HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA E95-0007 - RANDALL ZACK - TEMPORARY STORAGETEMPORARY MOBILE
STORAGE
STORAGE & MAINTENANCE
OF CARGO CONTAINERS
10160 WEST MARGINAL
PLACE SOUTH
E95-0007
PROJECT FRIITT ASSSCIAThS NO. SHEET OF
®®EM BUCHER, WILLIS & RATLIFF SUBJECT,....1,, AF` Gm..a.5Ectg..OF..TI DESIGNED DATES/3/95-
11011213111%. I®a®ij®1%. ENGINEERS PLANNERS r ARCHITI..CTS
ESTIMATED ODST $1000 INSTALLED BY CLANE2
CHECKED DATE
AFFIDAVIT OF
Kabi�`
ISTRIBUTI I 0 N
ISS hereby declare that:.
Notice of Public Hearing
Notice of Public Meeting
0 Board of
Packet
Board of
Packet
fPlanning
Packet
Adjustment Agenda
Appeals Agenda
Commission Agenda
0 Short Subdivision Agenda
Packet
fl Notice of Application for
Shoreline Management Permit.
D Shoreline Management Permit
Xpetermination of Non-
significance
Mitigated Determination of
Nonsignificance
Determination of Significance
and Scoping Notice
Notice of Action.
Official Notice
Other
Other
was mailed to each of the following addresses on
o+ Tr S or Ici .1
F -co (off
ce,p1 1-0 PuJol iL oY �S
Nip 1 1-Ccunt--c-6-xect n
ems c(- r- -col ud�l c �f,dr� o (-417)0q3-
Name of ProjectR aindCLI I 2t& Signatu r'. i
File Number Es cco 7
• CHECKLIST: ENVIIIIJNMENTAL REVIEW/SHORELINE*KNIT MAILINGS
FEDERAL AGENCIES
( )U.S. ARMY CORPS OF. ENGINEERS
( )FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
( )DEPT. OF INTERIOR -FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE
WASHINGTON
( )U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
( )U.S. DEPARTMENT OF H.U.D. (REGION X)
STATE AGENCIES
(, )OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY
i/(•,4 TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT
( )DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES
( )OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR
( )DEPT. OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
( )DEPT. OF FISHERIES
( )K.C. PLANNING & COMMUNITY. DEV.
( )BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD '
( )FIRE DISTRICT #11
( )FIRE DISTRICT #2
( )SOUTH CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT
( )TUKWILA LIBRARIES
( )RENTON LIBRARY
( )KENT LIBRARY
( )CITY OF SEATTLE LIBRARY
)US WEST
)SEATTLE CITY LIGHT
)WASHINGTON NATURAL GAS
)WATER DISTRICT #75
)SEATTLE WATER DEPARTMENT
)GROUP W CABLE
)OLYMPIA PIPELINE
( )KENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT
( )TUKWILA CITY DEPARTMENTS:
,/(.PUBLIC WORKS ( ) FIRE
( )POLICE ( )FINANCE
( )PLANNING ( )BUILDING
( )PARKS AND ORECREATION
( )TUKWILA MAYOR
( )DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL & HEALTH SERVICES
(ADEPT. OF ECOLOGY, SHORELANDS DIVISION
DEPT. OF ECOLOGY, SEPA DIVISION*
( )DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE
( )OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL
*SEND CHECKLIST WITH DETERMINATIONS AND
*SEND SITE MAPS WITH DECISION
RING COUNTY AGENCIES
( )KING COUNTY DEPT. OF PARKS
( )HEALTH DEPARTMENT
( )PORT OF SEATTLE
( )BUILDING & LAND DEV. DIV.-
SEPA INFORMATION CENTER
SCHOOLS/LIBRARIES
)HIGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT
)KING COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY
)SEATTLE MUNICIPAL REFERENCE LIBRARY
)SEATTLE SCHOOL DISTRICTS
)RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT
UTILITIES
( )PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT
( )VAL-VUE SEWER DISTRICT
( )WATER DISTRICT #20
( )WATER DISTRICT #125
( )CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC WORKS
( )RAINIER VISTA
( )SKYWAY
CITY AGENCIES
( )RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT
( )CITY OF SEA -TAC
( )CITY OF SEATTLE
( )CITY OF BURIEN
( )TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS
( )TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
OTHER LOCAL AGENCIES
( )PUGET SOUND REGIONAL COUNCIL
( P.S. AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY
( )SW K.COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
( )MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE
( )DUWAMISH INDIAN TRIBE
MEDIA
( )DAILY JOURNAL OF COMMERCE
( )VALLEY DAILY NEWS
( )METRO ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING DIV.
OFFICE/INDUSTRIAL 5,000 GSF OR MORE
RESIDENTIAL 50 UNITS OR MORE
RETAIL 30,000 GSF OR MORE
( )HIGHLINE TIMES
( )SEATTLE TIMES
PUBLIC NOTICE MAILINGS FOR PERMITS
SEPA MAILINGS
Mail to: (comment period starts on date of mailing)
Dept. of Ecology Environmental Review Section
Applicant
Other agencies as. necessary (checked off on attached list)
Include these documents:
SEPA Determination (3 -part form from Sierra)
Findings (staff report, usu. with MDNS)
SEPA Checklist (filled out by. applicant)
Drawings/Plans of project (site plan., elevations, etc. from PMT's)
Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed & sent to newspaper).
SHORELINE MAILINGS
Notice of Application:
Notice of application for a substantial development Permit must be
mailed to owners and to property owners within 300 feet of subject
property, prepare an affidavit of publication, and publish two
consecutive weeks with deadline for comments, due 30 days after last
newspaper publication date.
Shoreline Permit:
Mail to: (within 8 days of decision; 30 -day appeal period begins
date received by DOE)
Department of Ecology Shorelands Section
State Attorney General
Applicant
Indian Tribes
Other agencies asnecessary (checked off on attached list).
Include these documents:
Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (3 -part form from Sierra)
Findings (staff report, if applicable)
Shoreline Application Form (filled out by applicant)
Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's)
- Site plan, with mean high water mark & improvements
Cross-sections of site w/structures & shoreline
Grading plan
Vicinity map
SEPA De- termination (3 -part form from Sierra)
Findings (staff report, usu. with MDNS)
SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant)
Any background studies related to impacts on shoreline
Notice of Application
Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed & sent to newspaper).
Affidavit of Publication (notice was published in newspaper).
•
CITY OF TUKWILA
DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS)
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL:
CHANGE OF TO ALLOW STORAGE OF TRAILERS.
PROPONENT: RANDALL ZACK, TMS=
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL, INCLUDING, SATREET ADDRESS,
*. ANY;
'
ADDRESS: 10160 `WEST+; MARG�ISNAI iPL S i,;%(/ , y} 4
PARCEL NO: ,042304-.9001 '-- '_ +r, . ,-.
SEC/TWN/RNG 04/23/04, �, . ,'
,_•f i,' - ��� aj t,'; 1 r) /l i> 1 \%\! \� 7 •
LEAD AGENCY:' 'i CITY OF TUKWILA, `i`� ! :, .:,,� FILE N0:`=;E9.5-0007
The City has determined that ,,the"'proposal does not have a ..probab'l3e
significant adverse i'mpact� on thelsenvA ronment . An env,ironmenta 1, '
impact srtatement.''(EIS) is—riot regufr ed�under RCW 43.21c 03U_(•2)''(c�) :f'��
This decision was made after' rev i-ew of comp l eted env i r7onmenta l
check l i stV and- other i of orraa'tion on' f i 1 e<w,i t'Fi.-th.e lead agency:- This
i of orma'�t'i'on i s ava=i 1 ab_1,e_ tb,,,the ,publl i c .on a request .
t*********;**.*:********,t,***i*,/,it****,*******i*****,************,o-r**********I ******
fl
This�determ'inat_ion, is f�inatl and ts�i'gned\thihs 2-'7 day of rLr.'{' }
199 1,,� , _. ; - yJ , \ ,i ti.
o'
V
Steve Lancaster, Responsible Off icia/t f r'.
City of Tukw;ikla, '(.206) '-431-3680 �{ '� -''
6300 Southcenter Boulevard ;
Tukwila, WA 9818& < u f,--
You may appeal thls:,determination to the City Clerk at Gift-y,'tHal), 6200
Southcenter Boulevard;,, Tukwi 1a, `;/WA 981Wno later than; -.1.0 days from the
above signature date`:by�written ;appeal, stating the;: basis of the appeal for
specific factual objections: 1 You `may be 'requi.re_d toy --bear some of the
expenses for an appeal . -‘�• ',1-7--77--,--:7. �--.
Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the City
Clerk and Department of Community Development.
Memorandum
TO: Jack Pace
FROM: John Jimerson
RE: SEPA - Temporary 1/1/e'Storage
DATE: April 25, 1995
Project File No. E95-0007
Project Description:
The property is located at 10160 West Marginal Place South. The
proposal is to use a 2.2 acre site for the storage and maintenance
of cargo containers. The previous use was as a parking lot for
Boeing. A site plan showing the containers stacked four deep on
either side of a 60 foot center aisle has been submitted.
Agencies With Jurisdiction:
None.
Comments to SEPA Checklist:
Page 3, No. 12: The project site is located at 10160 West Marginal
Place South.
Page 5, No. 2: Emissions will be generated from the trucks
delivering and retreiving cargo containers to and from the site.
Page 13, No. 10: The cargo containers would be stored two high for
a total of 17 feet.
Summary of Primary Impacts:
The proposed use will not generate significant impacts different
from the previous use of the site as a parking lot, except that the
use will result in unsightly storage of cargo containers.
Summary of Proposed Mitigation:
There is no mitigation proposed by the applicant. However,
compliance with the zoning code height limitation of 20 feet on
outdoor storage (18.50.020 TMC) and requirement for screening of
outdoor storage (18.52.040 TMC), the aesthetic impacts will be
adequately mitigated.
Recommended Threshold Determination:
Determination of Non -Significance.
• •
To: Linda Cohen
From: Steve Lancaster
Subject: Rhone-Poulenc Agreement
Date: March 15, 1995
As I mentioned to you yesterday, item #3 of the memo I sent you on March 13 relating to the Rhone-Poulenc agreement,
should be modified to read as follows:
3. Beyond 100 feet away from the East Marginal Way property line, outdoor storage of shipping
containers may occur up to a height not to exceed 42.5 feet for a period not to exceed five years, provided
that all applicable requirements of the King County Shoreline Master Plan, including but not limited to
height limitations, are met. In the event that the City of Tukwila has not amended its outdoor storage
height limitations by the end of this five year period, the parties agree to re -open discussions in an attempt
to achieve a long-term agreement regarding outdoor storage on the subject property.
Thanks for your assistance.
•
To: Linda Cohen
From: Steve Lancaster
Subject: Rhone-Poulenc Agreement
Date: March 13, 1995
The following is the substance of the proposed agreement with Rhone-Poulenc. Thank you for your
assistance in putting this in proper format.
As we discussed last week, I am particularly concerned that the agreement make clear the reasons for this
agreement, and why this property must be treated differently from others similarly situated.
I have underlined substantive changes from the points laid out in John McFarland's letter to Rhone-
Poulenc, dated February 16, 1995.
1. There shall be no outdoor storage located nearer than 25 feet from the East Marginal Way
property line.
2. Between 25 feet and 100 feet away from the East Marginal Way property line, outdoor storage
shall not exceed 20 feet in height.
3. Between 100 feet and 500 feet away from the East Marginal Way property line, outdoor storage
of shipping containers may occur up to a height not to exceed 42.5 feet for a period not to exceed five
years. In the event that the City of Tukwila has not amended its outdoor storage height li 'tations by the
end of this five year period. the parties agree to re -open discussions in an attempt to achieve a long-term
agreement regarding outdoor storage on the subject property.
4. All other outdoor storage shall strictly comply with the requirements of the Tukwila City Code,
including screening requirements, as currently constituted or as amended in the future.
5. Landscaping and screening within the twenty-five (25) foot setback along East Marginal Way
shall meet and exceed the requirements of the Tukwila Municipal Code. Landscaping shall be designed,
installed and maintained so as to reduce the adverse visual impact of the proposed outdoor storage, to the
satisfaction of the Director of Community Development. Criteria to be considered by the Director shall
be as follows:
a. A landscape plan reflecting all applicable requirements shall be prepared and stamped by a
Washington State licensed landscape architect. In the event of conflict between the landscaping
and screening criteria cited herein. and the landscaping and screening requirements of the
Tukwila Municipal Code. the more stringent requirements shall apply
b. The entire setback area adjacent to East Marginal Way. with the exception of an approved
access drive. shall be landscaped in a manner that shall achieve ninety (90) percent live ground
coverage within three years of planting.
• •
p. Outdoor storage shall be screened from East Marginal Way. Screening in this area shall be a
minimum of twelve (I2) feet in height at the time of planting,
d. The landscaped setback area shall be served by an automatic irrigation system incorporating
soil moisture sensors.
e. There shall be no fence located within the twenty-five (25) foot setback along East Marginal
Way.
All other landscaping and screening shall comply with the requirements of the Tukwila Municipal Code.
6. A maintenance assurance device meeting the requirements of the Director of Community
Development shall be provided to the City. assuring that all landscaping remains healthy for a period of
one year from completion of planting.
Please note that Rhone-Poulenc has also requested that the 42.5 foot height allowance be extended to the
entire property outside the 100 foot setback from East Marginal Way, and a 200 foot setback from the
Duwamish River. I feel this would be going beyond our original discussions and their original proposal,
so have not included it.
cc: John McFarland
•
vikt143\---6111084011. Wet
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
Purpose of Checklist:
The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies
to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact
statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality
of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency
identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done)
and to help the agency decide whether. an EIS is required.
Instruction for Applicants:
This environmental checklist .asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. The City
uses this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant,
requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known,
or give the best description you can.
You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases,
you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need
to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal,
write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary
delays later.
Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations.
Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the City staff can assist you.
The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of
time or on different parcels of land. Attached any additional information that will help describe your
proposal or its environmental effects. The City may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional
information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact.
Use of checklist for nonproject proposals:
Nonproject proposals refer to actions which are different or broader than a single site specific development
project, such as plans, policies and programs.
Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply".
In addition, complete the supplemental sheet for nonproject actions (part D).
For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project", "applicant", and "property
or site" should read as "proposal", "proposer", and "affected geographic area", respectively.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
A. BACKGROUND
1. Name of proposed project, if applicable:
2. Name of applicant: 1'_M_b
3. Address and ph ne number of applicant and contact person:
1Ai7% 16 - Cit . 6. r , \AIN 9EO6 C E
4. Date checklist prepared: 1-1'•-�c9
Control No.
Epic File No. E.c5 OC)o7
Fee •$ 325 Receipt No.
5. Agency requesting Checklist:
City of Tukwila
6. Proposed timing or schedules (including phasing, if applicable):
ttkoop-ft.N Ci
7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity
related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain.
8. List•any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will
be prepared, directly related to this proposal.
9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other
proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes,
explain. `' ,0
-2-
10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal.
NAeant' fiv7
11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses
and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this
checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not
need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete
description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be
summarized here.
12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand
the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if
any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over
a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal
description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably
available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not
required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica-
tions rel ated to thi s checkl st.
13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land
Use Pol'cy Plan Map as environme ally sensitive?
CIAVOWNL—: 04
-3-
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICAIQt
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
1. Earth
a. .General description of the site (circle one):la
rolling ally, steep slopes, mountainous, other
b. What is the steepestlope on the site (approximate
percent slope)? (1.2..,'k
c. What general types of soils are found on the site
(for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If
you know the classification of agricultural soils,
Cecify them and note any prime farmland.
I l aveA
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable
soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe.
e. Describe the.'purpose, type, and approximate quanti-
ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate
source of fill. lANI0e.,
f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing,
copstruction, or use? If so, generally describe.
1f'
g•
About what percent of the site will be covered with
impervious surfaces after project construction (for
ex mple, asphalt or buildings)? p Com tc..9643,‘
-4-
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
•
•
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or
other impacts to the earth, if any:
2. Air
a. What types of emissions to the air would result from
the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors,
industrial wood smoke) during construction and when
the project is completed? If any, generally
describe and give approximate quantities if known.
SFv�i
b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor
that may ai;fect your proposal? If so, generally
describe.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or
other impacts to air, if any:
3. Water
a. Surface:
1) Is there any surface water body on or in the
immediate vicinity of the site (including year-
round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes,
ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and
provide names. If appropriate, state what
s ream or river it flows into.
-5-
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
•
•
2) Will the project require any work over, in, or
adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described
waters? If yes, please describe and attach
available plans.
3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material
that would be placed in or removed from surface
water or wetlands and indicate the area of the
site that would be affected. Indicate the
source of fill material.
4) Will the proposal require surface water
withdrawals or diversions? Give general
description, purpose, and approximate quan-
tities, if known.
5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year
floodplain? If o, note location on the site
plan. Do �`� r�9ct9 .
6) Does the proposal involve any, discharges of
waste materials to surface waters? If so,
describe the type of waste and anticipated
volume of discharge.__
-6-
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
• •
b. Ground:
1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be
discharged to ground water? Give general
description, purpgse, and approximate quan-
tities, if known.
2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged
into the ground from septic tanks or other sour-
ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage;
industrial, containing the following
chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the
general size of the system, the number of such
systems, the number of houses to be served (if
applicable), or the number of animals or humans
tte system(s) are expected to serve.
c. Water Runoff (including storm water):
1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm
water) and method of collection and disposal, if
any (include quantities, if known). Where will
this water flow? Will this water flow into
ther waters? If so, describ-.
VCck \lM
-7-
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
• •
2) Could waste materials enter ground r surface
waters? If so, generally describe.
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface,
ground, and runoff water impacts, if any:
4. Plants
a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the
site:
deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other
evergreen tree: 'fir, cedar, pine, other
shrubs
grass
pasture
_ crop or grain
wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush,
skunk cabbage, other
water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other
other types of vegetation
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed
or altered?
c. List threatened orndangered species known to be on
or near the site. �
-8-
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
•
•
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other
measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the
site, if any:
5. Animals
a. Circle any birds and animals which have been
observed on or near the site or are known to be on
or near the site:
birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other:
mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other:
fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish,
other:
b. List any threatened or a dangered species known to
be on or near the site.
c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so,
explain.,
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife,
if any: r—
-9 -
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
• •
6. Energy and Natural Resources
What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil,
wood stove, solor) will be used to meet the
completed project's energy needs? Describe whether
it will be ed for heating, manufacturing, etc.
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar
energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally
describe. b
c. What kinds of energy conservation features are
included in the plans of this proposal? List other
proposed measures to reduce or control energy
impacts, if any: ._.,
7. Environmental Health
a. Are there any environmental health hazards,
including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire
and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could
occur as a suit of t proposal? If so,
describe. OnL
1) Describe special emergency services that might
be required.
2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ-
mental health hazards, if any: r'
-10--
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
•
b. Noise
•
1) What types of noise exist in the area which may
affect your project (for exaple: traffic,
equipment, operation, other)?
2) What types and levels of noise would be created
by or associated with the project on a short-
term or a long-term basis (for example: traf-
fic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate
whatlhoursr_poi e would corRe from the site.
�r-�- lSc 9 -QO c1tr 1 Nye "
3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise
impacts, if any: -�
8. Land and Shoreline Use
a. What is the current use f the site and adjacent
properties? qa.se_
b. Has the sitebeen used for agriculture? If so,
describe.
c. Describe any structures on the site. tikaeA.e_
-11-
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
•
d. •Will, any structures be demolished? If so, what?
e. What is the current zoning classification of the
site? \-k}\--
f.
-k}\--
f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation
of the site? ke,7\-
g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master
program designation of the site? ---
h.
h. Has any part of the site been classified as an
"environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify.
i. Approximately how many peo le would reside or work
in the completed project?
j. Approximately how m ny people would the completed
project displace?
k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement
impacts, if any: .-
1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com-
patible with existing and projected land uses and
plans, if any: T--
-12-
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
•
9. Housing
a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if
any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income
housing? -3
b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eli-
minated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-
income housing.
' c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing
impacts, if any: -
10. Aesthetics
. a. What is the tallest height of any proposed
structure(s), not including antennas; what is the
principal exterior iuilding material(s) proposed?
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be
altered or obstructedL -'
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic
impacts, if any: --
-13-
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
•
11. Light and Glare
a. What type of light or glare will the proposal
produce? What time of day would it mainly occur?
b. Could light or glare from the finished roject be a
safety hazard or interfere with views? �y
c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may
.affect your proposal?fin
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and
glare impacts, if any:
12. Recreation
a. What designed and informal recreational oppor-
tunities are in the immediate vicinity?'k
�\�
nc^c t 4,
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing
recreational uses? If so, describe.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on
recreation, including recreation opportunities to be
provided by the project or applicant, if any:
-14-
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
• •
13. Historic and Cultural Preservation
a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro-
posed for, national, state, or local preservation
registers known to be on or next to the site? If
so, generally describe.,
b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of
historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural
importance known to be on or next to the site.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if
any:
14. Transportation
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the
site, and describe .proposed accss to the existing
street sy tem. khowton site pl ns, if any.
.22k Vi (WO, ecy
b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If
not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest
transit stop?A
c. How many parking spaces would the completed project
have? How many1\would the project .el'm,� i riZzAA
411120,
-15-
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
•
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets,
or improvements to existing roads or streets, not
including driveways? If so, generally describe
(indicate whether public or private).
Will the project use (or occur in the immediate
vicinity of) water, rail,,or air transportation? If
so, generally describe. *0
f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated
by the completed project? If known, indiate when
peak volumes would occur.
e urt —
g. Proposed measures to reduce orcontrol transpor-
tation impacts, if any: --
15. Public Services
a. Would the project result in an increased need for
public services (for example: fire protection,
police protection, healthcare, schools, other)? If
so, generally describe.
b. Proposed measures to 'reduce or control direct
impacts on public services, if any.
-16-
16. Utilities
a.
•
utilities currently available at the site:
natural gas, water, refuse service,
e ephone, (ani ar_y sewers septic system, other.
b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the
project, the utility providing the service, and the
general construction activities on the site or in
the immediate vicinity which might be needed.
C. Signature
The above answers are true and complete to the best of
my knowledge. I.understand that the lead agency is
relying on them to ma.- its de,►isio
Signature:
Date Submitted:
PLEASE CONTINUE TO THE NEXT PAGE.
-17-
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICAA
D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS
•
(do not use this sheet for project actions)
Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful
to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of
the environment.
When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the
proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from
the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity
or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not imple-
mented. Respond briefly and in general terms.
1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge
to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or
release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production
of noise? 'ks,,,/
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are:
2. How would the proposal be li'ely to affect plants, ani-
mals, fish, or marine life? `A(snr,_
Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, ani-
mals, fish, or marine life are:
-18-
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
•
•
3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or
natural resources?
Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and
natural resourses are: --
4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect
environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or
eligible or under study) for governmental protection;
such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers,
threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or
cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime
farmlands? 1400("p____
Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid
or reduce impacts are: ---
5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and
shoreline use, inclduing whether it would allow or
encourage land r shoreline uses incompatible with
existing plans? �60,.._,
-19-
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
• •
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land
use impacts area: ---
How does the proposal conform to the Tukwila Shoreline
Master Plan? --
6. How would the proposal be likely to increase dem ds on
transportation or public services and utilities?
,^,P
Proposed measures to reduce or respond:to such demand(s)
are: ---
7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict
with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for
the protection of the environment. cin,,,_,
-20-
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
• •
8. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila
Comprehensive Land s P icy Plan? If so, what, poli-
cies of the Plan? ^,iGt,^
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s)
are:
-21-
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLI
•
SEvaluation for
Agency Use Only
E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON PROJECT
PROPOSALS
Theobjectives and the alternative means of reaching 'the
objectives for a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the
aforegoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This
information provides a general overall perspective of the
proposed action in the context of the environmental infor-
mation provided and the submitted plans, documents, suppor-
tive information, studies, etc.
1. What are the obj-ct"ve(s of the propos I?
2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these
objectives? ----
3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the
preferred course of action:
-22-
•
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
4. Does. the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila
-Comprehensive LandsPp],ic�(an? If so, what poli-
cies of the Plan?
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s)
are:
-23-
• •
INTERIM
(3/11/94)
PLEASE SUBMIT THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION:
1. TWELVE SETS OF THE PLANS NEEDED TO CLEARLY DESCRIBE 1'HE
PROPOSED ACTIONS.
2. ONE PMT SET OF PLANS REDUCED TO 8 1/2 X 11.
3. FOUR COPIES OF ANY STUDIES NEEDED IN SUPPORT OF THE
CHECKT.TST.
4. FIFTEEN COPIES OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WHICH
INCLUDES 8 1/2 X 11 COPIES OF THE REDUCED PLANS.
ADDITIONAL COPIES OR FURTHER: INFORMATION MAY BE REQUIRED.
AERIAL PHOTO
AERIAL PHOTO