HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA E95-0022 - INTERURBAN CONVENIENCE STORE - OFFICE BUILDING TO GROCERY STOREINTERURBAN
CONVENIENCE STORE
EXISTING BUILDING
FROM OFFICE SPACE TO
GROCERY STORE
14805 INTERURBAN AVE. S.
E95-0022
• •
AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION
1, I eXy _ �o obi hereby declare that:
flNotice of Public Hearing Determination of Non-
significance
O Notice of Public Meeting
nBoard of Adjustment Agenda
Packet
Board of Appeals Agenda
Packet
Planning Commission Agenda
Packet
fl Short Subdivision Agenda
Packet
O Notice of Application for
Shoreline Management Permit
LIShoreline Management Permit
Mitigated Determination of
Nonsignificance
Determination of Significance
and Scoping Notice
Notice of Action
Official Notice
Other
Other
was mailed to each of the following addresses on
iq5-
- -N./s160 40 ,,lel mS iou,hl 1-c_ c`+i or -N on d i / �S
- su/A-, oF- er_o 1R
YYl u ► I �d /11 ISIS
Name of Project COM / - StaCC. signature K. ede,t)ix-v:7
File Number LG5lO�ZZ
TO: PUGET SOUND AIR POLLUTION CONTROL
110 UNION ST #500
SEATTLE WA 98101
li
CITY OF TUKWILA
6200 SOUTHCENTER BLVD.
TUKWILA, WA 98188-2599
(206) 433-1800
TO:
SEPA ENVIRON. REVIEW
DEPT OF ECOLOGY
P 0 BOX 47703
OLYMPIA WA 98504-7703
FI
CITY OF TUKWILA
6200 SOUTHCENTER BLVD.
TUKWILA, WA 98188-2599
(206) 433-1800
CITY OF TUKWILA
DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS)
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL:
INSTALL UST. FUEL PUMPS AND CANOPY, REMODEL
EXISTING BUILDING;
PROPONENT: JACK WEISENBERGER ""7___ `--1-- ; }..
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL'... INCLUDING13 STREET;'A 'ADDRESS:, IF -ANY.--:
�=y 7f 1,'1 1i:..l.i L_ �_ \\ r. , // �j f, .
ADDRESS: 1,.------)7
4805 .INTERURBAN- AW S L. 1. -,�
PARCEL NO: /(3,59700'04\40 o c' ' :'c' ' `' ( \,1,.
SEC/TWN/RNV x%23/23 h04)i tom, ,2/ ( \ \ I r.
,
> ) �`� 1Cyt
LEAD AGENCYIQ CITY" -OF TUKWILA ';r' FILE -N0 -E95-0022
f 9 �1 r_ Q `\ f 4�0` k
The City h'ass d'e,t''ermi Tied tha'n the\pr•ono` „e''
1 does not have a- r-obab l
sianif icant a.dverrse Cimpact—on theye•nv�t�r�,onment. An envisronmenta1� �.
impact .tattenenpEIS) is no•t re.u,uired under RCW 43.21c 030(2) (c)\.',
This deci!// ion:�was made atter-- review of a�, corno-Leted environmental \'
7 - , -.� \. 11 t J I
checklifst�1 and other intarma•tion o'n tile -with the, lead ageencv:-= Thits;l
inform at,i�on is fava:irLab1e t•o the•y,nubi1'i, on fre iues;t. °;a�
•k****•k*•k* kk* k**;k••k**,*•k**,*****k***.ktk******yk****F*'**•+*�k*•k k* k * k•k k**_•k-*_ ** k*1 •iii******
1 w, � .•,,._r. °d ibv
This DNS !,i s issued unden,A4 97 `1.1`=340'(2) .,, comnren.ts must be' submi tte,,
r t �t „ � �,.� 1 3' Ali _.
�IV���Sv, 2 _1 9 '', The 1 ead°._agency w.i 1 1 not; acti�' on
this pra;p;o'sal =tar 15 days from the date. -hello . ;C -„f
:a n 1 vi ve
4'_ f
}`/ 'Date,
Stevel anca's,er, Responsible 0ff icial�
City -t Tukw'i'ita. (206) 431-3680
6300 Southcenter Boulevard .-
Tukwila, WA '9,8488
-.�F
You may appeal thi:sdeterminatiori (to the(;C,ity Clerk at,,C-ity Hall, 6200
Southcenter Boulevard;. .T.ukwi la. WA , 98138 sno later..;t n' 10 days from the
above signature date bv ,wP i:.tten -appea 1--sta i ng Ahe'' bas i s of the appeal for
specific tactual obiections fou mav_be-r-ey"u'yir ed ti bear some of the
expenses for an appeal.
Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the City
Clerk and Department of Community Development.
Memorandum
TO: Jack Pace
FROM: John Jimerson
RE: SEPA - Interur n Convenience Store
DATE: August 9, 1995
Project File No. E95-0022
Project Description:
The site is located at 14805 Interurban Avenue South. The project
includes installing a fuel system (UST, Pumps, Canopy) to the
convenience store and make modest changes to the existing building
including constructing a new fascia and painting it a new color.
A previous MDNS was issued in 1994 for remodeling the site and
building for use as a convenience store.
Agencies With Jurisdiction:
Department of Ecology
Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Agency
Comments to SEPA Checklist:
Page 3, No. 10: The project also required City of Tukwila Board of
Architectural Review approval.
Page 3, No. 11: The project also includes replacing a portion of
the mansard roof with a stucco fascia.
Summary of Primary Impacts/Proposed Mitigation:
Traffic impacts for the project were addressed with the 1994 SEPA
when traffic mitigation measures were imposed. The proposal to add
fuel sales is not likely to substantially increase traffic in the
vicinity. The additional traffic to the site will primarily be
pass -by traffic.
Recommended Threshold Determination:
DNS
F
CEnviivnrnth1
SERVICES COMPANY
ECENED
2190
c �iv;jvi(irn a Y.
TENT
DATE: 67 --02I- %S-
TO: Cly D& 7-.v�RY/4/9 27. c!, : ) 7,44,,4fA
ADDRESS: 3O0
7z//i2/l / rte, ' yF/
ATTN: Jte,//,r/
FROM: �/4G I�C/S!=/t//_�r���G%.�
NUMBER OF PAGES FAX it, )
(inc. cover sheet)
*********************************************************************
ENCLOSURE(S)
Quantity Item Description
6 sea
%.
Je
12cviscL l -� 9s—
COMMENTS : /¢S A!C=1
Z
(TRANSFAX)
UST SPECIALISTS
8585 Highway 20 • P.O. Box 2049 Port Townsend, WA 98368-2049 360.385.4221 1800.222.9219. 360.379.9395(fax).
• Contractor License # PACIFESI03BR
1
sEb (0--9.95
To LID Pai L �y57c4j
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
A. BACKGROUND
E
I����I /�
C 1 No. ('CS_ -�..)V
Epic File No. 04— n o r)
Fee $ 325 Receipt No.
yNO.
1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: �p q,16 CbN MS'r S't'
2. Name of applicant: 4tit ,
3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: g V.11.4
�( ['
.c -Tai' - P s
4. Date checklist prepared: r7 L . 15 . J'?T3IJEVJZED (-7 q5 (FUEL SYSTEM)
5. Agency requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila
f`
_ i..
•
6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable):
3mo►J
7. Do you have any plans for
related to or connected with
1'1Ay (3c.
future additions, expansion, or further activity
this proposal? If yes, explain.
PD1ilori\ '(b fDu-tw
FF-efeibEr> LE -fa-
8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will
be prepared, directly related to this proposal.
SG2s
SO P PC4P-. e;Ar
9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other
proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes,
explain._._ C SU(3/0G67-mo'N17
RECEIVED
J,1 -A 221
-2- COMMUNI rY
DEVELOPMENT
RECEIVED
FEB 1 71994
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
f
• •
10. List any government approvals or permits that will sbeAleeded for your proposal.
4tlt-D1t,1(J-_1 17 I4t'Gl c_ VA -R ti US 0 T7G (TY f sia t c-rS•.
a./ De; S!/r1NI% .4 je wriz ) T ':ec • 1Q,UTjS1O,eiT/ C n roc: i,� 1J Oc .e41,T *'
r\lo7- kl= OF/.V7Z-,if7- To /N57-4 / / '
C iC SURjy1'n igf -&-:e 4r.1
ORE' Dc7A7; /9rlar.',90/
11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses
and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this
checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not
need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete
description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be
summarized here.
s f P6e1,4 ( "7 ,
Ick i-ofg5`i'bf.
12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand
the precise location of your proposed, project, including' a street address, if
any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over
a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal
description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably
available.. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not
required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica-
tions related to this checklist.
-4t'fE Iq rSLR.t�,fRs1 Ails- . 57
_914��O�/A�_
Le. JJQscr�+T r� Ft trrLu
13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land
Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive?
*7 -
Jo
-3-
TO BC COMPLETED BY APPIA411Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
1. Earth
a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat,
rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other
M,nPcv -rte caAtt.xiF+.pT
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate
percent slope)? ."71 ep.q.' .(?LC -T ¶l.AA)
c. What general ty of soils are found on the site
(for example, cla sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If
you know the c ssification of agricultural soils,
specify them and note any prime farmland.
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable
soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe._.
e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti-
ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate
source of fill.i,anNw
f. Could 'erosion occur as a result of clearing,
construction, or use? If so, generally describe.
1.16
g•
About what percent of the site will be covered with
imperviouss ces after project construction (for
example, sphalt .r_ buildings)? rp(,
-4-
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or
other impacts to the earth, if any: — 00
2. Air
a. What types of emissions to the air would result from
the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors,
industrial wood smoke) during construction and when__
the project is completed? If any, generally
describe and give approximate quantities if known.
14c1JV
, C iW r! ACT et/1Y , c P��,v�
I n i4'r/llo_5, /=,eF Jt /i/.4 )' 7`79 ,1/AV77°.
i2 COt't y 0411PSICRIT
b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor
that may affect your proposal? If so, generally.
describe. — o
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or
other impacts to air, if any:
57A&E :z :a VA? ' I2CCOU',_V P/l/t-. Z-:oN
TANKS D!5 Ac,v$ s
3. Water
a. Surface:
1) Is there any surface water body on or in the
immediate vicinity of the site (including year-
round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes,
ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and
provide names. If appropriate, state What--
stream
hat -stream or river it flows into. Ng)
-5-
Evaluation for
410 411 Agency Use Only
2) Will the project require any work over, in; or
adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described
waters? If yes, please describe and attach
available plans.. 1p
3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge. material
that would be placed in or removed from surface
water or wetlands and indicate the area of the
site that would be affected. Indicate the
source of fill material. —,e,
4) Will the proposal require surface water
withdrawals or diversions? Give general
description, purpose, and approximate quan-
tities, if known. Nn
5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year
floodplain? If so, note location on the site
plan. r
6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of
waste, materials to surface waters? If so,
describe the type of waste and anticipated
volume of discharge.
Evaluation for
•
Agency Use Only
b. Ground:
1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be
discharged to ground water? Give general
description, purpose, and approximate quan-
tities, if known.
2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged
into the ground from septic tanks or other sour-
ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage;
industrial, containing the following
chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the
general size of the system, the number .of such
systems, the number of houses to be served (if
applicable), or the number of animals or humans
the system(s) are expected to serve.J4Q .
c. Water Runoff (including storm water):
1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm
water) and method of collection and disposal, if
any (include quantities, if known). Where will
this ...water flow? Will this water flow into
other waters? If so, describe.
s
-7-
•
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface
waters? If so, generally describe. go
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface,
ground, and runoff water impacts, if any4c
.s - uPPcg7qL � Q,v� c,
4. Plants
a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the
site:
✓deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other
evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other
shrubs
grass
— pasture
_ crop or grain
/wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush,
skunk cabbage, other
water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other
other types of vegetation
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed
or altered? ,
c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on
or near the site. sjotag
-8-
411 Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other
measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the
site, if any: L 9TH .
5. Animals
a. Circle any birds and animals which have been
observed on or near the site or are known to be on
or near the site:
birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other:
mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other:
fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish,
other:
b. List any threatened or endangered species known to
be on or near the site. 1.,1p1,11b kop4,,4
c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so,
explain. ,Jv
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife,
if any:
-9-
•
6. Energy and Natural Resources
a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil,
wood stove, solor) will be used to meet the
completed project's energy needs? Describe whether
it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc.
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar
energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally
describe. ic\Q
c. What kinds of energy conservation features are
included in the plans of this proposal? List other
proposed measures to reduce or control energy
impacts, if any:
7. Environmental Health
a. Are there any environmental health hazards,
including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire
and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could
occur as a result of this proposal? If so,
describe. e
F=UEL 1=-7,:2F'
1) Describe special emergency services that might
be required.
2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ-
mental health hazards, if any:
T,9,4,4= H 2,04-J,e =5-k5 rC /rl 6%/ J9, -' L 2 a ' .. /_i.�'6 EXT�� !/��✓i�Erc�S,
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
-10-
4 •Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
b. Noise
1) What types of noise exist in the area which may
affect your project (for example: traffic,
equipment, operation, other)? NotniZs-
2) What types and levels of noise would be created
by or associated with the project on a short-
term or a long-term basis (for example: traf-
fic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate
what hours noise would come from the site. ---
S'(4 (Z. T-- 7"0.,t4 c_cs, c S -rrtoC <<vr.0 .
frorS (5" d- -or-C-7etMT-n'APC-"rC , -d(rCr.
3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise
impacts, if any:
8. Land and Shoreline Use
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent
properties? -
S S'0i PC-0frtcmc E, g: ck .
b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so,
describe. RO.
c. Describe any structures on the site.
-11-
,.1
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what?
e. What is the current zoning classification of the
site? G -r C 1 R G l c61 L C da -t 0-4- cin. u Prc.')
f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation
of the site? Coo .tcr2cff4 c..
If applicable, what is the current shoreline master
program designation of the site? Ke,NC'
g•
h. Has any part of the site been classified as an
"environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify.
e
sc'rrcc-r( \e'c' kTt l-S.C;cc,o Pec j.
i. Approximately how many people would reside or work
iri the completed project?
j. Approximately how many people would the completed
project displace? Nf4rje,
k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement
impacts, if any:
1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com-
patible with existing and projected land uses and
plans, if any: C&F-t PC Y
c
-12-
9. Housing
411 Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
Approximately how many units would be provided, if
any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income
h sing?
N
b. Approximately h many units, if any, would be eli-
minated? Indica whether high, middle, or low-
income housing.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or co rol housing
impacts, if any:
10. Aesthetics
a. What, is the tallest height of any proposed
struc'ture(s), not including antennas; what is the
principal exterior building material(s) proposed?
b. What views .in the immed'i•ate vicinity would be
alteredor obstructed? N.
.777
N
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control ae hetic
impacts, if any:
-13-
(-f-T =I7FT,
h1aT��!}C LJc)62, Ohr .0 c
tE- G.Li1SS W (VC C)c.)
5714-o47) i i•e G , M jigs/It-a:6
Ca(AP-Y < gA,R
`R
411 Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
11. Light and Glare
a. What type of light or glare will the proposal
produce? What time of day would i>. mainly' occur?
�11�1X-,P c21.r1o// z/6,•/
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a
safety hazard or interfere with views? Iy p
A,eD
Fob slf TY £F �/�72 ,(25 lr�is�iL� FvELi,�� .
_ ib
c. What existing off-site s urces of light or glare may
affect your proposal? tlpljit
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and
glare impacts, if any:
12. Recreation
a. What designed and informal recreational oppor-
tunities are in the immediate vicinity? /A---
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing
recreational uses'? If so, describe. No
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on
recreation, including recreation opportunities to be
provided by the project or applicant, if any: QA1,10,
-14-
0 Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
13. Historic and Cultural Preservation
a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro-
posed for, national, state, or local preservation
registers known to be on or next to the site? If
so, generally describe. 1\10
b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of
historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural
importance known to be on or next to the site.
c.Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if
any:
14. Transportation
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the
site, and describe proposed accss to the existing_
street system. Show on site plans, if any.
Sd.er
b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If
not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest
transit stop? lip„. Iric r�h� a` vie"
5(7-67;t
c. How many parking spaces would the completed project
have? How many would the project eliminate?
?(O v
-15-
C .cec CQ j
(- PA vcsa frtg.K. "ne.G
fie.0 IS' k, v- UP
(DUG Ursfba C--R.0VN
GAS pyo' c-) HO
Nor S7-22,1 Pet. PoR.
d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets,
or improvements to existing roads or streets, not
including driveways? If so, generally describe
(ipdisate whether public or private). NICD Sc'E SUPPC.G,t0‘cz'
TCTS - 7-7-01, ( _► Cc)A - 6..-;--7-c
i
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
7-0
rGA 1-9 PAxo-{(CAPF(
e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate
vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If
so, generally describe. kSo
f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated
by the completed project? If known, indicate when
peak volumes would occur.
g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor-
tation impacts, if any:
S'rz� _CUP P .
15. Public Services
a. Would the project result in an increased need for
public services (for example: fire protection,
police protection, health care, schools, other)? If
so, generally describe. g o
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct
impacts on public services, if any. NI
-16-
psi --el,
•
16. Utilities
• Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
a. Circle utilities currently available at the site:
e ctr' ty, n ura gas, , refuse service,
t p e, sewer, epticsystem, other.
b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the
project, the utility providing the service, and the
general construction activities on the site or in
the immediate vicinity which might .be needed.
t J 5'C;v :-'u ? P C C; r i &,vf,7"
C. Signature
The above answers are true and complete to the best
my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is
relying on them to make its decisi.,n.
of
Signature:
Date Submitted:
i= V/SID, -' 5 e. es - 9 -5'5--
J • J
c;=.€ /P4 Yf%6_ E,Li/�.P�,cJ,vfc vTi�1 L
PLEASE CONTINUE TO THE NEXT PAGE.
s
-17-
S-ries'.
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPI Ti T
D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS
(do not use this sheet for project actions)
Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful
to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of
the environment.
When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the
proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from
the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity
or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not imple-
mented. Respond briefly and in general terms.
1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge
to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or
release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production
of noise? 4J c#i�nc g4 ITH
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are:
N/Ps
2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, ani-
mals, " fish, or marine life?
%(cAjj
� frIps,44., -nN 4. V el r
IJ0 e? IN.14144 Aro.' 4r 1s.
e
Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, ani-
mals, fish, or marine life are: 1,1%
Avic
-18-
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
7 (5 s 6C-,776moo
rs t 7-
AfPC,(CA?CCS
AC7'-60n/'
.:1
0 Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or.
natural resources? N1/A
Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and
natural resourses are: N/ADv
4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect
environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or
eligible or under study) for governmental protection;
such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers,
threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or
cultural sites wetlands, floodplains, or prime �
farmlands? ipc
Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid
or reduce impacts are: Nye
e
5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and
shoreline use, inclduing whether it would allow or
encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with
existing plans? tJ/pl
-19-
•
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land
use impacts area:
How does the proposal conform to the Tukwila Shoreline
Master Plan? jJ ps-
6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on
transportation or public services and utilities?
Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s)
are: 0/p
7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict
with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for
the protection of the environment. ,,jyp
J
-20-
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
8. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila
Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli-
cies of the Plan? 1,jc.:,
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s)
are: /p{
-21-
.TO.BE"COMPLETED BY APPLA•
• -Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON PROJECT
PROPOSALS
The objectives and the alternative means of reaching the
objectives for a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the
aforegoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This
information provides a general overall perspective of the
proposed action in the context of the environmental infor-
mation provided and the submitted plans, documents, suppor-
tive information, studies, etc.
1. What are the objective(s) of the proposal?
(00,101e5
Ib P'
. 1.
t
i Csci-1 lac+ r�-
b L I I
PIJN1fS IAl e -ci= SjDieC.
2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these
objectives? Ab►Je,
3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the
preferred course of action:
-22-
4. Does the proposal
Comprehensive Land
cies of the Plan?
P 2 6 ?bs c%t,
•
conflict with policies of the Tukwila
Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli -
Kb .RS
pc,ts ✓I (-r'! F' k Ter),
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s)
are: i\ /PC
-23-
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
•
Order No. 862001
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
THAT PORTION OF TRACTS 22 AND 23 OF INTERURBAN ADDITION TO SEATTLE, AS
PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 10 OF PLATS, PAGE 55, RECORDS OF KING
COUNTY, AND OF VACATED RIVER STREET LYING BETWEEN SAID TRACTS,
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE EASTERLY PROJECTION OF THE NORTH
LINE OF SAID TRACT 22 WITH THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF INTERURBAN AVENUE
AS CONDEMNED IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NO. 109001;
THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID AVENUE 190
FEET;
THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY AT RIGHT ANGLES TO SAID AVENUE, 125 FEET;
THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY PARALLEL TO SAID AVENUE, 30 FEET;
THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY AT RIGHT ANGLES TO SAID AVENUE, 25 FEET;
THENCE NORTHWESTERLY PARALLEL TO SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID AVENUE TO
THE NORTH LINE OF SAID TRACT 22;
THENCE EASTERLY TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
EXCEPT THAT PORTION LYING NORTHERLY OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE:
BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF VACATED RIVER STREET WHICH IS
20 FEET. SOUTHERLY OF THE EASTERLY PROJECTION OF THE NORTH LINE OF
TRACT 22;
THENCE EASTERLY PARALLEL WITH SAID NORTH LINE TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY
LINE OF INTERURBAN AVENUE AND THE TERMINUS OF THIS LINE DESCRIPTION;
SITUATE IN THE CITY OF TUKWILA, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON.
s
Page 2
•
\. J
/ " `; t t
,\ it t
t\\ t`tt t
t, tt ,I
01
t
•
F 0►
1
Gov't Loi 1
6.75 Acres
?PO"
StTe
19405
D
62SQ
Chi 'J:I I
I
II
II
TR. A
/5/ST
•1Fjtvir ♦ill
, . •.�,
•
•
23-4 ~ x •
1 —-
— — -•*,•: •
er,
O.Q.N.
1 V_.
/SME -Ni:
;.µi;.
• ,
t �
>t t�
A CON
R-21
•
TESR-3
IS!
J F Ye ' 1
GM 166 U.JIiS-.-
tft
csi
ve.7/73"
cia
NAN 440,16 latiCly4„100:• 4**3 iryp.
5 lAi6VIT i,(00 ,:s2o
22'
.11
11
11
11
PARKING,
qYZCY
-typ/cAl- oc.5
0
ex I ST1N6
BLDG,.
(2.30o 5.
MIN. 44"
CLEAT
4EARADmoeF
S/W FG
STAGE II V .R.
DOLIELEWALL FIBERGLASS
- PRODUCT PIPING ( 3"/2")
2.5'
MAX. PEA.
c...rry
•
(0
.111 18'
•
•
7.•
•
NEW 6" REINFORCED CONCRETE
,r ii, /1 koRivE SLAB ,
1 :-.; .• . - __
____ ___ _ . _
NEW 2•4 , X 40 ' CANOPY.'<" I 1.1
STALLS 6 30'
fj1,1.75
L.
to
• 4'
•
KEY
A f. A
AREA
QAR,A
..epe.‘e=
CURRiNTL'( PERViou1
INTERUReAt.( AVE=. S,
TO BG4.orwo ►JO►J-P6Rf OUS
CURRJNTIy No.J-PnadiovS -To
CUaagaTt.y NON-PleRviou1
T o
OEcoir+i
TCRdlouS
14a.14,.J t/p J-Ptgaviou
0)
LigvEy T144fra7
gpe2 rb,
1S -1S9 F012,
STII Y J
5000 5i.
q {, 1120o 57 4'4 of der Now -ft -mous AREA
80o sl. Cf. TV 8E ADDEO
s1TE SURFACING
1=0 LAN
N D SCALE_
U Y11. rty
V/kta�'f Co , -
011_ \i/ATEF',
5&Pr reds-ro R
• \MOLT No,
- oft E4"uAL:
60_ cp5
1
((01.80)
�leN txrguveo
GtKb - TYP
10i 00
(10b,72)
(IDD,SZ'
.'1
(1ol.1.4
LIoce of L�
of Ex�stIelcy
PA4criErtT
MATCH NEW
pA4eMeN r To
(1p0.2.0
Corip4ELT 10
X;5T,Ic4 H H
INV = 9(0.35
L AR.uGTU K.E.
(RE -(Al
FF = J o ►. So
,: 1 1D 4P1u (llbolz.o0(fl2)
CB Z IoI-`I ' 10 1.'t
RIMS 100.00 • 'Cork -RETE U/▪ AL-K
REMovE AND gept.&
Ie.J•4= 9(.5(. • Airy✓ --a.
I Z7 LF 9 QS G1"rli► / IOI.co
51-0911 c D.DOS
[�w
100,30,
ce.414 1
1>.04.99.70 _
1•4 97 .7.0
130.00
100.00
(99.(04) AITC,t+ Ir1E.YJ FAVe.ri'_►4T
/ TO LX�ZT��:
cNC1JMGjL1
it55 u ME0
RIM ELEs(10o.00')
E%IST,N4
51-0041,1 1-.414.A44 M.H.
I NTERun3AN AVE. S.
G FtAE) I G RAI NAGE P 1_AN
F -IM Dr fxitxt Gs H/WFickz . PX1 N WLJ .
. 1 L}li, !r l -AJ'AE IJ'ti, I
1"- it;
x
PACIFICEn viron menta
S E.R V I C E S C O M P A N Y
UST SPECIALISTS
8585 Highway 20 P.O. Box 2049 Port Townsend, WA 98368-2049 360.385.4221 1800.222.9219 360.379.9395(fox)
Contractor License # PACIFESI03BR
TAGE I VAPOR RECOVERY MANHOLE
PILL CONTAINMENT MANHOLE
SWF'S •=1.4 TAT_T.a"1•.Zt=0%i
TANK MONITOR PROBE
W/ 16" WATERTIGRT MANHOLE
•
N • • • •
'" MINUS. .
PEAGRAVEL'FILL '
•
5
f 3" P.G. STAGE II
VAPOR RECOVERY
6E6, 6 GAUGE IMF
.2" BALL VALVE'
FLEX LINE
30" MANHOLE
SUBMERSIBLE TURBINE
TANK VERT M41 44 -IDLE
OPTIONAL.. L-ocATION
PRODUCT PIPING
BALL FLOAT-
VENT
LOAT-
VENT VALVE
--DROP TUBE
124:000 GAL
10000 GAL 28'-0"
8000 GAL 22'-0"
I
:r_ i:•. REINFORCED CONCRETE TART ANCHOR BOIW-DOWN STRAPS'~.T
12" SQUARE X LENGTH OF TANK + 1 • W/ T?CIC.SS �'; :I ►�.;,
� `,✓'�/moi%i
•
2" LCT LINE
NUMBER OF VENTS
5' 5' 5' S-
(4) 2- GALV. VENT RISERS
2- VENT RISER FROM
USED OIL TANK, IF REVD
3/8- DIA. U -BOLTS
vATH NUTS.
1/4- PROJECTION OF METAL
FRAMING CHANNEL.
3- TUBE STEEL FRAME,
8• ABOVE FIN. YARD GRADE
6
6
m
0
m
r.
O 9
o
0
VAPOR VENT CAP
NOTE.
VENT RISERS MUST BE
5.-0- MIN. DISTANCE FROM
ANY PROPERTY LINE,
PER UFC 5005, 1988 ED
x 3' . 1/8- TU8E
STEEL FRAME
SERIES 1200-H 3-1/4"
METAL FRAMING CHANNEL
2" CALV. RISER
2' GALV. COUPLING
rINISH GRADE
(2) 2" CALV 90' ELLS &
NIPPLE SWING JOINT
(,I
><>
2-o FIBERGLASS VENT LINE
2- N.P.T. FIBERGLASS
ADAPTOR
CONCRETE FOOTING
VENT RISER SUPPORT BRACKET
OPW 53-V Float Vent Valves
The OPW 53-V Series Float Vent Valves are designed
to be installed in OPW 233-V Series extractor fittings to
form a system to help prevent product mixing, and to
meet the Federal EPA technical standards for overfill
prevention of petroleum UST's.
The OPW 53-V Series Float Vent Valves have a
stainless steel ball which in an overfill condition, seats
tightly against a specially designed valve seat, restricting
the flow of vapors back to the delivery transport, or tank
vent. The pressure created in the US1 by this vapor
flow restriction works against the head of liquid remain-
ing in the delivery transport and hoses, to reduce the
incoming flow rate. These valves are superior to other
valves because of the stainless steel ball float and
specially designed Duragard® coated seat which helps
eliminate valve hang up due to corrosion.
OPW Float Vent Valves are
Covered Under Patent No. 3,736.950
Model 53 -VM shown
A
2" NPT -1
D
2' Diameter
Ball
Flex Catch 705-5 features a 5 -gallon recovery-
vessel with a fiberglass cover. Ground level
installation is easy ... simply thread directly
onto a 4" riser. The internal drain valve
eliminates the use of external drain hoses
which can clog and bend shut.
LIGHTWEIGHT
FIBERGLASS
COVER
WATER
RUNOFF
CAST IRON
RING
CEMENT &
Combined Stage 1 and Stage 11
Vapor Connection.
GRAVEL GUARD
THICK, RUGGED,
FLEXIBLE
BELLOWS
EXPANDS &
CONTRACTS
CAST IRON BASE
INTERNAL DRAIN
Vapor Vents
• Pressure Vacuum Vents - OPW 523,
523S
• Open Vent - OPW 23
This illustration shows an OPW
233 -MSD (including the OPW 53 -VM)
with a 1611 -AV adaptor for Stage I
vapor recovery. The manifolded vent
lines provide one connection for the
vent and the other connection for the.,
Stage II vapor recovery fitting if
required.
OPW 233 -VM
The OPW 233 -VM extractor is a multi -outlet extractor,
available in 2 sizes; used in direct manifolded systems,
vapor recovery, or where provision for Stage 11 Vapor
Recovery is needed.
SIZES: 4" x 2" x 3" WT. 18.73 lbs. 233 -VM -6045
4" x 2" x 2" WT. 16.62 lbs. 233 -VM -4422
All OPW 233-V series extractors are specially coated with
black Duragard® coating, for improved corrosion
resistance and easier cage removal.
FUEL .TANK INSTALLATION DETAILS
PACIFIcEnvironmetai
S E R V I C E S C O M P A N Y
UST SPECfALISTS-
P.O. Box 2049 Port Townsend, WA 98368-2049 360.385.4221 1800.222.9219 360.379.9395(fax)
Contractor License # PACIFESI03BR
8585 Highwoy 20
BRAVO
rpNCRF.
BOx
TE ISL
AND \
ASPHLT PAVING OR
RE NFA CONCRETE PAVING
•
II'_II._11._II
II
II
11_II
\
-
01.....
{A
{N=I
\
�.:.:
.:;:'..;.: .:.
-AAAA . .
: ', ::..:AAAA
. . ":
"
\'
IIr
7i-
ILS
/�IlLil
�Nr�tmmis
STORAGE TANKS
/
\,�\l
`/�
`// `/ if l �l Hifi\V
/\ /\\ /\\ j\�j'i. /i ��\ \
I
//\/
\/\\/��\
/
`�■
-_
Al
SLOPE
1J4- PER FOOT-
L 9-
9' O
9, T. 9-
6'
Q
��
FIBERGLASS 3" VAPOR
RETURN LINE, WHEN REO'0
FIBERGLASS DOUBLE WALL PIPE,
3.0 SECONDARY OVER 2'0 PIPES
(LINES MUST BE 3 FROM ANY
ELEC. ELEC. CONDUITS, .WATER LINES. ETC.)
FIBERGLASS SINGLE WALL
PIPE -3'0 VAPOR RECOvERY
-
- FIBERGLASS DOUBLE WALL
PIPE 3'0 SECONDARY
OVER 2'0 PIPES.
LINES .0 DISPENSER ISLAND SCALE: NONE
PIPE TRENCH SCALE: 1-=1'-0"'
NOTE:
wHERE ELECTRICAL CONDUIT
PROJECTS THRU BOX, SEAL
TOP WITH PETROLEUM COMPATIBLE
SEALANT, TO PREVENT ANY PRODUCT
FROM ENTERING CONDUIT RUN.
PIP=NG =SOMET iC
eP. vO PV.P BD.
PL •CCU �+
CO -4C ISL•,,U
10 DIyE.SCR C
I/2• (u(RG(..r-r,
,.(vC
/2- v.POR R(C0v(R. uv[
Svul_O(( r.0S'
(I.,;
3' SECONDARY NOSC
FLCx CONNECTOR Yr(u.. I -I/3' u.LE S+•KL. 2•' LOv'G
C0UPRCSSION
GLAuP (TYP.T
FIBERGLASS SINGLE WALL
PIPE -3"0 VAPOR RECOVERY
Y necRu. SS
Y.POR RETURN
r,BCRGLASS Y-90' (1.80w (Irv.)
OR 3' TEC
r,eERGL.SS DOUBLE *ALL
PIPE 3'. SECONDARY
OKR 3'. PR00VC7 (TYP
•
1_1
IGS112.1
L
E 21/2. S ELEVATIONi.
S CAL. E k3 "
= a_
1
--- .• •
- • - -• •
. . . .
F. F. 1 01. 0
T_Tlvl la CD ID EL.3E
14805 INTERURBAN AVENUE
TUKWILA , WA 98168
OWNER: CHARLES HONG
PROPOSED PUMP ISLAND CANOPY (24'X 40')
]ET__,-N.7-A75,9E. DE ON
3_ r 13 • •
= Ar
L
INTER'
- AVENUI
100.62 • _
P L