Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA E97-0029 - TACO TIME - NEW RESTAURANT BUILDINGTACO TIME RESTAURANT NEW FAST FOOD RESTAURANT CONSTRUCTION 6820 S. 180T" ST. E97-0029 AFFIDAVIT O Notice of Public Hearing O Notice of Public Meeting OBoard of Adjustment Agenda Packet O Board of Appeals Agenda Packet flPlanning Commission Agenda Packet fl Short Subdivision Agenda Packet O Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit LJ Shoreline Management Permit OF DISTRIBUTION hereby declare that: Determination of Non- significance O Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance flDetermination of Significance and Scoping Notice LI Notice of Action Official Notice Other Other was mailed to each of the following addresses on fl * 8,t rl . . C._.. S 2A- Name of Projecta-D (\ll JIY _V ) Signatur File Number eq-/ - CHECKLIST .NVIRONMENTAL REVIEW/SHORELINE IT MAILINGS ( ) U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS ( ) FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION ( ) DEPT OF FISH & WILDLIFE FEDERAL AGENCIES ( ) U.S., ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ( ) U.S. DEPT OF H.U.D. WASHINGTON STATE AGENCIES OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT DEPT NATURAL RESOURCES OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR DEPT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT OF FISHERIES & WILDLIFE ( ) DEPT OF SOCIAL & HEALTH SERV. ( ) DEPT OF ECOLOGY, SHORELANDS DIV (') DEPT OF ECOLOGY, SEPA DIVISION* ( ) OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL * SEND CHECKLIST WITH DETERMINATIONS * SEND SITE MAPS WITH DECISION KING COUNTY AGENCIES K.C. PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEV. BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD FIRE DISTRICT #11 FIRE DISTRICT #2 K.C. WATER POLLUTION CNTRL SEPA OFFCL ( ) S CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) TUKWILA LIBRARIES ( ) RENTON LIBRARY ( ) KENT LIBRARY ( ) CITY OF SEATTLE LIBRARY ( ( U S WEST SEATTLE CITY LIGHT WASHINGTON NATURAL GAS HIGHLINE WATER DISTRICT SEATTLE WATER DEPARTMENT TCI CABLEVISION OLYMPIC PIPELINE ( ) K.C. DEPT OF PARKS ( ) HEALTH DEPT ( ) PORT OF SEATTLE ( ) BUILDING & LAND DEV DIV SEPA INFO CENTER y ) K.C. TRANSIT DIVISION - SEPA OFFICIAL SCHOOLS/LIBRARIES ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) CITY AGENCIES ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) HIGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT K C PUBLIC LIBRARY SEATTLE MUNI REF LIBRARY SEATTLE SCHOOL DISTRICT RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT VAL-VUE SEWER DISTRICT WATER DISTRICT #20 WATER DISTRICT #125 CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC WORKS RAINIER VISTA SKYWAY KENT PLANNING DEPT TUKWILA CITY DEPARTMENTS: ( ) PUBLIC WORKS ( ) FIRE ( ) POLICE ( ) FINANCE ( ) PLANNING ( ) BUILDING ( ) PARKS & REC. ( ) MAYOR OTHER RENTON PLANNING DEPT CITY OF SEA -TAC CITY OF BURIEN TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS CITY OF SEATTLE - SEPA INFO CENTER SEATTLE OFFICE OF MGMNT PLANNING LOCAL AGENCIES PUGET SOUND REGIONAL COUNCIL P.S. AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY SW K C CHAMBER OF COMMERCE MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE DUWAMISH INDIAN TRIBE ( ) DAILY JOURNAL OF COMMERCE ( ) VALLEY DAILY NEWS 2/10/97 C:WP51DATA\CHKLIST ( ) METRO ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING DIV. OFFICE/INDUSTRIAL 5,000 GSF OR MORE RESIDENTIAL 50 UNITS OR MORE RETAIL 30,000 GSF OR MORE MEDIA ( ) HIGHLINE TIMES DPC.) SEATTLE TIMES CITY OF TUKWILA DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL MOVEMENT OF 891 CUBIC YARDS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW 2,295 SQUARE ,FOOT TACO TIME RESTAURANT WITH ASSOCIATED PARKING PROPONENT: RICK LENTZ • LOCATION OF PROPOSAL, •INCLUDING STREET ADDRESS, IF ANY: ADDRESS: 6820 5 180 ST PARCEL NO: 362304-9105 SEC/TWN/RNG: 36/23/04 LEAD AGENCY:,CITY OF TUKWILA FILE NO: E97-0029 • The City has determined thatthe.proposal does not have a probable. significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS)is not required -under RCW 43.21c,030(2)(c1-:, This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checkli,St-and other information on file. with the lead agency. This information is available to the:public.on request. • ***4************4*******4******4**********************************11,44***4** This determination is final and signed this -1 day of 19 Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official City of Tukwila, (206) 431-3670 6300 Southeenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98133 Copies of the procedures for SERA -appeals: are available with the Department of Community .Development. To: From: Date: Re: City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director MEMORANDUM Steve Lancaster Michael Jenkins October 2, 1997 E97-0029, SEPA review of application by Taco Time, 6820 S. 180th. Project Description: This SEPA review is for earth movement related to the construction of a 2,295 square foot restaurant with drive through and 19 parking stalls. The applicant proposes to remove 491 cubic yards of earth and to replace with 400 cubic yards of fill, imported from off-site. Cut and fill is in response to construction requirements for project and to comply with City of Tukwila Flood Control Zone requirements, Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) section 16.52 Agencies with jurisdiction: None Summary of Primary Impacts: • Earth Site is generally flat with no history of unstable areas. Site is not within the Shoreline Management Zone (TMC 18.45), although Green River is approximately 220 feet from proposed east property line for project. Project includes over -excavation and refilling of site with structural fill, as referenced in project description. Approximately 80% of site is composed of impervious surfaces. Temporary erosion control measures will be used during construction. • Air Equipment exhaust from excavation will be generated, as well as related effects from use drive-through components of restaurant • Water The Green River is located approximately 220 feet east of parcel. No work will occur within Shoreline zone, with no sensitive areas found on parcel. Storm water runoff will occur from result of project, which will be collected in existing storm drainage system. Building will be constructed above a designated Flood Control Zone area, in accordance with Tukwila Flood Control Zone ordinance (TMC 16.52). 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Far (206) 431-3665 E97-0029 SEPA Checklist - Taco Time 6820 S. 180th St. October 2, 1997 • Plants • Only grass areas are currently found on parcel, which will be removed and replaced with landscaped areas in relation to development. • Animals No known species or migration routes nearby. • Energy/Natural Resources Energy will be used during construction and excavation. • Environmental Health No impacts other than noise generated during excavation activities. • Land/Shoreline Use Site is located in the Tukwila Urban Center. Applicant is currently seeking approval of a Short Plat application to create a separate parcel for the restaurant and related parking. Site is currently used as parking of existing Commercial Use. • Housing No impacts. • Aesthetics No impacts from excavation activities. • Light and Glare No impacts from excavation. • Recreation No impacts from excavation. • Historic/Cultural Preservation No known places or landmarks. E97-0029 SEPA Checklist - Taco Time 6820 S. 180th St. October 2, 1997 • Transportation • Project site is located on S. 180th St., near West Valley Hwy. Trips will be generated by employees and construction equipment to complete excavation. • Public Services No impact. • Utilities No impact Recommendation: DNS 09/15/1997 16:32 2067477149 SEP 10 '' 7 1 :05FI1 %KI.• I DCD-'P14 CMA PAGE 02 CITY OF TUKWILA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Telcphonei (206) 431.3670 6300 Southccnter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 AFFIDAVIT OF INSTALLATION AND POSTING OF PUBLIC rn`FORMATION SIGN(S) Store of Washington County of King Civ of Tukwila IPehk e p, Zn (print Name) understand that Section 18.104.110 of the Tukwila Municipal Code requires me to post the property no later than fourteen (14) days following the issuance of the Notice of Completeness. 1 certify that on the Public Notice Soard(s) in accordance with Section 18.104,110 and other applicable .guidelines were posted on the property located at & I P;--CP-Vo s. so as to be clearly seen from each right -of -way providing primary vehicular access the property for application file number _2,�... ant (Applicant Signature SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this ,.j 1t' day of , 19 a% w/ NOTARY F'rBLIC in and for the State of Washingtvr or- ugior residing at AO • My commission e•ires on / 6 ---OD AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION I, ) Q ,I,C'�°i t-V1i'V1')11 Y7 hereby declare that: Notice of Public Hearing n Notice of Public Meeting fl Board of Packet Board of Packet Planning Packet Adjustment Agenda Appeals Agenda Commission Agenda fl Short Subdivision Agenda Packet O Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit OShoreline Management Permit Determination of Non- significance Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice Notice of Action Official Notice yOther \1 Other Atico was mailed to each of the following addresses on Name of Projectlar File Numbert-1 -- nmct Signatur l L 1' Y \ 9A 14,06_, • City of Tukwila Department of Community Development NOTICE OF APPLICATION DATED SEPTEMBER 16, 1997 John W. Rants, Mayor Steve Lancaster, Director The following applications have been submitted to the Department of Community Development for review and decision. FILE NUMBERS: APPLICANT: LOCATION: PROPOSAL: OTHER REQUIRED PERMITS: E97-0029 (SEPA Application) Merrick Lentz Architects 6820 S. 180th St. Construction of a 2,295 square foot Taco Time restaurant, with drive through and 19 parking spaces. Building Permit Land Altering Permit These files are available for review at the Department of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA. Please call (206) 431-3670 to ensure that the file(s) will be available. OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT You can submit comments on this application. You must submit your comments in writing to the Department of Community Development by 5:00 p.m. on September 30, 1997. If you have questions about this proposal contact Michael Jenkins, the Planner in charge of this file. Anyone who submits written comments will become parties of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. APPEALS You may request a copy of any decision or obtain information on your appeal rights by contacting. the Department at 431-3670. A decision from the Planning Commission may be appealed to the City Council. The Department will provide you with information on appeals if you are interested. DATE OF APPLICATION: NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: NOTICE OF APPLICATION: September 2, 1997 September 11, 1997 September 16, 1997 2 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 09/15/1997 16:32 2067477149 CMA PAGE 01 MERRICK LENTZ A,RC}1ITECT • • DATE: .5grf ig lqq 1 TO: TA.1 ' rtm e ATTN:gl6 S FAX NO: 22 8 • Tkw SUBJECT: 1'VKA-)t 1.�A FROM: e4fAC LE1417 - / AA 1(-4 t1„ E)J Voj 5 MERRICK LENTZ ARCHITECT 1800 - 136th Place N. E., Suite 100 Bellevue, WA 98005 Telephone: (206) 747-3177 FAX: (206) 747-7149 'WOi < AIY'►otwtr -r, BE J X7 -Co &t' krervic. 69-0-rikrc gr 1 1. s hoe fitist re0 T.o -Oa 7o iNI W pn p4•1 Ih ogRofa1 IstfvtzE F IYi,ctiAlig,l rs T riff flOrrOV5 AlR, -- TA - 1(14, -.1 4'mac. 5€E- Y,7J 7.144.504-`( Arcs PAGE 1 OF L PAGES. • City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION• September 10, 1997 Rick Lentz Merrick Lentz Architects 1800 136th Place NE, Suite 100 Bellevue, WA 98005 RE: SEPA Application for Taco Time. Restaurant, 6820 S. 180th St. File No. D97-0181 Dear Rick: Your SEPA application, on behalf of Taco Time, for the construction of a 2,295 square foot restaurant, with 19 parking spaces and a drive through, has been found to be complete on September 10, 1997 for the purposes of meeting state mandated time requirements. I have been assigned to this project. The next step is for you to install the notice board on the site within 14 days of the date of this letter. Also, you must obtain laminated copies of the Site Plan and Notice of Application to post on the board, which are available at DCD. After installing the sign, you need to return the signed Affidavit of Posting to the our office and you will receive the Notice of Application and Site Plan. An appropriate place for the sign would be adjacent to the existing Notice Board posted for the Subdivision approval. This determination of complete application does not preclude the ability of the City to require that you submit additional plans or information, if in our estimation such information is necessary to ensure the project meets the substantive requirements of the City or to complete the review process. I will be contacting you soon to discuss this project. If you wish to speak to me sooner, feel free to call me at 431-3685. Sincerely, Michael Jenkins Assistant Planner cc: Reviewing City Departments c:\msoffice...sepa\9729comp.doc 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION 1, . v .C-CL.�4 h tv i 1 VC hereby declare that: Li Notice of Public Hearing O Notice of Public Meeting Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet Board of Appeals Agenda Packet OPlanning Commission Agenda Packet fl Short Subdivision Agenda Packet O Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit 0 Shoreline Management Permit Il Determination of Non- significance fJ Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice Notice of Action Official Notice Other was mailed to each of the following addresses on h , ) atv7 Name of Project � 119 Signature— n\V-1 File Number( City of Tukwila John W Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION September 10, 1997 Rick Lentz Merrick Lentz Architects 1800 136th Place NE, Suite 100 Bellevue, WA 98005 RE: SEPA Application for Taco Time. Restaurant, 6820 S. 180th St. File No. D97-0181 Dear Rick: Your SEPA application, on behalf of Taco Time, for the construction of a 2,295 square foot restaurant, with 19 parking spaces and a drive through, has been found to be complete on September 10, 1997 for the purposes of meeting state mandated time requirements. I have been assigned to this project. The next step is for you to install the notice board on the site within 14 days of the date of this letter. Also, you must obtain laminated copies of the Site Plan and Notice of Application to post on the board, which are available at DCD. After installing the sign, you need to return the signed Affidavit of Posting to the our office and you will receive the Notice of Application and Site Plan. An appropriate place for the sign would be adjacent to the existing Notice Board posted for the Subdivision approval. This determination of complete application does not preclude the ability of the City to require that you submit additional plans or information, if in our estimation such information is necessary to ensure the project meets the substantive requirements of the City or to complete the review process. I will be contacting you soon to discuss this project. If you wish to speak to me sooner, feel free to call me at 431-3685. Sincerely, Michael Jenkins Assistant Planner cc: Reviewing City Departments c:\msoffice...sepa\9729comp.doc 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 • • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instruction for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. The City uses this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the City staff can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attached any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The City may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: Nonproject proposals refer to actions which are different or broader than a single site specific development project, such as plans, policies and programs. Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply". In addition, complete the supplemental sheet for nonproject actions (part D). For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project", "applicant", and "property or site" should read as "proposal", "proposer", and "affected geographic area", respectively. A. BACKGROUND • RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA SEP p 2 1997 PERMIT CENTER ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Contr•No. Epic File No. Fee $ 325 Receipt No. 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: -TAGO TIME 2. Name of applicant: M tEt..5TZ Ai2thAALT - TACO TimE 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: iZICK.Lg rCZ (Scb ►3co ' PL. KIEISOM co, gELL VOe, WA 1 5- (4zs)74-1 4. Date checklist prepared: S'691 A .-,2 21 1117 5. Agency requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Qs-Ctz.0 e. --Ti o r SCA -3e Q LE. O u Pot Pt -72-n'\ r( A PPaovt- orJ oR PceDiri otTo& - 1 t i'i''-1, 'TOIL oPET1tr.)t, W o u LO YttEN1 vece-mi, 151 1 of } 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. NO 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Gl ooTe_CKri t arL. i2f-fol( IS Mg -Q.(9'? oN ritE t )YT - Tl GIT'( 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. QKo 1'0 SE 5gorr PI'.t'Lis2g. WEST��P rel Po��lot� PtZOP� `i i5 V IJ 0 j o Ir.LC e l IEN Wv GIT,{ h7 h 5 'TI(Yl E. i F pspP PO v L AN U-fki-cv., COMt'n 4AL U5!✓ (ooLO CE $uic-c. 7N15 foiuQ€ fl 10o0HSE Qx G7 or l r -rpco TIME PR.aO7 -2- • • 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. BO t t-Oit Z P4lr[7I 1.-r -\ vrm ?.fir Pt v n rr, s c NP4E PST - 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of'your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized here. C pJ�'fP.UL7�. big Nil DOE: STO-'11 WOE PY FDc)1D • 7 v_ A w�7t L.L. _ Px+ , s-rF V . AND 1x— vE Y'N S1TF 60P u-' VAcAoNtT. $u11.00,4 i5 226S 'st . :cor' 1. Srrl 1S 3&, (,, 77 sr (o.84. AG) Dr wili<-c-1 .Ps-PPP-0KIY'llN7EL`t' DIJE 15_�lEO il-N D use° f.D.R A -c 5s °MXt'. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s).. Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica- tions related to this checklist. HoM E rePoOC Low A C (,8'LO 0-rEuS .6—C—C. 1'1 IS _____ aN "(tIE MI' 61' 55T- 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? -3- TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICA• B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, • Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)?1\i/Pc c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti- ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. OtLb `. 7 000.101ET)05 DUB-i• E?ATtr Q IcU J�� Stl?�GTU� �I,L�. 17 o -x.. 2'. sotuou rINtSN rizo2 mu&r 6e- \ 1)Cre° e\1)Cre9 MPRH I Y, CramPir Wrf\ (Yt►NlMUM Ftp at•1M no nl also CAT{. 441 (6Y Pictrr 4-‘196- FA f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. 5r-fe IS i' -t ( tJmA t'(I5 fl►Yi PA-Ulmt, Psl c. YOD .cSivrl Po(U► CotJS.z121JCt oro 1wLQ "(AYE t t4 eo5S1E LE g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? ND % -4- 410 • Evaluation for Agency Use Only h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: • po(U; ttostoN1 CotJteoL rt1 E-ASu P,E1 W 1 Ll. BE Uri pu 4 t• 1 Gc0�12-0L'(i,arrmorsTuY To ?pc -11r- aQ-eDoopt P.a' uek' C-- room f3Etomimac, fnuOPYoR- D rY. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. 0teRn0C (Teen?a,P ( 0024 tal •g .-(►) t. ca -21 Asir a' eesITAJVIK( of S . Vniir,tE eX4.4,PNr rvc i iQ) ►nDi2-111E:-"n-rt2oN,14 LANE b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. 'NO c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Nc►-\E OE r1EQ ib BE tJEcESS 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate' vicinity of the site (including year- round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. P�xT1 P -IV t 5 I,OC'(Xt�E reoee _ -5- 411 • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Will the project require any work .over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. tNjo A1,iia,a )nk 1 E 2co' PAA12-K_. 1p,0, Oct -De 61.t A- fffD1 tOUSL`' pr'N E I PFO rotnic - CSF fl ) c 7Ps L t.. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. 110 F ice( To A V-NOt,oN1 4) Will the proposal require surface water. withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. 4301i -01a-3 A -NO N t r / Pk E rnr'3[ moo i .. y.1 1" i' ATM PfrrIrc-AN-6 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No -6- • Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. 2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sour- ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. 5-tbern 1 k- _ cel 6Ulu7 NtJ ,P/1Je2¢ERS 5Y5'Cerv� C013S-C t -'CO 8j t -100)E Q oT -7- iEvaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. hto d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: iU_LUAt\X„ W 1 U. PE CoN�r �TtD FiT I_Kit2 'To BFL_zvE 0A -C÷ awl) (AN. ?ub�1oFF ffon cows-rBeu�� tC- ecL5tt O TheixYlA frPP ML02 p(zoPCYLui s ►J o -Co t\+ol,C Tim PRo s 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs 'X grass _ pasture — crop or grain _ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other _ water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? pj,L c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. -8- • • d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: LI A4 isf— __f2ILQ:C_L8:NOSe-PseENO 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: ----------- fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: -9- Evaluation for Agency Use Only 111 • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solor) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. tif.frntN16 Look! Kvi NA-aYU t. AP") 6,00U Ot.Fc-rel UT•' b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. tjo c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: (oiv\ ?11 IWCE W ark wy,,e Gooks N w c a Kr-% t?met [ gE PeoPtlzul phn5rPn Nei. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. t\k 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ- mental health hazards, if any: . WenPv( OT -1 1 PtfN t nelvnGG\r-C U5 ANIO 47-auv Alio . -10- • • Evaluation for b. Noise Agency Use Only 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? _pu It ►.4 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short- term or a long-term basis (for example: traf- fic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. 1.6-i 1 L ► N1 oR-1 v E-Tt-1Y_0 ur t -k 1-1-00¢5 Fgall It /nn "fo 11 P(vl _ 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: I' c 'J DE 1t) To 6'F fJEC 41_ 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? • srrE Is \ Ac, - of 1 A (PM 4Nk LDLOA3ki-«31U b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. P c. Describe any structures on the site. Nor, -11- • Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? r'flrn k.m- f.What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? 600m :t g• If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. t JO i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 25 (wa ) Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? j• k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: No0E 1. 'Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com- patible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if -12- . Evaluation for Agency Use Only 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, .middle, or low-income. housing? KDNE. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eli- minated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing. 104.16 c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Not 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? �1 'Zo k •mRT a,1'l s - SYo&c< , Q_000r j b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: eotnc of LWTR �A� N 1 tit b �eomm� -13- • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? 00b4 To 6-4,5)N;AT ti 9m t . b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Not t 1- L-( To ► m Phu( Sig P.Lout ) 0 i tr Cofl i C- t VL E c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Not.)E- DEf1EO to QC t.SEC , 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational oppor- tunities are in the immediate vicinity? 1 WA rel.I ) T-A11 b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by theproject or applicant, if any: ►Sotsfi= in Bc NErES_ -14- • Evaluation for 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation Agency Use Only a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro- posed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. NNE k'.flowN1 b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. MCDOE c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: NONE O D To 6E I�SCG SSQ ' 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed accss to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. 5ox71-\ 1 b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? YES c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? I1 SPA -e Flu. P12ovtom. -15- II) • Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. �(2 f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. PLAInc_Io Lo wIt WcxJ J7 PSE, 11.3o — I ' oo U9ff 0/Yfi_ Wrfk oNOk '( VottkimcaDCLuP4 KVA4'•�io - 30 OC) » - g• -4a f- e oKIYnKr6L`e. ± 3C0. Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor- tation_ impacts, if any: SIIJC.E NION-( TRIPS Wu,I., ISE A RC �-r Wit£ com1►4 To hbM>c QE r 4$JQ T{dt-rl DEG chnT, -rn aro? A r -1111-oT1n-)E , Ti -to I w cr orl 3N{SrOMS. 15. Public Services .Asa C.� a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. 4.0 b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Not )E oalACO -16- •. Evaluation for Agency Use Only 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity) (Natural gas') (waterT (refuse service) (telephone) sanitary sewer') septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. ALL or Tr E f oyE UTA M -n w u, 6E trTt UZGD WI -ft -tout 1MPkL •. rA. 5 C. Signature The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to its deci 1444111011V Signature: /////i /� Date Submitted: PLEASE CONTINUE TO THE NEXT PAGE. -17- TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICS • Evaluation for Agency Use Only E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON PROJECT PROPOSALS The objectives and the alternative means of reaching the objectives for a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the aforegoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This information provides a general overall perspective of the proposed action in the context of the environmental infor- mation provided and the submitted plans, documents, suppor- tive information, studies, etc. 1. What are the objective(s) of the proposal? oevaoe A VAcCA-NVT rnfv\M ¢.cIAL SI -Ce- IN A 7 W ►l l..1JE P1712AGTIVE Gorv11MONI-rY (AND Mn&fc.TIVE ToM S); TI tfcr Atka.' -ate Bn) s I ►.l i 5 To b tf4VVrE HT A e 2c*1-r A.f 0 "To Br A VITAL QnT CI -r( Fulz.M/ 1'( ''(E1 $ is 2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these objectives? 1 eM WoiztK kr Pornf-K iocAT1oN1. 3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the preferred course of action: Al -MI5 -fimE.'i1 - Pca. No atte& P VM 1.A6L ASF 0 N$L M Pt-e=1"t ole tc r a.15 -n-t-P F cor A . Wrri 1146 moposED srre-. G IvF-1 T. . LACK of A EM -1.12 LOCI Ro NA 01= vAL p1 . CdNVLI✓ VALE `Tkt- PROPosW 5rr L A r t3 s OEC( I S -(Ct6 PP --I✓ EO OPt . • -22- • 4. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? A -R6 tS o to ►S Pt4GTS k rrA -fly `TU(W ILO L9rv\Pt tvENSNE LAND aSe. PotA P( eLA.1. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: Kloo6 oeuAro 'ro 13C t-l�C.e SS r&- '. • -23- Evaluation for Agency Use Only CITY OFiUKWILA Department of Community Development • 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431-3670 RECEIVED CIN OF TUKWILA SEP 0 2 1997 PERMIT CENTER SEPA APPLICATION CHECKLIST FOR STAFF USE ONLY Planner: File Number: 5'43 7-O0a9 Receipt Number:: Applicant notified of incomplete application: Applicant notified of complete application: Cross-reference files: PR q7-6 / a 0191 Notice of application issued: A. NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: TACc) TImE N Ar T B. LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: (address and accessors parcel number(s)) (082o sourtl I8o- sireer Quarter: 3(9 Section: 23 Township: 01- Range: (This information may be found on your tax statement) C. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Go,J5Tr Itt A 221.5. sp Is-rAtiarAf.rr WIM 19 rfl,r -17111-S 4NP P41vE -L4'tl GSE. D. APPLICANT: NAME: MGK.. LEM-rZ (e.1c L.a-Ktrz) ADDRESS: 1 &20 136.44. P E- �E 1 5� rC loo I SaLEME) WA SIB PHONE: (425) 7+7 - 3177 SIGNATURE: I�A1x (425) 747 - 714j DATE: I 2, pier CITY O•TUKWILA •RECEIVED Department of Community Development CITY OF TUKWILA 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 SEP 0 2 1997 Telephone: (206) 431-3670 PERMIT CENTER ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (SEPA) APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS To submit for SEPA review, provide the items listed above to the Planning Division at 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Room 100. 6 copies of the completed and signed environmental checklist. You may use the City's pre-printed form or you may re -type the questions on your computer. If you choose to re -type the form into your computer, be sure to do so accurately. Mistakes or omissions will increase the review time. • 6 sets of the full size plans needed to clearly describe the proposed action. stre PLA -rt ANP I GF-i21oc ELEvATioNIS • One set of plans reduced to 8.5" x 11". ❑ Four copies of supporting studies. Sn11/2 Kera?T P C€/ -( 506mal One copy of the checklist application. One set of mailing labels for all properties 500' from the subject property. (See address label worksheet.) (uuSE = rvvie r -st_ s1)g1,1►T-TG-p) $325 filing fee. COMPLETING THE CHECKLIST The checklist contains several pages of questions which you are asked to answer. It covers a comprehensive set of topics. As a result, several of the questions may not apply to your project. If a particular question does not apply, simply write N/A underneath. HOWEVER, be aware that many questions apply despite appearing not to. Care needs to be taken in reading and answering the questions to ensure the appropriate response is provided. It is important that accurate and clear information be provided. You may not know all of the answers. Answer each question to the best of your ability. If we find an answer to be insufficient, the City may contact you to ask for more information. Sometimes, after reviewing the checklist, the City will ask you provide additional studies or information. Commonly requested information includes traffic analysis, site topography, soils studies and tree surveys. • 75.50' NO REVISIONS TO EXISTING • PAVED AREAS .c4 co I z SETBACK S88' 4 5 4 rE 5' st—f r — 3? a 2: q 4 24' — 205.00' S. SI. SO =Ng S G 1 --THIr----' ,r CONC. )MAL 4— 0 TACO. TI ME 22415 SP ORDER BOARD' EXIST. ASPHALT TO REMAIN 11 g g e \MASH ENL I N REMOVE EXISTINS CURS 1 SO1 1 '13-1/u 26100' 1 N884547 -W 64.00' SITE PLAN SCALE= I" ER 20'—O" / 2 ASPHALIC PAVEMENT 1". . f v o - 28'1858- R = 30.00' L = 14.83' N 8 Er 45' 4 7" 101 94.00• Pt= MC) • .-.: 104'07'29- R = 10.00' L = 18.17' S00.00 '00- E 6 62' = 24'28'16" R = 20.00' 1. = 8.54' = 13'41'22" R = 178.23' L = 42.58' LOCATION OF \ 200' SETBACK FROM \ HIGH WATER MARK UNPUBLISHED WORK ©1997 MERRICK LENTZ ARCHITECT MERRICK LENTZ ARCHITECT 1800 – 198th Place N.E., Suite 100 Bellevue, Weiehington 98005 208/747-3177 FAX 208/747-7149 \febSt5TETZD ARGHITECT :ICK D. UNTZI STATE c7F2 Vis6Hiti5T011 PROJECT NAME 41 Tacollmee TUKWILA, WA '�:R;illlllhllUllp111u1411P1I1p 1E-11111E- CURB -11111= RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA SEP t 2E7 PERMIT CENTER nsv s20'.T.rf IP ase 1 , 040 .i • •so v ,OR r A - IOOOrn. 1000' IT c DOST. AYINLT 11,11:1544111 CURB DETAIL KaLS 12.P+ La1Olp MOMS “RIG CAR 3, BOLLARD DETAIL ii� ®E n11=0111 mimipmE umn*E-11111 SODOOCPf ARE p - I].r2r R - In]S 1-12]0' 1— LOCATION OF ll 200' SETBACK FROM ll HI6H WATER MARK A -WORST war L -IA Iv EXTRUDED CURB DETAIL .OILS 1.A.,+ r.• SITE PLAN DGALD. . 200 R ( 6/ 4106 LEMMA DO 5MEM NAME 4) ITT. WOES L11 0004012 T19. 3 LRCS ••-r MR 0u •rL- (RAW IW •Coat . OnesaN2 000171INAT PRA OCTAL agEMARBIR 21 V. PAU DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE N01A01 LR afar rem RLAe VIA MIL PON DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE 1Or6 M•.T+ K sum sue sAesa ae2 nn• LeRe1Rr AT 400 •PAO2 ONLY. M. 01. SIM OM P MRP DISABLED PARK'G SIGN w scant Y rD• PAIRm •TAA BARRIER -FREE SYMBOL b CAW uslafsm vow Olen YEfYYOJ( 1prti /KMIEC1 MERRICK LENTZ ARCHITECT IMO s�r - 4*4*4 PXL. — On wnsa-an 1=1/10-n1* .IYmm� NINO= Q. LOWS ODOR RI RPROARRN PROLEC2 NAN! 1a 7acoTkne. R/CWILA, WA DRAWING T818 SITE PLAN DAZE MAY 11 LST DRAWN BY 11. • CHECKED BY. REVISIONS ALLY 25. NTT A-1 RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA SE? 0 2 ms7 PERMIT CENTER ,Ra ns, eme.Nfw— Clea 020100 ,lea ammo OR. PYW- nv NOr•RTH ELEVATION w.r. •1111-1. \\\\\\\.`\\\\\\\\\ \. Q. a0 • 1E11 111 dial \\\ • c2rr.am •f.4N•+ 100 11.1%f 13 ROOF PLAN •ro name MOM ,v. MI . A7c,.0 SOUTH ELEVATION 1► Nna &MIN MT. MDC. AMMO TOE *arca, axanf I p 1111111. ® _.® O Illillilillllll lil 1111. rr, Ome Nfa, WOO IUEST ELEVATION OYe.;, EAST ELEVATION UNPUOLONED MERRICK LENTZ ARCHITECT u.. - In 10•- ILL Done ,a 1118MTrtn r lOVI7irmu woo=J�e PROJECT NAME 141hcoThne. ?UKWILA, WA DRAWING T1TLR I�LOO,R raA' v DATE MAT D, MST DRAWN BY ML CHEMED BY . REVISIONS .ALT 2.. MJWI A-3