The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSEPA E95-0009 - GOODWILL - WAREHOUSE TO RETAILGOODWILL RETAIL BUILDING T.I. CONVERT WAREHOUSE SPACE TO RETAIL 1180 ANDOVER PARK WEST E95-0009 AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION hereby declare that: ONotice of Public Hearing Determination of Non- significance O Notice of Public Meeting LIBoard of Adjustment Agenda Packet Board of Appeals Agenda Packet flPlanning. Commission Agenda Packet Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance Determinatioh of Significance and Scoping Notice Notice of Action Official Notice fl Short Subdivision Agenda E Other Packet O Notice of Application for 0 Other Shoreline Management Permit 0 Shoreline Management. Permit was mailed to each of the following addresses on bittas C4b1 i c 'vjc r S PCQQ SeC.+fle_ neLOSocperr- -or rub 0-1- F -C -0)0q1 Name of ProjectGOOdVJ'11 1?- 6\ Signature File Number.b-q5"--(DOCCI CITY OF TUKWILA DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) 1 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: CONVERT WAREHOUSE SPACE TO RETAIL PROPONENT: BOB KROESE ss LOCATION OF PROPOSAL ,f'I:NCL1UDING, STREET ADDRESS, IE AN:Y: ADDRESS: 1 Y80:),ANDOVER` PK : W +`, '/' i �\ :, Irl. Z.:'.. PARCEL NO: X352304-9085- J j ii, 1i \. SEC/TWN/RNG:. (35/23/04. � <' `" - o ,, v 1 *, LEAD AGENCY -'/CITY OF TUKWILAV`+61:-, _,Th '' , k _ f ., r`; a The City lias�determine- roposal does not haye` a 2p-robapl.++,,e significant" adverse impactt._on the,;env.1'ronment. An env�ironmenta1/ \ impact sita;tement'-(EIS) is =not regju,i°red-,under RCW 43.21cf030(.2));'(c);.;' This decd s�i on was made of eer'rev if'j/ew of .a�comp 1 eted env i ronmenta 1 t( check1is�t�Uand`-othee ioformat,i,on on fi1ew,t�th -the lead agency:I Thl 1nforma;t�ion is available to�,ttie pyubl i:cy ` 'h request. � _':. `st} *******4**'**1**,*****,******.***d*****l*'*****t****.,**,*************'***"******j*-*1i****** � -4,--,r 4 f 11. ty�\ \ 4\ - �r \.. __ri I I ,i lel .�1 !'qy IFF 't f '/• µ ..} �"-._ l This eierm`i'n.a�.t-ion, is"f�inail d0d !s gned' this �S day of �1��'' wig �. Y ' — FILE NO:,;E95-0009 d that tRi p Steve Lancaster, "" °" , Responsible Official City of Tukwila, 1206)'(4,31-3680 ( ` 6300 Southce,rit�er Boulevard',, Tukwila, WA -48188-;) !i 00 You may appeal this.determination to the City Clerk at G:itY—Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard=„' Tukwila, `= iWA )\ 981188rino later tha0 1�0 days from the above signature date by written +appeaL:l stating the basis of the appeal for specific factual objections– You may lbe requir.ed_rto bear some of the expenses for an appeal. Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the City Clerk and Department of Community Development. TO: Jack Pace FROM: John Jimers RE: SEPA - Goodwill DATE: April 28, 1995 Memorandum Project File No. E95-0009 Project Description: The property is located at 1180 Andover Park West. The proposal is convert 20,000 s.f. of warehouse space, which is currently under construction, to a retail use. A SEPA threshold determination was made for the current building permit based on a warehouse use. Agencies With Jurisdiction: None. Comments to SEPA Checklist: None. Summary of Primary Impacts: There will be increased traffic resulting from the conversion of warehouse use to retail use. Summary of Proposed Mitigation: The applicant proposes to mitigate increased traffic through payment of mitigation fees. The Public Works confirmed the analysis of the traffic engineer that the fee would be $6,127. Recommended Threshold Determination: Determination of Non -Significance. CHECKLIST: EIRONMENTAL REVIEW/SHORELIN.ERMIT MAILINGS FEDERAL AGENCIES ( )U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS ( )FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION ( )DEPT. OF INTERIOR -FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE WASHINGTON ( )U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ( )U.S. DEPARTMENT OF H.U.D. (REGION X) STATE AGENCIES ( )OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY ( )TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT ( )DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES ( )OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR ( )DEPT. OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ( )DEPT. OF FISHERIES ( )K.C. PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEV. ( )BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD ( )FIRE DISTRICT #11 ( )FIRE DISTRICT #2, ( )SOUTH CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT ( )TUKWILA LIBRARIES ( )RENTON LIBRARY ( )KENT LIBRARY ( )CITY OF SEATTLE LIBRARY )US WEST )SEATTLE CITY LIGHT )WASHINGTON NATURAL GAS )WATER DISTRICT #75 )SEATTLE WATER DEPARTMENT )GROUP W CABLE )OLYMPIA PIPELINE ( )KENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT ( )TUKWILA CITY DEPARTMENTS: (PUBLIC WORKS ( ) FIRE ( )POLICE ( )FINANCE ( )PLANNING ( )BUILDING ( )PARKS AND ORECREATION ( )TUKWILA MAYOR ( )DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL & HEALTH SERVICES (/)DEPT. OF ECOLOGY, SHORELANDS DIVISION ('DEPT. OF ECOLOGY, SEPA DIVISION* ( )DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE ( )OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL *SEND CHECKLIST WITH DETERMINATIONS AND *SEND SITE MAPS WITH DECISION RING COUNTY AGENCIES ( )KING COUNTY DEPT. OF PARKS ( )HEALTH DEPARTMENT ( )PORT OF SEATTLE ( )BUILDING & LAND DEV. DIV.- ' SEPA INFORMATION CENTER SCHOOLS/LIBRARIES ( )HIGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT ( )KING COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY ( )SEATTLE MUNICIPAL REFERENCE. LIBRARY ( )SEATTLE SCHOOL DISTRICTS ( )RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT )PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT )VAL-VUE SEWER DISTRICT )WATER DISTRICT #20 )WATER DISTRICT #125 )CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC WORKS )RAINIER VISTA )SKYWAY CITY AGENCIES ( )RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT ( }CITY OF SEA -TAC ( )CITY OF SEATTLE ( )CITY OF BURIEN ( )TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS ( )TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS OTHER LOCAL AGENCIES ( )PUGET SOUND REGIONAL COUNCIL ( )P.S. AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY ( )SW K.COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ( )MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE ( )DUWAMISH INDIAN TRIBE MEDIA ( )DAILY JOURNAL OF COMMERCE ( )VALLEY DAILY NEWS. ( )METRO ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING DIV. OFFICE/INDUSTRIAL 5,000 GSF OR MORE RESIDENTIAL 50 UNITS OR MORE RETAIL 30,000 GSF OR MORE ( ) HIGHLINE TIMES ( )SEATTLE TIMES • • PUBLIC NOTICE MAILINGS FOR PERMITS SEPA MAILINGS Mail to: (comment period starts on date of mailing) Dept. of Ecology Environmental Review Section Applicant Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list) Include these documents: SEPA Determination (3 -part form from Sierra) Findings (staff report, usu. with MDNS) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) Affidavit of Dlstribution.(notice was mailed & sent to newspaper). SHORELINE MAILINGS Notice of Application: Notice of application for a substantial development Permit must be mailed to owners and to property owners within 300 feet of subject property, prepare an affidavit of publication, and publish two consecutive weeks with deadline for comments due 30 days after last newspaper publication date. Shoreline Permit: Mail to: (within 8 days of decision; 30 -day appeal period begins date received by DOE) Department of Ecology Shorelands Section State Attorney: General Applicant Indian Tribes Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list). Include these documents: Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (3 -part form from Sierra) Findings (staff report, if applicable) Shoreline Application Form (filled out by applicant) Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) Site plan, with mean high water mark & improvements Cross-sections of site w/structures & shoreline Grading plan Vicinity map SEPA Determination (3 -part form from Sierra) Findings (staff report, usu. with MDNS) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Any background studies related to impacts on shoreline Notice of Application Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed & sent to newspaper) Affidavit of Publication (notice was published in newspaper). GOODWILL RETAIL SITE TRIP GENERATION DISTRIBUTION AND MITIGATION REPORT Prepared for Mr. Tom Barker GOODWILL INDUSTRIES c/o Bob Kroese, AIA PERCICH KROESE ARCHITECTS 603 Stewart Street Suite 707 Seattle, WA 98101 Prepared by TRANSPORTATION PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC. 2101 - 112th Ave. N.E., Suite 110 Bellevue, Washington 98004 Telephone - (206) 455-5320 March 29, 1995 'EXPIRES 413/62( TPE VICTOR H BISHOP P E . Presdenl DAVID H ENGER P E . Vice Pres dens TRANSPORTATION PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC. Mr. Tom Barker GOODWILL INDUSTRIES c/o Bob Kroese, AIA PERCICH KROESE ARCHITECTS 603 Stewart Street Suite 707 Seattle, WA 98101 2101 - 112th AVENUE N.E., SUITE 110 — BELLEVUE, WASHINGTON 98004 TELEPHONE (206) 455-5320 FACSIMILE (206) 453-7180 March 29, 1995 Re: Goodwill Retail Site Trip Generation Distribution and Mitigation Report Dear Mr. Barker: We are pleased to present this trip generation distribution and mitigation report for the proposed retail redevelopment project located at 1180 Andover Pk. W. in the City of Tukwila. The project proposes to replace the existing 83,272 sq. ft. (20,000 sq. ft. under construction) warehouse building (13,040 sq. ft. office, and 70,333 sq. ft. storage space) with a 83,272 sq. ft. retail/storage building. The proposed use of the facility is 50,333 sq. ft. warehouse, 13,040 sq. ft. office and 20,000 sq. ft. retail. We have visited the project site and surrounding street network, and have prepared this study per our telephone conversation with Mr. Ron Cameron, P.E., City Engineer of Tukwila. This report provides a trip generation distribution and pro rata share contributions to identified City of Tukwila street projects. The conclusions and recommendations begin on page 4 of this report. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Figure 1 is a vicinity map showing the location of the site and the surrounding street network. Figure 2 shows a preliminary site plan received by TP&E, Inc. The plan consists of 83,272 sq. ft. of total building space, 139 parking stalls with two handicap stalls and three driveways onto Andover Park West. These driveways are existing T0820.RPT �pE Mr. Tom Barker GOODWILL INDUSTRIES March 29, 1995 Page - 3 - including employee, customer, visitor, recreation, and service and delivery vehicle trips. A pass -by trip is an existing trip that comes directly from the traffic flow on a road adjacent to the project site, and does not require a diversion from another roadway. A diverted linked trip does require a diversion from another roadway. Both of these types trips can be deducted from the total primary trips because they are not new to the street network. Based on pass -by and diverted linked trip percentages found in Section VII of Trip Generation and previous traffic studies, we estimate that approximately 35% of the site -generated trips can be classified as pass-by/diverted linked trips. The net new project trips were calculated by subtracting the pass-by/diverted linked trips from the total driveway volumes for the proposed project and the trip generation from the existing warehouse building. Figure 3 shows the estimated trip distribution and the calculated site -generated traffic volumes. The distribution is based on the characteristics of the street network, existing traffic volume patterns, the location of likely trip origins and destinations (residential, employment, shopping, social and recreational 'opportunities), expected travel times, and previous traffic studies. TRAFFIC IMPACT MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS The City has indicated that they are collecting contributions for several intersection improvement projects throughout the City. The developer should offer to pay contributions for those intersections which are expected to be impacted by net new noon peak hour project trips. According to our trip generation analysis the net new noon peak hour trips generated by the project is 21. Therefore, the following intersections and their associated cost per noon peak hour trip are listed in Table 2. In addition to the pro rata share contributions identified in Table 2, the 20,000 sq. ft. approved warehouse addition project is required to construct frontage improvements to Andover Pk. W. to the City criteria. T0820.RPT Mr. Tom Barker GOODWILL INDUSTRIES March 29, 1995 Page - 4 - CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS We recommend that the Goodwill Retail project be constructed as shown on the site plan with the following traffic mitigation: 1. Offer to contribute $6,267.00 for proposed City road improvement projects as identified on Table 2 of this report. 2. As part of the existing permit to add 20,000 sq. ft. of warehouse space the developer will be constructing improvements to the frontage of Andover Park West to the City's requirements. 3. On site pedestrian circulation should be provided as identified on the preliminary site plan between the bus stop and the front door to the retail activity. No other traffic mitigation should be necessary. If you have any questions please call me at (206)455-5320. Very truly yours, TRANSPORTATION PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC. Mark J. , P.E. Senior Transportation Engineer MJJ/es T0820.RPT SPE �pE TABLE 1 VEHICULAR TRIP GENERATION GOODWILL RETAIL SITE TRIP EQUATION ENTER EXIT TOTAL Proposed Retail, 20,000 sq. ft. ITE Land Use Code 820 Average Weekday T = 28.61x 286(50%) 286(50%) 572 AM Peak Hour T = 0.52x 6 (63%) 4 (37%) 10 PM Peak Hour T = 2.61x 26 (50%) 26 (50%) 52 Existing Warehouse to be replaced with retail use, 20,000 sq. ft., ITE Land Use Code 150 Average Weekday T = 4.88x 49(50%) 49 (50%) 98 AM Peak Hour T = 0.57x 8 (72%) 3 (28%) 11 PM Peak Hour T = 0.74x 5 (35%) 10 (65%) 15 Net New Street Network Trips (Total Projected Driveway Volumes Minus 35% Pass -by and Diverted Linked Trips For Retail Portion Minus Existing Trips) Average Weekday 137 (50%) 137 (50%) 274 AM Peak Hour [4] [0] [4] PM Peak Hour 12 7 19 T = Trips X = 1,000 sq. ft. NOTES: A vehicle trip is defined as a single or one direction vehicle movement with either the origin or destination (exiting or entering) inside the study site. These trip generation values account for all site trips made by all vehicles for all purposes, including employee, customer, visitor, recreation, and service and delivery vehicle trips. T0820. RPT �pE TABLE 2 PRO RATA SHARE CONTRIBUTION GOODWILL RETAIL SITE INTERSECTION COST PER NOON PK. HR. TRIP PM PK. HR. TRIPS NOON PK. HR. TRIPS CONTRIBUTION COST Southcenter Pkwy./ Strander Blvd. $140 3 3 $560.00 Andover Pk. W./ Strander Blvd. $317 10 11 $3,487.00 Andover Pk. E./ Strander Blvd. $135 2 2 $270.00 W. Valley Hwy./ Southcenter Blvd. $1,000 1 1 $1,000.00 W. Valley Hwy./ S. 180th St. ' $475 2 2 $950.00 TOTAL $6,267.00 T0820. Rpt VICINITY MAP GOODWILL SITE TRIP GENERATION, DISTRIBUTION AND MITIGATION REPORT E r i ' 1 1 1_1 1 1. Ii I. 11 I f IIllli Ii� r I j i j j 1111 .Ir1-1 1� J i .LJLJ 1 L RL'I'AIL TENANT IMPROVEMINT -�• 0 kri Ca °c tri H'HH' I IIIIrzl- 0 SITE PLAN GOODWILL SITE TRIP GENERATION, DISTRIBUTION AND MITIGATION REPORT 4 et)t�r e/�d 15% N [41] not to scale O PROJECT TRIPS Net New 274 Daily 19 PM Peak Hour 21 Noon Peak Hour S. 178th St. 10% [27] 0 LEGEND S. 180th St. xx% Trip Distribution Percentage OX PM Peak Hour Traffic .Volume [XX] New Average Weekday Traffic Volume Note: Noon peak hour traffic volumes 10% higher. SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES & DISTRIBUTION GOODWILL SITE TRIP GENERATION, DISTRIBUTION AND MITIGATION REPORT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Purpose of Checklist: 6-9S-ocxy9 RECEIVE.° MAR 2 1 1995 DEVELOPMENT The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instruction for Applicants: This environmental checklist ,asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. The City uses this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. v You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the City staff can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attached any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The City may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: Nonproject proposals refer to actions which are different or broader than a single site specific development project, such as plans, policies and programs. Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply". In addition, complete the supplemental sheet for nonproject actions (part D). For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project", "applicant", and "property or site" should read as "proposal", "proposer", and "affected geographic area", respectively. Cont. No. Epic File No. Cgs -cog Fee. 325 Receipt No. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: (OOt'WIL.L ge7WL 6Lf. TZ. 2. Name of applicant: j' -i'1 ; 56: "ebeew/72: 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: gGk3c=e5� T 74 5477 eal 9 /oi 4. Date checklist prepared: Iv- - Z2-1' 5. Agency requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): TA -Amour /Ad/Wave/WAITS Pt -7 P (4A/E 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. NO 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. PERM/T/� R4 gEv/E_aJ f w/ou y 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. NO ,e,VoWN -2- • • 10. List any government approvals or permits that will .be needed for your proposal. 445,094 fie. 41.0Ae0E_ — iS 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete • description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized here. ___moi_ 547 , • _ - -•ufaistOvr 4.4 pm SF. ,r f.X[s ri#4 iL !�sE 'vim 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica- tions related to this checklist. Tcl t1 _ 44l 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land • Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? -3- TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLIC• B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, • Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? -t Yo• �o c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example,(clay, sand, gravel) peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in .the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti- ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? A; l — /VD GyO7V 'L `'1 4C/SrANG -4- . 0 Evaluation for Agency Use Only h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or. other impacts to the earth, if any: NONE Alff-12ED 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. _.e,..STie4Gnov/ De,57* A1/iv,,s 4 /-tee T. I. ) 40514I/s7?C JGTio,/ joy sr Ai/41547 filiza4i %uoe b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: A/11V 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year- round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. /VO -5- Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. /S(O 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. NONE 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. No 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. I/O 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. ,'Vo -6- • Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. /1(o 2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sour- ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. NAME c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. .45)(7507/146 SUI LD/K& Sfl(GG , L& til 1PJA/ ` /NTo CiTy OP 72i/e.t.d.', A 5704 4i ,SyS7'E/''%)--- -7- 411 Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Np d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: j006 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs X grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? NoA/L c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. NONE -8- Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: SX/S7'N& 9/J. _ASE- --7412126 OF 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: NONE fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: NOMS b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. NONE c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. /1/7 d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any:,/aA/E - -9- 111 . Evaluation for Agency Use Only 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solorY will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. G1 t b,. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent. properties? If so, generally describe. /V0 c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: f �VE/'&gfL�c/)(77 tlSE 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. A/d 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. NONE 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ- mental health hazards, if any: �'0V7R/t-7 P.'s STS ; -10- . Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? 72.4-Pc/c- 2) 2.4-Pc/G 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short- term or a long-term basis (for example: traf- fic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. , PPYrio v4 -L 7is IoM uS,E A,54P-E ziezt S= Go�•ST,GuGfq.•� - 7-' -,o f. 010,w1 0r 1 -nam — fid. ,9` 1 7b g'c' /n/ 3) Proposed measures to reduce .or control noise impacts, if any: fta,/F. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? -TGLI-rL�L b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. f(,/� c. Describe any structures on the site. 4(/67/N6' l -v4 6610Y 14 419405 0 a3, z7z pF' • Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? WO e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? GM f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? CM g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? /k`/h► h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. ND i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Ps. yE , j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? A/07W k. Proposed measures.to avoid or -reduce displacement impacts, if any: N/,9 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com- patible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: ar.s6goa ,qitJ> 4J 7gmT?, , 1"442. '9PPL/e>ortr 6.i Ty t 5T rz CQ2i-S. -12- • ! Evaluation for Agency Use Only 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing? Nom!' b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eli- minated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing. JVD/./E c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: ,I p,/E 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? 61,17xf G9,VoPy 1/ 4A/ EXWT-f^-6 Ze'' w. Ex pese -7E b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? ivoNE c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: SCsu 'r/V4, J KeA ?z,shgvev. -13- . Evaluation for Agency Use Only. 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time.of day would it mainly occur? NdNE' b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? NO c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? AAp4,45 d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: *Ad 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational oppor- tunities are in the immediate vicinity? J A05 b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. fl c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: -14- • ! Evaluation for Agency Use Only 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro- posed for, national', state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. /v'2 b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. NONA' c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: /1✓DN4 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed accss to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. peps 1-- h" $ ANcov e P - kJ 7 AavrAt- b.. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? y,Gj c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? ?or.� (/IV 30) -15- • 41, Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe. (indicate whether public or private). PIS -iewir (s,os_ c ,tet e -. s.) e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. /E,412.- S�LI� �1140��5 T 45/1,4E f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. E 1ti9ff/G S7Lo y g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor- tation impacts, if any: Megal/eNf 7S _,',N'1' Ay WhiqC %moo 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Ppm43t ,q� (4 p6u� 4./Av4¢61 /z • ? .c... b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. irieW546. -16- • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities curre 1 available at the site: e ectricity natura gas, service p one, sa sep is system, b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. c./SE c%F fiXiSTlti� � rwJf�Q _ �L (...¢rt.�, dN40S, i g-4440,WAUL C. Signature The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency relying on them to yak- it; deF/sion. Signature: Date Submitted: 3 -2o -q5 PLEASE CONTINUE TO THE NEXT PAGE. -17- is TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICAS . Evaluation for Agency Use Only D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not imple- mented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life? Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life are: -18- 411 • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resourses are: 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or. cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: 5. How would the proposal be likely to -'affect land and shoreline use, inclduing whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? -19- • Evaluation for Agency Use Only Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts area: How does the proposal conform to the Tukwila Shoreline Master Plan? 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. -20- • 0 Evaluation for Agency Use Only 8. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: -21- TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLIC• •Evaluation for Agency Use Only E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON PROJECT PROPOSALS The objectives and the alternative means of reaching the objectives for a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the aforegoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This information provides a general overall perspective of the proposed action in the context of the environmental infor- mation provided and the submitted plans, documents, suppor- tive information, studies, etc. 1. What are the objective(s) of the proposal? 7b £sr445L . ' /0.5T/Ia- USS CaF20, E ..s 2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these objectives? /1/GYVE 3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the preferred course of action: N0 • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 4. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? AO Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: 104 (ND f4.1 --' -23- INTERIM (3/11/94) PLEASE SUBMIT TILE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: 1. TWELVE SETS OF THE PLANS NEEDED TO CLEARLY DESCRIBE THE PROPOSED ACTIONS. 2. ONE PMT SET OF PLANS REDUCED TO 8 1/2 X 11. 3. FOUR COPIES OF ANY STUDIES NEEDED IN SUPPORT OF THE CHECKLIST. 4. FIFTEEN COPIES OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKTJST WHICH INCLUDES 8 1/2 X 11 COPIES OF THE REDUCED PLANS. ADDITIONAL COPIES OR FURTHER INFORMATION MAY BE REQUIRED. Nav Lig 1111 1 EXISTING R/R SPUR Flew JM6.f picig NC I 8 Clic 11111 1 .1 1 1 1 1 I• 1' I. EXISTING WAREHOUSE EXESTING OFFICE/SHOWROOM ® T 1 T TT MAR 2 1 1995 „ rENT AAiLvveR PAR& 14, EST NedeThi E'EDDIND(O AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER at SAID ODVEBNOAENTLOT I; THENCE NORTH ".. 57 SEA M NEON. 8 SEC, WEST ALONG THE NORTH UNE OP SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 1 A ..: . DISTANCE OP 949.49 PEET; THENCE SOUTH I DEG. 51 511)4.39 SEC WEST A DISTANCE OF. 3034 PERT TO THE TanIE PIT OP EEOOdEN0 THIDADI CONTINUING SOUTH 1 DEA. 51'.. MIK 39 SEC WEST A DATANO3 OP 31631 FEET. • NORTH SS DEQ 8 SEN. 21 SEC. WEST 333.00 FEET TO THE BAST MAR®; GP ANDOVER PARK WEST. THENCE NOR1H'. I DPA 51 MIN. 39 SEC. EAST ALCNO SAID EAST MARLO N 54634 FSI; THENCE SOUTH A DEO. SMEN: 21 SEC EAST MOD PEST TO THE TRIM Pg1NT I'8EMO•IDxi . PEOJECTDPSIRIPTION: 20,000 SP testae mWoo9emenD, ohms from misting WAr0OY/DUm to 10:10015 PRC)1BC'1' ADDRESS:t 1180 Andover Perk West 711kw51e, wubington Goodwill /Mr. Tom Barba 1400 South Lane Street Scunl4 Washington 91144889 - Robert Broom. AIA (Pied. Mgr.) Perdeb Krouse ArcLrteeD 603 Stewart Street, Suite 707 Scuttle, Waehmgm 98101 •1991 UBC BUILDING CODE... ZINE: . -. 'OCCUPANCY: CONSTRUC110N TYPE. Smi AREA: IDQSSING BUILDING AREA • WAREHOUSE OFFICE/SHOWROOM - • PROPOSED BUILDING AREA WAREHOUSE OFFICE RETAIL SITE COVERAGE - REQUIRED YARDS: FRONT SIDE REAR S' -. "PARKING REQUBtE s4EN S: . WAREHOUSE OPFICPJSHOWROOM . RETAIL •- TOTAC'STALLS EXIS11NO 20,000 SF ADDmON' .. RETAII. PARKING WAREHOUSE PARKING - - • NEW STALLS PROVIDED 'TOTAII PARKING PROVIDED. COMPACT STAUS PROVIDED INTERIOR LANDSCAPING REQ'D. INTERIOR LS. PROVIDED: B-2 (NO Chmge) ' III N Sprmldered 4.18 Acres (181,998 SF) 83,272 SF Total 70,333 SP 13,040 SP 83.272 SF 70011 50,333 SP 13,040 SP 20,000 SF 45.75 %(No Chcuge) 15 Feet (NO Change) 5 Feet (No Cherlge) N. Required. . . ® lnooOSF.' ®zSnooO SF ®2109-5/10.5,000 SF - 50 (ate' Pl±253 9rmKF:KmQ 29 (uedit for exisdm use) 30 Addmonel teas rearmed 30 139 37 (27Y.) .. ®12 SFf Stag: 360 SF • 360 SF.1 • re- 4.tict