HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA E95-0013 - UPS (UNITED PARCEL SERVICE) - FUELING FACILITY AND UNDERGROUND TANKUNITED PARCEL SERVICE
REPLACE EXISTING
FUELING FACILITY &
UNDERGROUND TANK
550 ANDOVER PARK WEST
E95-0013
AFFIDAVIT
OF DISTRIBUTION
I, IDaol liS hereby declare that:
O Notice of Public Hearing
Notice of Public Meeting
O Board of Adjustment Agenda
Packet
O Board of Appeals Agenda
Packet
0 Planning Commission Agenda
Packet
0 Short Subdivision Agenda
Packet -
Determination of Non-
significance
Mitigated Determination o
Nonsignificance
Determination of Significance
and Scoping Notice
Notice of Action
Official Notice
Other
O Notice of Application for 0 Other
Shoreline Management Permit
flShoreline Management Permit
(a/was mailed to each of the following addresses on
61 — .ceo
/1)0(4; oil .
.Irn J cou.t-er... ;hal Ctro 1
r eo(I L.55i br) �D►�
Name of Project UPS
File Number E 5- 0013
Signatur
CITY OF TUKWILA
DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS)
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL:
INSTALLATION OF A 12,000 GALLON UST, REMOVAL OF AN
EXISTING 10,000 S.F. UST, REPLACEMENT OF FUEL
ISLAND, INSTALLATION OF-ANO:I" TER SERARATOR AND
CANOPY..r�'�,;
LOCATION OF PROPO,SA`L,..INCLUDINGSTREET ADDRESS!,; I,F ANY:
,..t �t
00
PROPONENT: DAN BRANDES`" UPS;
ADDRESS4, 550. ANDOVER PK°W
PARCEL N0�2623.049015`' "�� te.kt ti`•
SEC/TWN/RG
LEAD AGENCY:
26/23/4
LSC"ITY OF TUKWIL• A
Jar =a
4,_„„
`'The Cityir-hasetermnined that--ht,he: eproposa 1 ' does not have'.a pr•,obab lie•
significant adverse i mpac.t on, the/ env i r e,nmen°t..e, n
An environmental
impact Pstatement
(EI'.SVis noreJ eva lqutedti unde
r RCW, 43.21c. 010 (-21;(c )
This decision was ade after\rew"ofacompleted environmena1
checkl and-otherinorma,'tionE.on
o
0
o
FILE NO): E95-O013J
lead agency: . Thi.s';,I
informati;on is•avai lable to,- the,p'ubl is on.; request. N
* * * * * * * *'*:*,* * * * 7 1i %f * /i-* * * * *4 'kr'! * *f *'�', l4 * * k �'''t * 4i,*'k'� * *,'k'A,* * * * * * * * * * *7* ** 'k *.'k It is *�,'k�* *' * * * *
i f - t .-i.-N.,:: V L.,\. t..' ^'l „.1, -..i-'-..,`. / 1
t}� /✓e t 1 f
7 s t e J r..VA! ; 4,
This DNS�y�is 1 -slued =under 197-11-340(2) comments must be sub.mitttedf by
IN �� -t = f \\, `'- t e T h.e`1 1 teatd ag •e,n c y Cw i 1 1_ ho t a.c�t on
,fir �;.
this proposalfor-• 15 'days from the date below. ,,,,.\
t. r
t,
Steve Lancast.e, Responsible 0fficial
City of Tukwila!;<� (206), 431-3680`
6300 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila, WA 98188,
You may appeal this determination 'to the City C l e_rk.:at City Hall, 6200
Southcenter Boulevard, Tukw1 l -WA,:_.,9.8.1.88:,.no:.l;ater"than 10 days from the
above signature date by wr i teen= a;pp eal s=t-ati:ng' the basis of the appeal for
specific factual objections. You may be required to bear some of the
expenses for an appeal.
;,Date
Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the City
Clerk and Department of Community Development.
Memorandum
TO: Jack Pace
".4
FROM: John Jimerson
RE: SEPA - Unite rcel Service
DATE: June 14, 1995
Project File No. E95-0013
Project Description:
The property is located at 550 Andover Park West. The proposal is
to replace an existing fueling facility with new a new facility.
The replacement components will be placed where the existing
components are located. They include a 12,000 gallon UST to
replace a 10,000 gallon UST and new pump island components. In
addition, a new 36' x 30' canopy is proposed to cover the fueling
islands, and an oil/water separator will be installed.
Agencies With Jurisdiction:
Department of Ecology.
Metro.
Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Authority.
Comments to SEPA Checklist:
None.
Summary of Primary Impacts/Mitigation:
The project will be an upgrade to an existing facility. The new
tank and pipes will be double walled, thus reducing the possibility
of contaminating the soil. Storm water improvements include an
oil/water separator and a canopy which will help control
contaminants that spill during fueling. Per PSAPCA requirements,
vapor recovery systems are included with the fueling equipment.
Recommended Threshold Determination:
Determination of Non -Significance.
CHECKLIST: ENV4IFNMENTAL REVIEW/SHORELINE RMIT MAILINGS
FEDERAL AGENCIES
)U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
)FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
)DEPT. OF INTERIOR—FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE
WASHINGTON
( )U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
( )U.S. DEPARTMENT OF H.U.D. (REGION X)
STATE AGENCIES
( )OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY
( )TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT
( )DEPT. OF NATURAL. RESOURCES
( )OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR
( )DEPT. OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
( )DEPT. OF FISHERIES
( )K.C. PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEV.
( )BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD
( )FIRE DISTRICT #11
( )FIRE DISTRICT #2.
( )SOUTH CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT
( )TUKWILA•LIBRARIES
( ) RENTON LIBRARY---
(
IBRARY-_...( )KENT LIBRARY
( )CITY OF SEATTLE LIBRARY
( )US WEST
( )SEATTLE CITY LIGHT
( )WASHINGTON NATURAL GAS
( )WATER DISTRICT #75
( )SEATTLE WATER DEPARTMENT
( )GROUP W CABLE
( )OLYMPIA PIPELINE
( )KENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT
( )TUKWILA CITY DEPARTMENTS:
( )PUBLIC WORKS ( ) FIRE
( )POLICE ( )FINANCE
( )PLANNING. ( )BUILDING
( )PARKS AND ORECREATION
( )TUKWILA MAYOR
( )DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL & HEALTH SERVICES
( )DEPT. OF ECOLOGY, SHORELANDS DIVISION
(.:4DEPT. OF ECOLOGY, SEPA DIVISION*
( )DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE
( )OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL
*SEND CHECKLIST WITH DETERMINATIONS AND
*SEND SITEMAPS 'WITH DECISION
KING COUNTY AGENCIES
( )KING COUNTY DEPT. OF PARKS
( )HEALTH DEPARTMENT
( )PORT OF SEATTLE
( )BUILDING & LAND DEV. DIV.—
SEPA INFORMATION CENTER
SCHOOLS/LIBRARIES
( )HIGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT
( )KING COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY...
( )SEATTLE MUNICIPAL REFERENCE. LIBRARY
( )SEATTLE SCHOOL DISTRICTS
( )RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT."
UTILITIES
( )PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT
( )VAL—VUE SEWER DISTRICT
( )WATER DISTRICT #20
( )WATER DISTRICT #125
( )CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC WORKS
( )RAINIER VISTA
( )SKYWAY
CITY AGENCIES
( )RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT
( )CITY OF SEA—TAC
( )CITY OF SEATTLE _
( )CITY'OF BURIEN
( )TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS
( )TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
OTHER LOCAL AGENCIES'
( )PUGET SOUND REGIONAL COUNCIL
1'.S. AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY
( )SW K.COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
( )MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE
( )DUWAMISH INDIAN TRIBE
MEDIA
( )DAILY JOURNAL OF COMMERCE
( )VALLEY DAILY NEWS
l�Ar'A LPDC.LI47OaJ Ccs/P(101--
( AMETRO
' UL(1METRO V.
OFFICE/INDUSTRIAL 5,000 GSF OR MORE
RESIDENTIAL 50 UNITS OR MORE
RETAIL 30,000 GSF OR MORE
( )HIGHLINE TIMES
( )SEATTLE TIMES
r •
PUBLIC NOTICE MAILINGS FOR PERMTrS
SEPA MAILINGS
Mail to: (comment period starts on date of mailing)
Dept. of Ecology Environmental Review Section
Applicant
Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list)
Include these documents:
SEPA Determination (3 -part form from Sierra)
Findings (staff report, usu. with MDNS)
SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant)
Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's)
Affidavit of Dlstribution (notice was mailed & sent to newspaper).
SHORELINE MAILINGS
Notice of Application:
Notice of application for a substantial development Permit must be
mailed to owners and to property owners within 300 feet of subject
property, prepare an affidavit of•publication, and publish two
consecutive weeks with deadline for comments due 30 days after last
newspaper publication date.
Shoreline Permit:
Mail to: (within 8 days of decision; 30 -day appeal period begins
date received by DOE)
Department of Ecology Shorelands Section
State Attorney General
Applicant
Indian Tribes
Other agencies asNnecessary (checked off on attached list).
Include these documents:
Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (3 -part form from Sierra)
Findings (staff report, if applicable)
Shoreline Application Form (filled out by applicant)
Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's)
- - Site plan, with mean high water mark & improvements
Cross-sections of site w/structures & shoreline
Grading plan
_ Vicinity map
SEPA Determination (3 -part form from Sierra)
Findings (staff report, usu. with MDNS)
SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant)
Any background studies related to impacts on shoreline
Notice of Application
Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed & sent to newspaper)
Affidavit of Publication (notice was published in newspaper).
ConSl No.
Epic File No.
Fee $ 325 Receipt. No.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
A. BACKGROUND
1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: QST (�\ rA.(
2. Name of appl icant: UL ; c;e3- ; cc
3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person:
Ltc—s- Sev��,�k � wt e Sari -k c --±e Wa (A3\GR (2.06,)(02,1-622_e
4. Date checklist prepared:
5. Agency requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila
6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable):
S+trf N\ek 3l i WAS
Coni-0€1j.)A9 30 ; ►Ins
7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity
related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. tJ c.
8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will
be prepared, directly related to this proposal.
O0i4 sk-G tA1E h,\(.._%NIOVet \ 1 m 4 i �P asct s<t.a.cP�L:\-- i..) ; l l
to /0ge..-VeA cm la atiety ls.s wZ\\ 6e. *t key - r0, -
9. Do you know whether ,applications are pending for governmental approvals of other
proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes,
explain. tes : k i took rec€ $ per +c i..t fo ca
, ‘- P c PPc-R
CP.j e+ �A ns�A•f Poo.t- Cc-vvi-Nr nt vtey\
1.e C'•+ y aE T., hk w , lo. e �w.� 4� are. Qe-: Al
-2-
10. List any government approvals, or permits that will be needed for your proposal.
1 Jr-Q ctiv..A S Assesswt.eIdt4- (ZQior*
Metro Sewer nl1-Z6 n , ri,nAA D:1 WaAFr saen!a{�^
PSAPCA Nib -4; ce r -C Co., Ire c 1; v\ acrd 544h-4,34,41._\\ cLepi: Ca+.ovt-�
C;+y o F T„ k;,2; l: s pec-,u,d is
11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses
and the size of the project and site. There 'are several questions later in this
checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not
need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete
description of the objectives aid alternatives of your proposal and should not be
summarized here.
14 1N1. oilN e � es c - �t n 1: 1; rte, c�vtr�l c e 4 ce .
.OA Ct. ku l 1t+l pJ6V-2 L.J" \ ro- .CG. e& o .
_ [yt 0 e; ✓lJ( . P o1 As Iz4\ \. r\ Ara;EN. O" pact.
12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand
the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if
any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over
a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal
description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably
available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not
required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica-
tions related to this checklist.
Soy i de oA , - << �: iy ora �_�-� SSC)— ovec-�n.rk
48i4L fl t t
-�-�;
4Z S
<- crE_a_ c-ck. ,Aoty,
13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land
Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive?
NQ
-3-
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLI T
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
1. Earth
a. General description of the site (circle one):
rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, o er
•
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate
percent slope)? \O
c. What general types of soils are found on the site
(for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If
you know the classification of agricultural sols,
specify them and note any prime farmland. 5 ar.aiGk/
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable
soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe.
No
e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti-
ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate
source of fill. A 00 ,dtc {c,
aak— Aeau raJek
f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing,
construction, or use? If so, generally describe.
filo
g•
About what percent of the site will be covered with
impervious surfaces after project construction (for
example, asphalt or buildings)? rJo Llna.e
-4-
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
•410
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or
other impacts to the earth, if any: e.c;5c, 5iorr�nwcle,
w
4.4 50.e �c cu nS L,.L c l.� c Qv' C 's u 1-% t, 4-y
2. Air
a. What types of emissions to the air would result from
the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors.,
industrial wood smoke) during construction and when
the project is completed? If any, generally
describe and give approximate quantities/ if known.
n
e —
01 ASok hQ , ` 5 1 2 1 0.ska uc.-
b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor
that may affect your proposal? If so, generally
describe. No
c. Proposed measures to reduce•or control emissions or
other impacts to air, if any: e 1 &v -J S 4a_cke1\
J(xl,0c i?ec.oJea
3. Water
a. Surface:
1) Is there any surface water body on or in the
immediate vicinity of the site (including year-
round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes,
ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and
provide names. If appropriate, state what
stream or river it flows into. rlv
• •
2) Will the project require any work over, in, or
adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described
waters? If yes, please describe and attach
available plans. tjd
3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material
that would be placed in or removed from surface
water or wetlands and indicate the area of the
site that would be affected. Indicate the
source of filll material .?j,wa
4) Will the proposal require surface water
withdrawals or diversions? Give general
description, purpose, and approximate quan-
tities, if known.
5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year
floodplain? If so, note location on the site
plan. No
6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of
waste materials to surface waters? If so,
describe the type of ,waste and anticipated
volume of discharge. N o
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
• •
b. Ground:
1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be
discharged to ground water? Give general
description, purpose, and approximate quan-
tities, if known. NI
2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged
into the ground from septic tanks or other sour-
ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage;
industrial, containing the following
chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the
general size of the system, the number of such
systems, the number of houses to be served (if
applicable), or the number of animals or humans
the system(s) are expected to MA -c,
c. Water Runoff (including storm water):
1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm
water) and method of collection and disposal, if
any (include quantities, if known). Where will
this water. flow? Will this water flow into
other waters? If so, describe. Isle. ' 0.r
will be coJett_ct b c(:$y. T4.et-e L
S.CCI o' be.c4ertktn -&Q
p.'; o )a w C bV k(Aei&
amu:."/ . se
-7-
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
•
2) Could waste materials. enter ground or surface
waters? If so, generally describe. bdv
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface,
ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: NIA—OP
4. Plants
a. Check .or circle types of vegetation found on the
site:
deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other
_ evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other
shrubs
grass
_ pasture
_ crop or grain
wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush,
skunk cabbage, other
water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other
other types of vegetation
b. What kind and ount of vegetation will be removed
or altered?
c. List threatened or endan eyed species known to be on
or near the site. ov`c
-8-
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
d.
•
410 Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other
measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the
site, if any: IQ A.e
5. Animals
a. Circle any birds and animals which have been
observed on or near the site or are known to be on
or near the site:
birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other:
mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other:
rJ o rte
fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish,
other: Nome
b. List any threatened or endangered species known to
be on or near the site. N30,A.e
c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so,,
explain. tQo
d. Proposed measures 'to preserve or enhance wildlife,
if any: Nowt
-9-
•
6. Energy and Natural Resources
• Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil,
wood stove, solor) will be used to meet the
completed project's energy needs? Describe whether
it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc.
Por �v� �,n �;s ylsers
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar
energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally
describe. 1\1c
c. What kinds of energy conservation features are
included in the plans of this proposal? List other
proposed measures to reduce or control my
impacts, if any: 3 M �,k„ "k4 010010?-4-w�s ko
%° war./
7. Environmental Health
a. Are there any environmental health hazards,
including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire
and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could
occur as a result of this proposal? If so,
describe. Nip
1) Describe special emergency services that might
be required. Ijo-
2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ-
mental health hazards, if any: r-3
-10-
•
b. Noise
• Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
1) What types of noise exist in the area which may
affect your project (for example: traffic,
equipment, operation, other)?_fl;,: ,,,Alr.A121
2) What types and levels of noise would be created
by or associated with the project on a short-
term or a long-term basis (for example: traf-
fic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate
what hours
noise would come from the site.
r"-\- 4,erkm. c -E- ow
Me.1/413(—A "P 3o.
3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise
impacts, if any: v,„e �1o,Jf_
d%v r Vl o r u.� . \ p w u.. �O v ,
g /*,n1 _gyp M — F.
8. Land and Shoreline Use
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent
properties? tvaJs.' 0.1
b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so,
describe. No
c. Describe any structures on the site. 1�1axe Lo.ise
-11-
Evaluation for
• • Agency Use Only
d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what?_
Nd
e. What is the current zoning classification of the
site?
f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation
of the site? \ v‘d,„5-ve. a,l
If applicable, what is the current shoreline master
program designation of the site? N/ A
h. Has any part of the site been classified as an
"environmentally sensitive” area? If so, specify.
NJo
i. Approximately how many people would reside or work
in the completed project? S
Approximately how many people would the completed,
project displace? Nov\e-
k. Proposed measures to void or reduce displacement
impacts, if any: t,J
1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com-
patible with existing and projected land uses and
plans, if any: Heft: ca-4;oin off-- C;4-y-412rw-`
-12-
•
9. Housing
• Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if
any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income
housing? 1\-10.ne
b.. Approximately how many units, if -any, would be eli-
minated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-
income housing. (-10�e
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing
impacts, if any: Nope
10. Aesthetics
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed
structure(s), not including antennas; what is the
principal exterior building material(s) proposed?
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be
altered or obstructed? No.'.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic
impacts; if any: Qa;,�l
-13-
•
11. Light and Glare
Evaluation for
• Agency Use Only
a. What .type of light or glare will the proposal
produce? What time of day would it mainly occur?
N0 aC\ct-; t;Cu1a yACd t1n+5
-rill IA
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a
safety hazard or interfere with views? iJo
c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may
affect your proposal?
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and
glare impacts, if any: Niov.e
12. Recreation
a. What designed and informal recreationaloppor-
tunities are in the immediate vicinity? p.lorke
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing
recreational uses? If so, describe. t.lo
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on
recreation, including recreation opportunities to be
provided by the project or applicant, if any: 'Joke
-14-
•
• Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
13. Historic and Cultural Preservation
a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro-
posed for, national, state, or local preservation
registers known to be on or next to the site? If
so, generally describe.
b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of
historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural
importance known to be on or next to the site.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if
any: .J o
14. Transportation
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the
site, and describe proposed accss to -the existing
street system. Show on site plans, if any.
o.ccAss -Eo ck--.doj er f ur k tomes -1-
b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If
not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest
transit stop? 1 r.;ke_
c. How many parking spaces would the completed project
have? How many would the project eliminate? 'o
LA,c. e
-15-
Evaluation for
:, • Agency Use Only
d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets,
or improvements to existingroads or streets, not
including driveways? If so, generally describe
(indicate whether public or private). N o
e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate
vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation?. If
so, generally describe. ___LI o
f. How many vehicular trips per .day would be generated
by the completed project? If known, indicate when
peak volumes would occur. I)ohe
Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor-
tation impacts, if any: rloA
15. Public Services
a. Would the project result in an increased need for
public services (for example: fire protection,
police protection, health care, schools, other)? If_
so, generally describe. 11c,
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct
impacts on public services, if any.
-16-
16. Utilities
a. Circle utilities
e ephone
• Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
ntly available t the ate:
natural •as,, 412.1%, efuse servici,
ani ary sew r, septic system, other.
b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the
project, the utility providing the service, and the
general construction activities on the site or in
the immediate vicinity which might be needed.
C 4-y 04-7J'L �J• l(� Sz �J Z ` i �./ Cz cka.k A
C. Signature
The above answers are true and complete to the best of
my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is
relying on them to make its decision.
Signature:
Date Submitted: S -3- 95—
PLEASE CONTINUE TO THE NEXT PAGE.
-17-
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLIC T
D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS
• Evaluation for-
Agency
or-Agency Use Only
(do not use this sheet for project actions)
Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful
to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of
the environment.
When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the
proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from
the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity.
or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not imple-
mented. Respond briefly and in general terms.
1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge
to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or
release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production
of noise? -77 r -12-,r'siLi',tI.. /a.J /WA./ v�O1� r'aale c%
C. Pi/ I re ;cL , 'J?`C r'erkOA
HOale tier 1 v2_Por neCd,aer't/ L f /
/'ez(uc v r4,'r ,4,1 ss, 0,45
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are:
145 -4 1/ S 7e // ue eo' recovery
2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, ani-
mals, fish, or marine life? /Vo ,',,19 ;n efreA 40
Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, ani-
mals, fish, or marine life are: No,te—
PaiPd 4rPa .
-18-
•
Evaluation for
• Agency Use Only
3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or
natural resources? 1),w— ,/4- -alien lie use of
petroleuw,, -4,r "de l,,✓e/y rie h;.cleS.
Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and
natural resourses are: Prjc.-I- "-Aria/ rP_S�vr(PS
dy I‘it SIAiI,•,q c1o46le L. I,
4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect
environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or
eligible or under study) for governmental protection;
such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers,
threatened, or endangered species habitat, historic or
cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime
farmlands? /v one — ;-,o ..wPacf
Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid
or reduce impacts .are: "Jed- pp /,' cab IP
5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and
shoreline use, inclduing whether it would allow or
encourage land -or shoreline uses incompatible with
existing plans? A,ln.I- .4pp). (c (Ie
-19-
0 Evaluation for
Agency Use OnTy
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land
NJ4
use impacts area:
How does the proposal conform to the Tukwila Shoreline
Master Plan?
6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on
transportation or public services and utilities?l
AIorie --no c-(ct.4'e r M 0140,(-44;41
Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s)
are: Ncte. — A)%
7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict
with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for
the protection of the environment. p. - !fire
1,p r o C o ( o -ft er ► e7 ; rec.c2vrfs
f I045-/ AO bit 'S Q..f; Cr Pak
-20-
•410
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
8. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila
Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli-
cies of the Plan? Alo
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s)
N�A
are:
-21-
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT Evaluation for
. • Agency Use Only
E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON PROJECT
PROPOSALS.
The -objectives and the alternative means of reaching the
objectives for a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the
aforegoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This
information provides a general overall perspective of the
proposed action in the context of the environmental infor-
mation provided and the submitted plans, documents, suppor-
tive information, studies, etc.
1. What are the objectives) of the proposal? 1Jpgrae/e
5/ �/e 14141i -{11.21k Gu 11,,.ble
c�«/! - "ank- aka °'P1•, 4:4 ; etsin) a caves
2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these
objectives? N one
3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the
preferred course of action: /VO4- ar pl,'ca 6/P .
-22-
• •
4. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila
-Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli-
cies of the Plan? V
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s)
AJ
are:
-23-
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
United Parcel Service 4455 7th Ave., S., Seattle, WA 98108
(206) 767-9700
April 11, 1995
Mr. John Jimerson
City of Tukwila
Department of Community Development
63 South Center Blvd.
Tukwila, Washington 98188
RE: Request for determination of SEPA
Dear Mr. Jimerson,
RECEIVED
Mni 1 1995
COMMUNl FY
DEVELOPMENT
We would like to upgrade our fueling facility located at 550 Andover Park West: Our existing system has one
steel underground storage tank (UST), we intend to upgrade this to a 12,000 gallon double wall fiberglass tank
complete with dispenser containment, water tight turbine enclosure, overfill and spill prevention manholes, interstitial
monitor, in tank leak detect monitor, piping sump leak detector, Stage I and Stage II vapor recovery, a canopy and
drains that lead to the Sanitary Sewer after an oil water separator. These improvements will help us upgrade our
existing system to a state -of -the art system in full compliance with new UST Regulations. We would like to proceed at
your earliest convenience. We are currently in process of pursuing permits from the Building Department, Public
Works, Planning Department, DOE, and PSAPCA.
We have enclosed a copy of the City of Tumwater's (a virtually identical situation to ours here in Tukwila)
determination of non significance to assist you in your efforts. We appreciate your help in this matter, if we can be of
further assistance feel free to call me at 206-621-6233, or Dan Brandes at 206-621-6228.
Sincerely,
Andrew R. Watson
District PE Manager
enclosure: UST Drawings
City of Tumwater's statement
• I?I1.\1.1 1111A11 S.\\'.
11 \I\\':\ 11 R. \\':\ `4N;01
;;-1..1126
n. .111 1
.• -;.i I2J
t II
\I `\li'.I` 1 I:\ 1 •'I:
\I I.`G\l l'
•. • \'. 1:1 sot lit 1 `
:00 ;;.1..1110
• ` 1',t 1 1`I:l'\I:1\11-\1'
:`:I::: 1 ICI:\::1:
:OP ; 1:1 •: . 1'• `1.1, I 1 `1 1. i :1%;
;
:1
1\11'1'1(;18\'1'1 1)1)14:'1'I4:IZ1111Nik'I'I()N._.()14' N(:)N.SI(14N114I('r\N<'f,
\1h.hinl,lnn. 1 (lmintnnilc.
. `•,1••11'`:111
ISI\11,`1'\11'.1
I' \I.1:' :. 111. I:1 \ 111 •'.
206'7;.1 4l$'
•
1,1 \ I I • \ I I SI I(\ I; I
ISI 11. •1".11'.1 1 t+1:1`.11 III`.. •
21`6' 7 i4••11 ; It
110h 1,1 I'. \I( 1
206.75.1.4190
•.11•;11 11.\l.; 0I 1•1
Description of Proposal: Replacement cif a 7,500 gallon underground gasoline storage lank
with a new 12,000 gallon tank. along with the consl.ruc.tion of a canopy over existing fuel island.
Proponent:
1111ited Parcel Service
73183 New 1Vlarket; Street. SW
'.Puntwat.er WA 985 12
Location of Proposal: 7383 New Market. Street. SW,'I'untwater, 1VA. A portion of NW 1/4 of
NE 1/4 of Section 10, 'I'1.7N, R•2WWM, Thurston County, WA.
Lead Auencv:
of'I'un1\vater
Development. Services 1)eparl.tnenl,
12 710 1 oe'1iOo
The lead agency .for this proposal has determined that it does not. have a probable significant
adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact. Statement (147,.15) is not required
under RCW 43.21.C.030(2)(c). '.Phis decision was made after review of a completed environmental
checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the
public upon request.
Conditions a£ Approval for Mitigating l nvirontnetital Impacts:
1. 'l.'he applicant will need to provide documentation from the Department of Ecology
that no leaks or spills have occurred as a result of the existing tank. .1f leaks or
spills have occurred, additional mitigation will be required to address cleanup.
2. The project is hound by the conditions of approval of 1.11e final formal site plan review
letter.
This Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance is issued under WAC 197-1.1-350; the lead
agency will not act on this proposal for 15 clays from the date below. Comments must: be
submitted pn or before 5:00pm by November 18, 1994.
Date: November 3, 1991
MITIGATED DETERMINA'T'ION OFNONSIGNII+ICANCI
United Parcel Service
Page 2
Responsible Official: Michael P. Davolio, AICP, Director
Development Services Department
Addres�s: 555 Israel Road SW, '.Cumwater WA 98501
Phone: 754-4180
nvironmeftal Review Officer:
Signature:
Michael P. Davolio, AICP, Director
1)eve'opinem t Services De )arl.ment
4
Appeal of this MDNS must be made to the Tuinwater Hearing Examiner
along with a filing fee of $175 by November 28, 1994.
C:\W INDATA\M ISC\DNS\UPS.MDN
7
)
.X.. ;,( 1
}.
U
O
>:
IELJ
ASPHALT: 4" ATB,
2" CLASS B, 6-5/8"
MINUS CRUSHED ROCK
A3
SEE DETAIL
FACILITY
8" CONCRETE
BAR REINFORCED
r 0
0 0
0
0
C
EMERGENCY
SHUT OFF
DETAIL: EXISTING FUEL ISLAND NOT TO SCALE
NOTES:
I. NEW FUEL ISLAND TO GO N EXISTING LOCATION.
2. ALL EXISTING COMPONENTS TO BE REMOVED
AND REPLACED WITH NEW.
3. SANITARY SEWER CURRENTLY RUNS UNDER TI -E
EXISTING FUEL ISLAND, THIS WILL BE USED FOR NEW
TIE N.
4. NEW ASPHALT SECTION 6" - 5/8" CRUSHED, 4" - ATB,
2" - CLASS B. CONCRETE 8" (#5 BAR 2' - o.c.)
5. NEW FUEL ISLAND TO HAVE 30' BY 36' CANOPY WITH
DRAN AND 01 WATER SEPARATOR WHICH GOES TO SS.
6. OL WATER SEPARATOR - UTLITY VAULT 3 BAFFLE, 577.
•
•
919
u6i 2 Undmd 9erea1 Same
HIND KENT. FUEL ISLAND
RO▪ RK NEITIOI ECM KV MEM. MR,
042119 11M160. Off ItOff• 1176U2
▪ CIIIPINT ER MY MIT 1.0". PTO OS.
CM 1.0•41134 WOW MI. TO
0.06 011.0 fr MT NIP= NIKI/r
karlD,1.530d .1601111.
UPGRADE II
no KENT - 01
•
E0i
GON Cis
pP
F�� JPO�
N
JENi
OpI.
IZ 000
TANK
D
ROOD G
fjOiRPIPOON AGLAS tNNE OI Psi N
• SUGOrjOpR
CO C
FLC,X JACK
vITP
4`
\ I
ON iTs � he _ /
q -d/
.0
CO'\\ visPENs
ER 15,PNO
•
•
e Is micV®c
ISOMETRIC PIPING DIAGRAM L' Unapt PoredSams
WT TO SCALE
NOTE: SLOPE ALL PIPING 00VN TO TAMC o 1/8' PER FT. AIN
OSI•1911 (11 /Mr Mal .007. DIM CM -
WIZ PFTION071.11.0 110112.
MAN A11.91.10,100192 IMISL OWL
izike GAL IST INSTALLATION
LAYOUT PLANS 8 PIPING DIAGRAA
I SIBA PUAP. 2 GAS 0ISP
I "-• AS SHOVN
NO. KENT -02
_J
%II
CORNER OETAIL
ITYPICALI
CONSTRUCTION .JOINT
ITYPICALI
37-0 1/2' XERXES
(36'-3'1
I f 10025 1
NOTES: I- SET ALL TANK MANHOLES 2 1/2- (021) ABOVE ADJACENT
TOP OF CONCRETE SLAB
2- SLOPE ALL PAVING AVAY FROM CONCRETE ISLAND PAVING
SLAB - AREA DRAIN CONNECTED TO OIL/VATER SEPARATOR
AUST NOT INTERCEPT STORAVATER RUN-OFF FROM AREAS
OTHER THAN CONCRETE ISLAND PAVING SLAB
3- SLOPE TOP OF ISLAND AVAY FROM DISPENSER BASE. SET
DISPENSER BASE LEVEL
ISLAND LAYOUT PLAN
SCALE : I/4- =
DIMENSIONS SI -DVN FOR XERXES TANK
OVENS -CORNING DIMENSIONS IN PARENTHESIS
0/V
SEPARATOR
NEI
=NM 1.1149I MIDI KR NSLIMEN lx016.
03039 70013150 P.M IO 10.9.6
61.0. IMNSI rg CIF
00E NW .13•1001C010.0) DOI. TO
MIR OR 10 WC Ir FON WI PA=
MITIO.P.0510 1M119 ARO. Ph.
8' GATE VALVE
(TO
SS
1
•
•
I 1.
WMP K=M
unix Ford Saw=
2200 GAL UST 0 STALLATIW
LAYOJi PLANS
1 S.BA RIM. 2 GAS DISP
"• AS SHOWN
No KENT - 03
.' 1
.SWALE• TO' DRAIN
_
I' �°
= a
N
e025
�
20
CJ
o
UI
TURBINE FIII.OSAE
O
I-
UI
O O o
RVENT/VAPOR ELI_ OH
A CRAIN
...."'......)
I
CJ
'
(
00 SLOPE
. 0
e
0
REMOTE
DISPENSER
REMOTE
DISPENSER
H
u
•
UI
- -
m
N
CONTROL JOINT
Til,
VI
\ J
,,,_
O
O
110025
I
110025 L
kms/
15'-0'
13--0'
13-0'
10'-0
,
14.-0
1
ISLAND
41.-0-
NOTES: I- SET ALL TANK MANHOLES 2 1/2- (021) ABOVE ADJACENT
TOP OF CONCRETE SLAB
2- SLOPE ALL PAVING AVAY FROM CONCRETE ISLAND PAVING
SLAB - AREA DRAIN CONNECTED TO OIL/VATER SEPARATOR
AUST NOT INTERCEPT STORAVATER RUN-OFF FROM AREAS
OTHER THAN CONCRETE ISLAND PAVING SLAB
3- SLOPE TOP OF ISLAND AVAY FROM DISPENSER BASE. SET
DISPENSER BASE LEVEL
ISLAND LAYOUT PLAN
SCALE : I/4- =
DIMENSIONS SI -DVN FOR XERXES TANK
OVENS -CORNING DIMENSIONS IN PARENTHESIS
0/V
SEPARATOR
NEI
=NM 1.1149I MIDI KR NSLIMEN lx016.
03039 70013150 P.M IO 10.9.6
61.0. IMNSI rg CIF
00E NW .13•1001C010.0) DOI. TO
MIR OR 10 WC Ir FON WI PA=
MITIO.P.0510 1M119 ARO. Ph.
8' GATE VALVE
(TO
SS
1
•
•
I 1.
WMP K=M
unix Ford Saw=
2200 GAL UST 0 STALLATIW
LAYOJi PLANS
1 S.BA RIM. 2 GAS DISP
"• AS SHOWN
No KENT - 03
111 3/4' TO FUEL FACILITY CONSOLE (DISPENSER)
(1) 3/4- SPARE
II) 3/4' TO FUEL FACILITY CONSOLE (LIGHTING)
(I) 3/4' TO MONITORING CONSOLE
(I) 3/4' TO FUEL FACILITY CONSOLE (SUBMERSIBLE)
FACILITY
STIR IP AT BUILDING
•
3 - 0' PVC CONDUIT FOR SPARE. 50 FOOT RUN
1 - 2' STEEL SCHEDULE 40 GAS LINE FUTURE. 50 FOOT RW
CONDUIT LAYOUT PLAN
SCALE 1/4'=1-0'
NOTE : RUN 3/4' CONDUIT FROM FUELING
FACILITY CONSOLE TO EMERGENCY
SI -UT OFF LOCATED NEAR DISPENSER
ISLAND
Off
M. 121.71. MUMS SALM. MIER CM.
0•21110. IMMIM RPM *MM.
MM OMMIDS 101...
1.4.135. SMIZE
•
I13 UST REVISXXS
u
Uwdsd Pmr:A Same.
12.E GAL UST NSTALLATIW
' ELECTRICAL CONDUIT
I SIBA PUMP. 2 GAS DISP
AS S-OAN
I®. I ..m
CNC, KENT - 04
L•
SEAL EDGES WITH
LIOUD ASPHALT
ASPHALT
PATCH
EEDONG
= MN 24. FOR PIPE 12 OR LESS
= MN 42, 00. 0100 PPE > Tr
ExSTNG PAVEMENT
BASE COURSE OF COMPACTED
CRUSHED ROCK VSDOT 9-309(3)
BACKFLL TRENCH MTH IMPORTED BANK RUN
OR NATIVE SOL MEETING WSDOT 9-030
SPECIFICATIONS
SEE NOTE 1 FOR TRENCH SCE SLOPE
BED PPE IN CLEAN WELL GRADED
SAN) OR 548"-CRuSJ-ED SURFACING
MEETING WSDOTAPwAM 9-039 01
VERFY BEDDING UNFORmLY SUPPORTS
NOTES PFE BELOW OPRNGLIsE PRIOR TO COVERNG
TRENCH sOF 01 OPEC 01-1011 OF DFT.M'of s -k -n RI. CONTRACTOR N ACCORDANCE WITH CONDIT-DNS ENCOUNTERED
AND APPuCABLE OSHA. STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS PROVOE 9-10RNG AS NEEDED TO PROTECT ADJACENT
STRUCTURES PAVEMENT AND EXISTING UTUTES FROM DAMAGE DUE TO POTENTIAL SLOUGHING
2 REMOVE ALL LOOSE. WET NM/ ORGANIC SOLS FROM BOTTOM OF TRENCH PRYOR TO PLACING BEDONG BEDDNG
SHALL CONSIST OF CLEAN SANDY GRAVEL MEETING REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 9-030 WSDOT,APWA STANDARD
SPECFCATIONS
3 BACKFLL MORE THAN 2 FEET BELOW PAVEMENT SHALL EE COMPACTED TO AT LEAST 90 PERCENT OF mAxmum
mCOFED PROCTOR DENSITY cASTM D 1557). BACKFLL WITHIN 2 FEET OF THE PAVEMENT SHALL BE AT LEAST
05 PERCENT OF MAXIMUA MOOFED PROCTOR DENSITY
4 PATCH PAVEMENT MTH PAMAUM r CLASS B HOT MX ASPHALT OVER 6- COMPACTED CRUSI-ED ROCK. CR MATO-1
ExISTNG PAVEMENT SECI1ON, WHO -EVER IS GREATER
5 PLACE BACKFLL AND FLL MATERIALS N LA fERS NOT MORE
THAN r N LOOSE DEPTH FOR MATERIAL COMPACTED BY HEAVY
COMPACTION EQUIPMENT. AND NOT MORE THAN 4- IN LOOSE DEPTH
FOR MATERIAL COMPACTED BY HAND -OPERATED TAMPERS
TYPICAL BACKFILL AND SURFACE REPAIR
NOT TO SCALE
1750. COVER
36•SO DIAMOND
PLATE DOOR
R -SO. COVER
INLET
GMT RETAINER
wER
API APPROVED 014/ATER SEPARATOR WITH 333 GPM k
30 80N RETENTION TGE PAVAN. SUCH AS UTLITY VAULT
MODEL 577-S
7
OIL/WATER SEPARATOR
NOT TO SCALE
opera. KR
COCOS IP 1.19,721 1113113 1,1 rep.,
=MCI 13. M•11.1 Ot OW
MAC MI MIMI. 0.11.1,0131112
MOS Oi 1.01 Mt NW{ KR(11i1.[
INTIEM •15•01011r .119M12,
•
•
IP I 93 1.61 FEVISCAIS
144,44,.
i157
VOW
NECISID
Unntad Pareal Same
TRENcri AND 01L VATER EETAIL
1—
05 5(909(4
cNG.
NO KENT - 05 -
•
I . oe ca. .p ;d 3Mort,
^�I a
1.013.1110.0 0110010 .111•II
- l
a q uBl[.O-a( of ai
W `IOx19
,T5 10x10.1/4
TYPICAL 4 PLACES
L ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM TO Tti "MNMJ4 STANDARDS OF :THE UNFORM BUILDING
CODE. 1991 EDITION.
2. DESIGN LOADS':
4 WS)LOW D 80 MPH, EXPOSUREC
`. SEISMIC 'ZONE 3
3. FOU D}ATIONt ''.
7 SOL TYPE: , SAND SLTY SAND, CLAYEY SAND, SLTY GRAVEL OR
I ,, CLAYEY GRAVEL '
FOUNDATION: SPREAD FOOTNGS OF' NATURAL OR COMPACTED SOL.
yy k DESIGN BEARNG VALUE = 1500 PSF'MAX
4. Tlf OWNER/GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL' VERFY THAT THE SOL IS CAPABLE OF
SUPPORTNG THE INTENDED LOADS. ALL CONCRETE MUST BE PLACED )PON UNDIS-
TURBED COMPACT
DISTURBED.COMPACT NATURAL SOL AR APPROVED FLL COMPACTED TO 957.. OF MAXIMUM
NSITY. ALL BACKFLL ADJACENT TO FOOTNGS SHALL BE PLACED N 8"'LFTS
COMPACTED TO 957. OF MAXM0.MA DENSITY.
5. TE SHALL HAVE'A MNJM0.)M STRENGTH AT 28. DAYS OF 3000 PS
(bESI,N 2500 PSI) BUT SHALL HAVE I0 LESS THAN SX `(6) SACKS OF TYPE
HENT PER. YARD. SLUMP TO BE 4" PLUS' OR MINUS i.'"MAXMLIM AGGREGATE SZE
LL BE 1-1/2". ALL RENFORCNG BARS, ANCHOR BOLTS AND NSERTS SHALL BE .
L SECURED N POSITION PRIOR. TO PLACING CONCRETE. ALL .CONCRETE SHALL BE
),
CAMCALLY VIBRATED.6: L REPFORCNG SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM ;A615,`GRADE 60 AND SHALL'BE PLACED
CONFORMANCE WITH ACI 318-89 AND TFE.MANUAL OF STANDARD PRACTICE
EtYCPS ..:..
7 :0.i .STRUCTURAL STEEL SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A-36. SOUARE STEEL TUBES SHALL
QONFORM TO ASTM A500, GRADE 8. ALL BOLTS SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A-307. ALL.
NI/EL NG TO. BE PER UBC STANDARD: 27-6 USING E70XX ELECTRODES.
8:: T) -E ROOF, DECK SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A446 GRADE 8 AND. SHALL BE 20 GAGE:WITH.
TI -E FOLLOWNG PROPERTES: +S=.410,. -S=.288; "+1=.914 AND -1=.420
P,TTACHMENTS SHALL BE WITH; PO TEL( SCREWS. AT 4'-O ON CENTERa
.. - (4) 9/4' DIA. BOLTS•
:
L W2. K H/2 x V8 x 4-V2'
DECK CLP, ALTERNATE 50E5
BEAM TO BEAM GONNEGTION
5cde 9/4' • (-0'
n : (3) *4"GL05ED,HOOP
TE5 WITH CENTER
GRO55 TES,
(8) •r5 VERTICAL
F-`— (4) .a4 GL05ED HOOP
5C]R TES w:12'. OL.. • ..
1.2`x2".x 15 ga.
Exp. ES SEPT' 4)f
7. 14 this Ire is not to scale,
drtn ng: is reduced Do not scale.
DATE: 4/19/95
REVI510N5: `
UNITE! PARCEL SERVICE PROJEGT No:
X 36'—O" CANOPY- 615187
KENT_, WASHB'IGTON SHEET.