Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA E95-0030 - LES SCHWAB - TIRE CENTERLES SCHWAB TIRE CENTER WITH PARKING & LOADING AREA (40 S. 180T" STREET E95-0030 A P F I.D A V I T OF DISTRIBUTION i, S4l-\I k' MC v\ -L-e hereby declare that: Notice of Public Hearing Notice of Public Meeting Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet O Board of Appeals Agenda Packet Planning Commission Agenda Packet Short Subdivision Agenda Packet O Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit fShoreline•Management Permit was mailed to each FAY To �► I\11) -f\ QUER, M F S - 2,'582 Determination of Non- significance (16) Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice Notice of Action Official Notice Other Other of the following addresses on Np\ljj ),Gjc5 NVI--E.A To O Pte. CAST Tobin 3(0 AV CT.S XornA , WA q$ icl -I,IV1gaftlFivi A -L RcAliew Si�Cn0N D ft- or. E jw4 4 P.O. BMX 41703 00/014)A, WA `N 04 _x103 Name of Project Crjpgnature File Number Ec150030 51-tog.EUN plEgm i r Coc - iNA i oZ- O ft oP ECo LoC�") S1�or tiDS P, ,RA) Po 3v -A .4-100 bt-UP (A, WA- ciy - 76(1,n • CITY OF TUKWILA DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: CONSTRUCT A 13.3OO S.F. TIRE STORE W/40 PKG SPACES PROPONENT: PAUL CASEY LOCATION OF PROPOSAL.. INCLUDING STREET ADDRE'SS, IF F4 : ADDRESS: 6.8405 1i?tli >T ,y "'1� �ti �-,_, _t PARCEL NO: ,3"62)3'04,-9'07/4.,.... 1 -` \t 1. _> SEC/TWN/RNG: .,. - ,5!23/04 \" _ : ';', `, ° } t, i\`, LEAD AGENCY: CI -TY OF "TIIi...WILA './ y f FILE `N'O: .E9•5-OO� O� The City h`as de'ternline�d that, th \proposal does not hve-a\.pr=illba.k►1 e sign1f 1carit. adv_e'rse zglpact_Ioit the erivi"r-+�i' merit. An enviro-i111ien`ta1:,,',- Ri y ' ➢ > t .' 3.21 (5::,.03:-0...(1.:2) ' (ct) A\t i Inpact ��t,�,telll�:rr[,�(EI-..+) i s�i�t r�eelf�r�lPi-�d�,,u.r�der R 'W 4.s �::. This dei sli on was. made af•te`r- r:e,v i 0sw of ,al-ocomp 1 eted env i r'-onmerrta 1 \\•( ‘ check 1 i s trl. and other i of �r:mat,i-on o,h- t i 1 e. 'w,i this" the 1 ead alaenc.:v This', 1 nformat l;on i s ava i 1 ab,1 e tom the uub -I 10.91—i reaue"'.t . _` i. 'k •,4 ••4 •k -k •k 'A' :4 i :4 k •k,k-•k :4 k 4 A l * i.* * A. k k" **'-ic 4 k k k"; 4\44 k k :4 k`4 k"•k A k "'kit.'" k k k k :4 k 4 ;44k k N" k'rr 4 k 'k i41 4.-444'" 4 :4 .4 * pill JO 1..a "--,-^ .... :� 4 i J s" i.< ., Th D{4S Ir.is;,i.ss.ued', r ny :1;97/-11-4340.(2)',.. � .: comments must be- submitte'd'dj�bv GQv 1e�r 121,995 =a._ ' _ ..e' /The..-lead,agency will not, ac`ttllron this p r i p i s a� l ,„for 15 days from the d'a'te hewl o w...,-�. ", _ r if Steve LancaS•ter. Responsible Oft i c lair' /\ Dates, City of Tukwi�la. ~C,206)-•4.31-36 0 I ' i._ _-' � F . t-� 6300 'Southcenter• Bo s l evard> Tukwi la, WA :,9'8182, ...I.. '',..,•',,,.. You may appeal this. determination to the City Clerk at r_ity'' Ha11, 6_'00 Southcenter Bou 1 eva•r•4d•, Tukwi la, ' :, WA';,, 91181i':no later thati---10 days from the above signature dates h .written Itappea�,l stating the. -ba fi{:' of the appeal for spec i t i c. tactual ob j e t_i.o,.._, Ya'u ina_v •be requ ired T'tu" `bear some of the ei.pens.e: for an appeal . ': '':.:.-."-,7 . •� - _ Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the City Clerk and Department of Community Development. • CITY OF TUKWILA DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: CONSTRUCT A 13,300 S.F. TIRE STORE W/40 PKG SPACES PROPONENT: PAUL CASEY LOCATION OF PROPOSAL, INCLUDING STREET ADDRESS, IF ANY: ADDRESS: PARCEL NO: SEC/TWN/RNG: LEAD AGENCY: 6810 S 180 ST 362304-9074 35/23/04 CITY OF TUKWILA FILE NO: E95-0030 The City has determined that the proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21c.030(2)(c).. This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. *************************************************************************** This DNS is issued, under 197-11-340(2). comments must be submitted 1 t\ 3 12 11-1 \ 9 '- . The lead agency will not act this proposal for 15 days from the date below. G\e\f-e_ Steve Lancaster, Responsib City of Tukwila, (206) 431-3680 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 by on N NEA 13aR 2� 1995 Date You may appeal this determination to the City Clerk at City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 no later than 10 days from the above signature date by written appeal stating the basis of the appeal for specific factual objections. You may be required to bear some of the expenses for an appeal. Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the City Clerk and Department of Community Development. TO: Jack Pace FROM: John Jimerson RE: SEPA - Les Schiwab DATE: November 20, 1995 Memorandum Project File No. E95-0030 Project Description: • The site is located on S 180 ST on the southwest corner of the Home Depot site. The proposal is to construct a 13,400 square foot tire store with 40 parking spaces. Agencies With Jurisdiction: None. Comments to SEPA Checklist: Page 3, No. 10: The project is located within 200 feet of the Green River, therefore, a shoreline substantial development permit must be obtained. Page 3, No. 13: The answer is "no". The site has not been identified as an environmentally sensitive area. Page 11, No. 7(b)(2): Also noise from operations, usually from tools powered by air compressors. Page 11, No. 8(c): Technically,. the Home Depot building is located on the same site. A preliminary short plat has been approved which will separate the Les Schwab site from Home Depot. Page 12, No. 8(e): The current comprehensive plan classification for the site is Light Industrial. Summary of Primary Impacts/Mitigation: 1. Earth-- The site is level, no impacts are anticipated. 2. Air -- The proposal will result in increased vehicular trips and associated air pollution. 3. Water -- Storm water is collected into the City's storm water system. 4. Plants --Lawn, spruce and pine trees will be removed from the pad. A combination of deciduous and coniferous trees are proposed with the new landscape plan. No endangered or candidate species are known to be on the site. 5. Animals -- Very limited amounts' of habitat for small animals will be eliminated. There are no endangered or candidate species known on or near the site. 6. Energy and Natural Resources -- The project will require energy for construction and operation, and for vehicles coming to the site. 7. Environmental Health -- The project will not generate impacts beyond the site. On site environmental health hazards are regulated by the Department of Labor and Industries. 8. Land and Shoreline Use -- The proposal is consistent with the adopted land use plan and zoning and does not significantly change character of the use of the site. 9. Housing -- The proposal will not affect any existing or planned housing. 10. Aesthetics -- The proposal will is subject to BAR design review and standards. The facility is in scale and compatible with the surrounding land uses. 11. Light and Glare -- The proposal will not generate light and glare beyond that normally found along a commercial arterial. 12. Recreation -- The proposal will not affect the Green River trail located across the street. Customers will have easy access to the trail while waiting for their car to be serviced. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation -- The, site is not known has having any historical or cultural significance. 14. Transportation -- The site is well served by the surface and street system. By nature of the business, the increased demand of this project on public transit will be nominal. 15. Public Services -- Project is not likely to generate substantial increase in demand for public services. 16. Utilities -- Project is not likely to significantly increase demand on the utility systems. Recommended Threshold Determination: DNS • PUBLIC NOTICE MAILINGS FOR PERMITS SEPA MAILINGS Mail to: (comment period starts on date of mailing) Dept. of Ecology Environmental Review Section Applicant Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list) Include these documents: SEPA Determination (3 -part form from Sierra) Findings (staff report, usu. with MDNS) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) Affidavit of Dlstribution (notice was mailed & sent to newspaper). SHORELINE MAILINGS Notice of Application: Notice of application for a substantial development Permit must be mailed to owners and to property owners within 300 feet of subject property, prepare an affidavit of publication, and publish two consecutive weeks with deadline for comments due 30 days after last newspaper publication date. Shoreline Permit: Mail to: (within 8 days of decision; 30 -day appeal period begins date received by DOE) Department of Ecology Shorelands Section State Attorney General Applicant Indian Tribes Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list). Include these documents: Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (3 -part form from Sierra) Findings (staff report, if applicable) Shoreline.Application Form (filled out by applicant) Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) - Site plan, with mean high water mark & improvements Cross-sections of site w/structures & shoreline Grading plan Vicinity map SEPA D- etermination (3 -part form from Sierra) Findings (staff report, usu. with MDNS) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Any background studies related to impacts on shoreline Notice of Application Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed & sent to newspaper) Affidavit of Publication (notice was published in newspaper). CHECKLIST: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW/SHORELINE PERMIT MAILINGS FEDERAL AGENCIES ( )U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS ( )FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION ( )DEPT. OF INTERIOR -FISH &_WILDLIFE SERVICE WASHINGTON ( )U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ( )U.S. DEPARTMENT OF H.U.D. (REGION X) STATE AGENCIES )OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY )TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT )DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES )OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR )DEPT. OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT )DEPT. OF FISHERIES ( )K.C. PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEV. ( )BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD ( )FIRE DISTRICT #11 ( )FIRE DISTRICT #2 ( )SOUTH CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT ( )TUKWILA LIBRARIES ( )RENTON LIBRARY ( )KENT LIBRARY ( )CITY OF SEATTLE LIBRARY ( )US WEST ( )SEATTLE CITY LIGHT ( )WASHINGTON NATURAL GAS ( )WATER DISTRICT.#75 ( )SEATTLE WATER DEPARTMENT ( )GROUP W CABLE ( )OLYMPIA PIPELINE ( )KENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT ( )TUKWILA CITY DEPARTMENTS: ( )PUBLIC WORKS ( ) FIRE ( )POLICE ( )FINANCE ( )PLANNING ( )BUILDING ( )PARKS AND ORECREATION ( )TUKWILA MAYOR ( )DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL & HEALTH SERVICES ( )DEPT. OF ECOLOGY, SHORELANDS DIVISION (-)DEPT. OF ECOLOGY, SEPA DIVISION* ( )DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE ( )OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL *SEND CHECKLIST WITH DETERMINATIONS AND *SEND SITE MAPS WITH DECISION KING COUNTY AGENCIES )KING COUNTY DEPT. OF PARKS )HEALTH DEPARTMENT )PORT OF SEATTLE )BUILDING & LAND DEV. DIV.- SEPA INFORMATION CENTER SCHOOLS/LIBRARIES CITY )HIGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT )KING COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY )SEATTLE MUNICIPAL REFERENCE LIBRARY )SEATTLE SCHOOL DISTRICTS )RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT )PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT )VAL-VUE SEWER DISTRICT )WATER DISTRICT #20 )WATER DISTRICT #125 )CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC WORKS )RAINIER VISTA )SKYWAY AGENCIES )RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT )CITY OF SEA -TAC )CITY OF SEATTLE )CITY OF BURIEN )TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS )TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS ..,��• R0 OTHER LOCAL AGENCIES ( )PUGET SOUND REGIONAL COUNCIL ( )P.S. AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY ( )SW K.COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ( )MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE ( )DUWAMISH INDIAN TRIBE MEDIA ( )DAILY JOURNAL OF COMMERCE ( )VALLEY DAILY NEWS ( )METRO ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING DIV. OFFICE/INDUSTRIAL 5,000 GSF OR MORE RESIDENTIAL 50 UNITS OR MORE RETAIL 30,000 GSF OR MORE ( )HIGHLINE TIMES ( )SEATTLE TIMES • TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: Ron Cameron, P.E. City Engineer City of Tukwila Jeff Haynie Entranco September 25, 1995 PROJECT: Les Schwab - Tukwila Entranco Project No. 95809-07 This technical memorandum documents the trip generation for the proposed Les Schwab Tire Center located on the Home Depot site in Tukwila, Washington. The proposed Les Schwab Tire Center will be approximately 13,200 square foot (sf) with nine service bays. The trip generation for the proposed tire center was calculated for the following scenarios: 1) Using the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual (land use code 848 - Tire Store), fifth edition, January 1991 based on 1,000 sf of gross floor area. The p.m. peak hour trip generation rate calculated from the ITE trip generation manual is 5.13 p.m. peak hour trips per 1,000 sf of gross floor area. 2) Using the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual (land use code 848 - Tire Store), fifth edition, January 1991 based on number of service bays. The p.m. peak hour trip generation rate calculated from the ITE trip generation manual is 3.47 p.m. peak hour trips per service bay. 3) Using trip generation rates observed at an existing Les Schwab Tire Center. A trip generation study was conducted by Transportation Planning and Engineering (TP&E) in 1993. This trip generation study was based on manual counts at an existing Les Schwab Tire Center. The study determined a p.m. peak hour trip generation rate of 3.88 trips per 1,000 sf of gross floor area. The results of this study are included as Attachment A. A summary of the p.m. peak hour trip generation rates for the three scenarios is shown in table 1. g:\traffic\95809-07\techmemo.doc 1 Table 1 Trip Generation Summary 13,200 sf with 9 service bays Scenario P.M. Peak Hour Trip Total Gross P.M. Generation Rate Peak Hour Trips 1) ITE Land Use Code - 848 5.13 68 1,000 sf of Gross Floor Area 2) ITE Land Use Code - 848 3.47 31 Number of Service Bays 3) Les Schwab Trip Rate (TP&E) 3.88 51 1,000 sf of Gross Floor Area A traffic impact study was prepared by Entranco for the Tukwila Home Depot development in December 1992. This study included two retail pads consisting of 14,100 sf that were to be located on the Home Depot development. The trip generation summary from the Home Depot traffic impact study is provided in Attachment B. The retail pads were determined to generate a total of 204 gross trips during the p.m. peak hour. A 25% reduction was used for passby trips. Therefore, the total net new trips generated by the retail pads was determined to be 153 p.m. peak hour trips. The mitigation fee for the Home Depot site was determined to be $204,023 as documented in the January 25, 1993 letter to the City of Tukwila from Entranco (see Attachement C). The trips associated with this mitigation fee included the trips generated from the proposed retail pads. As we understand, this mitigation fee has been paid by Home Depot. Summary The proposed Les Schwab Tire Center is estimated to generate between 31 and 68 gross p.m. peak hour trips (excluding a reduction for pass -by trips). The proposed tire center will generate fewer trips during the p.m. peak hour, as compared to the retail pads described in the Home Depot traffic impact study. Therefore, no traffic impact mitigation is proposed. cc: John Jimerson, City of Tukwila Russ Parker, Les Schwab Paul Casey, Casey Group g:\traffic\95809-07\techmemo.doc. 2 • A. BACKGROUND RECEIVED EMOIMNI#5 CHECKLIST COfvMMviuidi 1 V DEVELOPMENT Cont. No. Epic File No. 695.6o3-0 Fee :$ 325 Receipt No. 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Les Schwab Tire Center 2. .Name of applicant: Casey Group Architects, Paul J. Casey 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Paul J. Casey 10116 36th Ave. Ct. SW, Tacoma, WA 98499 (206) 584-5207 4. Date checklist prepared: 9/25/95 5. Agency requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Late winter or early spring 1996 construction start, 6 mo. cousLLuction schedule in one phase. Appli ation of site preload this winter_ 7. Do you have. any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Home Depot SEPA Checklist Shoreline Develpment Permit 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other. proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None known beyond current "BAR" application, utility relo- cation application and Shoreline Development Permit application. • • 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your ro al. SEPA Determination, building permit, plumbing, electriQs cal, pHVAC permits, site development/grading permit, sign permiLb. Utility rPlnrat-inn permit and Shoreline Development permit will also bP rPggui red 11. Give brief, complete description of. your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete • description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized here. Approx. 13 400 s.f. Les Schwab Tire Center with on site parking fir arpjx. 34 cars and one loading space. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township,and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica- tions related to this checklist. On S. 180th Street, at southwest corner of Home Depot property, Parcel #3623049074 NW Quarter Section 36, TWP-2314. 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? Not known. RECEIVED OCT 1 1 1995 ®EVELOPM y E COMPLETED BY APPLICo ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS . Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, . Evaluation for Agency Use Only other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 1% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them ..and note any prime farmland. Sand over silt base d. Are there surface indications or,history of unstable soils in .the Immediate vicinity?. If so, describe. Existing soils are compressible . Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti- ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. .Approx.. 3500 cu. yd. of preload will be placed at site for a period of about 3 mo. . Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If.so, generally describe. Localized only due to flat nature of site About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or, buildings)? See site plan. • Evaluation for Agency Use Only h. Proposed measures to .reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Use of silt fences, hay bales, etc.. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? 'If any, generally describe and .give approximate quantities if known. Short and long term vehicle emissions, quantities, are unknown. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. Traffic on adjacent 180th and Home Depot parking lot,_ emissions will have little to no impact to this proposal. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: None planned. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year- round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Edge of Green .River Dike is approx. 130' southwest of property. 411 • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. See submitted plans, work on -this development will occur within boundary of existing Home Depot proper—.. that is now fully developed. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would. be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose,'.and .approximate quan- tities, 'if known. • No .). Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan . No 6) Does the .proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. Proposal will utilize existing Home Depot storm drainage system. 411 • Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, ..and approximate quan- tities., if known. No 2) Describe waste materials that will bedischarged into the ground from septic tanks or other sour- ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of .houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. Site is served by sanitary sewer. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water •flow? Will this water flow: into other waters? If so, describe. Runoff from roof & paved areas is routed through existing Home Depot storm system, through existing oil]water seQarator to City storm. _line in S. 180th St. This water goes west to —Ari over then north to regional storm system. -7- • Evaluation for 2) Could, waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Nnt anticipated. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any:. • Water will be routed to existing regiona7— storm system- . Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found site: x deciduous tree: x evergreen tree: x shrubs x grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, other types of vegetation lder, maple, aspen, other cedar, pine, other on the buttercup, bullrush, eelgrass, milfoil, other What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? All onsite, except i oUt?r St. buffy. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or hear the site. -Noneobserved. Agency Use Only 411 • Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Proposed landscaping,. use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance. vegetation on the site, if any: Proposed landscaping is anticipated .to complement Home Depot landscaping. a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron,.eagle,ongbirds other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: .fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None observed c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. NQt n icipa,ted d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None beyond landscaping • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solor) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electric and/or natural gas heating.. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If .so, generally describe. No c What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Design to State Energy Code Standards. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. Not anticipated 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Typical police, fire, medical associated with retail tire sales. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ- mental health hazards, if any: None -10- • Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Noise 1.) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Traffic from S 180th St. ani existing _narking area. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short- term or a long-term basis (for example: traf- fic, construction, operation; 'other)?.... Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Short term construction. and long term traffic. 3) Proposed measures to reduceor control noise impacts, if any: Use of perimeter landscaping. . .Land and Shoreline Use a. What As. the current use of the' site and adjacent properties? Site undeveloped, except for paved parking areas. Property. to north, east & west is Home Depot". Property to south is small park. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Not in recent history, was part of F & N Warehouse facility. Describe any structures on the site. None -11- • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No What is the current zoning classification of the site? CM f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation g. of the site? Not known If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, .specify. No i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 10 j. Approximately how many people would the completed • .project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or •reduce displacement ,impacts, if any: None 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com- patible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Use of similar landscaping and-Tuilding materials. • Evaluation for Agency Use Only .9. Housing a. Approximately how 'many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle; or low-income .housing? None. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would .be eli- minated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing. None . .. Proposed measures to reduce .or control housing impacts, if any: None 10. Aesthetics a. What is the ' tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? 24'_/_. metal roof.& split face concrete block. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Use of split face concrete block and accent elements to soften buildinq's impact. -13- • ! Evaluation for Agency Use Only 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would. it mainly occur? Vehicle headlights during evening. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere -with' views?' • No c. What .existing off-site sources of light or.glare may :affect your proposal? None . Proposed measures to reduce or control light and . 'glare impacts if any: t�se. of shielded exterior ligit fixtures Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational oppor- tunities are in the immediate vicinity? Small park to south of property and river walking trail to east of property. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if'any: None -14- • • Evaluation for 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a.. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro- posed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so; generally describe. None known b: Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None observed c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed:accss' to the existing street system. Show on site'plan's, if any. S. 180th Street b. Is the site currently served by .public. transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to. the nearest transit stop? Not known c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the projecteliminate? Approx. 34 stalls, would.: eliminate approx. 20 existing stalls.; -15- Agency Use Only • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will the proposal require any new..roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or' streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No .f. How, many vehicular trips per, day would be generated by the completed project? If known, 'indicate when peak volumes would occur. See traffic memo submitted by -1 tThnco, 68 -pm peak hour trips are anticipated which is less than earlier submitted amounts as part of Home Depot Traffic Study. g. Proposed measures to reduce•or control transpor- tation impacts, if any: None 15. Public Services Would the project' result in an increased lieed for •ubl' - --x.1.1e' • re .protection police protection, ihealth care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Yes, ;typical for, a retail facility of nig— . fiis. size. b. Proposed measures to reduce or, control direct impacts on public services, if any. • None -16- 16. Utilities iEvaluation for Agency Use Only a.. Circle utilities currently available at the site: natural •as, water septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Electricity, water, sanitary sewer, telephone, refuse. ..Signature • The• above answers are true and complete to the best of myknowledge. . I understand that the lead agency is . ,,relying on them to .its \decision: .i'gnature: ate Submitted: :EASE.:.CONTINUE TO THE NEXT PAGE. ATTACHMENT A � Mr. Michael Oxman LES SCHWAB TIRE CENTER September 21, 1994 Page -5- year, determined from historical data on SR 99 (Pacific Hwy.) as given in WSDOT's 1992 Annual Traffic Report. Pipeline Proiects According to the information provided by the City of Federal Way, the followina future development projects have been approved in the study area. They are: - Campus Glen - Home Depot - Helter Real Estate - State Farm Federal Way Service Center - Bellacarrio Woods - Campus Highlands - Harbor Ridge Estates The traffic from these projects has been added to the 1995 horizon year traffic volumes. PROPOSED ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS According to the City of Federal Way's 10 year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) for 1993-2002 dated August 4, 1992, there are only two roadway improvement projects identified in the vicinity of the project. They are: 1. S. 348th St: 1-5 to SR 99 Realign roadway to correct lane offset at SR 99, HOV lane, sidewalks, signal modification, illumination, street trees, property acquisition. The approximate cost of the project is $404,000.00. 2. S. 336th St. at SR 99 Signal Widen to five lanes with provisions for bicycles, sidewalks, signal modification, illumination, street trees, property acquisition modification. The approximate cost of the project is $4,789,000.00. VEHICULAR TRIP GENERATION According to ITE Trio Generation, Fifth Edition, 1991 Preface: F0817A93.Rpt • SOURCE: LES SCHWAB TIRE CENTER TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY, TP&E, SEPTEMBER 27, 1994 T • Mr. Michael Oxman LES SCHWAB TIRE CENTER September 21, 1994 Page -6- "Because trip generation characteristics for a land use may vary, extreme care must be taken in the use of the data. You may wish to modify or adjust the trip generation rates and equations presented in this report to reflect a site's location, public transportation service, ridesharing program, proximity to other developments that may reduce vehicle trip-makina through walking or combining trips and special characteristics of the site or the surrounding area. You should collect local data for comparison when considering use of the data in this report." Based on these Guidelines we have conducted a trip generation rate analysis for an existing Les Schwab Tire Center. The existing Les Schwab Tire Center is located at 25101 Pacific Highway South. This store includes 9,000 gross sq. ft. of buiiding area, four service bays, four alianment bays and one truck slab. In addition to this one facility, data was obtained for the other 21 Les Schwab Centers in the Puget Sound area. The trip generation analysis included the following: 1. Conducting a full 8:00 AM - 6:00 PM customer receipt count. The cc:Int was done on Tuesday, September 14, 1993. A summary of this count is given in Table 5. 2. Conducting manual turning movement count at the driveway of the above- mentioned store on the same day, between the hours of 4:00 PM and 6:00 PM. The summary of this turning movement count is given in Table 6. 3. Reviewing the monthly cash register transaction data from 21 Les Schwab Tire Center Centers in the Puget Sound area. The data is attached. Our review of the data showed an average 51 customer receipts per day which equals 102 customer trips per day. The review of total customers count data as given in Table 5 shows that on an average weekday there are 87 sales (customer receipts). The morning peak hour occurred between 11:00 AM -noon, and the PM peak hour occurred between the hours of 5:00-6:00 PM. Table 5 also shows that the PM peak is about 23% of average weekday sales. The two hour manual turn movement count (Table 6) at the driveways shows that during the PM peak hour (5:00-6:00 PM) a total of 35 customers entered or exited the store. The 35 trips compares favorably with the customer receipt information showing 20 transactions which results in 40 trips (20 transactions x 2 trips per transaction). Some of these customers may not come and leave during the 5:00-6:00 PM time period due to the time involved in changing the tires. Based on the gross area (9,000 sq. ft.) of the store and the field data collected, the PM peak hour trip rate is calculated as follows: F0817A93.Rpt SOURCE LES SCHWAB TIRE CENTER TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY, TPBE, SEPTEMBER 27, 1994 • qoE Mr. Michael.Oxman LES SCHWAB TIRE CENTER September 21, 1994 Page -7- PM peak hour trip rates = total trios = 35 = 3.88 trips/1,000 sq. ft. gross area 9 The 3.88 trip rate is well within the range of rates (2.58-8.14) as identified in the Trip Generation for this land use. Detailed calculations are attached. Based on the same methodology, AM and average weekday rates are also calculated. Table 7 shows the calculated and ITE rates for weekday, AM and PM peak hours. PASS -BY AND DIVERTED -LINK TRIP CREDITS A pass -by trip is an existing trip that comes directly from the traffic stream passina the facility on the adjacent road system and does not require a diversion from another roadway. Whereas diverted -linked trips are trips attracted from the traffic volume on roadways within the vicinity of the aenerator but which require a diversion from that roadway to another roadway to gain access to the site. These roadways could include streets or freeways adjacent to the generator, but without access to the generator. Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trio Generation, Fifth Edition, 1991, does not provide pass -by or diverted -link trips credits factors for tire stores. It is a common observation that people tend to avoid making new trips during peak hours, so that a substantial number of the trips generated in peak hours are already on the road during peak. hours. Based on our engineering judgement and knowledae of the area, we assumed 10% of the new trips can be classified as pass -by and diverted -linked trips. Based on the calculated rates for the Les Schwab Tire Stores, the total net new trips generated during the PM peak hour is 49 trips. TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND ASSIGNMENT Figure 3 shows the calculated PM peak hour site -generated traffic and assumed distribution. This trips distribution and assignment was submitted to the City dated September 29, 1993. The City did not identify any concerns with the distribution at that time. However, this revised report provides further discussion regarding the trip distribution characteristics. The PM peak hour trip distribution is based on the characteristics of the road network, existing traffic volume patterns, the location of likely trip origins and destinations, estimated travel times and other traffic studies done in the site vicinity. The trip distribution also takes in to account potential market areas. Therefore, as most of the residential and F0817A93.Rpt SOURCE: LES SCHWAB TIRE CENTER TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY, TP&E, SEPTEMBER 27, 1994 eTTACHMENT B • Land Use Table 3 Trip Generation Summary Trip Rate Noon Peak and P.M. Peak Per 1000 Per 1000 Square Square Total Square Feet Feet AWDT Feet In Out Total Home Depot 145,572 30.7 4,469 3.68 252 284 .536 Garden Center 28,538 35.5 1,013 3.73 50 56 106 Retail Pads 14,100 159.8 2.253 14.5 2.5. 108 2 Gross Total Trips 7,735 398 448 847 Less 25% Passby 1.934 aa Net Total Trips 5,801 299 336 635 Note: AWDT - Average Weekday Daily Traffic. Trip Distribution The trip distribution and assignment for the proposed development's trip generation was based on the existing travel patterns, access to the major arterials, and access to 1-5 and 1-405. The passby traffic distribution was taken from traffic traveling along West Valley Highway and South 180th Street. Figure 5 depicts the trip distribution percentages of the proposed project with and without an access at Saxon Drive. Trip assignment of the project -generated volumes to the surrounding street network based on this distribution is shown in figure 6 for the noon and p.m. peak hours. This distribution was also approved by Mr. Cameron. As suggested by the Tukwila Engineering Department, no background traffic growth was assumed for the 1993 traffic volumes. Therefore, 1993 projected traffic is based on the existing traffic and projected Home Depot traffic. Figures 7 and 8 show the resulting study intersection volumes with and without the potential additional access to Saxon Drive. SOURCE HOME DEPOT STORE - TUKWILA, TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY, DECEMBER 1992 92040-60 /REPORTS / TRFCIMP (12)29192) /03w 9 CO 10900 NE 3TH ST SUITE 100 OELLIVUE WASHINGTON 90004 Int FAL 206 404 0220 TELEPHONE 106 404 +►00 WASHINGTON A 11 1 t 0 N A CALIIOANIA (*ATTACHMENT de ENTRAPICO January 25, 1993 Ron Cameron City Engineer, City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 Re: Home Depot - Tukwila Mitigation Fee Methodology Entranco Project No. 92040-60 Dear Ron: This letter summarizes our methodology for determining the mitigation fees for the proposed Home Depot in Tukwila, Washington. Per our telephone conversation on January 22, 1993, we are sending you the information needed to justify the numbers we used for mitigation. There was an error in figure 6 of our report which I believe caused this confusion. It was, not clear if the project generated traffic volumes in figure 6 included the passby trips or if it showed only the net "new" project trips. Figure 6 has been corrected to show the total (new + passby) trips generated by Home Depot. The mitigation fees are applied to only the new trips, therefore, the volumes shown in figure 6 volumes should not used to determine mitigation fees. For your convenience we have separated the new trips (figure A) from the passby trips (figure B). The combination of these figures will result in the volumes shown in the revised figure 6. The mitigation fees are based on the increase in peak hour traffic at the intersections. Thus, the volumes shown in figure A only should be used to determine the mitigation fees for Home Depot. The mitigation fees should be as follows: • Southcenter Parkway/Strander • Andover Park West/Strander • Andover Park East/Strander • S 180th Street/SR 181 127 peak hour trips at $140/trip 64 trips at $317/trip 223 trips at $135/trip 286 trips at $475/trip $17,780 $20,288 $30,105 $135,850 11 299..v Ron Cameron January 25, 1993 Page 2 Co The total trip mitigation for Home Depot is $204,023. If you have any questions please feel free to call me. Sincerely, ENTRANCO Sherman Goon Project Engineer Attachments: Revised Figure 6 Figure A and Figure B cc: Francis Chu, Greenberg Farrow Architects Mark Miller, Mark Miller Consultants, Inc. JJH:SDG:jhw /Of Haynie E.I.T. Project Engineer 11OYE (4 .6Z34 t Andover Park w c.. Minider Blvd. Z5 .:^.oxs-AY.?S?'' t ` o- 1. .o J t Z3) o 1L Saxon Drive L 69(0) =zo(z4 COI 11*T ...go cO) . Meal .dRIPis t rwoosAaysbgpnCoo toxo) . Nam .dPuPeat s/welthamaSimOft •--- Penal Sem 01.icons 11 (ts) l Z5 Z `j (} 94\ �z9Y-z1)J . ' Figure 6 Project Generated Traffic Volumes 2570 P,9 -s56 7R/P5 • (30) (40) 30 40 • (34) 34 i 7 (77) 387 987 m40'• Strander Blvd 387 .4.-- 387 34 (34) 1.:ITV;;M:z.zoriV.:4=7.mrZaramme::. !se:: ;•):: :••7: 118 Minkler Btvd g..4. 90(90) . ir.r.tx (89)89 .4441 "VT.,747.3';143MkrZezc110MV.WA14 OW 0 "la ;j: 4 (101) Drive 774 1•EOP. 774 .411 774 S 18011, St (46) 44 (44) 4s kik 4 46(46) ar.,...mairmamszt,..0A4mremzzi...,,yArg (44) 44 a"." los 1••• 118 (17) rA-111. 90(90) "1•12.4.:54,z (67 0) k. 30 (30) 11 79 90(40) alJ S. ( 9) 104 (30)90 '4. (40) al 47 0.- 80 (80) (47) 47" ro • (82) 82 (111) 111 nk 84 14 (84) (119fif,„9Ettor Legend: nto . Noon ard 114 Peak Hour wIttelut Access to Salon DM (003)• Nom and PI4 Peak Howieke= to Saxon (hive 000 . Daily Wines - - Potereal Saxon Orin/wave Figure 6 Project Generated Traffic Volumes YIM arum V310.A.aLD nirkAa s OCR. r R RVA Donn KALI r • NO R -r G3 ]1d liiw atb 'IL°t1Il�wfill Ottcpn-ce Tuk wila, Washington 11101RdQSR OR41ID Ir MW 18TAllR.M MO R.rD1 MT MV a.. RA04/0 MT. 1•11•11 MT 430M ULLIN! PAM Oils 1:01 INS • Mill MITA1l10 ,AIR 01'3 I s -•Q K111:0111 106.1•6•6 Ma AD LOOM mt. atom PAW Po TO .1r A,a.D OM -' LAMIGITM OP MIAMI', =SCRIM IMIlt C2 DAIMM & 71131MILINDIARY SIGN Di T iUL v... W.r. WT 3ll1'IE I?LAN ��i soveanssm T MCA&. r • N. I CF& PLAM 1Mw MIILiiI' MMIATI K Ian IAOR.1r! MOM. 11.Cf10 MOlWUM COMM% v� Mi O.a0 Cay Gw©nnilD AmeQnnteeits Architecture And Planning IPI1 pm•ACTDIMOOILL SS3 GOMM fr. YOSMAip 3AI M STATISTICS HIIi0a 1100 . PA1013 FlO.'Of3. AO RATA 13OTa610 MBA MOW• 0.7.1 l0,1.4M.• 314 r1.. MS KW ,0:+0.00 ARA~KTAGK• MA en R. MI ROMs 4Oi. Of•C* b0 M 000002il1wA M NR PM$011 ALIMMIL 010 MYR 10IMIal MM MIDI MA OO/. Oki MIA ALK V. • m (C,N • (OM -„IM3K•M MO.R. yilyl n.Ori 8 00.001 g • 400•411, MOM 4» PCUIVVII MLOAVIVN V.A. mW.lf1TA wusno10s1•wus VAMP IVnncxwu EAST ELEVATION acne, is • r -m' Itiiifl'»i' V vo w$.e 00.•• �rt�DNANO Vaal11 0.420 Pal IA.& AVOW VP OCR WU, MOO er. NU. 14•1116. MPVD NORTH ELEVATION same. Vs' • r.m. ...ICI ww Ma - rnaNOVA awnrweMD oil! Him !11111111 n 1 COMWI C�tl MVP aww wa SOUTH ELEVATION scxe. iV . r.m' 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 M 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 WEST ELEVATION °CALE, w . r.a, MO VOVVD L•04164.8 ARNIM Csamy (SII°®ul Aneailti Architecture and Planning li ,1,� . I .......I,� 1. .7! Y:4+--=: ii11111111111111.111-'Hca F L IIIIII�Y11 - — - 1111!11111 Kt. .tfa ,)}-145a:_, a ��- ,. + � NW 1►r..N: Wb�M1; i ti 8 wusno10s1•wus VAMP IVnncxwu EAST ELEVATION acne, is • r -m' Itiiifl'»i' V vo w$.e 00.•• �rt�DNANO Vaal11 0.420 Pal IA.& AVOW VP OCR WU, MOO er. NU. 14•1116. MPVD NORTH ELEVATION same. Vs' • r.m. ...ICI ww Ma - rnaNOVA awnrweMD oil! Him !11111111 n 1 COMWI C�tl MVP aww wa SOUTH ELEVATION scxe. iV . r.m' 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 M 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 WEST ELEVATION °CALE, w . r.a, MO VOVVD L•04164.8 ARNIM Csamy (SII°®ul Aneailti Architecture and Planning NO'R771 Scale: 1-=20'60' /oil= IT VIZ • TREE PL4NTN6 DETAL 6.6 0 ..t••,o .. � 00.1. Int SFRLB PLANTNG PETAL- - rr< 400 PLANT MATERIAL LKT . Co. Dot.ir.J N.0 Comm Now 10 .17.0 ..1 0..000 D••.j a -M •.Q • - e ,0.�r�r %-r 050 • 000 UOyU 00 •if fCf PLY 01.4 .110 nal T7 b .b• 0.0417 *O.D.D DOW 00 • •^•41,0 1�1b'O'e'0.0000O .C.:00:0:0:4 -.P.2,,:::2.:9:::::::: •701 .o 070010 16.- ,_ _ APP.. .0 0 t ^b00a rla0rr64exsT.6 Do .LO06,T�T. 414. ..din 40.2 ..0 ALA 4.00 I•nc.4.50» 0151100044004,1 Dr 0202 Or 72214. PILL 00 *4.7.1 Do..e tor1,TE0..7.60 .PR l%l^I caae10`=207...705{6e Landscape Plan M.imm ' 0o uO 0.00007 RD %.ner - C %MLT 0072 .¢TO,r.mno, 440.D12 0.61 .40170007000 r rem env." .LLATN 00.0410 00401 re16nv.7.• 0.09000 K% 17e4407* 00447[20/ an 2.07.071. 701.10• 04,00. 4.00.407 774. corm. 2•011,1012716•52A 60150121.22:0 40.41 L410067.Y23 'OTTO 2000 000.1 Y900L.7. 01007.4 1e10000607420 0.2.27, . udn0. O.wl S. 160TH STREET 0..0. 4001, 6041* 00 107. 0110,0155 {Skit, .Y, r 0.L *40-1.00.-50.417 xr x D.w Doe,c .1111 xr Ye. 075=D0 Ours tr 4070. ,ca rle e- •err r 2..L 0.14000= real 071027040000. 0..a 0070 7027 740074 027027 O.nNv_, 0tl00 0.00 ,71.407 O 'Yc 2141. w Y7. SP VC p.cn9/Rmwi., x0 01 r 00.00.71070.1 VW. VOe 1.00/.0019 70,116 TQ 000 c 00 OL a'OLW OC 601 Oe NOT Yl4m 0 4000, 00427 Ma sr 00 726.T1071,45700 rule A. L00".•[•M•, TO oe COVOCEP 02 TONT.,1.10.0.0 *40Ow10YT,0, IN154 Y0210• •{547410 41.0 .D LISH 2OK, • TOO 2C.0 �.[ 04 TJR .4., • r.10� 0,112515 .D 000.010.01 • ,a 0072.4 40)30,060=00)70.100,000 LEGEND u. {{Ea .04» LA. TMJ. TT{ 0 4 000.000.0.2 *0'.4:0444* .T 0..4 Cella[ *:e YFOOTon w .r% 317:19170 71001 01 005700 re, TO 00 Q..T.ta NOTES • *000. 4.40016.0 5.6.7 .007 n 40:97 TO .90910.rtr.T OM .1.40,1.TMJ.r } ! * per DMR 4ALV YVR 0052 . . • 140 Itll.' 114 1.00%427 0000 Tr..01 M. • 700 0177.4.7170 00100,0+00 2000 Yecruta , • ta ono/ .6 PDS Ya x507.0, 65212{,r. 1.,, e�0 Y .111,.0,7T*J Oi1Q Tn.T,01,14:1,. 7,000 510707.71.5 TO 00262 POW mxt..‘rnoN MCC TO 000C • :4.%u VIZ OL ro,rot Ter, .07< 0o T0,01. • 107107 DC57.6 PLANTS .le„ 1.00.7x910 {OVAL • 0510C� T16 W0*2?! D.ulO 071072 7000 TO MeV! t ATIY• 0 7041. 02 �.04, TIC S007, 57770 rtl0.16.17{10.5 1 ,T6 3 01 OTY K4Cr40.0 1,404/KT.= OC t007 • MT... Ra•!fN„ 4.LLOOf 00'04 7.040 • 10706 70707 07044.004 7127 10424 .0 40e 001707 11.0.77. 74.0 • 1,247005 C?Yie 11001027 146.5 .Q., 00 YAILT TO 60. 0070T 070.11 ..DOwm 0.0.7, 07000. MOO . 0017 16.00 111444 a a .61 i 3@ 4 Casey .Group Architects Architecture And Planning 1LIl 40 r P. Y 8 81 40 0; 40 07 g • • EXIST TYPE II S4' A 401 RIM • 2197 IE(RS)=R.813 EXIST TYPE 154' P 161 RIM = 2148 IE(NS,E)=15.24 40 Ei 07 L/a/T OF .5A"'7 HA7CO/ ENST /,4417. 01 RELOCATE ERRE. (■(! _0000R/IE1FAiTF— WTI DE BALM • SOW LOM POINTS TO REMAIN Al FASTING [Arai BA5D6 a 0 N0. DATE By CND. APPR. REVISION iranC IA=1 NI DRAIN BY DATE 0E510F0 BT Yb 0/22/95 DNEDBD BT Ii1 9/22 95 AV4ROIE0 BY SCALE: HOR11. VERT. JOB NO.: Mil COalting Enpmee s 1271 Thio AvNxw. Suite 900 Seattle. WegWpton 9801 C2061622-5822 Fax C206)622-8130 /COMO .50.404 sr 14( av n m r GRAPHIC SCALE 0 01 40 (NOD) 41.2040 TUKWILA LES SCHWAB UTILITY SITE PLAN DESIGN REVIEW n • • SHEET C-1 rturu i�iwiliul REMOVE 20 EXIST: PARCJN6 STALLS '15521E NEW ESP (TYPICAL EXISTAG) RD OVE-19.EXIST. P--.. STALL REMOVE EXISTNG �1 ''AJLJ16YLLLcSY-:.. 19'-0' (TYPICAL) ,. SIGN BY CORER . (P15TALLEO BY SRN 'INSTALLER/30 SQ. Ft. PER SIDE 21 NEW PARKINS STALLS 30.046.5.8CS FT.11.49 ACFff6) 0122 8Q. FT. .. 21,411 SQ. FT. . . . w n(DUICa QS20 SQ. PAVING 64 x 61-0' STANDARD STEEL PAN PIPE T(EYWAREICl.1 BINSTALLER). .. . .. MIDDLE'BTEEL PIPE.- BEE 88C11E•DU.E FOR PPESM.-(BY-SIGN . INSTALLER. PANT: UNITE LOVER STEEL PIPE - SEE EaEPILE .. FOR PIPE SITE AND 1.136T14 . (ET =NEW. PANT RED TO . 448' AFG. AND UNITE ABOVE. WP. J -BOX . LANOSCAP11 OR PAVE"ENT PARKING REQUIRED PAR— PROVIDED: . RECYCL:N3 AREA REQUIRED RECYCLING AREA FRONDED FREE 8TA/ONG 8144 NEW POLE LIGHT • TO MATCH. EXIST. • TOTAL - 38,969.98. FT. 13222 60.'FT. x 2S )1000. 3305 STALLS 40 STALLS ' 13122 SQ FT. / 1000 x 9 80. FT.. 663 SOFT 144 80.,FT. APPROX. R9' FRONTAGE. THE ORE 80 ea PT. PER SIDE AI (70AF*1 P. BEE _ - .SIGN ELEVATION THIS SHEET WALL AREA • .3200 8F. • EEF . . 10.02 x (3200 - 3000)).110 • 114 80. FT.- • ALCO4 E7 .-9iGN AREA. PROVIDED •(2)4880.FT..•9660.FT.'.. '. C2 EXIBTUG E COMPACTED STRUCTURAL BAGQaLL CR LEAN =CRETE. PER BPECPCATIONS. OR UNDISTURBED EARTH • S88'45'41'E ''lb OREM =NQ.gime 1CP OF DRS 2516 EU EMIT : A lldite t Ate And Planning 7OO911L1VG AND ?ODLE SCHEDULE MANIMIJ'RSal I$IGNT. '11 . 30. PT. MR AXRtI1 SIGN AREA • 83 FT: � : , - I LATERAL SOIL SEARING PREWRE. 60 PAF. / FT. EPTH WIND EXPOSURE •• 13 C WIND SPEED •• • 10 MPH. CO MPH. 40 MPH,. 10 MPH. 80' MPH. 80 MPH. FOOTNG'UUDTH B. 41-0' 8'-0' 9'-0' 5'-0' 9'-0' 51-011 FOOT6G'DEPTH 91' 5'-0' 9'.0' 9'-6• 5'•6'. 6-0• 61-6. MIDDLE PIPE SIM; .104 STD. 104 610. 104 81). 104 8TC. I0 • STD. 104 STD. LOVER -PIPE 812E, Q4 82D. .Q4 810. Q'6 STD.. Q4 810: Q'1 51D. 04. 610. LOSER PPE 1108311 I0'-0' 10'-0' 10'-0' . 10'-" -B'-0' 19'-0• ••SEE 'DESIGN CRITERIA' OR BPECFICATIONS - .. . PAUL L . CASEY, AIA DRAWN BY : �/ 6 .✓ 7 ISSUE DATE LATEST REVV, THIS SET: • 1 V116 36th A venue Court SW, Suite . 8109 Tacoma, Washington 98499 (206) 584-5207 EXIST TYPE IT 54' 0.1,11 RIM = 21:97'. TENS) -15$3 OCATED STORM SYSTEM Ti§0A, fl.SC TB,LE IMKUHL efi EXIST TYPE ii 54'4 MN RIM = 2148. IE(N,S.E)=1 .24 z 2 o_ d• w. 0 s 0 LOW POINTS TO RalATN AT EXISTING CATCH BASINS 10 1. a 0. 0 0 a 0 0 CO • a oc O z 0 m z 0 A 10 pECID BENCHMARK: CHISELED SOUARE W 1HE TDA OF CURB. EL 2.00 N0: DATE_ APER`., REVISIQN DRAWN BY' DATE DESIGNED BY MRS 9/22/95 OF1ECJCED BY - R1 9/22/95 APPROyED BT.., SCALE: HORIZ. VERT.' JOB• NO. : Car><uttbg Engineers 1201 Third Avenue.. Suite 900 Seattle Washington 98101 L2061 6225872. Fax (2061 B c 9 0 • -TU.KW.ILA LES SCHWAB UTILITY SITE PLAN DESIGN REVIEW N: SHEET 11111111111111 = o • = ®0 ®_ =e0 WEN 01100 01010 Om Om Eltr, Ala mifillingr'' 111111111111 MI MB 1=0.•00•100 IMMN 1s�Gsis���Jt�PA - YERPT LOCATION AND PROVIDE BRAD 9ACKW6 AT ro BRACKETS (T7P Or L lav:: �i •t - I_= 2•xb• DOUNBPOVT (TTP). PANT • TO MATCH WALL ;446ILATED STEEL PANELS "PAINED TO MATO4 WALL EAST _.ELEVATION SCALE: IB It -0" . BORCM (2) PANELS STEEL.: .. NBLATED. PAINTED TO MATCH WALL ALL OTHER PMELS DOUBLE GLAZED ALL LaTE6. NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: I/8" .• I-0'• 1111.11111111111111111111111 111111111/ WRTE / CPP W/flE' METAL ROO. . II.1.1.11Il•1111111I111111• PAINTED OFR WIRE SRR PACED (21I - WALL PAATTED MUI 1111 _1 PANTED MTYD 1E:D 1010.00.00 SOUTH. ` ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8" 11111 .00000.11111/000/01•110011100/0101.••••000000. - a= === = = == = == === = 0000 == = = ==� == = I == 11=============_ — _ _ MUM _ _ _ _-J1Yi-JllL1SL7lL YY�f1�' — 0000— J11� �SLT: ����il�!!_ _—_ 1- ti _____• ____ �_ �RIMY.E�Ammo •% im _ _ _ - __11 ': _____ __ _ 0•00••_� ���_ 1ZM _�M o - �� _�� o Z. AMMO �._. �����••••_ ��_ �_ _ vii rYL�a�i Iti r, 1". — __— _0000-- �� S m p �' 'I� imr, =� == — � ���?�S Z'� �.� r= _ter__ r =_ __ .1E1..1 - o,L? ____ __ ____:==�.a. i %_ _- _ __ _____ - - _ 0000_ __=__:-r- _:__ -1:_ _ �_ f - �_ �.�:_ �� fi__ _ r_. �_ �I:�4 :•__ir r_____ ____� y.� •• __ - .1% = r r 0000 r = =�= = = = - = =-•== - _ _ - - ========== _• _ =I=: _-� __ —= _ =_ — = - - - 0000 - 0000 = - _ _: == _ r= = •_�_ 0000= _0000 = e =_ _ == _ _moo = ==0000- 0000-- = - _ _ _' -================== -1 =• =' =0000 0000-- -- ==- =--= = x0000=-=== ========== - _ _ ==-=_===_=__=i1-- 01•00M000•10•00====.00000=1•••••••/00-----=-====-= == == = ===== •I - = = SI M:= ==-====- oo=-===---N _.ta.;"a.1. T ===7==--- - === {X. ===0000r=r1 0000 = 0000................................... -== - — = — — 0000 --�- —0000--0000 0000 - 0000-- _..--J--..—=========i=======�=•I1—.: = ••001/11•1=11=-. = 0000 - - .0000 ----=- WEST: ELEVATION SCALE:. I/8"..I'-0" • BE REPINED BT LMDBCdPE &DU GTounp AI chttec .Architecture and 0 COMMu'/..