HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA E99-0035 - BOEING - BUILDINGS 2-50, 2-66, 2-71 AND 2-72 DEMOLITIONSBOEING BUILDINGS
2-50, 2-66, 2-71, 2-72
DEMOLISH BUILDINGS &
USE SITE FOR CONTAINER
STAGING & STORAGE
8123 E. MARGINAL WAY S.
E99-0035
•
City of Tukwila
Steven M Mullet, Mayor
Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director
NOTICE OF DECISION
December 14, 2000
To: John Crull, Applicant
State Department of Ecology, SEPA Division
This letter is issued pursuant to Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) Section 21-04.156 and serves as
a notice of decision that the application for demolishing a 56,775 square feet building at 8123
East Marginal Way South is designated as Planned Action and no further SEPA review is
required.
Project Background
FILE NUMBER: E2000-0130
APPLICANT: The Boeing Company
REQUEST: Determine that demolition of 56,775 square feet building is a Planned
Action and all impacts have been mitigated as part of 1998 EIS.
LOCATION: 8123 East Marginal Way South
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
DETERMINATION:
ZONING/COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN DESIGNATION:
The current proposal is to demolish 56,775 square feet one story,
steel frame building referred as 2-66 building located at 8123
East Marginal Way South.
The project is designated as a Planned Action and no further
SEPA review or threshold determination is required. This
decision is final with no administrative appeals.
Manufacturing Industrial Center/ Heavy
Project materials including the application, staff report and other studies related to the permit are
available for inspection at the Tukwila Department of Community Development, 6300
Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100, Tukwila WA from Monday Through Friday, between 8:30 am and
5:00 pm. The project planner is Minnie Dhaliwal who may be contacted at 206-431-3685 for
further information. Property owners affected by this decision may request a change in valuation
for their property tax purposes notwithstanding any program of revaluation.
Decision issued by:
Steve Lancaster
Director, Community Development
6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206-431-3670 • Fax: 206-431-3665
CITY OF TUKWILA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
FINAL STAFF EVALUATION
FOR ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
Demolition project at 8123 East Marginal Way South
File No: E2000-030
I. SUMMARY OF PROPOSED ACTION
The current proposal is to demolish 56,775 square feet one story, steel frame building
referred as 2-66 building located at 8123 East Marginal Way South. A portion of the
proposed project is within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of the Duwamish River
and hence is subject to Shoreline Substantial Development Permit.
II. GENERAL INFORMATION
Project Name: Demolition of 2-66 Boeing building.
Applicant: The Boeing Company
Location: 8123 East Marginal Way South
Zoning: MIC/H
Comprehensive
Plan Designation: MIC/H
II. REVIEW PROCESS
This proposal was identified as a potential Planned Action as it met the requirements listed under
Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) Section 21.04.152. As part of this Planned Action review process,
the proposed project is analyzed to ensure that all impacts have been mitigated as part of 1998 EIS
and also if the proposal is consistent with the Tukwila Comprehensive Plan.
• •
III. BACKGROUND/PROPOSAL
The current proposal is to demolish 56,775 square feet one story, steel frame building
referred as 2-66 building located at 8123 East Marginal Way South. The subject site is
developed as an aircraft manufacturing facility with a number of separate buildings. A
portion of 2-66 building is within 200 feet of the Duwamish River and is subject to Shoreline
Substantial Development permit. The subject site is zoned Manufacturing Industrial
Center/Heavy (MIC/H).
On March 8, 2000, Planned Action determination was issued for demolition of three
buildings on the subject site, building 2-50, 2-71 and 2-72. Refer to File number E99-0035.
Tukwila's Manufacturing and Industrial Center (MIC) is an important regional center of
industrial activity. Industrial development over the most of the sub -area was evaluated in
multi -site environmental review. In 1992, a programmatic environmental impact statement
(EIS) was prepared for the Duwamish Corridor master plan, a proposal to redevelop Boeing
properties in the MIC over a 10 year period. In 1998, sub -area plan/EIS updates extended the
previous analysis of the corridor's Boeing properties (about 650 acres) to the entire MIC sub-
area (about 1,370 acres). As part of this Planned Action review for the current proposal, the
impacts of the current proposal are compared to 1998 Integrated GMA Implementation Plan
and Final Environmental Impact Statement in order to ensure that all impacts have been
mitigated.
IV. CONSITENCY WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
The City of Tukwila Comprehensive Plan identifies the area surrounding the subject site as
a Manufacturing Industrial Center/Heavy. The proposed project meets the goals and policies
listed in the Comprehensive Plan for MIC/H area.
Specifically, the proposed project meets the following goals and policies:
Goal 11.1: Support the existing industrial activities in the MIC and development of new
industrial activity in order to maximize the employment and economic benefits to the people
to Tukwila in the region, while minimizing impacts on residential neighborhoods.
Policy 11.1.5: Allow uses that are commonly associated with manufacturing and industry,
including those directly supporting such activity, such as offices and laboratories, while
prohibiting unrelated uses.
• •
Policy 11.1.8: Improve public access and use of the west side of the river, protecting owner's
rights to reasonable use and enjoyment, improve employee access to the east side of the river
and emphasize restoration on both sides of the river.
V. REVIEW OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
The following lists the elements contained within the Environmental Checklist submitted for
the proposed project. The numbers in the staff evaluation correspond to the numbers in the
Environmental Checklist. If staff concurs with the applicant's response, this is so stated. If
the response to a particular item in the checklist is found to be inadequate or clarification is
needed, there is additional staff comment and evaluation.
A. BACKGROUND:
1-4
5—Shoreline Substantial Development permit is also required.
6-7-- Concur with checklist.
8 – The subject site is within 200 feet of Ordinary Highwater Mark of the Duwamish River.
It is subject to King County Shoreline regulations and a Substantial Development Shoreline
Permit is required for this project.
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS:
1. Earth:
a -h-- Concur with checklist.
2. Air:
a -- Applicant will be required to obtain all relevant permits from Puget Sound
Pollution Control Agency to address any emission to the air.
b -c– Concur with checklist.
3. Water:
a(1)-a(2)—The site is situated along the Duwamish River Channel. No work will
take place either over or in the Duwamish. The project is subject to Shoreline
Substantial Development Permit and will meet all shoreline regulations.
a(3)-(5) -- Concur with checklist.
a(6)—There is an existing storm drainage system on site. No changes are proposed
to the existing storm drainage system. There are three outfalls in the 2-66 area. There
are spill control type oil -water separators in nearly every catch basin in the area. All
impacts related to drainage will be addressed and mitigated during the process of
reviewing the demolition permit. The project will meet all erosion and sedimentation
control requirements of King County Surface Water Design Manual.
b(1) and (2) -- Concur with checklist.
c (1) – No changes are proposed to the existing storm drainage system.
c (2) – Best Management Practices to ensure that no construction debris enters the
storm drainage system include; placing filter fabric in the catch basins, site sweeping,
covering containers with chemicals and cleaning the slab where there is visible
contamination from historical industrial activities. All impacts related to construction
debris will be mitigated as part of demolition permit.
d -- Concur with checklist.
4. Plants:
a -d -- Concur with checklist.
5. Animals:
a—In addition to the animals listed in the checklist the following have been observed
on or near the site:
Birds- Bald eagle, Water Fowl
Mammals- River Otter
Fish- Chinook, Cho, Chum, Steelhead, and Bull Trout
b—Bald Eagle and Bull Trout are threatened species observed near the site.
•
c—Bull Trout also use river for migration route and rearing.
d -- Concur with checklist.
6. Energy and Natural Resources:
a -c -- Concur with checklist.
7. Environmental Health:
a —Concur with checklist.
a(1)—Hazardous Materials Control Systems will be place to address any spills or
clean up practices.
a(2)—Concur with checklist.
b (1) and (2) -- Concur with checklist.
b (3) -- Compliance with applicable local, state and federal noise regulations will
mitigate any potential adverse noise impacts, associated with the project.
8. Land and Shoreline Use:
a— Concur with checklist.
b—Although not recently, but years ago the site was a dairy farm.
c -g — Concur with checklist.
h— The subject site adjoins the Duwamish River.
i-I—Concur with checklist.
9. Housing:
a -c -- Concur with checklist.
10. Aesthetics:
a-c—Concur with checklist.
11. Light and Glare:
a -d -- Concur with checklist.
12. Recreation:
a -c — Concur with checklist.
13. Historic and Cultural Preservation:
a -c -- Concur with checklist.
14. Transportation:
a -g -- Concur with checklist.
15. Public Services:
a -b -- Concur with checklist.
16. Utilities:
a -b -- Concur with checklist.
V. CONCLUSION
The current proposal to demolish a 56,775 square feet building is consistent with
Comprehensive Plan. It is also determined that all impacts associated with the current
proposal have been mitigated pursuant to the environmental impact statement.
Prepared by: Minnie Dhaliwal, Associate Planner
Date: December 13, 2000
DEC -.13.2000 2:35PM POS ENG ENGINEERING
Port of Seattle
December 8, 2000
Steve Lancaster, Director
Department of Community Development
City of Tukwila
6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100
Tukwila, Washington 98188
•
Reference; City of Tukwila, Shoreline Permit, File Number L2000-059
Planning Commission, Design Review, File Number L2000-058
Boeing Company—redevelopment of former Isaacson Steel Works site
Steve Lancaster:
NO.888
P.2/3
This will acknowledge receipt of notice of the referenced shoreline permit application and design review action, for
property on the east shoreline of the Duwamish Waterway, approximately river mile 4.3, in the City of Tukwila, King
County, Washington. The proposed Boeing Company project has the potential to affect shoreline in the Duwamish
Waterway and it is important to carefully review the land use and environmental elements of the proposal.
The Port of Seattle owns approximately 0.5 acres of upland and shoreline adjoining the west margin of the proposed
Boeing Company project at 8625 East Marginal Way. Port -owned shore land includes filled former aquatic area and
structural shoreline stabilization constructed as part of the former industrial use at the site, Isaacson Steel Works.
It is the port's understanding that the proposed project does not include any use of port -owned property. However, it is the
Port of Seattle's request that the following conditions apply to industrial uses and activities approved by the City of,
Tukwila for the upland site development described by File Numbers L2000-058 and L2000-059.
1. Future development on property owned by the Boeing Company, including any cleanup or remediation of site
contamination, must not result in adverse effects on port -owned upland or aquatic area in the vicinity.
Construction activities and subsequent use, operation, and maintenance of new facilities at the site must ensure
that adverse changes to storm water and ground water conditions and aquatic area sediments will not result.
2. Construction of new facilities, including landscape area, at the site must not foreclose potential use of port -
owned shore land adjacent to the site for restoration of fish and wildlife habitat or environmental remediation. A
construction and maintenance easement allowing for access to port property through the proposed development
site is, therefore, necessary.
It is important to note that the present proposal includes landscape area separating structures planned for the site from the
port's Duwamish Waterway shore land and aquatic area property. The landscape area will be a valuable asset to the
upland portion of the site, east of port property. Future use of port property west of the development site has the potential
to complement landscape/open space area included in the present proposal as well as providing substantial fish'and
P.O. Box 1209
Seattle, WA 98111 U.S.A.
(206) 728.3000
Fax (206) 728-3252
www.portseartle.org
•DEC.13.2OOO 2:35PM POSNGINEERING
Steve Lancaster
City of Tukwila
L2000-058 and L2000.059
Page 2
NO.888 P.3/3
wildlife habitat improvements in the Duwamish Waterway. It is, therefore, important that future use of port -owned shore
land at the site for restoration activities not be impeded by the present proposal.
This is to request that this letter be placed on record. Please contact me at 728-3071, or Geo, Blomberg, environmental
management, at 728-3194, if you require additional information.
cc; T, Goodwin, Legal
December 6, 2000
Re:
•
SEPA Planned Action for Boeing 2-66 Building Demolition
8123 E. Marginal Way South
000160-0020
Subject: Additional information on stormwater system and pollution/debris
prevention control measures.
Boeing has two stormwater permits for this area. One covers all of Plant 2 (503000482)
and the other covers South Yard construction including the 2-66 demo (S03003174).
There are three outfalls in the 2-66 area. The southern -most drainage has a gate valve
that can be shut in case of spills. (Note: There are no tanks or hazardous materials
involved in the demolition action.) In addition, there are SC -type (spill control) oil -water
separators in nearly every catch basin in the area. These are actually stainless steel catch
basin inserts that act to collect solids and capture small amounts of oil.
When the 2-66 is demolished, we will follow the requirements of permit 503003174.
There are a number of BMPs that we have already implemented in the South yard that
will carry over to the 2-66. These BMPs include, but are not limited to:
• placing filter fabric in the catch basins
• site sweeping
• covering containers with chemicals
• cleaning the slab where there is visible contamination from historical industrial
activities
Please contact me if you need additional information.
John Crull
Boeing Facilities Services
206/544-7456
w v3 ) s CtjUo
17, gyp.'v
7
FROM :FACILITIES
December 6, 2000
•
206 544 5889
2002-06 13:41 #545 P.01/01
To: Alexa Berlow
City of Tukwila FAX 206.431.3665
Re: Shoreline Permit L99-0082
Revised to include Demolition of the adjacent 2-66 Building
8123 E. Marginal Way South
000160-0020
Subject: Supplemental information about the Boeing 2-66 Building demolition proposal
1. Located adjacent to the 2-50, 2-71 and 2-72 Buildings, the 2-66 Building is a me -story
industrial building located in the southwest corner of the Boeing Plant 2 property.
2. Like the other three buildings, the metal framed and skinned building will be demolished to
the existing concrete slab. No earthwork or penetration of the slab will occur.
3. The 56,775sf building is located farther inland than the 2-50, 2-71&72 buildings. The 200
foot shoreline zone boundary bisects the building. Approximately three-quarters of the
building area is situated outside the shoreline zone. Approximately 14,000sf is located
within the shoreline zone.
4. The site conditions applicable 2-66 are identical to the site conditions for the 2-50,71 &72
buildings.
5. All utilities will be capped using in-kind materials per best management practices and
standards.
6. The demolition sub -contractor will obtain all necessary hauling permits, separie from the
Demolition Permit.
7. Boeing has two stormwater permits for this area. One covers all of Plant 2 (S03000482) and
the other covers South Yard construction including the 2-66 demo (S03003174). There are
three outfalls in the project area. The southern -most drainage has a gate vale that can be
shut in case of spills. (Note: There are no tanks or hazardous materials involved in ':lig:
demolition action.) In addition, there 'are SC -type (spill control) oil -water separators in
nearly every catch basin in the area. These are actually stainless steel catch basin inserts that
act to collect solids and capture small amounts of oil.
When the 2-66 is demolished, we will follow the requirements of permit S03003174. There
are a number of BMPs that we have already implemented in the South yard that will parry
over to the 2-66. These BMPs include, but are not limited to:
• placing filter fabric in the catch basins
• site sweeping
• covering containers with chemicals
• cleaning the slab where there is visible contamination from historical industrial activities
Please contact me if you need additional information.
Crull
oeing Facilities Services
206/544-7456
•
CITY OF TUKWILA
Department of Community Development
6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188
Telephone: (206) 431-3670 FAX (206) 431-3665
E-mail:: tukplan a,ci.tukwila.wa.us
AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP AND HOLD HARMLESS
PERMISSION TO ENTER PROPERTY
Jnnil
2000
STATE OF WASHINGTON
COUNTY OF KING
The undersigned being duly sworn and upon oath states as follows:
1. 1 am the current owner of the property which is the subject of this application.
2. All statements contained in the applications have been prepared by me or my agents and are true and correct to the best of my
knowledge.
3. The application is being submitted with my knowledge and consent.
4. Owner grants the City, its p1 ogees agen engineers,,,�,Qntractors or other representatives the right to enter upon Owner's real
property, located at �/ L. 5 -R-67"— //I f'i/24, I✓fi'L (VA y 601, �H
for the purpose of application review, for the limited time necessary to complete that purpose.
5. Owner agrees to hold the City harmless for any loss or damage to persons or property occurring on the private property during the
City's entry upon the property, unless the loss or damage is the result of the sole negligence of the City.
6. The City shall, at its discretion , cancel the application without refund of fees, if the applicant does not respond to specific requests for
items on the "Complete Application Checklist" within ninety (90) days.
ss
7. Non -responsiveness to a City information request for ninety (90) or more days, shall be cause to cancel the application(s) without refund
of fees.
EXECUTED at 6;t= %9`'1'( (city), (state), on /1 — 3 0
.�Q••
o
NOTA1i►
•p PUB%,
J4J r t 0 4.. °lb. `
16
On this day personIv flliminfOrore me
the foregoing instrument and acknowledged
mentioned therein.
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFO
2000
(Print Name)
P.0.3•77,- 3707 f I . zR-7 i
(Address)
S£41 -`[TLE a../ R Z -I - 22-0 7
(Phone Number)
(Sig
Clit... C.t— to me known to be the individual who executed
at he/she signed the same as his/her voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes
EON THIS O O DAY OF
NOTARY P
residing at
in an • f•rthe tate of ashington
•,41
� ' i
My Commission expires on
City of Tukwila
•
•
Department of Community Development
John W Rants, Mayor
Steve Lancaster, Director
Revision submittals must be submitted in person at the Permit Center. Revisions will not be accepted
through the mail, fax, etc.
Date: II— 7- 00
Plan Check/Permit Number: L 99- 008?
Response to PNP ,V6 "f L
0 Response to Correction Letter #
0 Revision # after Permit is Issued
3 T. C S 2009
lJ���`J J
Project Name: 2-5O1 2-71 2-7Z l3V/1-.D/A/ Di esiot I rio,u uv U
Project Address: eJ Z 3 4e 6 i.,./.¢ 4' -5a •
Contact Person: J.:7HAJ Phone Number: 544-74/54,
Summary of Revision: ADD DE nOL1l a"J 2' &,1 ' 13cm-otA14
THE AT? L.) Ti 0kJ .
-- Dern at./ s t1 7'0 '7'! 1 c ge-re ....4 8 &4 vvtE AS T FE-
-50, 2-71 42-72- Bv1c.D1AL6s)
-- idp Ai 012 0v w►4 -7 t1j -i-
— -r 2 -lo to 731-04 IS toL147E t7 rii41' 7H$7z. ✓/01-i4 nl0 nisei Ai
T1 -I -r 2-511 2-7 i e 72- BLD6 5 , 75°4 of Me 57-40c_rv1
5 L(94A yvN D L,4 id 0 uJA Az) of Zoo 5 14o,E4 ht/E
2013E
ALL__ Loge— Colt, g _Go rvtP i rewiP-i fl t-rn
Sheet Number(s): 66744 AT& SET OF "Dm tomr65 pAg_ovg2
"Cloud" or highlight all areas of revision including date of revision
Received at the City of Tukwila Permit Center by:
DI Entered in Sierra on
06/29/99
1. N.1 Cnrr►hr•ontor Rwlevard. Suite #100 • Tukwila. Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Far (206) 431.3665
•
Dept. Of Community Development
City of Tukwila
AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION
I.olivli,Gla I'VV W & HEREBY DECLARE THAT:
Notice of Public Hearing
Project Name `l(, rk2
Determination of Non -Significance
Mailer's Signature: J)JJJijLUJ.,
Notice of Public Meeting
Mitigated Determination of Non -
Significance
Board of Adjustment Agenda Pkt
Determination of Significance & Scoping
Notice
Board of Appeals Agenda Pkt
Notice of Action
Planning Commission Agenda Pkt
Official Notice
Short Subdivision Agenda
Notice of Application
Shoreline Mgmt Permit
Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt
Permit
__FAX
To Seattle Times
Classifieds
Gail Muller Classifieds
PO Box 70 - Seattle WA 98111
�(
(\
Other
—P�-�i` C3__Mail:
WA
Was mailed to each of the addresses listed on this ((J't1 day of 1 jj1in the
year 20�
P:GINAWYNETTA/FORMS/AFFIDAVIT-MAIL01/24/0011:44 AM
Project Name `l(, rk2
V
Project Number: EC— (jj
Mailer's Signature: J)JJJijLUJ.,
P:GINAWYNETTA/FORMS/AFFIDAVIT-MAIL01/24/0011:44 AM
CHECKLIST: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW/SHORELINE PERMIT MAILINGS
( ) U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
( ) FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
( ) DEPT OF FISH & WILDLIFE
OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY
TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT
DEPT NATURAL RESOURCES
OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR
DEPT OF COMM. TRADE & ECONOMIC DEV.
DEPT OF FISHERIES & WILDLIFE
FEDERAL AGENCIES
( ) U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
( ) U.S. DEPT OF H.U.D.
WASHINGTON STATE AGENCIES
K.C. PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEV.
BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD
FIRE DISTRICT #11
FIRE DISTRICT #2
K.C. WATER POLLUTION CNTRL SEPA OFFCL
TUKWILA SCHOOL DISTRICT
TUKWILA LIBRARIES
RENTON LIBRARY
KENT LIBRARY
CITY OF SEATTLE LIBRARY
U S WEST
SEATTLE CITY LIGHT
PUGET SOUND ENERGY
HIGHLINE WATER DISTRICT
SEATTLE WATER DEPARTMENT
TCI CABLEVISION
OLYMPIC PIPELINE
KENT PLANNING DEPT
TUKWILA CITY DEPARTMENTS:
( ) PUBLIC WORKS
( ) POLICE
( ) PLANNING
( ) PARKS & REC.
( ) CITY CLERK
( )
( )
( )
( )
FIRE
FINANCE
BUILDING
MAYOR
PUGET SOUND REGIONAL COUNCIL
P.S. AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY
SW K C CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE
DUWAMISH INDIAN TRIBE
( ) SEATTLE TIMES
07/09/98 C:WP51DATA\CHKLIST
( ) DEPT OF SOCIAL & HEALTH SERV.
( ) DEPT OF ECOLOGY, SHORELIND DIV
C."-') DEPT OF ECOLOGY, SEPA DIVISION*
( ) OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL
* SEND CHKLIST W/ DETERMINATIONS
* SEND SITE MAPS WITH DECISION
KING COUNTY AGENCIES
K.C. DEPT OF PARKS
HEALTH DEPT
PORT OF SEATTLE
K.C.DEV & ENVIR SERVICES-SEPA INFO CNTR
K.C. TRANSIT DIVISION - SEPA OFFICIAL
SCHOOLS/LIBRARIES
HIGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT
K C PUBLIC LIBRARY
SEATTLE MUNI REF LIBRARY
SEATTLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT
UTILITIES
PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT
VAL-VUE SEWER DISTRICT
WATER DISTRICT #20
WATER DISTRICT #125
CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC WORKS
RAINIER VISTA
SKYWAY
CITY AGENCIES
RENTON PLANNING DEPT
CITY OF SEA -TAC
CITY OF BURIEN
TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS
TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
CITY OF SEATTLE - SEPA INFO CENTER - DCLU
SEATTLE OFFICE OF MGMNT & PLANNING*
* NOTICE OF ALL SEATTLE RELATED PLNG PROJ.
OTHER LOCAL AGENCIES
( ) METRO ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING DIV.
OFFICE/INDUSTRIAL 5,000 GSF OR MORE
RESIDENTIAL 50 UNITS OR MORE
RETAIL 30,000 GSF OR MORE
MEDIA
•
City of Tukwila
•
Steven M. Mullet, Mayor
Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director
March 15, 2000
Rick Ford
Boeing Company
P.O. Box 3707
M/s 19-35
Seattle, Washington 98124
RE: Boeing Demolition
SEPA — Planned Action, File # E99-0035
Dear Rick Ford:
Your application for the SEPA-Planned Action has been approved. Enclosed is a copy of
the approval.
Associated permits for this development continue to be in progress. I will notify you
when their approval has been made.
If you have any questions, I can be reached directly at (206) 431-3673.
Sincerely,
Alexa Berlow
Associate Planner
6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206-431-3670 • Fax: 206-431-3665
•
Ciy of Tukwila
•
Steven M. Mullet, Mayor
Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director
March 8, 2000
SEPA — PLANNED ACTION
To:
• Rick Ford, Boeing Company (Applicant/Owner)
• Washington State Department of Ecology, SEPA Division
• King County Development and Environmental Services — SEPA Information Center
PROJECT BACKGROUND
File Number: E99-0035
Permit Type/
Approval Request: SEPA — Planned Action
Name of Applicant
and Current
Property Owner:
Rick Ford (Applicant)
Boeing Company (Owner)
Project Location: 8123 E. Marginal Way So.Tukwila, WA 98188
Associated Permits: Shoreline Substantial Development (File Number L99-0082)
Other
Government
Approvals: Duwamish Corridor Redevelopment EIS (1992) and related
Mitigation Agreement (10/26/93).
RCRA Consent Order for Corrective Action. (The proposed
demolition is within the RCRA Consent Order area).
6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206-431-3670 • Fax: 206-431-3665
File Number E99-0035 • • SEPA — Planned Action
Boeing Company
Deviations:
2
Property owners affected by this decision may request a change in
valuation for property tax purposes notwithstanding any program
of revaluation.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed plan is to demolish three (3) buildings: Building number 2-50, 2-71, and
2-72. The 2-50 building is a 1,200 square foot steel framed structure with a pitched metal
roof and metal siding. The 2-71 building is a 300 square foot lean-to type building open
on all sides, and used for sand and gravel storage. This is an old structure with metal pipe
columns and a metal roof. The 2-72 building is a 1400 square foot three -sided storage
shed with sliding metal doors closing off the front. This is a wood -framed structure with
metal siding and roof material. After demolition, the site will be used, for container
staging and storage. The site is fully developed as an aircraft manufacturing facility.
Building 2-50 and 2-72 are within 200 feet from the Duwamish Waterway: Building
2-50 is approximately 40 feet east of the Duwamish waterway. Building 2-71 is
approximately 210 feet east of the Duwamish Waterway. Building 2-72 is approximately
115 feet east of the Duwamish Waterway. The proposal lies within the 100 -year flood
plain. Storm water runoff will be collected in a plant -2 storm -water control system. A
FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map is attached.
Plant 2 is served by East Marginal Way South, through Gate B-18 entrance. The site is
also serviced by the Metro bus system, adjacent to Gate B18. Parking will not be created
or eliminated by this project. No additional trips will be generated.
The demolition is proposed to occur during Winter 2000. Future additions and or
expansions of the project are not anticipated at this time.
Vicinity map, site plans, and photographs attached.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the planned action. The planned action meets all initial
qualifications, as outlined in TMC 21.04.152.
File Number E99-0035 • SEP_A — Planned Action
Boeing Company
APPROVALS
The Planned Action is approved by
FILES AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
3
Date: 3/' efrJ
Project materials, including the application, and reports, or other studies related to the
permit are available for review at the City of Tukwila, Department of Community
Development, 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100, Tukwila, Washington. The
offices are open Monday through Friday from 8:30am to 5:OOpm.
•
City of Tukwila.
John W. Rants, Mayor
Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director
Revision submittals must be submitted in person at the Permit Center. Revisions will not be accepted
through the mail, fax, etc.
Date: /
Plan Check/Permit Number:
Response to Pr/o N6 t1 $ z
0 Response to Correction Letter #
0 Revision # after Permit is Issued
Project Name: 2-50, 2-7/ 2-7Z By/L.DI.IL Di. Ala4crio,v
Project Address: e Z 3 /.v¢ [ /A/M Y -5 d•
Contact Person: /2/L' 4— ID fZ 1) Phone Number: 206 655-9880
Summary of Revision: /1/ Gr/ DR A `r/f/vt5 Tp .-4/?d 2 T PLAviv EQ
C' riO.y 1 17 -SND., E• —
rfpN
Sheet Number(s):
"Cloud" or highlight all areas of revision including date of revision
Received at the City of Tukwila Permit Center by:
0 Entered in Sierra on
06/29/99
A' t'1 cniithrenttr Boulevard Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Far (206) 4313665
•
CITY OF TUKWILA
Department of Community Development
6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188
Telephone: (206) 431-3670 FAX (206) 431-3665
E-mail: tukplan@atukwila.wa.us
SEPA
PLANNED
ACTION
APPLICATION
FOR STAFF USE ONLY Sierra Type: P -PACT
Planner:
File Number:
Application Complete (Date:
)
Project File Number:
Application Incomplete (Date:
)
MIC Planned Action EIS File Number: E96-0034
Other File Numbers
NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Z-50, 1-7/ 1 2-7 Z 3vlav/.v c a7e-4.04/T/ON.
LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and
subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS.
/23 F. t 126//,t •o L *11,4
000/Z1 D- 0020
Quarter: Section: Township: Z4 Range: 4E
(This information may be found on your tax statement.).
DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR :
The individual who:
• has decision making authority on behalf of the applicant in meetings with City staff,
• has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development
standards, and
• is the primary contact with the City, to whom all notices and reports will be sent.
Name: g":D .506/NG ea .
Address: /? !' • g 0 4 37,07 - rkris JQ -35 SEA- rrz 6 1,,/ 9f3 / Z4
Phone: 2.0 /. to $ - 5P; gB FAX: 20 6 655 - 50¢3
Signature:
Ai 4-1
G: I APPHAMLI NDUSEAPPI,p1anI.doc. O9/30/99
Date: / 2 - 7 — f 9
STATE OF WASHINGTON
• •
CITY OF TUKWILA
Department of Community Development
6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA
98188
Telephone: (206) 431-3670 FAX (206) 431-366
E-mail: tukplan(a,ci.tukwila.wa.us
Al+rwAVIT OF OWNERSHIP AND HOLD HARMLESS
PERMISSION TO ENTER PROPERTY
ss
COUNTY OF KING
The undersigned being duly swom and upon oath states as follows:
1. I am the current owner of the property which is the subject of this application.
2. All statements contained in the applications have been prepared by me or my agents and are true and correct to the best of my
knowledge.
3. The application is being submitted with my knowledge and consent.
4. Owner grants the City, its employees, agents, engineers, contractors or other representatives the right to enter upon Owner's real
property located at R/23 E• /Yl0g24/N ry G w.4 9' Sn
for the purpose of application review, for the limited time necessary to complete that purpose.
5. Owner agrees to hold the City harmless for any loss or damage to persons or property occurring on the private property during the
City's entry upon the property unless the loss or damage is the result of the sole negligence of the City.
6. The City shall, at its discretion , cancel the application without refund of fees, if the applicant does not respond to specific
requests for items on the "Complete Application Checklist" within ninety (90) days.
7. Non -responsiveness to a City information request for ninety (90) or more days, shall be cause to cancel the application(s) without
refund of fees.
EXECUTED at 6 E4 r TLE (city), 14/ r4 (state), on / 2 - 7` -/ '
RtGH,4,z0 I. /=D12. -/30E/.4 el,.
(Print Name)
RO. Sow 3707 ,Sc •-rrt E w..0 9B/j4
(Address)
204, .S5-9g8�
(Phone Number)
(Signature)
`
On this day personally appeared before me t9 me known to be the individual who
executed the foregoing instrument and acknowle that he/she s the same as his/her volun_� the uses and
purposes mentioned therein. `art *.V Abet._
.17� � ,>. �{SIG
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME ON.'PFIIS / DA OF ' -i _ . 2/1_=mac.% c
NOT4RY PUBL
residua at
My Commission expi
G:IAPPHAMLANDUSEAPPIsp1anhI.doc, 12/06/99
• •
PLANNED ACTION INITIAL QUALIFICATIONS (TMC 21.04.152)
A. BACKGROUND
1. Date checklist prepared:
December, 1999
2. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable):
Winter, 2000
3. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or
further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes,
explain.
Future additions and or expansions of the project are not
anticipated at this time.
4. Do you know whether applications are pending for
governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the
property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain.
Duwamish Corridor Redevelopment EIS (1992) and related
mitigation Agreement (10/26/93)
A RCRA Consent order for Corrective Action has been
completed for Plant 2. The proposed demolition is within the
RCRA Consent Order area.
5. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed
for your proposal, if known.
Federal:
None known at this time
State of Washington:
None known at this time
King County:
None known at this time
City of Tukwila/Local:
Planned Action / Approval
Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (P -
Shore)
Planned Action Checklist 2-50, 71 & 72 Building Demolition 1
12/07/99
• •
6. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the
proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are
several questions later in this checklist that ask you to
describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to
repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may
modify this form to include additional specific information on
project description.)
To demolish, to their existing concrete floor, the existing
2-50, 2-71 and 2-72 buildings.
The 2-50 building is a 1200 square foot steel framed
structure with a pitched metal roof and metal siding.
Building number 2-71 building is a 300 square foot lean-to
type building open an all sides used for sand and gravel
storage. This is an old structure with metal pipe columns
and a metal roof.
The 2-72 building is a 1400 square foot three -sided
storage shed with sliding metal doors closing off the front.
This is a wood framed structure with metal siding and roof
material
After demolishing the site will be used for container
staging and storage.
7. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a
person to understand the precise location of your proposed
project, including a street address, if any, and section, township,
and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of
area, provide the range or boundaries of the sitels). Provide a
legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if
reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required
by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed
plans submitted with any permit applications related to this
checklist.
The project is located in the City of Tukwila on:
Site address: 8123 East Marginal Way South
See Exhibit A, Location in Region; Vicinity Map; Site Plan
and Topographic maps for exact location within Plant 2
Legal Description attached as Exhibit B
8. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's
Comprehensive land Use Policy Map as environmentally sensitive?
Planned Action Checklist 2-50, 71 & 72 Building Demolition 2
12/07/99
6. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the
proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are
several questions later in this checklist that ask you to
describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to
repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may
modify this form to include additional specific information on
project description.)
To demolish, to their existing concrete floor, the existing
2-50, 2-71 and 2-72 buildings.
The 2-50 building is a 1200 square foot steel framed
structure with a pitched metal roof and metal siding.
Building number 2-71 building is a 300 square foot lean-to
type building open an all sides used for sand and gravel
storage. This is an old structure with metal pipe columns
and a metal roof.
The 2-72 building is a 1400 square foot three -sided
storage shed with sliding metal doors closing off the front.
This is a wood framed structure with metal siding and roof
material
✓ After demolishing the site will be used for container
staging and storage.
i
7. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a
person to understand the precise location of your proposed
project, including a street address, if any, and section, township,
and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of
area, provide the range or boundaries of the sitels►. Provide a
legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if
reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required
by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed
plans submitted with any permit applications related to this
checklist.
The project is located in the City of Tukwila on:
Site address: 8123 East Marginal Way South
See Exhibit A, Location in Region; Vicinity Map; Site Plan
and Topographic maps for exact location within Plant 2
Legal Description attached as Exhibit B
8. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's
Comprehensive land Use Policy Map as environmentally sensitive?
Planned Action Checklist 2-50, 71 & 72 Building Demolition
t kJT'C4
17_y , Giw`
roo�WWIt Ca ,
e_
(01Le61-1.0' 0111?
0�� a RA -0 ma -
(y D 90
'1'1,Y1 Set 1)4'
r7„ w e vv1
1_C,,satSiciJ9)I )2 c�
IZe. w1c11^--5(�(A/C-ol
"Yvo. Stt S h. Pv"it/'
r-1
2
12/07/99
• •
No
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
1. Earth
a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling,
hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other . .
Flat
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate
percent slope)?
0%
c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for
example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the
classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any
prime farmland.
Soils disturbance is not anticipated.
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in
the immediate vicinity? If so, describe.
No
e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of
any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill.
None
f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or
use? If so, generally describe.
No
g. About what percent of the site will be covered with
impervious surfaces after project construction (for example,
asphalt or buildings)?
Planned Action Checklist 2-50, 71 & 72 Building Demolition 3
12/07/99
• •
The site is currently a 100% impervious, paved surface and,
will continue to be impervious when the project is complete.
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other
impacts to the earth, if any:
None
2. Air
a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the
proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke)
during construction and when the project is completed? If any,
generally describe and give approximate quantities if known.
During construction, vehicle and construction equipment
emissions and dust will be released.
b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that
may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe.
No
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other
impacts to air, if any:
Mitigation measures will be implemented as required to meet
or exceed all applicable standards as required by the Puget
Sound Air Pollution Control Agency and the Department of
Ecology. Additional potential mitigation measures to reduce
emissions include ensuring that machines and equipment used
during construction are well maintained.
3. Water
a. Surface:
1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate
vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams,
saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and
provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows
into.
Planned Action Checklist 2-50, 71 & 72 Building Demolition 4
12/07/99
• •
Building 2-50 is approximately 40 feet east of the Duwamish
Waterway. Building 2-71 is approximately 210 feet east of the
Duwamish Waterway. Building 2-72 is approximately 115 feet
east of the Duwamish Waterway.
2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to
(within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe
and attach available plans.
Yes, buildings 2-50 and 2-72 are within 200 feet from the
Duwamish Waterway.
3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that
would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands
and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate
the source of fill material.
None
4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or
diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate
quantities if known.
No
5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If
so, note location on the site plan.
No, see Exhibit C FEMA, Flood Insurance Rate Map, King
County.
6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste
materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste
and anticipated volume of discharge.
No
b. Ground:
1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be
discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose,
and approximate quantities if known.
No
Planned Action Checklist 2-50, 71 & 72 Building Demolition 5
12/07/99
2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the
ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example:
Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals;
agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the
number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if
applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are
expected to serve.
None
c. Water runoff (including storm -water):
1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water)
and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities,
if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into
other waters? If so, describe.
Storm water runoff will be collected in a Plant 2 storm -water
control system. No additional impervious surface or runoff
will be created by the project.
2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters?
If so, generally describe.
No
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground,
and runoff water impacts, if any:
Utilize existing onsite storm water system to mitigate potential
runoff water impacts. Appropriate mitigation measures will be
initiated during construction to reduce and control surface
water runoff impacts.
4. Plants
a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site:
deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other
evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other
shrubs, grass, pasture, crop or grain,
wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk
cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil
Planned Action Checklist 2-50, 71 & 72 Building Demolition 6
12/07/99
• •
other types of vegetation
None
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or
altered?
None
c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or
near the site.
None
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other
measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any:
None
5. Animals
a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on
or near the site or are known to be on or near the site:
Birds and animals which have been observed on or near the
site are listed below:
birds: seagulls, crows
mammals: none observed
fish: in the Duwamish Waterway
b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on
or near the site.
None known at this time.
c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain.
Unknown
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any:
Utilize temporary erosion, long-term storm water and
hazardous materials control systems and best management
Planned Action Checklist 2-50, 71 & 72 Building Demolition 7
12/07/99
• •
practices to prevent contaminated discharges into the
Duwamish Waterway.
6. Energy and Natural Resources
a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood
stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy
needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating,
manufacturing, etc.
None
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy
by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe.
No
c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in
the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to
reduce or control energy impacts, if any:
None
7. Environmental health
a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including
exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or
hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If
so, describe.
Usual oils, greases, fuel and solvents will be present during
construction.
1) Describe special emergency services that might be
required.
No special emergency services will be required. The
hazardous materials involved are commonly used and are
reasonably expected to be within the capability of the existing
emergency service operations.
2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental
health hazards, if any:
Planned Action Checklist 2-50, 71 & 72 Building Demolition 8
12/07/99
• •
No
b. Noise
1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect
your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)?
None
2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or
associated with the project on a short-term or a Tong -term basis
(for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate
what hours noise would come from the site.
Temporary noise impacts during construction are anticipated.
Construction projects of this type typically produce noise
levels which range from 68 to 98 d.b.a. at 50 feet from the
specific equipment.
3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts,
if any:
None. The site is not near residential uses.
8. Land and Shoreline Use
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties?
The site is fully developed as an aircraft manufacturing facility.
b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe.
No
c. Describe any structures on the site.
Plant 2 is a large aircraft manufacturing facility, consisting of
many buildings and ancillary uses. The project site is located
within Plant 2
d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what?
Yes the 2-50 (1,200 sf), 2-71 (300 sf) and 2-72 (1400sf)
buildings.
Planned Action Checklist 2-50, 71 & 72 Building Demolition
9
12/07/99
• •
e. What is the current zoning classification of the site?
Heavy Manufacturing
f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the
site?
Manufacturing Industrial Center — Heavy (MIC/H)
g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program
designation of the site?
N/A
h. Has any part of the site been classified as an
"environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify.
No
i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in
the completed project?
None
j. Approximately how many people would the completed
project displace?
None
k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement
impacts, if any:
None
I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible
with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any:
None
Planned Action Checklist 2-50, 71 & 72 Building Demolition 10
12/07/99
• •
9. Housing
a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any?
Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing.
None
b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be
eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income
housing.
None
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts,
if any:
None
10. Aesthetics
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not
including antennas; what is the principal exterior building
materialls) proposed?
Not Applicable
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or
obstructed?
None
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts,
if any:
None
1 1. Light and glare
a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce?
What time of day would it mainly occur?
Not applicable
Planned Action Checklist 2-50, 71 & 72 Building Demolition 11
12/07/99
• •
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety
hazard or interfere with views?
No
c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect
your proposal?
None anticipated.
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare
impacts, if any:
None
12. Recreation
a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities
are in the immediate vicinity?
There is a large Boeing recreational facility in a nearby Plant 2
building. In addition, the proposed building will be located
approximately one mile north of the main Boeing Oxbow
recreational facility, which includes a shoreline trail.
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing
recreational uses? If so, describe.
No
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on
recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by
the project or applicant, if any:
None
13.Historic and cultural preservation
a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for,
national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or
next to the site? If so, generally describe.
No
Planned Action Checklist 2-50, 71 & 72 Building Demolition 12
12/07/99
• •
b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic,
archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on
or next to the site.
None have been identified on the project site.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any:
Although previous excavations have disclosed no indications
of archeological significance, if artifacts are uncovered, work
in that area will be halted pending notification and response
from appropriate agencies.
14.Transportation
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and
describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on
site plans, if any.
This portion of Plant 2 is served by East Marginal Way South
and through Gate B-18 for entrance.
b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is
the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop?
Yes, there is a large Metro bus stop adjacent to Gate B18,
which serves the southern half of Plant 2 and the project site.
c. How many parking spaces would the completed project
have? How many would the project eliminate?
No parking will be created or eliminated by this project.
d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or
improvements to existing roads or streets, not including
driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or
private).
No
e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of)
water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe.
No
Planned Action Checklist 2-50, 71 & 72 Building Demolition 13
12/07/99
• •
f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by
the completed project? If known indicate when peak volumes
would occur.
No additional trips will be generated.
g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation
impacts, if any:
None
15. Public Services
a. Would the project result in an increased need for public
services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health
care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe.
None is anticipated.
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on
public services, if any.
None
16. Utilities
a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity,
natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer,
septic system, other.
Electricity, natural gas, domestic water, refuse service,
telephone, sanitary sewer and storm sewerage are currently
available.
b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the
utility providing the service, and the general construction activities
on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed.
None
Planned Action Checklist 2-50, 71 & 72 Building Demolition 14
12/07/99
• •
C. SIGNATURE
The above answers are true and complete to the best of my
knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them
to make its decision.
Signature:
Date Submitted:
Richard J. ord 1.-7/
Planned Action Checklist 2-50, 71 & 72 Building Demolition 15
12/07/99
•
2-50 Building
•
•
2-71 Building
•
2-72 Building
MATCHUNE SEE SHEET S5
10012.2
100.0
01002 ROD<
b .[
11101.01
• 0101 VOL
] u•1RV
O 414 MY
O flti10 10202
O WIMP !101442[
- 100
M10040 01[
be AQ 0210
b W 0110
01001
• OM MU
HE FO 101 101011
O
0020 101
• 10010[10(
— 0 O[CM 1001
.u0010
• RMC 0010
O 010]1110•[010
101 M2
• 1011 0010 [ Of
X nn•A3m
O 10100000
X 9411/2
ORYI 00100100010 10001 01004 O10 .10(01•
ODOR M •010.000A1 02Tu10 l0 k •40001
tM Out IK DS- RDA 2422 401 •N .4011 2.
1 120 1100001 OIyT 14100000 170 0170*
M( 20(417 02000 014 2200000010 001004 10
102 000(00 UR 040 M 13 -Ill( RAO/[ 1.222
011002 .011 1 00ROM[S
OBOE/IVG•
PLANT 2 & NORTH OUWAMISH CAMPUS
ALTA SURVEY
LEGAL DESCRIPSO!
THAI Palms OF G0101 4 14 10T 1 AN0 OF RIC STEPHEN *170[1 00111104
CL41 110. 38, ALL 21 SEGPO. 13. 10101547 23 N04T1t RANDS 4 EAST. WM..
01 RDN CotUrr'. YASK•0101• 11141E2313140 Or D+E EAST usAON OF 4204 AK. 234:4
ALA 10101101 AS 11ACAOAM Scat) Aho AS STATE AO ROAD 110. I). AAS LYN5 WESTOILY OF
.ti war MARCO: OF 111.10111 STATE 1411.44* NO. 1 AS Es1A5LISIED BY .1405 NECOR00D
0.001 RECOR3010 NO'S 7!14211 410 5531863. AND 10:10 SO'JTHEA2IERLY Or 114E
StU1SE1000 4101014 0• SOUTH 13104 SMUT Coal,. BA2111 COUNTY ROAD). AND
L1D:0 SCUMMY OF A LOC OMSTANI SOUTHERLY 110 IEFT. MEA9AE0 AT RANT
A41CILE3. 121.141 INE SOUDK4T UNE of 1011111 1300,4 SWOTS
A PORTION of the S.E. 1/4, SECTION
UTILITY CONFLICT NOTE;
CAUTION:
ME C3IDACTO 11101 Y IIP0321rut 100'O0 BC 00411 1. [111218. Y0 'X!10
a 1:1 1261X; 10'0111$ 140021 Soo/ O BEY RMS 01 ROT 11(030.44 :.0 023:£1
u0 LAH-016 BE 104040 110 IttlY10 !04.1110 HKX TO 00017100*.
goutteld 411-3322 A.13 TAM 2.2.10.mi 2.1 21
Bt 503010 aura L111'14•1a0;AS1a Ur*1
R 7.43 U! CAOf3Mi 10/101114111 10,11
atm 0 301004.100 1451. 112.:0d a 410 011103 A5 SLID O o1Si ELMS
AIS *34 34.100000 00 *01 0220110
e ,
er shat �
5
15, TOWNSHIP 23 N., RANGE 4 E., W.M.
...._.„
, 11
.,.
Y ,,,,„- tl .1
.......
✓ /� y• , '�� j h, 1 ISA
>•---' 1 � •6.01 , 1
•
s. ar'
-crag.▪ -._ .r..:,,,;,-„;,-,..„,---------.
,�, ip: 8,...`
.t., - --- •J`���.�
•
-, 19., *o*0. 8014
/ Y_ 01.0 2.41.
4~,,,,-
g-----.....
•
jjpp.x
be ki
V' el/
/ / S Yf
4101•-//� . .,
.3' I - -rill.II• 54'
0L/41 ./331KIC0:4
410: 100.0•
LL: 131.0(L4,Of;
• 114. o`It. 41.1
�3. 6024: 1T,a
1- . '2111 W., S.W.
(:0! Varf....
4
1,C4P41-1 ala
\•`
•y
r
'
•
14*
rye4a
01. 0..0 C.00.
/,�/ /�/ GU6lR Eb�DOwAI.l;
'/• '1 S 1!40%1
1'1.1' "'d
- Cy 148.'
% )
.A' L/� w�INl(
p l)
w � c-'
� 40,
j---LOe1Iua LV
F2111 10CRS 4,111*
1-014. 02-041
L', FKC 42.0.0* y l4
R`-+'o,TMn
•'•14' r*ty., iTlMlap Q
tb FACG m Aa'+1 al*tf
It: 1•lS.0
11.44: 1.0'
6'11.13.7.
1*0 4
104
GRAPHIC SCALE
I a rift 1 ..... ----
I_.n a
L� �•.
MSO
SSS J:1 p
410.014.00
0i44N14...I•
\, a r�r1
•e. ..
010 / 4•(410.*. 0.114,]
'4
�• �11.
TP -1.11.100. *0.011
- If.O. 1010* 0 3.30. 0.0*
la 111*4 .•sC.WAV•.
41111111111111(
RECEIVED
PIX 3L71.1001 0r --
0.1 S*., 3' ..010 MMA
0AW, S. 40+4410
UFTL*L 0A10.04
041040- OA40.14'
0511
VICINITY
2.0.1
£L1*tU7 10440101E woo k
3D'!.•• 00 0A.3.�
;�a�. �TgTii iel
'` f.W..ai viii,
.Y..2.-,. {130 a.104' 40114I CO.DO:5
4' oo. 0.0.1 m01 atoms a4r•8110V 1mow
{ Oa
4a ONO8 WV/ =OHO Say.. t =MN
ownOn sot WO 10 WI Br 'SOARED 401.
A!RED PP*Aa 006
-1300400.4 0f3 cc -'s13;
(K'GO •-t14 tf6 / urT C°'i
1.000 •00•1/W•1.1141
EJ0lu0N5 To 01113.4
400 C9.1A 3110.02.
NCOC llCK: 5110134..
TO (AMR 1.41412 4104-0
99.010*
Area(
(=Yip
NOV 2 8 2000
•1'01.."P
j rr• 11-��% L0IRVS MTM
l I,',i.'' ^• ill. '( 121IA' G110WFItl
;3 1" r
f..4 w.. V 0000 _.. 0,r. 0000... .
1111 .40'0 /4.
CnA
0 40'2
ic
SOY
•
,TIOAfr
aR 512.4.
151.011 (34.18(44.0
9rn
204.44/C C. .014.
3100.
Ser 04 CRUSH BD
014314.. 0l C5N,PAc000
115T.45. 014100, ..
ri rr s-1 q& .%kl *IL. F !110/ RF 4TRIE'TE1R
MAf`?,I,A1.1, RD. - DR SEG4rIQT..j
61A61HG N0120
•
I. 04.,1410!1.0, tp4c1401 .0 wait 4,01 colt*,, 4 Ow 1110 3iaM0f !
l0 leper 411401 ono moAebJ 4400.:4+. n 11614,•411* 0,• 10300
AMA... untended 8* 0.101r of 1,010 41 Wd•V 050,14.10/ O0
C1.pla XL
L In.y pl.m30(104 1 *I 110 ban3.n olm..aw0010.8 000.0
d IM ..o1art. 41 4.041* ow 100000100,d drp1A d wading
ncir.11n.I.
3. 110 c0*00c1* J,OY p.1,1Por.641. 010.1..! cwdd.relbnl durap
01014 wort lncL.d..O 0.tch ,h0Ana pr 001* 044c14504040 .0.4 031
•4.11910.4*
•
1 Tho.n1M.a 4.aa n.0 401.r+Oca1•rytpolw ts.*o.oy 0/01'11
d✓..p.*4410.3041. to a1. plot.
L 4101444 wed 0144411. po...4 tun 010•01 0..011r,00lw
10110 ot1..•d *d OPow W M M .pour.
l 414..0101}0.0108040110b. con pat loot la 0.104....1.01111*01
WA:1nmI.0d* 61,0,044.040.1S.o WLL.30l: TM10;AO (,•c0
611100 epl4.4.01moblw 0..1.030, 00nal 0.0..4,.0 I3'. Wa0*.*,
1. C00-400*00n 1011001 be b.n Aa. m,1uc114., I1, 01 W 040000. 01
1 41 0001100010...ld 4.41 bt 000p0c1.0 b 1111.00 P1C*1.0.
0,40+101,010*....
1. I> bp. 4,04 ro1.*.•0OI 4010 M 14p.1 O10 nal 414044 x10
10 A*,0i10i4 *1.044 4.✓ b.1.pl 11 * o d 1.. *1.e.. .r..d ..d 0.410.
1004 ►• 0004m010 1. p..10dc 00a./.0, 041.,410 -
11. COA0*l* dal 1.r. ....•.14.14104. 000 0•n,.y.d h* 0.041.9
1011011.0 400.401 wew190, to arias .2* Mel f n.0.00y.
•
HATCHUNE SEE SHEET S5
r
Ag PAN
---r--------------------
Fr- •
2-48 \ d
•
N
2-45
J
•
;b
e$
14: a6
2-65
2-62 \ \
2-81 - 2-80
SEE -S
SOLE M TELT
ISOM
• WOO
COCIOE ROW
• I0040
• MOM VOL
T 1•m a7
O an 101
O flat 11010[
O IMMO =O..CT
1030•
IP rat can ax
VP 1n •iR
0C TAS ar
41— ar MOO
o-yf lar rot
�--' 110 MI 1000
OTOn •T
e 110100 n[
— MOO MCI
.010•.001
• MO MS OQ
• MOOT o • MC
• o NS
• IWO CVO 197
X 10 11 MI U:
CI ICI It
X Vel WO
10••2.0•
0 an WO
ac aauo
00 •009N1t
CO 0310e• ..00T WOO d
O 00 WANG
R
14. =A
PO POO 0/ ICOVEC
c 1O.m0
ROM
OU
• Us10 7 00
TI*
1
•O L N0.
01:00000 POL.,
✓ 000140
II n•m NU
••v3
----.� IOLM U[
AS -BUILT OFFSET CODE
V7.T h1401001003 91004 OSCC M 770[017
ODOR M 7*00000M 051006 10 04 000010
UK TUT M AY1•15.7 RAMI 10 •TA 74.1 1
uR W11101. VRT 40100123 1110.2,7900
TOE 7•GKMT 00•2R 7K POV0100A/11 011010 TO
1117 7.2011[ Vrt Vol 7K 0-110.7 I0AAA[ Ua
017900 RA01 3 10030UK1
R 0.•.T
rPLANT 2 & NORTH DUWAMISH CAMPUS
ALTA SURVEY
Yrs
66rcri- N
Gl2,s. - I C ScAL
20
10
20
40
60
SCALE IN FEET
- p 1 13oD tAit\ le)
011
MOM [FIAT 10YD1
MONKS
OSSCRIPTION Of LOCATION
MAIM 7.4. ti l ••
..tl.t .1 ...IAA..,
• ..t C..1.r.
MAIN 14.97 • .a I••
ulialolP .r Ilse/ Sas .1Al A..I
..A. .d I. TSOOI. liel
. AIA of a.0000g S 0.1..
1AI42 24.17 . m 1111
,e r •.d .1 r.l el
.
7...1 .ISA_:r ted lda:
•
VICINITY MAP
•
w
2-5
2-41
2-40
2-44
2-45
2-49
2-51
1 2-641
2-65
2-66
0
2 -72 1
2-7! 2-81
PROJECT SITE
SCALE: NONE
2-84
2-117
2-116
9
2-55 0
2-62
O� 06
110
0
0
a
\ 2-1090
9 \\
IQ
z
GATE B-18
SITE ACCESS
%r/
• •
LOCATION IN REGION
ISSAQUAH
PROJECT
SITE
SCALE: NONE KENT
•
MATCHUNE SEE SHEET S5
2-48
snbs
IOUIo
COMTE MAC
• 1000 WU
OUTT OP
o MOT MU
O SION I L
O WOW SOO room
r IOW N
POST MOO= WA
W MLK
CAS WLTt
Off WWI
IOR Pal
IaPPFt PQd IVT -OR
UAI1 Pall
o [1LR0[ Pal
-. RALR20 VITOl
.00000:01
• MAC /NS6 OTOT
o ONO[R TOP 1 CPS
. Poi ME
• Roe MOM O►
X SET P[ Wu to
o Tzt QM 1 uP
X DOIatoo
ATT•o4Toa
a ala sum
Tyic maim
as on or Rau
O10 EL.11000. •ITTAMT PSTIPCT Tat
o as EMKO
NIS NOT TO SOLE
POS POR V EaMIC
Pio PER NUM TRURO
41 On E SWILL Pri0 PID[
PPS 0000
4a at POR 6 IMMO
IID UDEIOOPa POPQ
✓ ISIgpIATiD
V RAM POI
EY
AS -BUILT OFFSET CODE
OFFSET 1EASYTdEITS 91001 PISIOE THE POMPOM
OOIOTE TI PQOE100JM *STAMM 10 TME PROPERTY
UNE TWAT INC AS -WMT FEATURE UES •T4.1 RANT 2.
W TAT[ RANTER. KISET VEAAIPtEYENTS 01103 WT90E
TWE PROPERTY 0(NOTE THE PERPOIODAAR OSTAIICE TO
TWE PROPCRtt UNE THAT TWE AS -00.1 FEATURE ICS
OITSOE PLANT S 0QM0MK5.
PLANT 2 & NORTH DUWAMISH CAMPUS
ALTA SURVEY
"-='•
--
•
VICINITY MAP
2-
2-41
2-40
2-44
2-49
2-66
2-51
2-64
2-65
0
2-62
2-45
2-55;
oa
° al
2-72
2-71 2-81 lio
0
\
PROJECT SITE
SCALE: NONE
2-84
2—\117
2-116
0
\ 2-1090
GATE B-18
SITE ACCESS
4z?
•
•
LEGEND:
I
I
I
I
I
I
GENERAL NOTES:
I
I
1
1
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
JORGENSEN STEEL
"'
tot
\
152
141
X
taw
X
14.4
% 142
I 147
-•••--•-
141 36-A
32,40 a
4142
/ /�C
4s
115 A?
1' •
"'
1 •
/ t 12.2
m
Z.3 .
ul
e
0
'^
CONSTRUCTION NOTES:
1
1
IU
/../
14.2liee
/
14.111 141 / `
/ 1U
1]S 111 /••.
1 16, 8 36-B ,'
/ Sq
390 SQ •
,% •/,..ft.o0
j172
1M 114p
rte/
110/I" Z •1`
112
'
/
/
13.2
I
113
rI
------T ---- --
2<71
12.1
12.1
`~`,
171 ,~~`.
1
12.7
12.7
8,427
I
1
1
10 0 20 40 60
1
/20
144 'µ1
1
SCALE IN FEET
i.iiIIII:
/ 1>s
1
C
Cib
CIS
C14
C13
C12
C11
C10
i 3.067
I
c26
as
a4
C23
C22
a,
c20
C19
c,a
Iu
"' ; 36-C I ! '
cis
C34
C33
C32
C31
c30
a9
c2e
C27
133
C43
C42
C41
ca
c39
/ 9,141 SQ.FT. Icu
CR
C37
cis
mac—--_--�_ t L
Ker PIAN
MATCH UNE - CONTP1l,ATIoN SEE SHEET c25 ta4 gat
m
w
r•ao
ow
ow
de
w
woo
oat
ACCEPTASUTT
`t1.97
00 0001 MOM
a
TOP O ANO SURVEY
U+dwum
=FOAM II SPIICD
era.
Mg
ArierEAIOW
IMMO a.
OM.
OM
C 1 7
.
FACIUrES DEPARTMENT
vm®
A
PLANT 2
MP a
COW 1s
CML VASTER COL PLT 2
"•" 270-CI7
•
•
• •
•
LEGEND:
DUWAMISH COMMERCIAL WATERWAY
— a— cram sEITR
—911— SWART SEM
—R— ROOF 0R
GENERAL NOTES:
1st/24- ouw L ON
N. x -I30
CP
W. 1.43
...3'-773
NII. -13 ,
CUITN1 /ft)
wI
`
110.32-268110.32-268 (i. .14)
-
DN. 5311
<2jsz
X 70_
2-50
„1 .:. ICU X11
119.13-770
O
_
8OU6NLN 1 OUIFHI
PC�
W. 0.22
W.5.45 ..
OH
1.1
M M. oR2
IP 1221 N/Ca
BOT 9
4. 60
"”' " 1z,u
CONSTRUCTION NOTES:
IP Ill
NNS 11.13
X774 SOT 1a4
PRO 1427-1
11•s-61 w u
FL ILA
�17.t0
R u
4
IN IL LIS
1.73
NL.34-230
�yF•�•
ROI
vc^
SO WS
\ ♦♦
\
v
♦ \ N. \ \
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
\\\
\ \ \
\\)1
41 \
wW II t./
R 236
116.34-231
C9-1
/ INAl..,
2-49
i0 10 0 20 40 60
IN
� M.•per/"
BOT 9.7
SCKE I" FEET
_
1
C297M
C295
C294
0293
C292
0291
c 90
2-66
I
C306
0703
C304
0303
c702
0301
000
cog
0290
P
El
C315
C314
C313
0312
0311
C310
C309
0360
C307
p
0324
C323
0322
C321
0320
C311
C310
0317
C311
MATCH
LRNE- CONTINUATION
SEE SHEET 41313 tad s'.K
R
NMI
,.
IlfIll
R
M,
d
I
MOM
R
1.1"11
STCRMISANRARY, SEWER
WOK WPM WOW -OA POOL Ie
14ua
770®
-
MIC MX
40
1101
.,.�..
.><
R
1...0.
C296
OLBOE/ARO'
tows
PLANT 2
CML WSIER DOL RT 2
r 7:04291
•
• • • •
r__
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
I
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
i
1
1
1
L_
LAI
!IMP IMP IMMO MO
w
.61.10/01
ea
6111
IMP MP 01•611,
WOO
MP MD -- --4MIMMO
-- 411.1, --Mino
-- -- -- -- --
JORGENSEN STEEL
•
6f
64
0.AFIGIE7A112•
11•• 411M11• IMP MP IMP IMP
ACCEPUBKiiY
114 OQK11 MAO
66:6021161s /16674D
l�W01>1r1��
Qom'
1
_J
LEGEND:
GENERAL NOTES:
CONSTRUCTION NOTES:
20 10 0 20 40 60
11125
SCALE IN FEET
=11116
11125
14124
11115
11114
11113
11112
11111
11110
11123
11122
11121
11120
11119
11118
11135
11134
11133
11132
14131
11130
11129
11126
11127
11144
1114.3
11142
11141
14140
11139
11136
11137
11136
0101.16/7
6111161J1
PLUMBING
60100 M OM 0116
2
wwa m
166
PLANT 2
14EoNNPx WSTER COI.
0.606 666.06
KEY PIAN ID
IOU s o6
261601.6.a
sa
M117
AU
PLT 2 °YD a 2.VO-11117
DUWAMISH COMMERCIAL WATERWAY
I -J
0
- UNE
1
\ • \ �\ \ \ ♦ \ \ \ \
•
\ \ \
\ \ \
\\ \\ \\
0•-1-1/2'C
_ r _ —
1-1/2 6 (A)
2-66
a
SOUTH AREA EMERGENCY SHUTOFF
•:u,.ru 1,
1 1 /2'G (A)
0
1' PROPANE (A)
t sA
.�v
1' PROPANE (A)
b
1 ACEMENE (A)
6�-
1 1/2'G (A) \\
1-I/YG
I I/2'G (A)
MATCH LINE-COPRINUATION SEE SHEET M124
OD 1=0
2 1/2'G (A).
2-1I/2'G."
6'C(A)
6'G(A)
2-49
2 1/2"G
6'G(A)
1 I/2'C (A)
I'G (A)
_—_ OM OM
NO NM
41=1
1'G
1'0 (A)
<
20 10 0 20 40 60
SCALE IN FEET
11117
1/a 11115
11126
11125
11114
11113
1/112
11111
11110
11124 11123
11122
11121
11120
11119
11118
11135
11134
1/133 11132
11131
11130
11129
11128
11127
11144
11143
11142 11141
11140
11139
11138
14137
1/136
KEY PLAN
MOM
sr
r01041/
ra
sir
wmlo
awre UPait
?JUG
OLIFArEZIVAG
ACCEPGBILIIY
Da MEN AND/OR
Vicetttca II WOO=
Varliat
Yl Y 1't{.ii
PLUMBING
A10.1.341:1
0121.
OAR
1ECIPIHEAL IMSTER
PLANT 2
COL X -2/1T -X PL/JR 2
M116
JCS
COW la
2-1'0-11116
•
• SINOP MEND 0•1110 =IN 411110 OMER IMMO. 41M11. AIM, MIND • 4=1111
JORGENSEN STEEL
k
LEGEND:
—si.— sm SEWER
f
—vs— SN(T RY SEWER
a ROOF DRAIN
1
REFERENCE DRAWINGS:
2 -YD -0554
GENERAL NOTES:
1. FOR GENERAL NOTES SEE SNIT C2.
1 ',
MN
12.9
76.76-154
SOIIN-6
ROA1
116
CB -I
RIM 1
IN 10.6
NV N 10.60
NS 10.60
BOT 9.9
Ne.36-709
C8 TYPE 1
NN 10.0
1
1
MATCH UNE -CONTINUATION SEE SHEET 0305
oll•Mo MOM MOM
CONSTRUCTION NOTES:
20 10 0 20 40 60
SCALE IN FEET
0296
0295
0294
C293
C292
C291
0290
C306
0305
C304
C303
C302
C301
C300
C299
C298
C315
C314
C31.3
C312
C311
0310
0309
0308
0307
C324
0323
0322
0321
0320
0319
C318
C317
C316
�PUN
.t
Harris Group k c.
97-1142
Kira
811•0110
02
STY
IMMO
OW
COMM 6 PO= 4117219/
z1•
primezvar•
ACCEPTABILITY
tls tksa 810/01
rawcala 6 warp
.•03.60 to OWL ops
eNGO. COIOOOt
biwaan
1113.7
12444
STORM 1 SANITARY SEWER
972196
xe02 soft
2-6.99
,26.66
LISA
1t6"6
111E
CML MASTER
PLANT 2 YARD
C297
Jr NM
972196
RAM 2 'K
2 -YD -0297