HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA E95-0025 - HIGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT - CAPITAL FACILITIES PLANHIGHLINE SCHOOL
DISTRICT NO. 401
FACILITIES DEPARTMENT
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
E95-0025
•
City of Tukwila
John W. Rants, Mayor
Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director
August 25, 1995
Alan J. Schmidt
Highline School District No. 401
17810 8th Ave S.
Seattle, WA 98148
RE: Six Year Capital Facilities Plan
Dear Mr. Schmidt:
We have reviewed the above referenced Capital Facilities Plan and
DNS and have the following comments to offer.
The City of Tukwila is currently conducting public hearings on a
new Comprehensive Plan, with the final hearing scheduled for
October 16, 1995. The Planning Commission is reviewing the draft
development regulations which are scheduled to be forwarded to the
City Council in early September.
The draft plan, regulations and EIS have been previously forwarded
to the School District. We recommend that you review these
documents to ensure they will conform to the proposed CFP. If you
find additional coordination between the City's and the School
District's planning efforts is needed, we encourage you to take the
opportunity to comment at the City Council public hearings.
As noted in the executive summary, the School District has no plans
for implementing impact fees for Tukwila. Should there be a change
in this position, we recommend you contact us as early in your
planning process as possible and provide us with information
supporting new impact fees so that we may work with you to develop
appropriate ordinances.
If you have any question, don't hesitate to call me at 431-3686.
Sincerely,
Steve Lancaster
Director, DCD
6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665
•
August 21, 1995
LL-
(t)(5ce
Alan J. Schmidt
Highline School District No. 401
17810 8th Ave S.
Seattle, WA 98148
(JJ
RE: Six Year Capital Facilities Plan
Dear Mr. Schmidt:
•
I have reviewed the above referenced Capital Facilities Plan and
DNS and have the following comments to offer.
The City of Tukwila is currently conducting public hearings on a
new Comprehensive Plan, with the final hearing scheduled for
October 16, 1995. The Planning Commission is reviewing the draft
development regulations which are scheduled to be forwarded to the
City Council in early September.
The draft plan, regulations and EIS have been previously forwarded
to the School District. We recommend that you review these
documents to ensure they will conform to the proposed CFP. If
afto a^ur row„ pw you find additional coordination between the
City's and the School District's planning efforts, a needed, we
encourage you to take the opportunity to comment at the City
Council public hearings.
CFP des use of impact fees to pay for school.faciliies.
u m -y want to .ceerdinate with the City on impact fees, as the
y of Tukwila draft plan and regulations do not propose
lementation of impact fees at this time.
If you have any
Sincerely,
Jack Pace
Senior Planner
question, don't hesitate to call me at 431-3686. L
(0"5"(741,-3-/ 0^41474 i‘2(Ctiej
lcke3(CJ ( '//`.
uy\A
"""A ,�, (75k"
Ia r C G c f
1-✓�'G' — w % Gov/ ° - (
CITY OF TUKWILA Id: MISC120 Keyword: UACT User: 1684 08/21/95
Comments regarding an Activity STATE ENVIR PROTECT ACT
Permit No: E95-0025 Tenant: HIGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Status: PENDING Location: 17810 8TH AVE. S., SEATTLE 98148 (HIG
Line User Id Text
1 1684 8/21/94: No comments due to low priority of review. Can't
2 1684 respond by 8/24 deadline, nor do I suggest spending time
3 1684 reviewing docsince there are only a few blocks of Tukwila
4 1684 land in the Highline School dist (areas south of S. 160th
5 1684 St.). vu
Enter Option: A=Add, C=Change, D=Delete, I=Inspect
Up/Down=Select, PgUp/PgDn(F2)=Page, F3=First 12, ESC=Exit
Comment Added O.K.
ecgC
02
•
I!
.....
. .::. JIi7,7_,i
•.P.;; ,._.
74 ri'l..;,..;',1;,-,.
. ! .1 1 . •,,,-.:,,,;.....,.;
. .. , ..c,,,.. u! ._; 11
i ' d .---
-
I . I I -.:- 11 \- , ,.7-
J;I! -. .
rif 11 -.1':. ; •-•;
I ji P: .-:-....,-. r.
L1
r-:1 .;•.-
/'-'.
•
r- -•••
• 1 ,Y1.7.1'
77-:31
r'<•E%-s. .-;
11_
111/4,• 1-1-7..7•".--'7'h,.. -\\ 4 if:j
\ •
LigRGOCIE'EC E
9."‘k• ." • •,‘ 1[J.
ss.
• :••••••;-•--.% "• 7* --
A , • • . ••• 1.23 •••••, • >N5:
"
4.> • /..'
— k.--• ".*
• • ,
\ ;I!
-••- •
HI • \s!
.:;111.ki•ii, ,‘•
:,..- •-•::::=H';,.*:--iii7.1.•-•;-/.7.,...:•:4,,\.,.• ,.:k.`;‘. /4.\
•••/„,,,..E: .,:.4.--"-z7:17:•.z,-....
_.5....z.........
r:.-.75---z-'4....._,----:z•-: .
'.---
— . ;l:ii ,‘... 1-•-•...:1.i.:...„..,,;,:.,—(-,,,I,.,•,.!1.'„P. -r,-..:.,; .i;..'t.„q,:i,..'3,.'-p,,4.1,' t.4.' ..'0:t4. `:‘;..-, p4f.-..'!;il,., a.4..... •i ,.,! I,-'.....,*i'..:rI.1zi4l1p....i.1.j, -,.7.ii.1.l.7l..1p9.,.A.‘.11t...•..7,1.i;..,1
,,_;,;..-,c;..\,.-:,;-iii•,;.•,-.I,c.•.
. . ,...
• ; "4
,,14e P ,_0
—-1r43 47i "
p p•
T0 -A,.:11.E4-.2 •.
• 4O.,. „..::
....":7::: --. 7--:•--'t:..--
-
1 \'7',..--‘2,'..17!7•13' 4,_.'Llii. -,-; , -,-..:,-.,:-....,"
11 .. •64•7.R.;1. 1414.2
L:! ::. 11 ,...2::•:...: : • .. P
. . ,
1:, •*!-ITT-.... '.. •- - -1 '',. •
7.41.:,--.11.1.14 • •; i 4'1 i'2 6 '
.....!•!1;.;.li..:1,-1.-•••ii:._,..,1. , ,;
'-' : 'I 7 I *
R..7.,T 1••, I.7.3 ,-:1 •P-1.74•
1
,P.• : • ,!. ' • : :II_
.....• -7- , 1 " ''. ' tr••• • •
-47.2 ,•I f 1 p - • ri , r , ,;
- ,-,„. ,. ,...4..,.. , , n•• -••.a
N. • . .1.r.!
...........„_!:....... ,
"-77-,:i...%*7- ••••-•-• .:
".: -;•••••••=:.:--17-• i ,ti
-;••Zz.r........- / ,.1
.-::;":.....":...:-.7:".•
• li
'.1-.7-...• .•*,.....-•"' ' 4(
, -.:.:FT".."......'Nlz...„.‘
w ?..---.."-- '' • '....: -.. ..""--"' ..::••-
' .7..-.1.-...".... .. •--.Z.......
•:..--:...' 7..---:-:::....... -,.....:-......
.4.--:."----%•7-...:•.-:...,---...
.......:„..,z............ -....„.........
-...- ..........---
-......,.........
•
. •
mei
/-,..:1-in__ •`;‘, ,. s' ': ..-.'
, RIM , . . : v . -4., .11-47.1. \ - .... , • . ' ''' - " - -
il'..' :,7111'1417:1; ill- k .- ' : . • :"7,...7"';' -6...:'...?3_;:il.. _ -.'!\.' ..
7-L-!i..i.111.1.7:• . • • , r . h. :It .1, .. • , t.1 1.r , ,- , „ --,,.. • • .-, ..1._
• • .• • . i 1 CM t ) )
' 1 . " -____S .. .1!
1.,,C1.4,1• ,
.1 C 1. :: .
1 ..`..c".." li ,,,,.., I, t
— CP
.' ; -11 , '' lic is . • I- ' PI ,:.
7 .74 •-:-.' „--,i I. - :r----, :, ,,-„srsi,
L.
- 1
i ' j • -i .! : I,'
c_.__I -:,-. euf,
i 1 1 -4..--i;
TURL1ftA
cAcrDS irt
E4 Ocala'
ca -1) iSr
P
I,r
ij
7,.;•-•• ••••••,,
4162minum
• ,
1.11.1
1 C t _ ^
Riverton Hei ,ts Elementary
McMicken Heights Elementary
Tv kevtut LAW> S c.
f(G(t.r"I( SCW. (ST
Wat its vu.
NIATTUl•TACOMIA
DITOATIOMAL
A/MOIIT
Bow Lake
Tyee High
Chinook Mi
1
FORM FOR (PROPOSED/FINAL) DECLARATION
OF (SIGNIFICANCE/NON-SIGNIFICANCE)
Description of proposal Capital Facilities Plan
Proponent Highline School District No. 401, Facilities Department
Location of Proposal
Lead Agency Highline School District No. 401
This proposal has been determined to (have/not have a significant adverse impact upon the
environment. An EIS (is/is not) required under RCW 43.21C 030(2)(c). This decision was
made after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other
information on file with the lead agency. The information is available to the public on request.
There is no comment period for this DNS.
_x This DNS is issued under 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal
for 15 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted y s 4. 1995.
Responsible Official Alan J. Schmidt
Position/Title Asst. Director, Maintenance Phone 433-2252
Address 17810 - 8th Avenue South Seattle, WA. 98148
Date F- �f - 9s- Signature gle?,&. iyy,,c
0 You may appeal this determination to (Name): Alan J. Schmidt
at (Location): HSD #401, 17810 8th Ave. So., Seattle, WA 98148
no later than (date): August 24, 1995
by (method): Written comments
You should be prepared,to make specific factual objections.
Contact Alan J. Schmidt to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals.
0 There is no agency appeal.
�33�dlll
muiva-
�(cleC�tS
HIGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 401'
KING .COUNTY=WASHINGTON
HIGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 401
Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan
1995-1996 2000-2001
June 1995
For Information on the Plan, please call the
Facilities Department at 433-2501
HIGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 401
15675 Ambaum Blvd. S.W.
Burien, Washington 98166
12061433-0111
SIX-YEAR CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
1995-1996 2000-2001
June 1995
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Ben Kodama
Carol Mohler
Eduardo I. Pina
Tom Slattery
Wilton S. ViaII I11
ADMINISTRATION
Joseph R. McGeehan
Superintendent
Geraldine L. Fain
Assistant Superintendent
Business & Plant
Linda Byrnes
Administrative Assistant to the Superintendent
HIGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 401
SIX-YEAR CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section Page Number
Executive Summary 2
11 Six -Year Enrollment Projection 4
III Current District "Standard of Service" 9
IV Inventory and Capacity of Existing Schools 12
V Six -Year Planning and Construction Plan 17
VI Relocatable Classrooms 26
VII Projected Classroom Capacity 27
VIII Finance Plan and Impact Fee Schedules 29
Hiphline School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan
June, 1995 Pape 1
!\•
/
/ .\
•
\ )' / q
,/
1- •r: V 1c
•�),1: ' L.
.. r y
/ /
/,
•\
.1
)
f'
/
•
f
Executive Summary
This Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan has been prepared by the Highline School
District, in compliance with the requirements of Washington's Growth
Management Act and King County Ordinance No. 10162. This annual plan update
was prepared using data available during the 1994-1995 school year.
The 1995 Plan is consistent with prior long-term capital facilities plans adopted by
the Highline School District. This Plan is not intended to be the sole planning
document for all of the District's needs. The District may prepare interim and
periodic Long Range Capital Facilities Plans. Any plans will be consistent with this
Plan.
The 1995 Plan is an update of a Plan which originated in 1984. The fulfillment of
the original plan began in 1986 with a $57 million capital bonds measure. The
focus of the original plan was to modernize existing schools, provide additional
space and provide needed core facilities to support the educational programs.
During the past 9 years, the Plan has been adapted to place greater emphasis on
constructing additional facilities to house the growing enrollment that has resulted
from the 1985 King County Growth Management Plan. The District Plan has also
been modified to reduce the total number of schools that the District will operate
in the future. Schools will be larger with increased enrollments and staffing. This
will enhance the delivery of programs and services, and increase operating
efficiency.
In order for impact fees to continue to be collected in the unincorporated portions
of the District, the Metropolitan King County Council must also adopt this plan
update. In order for impact fees to be collected in the incorporated portions of the
District, the City of Burien, the City of Des Moines, the City of Normandy Park,
and the City of SeaTac must also adopt this Plan and their own school impact fee
ordinances. To date, none of these cities have adopted a school impact fee
ordinance.
A financing plan is included which outlines the District's intent for implementing
this Plan.
This Capital Facilities Plan delineates the District's "standard of service" in order
to determine the District's current and future capacity. The Growth Management
Act and King County Ordinance No. 10162 authorizes the District to make
adjustments to the standard of service based on specific needs of the District.
Hiphhne School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan
June, 1995 Pape 2
Executive Summary (continued)
The capacity of the schools in the District is calculated based on this standard of
service and the existing inventory, which includes relocatable classrooms. The
District's 1994-95 program capacity of permanent facilities is 20,726. District
relocatable capacity of 500 brings the District's current capacity to 21,226.
Full Time Equivalent enrollment in October, 1994 was 16,888. The actual number
of individual students per the October 1994 head count was 17,937.
During the Summer of 1994 the District's Long Range Capital Facilities Plan was
studied by the Building Study Committee, "A Blue Ribbon Panel." The Final Report
was issued on August 19, 1994. Findings and recommendations of this
committee were used in revising the Long Range Plan.
The Capital Facilities Long Range Plan was originally adopted by the Highline
School District Board of Directors on June 17, 1992. An updated plan was
reviewed and approved by the Board on June 8, 1994. The update was based
upon the assumption of the passage of a 1995 Capital Projects Bond Issue. The
issue was on the May 16, 1995 ballot and failed to gain a 60% approval.
The revised 1995 Capital Facilities Plan is predicated upon the passage of a 1996
Bond Issue. Relocatable facilities (portables) will be used to accommodate District
growth until new buildings could come "on-line" in 1998.
The District's Board of Directors approved this 1995 update of the Plan in its
regular meeting of June 28, 1995. As required by the Growth Management Act,
this Plan will be updated periodically, with changes in the fee schedule adjusted
accordingly.
The Plan has undergone SEPA review and a DNS has been issued. The
notification appeal and comment period concluded June 5, 1992. (See Appendix
D for Checklist.)
Highline School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan
June, 1996 Pape 3
f
11 , ---.SIX-YEAR ENROLLMENT PROJECTION'
1 f
/
u.
J \�
J 7 ,7
(, • ')/
r
)
/ `1,
J \
II Six - Year Enrollment Projection
Growth projections were calculated by analyzing an eight-year history of the
District. The King County live births and the District's relational percentage
average were used to determine the number of kindergartners entering the system.
The percentage increase ranged from a high of 7.03 in 1986 to a low of 6.04 in
1993. Based on an eight-year average, 6.07 of King County live births are
equivalent to the number of students projected to enter Kindergarten in the District
for the next six-year period.
Projections for Grades 1-12 are calculated using historical cohort survival ratios
from the past five years. These are weight averaged by year to produce future
year projections.
Based on the District's forecast, student enrollment is projected to increase by
approximately 1,429 through the 2000-2001 school year which will be an 8%
increase over the District's current student population.
The expectation is that growth will occur Districtwide, with future emphasis on
the Northwest Quadrant (White Center) and the "Highway 99" Corridor. Although
increased residential density is now permitted in these areas, economic factors will
probably drive these growth areas. Future mass transit plans could accelerate
this growth. The District continues to track new and proposed developments.
The Highline School District has reviewed King County, Des Moines, Normandy
Park, and SeaTac Comprehensive Plans. We are awaiting a final plan from the
City of Burien.
In the recent past, development has continued at a greater pace in the Des Moines
area, and adjacent south District lands. The District is currently absorbing this
growth while planning for increased growth in other areas due to increased
residential zoning densities. Land availability will continue to drive South District
growth. Over time, however, as the developable land becomes increasingly scarce
and expensive, the growth is expected to slow.
Projections consider the following assumptions:
1. New housing development, both single and multi -family units, will continue
at the current rate.
2. There will be no major policy changes which will alter the holding capacity
of the students currently enrolled or projected for enrollment in the Highline
School District.
Highline School District Six -Yea Capital Facilities Plan
June 1996 Pape 4
3. There will be no unexpected, major land use changes in the Highline School
District.
4. The economic conditions in the District and the area will generally follow
the same trend that prevailed in 1994.
5. The residential in/out-migration patterns of students will remain constant.
6. No dramatic changes in present ratios of private to public school
enrollments will occur.
7. Existing and foreseeable educational programs will approximate those
currently operating within the Highline School District.
8. Current child care programs will exist and the effect of child care placement
in the community, as well as District child care programs will remain the
same.
Current projections may be modified to reflect significant changes in such
conditions as:
1. Unexpected increase or decrease in new housing starts for single and/or
multiple family units.
2. Modification of District policy related to
• open enrollment
• student transfer
• out -of -district students
• child care programs
3. Major land use rezoning, such as
• development of SeaTac Business Park
• extension of SR 509
• further adjustment of residential density by municipalities
4. Unexpected changes in the District's construction/remodeling schedules
impacting the availability of space for students at specific sites.
Highlune School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Pin
June 1996 Pqe 6
5. The availability and placement of new child care facilities.
6. The current rate of in/out-migration of students.
7. Port of Seattle land acquisition.
8. The opening or closing of private schools.
Highline School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan
June 1996 Page 6
Highline School District - 1995 Capital Facilities Plan
Enrollment History - Table #1
Number of Live Births Shown are from Five Years Prior to the Enrollment Year.
Highline School District Ss -Year Capital Facilities Plan
June 1995 Page 7
1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994
King Co. Live Births
18,388
18,811
18,533
18,974
19,788
19,953
20,423
21,275
22,386
HSD Kind/Births %
7.03%
6.89%
7.31%
7.07%
6.31%
6.68%
6.20%
6.04%
6.06%
Kindergarten
1,293
1,296
1,355
1,342
1,248
1,332
1,266
1,285
1,356
Grade 1
1,272
1,291
1,315
1,379
1,411
1,281
1,408
1,328
1,376
Grade 2
1,130
1,257
1,329
1,338
1,329
1,342
1,303
1,402
1,358
Grade 3
1,211
1,155
1,298
1,349
1,320
1,353
1,403
1,327
1,464
Grade 4
1,132
1,201
1,198
1,290
1,313
1,367
1,364
1,416
1,355
Grade 5
1,051
1,155
1,164
1,198
1,300
1,373
1,374
1,394
1,414
Grade 6
1,089
1,084
1,185
1,175
1,195
1,317
1,366
1,375
1,413
Sub Total K-6
8,178
8,439
8,844
9,071
9,116
9,365
9,484
9,527
9,736
Grade 7
1,070
1,120
1,110
1,199
1,233
1,254
1,348
1,381
1,410
Grade 8
1,135
1,103
1,122
1,089
1,173
1,201
1,217
1,303
1,336
Sub Total 7-8
2,205
2,223
2,232
2,288
2,406
2,455
2,565
2,684
2,746
Grade 9
1,183
1,165
1,191
1,170
1,199
1,350
1,341
1,443
1,599
Grade 10
1,308
.1,191
1,152
1,137
1,222
1,220
1,355
1,303
1,379
Grade 11
1,409
1,377
1,267
1,209
1,149
1,218
1,257
1,240
1,219
Grade 12
1,494
1,523
1,523
1,270
1,205
1,195
1,246
1,313
1,258
Sub Total 9-12 1
5,394
5,256
5,133
4,786
4,775
4,983
5,199
5,299
5,455
Total Enrollment
15,777
15,918
16,209
16,145
16,297
16,803
17,248
17,510
17,937
Increase/Decrease
N/a
141
291
(64)
152
506
445
262
427
Number of Live Births Shown are from Five Years Prior to the Enrollment Year.
Highline School District Ss -Year Capital Facilities Plan
June 1995 Page 7
Highline School District - 1995 Capital Facilities Plan
Six -Year Enrollment Projection - Table #2
Number of Live Births Shown are from Five Years Prior to the Enrollment Year.
Projections are Based on Information from the Wa State Center for Health Statistics.
King Co. Live Births are Projected for 1999 & 2000.
HSD Kind/Births % Projections(1995-2000) are a Weighted Average.
Highline School District Sz-Year Capital Facilities Plan
June 1995 Page 8
1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2,000
King Co. Live Births
22,386
22,951
22,799
23,049
22,330
22,123
21,916
Increase/Decrease
1,111
565
(152)
250
(719)
(207)
(207)
HSD Kind/Births %
6.06%
6.07%
6.07%
6.07%
6.07%
6.07%
6.07%
Kindergarten
1,356
1,393
1,384
1,399
1,355
1,343
1,330
Grade 1
1,376
1,351
1,464
1,454
1,470
1,425
1,411
Grade 2
1,358
1,314
1,336
1,448
1,438
1,454
1,409
Grade 3
1,464
1,434
1,344
1,367
1,481
1,471
1,487
Grade 4
1,355
1,339
1,447
1,356
1,379
1,494
1,484
Grade 5
1,414
1,438
1,360
1,470
1,377
1,401
1,518
Grade 6
1,413
1,400
1,444
1,366
1,476
1,384
1,407
Sub Total K-6
9,736
9,669
9,780
9,860
9,978
9,971
10,047
Grade 7
1,410
1,417
1,443
1,488
1,408
1,521
1,426
Grade 8
1,336
1,341
1,376
1,401
1,445
1,367
1,477
Sub Total 7-8
2,746
2,758
2,818
2,889
2,853
2,888
2,903
Grade 9
1,599
1,510
1,554
1,595
1,623
1,675
1,585
Grade 10
1,379
1,479
1,504
1,548
1,588
1,617
1,668
Grade 11
1,219
1,271
1,402
1,467
1,510
1,549
1,577
Grade 12
1,258
1,269
1,301
1,435
1,502
1,546
1,586
Sub Total 9-12 1
5,455
5,529
5,762
6,045
6,224
6,388
6,417
Total Enrollment
17,937
17,956
18,360
18,795
19,055
19,247
19,366
Increase/Decrease
427
19
404
435
260
192
119
Number of Live Births Shown are from Five Years Prior to the Enrollment Year.
Projections are Based on Information from the Wa State Center for Health Statistics.
King Co. Live Births are Projected for 1999 & 2000.
HSD Kind/Births % Projections(1995-2000) are a Weighted Average.
Highline School District Sz-Year Capital Facilities Plan
June 1995 Page 8
}
•
(/
: J•
-1' y
( \
)
,CURRENT. DISTRICT ,'STANDARD;OFiERVICE'.
f•
—7
A
\'6
( � / 1t•
• )j
-'' -, . ' i
( . 1 I • .
. 1 • f 1 \
J ,. / 7' , /
/
. ��
J , \ J
tl• i r �\' ) /.t ` / /• / 1
! Il —(
_ _ S 1 \ -•-( t
i••4 I_ ) 1
:• .
•')
'1 . `./ 1
{ ; •\1 f /.
•
'1. - J
/ , -. . (I 1 !.
/'4t ,.• •f.,./•
•1•• \ \,.,- 1
;1
\
•t•{
/1,1
•
•
N.
•
•
r•
\— \ .
C f
III Current Highline School District "Standard of Service"
In order to determine the capacity of the District's facilities, the King County
Ordinance No. 10162 refers to a "standard of service" that each school district
must establish in order to ascertain its overall capacity. The standard of service
identifies the program year, the class size, the number of classrooms, students
and programs of special need, and other factors determined by the District which
would, in the District's judgment, best serve its student population.
This Plan includes the standard of service as established by Highline School
District.
The standard of service defined herein may change due to state wide budget cuts
to special education funding. Future changes to the standard of service will be
reflected in future Capital Facilities plans.
The Highline School District's standard of service is predicated on housing all
instructional programs and non -instructional services in appropriate permanent
facilities. Portable classroom units are used to house programs and services only
as an interim measure until suitable permanent facilities can be provided.
District Programs
The District's facilities house the basic "regular" education program, plus a broad
range of "special programs." Special programs is a generic term which includes
programs for students with disabilities, remedial programs, and enhancement
programs. Approximately 15 percent of the District's students are enrolled in
special programs.
The District's standard of service requires facilities for support activities provided
by school based and itinerant personnel who provide counseling, tutoring, therapy
and other vital services. These activities are typically "pull-out" activities, i.e. they
occur in spaces other than the student's regular classrooms.
Finally, the District's standard of service further requires adequate "core facilities"
to house library, administration, physical education, and food service spaces.
These spaces are sized to accommodate the needs of the anticipated or planned
enrollment for a particular facility.
Highline School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan
June 1996 Pape 9
Identified students are provided educational opportunities in programs as follows:
Bilingual/ESL Program
Challenge Program
Communication Disorder Specialist
Computer Assisted Instruction (CAI)
Deaf and Hard of Hearing
Developmentally Disabled (DD) = Mentally Retarded/Mild, Moderate and
Severe
Developmentally Handicapped (DH)
Early Childhood Assistance Program (ECEAP)
Gifted Education
Graduation Equivalent Program (GED)
Health Impaired (HI)
Highline Preschool
Home Schooling Program
Honors Program
Indian Education Program
International Baccalaureate (IB)
Multiple Handicapped (MH)
Occupational/Physical Therapy
Olympic Childcare
Orthopedically Handicapped (OH)
Realistic Transition Program
Reentry Program
Teen Parent Program
Serious Behaviorally Disabled (SBD)
Specific Learning Disabled (SLD or LD)
Vision Impaired
Vocational/Occupational/Career Ed Program
Grade Span Class Sia s
The required number of classrooms is primarily a function of the ratio of students
per teacher (class size). Grade level student/teacher ratios are established by the
District's collective bargaining agreement with its teachers and by the State's
funding apportionment formula.
Highline School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan June 1995 Pape 10
The District's current bargaining agreement specifies the following basic ratios.
Grade level
Kindergarten
1-3
4-6
7-8
9-12
OSC
Regular Prngram Special Program
23.5:1 (47:1 @ 1/2FTE)
24:1
26.5:1
28:1
28.5:1
N/A
6:1-12:1
„ „
„ „
„ „
„ „
28.5:1
For planning purposes the District bases classroom space requirements on an
average ratio of 25:1 for regular programs and 12:1 for special programs.
Room Utilizatinn
As a result of yearly variations in student enrollment, the need for specialized
rooms for certain programs, and the need for teachers to have a work space
during their planning periods, it is not possible to achieve 100% utilization of
regular teaching stations. Based on the analysis of actual utilization, the District
has concluded that the current utilization rate is 80%.
As new buildings are added to the District's inventory to replace older buildings,
the utilization factor will increase. New elementary buildings designed for a
capacity of 650 students have an increased utilization factor of 85%. The
District's recently constructed elementary schools therefore, house approximately
550 students. The intent of the District's Master Plan is to permanently close
small inefficient elementary schools as new larger schools are built.
The utilization factor will increase over time as new construction continues. The
increased efficiency of the new elementary buildings will increase the overall
District efficiency by 1-2% over the six year period.
Highine School District Six -Near Capital Facilities Plan
June 1996 Rige 11
,I•
•
L
`• I -•rte; i 't
-
\ - - •
(• •
•
1
IV Inventory and Capacity of Existing Schools
The District currently has permanent program capacity to house 20,726 students
based on the District's Standard of Service. Relocatable capacity of 500 students
brings the total capacity to 21,226. Full Time Equivalent student enrollment for
1994-1995 is 17,937.
Included in this section are: a map of existing facilities, the current classroom
capacity analysis, and an October 1994 enrollment summary. The existing
facilities map shows current schools and other District properties. District
classroom capacity is shown for permanent and relocatable rooms. Regular and
special programs enrollments are identified by location in the enrollment summary.
School addresses are as follows:
FLFMENTARY SCHOOLS
Beverly Park @ Glendale
1201 S. 104th St.
Bow Lake
18237 42nd Ave. So.
Cedarhurst
611 So. 132nd St.
Des Moines
22001 9th Ave. So.
Gregory Heights
16216 19th Ave. S.W.
Hazel Valley
402 S.W. 132nd St.
Hilltop
12250 24th Ave. So.
Madrona
3030 So. 204th St.
Marvista
19800 Marine View Dr. S.W.
McMicken Heights
3708 So. 168th St.
Midway
22447 24th Ave. So.
Mount View
10811 12th Ave. S.W.
North Hill
19835 8th Ave. So.
Olympic (1)
615 So. 200th St.
Parkside
2104 So. 247th St.
Riverton Heights (2)
3011 So. 148th St.
Salmon Creek
614 S.W. 120th St.
Seahurst
14603 14th Ave. S.W.
Shorewood (3)
2725 S.W. 116th St.
Southern Heights
11249 14th Ave. So.
Sunnydale
15631 8th Ave. So.
Valley View
17622 46th Ave. So.
White Center Heights
712 S.W. 102nd St.
(1) Former junior high school
(2) Location of elementary grade level severely disabled programs.
enrollment at 6:1.
(3) Kindergarten based in Evergreen High School.
Hiphline School District Six -Yen Capital Facilities Plan
June 1996
Special
Pce 12
MIDDLE SCHnnI
HIGH SCHOOLS
Cascade Evergreen
11212 10th Ave. S.W. 830 S.W. 116th St.
Chinook Highline
18650 42nd Ave. So. 225 So. 152nd St.
Pacific Mt. Rainier
22705 24th PI. So. 22450 19th Ave. So.
Sylvester Tyee
16222 Sylvester Road S.W. 4424 So. 188th St.
ALTERNATIVE SCHnn1 S
Satellite High School
440 So. 186th St.
SeaTac Occupational Skills Center
18010 8th Ave. So.
Highline School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan June 1995 Pps13
=
HIGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 401
iii . s r ��••1i
1 11111 tt it
1iA1111C.i�
111! 11I ^PIIIK 1I .
!Imo MOE n'� 1 11. F
• '�lll iffih1 l�1 11 �1i 11
,11LL■■.■■
111110111116Effil IMO
White Center Heights Elementary
Er1;itru iMin !!R4lIt 1
Beverly Park @ Glendale Elementary
Southern Heights Elementary
Salmon Creek Elementary
Hilltop Elementary
Hazel Valley Elemen
Cedarhurst Elementary
Seahurst Elementary
Highline High
Sunnydale Elementary
Gregory Heights Elementary
Sylvester Middle
1!9llii_w !!IR!Rl� I�l�
1i1
-,SrattailkEEMENIONME
AllN4a�
X11 11
feat'!ilrir��_�,,,•�„�s�Gll!R!!!!1 •
Riverton Heights Elementary
McMicken Heights Elementary
1'
' Valley View Elementary
SeaTac OSC
Satellite Alternative High
Marvista Elementary
North Hill Elemen
Olympic Elemen
0
0
Des Moines Elementary
OTHER PROPERTIES
1/2
1_
a
1 2
Highline School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan
Bow Lake Elementary
Tyee High
Chinook Middle
Madrona Elementary
Mt. Rainier High
Midway Intermediate
Pacific Middle
Parkside Primary
June 1995
MAP #1
Page 14
Highline School District - 1995 Capital Facilities Plan
1994/95 Existing Capacity - Table #3
School
Regular
Rooms Cap
Special
Rooms Cap
Permanent
Rooms Cap
Portables
Rooms Cap
Total
Rooms Cap
Elem Subtotal
419 10,475
36
348
455
10,823
16
400
471
11,223
MS Subtotal
126 3,150
11
132
137
3,282
4
100
141
3,382
HS Subtotal
261 6,525
8
96
269
6,621
0
0
269
6,621
District Total 1
806 20,150
55
576
861
20,726
20
500
881
21,226
School
Regular
Rooms Cap
Special
Rooms Cap
Permanent
Rooms Cap
Portables
Rooms Cap
Total
Rooms Cap
Bev Park @ Glen
23 575
2
24
25
599
0
0
25
599
Bow Lake
16 400
6
36
22
436
2
50
24
486
Cedarhurst
17 425
2
24
19
449
0
0
19
449
Des Moines
18 450
2
24
20
474
0
0
20
474
Gregory Hts
21 525
1
12
22
537
0
0
22
537
Hazel Valley
15 375
2
24
17
399
2
50
19
449
Hilltop
16 400
0
0
16
400
0
0
16
400
Madrona
14 350
1
12
15
362
4
100
19
462
Marvista
20 500
1
12
21
512
1
25
22
537
McMicken Hts
15 375
2
24
17
399
1
25
18
424
Midway
24 600
0
0
24
600
0
0
24
600
Mt View
19 475
0
0
19
475
0
0
19
475
North Hill
16 400
2
24
18
424
1
25
19
449
Olympic
27 675
1
12
28
687
0
0
28
687
Parkside
25 625
0
0
25
625
0
0
25
625
Riverton Hts
13 325
8
48
21
373
0
0
21
373
Salmon Creek
12 300
2
24
14
324
0
0
14
324
Seahurst
27 675
0
0
27
675
0
0
27
675
Shorewood
20 500
0
0
20
500
1
25
21
525
Southern Hts
15 375
2
24
17
399
0
0
17
399
Sunnydale
21 525
0
0
21
525
0
0
21
525
Valley View
11 275
0
0
11
275
3
75
14
350
White Center Hts
14 350
2
24
16
374
1
25
17
399
Elem Subtotal I
419 10,475
36
348
455
10,823
16
400
471
11,223
Cascade
35 875
6
72
41
947
3
75
44
1,022
Chinook
25 625
3
36
28
661
0
0
28
661
Pacific
29 725
1
12
30
737
1
25
31
762
Sylvester
37 925
1
12
38
937
0
0
38
937
MS Subtotal I
126 3,150
11
132
137
3,282
4
100
141
3,382
Evergreen
59 1,475
0
0
59
1,475
0
0
59
1,475
Highline
68 1,700
1
12
69
1,712
0
0
69
1,712
Mt Rainier
59 1,475
0
0
59
1,475
0
0
59
1,475
Tyee
45 1,125
6
72
51
1,197
0
0
51
1,197
Alternate H.S.
16 400
1
12
17
412
0
0
17
412
Occupatn'l Skills
14 350
0
0
14
3.50
0
0
14
350
HS Subtotal I
261 6,525
8
96
269
6,621
0
0
269
6,621
District Total 1
806 20,150
55
576
861
20,726
20
500
881
21,226
Highline Shod Diaries Sx-Year Capital Facilities Plan
Jure 1995
Page 15
Highline School District — 1995 Capital Facilities Plan
October 1994 — Enrollment Summary — Table #4
School
Regular
Kind 1-6 7-8 9-12
Reg
Subttl
Spec
Prog
Current
Total
FTE
Total
Beverly Park @ Glen
69
415
0
0
484
75
559
506
Bow Lake
52
285
0
0
337
42
379
353
Cedarhurst
46
297
0
0
343
41
384
361
Des Moines
44
253
0
0
297
11
308
286
Gregory Hts
52
309
0
0
361
42
403
376
Hazel Valley
51
325
0
0
376
47
423
3975
Hilltop
70
310
0
0
380
12
392
359
Madrona
67
395
0
0
462
0
462
428.5
Marvista
58
433
0
0
491
0
491
462
McMicken Hts
66
327
0
0
393
0
393
360
Midway
0
373
0
0
373
35
408
408
Mt View
63
381
0
0
444
0
444
4125
North Hill
100
246
0
0
346
62
408
344
Olympic
0
241
0
0
241
116
357
348
Parkside
131
381
0
0
512
53
565
490
Riverton Hts
27
183
0
0
210
15
225
2115
Salmon Creek
46
260
0
0
306
0
306
283
Seahurst
88
437
0
0
525
71
596
552
Shorewood
52
354
0
0
406
69
475
449
Southern Hts
54
308
0
0
362
18
380
353
Sunnydale
53
347
0
0
400
115
515
4885
Valley View
23
185
0
0
208
74
282
2705
White Center Hts
39
309
0
0
348
74
422
3875
Elementary Subtotal 1
1,251
7,354
0
0
8,605
972
9,577
8,887
Cascade
0
0
579
0
579
166
745
744
Chinook
0
0
543
0
543
107
650
649
Pacific
0
0
506
0
506
66
572
570
Sylvester
0
0
622
0
622
87
709
708
Middle School Subttl I
0
0
2250
0
2250
426
2676
2671
Evergreen
0
0
0
895
895
213
1108
1093
Highline
0
0
0
1120
1120
172
1292
1290
Mt Rainier
0
0
0
1073
1073
101
1174
1145
Tyee
0
0
0
752
752
174
926
917
High School Subtotal 1
0
0
0
3840
3840
660
4500
4445
Basic Skills Program
0
0
0
276
276
0
276
276
Maywood Programs
0
158
70
185
413
0
413
233
Satellite School
0
0
0
198
198
3
201
171
OSC—HSD(OSC Only)
0
0
0
0
0
64
64
64
OSC—Out of District
0
0
0
0
0
235
235
141
Subtotal 1
0
158
70
659
887
302
1189
885
District Total 1
1251
7512
2320
4499
15582
2360
17942
16887.5
Note: FTE Total Reflects Part Time Kindergarten & Special Program Students.
Higbline School District Sx—Year Capital FadlitieaPlan
June 1995
Page 16
,SIX`YEAR PLANNING AND CONSTRUCTION PLAN'
..• /
/ I•.
.\ - . \--,
1
•
)
•
�
V District's Six - Year Planning and Construction Plan
The Highline School District has recently completed three projects following its
long range planning process. These projects are as follows:
Sylvester Middle School: Addition of eight permanent classrooms.
Cascade Middle School: Addition of eight permanent classrooms.
Pacific Middle School: Rehabilitation of common areas and special
program areas.
On May 16, 1995 a $118.5 million bond issue was presented to the Highline
voters to fund major capital improvements. The ballot issue was defeated at the
polls. The long range plan, as well as the District's six year plan, has now been
moved forward by approximately two years. This plan projects a capital projects
bond issue in the Fall of 1996. If a bond issue were to pass at that time,
construction on new projects would begin in the Spring of 1997, with completion
of five to six new elementary schools by Fall of 1998.
The six year plan proposes to house increased student enrollment between 1995
and 1998 in relocatable (portable) classrooms. The District would add portables
at sites where appropriate in order to temporarily house the student population
increase. At the writing of this report it is difficult to predict exact locations for
the required portables.
The Highline School District's Long Range Plan calls for elementary schools to
have a capacity of approximately 650 students. This equates to 550 students,
at an 85% utilization efficiency.
Upon completion of the six year plan, the District's four middle schools would be
sized for an expected utilization of 750 students per school. Three high schools
(Mt. Rainier, Highline and Evergreen) would be sized for an expected utilization of
1500, while Tyee would be sized for 1000 students.
The intent of the District's Long Range Plan is to increase the size of elementary
schools to the approximate 650 student size. This will gradually increase the
District's utilization factor.
Included in this plan is a schedule of projects for the six year construction period,
outlined by type, location, and estimated completion date.
Hiphline School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan
June 1996 Pipe 17
Urhan Growth/Long Range Plan
During the Summer of 1994 a "blue ribbon panel" of experts was convened to
review the Highline School District's Long Range Capital Facilities Plan.
Participants in this review included planning professionals from the local
municipalities, as well as King County. Those jurisdictions which had
comprehensive plans, presented those to the committee along with growth
summaries.
The District has provided an overall urban growth plan (see Map 2). This growth
plan takes into account input from all the jurisdictions involved in the blue ribbon
panel. Areas of increased density were outlined by the planners, indicating that
growth would occur in the northwest quadrant of the District (White Center), and
along the "Highway 99" corridor. The southern portion of the District is growing
at a high to moderate rate. Other areas are zoned for low to moderate growth.
Review of the District's Long Range Plan (see Maps 3, 4, 5 and 6) shows an
increase in District capacity, relative to the higher growth areas. Four replacement
elementary schools are proposed for the northwest quadrant of the District. Three
replacement elementary schools are outlined for construction along the "Highway
99" corridor.
The growth to be accommodated is based upon current enrollment projections,
and demographics. The areas intended for more intense urban growth as outlined
in the comprehensive plans do not appear at the writing of this report to be
generating additional enrollment beyond our current projections. Until such time
as the local economies will be able to generate an increased level of residential
development, the District does not foresee a need for additional construction. The
District is, however, maintaining an inventory of properties for the purpose of
accommodating additional growth, if economic conditions produce higher
residential densities in designated urban areas.
Highline School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan
June 1998 Pape 18
Regional Projected Growth
* Based on Municipal
Comprehensive Plans
Highline School District Six - Year Capital Facilities Plan
June 1995
Map #2
Page 19
Elementaries Completed by 1998
White Center
Mt View
Salmon Creek
Shorewood
Hazel Valley
Seahurst
Sunnydale
Gregory Hgts
North Hill
Bev Park @ Glen
Southern Hgts
Hilltop
Cedarhurst
Riverton Hgts
McMicken
Heights
Marvista
Olympic
Des Moines
Valley
View
0 Replacement Schools
Closed Schools
HlghWe School District Six - Year Capital Facilities Plan
June1995
Midway
Parkside
Map #3
Page 20
Elementaries Completed by 2000
White Center
Mt View
Salmon Creek
Shorewood
Hazel Valley
Seahurst
Sunnydale
Gregory Hgts
North Hill
Marvista
Bev Park @ Glen
Southern Hgts
Hilltop
Cedarhurst
Riverton Hgts
McMicken
Heights
Valley
View
aReplacement Schools
Closed Schools
HighlIne School District Six - Year Capital Facilities Plan
June1995
Midway
Parkside
Map #4
Page 21
Middle School Six -Year Plan
Remodel Project
Highline School District Six - Year Capital Facilities Plan
June 1995
Map #5
Page 22
High School Six -Year Plan
Remodel Project
Highline School District Six - Year Capital Facilities Plan
June 1995
Map #6
Page 23
5
m
m
ACTIVITY ORIG
DESCRIPTION DUR
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
Madrona 24
.....:: ;, r : Madrona
'"
Mt View
1 I
•�' ,'��;. i"' Hazel
Valle
I
Y
Mt View 24
Hazel Valley 24
White Center 24
i
i
White Center
I I
Gregory Heights
McMicken Heights
-1
Gregory Heights 24
McMicken Heights 24
1 +
North Hill 241
North Hill
Marvista
I
Marvista 24
I
Shorewood 24
Shorewood
Mt Rainier HS 30I
Bow
Tyee
Lake
HN
Mt Rainier
HS
Six—Year
Plan
Bow Lake 24
Tyee HS 24
Pacific MS 24
IPacifi9 MS
Highline HS 30
`' `'`'` " "' Highline
1 I I
HS
HS
Evergreen HS 30
1 I
1 f ''' F�vergreen
Midway 241
` i...'' Midway1
Parkside
HS
Parkside 24
1 1• 1 1 1
Satellite HS 24
Satellite
Cedarhurst 24
Cedarhurst
4 1 I
I
l
Waskowitz
I
Sunnydale 24
Sunnydale
I I I
Camp Waskowitz 24
Camp
+ 4 1 I
Zenith 24
Zenith
MI
I
+ I
MS
View
1
Chinook MS 24
Chinook
1 1 1 1 I 1
Hilltop 241
Southern
Sxlvest
1
1 1
I Hgts
eT+
I 1 11 I Hint/
1 1 1 1 Valley
1 I I 1
Valley View 24
Long
Range
Plan
Southern Hgts 24
Sylvester MS 24
Cascade MS •24
Cascade
MS
SIX—YEAR & LONG RANGE SCHEDULE
Highline School District — 1995 Capital Facilities Plan
Permanent Capacity Schedule — Table #5
School
Student Capacity
1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000
Madrona
362
362
362
362
650
650
650':
Mt View
475
475
475
475
.............................
650
650
650
Hazel Valley
399
399
399
399
662
662
662
White Center Hts
374
374
374
374
650
650
650'.
Gregory Hts
537
537
537
537
650
650
650'.
McMicken Hts
399
399
399
399
662
662
662
North Hill
424
424
424
424
424
662
662:'.
Marvista
512
512
512
512
512
650
650
Shorewood
500
500
500
500
500
' 650
650'.
Mt Rainier HS
1475
1475
1475
1475
1475
1475
1700
Bow Lake
436
436
436
436
436
436
650
Tyee HS
1197
1197
1197
1197
1197
1197
............ .......... .
1197
Pacific MS
737
737
737
737
737
737
862
Highline HS
1712
1712
1712
1712
1712
1712
1712
Evergreen HS
1475
1475
1475
1475
1475
1475
1475
Midway
600
600
600
600
600
600
600
Parkside
625
625
625
625
625
625
625
Alternate HS
412
412
412
412
412
412
412
Cedarhurst
449
449
449
449
449
449
449
Sunnydale
525
525
525
525
525
525
525
Zenith
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Chinook MS
661
661
661
661
661
661
961
Hilltop
400
400
400
400
400
400
400
Valley View
275
275
275
275
275
275
275
Southern Hts
399
399
399
399
399
399
399
Sylvester MS
937
937
937
937
937
937
937
Cascade MS
947
947
947
947
947
947
947
Beverly Park @ Glen
599
599
599
599
599
599
599
Seahurst
675
675
675
675
675
675
675
Occupatioal Skills
350
350
350
350
350
350
350
Salmon Creek
324
324
324
324
0
0
0
Riverton Hts
373
373
373
373
0
0
0
Olympic
687
687
687
687
687
0
0
Des Moines
474
474
474
474
474
474
474
Total 1
20,726
20,726
20,726
20,726
21,407
21,246
22,110
Highline School District Sz—Year Capital Fieilaiea Plan
— Denotes Increased Capacity & School Year Project is Complete.
June 1995 Page 25
VI RELOCATABLE CLASSROOMS
Currently the District utilizes 77 total portables. Of this total 20 are utilized for
classrooms in excess of permanent capacity, 57 are used for other educational
programs or services.
The plan proposes to increase the number of portable classroom locations in the
1995-96 school year, and 1996-97 school year. Additional classroom portables
will come from those which are presently used for other purposes. The District
does not plan on purchasing additional portables within the next five years.
The Highline School District does not consider portables or relocatable classrooms
as acceptable permanent facilities. A major concern of the Highline School District
is the lack of adequate portable soundproofing for use under the flight path of
SeaTac International Airport. Other concerns include heating, ventilation, fire
safety, security, restrooms, and lack of water. The District's Long Range Master
Plan does not propose to eliminate relocatable facilities entirely. Portables permit
the District additional flexibility in dealing with uneven or unbalanced enrollment.
The District plans to utilize portables for interim housing during construction of
facilities. Portables are an integral part of the District's planning process and help
to alleviate a number of short-term over -crowding concerns.
Highline School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan
June, 1995 FIpe28
VII PROJECTED CLASSROOM CAPACITY
Based on enrollment projections, District Standards of Service, current inventory
and capacity, and future planned classroom space, the District will have sufficient
capacity to house students over the next six years. Some schools may experience
overcrowding as the District awaits funding of additional construction projects.
Portable classrooms will be utilized to relieve the overcrowding. Overcrowding
may also occur due to variations in area enrollments. This will also be
accommodated by the use of portables.
Table 6 outlines the District's present and projected capacities.
Highline School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan
June, 1996 Paps27
Highline School District - 1995 Capital Facilities Plan
Capacity Calculations - Table #6
Factor
1994 1995 19% 1997 1998 1999 2000
Permanent Capacity
Added Capacity(Perm)
20,726
20,726
Madrona
288
Mt View
175
Hazel Valley
263
White Center Hts
276
Gregory Hts
113
McMicken Hts
263
North Hill
238
Marvista
138
Shorewood
150
Mt Rainier
225
Bow Lake
214
Tyee
0
Pacific
125
Chinook
300
Closed Schools
Salmon Creek
(324)
Riverton Hts
(373)
Olympic
(687)
Permanent Capacity
20,726
20,726
20,726
20,726
21,407
21,246
22,110
Permanent Capacity(Chk)
20,726
20,726
20,726
20,726
21,407
21,246
22,110
Permanent Classrooms
860
860
860
860
880
873
893
Relocatable Capacity
500
525
925
1,450
900
900
400
Relocatable Classrooms
20
21
37
58
36
36
16
Total Capacity
21,226
21,251
21,651
22,176
22,307
22,146
22,510
Total Classrooms
880
881
897
918
916
909
909
Utilization Efficiency
80%
80%
80%
80%
81%
82%
82%
Adjusted Capacity
16,981
17,001
17,321
17,741
18,069
18,160
18,458
Total Enrollment
Total FTE Enrolment
17,937
16,888
17,956
16,906
18,360
17,286
18,795
17,695
19,055
17,941
19,247
18,121
19,366
18,233
Surplus Capacity
93
95
35
45
128
38
225
* Notes: 1. Utilization Factor: 80% - 1994 FTE Enrollment/Total Capacity.
2. Utilization Factor Increase is due to New Building Efficiency.
3. FTE = Approximate Full Time Equvalent (ie 112 day Kindergarten = 0.5).
Highline School District Sx-Year Capital Facilities Plan
June 1995 Page 28
1 / •_
;;,
1
•
(• 1
, 11. 1
•
.
.s. \' "
- 1
VIII ' FINANCE PLANAND IMPACTvFEE 'SCHEDULES
/
I 1 '
,
—
!-
7-
l -7
\,
{ — 1 ,
/I y./ .�
.$.'(
/ •/ I,.
C •
I 'f 1.
•
1
1
/�
I
\
e� -.\ II\J1 J\,`,
1
—
..)\ I
1I
•\_� }' l /, i 1 / 1 .
`l r `
1 \ i-.. /
1 4. 1
s(\ 4 ,
\. (
• \ `
\ }t\
,`"\
•
\.
l-.
•/J .: ,
/ '
/ .•
1,1
, — —
/,
. J -r/
i \ \.
/,
/
1/
•
•
\ I •
/
\ 1
/— \ / `
1.
'� •l
VIII Finance Plan
The finance plan demonstrates how the Highline School District plans to finance
improvements for the years 1995 through 2000. The financing components
include secured and unsecured funding. The plan is based on the passage of
future bond issues, available funds from previous bond issues, securing of State
funding, and collection of impact fees.
The plan shows the District accumulating further impact fees without a
corresponding expenditure until 1998. If the bond issue fails, the District will
accumulate impact fees for up to four years (1995-97) before expenditure. The
accumulated fees will be used in the fifth year for construction of new permanent
classroom space.
These additions will be added to schools which have recently been remodeled or
replaced. A free standing classroom building may be considered at sites where
existing buildings are to be demolished, only if specific growth demands warrant.
Impact fee calculations are provided in this section for single family and multi-
family developments. Following the King County Ordinance methodology these
fees are calculated as follows:
Single Family
Multi -Family
Highline School District Six -Year Capital Facilities Plan
$2577.03 per unit
$1535.09 per unit
June 1995 Pep 29
Highline School District — 1995 Capital Facilities Plan
Six—Year Finance Plan — Table #7
Funding
Sources
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000
Bond Funds
15,000
120,000
90,000
46,246,512
23,243,628
37,931,628
State Match
18,228,000
9,100,000
14,812,000
Impact Fees
625,488
156,372
156,372
Other Funds
15,000
120,000
90,000
10 700000
Total 1
$15,000
$120,000
S90,000
S65,100,000
$32,500,000
S52,900,000
Note: Bond Funds, State Matching Funds, & Impact Fees are Unsecured. Impact Fees
are Projected Based on Amounts Accrued in 1993 & 1994.
Project
Expenditures
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000
Portables
15,000
120,000
90,000
Madrona
11,300,000
Mt View
10,400,000
Hazel Valley
10 700000
Gregory Hts
10,400,000
White Center
10,400,000
McMicken Hts
11,900,000
North Hill
11,100,000
Marvista
8,900,000
Shorewood
12,500,000
Mt Rainier
25,800,000
Bow Lake
11,600,000
Tyee
9,200,000
Pacific
6,300,000
Highline
Evergreen
Midway
Total 1
S15,000
$120,000
S90,000
$65,100,000
$32,500,000
$52,900,000
Highline School District Se—Year Capital Pacilitia Plan
June 1995 Page 30
Highline School District — 1995 Capital Facilities Plan
Impact Fee Calculation — Factors — Table #8
Description Value Unit
Al — Elementary School Site Cost
$0.00
$
A2 — Middle School Site Cost
$0.00
$
A3 — High School Site Cost
$0.00
$
B1 — Elementary School Construction Cost
$12,903.11
$/Student
B2 — Middle School Construction Cost
$16,018.99
$/Student
B3 — High School Construction Cost
$17,475.26
$/Student
C1 — Elementary School Relocatable Cost
$45,000.00
$
C2 — Middle School Relocatable Cost
$45,000.00
$
C3 — High School Relocatable Cost
$45,000.00
$
D1 — Elementary School SPI Square Foot Allowance
80
SF
D2 — Middle School SPI Square Foot Allowance
110
SF
D3 — High School SPI Square Foot Allowance
120
SF
Elementary School Student/Teacher Ratio
24.8:1
S:T
Middle School Student/Teacher Ratio
28:1
S:T
High School Student/Teacher Ratio
28.5:1
S:T
Boeckh Index
$86.96
$/SF
State Matching Percentage
46.50%
%
Capital Property Tax Rate
$0.70
$/1000
Bond Interest Rate
4.98%
%
Average Assessed Value — Single Family
$129,200.00
$
Average Assessed Value — Multi—Family
$36,719.00
$
Permanent Square Footage Factor
0.98
Perm/Ttl SF
Temporary Square Footage Factor
0.02
Temp/Ttl SF
Student Generation Factor — Single Family (K-6)
0.305
Students/Unit
Student Generation Factor — Single Family (7-8)
0.090
Students/Unit
Student Generation Factor — Single Family (9-12)
0.159
Students/Unit
Student Generation Factor — Multi—Family (K-6)
0.148
Students/Unit
Student Generation Factor — Multi—Family (7-8)
0.085
Students/Unit
Student Generation Factor — Multi—Family (9-12)
0.074
Students/Unit
Notes: 1. All planned projects will occur on existing sites. While it may be necessary to increase
site size for some projects there is no basis for site costs at this time.
2. The student generation factors are based on surveys of existing developments in the
Highline School District.
Highline School District Sx—Year Capital Facilities Plan
June 1995 Page 31
Highline School District - 1995 Capital Facilities Plan
Impact Fee Calculation - Single Family Residence - T#9
• Site Acquistion Cost per Single Family Residence(A) - N/A at this Time
• Permanent Facility Construction Cost per Single Family Residence
Formula: Construction Cost per Student x Student Factor x (Permanente Total Sauar
Category
Const Cost Student Footage Subtotal
Per Student Factor Ratio
B 1 (Elementary)
$12,903.11
24.8
0.305
0.98
$3,856.74
B 2 (Middle School)
$16,018.99
28.0
0.090
0.98
$1,412.87
B 3 (High School)
$17,475.26
28.5
0.159
0.98
$2,723.00
B (Subtotal) 1
$7,992.61
• Temporary Facility Construction Cost per Single Family Residence
Formula: (Facility Cost/Facility Capacity) x Student Factor x (Temporary/Total Square Foot
Category
Facility Facility Student Footage Subtotal
Cost Capacity Factor Ratio
C 1 (Elementary)
$45,000.00
24.8
0.305
0.02
$11.07
C 2 (Middle School)
$45,000.00
28.0
0.090
0.02
$2.89
C 3 (High School)
$45,000.00
28.5
0.159
0.02
$5.02
C (Subtotal)
1 $18.98
• State Match Credit per Single Family Residence
Formula: Boeckh Index x SPI Footage x District Match % x Student Fact
Category
Current SPI District Student Subtotal
Boeckh Footage Match % Factor
D 1 (Elementary)
$86.96
80
0.4650
0.305
$986.65
D 2 (Middle School)
$86.96
110
0.4650
0.090
$400.32
D 3 (High School)
$86.96
120
0.4650
0.159
$771.53
D (Subtotal) 1
$2,158.50
• Tax Credit per Single Family Residence
Formula: Assessed Value x Tax Rate x Compound Interest
Category
Value
Average Residential Assessed Value
B = Permanent Facility Cost per Residence
$129,200.00
Current Debt Service Tax Rate
$18.98
0.00070
Annual Interest Rate/Discount Period
($2,158.50;
4.98 % /10 Years
TC Tax Credit (((1+0.0498) ^ 10-1)/(0.0498•(1+0.0498) ^
10))•129,200'0.0007 $699.03
• Developer Provided Facility Credit(FC)
• Fee Reca
$0.00
Category Cost
A = Site Acquistion Cost per Residence
$0.00
B = Permanent Facility Cost per Residence
$7,992.61
C = Temporary Facility Cost per Residence
$18.98
Subtotal of Costs $8,011.59
D = State Match Credit per Residence
($2,158.50;
TC = Tax Credit per Residence
($699.03;
FC = Developer Provided Facility Credit
$0.00
Subtotal of Credits ($2,857.53;
Total Unfunded Need(Costs - Credits) $5,154.06
Developer Fee Obligation per Residense(Need x 0.5) $2,577.03
Highline School District Sur -Year Capital Facilities Plan
June 1995
Page 32
Highline School District - 1995 Capital Facilities Plan
Impact Fee Calculation - Multi -Family Residence - T#10
• Site Acquistion Cost per Multi -Family Residence(A) - N/A at this Time
• Permanent Facility Construction Cost per Multi -Family Residence
Formula: Construction Cost per Student x Student Factor x (Permanent/Total Square Footage Ratio
Category
Const Cost Student Footage Subtotal
Per Student Factor Ratio
B 1 (Elementary)
$12,903.11
24.8
0.148
0.98
$1,869.82
B 2 (Middle School)
$16,018.99
28.0
0.085
0.98
$1,337.73
B 3 (High School)
$17,475.26
28.5
0.074
0.98
$1,267.31
B (Subtotal) 1
$4,474.85
• Temporary Facility Construction Cost per Multi -Family Residence
Formula: (Facility Cost/Facility Capacity) x Student Factor x (Temporary/Total Square Footage Ratio
Category
Facility Facility Student Footage Subtotal
Cost Capacity Factor Ratio
C 1 (Elementary)
$45,000.00
24.8
0.148
0.02
$5.37
C 2 (Middle School)
$45,000.00
28.0
0.085
0.02
$2.74
C 3 (High School)
$45,000.00
28.5
0.074
0.02
$2.34
C (Subtotal) 1
510.44
• State Match Credit per Multi -Family Residence
Formula: Boeckh Index x SPI Footage x District Match % x Student Factor
Category
Current SPI District Student Subtotal
Boeckh Footage Match % Factor
D 1 (Elementary)
$86.96
80
0.4650
0.148
$478.35
D 2 (Middle School)
$86.96
110
0.4650
0.085
$379.03
D 3 (High School)
$86.96
120
0.4650
0.074
$359.08
D (Subtotal)
1 $1,216.45
• Tax Credit per Multi -Family Residence
Formula: Assessed Value x Tax Rate x Comuound Interest
Category
Value
Average Residential Assessed Value
B = Permanent Facility Cost per Residence
$36,719.00
Current Debt Service Tax Rate
$10.44
0.00070
Annual Interest Rate/Discount Period
($1,216.45;
5 % /10 Years
TC Tax Credit (((1+0.0498) ^ 10-1)/(0.0498•(1+0.0498) ^
10))•36,719.0.0007 5198.67
• Developer Provided Facility Credit(FC)
• Fee Reca
50.00
Category Cost
A = Site Acquistion Cost per Residence
$0.00
B = Permanent Facility Cost per Residence
$4,474.85
C = Temporary Facility Cost per Residence
$10.44
Subtotal of Costs $4,485.29
D = State Match Credit per Residence
($1,216.45;
TC =Tax Credit per Residence
($198.67`
FC = Developer Provided Facility Credit
$0.00
Subtotal of Credits (51,415.12:
Total Unfunded Need(Costs - Credits) $3,070.18
Developer Fee Obligation per Residense(Need x 0.5) 51,535.09
Hig,Iine Sehool District Sx-Year Capital Facilities Plan
June 1995
Page 33