The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSEPA E96-0017 - SANFT LOUIE - TREE REMOVALLOUIE SANFT REMOVAL OF HAZARDOUS TREES & SITE CLEAN-UP 14400 INTERURBAN AVE. S. E96-0017 :- • AFFIDAVIT I, syLVlA Notice Notice • OF DISTRIBUTION ANCMtA L AJ hereby declare that: of Public Hearing of Public Meeting OBoard of Packet Board of Packet O Planning Packet Adjustment Agenda Appeals Agenda Commission Agenda Short Subdivision Packet Agenda O Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit LI Shoreline Management Permit KDetermination of Non- significance fl Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance ODetermination of Significance and Scoping Notice 0 Notice of Action 0 Official Notice 0 Other 0 Other was-Riai1ed to each of the following addresses on FAXE l� SH R TIk -RT S ATrue Tim es Name of Project 5)6.4 FT, LOUL I E, File Number E-9(0 - Don Signature AFFIDAVIT 1, LNPF MCMu Lt_5(Q O Notice of Public Hearing O Notice of Public Meeting O Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet ❑ Board of Appeals Agenda Packet O Planning Commission Agenda Packet O Short Subdivision Agenda Packet OF DISTRIBUTION hereby declare that: Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit LIShoreline Management Permit. 36Determination of Non- significance O Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance ❑ Determination of Significance and. Scoping Notice ❑ Notice of Action was mailed to each of the following 1) DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY SEPA REVIEW SECTION PO BOX 47703 OLYMPIA, WA 98504-7703 2) DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY SHORELINE PERMIT REVIEW 3190 160th Av S BELLEVUE,/ WA 98008-5452 Name of Project SAND \ Lowe_ e_ File Number E \(Q " b4Oq Official Notice Other Other addresses on _ `- 6-1(P 3) CITY OF TUKWILA - PUBLIC WORKS 6300 SOUTHCENTER BLVD - STE 100 TUKWILA, WA 98188 4) LOUIE SANFT 6120 52nd AVENUE SOUTH SEATTLE, WA 98118 1, Signature C 1 r,b-.-. CITY OF TUKWILA DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: SHORELINE AND TREE PERMITS VEGETATION. INCLUDING TREE SHORELINE ZONE. PROPONENT: LOUIE SANFT LOCATION OF PROPOSAL, INCLUDING ADDRESS: PARCEL NO: SEC/TWN/RNG: LEAD AGENCY: TO ALLOW CLEARING OF REMOVAL, WITHIN THE STREET ADDRESS, IF ANY: 14440 INTERURBAN AV S 336590-1605 23/23/04 CITY OF TUKWILA FILE NO: E96-0017 The City has determined that the proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21c.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. *************************************************************************** This DNS is issued under 197-11-340(2). comments must be submitted by EPitM8��2 19 I95(12 . The lead agency will not act on proposal for 15 days from the date below. this Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official City of Tukwila, (206) 431-3680 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA .98188 Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the Department of Community Development. TO: Jack Pace FROM: John Jimerson RE: SEPA - Sanft Tree and Shoreline Permits DATE: September 3, 1996 emorandum SEPA Project File No. E96-0017 Underlying Permits: L96-0026 (Shoreline Permit) L96-0027 (Tree Permit) Land Altering Permit Project Description: The property is located at 14440 Interurban Avenue South. The applicant is requesting an "after the fact" shoreline permit and tree permit. The applicant removed vegetation and several trees within the shoreline zone without benefit of these required permits. Applications were submitted in response to enforcement actions by the City Attorney. The applicant removed several trees from the shoreline zone - the species, size and exact number are unknown. Using aerial photographs it appears there were roughly 15 trees removed from within the shoreline zone. Several other trees located in the northwest corner or the site but out of the shoreline zone were also removed. The applicant also removed other vegetation including grasses and bushes - most likely blackberries. At the time of inspection, large areas of bare ground had been exposed, thus triggering the requirement for a land altering permit for vegetation removal. Agencies With Jurisdiction: Department of Ecology. Comments to SEPA Checklist: Page 3. No. 11: Trees were removed without City inspection. No determination was made that the trees were hazardous. Page 4. No. 1 b: Steep river bank scopes bank exceed 3%. • Page 8, No. 4b: Attachment shows 4 trees within the shoreline as being removed. Subsequent submittal by applicant shows 8 trees as being removed. Based aerial photographs, there may have actually been about fifteen trees removed. Applicant has also indicated that blackberry bushes used to be on site - thus implying they have been removed. On site visit, large portion of site was bare to ground. Grasses were either dug up or trampled. Page 9. No. 4d: Tree permit will required replacement trees based on number of trees removed or based on canopy coverage method - to be determined with permit review. Either way, the number will far exceed six trees. Page 18 - 21: Not a non -project action. Summary of Primary Impacts: The primary impacts are related to environmental value (such as habitat and biological value) along the riparian corridor and aesthetic value. Summary of Proposed Mitigation: The City has adopted tree replacement standards (Chapter 18.54 TMC) for trees removed within a shoreline zone. These standards will be administered through the tree permit process. Recommended Threshold Determination: Determination of Non -Significance. • City of TLIICWIIf! John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director TRANSMITTED BY FAX July 8, 1996 Louie Sanft 6120 52nd Avenue South Seattle, WA 98118 RE: L96-0026 & L96-0027 Dear Mr. Sanft: This is to follow up on my letter of three weeks ago in which I reminded you the above referenced applications have been found to be incomplete. New regulations become effective on July 10, 1996 which will affect those applications if you do not complete them before that date. The changes would result in a requirement that you provide mailing labels for residents and owners within 500 feet of the site (currently it is 300 feet), provide a 4' x 4' board with a notice of application on the site, and could require additional plans and information to be submitted to meet the standards for a complete application. If you do not meet this deadline, you will need to obtain new application forms from the City which identify the information necessary for a complete application. If you have questions on these matters,, please call me at 431-3663. Si cerely, ohn Ji 'erson Assoc ate Planner cc: City Attorney 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 • PROJECT SCOPE * TO REMOVE LARGE BLACK COTTONWOOD TREE WHICH IS A DANGER TO G.T. DEVELOPMENT CORP. (neighbors) * TO REMOVE DEBRIT PEOPLE DUMPED ON THE SITE TIRES, CONCRETE, CARPET, SOFAS, GARBAGE, ETC. * TO REMOVE REMAINING DEBRIS & STUMPS AT 200 FEET AND BEYOND * TO GRADE TO LEVEL SITE RECEIVED - CITY OF TUKWILA MAY 3 1 1996 PERMIT CENTER ContriNo. Epic File No. fq(o Fee $ 325 Receipt No. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: N/A 2. Name of applicant: LOUIE, Sf-NFT- 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: (.012.0 52 N° AVE N L.& So L -H � SEA -711L6-1 4. Date checklist prepared: 512.8/eit, 20c, 7aa—(L8ZL '\L" • 92118 5. Agency requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): h!/A 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. NOT CIA rs,6NTLy. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. _ Stt()RELINE 1EVE LopMENT PeR .M IT kFpLICATION 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. A . -2- RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA MAY 3 11996 PERMIT CENTER 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your. proposal. 16 ca N Z 1 T2M 17'- 3 T3 List -ND lME) to P6t2M IT ,11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized here. H E PuRPOs Tt+ IsyNogr.- 1s :o RM oV6_15�s� A' -t_e A- ' Z—To Ttt8— — N E 16+ ►f BO R► N� P'I`TIES NM LD I N(51S JIN I) fLoy , /4s LA L ,kS TQ CLEA-r1/4.) ?Fte Si T6 OF Gr4R8A-61>✓ A-r.JD AERRt'T- W Ft I C.I+ PI 6R BYES I LLb1 MAIM ONS—'Pt& P2DPtQT : IN GEt0t &,r.., TO CLE40 LIP Ttt1S eL. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica- tions related to this checklist. I LI- DO SNTEfLuPBA-N AA)6-N.) tke & I•tTh, TA_ K_ I Lti- 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? -3- 410 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICA• Evaluation for Agency Use Only B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other RELAT1VE.LY FLAT • b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate vr� �O/o percent slope)? 3 / \` .)t _,�� 4 c. What general types of soils are found on the site, (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. M o5T off Ti -{e Sol L 1 S PEPtT W ITN A MIX OF S/kNA AND Cs�RAVEL • d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. THE SOILS , t& CcripAcr 5TABLE.• e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti- ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. MINJMerl, G2,4t 1tJ& S RECDuI12ED. Si M PLY To KE& • TttE SITE LES /SND CL& J- O Get28AU6• f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. ER-OS1 k.) SIS LlLD NOT OCCIAL- BEtA LASE W E b0 NOT h}ftV6. A -N P LA NS FOR- DIST U1 RSJ r•bi TIt6 Ergo l ND To S til c}-1 AN OC?ENT • g• About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? p 7. -4- • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: WE RX LX5T C CoNTzap L PP.oBLEMS, BUT IF SIACH WoRIL CREWTES A THZEAT WE W I l.L H'(DROSEED TO CoNTP—oL E2051 OK • 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the the proposal (i.e., dust, industrial wood smoke) during the project is completed? describe and give approximate NOTHING, EXPECTED• 0 air would result from automobile odors, construction and when If any, generally. quantities if known. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. NOTI-tlNdi EXE€C1`ED • c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: NOTt'tI NCI EXPECTED • 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year- round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it'flows into. THE AREEN 1z \ g LTJ N MIE,_ VAC -11\317i 0f 'NE fRbpo D �JoRK• -5- • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Av PogyI0p1 Of= 71iF. word`. WILL Be wlrt-tiN zoo FT OF ME R IVF 12.. (5o M E Tepee REr✓1oV4{_7 RE- 612-A-P)N6,, A-tvD &f1t2BR6E,/AEfiC.rT C l.Eot N- r,. j 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the. source of fill material. No FILL- OA DRE136E�M.4�G-i2_� WILL BE REmov&D 0'e_11D_ 1n1 TTfI5 VAC.IJ 117. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. NONE. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No . 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No • -6- • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. No. 2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sour- ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. NONE. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. N/A. -7- • • 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: N/A surface, 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: X deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs NX grass — BL C Kadryr Bush _ pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Lem OVi' -L o F 1-26-6S Cies r. 04r c Nnv EIvr) c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. NONE KNOWN PRofgTY -8- Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Proposed landscaping., use of native plant Evaluation for Agency Use Only measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on other 7(e site, if any: ---- P - 71± a e Tom— A° �R � i'v-200_x- �mO-� � - 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been. observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species knownto be on or near the site. DN6 . c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. -------- d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: -9- 411 • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric,- natural gas, oil, wood stove, solor) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. WA. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. 1.4n. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: NON,. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. NO• 1) Describe special emergency services that might be' required. NONE• 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ- mental health hazards, if any: N/. -10- • • b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? KVA 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short- term or a long-term basis (for example: traf:=. fic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. N 01JF. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? THIS SITE 15 VACAPQT'2optgT'(. A P:AGErNT TO TFtLS S Me- A 2,E 'TL�wft RE ft o N►.�N t,c �hc�o E 1 N6�� bFFIC€ gu)LpfN S. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. NOT RECE.Nirc'f. c. Describe any structures on the site. N O N E CAA RLE,1rLy -11- Evaluation for Agency Use Only • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? NONE. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? LI6tfT INDUi.STQIRL/Nt"NftiFACTb121Nc . f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Ulh FtT IN DI.iSTt21AC./M74-N lnFAg 2tN6,. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master, program designation of the site? I,,pk.. g. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? .61- j. - j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com- patible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: peoposien, 1S inarthis3 P �oT�TF-n LAS LA. S & Fo g TFC t S PRoPERTy. . -12- • • 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing? K3d4k. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eli- minated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing. NpNE . c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: WA. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? ts. A b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? c. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: N/A.• -13- Evaluation for Agency Use Only • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 11. Light and Glare a. What_ type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? NONE• b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? MO. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? wc*JE • d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: NOL 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational oppor- tunities are in the immediate vicinity? b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. ND• c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any:_ -14- • 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro- posed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. NONE• b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. ►JoNE. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: N/g 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed accss to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. M/t IA,LE ottVEN, WEST i,1 DE. DF SITE— b. ITE• b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? ►�►p� ot.� BLOCS . c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? N/A• -15- Evaluation for Agency Use Only • • d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). IN) 0 • e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. NON. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor- tation impacts, if any: NJA 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. -16- Evaluation for Agency Use Only • • 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. N/A• b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the,site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. C. Signature The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Date Submitted: PLEASE CONTINUE TO THE NEXT PAGE. -17- Evaluation for Agency .Use Only TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLIC. • D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not imple- mented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? }{IC�1-ILY IAtvLIK.=LT Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: NVA 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life? 6 -I Ik LD tvcT }-t f E k I m FACT 6 ft-NIw ft -LS/ Wt Lb LIFF-.. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life are: WILL PE RE- PLA- N) & SIX Arch 6-1 71tE HO RE -Li t• : TO RF_fLRGE 1Ets RE mo. U6 -D 1NITt11\) 200F r o� R NEE . -18- Evaluation for Agency Use Only • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? fhIGn1.1L'' bLN3 LlKEL' . Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resourses are: ISS/fit 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Fecr P IeO QOs ons Ens v 11Zo N MEtJT, Vv 6E M I N I M 14-L DR NONE Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: h. 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, inclduing whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? p120POSft - 15 CDMP'1t7' 1SlE W Int THEtkp.(Z�r.In-�.N� DItJGi p2b fr2.T11 si Sitau Lb ticrr kr-Fecr Lti-NO c it SAH aR LJ t' u.5 E • -19- • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts area: ThE wo C. Ca) Crr-E A 01..) TH I S 26 pc S ArL SHOULLZ t\S OT I M pAc i}t�12�11NE 012 D, h -ND ANYTf+1K)f1 1N tt'► U1 v D,�r1 fi, f Q.S t 1 -H5 WILL. $ How does the proposal conform to the Tukwila Shoreline Master Plan? `SNS •pee) p oS►4-t, Cr» Ffl esv S A-ry D 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? N/4 • Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) N/A• are: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. s pe.o p SAt stfi-1,(.._ meg- QIN --L.I cr 0 - N v0 ► e . •- t'n AND S th t. . C..c r3 t2 Yo w I n* ArrJ Suj+ R.LESI_i'vbFr1, ge6zvLAMON� u -20- • M' Evaluation for Agency Use Only 8. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? No• Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: t� -21 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICS • Evaluation for Agency Use Only E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON PROJECT PROPOSALS The •objectives and the alternative means of reaching the objectives for a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the aforegoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This information provides a general overall perspective of the proposed action in the context of the environmental infor- mation providedand the submitted plans, documents, suppor- tive information, studies, etc. 1. What are the objective(s) of the proposal? To R£Mo.VE f{ -C L Hf��►�RDouS TRE -r• FY2DM THIS SITE, P Fagg Tf+E`' FALL ONTO IvE16tiH6o121n�G1,• StAILD1N�L knit) DESToRcWo2 INIUEE • TD CLC-tgtU-(tip THE SITE of Gtr►2Bf1; 6,E A - ND DIT LEST By TRi4NSIENT5 A -NA 1LLE6 -L D(,tMp&12S TO RemoUE T�tr� 7fi2ERT OF TWANSIENTS bTi9-2TIN61 A- F112E W1+1 CFt MAY 61E:T di LAT OF• CGt rte.AL /t -NP SpI?C_.tt-1> OR AESTIZOy 1J&I6,!-fRO 1\3(-7SLAILINGiS. LILTI M A -T6 Ly, TO CLEAN- lAp S/rr So iT /S p/2E56nsrkSLe- Jni TN LS N 6t H36ett& J. r►vsr ,i- eF st I, Sota.6 Eve.''• 2. What are the alternative meansof accomplishing these objectives? Tit& f3LT672NA-T!U&S A -,2E UIrl17-6p. T K NiLy OTH-Eree -1 7 /VRTIVF.- L-JOu.[.j1 BE= Dol 61 /vOTttIN&. ST -Ti,tS QwD . 3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the preferred course of action: T'F rt -}6 ty-76.12Nf}-T1V6 I S 456-b, THEN-) T'tt6R.E WILL 5T/LA. 13E 'ME '7-itiz-EAT OF k -Mee Fri it. -11\)e, Ac i' oN k NE1641Fo/ziNGn Suudi.1NGi CM-mit/AL ,4 -ND ot J e 'Ku -way). THE ARS/46E !F -Nb DEBe_IT WlLL CoNIN 1E To B C v a 'TH R£i4-r 0P Te.t4nsfEr1TS Li VI Ive6, *) ?fit& pt20/6eTy MAA{ LI b,.#T •E 772665 o $Ru.5ti o N Ft12�, WHICH MAY s P READ A-ntp CREATE EjCTENSIV6 DA?NA I . 'Tb Nei EittBbt21N6s S(.i/CpiNG,S • 774-E PEE FE,e 2J Co u t2S 6 o F A -GT 1 0 1 3 Wo CLW BE Cot'►' p rir & Tti-c water_ *S p12,o poSE-.D__ ttr--AvE in/ -22- 4. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: No Cotvui CT W L 00=4.0,- C=tti -23- -23- Evaluation Evaluation for Agency Use Only SHORELINE SUBS*TIAL DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION CITY OF TUKWILA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431-3680 anner: File Number: oss; Reference Files: Receipt Number:' 1. BRIEFLY DESCRIBE YOUR PROPOSAL: REMOVE N79-• fIR ID01-CS TPEce FRor✓i sir&: CLEftni-t ce S TE of GAtegicttnewer. 2. PROJECT LOCATION: (Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block, and sub- division; or tax lot number, access street, and nearest intersection) / 4400 .1-1.)TEieU2t3 1 i #91/ENLAE So LATH Quarter: Section: Township: Range: (This information may be found on your tax statement) 3. APPLICANT:* Name: L lit, I E S,' T Address. Phone. (IZO saha- Ave ►) Vt so LA -71-11/ AtJLQ G8 I IB 20(a 72Z • Co SZ4- Signature:•Date: S/Z. g.// * The applicant is the person whom the staff will contact regarding the application, and to whom all notices and reports shall be sent, unless otherwise stipulated by applicant. AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP 4. PROPERTY Name: A L LO L t IE OWNER Address: (0120 5Z nae A'UEIU t Phone: c -O Co ' 7 a Cog & Li- I/WE,[signature(s)] swear that I/we are the owner(s) or contract purchaser(s) of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers contained in this application are true and correct to the best of my/our knowledge and belief. Date: SAN F -1 - So SeM-tQz 6181 I RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA MAY 3 11996 PERMIT CENTER ..SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Page 2 5. Present use of property: VAC, NYT- PROP . 6. Total construction cost and fair market value of proposed project (include additional future developments contemplated but not included in this application): 5cete) so 7. List the master program policies (use program sections or page numbers) which are applicable to this development: 8. List any other permits for this project from state, federal or local governmental agencies for which you have applied or will apply, including the name of the issuing agency, whether the permit has been applied for (and if so, the date of the application), whether the application was approved or denied and the date of same, and the number of the application or permit: SEpA Apel i cats crr-- - e Qe—it Layld Alte -N Pev v" 9. Nature of the existing shoreline. Describe type of shoreline, such as stream, lake, marsh, flood plain, floodway, delta; type of beach, such as erosion, high bank, low bank, or dike; material such as sand, gravel, mud, clay, rock, riprap; and extent and type of bulkheading, if any (to be completed by local official): 10. In the event that any of the proposed builidngs or structures will exceed a height of thirty-five feet above the average grade level, indicate the approximate location of and number of residential units existing and potential, that will have an obstructed view (to be completed by local official): A . SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Page 3 11. If the application involves a Conditional Use or Variance, set forth in full that portion of the Master Program which provides that the proposed use may be a Conditional Use or, in the case of a Variance, from which the variance is being sought (to be completed by local official): 12. Give a brief narrative description of the general nature of the improvements and land use within one thousand (1,000) feet in all directions frpm the development site: TO me Nor2TK eXISTS 617.- .DF -;VE: opvie) erJT Co Pn►2A-T1D3, TO SOL&TH. (CrH wA-2EHn L rinFF1 C To Tl -+f W ST 1 s VA -CA -MT pROPPR-Ty t'-tJT) nrrezLA12.8 m AVE N �AIQD beNT ?f -k. K. . /. A-DDe6ss SIG tt/30,2 ih16-7 Pf-7765 .67T D1/6. -!_.OP M6-- T- Cor-to,e4.9-TIOI) 6437clu-tt--7 / /./� Tu e wi & ft-, VJ4 • 9 8/eog Kph 27•aY- •/305 2. E R/KS Vu sr 600 .TN tep--(.a-bah 1-ve . So . Tu4t/v/Goy, IAA q'gl(08 plo#&aGYo a LI& %O SEPA CHECKLIST APPLICATION FOR STAFF USE ONLY Planner: File Number: Receipt Number: Cross-reference files: Applicant Notified of'Incomplete Application: Applicant Notified of Complete Application: Notice of Application Issued: A. NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: B. LOCATION (address and assessors parcel number(s)): 14 4 00 1►•�-r-e,e LA.Rg ,k' € u.6 So uT+, TUAKw I L/ . Quarter: Section: Township: This information may be found on your tax statement C. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: VA% CA rv-r L D D. APPLICANT Name: Address: Phone: Signature: Range: Co 1 ZO SZ AV6 . So L.:rff &&l -It -LA V'j t . ci811$ 20(a— 7Z Z.— 82 Date: /28lglo 6cZ NORTH vE Cuke&-rr SITE. sc/42.E " = 40 ERILS SA -LS RECEIVED. OF TUKWILA 375' MA LtL& 14 VENUE. 3 1 9996 PERMIT CENTER Norz-TH Si -T-6_ Pe To Mg -1-1-1 2 /1% RECEIVED C�r°f TUKWILA PERMIT CENTER NORTH f EMA-IN/NG TREES • To E& kEMOVeD ECEIVED TUKWILA MAY 3 19996 PERMIT CENTER . N ORT} T SS g - PL /9 ivT6D Tis S P/be6f , fPCOX • 4U- 50 � mer PICUr PEAN16.49,1 • 461/ ,RECEIVED IT.OFITUKWILA MAY 3 19996 PERMIT CENTER Memo HI611 h6A7--2 Ve L/r1 / TS OF 40' 6.0/ /DD S 37<5 RECEIVED CITY. OF TUKWILA MAY 3 11996 PERMIT CENTER N oRrft a -0o rT 5 rMc,t 375' D CITY OFTIVTUKWILA MAY 3 1 1996 PERMIT CENTER • ZOO' LEIS4N1 E14VI2oNMN•17". E l 00' ftl6lt IM P14Gr ENV'wow i'v &,JT X too' 40 Lbw rMPita 6t v1 t2on)MENi 12, v &Q by v192vwn1 E MeitM tt16N VoAT . .-A— SHOP-6 UN& Ptzo /L E sCm G€ la = 40' — V 1 >E.iNo wv OF PE.o P612T`f. RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA MAY 3 1 1996 PERMIT CENTER WEST Ze (4 E .4 -K1 Et.lVI RoN M eArT' Nib /MP' cT CcwrM ECJ Vl 120 1044 MCA -NI 14160t WART. • SC�fi l,� 1 " = 40' —V16.1A) IoM CE—ir oF- pRo f r . _ T2EES 132uS f-} A-toNZ. Qi61...A.) 1 6N r T 61'SS 6-S /4 N D S Iv% vitt_ Q 1,+4-+•)T 6 A.o t.JT'tt d N R6_w't6. Peo 7Y RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA MAY 3 11996 PERMIT CENTER 1031 790 D•1JNLAP Sr • 1,ouTaa•o 8A> I 60 srOue•nON N . threw .MEN SLICK C ' ST y DNia 1iNc" w NINAtY1 ri 0. : RAI N Is _.o. q'; .i'nn;tetin$sr\r x t .,:,r. ''Cil ,yrs,. •5..r.. _44 A: :N Qcni�l0nw 7%t 5 0•:101• Y RAINI€Rc H • Priltlllyd Island Seal0 Park I114. , =; Atlantic City Park s •uw0.T3•M•r•uwl •7 § T a • �e '4 s, \f17 aOYTN n RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA MAY 3 11996 PERMIT CENTER 70 Nee 11 3 '1:4nl '0 C Acre, 1:Tr'yT'R �,. Call.:'111o.,'IS'it. Cahn E" ED;n�r. sJ {. .�CHDIIn i �'_ .PLENDALE 3 Gdfd Covmry "* 1111,4171_ tPn ref i L i1I N,N 41 1 INT. `'IaT 1 ''177, 11 BPUTLEV RD_; PARK —*-1. 3 17717 _•, sl f IY,. s: IS. 00m.:51 + 14)44-1, 11417'0 1 13:._' V BRYN MAWR 1 1177'• 11 ST 1371, 13610 1 Irl. 0 1.110.11 u>o ' 7 . I33i7__ 1l, C' RIVERTON 2----i T 01‘:: 5111.0 1 5 Mk ■ 'atn al = 169 i Sunxf Co ' % • , 3 '3M fi orf .Iw t •. , 0.1110.71_,. 11. . J• gg>.__ 1 IMI, : 1l' :T R s IUINI � 4i•. 'wutii 6rod ---Ir— 'A1,%IIf>Ifdl, < i Ml• II Ie 1 F1 q McMICKEN I -a 1.17 na •-• -' 1 1 . ;'• s 177 S IYINF O II 31 n ..I 1 ✓ ALLA MPS 5 4341 :.! •+'. 11114Th :`Vont, 7771140 .0 Cid? Cr, dd ima,l l.a 1 t7N4II -' : 5347y, 121:7 ; ; R :.