Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA E95-0019 - AMERICAN MEDICAL TECH - OFFICE AND AMBULANCE DISPATCH CENTERAMERICAN MED TEC'H- SO UTH GATE OFFICE & AMBULANCE DISPATCH CENTER E95-0019 ` OV 01 '95_12:21 LPN ARCHITECTS (206)583-0708 P.1/1 l'oy; :: A E-rc), A.IP... '701 Fourth A �e. : i ur 102 Seal Ile. V <. (),,;13.1 (206) 5P i ((Tr) 1 ,.; (206) • MEMORANDUM TO: John Jimerson, AICP Associate Planner Dept. of Community Development City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Blvd Tukwila, WA 98188 RE: American Med Tech L95-0033 L95-0034 E95-0019 Dear John: DATE: 1 November 1995 PROJECT NAME: American Med Tech PROJECT NO: NW 95010 REGENE NOV 01 1995 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Per our phone conversation, the proposal for this project has stopped and the submittals for BAR and Architectural Use Permit can be terminated. It is our understanding the SEPA check list can be amended for a pending hotel project for this site and new documents would be required specific for a hotel project. Thank you for your assistance and patience; Via Fax Bob Hart, SGA Herman R. Eminger MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: • John Jimmerson, Associate Planner Phil Fraser, Senior Engineer Gary Schulz, Urban Environmentalist- August 1, 1995 Project/SEPA Review for 53rd Avenue S.- American MedTrans Project #L95-0034. As requested, I have reviewed the SEPA Checklist and proposed site plan for Conditional Use/BAR Applications. In addition, I visited the site yesterday to look at drainage, topography, and proposed sensitive area use. Even though I'm not sure what level of detail is needed at this time, there are a few issues that I have identified in the following comments. Site Plan: The proposed site alterations include grading the north portion down about 10 feet. Will this waste material be deposited on the lower south portion? The topographic relief shown on the maps appears accurate but there is no professional land survey referenced. It is not clear where the access points are located but the site is to be graded down to the elevation of 51st Avenue S. Drainage: Most of the development site appears to drain to the east and south. Existing runoff may flow into WSDOT right-of-way adjacent to SR 518 on the southeast side of the site. There appears to be a drainage swale just offsite near the southeast corner. However, the project proposal includes a water quality pond on the northeast slope area and this would drain down a steep slope and into Gilliam Creek. This is described as an alternative to discharging directly into the'City's stormwater system. The King County Surface Water Design Manual - Core Requirement #1 specifies all runoff be discharged at the natural location so as not to be diverted onto, or away from, the adjacent downstream property. The Manual also requires some form of detention and treatment of stormwater runoff. American MedTrans Memo August 1, 1995 Page 2 Geotechnical: The GeoEngineers 3/19/90 report is not project specific and can only be partly used. This report does recommend a 25 -foot building setback from the north slope area. The current site plan shows alteration of the top portion of the slope. Because the current proposal affects the slope from grading I would recommend the 15 percent slope gradient be identified at least on the north slope to determine SAO requirements for sensitive slopes. Per the geotechnical recommendation there may, be a slope buffer area for this project. Tree Permit: It is not clear as to how the trees to be removed were surveyed. The landscape plan only shows some of the existing trees and does not fully address the trees on the north and east sides associated with sensitive area slopes. Depending on the final slope impacts, the Tree Ordinance "canopy coverage" method may be appropriate for this site's permit. cc: Steve Lancaster, DCD Director Jack Pace, DCD Senior Planner City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster Director June 19, 1995 Bob Hart SGA CORPORATION 6414 204th St. SW Lynnwood, WA 98036 RE: American Med Tech L95-0033 L95-0034 E95-0019 Dear Bob: I have reviewed the applications for CUP, BAR and SEPA for the above referenced project and have found them to be incomplete. The (following additional information needs to be submitted before the 'project will be scheduled for a public hearing: BAR/CUP 1. A landscape plan showing proposed landscaping: size, species, location and spacing (13 copies). 2. Location of trees with a trunk diameter 6" or greater, and identification of those to be removed. 3. Revised architectural drawings identifying building materials and colors, and dimensions of sign (13 copies). 4. Color and material board. 5. One complete set of PMT's. 6. A site plan showing existing and finished grades at 2' contours and -location of Gilliam Creek and required buffer. SEPA 1. Six copies of theenvironmental checklist and six sets of plans. 2. Geotechnical analysis to comply with requirements of Chapter 18.45 TMC. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 OTHER The project also requires a lot consolidation and tree permit. These approvals must be obtained prior to issuance of a building permit. However, it is recommended that these permits be applied for as early as possible in the process. If you have any questions in this matter, don't hesitate to contact me at 431-3663. Sincerely, '% L__,I.1- 4 ohn • 1imerson ssoi' fate Planner CHECKLIST: ENVI •NMENTAL REVIEW/SHORELINE P HIT MAILINGS FEDERAL AGENCIES ( )U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS ( )FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION ( )DEPT. OF INTERIOR -FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE WASHINGTON ( )U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ( )U.S. DEPARTMENT OF H.U.D. (REGION X) STATE AGENCIES ( )OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY ( )TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT ( )DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES ( )OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR ( )DEPT. OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ( )DEPT. OF FISHERIES ( )K.C. PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEV. ( )BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD ( )FIRE DISTRICT #11 ( )FIRE DISTRICT #2 ( )SOUTH CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT ( )TUKWILA LIBRARIES ( )RENTON LIBRARY ( )KENT LIBRARY ( )CITY OF SEATTLE LIBRARY ( )US WEST (-)SEATTLE CITY LIGHT ( )WASHINGTON NATURAL GAS • ( )WATER DISTRICT #75. ( )SEATTLE WATER DEPARTMENT ( )GROUP W CABLE ( )OLYMPIA' PIPELINE ( )KENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT ( )TUKWILA CITY DEPARTMENTS: ( )PUBLIC WORKS ( ) FIRE ( )POLICE ( )FINANCE ( )PLANNING ( )BUILDING ( )PARKS AND ORECREATION ( }TUKWILA MAYOR )DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL & HEALTH SERVICES )DEPT. OF ECOLOGY, SHORELANDS DIVISION )DEPT. OF ECOLOGY, SEPA DIVISION* )DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE )OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL *SEND CHECKLIST WITH DETERMINATIONS AND *SEND SITE MAPS WITH DECISION KING COUNTY AGENCIES ( )KING COUNTY DEPT. OF PARKS ( )HEALTH DEPARTMENT ( )PORT OF SEATTLE ( )BUILDING & LAND DEV. DIV.- SEPA INFORMATION CENTER SCHOOLS/LIBRARIES ( )HIGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT ( )KING COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY ( )SEATTLE MUNICIPAL REFERENCE LIBRARY ( )SEATTLE SCHOOL DISTRICTS ( )RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT )PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT )VAL-VUE SEWER DISTRICT )WATER DISTRICT #20 )WATER DISTRICT #125 )CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC WORKS )RAINIER VISTA )SKYWAY CITY AGENCIES ( )RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT ( )CITY OF SEA -TAC. ( )CITY OF SEATTLE ( )CITY OF BURIEN ( )TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS ( )TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS OTHER LOCAL AGENCIES ( )PUGET SOUND REGIONAL COUNCIL ( )P.S. AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY ( )SW K.COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ( )MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN• TRIBE ( )DUWAMISH INDIAN TRIBE MEDIA ( )DAILY JOURNAL OF COMMERCE ( )VALLEY DAILY NEWS ( )METRO ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING DIV. OFFICE/INDUSTRIAL 5,000 GSF OR MORE RESIDENTIAL 50 UNITS OR MORE RETAIL 30,000 GSF OR MORE ( ) HIGHLINE TIMES ( )SEATTLE TIMES • 1 PUBLIC NOTICE MAILINGS FOR PERM TS SEPA MAILINGS Mail to: (comment period starts on date of mailing) Dept. of Ecology Environmental Review Section Applicant Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list) Include these documents: SEPA Determination (3 -part form from Sierra) Findings (staff report, usu. with MDNS) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) Affidavit of Dlstribution (notice was mailed & sent to newspaper). SHORELINE MAILINGS Notice of Application: Notice of application for a substantial development Permit must be mailed to owners and to property owners within 300 feet of subject property, prepare an affidavit of publication, and publish two consecutive weeks with deadline for comments due 30 days after last newspaper publication date. Shoreline Permit: Mail to: (within 8 days of decision; 30 -day appeal period begins date received by DOE) Department of Ecology Shorelands Section State Attorney General Applicant Indian Tribes Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list). Include these documents: Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (3 -part form from Sierra) Findings (staff report, if applicable) Shoreline Application Form (filled out by applicant) Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) Site plan, with mean high water mark & improvements _ Cross-sections of site w/structures & shoreline Grading plan Vicinity map SEPA Determination (3 -part form from Sierra) Findings (staff report, usu. with MDNS) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Any background studies related to impacts on shoreline Notice of Application Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed & sent to newspaper) Affidavit of Publication (notice was published in newspaper). CORPORATION June 5, 1995 Mr. Ron Cameron City Engineer City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 Subj: Southgate Traffic SEPA SGA Job #95-055 Dear Mr. Cameron: Attached is a data sheet which indicates daily and peak hour traffic expected from the user of the proposed building at the Southgate site. The user is American Medtech, an ambulance company which will occupy the entire building as an administrative and fleet maintenance facility. The ambulances, although dispatched from this facility, are actually kept at strategic remote locations and will not be housed at the facility in between runs. The total daily trips projected are about 35 to 40. Much of the parking stalls will be used for out -of -service vehicles waiting to be either repaired or cleaned, or back in service. In our opinion, the impact to traffic as a result of American Medtech's use will be insignificant. Please let me know if further traffic analysis is required. Sincerely, SGA Corp ratio Robert Hart Vice President 6414 204th ST. S.W., SUITE #200 LYNNWOOD,WASHINGTON 98036 206 118 2191 GENERAL CONTRACTORS • CONSTRUCTION AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT FAX 206 118 2196 # SGACO**084BS EXPECTED TRAFFIC PATTERN - NEW BLDG LOCATION AM PERSONNEL VEHICLES FIELD CREWS (POV) DISPATCH STAFF FLEET SERVICE MANAGEMENT STAFF OPERATIONS STAFF MARKETING STAFF NURSING STAFF TRAINING STAFF PT ACCTS MGMT TOT PERS VEHICLES PRODUCTION / SRVC UNITS TOT PRODUCTION UNITS LUNCH HR TRAFFIC Sbeeti PEAK = 07:00 - 09:00 NUMBER OF CARS PEAK AM TRAFFIC IN OUT 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IN OUT 1 1 4 4 2 1 1 5 PM PERSONNEL VEHICLES FIELD CREWS (POV) O DISPATCH STAFF 0 FLEET SERVICE 0 MANAGEMENT STAFF O OPERAT1ONS STAFF 3 MARKETING STAFF O NURSING STAFF O TRAINING STAFF O PT ACCTS MGMT 3 22 1 2 1 4 1 6 4 CARS/DAY NON COMPANY TRAFFIC 0 VISITORS PER SHOP RELATED TRAFFIC SALES PEOPLE COURIER / POSTAL TRAFFIC BILLING TRAFFIC FOOD DELIVERIES 1 1 12 4 4 DAY WK WK WK MO 19 3 0 TOT PERS VEHICLES 4 PRODUCTION / SRVC UNITS TOT PRODUCTION UNITS PEAK = 16:00 - 18:00 NUMBER OF CARS PEAK PM TRAFFIC IN OUT IN OUT 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 1 1 0 5 1 2 3 5 5 20 1 1 NON COMPANY TRAFFIC /! VISITORS PER SHOP RELATED TRAFFIC SALES BILLING TRAFFIC COMPUTER MAINT VENDING MACHINES EQUIPMENT MAINT Page 1 2 DAY 1 WK 2 WK 1 MO 2 MO 2 MO 1 2 15 0 _ki tCA-1.) MOD ery c((4 tqirc RECEIVED UN' 1 21995 COMMUNITY ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST DEVELOPMENT A. BACKGROUND ContrdNo. PP_C�'�-4! Epic File No. gS----091)/ Fee _$ 325 Receipt No. 1: Name of proposed project, if applicable: Southgate. 2. Name of applicant: SGA_.Corporation American- Med Tech 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 6414 204th St. S.W. Suite 200, Lynnwood, Washington 98036 C/0 Bob Hart (206)778-2191 4. Date checklist prepared: May 26. 1995 5. Agency requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing. or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): August 1995 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared,'or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal.. None 9: Do..you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No -2- 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. T't.kwila building permit. boundary line adjustment, conditional use permit and. Board of Architectural Review. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete description of the objectives and. alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized here. Single story construction of approximately 16,000 s.f. Use is office, service and dispatch center for an ambulance comp aj. Install office for ..,-administration_ and servirQ bays for minor maintenance and repair of vehicles. 12'. Location of the proposal: Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if - any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica- tions related to this checklist. Location is in Tukwila, bordered by Southcenter Blvd. to the north, 51st Ave. So. and_DOT right=of=way for Highway 518 to the west and south ° ;t; , ___E..0iati,ure, and an office_parI o the east. 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? No T0.'BE COMPLETED BY APPLICAS 8: ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General d rolling, fEvaluation for Agency Use Only ion of the site (circle one): Flat, steep slopes, mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope/on the site (approximate percent slope)? Approx. 65% on the north position of site c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Sand with variahle silt and gravel over III d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No recent evidence of erosion e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti- ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. No new fill required, grading will require cuts of up to 8 ft_ and filling of low areas._ A small amount of export\ may be required. f. Could erosion occur as a result ofclearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Temporary erosion is possible until landscaping is installed 9• About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Approximately 75% -4- • 411 Evaluation for Agency Use Only h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Erosion control and siltation fence during construction 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when. the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Auto. truck and equipment during construction — none being significant.Auto, truck emissions after construction b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that May affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. Nn c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: During earthwork activity, rluist rnntrnl meatur_eswill hp impl Pmented 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year- round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or -river it flows into. No water on site. Creek area exisj& to norms -5- S eS;" 'Z- G�,/\,vvn,.e)..71q9 Evaluation f o r Agency Use Only h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Erosion control and siltation fence during construction __p.er city standards -and new landscaping 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Auto. truck and equipment during construction - none being significant. Auto, truck emissions after construction b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal?., If so, generally describe. Nn c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: During earthwork irtivity, dust_rnntrnL n suno.es_ ,-ill .he_implemented_ 3tW akear a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in .the immediate vicinity of the site (including year- round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. if appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No water on site £re arezt exist& to norms CY'�L',1^�S2S h51/4/ Ly. Nom^ • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate- the source of fill material. None 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. No 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No -6- •Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Ground:. 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. No 2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sour- ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters?. If so, describe. Runoff will flow into existing storm drainage: ystem per city standar._ -7- ** (p -"^"\e b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. No 2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sour- ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None c =W a-t_er-Ru.nof f ( including storm water) : 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Runoff will flow into existing storm drainage system per ri ty__standarsis_ Evaluation for Agency Use Only Alternate proposed system .to run inta_rrPPk after detention and_biofiltratin -7- k)\k/4._. ** 0 Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Potential impact to be insignificant 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: //deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other V evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs grass _ pasture _ crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Very few trees wi1L1he cut. Crs&sses anrLweeds will be removed c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known -8- • Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Landscaping will be Northwest native plant materials, grass, deciduous and evergreen 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle other: other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: None fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: None. b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. None d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None -9- • 6. Energy and Natural Resources • Evaluation for Agency Use Only a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solor) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Natural gas for heat. Electric for power and fighting. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Building would be designed to meet state energy code 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. None 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ- mental health hazards, if any: N/A -10- • Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? traffic along Hwy 518 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short- term or a long-term basis (for example: traf- fic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise"would come from the site. Construction noise from 7:OOAM to 6:00 PM Auto and truck traffic will not he .s.igni f i cant 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Mufflers on construction vehicles 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Site is currently a vacant lot. b. Has the site been .used for agriculture? If so, describe. No knowledge of past agricultural use c. Describe any structures on the site. None -11- • Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No e. What is. the current zoning classification of the site? C-2 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Regional retail business g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A h. Has any part of the site been classified as .an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Type II watercourse at north end of site. Development will be out. de required buffer of 35 feet. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 45-70 j.. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None required 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com- patible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Project will he in cnmpliancP with all applicable codes and ordinances -12- 410 Evaluation for Agency Use Only 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would 'be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing? None b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eli- minated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: N/A 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building materials) proposed? Height is approximately 28'&"15"' exterior milt—up•struc Lure with reveals; painted with a three color scheme. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would altered or obstructed? None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Landscaping ground' _areas: 'wi:lL_ break up _Eui,1 di nq mass. .ialass color and architeLimral jetailing provide 11 sting a sth-.i -13- . Evaluation for Agency Use Only 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Minimal lighting at parking area.'. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Street lightingwillnot have a negative effect d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Light fixtures will be directed down to parking and walkways. 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational oppor- tunities are in the immediate vicinity? 1111 MP b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None -14- • 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation • Evaluation for Agency Use Only a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro- posed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: N/A 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed accss to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Southcenter Blvd. accessed through private existing road. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest trrnsit stop? Transit stops occur on Southcenter Blvvd:'to east of I-5 c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Project would provide approximately 90 parking stalls. None would be eliminated- -15 • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No f. How many.vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Initially approximately 35 to 40. See attached letter. A.M. peak 7 to 9. PM peak 4 to 6 g Proposedmeasures to reduce or control transpor- tation impacts, if any: Encourage ride sharing and public transportation 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Increased need is not expected and facility will provide eervice b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Design factors should minimize impacts on public services i.e. fully sprinklered buildings with 24 hour monitoring. -16- 16. Utilities ircle uti ities currently available at the site: electricitnatural •. water -)refuse service, e ep one, sanitary sewers septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. All utilities are available at the site C. Signature The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge.' I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Date Submitted: Evaluation for Agency Use Only PLEASE CONTINUE TO THE NEXT PAGE. -17- cr Lauchlin R. Bethune . Landscape Architect, ASLA- - 11322 SE 2113111P)608 Kent. WA 98031 . ..(206) 8594789 921 821. 021. f f111.16'rtl= 64r i — 1 -,47//z. . / . /. ems. =,00.99 .4E,4S.00 ♦...)1..,......., ..... N .{.. .4E,4S.00 N Architecture and Planning Gleason Pomeroy Northwest' Royce A. . Berg, A.I.A. .. 1201- 4th Ave. S, Ste 200 Seattle. Washington 98134- (206) 583-8030 - NO DESCRIPTION -17 Fre Feet-VMv IttorwilIteri 0Nr M T g" P+.coic vi," Pare Lou`r' v I6"'Arlr P;ok451 a,. hu(*' wwtyr 4 1/0'' Pne k6.,1.2"1' S Fin' Polio- wu-r-rf .I Iv'.ftlev.f LaGoArf q `. I1.11.,. l.ow.w'f- - q. e, 118'..r-P1.a...: 2 0-0,,, 3°I vIb'6e-t, cmrn / ,f• 6' Iiy'f corhi /' Z14 -=. 41' I� ,! 111 ('o'( 02,19.10.4.7 f u,,w1H6j < -q, I-11t.a, 1LNI16tI,!r" • y1f �P �1�'IL /� 1✓� cl 4) -W#i Aa-Asifkici 0' lira i.. /h i h LANDSCAPE PLAN O9511090AIA1I89O • Wa / i 2 orl-lerw-Iii. xvmorl . G7rllr'1 :.1' ; oviviZ I-1t%"Iuw1=:0IL ° S. 144.-r. ift -1-0.-1-• iri . l'OFIr'13'(ia'j.' 1M w `. . 3 14l9.44 -,i r✓ +-t3 6.'1`',/ Y4 a is"'-, . I`f 'fr/`°.. Irl Ir1ei3% (/O)43 • t'w E:Wcolf+ori Fh4114-114.114'11,r7, 1 43-1.,/04-r ''J'. o" 1 RECr-" e 11 1 JUL 1 5 1995 'LPN Archltects & Planners File: 95010/AM-0' JOB NO.: 95010 DATE: 0/29/95 DRAWN:L4&,/SQp CHECK. SHEET NO OF: =.00'99 3 .4E.4S.00 N z .1.c652 A :OC.4S.00 S IoI�J uq___— ' 41"6 p 113 -�Z Architecture and Planning .4E.45.00 N �Leason Pomeroy Northwest Royce A. Berg. A.I.A. - 1201— dth Ave. S.. Ste 200 Seattle. Washington 98134 (206) 583-8030 ,. NO DESCRIPTION ewutSED rgFcieJIQ% A-ta 6/.3%i 6� PEPJIOU5 AQrA0.-:30;566 ,`�r '5%/1 IJhkr t5,1i2 40.fu YJ. t -riki En' F1'161Js t:OR��l� PAIekid& 4' e9 6174uh l COMPACT .• :.?fl': • 11:IK IV HL �} , . 13x 20,I .. . _Pi11L2Ik,6 Aga I.5.,910��T�la 24 IP51.6 4b KtR. At2.gAd . ` 81,97c. h; -` 2.01 ACRE SITE PLAN JOB NO.: 06010 DATE: 0/20/06 DRAWN: NW CHECK: SHEET. N0 OF: - A -2 Architecture and Planning ULeeson Pomeroy Northwest: Royce A. Berg. A.I.A. 1201— 4th Ave. S.. Ste 200 Seattle. Washington 98134 (206) 583-8030 NO DESCRIPTION DATE FLOOR. PLAN FLOOR PLAN 1/8" RECEIVED' JUL 131995 DEVELOPMENT File:00000/om-1 JOB NO.: 96007 SHEET NO. OF: DATE: 7/6196 'DRAWN: CHECK: IW Sf IodvnA4:..'357F .j 7 American I MedTrans' MOM 111111111 NMI IIIIIIIIIII WEST ELEVATION 1/8" J r NORTH ELEVATION 1/8" 5 SOUTH ELEVATION i_ro 1505 4 5o66: 3m ISG"Pa-i•AP American MedTrans_ 1 gAidLalt21- LD JAt1 • 1/8" ®1111111111111111 'II F1 L- kigTEly EAST ELEVATION 1/8" 3 C: CES V u C E Architecture and. Planning, �Leoson Porr.eroy Northwest Royce A. Berg, A.I.A. 1201- 4th Ave. S. Ste 200 Seattle, Washington. - 98134. (206) 583-8030. NO DESCRIPTION DATE EVISCn 7Ito ELEVATIONS. RECEIVE! • JUL 1 3 1995. - DEVELOPME'4 File: 95010/AM — 2 Imisinuart JOB NO.: 95010 SHEET.. NO OF: DATE: 7/5/96 , DRAWN: 9913 CHECK: