Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA E99-0034 - MUSTANG DEVELOPMENT - DEMOLITION AND REDEVELOPMENT OF OFFICE/WAREHOUSE BUILDINGMUSTANG DEVELOPMENT DEMOLISH & REDEVELOPMENT OF OFFICE/WAREHOUSE BUILDING 401 ANDOVER PARK E E99-0034 Cizy of Tukwila Steven M., Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director MEMORANDUM TO: Steve Lancaster FROM: Michael Jenkins DATE: Feburary 28, 2000 RE: Request for Administrative Variance for Required Parking — Mustang Development, 401 Andover Park E. � The architect for the Mustang Development Project, 401 Andover Park East, is requesting an administrative parking variance per TMC 18.56.140. Mustang Development is the Development Company for Fatigue Technology, who is relocating their facility from 100 Andover Park West to the referenced address. The applicant's has a 5% reduction from minimum parking requirements from 120 to 115 parking spaces. There are a total of 102 employees projected for this location. There are 79 employees with shifts between 7:30 and 6:00 p.m., 7 with hours from 3:30 to midnight and 3 from midnight to 6:30 am. REQUEST The project includes the partial demolition of an existing office/warehouse facility, to include the removal of an existing 6,000 sq. ft. office space, to be replaced by 43,000 sq. ft. of new office. The total area of the facility after new construction will be approximately 112,500 square feet. The minimum parking requirement is based upon three separate formulas. The parking requirement for the office component is '3 spaces per 1,000 usable, or net, square feet. The warehouse and manufacturing areas are calculated at 1 space per 2,000 and 1 space per 1,000 usable square feet, respectively. The requested variance is within the 10% threshold allowed under the code. Attachment 1 to this report is a copy of the site plan and parking calculations for the proposed use. DECISION CRITERIA Administrative variances may be allowed after the applicant demonstrates that the project will meet the following criteria, under TMC 18.56.140(B)(2): 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206-431-3670 • Fax: 206-431-3665 Memorandum February 28, 2000 Re: Administrative Parking Variance — Mustang Development L99-0081 1. All shared parking strategies are explored The project is under one business operation. No parking is available at the site to the south, as that development has sold its excess capacity to Red Dot. The property to the north does not have appropriate access to the parcel and is further limited by its use as a turning area for trucks. The properties across the street would not be appropriate due to limited pedestrian access. 2. On-site park and ride opportunities are fully explored Due to two work shifts required at the site, this is not a viable option. 3. The site is in compliance with the City's Commute Trip Reduction ordinance or, if not an affected employer as defined by the City's ordinance, agrees;to become affected. The business will not be an affected employer under the city's CTR ordinance. However, the applicant has indicated that they have promoted carpooling at the site. The applicant has also indicated that approximately 10% of their employees currently carpool and that 6 stalls could be designated for carpools. 4. The site is at least 300 feet away from a single family residential zone The closest residential zone is approximately 2 miles from the site. S. A report is submitted providing a basis for less parking and mitigation necessary to offset any negative effects. A traffic study dated November 10, 1999 was submitted as part of the SEPA file, E99- 0034. The analysis assumed a staff of approximately 104, as opposed to the 95 employees planned during peak hours for this facility. The study also assumes 127 parking spaces. No issues regarding parking were raised in the report. CONCLUSION 1. The applicant has reasonably attempted to obtain shared and off-site parking 2. The applicant will continue to promote commute alternatives to their employees and has indicated that their expected growth in the next few years will occur during their second shift, where parking demand is much less. 3. A traffic demand study for the site was submitted, but information regarding parking demand is inconclusive. Memorandum • February 28, 2000 Re: Administrative Parking Variance — Mustang Development L99-0081 RECOMMENDATION Approval of applicant's request for a reduction from 120 parking spaces to 115 parking spaces. The following is a list of conditions that the applicant must comply with as terms of approval. These conditions will be enforced over the life of the development. If the facility and/or the underlying property is sold or other wise conveyed, these conditions run with said sale and must be referenced in any and all sales agreements or other required legal documentation: 1. The applicant must comply with the following components of the City's Commute Trip Reduction program (TMC 9.44): • A baseline survey shall be done of all employees, using the City's adopted survey used by employer's affected by the Commute Trip Reduction ordinance, to determine type and extent of mode choice. This survey shall be repeated yearly to determine effect of trip reduction efforts. • At least 6 carpool spots shall be designated for Carpools only and located contiguous and in a location closest to the main employee entrance as feasible. These spaces shall be marked `Carpool Parking Only' and maintained over the life of the business. • An employee shall be appointed Employee Transportation Coordinator and develop and administer a Commute Trip Reduction program, including coordination with and a yearly report submitted to the City's Commute Trip Reduction Coordinator • All costs associated with survey collection and training to implement these conditions shall be born by the applicant. DECISION The request, as presented in this report, is hereby approved. Steve Lancaster, Director of Community Development 2-23-oo Date AFFIDAVIT MCA; riokeS' ONctice of Public Hearing ONctice. af Public Meeting 0E0=d af Adjust-TIn..t. Agenda. Packet OSaa_rd. af Appeals Agenda Pa.cket Planning Ca=issian Agenda Packet El Short Subdivision. Asenda Packet , • OF DISTRIBUTION • hereby declare that: eleterminatian of significance :'• fl Mitiga.ted • Dete=in.a_tian af • „ Nansignificance • • Dete.rmina.tian af Significance and Scapincr-Natice • ['Notice of Action • ['Official Notice Other ONatice of Application for her Shoreline Management Permit flShoreline Management Permit was mailed ta each af the fallowing addresses an • • Name a f Praj ect File Number p.qc(.OAA CO. - if cperr). CHECKLIST: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW/SHORELINE PERMIT MAILINGS ( ) U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS ( ) FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION ( ) DEPT OF FISH & WILDLIFE OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY ) TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT_ ) DEPT NATURAL RESOURCES OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR DEPT OF COMM. TRADE & ECONOMIC DEV. • FEDERAL AGENCIES ( ) U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ( ) U.S. DEPT OF H.U.D. WASHINGTON STATE AGENCIES ( ) DEPT OF SOCIAL & HEALTH SERV. ( ) DEPT OF ECOLOGY, SHORELIND DIV (..--)'DEPT OF ECOLOGY, SEPA DIVISION* ( ) OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL * SEND CHKLIST W/ DETERMINATIONS SITE MAPS WITH DECISION Cl off Cle - C N A Arc, s 7 7 7 — o-nk ANZ —l(pa Cl `846(1- •cr le ( ) DUWAMISH•INDIAN TRIBE. (C►KSEATTLE TIMES 07/09/98 C:WP51DATA\CHKLIST TY AGENCIES, K.C. DEPT OF PARKS HEALTH DEPT PORT OF SEATTLE 1 K.C.DEV & ENVIR SERVICES,SEPA INFO CNTR K.C. TRANSIT DIVISION - SEPA OFFICIAL 1LIBRLRIES HIGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT K C PUBLIC LIBRARY SEATTLE MUNI REF LIBRARY SEATTLE SCHOOL DISTRICT RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT CITIES PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT VAL-VUE SEWER DISTRICT WATER DISTRICT #20 WATER DISTRICT #125 CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC WORKS RAINIER VISTA SKYWAY iGENCIES RENTON PLANNING DEPT CITY OF SEA -TAC CITY OF BURIEN TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS CITY OF SEATTLE - SEPA INFO CENTER - DCLU SEATTLE OFFICE OF MGMNT & PLANNING* :E OF ALL SEATTLE RELATED PLNG PROJ. AL AGENCIES METRO ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING DIV. OFFICE/INDUSTRIAL 5,000 GSF OR MORE RESIDENTIAL 50 UNITS OR MORE RETAIL 30,000 GSF OR MORE =IA CITY OF TUKWILA DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: ADDITION TO AN EXISTING OFFICE/WAREHOUSE SPACE OF 4.3,800 SO FT OF OFFICE, 9,120 SW FT OF MANUFACT. SPACE AND DEMOLITION OF 6,000 SO FT OF EXISTING OFFICE SPACE PROPONENT: MUSTANG DEVELOPMENT, INC. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL, INCLUDING STREET ADDRESS, IF ANY: ADDRESS: 401 ANDOVER PK E PARCEL NO: 022340-0050 SEC/TWN/RNG: LEAD AGENCY: CITY OF TUKWILA FILE NO: E99-0034 The City has determined that the proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21c.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. •k**** k****************•k*•k*•k****k*******•k**********•k*******•k****** k****•k***•k* This determination is final and signed this I 1 day of -Jrt4UAVC'1_____ 2000 Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official City of Tukwila, (206) 431-3670 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the Department of Community Development. • City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director To: Steve Lancaster From: Michael Jenkins Date: January 5, 2000 Re: E99-0034, SEPA review for redevelopment of an existing office/warehouse building, 401 Andover Park E. MEMORANDUM Project Description: This SEPA review is for the demolition of 6,000 square feet of the office portion of an office/warehouse facility at 401 Andover Park E. The project also includes construction of an additional 9,120 square feet of manufacturing area and 43,800 square feet of office/warehouse space. Agencies with jurisdiction: None Summary of Primary Impacts: • Earth The site is sloped approximately two to three percent over the entire parcel. Existing soils are primarily silty sand and organic root material. Approximately 4,100 cubic yards of structural fill will be imported onto site, with equal amount of organic root material removed. 86% of site includes impervious surfaces. The applicant has submitted a Phase 1 environmental audit dated May 18, 1999. An Erosion Control Plan has not been submitted. A separate Geotechnical Report has not been submitted. • Air Negligible vehicle emissions will occur during construction. • Water The site is located away from any significant body of water and is not in a regulated flood plain. The applicant must submit a drainage plan meeting King County Surface Water Management requirements, including core requirements 1-8, Section 1.2 and special requirements 1-5, Section 1.3. The applicant has indicated that storm water detention and water quality system will meet City of Tukwila requirements. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 4313670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 E99-0034 • • SEPA Checklist — Mustang Development, Inc. 401 Andover Park E January 5, 2000 • Plants No significant trees or plantings are located on the site. A Landscape Plan has been submitted as part of the Design Review process. • Animals No threatened or endangered species known in area. • Energy/Natural Resources No impacts. • Environmental Health No significant noise will be generated by project. Any noise generated during construction or operation of the facility must comply with Tukwila's Noise Ordinance (TMC 8.22). • Land/Shoreline Use Proposed development is located in the Tukwila Urban Center. Project includes the demolition of an existing portion of the building with additions totaling approximately 52,000 square feet. The applicants are also seeking an administrative parking variance to reduce the required number of parking spaces from 116 to 110, for a total of 5% reduction. This administrative variance will be decided as a Type 2 review, approved by the Director of Community Development. • Housing No impact • Aesthetics The applicants are proposing a two-story addition to an existing one-story warehouse office/warehouse building. The addition, including the landscape plan and other site improvements, must be approved by the Board of Architectural Review prior to the filing of a Development Permit. • Light and Glare The development will not produce significant light or glare. A lighting plan, as part of the Landscape Plan, has been submitted for review by the Board of Architectural Review. E99-0034 0 0 SEPA Checklist — Mustang Development, Inc. 401 Andover Park E January 5, 2000 • Recreation No impact. • Historic/Cultural Preservation No known places or landmarks. • Transportation The applicants have requested an administrative parking variance to reduce the number of required spaces from 116 to 110, resulting in a 5% reduction from minimum parking requirements. One of the three existing driveways will be removed as part of the sire redevelopment. The applicants are working with BNSF to abandon rail spur at facility, which will be paved and used for onsite circulation and loading areas. A Traffic Analysis dated November 10, 1999 was prepared and submitted. According to the applicants, approximately 346 additional trips will be generated due to the proposed additional square footage. No traffic mitigation has been proposed, other than marking the north access lane 'entrance only'. • Public Services Proposed development will not impact or require specific public services. • Utilities The facility will be served by electric and telephone services. Recommendations: DNS • OUR JOB NO. 7256 DECEMBER 10, 1999 Prepared By: ' EXPIRES c i-- I (^ O 01 BARGHAUSEN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 1 821 5 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT, WASHINGTON 98032 (425) 251-6222 2 r CIVIL ENGINEERING, LAND PLANNING, SURVEYING, ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES u ENG" • • • TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1.0 PROJECT OVERVIEW 1 2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS SUMMARY 1 3.0 PROPOSED CONDITIONS SUMMARY 1 4.0 ANALYSIS OF THE EIGHT CORE REQUIREMENTS OF THE KING COUNTY SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL 1 5.0 SPECIAL ANALYSIS OF SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS 3 • 1.0 PROJECT OVERVIEW The proposed project is located within a portion of the Southeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 26, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian, City of Tukwila, King County, Washington. More specifically, the site is located at the southwest corner of the intersection of Treck Drive and Andover Park East. The proposed project is to construct additional space along the existing building. The site is currently developed and consists chiefly of impervious surfaces of asphaltic pavements, the existing structure, as well as associated parking areas, drive lanes, landscaped areas, and utilities. 2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS SUMMARY Drainage on site is collected by a series of catch basins and tightlines located throughout the subject property. The runoff is then conveyed to the southeast corner of the site and discharges to the existing storm drainage system along Andover Park East. The water then turns in a southerly direction and continues to the south along the western side of Andover Park East through a series of catch basins and 24 -inch storm drains, for approximately 2,000 feet where it then intersects at the intersection of Minkler Boulevard and Andover Park East. At this point, the drainage collects within an existing open channel/culvert system located along Minkler Boulevard. The water is conveyed into this open channel system via a 36 -inch concrete pipe. The open channel is approximately 6 feet wide with 3:1 side slopes. The side slopes are heavily vegetated and the open channel is approximately 10 to 12 feet deep. The flow then continues in an easterly direction for approximately 600 feet where it then is conveyed into a Regional Detention Facility. III3.0 PROPOSED CONDITIONS SUMMARY • Within the proposed conditions an additional ±.72 acre of impervious area will be added, along with additional storm drainage and water quality facility improvements. Flow control will be according to the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) and City of Tukwila standards. More specifically, we will be providing Level 1 Flow Control for additional impervious area. We also propose to provide water quality for the existing storm drainage on site. Specifically, it is proposed to add a new coalescing plate oil/water separator. 4.0 ANALYSIS OF THE EIGHT CORE REQUIREMENTS OF THE KCSWDM Core Requirement No. 1 - Discharge at the Natural Location. The discharge from the proposed project site must occur at the natural location. Response: This project will not divert runoff from the current drainage pattern and will discharge at the natural location within the existing 12 -inch storm drain running east underneath Andover Park East. -1- 7256.001 [BHE/mm/jss] • • Core Requirement No. 2 - Off-site Analysis. All proposed projects must identify the upstream tributary drainage area perform a downstream analysis. Levels of analysis required depend on the problems identified or predicted. At a minimum, a Level 1 Analysis must be submitted with the initial permit. Response: Based on field reconnaissance it appears the site receives little or no upstream drainage from the surrounding areas. On-site hydraulic conditions, as well as the downstream analysis, are discussed within Section 2.0 and Section 3.0 of this report. Core Requirement No. 3 - Runoff Control. Proposed projects must provide runoff control to limit the developed conditions, peak rate of runoff to the predevelopment peak rates for specific design storm events based on the runoff from defined existing site conditions and installed biofiltration measures. Response: This project proposes to provide a Level 1 Flow Control for the additional impervious area added, as well as providing water quality through a coalescing plate oil/water separator to the existing storm drainage facilities on site. Core Requirement No. 4 - Conveyance System. All conveyance systems for the proposed projects must be analyzed, designed, and constructed for existing tributary off-site runoff and develop on-site runoff from the proposed project. Response: A conveyance system design and analysis will be completed based on King County and City of Tukwila standards during preparation of the final construction plans. Core Requirement No. 5 - Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control. All projects that require engineered drainage plans shall provide temporary erosion and sedimentation control measures that minimize the transport of sediment to drainage facilities, water resources, and adjacent properties. Response: A temporary erosion and sedimentation control plan will be provided with the design of this project to minimize the transport of sediment to off-site drainage facilities, water resources, and adjacent properties. Core Requirement No. 6 - Maintenance and Operation. Maintenance of all drainage facilities constructed or modified by a proposed project is the responsibility of the property owner (see maintenance requirements for privately maintained drainage facilities in Appendix X) except King County may assume maintenance of drainage facilities constructed for formal plat subdivisions, planned unit developments, and some short plat subdivisions two years after construction approval. Response: A maintenance and operations plan will be provided with the final design review of this project. Core Requirement No. 7- Bonds and Liability. All drainage facilities for proposed projects (except drainage stub out connections, downspout roof drain infiltrations systems, and downspout dispersion systems for single-family residential lots) must be constructed in conformance with the bond and liability requirements of King County's Code 9.04.100. Response: This project will be constructed in conformance with the bond and liability requirements of King County Code 9.04.100. -2- 7256.001 [BHE/mm] • • Core Requirement No. 8 - All proposed projects, including redevelopment projects, must provide water quality facilities to treat the runoff from new and/or pollution generating pervious surfaces and pollution generating pervious surfaces. This is to require an efficient cost-effective level of water quality treatment tailored to the sensitivities and resource protection needs of the downstream receiving water to it's project site drains, or in the case of infiltration, protection of the receiving groundwater system. Response: Within the development we have proposed a coalescing plate oil/water separator to provide water quality to the existing storm drainage system. 5.0 SPECIAL ANALYSIS OF SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS Special Requirement No. 1 - Other Adopted Areas Specific Requirements. Response: The proposed project is not located within an area specific area. Consequently, Special Requirement No. 1 does not apply. Special Requirement No. 2 - Floodplain/Floodway Delineation. Response: The proposed project is not located with a 100 -year floodplain, as noted in the FEMA Map located within this report. Consequently, Special Requirement No. 2 does not apply. Special Requirement No. 3 - Flood Protection Facilities. Response: As noted in the response to Special Requirement No. 2, the proposed site is not located within a 100 -year floodplain. Consequently, Special Requirement No. 3 does not apply. Special Requirement No. 4 - Source Control. Response: The proposed project will be providing water quality source controls in accordance with the King County Stormwater Pollution Control Manual and the King County Code 9.12. Special Requirement No. 5 - Oil Control. Response: The proposed project does not meet the requirements of a "high use," site as noted in Section 1.3.5 of the KCSWDM. Consequently, Special Requirement No. 5 does not apply. -3- 7256.001 [BHE/mm] • • H14 VICINITY MAP SOURCE: THOMAS GUIDE NORTH • *HAGS SIS FEMA MAP NORTH CALL BEFORE E YOU DIC; PROPOSED CONDITIONS MAP « M 1/ 4 11Y17J75 (•fi (, U llllllll Q FX IILORIOOL tEIEA5C PAD }NV6{dp16P 1JE (0 - 4 s.�nn c,• s) « S.II.C.V 1 e 40 001116POUT 10061E PPM •IAC 16. 0 w7G F���■IIN�r�MNOt•�1'•- our ry•�!-v.rc 3 1!11999iiiiii m"?" ' �AE•��+. 4^� g/.i 45. Peentro 6l8Lfi TQ ^`89 =Q :C^.n i BiiIii/I/ (.1645 24 11,, S) 4.40600 It' 4) eartimarrosioir 11 notosalITIVONCIS 11 • 11 11 :, 11 11 14,41 I I a 1 EI. 15 1440( surf SEWER EASOftsrf 11 LORTIMAY SUOMI II - 10.74 (24 M. 5) LEGAL DESCRPTION IMP 5 6 116 NAI R MOM 111141* Mt E 1 40 1601621 11 MI6 a 0 PUTS PAILS 22 MD 23, 4(OIOS 6 010 C011tt7. 50.4114040 IOIE PMTI0MA.T 01:506513 )4 201164 40014010 AT 112 IAA 0101060 066/1 OF 5(07100 66. 100196 23 10611 0060 EMT, l 0. 111116 awry.084111011* 1106 1100144 OA 00' 4? EST 60110 112 5711611 1.11E 0 M 4T1106T 111016 6 M SA10 5E616 26 A 515100E 6 42. M FEET TO I0 ttRCTIOM 01744 THE TES71A7 IVACUI 6 M00440 PAM EAST; ACM 40144 01? 1f 2K EAST 6010 SAID 43TE*T M001U 1107 0157 TO 111 110E POIR 6 101511446. 14440E 661111116 W144 Ott 41 4? EAST 16 70 FEEL 10 A 40110 OF 1344; 7106 710144 A 11112 10 DI MI6 451110 A 0566 02 270.27 CELT 7160101 A (INTIM /MLA Or 711 1T 4? M 00C DIST MX 6 720. 73 RP 10 A P0110 6 E61151 11016; NO( 4M0G AA 001E 10 14 161 007110 A 000106 6 20.37 FEEL 15101 A 00000* AMU 6 10? 03' 50' M MC o1STM1E 6 1a OS tat. DEw 451 or ) ' 1t' mu 45110 NET; TIE16 SOUM 017 AY 20 est 351.00 2EET; 11E11E 501144 067 12' 32' E451 40150 NET 10 112 1044 40110 6 E56116. 96E6 TO MO 14101110 M 05132111 FO 0011/045 111166E1 OVER DE 114544(41 51 5 4151 11(46. sumer TO ATO 110.10144 M E6000 2O0 U111111 DIMIOES OVER 111 EMtM 1 13.00 NET MAW. 51034.1 6 ATO 1441111 M MEMO 200 545IT457 5(106 66 112 3055117 15.00 NET 110(6. DESIGN ASSUMPTIONS 021110110 M 110 101500 ASA ENE 12+0 050010000MEA 4 LESS 601 M (705106 01616660 MIA 003 F440FOS7 . 013111 6 10 1101 COM THE 101 145EN10 LIS OMEIprt MMA MO ((TNN 116 0110E IE-* 015506 1164 ICE 7106 A 4001100 0? MI 101 MUM AKA CORD 66165 0E 0(1611105 515140 11605 044 M 06110 0664516 M6A, TOOK021001011 16501 6 WSW D(301 1101* (15196O0 711 00; 00115111 570610E 1 • • SOILS MAP NORTH • SOIL SURVEY King County Area. Washington OR\GNAL • UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Soil Conservation Service in cooperation with WASHINGTON AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION Issued November 1973 GUIDE TO NAPPING UNITS For a full description of a mapping unit, read both the description of the mapping unit and that of the soil aeries to which the mapping unit belongs. See table 6, page 70, for descriptions of woodland groups. Other nformation is given in .tables as follows: • Acreage and extent, table 1, page 9. Engineering uses of the soils, tables 2 and 3, pages 36 through S5. Town and country planning, table 4, page 57. Recreational uses, table 5, page 64. Estimated yields, table 7, page 79. Na p Described symbol Mapping unit an page AgB Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 0 to 6 percent slopes---------- 10 AgC Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 6 to 15 percent slopes 8 AgD Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 1S to 30 percent slopes 10 AkF Alderwood and Kitsap soils, very steep 10 AmB Arents, Alderwood material, 0 to 6 percent slopes 1/ 10 AmC Arents, Alderwood material, 6 to 15 percent slopes 1/ 10 An Arents, Everett material 1/ 11 BeC Beausite gravelly sandy loam, 6 to 15 percent slopes 11 BeD Beausite gravelly sandy loam, 15 to 30 percent slopes 12 BeF Beausite gravelly sandy loam, 40 to 75 percent slopes 12 Bh Bellingham silt loam- 12 Br Briscot silt loam 13 Bu Buckley silt loam 13 Cb Coastal beaches 14 Ea . Earlmont-silt loam 14 Ed Edgewick fine sandy loam- 15 EvB Everett gravelly sandy loam, 0 to 5 percent slopes 1S EvC Everett gravelly sandy loam, 5 to 15 percent slopes 16 EvD Everett gravelly sandy loam, 15 to 30 percent slopes 16 EwC 'Everett-Alderwood gravelly sandy loans, 6 to 15 percent slopes 16 Indianola loamy fine sand, 0 to 4 percent slopes 17 Indianola loamy fine sand, 4 to 1S percent slopes 16 Indianola loamy fine sand, 15 to 30 percent slopes 17 Kitsap silt loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes 17 Kitsap silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes 18 Kitsap silt loam, 15 to 30 percent slopes 18 Klaus gravelly loamy sand, 6 to 15 percent slopes 18 Mixed alluvial land 18 Neilton very -"gravelly loamy sand, 2 to 15 percent slopes 19 Newberg silt loam 19 Nooksack silt loam 20 Norma sandy loam 20 Orcas peat 21 Oridia silt loam- 21 Ovall gravelly loam, 0 to 1S percent slopes 22 Ovall.gravelly loam,' 15 to 25 percent slopes 23 Ovall gravelly loam, 40 to 75 percent slopes 23 Pilchuck loamy fine sand 23 Pilchuck fine sandy loam 23 Puget silty clay loam 24 Puyallup fine sandy loam 24 Ragnar fine sandy loam, 6 to 15 percent slopes 25 Ragnar fine sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes 26 Ragnar-Indianola association, sloping: 1/ 26 Ragnar soil Indianola soil tdE Ragnar-Indianola association, moderately steep: 1/ 26 Ragnar soil Indianola soil KpC KpD KsC Ma NeC Ng Nk No Dr Ds DvC DvD JvF Pc Pk Pu FY .aC 2aD tdC 3 • Woodland Capability unit group Symbol TVe-2 lVe-2 VIe-2 VIIe-1 IVe-2 IVe-2 IVs -1 IVe-2 VIe-2 VIIe-1 IIIw-2 IIw-2 IIIw-2 VIIIw-1 IIw-2 IIIw-1 IVs -1 VIs-1 VIe-1 VIs-1 IVs -2 TVs -2 VIe-1 IIIe-1 IVe-1 VIe-2 VIs-1 VIw-2 VIs-1 IIw-1 IIw-1 IIIw-3 VIIIw-1 IIw-2 IVe-2 VIe-2 VIIe-1 VIw-1 IVw-1 IIIw-2 IIw-1 IVe-3 VIe-2 IVe-3 IVs -2 VIe-2 VIe-1 Page Symbol 76 3d2 76 3d1 78 3d1 78 2d1 76 3d2 76 3d2 77 3f3 76 3d2 78 3d1 78 3d1 76 3w2 75 3w1 76 4w1 78 75 3w2 75 201 77 3f3 78 3f3 77 3f2 78 77 77 76 75 76 78 78 78 78 74 74 76 78 75 76 78 78 78 76 76 74 77 78 77 77 78 77 3f3 4s3 4s3 4s2 2d2 ?d2 2d1 3f1 2o1 3f3 2o1 2o1 3w2 3w1 3d1 3d1 3d1 2s1 2s1 3w2 2o1 4s1 4s1 4s1 4s3 4s1 4s2 U. S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE : 1973 0 - 468-266 Renton silt loam- 26 Riverwash- 27 Salal silt loam 27 Sammamish silt loam 27 Seattle muck 28 Shalcar muck 29 Si silt loam 29 Snohomish silt loam 30 Snohomish silt loam, thick surface variant 31 Sultan silt loam- 31 Tukwila muck 32 Urban land 33 Woodinville silt loam 33 GUIDE TO MAPPING UNITS --Continued Mapping unit Described on page Capability unit Woodland group Symbol Page IIIw-1 75 VIIIw-1 78 IIw-1 74 IIw-2 75 IIw-3 75 IIw-3 75 IIw-1 74 IIw-2 75 IIw-2 75 IIw-1 74 IIw-3 75 IIw-2 75 Symbol 3w1 201 3w1 201 3w2 3w2 3w1 3w2 1/ The composition of these units is more variable than that of the others in the Area, but it has been ntrolled well enough to interpret for the expected use of the soils. • • • M r/ EXISTING CONDITIONS MAP • EX nK'mcm. rtlUelc MID lAW¢iAMR U. ,M r/ • WILMS i EL SD.C11. . OF c.O w - 1 1 mo! C.aoo (•• Pi -.......) l s tJ I 111 E -17.A If M A gl E.1 1 lY -/7.A .1 1N r Q.33 - EL CB T` _ _ c -tan (s- NO i - a T Tr — [-[-no (r N —_ �1 TTn F EX 15' IC[ SAKI afro Ertsx, E-lt.n it -1a74 04' IE. 5} • • City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director NOTICE OF APPLICATION DATED DECEMBER 9, 1999 The following applications have been submitted for review and decision. FILE NUMBER: L99-0080 (Design Review) L99-0081 (Administrative Parking Variance) E99-0035 (SEPA) APPLICANT: Mustang Development, Inc. LOCATION: 401 Andover Park E. PROPOSAL: Modify the facade and add new office space to an existing one-story office/warehouse building; reduce required parking spaces by 5% from 116 to 110 OTHER REQUIRED PERMITS: Development Permit These files are available for review at the Department of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA. Please call (206) 431-3670 to ensure that the file(s) will be available. OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT You can submit comments on this application. You must submit your comments in writing to the Department of Community Development by 5:00 p.m. on January 4, 2000. This matter is also scheduled for a public hearing on February 24, 2000. If you are interested in attending the hearing, please contact the Department at (206) 431-3670 to ensure that the hearing is still scheduled for this date. If you cannot submit comments in writing by the cutoff date indicated above, you may still appear at the hearing and give your comments on the proposal before the Planning Commission. If you have questions about this proposal contact Michael Jenkins, the Planner in charge of this file. Anyone who submits written comments will become parties of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. APPEALS You may request a copy of any decision or obtain information on your appeal rights by contacting the Department at 431-3670. A decision from the Planning Commission may be appealed to the City Council. The Department will provide you with information on appeals if you are interested. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 • City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director December 6, 1999 Jeff Jeffers CNA Architecture, Inc. 777 - 108th Ave N.E., Suite 400 Bellevue, WA 98004-5118 Re: Mustang Development proposal, 401 Andover Park E. (L99-0080, E99-0034) Dear Jeff: As part of the substantive review of your project, the Department of Public Works has provided the following comments: • A drainage plan meeting the King County Surface Water Design Manual must be submitted, specifically addressing Core Requirements Section 1.2, subsections 1-8 and Special Requirements Section 1.3, subsections 1-5. • Approval must be obtained from the Railroad for the removal of the railspur and installation of new pavement • Signage must be installed at the North driveway on Andover Park East for entrance only — no exit Please contact Michael Cusick in the Department of Public Works (206-433-0179) if you have questions about these requirements. These must be submitted for review prior to the issuance of the SEPA determination on your project. I am currently reviewing the project in regard to the Design Guidelines and will be contacting you to schedule a meeting to provide my comments and concerns about the project. In the interim if you have any questions, please contact me at 206-431-3685. Sincerely, Michael Jenkins Associate Planner cc: Michael Cusick 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 • City of Tukwila John W Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION December 3, 1999 Jeff Jeffers CNA Architecture, Inc. 777 — 108th Ave N.E., Suite 400 Bellevue, WA 98004-5118 Re: Application for Design Review and SEPA Review for an addition to and modifications of an existing building, 401 Andover Park E. (L99-0080, E99-0034) Dear Jeff: Your application on behalf of Mustang Development to modify and expand an existing one-story building, as referenced above, has found to be complete on December 3, 1999 for the purposes of meeting state mandated time requirements. The project has been assigned to me and is tentatively scheduled for a public hearing before the Board of Architectural Review (BAR) on February 24, 2000. The next step is for you to install the notice board on the site within 14 days of the date of this letter. The sign should be posted in a location that is easily accessible to people using the site. You received information on how to install the sign with your application packet. If you need another set of those instructions, you may obtain them at the Department of Community Development (DCD). Also, you must obtain a laminated copy of the Notice of Application to post on the board. This notice is also available at DCD. After installing the sign with the laminated notice, you need to return the signed Affidavit of Posting to our office. This determination of complete application does not preclude the ability of the City to require that you submit additional plans or information, if in our estimation such information is necessary to ensure the project meets the substantive requirements of the City or to complete the review process. I will be contacting you soon to discuss this project. If you wish to speak to me sooner, feel free to call me at 206- 431-3685. Sincerely, Michael Jenkins Associate Planner cc: Reviewing City Departments 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 4313665 • MUSTANG LLC 401 ANDOVER PARKWAY EAST TUKWILA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Purpose of Checklist • a G2 • rJ®�i The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW. requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the Agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. jnstructions for Applicants This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Govemmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of Checklist for Nonproiect Proposals: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply". IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTION (part D). For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project", "applicant", and "property or site" should be read as "proposal", "proposer", and "affected geographic area" respectively. wp:24:sepa1137 1 EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA NOV 121999 PERMIT CENTER MUSTANG LLC 401 ANDOVER PARKWAY EAST TUKWILA A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Mustang Development 2. Name of applicant: Mustang LLC 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Mustang LLC 100 Andover Parkway West Seattle WA 98188 Telephone: 206-246-2010 Contact: Kevin Dooley 4. Date checklist prepared: September 10, 1999 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Grading to begin: Spring year 2000 Construction to begin: Spring year 2000 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Phase I Environmental Audit prepared Environmental Associates Inc. dated May 18, 1999. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No applications are pending for other proposals affecting this site. wpl4:sepa1137 2 EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY • • MUSTANG LLC 401 ANDOVER PARKWAY EAST TUKWILA 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. • Grading permit • Street use permit • Building permit • Electrical permit • Mechanical permit • Sewer permit • Water permit All other necessary permits and approvals customary and incidental to this type of proposal. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the site of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) The proposed development consist of remodeling and expanding an existing industrial facility to meet new program requirements. The office portion of the existing building (6000 SF) will be demolished, modifications and a fire wall to be constructed in the 61,100 SF existing warehouse/manufacturing facility. The proposed expansion includes an additional 9120 SF of single story manufacturing and 43,800 SF of two story office/warehouse. All surface parking and landscaping will be in compliance with the City of Tukwila zoning and land use regulations. The proposed south and east facades will be site cast concrete tilt -up wall panels with aluminum cladding system at window bays for detail and interest. Windows will be insulated with compatible spandrel glass at warehouse areas. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. Street address: 401 Andover Parkway East (Andover Industrial Park No. 5) wp:24:sepa1137 3 EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY • • MUSTANG LLC 401 ANDOVER PARKWAY EAST TUKWILA B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH: a. General description of the site (circle underline one): Flat rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other: b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? Two to three percent. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, mulch)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Existing silty sand or sandy silt, under that silty sand, soft or loose sand to a depth of 100 feet. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. Soils are compressible. e. Describe the purpose, type and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Export organic root material. Import structural fill and finish grade, approximately 4100 cubic yards of material. Imported structural fill will be trucked in from local pit of fill source. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. g. None other than normally encountered during construction. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 86% of the gross land area is impervious. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth if any: wp:24:sepa1137 Erosion control measures will utilize best management practices including: Providing blanket protection of disturbed areas with the use of filter fabric, and intercepting surface runoff onto or off disturbed areas to control sediment transport throughout the use of fences and a settlement pond per the City of Tukwila. 4 EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY • MUSTANG LLC 401 ANDOVER PARKWAY EAST TUKWILA 2. AIR: a. What type of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e. dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known Some dust and particulate emissions from construction equipment and vehicles may occur during construction. When construction is completed, a limited amount of emissions will come from employee and visitor. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. None are known. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Contractor will be responsible for controlling dust. Control could be achieved through the periodic watering of roads or other means acceptable to the City of Tukwila. 3. WATER: a. Surface: 1. Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No. 2. Will the project require any work over, in or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No. wp:24:sepa1137 5 EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY • MUSTANG LLC 401 ANDOVER PARKWAY EAST TUKWILA 3. Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None. 4. Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, • and approximate quantities if known. No. 5. Does the proposal lie within a 100 year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No, the site does not lie within a 100 year floodplain. 6. Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. b. Ground: 1. Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. 2. Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) area expected to serve. None. wp 24:sepa1137 6 EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY • • MUSTANG LLC 401 ANDOVER PARKWAY EAST TUKWILA c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1. Describe the source(s) of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection, and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. The source of runoff is rainfall to roof tops and other impervious areas. The existing building and pavement areas are currently served by a storm conveyance system. As part of the new building expansion, a storm detention system will be provided for the new impervious building area and water quality treatment will be provided for the existing pavement area. After detention and treatment, storm water will discharge to the existing piped storm system in Andover Parkway East. 2. Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, or runoff water impacts, if any: Storm water detention will be provided for new impervious area and water quality treatment will be provided for existing pavement areas in accordance with City of Tukwila Design Standards. 4. PLANTS: a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: 1 deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other ✓ shrubs ✓ grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation (please list) wp.24:sepa1137 7 EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY • • MUSTANG LLC 401 ANDOVER PARKWAY EAST TUKWILA b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? The existing lawn will be removed in the limits of construction and a few individual trees at the edge of the site where driveways are created. The site will be landscaped after completion. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Landscaping planting will meet or exceed City landscape ordinance. Plant material will be either native or adapted and will be hardy to the Northwest climate and used to express seasonality in the landscape. 5. ANIMALS: a. Circle any birds and animals that have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other Birds and animals are unknown. b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None. wp:24:sepa1137 8 EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY • • MUSTANG LLC 401 ANDOVER PARKWAY EAST TUKWILA 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES: a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electricity will be used for lighting and manufacturing and natural gas for heating. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Building will meet the Washington State Energy Code, office to be heated space, warehouse and manufacturing to be classified as semi -heated space. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH: a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure° to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. None. 1. Describe special emergency services that might be required. None. 2. Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: b. Noise wp:24:sepal137 None required. 1. What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment operation, other)? Minor traffic noise from the street. 9 EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY • MUSTANG LLC 401 ANDOVER PARKWAY EAST TUKWILA 2. What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from site. Short-term construction noise associated with construction would occur during daylight hours. Long- term noise would be limited to autos visiting the site. 3. Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Construction will be limited to the normal working hours, i.e., 7:00 AM to 6:00 PM. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE: a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The site is presently developed as an industrial site for the making of paper envelopes. The proposed project is to develop the area designated as future expansion. The surrounding properties on all sides have been developed with light industrial facilities. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No. c. Describe any structures on the site. An existing 72,000 SF industrial facility including 6000 SF of office Type III -N sprinklered construction. The building is presently occupied by Mail -Well Envelope to make envelopes. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? The existing 6000 SF office portion of the facility will be demolished. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Tukwila Urban Center (TUC) District. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Tukwila Urban Center (TUC) District. wp:24:sepa1137 10 EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY • • MUSTANG LLC 401 ANDOVER PARKWAY EAST TUKWILA g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not applicable. h. Has any part of the . site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? j• Approximately 98 employees on day shift and 7 employees on swing shift. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None required. 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and project land uses and plans, if any: None required. 9. HOUSING: a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing? None. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low income housing? None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None. wp24:sepa1137 11 EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY • • MUSTANG LLC 401 ANDOVER PARKWAY EAST TUKWILA 10. AESTHETICS: a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? The building height will not exceed 35 feet; the exterior building material will be concrete tilt -up wall panels with aluminum panels and non -reflective glazing. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? No views would be impacted. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any? Building colors, orientation and landscaping will be utilized to break up expanses of structure and will blend tastefully with the surrounding environment. 11. LIGHT AND GLARE: a. What type of Tight or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? There will be lighting in the parking areas, walk areas, roadways, and on buildings during both evening and night hours. Vehicles using the site could increase daytime glare and night time lights that could be visible in the surrounding areas. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None are known. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: wp:24:sepa1137 The use of lighting fixtures that are designed to control Tight glare within the property and landscaping to block light from adjacent property. 12 EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY • • MUSTANG LLC 401 ANDOVER PARKWAY EAST TUKWILA 12. RECREATION: a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? None known. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None. 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION: a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally, describe. None are known. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None are known. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None required. 14. TRANSPORTATION: a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe the proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The development fronts Andover Parkway East. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop. wp:24:sepa1137 Transit exists on Andover Parkway East. 13 EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY • MUSTANG LLC 401 ANDOVER PARKWAY EAST TUKWILA c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Completed project to have 116 spaces, 7 spaces eliminated. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). There will be modifications to existing driveways and the elimination of one existing driveway. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. Rail easement along west property line. Spur line to existing facility to be abandoned in place and paved over with asphalt. f. How many vehicular trips (two-way) per day would be generated by the completed project? 836 vehicular trips total, existing facility generated 490 vehicular trips. Based on square footage only a net gain of 346 trips for the proposed addition would be generated. However, based on the proposed use of the facility, the occupant load will be Tess than that presently utilizing the facility. Therefore, there will be less vehicular trips generated than is that identified as existing. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any. Based on the prepared traffic impact analysis the number of employees proposed is Tess than that presently occupying this site. Traffic mitigation would not be appropriate. g. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES: a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None. wp:24:sepa1137 14 EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY . • MUSTANG LLC 401 ANDOVER PARKWAY EAST TUKWILA 16. UTILITIES: a. Circle underline utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural aas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. • Electricity is supplied by Puget Sound Energy. • Natural gas is supplied by Puget Sound Energy. • The City of Tukwila provides water and sanitary sewer services. It will be installed and/or modified as part of the project construction. • Telephone service is provided by GTE. • All utilities will be installed underground. C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: :s!% EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY Date Submitted: �//3 wp24:sepa1137 15 • • PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL AUDIT Mail Well Envelope Building 401 Andover Park East Tukwila, Washington 98188-7659 FREDRICK PROPERTIES, INC. RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA NOV 121999 PERMIT CENTER • ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC. 2122 - 112th Avenue North East, Suite B-100 Bellevue, Washington 98004 (425) 455-9025 FAX: (425) 455-2316 May 18, 1999 JN -9163 Fredrick Properties, Inc. 100 Andover Park West Tukwila, Washington 98188 Attention: Mr. Kevin Dooley Subject: PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL AUDIT Mail Well Envelope Building 401 Andover Park East Tukwila, Washington 98188-7659 Ladies and Gentlemen: Environmental Associates, Inc., has completed a Phase I Environmental Audit of the subject property located in King County, Washington 98188-7659. This report, prepared in accordance with the terms of our proposal dated April 23, 1999 and in a manner generally consistent with the intent and methodologies of ASTM E 1527-97, "Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process," summarizes our approach to the project along with results and conclusions. The contents of this report are confidential and are intended solely for your use and the use of your representatives. Four (4) copies of this report are being distributed to you. No other distribution or discussion of this report will take place without your prior approval in writing. Additional copies are available for a small fee. Within the context of the limitations of the attached report of which this letter is a part, relying solely upon the available information reviewed or otherwise developed in the course of our study, and momentarily excluding the presence of suspect and confirmed asbestos containing building materials including the fire curtain extending across the middle of the main floor ceiling, the nine inch square vinyl tile in the offices and in the lunch room, and the roofing insulation beneath the built-up roof, it would appear that the property is free from contamination by potentially hazardous, dangerous, or toxic materials. In the current use and good condition, none of these materials appear to present a threat to public health or to the environment and no action would be required at this time under Associate Offices: Oregon / San Francisco Bay Area Fredrick Properties, Inc. JN -9163 May 1871999 Page - 2 existing state, federal, or local laws and regulations. Common sense approaches to future management or additional evaluation for the above noted conditions are provided for your consideration in the Conclusions/Recommendations section of the attached report. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service on this assignment. If you have any questions or if we may be of additional service, please do not hesitate to contact us. Respectfully submitted, ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC. Don W. Spencer, M.Sc., P.G., R.E.A. Principal EPA -Certified Asbestos Inspector/Management Planner I.D. # AM 48151 EPA/HUD Certified Lead Inspector (Licensed) Registered Site Assessor/Licensed UST Supervisor State Certification #947458636 License: W000010 License: 11464 License: 876 License: 5195 License: 0327 (Washington) (Oregon) (California) (Illinois) (Mississippi) • • HASE "1 " ENVIRONMENTALAUDIT Mail Well Envelope Building 401 Andover Park East Tukwila, Washington 98188-7659 Prepared for: Fredrick Properties, Inc. 100 Andover Park West Tukwila, Washington 98188 Questions regarding this investigation, the conclusions reached and the recommendations given should be addressed to one of the following undersigned. lAz-,61-1Jr Wally Hst Environmental Scientist EPA -Certified Building Inspector I.D. # J&J981017-BIR-02 Don W. Spencer Principal M.Sc., P.G., R.E.A. EPA -Certified Asbestos Inspector/Management Planner I.D. # AM 48151 EPA/HUD Certified Lead Inspector (Licensed) Registered Site Assessor/Licensed UST Supervisor State Certification #947458636 License: W000010 (Washington) License: 11464 (Oregon) License: 876 (California) License: 5195 (Illinois) License: 0327 (Mississippi) Reference Job Number: JN -9163 May 18, 1999 1,1777tnlfA771AL'ATTA T A CC/If-11A TPC TMP • • 'A.BLE OF CONTENTS METHODOLOGY/SCOPE OF WORK 5 FINDINGS 6 General Description 6 Geologic Setting 7 Development History and Land Use 7 Property Conveyance/Ownership Data 8 Site Reconnaissance 9 Check For PCB -Containing Materials 10 Check For Asbestos -Containing Materials 11 Review For Lead -Based Paint 11 Radon Evaluation 12 Water Supply, Waste Water and Solid Waste Management 13 Review: Washington DOE Listing Of Underground Storage Tanks 13 Review: EPA & State Records Of Potentially Hazardous Sites 13 Superfund and NPL 13 CORRACTS 14 MTCA 14 RCRA/FINDS/TSDs 14 ERNS 15 Review: Landfill Documents 15 CONCLUSIONS/RECOMMENDATIONS 15 LIMITATIONS 17 REFERENCES (General and Database) 18 PLATES Plate 1 - Vicinity Map Plate 2 - Topographic Map Plate 3 - Site Photographs Plate 4 - Site Plan APPENDICES Appendix A - EPA And WDOE Data Base Lists Appendix B - WDOE File Report Appendix C - AHERA Certification Documents • • Fredrick Properties, Inc. May 18; 1999 JN -9163 Page - 5 METHODOLOGY/SCOPE''OF WORK Our study approach consisted of completing a series of investigative tasks intended to satisfy the level of effort often referred to as "due diligence" by the "innocent purchaser" in the context of the Superfund Amendment and Reauthorization Act of 1986 (SARA), and nearly identical requirements set forth in the Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA), Chapter 70.105 D (Section 040) RCW pertaining to standards of liability. The objective of a Phase I audit is to minimize potential future liability for environmental problems by demonstrating that at the time of acquisition or refinancing, the owner, buyer, or lender had no knowledge or reason to know that any hazardous substance had been released or disposed of on, in, or at the property. In an effort to evaluate condition and previous uses of the property in a manner consistent with good commercial and customary practice and in general accordance with methods outlined under ASTM E 1527-97 "Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process," our scope of work for this study included: • • • • Review of chronology of ownership and site history using the resources of the King County Assessor's Office, Washington State Archives, business directories from several time periods, and aerial photography from several time periods as primary resources. This included an attempt to identify possible former industries or uses presenting some potential for generating waste which may have included dangerous or hazardous substances as defined by state and federal laws and regulations. Acquisition and review of available reports and other documentation pertaining to the subject site or nearby sites. Review of Washington Department of Ecology (WDOE) and Seattle/King County Department of Public Health documents regarding current and abandoned landfills. Review of the current EPA Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System (CERCLIS), the EPA National Priority List (NPL), the EPA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Notifiers, RCRA Corrective Action Report (CORRACTS), and Emergency Response Notification System (ERNS) lists of sites which are potentially contaminated or which produce hazardous substances as a normal part of their commercial operation in the vicinity of the site. Review of the current Washington Department of Ecology (WDOE) listing of underground storage tanks (USTs) along with the WDOE's Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) listing for WDOE-documented leaking USTs in the vicinity of the subject property. Varl»anATAATi NTA T e Venue TP.c TN!' Fredrick Properties, Inc. May 18,-1999 • • • JN -9163 Page - 6 Review of the current WDOE Confirmed and Suspected Contaminated Sites (CSCS) list of potentially contaminated sites which have been the subject of hazardous waste investigation and/or cleanup activity in conjunction with the Washington Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA) Chapter 173-340 WAC. Risk evaluation for naturally occurring radon. A reconnaissance of the subject property (including buildings) and neighboring areas to look for evidence of potential contamination in the form of soil stains, odors, asbestos, lead-based paint (LBP), vegetation stress, discarded drums, discolored water, careless manufacturing or industrial practices, etc. • Preparation of a summary report which documents the audit process and findings. GENERAL DESCRIPTION The subject property includes an irregular shaped parcel covering approximately 174,104 square feet of land. Improvements to the property include a single story, masonry building enclosing approximately 70,625 square feet of space. The building was reportedly erected in 1969. Additional improvements include paved parking on the south side and attractive landscaping on the east side. Currently the property is occupied by Mail Well Envelope. The approximate location of the site is shown on the Vicinity Map, Plate 1, and the Topographic Map, Plate 2, appended herewith. The building is located in a commercial and retail area approximately one half of a mile southeast of Southcenter Mall in Tukwila, Washington. Photographs reflecting the character of the subject property are provided with this report as Plate 3. A brief description of land use on nearby parcels is provided below. Plate 4, Site Plan, depicts the setting of the subject property and land use for adjacent sites. North: Two commercial buildings are adjacent to the north. The east building houses Michael's Deli Mart, Yamada Teriyaki Restaurant, and Scarbos Furniture Warehouse. The west building is occupied by Prime Source and VWR Scientific Products. Treck Drive is farther north. South: A large warehouse building is adjacent to the south. Tenants of this building are Washington State Tees, D & R Sales and Service, and Pacific Northwest Inflatables. Red Dot Corporation, a manufacturer of air conditioners, is farther south. mATT/TD/IATNA'rATTA T Accn!'TA TAN IMI' Fredrick Properties, Inc. May 18,-1999 JN -9163 Page - 7 East: Andover Park East is adjacent to the east. The Rome Cable Building and Andover Executive Park, a three building complex, are across Andover Park East. West: BNSF Burlington Northern Railroad Tracks are adjacent to the west. Courtyard Hotel is across the tracks. According to the King County Department of Assessments, the subject property is zoned C -M, a commercial designation. GEOLOGIC SETTING Geographically, the subject site is situated on the floor of a moderately broad alluvial valley locally known as the Green River Valley. Published geologic maps of the area (Luzier, 1969) suggest that much of the material underlying the subject property is alluvium of the White River consisting of dark reddish -gray pebble -cobble gravel and sand derived largely from Mount Rainier. Topographically, the site is a level parcel, approximately 25 feet above sea level. Based upon inference from topography and local drainage patterns, it appears that shallow -seated groundwater in the vicinity of the subject property may flow in a northeasterly direction. Work completed by SEACOR at the Red Dot Building a short distance to the south indicates that groundwater is at 4 feet below the ground surface. With respect to surface water resources, the mature Green River (known as the Duwamish River farther to the north) is located approximately one-quarter of a mile east of the site. This surface water course gently meanders across the valley floor as it progresses to the north, eventually discharging into Elliott Bay of the Puget Sound. DEVELOPMENT HISTORY AND LAND USE Sources reviewed for information on site and area development and land use included the resources of the Seattle Public Library, King County Assessor's Office, Washington State Archives, and aerial photographs of the subject property and surrounding area from several time periods. Aerial photographs of the area were reviewed for the years 1936, 1946, 1956, 1960, 1968, 1974, 1980, 1985, 1990, and 1995. The following paragraphs provide an interpretive summary of our observations in each photo. The time intervals between the various historic aerial photographs selected for this particular project are, in our opinion, entirely adequate for the intended purpose which was to permit a general assessment of overall development and land use in the vicinity of the subject property. FNvTRfWWFNTAL ASSOCIATES. INC. • • Fredrick Properties, Inc. May 18; 1999 JN -9163 Page - 8 1936 The subject property and the surrounding area are pasture land. An oxbow lake is a short distance to the west of the subject property. 1946 The subject property is a cultivated hay field. The surrounding properties appear the same as in 1936. 1956 There is a small area of standing water on the subject property. The surrounding properties appear the same as in 1946. 1960 The subject property and the surrounding properties appear the same as in 1956. 1968 There are areas of fill and grade activity on the subject property as well as on properties to the north and south. Treck Drive has been paved a short distance to the north. Andover Park East has been paved to the east. The area across. Andover Park East has been filled and graded. 1974 The Mail Well Envelope Building has been constructed on the subject property. Two buildings now present have been constructed on the properties to the north. The building now present to the south has been constructed. The building currently present farther south has been constructed. The three buildings comprising the Andover Executive Park and the Rome Cable Building have been constructed to the east across Andover Park East. The property to the west appears the same as in 1968. 1980 The subject property and the properties to the north, south, and east appear the same as in 1974. The oxbow lake and the area to the west have been filled. 1985 The subject property and the surrounding properties appear the same as in 1980. 1990 The subject property and the properties to the north, south, and east appear the same as in 1985. The Courtyard Hotel has been constructed to the west across the railroad tracks. 1995 The subject property and the surrounding properties appear the same as in 1990. PROPERTY CONVEYANCE/OWNERSHIP DATA From the file resources of the King County Assessor's Office, resources of the Seattle Public Library, and Washington State Archives, the following limited history of ownership spanning a period of 49 years has been established: 77,7\TT7 DrIMlA ATTAT ACC'wire TAR riv Fredrick Properties, Inc. May 18; 1999 JN -9163 Page - 9 INSTRUMENT - .OWNER DATE OF PURCHASE Deed Mail Well Corporation 12-18-94 Deed American Envelope Company 7-29-85 unknown Champion International unknown unknown Northwest Envelope Company circa 1969 unknown F.G. Hill circa 1950 According to resources available at the Seattle Public Library and the Washington State Archives, the subject property was undeveloped until 1969, when the current building was constructed. No other buildings were ever constructed on the subject property. We reviewed Polk's Street Directories for the years 1976, 1980, 1985, and 1991. These directories documented occupation by Northwest Envelope Company and American Envelope Company. The Tukwila area does not have Sanborn Fire Insurance Map coverage. SITE RECONNAISSANCE An environmental scientist/EPA-certified Asbestos Building Inspector from our firm visited the property on April 11, 1999 to review on-site conditions and land use practices in the surrounding area. Mr. Jeremy Boynton, Plant Manager, and Mr. Ken Faucher, Maintenance Supervisor, provided access to the building and grounds. The representative areas reviewed during our site visit included the sales and reception offices, Mr. Boynton's office, graphics design room, the darkroom, the main floor storage, manufacturing and printing areas, the hazardous materials storage room, as well as the mezzanine art preparation room, lunch room and air compressor room. We reviewed accessible exterior areas and accessible exterior areas of adjacent properties. The subject property includes a 1969 vintage, single story, masonry building. The roof is flat and clad by a built-up roofing system. Paved parking areas are located on the south side of the building. Landscaped areas are situated on the east side of the building. Currently the building is occupied by Mail Well Envelope. Typical building materials and/or conditions observed during our site reconnaissance included: • • • • Floors are wood or concrete covered with sheet vinyl or 9 inch square vinyl tile. Interior walls throughout the building are wood panels and painted or papered drywall. Ceilings are unfinished or are suspended cellulose panels. Fluorescent light fixtures were noted throughout the building. VA717/11f7VMFNTA7. A.C.Cn(77ATF.S_ INC. • • Fredrick Properties, Inc. May 18,-1999 • Roof mounted gas fired units provide heating to the building. • Fiberglass and asbestos insulation was evident in the building. • JN -9163 Page -10 Fifty-five gallon drums of isopropyl alcohol, roller wash, type wash, ethyl acetate, alinox cleaner, limonene cleaner, rubber rejuvenator, alka-less cleaner, and non -PCB heat transfer oil are stored in the hazardous materials room. • Three rectangular drums of machine oil are stored in the hazardous materials room. • Small containers of paint, miscellaneous oils, grease, ceram-clean wash are stored in the hazardous materials room. Two pallet size 350 gallon plastic tanks of nonhazardous glue are stored on the main floor. A 4,000 gallon tank with two compartments containing nonhazardous envelope sealing glue and nonhazardous back seam glue is located on the south side of the main floor. According to Mr. Boynton, and with the exception of a small amount of spent solvent (mainly isopropyl alcohol with d-limonene) generated temporarily due to a solvent recovery still breakdown, no hazardous waste is generated on the property in the course of business. In addition, he stated that there are no above- or below -ground fuel storage tanks on the property. No evidence to suggest the presence of underground fuel storage tanks (i.e., vent lines, filler caps, etc.) was noted on the property. Similarly, no water wells or groundwater monitoring wells were noted on the property. At the time of our visit, no stains, odors, or unusual vegetation conditions that might otherwise indicate the potential presence of hazardous materials were observed on the subject property. CHECK FOR PCB -CONTAINING MATERIALS Prior to 1979, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) were widely used in electrical equipment such as transformers, capacitors, switches, fluorescent lights (ballasts) and voltage regulators owing to their excellent cooling properties. In 1976, the EPA initiated regulation of PCBs through issues pursuant to the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). These regulations generally control the use, manufacturing, storage, documentation, and disposal of PCBs. EPA eventually banned PCB use in 1978, and adoption of amendments to TSCA under Public Law 94-469 in 1979 prohibited any further manufacturing of PCBs in the United States. Light Fixtures Mr. Boynton informed us that all of the building's original fluorescent lighting was replaced by energy efficient fluorescent lighting in 1992. We do not suspect that the new fluorescent fixtures have ballasts with PCB content. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC. Fredrick Properties, Inc. May 18,-1999 Main Service Electrical Transformers • • JN -9163 Page -11 Three pad -mounted electrical transformers were noted on the north side of the subject property. Mr. Faucher informed us the transformers belong to Mail Well Corporation. The oil in the transformers was tested and does not have PCB content. CHECK FOR ASBESTOS -CONTAINING MATERIALS During reconnaissance of the property, we observed building materials to assess the potential for the presence of asbestos -containing materials (ACM). During our site review, three examples ofmaterial suspected to possibly contain asbestos were observed. These were the fire curtain extending across the middle of the main floor ceiling, the nine inch square vinyl tile in the offices and in the lunch room, and the roofing insulation beneath the built-up roof. We understand that an asbestos survey was completed for this building however a copy of the report was not provided to us or available for our review. Mr. Faucher recalled that the fire curtain, which is a corrugated cement asbestos board, and the roofing insulation were confirmed to contain asbestos. Mr. Boynton informed us that all friable asbestos pipe wrap insulation identified in the survey has been lawfully removed by certified asbestos workers. The remaining suspect and confirmed asbestos containing materials are non -friable and are in "good" condition according to AHERA guidelines. Our effort regarding identification of asbestos -containing materials within the subject building was a preliminary review and not an asbestos survey. Since no destructive sampling was authorized for this audit, materials not readily accessible such as possible asbestos -containing roofing materials and/or materials obscured behind, beneath, or within walls or existing flooring materials were not reviewed. REVIEW FOR LEAD-BASED PAINT Lead was formerly a common additive to many paints to improve their durability and coverage. Lead-based paint presents a special hazard to small children, who can ingest it by chewing on painted woodwork or eating flakes of paint. A number of studies showing the toxic effects of lead on humans, and on small children in particular, prompted the Consumer Product Safety Commission to mandate in 1977 that the amount of lead in most paints, including those for residential use, should not exceed 0.06 %. A review of interior painted surfaces on the subject property was conducted to assess the potential for lead -content in surface layers of paint. Representative painted surfaces including the white wall paint in the hazardous materials storage room, the white wall paint in the lunch room, and the green wall paint on the south wall of the main floor were analyzed using "Lead -Check" sodium rhodizonate color reagent paint tests. These tests provide a qualitative indication as to whether lead is present in paint samples with reproducible results to a lower detection limit of 0.5 percent, a level aAwronArA.►L'1t7Td1 AVVI1CIATP.0 1N!' • • Fredrick Properties, Inc. JN -9163 May 18,-1999 Page -12 corresponding to a threshold of concern established by HUD. None of the surfaces tested using the "Lead Check" screening method showed a reddish hue response characteristic of the sodium rhodizonate method as an indication of the likely presence of lead in painted surfaces. On that basis, we conclude that no lead was present in the surfaces tested. RADON EVALUATION Occurrence Radon is a naturally occurring, highly mobile, chemically inert radioactive gas created through radioactive decay of uranium and thorium. The potential for occurrence of radon varies widely and is dependent upon (1) the concentration of radioactive materials in the underlying bedrock; (2) the relative permeability of soils with respect to gases; and (3) the amount of fracturing or faulting in surficial materials (EPA, 1987). Health Risks Risk of Potential Exposure in the Tukwila Area The concern regarding radon and its potential effects upon humans arises from the results of studies (EPA, 1987) which suggest that approximately fifteen percent of all lung cancer mortalities in the United States may be attributable to exposure to radon. The EPA has established a concentration of radon of four (4) picocuries per liter (pCi/l) as a maximum permissible concentration "action level." Concentrations above this value would signal a potential health threat. According to some studies, an average concentration in homes across the United States is on the order of 1.4 pCi/1. The Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) recently published the results of measurements for radon made in residences throughout the region they serve which includes Washington, Oregon and Idaho. For the Tukwila area in the immediate vicinity of the subject property 88 tests have been performed. The results of their work (BPA, 1993) suggest that radon levels over 4 pCi/1 were detected none of the monitored residences in the vicinity of subject site. Additionally, the average listed radon reading in the subject site township was 0.47 pCi/l, well below the EPA threshold of concern. On the basis of the findings presented in the cited BPA survey, we conclude that the potential for exposure to naturally occurring radon at the subject site is low. FATVTPI1MMFNTAT ACCfl TA T1 TN(' • • Fredrick Properties, Inc. May 18,-1999 WATER SUPPLY, WASTE WATER AND SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT JN -9163 Page -13 Information supplied by Mr. Boynton revealed that the subject property has municipal water service and sanitary sewer service. Mr. Boynton stated that small quantities of photo developing chemicals and water based ink are lawfully discharged to the sanitary sewer system. We spoke with Jim Sifford with Seattle/Metro Industrial Waste Division. Inspection staff from Seattle/Metro Industrial Waste Division have visited the subject property on several occasions and found that "Mail Well Envelope appears to be following their management plan regarding photo chemicals and inks." One solid waste dumpster located on asphalt was noted at the northwest corner of the property. The dumpster, which is maintained by SeaTac Disposal, Inc., was relatively clean and free of overflowing debris at the time of our site reconnaissance. REVIEW OF WASHINGTON DOE LISTING OF UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS Review of the current Washington Department of Ecology listing of underground storage tanks (USTs) suggests that 21 facilities with registered USTs are located within a one-half mile radius of the subject property. Information regarding these USTs and their status is provided in Appendix A to this report. According to the most recent WDOE Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) listing, eight listed tank facilities located within an approximately one-half mile radius of the subject property have reported accidental releases or leakage to the WDOE in the past. The nearest LUST site to the subject property is the United Parcel Service transportation warehouse located at 550 Andover Park West. This site is approximately one quarter of a mile to the south in a cross -gradient hydrologic direction. Information regarding these LUST sites and their status is provided in Appendix A to this report. Considering the substantial separation distances and cross -gradient hydrologic positions of the listed tank sites in relation to the subject property as positive risk -mitigating factors, it is our opinion that the potential for environmental impairment of the subject property from these sources is very low. The approximate locations of the WDOE-documented underground storage tanks within a one-half mile radius of the subject property are indicated on the Vicinity Map attached to this report as Plate 1. EPA & STATE RECORDS OF POTENTIALLY HAZARDOUS SITES Superfund and NPL Review of the current EPA Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) and National Priority List (NPL) listings revealed no CERCLIS and no NPL sites within rNn»DrINTA.fl'1VTd T A ccn1'Td TR.c TN(' • • Fredrick Properties, Inc. May 18,-1999 JN -9163 Page -14 approximately one mile of the subject property that have been designated as potentially hazardous or eligible for participation in the Superfund cleanup program. CORRACTS Review of the current EPA Corrective Action Report (CORRACTS) listing revealed that no CORRACTS site are located within approximately one mile of the subject property that have been designated as having a potential release at the property under RCRA. MTCA The Washington Department of Ecology hazardous waste cleanup and investigation program was launched in 1989 as a part of the Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA), Chapter 173-340 WAC, in order to evaluate potential and actual hazards at sites within the state. Of the more than 788 sites currently on the program list, two are located within a one mile radius of the subject property. Both of these sites are located approximately one half of a mile to the east in a cross -gradient hydrologic direction. Information regarding these MTCA sites and their status is provided in Appendix A to this report. Acknowledging the substantial separation distances and cross -gradient hydrologic positions of the listed MTCA sites in relation to the subject property as positive risk -mitigating factors, it is our opinion that the potential for environmental impairment of the subject property from these sources is very low. RCRA/FINDS/ TSDs Review of the EPA's Facility Index System (FINDS) listing, revealed 64 sites within a one-half mile radius of the subject property which are regularly monitored by EPA/WDOE for the use or generation of small amounts of hazardous substances as a normal part of their business activities. The sites located within a one-half mile radius of the subject site are listed in Appendix A. The subject property appears on this list as American Envelope Company. We reviewed the WDOE file for the subject property. The file shows generation of two waste streams containing the solvent d-limonene also known,as Citra Safe. In 1993 American Envelope generated 2,771 pounds and in 1994 the quantity generated was 1,680 pounds. No hazardous waste generation was reported in 1997 and 1998. This file information is provided in Appendix B. No adjacent property appears on this list. We also reviewed the EPA's Treatment, Storage and Disposal (TSD) facilities listing for sites that treat, store, or dispose of potentially hazardous materials. Review of the TSD listing revealed that no TSD sites are located within a one mile radius of the subject property. .040 n/171 TTf1 Tl 1/9 • • Fredrick Properties, Inc. May 18,-1999 JN -9163 Page -15 Businesses named in the FINDS listing are users or generators of potentially hazardous or toxic materials as a normal aspect of their business practices. Listed businesses are required to closely monitor and report their use or generation of such materials to the EPA. Based upon this information, upon the monitoring and reporting requirements imposed by the EPA, and upon the presumption that the above-mentioned user/generators exercise prudence in management of these materials to minimize liability and EPA penalties, it is our opinion that the potential for environmental impairment of the subject property from these sources is very low. ERNS Review of the EPA's Emergency Response Notification Systems (ERNS) list for the State of Washington revealed that the subject site has not reported a spill. This list has been compiled with periodic updates since October 1987. LANDFILLS A review of WDOE and King County Health Department documents regarding current and abandoned landfills revealed that there are no documented landfills located within a mile radius of the subject property. U IONSIRECOMMENDDATIDONS As discussed briefly in the executive summary of the cover letter to this report, relying solely upon the available information reviewed or otherwise developed in the course of our study, and momentarily excluding the presence of suspect and confirmed asbestos containing building materials including the fire curtain extending across the middle of the main floor ceiling, the nine inch square vinyl tile in the offices and in the lunch room, and the roofing insulation beneath the built-up roof, it would appear that the subject property is free from contamination by potentially dangerous, hazardous, or toxic substances, and that such substances as defined under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA-42 USC -6901, et seq.), the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 USC 1257, et seq.), the Clean Air Compensation and Liability Act (42 USC 2001, et seq.), the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA: 42 USC 9601, et seq.), and the Dangerous Waste Regulations of the State of Washington, Chapter 173- 303 WAC, have not been disposed of on the property. vArr»nn7tTA,fL•ATTAT A ccnrrATT' INC Fredrick Properties, Inc. May 18,-1999 ASBESTOS JN -9163 Page -16 Borrowing evaluation criteria adopted under the Asbestos Health Emergency Response Act (AHERA, 40 CFR Part 763), the suspect and confirmed asbestos containing building materials including the fire curtain extending across the middle of the main floor ceiling, the nine inch square vinyl tile in the offices and in the lunch room, and the roofing insulation beneath the built-up roof are in "good" condition. In the current use and condition, the material poses no threat to public health or to the environment. No action would be required at this time under current state or federal regulations. To reduce exposure to potential future liability, it may be prudent to consider implementation of a management policy whereby all maintenance, repair, or service personnel who may be engaged to work on the property are formally advised (i.e., signed acknowledgment) as to the "suspected" presence of asbestos -containing materials (ACM) prior to commencement of any work associated with the ACM. Should the owner intend to renovate, demolish, remodel, or repair any or all portions of the structure containing asbestos, please note that applicable sections of WAC 296-65 require that all projects relating to construction, demolition, repair, or maintenance where release or likely release of asbestos fibers into the air could occur must be performed by "certified asbestos workers." Additional information may be obtained through the offices of Environmental Associates, Inc., or directly from the Washington State Department of Labor and Industries, P.O. Box 207, Olympia, Washington 98504.If future representative sampling and laboratory testing of suspect materials were to confirm that they do not contain asbestos, these recommendations may logically be disregarded. • • Fredrick Properties, Inc.. May 1871999 JN -9163 Page -17 MTA TION. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Fredrick Properties, Inc. and Fatigue Technology, Inc. along with Mail Well Envelope their several representatives for specific application to this site. Our work for this project was conducted in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill normally exercised by members of the environmental science profession currently practicing under similar conditions in the area, and in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in our proposal dated April 23, 1999. The condition of subsurface soil and/or groundwater cannot typically be determined by visual examination of surficial conditions such as those afforded by a Phase I audit such as performed here. Acknowledging that limitation, no warranty in that regard is made. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. If new information is developed in future site work which may include excavations, borings, studies, etc., Environmental Associates, Inc., must be retained to reevaluate the conclusions of this report and to provide amendments as required. The level of effort regarding identification of potential ACM should be considered a reconnaissance, should not be confused with an asbestos survey, and should not be used as a sole informational resource for removal, construction, or abatement bidding purposes. x..7:71,%,“71TL7TA T AC'C'cicirA TL'C TH7r, • • Fredrick Properties, Inc. May 18, 1999 JN -9163 Page -18 REFERENCES GENERAL Bonneville Power Administration (BPA), January 1993, Radon Monitoring Results from BPA's Residential Conservation Program, Report No. 15, (with April 1993 Map). Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), September 1987, Radon Reference Manual EPA 520/1-87-20. Luzier, J.E., 1969, Geology and Groundwater Resources of Southwestern King County, Washington. Water Supply Bulletin No. 28, 63 pps., 3 plates, 13 tables, 25 figures. SEACOR, March 18, 1991, Groundwater Investigation, Red Dot Corporation, 495 Andover Park East, Seattle, Washington. 12 pps, appendices. Thomas Brothers Map Co., 1998, The Thomas Guide: King/Pierce/Snohomish Counties. U.S. Geological Survey, 1949, Des Moines, Washington 1:24,000 Quadrangle. Photorevised 1968 and 1973, 1 sheet. U.S. Geological Survey, 1949, Renton, Washington 1:24,000 Quadrangle. Photorevised 1968 and 1973, 1 sheet. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC. • • Fredrick Properties, Inc. May 18;1999 DATABASE JN -9163 Page -19 The following table lists the various governmental database resources reviewed for this project, the ASTM search radius, the search radius for this project, and the date that the agency produced the listing. The 1984 date for the county landfill list should not be construed by the report user or reviewers as out-of-date. It is simply the last date of issuance of the list selected by the county government, ASTM not withstanding. DATABASE'RESOURCE INFORMATION DatabaseSource Search Radius (miles) Last Update . List Date.. ASTM , ''EAI NPL U.S. EPA 1.0 1.0 October 7, 1998 October 7, 1998 CERCLIS U.S. EPA 0.5 1.0 October 7, 1998 October 7, 1998 CORRACTS U.S. EPA 1.0 1.0 July 21, 1998 July 21, 1998 CSCS WDOE 1.0 1.0 November 23, 1998 January 27, 1999 UST WDOE Site & adjacent 0.5 January 9, 1999 January 26, 1999 LUST WDOE 0.5 0.5 January 9, 1999 January 26, 1999 State Landfill WDOE 0.5 1.0 June 13, 1996 September 3, 1996 County Landfill (closed) King County 0.5 1.0 July 1984 July 1984 RCRIS/FINDS' U.S. EPA Site & adjacent 0.5 July 21, 1998 July 21, 1998 RCRATSD U.S. EPA 0.5 1.0 July 21, 1998 July 21, 1998 ERNS U.S. EPA Site only Site only December 31, 1998 December 31, 1998 1 - The RCRIS/FINDS listing provided by the EPA Region X includes the following databases: RCRIS Large Quantity Generators; RCRIS Small Quantity Generator, Permit Compliance System (PCS); Airs Facility System (AIRS/AFS); Section Seven Tracking System (SSTS); National Compliance Database (NCDB); Enforcement Docket System (DOCKET); Contractor Listing (CONTR LIST); Criminal Docket (CRIM DOCKE); Federal Facility Information System (FFIS); Chemicals in Commerce Information System (CICIS); State Systems (STATE); PCB Activity Handler Activity Data System (PADS); Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System (TRIS), and; Dunn & Bradstreet (DUNS). ��1t 1r TI•/1111IT1 TT AT AOC, irfTATL'C' TT7/'' O Location of WDOE-Listed Underground Storage Tank @ Location of WDOE-Listed Leaking Underground Storage Tank Probable Direction of Shallow -Seated Groundwater Flow Site Location (groundwater arrow points to subject property) Scale I 0 112 1 mile r�Z ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC. 2122 - 112th Avenue N.E., Ste. B-100 Bellevue, Washington 98004 VICINITY MAP Mail Well Envelope Building 401 Andover Park East Tukwila, Washington 981887659 Job Number: JN -9163 Date: May 1999 Plate: 1 5r 655f �(' �/ 31 : \ sje -- ; I TUKW ILA 1 w 1 \: i gI..ist1.9 05 SOUTHCENTER MALL • CAES • . 1 656 1BiST \ ,J EVANS Apc BAKEA . 62ND p f - t . vK''% �? it1 • ,ro N v+ 197R , "'-- l••. r iN r/l STRA NoeR 19e7r nt O- 1 - ) Ir 6 1997H + ® \N.' I. it f 1707ti i t 4.tr.,® O 1 f r f 4 f t W A. 1 ti/N0'13!'1 J. i 1 t. }. t— UJ 0 ___ Y O �2F O f i .. - n o_tpORA E �_ - i r V) r.1INKLER O I . y4i Z O c' Z 0 r' r 4 •1, �. t 79TH 175THJtl� c 1. H , .. 116711, „mIAND ©1995 Thomas Bros. Maps O Location of WDOE-Listed Underground Storage Tank @ Location of WDOE-Listed Leaking Underground Storage Tank Probable Direction of Shallow -Seated Groundwater Flow Site Location (groundwater arrow points to subject property) Scale I 0 112 1 mile r�Z ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC. 2122 - 112th Avenue N.E., Ste. B-100 Bellevue, Washington 98004 VICINITY MAP Mail Well Envelope Building 401 Andover Park East Tukwila, Washington 981887659 Job Number: JN -9163 Date: May 1999 Plate: 1 Trailer • iThfy 1-; Park • Sch . • • \• •I • t. 't t 7:•••.‘ . t•• .•• • 11c ni • • -• . .1 - • - • • • . • • • • 1 •••:- 7-- „ 1 • • . .....-..,..„-J—L-4.-..—.../ . ! -• ,, , • . .• I • ••• Gravel . r•. , • . t 26TH ,,:--,--\-_:..).,.., 4— — ''l ! it - • ' -- • ' ' - , .i,..%4,• -=4.i.,•-,„•.,\\, 1../ t Crestvie.li L i A II '•..,::,..\ ' • s,„. ' i Cower . !( I --7.::.7. :•••-- ! M : T1 r ir,i1;.., •• - • i' , ., :±;411-i .. • . i... ,ST.i. t ..1 ,9tdr,..._1_ j 1 ,_ , a V...rr • Part. i.1....,;_; ; ., 1 , [ , i; . I - I "Cen 'Reiihts1 : 1.--..;.. ! : 1- -=---,•-•-;-- I 1 ... Bch - fi wet: . --------\\\ . ; - all 1 E. ! 1 11 UM .'-', *--....„....:0_____, ?•-•,, „,...----i.77' ,...--;:..- ;; ; , .. i ......,,,....„,-, • ,• 4 0 • • •,t I •2•'''..?•,•, • • • , ---- •• pk! !, , • "% Hall #• • 1 r iJ. 27 \ I SUbSt I I 0TH . sr Li;;i te SU) 'on •,-X.--: kI, 724 • 1 ;1 • - 1 1 - . \ --T------177-- . Substa A . - 0 ! 3 'MTH sr ' a ''. •-• 1 V Vivi/ .4f • ' .26 6 / i- -SCIA I. .^.^ . ••••1• 1 . .'-.... \ ; . i i \ ., .7 11 !Bow.. • 1......1: .. . , • 1 • • . 1 —734 - J ......- ..... — s -Chinook 1.:.'„ki.i.t:t Sq.' id . " •Nidi *B2 ir Ce • 7 : 1 - • Iya • :KV .iga 1 Substat.on ;11.Z • !13 • 11.• ••• i lit ' • k ,•.• ,--,,‘ o. - .1" : REIVTION s•-‘,„-•\., .4, ..; 1 ; TUKWILA ••-•,'.1 ..„3•Park* c.!0 11. Ift • 1 • - ...1 1 2..; I; -Tukwila _..._ ............ ;•,1 !.... • < -1-1 0 P. , ,4,' . ,II IM.i ' • • 'I"' ,.• ' II:: Z'' .. , - ....,.... r 'Ili', '''' •• / ' ' ' ..... . r :"..i.::::::.:•:•,..i., . "1 ,. , ••••• '''' ' Orillia: _,.„ I..11d'.,6 ........- .... . era ...s.r ; tros :" .... • ‘..... E.,,,a,,_ • - '''. 1 • • •• • I • • .1 •); Nff • RE>rfuN CORP KENT • '• 3.3 I. 4 HV Probable Direction of Shallow -Seated Groundwater Flow Site Location (groundwater arrow points to subject property) Scale 0 112 1 mile \ ENVIRONMENTAL - ASSOCIATES, INC. • 2122 - 112th Avenue N.E., Ste. B-100 Bellevue, Washington 98004 TOPOGRAPHIC MAP Mail Well Envelope Building 401 Andover Park East Tukwila, Washington 98188-7659 Job Number: JN -9163 Date May 1999 Ptak: 2 • ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC. 2122 - 112th Avenue N.E., Ste. B-100 Bellevue, Washington 98004 SITE PHOTe GRAPHS Mail Well Envelope Building 401 Andover Park East Tukwila, Washington 98188-7659 Job Number: JN -9163 Date: May 1999 Plate: 3 Retail Center Commercial Building Wells Fargo Bank Treck Drive Commercial Building Courtyard Hotel VWR Scientific Products Prime Source Scarbcs Furniture Washington State Tees D 8 R Sales and Service Pacific Northwest Inflatables U) ('a w Y L LL W Q 0 Andover Executive Park Rome Cable Fire Station Red Dot Corporation Not to Scale 1 Groundwater Flow ( Subject Property ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC. 2122 - 112th Avenue N.E., Ste. B-100 Bellevue, Washington 98004 SITE PLAN Mail Well Envelope Building 401 Andover Park East Tukwila, Washington 98188-7659 Job Number: Date: JN -9163 May 1999 Plate: 4 • • APPENDIX A EPA And WDOE Data Base Lists rTrurvnM inPNITA 7. 4 .C.CnCIA TFS_ INC_ Appendix A UST List JN -9163 SITE NAME ;SITE ADDRESS STATUS INSTALLED CONTENTS LIFT STATION #2 11005 ANDOVER'PARK W Operational 10/1/1986 Diesel THE SOUTHLAND CORP. 2391-21745 11035 ANDOVER PARK W Removed 1/1/1979 UNLEADED GASOLINE LINCOLN MOVING & STORAGE CO 11071 ANDOVER PARK WEST Removed unknown LEADED GASOLINE 5918 1115 ANDOVER PARK WEST Removed unknown USED OIUWASTE OIL 5918 1115 ANDOVER PARK WEST Removed 1/1/1981 UNLEADED GASOLINE 5918 1115 ANDOVER PARK WEST Removed 1/1/1981 UNLEADED GASOLINE 5918 ;115 ANDOVER PARK WEST Removed 1/1/1989 USED OIL/WASTE OIL TUKWILA STATION BP 116200 W VALLEY HWY Operational 8/1/1998 Diesel TUKWILA STATION BP ;16200 W VALLEY HWY Operational 8/1/1998 Unleaded Gasoline TUKWILA STATION BP 116200 W VALLEY HWY Operational 8/1/1998 Unleaded Gasoline DOUBLETREE SUITES SOUTHCENTER 116500 SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY REMOVED unknown N C MACHINERY CO LIFT TRUCK 116711 WEST VALLEY HIGHWAY Removed 1/27/1975 N C MACHINERY CO LIFT TRUCK 116711 WEST VALLEY HIGHWAY Removed 1/27/1975 UNLEADED GASOLINE N C MACHINERY CO LIFT TRUCK 116711 WEST VALLEY HIGHWAY Removed 1/27/1975 USED OIL/WASTE OIL FEDERATED DEPT STORES INC DBA THE 617000 SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY Removed unknown FEDERATED DEPT STORES INC DBA THE 617000 SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY Removed unknown N C MACHINERY CO. 117025 W VALLEY HWY Removed 1/1/1964 N C MACHINERY CO. ;17025 W VALLEY HWY Removed 1/1/1964 N C MACHINERY CO. 117025 W VALLEY HWY Removed 1/1/1964 N C MACHINERY CO. 117025 W VALLEY HWY Removed 1/1/1964 UNLEADED GASOLINE N C MACHINERY CO. 117025 W VALLEY HWY Removed 1/1/1964 HAZARDOUS N C MACHINERY CO. 117025 W VALLEY HWY Removed 6/12/1964 N C MACHINERY CO. 117025 W VALLEY HWY Closed in Place 1/1/1964 USED OIL/WASTE OIL N C MACHINERY CO. 17025 W VALLEY HWY Operational 3/18/1991 DIESEL N C MACHINERY CO. 117035 WEST VALLEY HWY Operational 5/1/1986 Diesel FIRESTONE TIRE & RUBBER COMP 1215 ANDOVER PARK WEST Closure in Procc unknown LEADED GASOLINE FIRESTONE TIRE & RUBBER COMP 1215 ANDOVER PARK WEST Closure in Procc unknown UNLEADED GASOLINE FIRESTONE TIRE & RUBBER COMP 1215 ANDOVER PARK WEST Closure in Procc unknown UNLEADED GASOLINE FIRESTONE TIRE & RUBBER COMP 1215 ANDOVER PARK WEST Closure in Procc unknown USED OIUWASTE OIL CHEVRON 91557 1220 STRANDER BLVD Operational 5/24/1991 USED OILJWASTE OIL CHEVRON 91557 1220 STRANDER BLVD Removed unknown CHEVRON 91557 1220 STRANDER BLVD Operational 5/24/1991 DIESEL CHEVRON 91557 1220 STRANDER BLVD Removed unknown LEADED GASOLINE CHEVRON 91557 ;220 STRANDER BLVD Removed unknown UNLEADED GASOLINE CHEVRON 91557 1220 STRANDER BLVD Removed unknown UNLEADED GASOLINE CHEVRON 91557 ;220 STRANDER BLVD Removed unknown USED OIL/WASTE OIL CHEVRON 91557 '1220 STRANDER BLVD Removed unknown CHEVRON 91557 ;220 STRANDER BLVD Operational 5/24/1991 LEADED GASOLINE CHEVRON 91557 ;220 STRANDER BLVD Operational 5/24/1991 UNLEADED GASOLINE CHEVRON 91557 1220 STRANDER BLVD Operational 5/24/1991 UNLEADED GASOLINE SOUTHCENTER MALL 1400 SOUTHCENTER BLVD Removed unknown USED OIUWASTE OIL MOHAWK PRODUCTS CO. 1402 BAKER BLVD. Removed unknown HAZARDOUS MOHAWK PRODUCTS CO. 1402 BAKER BLVD. Removed unknown HAZARDOUS SEAPORT INDUSTRY GROUP, INC. 1435 MINKLER BLVD Removed unknown TUKWILA FIRE STA. 51 1444 ANDOVER PARK E Operational 1/1/1974 DIESEL CITY OF TUKWILA FIRE DEPARTMENT 1444 ANDOVER PARK EAST Unknown unknown ALLPAK CONTAINER INC 1480 ANDOVER PARK EAST Removed unknown ALLPAK CONTAINER INC 1480 ANDOVER PARK EAST Removed unknown UNLEADED GASOLINE ALLPAK CONTAINER INC 1480 ANDOVER PARK EAST Exempt unknown XEROX CORPORATION 1505 STRANDER BLVD REMOVED unknown 'UNLEADED GASOLINE UNITED PARCEL SERVICE-TUKWILA 1550 ANDOVER PARK W Operational 7/27/1995 Diesel UNITED PARCEL SERVICE-TUKWILA 1550 ANDOVER PARK W REMOVED 1/1/1977 UNLEADED GASOLINE TUKWILA PUBLIC WORKS MAINTENANCE 6600 MINKLER BLVD Operational 1/1/1973 DIESEL TUKWILA PUBLIC WORKS MAINTENANCE S1600 MINKLER BLVD Operational 1/1/1973 USED OIL/WASTE OIL TUKWILA PUBLIC WORKS MAINTENANCE S600 MINKLER BLVD Operational 1/1/1973 UNLEADED GASOLINE MCCANN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. 1950 ANDOVER PARK EAST Removed unknown MCCANN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. 1950 ANDOVER PARK EAST Removed unknown LEADED GASOLINE MCCANN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. 1950 ANDOVER PARK EAST Removed unknown UNLEADED GASOLINE Appendix A LUST List JN -9163 SITE NAME SITE ADDRESS RELEASE 'STATUS STATUS DATE;MEDIA N C MACHINERY CO LIFT TRUCK 16711 WEST VALLEY HIGHWAY 8/11/1992 REPORTED CLEANED UP 6/1/1995 I SOIL N C MACHINERY CO LIFT TRUCK 16711 WEST VALLEY HIGHWAY 8/11/1992 ;CLEANUP STARTED 8/11/1992 ISOIL FEDERATED DEPT STORES INC DBA T 17000 SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY 1/17/1992 CLEANUP STARTED 6/1/1995 ISOIL FEDERATED DEPT STORES INC DBA T 17000 SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY 1/17/1992 CLEANUP STARTED 6/1/1995 1GW N C MACHINERY CO. 17025 W VALLEY HWY 4/10/1991 REPORTED CLEANED UP 6/1/1995 I SOIL N C MACHINERY CO. 17025 W VALLEY HWY 4/10/1991 CLEANUP STARTED 4/10/1991 (SOIL CELLO BAG CO., INC. 17100 W VALLEY HWY 1/22/1996 AWAITING CLEANUP 1/22/1996 1SOIL CELLO BAG CO., INC. 17100 W VALLEY HWY 1/22/1996 AWAITING CLEANUP 1/22/1996 1GW FIRESTONE TIRE & RUBBER COMP 215 ANDOVER PARK WEST 6/19/1991 CLEANUP STARTED 6/1/1995 (SOIL FIRESTONE TIRE & RUBBER COMP 215 ANDOVER PARK WEST 6/19/1991 CLEANUP STARTED 6/1/1995 ?GW CHEVRON 91557 220 STRANDER BLVD 4/2/1991 REPORTED CLEANED UP 6/1/1995 !SOIL CHEVRON 91557 220 STRANDER BLVD 4/2/1991 CLEANUP STARTED 4/2/1991 (SOIL SOUTHCENTER MALL 400 SOUTHCENTER BLVD 4/14/1993 REPORTED CLEANED UP 6/1/1995 (SOIL SOUTHCENTER MALL 400 SOUTHCENTER BLVD 4/14/1993 CLEANUP STARTED 4/14/1993 ISOIL SOUTHCENTER MALL 400 SOUTHCENTER BLVD 4/14/1993 REPORTED CLEANED UP 6/1/1995 1GW SOUTHCENTER MALL 400 SOUTHCENTER BLVD 4/14/1993 CLEANUP STARTED 4/14/1993 !GW UNITED PARCEL SERVICE-TUKWILA 550 ANDOVER PARK W 5/24/1990 REPORTED CLEANED UP 11/27/1990 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE-TUKWILA 550 ANDOVER PARK W 5/24/1990 CLEANUP STARTED 5/24/1990 Appendix A MTCA List JN 9163 SITE NAME SITE ADDRESS ' I ' i I I j v ICO I i m :74 CO (.1) I 1 D,D I� l I ai I j x ;MEDIA STATUS 1 B/N/A ORGANICS 1 HALOGENATED ORGANICS METALS EPA PRIORITY POLLUTANTS PHENOLICS PETROLEUM PETSTICIDES PCBs RADIOACTIVE WASTES CORROSIVE WASTES REACTIVE WASTES PAHs DIOXIN NON -HALOGENATED SOLVEN CONVENTIONAL ORGANICS ASBESTOS CONVENTIONAL INORGANICS N C MACHINERY Co Seattle Branch 17025 W VALLEY HWY 1 j ISoll iS S I IS US PRINTING INK CORP 17300 W VALLEY FREEWAY 4 !2 j IGroundwater S IS S IS j IS ! US PRINTING INK CORP 17300 W VALLEY FREEWAY 14 12 ;Sediment IS I S IS IS US PRINTING INK CORP 17300 W VALLEY FREEWAY ;4 ;2 j {Soil ;•C IS C IC i :C US PRINTING INK CORP 17300 W VALLEY FREEWAY 14 12 j !Surface Water !C IS C IC j C i I I i j i DOE STATUS indicates the current status of sites relative to the MTCA cleanup process. Code choices are: ' 1 ! I I I 1=Awaiting Site Hazard Assessment (SHA) 2=Ranked Awaiting Remedial Action (RA) I i ! I I ! f i •. ! I I 3=Remedial Action in progress I 4=Independent Remedial Action I 5=Construction Completed Operation 8 Maintenance Underway 6 =RA Completed Confirmational Monitoring Underway 7 =RA Conducted residual contamination left on site:on-going institutional controls required I i i I ! i I I i• I I I I { j ! I B =RA and all activities completed (no monitoring) j j , � � i , ! i I I 1 i SITE STATUS only applies to those sites undergoing an independent deanup. Code choices are: 1 =Release report received awaiting assessment by PLP(PLP = Potentially Liable Person) i ! I I I I ! i I I ! I I I i 2 =Independent Site Assessment or Interim RA Report received ! 3 =Final Independent RA Report received I i I I I I ! I j I RANK indicates the outcome of the WAshinglon Ranking Model (WARM).The WARM BIN Number will be a number between 1 and 5. i i i I I A result of 1 indicates the greatest assessed risk to human health and to the environment. A result of 5 indicates the lowest risk. I I I I! I ' I i I ' 1 Prepared by Wally Hurst 5/3/1999 Pace 1 Appendix A FINDS List JN -9163 ID NUMBER SITE NAME SITE ADDRESS DATA BASES WAD006216329 3M SEATTLE SALES CTR 100 ANDOVER PARK W RCRIS WAD988512349 FATIGUE TECH INC 100 ANDOVER PK W RCRIS DUNS -- WAD180231730 DIAMOND POWER SPECIALTY CO 1007 INDUSTRY DR RCRIS WAD988511200 EAGLE HARDWARE & GARDEN 101 ANDOVER PK E STE 200 RCRIS. NCDB WAD988491627 PRINTING CONTROL SVC INC 1011 ANDOVER PARK E RCRIS DUNS WA0001827435 KITS CAMERAS 002 1020 SOUTHCENTER MALL RCRIS WAD027443472 FRYE COPYSYSTEMS INC 1025 ANDOVER PARK E RCRIS WA0000142893 KITS CAMERAS CO02 1034 SOUTHCENTER RCRIS WAD067162081 THERMOGARD INSULATION CO SEATTLE 1040 ANDOVER PK W SSTS WAD988481263 SOUTHCENTER CLEANERS 1076 SOUTHCENTER MALL RCRIS WAD982658254 RAINIER RUBBER CO 1083 ANDOVER PARK E RCRIS WAD980986541 SOUTHLAND CORP 1085 ANDOVER PK E NCDB WAD988472445 BUMSTEAD MFG INC 1091 ANDOVER PK E RCRIS DUNS WA0001827518 JF SHELTON CO INC 1110 ANDOVER PARK W RCRIS WA0001390921 KINKOS PHOTOLAB TUKWILA 112 ANDOVER PARK E RCRIS WAD027429133 CHEMICAL WASTE MANAGEMENT INC 1120 ANDOVER PK E RCRIS WAD988506341 ABLE PEST CONTROL 1140 INDUSTRY DR RCRIS DUNS WAD988501540 UNOCAL SS 5918 115 ANDOVER PARK W RCRIS WA0000194159 WDOE NRO TUKWILA OIL BASED PAINT 1150 ANDOVER PARK E RCRIS WAD988499018 AERO GO INC 1170 ANDOVER PK W RCRIS DUNS WAD085189801 WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP TUKWI 1180 ANDOVER PARK W RCRIS NCDB PADS DUNS WAD988476065 PACIFIC ENGINEERING DESIGN INC 130 ANDOVER PK E STE 300 RCRIS DUNS WAD042554865 N C MACHINERY CO 16711 W VALLEY HWY RCRIS DUNS WAD027559327 N C MACHINERY CO TUKWILA 17025 W VALLEY HWY RCRIS CRCLIS DUNS WA0000271023 WDOE NRO W VALLEY HWY ACCIDENT 17100 BLK W VALLEY HWY ON RCRIS WAD009244948 CELLO BAG CO INC 17100 W VALLEY HWY • RCRIS AFS DUNS WAD988485611 CHEVRON USA INC SS 91557 220 STRANDER BLVD RCRIS WAD000712372 WAJAX PACIFIC FIRE EQUIPMENT I 227 ANDOVER PK E RCRIS DUNS WAD980985980 AM TEC INC 230 ANDOVER PARK E RCRIS WA0000997536 CAMERAS WEST 196 235 STRANDER BLVD RCRIS WAD988475380 OFFICE DEPOT BLDG 290 ANDOVER PARK E RCRIS WA0000275230 ACURA OF SEATTLE 301 BAKER BLVD RCRIS WAD982659161 KELLY GOODWIN CO 350 TRECK DR RCRIS NCDB DUNS WAD139391130 MOMENTUM GRAPHICS INC 355 TRECK DR RCRIS WAD982820201 V W R SCIENTIFIC 355 TRECK DR 1ST FLOOR RCRIS DUNS WAD063351506 AMERICAN CAN CO 400 BAKER BLVD RCRIS CRCLIS WAD044 995 645 FEDERAL ENVELOPE CO 401 ANDOVER PARK E RCRIS rAFS'}' TRIS _ WA0000819433 WASHINGTON COLOR & CHEMICAL CO 401 EVANS BLACK DR RCRIS DUNS WAD009271487 MOHAWK PRODUCTS CO INC 402 BAKER BLVD RCRIS WAD988466140 CONVERT PAC INC 402 STRANDER BLVD RCRIS DUNS WAD988475034 NORDSTROM DISPLAY MINKLER BLVD 435 MINKLER BLVD N SIDE BL[ RCRIS WAD988491692 VALCO GRAPHICS INC 480 ANDOVER PARK E RCRIS DUNS WAD009488495 RED DOT CORP 495 ANDOVER PK E RCRIS AFS NCDB TRIS DUNS WAD988507059 BOEING SUPPORT SVCS 7 51 505 BAKER BLVD RCRIS WAD052586310 TRI WAY IND INC SEATTLE _ 520 ANDOVER PARK E RCRIS WAD988496865 UNITED PARCEL SVC KENT 550 ANDOVER PARK W RCRIS I WAD980833982 OVEROAD CONTAINER SVC INC 569 STRANDER BLVD RCRIS WAD988469334 TUKWILA CITY OF MAINTENANCE 600 MINKLER BLVD RCRIS WA0000911537 ABLE PEST CONTROL 630 INDUSTRY DR NCDB WA0001390905 SOUTHCENTER MALL _ 633 SOUTHCENTER MALL RCRIS WAD988477568 AIR LAB INC 641 INDUSTRY DR RCRIS DUNS WAD000643585 EXIDE CORP 660 INDUSTRY DR RCRIS DUNS WAD988498929 SUPERIOR EXCHANGE 665 STRANDER BLVD RCRIS WAD982657645 SOUTHCENTER 1 HOUR CLEANERS 672 STRANDER BLVD RCRIS DUNS WA0002157634 FUJI TRUCOLOR TUKWILA 770 ANDOVER PARK E RCRIS WAD981769946 BINGHAM BFI MEDICAL WASTE SYS 772 INDUSTRY DR RCRIS Appendix A FINDS List JN -9163 ID NUMBER SITE NAME SITE ADDRESS DATA BASES WAD988491825 EXPRESSLY PORTRAITS SOUTHCENTER 804 SOUTHCENTER MALL RCRIS WAD988486726 MERCURY RECYCLING CO 855 INDUSTRY DR BLDG 23 RCRIS WA0001827476 NEW ENGLAND MUTUAL LIFE INS CO 903 INDUSTRY DR RCRIS WAD988472700 ARRK CREATIVE NETWORK CORP 917 INDUSTRY DR RCRIS DUNS WAD010208593 C & D BATTERIES DIV 960 INDUSTRY DR RCRIS WAD161164686 ELLISON MACHINERY OF THE NW 975 INDUSTRY DR BLDG 27 RCRIS WA0001390897 VEHICARE NORTHWEST 982 INDUSTRY DR RCRIS WAD988475125 PUGET SOUND P&L SOUTHCENTER SOUTHCENTER SHOPPING CT NCDB Data Base Key AIRS/AFS AIRS Facility Subsystem BRS 1995 Biennial Reporting System 1995 CERCLIS Superfund System DOCKET Enforcement Docket System FFIS Federal Facility Information System I FTTS/NCDB National Compliance Data Base 1 PADS PCB Activity Data System PCS Permit Compliance System RCRIS Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System SSTS Section Seven Tracking System SDWIS Water System Safe Drinking Water Information System STATE State Environmental Programs TRIS Toxics Release Inventory System UIC Underground Injection Control • APPENDIX B WDOE File Report IEA1B04 • • WDOE HWIMSy Facility Profile 05-05-99 10:07 Prod EPA ID WAD044599645 (?) Name American Envelope Co Currnt Ownr American Envelope Co Owner since 05-02-9 Activity Start 08-15-8 Location 401 ANDOVER PK E Activity End Gen Status SQG 03-03-9 City SEATTLE County KING State WA ZIP 98188 Latitude 47 27 ' 12.4 SIC 2677 ENVELOPES Longitude 122 15 ' 5.1 Contact Lisa Williams Phone (206)575-1400 Ext Gen # Wst Waste Managed (lbs) S Year Stat Strms On -Site Off -Site Owner _ 1998 SQG 0 0 0 American Envelope Co _ 1997 SQG 0 0 0 American Envelope Co _ 1994 2 743 937 1993 1 1,366 1,405 F1=Help F2=Waste F6=HW Activity F9=Affiliations F11=Permits SF1=Log SF9=Print . IEA1C07 • • WDOE HWIMSy List Waste Streams Highlighted waste streams manage Waste Off-site EPA ID WAD044599645 Current Name American Envelope Co 05-05-99 10:07 Prod Pounds S Yr WastelCodes Description Origin On-site Off-site _ 94 F002 D001 WTO2 WASTE CITRUS CLEANER 1 _ 94 F002 F003 D039 D001 CITRA SAFE,D'LIMONEN 1 93 F002 F003 D039 D001 CITA SAFE(D'LIMONENE 1 93 743 1,366 1,40 AAI005: Successfully VIEWed. F2=Waste Stream Details F7=Up F8=Down F9=Shipments SF1=Off-Site/Minimizatic F1=Help IEA1B24 • • WDOE HWIMSy Notification: Current Activity Summary 05-05-99 10:08 Prod EPA ID WAD044599645 Facility Name American Envelope Co Generator l ctivity (Source FORMS - 03-03-1999) This facility is a Small Quantity Generator (SQG). F1=Help F7=Up F8=Down • APPENDIX C AHERA Certification Documents Certi/cate a 3raini, J&J Associates is pleased to certify that Don W. Spencer has attended and successfully completed the AHERA MANAGEMENT PLANNER REFRESHER in accordance with 40 CFR Part 763, Subpart E, Appendix C on this 20th day of October 1998 at Bellevue, Washington Valid through October 20, 1999 COUFL�'E 1RUrTOR J&J981020-M PR -01 ACCRECITATION NQ J&J ASSOCIATES 550 NW Fairwood Way Bremerton. Washington 98311 (3601731-6015 eerily/lc-ate 3raini J&J Associates is pleased to certify that has attended and successfully completed the AHERA BUILDING INSPECTOR REFRESHER in accordance with 40 CFR Part 763, Subpart E, Appendix C on this 20th day of October 1998 at Bellevue, Washington '- Valid through October 20, 1999 " ? J&J981020--B R-98 �� Y c+�HSE I STRUCTOR ACCREDITATIG$NO. .- t /+ .1& I ASSOCIATES ,TS 550 NW Fairwood Way ' t.. • 6remerton. Washington 38311 ?k�; TaAINI G IRE CID!" 13601 731-6015 7raini1 J&J Associates is pleased to certify that Wally Hurst has attended and successfully completed the AHERA BUILDING INSPECTOR REFRESHER in accordance with 40 CFR Part 763, Subpart E, Appendix C on this 20th day of October 1998 at Bellevue, Washington Valid through October 20, 1999 COU' 4, I •.. RUCTOR TFWt1IN(, + ' ECTOR J&J981020-BIR-07 J&.1 ASSOCIATES 550 NW Fairwood My Bremerton. Washington 98311 (3601731-6015 ,Tap.Mr-e ROM ROiRD.O.• pRIIROOtMOV • OM memo O•LL errMa7 MVO MOT AMMO MO sommoroctomo 1 EOM ♦54GVMLRMN ,I ISOWERMPd tINIFi 60r %.CIM A ie "'"vr 111101111101 2$Q . , n 4.17 /CM •STRWL LMOW MacIcm L -I XV CO SEGOGNY. MOOTPMae-111N11t enRi SOUTH ELEVATION or•ro 0001O1- RN UT tlrara iwrt'.ID w(1 wu ("WOO m. <vnauunsMOON TT"WOOS MO. Ra! 1111\ I loll 111mcm ... pa$_,� I I ___ '- YLt2RU/ 5o arOORPOZZOZOSOZ..O.24 VOWS MOO .00ORPOOMOOMMS ❑❑ ♦TO).MWI . `morocco O0 MATO oO MOOR MAIM m. wt. T). 1tIOL OW. Tn. e1LrnUeln III 11 111111111 1111 11111 "awe '///�k x/�� 'G.'gli%�'iORM morommom Acfm •dz7yin zczax .7x$5:4'HO2x'Af IRMV[/ Oa MOOR enRr MU Of. EAST ELEVATION t/O a WON MALL MVO w•ro sot. maw MS11 num. cOCPAa1 exam (mmtonoo NORTH ELEVATION Iw•na M, alum Of MOOR • MOM. CONSOLGO011 /Mt 1ONMO ocot N IR WEST ELEVATION ur•ro / R5IMYJWYK IMT co eon* ROOF HVAC SCREEN/SITE UNE ELEVATION 1nr.ro Lar MOOR Nil "MOO Tn. • SURR+OUNPINtS AREA MAP ARCHITECTURE 7771oeara 1400 &Iwo. WA 911001 47587.6700 475.150.9116 re Ade IL Cir Mot L iwney AIA ►i4Rdpa A.dbar MUSTANG L.L.C. 401 ANDOVER PARR EAST TUKWI AI, WASHINGTON CALL BEFORE YOU DIG 1-800-424-5555 1-30' PRELIMINARY GRADING, DRAINAGE AND UTILITY PLAN / .IAII05 .20 0 (4' E) E7.. ELECTRICAL NETERN: 440 TPAISFORYER EA. M 6/ 4 BOLLARDS / 68812'32'W colo -_1. 3. ...-.21-7.-11:1 11r5. s EX. SAS 4EIERJ EK 5.11.1.0 EX. BUILDING FF -26.5± DOWNSPOUT 111RMINE • 1.01 YN. PROPOSED BUILDING ADDITION FF -26.5± r ROOF DOWNSPOUT 11GHRINE SENIKM 0 1.0% RAIN. iii 1- 74 PrIMITIffrarr77‘i . A PAVEWENT \ PERU' 913 -...-� NEW A4BT VMLTPAVBF:_ c.' n fe / � I wCC CC Q I S>i �l • Ev. 12' ED 486.50 EL IS' WOE SWTAR1---A SEWER EASEMENT P. SS E.15.0 EI. S:4N / �) 2;114.21.7E1.7 Ea. 51NN FOR. E.1674 (_4' NE. S1 „.-E2. M • REW AOHALT PAVEMENT PBI GCT. BTATOAROB Acit WOW EOLOWO DRRIVE'MAY AS MOAN 2.,_1138'05.42"W 482.4 • LEGAL DESCRIPTION TRACT 5 JTIE PLAT OF ANDOVER INDUSTRIAL PARK N0. 5, AS RECORDED IN VOLUTE 03 OF PLATS. PAGES 22 AND 23 RECORDS OF KING COMTT, WASHINGTON, YORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLL06 BEGINNING IIT THE EAST WARIER CORNER OF SECTION 20. TOWNSHIP 23 HERTN, RANGE 4 EAST. L W., IN KING COUNTY. WASIINGTOR HENCE NOR74 88? 05' 42' NEST ALONG TLE SOUTH LINE CF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SAID SECTION 24 A DISTANCE OF 482.84 FEET. TO INTERSECTION WITH 11E WESTERLY MARGIN OF ANDOVER PARK EAST; THENCE NOR74 OS? 47' 28' EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN 15.97 FEET TO TIE TRLE POINT Y EGIUUL HENCE CONTINUING NORTH 01? 47' 28' EAST 149. 78 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVE; HENCE ALO`.; A CURVE TO TIE MOOT HAVING A RADIUS OF 275.37 FEET TIRCU71 A CENTRAL MILE OF 47? 37' 38' AN ARC DISTANCE OF 229.73 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE THENCE ALS CURVE: CURVE TO TIE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 215.37 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ARE. E OF 10? 45' 50' AN ARC DISTANCE OF 40.65 FEET; HENCE NW:. 381' 12' 32' WEST 603 90 FEET: 1I0CE SMITH SI? 41 28' EST 384. 00 FEET; 11ENCE SOD, 88? 12' 32' EAST 40650 FEET TO 11E TRUE FLINT OF BEGINNING. SUBJECT TO HAND INCLUDING AN EASEMENT FOR RAILROAD REPOSES SVER TRE WESTERLY 5E5 FEET TIEJEOF. SUBJECT TO NO INCLUDING AN EASEIENT FOR UTILITY PULSES OVER TUE EASTERLY 15.00 FEETETIEREOF. SUBJECT TO IAIO INCLUDING AN EASEMENT FOR SANITARY SEWERS OVER TIE SOUHERLY 15.00 FEET11.EREM. DESIGN ASSUMPTIONS: EXCLUDING THE NEW BUILDING AREA. THE NEW IMPERVIOUS AREA IS LESS THAN THE EXISTNG (4PEFNOU5 AREA. OUR PROPOSED DESIGN IS. TO NOT DETAIN THE NEW IMPERVIOUS PAVEMENT AREA AND DETAIN- THE ENTIRE NEW. BUILDING AREA. NOTE THAT A PORTION OF.THE NEW 600.01NG AREA COULD BYPASS THE DETENTION SENIOR BASED ON THE COSTING IMPERVIOUS AREA. THE DETENPON DESIGN IS BASED ON THE KING COUNTY SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL (1998). . (...14=1- 0090 altat •oOlii CNA ARCHITECTURE CO LU z LU F 0 2 N N coR z I EXPIRES 9/23/01 EERWG\7256PGM1.DWG Dote/Time: 11/04/1999 07:37 Solt 1.30 I 5