Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA E95-0026 - SKYWAY FREIGHT SYSTEMS - TRUCKING FACILITYSKYWAY FREIGHT SYSTEMS TRUCKING FACILITY IN EXISTING INDUSTRIAL BUILDING 18449 CASCADE AVE. S. E95-0026 City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director MEMORANDUM To: Kim Crangi From: Moira Carr Bradshaw 1R) Date: 12 December 1995 Subject: Refund The City was processing two applications: E95-0026: Skyway Freight Systems Environmental Determination L95-0044: Skway Freight Systems Conditional Use Permit $ 100.00 - Receipt number 7091A on 10/16/95 $1075.00 - Receipt number 5645A on 8/28/95 The zoning of the applicant's property and subject site for the applicants has changed and is now in a new zoning district: Commercial/Light Industrial and the new zone allows truck terminals as an outright permitted use. The City has expended 3 hours at an hourly rate of $40.00 in setting up the files and communicating with the applicant regarding deficiencies in the application materials. The applicant's total fee of $325.00 and $850.00 minus $120.00 equals a total refund of $ 1055.00. Please issue a refund check to Skyway Freight Systems for the above refund amount and send it to : Skyway Freight Systems 18449 Cascade Av S Tukwila, WA 98188 Attention: Chris McNeil Thank you. cc: Files Skyway Freight C: I MCB I L TR I SKYWAY. RFD 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 4313670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 MEMORANDUM To: Susie Weismuller From: Moira Carr Bradshaw Date: 5 October 1995 Subject: Corrections to Letter dated 5 September 1995 I apologize for the confusion. With regard to number 1 of the letter, the fee for the conditional use permit is $850.00 and the SEPA (Environmental) Checklist is $325.00. Total fee required equals $1175.00 You submitted $1075.00 which leaves a balance of $100.00. The last page of the Environmental Checklist lists the number of copies required and I have copied that and I am faxing this to you. Before you reduce your plans to the 81/2 by 11 inch format, it would be advantageous to identify on the plans the building and the space within the building that you will be occupying. Thank you. • • ATTACHMENT A EconoLodge Waiver October 4, 1995 Page 7 include conditions similar to the Blue Star decision), or deny the waiver. CONCLUSION: 1. Denial of the waiver request would be consistent with the intent of the moratorium to prevent further development of hotel units, which historically generate criminal activity in the Highway 99 area, and to preclude expansion of these uses until the Comprehensive Plan is revised and adopted. 2. Approval of the waiver request would serve the interests of the individual and be consistent with the current interests of the City to see the area along the 99 corridor redeveloped to contemporary standards and with a regional use as envisioned in the Draft Comprehensive Plan. 3. Denial of the waiver request would require the applicants to either retain the existing motel units and the hardships associated with them or consider some other option that is different than their current operation. 4. Denial of the waiver request would preclude the applicants' preferred use and a use in their area of business expertise. 5. Approval of the waiver request would allow the applicant to proceed with a hotel development proposal that would improve the physical appearance of the area. The net effect on criminal activity is unknown, although a decrease is a possibility with replacement of theold facility with a modern facility. • City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 5 September 1995 Chris McNeil Skyway Freight Systems 18449 Cascade Av S Tukwila, WA 98188 Dear Mr. McNeil: John W. Rants, Mayor Steve Lancaster, Director /\') ° /(1t) \\ ° 112 \'? I understand you requested a written response as to the deficiencies in your conditional use permit (CUP) application and SEPA checklist. When we have received the following we will proceed with the review. 1) The SEPA Checklist fee is $325.00 and the fee for the CUP is $825.00 and your check was for $1150.00 - $100.00 more dollars is required. 2) The SEPA Checklist was inadequate and needs appropriate and accu to responses. Cparticular you need to respond to question numbers 10 , 11., and 14. Transportation which relates directly to your proposal. 15 copies , of the revised checklist are re.. ired. /5 3) We require a /- • omaf'erial transfer (PMT) of your plans reduced to 8 1/2 by 11. Then copies of your reduced plans need to be attached to the checklists. The vicinity map does not identify which building the proposal occupies. The site flan submitted does not clearly identify which space or its size that is to be occupied. In addition, twelve full size sets of plans are needed and only 7 were submitted. You may come in and modify the ones that were submitted to clarify your proposal and submit 5 more sets or you may revise .the plans and submit 12. If you have any questions, please call me at 431-3651. Yours truly, Moira Carr Bradshaw Associate Planner Files:L95-0044 E95-0026 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Far (206) 431-3665 [ �� 0 11 h A. BACKGROUND ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Contr•No. Epic File No. EE. tJ —Q:6,Q2 Fee $ 325 Receipt No. 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: existing bldg 2. Name of applicant: Skyway Freight Systems 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 18449 Cascade Ave South, Tukwila Chris McNeil 4. Date checklist prepared: 8/5/95 5. Agency requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Does not apply 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. NO 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. none 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. Do not know All 2 4 1995 p�V cL.Ur lcly T -2- 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. None that we know of 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized here. Trucking facility in an existing industrial bldg 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica- tions related to this checklist. Plans attached of existing building 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? Do not know -3- TOr,BE COMPLETED BY APPLIC• • Evaluation for Agency Use Only B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other Flat b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? Does not apply c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Do not know d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. NO e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti- ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Does not app y f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Does not apply g• About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Does not apply • Evaluation for Agency Use Only h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Does of apply 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Does not apply b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. None to our knowledge. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: None needed 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year- round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. DQaa not apply -5- • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Does not apply 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. Does not apply 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. Does not apply 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. Does not apply 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of No ste and anticipated volume of discharge. -6- • Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. Does not apply 2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sour- ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Does not apply -7- • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Does not apply 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: X deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other X evergreen tree: .fir, cedar, pine, other X shrubs X grass pasture _ crop or grain _ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? None c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None -8- • • . Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Does not apply 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Does not apply c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Does not apply d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Does not apply -9- { • • Evaluation for 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, color) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. fops nor apply b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Does not apply 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. None 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ- mental health hazards, if any:. There are no environmental health hazards thgt--- we know of at this site. -10- • Agency Use Only • b. Noise • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Does not apply 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short- term or a long-term basis (for example: traf- fic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Does not apply 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Does not apply 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? light industrial distribution b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No c. Describe any structures on the site. See plan attached -11- • Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? light i_nrincrrial f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? g• If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Does not apply h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? No people will be residing at the site. Approx 12 people are working at the facility. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Does not apply 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com- patible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Does not apply • 9. Housing Evaluation for Agency Use Only a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing? Does not apply b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eli- minated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing. Does not apply c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Does not apply 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? Does not apply b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Does not apply c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Does not apply -13- • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Does not apply b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Does not apply c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Does not apply d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Does not apply 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational oppor- tunities are in the immediate vicinity? Does not apply b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. Does not apply c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: ns not apply . • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro- posed .for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. Does not apply b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. Does not apply c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Does not apply 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed accss to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Does _not apply b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Does not apply c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Does not apply , • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). Does not apply e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. Does not apply f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Does not a p: Tply --- g. Proposed measures to reduce or Control transpor- tation impacts, if any: Does not apply 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Does not apply b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Does not apply 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities elec e e.hone • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only available at the site: cater refuse service septic system, oto b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Non C. Signature The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Date Submitted: PLEASE CONTINUE TO THE NEXT PAGE. -17- :T6 BE COMPLETED BY APPLIC• 110 Evaluation for Agency Use Only •; • D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of. the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not imple- mented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? No impact. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: N/A 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life? No Impact. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life are: N/A -18- • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? No impact. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resourses are: N/A 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? No impact. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: N/A 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, inclduing whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? No impact. -19- Evaluation for Agency Use Only Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts area: N/A How does the proposal conform to the Tukwila Shoreline Master Plan? Conforms 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? COAforms Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demandis) are: N/A 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. No conflict. -20- • 0 Evaluation for Agency Use Only 8. •Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? Not to our knowledge. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: N/A -21- TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLI.T . Evaluation for Agency Use Only E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON PROJECT PROPOSALS The -objectives and the alternative means of reaching the objectives for a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the aforegoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This information provides a general overall perspective of the proposed action in the context of the environmental infor- mation provided and the submitted plans, documents, suppor- tive information, studies, etc. 1. What are the objective(s) of the proposal? Operate as a distributing and wharehousing company in the existing location at 18449 Cascade Ave South. No new structures will be built. 2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these objectives? None 3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the preferred course of action: Does not apply i • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 4... Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? No Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: Does not apply -23- • INTERIM (3/11/94) • PLEASE SUBMIT THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: 1. TWELVE SETS OF THE PLANS CEDED TO CLEARLY DESCRIBE THE PROPOSED ACTIONS. 2. ONE PMT SET OF PLANS REDUCED TO 8 1/2 X 11. 3. FOUR COPIES OF ANY STUDIES NEEDED IN SUPPORT T OF THE 4. FIFTEEN COPIES OF THE E INCLUDES 8 1/2 X 11 COPIES O ��MENTAL C CST BCH REDUCED PIANS. ADDITIONAL, COPIES OR FURTHER INFORMATION MAY BE REQUIRED . CHECKLIST: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW/SHORELINE PERMIT MAILINGS FEDERAL AGENCIES ( )U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS ( )FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION ( )DEPT. OF INTERIOR -FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE WASHINGTON ( )U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ( )U.S. DEPARTMENT OF H.U.D. (REGION X) STATE AGENCIES ( )OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY ( )TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT ( )DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES ( )OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR ( )DEPT. OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ( }DEPT. OF FISHERIES ( )K.C. PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEV. ( )BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD ( )FIRE DISTRICT #11 ( )FIRE DISTRICT #2 ( )SOUTH CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT ( )TUKWILA LIBRARIES ( )RENTON LIBRARY ( )KENT LIBRARY ( )CITY OF SEATTLE LIBRARY )US WEST )SEATTLE CITY LIGHT )WASHINGTON NATURAL GAS )WATER DISTRICT.#75 )SEATTLE WATER DEPARTMENT )GROUP W CABLE )OLYMPIA PIPELINE ( )KENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT ( )TUKWILA CITY DEPARTMENTS: ( )PUBLIC WORKS ( ) FIRE ( )POLICE ( )FINANCE ( )PLANNING ( )BUILDING ( )PARKS AND ORECREATION ( )TUKWILA MAYOR )DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL & HEALTH SERVICES )DEPT. OF ECOLOGY, SHORELANDS DIVISION )DEPT. OF ECOLOGY, SEPA DIVISION* )DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE )OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL *SEND CHECKLIST WITH DETERMINATIONS AND *SEND SITE MAPS WITH DECISION KING COUNTY AGENCIES ( )KING COUNTY DEPT. OF PARKS ( )HEALTH DEPARTMENT ( )PORT OF SEATTLE ( )BUILDING & LAND DEV. DIV.- SEPA INFORMATION CENTER SCHOOLS/LIBRARIES ( )HIGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT ( )KING COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY ( )SEATTLE MUNICIPAL REFERENCE LIBRARY ( )SEATTLE SCHOOL DISTRICTS ( )RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT UTILITIES ( )PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT ( )VAL-VUE SEWER DISTRICT ( )WATER DISTRICT #20 ( )WATER DISTRICT #125 ( )CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC WORKS ( )RAINIER VISTA ( )SKYWAY CITY AGENCIES ( )RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT ( )CITY OF SEA -TAC ( )CITY OF SEATTLE ( )CITY OF BURIEN ( )TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS ( )TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS OTHER LOCAL AGENCIES ( )PUGET SOUND REGIONAL COUNCIL ( )P.S. AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY ( )SW K.COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ( )MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE ( )DUWAMISH INDIAN TRIBE MEDIA ( )DAILY JOURNAL OF COMMERCE ( )VALLEY DAILY NEWS ( )METRO ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING DIV. OFFICE/INDUSTRIAL 5,000 GSF OR MORE RESIDENTIAL 50 UNITS OR MORE RETAIL 30,000 GSF OR MORE ( )HIGHLINE TIMES (")SEATTLE TIMES • • PUBLIC NOTICE MAILINGS FOR PERMITS SEPA MAILINGS Mail to: (comment period starts on date of mailing) Dept. of Ecology Environmental Review Section Applicant Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list) Include these documents: SEPA Determination (3 -part form from Sierra) Findings (staff report, usu. with MDNS) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) Affidavit of Dlstribution (notice was mailed & sent to newspaper). SHORELINE MAILINGS Notice of Application: Notice of application for a substantial development Permit must be mailed to owners and to property owners within 300 feet of subject property, prepare an affidavit of publication, and publish two consecutive weeks with deadline for comments due 30 days after last newspaper publication date. Shoreline Permit: Mail to: (within 8 days of decision; 30 -day appeal period begins date received by DOE) Department of Ecology Shorelands Section State Attorney General Applicant Indian Tribes Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list). Include these documents: Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (3 -part form from Sierra) Findings (staff report, if applicable) Shoreline. Application Form (filled out by applicant) Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) Site plan, with mean high water mark & improvements Cross-sections of site w/structures & shoreline Grading plan Vicinity map SEPA Determination (3 -part form from Sierra) Findings (staff report, usu. with MDNS) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Any background studies related to impacts on shoreline Notice of Application Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed & sent to newspaper) Affidavit of Publication (notice was published in newspaper). DESCRIPTION LEGAL DESCRIPTION 1.i Inllln�l •'- ham' ]iLnnnn •= 13LE20 8 y— jlluil ilii �. Eaa- _ inlu•t 1 1 • L=� VALLEY HIGHWAY AREA PLAN SCALE: 1° IW' DATA Nt.'S.hl SOUTHCENTER SOUTH INDUSTRIAL PARK TUKWILA - - WASHINGTON CORPORATE PROPERTY. INVESTORS ALFRED H. CROONQUIST A.I.A. & ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTS 1322 SIXTH AVENUE fE , WASHINGTON 95101 PHONE 206.652-2600 rs P-r9.'r' AA r, %/., wNc., HPfPIcc�gg4 utar I C.H.U,) i ▪ . . ' v .IotoT +L s 641'10z5•. , , - '/ / K--- . -+4—, c•- -erg, tXaN o", EtLG6luN6r >7 , ' N'o'w ///.• Gr / ..16'•'r � ▪ .'.'cuifisMelfra... , • / / wv'rw+vvwl. DODM__7-U L 1X4L ' Nd. fbxt 602.6 MAT FN. `4j' Pw, -2 ,-2,'.•6'.15'41,4y W. Say.- W17.. $.av; 7�a rfze..•1c , 5'•y <l'• 4I1'g N•7. 5AV,. �• 7•,O••r1/4 6=`4774 1.•7a 46v,. • •.(it^"417�i' . w.7. ',,Av. r3 3,-0 `C,'-15"41 : v.•a 54 v. 1S •K6=sS<IN!,WD 6 6,5'k IN-. 5;77 S,4 V. I2r`•1A!3i.'L> ' I,'CONTRALTOR-SOALL' VFAffY ALL IIRI:NCIO0S AND DUILDIN_G CONDITION$ •1 1�I�, 1•k[awr�T: .P6 OR' TO•C0107ENCIRG 6000. SrRIN%LFRS SIIALf.'0F P"Ovinl:U Iv (1:1LINr: or OFFTCC,AND TOILET,ARI:oI.: • 4.1 U. 5 VENTILATION PER .SECTION 1105 OF 1110 7N1FORM BUILDING CODE: EXTIRGU I SIIERS-REQUIRED PER N.P.P.A:'110 (RY TENANT) 5.SNORE/VENTS WILL BE REQUIRED IF AND MIEN STOCRIPILTNG COMES-5ITH1N' ' THE .DEFINITION OF HIGH-P1LED COMBUSTIBLL STOCIO.,ER CIIAPTF.R:15.01 • 0.13.C.• (1973' EDITION)' .'y? 6, I1' �CJ'TN'C47 �V �`7 � TwrJJ CiQ+t?, 1A L: 4,47 .4a..1.1T 15-C" l Ow1l 4'10'4 That portion-ef Lo:s 4;' ;, and 8 of the pla t.o` Spgthcenfer South lndus- PTai—Park as'recorded lr vol�'^4.97. c+7 0iwts; .Pn7 21 I�, 25;, record's o: ••'ing County, Washington, described as follows: .Seginning at the northwest corner. of,said - 10b 5t' .--:hence 5.78. 6'.10' E along the north •1i ne.of-said lot 5 a distance of .240.00 i:nence aloe beurve-to the right.having a radius of 50.00 feet, -an are din Ince.of.78, 6 feet..through. a certral angle of 90"00'00'.: ' • - Tnence`.S.11'2 '50.'.5 along the east line...of said lot .5 and 4.-a di.stance.of _87.33 feet; .. :-hence along a rve-to the- right•havinq.a rad,usof-50-.00:feet an arc di/se,. .;ance of 69.62 f t'through a centr -angle of 79°47'00': . ' -'hence N88•49'10". along the Booth inc of said lot; 4 a distance of'101.85. . le/Ice N'•18°44.'38' 5 distance of 29 48 -.feet;`'. • co -1 GTaz.: MOTE xb" S tisou ,E .0=s 1' 2 Wsw�712111GIc u?o'xs 40'.0..'al0'-q" 4 ti-cs '7 4 F II0 C' r G'•C •' MF. Av x'bti �CGViS OIL• 77'ZUM' ST.7KA49 PRF.1:.'7 Art 'vo. r 1•Rt . END- OPTHS'( U!1.C7NOr. 0,4.7 -a'a 61-e" .GIa<o T; . L21 T f.!.,1caC.� pctF.a LnOL1' Wiz rence along a'curve to\the right.havi g a radius' of -459.28 feet an are. ;istanee of 161-32' feet rough a'cont•al angle of 20°07'70', :'levee R' 11.27'50° E along the.west line Of said -lots 4 and 5 and its ;Iutherly-extension a -d ata e of 542.5 'feet to:the point of. beginning. • •7ntainina 198,210 square feels or;4:55 .n tcs. w 01100 • 5o wC.0