Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA E97-0025 - AFRICA NW - WAREHOUSE BUILDINGAFRICA N.W. OFFICE / WAREHOUSE BUILDING 12605 PACIFIC HWY S. E97-0025 Al' A- /t//, 7/ 7/9 if/W-- 766,2 e o/., leu 'lam P4/, Dales (z06) 133 -O/ 7? .Zc• lya� 547- yapu 6"x- 2/3 Taws- (?ob) 3ZS=u21 NFildicw potAitAmAs. e� jq.,) ) Com; c 25'3 • 8623 s )2-6 ti, Cosr!► a GAP (zsf) 2Tz lzaQ Ke l_cL�e 7-e C i d TtiJ ojj'Q ra? 3677 /vl c k- 01 I v45 TO: File FROM: Michael Jenki DATE: March 25, 199 RE: Africa Northwest MEMORANDUM I received a call from Tom Parker today concerning the status of providing the wetland study, geotechnical report and design review packets. He indicated that he will be purchasing the land from Mr. Sumpter within the next 2 weeks. He also indicated that the referenced materials should be available within the next two weeks. I told him that a hearing on May 28 would be possible and that building permits take 12 weeks to review after BAR approval. 111 City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director March 9, 1998 Tom Parker Africa Northwest 1134 Broadway Seattle, WA 98112 Re: SEPA application for 12605 Pacific Hwy. S. Dear Tom: It has been 2 months since my last letter concerning the status of your application. Since you have not provided any of the requested information detailed in my January 7 letter, we will now be closing this file. If you decide to pursue other development at this site, please be aware that if SEPA is required a new application and fee will be needed. Sincerely, Michael Jenkins Assistant Planner 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 4313665 City of Tukwila • • John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director January 7, 1998 Tom Parker Africa Northwest 1134 Broadway Seattle, WA 98112 Re: SEPA application for 12605 Pacific Hwy. S. Dear Tom: I was writing for an update on your application. As you will recall, your application for a SEPA checklist was determined to be complete on August 28, 1997 but several items were needed to complete our review. These items include a complete application for Design Review on one of the proposed developments included with your application, a revised wetland study based on the proposed development area and a geotechnical report that includes delineation of all sensitive areas. To date, we have not received any of these items. Please contact me and let me know when you will be submitting these materials. If we have not heard from you by January 30, we will close our files on this matter. If you decide to proceed with the development after this date, a new application and fee will have to be submitted. Sincerely, Michael Jenkins Assistant Planner cc: .Gary Schulz c:\msofce...sepa\9725issu.doc 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION hereby declare that: ONotice of Public Hearing LI Notice of Public Meeting O Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet O Board of Appeals Agenda Packet OPlanning Commission Agenda Packet ODetermination of Non- significance O Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance flDetermination of Significance and Scoping Notice llNotice of Action Official Notice 0 Short Subdivision Agenda NlOther Packet ONotice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit fJShoreline Management Permit was mailed to each of the following addresses on `,Lrii/WO Other L nth ►•_- - SSW • q 81 Name of Project CUck-eucJkQeL 1 tee ) ) File Number"l� Signature • City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development 0 Steve Lancaster, Director NOTICE OF APPLICATION DATED SEPTEMBER 17,1997 The following applications have been submitted to the Department of Community Development for review and decision. FILE NUMBERS: APPLICANT: LOCATION: PROPOSAL: OTHER REQUIRED PERMITS: E97-0025 (SEPA Application) Tom Parker, d.b.a. Africa Northwest 12605 Pacific Hwy. S. Construction of a two-story, 10,512 square foot office/warehouse building Design Review approval by the Board of Architectural Review Land Altering Permit Building Permit The file is available for review at the Department of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA. Please call (206) 431-3670 to ensure that the file(s) will be available. OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT You can submit comments on this application. You must submit your comments in writing to the Department of Community Development by 5:00 p.m. on October 2, 1997. If you have questions about this proposal contact Michael Jenkins, the Planner in charge of this file. Anyone who submits written comments will become parties of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. APPEALS You may request a copy of any decision or obtain information on your appeal rights by contacting the Department at 431-3670. A decision from the Planning Commission may be appealed to the City Council. The Department will provide you with information on appeals if you are interested. DATE OF APPLICATION: NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: NOTICE OF APPLICATION: August 5, 1997 August 28, 1997 September 17, 1997 6300 Southcenter Boulevarr4 Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 41, City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster Director September 16, 1997 Tom Parker Africa Northwest 1134 Broadway Seattle, WA 98112 Re: SEPA Application for 12605 Pacific Hwy. S., File No E97-0025 Dear Mr. Parker: This letter is a follow up to the Notice of Complete Application that you were sent on August 28, 1997. As you will recall, when an application has been determined to be 'complete' under Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) 18.104, the Notice of Application must be posted on site and affixed to an approved Notice Board. In addition, copies of the Notice of Application are to be mailed to properties within 500 feet of the subject property. All of this information should have been provided to you with your application materials. As of yesterday, the parcel had not been posted. Under requirements in TMC 18.104.110, you are no longer in compliance with this code as it pertains to Notice of Application requirements. This may adversely affect your application in regard to the length of time required to make a final determination on your proposal. Please call me at 431-3685 and let me know when we can expect this site to be posted. . Sincerely, Michael Jenkins Assistant Planner 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 SEP 05 '97 02:57PM TUKWILA DCD/PW P.8 • CITY OF TUKWILA 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Telephone; (206) 431.3670 AFFIDAVIT OF IN'STALLAT'ION AND POSTING OF PUBLIC INFORMATION SIGNS} State of Washington County of King City ofTukwrla I Tp I`1 PA6 KU— • (print Name) understand that Section 18.104.110 of the Tukwila Municipal Code requires me to post the property no later than fourteen (14) days following the issuance of the Notice of Completeness. • I certify that an T (161 '1 1 the Public Notice'Bo s in accordance with Section 18.104.110 and other applicable guidelines were posted on the property located at 12600K P ftCt F lc- Vkl so as to be clearly seen from each right -ofvy providing primary vehicular access to the property for application file number Eq Affiant (Applicant Signature) SUBSCRIBED, AND SWORN to before me this ik day oir v� ,19 V-- NOT residing at My commission expires on • City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION August 28, 1997 Tom Parker Africa Northwest 1134 Broadway Seattle, WA 98122 RE: SEPA Application for Africa Northwest, 12605 Pacific Hwy. S., File No. E97-0025 Dear Mr. Parker: Your SEPA application, as referenced above, has been found to be complete on August 28, 1997 for the purposes 'of meeting state mandated time requirements. I have been assigned to review this project. The next step is for you to install a Notice Board on the project site within 14 days of the date of this letter. You received information on how to install these signs with your application packet. If you need another set of those instructions, you may obtain them at the Department of Community Development (DCD). Also, you must obtain a laminated copy of the Notice of Application to post on the board. This notice is also available at DCD. After installing the sign with the laminated notice, you need to return the signed Affidavit of Posting to the our office. This determination of complete application does not preclude the ability of the City to require that you submit additional plans or information, if in our estimation such information is necessary to ensure the project meets the substantive requirements of the City or to complete the review process. In this regard, there are several items that need to be submitted to begin the substantive review of your project. The following items are: • A complete application for Design Review on one of the proposed development plans submitted in conjunction with your SEPA application • A revised wetland study based on the proposed development area • A geotechnical report that includes delineation of all sensitive areas As these items are needed for substantive review of your project, the 120 day time period to review your project, pursuant to TMC 18.104.130, has been stopped. I have included a copy of this code section that explains the process that stops the 120 day review period. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me at 431-3685. Sincerely, Michael Jenkins Assistant Planner cc: Reviewing City Departments c:\msoffice...sepa\9725comp.doc 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 • CftyofTukwila /9 John W. Rants, Mayor epartment of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director MEMORANDUM TO: Michael Jenkins, Assistant Planner FROM: Gary Schulz, Urban Environmentalist DATE: August 25, 1997 RE: Application Completeness Review for Africa Northwest E97-0025, Sensitive Area requirements. I recommend the SEPA be determined incomplete for the following reasons. 1) Per the Director, the SEPA checklist must be signed by the person that authored it. 2) The SEPA does not include the level of detail necessary for making a reasonable determination. The site is wet and hydrology will be a major issue to address. Staff identified sensitive area issues during the pre -application meeting. These issues are not fully acknowledged in the checklist. Terra Associates, Inc. suggested landslide conditions are present on the site in their 2/28/97 Preliminary Wetland Evaluation. The preliminary investigation also observed wetland soil conditions but were not used due to past or present disturbance related to soil movement. The "disturbed" or "problem" area methodology may be necessary for wetland determination. I feel this sensitive area condition needs to be identified or addressed in the SEPA. The potential for Type 2 wetlands to exist on the site will affect the project site plan and possibly require a Reasonable Use Exception process. At a minimum, a geotechnical study should be submitted with the SEPA permit application. Please have the applicant submit their wetland study with the revised SEPA checklist. Let me know if there are questions concerning this memo. cc: Steve Lancaster, DCD Director Kelcie Peterson, Permit Coordinator 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 0 Tukwila, Washington 98188 ° (206) 431-3670 0 Fax (206) 431-3665 CITY OFCKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431-3670 RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA AUG 0 51997 PERMIT CENTER SEPA APPLICATION CHECKLIST FOR STAFF USE..ONL Y Planner: Fite Number: E `( % Receipt Number: Cross-reference files: fl 001 '• Applicant -notified ofincompleteapplication:. . Applicantnotifiedof complete'application: Notice of application issued: A. NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: 6/4 B. LOCATION, OF. PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: (address and accessors parcel number(s)) /TA-Gt e--0 t ,'-t J /2&t95 /3 . 1-1wy, 5emz C' P/172-ceL. Wes. 2.g D4- — q4 6 —03 Quarter: Section: Township: Range: (This information may be found on your tax statement) C. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: (VV «/ 2_01Am <5a i✓r - Off/cc/wm 5A -L_ sT Rtt& D. APPLICANT: ADDRESS: /l 31 - V DGt/1-3-y I 5Ei51-r7-GI5/ . 11 5 89' 34'19'E Lt- 205.id 11 156.72' N 89' 38' 25' W 589'.' 1'E DOUGLAS LANDSEM ARCHITECT AIA 1407 NORTH FOREST, BELLINGHAM, WA 9&225 360-733-2466 (TELE) 360-733-2864 (FAX) n IN.o NEW OFFICES AND WHOLESALE BUILDING FOR AFRICA N.W. RECEIVED CM/ OF TUKWILA t�lU I CENTED • • RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST AUG 0 5 1997 PERMIT CENT♦{R Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instruction for Applicants: This environmental checklist .asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. The City uses this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the City staff can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attached any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The City may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: Nonproject proposals refer to actions which are different or broader than a single site specific development project, such as plans, policies and programs. Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply". In addition, complete the supplemental sheet for nonproject actions (part D). For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project", "applicant", and "property or site" should read as "proposal", "proposer", and "affected geographic area", respectively. Control.. Epic File No. Fee $ 325 Receipt No. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND GGLL 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: ftP/Z/GP' A/./1/. 2. N ame of applicant: TD /&i i�j-/Z��l�—, D GA/r--/<, 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 7-314L4 P - 20(0-323 -ZZZI ,VDGl6L4A1175 M �tt-d60'753- 9116 ©W/Vl�/� c /v -cr-pe sew 4. Date checklist prepared:/V!, 1 / fR'77 5. Agency requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Tb b - /&J soCN /p5/ 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. 5e-4Jt ' _i , /� /5 Y/TE. - 2- s rox-y /o, c c {-z.00' - 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Te/ RJ r}s soc; p Pg-A.eD , - p-P-i-0u/iv �y Gi7 7z/ J27 EA/Pal-11M OA/ L(J,L / cH- v/5-5 Sid Z5/14 / 7Te.0 � o /. ie/e/1/ . 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. AJ A/In I - i Vij -2- • • 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. ,4J1' 1/e '<OKA' 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized here. rA-0P05 e0 Pie- G% & 77 tE a Aid (Z) WO S a S o#--- A- 5//72-STri27' ,e110126�-i ibQ s_ ��-- i " i ' • Asa. _ - �__^= i %Z-Jl //t/l//LdVe.1� Al Aro fC/ 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica- tions related to this checklist. p� L No• of Z304 -94-38-(55 i7 »et/ 1 L2 -os Hitly 773Ktvit.R•�6t/�. 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Po 1 icy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? -3- TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT• B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the sit (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, (steep slopes, mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (ap ro imat percent slope)? 0 5 -l -or i75 c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. 6 QoL N.D i'1 o A-nJ i DE 905 / 7' Of" Likla d /2t2 . d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. mis ; it .: i 1 e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti- ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. FIL1./N6 i,✓/LL- f3E- ,tiro///U << - co - ' 61 Te • QUAIvt777 UNC hvEP • f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, enerally describe. GoAJ 57-gti i7 o /t/ ti//[,L, orc 7,,_ w//k.J ft,2Pf1- DP- %i7 11V tt/LLSib' Wii-7A/:_rly517 ite6,. fzein/97/A)/ g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example asphalt or buildings)? /3- *-0. -Som �P�t142l�116 OA) ,e /Ttte—/Z f1- 57#1ei-tI.sra tD/AAbs,���� J % /14o Cr relt /t!Je--. -4- Evaluation for Agency Use Only • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: ,1 2. Air Sipe U .iv/ItVC a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximat- quantities if known. COM Li- /iN P/ Te rr /MST b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. IU6AJti /'-1l Df AJ c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: A/Olje,, p-1 1 j/i_ 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year- round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. A) 5aJlz-r-A-CE, 9-7g,/. t'DL SOA) O- / 5e13-g.AJAL I(/, 7 i 50/1- cJ 1tJL lit) 16 Nei 611 -Die -,3 -5- • 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. AJ/A- 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area ofthe site that would° be affectei. Indicate the source of fill material. •Evaluation for Agency Use Only 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, uan- tities, if known. 52 /9 4/ -4e- FROM 5u ' 4JAJi / 6 '4D A LL_ • SD61E, 7)?' DP- GD' -' '-' Df-- 0iP7-e-1V7761V 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. /NOT /IUD AJ A) 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. ND & JE- DiSCH/466P Sd/zr-761-6e, -6- • b. Ground: •Evaluation for Agency Use Only 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. ,9-60g1012. 14Jf -7 _, _. L. 2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sour- ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. No X/voWAI- 0450- frR6E /moo _raAoy 7wrn-,-. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Rel` D S/6A/Le._0 /4JACCd/Lor5AJ( _ •�/ V (dol.) M rte_ Il 5C -7- • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. -. /1/6 , d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: DSS/Gi() ,f- RUll1�1�� W22Z]el /e-640/l..0/1U6 70 Z 4.711J6 ir: 4 iris/i 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: a der aspen, other evergreen tree: ir, ce.ar, pine, other shrubs grass — pasture _ crop or grain _ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush,• skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other -they types of vegetation - b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? MUCtf' (Jr-- 77-14E. 5/ Te- Uo/tL Pe, 4.0 �-- f5L,96, c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. 1V0Ue KAWAJ -8- • d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: /�• 4--/ rr3— A rLI4 /', ' M(Fir �' y 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: hawk, heron, eagle, o gbirds other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. DN& /UONN c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. n/wiN d. Proposed me sures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: At/4 -9- Evaluation for Agency Use Only • •Evaluation for Agency Use Only 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, color) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. - /1J6'lr b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. N/D c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: ''t f. l.L 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result ofthis proposal? If so, describe. A JJJ J iJO__� 1) Describe special emergency`servi es that might be required. WOE. �l1 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ- mental health hazards, if any: MO AI iz• -10- • evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? _461.6.0? - 2) 0 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short- term or a long-term basis (for example: traf- fic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. i 5 I4JCJI •L i` 0/V i Sial i A / "ice &'/JS/ f -Ss Ore/CA-77 Al. 3) Proposed measureso reduce or control noise impacts, if any: n)/�- 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? _Aaell1 b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. c. Describe any structures on the site. -11- • d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Na •valuation for Agency Use Only e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? O/b»f-1 /A -L �.l�ff7— INDUST/t�l�u . f. What is the current comprehensive, plan designation of the site? or KAI'D b%J / If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? iV/A g• h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Nor K -0o VA/ i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? JQ=f Z.- 1P O 5 j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? Al k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: MO/1.)e, 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com- patible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any:IllDnir:J -12- • "'Evaluation for Agency Use Only 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing? /L//ft b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eli- minated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing. Al/,} c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, .if any: NA91- 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? He / /2/14/9 -77E44/4 -L. CDitine-er b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? NtAJF, c. Proposed measures impacts, if any: _�—reDNT reduce or control aesthetic -13- • •Evaluation for Agency Use Only 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Ivor) Ivo�UAJ. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? NO c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational oppor- tunities are in the immediate vicinity? nloN,� wAJ b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: MAI- -14- • . Evaluation for Agency Use Only 13. Historic and CulturalPreservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro- posed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the ite? If so, generally describe. A)MJ / k) k'Ai b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. JJ Ivo rvnJ c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Ajme. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed accss to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. /2/i C f/GUY f/(DA/7771/5 s77 - A--1 _5C� L 4�t J i9-� ,5 5/7" -Et.. ,v OTfte f9ec�s5 /�O�d5'�D b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the ap-oximate distance to the nearest transit stop? No f K_Alf (JA1 c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? pP-,-Ki AJ cp s . -15- • d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). Alb • Evaluation for Agency Use Only e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. /9/r- ail A f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. PA P,- ,ern? ci iu MoA177fq j7 ,�� F}-� Y g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor- tation im.acts, if any: APO i r 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, enerally describe. A46. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. 1�10N� -16- • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, other. FUS 51 -Av1r Ay��L'CP b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. WhLrcA ,5e-KJex-- C. Signature The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Date Submitted: PLEASE CONTINUE TO THE NEXT PAGE. -17- TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICAN# . Evaluation for Agency Use Only D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not imple- mented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? J 7 e P Re?. To Mer alry smicm w/9-rr4_ Sr-ll,D19-x_05 AIo A.)0A)Pli A-JRz. Finess/oA LS 2zourrlO) ne- ,$ %kf� P 1..5}-3E dTox /Au5 /GIJOGU/II , Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life? k•At. l 111," r. I %:�� �' Pm 77-f-15 PAW-el—TT Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life are: No PIOD1 77a&1 foe/Will- 2:M. -18- • 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? NIVP, /A1/541/Ai •Evaluation for Agency Use Only Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resourses are: tag -al -Eq.- MI AU, I_D fb I f -LL EAJeg y GOL7 AFAI 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? /146JCf/ 0/1J / SST /5 ` A),9I 5 Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: 5/r (S iJo r /ZI XWA) 5e; 17/VT.. 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, inclduing whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? tVIR -19- • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts area: N How does the proposal conform to the Tukwila Shoreline MastrPlan? N/r 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on trans ortation or public services and utilities? Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) /A) D 4,7 NP L -i - it wf� x� 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. N/ir -20- • 8. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? N/j Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) • /400 o I ./, are: • Evaluation for Agency Use Only -21- T,O`BE COMPLETED BY APPLICAN• 410 Evaluation for Agency Use Only E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON PROJECT PROPOSALS The objectives and the alternative means of reaching the objectives for a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the aforegoing items of the Environmental •Checklist. This information provides a general overall perspective of the proposed action in the context of the environmental infor- mation provided and the submitted plans, documents, suppor- tive information, studies, etc. 1. What are the objective(s) of the proposal? To S7 Jc T f� L :. • WITH fait] /3 -PPdeox 1=-/_r> or --- 7— 2 17H- 6c,E., te)14-7—#.542--- =(` H ¶ 19,i/j-nr. 4 . 2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these objectives? /572/Af,/ ' )6 HILLS', 195 e—ITTz- /7.05.5/11P-, (. Comm / 1 -ST7fy . h J acv ,S'/T w T .:dam AL. 3. Please. compare s h�ternative means and indicate the preferred course of action: -22- • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 4. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: fuG#�tf oSC�9f'icE. J % w/(A) -23- TITLE 18 — ZONING b. For Type 2 decisions requiring posted notice of application, from 14 days after the determination of completeness until the later of (i) 14 days after the issuance of a decision by the Director or other administrative authority, or (ii) the date of any administrative appeal hearing on the application. c. For a Type 1 decision requiring posted notice of application, from 14 days after the determination of completeness until the expiration of the public comment period. d. For any project requiring a Shoreline Substantial Development permit, the notice board shall be posted for a minimum of 30 days. 4. The Department shall have the discretion to determine that removal of the notice board prior to the end of the notice period, or failure to maintain it in good condition, is cause for discontinuance of review of the application until the notice board is replaced and remains in place for a specified time period. 5. An affidavit of posting shall be submitted to the Department by the applicant within 14 days following the Department's determination of completeness to allow continued processing of the application by the Department. (Ord. 1768 §2(part), 1996) 18.104.120 Mailed notice. A. Mailed notice shall be issued by first class mail by the Department within 14 days following the Department's determination of completeness as follows: 1. To owners of record of property within 500 feet of the site, and to the occupants thereof to the extent the street addresses of such properties are different than the mailing addresses of the owners. 2. To any agency or tribe which the Department may identify as having an interest in the proposal. 3. To any other party of record. B. Mailed notice shall be considered supplementary to posted notice and be deemed satisfactory despite the failure of one or more persons to receive mailed notice. (Ord. 1768 §2(part), 1996) 18.104.130 lime periods for permit issuance. A. Final decisions by the City on all permits shall be issued within 120 days from the date the applicant is notified by the Department that the application is complete. The following periods shall be excluded from this 120 -day period: 1. Any period of time during which the applicant has been requested by any City department, agency or hearing body with jurisdiction over some aspect of the application to correct plans, perform required studies, or provide additional information. The period shall be calculated from the date the applicant is notified of the need for additional information until the earlier of (a) the date the department, agency or hearing body determines whether the additional information satisfies the request, or (b) 14 days after the date the information has been provided to the department, agency or hearing body. If the department, agency or hearing body determines that the action by the applicant is insufficient, it shall notify the applicant of the deficiencies and the procedures of this section shall apply as if a new request for information had been made. 2. The period of time during which an environmental impact statement is being prepared following a determination of significance pursuant to RCW 43.21C. 3. A period of no more than 90 days for an open record appeal hearing on a Type 2 land use decision, and no more than 60 days for a closed record appeal on a Type 4 land use decision appealable to the City Council. 4. Any additional time period for administrative review agreed upon by the Department and the applicant. 5. Any additional time period agreed upon by the Department, the applicant and any parties to an appeal. 6. Any period of time during which an applicant fails to post the property, if permit processing is suspended by the Department pursuant to TMC 18.104.110. B. The time limits established in this section shall not apply if a project permit application requires an amendment to the comprehensive plan or a development regulation. C. The time limitations established in this section shall not apply to street vacations or other approvals related to the use of public areas or facilities issued pursuant to TMC Title 11. D. If a final decision cannot be issued within the time limits established by this section, the Department shall provide written notice of this fact to the project applicant. The notice shall include a statement of reasons why the time limits have not been met and an estimated date for issuance of the notice of final decision. (Ord. 1768 §2(part), 1996) 18.104.140 Applications - Modifications to proposal. A modification to project plans occurring before issuance of the permit shall be deemed a new application for the purpose of establishing time periods pursuant to TMC 18.104.130 when such modification would result in a substantial change in a project's review requirements, as determined by the Department. (Ord. 1768 §2(part), 1996) Printed December 18, 1996 Page 18-121 DOUGLAS LANDSEM ARCHITECT AIA 1407 NORTH FOREST, BELLWGHAM, WA 98225 360-733-2466 (TELE) • 360-733-2864 (FAX) SGI-I k10.2 RECE VED ITV OF TUKWILA AUG 0 5 1997 NEW OFFICES AND WHOLESALE BUILDING FORPERMIT CENTER AFRICA N.W. DOUGLAS LANDSEM ARCHITECT AIAI 1407 NORTH FOREST, BELLINGHA.M, WA 98225 ��n vnn �ncc rrc1 Me, t, -.ten nncn ry nv� AEC ED 'CITY OF TUKWILA AUG 0 5 1997 n Klo . 5 PERMIT CENTER NEW OFFICES AND WHOLESALE BUILDING FOR AFRICA N.W. I • Obtain the assessor's map(s) which contain(s) your property and all neighboring properties within 500 feet (See example diagram). You may use the maps on file in the Assessor's Office or purchase a set from the King County Department of Public Works Map Counter on the 9th floor of the Administration Building. Purchased maps must be ordered" several hours in advance of the time you '-i' • would like to pick them up. After securing the assessor's maps, obtain a "Real Estate Inquiry Batch Request Sheet" from the Department of Assessment. On this form provide the tax account number for each affected property as shown on the assessor's map(s) and submit the completed form to the Department of Assessment with the appropriate fee. Applicants can request that the information be printed in mailing label form or on standard paper. CITY OF TUKWILA • 630•uthcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Telephone: (206) 431-3670 ADDRESS LABEL REQUIREMENTS The City of Tukwila requires that neighboring residents, businesses and property owners be notified of certain types of pending applications in order to encourage citizen participation in the land use process. Applicants are therefore required to submit the following materials: • Mailing labels listing the owners of record for all property within 500 feet of the boundaries (not the center) of the applicant's site (2 sets or 3 sets if SEPA review is required). • Mailing labels listing the residents or businesses of any property within 500 feet of the property if they are different from the land owners (2 sets or 3 sets if SEPA review is required). • One copy of an assessor's map(s) showing the boundaries of the subject property and the 500 foot radius. -_122ND ST. 123ND ST Property owner names and addresses can be obtained from the King County Department of Assessment located on the 7th floor of the King County Administration Building, Room 700, 500 Fourth Avenue, Seattle. To compile the information required: To obtain occupants/resident/business names and addresses, consult the Kroll maps located in the Tukwila Department of Community Development and then visit the site to determine resident names and unit numbers. The information on the mailing labels may refer to "Resident" or "Tenant", with the proper mailing address, if the specific name is unknown. • • PARTIAL TRANSCRIPTION OF PRE -APP WITH AFRICA NORTHWEST DATED 1/23/97 Ron Cameron's Comments Ron Cameron (RC): Same stuff. We've got a lot of problems in this ravine with the three forks of Riverton Creek and the sewer from the old Riverton Tuberculosis Hospital, TB Hospital and all their stuff. This sewer has failed twice. I've been here 8 1/2 years. It's because of slope instability and it goes right into the stream, so we've been there several times, and what we're asking for is a geotechnical report/analysis of the hill - hillside stability and review of what's there. This one down here, the whole hill let go in the creek. The end result of this is (indeterminate comments)....30 years of Dames and Moore showing (indeterminate comments)....there's a deep rooted slide... Africa Northwest (ANW): And you think this site is just in line? RC: Well, I know through the water work you've done for well supply and well sources that the aquifer is 30 miles long (indeterminate comments)....goes up and goes down, so for your own protection, I would do that. For our before we issue anything, we want to make sure, especially with the current events and the slides everywhere is, is you need to be aware that we are gonna be extra cautious just because of the problems we've had on the hill. So you'd have the analysis and then the funding of the independent review, and the reason for that is, is we don't have source people on the staff depending on the complexity of that, because of the face of that hill and the failures we've had in other areas, we would elect to send it out to Shannon, Shannon Wilson and the people we use most often when we review. So, if you're selective in geo-engineering (indeterminate comments)....use Shannon Wilson for some reason, we'd use someone else... ANW: Sure RC: ...But we need to have somebody independent. ANW: I'll probably use (indeterminate comments).... RC: (indeterminate comments).... ANW: And is that OK? I mean, do you get along with them if they're still... RC: (indeterminate comments)....you know, it's a technical (indeterminate comments)....issue. Is it there? And what's the real (indeterminate comments)....and before we even sign off (indeterminate comments).... and what measures are going to be taken in the way of the groundwater and for shoring both side stability, so some of the things you were talking (indeterminate comments)...;and the drains and the drain pipes and the catchments would be addressed in site of that geotechnical report. ANW: I think I can turn that hill into a desert. I think I can make it so that the water doesn't come down (indeterminate comments).... RC: Well, when you do that, tell us how (indeterminate comments)....'cuz we've probably dropped a hundred grand over here `cuz it keeps coming up out of the center of the street. And it comes up out of a six foot pipe here and all of this mess... ANW: So, the water I hear running to the south of it is, I mean you put it underground in a pipe.... RC: This is a, this is a, this is a, you know, this just, this runs pure, clean, and we've had the Flow -Tote in here, and yet the Flow -Tote in the three years of draught that we experienced really didn't change - hadn't changed at all. I don't remember what they were running - 2 1/2 or 2E CFS and higher. And so at our recon here we found the same thing that Gary is saying - that there appears to be some streams and that in that geotechnical report with his sensitive areas, locate where they are and what you'll do with them. It just...if you put a shovel in that hillside, it comes out. We've got some (indeterminate comments)....spalls pit (indeterminate comments)....Just make sure you're OK for yourself and we (indeterminate comments)....we're not trying to scare you or anything, but we've seen the problems, and if you were on our side, you wouldn't, especially with the current situation... ANW: ...in the paper. I don't want to be interviewed about (indeterminate comments).... GROUP: (chatter and some laughter) ANW: ...and I don't think anybody wants to do that, like I say, it seems like all the easy, good sites are just....what's left is junk....it is... RC: Well, it just has more challenges, and I, you know, I think you probably can, but everything we've had up there has been a real....find out where the mobile home park is please, Kelcie. Kelcie Peterson (KP): Where is it up here? RC: It's right down on the other side of the highway. ANW: Oh, that's for sale? RC & KP: Yeah.... ANW: (indeterminate comments)....and maybe that's why RC: Did you see me on TV a year ago? See that eastern row? Those are all elderly people on.... END OF SIDE "A" OF CASSETTE RC: ...and the inside of that hill you can see. Now, now first, that's fill... 2 • • ANW: Um-humm RC: ...obviously fill, but if you look at it, and then look real careful you can see that it's done this. So, that...each of these has got to be 10 or 15 years worth. Some of that must have been before the fill. So, if you go back a hundred years, you can see it. So, if you climb around inside there, you see the trees trying to find "up." The "up" has changed in the past twenty, 'cuz they're different, and it's like the stuff over here, there's no rhyme or reason to to `em, you know? Some of them are this way, some of them are that way. So, we're aware of soils problems. If you're stuck and show that it works, good. We want you to do it, but we will certainly, you know, have to have, upon approval, review of that. And, I'm not trying to scare you, but I just want you to know what that process is. ANW: Yeah. The trees on this side are all upright. I couldn't find any trees that (indeterminate comments).... RC: Yeah. No, we've walked down there, and I'd like to go along with a couple of the other things here. You know, the site shows that South 128th is vacated. So, we witnessed that and it doesn't...we can't tell the assessors map shows that it's still there in part. So, that just needs to be clarified. (indeterminate comments)....bookkeeping thing and I'd like to make a copy of this... ANW: I think I have the vacated in submission right here RC: I don't need it today - that's just a bookkeeping thing. Our review in here looks like some of the mapping and your mapping may not have been right in the line in there, and without doing any more, we just want to make sure that your survey and the right-of-way of the WSDOT is OK. Do you have this? ANW: I don't have that... RC: We can...we'll just give ya' this on a copy... ANW: Well, I've got one that shows that this is vacated (indeterminate comments).... RC: We've come down from these guys trying to find what, you know, with these other things, and we've talked. If we ever build a street - 130th coming across - when we closed 130th here, we built these signals as what other options could we get through, so that's where we've tried to chase this (indeterminate comments).... question of what it would be and would we ever be able to build a street there (indeterminate comments)....economically - you'd never get the....Well then the sewer and the...in particular, these guys (indeterminate comments)...So, that's that business. For water and sewer, and I don't remember if twenty has it - has a main in Pac Highway or not. At one of the purveyor meetings I remember talking to him and I thought there was, but I just need to look at the map. And you're right on the boundaries, though I'm not sure...we haven't had time to go any further to see if you're twenty or one -twenty-five, but they've got a joint operating agreement, so I put down one -twenty both of 'em here for your availability letters, and then I put on Russ' at one - 3 • • twenty-five, his phone number, right on the sheet so you don't have to look that up, and I put Val- Vue's phone number on there, too, for the sewer availability. Again, the surface water is designed to the King County Manual, once you get all this geotechnical stuff worked out (indeterminate comments).... we cross paths a lot, or work together, or however you want to say it. It is us for pipe, and Gary for sensitive area and they mesh together (indeterminate comments)....You have to deal with both of us generally. Bio -filtration or a coalescing plate - that stuff's pretty standard. Your trip generation for the daily total and the AM and PM peaks - you trigger the sidewalk ordinance, so you would construct Pac Highway improvements and here's a preliminary design report. I don't see it as a big thing at this point, but you'd wanna have - as the preliminary, I could stamp the total location of the curb and gutter and the sidewalk. ANW: So, I need a sidewalk for my property? RC: You trigger that sidewalk ordinance - the project is over $200,000 - 250...$250,000 or 25% of the value or 25,000 feet, so that's all you. ANW: 500 feet? to where? I think I'll make it all the way up to the grocery store... GROUP: (miscellaneous discussion) RC: Why would we have a preliminary plan? It's the council's highest priority. ANW: The sidewalks? RC: Pac Highway - constructing curb, gutter, sidewalk (indeterminate comments).... ANW: So, can I build the sidewalk from the edge of my property up to the grocery store? RC: It all depends if you do pet traffic. That might be a mitigation. The sidewalk ordinance is triggered by the building size and and the TMC, and you don't have any description. On the trip generation I don't really see any way - any mitigation's, because I just don't think that you'll take that much traffic and I don't think you'll do any pet traffic. How many employees? ANW: Somewhere around twenty. Depends on who shows up on that day. RC: Is that what you have now? ANW: Yeah, that's about it. RC: Where are you at now? ANW: Seattle. RC: How many of 'em ride a bus? 4 ANW: (indeterminate comments)....No, no, seriously. If you do ride a bus, there's a bus line that goes along here. RC: (indeterminate comments)....so that's where's the bus stop. So, talk. If you do have the bus, address that in - address that so that when you get to BAR with Alexa you can answer (indeterminate comments).... ANW: So, there's no bus that comes up the hill? (indeterminate comments).... RC: No, the Pac Highway bus, and I forget the number of it, is METRO's most successful run. So, in all likelihood, in terms of ridership, it's better than our stuff in the 340 and 150 and counter (indeterminate comments)....of all the main corridors in the whole region, this one has a good chance of bus ridership. Just what are you gonna' do and how many crossing the street and generally probably need to recognize they're gonna have to cross with care. That's a 45 mile -an - hour speed limit there with probably 50 mile -an -hour speeds. That, that, that gets us to the loading zone that just we don't like and probably will permit, and the reason for that is, again over 50 mile - an -hour speeds here...it's wide open, and there's two things we don't want is somebody backing in... ANW: Sure, we don't want that either. RC: ...but there's no way to control that except to design it differently. The other thing we don't want is somebody sitting here and there's another semi out in that street. Hey, you're right. We know they do it on Occidental and I've seen 'em do it on Andover Park East, but out here at 50 plus miles -an -hour, you know, and some of the guys, you know, they have been haulin' a long ways - they can't see `em from behind very well if it's dark... ANW: Well, that's why we figured that they would pull in. They could pull right in... RC: But they're out...like your question earlier... ANW: Right RC: ...you said "I can't stop that." The only way to stop it is see if there's another way to do it, `cuz, `cuz... ANW: Right... RC: We haven't put a template on here... ANW: Well, what I'm gonna tell ya' is that we have designed - we can design a totally turn around on the site - get `em all the way off. We could make an off road...What truck drivers do, I've found, from Boise, Idaho to Alaska to Hawaii to all over Seattle - you could design anything you want, and there gonna do...ya' know? It's...so...ummm....I mean I can see that as a problem. That's why I tell you we designed the thing to get off the road - they can back, they can get in, they 5 • • can turn and get back out of it. So, try to put it, you know, for us to put the loading dock somewhere up on the side here is gonna be, ummm, gonna be impossible. But, I dunno...we can continue this through, which would address that problem of access, or something through, address this through, that they could come out and not be looked at... RC: Let me explain the decision process here and the bodies (indeterminate comments)....we're only here to help you... ANW: Sure. RC: ...and we do lots of help. We post streets, because you've been to Burney's. Were you to Burney's before we closed the street? ANW: Yeah, yeah, sure. RC: Have you been to the butcher? And the traffic that come - you know, these are misaligned? ANW: Sure RC: And people are... ANW: Sure RC: And drivers are worse than truck drivers ANW: Sure RC: And so this was a total free-for-all. And, and people, I mean, ya' know, several killed. In, in, including putting a couple peds, you know, a couple three -hundred feet down the street and through...and, not pretty. So, we had all this neighborhood business in there. They're very...some of 'em highly concerned that we closed this, and we signalized this arterial and this arterial. And, uh, and we worked with Burney for his drive through trucks, and these people come to council and say "yeah, it's supposed to happen that way," but, oh, like one of the neighbor people came in here in her van - Right turn only, and she turned right out here and got picked off by a truck coming through the signal against the sign. And we've seen the trucks do it. And the communication has been that way for three years. And the truck loading and going the wrong way - and if you think I'm gonna touch one down here with a ten foot pole, go find another site. And, and I don't mean to sound hard, but the history here, and the accidents, and the community concern, and the planning commission is that this is a fixture in the Tukwila community. He's been here, he's been in the paper a hundred years - and so you've got the people that say "Burney walks on water" and you've got the people that hate the trucks. So, there wasn't anything we could do there that would not be a mess. So, the drive-thru thing on the trucking is something we, we, we look at it - we push the radiuses around and, and the structure is designed so that it, you know, it's meant to work one way, or something like that. And if you - you can demonstrate that - that the deliveries all come from the north on 599, you know, not, not just by control 'cuz signs aren't gonna do it. They haven't 6 worked for us for Burney, and you - just like we said, you know (indeterminate comments)....the design has to do it. So, the design includes the marketing that the delivery stuff comes from the north or from the south and we'll look at that, but that... ANW: Well, that's... RC: ...that backin' in deal... ANW: No, I'm just sayin'...yeah, I'm just sayin' that that's somethin' I can't control... RC: No, no, neither can we. So, we need to approve something that precludes that. So, you know, I get to do all the good news for you - the dirt and the trucks. But.I think that - I, I still think that they're both still workable... ANW: Yeah, I can do it. RC: The rest of these checks on here are just the standard METRO side sewer and you will need to do land altering permits ANW: I wouldn't be this far along if I didn't think it wasn't solvable. Yeah, I mean, this is...do you think it's buildable? I mean, I mean if my photo guys looked at it and said - he said "without cores - you know, core samples, it's stable. Short of doing that, it's stable where you wanna build." RC: Did he walk it? ANW: Yeah. He went out with the guys who did the water... RC: No, I've been on this property that has been under tremendous scrutiny for years right here, and it looks like that to me, so....and I'm not a geotech and I just kind of look at it and go... ANW: There's, there's big differences RC: That big hole up there is the fill for Southcenter and the freeway, and this piece here hasn't had anywhere near the magnitude in the number of yards taken away.. ANW: This one here is the big, famous landslide. RC: And, and, and, and, not, not to argue with Gary, but we've walked that wood side up there all frontward and backward and all around - you know CONTINUED DISCUSSION ON SLOPE STABILITY AND HYDROLOGY OF THE SITE. KP: Do you have any more questions of us, `cuz we're about outta time? 7 • • ANW: I've got, Yeah, just a couple quick questions. You need a...you want truck staff to come in here and be able to load and then go out that they can't... it's really - it's just... RC: There are two things that we don't want. We want the design so that someone doesn't back a semi around from 99 onto the site... ANW: Right RC: And, and that it doesn't•set up so that this truck is queued so that somebody is sitting out in 99 for someone else to...you know, my perception is is that you must have one or two trucks that leave - one or two trucks an hour, so, the chances of this one or two trucks can leave without this happening are pretty small. ANW: Yeah, yeah - with a changed use. RC: If it changes use, then there's storage for two trucks (indeterminate comments)....you know, that's what we've got is an incredible accessibility, you know, to the freeway system to go anywhere in the Puget Sound (indeterminate comments).... ANW: So, you're sayin this pretty much doesn't work for your.... RC: Yeah, we haven't put templates on (indeterminate comments).... CONTINUED COMMENTS AND QUESTIONS BETWEEN APPLICANT AND PLANNING 8 Pre-Aplication Checklist CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development Building Division -Permit Center 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431-3670 PRE -APPLICATION FILE NO. PRE97-001 PROJECT: SIC N.w,. MEETING DATE/TIME: 1/23/97 2:30 P.M. SITE ADDRESS: 12605 PACIFIC aY s The following comments are based on a preliminary review. Additional information may be needed. Other requirements/regulations may need to be met. BUILDING DIVISION The following is meant to be general information related to the requirements of the Tukwila. Building Division for the processing of building permits. Specific code issues will be ,.. / addressed through the normal plan review process after the permit is applied for. M 1. Comply with the Uniform Building Code, 1994 Edition, as adopted and amended by the State (Table 10- �/ B, Section 1607, and Section 3003 of the 1994 UBC are not adopted). LTJ 2. Comply with the Uniform Mechanical Code, 1994 Edition, as adopted and amended by the State. 3. Comply with the Uniform Plumbing Code, 1991 Edition, as adopted and amended by the State. Er 4. Comply with the Washington State Energy Code, Chapter 51-11 WAC, 1995 Edition. Energy code specifications and data must be included on the building plans. L`7 5. Comply with Washington State Regulations for Barrier Free Facilities or Design (State amendment Crreplaces UBC Chapter 11 in its entirety). C 6. Apply for and obtain the following Building Division permits and approvals through the Department of Community Development Permit Center: /Building Permit %/Rack Storage • Other: ,/ Mechanical Permit • Demolition (building) T 7. All applications and plan submittals must be complete in order to be accepted by the Permit Center for plan review. Use the Plan Submittal Checklist provided on the reverse of the application forms to verify that all the necessary materials and information has been supplied. 8. Plans submitted for approval must be stamped by a Washington State licensed architect or engineer and shall specifically contain the name of the person designated as the architect or engineer of record for the project. This person shall be responsible for reviewing and coordinating all submittal documents prepared by others, including deferred submittal items, for compatibility with the design of the building. (See UBC Sec. 106.3.4) 171/ 9. Temporary erosion control measures shall be included on plans. Normally, no site work will be allowed ,..,/ until erosion control measures are in place. LTJ 10. Rockeries are not permitted over 4' in height. Retaining structures over 4' in height must be engineered retaining walls, and require a separate building permit. M11. All rack storage requires a permit and rack storage over 8' high must be designed for Seismic Zone 3. A Washington State structural engineers stamp will be required on plans and structural calculations submitted for rack storage over 8' high. Er 12. Construction documents shall include special inspection requirements as specified in UBC Sections 106.3.5 and 1701. The architect or engineer's inspection program required by Section 106.3.5 shall be included with plan submittal documents when permit application is submitted. Notify the Building Official of testing lab hired by architect or owner prior to permit issuance date. The contractor may not hire the testing lab. ❑ 13. Structural observation shall be required as specified in UBC Section 1702. 14. Construction documents shall contain soils classification information specified in Table 18 -I -A of the Uniform Building Code on the copies stamped and signed by Washington State licensed architect or engineer in responsible charge of the structural design work. ❑ 15. Separate demolition permits are required for removal of any existing buildings or structures. ❑ 16. Comply with UBC Appendix Chapter 12, Division II - Sound Transmission Control. Er 17. Addresses are assigned by the Tukwila Fire Prevention Bureau. Pre -Application Checklist Page 2 BUILDING DIVISION • ❑ 18. Obtain approvals and permits from outside agencies: ❑ ELEVATORS are regulated by State Department of Labor and Industries. Permits and inspections for elevators are obtained through the elevator section of that agency (reference RCW Chapter �.�/ 70.87). Phone (206) 248-6657. LTJ ELECTRICAL PERMITS AND INSPECTIONS are obtained through the Department of Labor and Industries. Phone (206) 248-6630. PLUMBING PERMITS AND INSPECTIONS are obtained through King County Health Department. Inspections: (206) 296-4732; Permits: (206) 296-4727. ❑ King County Health Department must approve and stamp plans for PUBLIC POOLS/SPAS and FOOD SERVICE FACILITIES prior to submittal to the Tukwila Building Division. ,..,/ Phone (206) 296-4787. LJ FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS plans are reviewed through the Tukwila Fire Department. Phone: ,(,2!06) 575-4404. L`J 19. MPs1 N(J �t'tXtt1R 6}}¢a. 'DUmet) 111 AcCDRDANGlily tIEG Z102, -S 4TAELa 29-A, u1 11�G 904. Z,2(o R AN A G1ge �,�"fir4fAIISNINC{ jstONt C 1'� 'RGSta t gen ri is veer. c Di N t•. LYJ 20. °I . 6144% (coi AAta.b-ex• II'irA Checklist prepared by (staff): Date: 01, 6O611 01 REG1tos. OF i iec ckkokrresz. t2 , - -r ►qleci-A-Atc4L. Viskrri p►Ti ON lb 135, T7goo tO tr _D ,tt z.*1- Fsu i L -D 't''c:c.), 6 j 6t1 MaiSCS ON 'PLAN ConritZTIcatJ op - 1 TEK 16 '� iWaMOT -- Ft U AL Pre-/spplication Che, dist CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development Building Division -Permit Center 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431-3670 PRE -APPLICATION FILE NO PRE97.-ooi: PROJECT. ICA N: MEETING DATE/TIMEr /23/97 :30 P.M: SITE ADDRESS26• o�,PACIFIC4aY s The following comments are based on a preliminary review. Additional information may be needed. Other requirements/regulations may need to be met. ENVIRONMENTAL 1) The site has slope areas that exceed 40 percent in gradient. Undeveloped slopes that are greater than 20 percent are treated as sensitive areas and will be subject to the Sensitive Areas Ordinance (SAO). Areas of Potential Geologic Instability are addressed in the Ordinance which is Section 18.45.080 E. of the Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC). 2) As part of project review a geotechnical investigation will be required to demonstrate the feasibility of the project and to determine adequate building design. The geotechnical investigation will depend on the degree of development related to sensitive slope areas. On-site grading may affect slope stability and groundwater movement. Significant groundwater discharge and the appearance of earth movement is evident throughout the on-site slope. 3) Slope areas, exceeding 20 percent grade, that are cleared for development will be subject to the Tree Ordinance (Tree Regulations - TMC Chapter 18.54). A required landscape plan will consist of tree retention and tree planting per the standards of the Ordinance. Tree replacement is required for those greater than 4 inches in diameter at breast height (DBH) except for black cottonwood trees. Only trees present on sensitive area slopes will be subject to the Tree Regulations. 4) In addition, there is a potential for associated wetland areas or seepage wetlands. Per the SAO, sensitive area study will be required for wetland determination (TMC 18.45.020 f.). If wetlands are present using the 1987 Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual, their ratings must be determined. Without an exception, only Type 3 wetland use and relocation is allowed but includes the mitigation standards of TMC 18.45.080 c. Pre -1 iiplication Ch&Qlist CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development Building Division -Permit Center 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188. Telephone: (206) 431-3670 PRE -APPLICATION FILE NO.. PRE97-001 PROJECT: AFRICA N.W. MEETING DATE/TIME: 1/23/97 2:30 P.M. SITE. ADDRESS. 12605 PACIFIC HY S The following comments are based on a preliminary review. Additional information may be needed. Other requirements/regulations may need to be met. FIRE DEPARTMENT - Construction Information 173/ 1. The City of Tukwila has adopted the 1994 Uniform Fire Code. This and other nationally recognized ,..�/ standards will be used during construction and operation of this project. Ld 2. Fire hydrants will be required. (City Ord. #1692) Tr 3.• Required fire hydrants shall be approved for location by the Fire Department, approved for purity by the Water Department, and fully in service prior to start of construction. By line of vehicular travel a fire hydrant must be no further than 150 feet from a structure; and no portion of a structure to be over 300 feet 7( from fire hydrant. (UFC 903 and City Ord. #1692) LTJ 4. Automatic fire sprinklers, audible and visual devices, and a minimum of one pull station per floor are required for this project. Sprinkler system and fire alarm shall comply with N.F.P.A. #13, #72, and ADA requirements. Sprinkler plans shall be submitted to Washington .State Surveying and Rating Bureau, Factory Mutual or Industrial Risk Insurers for approval prior to being submitted to Tukwila Fire Marshal for approval. The fire alarm plans are to be submitted directly to the Tukwila Fire Marshal for approval. Submit three (3) sets of drawings. This includes one for our file, one for company file, and one for the job site. (City Ord. #1742) LJ 5. Maximum grade is 15% for all projects. ,.,/ 6. Hose stations are required. (City Ord. #1742) LJ 7. A fire alarm system is required for this project. (City Ord. #1742) Plans shall be submitted to the Tukwila Fire Marshal for approval, prior to commencing any alarm system work. Submit three (3) sets of complete drawings. This includes one for our file, one for company file, and one for the job site. 171/ 8. Special installations of fixed extinguisher systems, fire alarm systems, dust collectors, fuel storage, etc. require separate plans and permits. Plans to be submitted to the Fire Marshal prior to start of installation. (UFC 1001) L✓J Portable fire extinguishers will 'be required in finished buildings per N.F.P.A. #10. (Minimum rating 2A, 10 BC) 1:71/9 J 10. Buildings utilizingstorage of highpiled combustible stock will require mechanical g g g q rncal smoke removal per 07 Section 81 of the 1994 UFC. . During construction, an all-weather access will be required to within 150 feet of the building. (UFC 902) t32- 4 12. No building will be occupied, by people or merchandise, prior to approval and inspection by Fire and ,,,, Building Departments. 121 13. Adequate addressing is required. Fire Department will assign all new addresses. Number size will be determined by setback of building from roadway. Four inch numbers are minimum. Numbers will be in color which contrasts to background. (UFC 901.4.4) i4. Designated fire lanes may be required for fire and emergency access. This requirement may be ,,/ established at the time of occupancy and/or after the facility is in operation. (UFC 901.4) ICJ 15. Special Fire Department permits are required for such things as: storage of compressed gas, cryogens, dry cleaning plans, repair garages, places of assembly, storage of hazardous materials, flammable or ,.,/ combustible liquids or solids, LPG, welding and cutting operations, spray painting, etc. (UFC 101) ILJ 16. Fire Department vehicle access is required to within 150' of any portion of an exterior wall of the first story. Fire Department access roads in excess of 150' require a turn around. Fire Department access roads shall be not less than 20' wide with an unobstructed vertical clearance of 13'6" (City Ord. #1741). 17I 17. Adequate fire flow availability will need to be demonstrated for this project. ❑ 18.h 6rf'AL., Sys4cwt w.4.1 be- ce.ywun,..a -Lye bw,ld,"5 Pc nett o -r. 4 -ye.-- of 5yuro-4yt Checklist prepared by (staff): i� � ,� Date: V207 Pre-i'plication Chetlist CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development Building Division -Permit Center 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431-3670 PRE -APPLICATION FILE NO.. PRE97-001 MEETING. DATE/TIME:: 1/23/97 2:30 P.M. PROJECT: AFRICA N.W.,i 12605 PACIFIC h S SITE,ADDRESS The following comments are based on a preliminary review. Additional information may be needed. Other requirements/regulations may need to be met. FIRE DEPARTMENT - Inspections 111 1. Overhead sprinkler piping a.. Hydrostatic test b. Trip test c. Alarm system monitoring test ❑ 2. Underground tank a. Location b. Distance between tanks c. Distance to property line ,-y d. Depth of cover LTJ 3. Fire alarm a. Acceptance test b. Fire Dept. approved plans ❑ 4. Hood and duct inspections a. Installation b. Trip test ❑ 5. Spray Booth a. Location b. Fire protection c. Ventilation d. Permit ❑ 6. Flammable liquid room a. Location b. Fire protection c. Permit 7. Rack storage a. Permit b.. Mechanical smoke removal c. Rack sprinklers d. Aisle width Er 8. Fire doors and fire dampers a. Installation �--�� b. Drop testing L4' 9. Fire final a. b. c. d. Fire Dept. access Building egress and occupancy Hydrants Building address ❑ 10. Other: a. d. Fire Dept. approved plans e. Sprinkler head location and spacing f. Materials and test certificate e. Vent piping, swing joints, fill piping, discharge piping f. Anchoring g. Hydrostatic test h. Separate Fire Dept. approved plans e. Fire protection systems: (1) Halon systems load (2) Standpipes (3) Hose Stations (4) Fire Doors (5) Fire Dampers (6) Fire Extinguishers b. c. d. Checklist prepared by (staff): e. f. g. Date: SVi7 Pre -plication Chetlist CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development Building Division -Permit Center 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431-3670 PRE -APPLICATION FILE NO.. PRE97-001 PROJECT: AFRICA N.W: MEETING DATE/TIME:. 1/23/97 2:30 c 30.13.14. SITE ADDRESS 12605 PACIFIC HY S - : The following comments are based on a preliminary review. Additional information may be needed. Other requirements/regulations may need to be met. POLICE DEPARTMENT CRIME PREVENTION SECURITY RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Doors: Doors should have quality locking mechanisms with minimum one inch deadbolt locks. All exit doors shall be operable from the interior without the use of a key or any special knowledge or effort. The Crime Prevention Unit should be contacted for information regarding correct hardware usage at 242-8084. 2. Orientation of Windows: Windows should be located so that the parking lot area can be easily surveyed by individuals inside the building. 3. Graffiti Prevention Program: It is important to win the war against the graffiti "artist" and keep your building attractive. New non-stick anti -graffiti water-based or wax like coatings are now available to make an effective barrier against graffiti or other potentially staining substances. Contact the crime prevention unit for further information. 4. Landscaping: Plant materials should be placed and maintained so to provide visibility and prohibit hiding places for unauthorized people around ground level door and window areas. Sticker shrubs may discourage crime activities. Low shrubs and umbrella trees (where the canopy is maintained above five(5) feet from the ground) will allow surveillance opportunities, hence reducing the potential for criminal behavior. 5. Lighting: Energy efficient security lighting is a relatively low-cost, yet extremely effective way to protect the building and its visitors. By providing sufficient lighting in the parking lot and around your building you will discourage burglars and vandals who don't like light, preferring the cover of darkness for their dirty work. Also the lighting will provide a legitimate sense of security for the employees and the visitors. 6. Identity: Addresses for each individual building should be visible, both in daylight and during darkness. Site development which does not properly identify buildings will delay emergency responses by police, fire, and aid units. 7. Security Alarm: Recommend installing a security alarm system during construction that would report a burglary in progress when the business is closed. Checklist prepared by T. Kilburg (242-8084) 1/23/97 Pre lic CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development Building Division -Permit Center 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431-3670 JAN 2 1 1997 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PRE -APPLICATION FILE NO. PRE97-001 PROJECT:. AFRICA N.W. 1/23/97 2:30 P. 12605 PACIFIC HY S MEETING DATE/TIME:SITE ADDRESS. The following comments are based on a preliminary review. Additional information may be needed. Other requirements/regulations may need to be met. PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT The Parks & Recreation Department has no comment on this project other than requesting a picnic table be included in the landscaping for the workers to use from the two buildings. PreSpplicatjon ChAlist CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development Building Division -Permit Center 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431-3670 PRE -APPLICATION FILE NO. PRE97-001 • MEETING DATE/TIME 1"23/97 2:30P.M. ROJECT: AFRICAc.N W.'.: ITE.ADDRESS `PACIFIC HY s 151 ❑❑❑❑❑❑o❑ The following comments are based on a preliminary review. Additional information may be needed. Other requirements/regulations may need to be met. PLANNING DIVISION - Land Use Information Comply with Tukwila Municipal Code (zoning, land use, sign regulations, etc.) 2. Obtain the following land use permits/approvals: ❑ Boundary Line Adjustment/Lot Consolidation ❑ Binding Site Improvement Plan ❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment ❑ Conditional Use Permit Design Review Design Review -Interurban Environmental (SEPA) (7 Planned Mixed Use Development ❑ Planned Residential Development erg 3. Zoning designation: CI ❑ Rezone Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Tree Permit ❑ Short Subdivision ❑ Sign(s) ❑ Subdivision ❑ Unclassified Use ❑ Variance ❑ Other: Ccs Site located in sensitive area? l Yes 4. Minimum setback requirements: Front: ? 6 Side: S Side: 5 Rear: 5 � tp +rcr SpLonEs ❑ No 5. Maximum Building Height: Height exception area? ❑ Yes No oo 6. Minimum parking stalls required: oto s. �i' ocv sr Handicap stalls required: Vi o sphu:s 7. No more than 30% of required parking stalls may be compact. No landscape overhangs into compact stalls are permitted, although no wheel stops prior to hitting the curb will be required. 8. Minimum landscaping required: Front: 12- S ' Side: S ' Side: S ' Rear: 0 ' 9. Landscape plans must be stamped by a Washington State licensed landscape architect. All landscape areas require a landscape irrigation system (Utility Permit Required). 10. Roof -top mechanical units, satellite dishes and similar structures must be properly screened. Provide elevations and construction details as part of building permit application submittal. 11. Trash enclosures and storage areas must be screened to a minimum of 8' in height. Provide elevations and construction details as part of building permit application submittal. 12. Building permit plans which deviate from that already approved by the Board of Architectural Review may require re-application for design review approval. 13. U A -12A AP CE ? 0 N k -/`t I hl �i j 1G�✓ W 1 P,�i LON 0? 14. l.0 l o f% l zv s t' I? -o H1 t31 rs Apt'- V CMZ -GYM I'i t -t7 . 15. L C WAC I-4 1 Nct l7» GAN 17 VSE vt 12 . t.A-w A TTA-c-ifin b-rtr 16. J 17. 18. 19. 20. Checklist prepared by (staff): CIL,KC. Date: 2 3 19S Pre-Lplication Checlist CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development Building Division -Permit Center 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431-3670 PRE -APPLICATION FILE NO. PRE97-001 MEETING. DATE/TIME: _.,1/23/97 2:30 P.M. PROJECT: AFRICA N.W. SITE ADDRESS: : 12605�. PACIFIC HY S _ The following comments are based on a preliminary review. Additional information may be needed. .Other requirements/regulations may need to be met. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Project: .AFRICA NW... Address Date: .January 23, 1997. By: Pre-Ap..PRE97-001. SEPA Shoreline BAR REVIEW COMMENTS: Availability Letters: .X. :12605 Pac,fic Hy. PW# Shortplt BLA ROW Vacation Permits Water 242-9547 .X. Sewer VAL VUE WD #125/WD #20 242-3236 1. Water. ... Assessment .X. Double Detector .X. Fire Loop/Hydrant ... Proportionate Fair Share/No Protest Water Agreement 2. Sewer. ... Proportionate Fair Share/No Protest Sewer Agreement ... Grease Interceptor designed to Uniform Plumbing Code Appx. H 3. Surface Water. Identify drain system condition for 1/4 mile downstream. . N. Design to KC Design Manual . X. Biofiltration or Coalescing Plate Separator ... Riverbank Stabilization - 4. Hydrological/Geotech:..HILLSIDE STABILITY GEOTECH ANAL AND PROBABLE INDEPENDENT REVIEW (FUNDING) 5. Traffic. .X. Trip generation & Distribution for AWDT, & AM, PM peaks • Channelization/access: .X. Frontal/Sidewalk: OR PROPORTIONATE FAIR SHARE AGREEMENT IF PEDESTRIAN SAFETY IS MET. (TMC11.64.020 rqmnt for: 25,000 ft, 259; of value, or $250,000) ...CBD Treeplan: .X. Undergrounding: .X.Curb cut/Access: 6.R/W-Easements:..IDENTIFY ALL EASEMENTS 7. Developer's Agreement• 8. Turnover: 9. Other: .REMNANTS OF STREAMS, VACATION OF 128th ALL THE WAY THRU?? CITY LIGHT EASEMENT - RECORDED COPY All maps & plans to use NGVD datum. PERMITS TO BE OBTAINED: ... Water: ..EACH BUILDING SHALL BE METERED SEPARATELY ... H2O Meter -Exempt ... H2O Meter -Permanent ... H2O Meter -Temp ... Sewer- ... Side Sewer ... Sewer Main .X. Metro Business Declaration Form .X•Land Altering: .X. Drainage- ... FZC: ...StreetUse• .X. Hauling: $2,000Bond, $1,000,000 Ins., Route Map & $25 Fee Req'd. • .Oversize Load $5,000Bond, $1,000,000 Ins , Bus.Lisc./$50 Fee, Route Map, $25 Fee ▪ PSAPCA (demolitions) Ext (Private/Public) .X. Metro Discharge Floor Elevation: "S'Lur"Or'SECDON /STREET. W,SSYINGTON :I 7_GU!✓r. ENG;NF—ERS Wesl Volley iiwy. Sr"I Y.'a .?8788 (CG) 55-410^ B OCCUPANCY ' " :OFFICES 1,500 SOFT MAIN.F-.00R M OCCUPANCY WHOLESALE STORAGE .,. . 1.500 SO FT SECOND _FLOOR PROJECT LOGATION— . 9,800 50 FT'OMAN FLOOR) ". . . WHOLESALE STORAGE . 8100 50 FT:. 1500 50''(SECOND FLOOR) - .-- WHOLESALE STORAGE 1500 50 FT ,SLOG 5' 11,200 SO PT - _ NMOLES STORAGE OCCUPANCY PANCY .°FRCSS 5 WHOLESALE STORAGE M ;ONSTazUCnON v=N PARKiNsi .NOTAL OFRGE AREA -1500.50 FT ,.1000 x 25 .'. L - - c 6 STALLS TOTAL 105540.500.1000:0 .- 21 STALLS ' TOTAL PARKING STALLS 550U5ED = 25 STALLS :. FULL SIZE STALLS (20 x 9) -17 STAL' 5 COMPACT SIZE STALLS (16 ,8)30%.6 STALLS , 2 ArCF4518L E PARKING STALL6 • ...