HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA E96-0015 - GULL SERVICE STATION - ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATIONENVIRONMENTAL
REMEDIATION FORMER GULL SERVICE
STATION NO. 240
EXCAVATE & TREAT
CONTAMINATED SOIL
15640 WEST VALLEY HWY
E96-0015
AGI
TECHNOLOGIES
July 30, 1996
15,256.146
City of Tukwila City Clerk
Tukwila City Hall
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila, Washington 98188
To whom it may concern:
Appeal Withdrawal
SEPA Determination - File No. E96-0015
Environmental Remediation
Former Gull Industries, Inc. Service Station No.240
15640 West Valley Highway
Tukwila, Washington
AGI Technologies (AGI), on behalf of Gull Industries, Inc., is withdrawing its SEPA Determination
appeal submitted to the City of Tukwila in a letter dated June 28, 1996. We understand our
withdrawal will allow our applications for Land Altering and Demolition permits to proceed.
Sincerely,
AGI Technologies
Lance E. Peterson
Senior Hydrogeologist
LEP/tag
cc: " Mr. William T. Vivian, Gull Industries, Inc.
Mr. Michael Jenkins; City of Tukwila
300 120th Avenue N.E., Building 4
■
RECEIVED
CITY OF TUKWILA
AUL 3 1 1996
PERMIT CENTER
Bellevue, Washington 98005 • (206) 453-8383 • FAX (206) 646-9523
WASHINGTON OREGON
CALIFORNIA
• •
AGI
TECHNOLOGIES
July 8, 1996
15,256.146
Mr. Michael Jenkins
City of Tukwila
Department of Community Development
6300 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila, Washington 98188
Dear Mr. Jenkins:
Condition Comment
SEPA Determination - File No. E96-0015
Environmental Remediation
Former Gull Industries, Inc. Service Station No. 240
15640 West Valley Highway
Tukwila, Washington
This letter provides AGI Technologies' (AGI) comment to the condition imposed by the City of
Tukwila on the June 13, 1996 SEPA Determination associated with the land altering permit AGI
applied for on behalf of Gull Industries, Inc. (Gull) for the above -referenced project.
SEPA Condition
"The city will hire an independent consultant at the applicant's expense to determine if there is soil
contamination in the right-of-way related to the subject property and what measures need to be
taken to mitigate any contamination. The study and its conclusions shall be presented to the City
for its evaluation prior to the issuance of a land altering permit."
AGI Comment
Gull has requested AGI conduct this investigation during the work on site. AGI has acted as
environmental consultant on over 400 sites containing petroleum hydrocarbon contamination. We
have established a reputation for providing cost effective and quality assessment and remediation
services. We believe we are qualified to perform the requested work. As part of our proposed
remediation activities at the site, we plan to conduct test pits and soil sampling along the right-of-
way.
300 120th Avenue N.E., Building 4
•
Bellevue, Washington 98005 (206) 453-8383
RECOVEDD
JUL 091996
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
• FAX (206) 646-9523
WASHINGTON OREGON
CALIFORNIA
Mr. Michael Jenkins AGI
City of Tukwila
July 8, 1996 TECHNOLOGIES
Page 2
We look forward to your favorable response to our request. Please call (206) 453-8383 if you have
any questions.
Sincerely,
AGI Technologies
Lance E. Peterson, P.G.
Senior Hydrogeologist
LEP/tag
cc: Mr. William T. Vivian; Gull Industries, Inc.
Mr. Steve Lancaster; City of Tukwila
AGI
TECHNOLOGIES
June 28, 1996
15,256.146
City of Tukwila City Clerk
Tukwila City Hall
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila, Washington 98188
To whom it may concern:
Appeal
SEPA Determination - File No. E96-0015
Environmental Remediation
Former Gull Industries, Inc. Service Station No.240
15640 West Valley Highway
Tukwila, Washington
RECEIVED
JUN 2 8 1996
CITY OF Turco.,
CITY CLERK
Pursuant to Tukwila Municipal Code 21.04.280, AGI Technologies (AGI), on behalf of Gull
Industries, Inc. is appealing the SEPA Determination issued for the above referencedproject on June
13, 1996. The basis for our appeal is the condition attached to the SEPA Determination. AGI
believes it is not necessary for the city to hire an outside consultant to assess for contamination in
the right-of-way related to the subject property. AGI is capable of performing the requested work
as part of our proposed remediation activities at the site, which includes test pits and soil sampling
along the right-of-way.
Sincerely,
AGI Technologies
Lance E. Peterson
Senior Hydrogeologist
LEP/tag
cc: Mr. William T. Vivian, Gull Industries, Inc.
300 120th Avenue N.E., Building 4
RECERFED
JUN 2 8 1996
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
ENT
• Bellevue, Washington 98005 • (206) 453-8383 • FAX (206) 646-9523
WASHINGTON - • OREGON
CALIFORNIA
City of Tukwila
John W. Rants, Mayor
Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director
June 27, 1996
Lance Peterson, P.G.
AGI Technologies
300 - 120th Ave., N.E., Bldg. 4
Bellevue, WA 98005-3020
Re: e96-0015, Gull Oil Station SEPA
Dear Lance:
This letter is to remind you that tomorrow, June 28, 1996, is the last day to file an
appeal on the SEPA determination for this project. As we discussed this matter
to some extent, I wanted to remind you about this pending date in case you were
going to proceed with filing an appeal or submitting any formal request for
reconsideration of the conditions related to this project.
If you have any questions, feel free to contact me at 433-7142
Sincerely,
Michael Jenkins
cc: Steve Lancaster
JoAnna Spencer
6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665
AFFIDAVIT
LI Notice of Public Hearing
fl Notice of Public Meeting
O Board of Adjustment Agenda
Packet
O Board of Appeals Agenda
Packet
LJPlanning Commission Agenda
Packet
OF DISTRIBUTION
hereby declare that:
0 Short Subdivision Agenda
Packet
L Notice of Application for
Shoreline Management Permit
LI Shoreline Management Permit
flDetermination of Non-
significance
MMitigated Determination of
Nonsignificance
Determination of Significance
and Scoping Notice
Notice of Action
Official Notice
Other
Other
was mailed to each of the following addresses on (9(/4/
DQ -V adz* - -61914 DIV
N('SAPC
1M,
SMV C UUv,V" p4 `'l c--4A-1^-iii
f) (*lit 'c, fico �� s
LIMA,U {2ti vsok ,
Name of Project 1166 1 )AJ14l( QS Signature
File Number (G"/(9' 01)(S
• CITY OF TIJK.WIL.
MITIGATED DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (MLNa)
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL:
EXCAVATE AND TREAT ABOUT 1.500 CU .YDS OF
CONTAMINATE[ SOIL. TREATED SOIL. WILL BE
REINSTALLED IN Tt-tE EXCAVATION AREA.
PROPONENT: AGI TECHNOLOGIES
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL, INCLUDING STREET ADDRES . IF ANY:
ADDRESS: 151 WEST VALLEY- HY
PARCEL NO: 000580-0032
5EC/TWN/RNG:
LEAD AGENCY: CITY OF TUKWILA FILE P10: E96-0015
The City has determined ned that: the proposal cites not have a probable
significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact
statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21r.03(H2I(c). This
decision was made: after review of a completed environmental checklist
and other information on file with the: lead agency. This information
is available to the public on request. The conditions to this SEPA
Determination are attached.
This r`G4S is issued under 197-11-340(2): Comments must be submitted by
Ae. ZS t. I i (p The lead agency will not act on this
proposaw for 15 days from the date below.'
Steve. Lancaster, Responsible Official
City of Tukwila, (206) 431-3680
6300 Sout.hcenter Boulevard
lukWi la> WA 98188
jvv. e 3+! 951
Date
Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with, the
Department of Community Development.
• •
CITY TIKW1LP.
COteD1T1ONS
Address: 156!NO WEST VALLEY HY
Applicant: Status: ISSUED
Per'm'it No: E96 -00I5 Applied: 05/15/1996
Type: P-.SEPA DNS Approved: 06/12/1996
Location:
Parcel #: 000580-0032
Zoning: MI
:*•.4.4:at•,k:`•:+•k:4.4•t•:k•b*:44•.4*'4.4:****:4.4*.4:4:+,:4*4.4.4.4:4•k•4•k•4:4.4'b*:a*•4A:4•k•h•k:s:t:k•k•k•k•k'444•.4'44•*•4•44'4**
I. The city will hire an independent consultant at the
applicant's expense to determine if there is soil
contamination in the right-of-way related to the subject
property and what measures need to be taken to mitigate
asiv contamination. The study and its conclus.ions.shall be
presented to the City for its evaluation prior to the
issuance of a land altering permit .
AFFIDAVIT
`0AAA1
O Notice of Public Hearing
O Notice of Public Meeting
LI Board of Adjustment Agenda
Packet
f Board of Appeals Agenda
Packet
fl Planning Commission Agenda
Packet
OF DISTRIBUTION
hereby declare that:
❑ Determination of Non-
significance
Mitigated Determination of
onsignificance
Determination of Significance
and Scoping Notice
❑ Notice of Action
Official Notice
0 Short Subdivision Agenda fl Other
Packet
O Notice of Application for 0 Other
Shoreline Management Permit
LI Shoreline Management Permit
was � each of the following addresses on
5e -(/\*AU iO4S
Name of Project A61- ""rpti/I O9 rD,$ `Signature
File Number eq Y' (5 -Di
(olt3 IPI(e .
10/14(
TO:
FROM:
RE:
DATE:
MEMORANDUM
Project File e96-0015
Michael Jenkins
SEPA review - staff evaluation o Environmental Checklist received
May 22, 1996
June 12, 1996
Project Description:
Site is located at 15640 West Valley Highway. Site is an abandoned Gull Oil Station.
Application is to excavate an estimated 1500 cubic yards of petroleum contaminated soil
and groundwater from two separate areas on site. Excavations to occur at or near
island and within existing structure. Soil will' be treated onsite and will be backfilled
within excavation area. Project will last approximately 4 months.
Agencies with jurisdiction:
None.
Comments to SEPA checklist:
Page 3, No. 11:
Page 3, No. 13:
Page 4, No. 1(e):
Page 7, No. 1:
Page 12, No. 8(e):
Shoring of right-of-way may be necessary during excavations.
Project does not lie within an environmentally sensitive area
No filling or grading proposed - site grade will be unchanged
after' completion of project
Petroleum contaminated groundwater will be treated by
circulating through excavations
Project is located in the Tukwila Urban Center (TUC) zone
Summary of interdepartmental comments:
• Fire: Will need a Fire Department permit and inspections
• Building: No comments
• PW: Land Altering permit will be issued after applicant submits copies of DOE, EPA
and Metro permits. Applicant to pay city's costs to assess what action to take
concerning contamination in ROW. Separate building permit required for demolition
of existing building and utility permit for capping utilities.
Also see attached comments input to Sierra file.
SEPA review - e96-0015
Gull Oil Station #240
June 12, 1996
Summary of Primary Impacts:
• •
• Earth
Level site, composed of sand/silty gravel. No filling or grading, as site will be
unchanged after remediated soil is returned. Erosion control will include use of berm
constructed of natural and/or man-made elements. Soil sloped so run off will flow
into open excavation area.
• Air
Minor dust and equipment exhaust during excavation, treatment and backfilling. Soil
to be dampened to control dust, as necessary.
• Water
Green River is located 800' west of site. No construction to occur within 200'
wetland perimeter, nor does project lie within 100 year floodplain. Any contaminated
groundwater will be treated by circulation through excavations. Water will be
discharged to storm/sanitary sewer after lab testing indicates levels are above
acceptable state levels. Approximately 20,000 gallons to be discharged, following
receipt of agency authorization. Runoff controlled by shaping soil treatment area to
retain runoff onsite.
• Plants
Grass and small, unclassified trees growing on site since property vacated. Will be
removed as part of remediation..
• Animals
Site provides no known habitat for mammals or birds. No known candidate or
endangered species found on site.
• Energy/Natural Resources
Project will only require use of energy sources during establishment of remediation
system. No known energy sources needed during remediation.
• Environmental Health
Petroleum hydrocarbon odors may be present during excavation and treatment.
Health and safety plan to be developed for project. Monitoring of air during project
will be performed to minimize exposure. Some equipment noise will be present
during excavation, treatment and backfilling. Noise levels to be similar to those on
adjacent West Valley Hwy. Work to be conducted between 7 a.m. - 6 p.m.
2
SEPA review - e96-0015
Gull Oil Station #240
June 12, 1996
• Land/Shoreline Use
• •
Site is a vacant service station with attached canopy, located in TUC zone. Under
Zoning Code section 18.28.050 (6), landfills and excavations are considered to be
unclassified uses allowed under zoning code, if it is determined to be a significant
environmental action. End result of project is a graded lot for future development,
not a landfill or excavation, although both processes will be used. Existing structure
to be demolished prior to remediation. Site is not classified as environmentally
sensitive.
• Housing
No housing demolition or housing proposed for site.
• Aesthetics
No structures proposed.
• Light and Glare
No known impacts.
• Recreation
No known impacts.
• Historic/Cultural Preservation
No known places, landmarks or objects.
• Transportation
Site is located on West Valley Highway, near a transit stop. Project may require a
street use permit during excavation if shoring is required along right-of-way.
• Public Services
No known impact.
• Utilities
Electricity, natural gas, water, telephone and sewer are probably onsite. Prior to
beginning remediation, utilities permit will have to be obtained.
SEPA review - e96-0015
Gull Oil Station #240
June 12, 1996
Recommendations:
• •
MDNS, with one mitigation measure:
• The city will hire an independent consultant at the applicant's expense to determine
if there is soil contamination in the right-of-way related to the subject property and
what measures need to be taken to mitigate the contamination. The study will be
undertaken during the demolition of the structure. The study and its conclusions
shall be undertaken and presented to the City for its evaluation prior to the issuance
of the land altering permit. Upon the review of this study by City staff, if it is
determined that there is no contamination in the right-of-way due to the conditions at
the subject property, the City will issue a land altering permit.
In addition, the applicant shall be advised of the following:
• A land altering permit will be issued by the Department of Public Works after the
applicant submits copies of permits from Department of Ecology, EPA and Metro.
• A demolition permit and appropriate utilities permits will be required prior to
proceeding with any of the soil remediation work related to this application.
• A permit from the Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Agency (PSAPCA) is required
as a condition of the demolition.permit. Contact at PSAPCA is Tom Hudson at 689-
4058
TO:
FROM:
RE:
DATE:
•
it y - emu
MEMORANDUM
•
Project File e96-0015
Michael Jenkins
SEPA review - staff evaluation of Environmental Checklist received
May 22, 1996
June 10, 1996
Project Description:
Site is located at 15640 West Valley Highway. Site is an abandoned Gull Oil Station.
Application is to excavate an estimated 1500 cubic yards of petroleum contaminated soil
and groundwater from two separate areas on site. Excavations to occur at or near
island and within existing structure. Soil will be treated onsite and will be backfilled
within excavation area. Project will last approximately 4 months.
Agencies with jurisdiction:
None.
Comments to SEPA checklist:
Page 3, No. 11:
Page 3, No. 13:
Page 4, No. 1(e):
Page 7, No. 1:
Page 12, No. 8(e):
Shoring of right-of-way may be necessary during excavations.
Project does not lie within an environmentally sensitive area
No filling or grading proposed - site grade will be unchanged
after completion of project
Petroleum contaminated groundwater will be treated by
circulating through excavations
Project is located in the Tukwila Urban Center (TUC) zone
Summary of interdepartmental comments:
• Fire: Will need a Fire Department permit and inspections
• Building: No comments
• PW: Land Altering permit will be issued after applicant submits copies of DOE, EPA
and Metro permits. Applicant to pay city's costs to assess what action to take
concerning contamination in ROW. Separate building permit required for demolition
of existing building and utility permit for capping utilities.
Also see attached comments input to Sierra file.
SEPA review - e96-0015
Gull Oil Station #240
• •
Summary of Primary Impacts:
• Earth
Level site, composed of sand/silty gravel. No filling or grading, as site will be
unchanged after remediated soil is returned. Erosion control will include use of berm
constructed of natural and/or man-made elements. Soil sloped so run off will flow
into open excavation area.
• Air
Minor dust and equipment exhaust during excavation, treatment and backfilling. Soil
to be dampened to control dust, as necessary.
• Water
Green River is located 800' west of site. No construction to occur within 200'
wetland perimeter, nor does project lie within 1.00 year floodplain. Any contaminated
groundwater will be treated by circulation through excavations. Water will be
discharged to storm/sanitary sewer after lab testing indicates levels are above
acceptable state levels. Approximately 20,000 gallons to be discharged, following
receipt of agency authorization. Runoff controlled by shaping soil treatment area to
retain runoff onsite.
• Plants
Grass and small, unclassified trees growing on site since property vacated. Will be
removed as part of remediation.
• Animals
Site provides no known habitat for mammals or birds. No known candidate or
endangered species found on site.
• Energy/Natural Resources
Project will only require use of energy sources during establishment of remediation
system. No known energy sources needed during remediation.
• Environmental Health
Petroleum hydrocarbon odors may be present during excavation and treatment.
Health and safety plan to be developed for project. Monitoring of air during project
will be performed to minimize exposure. Some equipment noise will be present
during excavation, treatment and backfilling. Noise levels to be similar to those on
adjacent West Valley Hwy. Work to be conducted between 7 a.m. - 6 p.m.
2
SEPA review - e96-0015
Gull Oil Station #240
• •
• Land/Shoreline Use
Site is a vacant service station with attached canopy, located in TUC zone. Under
Zoning Code section 18.28.050 (6), landfills and excavations are considered to be
unclassified uses allowed under zoning code, if it is determined to be a significant
environmental action. End result of project is a graded lot for future development,
not a landfill or excavation, although both processes will be used. Existing structure
to be demolished prior to remediation. Site is not classified as environmentally
sensitive.
• Housing
No housing demolition or housing proposed for site.
• Aesthetics
No structures proposed.
• Light and Glare
No known impacts.
• Recreation
No known impacts.
• Historic/Cultural Preservation
No known places, landmarks or objects.
• Transportation
Site is located on West Valley Highway, near a transit stop. Project may require a
street use permit during excavation if shoring is required along right-of-way.
• Public Services
No known impact.
• Utilities
Electricity, natural gas, water, telephone and sewer are probably onsite. Prior to
beginning remediation, utilities permit will have to be obtained.
3
Q
SEPA review - e96-0015
Gull Oil Station #240
Recommendations:
• •
MDNS, with three mitigation measures:
• Applicant shall pay for city's costs to assess possible actio s to take if co amination
extends into right-of-way.
�./ 'Q • A land altering permit will be issued by the Department of Public ► ,or s after the
diapplicant submits copies of permits from Department of Energy, EPA and Metro.
X • A demolition permit and appropriate utilities permits will be required prior to
proceeding with any of the soil remediation work related to this application.
4
CITY OF�TUKWILA
DepartmerWf Community Development II
6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188
Telephone: (206) 431-3670
SEPA APPLICATION CHECKLIST
FOR STAFF USE ONLY
P?'-- 00
-46
Planner:
File Number:
Receipt. Number: ,
Cross-reference files:
Applicant notified'of incomplete application:
Applicant notified of complete application:
Notice of application issued:
A. NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT:
Et" ct \ CKSZ'w.stril t Cul \ - Vc) yr 1 e -S
kc.,aHO
B. LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: (address and accessors parcel number(s))
1'S 6'-4 o Wes- \/o.k\t.
�lw luklvi lA Wio
K;v. Pr se-sSbrs
."oc o
Fo--c)oa -oo
Quarter: SW t Section: a` -t Township: Z3" Range: SE
(This information may be found on your tax statement)
C. PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
4-D`'.\ w‘11: -Act \ V`Q w\SL0.t G -k of-- -1cV.okur-. C.o h -‘ca, l hG of
D. APPLICANT:
NAME:
ADDRESS: 3°a ,c9NO'1Ct"-- I'VVer Z- . a i K 9 $2,"e.VLY j W OI g00s
PHONE: (o69"S3--S3 53 p06) 696-9Sc3
SIGNATURE: Z. DATE: S/' LI /9
Control No.
Epic File No. �—� — QDI5
Fee .$ 325Receipt No.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
A. BACKGROUND
Ev�v v•o" Nwn. A l %AAA ; ems — cov Ener
1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: C.,\\ Sz,v•voz.. a.k1.1o, ayo
2. Name of applicant: 'PSG z 72.c.- o\oy,ies
3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: v o. *: �.av,ca,��rer»►ti
300 Iop*k Pote.vw_k_ N , E . / P, \d� • 14 , 6�l levue-, W P otgooS
/ v
4. Date checklist prepared: 5//41
/c
5. Agency requesting Checklist:
City of Tukwila
6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable):
Tho_ pvsojQ<--k .;IA tern. .,p oX;"hrAke,y ovr •ytA.o"w- ks
7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity
related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain.
8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will
be prepared, directly related to this proposal.
7 j`1ow i d cuT -r'k Vua5 \ r• cope of
1 V"Q-r\- �o�C& �Y`c.hsVtii k�4
G -v l\ 5i�-E \o, yo
\S640 \P -t valley i -4 y•
•
�vkw�ta/ G10...5k; --
9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other
proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes,
explain.
o '2.
-2-
•
10. List any government appro als or permits that will be needed for your proposal.
rerwA)-, will wmk a 25'-1.-22�c USA.- �et'1•-i-1-
c -; ,s ; A- 0 -1=- -7:1 k -1c-
11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses
and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this
checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not
need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete
description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be
summarized here.I // .c
E.aC�0.0u kc� A -A7-,,..1,6,x e�c�w`ri,k2ck tocw`� CV1ot c Ya�is pr
t,-$vv-..VQ.J.,-\. corkaw.l �r�-t�Jl �� —ktu /artas o F -*he S t4 -t.
4411 �.0,
` i 4,,, t ^ (.)/ ` 7e_. ` r A toh c. V--It
(J r\ 01 rsbn-x` jr • , '� f�f-
Yc?JLI�" �1� ` L e —k \ ic: 1 1 <.:,k O "�S i VAGI ! Q
b,>r-k••, �1% -k4- - -trtc ed s� 7 �hr� 44V_ eXC4A1a-1�s.. iq*
V0(
04 4
r.
12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand
the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if
any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over
a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal
description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably
available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not
required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica-
tions related to this checklist.
ca&reS)• 1-S64o We$ -'c NI Ut ‘•90111,y
/ c.ay.i �• i {. h ro,i 3241. EXLGvu�ctoh
ireu5 a�,c( Lowtd IM*e•v.thc� Pa��. Cao ss Ser-,1/41oma) ar'e. A-Orr-o-iNe.4
e�-+c �Q s���p-'(bow Uard-t� L. 1
at� atsa a-Fk-actrl
13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land
Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive?
-3-
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICI • Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
1. Earth
a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat
rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, her
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate
percent slope)? ^-'I%
c. What general types of soils are found on the site
(for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If
you know the classification of agricultural soils,
specify them and note any prime farmland.
So AGA oi-,olSz Pry S ok ISa^^0( -47/31(6,07//3ic6,07
.c6t 6N�_ U rat res vl) ovna
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable
soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe.
0
e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti-
ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate
source of fill.
V j QS. k
wi\\ 1ryz, �)n c..kav ?ec.
f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing,
construction, or use? If so, generally describe.
Ey-0, Caw`& rJvC2 tay O�C�Irw•ih�` •
nv` S i (/ A-v‘Evo 5I �K G tic
Ql ay., t s re7i re4A cti,s ,park 1,.
o.' -V� ahr.� R I)rzrop
P�r�i,l- • AO, lu4k;o�
v
About what percent of the site will be covered with
impervious surfaces after project construction (for
example, asphalt or buildings)?
g.
-4-
•410 Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or
other impacts to the earth, if any: Qev.i.^R-'�-" re'1'1''' o1-
�prq�yaA so; \ -trern kv aver., (AIM coh-4auti 12/1,4,
co
"A-hR. prQZ.�
O`+ g�'�TI�_•
O — V..W1y t \o'ks, Cf'FNW.).1 Jc S oma" Y1N?vt C\eie•
\2e s (Qp 4-4
yuh e w: I \ �.�V►�Ad h
2. Air
QXCAVGhi°h
S� S-kpvw.yipr+
a. What types of emissions to the air would result from
the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors,
industrial wood smoke) during construction and when
the project is completed? If any, generally
describe and give approximate quantities if known.
NriVv.or dW s -'c /e �, . �w-+��-�chcw Sic �,,,,v + • S�
e.x ��'^-'c anal bcA.c. "c\
b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor
that may affect your proposal? If so, generally
describe.
k•\")`#\ 9-- Kv\owv�
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or
other impacts to air, if any:
S , ; \ w ' \e _ li z i
• • Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
2) Will the project require any work over, in, or
adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described
waters? If yes, please describe and attach
available plans.
3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material
that would be placed in or removed from surface
water or wetlands and indicate the area of the
site that would be affected. Indicate the
source of fill material.
4) Will the proposal require surface water
withdrawals or diversions? Give general
description, purpose, and approximate quan-
tities, if known.
5) Does the ,proposal lie within a 100 -year
floodplain? If so, note location on the site
plan.
No
6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of
waste materials to surface waters? If so,.
describe the type of waste and anticipated
volume of discharge.
-6-
•
b. Ground:
• Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be
discharged to ground water? Give general
description, purpose, and approximate quan-
tities,
uan- a
t i t i es, if known. 'tom.-v�1e� "^ `.vflcuv-k„' covoccv—fr'c''�
T-o
,„J(wo.-se., w\\ ...* 10 �vc..�Ic '' tcc r�° �S
_ ex caV rn-. io►�s. ohCA_ \cc,.v —ti-a.s rte} �rww�
a vt S-Eak - I....., tis ti's -fie aka w r '',” ' 1
b,_ 10‘...1‘ . dot s 4.o --4%L S-Eov'ii• (2)1," Sati i y gR�(+'"A"ZQ",�o -
Ak'r o rc ''^1 a-LWM«u"'S10`^, �y1jw�G-kg„ a roX%A4ek.e- f 2^ i1cl`'
2) Describe wastematerials that will be discharged u', l rJ�
into the ground from septic tanks or other sour-
ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage;
industrial, containing the following
chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the
general size of the system, the number of such
systems, the number of houses to be served (if
applicable), or the number of animals or humans
the system(s) are expected to serve.
\i3 d sJ7 •• s�
c. Water Runoff (including storm water):
1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm
water) and method of collection and disposal, if
any (include quantities, if known). Where will
this water flow? Will this water flow into
other waters? If so, describe.
C\\R_ soy\ \
5\v -kc& '
vw r ek-4- t
-7-.
• •
2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface
waters? If so, generally describe.
No
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface,
ground, and runoff water impacts, if any:
Soi �Y`QAh�ar� [�Y`Qol w �\ \•45L,
htaf- OvSZ -•
4. Plants
a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the
site:
')deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen,
evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other
shrubs
grass
pasture
crop or grain
wet soil plants: cattail,_buttercup, bullrush,
skunk cabbage, other
water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other
other types of vegetation
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed
or altered? SevQ_vcA Sma\1 A-re.Rs \navq_ rower
o� —F%n_ Si)1"2- a S rzok
��.. \qR?. r o ves.1
a, ,bc -sc e•c- .447k I3 erro j42.c^k,
c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on
or near the site.
-8-
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
• • Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
d. Proposed landscaping, use_of native plants, or other
measures to. preserve or enhance vegetation on the
site, if any:
\\°v\2
5. Animals
a. Circle any birds and animals which have been
observed .on or near the site or are known to be on
or near the site:
birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other:
mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other:
fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish,
other:
b. List any threatened or endangered species known to
be on or near the site.
c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so,
explain.
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife,
if any:
-9-
• • Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
6. Energy and Natural Resources
a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil,
wood stove, solor) will be used to meet the
completed project's energy needs? Describe whether
it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc.
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar
energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally
describe.
c. What kinds of energy conservation features are
included in the plans of this proposal? List other
proposed measures to reduce or control energy
impacts, if any:
7. Environmental Health
a. Are there any environmental health hazards,
including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire
and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could
occur as a result of this proposal? If so,
describe. .R.9-krmle,�"-, 1yav-� cav b�-. o�'e-s
vha � dot, 1 cn Vk-kra� ( V °A-4
s ex ,lo. ca"a vk-
1) Describe special emergency services that might
be required.
toht?„.
2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ-
mental health hazards, if any: �1
2-cj: Re . '� "'"- a"")( �YTc"k c 0.V' Nnov.:i.ov
- ov vo�oh �� n ak C \Jos w << D-- N?¢v-�'v�"`J t�
a.� •1‘-* ,boSurQ
-10-
• • Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
b. Noise
1) What types of noise exist in the area which may
affect your project (for example: traffic,
equipment, operation, other)?
tOv\e-
2) What types and levels of noise would be created
by or associated with the project on a short-
term or a long-term basis (for example: traf-
fic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate
what hours noise would come from the site.
E �i w.e..+/U( $not sg... eJcC,c,vc i ,
vr¢,w�C , co-J.I��ccs(x f- ; I I i h �l e 'eve1S
Oxo-Afk 5 i� ` \fns .a n i se_
wed V .\\ey11-2.7)4,7, wvos¢a hog vzJ kovl-s :
%a., --� o
3) Proposed measdres to reduce or control noise
impacts, if any:
Nov\e_
8. Land and Shoreline Use
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent
properties?
�rju s d �s a v es cc•'- Ths� .171t-c,3�d US•"•••F
^G vs; c sL CCeoAbcpy%,;'%h Wk\ � •
Pres iCtWfrrh Vro oe-k �is cone._ \
v�2S 5¢-
v
b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so,
describe.
c. Describe any structures on the site.
S2vv1Cq_ c -k ' b��ICJIi �QGiSuN2s �v�iKSS/
as/;< 60,
Pr-kktALk
-11-
• •
d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what?
f-\ \ Dare.. -*,1 6.5a ,eu.a\ shy
e. What is the current zoning classification of the
site? r"C)kv \ck Uv c
f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation
of the site? Q.s u6a_
g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master
program designation of the site? ()v -b'.
h. Has any part of the site been classified as an
"environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify.
i. Approximately how many people would reside or work
in the completed project?_meq h .
j. Approximately how many people would the completed
project displace? vl2
k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement
impacts, if any:
1`4P1-
1.
Pr
1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com-
patible with existing and projected land uses and
plans, if any:
-12-
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
/v\.' biP-' - 4.% 1, civ
4\4'
• • Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
9. Housing
a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if
any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income
housing?
b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eli-
minated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-
income housing.
Noes
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing
impacts, if any:
Nance.
10. Aesthetics
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed
structure(s), not including antennas; what is the
principal exterior building material(s) proposed?
N o sk Y'rirsQC
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be
altered or obstructed?
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic
impacts, if any:
-13-
• • Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
11. Light and Glare
a. What type of light or glare will the proposal
produce? What time of day would it mainly occur?
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a
safety hazard or interfere with views?
c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may
affect your proposal?
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and
glare impacts, if any:
12. Recreation
a. What designed and informal recreational oppor-
tunities are in the immediate vicinity?
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing
recreational uses? If so, describe.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on
recreation, including recreation opportunities to be
provided by the project or applicant, if any:
-14-
• • Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
13. Historic and Cultural Preservation
a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro-
posed for, national, state, or local preservation
registers known to be on or next to the site? If
so, generally describe.
1,<hoUv.
b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of
historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural
importance known to be onor next to the site.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if
any:
14. Transportation
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the
site, and describe proposed accss to the existing
street system. Show on site plans, if any.
W
b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If
not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest
transit stop? ACA 7 ub''t- ArG\5' •
`�� YAC ah Csi -to Y\SLGre- - - trc ^.i I)r- ir
c. How many parking spaces would the completed project
have? How many would the project eliminate?
-15-
• • Evaluation for
d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets,
or improvements to existing roads or streets, not
including driveways? If so, generally describe'
(indicate whether public private).
e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate
vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If
so, generally describe.
iso
f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated
by the completed project? If known, indicate when
peak volumes would occur.
g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor-
tation impacts, if any:
15. Public Services
a. Would the project result in an increased need for
public services (for example: fire protection,
police protection, health care, schools, other)? If
so, generally describe.
0
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct
impacts on public services,
if any.
-16-
Agency Use Only
•
16. Utilities
111 Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
a. Circle utilities currently available at the site:
refuse service,
septic system, other.
ccr�e c�c� - al 1 u,) -i I i -i e ,s . •
b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the
project, the utility providing the service, and the
general construction activities on the site or in
the immediate vicinity which might be needed.
C. Signature
The above answers are true and complete to the best of
my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is
relying on them to make its decision.
Signature:
Date Submitted:
-5/) 9 6
PLEASE CONTINUE TO THE NEXT PAGE.
-17-
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICA• • Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS
(do not use this sheet for project actions)
Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful
to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of
the environment.
When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the
proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from
the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity
or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not imple-
mented. Respond briefly and in general terms.
1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge
to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or
release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production
of noise?
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are:
How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, ani-
mals, fish, or marine life?
Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, ani-
mals, fish, or marine life are:
-18-
• • Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or
natural resources?
Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and
natural resourses are:
4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect
environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or
eligible or under study) for governmental protection;
such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers,
threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or
cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime
farmlands?
Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid
or reduce impacts are:
5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and
shoreline use, inclduing whether it would allow or
encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with
existing plans?
-19-
• • Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land
use impacts area:
How does the proposal conform to the Tukwila Shoreline
Master Plan?
6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on
transportation or public services and utilities?
Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s)
are:
7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict
with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for
the protection of the environment.
-20-
• • Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
8. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila
Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli-
cies
oli-
cies of the Plan?
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s)
are:
-21-
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLIC•
• Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON PROJECT
PROPOSALS
The objectives and the alternative means of reaching the
objectives for a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the
aforegoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This
information' provides a general overall perspective of the
proposed action in the context of the environmental infor-
mation provided and the submitted plans, documents, suppor-
tive information, studies, etc.
1. What are the objective(s) of the proposal? -t\, objeg.arive.
c-54- _ pro po Sa\ is ci C .- . c°' -'""`"44.''''s
p4 -1r •Q•Y
��C". tiwj0,rocar64 1`� Soic ` k rouhdwwkev.
c .jeKa.. 5;-4e- - o be\ow -a-t.L of L st,o,h
`Mz_-)c\r‘oc)\ vlp isvel.s o,3 fov.ovvw\erteA
-�ivz. Yv\o de.\ 'toxo S Cor -oro Ac-g C'�cav`v�
Qa�v�o�iov�, c re -le' 1'7?- 3`Io W14c.
2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these
objectives?
iVCS $4=4 \ clea u
1l Vp�r C>X'EV'0.Ctctuh C--{ver-k, sot t&c e.)
2) EXcaqQAAL So1 \ Urod1 -"rrtorh or S
3� FXcO 4. a k0,,, d ,1'
Or -4‘..v.‘ -.\c.1 des -Y.60 -0w" {_aVVclli 7 Cbuwhev,).
\ rha.V ve.S 3 v.ou'\r%wo v- cleo"i
1� �..5-talk we.\Ks 1-ecoiQev;roved i,�cev.
wok.e.v ort -\-Ino-Suvbcii.
a•.al-�re°v'c
Z� C,rc.Ar«ke. o- k -±rec woJc¢v, wl�(J' c.ccuo,\,,'}2S
r -kms �y-Voioo excavohkovS.
3. Please.compare tjhealternative means .and indicate the
preferred course of action:
Soi\ cko..U 7 O,\ y."4kwts
�•) VApor e- V Ace'skt 1 w o's'r" wov- C *t So \ S avot So TCInfL
2) 0,ASke-.orreorsro v\ -F ►S - r ry-kevre.d .
On 5 ;R .-rre_w\-, .,h IS -4 vvw 3.'c cr$h Qf fe-t-h- tv 2 e J -•
ow.o S CA h.3 (yi¢-ut ,,, k .& t SloN t "+ --Iro.1 at,.tyrq� yh o
Ew\o rdahc� a� �` c .k.E,,/rev viz cV ►•.1���
C * 164 .2A SDI \ - e'tt'VL. �r�-r-ervverl coovs I- of ox-kdev\. •
3; o -R- 51 k.� \ o rtd- \ rpt ,�, a s CA ov` ' -v'w &\ de.s cord^`
are- pt c.c,I I y -tu, i'- - - R_ Cos -'c 0 oh Str}@ Qairvesv)^t(
�7v o�hdwo r JQc Q\kerv.o..i QS
\1 t^^yro„v,dwo.ke�• -� e c.�c vMe vac Tv S ; h recove.t,y we,l(Sw of v" --‘c 7Yp ; .sv
.fa,r O. -�-%W\ \ d.Q c VV7. \ 1^ i S s O� u� 4r -S 1 �= va•i WtK $ i S
wle‘ i L\" i v\ V; b, .\r y ou K A w c1ik•1." Y'e cc:0myY.
/ SSL a a.v•ea S co hates
-kwa ro('se. u - ex ca�l�c i o�. S Show lc,l eXe
" edl uhdlwo�ho,. o,Ad-Fha.Ye{-or alt ow 4ov- a
Cov�k0.�^� Ku c.; cu la.�c�� or,� Areu.kihq -tom wake-
�hdwokev- -22- � Q
• •
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
4. Does. the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila
Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli-
cies of the Plan?
No
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s)
are:
Na
-23-
•
AGI
TECHNOLOGIES
ATTACHIMENT TO SEPA APPLICATION
PROJECT: Environmental Remediation - Former Gull Industries, Inc. Service Station No. 240
APPLICANT: AGI Technologies
300 120th Avenue N.E., Building 4
Bellevue, WA 98005
ITEMS INCLUDED IN ATTACHMENT: Figure 1 - Vicinity Map
Figure 2 - Site Plan
r
Figure 3 - Proposed Excavation Areas
Figure 4 - Land Altering Plan Cross Section
Project Description
Property Legal Description
MAY 1 4 1996
PERMIT CENTER
AGI
TECHNOLOGIES
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Environmental Remediation
Former Gull Industries, Inc. Service Station No. 240
15640 West Valley Highway
Tukwila, Washington
Proposed remediation at the site consists of excavation of contaminated soil for on-site treatment.
Before work begins, the site will be secured by installing a chain link fence. The fence will act as a
safety and control boundary to prevent site access to the public. Soil excavation will be conducted
in two areas on- the site, as shown on Figure 3. An estimated 1,000 bank cubic yards will be
removed from the former UST area. An estimated 500 bank cubic yards will be removed from the
pump island area. Each excavation will be terminated once groundwater is encountered. We have
assumed the excavations may extend to 16 feet bgs. We estimate 30 percent of the excavated soil
will not contain any petroleum hydrocarbons exceeding cleanup levels (based on analytical
laboratory testing to be performed). The clean soil will be backfilled in one or both of the
excavations.
All excavated soil containing petroleum hydrocarbons above cleanup levels will undergo on-site
Solid Phase treatment. Solid Phase treatment relies on naturally occurring bacteria to biodegrade
petroleum hydrocarbons in soil. The process is facilitated by adding nutrients and moisture and
tilling the soil to optimize the available oxygen. The soil is spread evenly over the treatment area
and is treated in approximately 1 -foot lifts. Soil samples are collected from each lift for analytical
laboratory testing to document that petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations are below cleanup levels.
The treated layer is then removed and placed as backfill and the next lift undergoes treatment. We
estimate each lift will require 2 weeks for treatment and backfilling.
Water which accumulates in the excavations will be treated by circulating the water within the
excavation. After treatment, a sample of the excavation water will be collected for analytical
laboratory testing to document petroleum hydrocarbons are not present above cleanup levels. The
treated water will then be discharged to the storm or sanitary sewer after appropriate authorization
is received. Multiple batches of excavation water may be treated until the water which reaccum-
ulates in the excavation contains no petroleum hydrocarbons exceeding cleanup levels.
GULL INI)Uti f TtIES, INC. . 3404 FOURTH AVENUE SOUTH . P.O. IIOX 24687 . SEATTLE, WASHINCTON 98124 • (206) 624.5900
P
• •1a
NO. 240
Y1JC_1�'rICN
SIZE: :
ZONING :
TAX ACCOUNT It
DESCRIPTION :
15640 WEST VALLEY HIGIHWAY
TUI£CWILA, WASH-NGI'O1
24,375 SQUARE FEET
M-1 CITY 02' TUKWILA.
000580-0032-00
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR PARCEZ., 240
GULL INDUSTRIES
'rl1A'1' portr:LON Or THE iIIENRY MEAlDE:11 DONATION LAND cLAa1+1 IN SECTION
24 TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH , RANCE 4 EAST, W .M . , IN KING COUNTY
WASHINC=N DESCRIBED AS 1 OLLC S •
(_ON1MIIINCINC AT 'P1 Its INTE1tS1:CrION OF TIM 1?7STL•;RLY MARGIN OF SECONDARY
STA:l'C: I11:c11WAY 2-M 'wt r VA. -11:Y IIIGIIWAY' BEING 72.00 t LL'.I' AS
N1i•:1 uiif,D Al` 1 xc ri` ANGLES TO Tial: MONUIENT LINT:- THEREOF AND THE
NoR11 IERLY RI:CI rr--Or-WAX LIME OP SOU171 15 lT11 BEING, 213.00
1•'LP:I' IN 411X11 MEASURED AT RIM'S ANCL1 '1'0 `Plw 'LINE
UI' :SA 1 D ; TRE T : T11ENC: NORI'l i 7 40 '50" wEsr ALCt4C SAID EM:'1 ra.Y
MARC IN 01' U. ._S.ti. 2-M, A DISPANC OF 312.97 rEatr 'P0 7111 '1.31!.1:
POINT OF ITL:GINNINC: THENCE NOrtrll 7°40' 52" WP21' ALCNC SAID MARGIN
175 1.11.71"11) BOUNDARY LINE ESTABLISHED D BY AGRI' d ' r RECORDED .
UNtN;1't AUDITOR '11 r'fLE NO. 6515212: sour!! 09°00'80" EAST
Ai LAC SAID BOUNDARY LINE 152 FEEIT TO A POINT NOrrl'It 09 00'00"
WEST 1139.23 Fli:ET F104 THE Wr:S'rEfil,Y MARGIN OF VAST L:CNC;1'ON STATE
11IC111WAY FRONTAGE LOAD "Y" LINE fi NC1: SOCrp1.1 7°40'50" 1ASST
'lO A 1'0111` WHIG!' BEARS NOR1'I! 02019 ' 02" PAST PROM ¶'HE TRUE POINT
OF BEGINNING: 7'11134CE SoTA'II 02°19'02" WCST 150 rE:;CP MORE OR
u•.:;.`; '1O THE '1.1tUE P0I1rr OF BEGINNING.
'lYY i riiim wr'r11 AN r_?nsf:ru rrr It7it INGIESS, r•:cri1".ss, AND UrILITIEZ
uV1:ft TI 1E kOLLOWINc DESCILII3ED T12;11C'I'
1' I' '11 Ili: :;01.'1'1 Mil: ; rLRLY CORNER OIc' 'r((1? ABOVE DES= LIED
'1'ItACK ; 'r1IINC1 N(3RII 102°19' 02" PAST 150.26 11:1~1', MORI : OR LT': S ,
'10 'Ptl1: SOUll!EA;,'1'I•:Itt.,Y C017t41_R'rIIER1X)F; 711ENCE ::.C111P11 7°40'513"
I. JL';1' 50 1:141:71% : '1111:11.2 ;,OUii l 2201'13' 02" WiS I' 'i'O T(11: 1�.A$Tl:1tLY LINE
c�F '41/1/4:1.1.111.RC11WAY: 'r1I1?NCti NORM 7 40'50" tdl?.:?i• 50 FEET 120 'TIME
IX )1:N1' Ur' 11Ec:;INN7.14.;
: � .:. w i�{� PARK
Ft RIO(`' _I.I
1d ! p0'f 1
OP, 1 T�
f10(NT ...` ^ 1* _ o , 10TH f �� S REHTON VILLAGE PL
It PARK �. .,`\ 1
i s u
By 2LW !�7,1 ®,® T �
?74µO,,7,„ NORTHER Dy c�IQlll/1 � L!, t31 Sr
2 y:� P I
W �� H -17H
H! n � Si
'S•� ISw K1 - "^ S 16TH si
-Ba
t.r ;°L es ; 14 T
i Race jl
✓VILA\\ „ -
PKV ss i I I :: Y, i :g
S' ite 4 ' _ Se Trac �N
3,5.
. Ii w PI® i_ UR?
A •a li rn , 'i '',r __ _' I s 'i wLBOT:
L•♦�•_•" '_ ' .' `�� < 150 I R E I�1I T N I 3 E ;awac
��.0 nfi1M',lN�/y s JR T W aBlr NTE... I I � 1 I G s 76TM'Si -•
tJ PrWR % 1VEI.1-V/11�L{.� I f
Lti .` ■ ii 1 , lob C» lea
,i• : •• ¢ 0 SW 7254 Si 5
�_ j fy4 I I I S 7nM'� •';t
r TREU P: - INDI(T ‘,....44.. n d
y
-S .'7 �, Iw
p { I �Wis. I
26 • 1. : / CNRIS 2 r 25'i SVTN 6T Q 3 R
E� ENSfK SW 315T & '1 1 6
= �-�, I! , ,f GREf fIT j2} N' 33R•
` yttt 1g`ll a I
N I '1 ){�1 I ry ST l ® r r
Cl1R ..,E I S
YINKLER • BIIYDI 1
-YPLAN6011 — — ? I — — r — V — J..1 -T i•_. T JS
aiffIGOK, At'
• P I W !
M'oJLR4 . cr - » T
• SAKDII 55 1A 1 W • Al.T T r VALlfY S 1)]TH
Tit It;
Ter
CfA7fR C {
��i
I46T ST
2, ,__V s ,s,ro ::sr1Iua
149TH ST r= 6 •
S 3611,-7571
150TH ST 150TH ST ; 155T y
S s O
ft -T ST L"
t SI
22 �■ 5 1 5i 23M S =3 .,
t j1`
SIB
LLL I.o'SD - �ISTRD.
A. 7.`, x TUX
.1056T" ST ��TF : PS
III R �■c4 u
3156TH = ST
S 157540 ST
S 166,, ST.
3 5 1515 1l. •
5 170T. !ST
sn
►— —
5 176Th
;IMA$ Sy
4
5 1101
"IS
Ia41-
s.
VALLEY,
rrEE
5' 's ST. ''I ? ..
PARK - I
PARK
192ND ST
►-Tv!
nr�,,riDRR I
11 0
1 sEaa PAR. 3 15'mi-- .. ST
e, O
„ CI r RIvE4S! ..---Tr
t,18i�0,
—Snr'--' —`!"�' �' a of `5 sari�cia �"--- - —,
/ Ir G4E_AB_K
/ 5; `t-7?QP::e ' 36
cS ' o, ? I f' _ \\ 1 ,P
it `\ 'r.. �� ei ,,f• AMal ST • • I 8 y/ 4,
4 �. c- , ,--1,-- _yi. j Q -
�% y ._' S ISH ST G. S 1®TH ST a".5'
S IRiH
•
•
MEAL , y N; x17 I JW1
s 1u' sT A - » s 19oiHN sr ! H3S> Cr
>I
IJ ( Lit
„1 S N NI Igo
14919 5T IV' S 19:540 ST
J Q -_ r- �
xJ KENT; 722$
1911« 5-Y' > = 151 I 5 INTH ST
oI si___ H 15
sT :�� l
2560
Scale in Feet
Reference: Map from The Thomas Guide, King Pierce, &
Snohomish Counties, page 41.
15nH�
`®1 521
T ST
170TH 57
SI725r S'
4.
e,
-5-1/41 2 — �S iT.Ti T
S Si 1
\1S' ST._.4 <( P
Yc: >I.P-
g. ' /
4_173
FS
76TH ST
x 5E 179TH PL Ei
SE MTN 2x17
5E IS ST 5T !'S
SF 15030 51
190TH ST.
S 192.10 / c 19
ST-
AGI
TECHNOLOGIES
Vicinity Map
Gull/Site No. 240
Tukwila, Washington
FIGURE
1
PROJECT NO. DRAWN DATE APPROVED REVISED DATE —
256146vm.cdr 15,256.146 BJA Mar 96
( HA2®)
LEGEND
I
i
Unpaved
I
I
I MW3
IInferred Surface Water 98.44
Runoff Direction
'6'7".2B Monitoring Well Number.
97 and Approximate Location
Showing Land Surface Elevation
In Feet Relative to an Assumed
Benchmark of 100.00 feet.
B1• Soil Boring Number
and Approximate Location
HA1® Hand Auger Number
and Approximate Location
( ) Pump Island
Former Underground
I l Storage Tank Location
L.
-- Property Boundary
20
40
Scale in Feet
Reference; Gulf Oil Company - U.S.
General Arrangement Plan
Service Station rd S.E. Quad.
1-405 and West Valley Road
Tukwila. Washington
Date Unknown
98.16
® Catch Basin
MW4
Inferred
location of
product piping'
Asphalt
Asphalt
Building
Concrete.
B1•
B2
Canopy Outline
MW2S
97.97
Curb —\
®Catch Basin
Concrete
HAI®
Ingress & Egress Easement
WEST VALLEY HIGHWAY (181)
Note: Bench mark is top of fire hydrant located near the southwest corner of the site.
I
•
AGI
TECHNOLOGIES
Site Plan
Gull/Site, No. 240
Tukwila, Washington
PROJECT NO. DRAWN DATE
256146s2.dwg 15.256.146 BJA Mar 96
AP OV
REVISED
ALW
FIGURE
2
DATE
7 May 96
MW2B
LEGEND
Soil Treatment
Area
Proposed Test Pit
Location
Monitoring Well Number
and Approximate Location
Pump Island
_ — 1 Former Underground
L— Storage Tank Location
AL__JA'
Property Boundary
Land Altering Plan
Cross Section Locations
Note: Building and canopy to be removed
prior to proposed excavation.
0
20
40
Scale in Feet
References: Gulf Oil Company - U.S.
General Arrangement Plan Service Station
fd S.E. Quad., 1-405 and West Valley Rd.
Tukwila, WA.
Utility locations from City of Tukwila
Public Works Dept., S. 156th St./
Nelson Place, SR -181 -Water Main Plan,
Sheet 5 of 6, MF 01918.
Underground phone line locations
based on utility locate markings.
Soil Treatment Area Containment Berm
x x
Excavation
Canopy Outline: �-
Excavation
MWr'
Abandoned Water Line
—Phone Line
— • — • — . 1– — —Storm Drain–Manhole
Curb i 1--'– • --'----4" Gas Line--�
_.._. _.._L-7_.._ ._12" Water Line– ••
Shoring (if
Site
required 1 Access
Phone Line -1 r t
_ _. _ _.._?roatri anh e_ ._.._.._ _
WEST
Phone Line
WEST VALLEY HIGHWAY 0811
I •
AGI
TECHNOLOGIES
Proposed Excavation Areas
Gull/Site . No. 240
Tukwila, Washington
PROJECT NO. DRAWN DATE
phasel-2.dwg 15,256.146 BJA Mar 96
APPROVED
REVISED
ALW
FIGURE
3
DATE
7 May 96
y.r_ga.g2
-r-
• , fI•••••':-:
7/
11;
A " • ' • •• A"• '
r --
. ,
I il ••••
I •
---
I 1
)71
• • .
H -J. 1
e • n - V, • 1 •
L-4
L
he.. ,•pollOrl 1
WEST VALLEY HIGHWAY (ISO
5
SHEET
1 of 2
Z1 a
I>
m
_!m
LAND ALTERING PLAN
CROSS SECTION
AGI
TECHNOLOGIES
Kam. w
OPNI•.Y11_NN-1...1-1 MN
Iowe vmtl
I4::04rD:
NHWN
aHEcnur
III SCRIP NON
ENC
GULL/SITE NO. 2+0
TUKWIL� WASHINGTON
15, 256.146
Mr. William T. Vivian
Gull Industries, Inc.
Post Office Box 24687
Seattle, Washington 98124
Dear Bill:
' Site Assessment Data Transmittal
Gull Site No. 240
' 15640 West Valley Highway
Tukwila, Washington
' This letter transmits data obtained during a site assessment conducted by AGI Technologies (AGI)
at the former Gull Service Station No. 240 in Tukwila, Washington. The site location is shown on
Figure 1.
' Two soil borings were drilled to a depth of 3 feet below ground surface (bgs) using a hand auger.
These borings were designated HAI and HA2, and were located below the pump islands, as shown,
' on Figure 2. Six more borings were drilled to a depth of 4-1/2 to 21-1/2 feet bgs using a truck-
mounted hollow -stem auger. Four of the borings were completed as 2 -inch -diameter PVC
groundwater monitoring wells. Well construction details are presented on Plate 2 in Attachment
' 1. The locations of the four monitoring wells (MW1 through MW4) and the two borings (B1 and
B2) are shown on Figure 2.
Soil samples were collected at 5 -foot intervals for borings extending beyond 5 feet in depth. Each
soil sample was classified according to the Unified Soil Classification System as shown on Plate 1
in Attachment 1. Logs of the borings, including a well construction summary, are also presented
' on Plates 3 through 8 in Attachment 1. One soil sample from each boring was submitted to
Analytical Technologies, Inc. (ATI) in Renton, Washington for qualitative analysis of gasoline-,
diesel-, and oil -range petroleum hydrocarbons by Washington State Method WTPH-HCID. This
analytical method identified two samples as containing gasoline -range petroleum hydrocarbons. The
two samples were quantified for gasoline -range petroleum hydrocarbons by Washington State
Method WTPH-G and for benzene, ethylbenzene, toluene, and total xylenes (BETX) by United States
Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Method 8020.
MAY 1 4 1996
' PERMIT CENTER
300 120th Avenue N.E., Building 4 • Bellevue, Washington 98005 • (206) 453-8383 • FAX (206) 646-9523
WASHINGTON OREGON CALIFORNIA
Mr. William T. Vivian
Gull Industries, Inc.
April 1, 1996
Page 2
AGI
TECHNOLOGIES
The four monitoring wells were developed and a groundwater sample collected for analytical
chemistry analysis on March 11, 1996. The samples were submitted to ATI for screening of gasoline -
range, diesel -range, and oil -range petroleum hydrocarbons using USEPA Method 8015 Modified.
This analytical methods identified three samples as containing gasoline -range petroleum hydrocar-
bons. These samples were quantified for gasoline -range TPH by Washington State Method WTPH-G
and for BETX by USEPA Method 8020.
The elevation of each monitoring well was surveyed and water levels were collected for the
preparation of a groundwater surface map. Groundwater elevation data are presented in Table 1.
Water levels collected on March 14 and 20, 1996 indicate the direction of groundwater flow is
generally to the south. The expected groundwater flow direction is to the north-northeast based on
the presence of the nearby Green River.
Analytical laboratory results for soil and groundwater samples are summarized in Tables 2 and 3.
Copies of AGI's quality assurance review and analytical laboratory reports are contained in
Attachment 2.
The analytical laboratory results indicate a release has occurred from the former underground
storage tank system at the site. Pursuant to Washington Administrative Code 173-340-450 of the
Model Toxics Control Act, the release must be reported to Ecology.
Sincerely,
AGI Technologies
Lance E. Peterson, P.G.
Senior HyLrogeologist
ary'Laakso
Remediation Services Manager
LEP/GLL/tag
attachments
Elevation in Feet
0-
5 —
10 —
15-
20-
25 —
30—
A
North
5min. separation between top of excavation
and adjacent single story structure.
7 Property Boundary
MW3
7".• .7" ••:- ...•-•,, .-.4 --. ,
...-ec ....:- '7.-. • - , -•-: r- ..- ,,..:••••":41 ••-•- _
.. 7,- 7' ,• . .a
Backfilled /Former,
,,,.......-.?..4•-,....,.•:77:7—.*-,.././Unde ground Storage
- -.'7. -r a:7' •-e :- .-- ,,--r•-'...i- '.-*-.-:-•- ,..
•• -;-.2;7 .,3 .7 .4... -.• , 4,-., •-•„;.;‘,....;.,,,....=..:.... _1, r:-.7-1 Tank Cavity",./
_--;._ .,, ,z.,,._. -,•:_tri. --...,..2-- .-.-..-7. ,-.7....:4 i--:: 4-7-0 / ,/ ,.'
/ / •
.. .•••.- -:-
717 s'tL :,
MW4
-,, -:......1,.. - 4. - .-•-• :-.1..,---,-,*
-...sei'.....?:::^'.• '.'`.:v..=..7.:-.-?•,-. 't
.J. •.j. ,.:.,--.•17,27:2:-._"%.."1.::.' -..2; .L :•_.,..'•
.-* - : - • .,- .. 1-1/2..•,--•
--7:-.',7:-.21-7„,,7-.74.Z.-.:1. •-;;,,.•.'-:•-•i- .. z.Tr-....
•
,.
71,: 71_ ..... _ .
. -*',44:- 7• -'•••_. ,- .-- ...a, a .,...
.-1. ..7... . "•-- •-• •••••• • •L...._
.....-7- -- - -
• • •'4••..
•
• 1 t•
•••••-4.:7:
4.•
A' B
Pump Islands
Maximum Excavation Limits Maximum Excavation Limits
. • -..% -14, ••:-. •-',.:-• :4--• -Pr. •"-• .7i r -t.!'-' - - .7•.•• -7...r, ..,, . -r• • - ..,• 2i,.....,.....r. .
..-..I;o74..7.:.47 ' ...-. .. .-... ...L.-7. 4,., '-....- ••".-, -',": ", ',Al". ,t," .",F ''''. '',•-"...%.'a.r.-4/.-t"......-1.;:- _'T_',. -..-•
▪ •---...2,--rj-,-,....x. -•,,...7..-,..,.7.-L:._1/4.--.1......;.....-....4:4-..:",.,7.,-..„...,_,...-.......,:-.,............. ,......_..-.d,...,..47.41.,.. ,...,r........7.7.,,,,,,_,A.. ,;.:,-....47....,..,,,..Hs.7.2.--1.,
e.... .., .. ••• 71'. .,.. 11., ..... • T. -r, • ! •Jr.•--, •-- • -. )- .7.. ..•:• nn .• •-••• .- .:-.- .-. . .7.-...•..•- ....i.
V .4.... 7-8. 7; •• ....: -F . 4 •-••••••-• • -•• -.: :71 •:••' ..r•• • •-t •-••• ••-; ..., fr.... Li.L. -1,, -...,- .4 ,i ir ..,.. -.. -•- ..-r-
• • '7. '''.• -.- •': .e: rt ........7%.,7.•'• •)-..... r' ',. -.... fr, -•• ••••..e.•••:r . - ,-. -. -, ,-...-....,•••-:., • -. ••.- ..-.,,7. `.,.,,, .:.4.,.-•, ',. - .
:•••
•
rt. 47. ••7(...717 '.t. .7 • 7,•7;‘,..., •
• -• ••-,7 • •"7 ..4k.."••••‘7.?7 •• 1.• • • .•-•••
rrs rrr. ;nn - •-s- • •-• .71 - ••-• %.,-*:.•r • -'4S
• • ••• • • 17.• •••••••• • -• sn-4 t•-••
• • .7.• • • '7. -.7 • -7. rn • 7: •-•• 7' • 7...77,77 •••-.• -• - • - •••- •rs' ••
- - • - nr• TT -n • • • -n n, • rnt,
7•'• •-• •••• 7•'' "7: .".7 • '•.• • -.7 -N. ..•17...7.•4••• • 7`..71,:•-•••r• '4.••••-••. ••,-
=*4:-.•• " • e7. • •▪ •••-• •-• .7.• • .- -• s.•".7
• ••••.`...".: :7 - • • 7-• • -0- .4. T.• 41
B'
West
Right -of -Way
Shoring (if required)
and Property Boundary
' • •77. .*•7- -••• ;-‘ -••• • •••.-: • - • - -.7. --a .
. . . . .
•Wa ter Table.: • -
4;r4;7‘• .='".."7.77':-:.••=""="a71 .P•17...4:q-. • -•%•••."-7-••
- . • •• . . .
Approximate bottom of excavation at 16'
Curb
/////'/
• ....t.:•••••••••‘.....:':.
7.. •
-••‘: -•••-• -•- -.• •.7' ...--' •
-L., ..:- ,-;-...'÷.• rt-. .r... '-c
r •-.7 ••-•,..-o. •••!.--•• ...-.
/ . -o .. • :'. •' 47,. '•••-,'
'( 77•••-•!••• , ' •-7. •7••• :,rt ..rg
• •••• ?v.{ •
„/- 4...,•••••,.- • r- rn: ••••7
••-
0.- a. c- . ••• . ., •
. ••••••• - ••- '7%7'
•
on au •
Estimated contaminated soil
to be removed.
Fill
Silty Sand
Silt
LEGEND
Vertical Scale: 1 inch 7 10 feet
Horizontal Scale: 1 inch .7 20 feet
Notes:
1) Cut slopes may be modified based
on a geotechnical engineer's observations
and approval during excavation.
2) Excavations will be restored to existing
grade.
Approximate bottom of excavation at 16'
Storm Drain
(approximate)
Phone Line
(approximate)
Abandoned
Water Line
(approximate)
AGI
TECHNOLOGIES
256146 xs.d wg
Land Altering Plan Cross Section
Gull/Site No. 240
Tukwila, Washington
8 May196 PIg00
DATE A
PROJECT NO. DRAWN
15.256.146 AL W
FIGURE
4
REVISED DATE
0
5, X
1
5 15250 81
22 S S6*. ST
5,1
,75
ste
50T. ST
S RESTON VILLAGE PL
20 tt•
i„.
1581 ra Z, ST
\!i5,
IMO
•Tr'
3157
LflMt
S
a
1701.1 51
h FS
r_irein Si —4
4
INN
f
Es:-.
VALLIY1
t/6101 ST. .f"
rril • .RIDGE'
PAA K ..4'
.0
.,,,I. 1.54.7 • z 5! .
>10 z . •
c 1 W2NO. • • •
'. • .
. .
36 .1
51
z SE in
si
sE 85151
SE 186514
PI
5 MTH
p -
s,
2560
l—I I
1
Scale in Feet
Reference: Map from The Thomas Guide, King Pierce,
Snohomish Counties, page 41.
5 Ile --
f s
51
11101e. ST
IL 5 -
nits!
KENT 22i
$ 1561r. I 51
IS•11857
AGI
TECHNOLOGIES
256146vm.cdr
PROJECT NO.
15,256.146
OFtAWN
BJA
Vicinity Map
Gull/Site No. 240
Tukwila, Washington
DATE
Mar 96
APPROVED
REVISED
FIGURE
1
DATE
-
LEGEND
MW24i Monitoring -Well Number
and Approximate Location
Soil Boring Number
B1 • and Approximate Location
HA1® Hand Auger Number
and Approximate Location
) Pump Island
Former Underground
1 Storage Tank Location
-- Property Boundary
0
20
40
- Scale in Feet
Reference: Gulf Oil Company - U.S.
General Arrangement Plan
Service Station le S.E. Quad.
1-405 and West Valley Road
Tukwila. Washington
Date Unknown
Unpaved
f 1
L J
L MW4
MW3 f
B '
L J
MW1
t9
Inferred
location of
product pipIng—
Asphalt
Building
Concrete
B1•
Asphalt •
82
Canopy outline
® Catch Basin
( HA2®)
Concrete
MW2i9 I( HA1® )
WEST VALLEY HIGHWAY (1811
Ingress & Egress Easement
AGI
TECHNOLOGIES
Site Plan
Gull/Site No. 240
Tukwila, Washington
PROJECT NO. DRAWN DATE
256146sp.dwg 15.256.146 BJA Mar 96
REED
FIGURE
2
REVISED DATE -1-
Table 1
Groundwater Elevation Data
Gull/Site No. 240
Tukwila, Washington
MW1
Total
Boring
Depth:
(ft boas)
Depth of
Screened
interval
(ft bgs)
Date
Measured
Time
(hours)
Top of
Casing
Elevation a
AGI
TECHNOLOGIES
(feet)
Depth to
Groundwater..
(feet),
Groundwater.
Elevation
(feet)
21.5
10-17
03/14/96
03/20/96
1440
1147
97.81
11.19
11.63
86.62
86.18
MW2
19
6-16
03/14/96
03/20/96
1420
1045
97.77
10.80
11.10
86.97
86.67
MW3
19
6.5-17.5
03/14/96
03/20/96
1436
1049
98.24
9.86
10.73
88.38
87.51
MW4
19
7-17
03/14/96
03/20/96
1434
1051
98.55
11.35
13.03
87.20
85.52
Notes:
a) Top of casing elevations in feet relative to a temporary benchmark with an assigned elevation of 100.00 feet.
Benchmark is the top of the fire hydrant located near southwest comer of site.
ft bgs - Feet below ground surface.
5356-146\GW-ELEVXLS
Table 2
Petroleum Hydrocarbons In Soil
Gull/Site No. 240
Tukwila, Washington
AGI
TECHNOLOGIES
Sample
Location
Sample LD.
Approx.
Sample `
Depth
(ft bgs)
Date
Sampled
OVM-PID
Headspace a
(ppm)
Washington State Test. Method
EPA Test Method
WTPH-HCID
WTPH-G
BETX 5030/8020
Gasoline Diesel 011
Gasoline
Total
Benzene Ethylbenzene Toluene Xylenes
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
MW1
MW2
MW3
MW4
B1
B2
HA1
HA2
MW1-12.5
MW2-12.5
MW3-12.5
MW4-12.5
B1-3
B2-3
HA1-2'
HA2 -1'
12.5
12.5
12.5
12.5
3
3
2
1
03/11/96
03/11/96
03/11/96
03/11/96
03/11/96
03/11/96
03/11/96
03/11/96
0
652
0
3
0
0
0
0
ND ND ND
D ND ND
ND ND ND
0 ND ND
ND ND ND
ND ND ND
ND ND ND
ND ND ND
—
— — — —
4,400
12 73 160 380
—
52
—
—
—
—
— — — —
ND 0.078 ND ND
— — — —
— — — —
— — — —
— — — —
Method Reporting Limit
20 50 100
5
0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025
Cleanup Levels b
100 200 200
100
0.5 20 40 20
Notes:
Samples analyzed by Analytical Technologies, Inc. of Renton, Washington.
Boxed values indicate concentrations above cleanup levels; shaded values represent hydrocarbon detections.
a) Volatile organic compound (VOC) headspace analysis of. soil sample. Headspace analysis is obtained using an organic vapor meter.
b) Method A suggested cleanup level for residential soil promulgated under Washington Administrative Code Chapter 173-340, State of Washington
Model Toxics Control Act Cleanup Regulation.
— Not analyzed.
ft bgs - Feet below ground surface.
mg/kg - Milligrams per kilogram.
D - Detected at or above Method Reporting Limit.
ND - Not detected.
TPH - Total petroleum hydrocarbons.
5256-146\BETX-S.XLS
Table 3
Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Groundwater
Gull/Site No. 240
Tukwila, Washington
Sample
Location
Date
Sampled
USEPA Method 8015 Modified
Washington State
Test Method
EPA Test Method
Hydrocarbon Identification
WTPH-G
BETX 5030/8020
Total
Benzene Ethylbenzene Toluene Xylenes
Gasoline Diesel Oil
Gasoline
mg/L
mg/L
µg/L
MW1
MW2
MW3
MW4
03/11/96
03/11/96
03/11/96
03/11/96
ND ND ND
0 ND ND
D ND ND
0 ND ND
—
— — — —
100
4,600
2,600
22,000
15,000
4.5
160
210
11
490
2.4
26
100
100
110
Method Reporting Limit
1 1 20
0.1
0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
Cleanup Levels a
1 1 1
1
5 30 40 20
Notes:
Samples analyzed by Analytical Technologies, Inc. of Renton, Washington.
Boxed values indicate concentrations above cleanup levels.
a) Method A suggested cleanup level for groundwater promulgated under Washington Administrative Code
Chapter 173-340, Washington Model Toxics Control Act Cleanup Regulation.
mg/L - Milligrams per liter.
µg/L - Micrograms per liter.
— Not analyzed.
D - Detected at or above Method Reporting Limit.
ND - Not detected.
TPH - Total petroleum hydrocarbons.
AGI
TECHNOLOGIES
5258-148VTPH-OW.XLS
AGI
TECHNOLOGIES
soilcleg.cdr
Soil Classification/Legend
Gull/Site No. 240
Tukwila, Washington
PLATE
1
PROJECT NO. DRAWN DATE APPROVED ED REVISED DATE
15,256.146 BJA Mar 96
UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM -
MAJOR DIVISIONS
TYPICAL NAMES
>
GRAVELS
Clean gravels with
GW
'..9:°.. . ,.
":.••
0:,'n.(
Well graded gravels, gravel -sand mixtures
N 7)
J
o
More than half
fraction
little or no fines
GP::::a:.•:
.><*:�'.•
.... •'4'
Poorly graded gravels, gravel -sand mixtures
O `"
CO d
a Z
coarse
is larger than
Gravels with
GM
:
PVC slip cap
Cast iron well monument and lid
1/1&•.(W&I
Concrete surface seal
Bentonite chip seal
2 -inch schedule 40 PVC
3/14/96
Water level on specified date
10-20 sand
2 inch Schedule 40 PVC screen
(0.020 -inch slots)
PVC threaded end cap
Bottom of exploration
AGI
TECHNOLOGIES
wellcons.cdr
Monitoring Well Construction
Gull/Site No. 240
Tukwila, Washington
PROJECT NO. DRAWN DATE
15,256.146 BJA Mar 96
APPROVED
.Cr -11°
REVISED
PLATE
2
DATE
0. 0.
O Q
0 03 U.
0 10
0 1
X 0 1
0 4
0 6
G Depth (feet)
a
E
0)
Equipment Mobile Drill B-59
Approximately
Land Surface 15 Feet MSL Date 3/11/96
Elevation
Asphalt
BROWN GRAVELLY SAND (SW), very dense, moist;
with trace silt. Fine grained gravel (FILL).
GRAY BROWN SAND (SP), loose, moist; with trace
silt. Fine grained sand.
Becomes wet
BROWN SILTY SAND (SM), loose, saturated; sand
fine grained.
BROWN AND GRAY SANDY SILT (ML), soft,
saturated.
BROWN SILTY SAND (SM), loose, saturated, sand
fine grained. Contains interbedded silt (ML).
Boring terminated at 21.5 feet.
Groundwater encountered at 12 feet during drilling.
AGI
TECHNOLOGIES
256146mw.cdr
Log of Monitoring WeII MW1
Gull/Site No. 240
Tukwila, Washington
PROJECT NO. DRAWN DATE
15,256.146 BJA Mar 96
APPROVED
REVISED
PLATE
3
DATE
Mobile Drill B-59
Approximately
15 Feet MSL Date
Asphalt
BROWN GRAVELLY SAND (SW), medium dense,
moist; with some silt (FILL)
GRAY SAND (SP), dense, moist; with some gravel and
trace silt. Fine to coarse grained sand.
Becomes very loose, wet to saturated with some silt
and trace organics. Very fine grained sand.
Becomes saturated. Sheen noted in sample.
GRAY SANDY SILT (ML), soft,
sand.
Boring terminated at 19 feet.
Groundwater encountered at 8
saturated, fine grained
feet during drilling.
AGI
TECHNOLOGIES
PROJECT NO.
Log of Monitoring Well MW2
Gull/Site No. 240
Tukwila, Washington
256146mw.cdr 15,256.146
DRAWN
BJA
DATE
Mar 96
APED
REVISED
PLATE
4
DATE
-z
• 0
N Ei
• oE 76
1 16
0 3
X 0
0 2
o Depth (feet)
n
E
l9
Equipment Mobile Drill B-59
Approximately
Land Surface 15 Feet MSL Date 3/11/96
Elevation
Asphalt
BROWN GRAVELLY SAND (SW), medium dense,
moist; with some silt (FILL)
BROWN GRAVELLY SAND (SP), medium dense,
moist; with some silt. Fine to coarse grained sand
and gravel (FILL)
BROWN SILTY SAND (SM), loose, moist.
GRAY SAND (SP) very loose, saturated; with some
silt. Fine grained sand, hydrocarbon -like odor.
GRAY SILT (ML), very soft, saturated; with trace fine
grained sand.
Boring terminated at 19 feet.
Groundwater encountered at 13 feet during drilling.
AGI
TECHNOLOGIES
Log of Monitoring Well MW3
Gull/Site No. 240
Tukwila, Washington
PROJECT NO. DRAWN DATE
256146mw.cdr 15,256.146 BJA Mar 96
APPROVED
REVISED
PLATE
5
DATE
Mobile Drill B-59
Approximately
15 Feet MSL Date
GREENISH GRAY SAND (SP), medium dense, moist;
with some silt and gravels. Fine to coarse grained
sand.
GRAY SILT (ML) very soft, saturated; with some fine
grained sand.
Boring terminated at 19 feet.
Groundwater encountered at 8 feet during drilling.
AGI
TECHNOLOGIES
Log of Monitoring Well MW4
Gull/Site No. 240
Tukwila, Washington
PROJECT NO. DRAWN DATE
256146mw.cdr 15,256.146 BJA Mar 96
PLATE
6
APPROVED REVISED DATE
.51°
11
au
E
Boring Number B1
o «.`.aada
A -
m Approximately
o 15 M a E Land Surface 15 feet MSL Date 3/4/96
uJ ° a m u.0
°. o o CO Elevation
0
X 29 0
X 22 0
5
10-
15-
0
BROWN GRAVELLY SAND (SW) dense, moist; with some silt (FILL)
GRAY SILTY SAND (SM) medium dense, moist; Fine to coarse grained
sand.
Boring terminated at 4.5 feet.
No groundwater encountered.
Boring Number B2
Approximately
Land Surface 15 feet MSL Date 3/4/96
Elevation
10-
15—
BROWN GRAVELLY SAND (SW) dense, moist; with some silt (FILL)
BROWN SAND (SP) medium dense, moist; with some silt and trace gravel.
Boring terminated at 4.5 feet.
No groundwater encountered.
AGI
TECHNOLOGIES
256146tp.cdr
Log of Borings B1 and B2
Gull/Site No. 240
Tukwila, Washington
PROJECT NO. DRAWN DATE AP VED
15,256.146 BJA Mar 96 ATP
REVISED
PLATE
7
DATE
E
a
a
0
X 0
X 0
o Depth (feet)
a)
n
E
Hand Auger HA1
Approximately
Land Surface 15 feet MSL Date 3/4/96
Elevation
10
15
Asphalt
BROWN GRAVELLY SAND (GW) dense, moist.
BROWN SAND (SP) dense, moist; medium coarse grained.
Becomes saturated at 2.5 feet.
Boring terminated at 3 feet.
Perched groundwater encountered at 2.5 feet during drilling.
Hand Auger
HA2
Approximately
Land Surface 15 feet MSL
Elevation
Asphalt
BROWN GRAVELLY SAND (GW) dense, moist.
BROWN SAND (SP) dense, moist; medium coarse grained.
Becomes saturated at 1.5 feet.
Boring terminated at 3 feet.
Perched groundwater encountered at 1.5 feet during drilling.
10
15
Date
3/4/96
AGI
TECHNOLOGIES
256146tp.cdr
Log of Borings HA1 and HA2
Gull/Site No. 240
Tukwila, Washington
PROJECT NO. DRAWN DATE
15,256.146 BJA Mar96
PLATE
8
APPROVED REVISED DATE
PROJECT AND
Project Name:
Project No.:
Lab Name:
Lab Number:
Sample No.:
Matrix:
AGI
TECHNOLOGIES
QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT
SAMPLE INFORMATION
Gull/Tukwila
15,256.146
Analytical Technologies, Inc. (ATI) - Renton, WA
603034 and 603035
MW1-12.5, MW2-7.5, MW2-12.5, MW2-17.5, MW3-12.5, HA1-2', HA2 -1', MW4-2.5,
MW4-12.5, MW4-17.5, B1-3, B2-3; MW1, MW2, MW3, MW4
Soil and Water
QUALITY ASSURANCE SUMMARY
All data are of known quality and acceptable for use.
ANALYTICAL METHODS
Parameter
BETX
Gasoline Range Fuel Hydrocarbons (TPH-G)
Hydrocarbon Identification (TPH-ID)
Fuel Hydrocarbons (TPH)
Moisture
Technique
GC/PID
GC/FID
GC/FID
GC/FID
Gravimetric
Method
EPA 8020
WTPH-G
WTPH-HCID'
EPA 8015 Modified'
CLP SOW ILM 01.0
a - Qualitatively identifies gasoline, diesel, and oil range fuel hydrocarbons (FHC); performed on
soil samples only.
b - Quantifies gasoline, diesel, and oil range FHC; performed on water samples only.
TIMELINESS
Time Time
Date Date Date Until Until
Parameter Sampled Extracted Analyzed Extraction Analysis
BETX 03/11/95 03/19/95 03/25/95 8 14 (14)
TPH-G 03/11/95 03/19/95 03/25/95 8 (14) 14 (21)
TPH-G 03/11/95 NA 03/21/95 NA 10 (14)
TPH-ID 03/11/95 03/14/95 03/15/95 3 (14) 4 (21)
TPH _ 03/11/95 03/15/95 03/16/95 4 (14) 5 (21)
Moisture 03/11/95 NA 03/13/95 NA 2
( ) - Number in parenthesis represents recommended holding time in days.
All samples were extracted and analyzed within recommended holding times.
Page 1 of 3
QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT
PROJECT AND SAMPLE INFORMATION
Project Name:
Project No.:
Lab Name:
Lab Number.
Sample No.:
Gull/Tukwila
15,256.146
Analytical Technologies, Inc. (ATI) - Renton, WA
603034 and 603035
See Page 1 of 3
AGI
TECHNOLOGIES
FUEL HYDROCARBON CHROMATOGRAMS
WTPH-HCID/EPA 8015 Modified: Gasoline range FHC were detected in samples MW2-12.5, MW4-
12.5, MW2, MW3, and MW4. These reported detections are consistent with the sample chromato-
grams.
TPH-G: Gasoline range FHC were detected in samples MW2-12.5, MW4-12.5, MW2, MW3, and
MW4. These reported detections are consistent with the sample chromatograms.
FIELD QUALITY CONTROL SAMPLES
Field Duplicates:
Rinsate:
Trip Blank:
None collected.
None collected.
None collected.
LAB QUALITY CONTROL SAMPLES
Method Blank: No analytes were detected at or above their method reporting limits (MRLs)
for the following methods:
Matrix Spike:
Page 2 of 3
EPA 8020
WTPH-G
WTPH-HCID
EPA 8015 Modified
Matrix Spike (MS) and MS duplicate (MSD) percent recoveries and relative
percent differences (RPDs) are within ATI's control limit criteria for the
following methods:
EPA 8020
WTPH-G
WTPH-HCID
EPA 8015 Modified
PROJECT AND
Project Name:
Project No.:
Lab Name:
Lab Number:
Sample No.:
Blank Spike:
Duplicates:
Surrogates:
AGI
TECHNOLOGIES
QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT
SAMPLE INFORMATION
Gull/Tukwila
15,256.146
Analytical Technologies, Inc. (ATI) - Renton, WA
603034 and 603035
See Page 1 of 3
Blank spike (BS) percent recoveries are within ATI's control limit criteria for
the following methods:
EPA 8020
WTPH-G
WTPH-HCID
EPA 8015 Modified
Duplicate analysis RPDs are within ATI's control limit criteria for the
following methods:
WTPH-G
EPA 8015 Modified
CLP SOW ILM01.0.
All surrogate percent recoveries are within All's control limit criteria for the
following methods:
WTPH-HCID
EPA 8015 Modified
EPA 8020/WTPH-G: Surrogate spike percent recoveries associated with
samples MW2-12.5 and MW3 exceeded All's control limits due to high
levels of target analytes in the sample. Sample results are considered
acceptable since all associated MS/MSD and BS recoveries are within
acceptance criteria.
SIGNATURES
Prepared by ' 4/a _ Date ,, 3/4/9
Checked by Date
Page 3 of 3
ov/1//96
March 28, 1996
AGI Technologies
P.O. Box 3885
Bellevue WA 98009
Attention : Lance Peterson
Project Number : 15256.146
Project Name : Gull/Tukwila
Dear Mr. Peterson:
ATI I.D. # 603034
RECEIVED
19,2,6
�0 ' ' -i
On March 11, 1996, Analytical Technologies, Inc. (ATI), received 12
samples for analysis. The samples were analyzed with EPA methodology
or equivalent methods as specified in the attached analytical schedule.
The results, sample cross reference, and quality control data are
enclosed.
Sincerely,
Vic ori L. Bayly
Project Manager
VLB/hal/mrj
Enclosure
Corporate Offices: 5550 Morehouse Drive San Dego, CA 92121 (619) 458-9141
DATE SAMPLED MATRIX
603034-1 MW1-12.5 03/11/96 SOIL
603034-2 MW2-7.5 03/11/96 SOIL
603034-3 MW2-12.5 03/11/96 SOIL
603034-4 MW2-17.5 03/11/96 SOIL
603034-5 MW3-12.5 03/11/96 SOIL
603034-6 HA1-2' 03/11/96 SOIL
603034-7 HA2 -1' 03/11/96 SOIL
603034-8 MW4-2.5 03/11/96 SOIL
603034-9 MW4-12.5 03/11/96 SOIL
603034-10 MW4-17.5 03/11/96 SOIL
603034-11 31-3 03/11/96 SOIL
603034-12 32-3 03/11/96 SOIL
MATRIX # SAMPLES
SOIL 12
TOTALS
ATI STANDARD DISPOSAL PRACTICE
The samples from this project will be disposed of in thirty (30) days
from the date of the report. If an extended storage period is required,
please contact our sample control department before the scheduled
disposal date.
2
ANALYTICAL SCHEDULE
CLIENT : AGI TECHNOLOGIES
PROJECT # : 15256.146
PROJECT NAME : GULL/TUKWILA
ATI I.D. # 603034
ANALYSIS
TECHNIQUE
REFERENCE LAB
BETX
TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS
HYDROCARBON IDENTIFICATION
MOISTURE
R = ATI - Renton
ANC = ATI - Anchorage
SUB = Subcontract
GC/PID EPA 8020 R
GC/FID WA DOE WTPH-G R
GC/FID WA DOE WTPH-HCID R
GRAVIMETRIC CLP SOW ILM01.0 R
AnalyticalTechnologies,Inc.
3
BETX - GASOLINE
DATA SUMMARY
CLIENT : AGI TECHNOLOGIES
PROJECT # : 15256.146
PROJECT NAME : GULL/TUKWILA
CLIENT I.D. : METHOD BLANK
SAMPLE MATRIX : SOIL
METHOD : WA DOE WTPH-G/8020(BETX)
RESULTS ARE CORRECTED FOR MOISTURE CONTENT
ATI I.D. # 603034
DATE SAMPLED : N/A
DATE RECEIVED : N/A
DATE EXTRACTED : 03/19/96
DATE ANALYZED : 03/21/96
UNITS : mg/Kg
DILUTION FACTOR : 1
COMPOUNDS
RESULTS
BENZENE
ETHYLBENZENE
TOLUENE
TOTAL XYLENES
FUEL HYDROCARBONS
HYDROCARBON RANGE
HYDROCARBON QUANTITATION USING
SURROGATE PERCENT RECOVERY
BROMOFLUOROBENZENE
TRIFLUOROTOLUENE
<0.025
<0.025
<0.025
<0.025
<5.0
TOLUENE TO DODECANE
GASOLINE
77
94
LIMITS
52 - 116
50 - 150
AnalyticalTechnologies,Inc.
4
BETX - GASOLINE
DATA SUMMARY
CLIENT : AGI TECHNOLOGIES
PROJECT # : 15256.146
PROJECT NAME : GULL/TUKWILA
CLIENT I.D. : MW2-12.5
SAMPLE MATRIX : SOIL
METHOD : WA DOE WTPH-G/8020(BETX)
RESULTS ARE CORRECTED FOR MOISTURE CONTENT
ATI I.D. # 603034-3
DATE SAMPLED 03/11/96
DATE RECEIVED : 03/11/96
DATE EXTRACTED : 03/19/96
DATE ANALYZED : 03/25/96
UNITS : mg/Kg
DILUTION FACTOR : 50
COMPOUNDS
RESULTS
BENZENE
ETHYLBENZENE
TOLUENE
TOTAL XYLENES
FUEL HYDROCARBONS
HYDROCARBON RANGE
HYDROCARBON QUANTITATION USING
SURROGATE PERCENT RECOVERY
BROMOFLUOROBENZENE
TRIFLUOROTOLUENE
12
73
160
380
4400
TOLUENE TO DODECANE
GASOLINE
707 G
220 G
LIMITS
52 - 116
50 - 150
G = Out of limits due to high levels of target analytes in sample.
Ana lyticalTechnologies,Inc.
CLIENT
PROJECT #
PROJECT NAME .
CLIENT I.D. .
SAMPLE MATRIX :
METHOD
5
BETX - GASOLINE
DATA SUMMARY
AGI TECHNOLOGIES
15256.146
GULL/TUKWILA
MW4-12.5
SOIL
WA DOE WTPH-G/8020(BETX)
RESULTS ARE CORRECTED FOR MOISTURE CONTENT
ATI I.D. # 603034-9
DATE SAMPLED : 03/11/96
DATE RECEIVED : 03/11/96
DATE EXTRACTED : 03/19/96
DATE ANALYZED : 03/22/96
UNITS : mg/Kg
DILUTION FACTOR : 1
COMPOUNDS
RESULTS
BENZENE
ETHYLBENZENE
TOLUENE
TOTAL XYLENES
FUEL HYDROCARBONS
HYDROCARBON RANGE
HYDROCARBON QUANTITATION USING
SURROGATE PERCENT RECOVERY
BROMOFLUOROBENZENE
TRIFLUOROTOLUENE
<0.029
0.078
<0.029
<0.029
52
TOLUENE TO DODECANE
GASOLINE
90
86
LIMITS
52 - 116
50 - 150
AAnalyticalTechnologies,Inc.
CLIENT
PROJECT #
PROJECT NAME
SAMPLE MATRIX
METHOD
6
BETX - GASOLINE
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
AGI TECHNOLOGIES
15256.146
GULL/TUKWILA
SOIL
WA DOE WTPH-G/8020(BETX)
ATI I.D. # 603034
SAMPLE I.D. #
DATE EXTRACTED
DATE ANALYZED
UNITS
: BLANK
: 03/19/96
: 03/21/96
: mg/Kg
COMPOUNDS
SAMPLE SPIKE
RESULT ADDED
DUP. DUP.
SPIKED % SPIKED
RESULT REC. SAMPLE REC. RPD
BENZENE
TOLUENE
TOTAL XYLENES
GASOLINE
CONTROL
BENZENE
TOLUENE
TOTAL XYLENES
GASOLINE
LIMITS
SURROGATE
RECOVERIES
BROMOFLUOROBENZENE
TRIFLUOROTOLUENE
<0.0250 1.00
<0.0250 1.00
<0.0250 2.00
<5.00 50.0
SPIKE
82
92
0.945
1.01
2.04
48.2
95
101
102
96
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
REC.
82 - 109
86 - 116
83 - 119
78 - 115
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
RPD
DUP. SPIKE LIMITS
N/A
N/A
20
20
20
20
52 - 116
50 - 150
AnalyticalTechnologies,Inc.
CLIENT.
PROJECT #
PROJECT NAME
SAMPLE MATRIX
METHOD
7
BETX - GASOLINE
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
AGI TECHNOLOGIES
15256.146
GULL/TUKWILA
SOIL
WA DOE WTPH-G/8020 (BETX)
ATI I.D. # 603034
SAMPLE I.D. # : 603045-4
DATE EXTRACTED : 03/19/96
DATE ANALYZED : 03/22/96
UNITS : mg/Kg
COMPOUND
SAMPLE
RESULT
SAMPLE
DUP. SPIKE SPIKED %
RESULT RPD ADDED RESULT REC.
DUP. DUP.
SPIKED
RESULT REC. RPD
GASOLINE
<5.00 <5.00 NC N/A
CONTROL LIMITS
GASOLINE
SURROGATE RECOVERIES
TRIFLUOROTOLUENE
NC = Not
calculable.
SAMPLE
75
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
% REC.
N/A 20
SAMPLE DUP. LIMITS
RPD
76
50 - 150
AnalyticalTechnologies,Inc.
CLIENT
PROJECT #
PROJECT NAME
SAMPLE MATRIX
METHOD
8
BETX - GASOLINE
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
AGI TECHNOLOGIES
15256.146
GULL/TUKWILA
SOIL
WA DOE WTPH-G/8020(BETX)
ATI I.D. # 603034
SAMPLE I.D. # .
DATE EXTRACTED .
DATE ANALYZED .
UNITS
603045-8
03/19/96
03/22/96
mg/Kg
COMPOUND
SAMPLE DUP. DUP.
SAMPLE DUP. SPIKE SPIKED % SPIKED °s
RESULT RESULT RPD ADDED RESULT REC. RESULT REC.
RPD
BENZENE
TOLUENE
TOTAL XYLENES
GASOLINE
CONTROL
BENZENE
TOLUENE
TOTAL XYLENES
GASOLINE
<0.0250 N/A
<0.0250 N/A
<0.0250 N/A
<5.00 <5.00
LIMITS
SURROGATE RECOVERIES
BROMOFLUOROBENZENE
TRIFLUOROTOLUENE
NC = Not calculable.
N/A 1.00
N/A 1.00
N/A 2.00
NC 50.0
SPIKE
69 '
56
0.794
0.889
1.81
41.0
79 0.840 84
89 0.886 89
91 1.79 90
82 43.0 86
REC.
62 - 104
63 - 115
64 - 117
59 - 111
DUP. SPIKE
68
58
LIMITS
6
0
1
5
RPD
20
20
20
20
52 - 116
50 - 150
AnalyticalTechnologies,Inc.
9
CASE NARRATIVE
CLIENT : AGI TECHNOLOGIES
PROJECT # : 15256.146
PROJECT NAME : GULL/TUKWILA
ATI I.D. # 603034
CASE NARRATIVE: HYDROCARBON IDENTIFICATION ANALYSIS - WA DOE WTPH-HCID
Eight (8) soil samples were received on March 11, 1996, for the qualitative
analysis of gasoline, diesel and heavy oil range organics by Washington State
Department of Ecology methodology.
The relative percent difference (RPD) for gasoline recovery in one of the
associated duplicates was outside ATI established control limits. The RPD
for diesel recovery in this same sample was within limits. The RPD's for the
other duplicate sample associated with this extraction batch were within
established limits. Since WA DOE WTPH-HCID is a qualitative identification
method, and positive results were found in both the original extract and the
duplicate that were out of limits, no further action was taken.
All other corresponding quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) parameters
were within ATI established control limits
10
117 AnalyticalTechnologies,Inc.
ATI I.D. # 603034
HYDROCARBON IDENTIFICATION
DATA SUMMARY
CLIENT : AGI TECHNOLOGIES
PROJECT # : 15256.146
PROJECT NAME : GULL/TUKWILA
CLIENT I.D. : METHOD BLANK
SAMPLE MATRIX : SOIL
METHOD : WA DOE WTPH-HCID
RESULTS ARE CORRECTED FOR MOISTURE CONTENT
DATE SAMPLED
DATE RECEIVED .
DATE EXTRACTED .
DATE ANALYZED .
UNITS
DILUTION FACTOR :
N/A
N/A
03/14/96
03/15/96
mg/Kg
1
RESULTS
GASOLINE CONCENTRATION LESS THAN 20 mg/Kg BY WA DOE WTPH-HCID.
DIESEL CONCENTRATION LESS THAN 50 mg/Kg BY WA DOE WTPH-HCID.
PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS >C24 CONCENTRATION
WTPH-HCID.
SURROGATE PERCENT RECOVERY
LESS THAN 100 mg/Kg BY
WA DOE
LIMITS
O-TERPHENYL 110 50-150
CLIENT
PROJECT #
PROJECT NAME
CLIENT I.D.
SAMPLE MATRIX
METHOD
RESULTS
11
ATI I.D. # 603034-1
HYDROCARBON IDENTIFICATION
DATA SUMMARY
: AGI TECHNOLOGIES
: 15256.146
: GULL/TUKWILA
: MW1-12.5
: SOIL
: WA DOE WTPH-HCID
ARE CORRECTED FOR MOISTURE
CONTENT
DATE SAMPLED
DATE RECEIVED .
DATE EXTRACTED .
DATE ANALYZED .
UNITS
DILUTION FACTOR :
03/11/96
03/11/96
03/14/96
03/15/96
mg/Kg
1
RESULTS
GASOLINE CONCENTRATION LESS THAN 20 mg/Kg BY
WA DOE WTPH-HCID.
DIESEL CONCENTRATION LESS THAN 50 mg/Kg BY WA DOE WTPH-HCID.
PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS >C24 CONCENTRATION
WTPH-HCID.
SURROGATE
PERCENT RECOVERY
LESS THAN 100 mg/Kg BY
WA DOE
LIMITS
O-TERPHENYL 97 50-150
12
AnalyticalTechnologies,Inc.
ATI I.D. # 603034-3
HYDROCARBON IDENTIFICATION
DATA SUMMARY
CLIENT : AGI TECHNOLOGIES
PROJECT # : 15256.146
PROJECT NAME : GULL/TUKWILA
CLIENT I.D. : MW2-12.5
SAMPLE MATRIX : SOIL
METHOD : WA DOE WTPH-HCID
RESULTS ARE CORRECTED FOR MOISTURE CONTENT
DATE SAMPLED
DATE RECEIVED .
DATE EXTRACTED .
DATE ANALYZED .
UNITS
DILUTION FACTOR :
03/11/96
03/11/96
03/14/96
03/15/96
mg/Kg
1
RESULTS
GASOLINE QUALITATIVELY IDENTIFIED BY WA DOE WTPH-HCID.
DIESEL CONCENTRATION LESS THAN 50 mg/Kg BY WA DOE WTPH-HCID.
PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS >C24 CONCENTRATION LESS THAN
WTPH-HCID.
SURROGATE PERCENT RECOVERY
100 mg/Kg BY
WA DOE
LIMITS
O-TERPHENYL 98 50-150
AnalyticalTechnologies,Inc.
CLIENT
PROJECT #
PROJECT NAME
CLIENT I.D.
SAMPLE MATRIX
METHOD
13
ATI I.D. # 603034-5
HYDROCARBON IDENTIFICATION
DATA SUMMARY
AGI TECHNOLOGIES
15256.146
GULL/TUKWILA
MW3-12.5
SOIL
WA DOE WTPH-HCID
RESULTS ARE CORRECTED FOR MOISTURE CONTENT
DATE SAMPLED
DATE RECEIVED
DATE EXTRACTED
DATE ANALYZED
UNITS
DILUTION FACTOR
03/11/96
03/11/96
03/14/96
03/15/96
mg/Kg
1
RESULTS
GASOLINE CONCENTRATION LESS THAN 20 mg/Kg BY WA DOE WTPH-HCID.
DIESEL CONCENTRATION LESS THAN 50 mg/Kg BY WA DOE WTPH-HCID.
PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS
WTPH-HCID.
>C24 CONCENTRATION
SURROGATE PERCENT RECOVERY
LESS THAN 100 mg/Kg BY
WA DOE
LIMITS
O-TERPHENYL 105 50-150
14
Ana lyticalTechnologies,lnc.
ATI I.D. # 603034-6
HYDROCARBON IDENTIFICATION
DATA SUMMARY
CLIENT : AGI TECHNOLOGIES
PROJECT # : 15256.146
PROJECT NAME : GULL/TUKWILA
CLIENT I.D. : HA1-2'
SAMPLE MATRIX : SOIL
METHOD : WA DOE WTPH-HCID
RESULTS ARE CORRECTED FOR MOISTURE CONTENT
DATE SAMPLED : 03/11/96
DATE RECEIVED : 03/11/96
DATE EXTRACTED : 03/14/96
DATE ANALYZED : 03/15/96
UNITS : mg/Kg
DILUTION FACTOR : 1
RESULTS
GASOLINE CONCENTRATION LESS THAN 20 mg/Kg BY WA DOE WTPH-HCID.
DIESEL CONCENTRATION LESS THAN 50 mg/Kg BY WA DOE WTPH-HCID.
PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS >C24 CONCENTRATION
WTPH-HCID.
SURROGATE PERCENT RECOVERY
LESS THAN 100 mg/Kg BY WA DOE
LIMITS
O-TERPHENYL 107 50-150
15
J� AnalyticalTechnologies,Inc.
ATI I.D. # 603034-7
HYDROCARBON IDENTIFICATION
DATA SUMMARY
CLIENT : AGI TECHNOLOGIES
PROJECT # : 15256.146
PROJECT NAME : GULL/TUKWILA
CLIENT I.D. : HA2 -1'
SAMPLE MATRIX : SOIL
METHOD : WA DOE WTPH-HCID
RESULTS ARE CORRECTED FOR MOISTURE CONTENT
DATE SAMPLED : 03/11/96
DATE RECEIVED : 03/11/96
DATE EXTRACTED : 03/14/96
DATE ANALYZED : 03/15/96
UNITS : mg/Kg
DILUTION FACTOR : 1
RESULTS
GASOLINE CONCENTRATION LESS THAN 20 mg/Kg BY WA DOE WTPH-HCID.
DIESEL CONCENTRATION LESS THAN 50 mg/Kg BY WA DOE WTPH-HCID.
PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS >C24 CONCENTRATION
WTPH-HCID.
SURROGATE PERCENT RECOVERY
LESS THAN 100 mg/Kg BY WA DOE
LIMITS
O-TERPHENYL 100 50-150
16
LAnalyticalTechnologies,Inc.
ATI I.D. # 603034-9
HYDROCARBON IDENTIFICATION
DATA SUMMARY
CLIENT : AGI TECHNOLOGIES
PROJECT # : 15256.146
PROJECT NAME : GULL/TUKWILA
CLIENT I.D. : MW4-12.5
SAMPLE MATRIX : SOIL
METHOD : WA DOE WTPH-HCID
RESULTS ARE CORRECTED FOR MOISTURE CONTENT
DATE SAMPLED
DATE RECEIVED .
DATE EXTRACTED .
DATE ANALYZED .
UNITS
DILUTION FACTOR :
03/11/96
03/11/96
03/14/96
03/15/96
mg/Kg
1
RESULTS
GASOLINE QUALITATIVELY IDENTIFIED BY WA DOE
WTPH-HCID.
DIESEL CONCENTRATION LESS THAN 50 mg/Kg BY WA DOE WTPH-HCID:
PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS >C24 CONCENTRATION LESS
WTPH-HCID.
SURROGATE PERCENT RECOVERY
THAN 100 mg/Kg BY
WA DOE
LIMITS
O-TERPHENYL 108 50-150
17
AnalyticalTechnologies,lnc.
ATI I.D. # 603034-11
HYDROCARBON IDENTIFICATION
DATA SUMMARY •
CLIENT : AGI TECHNOLOGIES
PROJECT # : 15256.146
PROJECT NAME : GULL/TUKWILA
CLIENT I.D. : B1-3
SAMPLE MATRIX : SOIL
METHOD : WA DOE WTPH-HCID
RESULTS ARE CORRECTED FOR MOISTURE CONTENT
DATE SAMPLED : 03/11/96
DATE RECEIVED : 03/11/96
DATE EXTRACTED : 03/14/96
DATE ANALYZED : 03/15/96
UNITS : mg/Kg
DILUTION FACTOR : 1
RESULTS
GASOLINE CONCENTRATION LESS THAN 20 mg/Kg BY WA DOE WTPH-HCID.
DIESEL CONCENTRATION LESS THAN 50 mg/Kg BY WA.DOE WTPH-HCID.
PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS >C24 CONCENTRATION
WTPH-HCID.
SURROGATE PERCENT RECOVERY
LESS THAN 100 mg/Kg BY WA DOE
LIMITS
O-TERPHENYL 100 50-150
18
41, AnalyticalTechnologies,Inc.
ATI I.D. # 603034-12
HYDROCARBON IDENTIFICATION
DATA SUMMARY
CLIENT : AGI TECHNOLOGIES
PROJECT # : 15256.146
PROJECT NAME : GULL/TUKWILA
CLIENT I.D. : B2-3
SAMPLE MATRIX : SOIL
METHOD : WA DOE WTPH-HCID
RESULTS ARE CORRECTED FOR MOISTURE CONTENT
DATE SAMPLED
DATE RECEIVED .
DATE EXTRACTED .
DATE ANALYZED .
UNITS
DILUTION FACTOR :
03/11/96
03/11/96
03/14/96
03/16/96
mg/Kg
1
RESULTS
GASOLINE CONCENTRATION LESS THAN 20 mg/Kg BY WA DOE WTPH-HCID.
DIESEL CONCENTRATION LESS THAN 50 mg/Kg BY WA DOE WTPH-HCID.
PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS >C24 CONCENTRATION LESS THAN 100 mg/Kg BY
WTPH-HCID.
SURROGATE PERCENT RECOVERY
O-TERPHENYL 104
WA DOE
LIMITS
50-150
2 AnalyticalTechnologies,Inc.
19
GENERAL CHEMISTRY ANALYSIS
CLIENT : AGI TECHNOLOGIES
PROJECT # : 15256.146
PROJECT NAME : GULL/TUKWILA
ATI I.D. # 603034
MATRIX : SOIL
PARAMETER DATE ANALYZED
MOISTURE 03/13/96
20
Ana lyticalTechnologies,Inc.
GENERAL CHEMISTRY ANALYSIS
DATA SUMMARY
CLIENT : AGI TECHNOLOGIES
PROJECT # : 15256.146
PROJECT NAME : GULL/TUKWILA
ATI I.D. # 603034
MATRIX : SOIL
UNITS :
ATI I.D. # CLIENT I.D. MOISTURE
603034-1 MW1-12.5 30
603034-3 MW2-12.5 29
603034-5 MW3-12.5 28
603034-6 HA1-2' 30
603034-7 HA2 -1' 23
603034-9 MW4-12.5 15
603034-11 B1-3 9.4
603034-12 B2-3 10
21
Jl\ AnalyticalTechnologies,Inc.
GENERAL CHEMISTRY ANALYSIS
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
CLIENT : AGI TECHNOLOGIES
PROJECT # : 15256.146
PROJECT NAME : GULL/TUKWILA
ATI I.D. # 603034
MATRIX : SOIL
UNITS t
PARAMETER
SAMPLE DUP SPIKED SPIKE °s
ATI I.D. RESULT RESULT RPD RESULT ADDED REC
MOISTURE
603034-11 9.4 9.7 3 N/A N/A N/A
t Recovery = (Spike Sample Result - Sample Result)
x 100
Spike Concentration
RPD (Relative t Difference) = (Sample Result - Duplicate Result)I
Average Result
x 100
SVA 170E WTPH-G
FB -F
5D
43
Ca
C
•
n
CD
Sasple: 603034-9 Channel: FID
Acquired: 22 -MAR -i6 3:51 Method: X:\MAXDATA\GLAD1032196GS
Consents: ATI : A COMMITMENT ro DUALITY
x 1O vol is
CD 9 CD
WA DOE WFPH-G
Filenase: R.1219G39
Operator: ATI
_-".may FE - F
i
TFT -F
1BLANK
Sasple: SRB 3-19 Channel: FID
Acquired: 21 -MAR -96 17:40 Method: X:\MAXDATA\6LAD\0321%03
Consents: ATI : A COMMITMENT TO DUALITY
.c 10-1 4)0 i t•s.
1
f
CD CD CD
G
CDb
WA DOE WTPH-G
Filename: R3219617
Operator: ATI
FB -F
— BFB -F
TFT -F
CONTINUING CALIBRATION
I
x 10— 1 vagi #.s
0 0 .
C
i
f—.
7;2 -
FB -F
TFT -F
I-
t
- - BFB -F
3—
WADOEWTPH-G
Filename: R3219601
Operator: ATI
IONTINUING CALIBRATION
a
1
0
x
h„ tit 4o
Ca C 0
WA DOE WTPH—G
Filen:dm R325G01
Operator: ATI
— FB -F
-
TFT -F
— AF: -F
TZL
••I
F+� m is
o
b+>
m
r•• m
lL 0
1/3
.-1
GI
i
J
-
ct
OE
•v
0.60 --
:I , �1
0.401
i
104 HI
`- r T 1 r T— -r- —/ r
0.50 3,50
Saaple: 602024-9
Acquired: 15 -4R -S6 22:25
S lt Vitt 41
WA DOE WTPH-HCID
Channel: ANN Filenase: R3221413
Method: X:VAXDATA\ANN\FUEU315 Operator: ANN
-
X -2- Li vci t5
-
BLANK
Sample: A ,1i4 'SR3 G`annel: ANN
Acquired: 1,5 -NR -,-16 17:12 xethod: X:\,":rXLATA\A,\ \FL'E_3215
;c 1v
(.0(3i -c.s
e.7;
Filename: R315EH07
Operator: ANN
c7i 1-• !-•
071 CI NI
4D Cr, cn
1 : i 1
14
3,
1
INTINUING CALIBRATION
Sample: 3;12f;: 11.1:21, Channel: ;.:4.
Acquired: I° -"i n .n I�1 Method: !:"r:Z+7A\;'N1F1E,�,-:_
vol. i.s
0
S
--I
1-1
en 0 C_l 0
111111. V.!+t ft... 114A0 •
u
a
WA DOE WTPH-HCID
Filename: EIEEAK
Operator: ANN
LONTINUING CALIBRATION
WA DOE WTPH-HCID
Smile: Df00 11222E Channel: ANN Filenaie: R31!EQ4
Acquired: 15 -MAR -i6 15:24 Method: X:\MXDATA\APAREL0315 Operator: CO
x I G 1 co o 1 t s
in
• •
..t. •:7) CO in
CI en CI Cn ci
CD
5 ;3 1 14
..Z=4=1133.
• 1i
_zdielitt2tr.
'''Siztirtrst- Tr-
•1•••••••••••.••••••••• ••••
114.
'CONTINUING CALIBRATION
11!•••••••••••••••••••••MMMOMIIIMMENDOMMINFM.111!•••••••••••••••••••••••••• •••••••••••••••••
Saiple: AL.A;NE ANN
Acquired: 11-M4.-98 12:Z4
Inj Vol: 1.N
Alkane
channel: ANN Filenaae: R311643
Method: 1:\MAXDATA\ANN\FjELKI1 Operator: ANN
t
v0t
I-, I-•
0 N
0 0
. 1 ,
— 3.29 C7
C: i
• L
cn -- __-......--.--..... 4.9t ca
= F
6.81 C9
-i r-----
r---
— 8.71 cle
,--- i
7—, --1
I-
.4 4,
,
, .
i.... r. .
CA - 15.16 CI4
12.16 Cit
C
•
17.82 016
2 P —1 -- 2E1.22 C18 •
.... 0 f.
Tz I • 1,,
• -1 :z.:9
C20
rri
1,n 1
r.....) i Iumbsbe
I 1
CI I
I -7.
_I I
i . ;..
r.4 I r
•
1... k
1 .
' I
• N I
I
— I
• __ _
— 24.36 C22
2; 18 C24
— 55 al6
34.20 C32
37.87 C.L4
AGI
TECHNOLOGIES
Date (3/// /9G,
CHAIN-OF-C�STODY
Page / of
'2r
-�• PROJECT INFORMATION
Laboratory Number: &O9O3zi
Project Manager: LATE .PETZiz o.t/
ANALYSIS REQUEST
Project Name: cc. /1 r rte -S 7�ktA)' la
PETROLEUM
HYDROCARBONS
ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
PESTS/PCB's
METALS
LEACHING
TESTS
OTHER
4
Project Number: /5256. /46 1A, 3/x7/04
TPH-ID State: 4)40
TPH-G State:
TPH-D State:
TPH Special Instructions
418.1 State:
co
8010 Halogenated VOCs
8020 Aromatic VOCs ''"I''
co
tv
to
m
X
E.
?J
8240 GCMS Volatiles
8270 GCMS Semivol.
8310 HPLC PAHs
8040 Phenols
1 DWS - Volatiles and Semivol.
8080 OC Pest/PCBs
8080M PCBs only
140 OP Pesticides
8150 OC Herbicides
DWS - Herb/pest
Selected metals: ust
Total Lead (Wa)
Organic Lead (Ca)
TCL Metals (23)
Priority Poll. Metals (13)
DWS - Metals
1 MFSP - Metals (Wa),
TCLP - Volatiles (ZHE)
TCLP - Semivolatiles
TCLP - Pesticides
TCLP - Metals
NUMBER OF CONTAINERS
Site Location: Sampled By:Wis/LC?
DISPOSAL INFORMATION
ykLab Disposal (return if not indicated)
Dispo(al Method:1-
Disposed by: Disposal Date:
QC INFORMATION (check one)
W-846 ■ CLP ■ Screening • AGI Std. IN Special'
..:. SAMPLE ID
DATE
TIME
MATRIX
LAB ID
MWI -/ ..r
-3/4/4
bg*
Son (
!Z
M AL -•S-
(
J/Do
'
/o�
t7
Z.
MWz- /Z.r
MA-
X
V
1
/btWz-1�,V-
MD
Li
e/
-0L?
AA - f-4• C
/3/r
S
X
2
11111 - 2/
v9ro
(Q
J
,4
- `,
14,4-z- I
t 2-30✓6
Vis'-
t
/tAW4 -Z•�
/4/2S-
x
f�e)L�
LAB INFORMATION
SAMPLE RECEIPT
RELINQUISHED BY: 1.
RELINQUISHED BY: 2.
RELINQUISHED BY: 3.
Lab Name: AT- •.E
Total Number of Containers:
Ci
5-�slgnaatture:
'
/ s(/t Time:
L7 C` ,, -4A. Grit -5
Signature: Time:
Signature: Time:
Lab Address:
Chain of Custody Seals: Y/N/NA
Printed Name: '3/,, /ate:
Printed Name: Date:
Printed Name: Date:
122- Iti%b/r 1414
Intact?: Y/N/NA
/6:57-:;44-4.44.1s6.--,
Company c,
Company:
Company:
Via: 1_6,
Received in Good Condition/Cold: _,\
Turn Around Time: Standard ■ 24 hr. ■ 48 hr. ■ 72 hr. III �k.
RECEIVED BY: 1.
RECEIVED BY: 2.
RECEIVED BY: 3.
PRIOR AUAORIZATION IS REQUIRED FOR RUSH DATA
Sign ture: ie:
1.��-- �i l," !j
Signature: Time:
Signature: me:
Time:
Special Instructions:
,Ped Name: Date:
n u,,- A, 31"(r
Printed Name: Date:
Printed Name: Date:
CompanyA ,. T
H
Company:
Company:
AGI OFFICES: Bellevue: (206) 453-8383
Gig Harbor: (206) 851-5562
Portland: (503) 232-1800 Oakland: (510) 238-4590
DISTRIBUTION: White, Canary to Analy ical Laboratory; Pink to AGI Project Files; Gold to AGI Disposal Files
Rev. 4/94
TECHNOLOGIES
Date C 3/f /94
CHAIN-OF-
TOD1(
Page 7- of 2.
PROJECT INFORMATION
Laboratory Number: 6 003L.1
Project Manager: 444/CE t^'' E-76/2so,t/
LY
ANASIS REQUEST � , I
Project Name: G4.4 // 7(la, TA ki,6 I -
/
PETROLEUM
HYDROCARBONS
ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
PESTS/PCB's
METALS
LEACHING
TESTS
OTHER
`
-s„
Project Number: / CZ 5-4-,, t iCe
TPH-ID State: :ii4,—
TPH-G State:
TPH-D State:
TPH Special Instructions
418.1 State:
8015M
8010 Halogenated VOCs
8020 Aromatic VOCs
8020M - BETX oc4y AO -n5 1-1.- u
8240 GCMS Volatiles �iF IGS
8270 GCMS Semivol.
8310 HPLC PAHs
8040 Phenols
DWS - Volatiles and Semivol.
8080 OC Pest/PCBs
3
W
w
8140 OP Pesticides
8150 OC Herbicides
DWS - Herb/pest
Selected metals: list
Total Lead (Wa)
Organic Lead (Ca)
TCL Metals (23)
Priority Poll. Metals (13)
o
.
w
N
MFSP - Metals (Wa)
TCLP - Volatiles (ZHE) 1
TCLP - Semivolatiles
TCLP - Pesticides
TCLP - Metals
NUMBER OF CONTAINERS
Site Location: -%i. �i.,,,'/la e M— Sampled By: Lt L?i/t FF'
,
DISPOSAL INFORMATION
ab Disposal (return if not indicated)
Dispo aI Method:
Disposed by: Disposal Date:
QC INFORMATION (check one)
"iiSW-846■ CLP ■ Screening ■ AGI Std. ■ Special
.;,.; SAMPLE ID
DATE .
TIME
MATRIX
LAB ID
,41 tail - /Z. S-
34�94
/ 13s-
So/L VI
'7
✓
/
'14 - /-. r-
/i44
( r-4
10
4-14›.r
A
'S) -3
/-l/ r
1I
✓
h'°
--
fl.
._,,.
i
3z-3
/s -s rr�
...1,3
✓
�-;cs-P1-..
�
r
LAB INFORMATION
S3MPLE.RECEIPT
RELINQUISHED BY: 1.
RELINQUISHED BY: 2.
RELINQUISHED BY: 3.
Lab Name: 7-=
Total Number of Containers:
/,- `Signature:
1g44 Time:
Signature: Time:
Signature: Time:
Lab Address:
Chain of Custody Seals: Y/N/NA
N
s /� )_
Printed Name: , fq(99ate:
C _ `� : w. or-‘ S t, • -
Printed Name: Date:
Printed Name: Date:
---r2e-/ 1-041—
Intact?: Y/N/NA
!
Company:
-74--e;17
Company:
Company:
1
Via: > � �,,e
Received in Good Condition/Cold:
Turn Around Time: XStandard ■ 24 hr. ■ 48 hr. ■ 72 hr. ■ 1 L.
RECEIVED BY: 1.
RECEIVED BY:. ., . 2.:.
RECEIVED BY:. .. ;.. 3,
,PRIOR AUTHORIZATION IS REQUIRED FOR RUSH DATA .
sigr1ature:Time:
uL7..-.,..1F t
Signature: Time:
Signature: Time:
Special Instructions:
9rinted Name' Da e:
;
l,`u�„� t �5[it � to
Printed Name: Date:
Printed Name: Date:
Comp y:
Company:
Company:
AGI OFFICES: Bellevue: (206) 453-8383 Gig Harbor: (206) 851-5562
Portland: (503) 232-1800 Oakland: (510) 238-4590
DISTRIBUTION: White, Canary to Analytical Laboratory; Pink to AGI Project Files; Gold to AGI Disposal Files
Rev. 4/94
Corporate Offices: 5550 Morehouse Drive San Diego, CA 92121 (619) 458-9141
1
LAnalyticalTechnologies,Inc.
ATI I.D. # 603035
SAMPLE CROSS REFERENCE SHEET
CLIENT : AGI TECHNOLOGIES
PROJECT # : 15256.146
PROJECT NAME : GULL/TUKWILA
ATI #
CLIENT DESCRIPTION
DATE SAMPLED MATRIX
603035-1 MW1 03/11/96 WATER
603035-2 MW2 03/11/96 WATER
603035-3 MW3 03/11/96 WATER
603035-4 MW4 03/11/96 WATER
MATRIX # SAMPLES
WATER 4
TOTALS
ATI STANDARD DISPOSAL PRACTICE
The samples from this project will be disposed of in thirty (30) days
from the date of the report. If an extended storage period is required,
please contact our sample control department before the scheduled
disposal date.
LAnalyticalTechnologies,Inc.
2
ANALYTICAL SCHEDULE
CLIENT : AGI TECHNOLOGIES
PROJECT # : 15256.146
PROJECT NAME : GULL/TUKWILA
ATI I.D. # 603035
ANALYSIS
TECHNIQUE
REFERENCE LAB
BETX GC/PID EPA 8020 R
TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS GC/FID WA DOE WTPH-G R
FUEL HYDROCARBONS GC/FID EPA 8015 MODIFIED R
R = ATI - Renton
ANC = ATI - Anchorage
SUB = Subcontract
3
AnalyticalTechnologies,I nc.
CASE NARRATIVE
CLIENT : «EXPR_1»
PROJECT # : «EXPR_2»
PROJECT NAME : aEXPR 3»
ATI I.D.
«ACC NO»
CASE NARRATIVE: BETX —GASOLINE ANALYSIS
Four (4) water samples were received by ATI on March 11, 1996, for gasoline
range hydrocarbons analysis by WA DOE WTPH-G according to Washington state
methodology and BETX analysis according to EPA method 8020.
The method blanks were free of all analytes of interest. All surrogate
percent recoveries were within ATI control limits with the exception of
bromofluorobenzene in sample 603035-3 (MW3), which was out of limits due to
high levels of target -analytes in the sample. The matrix spike/matrix spike
duplicate (MS/MSD) recoveries and relative percent differences (RPDs) were
within ATI control limits. The blank spike (BS) recoveries were within ATI
control limits.
All other associated quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) parameters
were within the ATI established control limits. All analytical hold times
- were met.
LAnalyticalTechnologies,Inc.
CLIENT
PROJECT #
PROJECT NAME
CLIENT I.D.
SAMPLE MATRIX
METHOD
4
BETX - GASOLINE
DATA SUMMARY
AGI TECHNOLOGIES
15256.146
GULL/TUKWILA
METHOD BLANK
WATER
WA DOE WTPH-G/8020(BETX)
ATI I.D. # 603035
DATE SAMPLED : N/A
DATE RECEIVED : N/A
DATE EXTRACTED : N/A
DATE ANALYZED : 03/19/96
UNITS : ug/L
DILUTION FACTOR : 1
COMPOUNDS
RESULTS
BENZENE
ETHYLBENZENE
TOLUENE
TOTAL XYLENES
FUEL HYDROCARBONS
HYDROCARBON RANGE
HYDROCARBON QUANTITATION USING
SURROGATE PERCENT RECOVERY
BROMOFLUOROBENZENE
TRIFLUOROTOLUENE
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<100
TOLUENE TO DODECANE
GASOLINE
100
100
LIMITS
76 - 120
50 - 150
L AnalyticalTechnologies,Inc.
CLIENT
PROJECT #
PROJECT NAME .
CLIENT I.D. .
SAMPLE MATRIX :
METHOD
5
BETX - GASOLINE
DATA SUMMARY
AGI TECHNOLOGIES
15256.146
GULL/TUKWILA
METHOD BLANK
WATER
WA DOE WTPH-G/8020(BETX)
ATI I.D. # 603035
DATE SAMPLED
DATE RECEIVED .
DATE EXTRACTED .
DATE ANALYZED .
UNITS
DILUTION FACTOR :
N/A
N/A
N/A
03/21/96
ug/L
1
COMPOUNDS
RESULTS
BENZENE
ETHYLBENZENE
TOLUENE
TOTAL XYLENES
FUEL HYDROCARBONS
HYDROCARBON RANGE
HYDROCARBON QUANTITATION USING
SURROGATE PERCENT RECOVERY
BROMOFLUOROBENZENE
TRIFLUOROTOLUENE
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<100
TOLUENE TO DODECANE
GASOLINE
95
100
LIMITS
76 - 120
50 - 150
AnalyticalTechnologies,Inc.
CLIENT
PROJECT #
PROJECT NAME
CLIENT I.D.
SAMPLE MATRIX
METHOD
6
BETX - GASOLINE
DATA SUMMARY
AGI TECHNOLOGIES
15256.146
GULL/TUKWILA
MW2
WATER
WA DOE WTPH-G/8020(BETX)
ATI I.D. # 603035-2
DATE SAMPLED
DATE RECEIVED .
DATE EXTRACTED .
DATE ANALYZED .
UNITS
DILUTION FACTOR :
03/11/96
03/12/96
N/A
03/21/96
ug/L
300
COMPOUNDS
RESULTS
BENZENE
ETHYLBENZENE
TOLUENE
TOTAL XYLENES
FUEL HYDROCARBONS
HYDROCARBON RANGE
HYDROCARBON QUANTITATION USING
SURROGATE PERCENT RECOVERY
BROMOFLUOROBENZENE
TRIFLUOROTOLUENE
4600
2600
22000
15000
100000
TOLUENE TO DODECANE
GASOLINE
98
96
LIMITS
76 - 120
50 - 150
/J� AnalyticalTechnologies,Inc.
CLIENT .
PROJECT #
PROJECT NAME
CLIENT I.D.
SAMPLE MATRIX
METHOD
7
BETX - GASOLINE
DATA SUMMARY
AGI TECHNOLOGIES
15256.146
GULL/TUKWILA
MW3
WATER
WA DOE WTPH-G/8020(BETX)
ATI I.D. # 603035-3
DATE SAMPLED
DATE RECEIVED .
DATE EXTRACTED .
DATE ANALYZED .
UNITS
DILUTION FACTOR :
03/11/96
03/12/96
N/A
03/19/96
ug/L
1
COMPOUNDS
RESULTS
BENZENE
ETHYLBENZENE
TOLUENE
TOTAL XYLENES
FUEL HYDROCARBONS
HYDROCARBON RANGE
HYDROCARBON QUANTITATION USING
SURROGATE PERCENT RECOVERY
BROMOFLUOROBENZENE
TRIFLUOROTOLUENE
160 D4
210 D4
11
490 D4
4500
TOLUENE TO DODECANE
GASOLINE
124 G
109
LIMITS
76 - 120
50 - 150
D4 = Value from a ten fold diluted analysis.
G = Out of limits due to high levels of target analytes in sample.
CLIENT
PROJECT #
PROJECT NAME
CLIENT I.D.
SAMPLE MATRIX
METHOD
8
BETX - GASOLINE
DATA SUMMARY
AGI TECHNOLOGIES
15256.146
GULL/TUKWILA
MW4
WATER
WA DOE WTPH-G/8020(BETX)
ATI I.D. # 603035-4
DATE SAMPLED
DATE RECEIVED
DATE EXTRACTED
DATE ANALYZED
UNITS
DILUTION FACTOR
03/11/96
03/12/96
N/A
03/19/96
ug/L
1
COMPOUNDS
RESULTS
BENZENE
ETHYLBENZENE
TOLUENE
TOTAL XYLENES
FUEL HYDROCARBONS
HYDROCARBON RANGE
HYDROCARBON QUANTITATION.USING
SURROGATE PERCENT RECOVERY
BROMOFLUOROBENZENE
TRIFLUOROTOLUENE
D3 = Value from a five
fold diluted analysis.
26
100 D3
100 D3
110
2400
TOLUENE TO DODECANE
GASOLINE
120
97
LIMITS
76 - 120
50 - 150
AnalyticalTechnologies,Inc.
CLIENT
PROJECT #
PROJECT NAME
SAMPLE MATRIX
METHOD
9
BETX - GASOLINE
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
AGI TECHNOLOGIES
15256.146
GULL/TUKWILA
WATER
WA DOE WTPH-G/8020(BETX)
ATI I.D. # 603035
SAMPLE I.D. #
DATE EXTRACTED
DATE ANALYZED
UNITS
: BLANK
: N/A
: 03/19/96
ug/L
COMPOUNDS
SAMPLE
RESULT
SPIKE
ADDED
DUP. DUP.
SPIKED % SPIKED
RESULT REC. SAMPLE REC. RPD
BENZENE
TOLUENE
TOTAL XYLENES
GASOLINE
CONTROL
BENZENE
TOLUENE
TOTAL XYLENES
GASOLINE
LIMITS
SURROGATE RECOVERIES
BROMOFLUOROBENZENE
TRIFLUOROTOLUENE
<0.500
<0.500
<0.500
<100
20.0
20.0
40.0
1000
SPIKE
97
101
19.2
20.4
41.6
1030
96
102
104
103
REC.
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A'
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
RPD
89 - 110
89 - 113
89 - 111
78 - 116
DUP. SPIKE LIMITS
N/A
N/A
10
10
10
20
76 - 120
50 - 150
J
AnalyticalTechnologies,I nc.
CLIENT
PROJECT #
PROJECT NAME
SAMPLE MATRIX
METHOD
10
BETX - GASOLINE
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
AGI TECHNOLOGIES
15256.146
GULL/TUKWILA
WATER
WA DOE WTPH-G/8020(BETX)
ATI I.D. # 603035
SAMPLE I.D. #
DATE EXTRACTED
DATE ANALYZED
UNITS
: BLANK
: N/A
: 03/21/96
ug/L
COMPOUNDS
DUP. DUP.
SAMPLE SPIKE SPIKED t SPIKED
RESULT ADDED RESULT REC. SAMPLE REC. RPD
BENZENE
TOLUENE
TOTAL XYLENES
GASOLINE
CONTROL
BENZENE
TOLUENE
TOTAL XYLENES
GASOLINE
LIMITS
SURROGATE
<0.500
<0.500
<0.500
<100
20.0
20.0
40.0
1000
RECOVERIES SPIKE
BROMOFLUOROBENZENE
TRIFLUOROTOLUENE
96
102
19.8
20.8
42.4
1000
99
104
106
100
REC.
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
RPD
89 - 110
89 - 113
89 - 111
78 - 116
DUP. SPIKE LIMITS
N/A
N/A
10
10
10
20
76 - 120
50 - 150
CLIENT
PROJECT #
PROJECT NAME
SAMPLE MATRIX
METHOD
11
BETX - GASOLINE
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
AGI TECHNOLOGIES
15256.146
GULL/TUKWILA
WATER
WA DOE WTPH-G/8020(BETX)
ATI I.D. # 603035
SAMPLE I.D. #
DATE EXTRACTED
DATE ANALYZED
UNITS
: 603035-1
: N/A
: 03/19/96
. ug/L
COMPOUND
SAMPLE DUP. DUP.
SAMPLE DUP. SPIKE SPIKED % SPIKED %
RESULT RESULT RPD ADDED RESULT REC. RESULT REC. RPD
GASOLINE
<100 <100 NC
CONTROL LIMITS
GASOLINE
SURROGATE RECOVERIES
TRIFLUOROTOLUENE
NC = Not calculable.
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
% REC.
N/A 20
SAMPLE SAMPLE DUP. LIMITS
RPD
97
94
50 - 150
AnalyticalTechnologies,Inc.
CLIENT
PROJECT #
PROJECT NAME
SAMPLE MATRIX
METHOD
12
BETX - GASOLINE
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
AGI TECHNOLOGIES
15256.146
GULL/TUKWILA
WATER
WA DOE WTPH-G/8020(BETX)
ATI I.D. # 603035
SAMPLE I.D. # .
DATE EXTRACTED .
DATE ANALYZED .
UNITS
603046-1
N/A
03/15/96
ug/L
COMPOUND
SAMPLE DUP. DUP.
SAMPLE DUP. SPIKE SPIKED °s SPIKED
RESULT RESULT RPD ADDED RESULT REC. RESULT REC.
RPD
BENZENE
TOLUENE
TOTAL XYLENES
GASOLINE
CONTROL
BENZENE
TOLUENE
TOTAL XYLENES
GASOLINE
<0.500 N/A
<0.500 N/A
<0.500 N/A
<100 <100
LIMITS
SURROGATE
RECOVERIES
BROMOFLUOROBENZENE
TRIFLUOROTOLUENE
NC = Not calculable.
N/A 20.0
N/A 20.0
N/A 40.0
NC 1000
SPIKE
97
100
19.9
20.7
41.8
1000
100
103
105
100
19.5
20.5
41.5
998
% REC.
0
86 - 113
87 - 114
85 - 113
80 - 113
DUP. SPIKE
97
99
98
102
104
100
LIMITS
2
1
1
0
RPD
10
10
10
20
76 - 120
50 - 150
AnalyticalTechnologies,Inc.
13
CASE NARRATIVE
CLIENT : AGI TECHNOLOGIES
PROJECT # : 15256.146
PROJECT NAME : GULL/TUKWILA
ATI I.D. # 603035
CASE NARRATIVE: TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS - EPA 8015 MODIFIED
Four (4) water samples were 'received on March 11, 1996, for the analysis of
gasoline, diesel and heavy oil range organics by EPA method 8015 modified.
There were no anomalies associated with the preparation or analysis of these
samples.
Samples chromatograms for 603035-2 (MW2), 603035-3 (MW3) and 603035-4 (MW4)
indicate petroleum hydrocarbons characteristic of gasoline.
All corresponding quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) parameters were
within ATI established control limits.
LAnalyticalTechnologies,Inc.
CLIENT
PROJECT #
PROJECT NAME
CLIENT I.D.
SAMPLE MATRIX
EPA METHOD
14
FUEL HYDROCARBONS
DATA SUMMARY
AGI TECHNOLOGIES
15256.146
GULL/TUKWILA
METHOD BLANK
WATER
8015 (MODIFIED)
ATI I.D. # 603035
DATE SAMPLED
DATE RECEIVED
DATE EXTRACTED
DATE ANALYZED
UNITS
DILUTION FACTOR
N/A
N/A
03/15/96
03/16/96
mg/L
1
COMPOUNDS
RESULTS
FUEL HYDROCARBONS
HYDROCARBON RANGE
HYDROCARBON QUANTITATION USING
FUEL HYDROCARBONS
HYDROCARBON RANGE
HYDROCARBON QUANTITATION USING
FUEL HYDROCARBONS
HYDROCARBON RANGE
HYDROCARBON QUANTITATION USING
SURROGATE PERCENT RECOVERY
<1
C7 - C12
GASOLINE
<1
C12 - C24
DIESEL
<20
C24 - C34
MOTOR OIL
LIMITS
O-TERPHENYL 109 68 - 144
AnalyticalTechnologies,Inc.
CLIENT
PROJECT #
PROJECT NAME
CLIENT I.D.
SAMPLE MATRIX
EPA METHOD
15
FUEL HYDROCARBONS
DATA SUMMARY
AGI TECHNOLOGIES
15256.146
GULL/TUKWILA
MW1
WATER
8015 (MODIFIED)
ATI I.D. # 603035-1
DATE SAMPLED : 03/11/96
DATE RECEIVED : 03/12/96
DATE EXTRACTED : 03/15/96
DATE ANALYZED : 03/16/96
UNITS : mg/L
DILUTION FACTOR : 1
COMPOUNDS
RESULTS
FUEL HYDROCARBONS
HYDROCARBON RANGE
HYDROCARBON QUANTITATION USING
FUEL HYDROCARBONS
HYDROCARBON RANGE
HYDROCARBON QUANTITATION USING
FUEL HYDROCARBONS
HYDROCARBON RANGE
HYDROCARBON QUANTITATION USING
SURROGATE PERCENT RECOVERY
<1
C7 - C12
GASOLINE
<1
C12 - C24
DIESEL
<20
C24 - C34
MOTOR OIL
LIMITS
O-TERPHENYL 107 68 - 144
AnalyticalTechnologies,Inc.
CLIENT
PROJECT #
PROJECT NAME
CLIENT I.D.
SAMPLE MATRIX
EPA METHOD
16
FUEL HYDROCARBONS
DATA SUMMARY
AGI TECHNOLOGIES
15256.146
GULL/TUKWILA
MW2
WATER
8015 (MODIFIED)
ATI I.D. # 603035-2
DATE SAMPLED
DATE RECEIVED .
DATE EXTRACTED .
DATE ANALYZED .
UNITS
DILUTION FACTOR :
03/11/96
03/12/96
03/15/96
03/16/96
mg/L
1
COMPOUNDS
RESULTS
FUEL HYDROCARBONS
HYDROCARBON RANGE
HYDROCARBON QUANTITATION USING
FUEL HYDROCARBONS
HYDROCARBON RANGE
HYDROCARBON QUANTITATION USING
FUEL HYDROCARBONS
HYDROCARBON RANGE
HYDROCARBON QUANTITATION USING
SURROGATE PERCENT RECOVERY
110
C7 - C12
GASOLINE
<1
C12 - C24
DIESEL
<20
C24 - C34
MOTOR OIL'
LIMITS
O-TERPHENYL 118 68 - 144
J� AnalyticalTechnologies,Inc.
CLIENT
PROJECT #
PROJECT NAME
CLIENT I.D.
SAMPLE MATRIX
EPA METHOD
17
FUEL HYDROCARBONS
DATA SUMMARY
AGI TECHNOLOGIES
15256.146
GULL/TUKWILA
MW3
WATER
8015 (MODIFIED)
ATI I.D. # 603035-3
DATE SAMPLED : 03/11/96
DATE RECEIVED : 03/12/96
DATE EXTRACTED : 03/15/96
DATE ANALYZED : 03/16/96
UNITS : mg/L
DILUTION FACTOR : 1
COMPOUNDS
RESULTS
FUEL HYDROCARBONS
HYDROCARBON RANGE
HYDROCARBON QUANTITATION USING
FUEL HYDROCARBONS
HYDROCARBON RANGE
HYDROCARBON QUANTITATION USING
FUEL HYDROCARBONS
HYDROCARBON RANGE
HYDROCARBON QUANTITATION USING
SURROGATE PERCENT RECOVERY
6
C7 - C12
GASOLINE
<1
C12 - C24
DIESEL
<20
C24 - C34
MOTOR OIL
LIMITS
O-TERPHENYL 113 68 - 144
/6\ AnalyticalTechnologies,Inc.
CLIENT
PROJECT #
PROJECT NAME
CLIENT I.D.
SAMPLE MATRIX
EPA METHOD
18
FUEL HYDROCARBONS
DATA SUMMARY
AGI TECHNOLOGIES
15256.146
GULL/TUKWILA
MW4
WATER
8015 (MODIFIED)
ATI I.D. # 603035-4
DATE SAMPLED
DATE RECEIVED .
DATE EXTRACTED .
DATE ANALYZED .
UNITS
DILUTION FACTOR :
03/11/96
03/12/96
03/15/96
03/16/96
mg/L
1
COMPOUNDS
RESULTS
FUEL HYDROCARBONS
HYDROCARBON RANGE
HYDROCARBON QUANTITATION USING
FUEL HYDROCARBONS
HYDROCARBON RANGE
HYDROCARBON QUANTITATION USING
FUEL HYDROCARBONS
HYDROCARBON RANGE
HYDROCARBON QUANTITATION USING
SURROGATE PERCENT RECOVERY
4
C7 - C12
GASOLINE
<1
C12 - C24
DIESEL
<20
C24 - C34
MOTOR OIL
LIMITS
O-TERPHENYL 112 68 - 144
LAnalyticalTechnologies,Inc.
CLIENT
PROJECT #
PROJECT NAME
SAMPLE MATRIX
EPA METHOD
19
FUEL HYDROCARBONS
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
AGI TECHNOLOGIES
15256.146
GULL/TUKWILA
WATER
8015 (MODIFIED)
ATI I.D. # 603035
SAMPLE I.D. #
DATE EXTRACTED
DATE ANALYZED
UNITS
BLANK
03/15/96
03/16/96
mg/L
COMPOUNDS
SAMPLE
RESULT
SPIKE SPIKED °s
ADDED RESULT REC.
DUP. DUP.
SPIKED
SAMPLE REC. RPD
GASOLINE
CONTROL LIMITS
GASOLINE
SURROGATE RECOVERIES
O-TERPHENYL
<1.00
40.0
SPIKE
38.8 97 N/A
t REC.
49 - 120
DUP. SPIKE
121 N/A
N/A N/A
RPD
20
LIMITS
68 - 144
107
40.0 140
SPIKE
83 142
% REC.
73 - 92
DUP. SPIKE
113 117
88 1
RPD
20
LIMITS.
68 - 144
r
0 7
0
WA DOE WTPH-G
Sample: 603035-2 DIL Channel: FIB Filename: R3219G13
Acquired: 21 -MAR -46 15:48 Method: X:\MAXDATA\GLAD1032196GS Operator: ATI
Dilution: 1 : 300.000
Comments: ATI : A COMMITMENT TO QUALITY.
Inz
x •.10_g ■rot is
r D 44
9 0 0
s s t
FB -F
TFT -F
WADOEWTPH-G
Sample: 603+35-3 Channel: FID
Acquired: 19 -MAR -96 18:44 Method: X:\MAXDATA\GLAD\031996GS
Comments: ATI : A COMMITMENT TO QUALITY
O
O
0
V�
0
x 1O vol t.s
r to
9 0 4
1 1 1
Filenames R3199018
Operator: ATI
FB -F
-
— TFT -F
_
P.
— BFB -F
vsemnalimu
Sample: 6133335-4 Channel: FID
Acquired: 19 -MAR -96 18:16 Method: X:\MAXCATA\GLAD\03199663
Comments: ATI : A COMMITMENT TO QUALITY
WA DOE WI'PH-G
Filename: R3199G17
Operator: ATI
x 10-1 +Pa a t• s
p 4.. N w
c 0 a 0
D t s
0
Ln
FA-F
— AFB -F
it
TFT -F
-
BLANK
Q
0
0 0
0
0
O
0
.11
0
WA DOE WFPH•G
Sauple: WRB 3-19 Channel: FID
Acquired: 19 -MAR -96 10:24 Method: X:\MAXDATA\GLAD\031996GS
Conentt: ATI : A COMMITMENT TO QUALITY
10-1- volts
!� N 4a
Ei 0 0 0
: 1 1
Filenaae: R3199803
Operator: ATI
— BFB -F
FB -F
TFT -F
— TFT -F
WA DOE WTPH-G
Fi1enue: R3219G03
Operator: ATI
(CONTINUING CALIBRATION
WA DOE WTPH-G
Sample: STD -C 6 Channel: FID Filenaae: R3199601
Acquired: 19-M R-96 9:18 Method: X:\MAXDATA\6LAD\031996GS Operator: ATI
Coaaents: ATI : A COMMITMENT TO QUALITY
x 1C3-1 teal t.s
0 1 N 4,
O E
O o 0 o
1 ,
0
0
O
ri
ft) Z
�-- BFB -F
� J
0
-
tEE
TFT -F
FB -F
7-77
i =
ITT -F
a
-- — BFB -F
Beige: 603035-1 Chinnelt 'WILMA
Acquired: 16 -MAR -96 3:37 Method: X:\MAXDATA\WILMA\FUEL0315
x 10 1 'volts
EPS, 8015 Modified
Filentee: R3158W18
Operators BR0
a CD o r r
CD a CD CD o
1 1 1 i 1 1
1-
Baeples 603835-3 Channels WILMA
Acquired: 16 -MAR -96 5:21 Methods X:\MAXDATA\WILMA\FUr10315
x 10-1 vas is
0 0 0 i-- r
0 o 0 0 0
1 1 1 1 I
0
cn-
0
0
in -
0
kA b 1O Mof i lea
Filenaees R3158W20
Operators BRO
i
Saupl,i 6030335-4 Channel: WILM•A
EPA 8015 Modified
Filmi�et R3158W21
Acquired: 16 -MAR -96 6:13 Method' X:\MAXDATR\WILMA\FUEL0315 Operator' BRO
10-1 at is
CI a o r r
0 0 0 0 0
1 1 1 1 1
Ing
o -
a
o -
'CONTINUING CALIBRATION
Saapltt G 500 Channel' WILMA
Acquirodt 15—MAR-96 22:24 Methods X:\MAXDATA\WILMA\FUELO315
IONTINUING CALIBRATION
Staple: D 500 Channel: WILMA
Acquired: 15—MAR-96 23:17 Method: X:\MAXDATA\WILMA\FUEL0315
x 10-1 vat is
0 0 0 r k -
'CD 0 0
C2 0
0 0
1 1 1 1 1
EPA 8015 Modified
Filenaee: R3158W13
Operator: BRO
1.20-
.30-
1.00-
1.00-
0
0.80
0.00 -
2M 9
1
Q� K 0.60-
oc
m
Q
U $�
:t
'
.11
O
0.40-
1111
.40-
1 I 1
1 I 1
0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50
x 101 minutes
5e'}blL 1W jQj :x
Alkane
Sasple: ALKANE WILMA Channel: WILMA
Acquired: 13—MAR-96 17:04 Method: X:\MRXDRTA\WILMA\FUEL0313
Inj Vol: 1.00
O-
0
W
0—
O
x 10-1 teal is
Filenane: R3138W03
Operator: BRO
O O O 1 r
0 0 0 0 0
1 1 1 . 1 1
3.75 C7
r1
5.40 C8
7.32 C9
_ 9.21 C10
1-
IN
IMO
12.65 C12 e5---
15.66 C14
18.32 C16
20.71 C18
22.88 C20
24.87 C22
26.69 C24 —
30.17 C28
— 35.15 C32
S u..v r vcJ c�.i A / C�. 3
39.12 C34 L
TECHNOLOGIES
.:. .. .. .= _:
CHAIN -OF -C STODY
Page � of /
Date 0311( /'?4
PROJECT INFORMATION
Laboratory Number: 0 Q 2, � %.�
ANALYSIS REQUEST
Project Manager: L.4A/Ge ?e7 2Sa$/
Project Name: �r41/ /-60.14 a rig 1 k Wi ld ''-1+21'�
PETROLEUM
HYDROCARBONS
ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
PESTS/PCB's
METALS
LEACHING
TESTS
OTHER
JJ
Project Number: I S-z_rt'Q , 1 4 Le
TPH-ID State: ().?A- ((; t5,,,>
TPH-G State: 0.,1
TPH-D State: 6t j3—
TPH Special Instructions
418.1 State:
o
5;
8010 Halogenated VOCs
8020 Aromatic VOCs
8020M - BETX only
8240 GCMS Volatiles
8270 GCMS Semivol.
8310 HPLC PAHs
8040 Phenols
DWS - Volatiles and Semivol.
8080 OC Pest/PCBs
8080M PCBs only
8140 OP Pesticides
8150 OC Herbicides
DWS - Herb/pest
Selected metals: dist
Total Lead (Wa)
Organic Lead (Ca)
TCL Metals (23)
Priority Poll. Metals (13)
DWS - Metals
MFSP - Metals (Wa)
TCLP - Volatiles (ZHE)
TCLP - Semivolatiles
TCLP - Pesticides
TCLP - Metals
g IFI 14
311
NUMBER OF CONTAINERS
Site Location: -t Ic-wi /14 zen.- Sampled By: Lc:
,
DISPOSAL INFORMATION
I 'Lab Disposal (return if'not indicated)
Disposal Method:
Disposed by: Disposal Date:
QC INFORMATION (check one)
p/-846 ■ CLP ■ Screening ■ AGI Std. • Special
SAMPLE ID . .
DATE
• TIME
MATRIX
LAB ID
/N kJ/ '
-3/i 1144,
i 4s"
WAR
I 2
)('(
'
Z
5-
/LtuJz
/IpZS'
�, l
)(,(,l
_
'
/
S-
,tiles
is -2o`
3 'XP(r
/
s
stria
1-q-1 o
L( 2yvr
�N/i
/
5-'
•
1
\\
f
ktlIck
LAB INFORMATION
SAMPLE RECEIPT
RELINQUISHED BY: 1.
RELINQUISHED BY:. 2,
RELINQUISHED BY: 3.
Lab Name: A
Total Number of Containers:
d v
N .
-spe: ! , . %.r/r/_Time:
Signature: Time:
Signature: Time:
Lab Address:
Chain of Custody Seals: Y/N/NA
Printed Nage:. (t, l tgate:
Printed Name: EarDate:
•
Printed Name: Date:
-06-N�� /.
Intact?: Y/N/NA
d/c
t
< <Mn t t Se ...-1,
Company: 'C. T
Company:
Company:
Via: 1.4
Received in Good Condition/Cold:
\(
Turn Around Time: standard ■ 24 hr. ■ 48 hr. ■ 72 hr. ■ 1 vik.
RECEIVED BY: 1.
RECEIVED BY::., 'r.:: 2.
RECEIVED_ BY; .,;::; ,; ,.: 3.
t., PRIOR AUTHORIZATION IS REQUIRED FOR RUSH DATA
Suture: Tim
Signature: Time:
Signature: Time:
Special Instructions: l
-1 j ted Nam : Date:
Iii A"- 4. 3/ 1 I(`t
Printed Name: Date:
4
Printed Name: Date:
Company:
At (
Company:
Company:
,
AGI OFFICES: Bellevue: (206) 453-8383 Gig Harbor: (206) 851-5562
Portland: (503) 232-1800 Oakland: (510) 238-4590
DISTRIBUTION: White, Canary to Analytical Laboratory; Pink to AGI Project Files; Gold to AGI Disposal Files
t - Rev. 4/94