HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA E95-0031 - HOLLY RICHARD - SHORT PLAT LOTSRICHARD HOLLY
SHORT PLAT CREATING
TWO LOTS FROM ONE
15642 47T" AVE S.
E95-0031
A F F I.D AVIT
I, syL'oN Mcmaj_p_n1
IlNotice of Public Hearing
Notice of Public Meeting
Board of Adjustment Agenda
Packet
Board of Appeals Agenda
Packet
Planning Commission Agenda
Packet
.LiShort Subdivision Agenda
Packet
O Notice of Application for
Shoreline Management Permit
Shoreline Management Permit
OF DISTRIBUTION
hereby declare that:
IJLiDetermination of Non-
significance
Mitigated Determination of
Nonsignificance
Determination of Significance
and Scoping Notice
Notice of Action
Official Notice
Other
Other
was mailed to each of the following addresses on
Environmental Review Section Keith B. Dewey
Department of Ecology 15122 42nd Ave. S.
P.O. Box 47703 Tukwila, WA 98188
Olympia, WA 98504-7703
Name of Project 001-)->11. 'R1CA:b' 1
Signature
f\cy\(JQ1
'`
File Number IF:n 6 " OO \
The Seattle Times
Linda Querin
464-2582 (fax)
.:e
•
•
CITY OF TUKWILA
DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS)
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL:
SHORT PLAT CREATING TWO LoTS OUT OF ONE
PROPONENT: RICHARD HOLLY
f .!.�sem``` C r x
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL:;- IN:LLUDINL STREET ADDRESS. IF< ANi
t r-, T
ADDRESS: 1.5�t,4t 47. AV a 1„ {'- r
�, . 1 ``
PARCEL NO- ,fJ'.1=0d60,-60.i0 •
SEC; TWN/RNfi: 22/23/fJ4
LEAD AGENCY=:. ; ' CITY OF-TUKWILA
FILE NO:' -E95 -a034
The City ;f a_ c1et.+'r.mine=c1 that tlye prop':, "1 does not have"a 70.r'obabjl;e
'igrlit iCaSi',t adver-e :impac.t7th the tiJi'r'
eorlment. An anV',i,r"orlmantal'
impact -' :e-
tatemnt;3(E,I'�,) is.—wr-
t e aifi' ad-,U.n,der RCW 43.21 c:0 �l(3,:) (Cy+��,:.a�
This deL,,1 i'n wa'= made af`t'er mev iR w of to �co►rip l eted env i
1,:t. rlli)e'nta 1 tjl
check; 1 is,t;1/ and- 1 of o, ni t l;on pon\t r )e -,-°w,, tlh the lead a'�ericv Th\,is'
1nfOrnia'tif'.h 1: ava 1 r N fj o h" e: • `
� ��ilab�l� [� th �ubli�vorl�r,equ.e�,t a"
4.
*'k*'A*:4•k•k4A�I:1•k 4•k4z4�k:i•k,* kk:44.k 444 A 4.*4 *41 ci �k *k'* 44.44* 4* 4 4:rkkkk:4 4kk'kkk:4kk•k•k:t:tlr'k:I :�'!rk•k
[pl
This e �'- - tt i'�rlaq i'arld.� i'+7rled�t"h-i,:w "
't 1 (t/��
\+
='_ Steve Lalter Re:p6-n ible Otticia1
Citv of Tula•(,206)"431-3630d ' - =-
6300 SouthenerBou1eJard _
.::
Tukwila, WA•`�`u`L1L'3-
' G l- "
You may appeal .'thi's;determination to the C--ity Clerk: at L:irty-'Hali, 6200
Southcenter Boulevar-:;d Tuk.wi la. . WA .9L},1Wno later than -1O days from the
above signature date -:b:' written 'appe:• a'.? stating the.:ba:i of the appeal for
specitic factual obaect�io.ns�a-Yuu `rna�v\be r-eyu1't
reduhear some of the
e'-penses for an appeal. ---'::::::,-z-.------ __-__ _ - ~-
Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the City
Clerk and Department of Community Development.
d a v- of AlC46.4r
•
CITY OF TUKWILA
DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS)
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL:
SHORT PLAT CREATING TWO LOTS OUT OF ONE
PROPONENT: RICHARD HOLLY
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL, INCLUDING STREET ADDRESS, IF ANY:
ADDRESS: 15642 47 AV S
PARCEL NO: 810860-0800
SEC/TWN/RNG: 22/23/04
LEAD AGENCY: CITY OF TUKWILA FILE NO: E95-0031
The City has determined that the proposal does not have a probable
significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental
impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21c.030(2)(c).
This decision was made after review of a completed environmental
checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This
information is available to the public on request.
***************************************************************************
This determination is final and signed this 2 I b day
1995.
Steve Lancaster, Responsible tSfficial
City of Tukwila, (206) 431-3680
6300 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila, WA 98188
of RN els +[3
You may appeal this determination to the City Clerk at City Hall, 6200
Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 no later than 10 days from the
above signature date by written appeal stating the basis of the appeal for
specific factual objections. You may required to bear some of the
expenses for an appeal.
Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the City
Clerk and Department of Community Development.
TO:
FROM:
RE:
DATE:
Jack Pace
John Jimers
SEPA - Rick Hilly Short Plat (E95-0031)
October 25, 1995
Memorandum
•
(4/
Project Description:
The proposal is to short plat one lot into two on property located
at 15642 47 AV S. There is an existing house which will be on the
front (west) lot with a septic drainfield between the house and
street. The second lot would be to the east, with access to the
street via an easement across the first lot. The septic drainfield
will be located on moderate slopes east of the building pad
location. The short plat is not categorically exempt from SEPA
because the site is located on an environmentally sensitive area
(slopes).
Agencies With Jurisdiction:
None.
Comments to SEPA Checklist:
Page 3, No. 10: A land altering permit and utility permit will be
required from Public Works. Septic design is subject to King
County approval.
Page 4, No. 1(b): Based on topography provided on survey, slopes
are as high as 20%
Page 4, No. B(1)(b): Erosion could occur with construction of
improvements on the site.
Page 11, No. 8(c): There is a single family residence on the lot.
Summary of Primary Impacts/Mitigation:
1. Earth -- The short plat will result in creating a new building
site closer to the steep slopes east of the property. However,
there is adequate room for a building pad on the level portion of
the lot and for a drainfield on the sloped portion of the lot. No
significant impacts on the earth are expected, with the Sensitive
Areas Ordinance requirement for a geotechnical report having been
waived.
2. Air
increase
3. Water
vicinity.
-- The proposal will result in a very small amount of
in vehicular trips and associated air pollution.
-- There are no known bodies of water in the immediate
As with all urban development, there is potential for
• •
increased pollutants entering into the stormwater. Since there is
no sewer, potential exists for pollutants entering into ground
water from the drainfield.
The project will result in potential increases in stormwater
runoff. This impact will be addressed in the short plat review
process.
4. Plants -- The site has been previously cleared of natural
vegetation. Volunteers from a previous vegetable garden and
various weeds, grasses and blackberry bushes have taken over the
cleared area. No endangered or candidate species are known to be
on the site.
5. Animals -- Very limited amounts of habitat for small animals
exists on the site., Future development of a residence will
eliminate small amount of bird and small animal habitat.
6. Energy and Natural Resources -- The eventual construction of a
house will result in heating and electrical costs normally
associated with single family residences.
7. Environmental Health -- The project will not generate hazards in
excess of what is normally expected from a single family residence
with a septic sewer system.
8. Land and Shoreline Use -- The proposal is consistent with the
adopted land use plan and zoning and does not change the single
family residential character of the neighborhood.
9. Housing -- The proposal will create a building lot for a new
single family residential structure.
10. Aesthetics -- The new lot will not be easily visible from the
street or the valley below. A home on the lot will enjoy views of
the valley and the Cascade mountains.
11. Light and Glare -- The proposal will not generate light and
glare beyond that normally found in a residential zone.
12. Recreation'-- The proposal will not significantly increase
demand forrecreational facilities. Crestview Park and Crystal
Springs Park provide public recreation facilities in the immediate
vicinity.
13. Historic and Cultural Preservation -- There are no known
historical or cultural artifacts on the site.
14. Transportation -- The site has access to 47th Avenue S, a
residential street. Public Transit is available to the west of the
site.
15. Public Services -- Project is not likely to generate
substantial increase in demand for public services.
• •
16. Utilities -- Project is not likely to significantly increase
demand on the utility systems.
Recommended Threshold Determination:
DNS
1, -
To:
-
To: John Jimerson
From: Joanna Spencer
Date: October 10, 1995
Re: Holly 47th Ave. S. Short Plat
Activity No. C9,54:0.Q31
L95-0042
PW Comments:
1. The on-site sewage disposal system currently serving 15626 47th Ave. S. must be abandoned
(PW -Storm Drain permit will be required for abandonment/removal of the septic system)
because it will be within the proposed new lot.
A new on-site sewage disposal system to serve the above existing residence must be designed,
installed and have an approved final as -built prior to the final subdivision application.
2. 3.5' high chain link fence encroaching into 20' ingress, egress and utility easement shall be
removed prior to short plat approval.
3. The site drains to Gilliam Creek. Any future development should have no drainage impact to
downstream neighbors. Flow shall be brought to predevelopment conditions. Drainage design
shall follow King County Surface Water Design Manual.
4. The Tukwila "underground ordinance" requires that all utilities be placed underground.
5. Access shown as 20 foot easement with at least'12 foot wide all weather surface and 4 foot
shoulders meets access requirements. A maintenance agreement is required for short plat
approval.
q:\mike\hollysp.doc
RECEIVED
OCT 1 0 1995
COMMUIvi I Y
DEVELOPMENT
CHECKLIST: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW/SHORELINE PT MAILINGS
FEDERAL AGENCIES
( )U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
( )FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
( )DEPT. OF INTERIOR -FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE
( )U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
( )U.S. DEPARTMENT OF H.U.D. (REGION X)
WASHINGTON STATE AGENCIES
( )OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY
( )TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT
( )DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES
( )OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR
( )DEPT. OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
( )DEPT. OF FISHERIES
( )K.C. PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEV.
( )BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD
( )FIRE DISTRICT #11
( )FIRE DISTRICT #2
( )SOUTH CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT
( )TUKWILA LIBRARIES
( )RENTON LIBRARY
( )KENT LIBRARY
( )CITY OF SEATTLE LIBRARY
)US WEST
)SEATTLE CITY LIGHT
)WASHINGTON NATURAL GAS
)WATER DISTRICT.#75
)SEATTLE WATER DEPARTMENT
)GROUP W CABLE
)OLYMPIA PIPELINE
( )KENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT
( )TUKWILA CITY DEPARTMENTS:
( )PUBLIC WORKS ( ) FIRE
( )POLICE ( )FINANCE
( )PLANNING ( )BUILDING
( )PARKS AND ORECREATION
( )TUKWILA MAYOR
)DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL & HEALTH SERVICES
)DEPT. OF ECOLOGY, SHORELANDS'DIVISION
)DEPT.•OF ECOLOGY, SEPA DIVISION*
)DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE__
)OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL
*SEND CHECKLIST WITH DETERMINATIONS AND
*SEND SITE MAPS. WITH DECISION
KING COUNTY AGENCIES
( )KING COUNTY DEPT. OF PARKS
( )HEALTH DEPARTMENT
( )PORT OF SEATTLE
( )BUILDING & LAND DEV. DIV.-
SEPA INFORMATION CENTER
SCHOOLS/LIBRARIES
( )HIGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT
( )KING COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY
( )SEATTLE MUNICIPAL REFERENCE LIBRARY
( )SEATTLE SCHOOL DISTRICTS
( )RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT
UTILITIES
( )PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT
( )VAL-VUE SEWER DISTRICT
(`)WATER DISTRICT #20
( )WATER DISTRICT #125
( )CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC WORKS
( )RAINIER VISTA
( )SKYWAY
CITY AGENCIES
( )RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT
( )CITY OF SEA -TAC
( )CITY OF SEATTLE
( )CITY OF BURIEN
( )TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS
( )TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
OTHER LOCAL AGENCIES
( )PUGET SOUND REGIONAL COUNCIL
( )P.S. AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY
( )SW K.COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
( )MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE
( )DUWAMISH INDIAN TRIBE
MEDIA
( )DAILY JOURNAL OF COMMERCE
( )VALLEY DAILY NEWS
( )METRO ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING DIV.
OFFICE/INDUSTRIAL 5,000 GSF OR MORE
RESIDENTIAL 50 UNITS OR MORE
RETAIL 30,000 GSF OR MORE
( )HIGHLINE TIMES
( )SEATTLE TIMES
PUBLIC NOTICE MAILINGS FOR PERMITS
SEPA MAILINGS
Mail to: (comment period starts on date of mailing)
Dept. of Ecology Environmental Review Section
Applicant
Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list)
Include these documents:
SEPA Determination (3 -part form from Sierra)
Findings (staff report, usu. with MDNS)
SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant)
Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's)
Affidavit of Dlstribution (notice was mailed & sent to newspaper).
SHORELINE MAILINGS
Notice of Application:
Notice of application for a substantial development Permit must be
mailed to owners and to property owners within 300 feet of subject
property, prepare an affidavit of publication, and publish two
consecutive weeks with deadline for comments due 30 days after last
newspaper publication date.
Shoreline Permit:
Mail to: (within 8 days of decision; 30 -day appeal period begins
date received by DOE)
Department of Ecology Shorelands Section
State Attorney General
Applicant
Indian Tribes
Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list).
Include these documents:
Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (3 -part form from Sierra)
Findings (staff report, if applicable)
Shoreline Application Form (filled out by applicant)
Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's)
- Site plan, with mean high water mark & improvements
Cross-sections of site w/structures & shoreline
Grading plan
Vicinity map
SEPA D- etermination (3 -part form from Sierra)
Findings (staff report, usu. with MDNS)
SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant)
Any background studies related to impacts on shoreline
Notice of Application
Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed & sent to newspaper)
Affidavit of Publication (notice was published in newspaper).
•
BACKGROUND
Name of proposed project, if applicable:
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
. • Name of applicant:
Control No..:
Epic Oe No.
Fee .$ 325 Receipt No.
S'P�9s�
,cz/ 6$ 1,. A46/
Addre s. and phone mber`"of applicant and contact person:
. ) ��7�-/ & / 2,q4-.17oo
4. Date checklist prepared: ?>44,k4;-
5.
5.Agency requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila
6. Proposedtimingor schedule ncluding phasing, if applicable):
7... Do you have any plans .for future additions, expansion, or further activity
related ,to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain.
b
List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will
be prep red, directly related to this proposal.
. Do youknow whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other
proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes,
explain. p
-2-
RECEIVED
SEP 2 6 1995
COMMUNil•Y
DEVELOPMENT
10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal.
AA-
o//r"
AffiMIDWAIVINI112411111
k57./. . <0,40)::o
'11. Giverbrief, comp ete descript on of your proposal, including the proposed uses
and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this
checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not
need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete
• • description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be
summarized her ;e.
%(/ 4 As `To i(6- F -Ox, /t/63EG2 AV.s-g-- k 770h/
12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand
the precise location of your proposed project, including 'a street address, if
any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over
a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal
description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably
available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not
required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica-
tions related to this checklist,
/d7, 6 417 4,' -
a ' OT #z c)/ - / L -ccxjz
13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land
Use Poly Plan Map as environmentally sensitive?
-3-
• 1O''BE COMPLETED BY APPLICAN•
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
1. Earth
•- description of the site (circle one): Flat,
rolling, illy, steep slopes, mountainous, other
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate
percent slope)? /' 5-' fyJ
c. What general types of soils are found on the site
(for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If
you know the classification of agricultural soils,
specify them and note any prime farmland.
Z .
A./
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable
soils the immediate vicinity? If so, describe.
e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti-
ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate
source of fill.
AVAW-
p /✓57.) 5/T2a-Tzlr2e-
f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing,
constryction, or use? If so, generally describ
-
/VD-
g. -
g.
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
About what percent of the site will be covered with
impervious surfaces after project construction (for
example, asphalt or buildings)? 3S -g.
AsP4 -T—�%2/VAf— /971/ A/,ia /er /L2G- trczr-
D� . .I.- T ,1/ic.r' ,s".LZ- F 4T 271/s
110 Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or
other impacts to the earth, if any: ii7n12-4414/ r-
Dv $i7 r /Anon/
2. Air
a. What types of emissions to the air would result from
the -•proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors,
industrial wood smoke) during construction and when
the project is completed? If any, generally
describe and give approximate quantities if known.
//
/ ri vi T'}/ ,70/7 S✓ z1..T- /e,./711)44/ ,C01145,1.7
b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor
that may affects your proposal? If so, generally
describe. Ala -
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or
other impacts to air, if any:
3. Water
a. Surface:
1) Is there any surface water body on or in the
immediate vicinity of the site (including year-
round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes,
ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and
provide names. If appropriate, state what
stream or riyer�it flows into.
/1/D7✓6
-5-
410 Evaluation for
411 Agency Use Only
2) Will the project require any work over, in, or
adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described
waters? If yes, please describe and attach
available plans. '
3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material
that would be placed in or removed from surface
water or wetlands and indicate the area of the
site that .would be affected Indicate the
source of fill material. A/brv'6
4) Will the proposal require surface water
withdrawals or diversions? Give general
description, purpose, and approximate quan-
tities, if known.
5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year
floodplain? If so, note location on the site
plan. /,
6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of
waste materials to surface waters? If so,
describe the type of waste and anticipated
volume of discharge. /t/O9Ar
-6-
b. Ground:
1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be
discharged to ground water? Give general
description, purpose, and approximate quan-
tities, if known.
2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged
into the ground from septic tanks or other sour-
ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage;
industrial, containing the following
chemicals...; agricultural; .etc.)' Describe the
general size of the system, the number of such
systems, the number of houses to be served (if
applicable), or the number of animals or humans
the systems) are expected to serve.
Detrf3T/c, p,i/ s'fz f*/I �?.t _ s rYPic � & /,rte 572��7-.. ,c- i7/� Y U.s62c
h y'a2- J.S x7;?,./ 07N/c7w& /941/4/22
24:740Pwq9 OP 9,-0 (RYA -Wax P r Oil Go/-
.
aT. p= 6ao y GSA 7-r 7 o /L 62cr2' Gd Irz c0/r/
c. Water Runoff (including storm water):
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
GJ�/:hot wI („C__
& '
0 /4✓41/c/7/0^/5
iiv 1oN vn/17i
s/reg-.
1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm
water) and method of collection and disposal, if
any (include quantities, if known). Where will
this water flow? Will this water flow into
other waters? If so, describe.
Pies/GAJ /20A-0 _
_I: i �%%1LYL,.114 t !LS�G�1 boy
f/19�51c. /leo
-7-
s
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface
waters? ,,If/� so, generally describe.
Na
. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface,
ground, and runoff water impacts, if any:
A/Ditir
T / A 4frN
t1/%1/7,40/t-
14 fr g
Check or circle types of vegetation found on the
site: rel �i ` .vvi -
4. Plants
deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other ( „ /
evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other Vl•�
shams
o pasture
n �.an� Alza -s
j`14) wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush,
,,,// skunk cabbage, other
jV water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other
-other types of vegetation •- / 4//w- mAl
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed
or altered?
/sT (f g"T��v�� L �vc A/ora
i�✓ro N d ��fL a✓st_�� S0,6,Oce O/'4W1
MVP,' /9«� NO411-- /Y47VC:1/G� b� G i iv 9-19 . Oc/Lo d (-Pew %/J{ 6-7
c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on
or near thes/ite.
�
�Yo4/f
-8-
• Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other
measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the
site, if any:
5. Animals
a. Circle .any birds and animals which have been
observed on or near the site or are known to be on
or near the site:
birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other:
mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other:
fish: bass; salmon, trout, herring, shellfish,
other:
b. List any threatened or endangered species known to
be on or near the. ite.
c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so,
explain.
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife,
if any:
-9-
•
410 Evaluation for
ill Agency Use Only
6. Energy and Natural Resources
a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil,
wood stove, solor) will be used to meet the
completed project's energy needs? Describe whether
it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc.
J),vL ADL 44122 �1� '.
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar
energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally
describe.
6
c. What kinds of energy conservation features are
included in the plans of this proposal? List other
proposed measures t reduce or control energy
impacts, if any: Njja�
7. Environmental Health
a. Are there any environmental health hazards,
including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire
and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could
occur as a resglt of this proposal? If so,
describe.
1) Describe special emergency services that might
be required. „/e.
2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ-
mental health iazards, if any:
NONE
•
b. Noise
11 Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
1) What types of noise exist in the area which may
affect your project (for example: traffic,
equipment; operation, other)?
2) What types and levels of noise would be created
by or associated with the project on a short-
term or a long -:term basis (for example: traf-
' fic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate
what hours noise would come from the site.
3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise
impacts, if an •
d440-
8. Land and Shoreline Use
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent
properties?
b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so,
describe.
/1/0 OI/iyL-AfJr✓ d- C .Qep✓
c. Describe any structures on the site.
-11-
Evaluation for
0 Agency Use Only
d. Will any structures, be demolished? If so, what?
/U0
e. What is the current zoning classification of the
site? /2631.00),V77/9-(—
f.
2631Dv?7/9-c,
f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation
of the site? 5,Ar—
If applicable, what is the current shoreline master
program designation of the site? (J,4/____l._it/
J►�o r Apg lG,tivea—
h. Has any part of the site been classified as an
"environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify.
S24-fer
i. Approximately how many people wo ld eside or work
in the completed projectsg
Approximately how many people would the completed
project displace? 0
j•
k. Proposed measures to avoiid, or reduce displacement
impacts, if any:
1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com-
patible with existing and projected land uses and
plans, if any:
Onters•—
-12-
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
9. Housing
a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if
any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income
housing? / ,t/7c) a0(1_z ,/ .Z6// c L ./9hck
Approximately how many units, if any, would be eli-
minated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-
income housing. 4/02.106—
c.
' njg
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing
impacts, if any: Af6A/ry
10. Aesthetics
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed
structure(s), not including antennas; what is the
principd1 exterior building material(s) proposed?
II/11V2f(/l�!
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be
altered or obstructed? ,/
/I%D/V • �Xi �/it/E> �D�� �� " , JScc-
DA/
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic
impacts, if any: 11/4.,kr-
-13-
.
ii0Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
11. Light and Glare
a. What type of light or glare will the proposal
produce? Whatime of day would it mainly occur?
/dh/er-
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a
safety hazard or, interfere with views?
c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may
affect your roposal?
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and
glare impact, if any:
Ale"
12. Recreation
a. What designed and informal recreational oppor-
tunities are in the immediate vicinity?
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing
recreational uses? If so, describe.
b
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on
recreation, including recreation opportunities to be
provided by the project or applicant, if any:
7111 Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
13. Historic and Cultural Preservation
a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro-
posed for, national, state, or local preservation
registers known to be on or next to the site? If
so, generally describe.
A/0
b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of
historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural
importance known to be1o,p or next to the site.
c. Proposed measures to r.duce or control impacts, if
any: Moe
14. Transportation
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the
site, and describe proposed accss to the existing
street system. Show on sit plans, if any.
b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If
not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest
transit stop? MQ - 3 fiGUC_'[Cg
c. How many parking spaces would the completed project
have? How many would the project eliminate?
'2_0.23 l/v/e
-15-
•
Evaluation for
41/ ill Agency Use Only.
d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets,
or improvements to existing roads or streets, not
including driveways? If so, generally describe
(indicate whether public or private).
e.
Will the project use (or occur in the immediate
vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If
so, generally describe.
D
f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated
by the completed Oroject? If known, indicate when
peak volumes would occur.
g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor-
tation impacts, if an •
15. Public Services
a. Would'the project result in an increased need for
public services (for example: fire protection,
police protection, health care, schools, other)? If
so., nerally describe.
gAS A/6a796.0Wim_ 72kaTe) /5t;;Awz--5/
•27/0-.. ..61� ^' — //t/7 /2 Gv✓L✓7
4A/ !n' ' S P- — / D' SJ/L-D/SPG / ibw•i
ec,� o/-4Mz v L-A, eA J r/
b. Proposed measures to . reduce or control direct
impacts on pubic services, if any.
/llo d
-16-
/3 P/iler
16. Utilities
a. Cir
ilities -fitly . . lable
natural
sanitary sewer,._,sep_ic system, other.
•a servic
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
l
b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the
project, the utility providing the service, and the
general construction activities on the site or in
the immedi5te vicinity which .might be neled.
C. Signature
The above answers ' are true and complete to the best of
my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is
relying on them to make its d_cision.
Signature:
Date Submitted:•
PLEASE CONTINUE TO THE NEXT PAGE.
-17-
'16,4(1-1-&
TO. BE COMPLETED. BY APPLICANT
D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS
Evaluation for
ill Agency Usejlinly
(do not use this sheet for project actions)
Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful
to read them in conjunction with the list of -the elements of
the environment.
When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the
proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from
the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity
or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not imple-
mented. Respond briefly and in general terms.
1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge
to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or
release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production
of noise?
L)AhJ
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are:
Al W
2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, ani-
mals, fish, or marine life?
Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, ani-
mals, fish? or marine life are:
j(fO, lfr
-18-
11 Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or
natural re ources?
Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and
natural resourses are:
Al1Y✓d
4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect
environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or
eligible or under study) for governmental protection;
such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers,
threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or
cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime
farmlands? t442424,0 A/or gzr 4N/ 0f
77.0"€DDF
Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid
or reduce impa is are:
ome-
5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and
shoreline use, inclduing whether it would allow or
encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with
existing plans?
G41Q0/..dr
-19-
•
• Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land
use imp -acts area:
How does the proposal conform to the Tukwila Shoreline
Master Plan? 00!
6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on
transportation or public services and utilities?
vue
Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s)
are: /0NAr
7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict
with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for
the protection of the environment.
kDa—YJ /✓bT
-20-
11
10 Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
8. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila
Comprehensive Land Use Poli y Plan? If so, what poli-
cies of the Plan?
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s)
are: Male
-21-
JU DC. wrirLCI U bT NNVLILHNI Evaluation for
1410 Agency Use Only
E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON PROJECT
PROPOSALS
The objectives and the alternative means of reaching the
objectives for a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the
aforegoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This
information provides a general overall perspective of the
proposed action in the context of the environmental infor-
mation provided and the submitted plans, documents, suppor-
tive information, studies, etc.
1. What are the objective(s) of the proposal? OwRAerrtr
/9 S 2T . /Ji, -T- /4,70Z 6.671.04:- 407:4
Sn-zC. F194. 4 D,9T-
2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these
objectives? jOVAir
3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the
preferred course of action:
C -1/4 "V APP,2od,-t___ /4/ 7//;J7 ez-y/ 7/>v
•
4. Does. the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila
Comprehensive Land Use Poly Plan? If so, what poli-
cies of the Plan? U
Proposed measures to,,void or reduce the conflict(s)
,
are: ,4/g
-23-
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
CITY OF TUKWIL4
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
SHOIOPLAT
APPLICATION
6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188
Telephone: (206) 431-3680 •
APPLICANT
Name: RICHARD HOLLY (KEITH B DEWEY - AGENT)
Address: 15177 A9nd A1,a Snnrh
City:
Tukwila, Wachington
Zip: (MAR Phone:9LLA- RR/RS7-6651
Signature: Date:
LOCATION
Street Address: 15626 47th Ave South
If vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision; or tax lot number, access street, and
nearest intersection.
SE
PARCELS
Zoning District
Existing Use
Proposed Use
Proposed Lot Size
QUARflittlr
22
SECTION
B
2.3
TOWNSHIP
RANGE
R-1 7.2
R-1 7.2
RESIDENTIAL
•
VACANT LAND
"
RESIDENTIAL
/2)50587;2.
is, /9¢s8.,CL
- -
DATE OF LAST PLAT:
RECEIIVED
SEP 2 6 1995
cCOMvirvium-ry
DEVELOPMENT
/
CHICAGO TITLEOSURA.NCE COMPANY
1800 COLUMBIA CENTER, 701 STH AVE, SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104
IMPORTANT This is not a Survey. It is furnished as a convenience to locate the land indicated hereon with
reference to streets and other land. No liability is assumed by reason of reliance hercon.
4il
SHORT PLAT NUMBER
• ITY OF TUKWILA, WASHING
LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS
BEFORE THE SHORT SUBDIVISION:
THE SOUTH HALF OF TRACT 111, SUNNYDALE GARDENS, DIVISION NO.
1, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 25 OF
PLATS, PAGE 50, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON;
EXCEPT THEREFROM THAT PORTION CONDEMNED BY STATE OF
WASHINGTON FOR HIGHWAY UNDER KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
CAUSE 656806.
AFTER THE SHORT SUBDIVISION:
LOT 1
THE WEST 152.00 FEET OF THE SOUTH HALF OF TRACT 111,
SUNNYDALE GARDENS, DIVISION NO. 1, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT
THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 25 OF PLATS, PAGE 50, RECORDS OF
KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON;
EXCEPT THEREFROM THAT PORTION CONDEMNED BY STATE OF
WASHINGTON FOR HIGHWAY UNDER KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
CAUSE 656806
LOT 2
THE SOUTH HALF OF TRACT 111, SUNNYDALE GARDENS, DIVISION NO.
1, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 25 OF
PLATS, PAGE 50, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON;
EXCEPT THE WEST 152.00 FEET; and
EXCEPT THEREFROM THAT PORTION CONDEMNED BY STATE OF
WASHINGTON FOR HIGHWAY UNDER KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
CAUSE 656806.
This space reserved for recorder's use
Return to:
APPROVAL
Reviewed and approved by the Short
Subdivision Committee and hereby certi-
fied for filing this day of .
,19
Chairman, Short Subdivision Committee
DEPARTMENT OF ASSESSMENTS
Examined and approved this
day of ,19_.
Assessor
Dept. of CommunityDevelopment
Planning Division Deputy Assessor
City of Tukwila
6300 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila, Washington 98188 Page of
SIGNATURES •
DECLARATION:
Know all men by these presents that we, the undersigned, owner(s) in fee simple and/or contract
purchaser(s) of the land herein described do hereby make a short subdivision thereof pursuant to
RCW 58.17.060 and acknowledge that said subdivision shall not be further divided in any manner
within a period of five years, from date of record, without the filing of a final plat. The undersigned
further declare this short plat to be the graphic representation of said short subdivision and the
same is made with the free consent and in accordance with the desire of the owner(s).
In witness whereof we have set our hands and seals.
Name-Ct;t(o i� .L Name.
Name -
Name.
Name• Name.
Name. Name.
STATE OF WASHINGTON
County of King
On this day personally appeared before me Richard L. Holly
to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the within and foregoing in-
strument, and acknowledge that he signed the same as his free and voluntary act and
deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned.
GIVEN under my hand and official seal this 20 day of April
c- S
STATE OF. WASHINGTON,
County of King
, 19 95 .
,,Illi s m,1�,,
otary Public in and for the State of 1I,.4t00'•,,�
residing at Federal Way ••4.
•VMssIOH•
:
NOT,aRy �
tn
m•
-1 : o p '1"— w:
l• ASHI ��•
istifigisisso
On this day personally appeared before me
to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the within and foregoing in-
strument, and acknowledge that signed the same as free and voluntary act and
deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned.
GIVEN under my hand and official seal this day of ,19
Short Plat Number
Notary Public in and for the State of Washington,
residing at
Page of
Ak UCAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMP • .(-7"4�00 COLUMBIA CENTER, 701 5TH All,
SEATTLE, WA 98104
SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE
Order No.: 432939
Certificate for Filing Proposed Short Plat
In the matter of the short plat submitted for your approval, this Company has examined the records of the
County Auditor and County Clerk of KING County, Washington, and the records of the Clerk of the
United States Courts holding terms in said County, and from such examination hereby certifies that the title to
the following described land situate in said KING County, to -wit:
SEE SCHEDULE A (NEXT PAGE)
VESTED IN:
RICHARD L. HOLLY, AS HIS SEPARATE ESTATE
EXCEPTIONS:
SEE SCHEDULE B ATTACHED
CHARGE: $200.00
TAX: $ 16.40
Records examined to July 14, 1995 at 8:00 A.M.
By
CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
--ie— V
CHRIS JOHANSON
Title Officer
628-8377
SHPIATA/12S90/EK
-/ Found monument 1/8" pin in rock
47th Ave. So and So. 156th St.
10/6/94
30'
LU
00
ti
9,91
Existing concrete driveway
20' ingress, egress and
easement for Lot 2
152.00_7
761 N
( O
3.5chain
io Wm fence
®1 .o LOT 1 16' 10 1
Propos fir.
\ drainfiel �9- I#15626 -
4" A \s�47th Ave. S.
�ch -ry +9 apple lExisitng
I 1 14"cher y10"appy House
99.7 `96 \ \.
_ I 101.4
�— — ;'gyp( 4.,oPPI�
Yoro.
h 152.00\ 9
e GGC d » ` 25 /50
Surryd°\ o. 1, v
S 88'29'46" E
utility o28"7:17
—\ al g� ceD1
r"
Tract 111
•— 135.18
orb• 1 . L
" -76.8
- T
I I l�j•>
\ \ Propos8d / rj�\
sirainfi5ld j / ,g,,
i 1 Jj!/• 1 1!.
li����
/j 1 I
x 69
o 031 3 A •
I 55
h yd
10
0
O
z
Map on File in Vault
0
U
a)
O
choin link w/
barbed wire highway
fence
State Hwy
69.7
b3,
3.
GRAP
518
w
S 84'18'1
51.7
28.02
N.
set rebar w/cap �D- ' �3' chain 7 rn
link fence
463.23
S 88'30'32" E
AREA
Lot 1 = 12,544 sq.ft. +/—
Lot 2 = 15,194 sq.ft. +/—
Elevation per assumed datum
Found monument — 2" pipe
10/6/94
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Tract 112
[•
nun[[uu[[[in[[rn�u[q
•
%.*alpl SC
.of WA
Ct.
-• :r
v
•
•
r,
EXPIRES 3/23/ i
essis
44
•
-
•
•
This Short Plat correctly represents a survey made by me or
inder my direction in conformaAce with the requirements of
approriatei%s been properly staked.
Name:
Date:
Certificate No.
L-5 23 6.o 4
8.64
47.2
48.2
(I)
City of Seattle
Norman B. Rice, Mayor
King County
Gary Locke, Executive
Seattle -King County Department of Public Health
Sharon Stewart Johnson, Acting Director
June , 1995
Keith Dewey, Agent
PO Box 16382
Seattle, WA 98116-0382
RE: Subdivision Pre -Application Review H95S0178
Dear Mr. Dewey:
The subdivision pre -application for parcel No. 8108600800 has been reviewed by
this office. It has been reviewed in accordance with the King County Board of
Health Title 13. Based on this review, it has been approved with the following
condition:
The on-site sewage disposal system currently serving
15626 47th Ave South must be abandoned because it will not be within
the proposed new lot. A new on-site sewage disposal system to serve the
above existing residence must be designed, installed, and have an
approved final as -built prior to final subdivision application.
If you have any questions, please call me at 29-4708.
PO:eh
Sincerely,
a
Peppe Olyano, R.S.
Environmental Health Specialist
Alder Square Environmental Health Services 1404 Central Ave. S., Suite 101 Kent, Washington 98032 (206) 296-4708 or 296-4666 FAX (206) 296-0163
-Printed on Recycled Paper
•
PR - PPLICATION REPORT ( cr.1'cL`/' (!e,(/(ef(
(Submit Application, Piotilln and Other Required Documents inalicate-
ATTACH A ROUTE/DIRECTION MAP FOR LOCATING THE PROPERTY
ACTIVITY NUMBER
e/7(
HEALTH HEALTH DEPT USE ONLY
REQUEST FOR SUBDIVISION
PRE -APPLICATION REVIEW
SEATTLE -KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES
Complete the following and submit with the appropiate fee.
Check Appropiate Box: SUBDIVISION 0 SHORT SUBDIVISION I$I
APPROXIMATE STREET ADDRESS 115626 tr7th Ave . So.
NAME AND/OR NUMBER OF B.A.L.D. APPLICATION 1 R• HOLLY
LEGAL DESCRIPTION I ATTA(HFD
PARCEL# 18 1 110 18 16101-0 1810 i0 1
NUMBER OF ACRES 1. 171, 1 TO BEE EZ EWED 1 1 12 1
OWNER 1 R HOLLY I ADDRESS 15118 42nd Ave S . , Tukwila
AGENT IK DEWEY 1 ADDRESS 1P.O. B0X16382 Seattle
• NOTE •
THIS APPLICATION IS FOR PRELIMINARY
REVIEW OF PROPOSED METHODS OF
SEWAGE DISPOSAL AND WATER SUPPLY
SMALLEST LOT SIZE 11, 21515 0 1 1 sq. ft.
PHONE 248-3983 I
98116-0382 PHONE 1857-6651 I
THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION MUST BE PROVIDED:
WATER SUPPLY: (Complete Section 1.2 or 3 below)
Section 1)XXExisting Public Water Supply I W • D . 1/75
Attach Certificate of Water Availability
Section 2. Proposed Public Water Supply
Section 3. u
(Name)
0 Declaration of Covenant Attached
O Restrictive Covenant(s) (if applicable)
Attached
O Water Use Agreement Attached
O Waterline Easements Attached
(Name)
O Recording# 1 1 1 I
O To be recorded with final approval
O Recording#
O To be recorded with final approval
O Recording# 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
O To be recorded with final approval
O Recording# 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1
O To be recorded with final approval
1 1
individual Wails (iviinirriurn lot size required for Individual well is 5 acres)
O Adequate water availability to be demonstrated prior to final approval
O Wells to be installed prior to final approval
SEWAGE DISPOSAL: (Complete Section 1, 2 or. 3 below)
Section 1.0 Existing Sewer System 1
(Name) .
Attach Certificate of Sewer Availability
Section 2. Individual On -Site Sewage Systems
Attach Soil Log Descriptions including soil type designation; (Minimum 1 per lot) and
Plot Plan (to include lot lines, lot sizes, location of existing sewage system(s) and soil log holes)
Section 3.0 1 Community/Larger On -Site Sewage System (Attach Preliminary Report)
I, hereby, certify that the information
:hi Signature of Owner/Agent;:;•
Name of Certified Designer (p10
Signature of Certified Designer,
U APPROVED
O DISAPPROVED
en Iis applicatigr'is �itrue and accurate representation of the existing conditions on t plat
A.•::,),,r. •, • Date •'' %1
- 'A VINBA(3?3Y ' KCID# ' On r)3
• 74) .95 / 4 (')
U
COMMENTS/CONDITIONS
(da
Date 5-22-95
P . o.1m4, 1 P. 4 , r0 ;
((Djtrfct Supervisor)
9
Any person aggrieved by any decision or final order of the Health Officer may make written application for appeal to the
King County Board of Sewage Review. Appeals must be filed within sixty (60) days of receipt of the decision or order.
ALDER SQUARE
1404 Central Ave. S. Ste.101 •
KENT WA 98032
296-4666, 296-4708
DISTRICT HEALTH CENTERS
EAST
2424 156th Ave. N. E.
BELLEVUE WA 98008
296-4932
CENTRAL
172 20th Ave.
SEATTLE WA 98122
296-4632
DATE RECEIVED
RECEIVED
MAY 26.1995
ALDER SQUARE
NORTH
10501 Meridian Ave. N.
SEATTLE WA 98133
296-4838
Zo
4140.
I Ptio9069
43ESJORMAF I
1
I Aga.$
Pfle 1905R.;
VriP/4/ 014
gRE
tv,.\....t
...,,, 004\,
wypo \o -,-
i‘ c-:0,-.300\
011
/ _
01 oft
•
47 721 4 - So
I
RieseLi/A_
PRA A7
S,
w
3a,Z'
_L _
40 vsEco.,('e.�
fi ko
L#1 G -F"' DK Red Loamy Sand
Medium Sand
2
ti" -32" Red
S cos' Sand Type
32-50"
aL4/2 0-12" Dk Red -Tan Medium Sand
34-48" Coarse Tan Sand Type t
Coarse Mediu
SL#3 0-12 DK Red Loamy Sand 12-32" 1 Red Medium
Sand 12-f0" Tan Medium Sand N TvpA 2
r
0
0 hd b 0 H ►-1 F-+
0000Z'. v'
W 7d N
HIXH10c-))� cn
c�Hz�rot d
P MH.
ti
M�3MNNZZln )cn
00H Ki
H hi O
Di t=J H
cn nr" `d 0
c^CD c) c) ``'HHy El It
' Zi- �pZtn1H4
Nftit�1i 3tail7r
N
t
cn P1 OHto
itn�' 8►rJ4cn
t'1 0. rj
74 H
OH
HZ ZZ0Z�
Al
ZIAfH ay 0(i
F0. H
r
0
Ei
o►OriMoto M
).Ctn''1Zt:'.
Nu) 1-4111o U>iitH
qZXH 0I -I
0 ZHc
t'iH 0Z0�i ln
HO'0.,88 dcnN
.ObhiHOrZ tri
Z
oxy1 oto
4 H Sc; tv trJ ►=i
HOZlnO
xo
z0z Z '�`� t�d+ Ng
al
2HHto pHCcnq
rro�jJ�jdJH
'»t=J H
c=JCc)omft)
it h7 111 H
HN •
Z�
v
SL#4 n -1A" Did Rad
ILoamv Sand
18-42" Red Medium
Sand 42"-54" Gr
Medium Sard
Type 2
333E
•
City o f Tukwila
PROJECT #
CERTIFICATE OF WATER AVAILABILITY
PART A: (TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT)
8
1.
Owner Name: RICK HOLLY
Address: 15118 42ND AVE SO., TUKWILA WA
Phone: 248-3983
Agent / Contact Person: KEITH B. DEWEY
Phone: 852-6651 P.O. BOX 16382 SEATTLE WA 98116
Site Address (Attach map and legal description showing hydrant location & size of main:
156XX 47TH AVE SO
2. This certificate is submitted as part of an application for:
E
Residential Building Permit
Short Subdivision
Commercial/Industrial Building Permit
3. Estimated number of service connections and meter size(s):
Preliminary Plat
Rezone
Q Other
ONE 3/4"
4. Vehicular distance from nearest hydrant to the rear of the furthest structure: 250' +- from setback
5. Minimum needs of development for fire flows: 1000 gpm at a residual pressure of 20 psi.
I X I Fire Marshall L1 Developer's Engineer City
Insurance Underwriter Q Utility Q Other
6. Area is served by:
HIGHLINE WATER DISTRICT
(Utility)
Owner/Agent's Signature: 6j7 Date: 5-23-95
• •
PART B: (TO BE COMPLETED BY WATER U27LITY)
1. This proposed project is located within TUKWILA / KING
(City/County)
2. ':Improvements required to upgrade the water system to bring it into compliance with the utilities'
comprehensive plan or to meet the minimum flow requirements of the project before connection:
3. Based upon the improvements listed above, water can be provided and will be available at the site with a
residual pressure of 20 psi at 1,000 gpm for a duration of 2 hours at a velocity of
10 fps as documented by the attached calculations.
I hereby certify that the above information is true and correct.
HIGHLINE WATER DISTRICT 824-0375
May 23, 1995
Agency Phone By: Polly Dai: e Date
PART C: (TO BE COMPLETED BY GOVERNING JURISDIC77ON)
1. Water Availability - Check one:
ElAcceptable service can be provided to this project.
nAcceptable service cannot be provided to this project unless the improvements listed in
Item #C2 are met.
ElSystem is not capable of providing service to this project.
2. Minimum water system improvements: (At least equal to B2 above)
Agency
Phone By Date
0
124.39
871-20
1.39
2
80
40
4.39
15605
M12623
U)
15617
M14956
0
41
15627
M14955
15633 �?
M7773 cio
t� �o
it al6NI-
• X58. u •
167.22 S r.
65.68
40A in in
. 03
t0
136.71
68.39
1
cn m
67.24
1.1ov
30
30
30
00 15604
M1597
0 15606
15608
CV
03 M1595
0 135
15620
M193335
cc
N
00
15.81
125
r
15644
M1589
1564
338.26
15646
o M1587
120
68.40
in co co
en
-et M 0
•
o
n 15815 3^
M1568
112
L0: #28, p. 3iczi
/8, 1966
343.26
15804.
15
— tee 4_
0 2 15818
M1550
15802
M9369
113
115.11
•
AQUA TEST, INC.
DATE: 5/8/95
CUSTOMER: BBB Percolation Tests
Attn: Calvin Bagby
1315 108th Ave E
Puyallup, WA 98372
(206) 833-7651)
SAMPLE ID: Holly - Existing @ 2.5'
TEST DATE: 5/8 / 9 5
ASTM CUMULATIVE WT
SIEVE NOM OPENING WEIGHT GRAMS
Gravel content to be used as
No. 10
2.0 mm
a. modifier only Esta USDA si. i.cifications)
28.0 28.r,' Gravel:
P.O. Box 950
Maple Valley, WA 98038-0950
(206) 432-9360
Fax (206) 432-4461
MEASURED
MaMPowikeili
No. 18
1.00 mm
38.8
No. 35
500 um
79.2
No. 60
No. 140
No. 270
Pan
250 um
106 um
53 um
Total Weiaht:
lsi
195.7
296.8
306.2
9.0%
Sands:
10 8 Very Coarse
40.4; Coarse
116.51 Medium
101.11 Fine
Very Fine
3.8%
14.2%
41.1%
35.6%
3.3%
'total Sands:
98.1%
311.6 5.41 . Slit/Clay:
Soil Type: % - 0f 1 L
1.9%
IA
Sample was classified in accordaice with:
The United States Dept. of Agriculture Soil C;c.iservation .3ervice Classification system
PREPARED BY:
7.1 nIl) (]C)O
/ 5-6 -9.S