Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA E97-0010 - US WEST COMMUNICATIONS - RAINIER VIEW COMMUNITY CLUB MONOPOLEUS WEST WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS RAINIER VIEW COMMUNITY CLUB MONOPOLE ON PROPERTY 10915 51ST AVE. S. E97-0010 AFFIDAVIT I, Ar1V1ut-LF []Notice of Public Hearing O Notice of Public Meeting []Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet Board of Appeals Agenda Packet LIPlanning Commission Agenda Packet Short Subdivision Agenda Packet Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit LJ Shoreline Management Permit was mailed to each of the following addresses on 1- OF DISTRIBUTION hereby declare that: kl)Determination of Non- significance 0 Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice Li Notice of Action Official Notice 0 Other []Other (eE T ACNEb SEE - Name of Project U7 ViGr ODINIAVW ICA -(I' S ignature File Number \ft ' (90 10 'N-9"11\ AA -At-- AFFIDAVITOF DISTRIBUTION i, 5yLYIA / VlW- -Ei V hereby declare that: O Notice of Public Hearing O Notice of Public Meeting flBoard of Adjustment Agenda Packet Board of Appeals Agenda Packet Planning Commission Agenda Packet LI Short Subdivision Agenda Packet []Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit LI Shoreline Management Permit was 4wWaleti to each of the following FAXE6 13AK,6AZA Ei JAnlbo i TI (L Nor c. Si 6S96 Determination of Non- significance Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice Notice of Action Official Notice Other Other addresses on -7--1-x`7 . Name of Project LLS iAir6-1- l_QA/Adi ignature > n ' `c' ► r u:a""- File Number �7 " ®n ro • i CITY OF TUKWILA DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: 60 FT MONOPOLE ON SE CORNER OF PARCEL PROPONENT: US WEST COMMUNICATIONS LOCATION OF PROPOSAL, INCLUDING STREET ADDRESS, IF ANY: ADDRESS: 10915 51 AV S PARCEL NO: 687420-1130 SEC/TWN/RNG: LEAD AGENCY: CITY OF TUKWILA FILE NO: E97-0010 The City has determined that the proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 4.21c.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. ✓ *****•k**k**********************k**'k*kk*•k*•k***•k***k'k•k'k***•k***•k``•k'k�,*• k• k•kk*k'k*•k** :3(4_This determination is final and signed this _`_ day of 41\ 1992. Steve LancasterrResponsible Official City of Tukwila, (206) 431-3670 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the Department of Community Development. To: From: Date: Re: City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Com 1 unity Development Steve Lancaster, Director MEMORANDUM Steve Lancaster Michael Jenkins July 2, 1997 E97-0010, SEPA review on application by US West for a 60 foot monopole at 10915 - 51st Ave S. Project Description: This SEPA review is for a proposal to locate a 60 foot monopole on the southwest corner of 10915 - 51st Ave S. The Rainier View Community Center is currently located at this property. The proposed development will include a monopole accompanied by ground cabinets located on a 114 sq. ft. concrete pad. Three (3) antennae array will be affixed to the top of the monopole with 2 antennas mounted on each array. A twelve inch Global Positioning System (GPS) antennae will be mounted on the center of the pole and a three (3) foot lightning rod will be located atop the tower. The total height with all components will be 63 feet. The monopole will be used to transmit telecommunication signals. Agencies with jurisdiction: None Comments to SEPA checklist: Pg. 1, section A: Pg 3, section 1: Pg. 4, section 3: Pg 5, section 4: Pg. 7, section 8: Pg. 9, section 14: Pg. 10, section 16: A Building Permit, Conditional Use Permit and Variance will be required. A land altering permit may be required The geotechnical report submitted by applicant needs to address existing sanitary sewer line on west side of property to comply with city codes and to ensure no negative impact on existing sewer due to construction. Geotechnical report must also address any potential settlement that may occur that would affect sewer system. Trees and shrubs with evasive root system are not allowed within 30 feet of public sewer or drain pipe, per TMC 14.12 Project must comply with all development requirements in TMC Title 18. Project must maintain required parking and access, per TMC 18.56, Off-street parking and loading requirements. Project must comply with Tukwila Undergrounding Code, TMC 13.08 6300 Southcenter Boulevar4 Suite #100 ° Tukwila, Washington 98188 ° (206) 431-3670 0 Fax (206) 431-3665 E97-0010 SEPA Checklist for AT&T Wireless monopole July 2, 1997 • • Summary of Primary Impacts: • Earth Slope is less than 1% on project site. Soils are generally medium dense to dense, with fine to medium sand with traces of silt and gravel. No unstable soils known in area. Minimum grading will be required for site preparation and may require a Land Altering Permit, if grading is in excess of 50 cubic yards. Will require compacting of 12 inches of soil to accommodate equipment pad. no impervious surfaces to be added to lot. • Air Incidental vehicle emission will occur during construction. No emissions will be generated by facility. • Water No work will be required on or over surface waters. No ground waters will be altered or diverted. Runoff from project will follow existing and natural drainage pattern. • Plants Evergreen trees and shrubs are located onsite. Applicant has proposed additional plantings to screen ground equipment. Any plantings with potentially invasive root system are not allowed within 30 feet of any public sewer, per Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) 14.12 • Animals No known endangered species on site. Development will not impact known habitats. • Energy/Natural Resources Electrical energy will be used for operation of radio base station and cooling equipment. • Environmental Health No know environmental hazards are associated with this project. Health risks associated with telecommunications systems are exempt from environmental review, pursuant to state and federal law. Incidental noise may be produced during construction. E97-0010 SEPA Checklist for AT&T Wireless monopole July 2, 1997 • Land/Shoreline Use Development is located in High Density Residential (HDR) zone. Current use of property is for Rainier View Community Center, operated by Kubota Gardens. Community Center facility is located in a one-story structure. No demolition will occur to accommodate development, however parking spaces adjacent to site will be removed to accommodate monopole and associated ground equipment. Additional landscaping has been proposed on perimeter of facility to screen ground equipment. 60 foot monopole will require approval of a variance from the 45 foot height limit in the HDR zone, as well as approval of the Conditional Use Permit application filed in conjunction with this SEPA. The proposed structure may be incompatible with surrounding residential and other land uses due to its height, as the proposed monopole exceeds the maximum height allowed in its zone. Such compatibility issues will be addressed through the Conditional Use Permit process applied for concurrently with this SEPA. • Housing No housing is proposed nor will development reduce housing. • Aesthetics The total height of the pole is 63 feet, comprised of a 60 foot metal pole with a 3 foot lightening rod attached to the top of the pole. Also include with the project are ground equipment, which are located in the rear of the site, adjacent to the pole with vegetative screening proposed. No specific provisions have been made by applicant in their underlying Conditional Use Permit application to mitigate aesthetic impacts of the 60 foot monopole. However, the applicant must meet all criteria outlined in TMC 18.64, Conditional Use Permits, as they pertain to mitigation of visual impacts., and comply with Tukwila Comprehensive Plan Policy 12.1.36 requiring utilities to minimize visual impacts of facilities where technically feasible. • Light and Glare None known • Recreation No known impact on recreation facilities or uses at Rainier View Community Center • Historic/Cultural Preservation No known places or landmarks. E97-0010 SEPA Checklist for AT&T Wireless monopole July 2, 1997 • . • Transportation The access to the development will be off 51st Ave S., through the parking lot for Rainier View Community Center. One vehicle trip per month is anticipated for service and maintenance. Bollards will be placed around site to protect it from on- site traffic. Development will have to comply with the following requirements in Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) 18.56, Off-street parking and loading requirements: 1. A minimum of 14 parking spaces (30% may be devoted to Compact Parking). 2. One loading space for a commercial use (TMC 18.56.060) 3. A handicapped parking space (TMC 18.56.080) 4. Bicycle parking and an appropriate location (TMC 18.56.130) 5. All turning and maneuvering space to be located on private property, unless specifically approved by the BAR or Public Works Director (TMC 18.56.040(5)(b)) 6. All driveways to rear parking at least 12 feet in width with a minimum of a three foot sidewalk adjoining the building and raised at least 6 inches (TMC 18.56.040(5)(d)) 7. All off-street parking or loading facilities shall be paved (10.56.050(7)(a)) A street use permit will also be required for any construction or development activities in the right-of-way. • Public Services Proposed development will not impact or require specific public services. • Utilities The facility will be served by Seattle City Light and US West Communications. No overhead wires are allowed for project, per TMC 13.08 Summary The project will require approval of the following permits: • Variance from height limits in the HDR zone • Conditional Use Permit • Land Altering Permit • Development Permit • Street Use Permit for work in Right -of -Way E97-0010 SEPA Checklist for AT&T Wireless monopole July 2, 1997 The project will also have to comply with the following Municipal Codes • TMC 13.08, Tukwila Undergrounding Code • TMC 14.12, Trees and Shrubbery obstructing sewers • TMC 18.56, Off-street Parking and Loading requirements Recommendations: DNS CITY OF TUKWILA • 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Telephone: (206) 431-3670 AFFIDAVIT OF INSTALLATION AND POSTING OF PUBLIC INFORMATION SIGNS) State of Washington County of King City of Tukwila I Ma revs U4^d kr (Print Name) understand that Section 18.104.110 of the Tukwila Municipal Code requirea me to post the property no later than fourteen (14) days following the issuance of the Notice of Completeness. I certify that b/ iv ^Q 17) 1991 the Public Notice Board(s) in accordance with Section 18.104.110 and other applicable guidelines were posted on the property located at 1091 S' Silt' Ave. .S. so as to be clearly seen from each right -of -way providing primary vehicular access to the property for application file number l-.'17 I; L. ci — 0,0 E`t7 - 00 ( 0 SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this /7 day of ��u & , 191?___ Affiant (Applicant Signature) NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington residing at My commission expires on dd.", RECEIVED JUN 1.8 1997 COMMUNITY - DEVELOPMENT CITY OF TUKWILA NOTICE OF APPLICATION PROJECT INFORMATION U.S. West Communications, by The Walter Group, has filed a SEPA environmental checklist for a proposed 60 foot Monopole with supporting ground equipment, for the establishment of a Personal Communication System (PCS) Base Station, to be located at 10915 - 51st Ave. S, Tukwila, WA. Permits applied for include: a Conditional Use Permit A Variance Other known required permits include: O Building Permit A Land Altering Permit Studies required with the applications include: a Geotechnical Report FILES AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC REVIEW The project files are available at the City of Tukwila Department of Community Development (DCD), 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100, Tukwila, WA. Project Files include: Variance; Conditional Use Permit; SEPA checklist, with supporting documents OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT Your written comments on the project are requested. They must be delivered to DCD at the address above or postmarked no later than 5:00 P.M., July 21, 1997. APPEALS You may request a copy of any decision, information on hearings, and your appeal rights by calling DCD at 431-3670. For further information on this proposal, contact Michael Jenkins at 431-3685 or visit our offices at 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100, Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Our telephone number is 431-3670 Application Filed: April 15, 1997 Notice of Completeness Issued: June 4, 1997 Notice of Application Issued: June 16, 1997 City of Tu�cwila • 6200 Southcenter Boulevard • Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433-1800 TO. M i -e _ - MEMORANDUM FROM• J04141..16 5IEIJC E12, DATE. 6.023-R-7 SUBJECT• (,LS k)Q5t COM YY t -1,a, Milt 0Lits /Mom E 9 7— 001 0 5EPR - 0021 A -R 14tu L-°7- DoZZ 110964 51,1 -Ave 5 s .'The, C-� eote i . ft,e f etl(o; ig c c�.�...d Oc �q I ' % 0 A,'de I'LL- pk :Th e r ort �.4,t .,:- V ` rn . L L gddvess rote4471-Acz da' i 2 AATIV o ccs- (I *, ► (�0 4. r TMC 14. l2.20o CT es AN() s laus8eit' oesnuterw6 sEL ESS) TREE51511x444s idirpt E ✓45/ ye R-oo.- s Ys rE"1 ,91eE Nor /9.44_014E0 kg/rill" 3o Fr 01N7 /P- wl/Sl.i G 5E44Ct2 43#2,9-/A) p/PE 5H73. A -I /»Jb L _/ SHif[.t BE 2EY/sED 1 City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION June 4, 1997 Marcus Handler The Walter Group 1109 First Ave, Suite 205 Seattle, WA 98101 Re: Conditional Use Permit Application, with Variance and SEPA, for 60 foot Monopole at 10915 - 51st Ave S., File Number L97-0021 (Variance), L97-0022 (CUP) and E97-0010 (SEPA) Dear Mr. Handler: Your applications, as referenced above, have been found to be complete on June 4, 1997 for the purposes of meeting state mandated time requirements. The next step is for you to install the notice board on the site within 14 days of the date of this letter. You received information on how to install the sign with your application packet. If you need another set of those instructions, you may obtain them at the Department of Community Development (DCD). Also, you must obtain a laminated copy of the Notice of Application and Notice of Threshold Determination to post on the board. These notices are available at DCD. After installing the sign with the laminated notice, you need to return the signed Affidavit of Posting to the our office. This determination of complete application does not preclude the ability of the City to require that you submit additional plans or information, if in our estimation such information is necessary to ensure the project meets the substantive requirements of the City or to complete the review process. I will be contacting you soon to discuss this project. If you wish to speak to me sooner, feel free to call me at 431-3685. Sincerely, Michael Jenkins Assistant Planner cc: Reviewing City Departments 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 Dow A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project: USWEST PCS Site SEA003 2. Name of Applicant: USWEST Communications - Wireless 3. Mailing address, phone number of applicant and contact person: Applicant: Contact Person: Dave Wernli Marcus Handler or Russ Stromberg USWEST Communications - Wireless The Walter Group 450 110th Ave. NE 1109 First Avenue, Suite 205 Bellevue, WA 98004 Seattle, WA 98101 (206) 451-6183 (206) 467-8704 Architect: Bechtel Design Engineering Ed Jenckes, Field Construction Manager 8140 Old Highway 99 Tumwater, WA 98501 (360) 352-7917 4. Date checklist prepared: 3/10/97 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Immediate construction when approved. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansions, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. One additional panel antenna per sector may be added at some future time should network traffic needs indicate that additional capacity is required. Additional growth cabinet may be added on the pad (additional pad will not be required.) 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared directly related to this proposal. A geotechnical report has been prepared. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. Not known. 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. RECEIVED Building Permit, SEPA review, FAA review and Conditional Use PermityvattikwiLA Variance. APR 1 5 1997 PERMIT CENTER 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. USWEST proposes a wireless telecommunications at 10915 51st Ave. South, in the City of Tukwila. USWEST will construct a PCS wireless communications facility consisting of a sixty foot (60') tall metal monopole with a base diameter of approximately three feet with a 3' lightning rod affixed atop the monopole. USWEST will install three (3) arrays of two (2) antennas (a total of six [6] antennas)mounted on the top of the monopole. A 12" G.P.S. antenna is to be mounted in the center of the pole. USWEST's base station equipment cabinets will be mounted on grade (concrete pad 9'6" x 12'). The entire site will be surrounded by parking bollards and a hedge on one side. 12. Location of proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If the proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range of boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. Kubota Gardens is located at 10915 51st Ave. South in the city of Tukwila state of Washington. 13. Assessor Parcel Number: 687420-1130 B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep, slopes, mountains, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? The slope is less than 1% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example: clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Subsurface conditions consist of 4 inches of asphalt concrete overlying medium dense to dense, fine to medium sand with a trace of silt and occasional gravel. The sand was encountered to the bottom of the boring. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, explain No. e. Describe the purpose, type and approximately quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source in fill. Minimal grading will be required, for the site is located on a relatively flat surface. The equipment will be supported on a concrete slab -on -grade which measures 9'6" x 12'. Equipment Toads are expected to be about 3,200 pounds. To reduce potential differential movement of the equipment slab the natural soils will be compacted to a firm and unyielding condition and 4 to 6 inches of crushed rock will be placed to support the slab grade. The upper 12 inches of the natural soils and any new fill placed for the slab support will be compacted to a minimum of 95% of the maximum density defined by ASTM D1557. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction or use? If so, generally describe. Very limited erosion is possible and will be controlled; while the monopole and equipment cabinets are placed on the existing hardtop. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surface after project construction (for example: asphalt or buildings)? The site will add not add any impervious surface to the lot. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Not applicable. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities, if known. Incidental vehicle emissions from construction vehicles. No emissions are generated by the operation of the facility. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any. Not applicable. 3. Water a. Surface: 1. Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream and river it flows into. No. 2. Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within feet) the described waters? If, yes please describe and attach available plans. No. 3. Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. Not applicable. 4. Will the proposal requires surface water withdraws or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. No. 5. Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year flood plan. If so, note location on the site plan. Unknown. 6. Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. b. Ground: 1. Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. 2. Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: domestic sewage; industrial, agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the systems(s) are expected to serve. No. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1. Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) the method of collection and disposal, if any (including quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this flow into other waters? If so, describe. Runoff to follow natural drainage pattern. 2. Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any. Not applicable. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other X evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine other X shrubs pasture crop or grain wet solid plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? No. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any. The site is located on the edge of a parking lot, therefore no landscaping is proposed. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other b. List any threatened or endangered species to be on or near the site. None known. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Not known. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any. Not applicable. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kind of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood, stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electrical energy will be used for operation of radio base station equipment and cooling fan. Backup batteries will be used for emergency power. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. c. What kind of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any None. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazard waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, explain. No. If any 1. Describe special emergency services that might be required. None required. 2. Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, b. Noise None required. 1. What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? None. 2. What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the projection a short-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Incidental noise associated with construction will be short term. 3. Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any. None proposed. Construction noise impact is minimal. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The site is currently used as an office for Kubota Gardens. Adjacent properties are either raw land or distant houses. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Not known. c. Describe any structures on the site. One 1 -story structure is currently on the property. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? HDR f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Unknown. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the Not applicable. g. site? h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area. If so, specify. Unknown. Approximately how may people would reside or work in the completed project. None. The site is unmanned. Maintenance visits would be approximately one per quarter. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any?` Not applicable. I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any. Additional landscaping is to be placed on the southern perimeter of the facility, currently landscaping is on the western edge of the lot and a building is toward the east. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high middle or low-income housing. Not applicable. b. Approximately how may units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Not applicable. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any. Not applicable. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principle exterior building material(s) proposed? The steel monopole is 60' high with a 3' lightning rod attached to the top.. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None known. The visual footprint is minor, which would only slightly alter any view across from the property. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any. None proposed. 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? None. views? b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with No. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control Tight and glare impacts, if any? None proposed. 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Not applicable. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any? Not applicable. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe? No. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural impotence known to be on or next to the site? None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any. Not applicable. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The site has access through 51st Ave. South. b. Is site currently serviced in public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Unknown. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? No parking will be added or eliminated. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rain, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. One vehicle trip per quarter is anticipated for maintenance purposes, otherwise, facility is unattended. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any. Parking bollards will be placed about the facility to avoid interference with parking lot traffic. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Not applicable. 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other: b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Seattle City Light and USWEST telephone service. C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature of Proponent/Applicant: The Walter Group Agent for the Applicant Date r'- > May 6, 1997 • City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director NOTICE OF INCOMPLETE APPLICATION Marcus Handier The Walter Group 1109 First Ave, Suite 205 • Seattle, WA 98101 RE: Application by U.S. West for a Cellular Tower at 10915 - 51st Ave S., including SEPA (E97-0010), Variance (L97-0021) and Conditional Use Permit (L97-0022) • Dear Mr. Handler: Your application for a Conditional Use Permit, Variance, with supporting SEPA Checklist, as referenced above, has been found to be incomplete. In order for this application to be determined as complete, the following must be submitted to the Department of Community Development: PUBLIC WORKS a. A copy of the Geotechnical Report listed in SEPA application, due to the location • of a City Sewer line near the proposed development. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT a. 6 additional sets of plans for SEPA application b. A separate Landscape Plan prepared by a licensed Washington State Landscape Architect. c. One, set of mailing labels comprised of two labels per address are required for each application. Only one set was submitted, therefore two more sets are required for the three applications submitted. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 May 6, 1997 Marcus Handler Re: Cell Tower at 10915 - 51st Ave. S. Page Two Upon receipt of these items, the City will re -review them for completeness and will mail you written notification of completeness or incompleteness within 14 days. These applications will expire if we do not receive the additional information within ninety days of the date of this letter unless an extension is granted pursuant to Section 18.105.070(E). A hearing is currently scheduled on this application before the Planning Commission on June 26, 1997. To ensure that this spot is held, the materials requested in this letter must be submitted prior to May 23, 1997. If these materials have not been received by this date, you most likely will be rescheduled for a hearing in July or August, depending on availability. If you have any questions, my telephone number is 431-3685. JoAnna Spencer, the Development Engineer for Public Works, can be reached at 433-0179. Sincerely, Michael Jenkins Assistant Planner cc: Reviewing City Departments c:\rnsoffice...reports19721 incm.doc CITY OFOJKWILA • DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431-3670 ZONING CODE VARIANCE (P -VAR) APPLICATION _'#' Fg :FO'SRSY AF<rFg U- SEO.. : • Planne -;.,::,-. PmT` f . ZR. N� eNu{f�"be• ! i - OO y1 4S.. >.S> „ aproje'ctFle# .// " .`ReceiptNumb,er. Zi 9; ,NL3 her F.@i #• . .: .022.. i,.`:411,i,,,,,,,,,li, ;.•° -'..!;10::,:o . Applicatin Complete Date. 0!Applicationincompiete (Date: ; `: ;' :tch' £ f 4 c' bF ;;) ` Otfier`Flle #, ' ` A1 ©0 4c' 1. PROJECT BACKGROUND A. NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: USWEST Communications - Wireless Rainier View Community B. LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: STREET ADDRESS: 10915 51st Ave., S., Tukwila, WA ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER: 687420-1130 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Located on drawings. Quarter: SE Section: 03 Township: 23 Range: 05 (This information may be found on your tax statement) c. CONTACT: (Primary contact regarding the application, and to whom all notices and reports shall be sent) NAME: Marcus Handler ADDRESS: 1109 1st Ave.. Suite 205. Seattle, WA 98101 PHONE: 224-8317 SIGNATURE: DATE: Y- 7-Y?" RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA APR 1 5 1997 PERMIT CENTER ZCVCKLST.DOC 7/2/96 11. A. WHY IS THIS VARIANCE BEING REQUESTED? To construct a wireless communication facility. B. DOES YOUR REQUEST MEET THE VARIANCE CRITERIA? The Board of Adjustment will base its decision on the specific criteria shown below. You are solely responsible for justifying why your property should not have to satisfy the same development standards which all other properties/projects must meet. The Board must decide that your variance request meets all five criteria. On a separate sheet, respond to each of the of the five criteria. The Planning staff has provided some explanatory notes (in italics) to help you respond to each criteria. Please feel free to use or ignore these as you see fit. The Board will make a decision based on the five criteria, not staff explanatory notes. 1. The variance shall not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitation upon uses of other properties in the vicinity and in the zone in which the property on behalf of the application was filed is located. Explain how your requested variance would not give you a special privilege in your use of the property in relation to the requirements imposed on adjacent and neighboring properties and on properties within the same zone classification. 2. The variance is necessary because of special circumstances relating to the size, shape, topography, location or surrounding of the subject property in order to provide it with use rights and privileges permitted to other properties in the vicinity and in the zone in which the subject property is located. Does a special property characteristic such as size, shape or topography, combined with the zoning code requirement, prevent you from using your property in the manner of adjacent properties or other like -zoned properties? Special circumstances should not be due to: 1) actions by past or present properly owners (i.e., developing or subdividing property which results in an extremely difficult to build parcel) or paying more for property than was justified by its development potential; or 2) actions which have already been compensated for (i.e., the State condemns a portion of land for 1-5 construction and compensates the owner for the diminished value of the remaining parcel).. 3. The granting of such variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and in the zone in which the,subiect property is situated. Would granting your request cause any narm, injury, or interference with uses of adjacent and neighboring properties? (Consider traffic, views, light, aesthetic impacts, etc.) 4. The authorization of such variance will not adversely affect the implementation of the Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan. After review of the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan, list any inconsistencies between your variance and the Plan's goals, objectives or policies. 5. The granting of such variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant possessed by the owners of other properties in the same zone or vicinity. Without the variance, no uses for which your property is zoned (i.e., for a single-family residence or commercial site) would not be possible. Without the variance, rights of use of your property would not be the same as for other similarly zoned property. Describe other altematives for use of your property. Why were these alternatives rejected? ZCVCKLST.DOC 7/3/96 CITY OF TUKWILA DEPARTMEWr OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEE 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431-3670 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (P -CUP) APPLICATION FOR STAFF USE ONLY: ` Planner. FileNumber: Receipt Number: Protect File #: 0 Application Complete (Date: '. SEPA FJIe #i -:Application Incomplete (Date: Other File #•' I. PROJECT BACKGROUND A. NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: 'USWEST Communications - Wireless Rainier View Community B. LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: STREET ADDRESS: 10915 51 Ave . S . , Tukwila , WA ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER: 687420-1130 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Located on drawings Quarter: SE Section: 03 Township: 23 Range: 05 (This information may be found on your tax statement) c. CONTACT: (Primary contact regarding the application, and to whom all notices and reports shall be sent) NAME: Marcus Handler ADDRESS: 1109 1st Ave.., Suite 205, Seattle, WA 98101 PHONE: 224-8317 r� /�� 7/�G�'l SIGNATURE: 4G ('Y(' DATE: V- ? - "7 CUPCKLST.DOC 7/5/96 C lu A. PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY: Community Club USE REQUESTED (FROM LIST IN YOUR ZONING DISTRICT): B. PROPOSED CONDITIONAL Conditional Use Permit C. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED USE FOR EXAMPLE, DESCRIBE THE MANUFACTURING PROCESSES USED, WHOLESALE/RETAIL/WAREHOUSE FUNCTIONS, OUTSIDE STORAGE OF GOODS OR EQUIPMENT OR OTHER INFORMATION WHICH WILL FACILITATE UNDERSTANDING OF THE ACTIVITIES YOU PROPOSED TO DEVELOP ON THIS SITE): Construct -loam ofdwirplpss communication facility consisting of a 60' monopole with a 3' lightning rod attachedrnthe center of the pole. Six panel antenn will attached to the top of the pole. A 9'6" x 12' concrete pad will support two equipment cabinets with room left for two additional growth cabinets. The site will will be screened and protected by parkin bollards. D. WILL THE CONDITIONAL USE BE IN OPERATION ANDIOR A BUILDING TO HOUSE THE USE BE STARTED WITHIN A YEAR OF ISSUANCE OF THE PERMIT? Yes . E. ON A SEPARATE SHEET, DESCRIBE THE MANNER IN WHICH YOU BELIEVE THAT YOUR REQUEST FOR AN CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT WILL SATISFY EACH OF THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA AS SPECIFIED IN TMC 18.64.030. 1. The proposed use will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity of the proposed use or in the district in which the subject property is situated. 2. The proposed use shall meet or exceed the performance standards that are required in the district it will occupy. 3. The proposed development shall be compatible generally with the surrounding land uses in terms of traffic and pedestrian circulation, building and site design. 4. The proposed use shall be in keeping with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan. 5. All measures shall be taken to minimize the possible adverse impacts which the proposed use may have on the area in which it is located. CUPCKLST.DOC 7/5/96 .2064677108 Air GROUP INC F-45511132 P-002 RPR 03 '97 16:28 D. PROPERTY OWNER DECLARATION The undersigned makes the following statements based upon personal knowledge: 2t✓C12-eC-t-r* 1. I am the current owner of the property which is the subject of this application. 2 All statements contained in the application are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. ' 3 The application is being submitted with my knowledge and consent. I understand that conditions of approval, which the City and applicant have jointly agreed may not be completed prior to final approval of the construction (e.g., final building permit approval) will be incorporated into an agreement to be executed and recorded against the property prior to issuance of any construction permits. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington and the United States of America that the foregoing statement is true and correct. 6,3t--1®-rt(Y) cit , U J( b -g- (state), on EXECUTED at , 199L. .moi A- 1,0g c (Print Name) Po &X 55( 6L-Lt.)t-ct- (L% (Address) q- 1074 (Phone Number) (Signature) akie_,,, t„,4 -rOt_t_dbei_( /DA/ Use additional sheets as needed for all property owner signatures. •1.1-18-1996 12:30PM FROM BECHTEL SEATTLE BTA 360 352 5417 P.4 October 29, 1996 Bechtel Corporation 8140 Old Highway 99 Southeast Tumwater, Washington 98501 Attention: Mr. Scott Mutchnik Re: Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed US West Tower Site SEA -003 10915 - 51st Avenue South Seattle, Washington GeoEngineers Project No. 5408-001-01, Task 1 Terracon Project team has completed geotechnical engineering exploration for the proposed US West Tower Site SEA -003 to be located at 10915 - 51st Avenue South in Seattle Washington. A sketch showing the tower location was provided by Mr. Scott Mutchnik of Bechtel, a copy of which is attached as Figure 1. This study was performed in general accordance with the scope of work (Exhibit A) contained in the Terracon Project Team contract with Bechtel dated September 24, 1996. The purpose of these services is to provide geotechnical engineering recommendations for design of foundations and other earth connected phases of the project_ lierracon PROJECT TEAM 8410 - 1541h Avenue NE Redmond, Washington 98052 (206) 881.6000 Fax (206) 861.6050 I ------------------------ RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA MAY 2 3 1997 PERMIT CENTER Proposed Construction: As currently planned, construction on the site will include a monopole cellular transmission tower and ancillary support equipment. The proposed monopole tower will be approximately 60 feet in height and will be supported on a drilled shaft foundation system. Maximum vertical loading at the base of the tower will be in the range of 9 to 10 kips, the maximum lateral force will be 3 to 4 kips and maximum overturning moment will range from 130 to 140 foot - kips. Scope of Services: The scope of the services performed for this project included a subsurface exploration program, laboratory testing and engineering analyses. One test boring was drilled on the site at the location of the proposed monopole tower. Selected soil samples were tested for the following engineering properties: • Water content Dry Density Compression Expansion pH Resistivity Water soluble sulfate content GEOTECHNICAL, ENVIRONMENTAL AND MATERIALS ENGINEERS QUALM' ENGINEERING SINCE 1285 •11-18-1996 12:31PM FROM BECHTEL SEATTLE BTA 360 352 5417 P.5 Bechtel Corporation October 29, 1996 Page 2 Terracon Subsurface Exploration Conditions: We explored subsurface conditions by drilling one boring to a depth of 31.5 feet at the proposed monopole location. A continuous log of the test boring was recorded by our field representative during the drilling operations. At selected intervals, samples of the subsurface materials and penetration tests were taken by means of driving split -spoon samplers. The soils were classified in general accordance with the classification system described in Figure 2. A key to the boring log is presented in Figure 3. The boring log is presented in Figure 4. Ground water measurements were made in the test boring at the time of site exploration and immediately after drilling. As presented on the log of boring, subsurface conditions consist of 4 inches of asphalt concrete overlying medium dense to dense, fine to medium sand with a trace of silt and occasional gravel. The sand was encountered to the bottom of the boring. Ground water was not observed in the test boring at the time of field exploration, nor when checked immediately after drilling_ These observations represent only current ground water conditions, and may not be indicative of other times, or at other locations. Ground water levels can be expected to fluctuate with varying seasonal and weather conditions. LaboratoryTesting: Selected samples were tested to determine the natural moisture content and dry density of the soils. The results are presented on the boring log in Figure 4. Laboratory swell and consolidation test results indicate that the near surface soils are non -expansive and exhibit low compressibility at in-situ moisture contents. The consolidation test results are presented in Figure 5. The results of corrosion tests completed in general accordance with ASTM (American Society of Testing Materials) methods are summarized in the following table: Depth (feet) Soil Classification Corrosivity Test Results pH Resistivity (ohm -cm) Sulfates (ppm) • 5 SP 5.9 165,000 12 10 SP 5.9 190,000 5 -11-18-1996 12.31PM FROM BECHTEL SEATTLE BTA 360 352 5417 P.6 Bechtel Corporation October 29, 1996 Page 3 Terracon These values should be used to determine potential corrosive characteristics of the on-site soils with respect to contact with the various underground materials which will be used for project construction. Tower Foundation: As presently planned, the proposed monopole tower will be supported on a single drilled shaft foundation system. A straight shaft at least 24 inches in diameter, drilled a minimum of 20 feet into natural soils is recommended. For axial compression, the drilled shaft may be designed for a maximum end bearing pressure of 25,000 psf (pounds per square foot). Skin friction of 300 psf can be used in designing for either uplift or compression loads. These values include a factor of safety of at least 2.0. For lateral load and overturning design, passive earth pressures can be determined based on an equivalent fluid density of 420 psf/ft for soils along the shaft above any free water surface. Ground water levels shouldVgeneraliy be below the tip of the shaft. Therefore, we do not recommend any reduction in passive earth pressures for saturated soil conditions at this site. For calculation of lateral deflection, a coefficient of subgrade reaction, independent of shaft diameter, of 78 tsf (tons per square foot) may be used for the analysis. The soil modulus for the subgrade soils increases linearly with depth by an amount equal to the coefficient of subgrade reaction for each foot of depth. Lateral load design parameters are valid for maximum soil strain of five percent acting over a distance of one shaft diameter. The passive pressure, soil modulus and coefficient of subgrade reaction are ultimate values; therefore, appropriate factors of safety should be applied in the shaft design. Drilling to design depth should be possible with conventional single flight power augers. The hole will probably remain open without stabilizing measures. However, casing may be necessary in the upper medium dense soil zone and concrete should be placed immediately after completion of drilling and cleaning. Due to potential sloughing and raveling, foundation concrete quantities may exceed calculated geometric volumes. Concrete with slump in the range of 4 to 6 inches is recommended. Free -fall concrete placement in drilled shafts will not be acceptable. The use of a bottom -dump hopper, or a tremie pipe discharging near the bottom of the hole where concrete segregation will be minimized, is recommended. Shaft bearing surfaces must be cleaned prior to concrete placement. A representative of the geotechnical engineer should examine the bearing surface and shaft configuration. ..,11-18-1996 12:33PM FROM BECHTEL SEATTLE BTA 360 352 5417 GE! 85.85 Rev, 05/93 P. 10 SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM • MAJOR DIVISIONS GROUP SYMBOL GROUP NAME COARSE GRAINED SOILS More Than 50% Retained on No.200•Sieve - GRAVEL More Than 50% of Coarse Fraction Retained on No. 4 Sieve CLEAN GRAVEL GW WELL -GRADED GRAVEL FINE TO COARSE GRAVEL GP POORLY -GRADED GRAVEL GRAVEL WITH FINES GM _ SILTY GRAVEL GC �— CLAYEY GRAVEL SAND More Than 50% of Coarse Fraction Passes No. 4 Sieve CLEAN SAND SW WELL -GRADED SAND, FINE TO COARSE SAND _____.---- SP POORLY -GRADED SAND SAND WITH FINES SM _ SILTY SAND SC CLAYEY SAND FINE GRAINED SOILS SILT AND CLAY Liquid Limit Less Than 50 INORGANIC ML SILT �~ CL _ CLAY ORGANIC 01. ORGANIC SILT, ORGANIC CLAY More Than 50% Passes No_ 200 Sieve SILT AND CLAY Liquid Limit INORGANIC MH SILT OF HIGH PLASTICITY. ELASTIC SILT CH CLAY OF HIGH PLASTICITY. FAT CLAY 50 or More ORGANIC OH ORGANIC CLAY, ORGANIC SILT HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS PT PEAT NOTES: SOIL MOISTURE MODIFIERS: t . Field classification is based on visual examination of soil Dry - Absence of moisture. dusty. dry to the touch in general accordance with ASTM 02488-90. Moist • Damp, but no visible water 2. Soil classification using laboratory tests is based on ASTM D2487-90. Wet - Visible free water or saturated, usually soil is obtained from below water table 3. Descriptions of soil density or consistency are based on • interpretation of blow count data, visual appearance of soils, and/or test data. Geo ,,Engineers SOIL. CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM - — FIGURE 2 ••.11-18-1996 12:34PM FROM BECHTEL SEATTLE BTA 360 352 5417 P. 11 8 LABORATORY TESTS: AL CP CS DS GS 0/0F HA SK SM MD SP TX UC CA Atterberg limits Compaction Consolidation Direct shear Grain - size Percent fines Hydrometer analysis Permeability Moisture content Moisture and density Swelling pressure Triaxial compression Unconfined compression Chemical analysis BLOW-COUNT/SAMPLE DATA: Biows required to drive a 2.4 -inch I.D. split -barrel sampler 12 inches or other indicated distances using a 300 -pound hammer falling 30 inches. Blows required to drive a 1.5 -inch I.D. (SPT) split -barrel sampler 12 inches or other indicated distances using 140 -pound hammer falling 30 inches. 'P" indicates sampler pushed with weight of hammer or against weight of drill rig. . SOIL GRAPH: SM Soil Group Symbol (See Note 2) Distinct Contact Between Soil Strata Gradual or Approximate Location of Change Between Soil Strata Q Water Level Bottom of Boring 22 ■ Location of relatively undisturbed sample 12 ® Location of disturbed sample 17 p Location of sampling attempt with no recovery Location of sample obtained in general accordance with Standard Penetration Test (ASTM D--1586) procedures Location of SPT sampling attempt with no recovery Location of grab sample NOTES: 1. The reader must refer to the discussion in the report text. the Key to Boring Log Symbols and the exploration logs for a proper understanding of subsurface conditions. 2. Soil classification system is summarized in Figure 2. e Co Geo 44,1. Engineers ' KEY TO SOFUNG LOG SYMBOLS • FIGURE 3 KT:CMS 10129190 n 0 0 1-3 0 a ••,11-18-1996 12:34PM FROM BECHTEL SEATTLE BTA 360 352 5417 P. 12 TEST DATA 1vMoi*Wre Dry Conant Density Blow Group 0 —Lab Tests (%) (pet) Count Sam • lee Symbol 5 10-- 15— - 5— ' 2 ' 30- 35 — 40— MD 7 CS 6 MD 6 MD 5 94 96 105 104 MD 4 108 13 20 29 52 58 66 B r R 1 X Note: See Figure 2 for explanation of symbols BORING SEA -003 ASPHALT SP SP DESCRIPTION Surface Elevation (ft.): Asphalt Reddish brown fine to medium sand with a trace of silt (medium dense, moist) Brown fine to medium sand with a trace of silt (medium dense, moist) Grades to include occasional gravel Grades to dense Boring completed at 31.5 feet on 10/02/96 No ground water encountered —5 1--10 —15 r` 20 — 25 — 30 — 35 —40 GeoEngineers LOG OF BORING FIGURE 4 4..,11-18-1996 12:34PM FROM BECHTEL SEATTLE BTA 360 352 5417 P.13 w 0. 0 0 0 r‘;- 0 0 an 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0 0.07 o.os z 8 0.09 0.10 011 0.12 0.13 0.14 0.1 0.2 as 1 2 5 PRESSURE (lbs/ft2x 103) 10 20 50 KEY BORING NUMBER SAMPLE DEPTH (FEET) SOIL CLASSIFICATION INITIAL MOISTURE CONTENT INITIAL DRY DENSITY (LasiFT3) 1 SEA -003 5.0 Fine to medium sand with a trace of sift (SP) 6 96 i ! . 4 i i 1 1 I 1 in] : •ItIII' 0.1 0.2 as 1 2 5 PRESSURE (lbs/ft2x 103) 10 20 50 KEY BORING NUMBER SAMPLE DEPTH (FEET) SOIL CLASSIFICATION INITIAL MOISTURE CONTENT INITIAL DRY DENSITY (LasiFT3) • SEA -003 5.0 Fine to medium sand with a trace of sift (SP) 6 96 Geo:,Engineers CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS FIGURE 5 01-18-1996 12:33PM FROM BECHTEL SEATTLE BTA 360 352 5417 ARAI/JACKSON W IKEL; d6 PrMCC • ARCHITECTS & PLANNERS 1601 East John Seattle. Washington 98112 12061323-8800 Fax 0061323-8518 sublea c A• CC F :art' ❑ Memorandum O Telephone Meme lir-Field NOM O Mtg Norex ❑ TO Be Typed P. 9 AV C.. Nib 1 (\di / i..— � it pkep ' to tit t✓ TZ ht. - ` •• r• • 111 tl • rt Pr 1 1 Iil 2 ' T 1-i halo fa r " r (" Ai —' i,hat° 7 �r I NSW SCE �t 43,5 fFix.c.Aaix, f (ci rZ�.EArn.'� . 60 ° .I~ sT4•r.t s) .` nPsi �. ba. f %i'..-'--jg;AJ 1l�OOx.&1c ‘4sjI 1.u = � � KE•S Rah piNktick. 1T i • \- r ,i.� -:t" I `-G.c u�'nt a,.- Wei ei L -14 i T, F3 5cht,a` I •••• t • k "JI �� tI ! 1 t BORING al psmakK M; r :m o 'nt �IIMU1IS� i,o5s OF PAIc <HJ&- UMW' T (J Repoi4cHeui$ 1 - SEA -003 .;11-18-1996 12:32PM FROM BECHTEL SEATTLE BTA 360 352 5417 P.8 Bechtel Corporation October 29, 1996 Page 5 . Terracon We have appreciated being of service to you in the geotechnical engineering phase of this project, and are prepared to assist you during the construction phases as well. If you have any questions concerning this report or any of our testing, or when we may be of further service for construction monitoring or consulting services, please do not hesitate to contact us. Sincerely, TERRACON PROJECT TEAM McFadden, P.E. role Manager ifr 112L K. Tuttle. P.E. Principal Document ID: 540080011WPbEA003.R Copies to; Mr. Don Clark Terracon Consultants Westem, Inc. 5035 S. 33rd Street Phoenix, AZ 85040 Mr. Joel Downs Andrew Corporation 2701 Mayhill Road Denton, TX 76208 11-18-1996 12:32PM FROM BECHTEL SEATTLE BTA 360 352 5417 P. 7 Bechtel Corporation October 29, 1996 Page 4 Terracon Equipment Support As presently planned, the proposed ancillary equipment will be supported on a concrete slab -on -grade.. We understand that the on -grade slab will measure about 10 feet by 12 feet. Equipment Toads are expected to be about 3,200 pounds. To reduce potential differential movement of the equipment slab the natural subgrade soils should be compacted to a firm and unyielding condition and 4 to 6 inches of crushed rock should be placed to support the slab subgrade. The upper 12 inches of the natural soils and any new fill placed for slab support should be compacted to a minimum of 95% of the maximum density defined by ASTM D1557. Should structural Toads be concentrated on the perimeter of the slab, a monolithic tum down edge should be considered. Thickened interior slab sections can be used to support concentrated or continuous slab loading provided that slab thickness and reinforcement are consistent with structural requirements. Foundations and slabs should be reinforced as necessary to reduce the potential for distress caused by differential foundation movement. Foundation excavations should be observed by the geotechnical engineer. If the soil conditions encountered differ significantly from those presented in this report, supplemental recommendations will be required. Seismic Considerations: The project site is located in Seismic Risk Zone 3 of the Seismic Zone Map of the United States as indicated by the 1994 Uniform Building Code. Based upon the nature of the subsurface materials, a seismic site coefficient, "s" of 1.2 should be used for the design of structures for the proposed project (1994 Uniform Building Code, Table No. 16-J). General Comments: The Geotechnical Engineer should also be retained to provide services during excavation, grading, foundation and construction phases of the work.' Observation of drilled shaft and foundation excavations should be performed prior to placement of reinforcing and concrete to confirm that satisfactory bearing materials are present and is considered a necessary part of continuing geotechnical engineering services for the project. Construction testing, including field and laboratory evaluation of fill, backfill, pavement materials, concrete and steel should be performed to determine whether applicable project requirements have been met. itwould be logical for Terracon Project Team to provide these additional services for continuing from design through construction and to determine the consistency of field conditions with those data used in our analyses. The analyses and recommendations in this report are based in part upon data obtained from the field exploration. The nature and extent of variations beyond the location of the test boring may not become evident until construction. If variations then appear evident, it may be necessary to re-evaluate the recommendations of this report. -411-18-1996 12:29PM FROM BECHTEL SEATTLE BTA 360 352 5417 P.2 October 16, 1996 Bechtel Corporation 8140 Old Highway 99 Southeast Tumwater, Washington 98501 Attn: Mr. Scott Mutchnik Re:' Tower Site SEA -003 10915 - 51st Avenue South Seattle, Washington GeoEngineers Project No. 5408-001-01, Task 1 lrerracon PROJECT TEAM 8410 -- 154th Avenue NE Redmond, Washington 98052 (206) 861.6000 Fax (208) 8616050 RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA MAY 2 31997 PERMIT CENTER Please find attached the preliminary boring log from the geotechnical exploration of the site conducted on October 2, 1998. Preliminary geotechnical engineering recommendations for design of the drilled shaft tower foundation include the following: • Minimum Shaft Diameter 24 inches • Minimum Shaft Length 20 feet - Maximum End Bearing Pressure 25,000 psf - Shaft Skin Friction 300 psf • Passive Pressure (equivalent fluid density) 420 psf/ft - Coefficient of Horizontal Subgrade Reaction 78 tsf The equivalent fluid density and coefficient of horizontal subgrade reaction presented above are ultimate values and an appropriate factor of safety should be applied to the design of the drilled shaft foundation. The soil modulus for the subgrade soils increases linearly with depth by an amount equal to the coefficient of subgrade reaction. Other design and construction details will be provided *in the final geotechnical report for the project. Sincerely, TER CON PR . EC o McFadden, P.E. Senior Geotechnical Engineer Document ID: 5408001/SEA003.PRE Enclosure: Boring Log SEA -003 Copies to: Mr. Don Clark Terracon Consultants Western, Inc. 5035 S. 33rd Street Phoenix, AZ.. 85040 GFf1TECHNICAL, ENVIRONMENTAL AND MATERIALS ENGINEERS `EXPIRES 3 I j•��'7 Mr_ Joel Downs Andrew Corporation 2701 Mayhill Road Denton, TX. 76208 QUALITY ENGINEERING SINCE 1965 1- 5408.001-01.113 '1-18-1996 12:30PM FROM BECHTEL SEATTLE BTA 360 352 5417 TEST DATA P. 3 Moisture Dry Content Density Blow Group Lab Tests (%) (pct) Count Sam • les Symbol BORING SEA -003 DESCRIPTION Surface Elevation (10: PRELIMINARY 7 5 - MD. 7 94 10-6 W MD 6 105 15 --\ MD 5 w w u - z x n 20 — 25— MD 4 30 — 35- 40 — 104 108 13 •1 20 1 29 52 58 66 ■ 1 B ASPHALT SP SP Note_ See Figure 2 for explanation of symbols Asphalt Reddish brown Tule to medium sand with a tract of silt (medium dense, moist) Brown fine w medium sand with a trace of silt (medium dense, moist) Grades to include occasional gravel Boring completed at 31.5 fax on 10/02/96 No ground water encountered Geo�En 'neers LOG OF BORING FIGURE 4 GROUND ROD - DETAIL, 'GROUND. ROD WITH ACCESS - DETAIL GROUND BAR - DETAIL 10TO 0 10f TO %ALE .KIN OM Orb.MOM 2' OR O : MONOPOLE EQUIPMENT GROUNDING - DETAIL ANTENNA GROUND BAR_ - DETAIL ?VT TO SCAR• 0 4 tubshrvJ 4' : t nNeeuLro M- . • . cgre+ r rift) nweaor—�j ,L nwreorrowrNemo4,-02MrbEMro 4e-02 me nMlsect+rouaw dTna" eeeALTOsear6Raw 3 1:4% L'� �r tEVB8- - peomusA.Fr./ 'at I OR GRED aur NiaW IimOF ort» n f ewL I LEvH. er+Is.elr 16Rc 1 — — -4- ' r TRANSITION . GROUND • BAR - DETAIL CCA ANTENNA GROUND. BAR - DETAIL O ANTENNA CABLE AND MONOPOLE ;GROUNDING - DETAIL NOT ro YALE ' N7 WALL �� 1of TO E -1y cAOPens ro .012P;E H9CPOLE a0U0nna t 12 wis Bae in ecumeIT mune • fnwe reel MEV Mr. 11 HOLE Illbs OILY (11.9 .. ( - .. . -: ,}._•L To FMB. MEOW ms eOL ro eraauoam I 4 was FM TO Nralo rmlb J' , .LO N111t.Bt• . (60010 LEVE. MATIOR OlY)• fN:O,v LEVE. GGIAP.euf OLYI• Ttp,"2/0 ;ftio OEM TO awns MOM) az MONOPOLE LIGHTNING =PROTECTION DETAIL .:CCA EQUIPMENT; GROUND'. BARS:- DETAIL _ •,•••••-; • • • ••••,. • • ‘,,,,,.....,-.2p.:.*..,.-vi r,.°•,•,. r 47r '.% ••• 6R4 46 PAVAIN MATCH YOE MO 11400E55 • . • -. ,. • . „ OF E051115 MISER CONCRETE PAD ERIE FILM c4991 ELECT/TELEPHONE BURIED CONDUIT DETAIL g Isc CALCULATION FLEatur Low Gacurnawr Fort 42. AT DE LAST POLE, • •• • zo toc IL -K1 / Vona 11 -PO MA Facto- • 20 • 123 FT. x 9200 A / OD V ni 14.5 • 005 •1/14•1/1•603.0.14 YR • M fac 0.-5 • OM 3100 A • 30E5 A L -I1 • 220, trg.s. (L-UA//velts (sL,42 NV: Pacto- •I/IM•i/I•2005•0.33- loc • IT x (Lc 11. -LI • 099 te WOO A 4264 A Li. -.--1051 KATIE:MAD L -M .4.56A L4. • Pc'elooeT - VOLTAGE 'X' / 24-L-2 V - 0 -L W -:- 10p209 .. • PANEL . RIM - - MN --.521- 00 WO --..__. • • • . M.C. BUS A FED IHRu SURFACE • DESCRIPMCH BKR CR lAW (Vaj WS" PK4SE ca BM cescRrnori . A B • 32 1 • 102 -• 1 - . 2 ,291........,.../ 2/ 3 Boa; 1 .. - 4 7, 2 8 0 En% usins cm2 -2 7. • 2y 7 • Boo aoo 8. or 10 2 • - . ' coeper CFSH 20 11 •,500 • • - 12 30 ......................SPIRE • 14 2 051-2 • 3y 15 aoo 1- .. - 18 3.7, ...___..7_____ -- MGT 2 17 aoD I - . 18 2 NATIERT HEATER • 5, 19 • . 1 - 20 8 gas% - • T. 8 21 leo 1 - 22 .. 9.oca MAO 0- 23 . 1 - 24 . MICE • .. • . . .. .., . CO:0 • . %NANO KVA - ••• • • CONNECTER K9A FACTOR • R63371X1E (101(V% OR • LESS) ._. REDEP11101£ (OVER 101(14) BOPOR (MGM• • , • c . : .. ,• • • ' - 02 . r : . , • , ; . . .• :,. 125r •: . 1009' . . 100% ' 7019/ OBIAND - 03 , . ; OA . 0A 14. IA .. . • • 6' A • A9PS '' IITIk GROUND BUS OBSTRUCTION LIGHTING SCHEMATIC POWER PLAN, DETAIL NOTES • - • • EX511115 PCMER POLE MN CPASOTEAD TRPREFOR143C CORACT SERVE. , -11TE [3E1- 07.4: 116T UTILITY ME SHALL EE LOCATED MAR OR WAPNER' MO AT MOT 0.4001 1)0 MONOPOLE CHER NV MUTT 10 orapose AGIVAL LOCATION OP .110 -FU PROW= MATHER IRAD COI THE LA6T MLITT POLE MAKE CCNI301011 *1 100 PORT. CCOORAGTOR SHALL 69 1)0 COMET IP LE POLE UTILITY MALL Kw CONNOT101 AT ISE OR1P me POLE ne constActra 94(41Levelatato °mum 10 110 10196 1280T. 00.0 %EMT MON1115 LOCATIOL FROM! .2. SOUR 5410. T01.G196 669.10 COOGTOR F004 ELECTRICAL SERVICE DOM TO MOEN 611010 RM. Pro OWL. HAvE AR 9212vICEE""EDSROMMAMFOO"NeCnIS CAIGTEDPE'121".MOnC".LPAR71'61". 04.110 •OTCLIOC°Ct 900. MEE MX &actin ocepeaato PROM Deussecr 10 peret c.pater UM PVC COA1132 611 .9 10 111(490104 Aro+ EELCM SRAM TO 4690. 11011 FOER COMO LP AT COMER CP P0551 CASIO. SEE CERN_ TM SIEET. COOK= 5 APPROXIMATELY Re move RE WEE OF TIE CARNET 01 RE IN6Hr NEAR coVERIMIPAC.85 THE CANEY. LEAVE 6. 01. SLACK COMUCTOICOL57 AT THIS LOCATION PRIM 10 ROM CABEIET AISTALLATIOL AP189INSTALLATION OF PMER LAMES, OE CONTRACTOR SHALLMANE NE COME.T01 woe 1110 6.49610? 469) 10 - INT1115 AT THE 5A0c OP ME CANNET /0 THE 44119.00400 69411 " 7 1 01*.- iOaff;;7„4:•'"704'-' . • • . • , SEA• . • -7- • , Zr;ft':,4.7:!•4-tc.- ‘ A, Tie tot Rae 14A1 BE RUN ON ne )&W1 102 mum. • ;0:01AMIE 14TH 00111 BECITEC UTILITY AND ROE • En Tt rirm miaow NTIOT FUL Lte To eAsE op ne ver Pat USE .VG COATED ARC WICK, TO WMISMoll 4904 MGM 612408TO AEONE COCIET LP Ilt POLE TOTE Poeff 04*111409194). RENEE COORDOIATE MTH IEST , 1014 44010 aimpeastec mor4 lye ram 70 lie 0%.0949cr LOCATION. •• 31113 IT CONDUIT AT WM CP GGT! 5448. USE ME. COATED 694 Mode 10 19.4(86404 PROM EELCM SRAM TO NICHE 1014 11)1 COME ACPCM 8.484401010110 01040169 MT TO 110 CAME MAY AVOID INTERFER1342 NMI ROUTES CP CAME TRAY • • a ALL INTERCOMECTICES Ernest comers 410 1908 yr us. MST AND ASE • por PART OP he C.CiffRALT. • : • • • ••••-•.: ;.••••;: • -- WWF 4X4 - W4.0X4.0: PATCH TO,MATCH EXIST PAVEMENT OR &RADE b• DIA SGMEDULE 40 CARBON . STEEL PIPE FILLED.WITH CONCRETE AND PAINTED • IN ACCORDANCE WITH PAINTIN& SPECIFICATION COMPACTED SOIL TO MIN 95% MODIFIED w Ir eA wAr - b' MAX DENSITY PER ASTM 01551 METHOD D (TO BE VERIFIED WITH SITE SPECIFIC. SOIL I REPORT). _ r ' • X �X.. - : Fi�Q� civic: - I. FOR CONCRETE NOTE SEE DETAIL 302. 2. &RAVEL SHALL BE NATURAL OR CRUSHED &RAVEL MOTH 100 PERCENT PA55IN& I INCH SIEVE. EQUIPMENT PAD/SLAB ON GRADE NO FROST.. CONDITION DOTAL. Vet t.-Ie0 . OO ALE OESTRUOT109. LIMIT PER MANPAOT- U OPI6ATIO. P AA• XG PM 6015 SHALL EEe • NO I41616t MAN TOP OP uePeUN6 ROD. EEE exc. POR PAA .. LIOYInOtl =TAU- ' INSTML ANTe0/A5 AND ANTENNA MOIMD • PER WOW. EPEC. • • 120$1N -TILT BRACKET BOLTED MOUNTING BRACKET 2 1/2' DIA PIPE MOUNT 0 TS 3° X3"XI/4" MONOPOLE 2 1/2° DIA X 3'-6" LONG STEEL PIPE'. C C • RECTO OIMENSION FOR HORIZONTAL • SEPARATION MOWr PAA LIe&T' CONTROLLER ON MONOP0.4 WORD. LOWER ANTENNA BRACKET COAX ACCESS HOLE MONOPOLE ELEV. - LOOKING EAST ANTENNA MOUNT .ANTENNA CONFIG. ANTENNA MOUNT ANTENNA MOUNTING GONFIGURAT!ON. JULY A,: 19ci6 ANTENNA MOUNT Arcbltset%,;&PtanneorE •S 160 a;e jth. 7.:,! ; va:sai2" c.. II: I. 111 HANDHOLE; FRAME ANTENNA COAX CABLE & :LENGTHS ANTENNA . No: of COAX COAX SIZE COAX LENGTHS ALPHA - 2 1/8" 15' BETA 2 1/S" 15' GAMMA 2 1/8" 15' GPS I 1!2" 45. SRE ammiii 1110 10915 TUKYVILA: ':'YVAS14140TO1 : • ••SEA .003 • DESIGN TYPE .1 ' L4 1/4•= 4 I1/16' 1. 2 3/4 TYPICAL ANTENNA DIMENSIONS I111:na m�-1 ,1}j 1=11 f�1=1 14 1 H �.I 11 1111: ffi ~ rIT 11=1 1=11= �---� W -If=1 II: 1I=I1=II=11=11=1f JI: UNDISTURBED. EARTH OU DOOR:ELi:Ci1Fi'- EW AND ON6IMLE," 'y' ANTEN$ SOLID TRAY Iw OPENPG . N BOTTOM FOR GRWrOuG SHEET TITLE TYPICAL DRILLED PIER FOUNDATION ' 'Si¢EriN c,� . ,AOR .1;�� f 34x50-.• 1,'100' 1.5x2.5 • 18.15 - 1,118.15 ... r REMOVE • • EXIST. ASPF4ALT. ,PAVING AS REQUIRED. Sz1 Ut CLEAN EDGE PATCH can -Twin, _CENTER REQUIREMENTS; MIN. OF I SPACE FOR EVERY. 100 SF OF ASSEMBLY AREA... MAX. OF I. SPACE FOR EVERY. 60. SF OF ASSEMBLY AREA EQUIPMENT 2T-G..,r MGNCrOLE FOUNDATION 4'=0• DIA. ACTUAL 014 TBD... BY MONOPOLE MMF - DISCONNECT/ METER PANEL SEE ELECT. CONC. PAD SEE 365/4-3 EXIST.LANDSCAPING.- SEE DETAIL PLAN. 2/A -I '. NEW POWER POLE) - . TO BE PROVIDED 4 INSTALLED BY UTILITY, =ORD. W/ ELEC. CONDUIT METAL COVER - SEE DETAIL 556/A-2 NEW CONC. PAD STANDARD CIVIL NOTES: STANDARD CONCRETE AND REINFORCING BAR.NOTES: SITE WORKI. ALL STTE WOW SHALL BE AS - - ICATED ON THE DRAW5C4 IPILATED IN THE SPECIFICATION PROJECT BU'I1ART. AND 2. RUBBISH, STUMPS: DEBRIS, 5110(8. STONES AND OTHER RERISE SHALL BE LVED FROM THE SITE AND DISPOSED OF LEGALLY. 3. THE SITE SHALL BE -GRADED TO CAUSE SURFACE WATER TO FLOW AWAY FROM THE PCS EOWPMB4T AND TOWER AREAS. 4. NO FILL OR EMBANQIENT MATERIAL SHALL OE PLACED CN FROZEN MATERIALS, SNOW OR ICE SHALL NOT BE PLACED IN ANY FROZEN • g1BANC LENT. . 5. THE 11UEGRADE SHALL BE COMPACTED AND BROUGHT TO A emooN INFORM GRADE PRIOR TO SHE CRJENED STONE APPLICATION: 6. ALL EXISTPG-ACTIVE SEWER WATER GAS, ELECTRIC, AND OTHER UTILITIES : WERE ENCOUNTERED IN THE WORK SHALL BE PROTECTED AT ALL TIMES. AND WERE REQUIRED FOR THE PROPER EXECUTION OF THE WORK. SHALL BE RELOCATED 45 DIRECTED BY ENGINEERS. EXTREME CAUTION SHOULD 8E USED BY THE CONTRACTOR WHEN EXCAVATING OR PER DRILLING AROUND. OR NEAR UTILRIES. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SAFETY TRAINING FOR THE.- . . :WORKING CRiEW .. - . 1. ALL EXISTING INACTIVE SELER, WATER GAB, ELECTRIC AND OTHER UTILITIES, 5. WHICH INTERFERE WITM THE EXECUTION O' THE WORK. SHALL BE RfiTMOVED AND SHALL BE CAFED, PLU3SED CR OTHERWISE DISCONTINUED AT POINTS . . 'WHICH WILL NOT MTERFERE WTM THE EXECUTION OF NE :WOR. SUBJECT-. TO THE APPR/VAL O' -ENGINEERING. a THE OREM, OF THE CUSTOMER'S PROPERTY. DISTURBED BY THE WORK AND NOT COVERED. 87' THE 13UILD114 DRIVEWAY OR CRUSHED STONE, SHALL BE GRADED TO A UNIFORM SLOPE, FERTILIZED. SEEDED, AND. COVERED WITH MLQ4 AS SPECIFIED IN THE SPECIFICATION. LANDSCAPE WORK ALL CONCRETE WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ACI 301, .. ACI 318 AND THE SPECIFICATION CART -IN-PLACE CONCRETE. - - ALL CONCRETE SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE STRE GTH OF 4000 PSI AT 28 DAYS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. REINFORCING STEEL SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM .4 68, GRADE 60, DEFORMED UNLESS NOTED OTHE,4J11SF WELDED WIRE FABRIC SHALL CGTFORI'1 TO ASTM A 1518 WELDED STEEL WIRE FABRIC UNLESS NOTED OTHERUISE. SPLICES.. CLASS 13' AND ALL HOOKS SHALL BE STANDARD 1N0. 10' SEWER E THE FOLLOWING MINIMUM CONCRETE COVER SHALL 8E PROVIDED FOR REINFORCING STEEL UNLESS 5HOUN OTHERWISE ON DRA11111,GS CONCRETE CAST AGAINST EARTH_' IN. . CONCRETE EXPOSED TO EARTH OR 'LEATHER '6 AND LARGER 2 IK 5 AND SMALLER 4 UAF _I in:.IN CONCRETE N07 EXPOSED TO EARTH OR WEATHER CR NOT CAST AGAINST TUE GROUND:. SLAB AND WALL 3/4 IN. 8EMM5 AND COLU'Y4S __J 1/2 IN. A. CHAMFER 3/4-' SHALL BE PROVIDED AT ALL EXPOSED EDGES OF CONCRETE UNO IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACI 301 SECTION 4.1A. 6. HOLES TO RECEIVE EXPANSION/WEDGE ANCHORS SHALL BE 1/8 LARGER IN DIAMETER THAN THEANCHORBOLT, DOWEL OR ROD AND SHALL COPFORI TO IIFR RECOI"E1ENDATION FOREMBEDMENTDEPTH OR AS 5H0114 CN THE DRAWINGS. AVOID CUTTING EXISTING REBAR WOMEN PILLING 'HOLES IN PROPERTY LINE DETAIL PLAN DETAIL DETAIL ..-11,e STORY DECK MOW . '20 10'7. O SCALE IN FEET-• LEGEND BASIS OF BEARING: .PUT L'EMERLAE OF slsrANE s ' av Far9vo MNuwuMrENls •.REaARe . Nls MHEaAMRED FROAN 1hE 50Y/TN- ; I' - caslaREE w/x -EAST CORER 0F SEC7iw 5 • . Da:. :.4l w(VE . - METHOD OF SURVEY.awECr.OasEi'Anw ®' MATER MEM? -MO ADJUSTMENT NECESSARY - . FARE N/ORAN7 ' INSTRUMENTA770N.- .Y. CEDO E1ER TorAL srARav flXLARO SURVEYACCURACY MEETS OR EXCEEDS MAC 132-130-090; 0): Mi1lER. LLlN10CEVERTICAL DATUM.• Cin of SEAmE £ A6Y'u""°r!' .. PK Nut BENCHMARK. smarm '0" Ca OF Nism5E nal 0 AM) srsr - PO BOX ' ELEV. 759.17.,' 0. Pa+tR POLE y cur mtcHoR UT. irJO'6'7IS/6r0' - - - ii' :JOLT E .'�. MGIC' 1271Y D .. 7EIE RISER LEGAL DESCRIPTION (AS PRMOW 8Y wag) r Cam. MEF Q. . . . .'LOIS 18 7NR000H & 70. aC 8L0 l0. POTTERY' wows AOOI170M: PROPOSED MONOPOLE _ ACCORDING 70 TN£ PUT THEREOF RECORDED HN VOLUME 5.0F MEATS PAGE 86. N 10NC COUNTY. 15(00167054; - YDMD/OVr N EASE . EXCEPT PORTON FOR CEDAR. MVP PIPE LINE AOM EE MAY. ") CEDAR15 MAPLE SOUTH- 112TH ST. REFERENCE DESCRIPTION DESIGN SHEET TITLE - �'(.:'; - -• DRAW • O✓R CHECK ✓AH 10.15 9E E INDEX TO DRAWINGS. . OWNER USWEST '':1249 NE 145TH" STREET • SEATTLE, W ASHINGTON • 98155 (206) 345=2336 CONTACT' JIM. BOWEN CONSTRUCTION MANAGER: BECHTEL CORP 8140 OLD HWY. 99 SE TUMWATER, WASHINGTON 98501 '. (360). 352-7917 CONTACT' _ ED JENCKES AGENT THE WALTER GROUP 1109 FIRST .AVE.,: *205 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 . (206) - 467-8704 • CONTACT' ALEX PERLMAN, RUSS. STROMBERG ,'09-A .; SURvEY. OP EXISTING CONNDITIONS::. ` E-2 GROUNDING PLAAI'- LEGAL: DESCRIPTION LOTS WTI -ROUGH 20, INCLUSIVE. BLOCK 10, POTTERY WORKS ADDRION ACCORDING TO TFE. PLAT hERECF RECORDED IN.VOLUPIE 5 CP PLATS PAGE -86, IN KING COWTY, uN MINGTON: EXCEPT PORRGN PGR" CEDAR' RIVER PIPELINE RKs1T CF WAY. GENERAL NOTES I. PRIOR TO THE SUBMISSION OF. BIDS, THE CONTRACTOR 9. THE.CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPERVISE AND DIRECT THE WORK,. SHALL: VISIT.. THE.;JOBSITE TO REVIEW THE SCOPE OF WORK - USING HIS. BEST SKILL AND ATTENTION. HE SHALL BE SOLELY AND EXISTING JOB CONDITIONS AFFECTING THE PROPOSED RESPONSIBLE' FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION MEANS, METHOD5, DEMOLITION, CONSTRUCTION, NECH'NVICAL AND ELECTRICAL TECHNIQUES, SEOLIENCE9. AND PROCEEDURES AND FOR COOK- INSTALLATIONS, AND OVERALL COORDINATION AND SHALL DINATINGALL PORTIONS OF THE WORK UNDER THE CONTRACT. MAKE` PROVISIONS TO THE COST THEREOF. THE CONTRACTOR: SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE. FOR FAMILIARIZING HIMSELF WITH 10, CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY BECHTEL OF ALL PRODUCTS OR ALL CONTRACT:DOCLIIIENTS, FIELD CONDITIONS AND ,ITEMS NOTED AS "EXISTING" WHICH: ARE NOT IN FIELD. DETAILS DIMENSIONS ,AND CONFIRMING'. THAT THE WOR( MAY BE ARE INTENDED TO 54-10W END RESULTS OF DESIGN MINOR. ACCOMPLISHED AS 9HOU.1N,PRIOR.TO PROCEEDING WITH . '."MODIFICATIONS MAY BE REQUIRED TO' SUIT JOB DIMENSIONS TI E UJO OR. CONDITIONS AND SUCH MODIFICATIONS SHALL BE .2. PLANS ARE NOT TO BE SCALED: THE PLANS. ARE INTENDED INCLUDED A5 PART OF THE WORK " TO BE A DIAGRAMATIC OUTLINE ONLY: UNLESS.NOTED OTHERWISE• R: IL CONTRACTOSHALL PERFORM 1-11G14 QUALITY PROFESSIONAL THERWI WORK JOIN MATERIALS TO UNIFORM ACCURATE FITS SO :THEY 3. DEMOLITION -IS NOT LIMITED ONLY. WHAT 98 INDICATED ON ' MEET WITH NEAT, STRAIGHT LINES, FREE OF SMEARS OR OVER- LAPS. INSTALL EXPOSED MATERIALS APPROPRIATELY LEVEL, - THE DRAWINGS: PLANS ARE. TO INDICATE -THE GENERAL PLUMB. AND. AT ACCURATE RIGHT ANGLES OR FLUSH WITH .40 - SCOPE OF DEMOLITION RFQUIRED:TO COMPLETE THE PRA- JOINING MATERIALS: WORK. OF EACH TRADE. SHALL. MEET ALL JECT AS 61-104441. ON THE CONSTRuCTION DOCUMENTS. NATIONAL STANDARDS PUBLISHED BY THAT TRADE- 4. SPACING BETWEEN EQUIPMENT IS REQLUIRED CLEARANCE 12. DRAWINGS; NOTES AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE COMPLEMENTARY.. THEREFORE, IT IS CRITICAL. TO FIELD VERIFY DIMENSIONS.. WHAT IS CALLED: FOR BY. ANY WILL. BE BINDING AS. IF CALLED SHOULD THERE BE ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THE CON FOR BY ALL TRACT. DOCUMENTS, EXISTING CONDITIONS '4N0/OR• DESIGN INTENT, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR -. 13. THE ARCHITECT/ENGINEER HAS MADE EVERY EFFORT TO SET OBTAINING A CLARIFICATION FROM BECHTEL PRIOR TO FORTH IN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS THE COMPLETE SCOPE PROCEEDING' WITH THE WORK,OR RELATED WORK IN OF WORK THE BIDDER: IS::NEVERTHELESS "CAUTIONED . THAT. QUESTION. MINOR OMMISSIONS AND DISCREPANCIES IN. THE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS SHALL NOT EXCUSE HIM FROM PROVIDING S. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY BECHTEL IN WRITING;' AND SHALL , A COMPLETED FACILITY AND IMPROVEMENTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE INTENT OF THESE DOCUMENTS. IT WILL BE THE RES RECEIVE WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION TO PROCEED BEFORE STARTING WORK ON ANY ITET'15 NOT CLEARLY DEFINED OR PONSIBILITY OF THE BIDDER TO BRING ANY CONFLICTS, OR:IDENTIFIED •BY THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTSOMMI55ION5, OR DISCREPANCIES TO THE ATTENTION OF BECHTEL IN WRITTEN FORMAT, PRIOR TO SUBMISSION OF PROPOSAL. IN 6. INSTALL ALL EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE EVENT OF DISCRPANCIES CONTRACTOR SHALL PRICE THE MANUFACTURER'S RECOMENDATIONS UNLESS SPECIFIED OTHER- MORE EXPENSIVE: OR EXTENSIVE WORK, UNLESS DIRECTED WISE INDICATED: OR. WHERE LOCAL CODES OR REGULATIONS:. OTHERWISE ': TAKE PRECIDENCE. T. v'ERIFY- ALL DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS AND ON THE SITE. AND NOTIFY BECHTEL OF ANY DISCREPANCIESBEFORE STARTING WORK. S. ALL WORK PERFORMED. AND (MATERIALS INSTALLED SHALL MEET. THE STRICT ACCORDANCE ASIA MINWI.U1 STANDARD, .WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES, REGULATIONS AND ORDINANCES HAVING JURISDICTIONdCONTRACTOR SHALL GIVE ALL NOTICES AND COMPLY WITH ALL LAUDS, ORDINANCES: RULES; REGULA- T10NS,'AND LAWFIUL:ORDERS OF ANY'PUBLIC AUTHORITY BEAR- ING ON THE PERFORMANCE OF: THE WORK ALL ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS'5NALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE.MUNICIPAL AND UTILITY COMPANY SPECIFICATIONS; • AND: LOCAL JURISDICTIONAL CODES, ORDINANCES` AND APPLICABLE REGULATIONS „ ' 14. THIS SITE REQUIRES. FAA. .LIGHTS ON THE MONOPOLE. THE BASE - STATION MUST BE OPERATIONAL WITH POWER AND COMMUNICATION - FACILITIES AVAILABLE BEFORE THE MONOPOLE CAN BE ERECTED: VICINITY MAP 0 UM Or NOT TO SCALE PROJECT SITE PROJECT SUMMARY __ . • ., 'VET®ALL' °stririARY, WTNQIT PORCE'AND SPECTONTFE REOJIRF7'ENTB OP . THE CONTRACT- DOCU'tE PS, THE DESCRIPTION OP THE. WORK OP hE CONTRACT . OAN,BE SIrRVR12ED A8 FOLLOW . SITE IMPROVEMENTS FOR A BELP-CONTAINED EQUIPMENT CARNET . AND INSTALLATION OP MONOPOLE. AND. PANEL ANTS IAS FOR U8 WEST WIRELESS PROJECT. 'TINE WORK CONSISTS CP PLACEMENT CP KELP-CCNTA VIED EQUIPMENT, CARPET FOUNDATION, MONOPOLE ANTENNA AND ASSOCIATED. SITE WORK WORK AT hE SMIT1•U.EBT COR/'ER CP THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 109/5 SISI AVE. SOON, TU WILLA, WA INSTALLATION OP .THE E0JIPMEM CABINET: COAX CABLES, T•1ONOPOLE TCLLER PANEL' NNTEAW45 AND THE PROVISION Cr BECCTS,ART MILER PROJECT. DATA CONSTRUCTION TYPE, - occuPANCY SELECTED BLDG.CODE, .- No. OF STORIES.: ". zoN/NG ' . JURI8DICTION ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUIBER. 681420-1130 • APPROVAL 11.115 SPACE 18 RESERVED -FOR SIGNATURES CP TI$. INVOLVED PARTES TO - • INDICATE THAT THEY.I4AVE REVIEWED THE ACOCTIF'ANM D00WIENTS AND HAVE APPROVED That' INITIATED. AFTER APPROVALS HAVE BEEN GIVEN MAY. RESULT IN ADDITIONAL DESIGN AND OR CONSTRUCTION COSTS. . DATE DATE.` 0476? 4. - by C C 27 -7417- "Tv • Atehfteeta;3.-PI•a3e¢T$ 160i Boot pltu,3 IsvYtPAi981TD. 1'. . Tel 1� SIYIBII •)* •s25 8115 : t, , Is-H_g8./�8S0cILfT3t �y : a emra 1d x .ria. •,^^t' t' U' S WEST; . . - �, WIRELESS Pfd6JE"f_ SflE U'iFORNATIfkt RAINIER:.VIEWC.QMM 106115 5I5T ` 1 TUKWIL:L.A,;k1Aw, SEA -003 ;Ya TYPE OUTDOOR EQUIPMIT;� AND MONOPOL'" j ANTENNA, SHEET TILE LEGAL:•DEESCRIRTION '- NOTES/.VIGtNIiY,Ntc�F' w, TM•�.a . L%Tv OPTU