TO A POINT 6 FEET DISTANT NORTHEASTERLY, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES, FROM THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF ME MESS BROTHERS COUNTY ROAD N0. 972: THENCE NORTH 7159'33" WEST ALONG A LINE 6 FEET DISTANT NORTHEASTERLY, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES FROM SAID EASTERLY MARGIN A DISTANCE OF 1771.86 .FEET THENCE CONTINUING ALONC SAI0 LINE 6 FEET DISTANCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG A CURVE TO THE RICHT HAMNG A RADIUS OF 919.37 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 210.78 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 1317808"; THENCE NORTH 0108'35" EAST ALONG SAID LINE 6 FEET DISTANCE NORTHEASTERLY A DISTANCE OF 285.11 FEET TO .THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 26; THENCE 504/TH 8755'53" EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE A DISTANCE OF 625.20 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF THE 50U TH NES T QUARTER OF ME SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 26; .HENCE SOUTH 875502' EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF sato SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST OUARTER A DISTANCE OF 140.16 FEET TO THE TRUE PONT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THE NORM 2 FEET A5 CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA FOR MINKLER BOULEVARD BY WARRANTY DEED UNDER RECORDING NO. 9408290325. PARCEL 0: AREA m 205,913 S0. FT. MOSS PORTIONS OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER AND SOUTHEAST WARIER OF THE,NORTHEAST QUARTER. ALL IN SECTION 35. TOWNSHIP 23 NORM, RANCE 4 EAST, W.N„ IN '(INC COUNTY, WASHINGTON. MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE SOUTH 88'54'46" EAST. ALONG THE NORM LME OF SAID SUBDIVISION 449.30 FEET THENCE SOUTH 01'05'14' WEST 36.0 FEET TO ME SQUTHERLY MARGIN OF SWM 180TH STREET AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 0105'14' WEST 365.78 FEET THENCE NORM 88'54'46" WEST 424.89 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 863800" 44E57 103,76 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 5870'50" WEST 74,23 FEET TO ME EASTERLY MARGIN OF 5704 AVENUE SOUTH (SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY); THENCE NORM 08'43'18' EAST ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN 316.06 FEET; THENCE NORTH 74'46'53 EAST ALONG 5410 EASTERLY MARGIN 63.77 FEET; THENCE ON SAID EASTERLY MARGIN ALONG A CURVE TO THE RICHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 50 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 76'18'21'. AN ARC DISTANCE OF 66.59 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 8834'46' EAST ALONG THE SOUTHERLY MARGIN OF SAID SOUTH 180TH STREET 485.16 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL F: AREA - 358,971 S0. FL THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF ME NORTHEAST QUARTER; AND OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST. W.M., IN '(INC COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID NW QUARTER OF THE NE QUARTER; THENCE SOUTH 0274'72' WEST ALONG THE WEST UNE OF 5A10 NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER, A DISTANCE OF 894.47 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 430 FEET OF SAID NORTHEAST OUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST WARIER AN0 THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING: THENCE NORTH 8750'57' WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE A DISTANCE OF 177.29 FEET TO A LINE 36 FEET EASTERLY OF THE CENTERLINE OF SOU THCEN TER PARKWAY (FORMERLY 57TH AVENUE 50U 1(H); THENCE SOUTH 1159'33 _EAST ALONG 5A10 LINE A DISTANCE OF 322,74 FEET; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 107.24 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 141.96 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE -OF 75'50'36' TO A LINE J6 FEET NORTHERLY OF THE CENTERLINE OF SOUTH 180M STREET, THENCE SOUTH 87'50'09' EAST ALONG SAID LINE A DISTANCE OF 576.70 FEET TO A LINE 740.70 FEET WEST OF THE EAST LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 35; THENCE NORTH 0151'39" EAST A DISTANCE OF 553.89 FEET TO A POINT SOUTH 01'57'39' WEST 50.00 FEET FROM THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ME TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED TO BRUCE E. MC CANN, ET AL. BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING N0. 7208170551; THENCE NORTH 8755'02" WEST 220.00 FEET,; THENCE NORTH 01'51'39' EAST 50.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 875502" WEST A DISTANCE OF 218.09 FEET TO A POINT 140.16 FEET EAST OF THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHEAST OARTER OF SAID SECTION 35: THENCE SOUTH 0274'12' WEST 4 DISTANCE OF 209.26 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF ME SOUTH 430 FEET OF SAID NORTH WEST OUARTER OF :THE NORTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE NORTH 8750'09" WEST A DISTANCE OF 140.16 FEET TO THE TRUE PANT OF BEGINNING. SHEET 8 OF' 8 CHAD WICK ec WINTERS LAND SURVEYING, INC. 4017 STONE WAY AORTIC SEATTLE. ITA, 98703 7R:Uecr 7; 07-20.15 PHONE \ FAX: (206) 632-3366 0RA7NN0' 11(17-500„1 CLIENT x.2,(1 Job Numbr 7230 �GHA(� P m — Z(425)25176222 c, u ° ' ' " a m - 0' <r y 'MD ENtifNE ... �. 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT, WA 98032. • (425)251-8782 FAX ' G CML ENGINEERING, LAND PLANNING. • SURVEYING, ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES De'Ipn.d 10(c D.:.n. WC xas: , ;,,,.,;cd 1'-0' , 9erDam ' N/A .. MBK CONSTRUCTION :.. 4949 S.W. MEADOWS ROAD - • ' LAKE OSWEGO, WA 97035 - (503) 636-2800 • . . • Tjj�. LANDSCAPE PLANTING PLAN . ".., .- . -..., .. MINKLER RETAIL BUILDING .. ... • Tukwila, Washington , . D1,ewoa NBM Aoo . - dote 112/11 e9 stied. . —1 File oA.nzinrni\7230\enaneerino\7230-Il.awu Dute/Tlme: 10/19/1999 15 19 Scat: 1.30 1.evfn )(refs : Z7230-1T,Z72301S,Z7230-1B, I BASIS OF BEARINGS] ------_________________ ! aq-Q.. rRT 7a`` -L f Mi N\ ` A 8OUTNC8NTER PARKWAY, 111111111 ilipyiglillilli 1p 1;1i i sit bag 411. 1i v1 i4 liiie 1 i w �A � 9 1 1 111 ;IIIA I gni § 41 1C . i �;;�i 51! 9111 !iii �� 6'41:* 1 ISI ct Idol i� illeil R11 Q � Is P�. 1s � a� RR ��2Ta a�q � � a� No �i 99 @ ll �° i ri ii aw pA l!w4 a I 111 . 1 Ii 1 it ;p 1 ! gq 6ali ! i IR.AS �A 1.43X a R 6 �$ �41 1 I X11!114 I 11 a El o w rr� v D Gl z O a ZS 32 _0 O O o.m m co y m CO 0 2 2 0 cng-�1 ��.C. — z ,11 :yY • WNW 441 1111 1:1 1; , lig 111111i:111' g'411-- 1111 .11gxigri „do, t. r. -:. 1 1;111!1 No 1) 12,4, Ij D . r o 60 4 PLS to• „'t ` 0sy01 t j a q` �a1 O RARROA0 EAetsE '1• "'fI I: R.. N. 7141000221,__1 J �St Ii I II -,1 4III1I4II.l ril rad O! C� • 1,` f f2 11 va. ,•1 fl I u 11 1 Ai ea 1:1 17 pQAfr tl �. 1I a 3pA ASr 1 1 as .1'01 yp9 III n4 - 1 a6 ., A� 1 I dA e K : i 1 1 I I I shq, 1111 1 _ ---_ 2__ _ . ` I � ° 1 ip I 1 1 zc I I e • o 11.1. 1- 11 _ �' I I '� z Ib' - .„ o - 1 Elio' ,g 1 1 I L CO h1 1 .. I • .:.E. I;ii 1111I I eA 1 ii 1 —I. .1 1 `I I 1 1I II �2.1a,1 eva .P i 4 6 av ' S O U T H C E N T'E R PARK 'W A 8818 i H V 18215 72945 AVENUE SOUTH 0i1P"0 NEW, WA 98032 p•..a _. _ (425)251-8222 - (425)251-8782 FM N«°...,- . SURVEYING, NINO, IAJ0 PLAIIIIII, 51J455110, rM .9011ENIAL SERVICES 0m. u.:I "/0 For: Trammell Crow Company 1687 - 114th Avenue S.E., Suite 250 Bellevue, WA 98004 Tine: ALTA / ACSM LAND TITLE SURVEY A PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF RECTION 28, Township' 23 North, Ranee 4 East, Willamette Merldlan Or n! " .' WILA ' KING County ` State of WASHINGTON F,.: P\S2SKPROA62112\UMW\681814.01 M 0aI./My, 07/23/1900 12:42 Scala: I -JO 1/10411 A,.I,: 62108071, PRELIMINARY