The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSEPA E95-0014 - EAGLE HARDWARE - OFFICE DEMOLITION AND STORAGE / GREENHOUSE CONSTRUCTIONEAGLE HARDWARE & GARDEN DEMOLISH OFFICE & CONSTRUCT STORAGE & GREENHOUSE SPACE 101 ANDOVER PARK EAST E95-0014 OCT -31-1995 09 38 FROM SCONZO / HALLSTROM • 1 10 � el2001 Western Avenue BXARREN553 Marker Race One INCORPORATEDSearle. Washingron 98121 TO 4313665 P.02/07 MEMORANDUM Tel: 2061448-4200 Fax:206/728-5608 DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: 'October 30, 1995 Hallstrom Jim Madsaac ?On- John Eagle Hardwar Garden - Tukwila Store Modification RECEIVED OCT 311995 TUKWILA PUBLIC WORKS Proposed Modification Eagle Hardware & Garden is proposing to remove the 22,000 sf office building at the north side of its Tukwila store, and reuse the space for a drive -that lumber yard. There will also be some shifts of mezzanine floor areas, and a 4,200 sf expansion of the garden department. The office space had been used for Eagle's corporate administration, which has recently moved to an off-sitc office building. A large portion of the 43,000 sf covered lumber yard floor area will be used for vehicle circulatiun. The row of parking along the north cdgc of the site between the two driveways will be reoriented to parallel the street alignment; and the westerly driveway would be widened to 35 feet to better accommodate two-way (in/out) truck and traffic turning movements - Effect on Site Traffic Generation The combined effective new retail space gained from the store modification would be slightly greater than the office space removed (5,700 sf garden and mezzanine expansion, and about 18,000 sf effective lumber yard expansion). The space used for the lumber yard is expected to have a traf- fic generation rate of less than half that exhibited for the original overall site retail operations. Trip Generation Comparison: Site Use Floor Area (sf) AWDT PM Pk Hr Office (Removal) 22,000 Trip Gen Rates 24.6* 3.4* Trip Generation Eagle Store Trip Gen Rates 41.9" Garden & Mezzanine 5,700 240 Lumber Expansion 18,000 380 Trip Generation 620 540 75 RECEIVED 3.2** 20 30 50 Net Change 1,700 +80 -25 Per ITE Tip Generation, 5th Edition. ^ Rates for Eagle stores found from a 1993 surrey of three sites, induding the Tukwila sure; half of these rates applied to the lumber expansion. OCT 311995 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Xaw a Warren, Inc.. 10l30R5 \i wm‘e.a-tuk.doc OCT -30-1995 18:51 K&W/JWM Home Ofc 95% P. 02 OCT -31-1995 09:38 FROM SCONZO / HALLSTROM John Halloran Eagle Hardware & Garden - Tukwila Store Modification October 30, 1995 TO • 4313665 P:03/07 Page 2 Average weekday site traffic generation would increase slightly; however, PM peak hour traffic would decrease slightly. The proposed site modification is therefore estimated to have a negligible impact on overall vicinity and driveway traffic volumes. Driveway Traffic Counts/Operations The City of Tukwila Public Works Department requested traffic counts and accident analyses be conducted for the two site driveways along Tukwila Parkway. Traffic counts were collected on Friday October 20, 1995 between 2 and 6 pm; the combined intersection traffic volumes peaked between 4:15 and 5:15 pm. The peak hour summaries are attached for the two driveway intersec- tions. During the PM peak hour, 149 vehicle trips turned into and out of the site (83 in/66 out). About 90% of this trip activity occurred at the easterly driveway; 10% at the westerly driveway. About 90% of the inbound site trips approached from the west, right -turning into the site; 10% approached from thc cast. left -turning into the site. Of the site exiting trips, 63% turned left out of the site onto Tukwila Parkway westbound, and 37% turned right onto Tukwila Parkway. Because of a relatively heavy eastbound -to -southbound right -turn movement at the Tulwila/ Ando- ver intersection, the eastbound curb lane traffic queues often'back up past the easterly Eagle driveway. However, the drivers tend to leave a gap to allow left -turning traffic to exit the site. This creates a somewhat hazardous condition as exiting vehicles move through the inner eastbound thru traffic lane into the center refuge lane. In fact, as the traffic counts were being collected, a mi- nor accident occurred -- with a left -turning exiting vehicle being struck by a vehicle approaching thc shorter signal traffic queue in the inner thru lane. Traffic Accidents Public Works staff made a valiant attempt to summarize accident history at the two Eagle drive- ways and at the nearby Tukwila/Andover intersection. Unfortunately, thc accident coding does not allow pinpointing accidents between public street intersections -- they are merged with accidents at the nearby public street intersection. The accident report that was obtained is attached. Over the three+ years of accident search, 12 accidents were found for the Tukwila/Andover inter- section, including any accidents that may have occurred at the three Eagle driveways near the intersection, and including any accidents associated with driveways on the east side of Andover Park East. Simple diagrams were prepared for each incident on thc attachment; however, it is diffi- cult to determine which accidents were intersection related versus nearby driveway related. Accident #2 likely occurred at an Eagle driveway, and is in fact similar to the accident described above during the count period. Accidents 6 and 1 1 had to occur along Andover Park East south of Tukwila Parkway. Accidents 4, 7, 10 and 12 likely occurred during the permissive phase of the east -to -south left -turn movement at the Tukwila/Andover intersection, but could also occur at the Eagle driveways. Accidents #2 and 8 could have occurred anywhere, and arc unmitigatiblc. Kato & Wanen, Inc. - 1 013OJ9S kiwm cogl-tuk.doc KATO &WARREN r.coarua•Tio OCT -30-1995 18:52 K&W'JWM Home Ofc 95% P.03 OCT -31-1995 09:39 FROM SCONZO / HALLSTROM John Hallstront Eagle Hardware & Garden - Tukwila Srore Modification October 30, 1995 TO 4313665 P.04/07 • • Page 3 Mitigation Considerations Any change in site traffic generation resulting from the proposed site modification would be insig- nificant; no mitigation would be necessary or warranted. Likewise, the site modifications would not significantly change driveway operations; however, the lumber yard access may promote a slight shift from the east driveway to thc west driveway along Tukwila Parkway. This could be viewed as a positive impact, since any shift in access traffic would relocate such movements farther from the Tukwila/Andover intersection signal queues. Eagle may want to consider placement of a "Right Turn Only" sign at the east driveway exit to Tukwila Parkway. Left -turn exiting vehicles could alternatively be encouraged to circulate to the westerly driveway along the north face of the lumber yard. This movement at the easterly drive- way must yield to all other traffic movements, as well as penetrate thc signal queues from the Tukwila/ Andover intersection. Left -tum exit from the westerly driveway occurs upstream from the signal queues, and largely avoids any need to yield to left -turning site ingress tragic. This ac- tion, however, should be viewed as a potential voluntary action on the part of Eagle in considering the safety of its customers. It is not caused nor exacerbated as a result of the proposed site. modifi- cations. Kato & warren. Inc.- 10/30/9S \jwmkegbrurdoe KATO &WARREN INfa•sua•Ttn OCT -30-1995 18:53 KaW/JWM Home Ofc 95% P:04 QCT -31-1995 09:39 FROM SCONZO / HALLSTROM From : TRi9T I COUNT • TO 4313665 P.05/07 PHONE No. 206 491 1079 TRAPFICOUIT Site Code : TUEV1LA. VA. : EIRE NARDVA1E M.V. DRIVE s. : TUKM1lA'MVO Hayssen!' br: leaonderY Onird Oct. 20 1995 B: 56PM 1'87 PEAK PERIOD A1A1.11313 FOR THE PERIOD: 2:00 P1,- 640 P1 DIRECTION START PEAK MR VOLUM! PERCENTS FROM PEAK ROUR FACTOR TRUCK Right Thep Left Tote1 TRUCK Right Thru left 0.1.1MOWM .4111 Berth 4:13 P8 0.08 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 Ent 6:15 PN 0.17 11 0 771 0 773 - 0 1100 0 South 6:50 PA 0.63 1 1 0 9 10 - 10 0 90 Most 6:30.PM 1.97 3 11 601 0 612 - 2 91 0 Entire Intersection • 6:1$ PM 0.00 0 0 0 D 0 -. 0 0 0 0.17 11 0 773 0 771 - 0 8100 8 0.58 0 1 0 6 7 -. 11 0 86 0.95 6 6 391 0 608 - 1 99 0 A Eah South Vest (TRUCK] EA E MA'' ARE N. . -RYV N Wi 11 (TRUCK] PAGE: I FILE: Kf12016cP DATE; 10120195 TUKWILA PARKWAY 0 594 600 6 J cr4-1, (TRUCK] 6 r ..00T-31-1995 09:39 FROM SCONZO / HALLSTROM TO 4313665 P.06/07 • Frail . TRPFFI01P1T • pH € N .. : 226 491 1879 • Oct.20 1995 B:54PP1 PO4 1RAFFI000NT Site Cods i TUKWILAWC EAGLE HARDWARE M. DRIVE : TUAIILA ?AMWAY novenas D7: friar, PAGE 1 FILL: K1120363P DAT!: 10/20195 PEAK PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR TUE PERIOD: MO M - 6:DO Y DIRECTION START PEA ALUMS .. PERCENTS IRON PEAK NOUN FACTa OR 'TRUCK Right' Uri U1t lotol TRUCK Right Ttru Left .North ,1:16 PN - 0.00 0 0 ,. 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 Eat s:IS PN D.15 11 0 )36 6 766 - 15 E 61 South 2:00 PA 0.70 0 •39 0: IA 17 - SS W►t 6:30 POI . 0.96 2 76 525 0 603 - 18 , 01 0 Utirs Intersootion D 0 0• .0 0 - 0 D...__.0 11 0' 13A ' 6 716 - 0 99 1 0 23 0 36 0 - 39 , 0. 61 6 N 640 0 • 541. - 12 AA 0 North East South Rest 6:15 FM 0.00 LAS 0.12 0.91 'EAGLE HAROWA E N:' DR2V [TRUCK) w+E 11 [TRUCK]. IMINI111.11111111w TUKWILA PARKWAY 0 528 69 • 597 r 744 736 L 8 23 TUKWILA PARKWAY. 0 23' EAGLE HARDWARE,:N'.T)RIVE OCT -30-1995 19:54 K&LJ/JIJM Home Oft 0 [TRUCK] 95% P.06 M C1 5 0 0 3 n 0 cis :14F1.1 TLA<IIILA IR_6 PI.1 o Dm ra A nkeerIda /` & sf MitimLL Pi rk wcl -- Grele,n41 Direction lot Nus4 Vum PD0 Rep2rt 9 Date Day Tit0.e Type of Accident Veh 61 Veh 92 Veli Fat roj H&R f 9205175 06/04/92 Thr 1652 Rear End 9206994 97/29/92 Tue 1525 Right Angle 9209476 10/16/92 Fri 1515 Right Angle 9211566 12/19/92 Sat 1455 Right Angle 0 9330616 01/22/9] Fri 1220 Rear and 9301327 09/2)/9] Mon 15C3 Sideswipe 7 93.31446 09/27/9] Fri 1025 light Angle V 9309169 10/23/93 Sat 2026 Right Angle 9 9403461 94/21/94 Thr 1230 Rear 3nd /Q 9403676 04/27/94 Ifed Right Angle /I 9101540 09/23/94 Fri 1110 Sideswipe 12 9502101 03/01/95 tied 1943 Right Angle TOTAL S' • S S - pi 2 8 - p 1f S 2 1 6 - E 1I B 2 E • 9 1 • 2 B - 10. E 91 2 1 h - 9 17 - 5 2 E - S 11 - 9 2 11 - E 5 - W 2 1 S - 10 a- V 7 5 - 5 V - E • 2 11 - ti N - 97 2 5 - S 11 - 8 2 Rt AN .4-ui? IQM All& o -0 - •-s( Re r s 4449' tKA- Rr4o f 9 of Acc-12 0 3 0 TOTAL ?D) Acc.0 TOTAL H&R Ace -0 14' of 4),,t) dr; vetAta ce-IA.17s ner ivriersexiDfn u k i.,I a. Pk a►y raa� EA4GLE (TE R e4 R.-, shie— RtA A tit 711-itP ? of:4g% O n —1 W I- 1D lD tD I1 i[1 O 3 • O AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION ^ , elle' Qi nS hereby declare that: Notice of Public Hearing O Notice of Public Meeting LJ Board of Packet OBoard of Packet J Planning Packet Adjustment Agenda Appeals Agenda Commission Agenda fl Short Subdivision Agenda Packet fl Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit fJShoreline Management Permit ?].;_ - Determination of Non- ignificance Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice O Notice of Action Official Notice Other Other was mailed to each of the followin addresses on 7/7 /C1S q• -ed. eubl iCo\,--J-I'Dr1 cin Prc) ) S�,P� Ecol em (pp)i-GaA-t- Name of Project�l�� F- LYtht/C�l� - Signature • File Number EG5_(yQ I LI • SEPA-ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW SEC DEPT. OF ECOLOGY P 0 BOX 47703 .OLYMPIA WA 98504-7703 JOHN HALLSTROM 919 124TH AVE NE #101 BELLEVUE WA 98005 CHECKLIST: ENV ONMENTAL REVIEW/SHORELINEWRMIT MAILINGS FEDERAL AGENCIES ( )U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS ( )FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION" ( )DEPT. OF INTERIOR -FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE WASHINGTON ( )U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ( )U.S. DEPARTMENT OF H.U.D. (REGION X) STATE AGENCIES ( )OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY ( )TRANSPORTATION -DEPARTMENT_ _.___.... ( )DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES ( )OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR ( )DEPT. OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ( )DEPT. OF FISHERIES ( ( )K.C. ' PLANNING &COMMUNITY DEV. )BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD )FIRE DISTRICT #11 )FIRE DISTRICT #2 ( )SOUTH CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT ( )TUKWILA LIBRARIES ( )RENTON LIBRARY ( )KENT LIBRARY ( )CITY OF SEATTLE LIBRARY ( )US WEST ( )SEATTLE CITY LIGHT ( )WASHINGTON NATURAL GAS ( )WATER DISTRICT._#75 ( )SEATTLE WATER DEPARTMENT ( )GROUP W CABLE ( )OLYMPIA PIPELINE ( )KENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT ( )TUKWILA CITY DEPARTMENTS: ( )PUBLIC WORKS ( ) FIRE ( )POLICE ( )FINANCE ( )PLANNING ( )BUILDING ( )PARKS AND ORECREATION ( )TUKWILA MAYOR ( )DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL & HEALTH SERVICES ( )DEPT. OF ECOLOGY, SHORELANDS DIVISION (4)EPT. OF ECOLOGY, SEPA DIVISION* ( )DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE ( }OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL *SEND CHECKLIST WITH DETERMINATIONS AND *SEND SITE MAPS WITH DECISION KING COUNTY AGENCIES ( )KING COUNTY DEPT. OF PARKS ( )HEALTH DEPARTMENT ( )PORT OF SEATTLE ( )BUILDING & LAND DEV. DIV.- ' SEPA INFORMATION CENTER SCHOOLS/LIBRARIES ( )HIGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT ( )KING COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY ( )SEATTLE MUNICIPAL-REFERENCE:LIBRARY ( )SEATTLE SCHOOL DISTRICTS ( )RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT UTILITIES ( )PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT ( )VAL-VUE SEWER DISTRICT ( )WATER DISTRICT #20 • ( )WATER DISTRICT #125 ( )CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC WORKS ( )RAINIER VISTA ( )SKYWAY CITY AGENCIES ( )RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT ( )CITY'OFSEA-TAC ( )CITY OF SEATTLE ( )CITY'OF BURIEN ( )TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS ( )TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS OTHER LOCAL AGENCIES ( )PUGET SOUND REGIONAL COUNCIL ( )P.S. AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY ( )SW K.COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ( )MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE ( )DUWAMISH INDIAN TRIBE MEDIA ( )DAILY JOURNAL OF COMMERCE ( )VALLEY DAILY NEWS ( )METRO ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING DIV. OFFICE/INDUSTRIAL 5,000 GSF OR MORE RESIDENTIAL 50 UNITS OR MORE RETAIL 30,000 GSF OR MORE ( ) HIGHLINE TIMES ( )SEATTLE TIMES PUBLIC NOTICE MAILINGS FOR PERMITS SEPA MAILINGS Mail to: (comment period starts on date of mailing) Dept. of Ecology Environmental Review Section Applicant Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list) Include these documents: SEPA Determination (3 -part form from Sierra) Findings (staff report, usu. with MDNS) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) Affidavit of DIstribution (notice was mailed & sent to newspaper). SHORELINE MAILINGS Notice of Application: Notice of application for a substantial development Permit must be mailed to owners an__d to property owners within 300 feet of subject property, prepare an affidavit of publication, and publish two consecutive weeks with deadline for comments due 30 days after last newspaper publication date. Shoreline Permit: Mail to: (within 8 days of decision; 30 -day appeal period begins date received by DOE) Department of.ECology Shorelands Section State'Attorney General Applicant Indian Tribes Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list). Include these documents: Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (3 -part form from Sierra) Findings --(staff report, if applicable) Shoreline Application Form (filled out by applicant) Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) Site plan, with mean high water mark & improvements Cross-sections of site w/structures & shoreline Grading plan Vicinity map SEPA Determination (3 -part form from Sierra) Findings (staff report, usu. with MDNS) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Any background studies related to impacts on shoreline Notice of Application Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed & sent to newspaper) Affidavit of Publication (notice was published in newspaper). • CITY OF TUKWILA DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: DEMOLITION OF INTERIOR OFFICES; DEMOLITION OF ADJACENT BUILDING AND REPLACEMENT WITH NEW ADDITION; AND ENCLOSING VARIOUS AREAS OF EXISTING BUILDING RESULTING IN A NET INCREASE OF 2,347 S.F. OF GROSS BLDG. AREA. PROPONENT: JOHN HALSTROM LOCATION OF PROPOSAL, INCLUDING STREET ADDRESS, IF ANY: ADDRESS: 101 ANDOVER PK E PARCEL NO: 022300-0030 SEC/TWN/RNG: 23/23/04 LEAD AGENCY: CITY OF TUKWILA FILE NO: E95-0014 The City has determined that the proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21c.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. *************************************************************************** Thi determination is final and signed this -71-k day of L) 199` L5 Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official City of Tukwila, (206) 431-3680 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 You may appeal this determination to the City Clerk at City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 no later than 10 days from the above signature date by written appeal stating the basis of the appeal for specific factual objections. You may be required to bear some of the expenses for an appeal. Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the City Clerk and Department of Community Development. • CITY OF TUKWILA DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: DEMOLITION OF INTERIOR OFFICES; DEMOLITION OF ADJACENT BUILDING AND REPLACEMENT WITH NEW ADDITION; AND ENCLOSING VARIOUS AR� EA OF G :IEXISTING BUILDING RESULTINN, A NET 'I'NCREt� ASE -F 2:347 S. F . OF GROSS BLDG. AREA '' il '''-7\'s,:, PROPONENT: JOHN 'HAL'STROM "`` i ` �,,'/ , li -}� „ ‘.`'�$ ,: !4 N. r wl 1J ' LOCATION OF PROPaOSAL, `INCLUDING STREET' -ADDRESS, LIF!ANY: ADDRESS t. 101 -ANDOVER '' PK E ., E 4,2 PARCEL ANW 022300-0030 R. SEC/TWN/RNG': It23/23/0,4 4 .. ---;y ##111 r f, -Or '0 ‘.‘\ 1E;,a1. ,• 0 0 , /0 ? \'.1 o r::2' ; ( FILE NO 0 E9 5=_0:0,14 LEAD AGE.Fd'Y: r CITY OF TUKWILA . The City_fhas�determined that fthe pr:oposa idoes not have a prob'able'significant adverse impaon -the envikr onment..,,4An environment -al \;, impact s*tement (E,IS1-71sm-not requiredlu'.nder:� RCWJ 43.21c.030(2) (c) 4 This decirsionwas=;made after review of a completed environmental check l i‘stand .other- i of or ma.t(i on on, f i l'ek with the' lead agency - ,.This. i nformat tpnr� i s, ava;i l abl°e-" tto ithe 'public ori request 1/ jf (}} tr .r; •4, i. ' ' '''',,..„-4._ 0 `l '% _-� ,®�0' - 'e d .a i t; -✓-«. r rf 0 •********it"yi***rit i********k***t*Ai*****ykktk�'�khk*yk'`yt4f*�i4yk%ykiliik***�Ir**A**4!************* a�t 1 ,\ ., v ,r 1 w;.-". '------, This deter{m i nat�io.,n is final and s i gnedY tt),i's j' 4n -'` dayl)o1 199 S. .) k >> e 4 , ✓ j� t �lJ. • I `p+ 1^ Steve LancasteRespohsible Officia.l,:;-,c:', City of Tukwila'(206) 431-3680 6300 Southcenter Boulevard =,( Tukwila, WA 98188`;, - You may appeal this determ' i;na%i`onto—the—Cit`yC1=e;r"k at City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, TukwiylF�9:84-8 no''later than 10 days from the above signature date by written appeal stating the basis of the appeal for specific factual objections. You may be required to bear some of the expenses for an appeal. Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the City Clerk and Department of Community Development. Memorandum TO: Jack Pace FROM: John Jimerso RE: SEPA - Eagle Hardware Remodel DATE: July 5, 1995 Project File No. E95-0014 Project Description: The property is located at 101 Andover Park East. The proposal is to remodel the existing Eagle Hardware store. The remodel will result in a net increase of 2,347 square feet of floor area after demolition of a mezzanine, enclosing outdoor areas, demolition of the adjacent 22,000 square foot office building and replacing it with 18,520 square feet of storage area and an 8,400 square foot garden department. Agencies With Jurisdiction: None. Comments to SEPA Checklist: None. Summary of Primary Impacts: The site is substantially developed and the construction and operational changes will not result in any subtantial adverse environmental impacts. Summary of Proposed Mitigation: Erosion control will be provided as needed. Recommended Threshold Determination: Determination of Non -Significance. • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST ContreNo. Epic File No. E 95 - 001 Fee $ 325 Receipt No. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Eagle Hardware & Garden 2. Name of applicant: Sconzo/Hallstrom Architects 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 919 -124th Avenue NE #101 Bellevue WA 98005 John Hallstrom 455-3203 4. Date checklist prepared: 4/20/95 5. Agency requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Start construction upon issuance of permit, complete construction within 15U days. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared directly related to this proposal. An earlier Environmental Checklist was submitted when Eagle originally occupied the building. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No -2- RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA MAY 031JJ PERMIT CENTER • • 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. Building Permit 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized here. Demolish 22,000 sf office and construct 18,520 sf storage, 4,800 sf Greenhouse, an 4OOf FdeneD ar ment-addition . Demolish 12;400 st of ice mezzanine, construct 4 -,-2U0 sf storage mezzanine, enclose 8,400 sf Garden Department and 1,700 st loading dock. Construct 6,685 sf Customer1ading canopy, 600 st Exit Vestibule and 250 sf prance Vestibule. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica- tions related to this checklist. 101 Andover Park East 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? No 3- TO E. COMPLETED BY APPLIC• B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, of er • Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? Slope or parking area drainage c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Site was originally preloaded at time of building construction. Original soils were si:l.ty,'gravelly, cobbley sand. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti- ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. There will be some fill and gradinL required on the south and west sides of the building to bring these areas up to grade. Source of fill will be a local dirt contractor. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. No g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? +/-85% -4- • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Generally practiced erosion control methods would be implemented as required. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Normal construction vehicular emissions and dust can be expected during construction. Vehicular emissions atter construction will be traffic generated —f"rom the completed project which would remain consistent with existing emissions. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. Not to our knowledge. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: .Water will be used to control dust as required. 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year- round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No -5- • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would° be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None 4) Will the proposalrequire surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. No 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No -6- • b. Ground: • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 1) Will ground water be withdrawh, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. No 2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sour- ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Water runoff is now directed to existing storm water system. Minor adjustments may be required to existing system Tie relocation of catch basins, lowerfng/raisillg catch basins etc .T -7- • . Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Existing storm water system should controt water runoff. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: X deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other X shrubs X grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other — other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Some of the existing landscaping will be relocated to accomodate the building addition. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None -8- • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve gr enh_ance vegetation o the site, if any: Landscaping wilt be relocated new may be i rrs al l usi ny Tat-ive northwe-s-t-p1ant • -• with Cif Tukwila`s zoning coden-ts . 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: None mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other:. fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None -9- • 6. Energy and Natural Resources • Evaluation for Agency Use Only a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solor) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will b used fox. heating,manufacturing, etc. Current buildingeutilizesoel ectri city or powr and These will be rn dtfted t6 meet the newbuItd-irtg conf i yura L i urr. • • • • b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. Nn c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Project will be in accordance with the current Washington State Energy Code. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals,. risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. Some toxic chemicals are for sale and would be in small containers for domestic use. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Eagle has in force an -emergency action plan and first aid response program. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ- mental health hazards, if any: All materials are stored in the manufacturer's containers. -10- • b. Noise • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? None --- 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short- term or a long-term basis (for example: traf- fic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Short term construction equipment, long term traffic associated with this type oT facility. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Do not believe addition will change existing noise levels. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Site is an existing Eagle Hardware & Garden store. AdgacenT properties are commercial users. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No c. Describe any structures on the site. Existing building contains +/-132,856 sf on the ground tloor and +/-21,920 sf on a mezzanine level. -11- • 0 Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will any ,structures be demolished? If so what? Demolition will consist:of a 22,000 sf office and 12,400 sf of mezzanine arm e. What is the current zoning classification of the site; CM Industrial Park f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Commercial g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? NIA h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the-ci4rpleted project? j• Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? 0 k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com- patible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Project will comply with City of Tukwila zoning code. -12- • •Evaluation for Agency Use Only 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing? None b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eli- minated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? Tallest height is +/-34'. Exterior of building is concrete tilt -up walls and glassiroiffont. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Paint building addition to match existing. -13- • 11. Light and Glare •Evaluation for Agency Use Only a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Addition will have minimal impact on existing light or glare which is minimal itself. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glareimpacts, if any: xisting exterior lightiny is directed —downward - and is contained on site. 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational oppor- tunities are in the immediate vicinity? Green River Trail System, b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: NnnP -14- • 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation 0 Evaluation for Agency Use Only a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro- posed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed accss to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Site is served from Andover Park East and Tukwila Parkway. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes, Metro. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Existing facility has 436 stalls. --- -15- • 0 Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No e. Will. the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Addition will not impact current ve-iicui ar trips per day to the existing facility. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor- tation impacts, if any: Current employees are encouraged the use of ride sharing and rapid transit. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. None known to be required. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None -16- • 16. Utilities •Evaluation for Agency Use Only a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic st other. All above except septic system, also m metro storm sewer is available. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Existing utilities currently servicing site include Puget Power, Washington Natural Gas, Metro Storm Sewer, and City of Tukwila Water and Sanitary Sewer. C. Signature The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Date Submitted: PLEASE CONTINUE TO THE NEXT PAGE. -17- PARKING PLAN DRAINAGE PLAN EVANS BLACK DRIVE STORAGE EAGLE ANDOVER PARI. EAST SITE PLAN PROJECT DATA GENERAL ADDITION LEGAL DE, YIN0GTOw,TRUL PARK 0 COTVE PROJECT ADDRESS a ANISOVER PARK EAST SUITE 100 T1101ILA. 1w BUILDING CODE DATA G OTCGSAND OCCIPANCT, -0 REiAK'''ADA 10NTr04•7210."' GREENwOWm RIIN ECEIVGARDEN DEPT. AND CONSTROCTION TOTALS RECEIVING DOCK AND GREENHOUSE Alm ZOWNG DATA SITE AREA, MAIN SN P. 1.OI AOR, MEDNG LOT COVERAGE NIDD Y1 1 MAH • PARKING FOR BLDG. ADDITION PARKING REDDRew SImOm 10120/100 - ,M3 GREENHOUSE , 300/ 400 • NO GAREN PT DDE. ,100/100 A L_ 133 TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED, STANDARD El 3.1 COMPACT El H1 HANDICAP 13 CWTONERLOADING1L 01PLOTEE b 3.3 OK 100 .3 DT TUKWILA. WA .T010 WEIR 331 SITE PLAN 010,01 RTC OSSEO 011 DATI 5.I11 AI,OI ELEVATIONS DETAIL WALL SECTION NO. moon . DATE I BT Iz-T-is l) I4 PROJECT MASE.EAGLE STORE-,TurAILA ADDRION. 0111XER/TENANT.._; EAGLE HARDOARE AND GARDEN RE PON. IJAAVRO 5 SID. .. - RENTON.'EA 1008 LEGAL DESCRIPTION, .... LOT S' ANDOV COUNTY. BASER PWNGTONARR SONSTRIAL PARK OT PROJECT ADDRESS, :'101 ANDOVER. PARK'EAST . '. - TUKOILA. BA TSIs. OCGTIPANCYi '.•' B-2 RETAIL IDENW OH EXISTING OFFICE BUILDING AND PORTION OP EXISTING EEZZANEE_ CONSTRUCT • tlicaVP-S ®UES AND DRIVE TTHROIGHH NL &DING ANDEMT. ' MATERIALS TARO AND ENLARGE EXISTING GARDEN DEPARTMENT) - . CONSTRUCTION TYPE'B-N SRSNKLERED . BLEEDING AREA'ISO. FT.h' LANDSCAPE AREA 413.5 SQ' PT. LUMBER YARD - caeL52 rEcDA.T •)nr yy) tQ1-5/400-Si4 L.C:NfAFut Clil..lf. .i?.aaulL,'DT / W . 0 ANDOVER -.PARK EAST'. STORE WESEL 331 SITE - - - PLAN' DRAMS RYO oHECXED JGH. DATE : 12=1:99. 441.01 NORTH ELEVATION PRELIMINARY PLANTING PLAN