HomeMy WebLinkAboutTIC 2017-09-12 COMPLETE AGENDA PACKETCity of Tukwila
Transportation and
Infrastructure Committee
❖ Kate Kruller, Chair
❖ Joe Duffie
❖ De'Sean Quinn
AGENDA
Distribution:
K. Kruller
J. Duffie
D. Quinn
D. Robertson
Mayor Ekberg
D. Cline
L. Humphrey
B. Giberson
R. Tischmak
G. Labanara
P. Brodin
R. Turpin
A. Youn
Clerk File Copy
2 Extra
Place pkt pdf on Z:\Trans &
Infra Agendas
e-mail cover to: A. Le,
C. O'Flaherty, A. Youn,
K. Kruller, D. Robertson,
D. Almberg, B. Saxton,
S. Norris, & L. Humphrey
TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 2017 — 5:30 PM
FOSTER CONFERENCE ROOM — 6300 BUILDING
ItemRecommended
Action
Page
1. PRESENTATION(S)
2. BUSINESS AGENDA
a) GIS Inventory of the Water System
a) Forward to 9/18/17
Pg. 1
Consultant Selection and Agreement for 2017
Regular Consent Agenda
b) TUC/TOD Pedestrian Improvements
b) Committee Approval
Pg. 17
Transportation Alternatives Program Grant Application
c) Strander Boulevard Extension Phase 3
c) Forward to 9/18/17
Pg. 21
Consultant Selection, Contract, Scope of Work, and Fee
Regular Consent Agenda
d) Riverton Creek Flapgate Removal Project
d) Forward to 9/18/17
Pg. 191
Resolution for RCO Grant Application
Regular Consent Agenda
e) Sprint Communications Company
e) Forward to 9/18/17
Pg. 195
Franchise Ordinance
Regular Consent Agenda
3. SCATBd
4. MISCELLANEOUS
Staff response to recent public comments regarding:
• Speed Cushion Implementation Criteria
5. ANNOUNCEMENTS
Future Agendas:
Next Scheduled Meeting: Tuesday, September 26, 2017
SThe City of Tukwila strives to accommodate individuals with disabilities.
Please contact the Public Works Department at 206-433-0179 for assistance.
TO:
IW ROM:
BY:
CC:
DATE,
9
Public Works Department - Bob Giberson, Director
Transportation and Infrastructure Committ
Bob Giberson, Public Works Directorl
Mike Cusick, Senior Program Manager
Mayor Ekberg
September 8, 2017
SUBJECT: glg IllygLitgLy gf the M&ter-S
, atem
Project No. 81640104
Consultant Selection and Agreement for 2017
Allan Ekberg, Mayor
ISSUE
Approve David Evans and Associates, Inc. (DEA) for the GIS inventory of the Tukwila Water
System,
Z A•
The contract for the GIS Inventory of the Water System will start in the Commercial Business
District. It will be the first phase of surveying the Tukwila Water system, The GIS survey project
will continue through the year 2022 with data being used to create an asset management
database for the water system. This project will build on the existing GIS databases that
currently exist for the sewer and storm drainage systems.
The City invited Requests for Professional Qualifications (RPQ) from five consulting firms that
were listed in the Municipal Research and Services Center's Consultant Roster. Three RPQs
were received; from DEA, PACE Engineers, and Gray & Osborn Engineering. After interviewing
the consultants and reviewing their RPQs, DEA was selected for the GIS Inventory of the Water
System. DEA has completed other design projects for the City and their work has been
satisfactory,
Consultant Budget for
Agreement 2017
GIS Inventory of Water $–x10-03 $67M�OQ
10*410pm I W9
Council is being asked to approve the consultant agreement with David Evans and Associates,
Inc. for the GIS Inventory of the Water System in the amount of $59,916.03 and consider this
item on the Consent Agenda at the September 18, 2017 Regular Meeting.
Attachments: Consultant Rating Sheet
Page 70, 2017-2022 C I P
Consultant Agreement with Scope of Werk
W)PW EngI13R0.11EGMA- WT Projectr,\2017 Water GIS (91640104)kInfo Merno GIS Water DEA 0910817 twaaex
WATER. 1315 CONSULTANT SELECTION
Mike Cusick
David Evans is spleried for the project.
No response
No response
10
10 10
10
10
10
David Evans
9
10
9
55
PACE
,
9 9
9
9
9
54
2
Gray & Osborne
8
9 8
9
9
9
52
3
Huitt Zollar, Inc
001
0
0'
0
0
0
Dowel, LLC
0
00
0
0
David Evans is spleried for the project.
No response
No response
CITY OF TUKWILA CAPITAL PROJECT SUMMARY
EXPENSES
2017 to 2022
PROJECT:
GIS Inventory of Water System Project No. 91640104
The GIS (Geographic Information System ) will provide current as -built data for the Tukwila water system.
DESCRIPTION:
The data base will include fire hydrants, valve locations, approximate water line locations, date of installation,
and material type.
The GIS mapping will provide information on the water system that is easily addressable by City staff
JUSTIFICATION:
and the public. With GIS data, the City will be able to develop an asset management plan to determine
67
the water assets needed to be upgraded or replaced.
STATUS:
New project for 2017 - 2022 CIP. Combined Asset Management System scheduled for 2017.
MAINT. IMPACT:
The survey will provide staff with -up -date information on the location of water line features.
COMMENT:
567
Land(R/W)
FINANCIAL
Through Estimated
lin S000's1
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 RFYOND TOTAL
EXPENSES
Design
67
100
100
100
100
100
567
Land(R/W)
0
Const. Mgmt.
0
Construction
0
TOTAL EXPENSES
1 0
0
67
1 100
1 100
100
1 100
1 100
1 0
567
FUND SOURCES
Awarded Grant
0
Proposed Grant
0
Mitigation Actual
0
Mitigation Expected
0
Utility Revenue
0
0
67
100
100
100
100
100
0
567
TOTAL SOURCES
1 0
0
67
1 100
1 100
100
1 100
1 100
1 0
567
2017 - 2022 Capital Improvement Program 70 3
CON of Tukwila Contract Number:
6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila WA 98188
1111111111111:11Z lei 10 1;3-4VUM114* I
THIS AGREEMENT is entered into between the City of Tukwila, Washington, hereinafter
referred to as "the City", and David Evans Associates,inc hereinafter referred to as "the Consultant",
in consideration of the mutual benefits, terms, and conditions hereinafter specified.
1. Proiect Designation. The Consultant is retained by the City to perform Engineering
Services in connection with the project titled GIS Inventory of Water System,
Z Sc2pe of Services. The Consultant agrees to perform the services, identified on Exhibit "A"
attached hereto, including the provision of all labor, materials, equipment and supplies.
31 Duration of Agreernent;Tire for Performance. This Agreement shall be in full force and
effect for a period commencing upon execution and ending unless
sooner terminated under the provisions hereinafter specified, Work under this Agreement
shall commence upon written notice by the City to the Consultant to proceed. The
Consultant shall perform all services and provide all work product required pursuant to this
Agreement no later than March 31, 2018 unless an extension of such time is granted in
writing by the City.
4. Payment. The Consultant shall be paid by the City for completed work and for services
rendered under this Agreement as follows:
A. Payment for the work provided by the Consultant shall be made as provided on Exhibit
"B" attached hereto, provided that the total amount of payment to the Consultant shall
not exceed $59,916.03 without express written modification of the Agreement signed by
the City.
B. The Consultant may submit vouchers to the City once per month during the progress of
the work for partial payment for that portion of the project completed to date. Such
vouchers will be checked by the City and, upon approval thereof, payment shall be
made to the Consultant in the amount approved.
C. Final payment of any balance due the Consultant of the total contract price earned will
be made promptly upon its ascertainment and verification by the City after the
completion of the work under this Agreement and its acceptance by the City.
D. Payment as provided in this section shall be full compensation for work performed,
services rendered, and for all materials, supplies, equipment and incidentals necessary
to complete the work.
E. The Consultant's records and accounts pertaining to this Agreement are to be kept
available for inspection by representatives of the City and the state of Washington for a
period of three (3) years after final payments. Copies shall be made available upon
request,
0
S. Ownership- and Use of Documents. All documents, drawings, specifications and other
materials produced by the Consultant in connection with the services rendered under this
Agreement shall be the property of the City whether the project for which they are made is
executed or not. The Consultant shall be permitted to retain copies, including reproducible
copies, of drawings and specifications for information, reference and use in connection with
the Consultant's endeavors. The Consultant shall not be responsible for any use of the said
documents, drawings, specifications or other materials by the City on any project other than
the project specified in this Agreement.
ComDlliarce with Laws. The Consultant shall, in performing the services contemplated by
this Agreement, faithfully observe and comply with all federal, state, and local laws,
ordinances and regulations, applicable to the services rendered under this Agreement.
T. Indemnification. The Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its officers,
officials, employees and volunteers harmless from any and all claims, injuries, damages,
losses or suits including attorney fees, arising out of or resulting from the acts, errors or
omissions of the Consultant in performance of this Agreement, except for injuries and
damages caused by the sole negligence of the City.
Should a court of competent jurisdiction determine that this Agreement is subject to RCW
4.24.115, then, in the event of liability for damages arising out of bodily injury to persons or
damages to property caused by or resulting from the concurrent negligence of the
Consultant and the City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers, the Consultant's
liability hereunder shall be only to the extent of the Consultant's negligence. It is further
specifically and expressly understood that the indemnification provided herein constitutes the
Consultant's waiver of immunity under Industrial Insurance, Title 51 RCW, solely for the
purposes of this indemnification. This waiver has been mutually negotiated by the parties.
The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement.
& Insurance. The Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement,
insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damage to property which may arise from
or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, its agents,
representatives, or employees. Consultant's maintenance of insurance as required by the
agreement shall not be construed to limit the liability of the Consultant to the coverage
provided by such insurance, or otherwise limit the City's recourse to any remedy available at
law or in equity.
A. Minimum Amounts and Scope of Insurance. Consultant shall obtain insurance of the
types and with the limits described below:
CA revised : 1-2013
1. Automobile Liability insurance with a minimum combined single limit for bodily
injury and property damage of $1,000,000 per accident. Automobile Liability
insurance shall cover all owned, non -owned, hired and leased vehicles.
Coverage shall be written on Insurance Services Office (ISO) form CA DO 01 or a
substitute form providing equivalent liability coverage. If necessary, the policy
shall be endorsed to provide contractual liability coverage,
2, Commercial General Liab!!qy insurance with limits no less than $1,000,000 each
occurrence, $2,000,000 general aggregate, Commercial General Liability
insurance shall be written on ISO occurrence form CG 00 01 and shall cover
liability arising from premises, operations, independent contractors and personal
injury and advertising injury. The City shall be named as an insured under the
Consultant's Commercial General Liability insurance policy with respect to the
work performed for the City,
3. Workers' Compensation coverage as required by the Industrial Insurance laws of
the State of Washington.
I M,
5
4. Professional Liabilitv with limits no less than $1,000,000 per claim and
$1,000,000 policy aggregate limit. Professional Liability insurance shall be
appropriate to the Consultant's profession.
B. Other Insurance Provision. The Consultant's Automobile Liability and Commercial
General Liability insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain that they
shall be primary insurance with respect to the City, Any Insurance, self-insurance, or
insurance pool coverage maintained by the City shall be excess of the Consultant's
insurance and shall not be contributed or combined with it.
C. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M.
Best rating of not less than A:Vll.
D. Verification of Coverage. Consultant shall furnish the City with original certificates and
a copy of the amendatory endorsements, including but not necessarily limited to the
additional insured endorsement, evidencing the insurance requirements of the
Consultant before commencement of the work. Certificates of coverage and
endorsements as required by this section shall be delivered to the City within fifteen (15)
days of execution of this Agreement.
E. Notice of Cancellation. The Consultant shall provide the City with written notice of any
policy cancellation, within two business days of their receipt of such notice.
R Failure to Maintain Insurance. Failure on the part of the Consultant to maintain the
insurance as required shall constitute a material breach of contract, upon which the City
may, after giving five business days notice to the Consultant to correct the breach,
immediately terminate the contract or, at its discretion, procure or renew such insurance
and pay any and all premiums in connection therewith, with any sums so expended to be
repaid to the City on demand, or at the sole discretion of the City, offset against funds
due the Consultant from the City,
9Independent Contractor, The Consultant and the City agree that the Consultant is an
independent contractor with respect to the services provided pursuant to this Agreement.
Nothing in this Agreement shall be considered to create the relationship of employer and
employee between the parties hereto. Neither the Consultant nor any employee of the
Consultant shall be entitled to any benefits accorded City employees by virtue of the services
provided under this Agreement. The City shall not be responsible for withholding or
otherwise deducting federal income tax or social security or for contributing to the state
industrial insurance program, otherwise assuming the duties of an employer with respect to
the Consultant, or any employee of the Consultant.
10. Covenant Against Contingent Fees. The Consultant warrants that he has not employed or
retained any company or person, other than a bonafide employee working solely for the
Consultant, to solicit or secure this contract, and that he has not paid or agreed to pay any
company or person, other than a bonafide employee working solely for the Consultant, any
fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gifts, or any other consideration contingent
upon or resulting from the award or making of this contract. For breach or violation of this
warrant, the City shall have the right to annul this contract without liability, or in its discretion
to deduct from the contract price or consideration, or otherwise recover, the full amount of
such fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or contingent fee.
11, Discrimination Prohibited. The Consultant, with regard to the work performed by it under
this Agreement, will not discriminate on the grounds of race, religion, creed, color, national
origin, age, veteran status, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, marital status, political
affiliation or the presence of any disability in the selection and retention of employees or
procurement of materials or supplies.
CA revised 1- 1-2013
Sm
0
12. Ass ignmen . The Consultant shall not sublet or assign any of the services covered by this
Agreement without the express written consent of the City,
13. Non -Waiver. Waiver by the City of any provision of this Agreement or any time limitation
provided for In this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other provision.
14. Termination.
A. The City reserves the right to terminate this Agreement at any time by giving ten (10)
days written notice to the Consultant.
B. In the event of the death of a member, partner or officer of the Consultant, or any of its
supervisory personnel assigned to the project, the surviving members of the Consultant
hereby agree to complete the work under the terms of this Agreement, if requested to
do so by the City. This section shall not be a bar to renegotiations of this Agreement
between surviving members of the Consultant and the City, if the City so chooses.
115, Applicable Law; Venue;_.Attorfl2�s Fees. This Agreement shall be subject to, and the
Consultant shall at all times comply with, all applicable federal, state and local laws,
regulations, and rules, including the provisions of the City of Tukwila Municipal Code and
ordinances of the City of Tukwila. In the event any suit, arbitration, or other proceeding is
instituted to enforce any term of this Agreement, the parties specifically understand and
agree that venue shall be properly laid in King County, Washington. The prevailing party in
any such action shall be entitled to Its attorney's fees and costs of suit. Venue for any action
arising from or related to this Agreement shall be exclusively in King County Superior Court.
15, Severability and Survival. If any term, condition or provision of this Agreement is declared
void or unenforceable or limited in its application or effect, such event shall not affect any
other provisions hereof and all other provisions shall remain fully enforceable. The
provisions of this Agreement, which by their sense and context are reasonably intended to
survive the completion, expiration or cancellation of this Agreement, shall survive termination
of this Agreement.
17, Notices. Notices to the City of Tukwila shall be sent to the following address:
City Clerk
City of Tukwila
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila, WA 98188
David Evans and Associates, Inc.
14432 SE Eastgate Way, Suite 400
Bellevue, WA 98007
18, Entire, 89reement; Modification. This Agreement, together with attachments or addenda,
represents the entire and integrated Agreement between the City and the Consultant and
supersedes all prior negotiations, representations, or agreements written or oral. No
amendment or modification of this Agreement shall be of any force or effect unless it is in
writing and signed by the parties.
CA revised 1-2013
7
DATED this day of 20
CITY OF TUKWILA
Attest/Authenticated:
City Clerk, Christy O'Flaherty
CA revised: 1-2013
By:
Printed Name; a DAM LAMA T
Title- AS50c-1A'tF-
Approved as to Form:
Offlee of the City Attorney
0
ME=
David ansae Associates, Inc.
14432 SE Eastgate Way, Suite 400
Bellevue, WA 98007
August 24, 2017
9
1.1 Project Description. ............... ....... ___ ................ ..............................,.,.,..............................., .....,.. 1
1,2 Project Deliverables Furnished by CONSULTANT
13 Responsibilities and Services Provided by CLIENT .......................... ........................................ ...........................1
1.4 Project Assumptions— ...................... __5 ............................ __ ...... ..,,,........................... .....,.,,,..,,.,.,..,..,..,1
2.1 Project Manage menk,.............................................................................. ..... ........ ............
2.2 Monthly Invoices/Progress Reports............................................................... .....,...... ..................... 2
2.3 Project Kick-off Meeting and Progress Meetings ............... .... ....,...........,....,.....,............,,.,....,.,,...,,..,..,.,,.,....,2
2.4 Quality Assurance /Quality Control Review.,..,.,, .... ......... ......................... ...... ...2
2.5 Change Management............ ... ....... . ..... ...... ,,..,...................... .
TASK .0 WA'T'ER SYSTEM GIS INVENTORY..... . ........ ....I..... ....,,.........................., ....,..,........,,,.. 3
3.1 Field Review..,,.... - ............................................a,,.,.,,,.,. ........ ...................,......,, ... ......... ; ,,.,,.,,.,3
3.2 Hata Collection ................................... ..........,,,,,,.,..,. . , .....,.,,.............. ,, .., .,........ 3
3.3 Water System As -Ruin Research—_.... . ....... ...................,... , ., ...,..,...,...,,,..., .
3.4 Geodatahase Preparation.... ,...... ... ,..,,,..... ...... ,........................ ............s............... ...... _ ....,.,.,...,...,.....,...,..,.,,,,,,.....3
City of Tukwila Scope of Services
Water System GIS Inventory August 24, 2017
10
im . I -- 1 1 111111" 11111 i &ON I
MUREEISIMME=
The City of Tukwila (CLIENT) is requesting professional services from David Evans and Associates, Inc.
(CONSULTANT) to inventory the water system and convert it into a Geographic Information System (GIS).
The major features of the project include:
Water System
Water Lines
Water Valves
Water Meters
Water Manholes
Fire Hydrants
*
Water Vaults
•
Water Risers
•
Post Indicator Valves
•
Fire Department Connections
"
Air Relief Valves
1.2 Project Deliverables Furnished by CONSULTANT
CONSULTANT shall deliver the following documents and products to CLIENT as part of this agreement:
0 Electronic copy of the GIS Geodatabase,
CLIENT will have the opportunity to review each of the deliverables. CLIENT review documents will be
returned with subsequent revision, illustrating that each review comment has been addressed as stated,
or how/why it was not addressed,
1.3 Responsibilities and Services Provided by CLIENT
CLIENT will:
• Provide existing water system maps, GIS maps and data, and other available mapping
information.
• Review all submittals made to the CLIENT within 15 working days, or as agreed, and return them
to CONSULTANT with consolidated written comments regarding changes or revisions needed,
• CLIENT will provide staff to aid with locating water features,
1.4 Project Assumptions
• Mapping accuracy requirement for object locations is "mapping grade" (+/- 3 feet), Objects will
be mapped to "survey grade" accuracy (+/- 0.10 feet) throughout the project unless dense
vegetation or forested areas prevent the use of survey grade GPS equipment,
s Water System mapping will be limited to area within public Right of Way,
• Horizontal datum will be NAD 83/91.
• Vertical datum will be NAVA 88.
• The project duration is assumed to be four (4) months.
City of Tukwila
Water System GIS Inventory
Scope of Services
August 24, 2017
11
11:7111", KIM WI 11��!
2,1 Project Management
CONSULTANT will provide direction for staff and review of their work over the course of the project. This
work element includes preparing monthly progress reports, to accompany monthly invoicing, that include
the status of individual work elements, number of meetings attended, outstanding Information required,
and work items planned for the following month.
CONSULTANT will monitor the project budget weekly throughout the course of the project, This work
element Is intended to help monitor costs and budgets, and to propose corrective actions, if needed.
These actions may Include formal requests for increases, modifications, or reductions in scope.
Drawings and documents received and generated over the course of the project require review,
coordination, and file management. The status of requested information will also be maintained,
2.2 Monthly Invoices/Progress Reports
Monthly invoices will be prepared by CONSULTANT per CLIENT requirements for work activities for the
prior month. These invoices will include SUBCONSULTANT work and will be accompanied by monthly
progress reports, back-up materials for expenses, and show approved budget and amount expended to
date.
Qg_Ilyff_a§1es: monthly Invoices and Progress Reports (6 total),
2.3 Project Kick -cuff Meeting and Progress Meetings
After receiving notice to proceed, CONSULTANT will conduct a project team kick-off meeting with staff
expected to be involved in the project and key CLIENT staff, The meeting will be used to discuss critical
elements of the Scope of Work, the project schedule, document control, and CA/QC procedures; and to
clearly define the roles and responsibilities of the project team members.
This work element provides for the preparation, attendance, follow-up, and documentation of meetings
during the length of the project. These meetings will be the forums for CLIENT to provide input and
guidance for the direction of the project. They will also be used,to discuss project issues, approve
submittals, and develop potential solutions.
CONSULTANT will prepare for, attend, and document up to four (4) meetings with CLIENT staff. The
CONSULTANT will attend one meeting every month with the CLIENT's project manager for the duration of
the project. The meetings will be held in a location acceptable to CLIENT and CONSULTANT.
Deliverables: Meeting Minutes (4 total).
2.4 Quality Assurance /Quality Control Review
This work element is for the QA/QC review of CONSULTANT deliverables by a designated QA/QC staff
member of the CONSULTANT team, CONSULTANT will assign a Quality Manager to the project that will
be responsible for ensuring that quality reviews are performed at stages throughout the project and on
all deliverables. The review will cover field and office work on an on-going basis. QA/QC documentation
will be maintained and filed with project records.
City of Tukwila Scope of Services
Water System GIS Inventory August 24, 2017
12
. ► Change Management
Project Managers from CLIENT and CONSULTANT are responsible for managing changes to the scope and
schedule. CLIENT is responsible for the authorization of any changes to the scope, budget, and/or
schedule, Team members must ensure that work within their areas remains within the defined project
scope, schedule, and budget. When issues, actions, or circumstances occur that could cause a change in
scope, personnel, cost, or schedule, team members must communicate potential changes to the Project
Manager as early as possible. Project Managers will determine whether the potential change issue will
lead to a change in scope, cost, or schedule.
CONSULTANT shall obtain written authorization from CLIENT before implementing any change to this
Scope of Services, schedule, or budget, All changes will be documented using the Project Change Form,
3.1 Field Review
CONSULTANT will conduct an existing water system maps/GIS review at the outset of the project to
identify key field conditions that may impact the field mapping including safety, traffic and access issues.
The procedures required to complete the field survey will be determined and safety risks will be analyzed.
3.2 luta Collection
CONSULTANT will field survey the location of water system point features and water system utility paint
locates south of Interstate 405 within the City of Tukwila retail water service area. Field notes will be
collected to support project deliverables. Pipe connections will be completed in the field where practical.
CONSULTANT will use CLIENT agreed upon GIS database structure,
3.3 Water System As -wilt Research
CONSULTANT will review research on existing utility information, provided by CLIENT, for inclusion in the
mapping. Where possible CONSULTANT will use provided as -built records to prepare and pre -enter system
information to be field verified. This will make the field effort more efficient.
3.4 Ueodatabase Update
CONSULTANT will utilize its field surveyed information, and the as -built research to create the
Oeodatabase CIS files.
CONSULTANT will include metadata for the Geodatabase updates.
Dellvgrables: Electronic copy of the updated Oeodatabase
City of Tukwila
Water System GIS Inventory
Scope of Services-
August 24, 2017
13
Fg!O �
City of Tukwila
Water System IS Inventory
David Evans and Associates, Inc.
Negotiated
Classification
Hrs.
X
Rate
Cost
1 Project Manager (PMGR/PLSU)
72
$
13244
9,535.68
2 Quality Control Manager (PI H)
6
$
203.28
1,219.68
3 GIS Manager (GISM)
10
$
141.68
1,416.80
4 Survey Manager (SVYM)
14
$
1190.96
2,67144
5 GIS Technician (GIST)
166
$
73.92
12,27032
6 Survey Technician (SVTE)
178
$
83,16
14,802.48
7 Party Chief (PCHF)
168
$
92,40
15,523.20
8 Administrative Assistant (ADMA)
8
$
92,40
739.20
9 Project Administrator (PADM)
B
$
106.51
852.08
-,Total -Hrs. -
630
Total Salary Cost
$
59,033.28
Direct Expenses
No.
Unit
Each
Cost
Mileage - Water System GIS Inventory
1,650
miles @
$0.535 /rrljl� $
882,75
subtotal
882.76
David Evans and Associates Total
$
69,916.03
Y:N,Aa1akNPw fbiderVW7-08-03 City of Tukwila GIS inventory BW901 651IM010 VI-XIO 8/25/2017 14
Page 2 of 2
XWaI®Wew IpIGnIS:Qi7•t18S Ghyvt YukWIo GIS InvunIM0449ol Sbgm4Iv Vt)dee 8/251207
15
16
City of Tukwila
TO: Transportation and infrastructure Comm
FROIVI� Bob Giberson, Public Works Director -
BY: Cyndy Knighton, Senior Program Manager
Xd11111ELffa=.
DATE: September 8, 2017
SUBJECT: TUC/TOD Pedestrian Improvements
Project No. 90710405
Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) Grant Applications
Ekberg, Mayor
ISSUE
Request Committee approval to submit a grant application to the Transportation Alternatives Program offered through Puget
Sound Regional Council (PRSC) for the TUC/TOD Pedestrian Improvements Project,
1. �fi�f�TZi7TII7
The Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) is a Federal Highway Administration funding program for community-based
transportation improvements such as bicycle/pedestrian facilities, historic preservation of transportation assets, environmental
mitigation and others, PSRC will be distributing approximately $16 million of federal fiscal year 2017-2020 TAP funds, Grant
applications are due on September 20, 2017 with funding available to successful projects beginning in February 2018. A
maximum of three applications per agency can be submitted with a maximum request of $2,5 million per application, Preferences
are given to projects which provide clear benefits to PSRC regional designated growth centers, therefore staff is recommending
that a grant application for the TUC/TOD Pedestrian Improvements project be considered for submission,
Approximately 700 feet of improvements to the Green River Trail were designed as part of the TUC Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge
Project, but were removed from the construction plans due to inadequate funding. This project will replace the Green River Trail
section from the new Pedestrian bridge landing to Christensen Road with a wider trail section and increased illumination. This
project is fully designed, has all required permits, and only needs construction funding to be completed,
FINANCIAL IMPACT
A minimum match of 13,5% of the project cost is required. The current 2017 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) only has funding
in beyond 2022. The proposed matching funds, if TAP funds are awarded, would have to be moved up in the CIP during the 2019
biennial budget cycle.
RECOMMENDATION
Committee approval to submit a grant application to PSRC's Transportation Alternatives Program for the TUC/TOD Pedestrian
Improvement Project,
Attachments: pg. 25, 2017 CIP
PSRC Call for Projects 07131117
WIPW onqprojectoka- rN & to projoctsUod pedestrian Improvernents (90710405)kinlo own tap grant application 090817 gl.doca 17
City
Grant
Tota I
_Tr2Le
Resoonsibv ll
R
Amount
Green River Trail Construction
jeu iest
RECOMMENDATION
Committee approval to submit a grant application to PSRC's Transportation Alternatives Program for the TUC/TOD Pedestrian
Improvement Project,
Attachments: pg. 25, 2017 CIP
PSRC Call for Projects 07131117
WIPW onqprojectoka- rN & to projoctsUod pedestrian Improvernents (90710405)kinlo own tap grant application 090817 gl.doca 17
CITY OF TUKWILA CAPITAL PROJECT SUMMARY
2017 to 2022
PROJECT: TUC/TOCK Pedestrian Improvements Project No. 90710405
DESCRIPTION: Construct bike/pedestrian connection in phases between the Tukwila Urban Center (TUC) Transit Center
and Tukwila Station in the Southcenter area's Transit Oriented Development (TOO) district
Connecting the TUC to the Tukwila Longacres Station is needed to increase pedestrian mobiilty, improve
JUSTIFICATION: access, and support more urban levels of development within walking distance of Tukwila Station, The
connection involves a pedestrian path extending from Baker Blvd via the planned TUC Pedestrian Bridge and a
pedestrian tunnel under the UPRR track embankment, Additional phases will extend the corridor to the mail.
STATUS: See Tukwila Urban Center - Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge, West Valley Hwy Non -Motorized and Baker Blvd Non -
Motorized CIP pages. Funding shown in beyond is for construction of the UPRR underpass (in 2016 $).
MAINT. IMPACT:
COMMENT: Mitigation listed is $20k from Sound Transit for pedestrian underpass of the UPRR tracks.
FINANCIAL Through Estimated
fin 1000'.0 2015 MG 2017 2011( 2019 2020 2021 2022 Rii;yrmin TOTAL
EXPENSES
Design
20
660
680
Land (R/W)
0
Const, Mgmt,
440
440
Construction
3,160
3,150
TOTAL EXPENSES
0
0 20 01
01 01
01 01
4,250
1 4,270
FUND SOURCES
Proposed Grant
3,400
3,400
ST Mitigation
20
20
KCDNR Trail Levy 1
0
Traffic Impact Fees
0
City Oper, Revenue
0
0 0 0
0 0
0 0
850
850
TOTAL. SOURCES
0
fl 20 0
0
0 0
4,250
4,270
2017 - 2022 Capital Improvement Program 25 18
q1AV
Puget Sound Reglor al caurld
To: Eligible Applicants and Interested Parties
From: Kelly McGourty, Program Manager
July 31, 2017
Subject: 2017 Transportation Alternatives Program Competition — Call for Projects
The Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC) invites eligible public agencies in King, Kitsap, Pierce,
and Snohomish counties to submit projects for the 2017 Transportation Alternatives Program
Project Selection Process. The Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) is a Federal Highway
Administration funding program for community-based transportation improvements such as
bicycle/pedestrian facilities, historic preservation of transportation assets, environmental mitigation
and others. PSRC will be distributing approximately $16 million of federal fiscal year 2017-2020
TAP funds.
Materials for the Call for Projects are available on PSRC's website at httos: vvww, src,
2LLO_rgL/_Our_
work/futiding/12roject-selection. These materials include the following:
• Information on the Workshops in each county
• Schedule
• Project Evaluation Criteria
• Guidance and Resources
• Access to the Project Application
• Summary of Eligibility Requirements
Please note: There is a limit of three applications per eligible sponsor, and project requests are
limited to $2.5 million pgr qp2lication. in addition, all projects must meet the eligibility requirements
of the funding program, as well as regional policies and all other federal requirements.
Applications are due to PSRC by 5p.m. September 20, 2017. Further instructions are available
within the Call for Projects materials.
If you have any questions on PSRC's 2017 Transportation Alternatives Program, please contact
Kelly McGourty at (206) 971-3601, or Lmcqourty src�,or
�
19
pugot Sound cound
• July 31 — Release Call for Projects
• August 8 —11— Workshops in each of the four counties
• September 20 - Project applications due to PSRC
• October 9 - Scoring complete by PSRC
• October 16 - 20 — Project Selection Committee meetings
• November 9 — Transportation Policy Board releases projects for public comment
• January 11 —Transportation Policy Board project funding recommendation
• January 25 — Executive Board approves projects for funding
• February 2018 —Approval into State TIP, funds available to projects
20
IN
I
[DJA
Public Works Department - Bob Giberson, Director
Transportation and Infrastructure CornmVitte
_# IBob Giberson, Public Works Director -1§1
2137mw=
III
L TTLTF�,A
SUBJECT: Strander Boulevard Extension Phase 3
Project No. 98610403
Consultant Selection, Contract, Scope of Work, and Fee
Allan Ekberg, Mayor
ISSUE
Execute a consultant contract with Berger ARAM to provide design services for the Strander Boulevard
Extension Phase 3 Project.
The City of Renton completed Phase 1 of the Strander Blvd/SW 271h St (Oaksdale Ave to Naches Ave)
in 2008 and Phase 2 in 2014 (from Naches to the new Sounder Commuter Rail Station parking lot,
between BNSF and UPRR). Phase 3 is being led by the City of Tukwila. Tukwila received Federal grant
funding for the preliminary engineering and right-of-way phases and is proceeding with the design
process as part of the preliminary engineering phase.
A Request for Qualifications (RFQ) was advertised on June 28 and July 5, 2017 inviting interested
consulting firms to submit proposals for preliminary engineering design of Strander Boulevard Phase 3,
Two engineering firms submitted proposals and both met the criteria required for consideration, Both
firms were interviewed and scored by a selection panel that was unanimous in selecting Berger ARAM
as the successful candidate (scoring matrix attached). A contract, scope of work, and fee estimate have
been negotiated and are attached for consideration.
FISCAL IMPACT
The negotiated contract amount for Berger ABAM's scope and fee outlined in Exhibit A is
$4,147,328.00 to provide final design services. The budget for Strander Boulevard Phase 3 is currently
$4,500,000,00
Council is being asked to approve the agreement with Berger ABAM for design services for the
Strander Boulevard Extension Phase 3 Project in the amount of $4,147,328.00 and consider this item
on the Consent Agenda at the September 18, 2017 Regular Meeting,
Attachments Page 13, 2017-2022 CIP
Interview Scoring Summary
Consultant Contract, Scope of Work and Fee
WAPIN EngWOJECTSA- RW & RS NrojecLstSfrandet Extension (9$010403)1hase IIAPrefininaxy EngineoringtWo, Verno BeI Aharn PE 090817 gI srn,doi,x
21
CITY OF TUKWILA CAPITAL PROJECT SUMMARY
2017 to 2022
PROJECT: Strander Blvd Extension Phase 3 Project No. 98610403
DESCRIPTION: Design and construct arterial improvements for a new roadway extending Strander Blvd/SW 27th St
from West Valley Highway to Oaksdale Ave in the City of Renton.
JUSTIFICATION: East/west capacity between 1-405 and S 180 St is needed to serve Tukwila and Renton access.
Project segregated into three phases. Phase I extended Stander Blvd/SW 27th St from Oaksdale Ave to
STATUS: Naches Ave SW. Phase 11 constructed a 2 lane road from Naches to the Sounder Train's Tukwila Longacres
Station's parking lot. Paid Renton $1 m for Phase I & 11. Phase III will construct the undercrossing of the
UPRR and complete the 4 lane roadway from West Valley Hwy in Tukwila to Naches Ave SW in Renton.
MAINT. IMPACT: New street.
Project partners include the City of Renton, Boeing, WSDOT, FMSIB, Sound Transit, Metro, Amtrak, and
COMMENT: BNSF and UP Railroads. Funds in 2015-16 are for updated cost estimates and grant applications.
STP (PSRC), FAST Lane, and TIGER grants were submitted in 2016.
FINANCIAL Through
in $000's 2015
Estimated
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021 2022 BEYOND
TOTAL
EXPENSES
Design 58
440
2,500
2,000
4,998
Land (R/W) 104
450
1,000
1,554
Wetland Mitigation
50
500
550
Const. Mgmt.
2,800
2,000
4,800
Construction
15,000
12,200
27,200
TOTAL EXPENSES 1162
1440
3,000 1
3,000 1
18,300 114,200
101
01 01
39,102
FUND SOURCES
Awarded STP Grant
2,551
2,595
5,146
Proposed TIGER Grant
7,900
5,894
13,794
Proposed State TIB Grant
2,500
2,500
5,000
Proposed FMSIB Grant
2,500
2,500
5,000
Proposed STP Grant
5,000
3,000
8,000
City Oper. Revenue 162
440
449
405
400
306
0 0 0
2,162
TOTAL SOURCES 162
440
3,000
3,000
18,300
14,200
0 0 0
33,956
2017 - 2022 Capital Improvement Program 13 22
Strander Blvd Ext Ph 3 - Interview Scoring Summary Sheet
Firm
,Cumulative Score
Avg Score
Rank
Berger ABAM
289
96.3
OFF
258
86
2
Individual Scores will not be released
Notes: Top two scoring candidates were chosen from this interview. Berger ABAM was
the top scoring candidate and city will begin contract negotiations with this firm.
W:\PW Eng\ PROJECTS\A- RW & RS Projects \ Strander Extension (98610403)\REQ\strander scoring -tracking, -record ot neg
MA�M-
Cost Plus Fixed Fee Consultant Agreement
Agreement Number:
Scope of Work
Firm/Organization Legal Name (do not use dba's):
DBE Participation
BergerABAM Inc,
Preparation and Delivery of Electronic Engineering and Other Data
Address
Federal Aid Number
33301 Ninth Ave S Ste 300, Federal Way, WA 98003
STPUL- 1276(007)
UBI Number
Federal TIN or SSN Number
601110595
91-1422812
Execution Date
Completion Date
Exhibit I
12/31/2020
1099 Form Required
Federal Participation
[:] Yes No
Yes No
Project Title
Strander Boulevard/Southwest 27 Street Extension
Description of Work
Provide preliminary engineering design and right-of-way
Services to construct a grade separated crossing Linder
a freight rail line and art extension of Strander Blvd. from SR IS I to SW 27th Street. For additional description
of the scope of work, see Exhibit A.
Yes 9% No DBE Participation
Total Amount Authorized-, $4,047,328,00
Yes No MBE Participation
management Reserve Fund: $ 100,000-00
F-1 Yes EE No WBE Participation
E]Yes [Z] No SBE Participation
Maximum Amount Payable: $4,147,328.00
Index of Exhibits
Exhibit A
Scope of Work
Exhibit B
DBE Participation
Exhibit C
Preparation and Delivery of Electronic Engineering and Other Data
Exhibit D
Prime Consultant Cost Computations
Exhibit E
Sub -consultant Cost Computations
Lxhibit l"
Title VI Assurances
Exhibit G
Certification Documents
Exhibit 14
Liability Insurance Increase
Exhibit I
Alleged Consultant Design Error Procedures
Exhibit J
Consultant Clain Procedures
Agreement Number:
Local AgencyA&E Professional Services Cost Plus Fixed Fee Consultant Agreement Page I of 14
Revised 311112016 24
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as shown in the "Execution Date" box on page one (1) of this
AGREEMENT, between the City of Tukwila
hereinafter called the "AGENCY," and the "Firm / Organization Name" referenced oil page one (1) of this
AGREEMENT, hereinafter called the "CONSULTANT."
WHEREAS, the AGENCY desires to accomplish the work referenced in "Description of Work" oil page one
of this AGREEMENT and hereafter called the "SERVICES;" and does not have sufficient staff to meet the required
commitment and therefore deems it advisable and desirable to engage the assistance of a CONSULTANT to provide
the necessary SERVICES; and
WHEREAS, the CONSULTANT represents that they comply with the Washington State Statutes relating
to professional registration, if applicable, and has signified a willingness to furnish consulting services to
the AGENCY.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms, conditions, covenants, and performance contained herein,
or attached and incorporated and made a part hereof, the parties hereto agree as follows:
1. General Description of Work
The work Linder this AGREEMENT shall consist of the above-described SERVICES as herein defined, and
necessary to accomplish the completed work for this project. Tile CONSULTANT" shall furnish all services, labor,
and related equipment and, if applicable, sub -consultants and subcontractors necessary to conduct and complete the
SERVICES as designated elsewhere in this AGREEMENT.
11. General Scope of Work
The Scope of Work and projected level of effort required for these SERVICES is described in Exhibit"A" attached
hereto and by this reference made a part of this AGREEMENT' The General Scope of Work was developed
utilizing performance based contracting methodologies.
XTUTEM. L9KMB3=
All aspects of coordination of the work of this AGREEMENTwith outside agencies, groups, or individuals shall
receive advance approval by the AGENCY. Necessary contacts and meetings with agencies, groups, and/or
individuals shall be coordinated through the AGENCY. The CONSULTANT shall attend coordination, progress,
and presentation meetings with the AGENCY and/or such State, Federal, Community, City, or County officials,
groups or individuals as may be requested by the AGENCY. The AGENCY will provide the CONSULTANT
sufficient notice prior to meetings requiring CONSULTANT participation. The minimum required hours or days'
notice shall be agreed to between the AGENCY and the CONSULTANT and shown in Exhibit "A."
The CONSULTANTshall prepare a monthly progress report, in a form approved by the AGENCY, which will
outline in written and graphical form the various phases and the order of performance of the SERVICES in
Sufficient detail so that the progress of the SERVICES can easily be evaluated.
The CONSULTANT, any sub -consultants, and the AGENCY shall comply with all Federal, State, and local laws,
rules., codes, regulations, and all AGENCY policies and directives, applicable to the work to be performed under
this AGREEMENT. This AGREE; ENT be interpreted and construed in accordance with the laws of the State
of Washington.
Agreement Number
Local Agency A&E Professional Services Cost Plus Fixed Fee Consultant Agreement Page 2 of 14
Revised 311112016 25
Participation for Disadvantaged Business Enterprises (DBE) or Small Business Enterprises (SBE), if required,
per 49 CFR Part 26, shall be shown on the heading of this AGREEMENT. If DBE firms are utilized at the
commencement of this AGREEMENT, the amounts authorized to each firm and their certification number will
be shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and by this reference made part of this AGREEMENT. If the Prime
CONSULTANT' is a DBE certified firm they must comply with the Commercial Useful Function (CUF) regulation
outlined in the AGENCY's "DBE Program Participation Plan" and perform a minimum of 30% of the total amount
of this AGREEMENT. It is recommended, but not required, that non -DBE Prime CONSULTANTS perform
a minimum of 30% of the total amount of this AGREEMENT.
The CONSULTANT, on a monthly basis, is required to submit DBE Participation of the amounts paid to all DBE
firms invoiced for this AGREEMENT.
All Reports, PS&E materials, and other data furnished to the CONSUI-TANT by the AGENCY shall be returned.
All electronic files, prepared by the CONSULTANT, must rneet the requirements as outlined in Exhibit "C --
Preparation
Preparation and Delivery of Electronic Engineering and other Data."
All designs, drawings., specifications, documents, and other work products, including all electronic files, prepared
by the CONSULTANT prior to completion or ten-nination of this AGREEMENT are instruments of service for
these SERVICES, and are the property of the AGENCY. Reuse by the AGENCY or by others, acting through or
on behalf of the: AGENCY of any such instruments of service, not occurring as a part of this SERVICE, shall be
without liability or legal exposure to the CONSUIJANT.
Any and all notices or requests required under this AGREEMENT shall be made in writing and sent to the other
party by (1) certified mail, return receipt requested, or (ii) by email or facsimile, to the address set forth below:
If to AGENCY: If to CONSULTANT:
Name: Steve Carstens Name,- Robert L. Fernandes
Agency: City of'Fukwila Agency: BergerABANI Inc.
Address: 6300 Southeenter Blvd., Suite 100 Address: 33301 Ninth Avenue S,, Suite 300
City, Tukwila State: WA Zip: 981.88 City: Federal Way State: WA Zip: 98003
Email: steve,carstens@tukwilawa,gov Email: bob,fcrtiaiides@abani.com
Phone: 206-431-2446 x. 1646 Phone: 206-431-2333
Facsimile: Facsimile: 206431-2250
The CONSULTANT shall not begin any work under the terms of this AGREEMENT until authorized in writing
0 -
by the AGENCY. All work Linder this AGREEMENT shall be completed by the date shown in the heading of this
AGREEMENT titled "Completion Date."
The established completion time shall not be extended because of any delays attributable to the CONSULTANT,
but may be extended by the AGENCY in the event ofa delay attributable to the AGENCY, or because of
unavoidable delays caused by an act of GOD,
governmental actions, or other conditions beyond the control of the
CONSULTANT. A prior supplemental AGREEMENT issued by the AGENCY is required to extend the established
completion time.
Agreement Number:
Local Agency A&E Professional Services Cost Plus Fixed Fee Consultant Agreement Page 3 of 14
Revised 311112016 26
The CONSULTANT shall be paid by the AGENCY for completed SERVICES rendered under this AGREEMENT
as provided hereinafter. Such payment shall be full compensation for SERVICES performed or SERVICES
rendered and for all labor, materials, supplies, equipment, and incidentals necessary to complete SERVICES,
specified in Section 11, "Scope of Work". The CONSULTANT shall conform to all applicable portions of 48 CFR
Part 31 (wwwecfr.gov), The estimate in support of the Cost Plus Fixed Fee amount is attached hereto as Exhibits
"D" and "E" and by this reference made part of this AGREEMENT.
A. Actual Costs: Payment for all consulting services for this PROJECT shall be on the basis of the
CONSULTANT'S actual cost plus a fixed fee. The actual cost shall include direct salary cost, indirect cost rate,
and direct non -salary costs.
I Direct (RAW) Labor Costs: The Direct (RAW) Labor Cost is the direct salary paid to principals,
professional, technical, and clerical personnel for the time they are productively engaged in work necessary
to fulfill the terms of this AGREEMENT. The CONSULTANT shall maintain support data to verify the
direct salary costs billed to the AGENCY.
2. Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) Costs: ICR Costs are those costs, other than direct costs, which are included as
Such on the books of the CONSUUI'ANT in the normal everyday keeping of its books. Progress payments
shall be made at the ICR rates shown in attached Exhibits "D" and "E" of this AGREEMENT. Total
ICR payment shall be based on Actual Costs. The AGENCY agrees to reirnburse the CONSULTAN]"
the actual ICR costs verified by audit, tip to the Maximum Total Amount Payable, authorized under this
AGREEMENT, when accumulated with all other Actual Costs.
A summary of the CONSULTANT'S, cost estimate and the ICR percentage is shown in Exhibits "D" and
"E", attached hereto and by this reference made part of this AGREEMENT. The CONSUIXANT (prime
and all sub -consultants) will submit to the AGENCY within six (6) months after the end of each frill's fiscal
year, an ICR schedule in the format required by the AGENCY (cost category, dollar expenditures, etc.) for
the purpose of adjusting the ICR rate for billings received and paid during the fiscal year represented by the
ICR schedule. It shall also be used for the computation of progress payments during the following year and
for retroactively adjusting the previous year's ICR cost to reflect the actual rate. The ICR schedule will be
sent to Ernail: Cons u I tantRates(y
,),wsdot.wa.gov.
Failure to supply this information by either the prime CONSULTANT or any of their sub -consultants shall
cause the AGENCY to withhold payment of the billed ICR costs until such time as the required information
is received and an overhead rate for billing purposes is approved.
The AGENCY' s Project Manager and/or the Federal Government may perform an audit of the
CONSULTANT'S books and records at any time during regular business hours to determine the actual ICR
rate, ifthey so desire.
3. Direct Non -Salary Costs: Direct Non -Salary Costs will be reimbursed at the Actual Cost to the
CONSULTANT These charges may include, but are not limited to, the following items: travel, printing,
long distance telephone, supplies, computer charges and fees of sub -consultants. Air or train travel will be
reimbursed only to economy class levels unless otherwise approved by tile AGENCY. Tile CONSULTANT
shall comply with the rules and regulations regarding travel costs (excluding air, train, and rental car costs)
in accordance with WSDOT's Accounting Manual M 13-82, Chapter 10 —Travel Rules and Procedures, and
revisions thereto. Air, train, and rental car costs shall be reimbursed in accordance with 48 Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) Part 31.205-46 "Travel Costs." The billing for Direct Non -Salary Costs shall include an
itemized listing of the charges directly identifiable with the PROJECT. The CONSULIANTshall nlaintaill
the original supporting documents in their office. Copies of the original supporting docurnents shall be
supplied to theAGENCY upon request. All above charges must be necessary for the services provided
Linder this AGREEMENT.
Agreement Ntu-nber:
Local Agency A&E Professional Services Cost Plus Fixed Fee Consultant Agreement Page 4 of 14
Revised 311112016 27
4Fixed Fee: The Fixed Fee, which represents the CONSULTANT'S profit, is shown in attached Exhibits "D"
and "E" of this AGREEMENT. This fee is based on the Scope of Work defined In this AGREEMENT and
the estimated person -hours required to perform the stated Scope of Work- In the event the CONSULTANT
enters into a supplemental AGREEMENT for additional work, the supplemental AGREEMENT may
include provisions for the added costs and an appropriate additional fee. The Fixed Fee will be prorated
and paid monthly in proportion to the percentage of work completed by the CONSULTANT and reported
in the Monthly Progress Reports accompanying the billings. Any portion of the Fixed Fee earned but not
previously paid in the progress payments will be covered in the final payment, subject to the provisions of
Section IX entitled "Termination of Agreement,"
5. Management Reserve Fund (MRF): The AGENCY may desire to establish MRF to provide the Agreement
Administrator with the flexibility to authorize additional funds to the AGREEMENT for allowable
unforeseen costs, or reimbursing the CONSULTANT for additional work beyond that already defined in
this AGREEMENT. Such authorization(s) shall be in writing and shall not exceed the lesser of $100,000 or
10% of the 'Total Amount Authorized as shown in the heading of this AGREEMENT. The amount included
for the MRF is shown in the heading of this AGREEMENT. This fund may not be replenished. Any
changes requiring additional costs in excess of the MRF shall be made in accordance with Section XIII,
"Extra Work."
6. MaxiML11-n Total Amount Payable: The Maximum Total Arnount Payable by the AGENCY to the
CONSULTANT under this AGREEMENT shall not exceed the amount shown in the heading of this
AGREEMENT. The Maximum Total Amount Payable is comprised of the Total Amount Authorized, and
the MRF. The Maximum Total Amount Payable does not include payment for Extra Work as stipulated in
Section X111, "Extra Work." No minii-nurn amount payable is guaranteed under this AGREEMENT
B. Monthly Progress Payments: The CONSULTANT may submit billings to the AGENCY for reimbursement of
Actual Costs plus the ICR and calculated fee on a monthly basis during the progress of the work. Such billings
shall be in a format approved by the AGENCY and accompanied by the monthly progress reports required under
Section 111, "General Requirements" of this AGREEMENT. The billings will be supported by an itemized
listing for each item including Direct (RAW) Labor, Direct Non -Salary, and allowable ICR Costs to which will
be added the prorated Fixed Fee. To provide a means of verifying the billed Direct (RAW) Labor costs for
CONSULTANT employees, the AGENCY may conduct employee interviews. These interviews may consist of
recording the narnes, titles, Direct (RAW) Labor rates, and present duties of those employees performing work
on the PROJECT at the time of the interview.
C. Final Payment: Final Payment of any balance due the CONSULTANT of the gross amount earned will be made
promptly upon its verification by the AGENCY after the completion of the work under this AGREEMENT,
contingent, if applicable, upon receipt of all PSE, plans, maps, notes, reports, electronic data and other related
documents which are required to be furnished under this AGREEMENT. Acceptance of such Final Payment by
the CONSULTANT shall constitute a release of all claims for payment, which the CONSULTANT may have
against the AGENCY unless such claims are specifically reserved in writing and transmitted to tile AGENCY by
the CONSULTANT prior to its acceptance. Said Final Payment shall not, however, be a bar to any claims that
the AGENCY may have against the CONSULTANT or to any remedies the AGENCY may pursue with respect
to such claims.
The payment of any billing will not constitute agreement as to the appropriateness of any item and at the time
of final audit; all required adjustments will be made and reflected in a final payment. In the event that such
final audit reveals an overpayment to the CONSULTANT, the CONSULTANT will refund such overpayment to
the AGENCY within thirty (30) calendar days of notice of the overpayment. Such refund shall not constitute
a waiver by the CONSULTANT for any claims relating to the validity of a finding by the AGENCY of
overpayment. Tile CONSULTANT has twenty (20) working days after receipt of the final POST AUDIT to
begin the appeal process to the AGENCY for audit findings.
Agreement Number:
Local Agency A&E Professional Services Cost Plus Fixed Fee Consultant Agreement Page 5 of 14
Revised 311112016 28
D= Inspection of Cost Records: The CONSULTANT and their sub -consultants shall keep available for inspection
by representatives of the AGENCY and the United States, for a period of six (6) years after receipt of final
payment, the cost records and accounts pertaining to this AGREEMENT and all items related to or bearing upon
these records with the following exception: if any litigation, clairn or audit arising out of, in connection with,
or related to this AGREEMENT is initiated before the expiration of the six (6) year period, the cost, records arid
accounts shall be retained until such litigation, claim, or audit involving the records is completed.
An interim or post audit may be performed oil this AGREEMENT. The audit, if any, will be performed by the
State Auditor, WSDOT's Internal Audit Office and/or at the request of the AGENCY's Project Manager.
A. Sub -Contracting
The AGENCY permits subcontracts for those items of SERVICES as shown in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by
this reference made part of this AGREEMENT,
The CONSULTANT shall not subcontract for the performance of any SERVICE under this AGREEMENT without
prior written permission of the AGENCY. No permission for Subcontracting shall create, between the AGENCY
and sub -consultant, ,Any contract or any other relationship.
Compensation for this sub -consultant SERVICES shall be based oil the cost factors shown on Exhibit "E" attached
hereto and by this reference made part of this AGREEMENT.
The SERVICES of the sub -consultant shall not exceed its maximum amount payable identified in each sub -
consultant cost estimate unless a prior written approval has been issued by the AGENCY
All reimbursable direct labor, indirect cost rate, direct non -salary costs and fixed fee costs for the sub -consultant
shall be negotiated and substantiated in accordance with section V "Payment Provisions" herein and shall be
memorialized in a final written acknowledgement between the parties.
All subcontracts shall contain all applicable provisions of this AGREEMENT, and the CONSULTANT shall require
each sub -consultant or subcontractor, of any tier, to abide by the terms and conditions of this AGREEMENT. With
respect to sub -consultant payment, the CONSULTANT shall comply with all applicable sections of the STATE's
Prompt Payment laws as set forth in RCW 39.04.250 and RCW 39.76,01 1 .
The CONSULTANT, sub -recipient, or sub -consultant shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national
origin, or sex in the performance of this AGREEMENT The CONSUUFANT shall carry out applicable
requirements of 49 CFR Part 26 in the award and administration of DOT -assisted contracts, Failure by the
CONSULTANT to carry out these requirements is a material breach of this AGREEMENT, which may result in the
termination of this AGREEMENT or such other remedy as the recipient deems appropriate.
VII. Employment and Organizational Conflict of Interest
The CONSULTANT warrants that they have not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona
fide employee working solely for the CONSULTANT., to solicit or secure this contract, and that it has not paid or
agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for the CONSULTANT, any
fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or any other consideration, contingent upon or resulting from the
award or making of this contract, For breach or violation of this warrant, the AGENCY shall have the right to annul
this AGREEMENT without liability or, in its discretion, to deduct frorn this AGREEMENT price or consideration
or otherwise recover the full arnount of such fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or contingent fee.
Any and all employees of the CONSULTANT or other persons while engaged in the performance of any work,
or services required of the CONSULTANT tinder this AGREEMENT, shall be considered employees of the
CONSULTANT only and not of the AGENCNand any and all claims that may arise under any Workmen's
Agreement Number:
Local Agency A &E Professional Services Cost Plus Fixed Fee Consultant Agreement Page 6 of 14
Revised 311112016 29
Compensation Act on behalf of said employees or other persons while so engaged, and any and all claims made
by a third party as a consequence of any act or ormssion on the part of the CONSULTANT's employees or other
persons while so engaged on any of the work or services provided to be rendered herein, shall be the sole obligation
engaged
and responsibility of the CONSULTANT.
The CONSULTANT shall riot engage, on a full- or part-time basis. or other basis, during the period of this
0
AGREEMENT, any professional or technical personnel who are, or have been, at any time during the period of this
AGREEMENT, in the employ of the United States Department of Transportation or the AGENCY, except regularly
retired employees, without written consent of the public employer of such person if he/she will be working on this
AGREEMENT for the CONSULTANT -
During the performance ofthis AGREEMENT, the CONSULTANT, for itself, its assignees, sub -consultants,
subcontractors and successors in interest, agrees to comply with the following laws and regulations:
Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
(42 U,S-C. Chapter 21 Subchapter V § 2000d
through 20OOd-4a)
Federal -aid Highway Act of 1973
(23 U.S.C. Chapter 3 § 324)
• Rehabilitation Act of 1973
(29 U,S.C. Chapter 16 Subchapter V § 794)
• Age Discrimination Act of 1975
(42 U.S.C. Chapter 76 § 6101 el. seq.)
* Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987
(Public Law 100-259)
* American with Disabilities Act of 1990
(42 U.S.C. Chapter 126 § 12101 et. seq.)
* 23 CFR Part 200
* 49 CFR Part 21
* 49 CFR Part 26
* RCW 49.60.1 80
In relation to Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the CONSULTANT is bound by the provisions of Exhibit "F"
attached hereto and by this reference made part of this AGREEMENT, and shall include the attached Exhibit '-'F" in
every sub -contract, including procurement of materials and leases of equipment, unless exempt by the Regulations
or directives issued pursuant thereto.
The right is reserved by the AGENCY to terminate this AGREEMENT at any time with or without cause upon ten
(10) days written notice to the CONSULTANT,
In the event this AGREEMENT is terminated by the AGENCY, other than for default on the part of the
CONSULTANT, a final payment shall be made to the CONSULTANT for actual hours charged and any appropriate
fixed fee percentage at the time of termination of this AGREEMENT, plus any direct non -salary costs incurred up to
the time of termination of this AGREEMENT
No payment shall be made for any SERVICES completed after ten (10) days following receipt by the
CON SUI_:rANTof the notice to terminate. If the accumulated payment made to the CON SUU'I'ANT prior to Notice
of Termination exceeds the total amount that would be due when computed as set forth in paragraph two (2) of this
section, then no final payment shall be due and the CONSULTANT shall immediately reimburse the AGENCY for
any excess paid.
If the services of the CONSULTANT are terminated by the AGENCY for default on the part of the CONSULTANT,
the above formula for payment shall riot apply.
In the event of a termination for default, the amount to be paid to the CONSULTANT shall be determined by the
AGENCY with consideration given to the actual costs incurred by the CONSULTANT in performing SERVICES
to the date of termination, tile amount of SERVICES originally required which was satisfactorily completed to
Agreement Nuniber:
Local Agency A&E Professional Services Cost Plus Fixed Fee Consultant Agreement Page 7 of 14
Revised 311112016 30
date of termination, whether that SERVICE is in a form or a type which is usable to the AGENCY at the time of
termination, the cost to the AGENCY of employing another firm to complete the SERVICES required and the
time which may be required to do so, and other factors which affect the value to the AGENCY of the SERVICES
performed at the time of termination, Under no circumstances shall payment made under this subsection exceed the
amount, which Would have been made using the formula set forth in paragraph two (2) of this section.
If it is determined for any reason that the CONSULTANT was not in default Or that the CONSULTANT's failure to
perform is without the CONSULTANT's or its employee's fault or negligence, the termination shall be deerned to
be a termination for the convenience of the AGENCY. In such an event, the CONSULTANT Would be reimbursed
for actual costs and appropriate fixed fee percentage in accordance with the termination for other than default
clauses listed previously.
The CONSULTANT shall, within 15 days, notify the AGENCY in writing, in the event of the death of any mernber,
partner, or officer of the CONSULTANTor the death or change of any of the CONSULTANT's supervisory and/or
other key personnel assigned to the project or disaffiliation of any principally involved CONSULTANT employee.
The CONSULTANT shall also notify the AGENCY, in writing, in the event of the sale or transfer of 50% or
more of the beneficial ownership of the CONSULTANT within 15 days Of Such sale or transfer occurring. The
CONSULTANT shall continue to be obligated to complete the SERVICES under the terms of this AGREEMENT
unless (lie AGENCY chooses to terminate this AGREEMENT for convenience or chooses to renegotiate any terrn(s)
of this AGREEMENT. If termination for convenience occurs, final payment will be made to the CONSULTANT
as set forth in the second and third paragraphs of this section.
Payment for any part of the SERVICES by the AGENCY shall not constitute a waiver by the AGENCY of
any remedies of any type it may have against the CONSULTANT for any breach of this AGREEMENT by the
CONSUUFANT, or for failure of the CONSULTANT to perform SERVICES required of it by the AGENCY.
Forbearance of any rights Linder the AGREEMENT will not constitute waiver of entitlement to exercise those rights
with respect to any future act or omission by the CONSULTANT.
The CONSULTANT shall make such changes and revisions in the completed work Of this AGREEMENT as
necessary to correct errors appearing therein, without additional compensation thereof, Should the AGENCY find
it desirable for its own purposes to have previously satisfactorily completed SERVICES or parts thereof changed or
revised, the CONSULTANT shall make such revisions as directed by the AGENCY. This work shall be considered
as Extra Work and will be paid for as herein provided Linder section XIII "Extra Work."
X1. Disputes
Any disputed issue not resolved pursuant to the terms of this AGREEMENT shall be submitted in writing within
10 days to the Director of Public Works or AGENCY Engineer, whose decision in the matter shall be final and
binding on the parties of this AGREEMENT; provided however, that if all action is brought challenging the
Director of Public Works or AGENCY Engineer's decision, that decision shall be subject to judicial review. Ifthe
parties to this AGREEMENT mutually agree, disputes concerning alleged design errors will be conducted under
the procedures found in Exhibit ``.I". In the event that either party deem it necessary to institute legal action or
proceeding to enforce any right or obligation Linder this AGREEMENT, this action shall be initiated in the Superior
Court of the State of Washington, situated in the County in which the AGENCY is located, The parties hereto
agree that all questions shall be resolved by application of Washington law and that the parties have the right of
appeal from such decisions of the Superior Court in accordance with the laws of the State of 'Washington. The
CONSULTANT hereby consents to the personal jurisdiction of the Superior Court of the State of Washington,
situated in the county in which the AGENCY is located.
Agreement Number:
Local Agency A&E Professional Services Cost Plus Fixed Fee Consultant Agreement Page 8 of 14
Revised 311112016 31
rg I M Lq if=
The CONSULTANT, any stip-consultants, and the AGENCY shall comply with all Federal, State,, and local laws,
rules, codes, regulations and all AGENCY policies and directives, applicable to the work to be performed under this
AGREEMENT. This AGREEMENT shall be interpreted and construed in accordance with the laws of tile State of
Washington.
The CONSULTANT shall defend, indemnify, and hold The State of Washington (STATE) and the AGENCY and
their officers and employees harmless from all claim, demands, or suits at law or equity arising in whole or in part
from the negligence of, or the breach of any obligation under this AGREEMENT by, the CONSULTANT or tile
CONSULTANT's agents, employees, sub consultants, subcontractors or vendors, of any tier, or any other persons
for whom the CONSULTANT may be legally liable; provided that nothing herein shall require a CONSULTANT
to defend or indemnify the STATE and the AGENCY and their officers and employees against and hold harmless
the STATE and the AGENCY and their officers and employees from claims, demands or suits based solely upon
the negligence of, or breach of any obligation Linder this AGREEMENT by the STATE and the AGENCY, their
agents, officers, employees, sub -consultants, subcontractors or vendors, of any tier, or any other persons for whom
the STXfE' and/or the AGENCY may be legally liable; and provided further that if the claims or suits are caused
by or result from the concurrent negligence of (a) the CONSULTANTor the CONSULTANT's agents, employees,
sub -consultants, subcontractors or vendors, of any tier, or any other persons for whom the CONSULTANT is legally
liable, and (b) the STATE and/or AGENCY, their agents, officers, employees, sub -consultants, subcontractors and or
vendors, of any tier, or any other persons for whom the STATE and or AGENCY may be legally liable, the defense
and indemnity obligation shall be valid and enforceable only to the extent of the CONSULTANT's negligence or
the negligence of the CONSULTANT's agents, employees, sub -consultants, subcontractors or vendors, of any tier,
or any other persons for whore the CONSULTANT may be legally liable. This provision shall be included in any
AGREEMENT between CONSULTANT and any sub -consultant, subcontractor and vendor, of any tier.
The CONSULTANT shall also defend, indemnify, and hold the STATE and the AGENCY and their officers
and employees harmless from all claims, demands, or suits at law or equity arising in whole or in part from the
alleged patent or copyright infringement or other allegedly improper appropriation or use of trade secrets, patents,
proprietary information, know-how, copyright rights or inventions by the CONSULTANT or the CONSULTANT's
agents, employees, sub -consultants, subcontractors or vendors, of any tier, or any other persons for whom the
CONSULTANT may be legally liable, in performance of the Work under this AGREEMENT or arising out of any
use in connection with the AGREEMENT of methods, processes, designs, in -formation or other iterns furnished or
communicated to STATE and/or the AGENCY, their agents, officers and employees pursuant to the AGREEMENT:
provided that this indemnity shall not apply to any alleged patent or copyright infringement or other allegedly
improper appropriation or use ot-trade secrets, patents, proprietary information, know-how, copyright rights or
inventions resulting from STATE and/or AGENCY's, their agents', officers' acrd employees' failure to comply
with specific written instructions regarding use provided to STATE and/or AGENCY, their agents, officers and
employees by the CONSULTANT, its agents, employees, sub -consultants, subcontractors or vendors, of any tier, or
any other persons for whore the CONSULTANT may be legally liable.
The CONSULTANT's relation to the AGENCY shall be at all times as an independent contractor.
Notwithstanding any determination by the: Executive Ethics Board or other tribunal, the AGENCY may, in its sole
discretion, by written notice to the CONSULTANT terminate this AGREEMENT if it is found after due notice and
examination by the AGENCY that there is a violation of the Ethics in Public Service Act, Chapter 42.52 RCW; or
any similar statute involving the CONSULTANT in the procurement of, or performance under, this AGREEMENT.
The CONSULTANT specifically assumes potential liability for actions brought by the CONSUt.-TANT's own
employees or its agents against the STATE and /or the AGENCY and, solely for the purpose of this indemnification
and defense, the CONSULTANT specifically waives any immunity under the state industrial insurance law, Title 51
RCW. This waiver has been mutually negotiated be the Parties.
Agreement Nuinber=
Local Agency A& Professional Services Cost Plus Fixed Fee Consultant Agreement Page 9 of 14
Revised 311112016 32
Unless otherwise specified in this AGREEMENT, the AGENCY shall be responsible for administration of
construction contracts, if any, on the project. Subject to the processing of a new sole source, or an acceptable
supplemental AGREEMENT, the CONSULTANT shall provide On -Call assistance to the AG13NCY during contract
administration. By providing such assistance, the CONSULTANT shall assume no responsibility for: proper
construction techniques, job site safety, or any construction contractor's failure to perform its work in accordance
with the contract documents.
Tile CONSULTANT shall obtain and keep in force daring; the terms of this AGREEMENT, or as otherwise
required, the following insurance with companies or through sources approved by the State Insurance
Commissioner pursuant to Title 48 RCW.
Insurance Coverage
A. Worker's compensation and employer's liability insurance as required by the STATEz
B. Commercial general liability insurance written Linder ISO Form CG 00 01 12 04 or its equivalent with minimum
limits of one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) per occurrence and two million dollars ($2,000,000,00) in the
aggregate for each policy period.
Ci Business auto liability insurance written under ISO Form CG 00 01 10 01 or equivalent providing coverage for
any "Auto" (Symbol 1) used in an amount not less than a one million dollar ($1,000,000.00) combined single
limit for each occurrence.
Excepting the Worker's Compensation Insurance and any Professional Liability Insurance, the STATE and
AGENCY, their officers, employees, and agents will be named on all policies of CONSULTANT and any sub -
consultant and/or subcontractor as an additional insured (the "Als"), with no restrictions or limitations concerning
products and completed operations coverage. This coverage shall be primary coverage and non-contributory and
any coverage maintained by the Als shall be excess over, and shall not contribute with, the additional insured
coverage required hereunder. The CONSULTANT's and the sub -consultant's and/or subcontractor's insurer shall
waive any and all rights of subrogation against the Als. The CONSULTANT' shall furnish tile AGENCY with
verification of insurance and endorsements required by this AGREEMENT. The AGENCY reserves the right to
require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies at any time.
All insurance shall be obtained from an insurance company authorized to do business in the State of Washington.
The CONSULTANT shall Submit a verification of insurance as outlined above within fourteen (14) days of the
execution of this AGR-EEMENTto:
Name: Steve Carstens
Agency: City of Tukwila
Address: 6300 Southeentler Blvd., Suite 100
City: Tukwila State: WA Zip: 98188
Ernail: steve.carstetis@tukwilawa.gov
Phone: 205-431-2446 x. 1646
Facsimile:
No cancellation of the foregoing policies shall be effective without thirty (30) days prior notice to the AGENCY.
The CONSULTANT's professional liability to the AGENCY, including that which may arise in reference to
section IN "Termination of Agreement" of this AGREEMENT, shall be limited to the accumulative amount of the
authorized AGREEMENT amount or one million dollars 01,000,000.00). whichever is greater, unless the limit of
liability is increased by the AGENCY pursuant to Exhibit 11. In no case shall the CONSULTANT's professional
liability to third parties be limited in any way.
Agreement Number --
Local Agency A&E Professional Services Cost Plus Fixed Fee Consultant Agreement Page 10 of 14
Revised 311112016 33
The parties enter into this AGREEMENT for the sole benefit of the parties, and to the exclusion of any third party,
and no third party beneficiary is intended or created by the execution of this AGREEMENT
The AGENCY will pay no progress payments under section V "Payment Provisions" until the CONSULTANT has
fully complied with this section. This remedy is not exclusive; and the AGENCY may take Such other action as is
available to it Under other provisions ofthis AGREEMENT, or other -wise in law.
X111. Extra Work
A. The AGENCY may at any tirne, by written order, make changes within the general scope of this AGREEMENT
in the SERVICES to be performed,
E. If any such change causes an increase or decrease in the estimated cost of, or the time required for, performance
of any part of the SERVICES under this AGREEMENT, whether or not changed by the order, or otherwise
affects any other terms and conditions of this AGREEMENT, the AGENCY shall make an equitable adjustment
in the: (1) maximum amount payable,* (2) delivery or completion schedule, or both; and (3) other affected terms
and shall modify this AGREEMENT accordingly.
C. The CONSULTANT must submit any "request for equitable adjustment," hereafter referred to as "CLAIM,"
under this clause within thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of the written order, However, if the AGENCY
decides that the facts Justify it, the AGENCY may receive and act upon a CLAIM submitted before final
payment of this AGREEMENT.
D. Failure to agree to any adjustment shall be a dispute under the section XI "Disputes" clause, However, nothing
in this clause. shall excuse the CONSULTANT from proceeding with the AGREEMENT as changed.
E. Notwithstanding the terms and conditions of paragraphs (A.) and (B.) above, the maximum amount payable for
this AGREEMENT, shall not be increased or considered to be increased except by specific written supplement
to this AGREEMENT,
If applicable, the CONSULTANT shall place their endorsement on all plans, estirnates, or any other engineering
data furnished by thern.
XV. Federal Review
The Federal Highway Administration shall have the right to participate in the review or examination of the
SERVICES in progress.
XVI. Certification of the Consultant and the Agency
Attached hereto as Exhibit"G-I(a and b)" are the Certifications of the CONSULTANT and the AGENCY, Exhibit
"G-2" Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension and Other Responsibility Matters - Primary Covered
Transactions, Exhibit "G-3" Certification Regarding the Restrictions of the Use of Federal Funds for Lobbying
and Exhibit "G-4" Certificate of Current Cost or Pricing Data. Exhibit "&Y' is required only in AGREEMENT's
over one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000.00) and Exhibit "G-4" is required only in AGREEMENT's over
five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000,00.) These Exhibits must be executed by the CONSULTANT, and
submitted with the master AGREEMENT, and returned to the AGENCY at the address listed in section Ill "General
Requirements" prior to its performance of any SERVICES under this AGREEMENT
Agreement Number:
Local Agency A&E Professional Services Cost Plus Fixed Fee Consultant Agreement Page 11 of 14
Revised 311112016 34
I
This document and referenced attachillents contain all covenants, stipulations, and provisions agreed upon by tile
parties. No agent, or representative of either party has authority to make, and the parties shall not be bound by or
be liable for, any statement, representation, promise or agreement not set forth herein. No changes, amendments, or
modifications of the terms hereof shall be valid unless reduced to writing and signed by the parties as a supplement
to this AGREEMENT.
This AGREEMENT may be simultaneously executed in several Counterparts', each of which shall be deemed
to be an original having identical legal effect. The CONSULTANT does hereby ratify and adopt all statements,
representations, warranties, covenarits, and AGREEMENTs contained in the proposal, and the supporting material
submitted by the CONSLANANT, and does hereby accept this AGREEMENT and agrees to all of the terrills and
conditions thereof.
11 Jill
:111111111 11110 77M "st
'Tile CONSULTANT acknowledges that sorne of the material and inrorniation that, may come into its possession
or knowledge in connection with this AGREEMENT or its performance may consist of information that is exempt
fi-orn disclosure to the public or other unauthorized persons under either chapter 42.56 RCW or other local, state
or federal statutes ("State's Confidential Information"). The "State's Confidential Information" includes, but is
not limited to, names, addresses, Social Security numbers, e-mail addresses, telephone numbers, financial profiles,
credit card information, driver's license numbers, medical data, law enforcement records (or any other information
identifiable to an individual), STATE and AGENCY Source code or object code, STATE andAGENCY security
data, non-public Specifications, STXFE and AGENCY non -publicly available data, proprietary software, State
security data, or inrorrilation which may ieopardize any part of tile project that relates to any of these types of
information. The CONSULTANT agrees to hold the State's Confidential Information in strictest confidence
and not to make use of the State's Confidential Information for any purpose other than the performance of this
AGREEMENT, to release it only to authorized employees, sub -consultants or subcontractors requiring such
information for the purposes of carrying Out this AGREEMENT, and not to release, divulge, publish, transfer,
sell, disclose, or otherwise make it known to any other party without the AGENCY's express written consent
or as provided by law, The CONSULTANT agrees to release such information or material only to employees,
sub -consultants or Subcontractors who have signed a nondisclosure AGREEMENT, the terms of which have
been previously approved by the AGENCY. The CONSULTANT agrees to implement physical, electronic, and
managerial safeguards to prevent unauthorized access to the State's Confidential Information.
Immediately upon expiration or termination of this AGREEMENT, the CONSULTANT shall, at the AGENCY's
option: (i) certify to the AGENCY that the CONSULTANT has destroyed all of the State's Confidential
Information; or (ii) returned all of the State's Confidential Information to the AGENCY; or (iii) take whatever other
steps the AGENCY requires of the CONSULTANT to protect the State's Confidential Information.
As required tinder Executive Order 00-03, the CONSULTANT shall maintain a log documenting the following:
the State's Confidential Information received in the performance of this AGREEMENT; the purpose(s) for which
the State's Confidential Information was receive&, who received, maintained and used the State's Confidential
Information; and the final disposition of the State's Confidential Information. The CONSULTANT's records shall
be subject to inspection, review, or audit upon reasonable notice from the AGENCY.
The AGENCY reserves the right to monitor, audit, or investigate the use of the State's Confidential Information
collected, used, or acquired by the CONSULTANT" through this AGREEMENT. The monitoring, auditing, or
investigating may include, but is not limited to, salting databases.
Agreenient Nuniber-
Local Agency AB Professional Services Cost Plus Fixed Fee Consultant Agreement Page 12 of 14
Revised 311112016 35
Violation of this section by the CONSULTANT or its sub-consultants or Subcontractors may result in termination of
this AGREEMENT and demand for return of all State's Confidential Information, monetary damages, or penalties.
It is understood and acknowledged that the CONSULTANT may provide the AGENCY with information which
is proprietary and/or confidential during the term of this AGREEMENT. The parties agree to maintain the
confidentiality Of Such information during the term of this AGREEMENT and afterwards. All materials containing
such proprietary and/or confidential information shall be clearly identified and marked as "Confidential" and shall
be returned to tile disclosing party at the Conclusion of the SERVICES Linder this AGREEMENT.
The CONSULTANT shall provide the AGENCY with a list of all information and materials it considers confidential
and/or proprietary in nature-, (a) at the commencement of the term of this AGREEMENT; or (b) as soon as such
confidential or proprietary material is developed. "Proprietary and/or confidential information" is not meant to
include any information which, at the time of its disclosure: (1) is already known to the other party; (ii) is rightfully
disclosed to one of the parties by a third party that is not acting as an agent or representative for the other party;
(iii) is independently developed by or for the other party; (iv) is publicly known; or (v) is generally utilized by
unaffiliated third parties engaged in the same business or businesses as the CONSULTANT.
The parties also acknowledge that the AGENCY is subject to Washington State and federal public disclosure
laws. As such, the AGENCY shall maintain the confidentiality of all such information marked proprietary and/
or confidential or otherwise exempt, unless such disclosure is required under applicable state or federal law. If a
public disclosure request is made to view materials identified as "Proprietary and/or confidential information" or
otherwise exempt information, the AGENCY will notify the CONSUIA'ANT of the request and of the date that Such
records will be released to the requester unless the CONSULTANT obtains a court order from a court of competent
jurisdiction enjoining that disclosure. If the CONSU`rANT fails to obtain the. Court order enjoining disclosure, the
AGENCY will release the requested information oil the date specified,
The CONSULTANT agrees to notify the sub-consultant of any AGENCY communication regarding disclosure that
may include a sub-consultant's proprietary and/or confidential information. The CONSULTANT notification to the
sub-consultant will include the date that such records will be released by the AGENCY to the requester and state
that unless the sub-consultant obtains a court order from a court of competent jurisdiction enjoining that disclosure
the AGENCY will release the, requested information. If the CONSULTANT and/or sub-consultant fail to obtain
a Court order or ether judicial relief enjoining the AGENCY by the release date, the CONSULTANT shall waive
and release and shall hold harmless and indemnify the AGENCY from all claims of actual or alleged darnages,
liabilities, or costs associated with the AGENCY's said disclosure of sub-consultants' information,
XX. Records Maintenance
During the progress of the Work and SERVICES provided hereunder and for a period of not less than six (6) years
from the date of final payment to the CONSULTANT, the CONSULTANT shall keep, retain and maintain all
"documents" pertaining to the SERVICES provided pursuant to this AGREEMENT. Copies of all "documents"
pertaining to the SERVICES provided hereunder shall be made available for review at the CONSULTANT's place
of business during normal working hours. If any litigation, claim or audit is commenced, the CONSULTANT shall
cooperate with AGENCY and assist in the production of all such documents. "Documents" shall be retained until
all litigation, claims or audit findings have been resolved even though such litigation, claim or audit continues past
the six (6) year retention period.
For purposes of this AGREEMENT, "documents" means every writing or record of every type and description,
including electronically stored information ("ESI"), that is in the possession, control, or custody of the
CONSULTANT, including, without limitation, any and all correspondences, contracts, AGREEMENT 's,
appraisals, plans, designs, data, surveys, maps, spreadsheets, memoranda, stenographic or handwritten
notes, reports, records, telegrams, schedules, diaries, notebooks, logbooks, invoices, accounting records,
work sheets, charts, notes, drafts, scribblings, recordings, visual displays, photographs, minutes of meetings,
Agreement Number:
Local Agency A&E Professional Services Cost Plus Fixed Fee Consultant Agreement Page 13 of 14
Revised 311112016 36
tabulations, computations, Summaries, inventories, and writings regarding conferences, conversations or
telephone conversations, and any and all other taped, recorded, written, printed or typed matters of any kind of,
description; every copy of the foregoing whether or not the original is in the possession, custody, or control of the
Z5
CONSUUFANT, and every copy of any of the foregoing, whether or not such copy is a copy identical to an original,
or whether or not such copy contains any commentary or notation whatsoever that does not appear on the original.
For purposes of this AGRFIEMENT, "ESI" means any and all computer data or electronic recorded media of any
kind, including "Native Files", that are stored in any ruedurnfrom which it can be retrieved and examined, either
directly or after translation into a reasonably useable form. ESI may include information and/or documentation
stored in various software programs such as: Email, Outlook, Word, Excel, Access, Publisher, PowerPoint, Adobe
Acrobat, SQL databases, or any other software or electronic communication programs or databases that the
CONSULTANI'may use in the performance of its operations. ESI may be located on network servers, backup
tapes, smart phones, thumb drives, CDs, DVDs, floppy disks, work computers, cell phones, laptops or any other
electronic device that CONSULTANT uses in the performance of its Work or SERVICES hereunder, including any
personal devices used by the CONSULTANT or any sub -consultant at home.
"Native files" are a subset of ESI and refer to the electronic format of the application in which such ESI is normally
created, viewed, and /or modified,
The CONSULTANT shall include this section XX"Records Maintenance"" in every subcontract it enters into in
relation to this AGREEMENT and bind the sub -consultant to its terms, unless expressly agreed to otherwise in
writing by the AGENCY prior to the execution of such subcontract.
In witness whereof, the pat -ties hereto have executed this AGREEMENT as of the day and year shown in the
"'Execution Date" box on page one (1) of this AGREEMENT.
Signature
Mm
Date
Arty inodfication, change, or reformation of this AGREEMENT shall require appro as toforin by the f
oaf `the Attorney General,
Agreement Number:
Local Agency A&E Professional Services Cost Plus Fixed Fee Consultant Agreement Page 14 of 14
Revised 311112016 37
See attached Exhibit A-1.
Exhibit A
Scope of Work
Project No.
Agreement Number:
WSDO T Form 140.089 EF Exhibit A Page I of I
Revised 1013012014 38
1 0 : I I - * - I . I . . b. 9 i 1
The cities of Renton and Tukwila have been working in partnership to complete a connection of
Strander Boulevard in the City of Tukwila with Southwest 27th Street in the City of Renton, As
lead agency for the first two phases of the project, the City of Renton completed an
undercrossing of the BNSF Railway in 2014, connecting Southwest 27th Street with the Tukwila
Sound Transit Station, The City of Tukwila will complete Phase 3 of the project as shown in
Figure 1.
Figure 1 —Project Phasing
City of'rukwilA
Strander Blvd/SW 27th St Extension
Tukwila, Washington
BergerABAM, P14.0347.00
September 2017
Exhibit Awl Page I of 60
W
In order to reduce the cost of the first two phases of the project, the BNSF undercrossing was
completed by installing a pump station to pump both stormwater and groundwater entering
the roadway excavation from the surrounding area. This was envisioned as an interim
condition until construction of a full, four -lane arterial connection of Strander to Southwest
27th, The full build -out was anticipated to require the construction of watertight walls and a
bottorn seal for the underpasses,
PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION
This scope of work defines the effort required to complete the design of Phase 3, as described
above. It also defines the effort required to reevaluate and update the project's National
Environmental Protection Agency (NEPA) document, acquire right-of-way (ROW), and secure
approvals from both BNSF and Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) for temporary and permanent
modifications to their facilities. Construction phase services are not included in this scope of
work-, but will be provided as supplemental services when required.
Phase 3 of the Strander Grade Separation Project will place Strander Boulevard beneath the
UPRR tracks by extending the excavation for the BN,' -,F underpass to the west and under the
UPRR. The undercrossing will utilize the pumping system constructed in Phase 2 of the project
to pump stormwater for the proposed Phase 3 extension to the existing pond. The existing
pump station will need to be modified and the pond will need to be enlarged and modified to
function in accordance with the latest water quality standards. Groundwater will be separated
from the stormwater and an additional, new groundwater pumping system will be used to
purnp groundwater to an outfall in the Green River. The discharge location has yet to be
determined, The roadway section will be established in consultation witl,-L the City o€ Tukwila
(hereinafter referred to as CITY) and is anticipated to be similar to the roadway section
established by the CITY during the planning of the project, Other features of the project include
modifications to access several businesses located to the west of UPRR, and utility relocations,
permanent or interim, and/or protection.
SCHEDULE
The target dates for completing all work are shown on the attached schedule. These target dates
assume that the notice to proceed (NTP) for Phase 3 is provided on 26 September 2017.
SUBCONSULTANTS
The following subconsultants will participate in the delivery of this scope of work as follows.
• Fehr & Peers - Traffic Engineering
• Hanson Professional Services - Railroad Track Design
• Shannon & Wilson - Geotechnical Engineering
• I Alliance - Surveying
• Abeyta & Associates — Right -of -Way Services
• Bright Engineering —Structural Engineering
• R & W — Purnp Station Electrical Engineering and Control Systerns,
City of Tukwila
Strander tilvd/,SW 27th St Extension
Tukwila, washingtoll
BergerABAM, P140347.00
September 201",
Exhibit A-1 Page 2 of 60
EX
* Widener & Associates - Environmental Documentation and Permitting
The following list is included to confirm the understanding between the CITY and
BergerABAM (hereinafter referred to as CONSULTANT) and will be used to guide the work.
Additional assumptions are provided with each specific project task.
1. Throughout this scope of work, it is understood that the CITY will provide the
CONSULTANT with one set of consolidated review comments for each draft review
round. The CONSULTAN"r will respond to the comments and incorporate the agreed-
upon resolution into the final document(s).
1 It is anticipated that the roadway typical section will be a four -lane arterial and that the
key design features will be based on the design report prepared by CONSULTANT for
the City of Renton during the planning of the project and the Stornmater System
Conceptual Desi ti Report prepared by BergerABAM for the City of Tukwila, dated
7 April 2017,
1 'The underpass will be watertight and it is assumed that the small amount of
groundwater from the underpass can be combined with treated stormwater and
discharged to the Green River through a new outfall.
4. UPRR may require a separate utility agreement for the new discharge line described
above. The costs for obtaining this are not included in the scope of work.
5. It is assumed the Citv of Renton and the Washington State Department of
'rransportation (WSDOT) will allow the CITY to use the Springbrook Creek wetland
mitigation bank constructed by the City of Renton and WSDOT.
6. Stormwater, treatment will comply with the King County Surface Water Design Manual
(KCSWDM), recently updated to be consistent with the 2014 Washington State
Department of Ecology's (WDOE) Stormwater Management Manual for Western
Washington -
T The CITY will need to establish a preliminary engineering agreement with the Union
Pacific Railroad (UPRR) and BNSF Railway (BNSF) to reimburse UPRR and BNSF for
their review time.
8, It is assumed that CONSULTANT will design the new UPRR overpass, as well as the
proposed shoofly. It is assumed that UPRR will provide comments to the
CONSULTANT in a timely manner to facilitate the CONSULTANT's design of project,
9It is assume the extension of the BNSF bridge foundations, to allow the existing bridge
to be widened in the future, will be the same as the existing foundations. Widening of
the superstructure is not in the scope of work.
City of Tukwila BergerABAM, P14.0347.00
Sh,aoder Blvd/SW 2701 St Extension September 2017
Tukwila, Washington Exhibit A-] Page I of 60
41
M Utility relocation and reconstruction plans for power, gas, and communication
purveyors will be prepared by the respective utility. The CONSULTANT will coordinate
directly with the utility companies and the CITY,
IL It is assumed that design for relocation of the King County sanitary sewer will be
completed by King County and the plans incorporated into the construction contract for
the Strander Boulevard/Southwest 27th Street Extension. The CONSULTANT will
coordinate directly with King County and will provide assistance with routing the sewer
through the project site,
12. It is assumed that enough nionurnentation still exists to determine the necessary
boundaries for this projects efforts. If additional work, such as exhaustive title research
and complete section breakdown work is required, a portion of that work may be
needed to be completed as a supplemental service,
13. Public utility locating services provided by callbeforeyoudig.org will be utilized to do an
initial location of utilities in the public ROW. A private utility locating company is
included. in this proposal, to provide complete information to verify the location of
publicly and privately owned buried utilities (sanitary, storm, water, power, gas,
telecommunications, etc.) with painted locate marks.
14. Additional support for vacations of existing ROW or boundary line adjustments (BLA)
of resulting parcels is not included in this proposal as it cannot be determined until the
design is finalizod. If these services are required, those services will be provided as
supplemental service.
15, "The CITY will provide rights -of -entry onto private lands prior to field survey crew
visitation, environmental explorations, and geotechnical investigations. Tile
CONSULTANT will provide a. list of private property access that will be required The
CITY will be responsible for making all initial contact and subsequent legal
arrangements, if required, for rights -of -entry to private property. The CONSULTANT
will subsequently be responsible for notifying both the CITY and the property owner
regarding the timing of the work
16, Coordinate mapping values will be based upon a "project datum" being a ground
realization of state plane grid coordinates.
17. Preparing and recording a Record of Survey (ROS) is not included in this proposal. If
additional work is required, this work will be provided as supplemental service.
To facilitate management of the project in. an efficient manner, Phase 3 work will be broken into
the tasks listed below.
City of Tukwila Berge rABAM, P14,034700
Straoder Blvd/SW 27th St Extension September 2017
Tukxvila. Washington rxhibit A-1 Page 4 of 60 42
Task I ,O
Project Management
'Task 10
Directed Services
Task 10
Independent Cons tructabili ty Review
Task 4.0
Survey and Base Mapping
Task 5.0
Utilities
Task 6.0
Traffic Engineering, Illumination, and Signal Design
Task 7,0
Right -of -Way
Task 8.0
Environmental Documentation and Permitting
Task 9.0
Railroad Engineering and Design
Task 10.0
Structural Engineering
Task 11.0
Geotechnical Engineering
Task 12,0
Drainage Design
Task 13.0
I -lump Station Design
Task 14.0
Roadway Design
The level of effort associated with providing these services is shown in Exhibits D and E. The
estimated level of effort is based upon the assumptions and task descriptions provided below.
Efforts to complete these tasks can vary fron'i the effort assumed for the preparation of the level
of effort shown in Exhibits D and E. Sorne budget items may cost more and others may cost less.
The CONSULTANT shall monitor total costs expended under this agreement and shall notify
the CITY if funds need to be reallocated bet -ween tasks.
City of Tukwila BergerABAM, P14.0347.00
Strander Blvd/SW 27th St Extension September 2017
Tukwila, Washington fixhilAt A-] Vage 5 of 60
43
TASK 1.0 PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Subtask 1.1 Project Coordination
BergerABAM (hereinafter referred to as CONSULTANT) shall provide project management and
corru-nunications between the CONSULTANT team and the City of Tukwila (hereinafter
referred to as CITY). The CONSULTANT shall perform. project administration and management
tasks as follows.
# Prepare and submit monthly invoices, including a tabulation of hours expended, broken
down by each major task.
• Prepare monthly progress reports summarizing the status of the budget, identifying trends,
and taking corrective actions if necessary.
• Prepare and update project schedule periodically as circurris Lances require or as requested
by the CITY. The project schedule shall be developed using Microsoft Project.
• Prepare subconsultant agreements and perform ongoing subconsultant coordination.
• Maintain all contract -required documentation,
• It is anticipated that the Phase 3 effort will last approximately two years (24 months),
Subtask 1.2 Quality Assurance
The CONSULTANT shall provide quality assurance/quality control (QA/ C) for all design
work in accordance with the CONSULTANT's QA/(,aC standards,
Subtask 1.3 Meetings
Project Team Meetings
The CONSULTANT shall facilitate biweekly internal project team coordination meetings during
Phase 3. A total of 52 team meetings are anticipated over a period of two years. Meetings shall
be approximately 1 hour in duration and shall be attended by an average of five
CONSULTANT team member,,,, including three of the CONSULTANT's project management
and/or project engineering staff and two other CONSULTANT discipline specialists.
Progress Meetings with CITY Staff
The CONSULTANT shall facilitate monthly progress/project meetings with CITY staff. A total
of 24 CITY meetings are anticipated over a period of two years. Meetings shall be
approximately 4 hours in duration, including preparation and travel time and shall be attended
by an average of four CONSULTANT team members, including two of the CONSULTANT's
project rnanagernent and/or project engineering staff and two other CONSULTANT discipline
specialists,
Defiverable(s)
# Monthly progress report and invoice (one copy)
City ofTukwila
Strander Blvd/SW 27th St Extension
Tt*wila, Washington
BergerABAM, 1'14,0,347.00
Septernbes 2017
Exhibit A-1 Page 6 of 60
EV
• Updated project schedules if required (one copy)
• Updated contract forms and certifications
• Meeting notes for all t-neetings
• QA/QC documentation for all design work will be made available to the CITY upon request
City of'l'ukwila
Strander B)vd/SW 27th St Lxtefisiou
Tukwila, Washington
BergerABAM, P14.03,17.00
Sop tember 2017
Exhibit A-] Page 7 of 60
45
This task is intended to cover project activities that are likely to be required, but for which the
scope and level of effort cannot accurately be defined, These activities are currently not
included in the scope of services but will be provided as a supplemental service if required.
Subtask 2.1 Public Involvement
If requested by the CITY, the CONSULTANT shall conduct two public open houses during the
design of the project. The purpose of these open houses would be to provide the general public
information about the status of the project. This information is expected to include the purpose
and need for the project, provide responses to frequently asked questions, and provide
information about the funding status and schedule for the project. It is anticipated that the CITY
will receive input on the project at these meeting and that the input will generally be supportive
of the project. Up to two CONSULTANT technical staff will, attend to answer questions about
the project. It is anticipated that one open house will be held early in the design and the second
would be held when it becomes clear that the project is in a position to move into cons t ructi oil.
Written responses to comments received are not anticipated, but can be provided as a
supplementary service. Additional stakeholder involvement in the planning of the project is
included in other project tasks where necessary.
Deliverable(s)
• Up to five exhibits
• One hundred notices for mailing
• Written summary of comments, received
Subtask 2.2 Value Engineering
If requested by the CITY, the CONSULTANT shall participate in a value engineering (VE)
review of the project. The CITY may elect to contract directly with a VE workshop facilitator or
may request the CONSULTANT provide this service. Other services to be provided by the
CONSULTANT include the preparation of the presentation to the VE workshop participants, a
written response to VE team recomnieridations, and modifications to the project's design
required to implement VE team suggestions that are acceptable to the CITY. It is assumed that
the VE workshop would be conducted at the 30 percent design level so that any
recorn-mericlations to be incorporated in the project can be implemented early in the design,
when the effort to incorporate them is minimal and can be accomplished as part the submittal
review process,
Dellverable(s)
• An initial presentation, of the project to the VE team
• Review and response to the VE team recornmenclations
• VE recommendations accepted by the CITY will be incorporated in future design submittals
Subtask 2.3 Ad, Bid, and Award Services
The CONSULTANT shall provide additional bid period engineering services for the Strander
Boulevard/Southwest 27th Street Extension - Phase 3 project. The CONSULTANT' shall answer
City of Tukwila BergerABAM, P14,0347.00
Strander Blvd/F)W 27th St Extension September 2017
Takwila, Washington W:tibi(A-] Page 8 of 60
EN
questions from bidders that are forwarded through the CITY. The answers shall be returned to
the CITY for distribution by the CITY to respective parties.
Subconsultant Coordination
The CONSULTANT will coordinate with internal resources, including the project geotechnical
and environmental engineers, as required, to assist in answering bidder questions. This may
involve coordinating resources to draft revised special provisions and/or plan sheets.
Plan Modifications, Addendurns, and Clarifications
'The CONSULTANT will furnish tecl-Ltical input to the CITY in response to bidder requests for
clarification of bid docurnents. If warranted, the CONSULTANT will provide technical
assistance necessary for preparing addenclums that may include revised plan sheets and/or
revised special provisions. Assume up to 25 unique requests averaging 2 hours of response time
for each request- Assume up to three addenda and up to 16 hours of preparation for each
addendum.
Deliverable(s)
* Ernail responses to CITY for bidder questions
a Orte electronic copy of new special provisions or revised special provisions for each
addendum in Microsoft Word format
# One electronic copy of revised bid quantities for each addendum
* One half sized (11.x17) print of revised plan sheets for each addendum
City oaf Tukwila
Strander Blvd/SW 27tli St Extension
Tukwila, Washington
BergerABAM, P14.0347.00
Sept(qub(7 2017
Exhibit A-1 Page 9 of 60
47
Ott -Sakai (hereinafter referred to as SUBCONSULTANT), under a separate subconsultant
agreement with CONSULTANT, shall facilitate an independent constructability review of the
project. This effort shall be completed at the 30 percent design level so that any
recommendations to be incorporated in the project can be implemented early in the design,
when the effort to incorporate them is minimal and can be accomplished as part the submittal
review process. It is assumed that this review will require a minimum of three constructability
workshops/meetings. SUBCONSULTANT will also provide an independent construction cost
estimate at the 30and 60 percent design levels.
The proposed constructability review is anticipated to focus primarily on the development of
alternative methods of constructing the bottom seal. The alternative methods are not well-
defined, but are anticipated to include use of tremie methods, in combination with some
dewatering, The goal is to minimize the amount of dewatering. The CONSULTANT will
develop preliminary design concepts and submit/present to SUBCONSULTANT for review and
comment. A memorandum will be written to summarize the alternative bottom seat work
access needs, including temporary walls to facilitate construction. SUBCONSULTANT will use
plan sheets provided by CONSULTANT and superimpose the equipment locations, crane size,
and pick radius needed for the work. The work will also inctude formulating a conceptual level
cost estimate and a review of the construction schedule provided by the CONSULTANT.
Del ver able(s)
* An initial presentation of the project to SUBCONSULTANT
SUBCONSULTANT will prepare a draft and final memoral-idurn of the work described
above
Up to two other meetings, with meeting minutes, to discuss and resolve issues identified by
the review
# An independent review of the construction cost at the 30 and 60 percent design submittals
City of Tukwb
Strander Blvd/SW 27th St Extension
Tukwila, Washington.
BergerABAMI, 1114,0347A
September 2017
exhibit A-1 Page 10 of 60
ER
il;,Irirrii,
One Alliance (hereinafter referred to as SUBCONSULTANT), under a subconsultarit agreement
with the CONSULTANT, will provide existing site condition data in addition to the preparation
of existing condition documents for this project's design. This will include existing conditions
topographical survey and ROW, and parcel boundary document research, field work and base
mapping preparation, including any traffic control and or safety compliance requirements -
Surveying services shall be performed under the direction of a professional land surveying
licensed to practice in the state of Washington.
The SUBCONSUL'TANT shall provide geodetic survey control to support the project. Surveying
services shall be performed tinder the direction of a professional land surveyor licensed to
practice in the state of Washington. The survey control network will be based on CITY and
other jurisdictions' published control, as well as survey control established in previous phases
of this project.
Horizontal and vertical datums will conform to the daturas established by Phase I of the
Stander Boulevard Extension Project.
Horizontal Datum - NAD83/91 Washington State Planes, North Zone, US Survey Feet
Vertical Datum - North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD 88), US Survey Feet
Survey control will be -set out of the expected project extents to ensure a good basis for this
project's future construction.
Caclastral monumentation local to the site, as available, will be tied into this survey, to aid in
resolution of the ROW in the project area.
Subtask 4.2 Topographic Survey
The mapping provided, as shown in Figure 2, will be in support of the design of improvements
to design the roadway extension of Southwest 27tb Avenue to Strander Boulevard, and the
associated sidewalks, utilities, and underpass beneath the existing railroad tracks.
'The topographic mapping will cover approximately 39 acres and will include the following.
9 Locate overhead utilities, including "sag" locations/elevations of all overhead lines crossing
the proposed Strander extension. All utility poles, including transmission poles north and
south of the proposed Strander extension., will also be located.
Topo for United Pacific Railroad (UPRR) embankment and tracks, with elevations of top of
both rails, for 1,000 feet north of, and 1,000 feet south of, the crossing of Strander. Track
survey shall be at 50 -foot intervals in curves and 100 -foot intervals in tangent track.
City of Tukwila BergerABAM, P14.0347.00
Strander Blvd/SW 27th St Extension September 2017
Tukwila, Washington E—xhibit A-) Page 11 of 60
49
Figure 2.
City of Tukwila BergerABAM, P14.0347,00
Strander Blvd/SW 27th St Extension September 2017
Tukwila, Washington Exhibit A-1 Pagc 12 of 60
ME
• Topo BNSF Railway(BNSF) undercrossing, (abutments, low chord, top of track, and
roadway features below), as well as embankment and top of both rails for 100 feet north and
1.00 feet south of undercrossing.
• Buildings and structure envelopes and fence envelopes for areas secured by fencing.
• Striping and channelization for existing roadways, West Valley Highway and businesses
with limits shown in Figure 2.
• Concrete, asphalt, gravel, curbs, paths,
• Drainage courses, swales,
• Inlet and outlet of found culverts, including those shown in Figure 2.
• Visible utilities and painted underground utility locations marked by a utility location
company.
• Up to 40 potholes (20 by APS and 20 by Olympic Pipeline),
• Ground elevations and all breaklines sufficient to create ]-foot contours,
• Trees 6 inches Dl3H and larger.
• Pipe invert elevations and descriptions of storm/sanitary sewer structures.
• Locate Ordinary High Water Mark along the Green River from Strander Boulevard to 200
feet south of the southern outfall.
• SUBCONSULTANT will apply for a UPRIZ "PERMIT TO BE ON RAILROAD PROPERTY
FOR NONINTRUSIVE CIVIL ENGINEERING SURVEY." CITY will assist, if necessary, in
obtaining this permit.
• SUBCONSULTANT will obtain UPRX and BNSF badges, as well as obtain adequate
railroad insurance prior to entering railroad property.
Subtask 4.3 Utility Locate Services
The SUBCON SULTANT will provide underground utility location information on existing site
condition documents, A private utility locating company will be utilized to initiate utility
marking with 81, 1, Utility Locate Services and to mark-, utilities not covered by the 811 service.
All utility marks will be located as part of the topographic survey.
Subtask 4.4 Right -of -Way and Parcel Resolution
SUBCONSULTANT will resolve existing ROW and adjacent parcel boundaries and existing
easements on the adjacent parcels within the project area. It is estimated that 22 title reports will
City of Tukwila BergerABAM, P14 0347.00
Strander Blvd/SW 2701 St Extension SLpteniber 2017
Tukwila, Washivigton Exhibit A-3 Page 13 of 60
51
be needed to determine the CITY's ROW boundaries, as well as determine potential ROW
acquisition areas, easements, and permits.
ROW and boundary resolution that was performed for previous phases of the project will be
utilized and expanded upon to generate a ROW base rnap for the project.
Subtask 4.5 Easements and Exhibits
SUBCONSULTANT will prepare and deliver legal descriptions and exhibits for up to 22 parcels
(ownerships) for ROW takes and easements. Up to 40 easements (temporary or permanent) and
exhibits will be prepared with up to three revisions per parcel.
Subtask 4.6 Wetlands and Pond
SUBCONSULTANT will map the detention pond and adjoining wetlands as Shown as areal in
Figure 2. Mapping will include two days of a three-person crew (or three days of a two -person
crew), for locating wetland flags as set by others.
Assumption(s)
• SUBCONSULTANT shall obtain title reports with underlying documents for up to
22 parcels.
• SUBCONSULTANT shall obtain right -of -entry (ROE) for U]"RR and BNSF properties,
• SUBCONSULTANT will coordinate access and entry onto railroad properties.
• SU13CONSULTANT cannot warranty that adequate access to any properties will be granted
and will notify the CITY if problems with access are experienced.
• ROE to 22 adjacent properties will be required and obtained by the CITY.
SUBCONSULTANT will coordinate and schedule work with the client and CITY to ensure
proper notification of property owners.
* 'Traffic control, if required, to be provided by SUBCONSULTANT.
* Tree tags and driplines are not a part of the scope of services.
• Wetland and OFIWM flags to be set by others. Sketched maps of the wetland and OHWM
flag locations will be provided to SUBCONSULTANT prior to the wetland mapping. The
estimate for wetland flag locating is for three 8 -hour days for normal two -person crew-
• Estimate for potholes is an estimate only and may change based on actual costs, including
potholing OPL pipelines, SUBCONSULTANT has no control over this work or the price for
this work and does not warranty either the price or the quality of the work itself.
• Estimate for underground utility locates is subject to change, SUBCONSULTANT has no
control over this work or the price for this work and does not warranty either the price of
the quality of the work itself.
City of Tukwila BergerABAM, P14.0347,00
stranger Blvd/SW 27th St kxtension Septcmbt,,�r 2017
Tukwila, Washington rExiiibit A-1 Pap 14 of 60 52
Price for title reports is an esfirnate only. SUBCONSUTLANT has no control over this price.
It may be higher.
Deliverable(s)
Topographic survey and ROW base rnap (electronic copy), I -foot contour intervals
• AutoCAD surfaces (DTM Files) (electronic copy)
Copy of field survey books (electronic copy)
ASCII file of control points
Construction control plans
City of Tukwila aergerABAM, 1`14,0347,00
Strander Blvd/21M 27th St Extension Sopturnber 2017
Tukwila, Washington Exhibit A-1 Page 15 of 60 53
TASK 5.0 UTILITIES
The CONSULTANT shall coordinate with the utility companies during the conceptual design
process in order to determine the necessary impacts to their systems, staging alternatives,
upgrades to utilities, and to assess any utility relocation costs.
Subtask 5.1 Existing Utility Data
The CONSULTANT shall contact all utilities within the corridor to obtain and review available
as-bullts and construction record drawings for the existing utilities, A private utility locate
service will determine the location of all the underground utilities. This work is included in
Task 4 - Surveying and Base Mapping, As -built information and other information obtained
from the utility companies will be incorporated into the project base map. The CONSULTANT
shall provide the CITY with an AIWA color -coded Existing Utility Map Exhibit. Utilities
known to exist in the project area, and anticipated to be affected by construction of the project
include the following.
# Olympic Pipe petroleum gas lines (12 -inch and 14 -inch)
9 PSE overhead power (transmission and distribution)
* PSE substation
• Fiber optic (AT&T, Level 3, and Sprint located in UPRR ROW)
• King County sanitary sewer
• Sixty -inch Seattle Public Utilities (SPU) waterline to the north, perpendicular to UPRR.
Affected by shoofly
• 'Utilities in vicinity of West Valley, including PSE gas comrriu�nications, and water, sewer,
and power services, all of which may or may not be affected
• City of Renton lighting system installed August 2017 (located along north side of sidewalk
from BNSF to intersection of Naches Avenue)
The CONSU LTANT shall identify options for maintaining sewer service during the project and
for relocating or replacing the permanent utilities, The following research work will need to be
completed for this task,
Collect and review available paper and electronic as-builts and construction record
drawings for the existing utilities and associated equipment, including valves, structures,
and other features.
• Collect and review available sanitary system masterplan, hydraulic model, and any reports
from King County, with an emphasis on the design criteria used for the existing sanitary
force main line.
City of Tukwila bergerABAM, P]4,03VAI
Strander Blvd/SW 27th St ExtenMon September 2017
Tukwila, Washington Exhibit A-1 Page 113 of 60 54
Deliverable(s)
* Draft existing utility map exhibit (color 34x22 roll plot)
Subtask 5.2 Preliminary Coordination with Utilities
The CONSULTANT will facilitate the coordination efforts with both the public and private
utilities within the corridor. The CONSULTANT will coordinate directly with the utility
companies.
The CONSULTANT shall attend a utility kick-off coordination meeting with each of the utility
companies, which will be held at the CITY- The CONSULTANT will endeavor to reduce the
number of meetings by meeting with more than one at a time. ''lie purpose of the kick-off
meeting is to inform them of the project, discuss impacts to the utilities based on the
preliminary concepwal construction staging, discuss utility upgrades, determine existing utility
easements, and to get initial feedback on the utilities' concerns and their anticipated level of
effort for the project-,
Based on utility company feedback from the utility coordination meeting, the CONSULANT
shall develop utility construction staging and relocation concepts. The concepts will be
incorporated into the draft utility relocation/protection conceptual design for CITY and utility
review. All comments will be consolidated into a single set of comments by the CONSULTANT,
As part of the effort described above, the CONSULTANT will facilitate one additional
coordination meeting with each of the utility companies, which will be held at the CITY. The
purpose of this coordination meeting is to present the proposed utility relocation plan and to
get final feedback on the utilities' concerns and their anticipated level of effort for the project.
Because it may not be possible to have all the utilities present at one time, an allowance has
been made for at least one separate rilecting with each utility.
It is assumed the respective utility owners will provide timely concurrence on relocation plans
for all utilities and will provide design of the relocation. to the CITY and CONSULTANT in
subsequent phases of the project, The CONSULTANT shall assist the CITY in preparing any
necessary agreements by providing a memorandurn, documenting proposed relocation plans
and including meeting minutes and other correspondence generated by the utility coordination
effort.
Assumptions(s)
• Final utility relocation/protection conceptual design will be used by the CITY in their Utility
Memorandum of Understanding.
Deliverable(s)
* Draft utility relocation/protection conceptual design (1IxI7 electronic copies)
— Construction phase relocation/protection
— Final condition relocation/protection
City of Tukwfla
Strander Blvd/SW 27th St Extension
Tukwila, Washington
BergerARAM, 1114-0347,00
5eptemb", 2017
Exhibit A-1 Page 17 of 60
55
# Consolidated comments (Excel electronic format)
Final utility reparation/protection conceptual design (11xl7electronic copies)
— Construction phase relocation/protection
— Final condition relocation/protection
Subtask 5.3 Coordination with Utilities for Final Design
The CONSULTANT shall. attend. two meetings with utility representatives and the CITY, one
before and one after the preliminary design (30 percent PS&E) submittal, Decisions from these
meetings will be documented in the meeting minutes and incorporated into the plans, The
CONSULTANT will provide exhibits and the minutes for these meetings. Meetings for the
water main and sanitary sewer force main will be held separately and are included under
Subtask 53,
Assumptions(s)
• Two utility coordination meetings,
• One round of comments from CITY and utilities on the preliminary design submittal,
• CONSULTANT will compile comments from utilities into the utility coordination log.
Deliverable(s)
Consolidated set of utility comments for the preliminary design submittal in MS Excel
format
* Meeting minutes in MS Word electronic format
• Hard copy of plans (11x17) for cacti individual utility at each irteeting and a full-size set for
use in discussions at each meeting
• Hard copy roll plot (22x34) depicting all utility relocations will be provided to each utility at
a 30 percent design level
Subtask 5.4 SPU Waterline Monitoring Plan
The CONSULTANT shall propose a plan to the CITY to monitor SKUs waterline for settlement
or other movement.
Deliverable(s)
* One PDF of a draft waterline monitoring plan
# One round of comments from King County and CITY on the preliminary design submittal
CONSULTANT will compile comments from CITY and King County into the utility
coordination log
• If applicable, the CONSULTANT will coordinate and obtain written concurrences from the
County on any requested deviation from the County's standards prior to the beginning of
construction of the Interceptor Adjustment Work
City of'rukwila &rgerABAM, P1,0347.00
Strander 13]vd/SW 27th St Extension September 2[7't7
Tukwila, Washingtoii Lxhibit A-1 Va p
,e 18cif 60
.19
Dellverable(s)
Consolidated set of sanitary sewer comments for the preliminary design submittal in MS
Excel format
9 Meeting minutes in MS Word electronic format
Subtask 5.5 King County Sanitary Sewer Relocation
A new sanitary sewer pump station will be required to divert flow from a portion of a King
County owned sanitary sewer trunk line that will be impacted by this project, The
CONSULTANT shall present options to relocate the King County sanitary sewer interceptor
(between existing County Manhole No. R-18-16 located at the northwest corner of the Tukwila
property and intersection of Southwcst 2701 Street/Naclies Avenue). The CONSULT AN"I'shall
coordinate with King County on the route and document decisions agreed to in meeting
minutes. It is assumed King County will design the relocation and provide final plans,
specifications, and estimates to the CONSULTANT to include in the construction contract for
the Strander Boulevard/Southwest '7th Street Extension project.
Key components of the relocation. design will include duplex submersible solids handling
pumps, wet well, valves, valve vault, discharge piping, controls, CMU block building to house
the controls, and standby generator. The wet well and valve vault will be precast concrete. It is
assumed that King County will evaluate the need for odor and corrosion mitigation and
incorporate required mitigation into the design if deemed necessary.
Deliverable(s)
* Meeting mmittes documenting design coordination with King County
City of'rukwfla BergerABAM, 1'14,0347,00
Strander Blvd/5W 27th St Extension Septembox 2017
Tukwila, Washington Exhibit A-1 Page 19 of 60
57
ff-mm-mi'miiiiiiiii i lF 11 l5l1'i1ll1!;11l!11 1� 1� i !';l :;1�lli . I k 1. 0
Subtask 6.1 Develop Assumptions and Methods for Traffic Analysis
SUBCONSULTANT (hereinafter referred to as SUBCONSULTANT), under separate
subconsultarit agreement with CONSULTANT, will collect, review, evaluate, and synthesize
prior traffic analyses prepared for the Strander Boulevard extension and other projects in the
study area (Northwest Arena DEIS, Southcenter Subarea Plan EIS, Transportation Element
Update, etc). Ii -i addition, SUBCONSULTANT will coordinate with part -net
agencies/jurisdictions to understand expectations for the project. The primary purpose of this
task will be to gather additional background information required to complete the traffic
analysis and design of the extension project.
Specific tasks include the following.
* Coordinate with WSDOT, Renton, and Tukwila to obtain and review relevant traffic studies.
Review the analyzed scenarios, including traffic forecasts and horizon years associated with
phasing the project.
Coordinate with the CITY to determine the roadway cross section and active transportation
access needs to analyze in Phase 3 and the appropriate horizon years to analyze.
Deliverable(s)
• Surnmary of prior reports/studies
• preliminary construction cost estimates for anticipated signal modifications
Subtask 6.2 Traffic Study/Operation Analysis for Environmental Documentation and
30 Percent Design
SUBCON' ULTANT will prepare a traffic study to verify the intersection/roadway georrietrics
that satisfies environi-nen(A documentation requirements, This process will consist of the
following.
PM peak period traffic counts and traffic signal timing plans will be collected within the study
area that will be defined as part of Phase 3. For the purpose of budgeting, it is assured that the
following intersections will be analyzed.
• Strander Boulevard and West Valley Highway
• South 180th Street and West Valley Highway
• Southwest Grady Way and West Valley 1-fighway
• Strander Boulevard and Andover Park West
• Long
,acres Way and West Valley Highway
• South 156th Street and West Valley Highway
• Fort Dent Way and Interurban Avenue South
• Strander Boulevard. and Naches Avenue SW
0 Strander Boulevard./Southwest 27th Street and Oakesdale Avenue SW
city of Tukwila
Strander Blvd/%W 27th St Extension
Tokwila, Washington
BergerABANI, P14.0347.00
September 2017
EMiNt A-1 Page 20 of 60
.IQ
Relatively recent traffic counts during the PM peak hour may have been collected as part of the
Northwest Arena EIS project, To the extent that relevant traffic counts are available, those
counts will be used.
Twenty -four-hour tube counts with vehicle classification and average speed for up to
20 locations will also be collected for the noise and air quality analysis.
The rationale behind the relatively large study area is to understand how traffic patterns will
shift with the completion of the Strander Boulevard extension, understand if any traffic signal
timing modifications are warranted at nearby intersections, and to fully capture the potential
environmental impact,,; of the new traffic pattern.
TrafficOperations Analysis
PM peak hour intersection level of service will be evaluated for the above intersections
according to the Highway Capacity Manual 2010 standards, Traffic operations will be evaluated
using Synchro/SimTraffic software. Scenarios evaluated include existing conditions, the design
concept-, and future no -action scenarios. A field visit during the peak hours will be conducted to
verify model results.
Operations will be evaluated for existing conditions, year of opening, and a horizon year
determined through coordination with CITY' staff, The build and no -build scenarios will be
evaluated for the opening and horizon year. One option for the horizon year analysis is to
increase traffic volurries until the interim design begins to experience level of service
degradation. Based on growth rates from the City of Tukwila Travel Demand Forecasting
model, a "year of failure" can be identified to determine at which point the full widening
project would be warranted. Traffic signal warrants will be prepared for the Strander
Boulevard/Tukwila Station Access Road loop ramp intersection for submittal with the traffic
signal permit. SUBCONSULTANT will complete the traffic signal permit and submit to
WSDOT for review. They will address WSDOT comments and process the permit for approval.
SUBCONSULTANT will prepare a traffic signal warrant analysis in accordance, with the
procedures stated in the WSDOT Design Manual, July 201.7, and the current MUTCD.
The future no -action scenario is included for environmental documentation purposes. As an.
optional task, additional scenarios can also be evaluated to determine potential design
modifications to accommodate events at the Northwest Arena.
'the new traffic operations analysis and findings will be incorporated into an update of the
Technical Transportation Discipline (TDR) report completed in 2004. The TDR update will
utilize the Traffic Study Report and will only include the build. alternative and no -build
alternative at opening and horizon year. Minimal budget and effort are included. The scope
and budget include reforecasted future traffic volumes and growth rates using data from the
City of Tukwila BergerABAM, P14.0.347.00
Strander BIWISW 27th St Extension September 2017
Tukwih, Washington 8xhibit A -I Page 21 of 60
�-g
Traffic Study Report. SUBCONSULTANT will also refine impacts to rail, transit, trail, and
freight.
Additional data will be documented for the build and no -build scenarios to Support the noise
and air quality analysis. This includes documenting assumed roadway characteristics, vehicle
speeds, vehicle classification, traffic volumes, and traffic signal characteristics.
Recognizing that this project will seek competitive grant funding, SUBCONSULTANT will also
propose a greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions/vehicle-miles of travel analysis. This type of
analysis can demonstrate how reduced congestion and less circuitous vehicle circulation can
reduce vehicle emissions and improve area connectivity.
Deliverable(s)
* 'Merno describing the traffic analysis methods and assumptions
# Traffic Study Report
9 intersection/signal/cliatinelization design recommendations
* Coordination to incorporate traffic analysis into environmental noise and air quality
analysis
o Focused updated 'Transportation Technical Discipline Report
* WSDOT traffic signal permit
* WSDOT/NIUTCD signal warrant analysis
Subtask 6.3 Preliminary Illumination and Signal Design (30 percent PS&E)
SUBCONSULTANT will prepare -30 percent design plans and construction cost estimates for
illumination within the project area, a traffic signal modification at the Strander Boulevard/West
Valley Highway intersection, and traffic signal installation at the Strander Boulevardrrukwila
Station Access Road loop ramp intersection. It is assumed that others will provide the as -built
design plans and geometric base drawings. As part of the design process, a site visit will be
conducted to verify existing conditions, including observable utility locations, sight lines, traffic
detection infrastructure, and existing signal and illumination equipment. The 30 percent plans
will identify required changes to signal phasing, existing traffic signal equipment, and proposed
signal and lighting equipment locations. The plans will also help to identify potential impacts to
ROW and to determine if other design measures are needed to accommodate the project.
SUBCONSULTANT will develop construction cost estimates based on the 30 percent design
plans, SUBCONSULTANT will address one round of comments from the CITY and submit
revised 30 percent plans and estimates.
City of Tukwila Berger ARAM, P14.0347,00
)trander Blvd/SW 27th St Extension September 2017
Tukwila, Washington Exhibit A-) Pagc 22 of 60
ME
Dellverable(s)
4 Thirty percent plans and construction cost estimates for signal modification at Strander
Boulevard/West Valley Highway, signal installation at Strand( -.-,,r Boulevard/Tukwila Station
Access Road loop ramp intersection, traffic signal installation at Strander Boulevard/Naches
Avenue, and illumination within the study area (on Strander Boulevard between West
Valley Highway and Naches Avenue, the new pedestrian bridge, the new vehicular bridge
over Strander Boulevard, and the UPRR bridge)
Subtask 6.4 Final Illumination and Signal Design (60, 90, and 100 percent PS E)
SUBCONSULTANT will prepare final plans, specifications, and construction cost estimates for
illumination within the project area, a traffic signal modification at the Strander Boulevard/West
Valley Highway intersection, and traffic signal installation at the Strander Boulevard/Tukwila
Station Access Road loop ramp intersection. 'rho design will also include traffic signal
interconnect ort Strander Boulevard from West Valley Highway to Naches Avenue, It is
assumed that the soil bearing pressure for traffic signal foundation designs will be provided to
SUBCONSULTANT by others. It is anticipated that submittals will be required at 60, 90, and
100 percent completion levels. The construction cost estimates will be updated for each
submittal. SUBCONSULTANT will address one round of comments from the CITY for each
submittal.
SUBCONSULTANT will prepare a Public Interest Finding (PIF) Form if proprietary traffic
signal or illumination equipment is required. They will submit the PIF to WSDOT for approval,
Deliverable(s)
Sixty, 90, and 100 percent plans, specifications, and construction cost estimates for a signal
modification at Strander Boulevard/West Valley Highway, signal installation at Strander
Botilevard/Tukwila Station Access Road loop ramp intersection, and traffic signal at
Strander Boulevard/Naches Avenue, and illumination within the study area (on Strander
Boulevard between West Valley Highway and Naches Avenue, the new pedestrian bridge,
the new vehicular bridge over Strander Boulevard, and the UPRR bridge)
* Public Interest Finding (PIF) Form for WSDOT approval. of proprietary signal and
illumination equipment
Anticipated drawing list:
Traffic signal plans for the three intersections described above - 5 sheets/each for a total of
15 sheets
- Traffic Signal Plan
- Traffic Signal. Wiring Schedule and Breaker Schedule
- Traffic Signal Wiring Diagram
Traffic Signal Standard Detail Chart
Traffic Signal Input File Layout
Illumination Plan - I sheet
City oi-Nikwila BergerABAM, P14.0347.00
Strarider Blvd/SW 27th St Extension September 2017
TuAwfla, Washington Exhibit A-1 Page 23 of 60
61
TASK 7.0 RIGHT-OF-WAY PLANNING AND PROJECT FUNDING ESTIMATE
Subtask 7.1 Local Business Access Design
This task involves engineering, design, and coordination required to reconfigUre, access to the
Taco Bell and Jack -In -the -Box restaurant,,; located at the intersection of Strander Boulevard and
West Valley highway. This work may involve potential revisions to the parking configuration
at a conceptual design level.The level of effort for this task assumes up to three meetings each
with these businesses; one to confirm operations, a second to present potential solutions, and a
third follow-up meeting, if required, to be determined in consultation with the CITY.This work
is to be completed in coordination with the roadway design effort described in Task 14.
Assumptions(s)
* One round of CITY review comments
Deliverable(s)
• Preliminary conceptual design of revised access to Taco Bell and Jack- in- the- Box, required
modifications to parking, and other changes as may be agreed to with each business
• Conceptual design to be included in the 30 percent plans
Subtask 7.2 Right -of -Way Plan
ROW required for the project has not yet been determined. For the purpose of budgeting this
task, the CONSULTAN,r has assumed a minimal level of effort for coordinating with potential
affected property owners. It is assumed that any significant effort required to address property
owner concerns, as required to facilitate the acquisition process, would be provided as
supplemental service during the ROW acquisition phase of the project. It is assumed that ROW
plans will not be required to support the preparation of the Project Funding Estimate (PFE). It is
assumed that up five ROW drawings/exhibits will need to be prepared, in WSDOT required
format, to illustrate the project's ROW needs and impacts.
Deliverable(s)
* Coordination meeting minutes
* ROW drawings/exhibits as required to support the preparation of the PFE
Subtask 7.3 Project Funding Estimate
The CONSULTANT will identify real property rights (perrnanentand temporary) required for
the project and evaluate the potential acquisition impacts as they may relate to preliminary
ROW acquisition costs and timeline to complete the ROW acquisition process. Based on the
work described above, the CONSULTANT shall prepare a Project Funding Estimate (PFE) to be
used to obligate ROW funds.
9ER00-1am
Abeyta (hereinafter referred to as SIJ BCONSULTANT), under a subconsultant agreement with
CONSULTANT, shall perform the following services.
City of Tukwila BergerABAM, P14,0347_00
Strand Blvd/SW 27th St Extension September 2017
Tukwila, Washington Exhibit A-1 Page 24 of 60
62
This scope of work entails Pre-acquisition services for the construction of the Strander Grade
Separation Intersection Project. These services will be furnished inaccordance with city, state
and federal guidelines and regulations, including the policies and procedures of the Uniform
Relocation Act.
The overall ROW acquisition objectives are
* Prepare a PFE report
# Provide support to CONSULTANT and the CITY in preliminary evaluation of property
acquisition impacts
A specific list of performance objectives is outlined in the following paragraphs,
Specific Objectives
The key objectives for this project include the following.
Inspect and prepare a preliminary survey report for each parcel (22 parcels)
1 Provide a PFE/AOS report with WSDOT approval — a total of 22 parcels
1 Provide support to CONSULTANT to evaluate schedule, financial, and risk estimates
for obtaining real property acquisitions, including appraisal and valuations for possible
property acquisitions to support cost estimates — a maximum of 20 hours
Assumption(s)
• ROW needs will be provided by CONSULTANT
• CONSULTANT will provide direction that defines, the level of effort for requested support
• CONSULTANT will coordinate property research with SUBCONSULTANT
Deliverable(s)
• PFE (draft and final)
• Electronic versions of all documents as compiled PRFs and two hard copies
Deliverable(s)
e Preliminary cost estimates for anticipated ROW acquisitions and easements. Input to the
project schedule regarding the timeline for completing and certifying the project ROW
* PFE for completing the ROW acquisition
Subtask 7.4 Right -of -Way Acquisition
These services are not included in the scope of work.
ON of'rukwila
Strander Blvd/SW 271h St Vxlelltiiori
Tukwila, Washington
BergerABAM, 1114,034700
September 2017
Exhibit A-1 Page 25 of 60
63
TASK 8.0 ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION AND PERMITTING (Widener &
Associates)
Currently, the project has yap proved NEPA and SERA documentation. However, this
documentation needs updating, and the project's NEPA and SEPA determinations need to be
updated, prior to the next federal action.
Widener & Associates (hereinafter referred to as SUBCONSULTANT), under a separate
subconsultant agreement with CONSULTANT, will provide design assistance and early agency
coordination during Phase 3 of the project. Early input into the foririation of project alternatives
will be provided to ensure each alternative includes provisions to minimize impacts to the
surrounding environment. This coordination within the various design elements of the project
will identify and incorporate rninimization measures early in the alternative development phase
of the project and will ensure that an appropriate range of stormwater and groundwater
management alternatives are developed prior to agency coordination.
Task 8 requires the following tasks to document the reevaluation of the project's currently
approved NETIA and SEPA documents, Depending on the outcome of updated traffic modeling,
amendments/supplements to existing environmental documentation will be required for noise,
air, Section 106, wetlands and wetland bank use, hazardous materials, and CITY permits. New
docurnents are required for the biological assessment (BA), the Joint Aquatic Resource Permit
Application (JARPA), and environmental justice.
Subtask 8A Design Assistance and Early Agency Coordination
The CONSULTANT, with assistance from SUBCONSULTANT, will assist the CM in
presenting the alternatives to both the state and federal permitting agencies to identify the
regulatory issues associated with each alternative. Potential minimization measures for each
alternative will also be identified during the coordination with agency representatives- All
permitting issues and the recommended perri-vitting process for the preferred alternative will be
documented in the project design report. It is assurned that this effort will be accomplished with
graphics and design drawings required to complete the design report and to conduct the open
houses, and that no other special presentation materials are required.
Deliverable(s)
SUBCONSULTANTwill prepare meeting minutes and memoranda documenting the
coordination activities with state and federal agencies, as required
Subtask 8.2 Prepare the Area of Potential Effect (APE)
The CONSULTANT will coordinate with SUBCONSULTANT and provide support for
updating the APE if required.
Deliverable(s)
o Draft APE for the project
City of Tukwila BergerABA M, P1 4.0347 00
Strander 131vd/SW 27th 51, f-,xtansion September 2017
Tukwila, Washington Exhibit A- I Page 26 of 60
M]
Subtask 8.3 Section :106 Report (Cultural and Historic Resources)
This work would include the preparation of the Section 106 report amendment in accordance
with the State Historic Preservation Office standards and guidelines for any new areas that
maybe impacted. The work will include the following.
Pertinent literature on the archaeology, ethnography, and history of the project area will
be reviewed to determine the existence of archaeological sites and to refine the
probability of archaeological resources and traditional cultural places in the project
areas.
2, The SUBCONSULTANT will maintain contact with the local tribes for any information
on historic Indian USO of the project area.
3a A systematic field reconnaissance will be conducted to identify previously recorded
and/or unrecorded. archaeological sites for the proposed project where ground -
disturbing activities are expected to take place. Field reconnaissance will consist of the
traverse of pedestrian transects at varying intervals, depending on, terrain throughout
the proposed project area. Shovel probes (digging a hole with a shovel) will be
excavated, as deep as feasible, and in areas expected to have a high probability for
cultural resources. Shovel probes will be augmented through auger probes to explore
the deepest possible deposits. Shovel probes will be screened in highly probable areas
and in soil matrixes too dense to identify small chipping debris.
4All new sites will be mapped, photographed., and recorded on Washington State
Archeological Inventory forms and submitted to the state Office of Archeological and
Historic Preservation (OAHP) for Smithsonian numbers. Every effort will be made to
include Tribal cultural resources personnel in assisting the field effort. Rights -of -entry
will be provided by the CITY.
Deliverable(s)
a Three copies of a draft Section 106 Report will be prepared to describe cultural resources
identified in the project area to meet state and federal standards for reporting as outlined in
the guidelines provided by the OAHP. The report will include summary background
information appropriate to a cultural resources assessment of the project area, including
environment, previous cultural resources studies, othnography/ethno, history, and history.
A discussion of agency and Tribal consultation, methodology, the results of the
investigation, and a map of located archaeological sites will be provided. Recommend a tions
will also be extended to any cultural resources that may be significant. Monitoring of
construction excavation recommendations may also be included. The historic structures
inventory form and/or archaeological site inventory form will be attached to the report as an
appendix
Three copies of a revised draft Section 106 report incorporating
', CITY comments
& Three, copies of a final Section 106 report incorporating WSDOTcomments
City of Tukwila Bergei-ABANI, P14-034700
Strander Blvd/SW 27th St Wension September 2017
Tukwila, Washington Exhibit A-1 Page 27 of 60 65
Subtask 8.4 Noise Study
The SUBCONSULTANT will prepare a traffic noise report to evaluate traffic noise levels at
sensitive receptors near the project that would be poteritially affected by traffic noise and to
identify potential mitigation measures. The traffic noise report will be developed in accordance
with WSDOT's Environmental Procedures Mantial-
Sound Level Measurements
After review of the proposed project alternatives, the SUBCONSULTANT shall visit the project
area to identify potentially sensitive noise receivers and to take measurements of existing sound
levels. The SUBCONSULTANT will measure existing noise levels during the peak hours to be
used in calibrating the noise model. Measurements will be undertaken in accordance with
WSDOT and Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) guidelines, and will be made with
Type 1, sound level meter. During these measurements, souroes, of existing noise and
topographical features will be noted and traffic speeds and vehicle numbers and mix will be
noted.
Construction Noise Impact Evaluation
The noise analysis will evaluate potential short-term impacts of noise from construction
activities. Construction noise on nearby sensitive receptors will be evaluated based on estimates
published by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) of maximum noise levels of
typical construction equipment in conjunction with simple distance attenuation, Computer
modeling of construction noise levels will not be performed.
Traffic Noise Impact Evaluation
The SUBCONSULTANT will evaluate traffic noise impacts using the FHWA Traffic Noise
Model (TNM) to estimate future traffic noise levels for the worst-case build alternative. The
worst-case, scenario will be selected from among the build alternatives, and will be chosen
based on expected future traffic Volumes and the location of the alignment relative to sensitive
receivers. The noise modeling will predict PM peak -hour L,eq noise levels frorn traffic at a
maximurn of 15 receptor locations that could be affected by the proposed project and will
consider existing conditions and design year conditions. Modeling to calculate noise contour
lines is not included,
Mitigation Analysis
The SUBCONSULTANT will identify mitigation measures to reduce noise levels during
construction. If predicted long-term traffic noise levels from operation of the project would
cause noise impacts, mitigation measures will be developed in cooperation with the lead agency
and design engineers. Mitigation analysis, if required, will include evaluation of the
effectiveness and general size and location of natural and man-made noise barriers using the
TNM model.
Deliverable(s)
Three copies of a draft traffic noise analysis report for review by ary witti accompanying
draft special provisions if required
City of Tilkwila fiergerABAM, P14.Cl347,00
Strander Blvd/,;W 27th St Extension 5pptembar 2017
Tukwila, Was iington Exhibit A-1 Pap 28 of 60
66
Three copies of a draft traffic noise analysis report, incorporating the CITY's comments, for
submittal to FHWA/VVSDOT
Three copies of a revised draft traffic noise analysis report, incorporating comments by
FHWA/WSDOT, for submittal for approval
Subtask 8.5 Hazardous Material Memorandum
The SUBCONSUTANT will prepare a hazardous materials memo to evaluate the presence, or
likely presence, of potential hazardous substances within the physical kraits of the project that
would have an effect on the overcrossing project. Sites with potential for environmental
issues/impacts include those that indicate current or past uses as service stations, battery shops,
dry cleaners, chemical storage, or manufacturing facilities; sites with fuel or chemical storage
tanks or drums present; or those with strong pungent or noxious odors, The scope of services
for this study will include
A review of the results of a federal, state, and local environmental database search
provided by an outside environmental data service for listings of known or suspected
environmental problems at the sites or nearby properties within the search distances
specified by WSDOT.
2. A review of historical aerial photographs, fire insurance maps, city directories, chain -of -
title reports, and tax assessor records, as available and appropriate, to identify past
development history on the parcels relative to the possible use, generation, storage,
release, or disposal of hazardous substances. An attempt to identify uses of the sites
from the present to the time that records show no apparent development of the site, or
to 1940, whichever is earlier.
Conduct of a visual reconnaissance of the parcels and adjacent properties to identify
visible evidence of potential sources of contamination.
4. A letter report that will summarize the results of this study- The letter report will briefly
discuss the project activities and include a table ranking the parcels (low, moderate,
high) by their potential for contamination from either on-site or off-site sources, A draft
letter report will be provided for review and comment, Upon receiving comments, the
letter will be modified as appropriate and made final.
Deliverable(s)
• Three copies of the draft hazmat memo will be provided
• Three copies of the hazmat memo will be provided incorporating CITY comments
• Three copies of the final hazinat memo will be provided incorporating WSDOT/FHWA
comments if required. It is assurned that WSDOT/FHWA corrunents will not alter the basic
conclusion of the documentation or require further alternative studies
City of Tukwlta
Strander Blvd/SW 2711t St Extension
Tukwila, Washington
bergerABAM, P14,0347 DO
September 2017
Exhibit A-1 Pap 2) of 60
67
Subtask 8.6 Biological Assessment (BA)
A BA (NO EFFECT LETTER) will be prepared for the preferred alternative in accordance with
WSDOT guidelines. The following subtasks will be undertaken in preparation of the project BA
(NO EFFECT' LETTER).
Collect available documentation concerning the project activities and pertinent
biological information. Biological information will include priority habitat and species
data from thea Washington' State Department of Fish and Wildlife, along with rare plant
and high-quality ecosystem data from Washington State Departrnent of Natural
Resources (WDNR). This information will be reviewed and a consultation strategy will
Be developed,
Check with United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and National
Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Fisheries to verify lists of
endangered, threatened, proposed, and candidate species.
3. Conduct a field reconnaissance to investigate on-site habitat conditions.
4. Make telephone contact with the appropriate resource agency staff for input on species
occurrence, habitat use, and potential project impacts.
Prepare a draft BA (NO EFFECT LETTER) addressing listed species, proposed species,
candidate species, species of concern, and critical habitat. The BA (NO EFFECT LETTER)
will include a project description, a list of species, a description of the species and their
habitat, an analysis of project effects, and mitigation recommendation,-,.
Provide the draft B.A (NO EFFECT LETTER) to the CITY for review and approval.
7. Revise the BA (NO EFFECT LETTER), as appropriate, and submit the final BA (NO
EFFECT LETTER) to wsr)ar for their approval-
Deliverable(s)
* One electronic copy of a draft BA (NO EFFECT LETTER) for review by CITY
One electronic copy of a draft BA (NO EFFECT LETTER), incorporating the CITY's
comments, for submittal to WSDOT
9 'Three copies of a final BA (NO EFFECT LETTER) that incorporates WSDarcornments
Subtask 8.7 Air Quality Analysis
The purpose of the air quality report is to identify any significant impacts and necessary
mitigation measures, and to determine conformity with pertinent air quality rules, The air
quality modeling assessment will meet the requirements of federal and state conformity
regulations and the procedures in EPA's Guidelines for Modeling Carbon Monoxide from
Roadway Intersections (1992), and will provide a project -level conformity determination for the
project.
City of Tukwila BergerABAM, (14,0347.00
Strander Blvd/SW 27th St Extension Septernbcr 2017
Tukwila, Washington Exhibit A-1 Pago 30 of 60
68
I After review of the proposed project alternatives and the results of the traffic analysis,
the SUBCONSULTANTwill select intersections for project -level air quality modeling.
'rhe SUBCONSULTANT will visit the project area to assess the presence of potentially
sensitive receivers and to measure the physical parameters of the selected intersections.
2. Traffic Impact Evaluation: The SUBCONSULTANT will conduct an air quality impact
analysis using approved regulatory models and modeling techniques, This analysis will
include use of the latest MOBILE series emission factor prediction model and Version 2
of the CAL3QHC dispersion model. In this process, the SUBCONSULTANT will
coordinate as necessary with the appropriate regulatory agencies. Tile modeling will
calculate carbon monoxide (CO) concentrations near each intersection for the following
scertarios: (1) existing conditions; (2) opening and design year no action; and (3)
opening and design of the build alternative.
Mitigation Analysis: In the event the impact analysis modeling indicates the project
would cause significant air quality impacts, it will be necessary to quantitatively
consider mitigation measures for each of the intersections where impacts are expected.
For purposes of estimating a budget, the STJBCONSULTANT will assume modeling
mitigation measures are necessary at all four affected intersections for the worst-case of
the build alternatives,, and will allow one day for the iterative process of WASIT or
CAL3QHC and available traffic modeling.
4. Air Quality Technical Study: The SUBCONSULTANT will prepare a draft technical air
quality report to document the methods and the results of the impact and mitigation
analyses, and to provide a conformity statement for the project. The CITY will review
the draft report and prepare consolidated comments, The SUBCONSULTANT will
incorporate the CITY's comments into a final technical report
Deliverable(s)
* Three copies of the draft will be provided
Three copies of the final air conformity analysis report will be provided to WSDOT/FHWA
incorporating CITY comments
* 'Three copies of the final air conformity will be incorporating WSDOT/FHWA comments
Subtask 8.8 NEPA Environmental Classification Summary Update
Service-, will be provided to prepare the ECS form by reviewing technical reports related to the
project, applying project -specific data to the form and coordinating approval for the project by
both WSD(fr.
Deliverable(s)
* Three copies of the draft ECS will be provided
City of Tukwih
Strander Blvd/SW 27th St Extension
Tukwila, Washington
EtergerABAK VNM47,00
September 2017
Exbibit A-1 Page 31 of 60
W
Three copies of the final ECS documentation will be provided incorporating CITY
comments
Three copies of the final ECS documentation will be provided incorporating WSDOT/
FHW.A comments if required, It is assumed that WSDOT/FHWA comments will not alter
the basic conclusion of the documentation or require further alternative studies
Subtask 8.9 Wetland and Critical Areas Study
The purpose of this report is to identify jurisdictional wetland within the project corridor and
critical areas, as well as provide mitigation if necessary. The SUBCONSULTANT will develop,
implement, and complete field surveys to identify and delineate wetlands in the project area
using the appropriate methods, described in the U.S, Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)
Wetlands Delineation Manual (Environmental Laboratory, 1987), Wetlands Research, Technical
Report Y-87-1, January 1987. The SUBCONSULTANT will delineate wetlands within 200 feet of
the project area.
The SUBCONSULTANT will prepare a comprehensive report that includes detailed wetland
maps, documentation of survey methods, results, potential impacts from project actions, and
recommendations for wetland protection and mitigation. The report also will contain
appropriate forms for wetland identification, delineation, and function assessment required by
USACE. The information in this report is intended for use in compliance with Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act. The final report and associated documents will be in a format acceptable to
USACE.
Delineated wetland boundaries will be identified on the ground with flagging, The delineated
wetland boundaries will, be mapped with accuracy acceptable to USACE.
Deliverable(s)
An electronic copy of a draft wetland delineation for review by the CITY with
accompanying critical areas provisions if required
An electronic copy of a draft wetland delineation, incorporating the CITY's comments, for
submittal to USACE and DOE
An electronic copy of a final wetland delineation, incorporating comments by USACE and
DOE
Subtask 8.10 Wetland Mitigation Use Plan
A wetland mitigation plan will be prepared for the development of the cay owned properties,
The plan will be completed to meet the requirements of USACE and DOE, The following
subtasks will be undertaken in preparation for the project mitigation use plan.
a
1. Condition assessment of the proposed mitigation site.
cit},,wrukwiti Berger.ABAK P14.0347.00
Strander Blvd/SW 27th St Extension SeptembOT 2017
Tukwila, Wasliington Exhibit A- I Page 32 of 60 70
Analysis of the proposed impacts and the proposed mitigation site to show how the
mitigation site comply with USACE and DOE regulations.
3. Complete a draft of the wetland mitigation use plan which will include a narrative
describing the proposed mitigation site, a vicinity map, a plan view and/or detail maps
of the proposed mitigation and other informational maps as required by the permitting
agencies.
4, Revise the plan based on agency comments
Deliverable(s)
# Three copies of a draft mitigation use plan for review by the CITY with accompanying draft
special provisions if required
'Three copies of a draft mitigation use plan, incorporating the CITY's comments, for
submittal to USACE and DOE
Three copies of a revised draft mitigation plan, incorporating comments by USACE and
DOE
Subtask 8.11 SEPA
The SUBCONSULTANT shall complete appropriate SEPA documentation, including all needed
studies, modeling, and analysis in accordance with State Environmental Policy Act (RCW
43.21C) and SEPA Rules (WAC 197-11). The SUBCONSULTANT will coordinate with the CITY
to address comments oil the SEPA Checklist and provide support for the SEPA process.
Deliverable(s)
* SEl-A Checklist
Subtask 8.12 State and Federal Permits
SUBCONSULTANT will assemble and organize all necessary environmental permit
applications to a standard acceptable by the permitting agencies. Anticipated permits include
the following,
• Section 404 Permit
• Section 401 Permit
• Shorelines Permit
Permit applications shall include all requested information, such as application forms, all
necessary pert -nit drawings, an attachment describing project location, project purpose and
need, alternatives considered, and a summary of project impacts. The SUBCONSULTANT shall
also provide a draft transmittal letter for submittal of they application by the CITY. Draft
applications, including supporting information, shall be submitted to the CITY for review and
comment. Revised permit applications shall be provided to the CITY for signature and
submittal to permitting agencies. The SUBCONSULTANT shall perform the necessary
coordination to obtain the permits.
City of Tukwila BergerABAM, P14,0347.00
Strander Blvd/SW 27th St Extension September 2017
Tukwila, Washington Exhibit A-] Page 33 of 60
71
Deliverable(s)
• Three copies of the draft JARPA for review by the CITY
• Three copies of the revised draft JARPA incorporating CITY comments
• Three copies of the final JARPA will be prepared incorporating agency cornment,-
Subtask 8.13 CITY Permits
SUBCONSULTANT will assemble and organize all necessary environmental permit
applications to a standard acceptable by the permitting agencies. Anticipated permits include
the following.
• Critical Area Permit
• Fill and Grade permit
Permit applications shall include all requested information, such as application forms, all
necessary permit drawings, an attaclirnent describing project location, project purpose and
need, alternatives considered, and a summary of project impacts, The SUBCONSULTANT shall
also provide a draft transmittal letter for submittal of the application by the CITY. 'Draft
applications, including supporting information, shall be submitted to the CITY for review and
comment. Revised permit applications shall be provided to the CITY for signature and
submittal to permitting agencies, The SUBCONSULTANT shall perform the necessary
coordination to obtain the permits.
Deliverable(s)
• Two draft copies of the permit applications
• Two final copies of the permit applications
City ofrukwila BergerABAM, P14.0347.00
Strander BlvdISW 27th $t Lxtension September 2017
Tukwila, Wasbington Exhibit A -1 Page 34 of 60 72
TASK 9.0 RAILROAD ENGINEERING AND DESIGN (Hanson Professional Services)
Hanson Professional Services (hereinafter referred to as SUBCONSULTANT), under a separate
subconsultant agreement with CONSULTANT, will provide the following tasks,
Subtask 9.1 Project Coordination
Deliverable(s)
None. St, BCONSULTANT will manage/administer Task 9.0 and coordinate with others as
appropriate for the various project phases.
Subtask 9.2 10 Percent Railroad Shoofly Plan
1, Conduct a site review concurrent with the topographic survey and prepare a one-page
Field technical rnemorandurn of rail weight, tie type, rail weight transitions, insulated
joints, culvert locations, and general observations. The purpose of this item is to collect
required track, and tie information and to provide the track designers with first-hand
knowledge of the project site, 'Topographic Survey to be provided by others.
Prepare 10 percent shoofly track plans suitable for developing an opinion of probable
cost of construction ((SPCC), per the requirements stated in the checklist contained in the
UPRR'Public Projects — Plan Submittal Guidelines', Rev. 8/04/2017 (available upon
request),
10 percent plans will be based on the previous Strander Boulevard project base
mapping
1 An OPCC will be developed using current industry track costs and civil costs from
WSDOT unit bid prices. See Limitations and Assumptions.
Deliverable(s)
Brief field technical. memorandum of rail weight, tie type, transitions, photos, and
observations
# 10 percent shoofly design plans (1lxl7) PDF format
# OPCC of construction for 10 percent track plans
Subtask 9.3 25 Percent Railroad Shoofly and Phasing Plan
1, Further the 10 percent shoofly horizontal and vertical design to 2_5 percent per the
requirements stated in the checklist contained in the LYPRR'Public Projects — Plan
Submittal Guidelines', Rev. 8/04/2017 (available upon request). The approximate tasks
and plan list to be developed from the UPFR requirements are as follows:
— Plans will include responses to the UPPR 10 percent design comments.
— Plans will be updated with now base mapping (by others). See Limitations and
Assumptions.
City of Tukwila bergeiAHAM, P14,0347,00
Strander Blvd5W 27th St Extensic.in Septernber 2017
Tukwila, Washington Exhibit M Page 35 of 60
73
Prepare a phasing plan schematic - (no scale 11x17 — tip to two sheets) and prepare a
brief phasing narrative technical memorandum, See Limitations and Assumptions.
Shoofly plan and profile(
rofile sheets (three sheets) to cover at least 200 feet beyond the
end of the shoofly (1"=100' i6 Size 11x17),
Shoofly typical section sheets (four sheets) to include continuous stationing, and
potential embankment pre -loading (no scale 1107).
Curve data sheet with shoofly coordinates (one sheet) (no scale 11x17).
Prepare civil/track detail sheet (two sheets) (no scale I1x17).
Earthwork model (Civil 3D 2017) by phases in Civil 3D based on UPRR standards
and geotechrucal report recommendations.
Shoofly cross section sheets (minimal annotation) by phase (12 sheets) (1"=20' 1/2 Size
11x17).
— Review geotechnical report for subgrade and slope recommendations.
— Provide utility review for UPRR guideline conformance. Utility casing and extension
design, is not included in the scope of services. See Limitations and Assumptions,
— Design shoofly track to accommodate positive railway drainage. Hydraulic and
hydrologic (H&H) analysis and report are not included in this scope of services. See
Limitations and Assumptions.
— Prepare quantity summary table directly on the plan sheets to delineate those
quantity items by contractor and UP' Z.
— Prepare an engineering design, technical memorandum to record design
methodologies, decisions, and assumptions.
— Start preparations of track. specifications — UPRIZ standard construction
specifications will be considered the primary specifications for the track
construction; however, other technical specifications will be developed as necessary,
2. Update the OP CC for track and embankment to 25 percent level.
3. Prepare PDFs for submittal.
4. Schedule and attend a site visit with a UPRR project representative.
Deliverable(s)
* Updated phasing plait —schematic format with phasing narrative
City of Tukwila BergerABAM, VI 4,0347 00
Strander Blvd/SW 27th St Extension September 2017
Tukwila, Washington Exhibit A-1 Page 36 of 60 74
Twenty-five percent shoofly design plan set
Opinion of probable cost of construction for 25 percent track plans
Draft 25 percent engineering design technical memorandum
0
Subtask 9.4 30 Percent Railroad Shoofly Plans
Update the 25 percent shoofly design plans to 30 percent per the requirements stated in the
checklist contained in the UPRR'Public Projects — Plan Submittal Guidelines', Rev. 8/04/2017
(available upon request). This phase will consist primarily of updating the shoofly design plan
set from commentary provided by UPRR on the 25 percent submittal and the subsequent UPRR
site visit,
Deliverable(s)
• Updated phasing plan — schematic format with phasing narrative
• Thirty percent shoofly design plan set
• OPCC for 30 percent track plans
• Thirty percent draft engineering design technical memorandum
Subtask 9.5 60 Percent Railroad Shoofly Plans — Only Required at UPRR's Request
Updating the 30 percent shoofly design plans to 60 percent could be required by UPRR. As this
is typically only required due to unusually complicated site conditions, this task is not currently
included in this scope.
Deliverable(s)
* None
Update the 30 percent shoofly design plans to 90 percent per the requirements stated in the
checklist contained in the UPI .'Public Projects — Plan Submittal Guidelines', Rev- 8/04/2017
(available upon request). This phase will consist primarily of updating the shoofly design plan
set from the 30 percent submittal. The 90 percent consists generally of updates driven by
railway signal needs, and general site grading as follows.
Addition of cut and fill lines to the track plans to account for railway walkways, signal pads,
etc, See Limitations and Assumptions.
* 5chedule and attend a site visit with a UPRR project representative
Deliverable(s)
* Updated phasing plan — schematic format with phasing narrative
* Ninety percent shoofly design plan set
9
(SPCC for 90 percent track plans
* Specifications
* Ninety percent draft engineering design technical memorandum
City of Tukwila Berger'ABAM, P14-0347,00
Strander Blvd/SW 27th St Extensm September 2017
TuRwila, Washington Exhibit A-1 Page 37 of 60
75
Subtask 9.7 100 Percent Railroad Shoofly Plans — Including Bid Support through
Contractor Award
Update the 90 percent shoofly design plans to 100 percent per the requirements stated in the
checklist contained in the UPRR'Public Project's — Plan Submittal Guidelines', Rev. 8/04/2017
(available upon request). This phase will consist primarily Of Updating the shoofly design plan
set from commentary provided by UPRR on the 90 percent submittal and the UPRR site visit.
Review and add text as necessary to the final construction project handbook (construction
project handbook by Others).
Verify bid item list pertaining to the shoofly track to be provided by the contractor.
Respond to contractor and CITY RFls. See Limitations and Assumptions.
Attend prebid meeting (one meeting), See Limitations and Assumptions,
beliverable(s)
• Updated phasing plan — schematic forma with phasing narrative
• One hundred percent shoofly design plan set
• OPCC for 100 percent track plans
• Finalized specifications and bid item list
• Final engineering design technical memorandum
• Responses to Contractor and CITY R.Fls (up to six)
Limitations and Assumptions
• CADD work in this scope of services will be in AutoCADICivil,3D 2017 with line -styles, s!pnbuls,
etc. conforrning to UPRR CADD Standards, Conversion to other CAOD platforms isnot in this
,scope of services, Should CARD conversion be required, it would be considered as an additional
service,
• Base mapping updates (by others) to be in AutoCADICivil 3D 2017 at a compatible dattrin with
previous Strander Boulevard design efforts.
4P General shoofly plan developinent is per LIPRR 'Public Projects — Plan ,fit b;nittal Guidelines', Rev.
810412017
• UPRRs disposition towards this grade separation project will be more clearlil known after the
suInnittal of the prelintinary engineering agreernent. It is assumed that should significant changes be
required they would be considered as an additional service(s),
• Separate H&H analysis and report for° the shoqfly is not included in this scope of services,
• UPRR utiliti
.1 casing extension design, and review of nona,UPRR utility design is not included in this
scope of services,
• Bidding support is included in 100 percent phase through contractor award, Construction
tnanageinent (CM) is not included in this scope of set -vices,
• OPCC costs will use current railwav industry and WSDOT cost data- Final construction cost for
UPRR supplied labor and materials to be provided by UPRR with C&M Agreenjent.
• The design process will eniploy the Hanson Professional Services Inc. QC Review process,
• Should a 60 percent submittal be required by UPRR, a suppleirtental scope and fee will be submitted
at that hive.
City of Tukwila BergerABAM, 4'14.0347.00
5trander 81vd/SW 27th St Vmtension SLptember 2017
Tukwila, Washington Exhibit A-1 Page 3A of 60 76
Railway signal additions ky UPRR, includingsignal berins are not anticipated, Significant signal
grading improvements beyond track walkwt;qls including a separate grading plan are not included 07
this proposal and will be considered as an additional service,
Railway parallel railroad maintenance and access roads deemed necessary by LIPRR are not
anticipated, because there art, none in the existing condition. Parallel railroad maintenance and access
track access road design is not included in this proposal and will be considered as an additional
service. Subinitting as list of construction. inaterials to the CITYfor separate analysis and assistance
with that analysis effort is not included in this scope of services and will be considered as an
additional service,
It is assioned the specifications provided in this scope of services are fair the shoofly track
construction, ruction, shoqfly bid items, and language linking the railway specifications to the front end'. The
front end" sections of bid documents are by others.
city of 'rukwfla BergerABAM, 1114.047,00
Strander Blvd/SW 27th St Extension September 2017
Tukwila, Washington Exhibit A-1 Page 39 of 60
77
This task includes the structural engineering required to develop conceptual layouts, coordinate
design efforts, and complete construction documents for structural elements identified herein
for the Strander undercrossing of the BNSF and UPR R railroad tracks.
The following design codes will be used to conduct the design and analyses.
1. WSDOT Bridge Design Manual LRFD, version M 23-50.17, June 2.017
2. AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, 7th Edition, and interims
3, AASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design 2nd Edition (2011)
4. 'W DOT Standard Specifications for Road, Bridge, and Municipal Construction (2016)
5, INF-UPRR Guidelines for Railroad Grade Separation Projects (1/24/2007)
6. AREMA Manual for Railway Engineering (2017)
Assumption(s)
Shoofly for UPRR Railroad tracks will be constructed to the east. A temporary shoring wall
will be designed and included in the contract to accommodate the construction of the UPPR
bridge. A temporary shoring wall will not be required to extend the BNSF bridge
foundation. The UPRR bridge undercrossing will be constructed adjacent to the temporary
shoring wall and completed in one stage, including an extension of the bridge foundation to
the west for a future track.
Vehicular and pedestrian access to the existing Sound Transit: Station, from Southwest 27th
Street, will be closed during construction of the walls, seal, and bridges east of the UPRR
tracks.
Vehicular bridge for access to Sound Transit Station will be normal to undercrossing
alignment, a single -span structure (no interior pier required), and the approach grading will
accommodate alignment and profile effects. Sound Transit parking may be extended
towards this structure and this access will be coordinated through the CITY, as required.
Seal will be constructed with open excavation, coffer cell, and tremie placement of concrete.
A structural seal and fascia wall elements will be incorporated to seal and strengthen the
undercrossing. Temporary struts may be required during construction, but permanent
struts are not assumed to be incorporated into the design.
# Sheet pile wall with whalers and ground anchors will be used as the structural wall system,
in place of secant pile wall designs.
Dead -man (buried anchor) walls will be utilize to limit extension of permanent ground
anchors (PCAs) along project, where possible.
City of Tukwila BergerABAM, P14.0347.00
Strander Blvd/SW 27th St Extension September 2017
'rukwila, Washington Exhibit A -I Pare 40 of 60 78
Bridge Service and Strength Analysis
Service and strength load combination analyses of the proposed new bridge structures will be
conducted to demonstrate that the proposed structure meets the performance requirements per
AASHTO or AREMA, as applicable,
Bridge Extreme Analysis
Extreme load combination analysis of the proposed new bridge structure will be conducted to
demonstrate that the proposed structure meets the performance requirements per AASHTO or
AREMA, as applicable.
Bridge Capacity Analysis and Design
Component capacity calculations will be completed and designs will be prepared for the bridge
components based on the controlling design forces as determined from the -service-, strength,
and extreme analyses.
Wall Service, Strength, and Extreme Analysis
Analysis of the walls will be based on service, strength, and extreme load combinations to
demonstrate that the proposed structures meet the performance requirements per AASHTO or
AREMA, as applicable.
Subtask 10.1 BNSF Railroad Bridge and Walls
The CONSULTANT shall review the as -built drawings for the existing BNSF underpass
structure, review geotechnical data, coordinate with geotechnical engineer, develop design
parameters, design elements, meet with the CITY and BNSF, and prepare the following
submittals to meet the requirements of Table 3-2 of the BNSF-UPRR Guidelines for Railroad
Grade Separation Projects (1/24/2007).
Prepare bridge substrucwre extension concept design plans and pictures for the BNSF
bridge over Strander and will be used in establishing a preliminary engineering
agreement with BNSF. The bridge will. be similar to existing BNSF substructure, which is
a pile -supported footing extending full width of underpass with abutments and an
interior pier wall.
2Develop the applicant response to the BNSF comments to the conceptual design and
prepare a type selection report (30 percent submittal), including design plans and
construction phasing.
3, Integrate the bridge concept with adjacent permanent or temporary retaining wall
designs, if necessary. Coordinate with the geotechnical engineer to design ground
improvement procedures between the structure foundation and the seal.
4. Coordinate with tile civil design for roadway section, drainage, and utilities within the
underpass.
5, Develop the applicant response to the BNSF comments to the 30 percent submittal and
prepare a 60 percent design submittal, 'including design plans and calculations;
city of rukwfla BergerABAM, P14.0.347.00
Straoder Blvd/SW 27th St Extension September 2017
Tukudla, Washington Exhibit A-] Page 41 of 60 79
geotechnical report (see Task 11); project specifications and special provisions (see
Subtasks 10,9, 14.5 and 1.4.6),- drainage report and plan (see Task 12); and construction
phasing.
Develop the applicant response to the BNSF comments to the 60 percent submittal and
prepare a final design submittal (CITY's 90 percent submittal), including design plans
and calculations,- geotechnical report (see Task 11); project specifications and special
provisions (see Subtasks 10.9, 14.5 and 14,6),- drainage report and plan (,see Task 12); and
construction phasing.
The CONSULTANT shall update and coordinate design efforts for contract documents based
on WSDOT and CITY review of final design. See Subtasks 1.0.9,14.5 and 14.6 for specials and
estimate.
Deliverable(s)
• BNSF concept submittal (11x17 PDF format)
• BNSF 30 percent submittal (llxl-/ PDF format)
• BNSF 60 percent submittal (11x17 PDF format)
• BNSF final submittal (11x17 PDF format and I1x17 hard copy)
• CITY and WSDOTreview Package (11x17 PDF format)
• Contract documents (IIx17 PDF format and 7.1x17 hard copy)
Subtask 10.2 Union Pacific Railway Bridge and Walls
'I"he CONSULTANT shall review the site conditions for the existing UPRIZ underpass structure,
review geotechnical data, coordinate with geotechnical engineer, develop design parameters,
design elements, meet with the CITY and UPRR,and prepare the following submittals to meet
the requirements of Table 3-2 of the BNSF-UPRR Guidelines for Railroad Grade Separation
Projects (1/24/2007).
Prepare bridge superstructure and substructure concept design plans and pictures for
UP RR bridge over Strander and will be used in establishing a preliminary engineering
agreement with UPRR. Bridge to be similar to adjacent BNSF structure, which is steel
plate girder with pile -supported footing extending full width of underpass with
abutments and an interior pier wall.
Develop the applicant response to the UPRR comments to the conceptual design and
prepare a type selection report (30 percent submittal), including design plans,
construction phasing, and shoofly (see Task 9).
3. Prepare staging options at bridge. Integrate bridge concept with adjacent permanent or
temporary retaining wall designs. Coordinate with the geotechnical engineer to design
ground improvement procedures between the structure foundation and the seat.
Coordinate track and ballast design with rail engineer. See Subtask 10.3 for temporary
shoring wall design.
City of Tukwila BergerABAM, P14.0347.00
stra"der 131vd/SW 27th St Extcnsion Septurnbu 2017
"I'Awila, Wa-,-,hington Exhibit A-1 Page 42 of 60 80
4. Prepare concepts for utility conduits on. bridge and design components to integrate the
utilities. Coordinate with the civil design for roadway section, drainage, and utilities
within. the underpass.
Develop the applicant response to the UPRR comments to the 30 percent submittal and
prepare a 60 percent design submittal, including design plans and calculations;
geotechnical report (seeTask 11); project specifications and special provisions (see
Subtasks 111.9, 14.5 and 14.6),- drainage report and plan (see Task 121),- shoofly design (see
Task 9); and construction phasing,
& Develop the applicant response to the UPRR corrin -tents to the 60 percent submittal and
prepare a final design submittal (CITY's 90 percent submittal), including design plans
and calculations; geotechnical report (see Task 11); project specifications and special
i i
provisions (see Subtasks 111.9, 14,5 and14.6); drainage report and plan (see Task 12);
shoofly design (see Task 9); and construction phasing.
The CONSULTANT shall update and coordinate design efforts for contract documents based
on WS001'and CITY review of final design. See Subtasks 10.9,14.5 and 14.6 for specials and
estirnate.
Deliverable(s)
• UPRR concept submi t tat (11x17 PDF format)
• UPRR 30 percent submittal (11x17 PDF format)
• UPRR 60 percent, submittal (I Ix17 PDF format)
• UPRR final submittal (11x17 PDF format and 1Ix17 hard copy)
• CITY and WSDOT review package (I I x17 PDF format)
• Contract documents (11 xI 7 PDF format and 11x"17 hard copy)
Subtask 10.3 Union Pacific Railway Temporary Shoring Wall
The CONSULTANT shall prepare a concept and design of the temporary shoring wall required
to Stage construction between the shoofly and the UPRR bridge. This wall shall be included in
the contract documents, reviewed, and approved by UPM as part of the requirements of
'Table 3-2 of the BNSF-UPRR Guidelines for Railroad Grade Separation Projects (1/24/2007). The
submittals will be incorporated into those listed in Task 102
Subtask 10.4 Sound Transit Vehicular Bridge
The CONSULTANT shall prepare a concept and design of a vehicular bridge that connects the
loop ramp intersection from the undercrossing to the Sound Transit Station as a single span
precast -prestressed concrete girder bridge. The foundations will be constructed with a pile -
supported footing and abutment walls, similar to the existing BNSF bridge. Retaining walls and
shoring will be coordinated with the undercrossing structure and civil design. Ground
improvements will be evaluated and cl",ilpied, as required, at the interface of the foundation
and the seat.
City of Tuk- will bergerAUAM, P14,0347A
Strander Ulvd/SW 271b St Extension Sep lcrnber 2017
TU141AIII-a, Washinknon Exhibit A-1 Page 43 of 60 81
Special provisions, quantities, and estimates will be included in Subtask 10.9.
Deliverable(s)
* Thirty percent CITY submittal (I7.x]7 PDF format)
* Sixty percent CITY submittal (11x17 PI format)
* 90 percent CITY submittal (11x17 PDF format)
* WSDOrf/CITY contract submittal (11x17 PDF format and IIxl7 hard copy)
Subtask 10.5 Retaining Walls
The CONSULTANT shall prepare a concept and design of the permeant retaining walls for the
undercrossing, maintenance access for local utilities, business access, and integration of
pedestrian and vehicle traffic throughout the project. The retaining walls for the undercrossing
will be constructed with a sheet pile wall system utilizing permanent ground anchors (PGA)
and buried anchor (dead -man) walls. Cantilever soldier pile walls and cast -in-place walls will
be integrated where applicable. Geosynthetic retaining walls and moment slabs will be required
to grade up to the required profile for the pedestrian bridge, and possibly the vehicular bridge,
spanning the undercrossing. See Figure 3 for preliminary retaining wall layout.
Figure 3 — Preliminary Retaining Wall Layout
Retaining wall and shoring staging will be coordinated with the adjacent structures and civil
design. The structural seal is integrated with the undercrossing walls, but is separated out as
Subtask 10.6. Special provisions, quantities, and estimates will be included in Subtask 10.9,
Deliverable(s)
* Thirty percent CITY submittal (11x17 PDF format)
* Sixty percent CITY submittal (11x17 PI format)
* 90 percent CITY submittal (1.1.x17 PIF format)
* WSDor/ci,ry contract submittal (11 x17 PDF format and 11x17 hard copy)
City of Tukwila BergerABAM, 1'14,0347.00
Strander 13lvdJSW 27th St Extension Sep Lernber 2017
Tukwila, Washington Exhibit A-1 Page 44 of 60
82
Subtask 10.6 Seal and Fascia Walls
The CONSULTANT shall prepare a concept and design of the undercrogsing structural Seal and
fascia walls. The staging of the seat shall be coordinated with the construction of the shoofly
and temporary shoring walls, and integrate the BN F, vehicular, and UPRR bridge foundations.
The seal depth will vary along the length of the project to counter buoyancy effects of the
permanent and temporary excavations. The sea.], in conjunction with the reinforced concrete
portion of the seal and fascia walls, the pile -supported structure foundations, ground
improvement, and roadway section grading, will create a water resistant barrier and act
integrally with the structural walls to create a boat for the undercrossing. Storm drainage and
infiltration will be addressed in Tasks'12 and 13.
The seal will be constructed in stages and poured in segments to accommodate site conditions,
such as high-water table, differing subsurface materials, staging of the corridor, utilities, and
contractor means and methods. These impacts and staging of the seal will be evaluated as part
of the seal design.
An edge beam and approach slab will be utilized at each transition of the seal to standard
subsurface ground conditions.
Special provisions, quantities, and estimates will be included in Subtask 10.9.
Deliverable(s)
• Thirty percent CITY submittal (11x17 PDF format)
• Sixty percent C11'Ysubmittal (11x17 PDF format)
•
Ninety percent CITY, submittal (11x17 PDF format)
• WSDOT/CITY contract submittal (11x17 PDF format and 11x17 hard copy{)
Subtask 10.7 Pedestrian Bridge
The CONSULTANT shall prepare a concept and design of a pedestrian bridge that connects the
Interurban Trail over the undetcrossing using a prefabricated bridge. The foundations will be
constructed with spread footings and curtain walls that surcharge the structural walls of the
undercrossing and will be incorporated into Subtask 10.5. Retaining walls will be constructed to
raise the trail profile and meet ADA standards (see Subtask 10.5).
The CONSULTANT will coordinate the superstructure performance criteria with up to three
prefabricated bridge suppliers, The superstructure will be acquired by the contractor based on
performance criteria. The foundation and bearings will be design and incorporated into the
contract documents, based on the superstructure performance criteria.
Special provisions, quantities, and estimates will be included in Subtask 10.9.
Deliverable(s)
• Thirty percent CITY submittal (11x17 PDF format)
• Sixty percent CITY submittal (I1x17 PDF format)
City of TukwflD BergerABAM, P14.0347.00
Strander Blvd/ -';W 27th St lExtension Svpteinber 2017
Tukwila, Washington Exhibit Al fate 45 of 60 83
• Ninety percent CITY submittal (11x'17 PDF format)
• WSDOT/CITY contract submittal. (11 x17 PDF format and I I x 17 hard copy)
Subtask 10.8 Miscellaneous Structures
The CONSULTANTshall prepare a design of the following miscellaneous structural elements.
• Limits of the structure excavation
Luminaire bracket's and details, incorporated into the und-ercrossing structure
• Signal bridge at intersection for loop rarnp to Sound Transit Station
• Signal bridge foundations, integrated behind or into structural walls of undercro.s'sing
The CONSULTANTwill coordinate the design of these elements with the other structural and
civil aspects of the project. Special provisions, quantities, and estimates will be included in
Subtask 10.9.
Deliverable(s)
• Sixty percent CITY submittal (11x17 PI format)
• Ninety percent CITY submittal (11x17 PDF format)
• WSDOT/CITY contract submittal (11x17 TTP format and Ilx'17 hard copy)
Subtask 10.9 Structural Special Provision and Estimate
'The CONSULTANT'shall prepare a conceptual estimate for the 30 percent submittal, a special
provision outline, updated estimate for the 60 percent submittal, and a project estimate and
special provisions for the 90 percent and final submittals.
Defiverable(s)
• Thirty percent CITY submittal — structural estimate (PDF format)
• Sixty percent CITY submittal — structural estimate (PDF format)
• Sixty Pei -cent CITY submittal — structural special provisions outline (PDF format)
• Ninety percent CITYsubmittal — structural estimate (PD F format)
• Ninety percent CITY submittal — structural special provisions (NIS Word and PDF format)
• WSDOT/CITY contract submittal — structural estimate (PDF format)
• WSDOT/CITY contract submittal — structural special provisions (MS Word and PDF format)
The CONSULTANT shall utilize standard WSIDOT forn-i liners for aesthetic treatments for the
walls of the underpass. The CONSULTANT will participate in up to three 2- hour meetings
with the CITY to discuss concepts. The preferred alternative will be incorporated into the
project and no additional plan sheets will be included in the contract documents for
architectural treatments,
City of Tukwila BergerABANI, 1'IC034700
Strauder Blvd/SW 27th St FxtemMon. September 2017,
Tukwila, Washitigton Exhibit A-1 Page 46 of 60 84
TASK 10.0 STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING (Bright Engineering)
Bright Engineering Inc. (hereinafter referred to as SUBCONSULTANT), under a separate
subconsultant agreement with CONSULTANT, will perform the following tasks.
Subtask 10.3 Union Pacific Railroad Temporary Shoring Wall
The SUBCONSULTANT shall prepare a concept and design of the temporary Shoring wall
required to stage construction between the shoofly and the UPRR bridge. This wall will be
integral with undercrossing structural walls and will utilize PCAs underneath shoofly, PGA,
Whaler, and other details to construct, maintain, and remove the temporary shoring wall will be
included in this effort.
This wall shall be included in the contract documents, reviewed and approved by UPRR as part
of the requirements of Table 3-2 of the BNSF-UPRR Guidelines for Railroad Grade Separation
Projects (1/24/2007), to be performed by CONSULTANT.
Special provisions, quantities, and estimates will be generated by CONSULTANT
Subtask 10.4 Sound Transit Vehicular Bridge
The CONSULTANT shall prepare a concept and design of a vehicular bridge that connects the
loop ramp intersection from the undercrossing to the Sound Transit Station as a single -span
precast -prestressed concrete girder bridge. The superstructure will be a precast -prestressed
concrete girder with integral concrete deck and diaphragms, per WSDOT standard practice. The
bearings, expansion joints, barriers, and all other connections to the bridge superstructure are
included in the superstructure design.
Typical 2 - 2-inch-diarneter conduit with junction boxes will be included in the traffic barrier,
but other conduits, utilities, luminaries, or miscellaneous items connected to the bridge will be
designed by CONSULTANT,
The foundations will be constructed with pile -supported footing and abutment walls, similar to
the existing BNSF bridge. Retaining walls and shoring will be coordinated with the
undercrossing structure and civil design. Ground improvements will be evaluated and
designed, as required, at the interface of the foundation and the seal. Walls, abutments,
foundations, and other interactions with undercrossing structure will be designed by
CONSULTANT.
Special provisions, quantities, and estimates will be generated by CONSULTANT.
Deliverable(s)
• Thirty percent, CITY submittal (11x17 PDF format)
• Sixty percent Cll'Ysubmittal ('Ilx'17PDF format)
• Ninety percent CITY submittal (I1x]7 PDF format)
• WSDOT/CITY contract submittal (11x17 PDF format and 11x17 hard copy)
City of Tukwih BergerABAM, 1"14.0347.00
StranOer 131vd/SW 27th St Extension Suptember 2017
Tulovila, Washington Exhibit A -I Ila ge 47 of 60
85
Subtask 10.8 Miscellaneous Structures
The SUBCONSULTANT shall prepare a design of the following miscellaneous Structural
elements.
Signal bridge at intersection for loop rarrip to Sound Transit Station. Structure will be
rectangular sections, per WSDOT BDM Chapter 10, with bolted connections and baseplate
with anchor bolts.
Signal bridge foundations, integrated behind or into Structural walls of undercrossing,
Foundation will be drilled shafts placed an appropriate distance behind the structural walls
(to be determined), Geotechnical engfi-teers will provide allowable lateral bending capacities
of soil. Design shall follow requirernents, of BDM Chapter 10.
'the SUBCONSULTANT will coordinate the design of these elements with the, other structural
and civil aspects of the project.
Special provisions, quantities, and estimates will be generated by CONSULTANT.
Dellverable(s)
• Sixty percent CITY submittal (11x17 PDF format)
• Ninety percent CITY submittal (1IxI7 PDF format)
• WSDOT/CITYcontract submittal +11x17 PDF format and 11x 17 copy)
city of rotowiia BergeYABAM, P14 034TOO
Strander BIVd/5W 27th St Extenwri September 2017
Tukwila, Washington Exhibit A-1 Page 48 of 60 86
TASK 11.0 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SUPPORT (Shannon & Wilson)
Shannon & Wilson (hereinafter referred to asSUBCONSULTANT), Linder a separate
subconsultant agreement with CONSULTANT, will evaluate the subsurface conditions at the
project site based on available existing subsurface data and one in Situ test, described below.
Based on the subsurface conditions, the SUBCONSULTANT will provide geotechnical
engineering recommendations for final design of the project. Recommendations would include
foundations, walls, temporary shoring, settlement, stability, and seismic considerations.
SUBCONSULTANT would assist in developing plans and specifications for the project bid
package.
Subtask 111 In Situ Testing
Stormwater Pond Infiltration
The existing stormwater pond will be expanded as part of the project. The facility design
depends partly on the infiltration rate of the subgrade. To improve the estimate of the
infiltration rate, SUBCONSULTANT will perform a pilot infiltration test (PIT) near the existing
stormwater pond. The PIT will require an excavator and water source,- SUBCONSULTANT will
retain an excavator subcontractor, and use an on-site water source to perform the PIT
Assumption(s)
The test will be located on public property, UPRR property, or PSE property. The CITY will
contact property owners and arrange for ROE for the test(s). SUBCONSULTANT will notify
the CONSULTANT, CITY, and property owner regarding the timing of the testing work.
• Water for the PIT will be available at the test location near the existing stormwater pond. A
water truck or outside water source will not be required.
• The PIT excavation will be loosely backfilled with the excavated material. No site
restoration will be performed.
• If street -use permits, traffic control, or railroad flaggers will be required to perform the test,
the SUBCONSULTANT will plan, coordinate, and procure the required items.
• To locate utilities on public property, SUBCONSULTANT will call the One -Call Utility
Locate number; any private utility location would be done by the CONSULTANT.
• The CONSULTANT or CITY will survey (provide plan coordinates and elevation of the
ground surface) the test location.
Subtask 11.2 Geotechnical Engineering
SUBCONSULTANT will provide design recommendations in accordance with applicable
standards, including CITY, WSDOT, UPRR, ad BNS F Railway. Engineering services will
include
City ofrukwifil HergerABANJ, P14.0347,00
Strander Mvd/5W 27th St P.W�nsion svpwmber 2017
Tukwila, Washington Exhibit A-1 Page 49 of 60 87
Seismic Design Considerations.
SUBCONSULTANT would provide seismic design parameters for the project based on the
seismic design level specified by the CITY. STJBCONSULTANT would perform liquefaction
hazard analyses for the existing subsurface explorations in the footprint of the project, and
include the results of those analyses in other engineering evaluation$ (e.g., earth pressures,
stability).
Develop Bridge Foundation Recommendations
SUBCONSULTANT would provide LRFD axial and lateral resistances for deep foundations, or
bearing and lateral resistance for shallow foundations, if applicable. If we recommend deep
foundations, we would provide parameters for developing lateral resistance curves, but'AIOLIld
not perform lateral resistance analyses (e,g., LPILE).
Develop Retaining Wall Recommendations
SUBCONSULTANT would provide LIZFD bearing resistances, static earth pressures, and
seismic earth pressures, as applicable, for temporary and permanent retaining walls. Wall types
may include soldier piles with tieback/deadman anchors, cantilever, and structural earth walls.
Evaluate settlement, global stability, and seismic displacement of walls, as applicable,
Develop Underpass Design Recommendations
Evaluate uplift forces and mitigation alternatives for the Underpass structure. Mitigation
alternatives could be fiedown anchors, gravity structure, etc.
Develop Shoofly Embankment Recommendations
Evaluate settlement and stability of the shoofly embankment. Develop recommendations to
achieve required design standards for settlement and stability (e.g., base reinforcement,
preloading),
Update Existing Groundwater Model
SUBCONSULTANT would continue reading existing dataloggers at the site (six piezometers
and two stormwater pond stage loggers). SUBCONSU ,TENT would update the groundwater
model calibration using the recorded groundwater and pond stage level.
Develop Recommendations for Utility Protection
SUBCONSULTANT would evaluate potential impacts to existing utilities from construction
activities (e.g., vibrations, settlement), and develop mitigation alternatives.
Evaluate New Outfall Foundations
Evaluate foundation type,, and settlement of the new outfall. SUBCONSULTANT would
estimate the soil conditions it the outfall location based on geologic maps and engineering
judgment,
Evaluate Stormwater Infiltration Rates
Evaluate design infiltration rates based on PIT' results.
CRY of Tvkwita BergerABAK P14,0347,00
Strander Blvdy' SW 27th St Extension September 2037
Tukwila, Washington Exhibit A-1 Page 50 of 60 88
Evaluate Construction Considerations
Evaluate construction considerations related to site preparation, earthwork, excavations,
ground improvement, and temporary shoring.
Assumption(s)
9 SUBCONSULTANT's hours estimate shows the assumed number of analyses/scenarios for
each scope item,
Approximately 75 percent of the analyses would be completed for the draft geotechnical
report, The remaining analyses would be completed as part of the final report,
Deliverable(s)
• Draft (60 percent) geotechnical report
• Final geotechnical report
Subtaskil.3 Plans and Specifications
SUBCONSULTANT will review and cornment on construction plans and specifications related
to geotechnical components of the project.
City of Tukwila BergerABAK f'14,0347,00
Stratider Blvd/SW 2701 St Extension Seplernber 2017
Tukwila, Washington
Exhibit A-1 Page 51 of 60 89
i
The CONSULTANT shall prepare a drainage report and preliminary conveyance design for the
project in sufficient detail to support the completion and approval of the environmental
documentation for the project. 'The drainage report will be prepared per the criteria of the
adopted 2016 King County Surface Water Design Manual (SWDM) and relevant policies of the
City of Tukwila as appropriate. The drainage report shall include the following,
I. Project overview
2. Detailed project description
1 'Tributary area exhibits
4, Runoff calculations
5, Gutteranalysis including sag analysis
& Detention calculations
T Water quality computations
8. Storinwater conveyance calculations
9, Wetland hydro period analysis
10t Maintenance and operation of facilities
The drainage report and preliminary conveyance design will be based on the concept illustrated
below, with the outfall location and discharge route to be determined after topographic survey
information has been obtained, An outfall and discharge route memorandum will be provided
to the CITY.
The CONSULTANT shall meet with the CITY and the environmental subconsultant to
determine the wetland hydra period baseline.
Assumptions(s)
a Groundwater seeping into the underpass will not need to be treated.
o Storm water runoff from the roadway will be collected separately frorn the groundwater,
treated and subsequently comingled with the groundwater and discharged to the Green
River.
o The discharge route and outfall location will be selected based. on the ability to gravity flow
(or not) the treated storm water and untreated ground water. These decisions will be made
in consultation with CITY staff and documented in a brief memorandum.
The stormwater design process will include Lip to three meetings with the CITY and other
involved parties to review and discuss options being considered. One additional meeting
with the CITY will be required to review and discuss comments on the draft drainage
report.
9 171 -ie CONSULTANT shall provide PS&E for the projects storm water system, including
submittal reviews with the C11Y at the 30, 60, 90, and 100 percent completion levels.
city (.)f,rukwili BergerABAM, P14.0347.00
Strander tilv4/SW 27111 St rxtension Septcmbe.r 2017
Tukwila, Washington Exhibit A-1 Page 52 of 60 90
Storm titer PS&E submittals, and the effort associated with them, are not included in this
task, but will be incorporated in to the roadway design submittals as described in Task :14.
Deliverable(s)
a Meeting minutes
Draft and final outfall and discharge route memoranclum(one electronic and two hard copy')
Draft and final drainage report (one electronic and two hard copy)
City tit Tukwila BergerABIAM, 1`14.0347.00
Strander Mvd/SW 27th 51 Extensioty Septurnber 2017
'ruk"61a, Washington Exhibit A•1 Ila ge 53 of 60 91
TASK 13.0 PUMP STATION
The pump stations and outfall configurations will be established based on the final discharge
route. The existing pump system will be modified as described and shown in Figure 4. Existing
pump station modifications will include the addition of a third pump and associated valves and
controls, upsized power feed, and modifications to the existing pump layout and control system
as necessary to accommodate the addition of the third pump. The: need for a second standby
generator will be assessed and incorporated in to the modification if deemed necessary.
If the discharge to the Green River cannot be routed via gravity flow, a new combined
storm/groundwater purnp station will be required to pump treated storm water and
groundwater to the outfall. It is assumed this pump station will largely mirror the existing in
configuration and layout. Key components will include duplex submersible pumps, wet well,
valves, valve vault, discharge piping, controls, CMU block building to house the controls, and
standby generator. The wet well and valve vault will be precast concrete. The associated work
for this additional pump station systern, is included in Subtask 13.8 Outfall Pump Station
Design.
A groundwater pump system will be required to pump collected groundwater to the discharge
pipe or to the new combined stortri/groundwater pump station. The new groundwater pumps
will be duplex submersible and installed in an existing manhole that will be converted to a wet
well.Thecontrols will either be housed in an outdoor enclosure or inside the existing pump
station building if there is room.
All of the new pump stations will have telemetry equipment and will be connected to the
municipal Supervisory Control and Data Acquisitions (SCADA) system, If ownership of the
existing pump station is transferred to the CITY, that the existing lift station telernetry and
control panels will be replaced with the CITY's standard panels.
The current concept for the basic pump station improvements are shown in Figure 4 below. It is
understood this may be refined during the initial design phase and, as noted in Subtask 13.8
below, there may be a need to provide an outfall pump station if the preferred discharge route
cannot be gravity fed.
Subtask 13.1 Determine Criteria
The CONSULTANT shall meet with the CITY to confirm design criteria, determine pump sizes,
and identify equipment brands that are acceptable to the CITY and, if possible, comply with
"Buy American" provisions for this potentially federally funded project, Meeting minutes will
be provided.
City of Ttil,wila fiergerASAM, PNR347,00
51rander Blvd/.SW 27th St Extension Seplember 2012
TAvvila, Washington Exhibit A-1 Page 51 of 60 92
To Duffel!
Stormwater from
Combined Pond N
Storm
0 Existing
Inlet Manhole
Add 3rd Purnp - UpsizefReplace Motors and Impellers
Existing Wetweil
Existing Valve
Vault
Load Bank
Existing Control
Bldg
Existing Meter
Vault
"- Add 3rd MCC Section
F Existing Generator
Figure 4.
III—Add 500 kW
Generator
- To Energy Dissipator/
Combined Pond
City of Tukwila
Strander Blvd/SW 27th St Extension
(.0
Tukwila, Washington
Exhibit A-1
BergerABAM, P14.0347.00
September 2017
Page 55 of 60
Subtask 13.2 Draft Stormwater Pump Station Memorandum
Preliminary drawings, supporting calculations, equipment data, specifications, and cost
estimates of construction for the stormwater pump station will be provided in a draft
stormwater pump station memorandum for CITY review. The CITY will provide one set of
consolidated review comments. The CONSULTANT and the CITY shall rneet to review the
corvirrients, and responses. Comments will be incorporated into a final stormwater pump station
memorandum as part of Subtask 133. Meeting minutes will be provided.
Deliverable(s)
0 Draft stormwater pump station memorandum
Subtask 13.3 Final Stormwater Pump Station Memorandum
Comments from the CITY on the draft stormwater pump station report will be incorporated
into the final stormwater pump station memorandum,
Deliverable(s)
• Final stormwater pump station memorandum
Subtask 13.4 Public Interest Findings
Proprietary components of the pump station(s) will need an approved Public Information
Finding (PIF) from WSDOT. It is assumed that there will be three components that will each
need a separate RIF.
Deliverable(s)
0 Three PIFs for WS OT approval
Subtask 13.5 Stormwater Pump Station Plans
The CONSULTANT shall prepare the stormivater pump station plans in accordance with tile
drawing list included with the level of effort estimate.
Deliverable(s)
# Thirty percent permitting submittal
Sixty Percent Submittal. This submittal shall incorporate comments from the CITY on the
30 percent submittal and shall represent a complete draft of the construction contract
Ninety Percent Submittal. This submittal shall incorporate comments from the CITY on the
60 percent submittal and shall represent a complete draft of the construction contract
• Final Submittal, This submittal shall incorporate CITY comments on the 90 percent
submittal and is intended for final review by SDOT to obligate construction funds for the
project
City of Tukwfla BergarABANI, PIC0347.00
Strander Blvd/SW 27th St Extension September 2017
Tukwila, Washington Exhibit A-1 Page 56 of 60 94
Subtask 13.6 Stormwater Pump Station Specifications
WSDOT Standard Specifications for Road, Bridge, and Municipal Construction (2018) will be
the standard specifications for the work, The CONSULTANT' will prepare the general special
provisions and project -specific special provisions required for construction of the pump station.
Deliverable(s)
* Special provision submittals at 60 (outline), 90, and 100 percent level of completion
Subtask 13.7 Stormwater Pump Station Construction Cost Estimate
A construction cost estimate shall be prepared for the 60,100, and final subinIttals. This estimate
will be used as the basis of review for the lowest responsive responsible bidder
Deliverable(s)
• Costestimate submittals at 30,60,90, and 100 percent level of completion
• Three hard copies of the construction cost estimate
• One electronic copy (PDF) of the construction cost estimate
• One electronic copy (NIS Excel) of the construction cost estimate
Subtask 13.8 Outfall Pump Station Design
A new combined storm/groundwater pump station will be required if the
stormwater/groundwater cannot be discharged to the Green River via gravity flow. It is
assumed this pump station will largely mirror the existing in configuration and layout. Key
components will include duplex submersible pump--,, wet well, valves, valve vault, discharge
piping, controls, CMU block building to house the controls, and standby generator, The wet
well and valve vault will be pre -cast concrete, This subtask includes the design of the additional
combined storm/ground water pump station,
Dellverable(s)
• Purnp station plan submittals at 3C1, 60, 90, and 100 percent level of completion
• Special provision submittals at 60 (outline), 9t1, sand 100 percent level of completion
• Cost estirriate submittals at30,60, 90, and 100 percent level of completion
Subtask 13.9 Stormwater Pump Station Electrical Engineering
R (hereinafter referred to as SUBCONSULTANT), under a separate subconsultant
agreement with CONSULTANT, will provide electrical engineering and control systems design
required for upgrades to the existing stormwater pump station, construction of a new 100 HP
stormwater pump station, and if required construction of a new groundwater pump station. For
each pump station, the SUBCONSULTANT shall perform the following tasks.
Meet with CONSULTANT and CITY to review the pump station design requirements.
1 Prepare electrical calculations for utility service, generator sizing, and electrical
distribution based on pump station design criteria.
3. Coordinate electrical service requirements for provision of power to the upgraded pump
station site. Meet with the local power company if required.
City of "I'Awila BergerABAM, P14.0,347.00
Strander Blvd/SW 27th St Extension SLptember 2017
'rukwila, Washington Exhibit A-1 Page 57 of 60 95
4- Attend one workshop with the project team to review the preliminary design documents
and establish criteria for final design.
5, Prepare final electrical and control system drawings for construction, Drawing
submittals shall be provided for 60, 90, and final completion stages. Anticipated
drawings include
- Legend and abbreviations
- Site plan
- Modified one -line diagram
- Electrical building power, lighting and control
- Vault power, lighting and control
- Electrical distribution details
- Circuit schedules and panel schedules
- Pump starter schematic diagrams
- Control system power schematic
- Control system 1/0 diagrams
- RTU interconnection diagrams
- Control panel details
6. Prepare electrical and control system technical specifications based on standard
specifications from the owner.
7. Prepare an engineering opinion of construction costs for the electrical and control
systems.
8, Attend up to four design team review meetings.
City of Tukwila BergurABAM, P14.0347,00
Strander Blvd/SW 27th St Extension September 2017
Tukwila, Washington Exhibit A -I Page 58 of 60
96
TASK 14.0 ROADWAY DESIGN
This task involves engineering and design work for the roadway, trail, and project construction
phasing.
Subtask 14.1 Roadway Geometry
The CONSULTANT shall prepare a preliminary layout of the roadway. The roadway shall meet
sight distance requirements based on the roadway design speed, vehicle turning requirements
based on the, project design vehicle(s), the requirements of the current Americans with
Disabilities Act (ADA), and other guidelines. The CONSULTANT shall prepare environmental
documents to support the roadway design as needed.
Assumptions(s)
9 One round of CITY review con-u-nents.
Deliverable(s)
9 Preliminary design(s) of the roadway to be included in the 30 percent plans, including cross
section and horizontal and vertical geometry.
* Environmental exhibits to support roadway design,
Subtask 14.2 Trail Layout
The existing interurban trail parallels the UPIZ on the west side of the UPRR requires a
pedestrian bridge over the grade separation, which affects the profile and length of the
underpass. In order to bring Southwest 27th up to grade in the shortest distance, the trail will
likely need to be rerouted to the west or the east. The CONSULTANT shall investigate tip to
three alternative routes and prepare preliminary layout of the preferred trail route. The trail
shall n-teet the requirements of the current ADA guidelines.
Assumptions(s)
• One round of CITY review comment-,
• The trail will require a prefabricated bridge over the grade separation,
Defiverable(s)
* Preliminary design(s) of the trail to be included in the 30 percent plans
Subtask 14.3 Project Construction Staging
The CONSULTANT will develop construction staging and phasing concepts for the project. The
concepts will include all major construction activities and the sequencing of these activities,
Deliverable(s)
• Construction staging plans will be included in the roadway PSE submittals described
below
Subtask 14.4 Roadway Plans
The CONSULTANT shall prepare roadway plans in accordance with the drawing list included
with the level of effort estimate,
�--ity f T.kwil. Berpi-ABAM, P14.0347M
Strandev Blvd/SW 27th St Extension September 2017
Nkwila, Washing Ilton Exhibit A-1 Page, 59 of 60 97
Deliverable(s)
* Plan submittals at30,60,90, and 100 percent level of completion
Subtask 14.5 Specifications
The underpass construction is not common and special provisions will be required to
supplement the WSDOT Standard Specifications for Road, Bridge, and Municipal Construction
and the associated amendments and general special provisions. The CONSULTANT will
prepare outline specifications identifying all anticipated payment items. Draft special
provisions will be prepared where required. It is anticipated that there will be a special
provision required for each of the following, among others.
• Secant pile walls
• Bottom sea] construction
• Railroad construction
• Pump stations
• Utility work
Deliverable(s)
* Special provision submittals at 60 (outline), 90, and 100 percent level of completion
Subtask:14.G Construction Cost Estimate
An engineer's construction cost estimate shall be prepared based upon the list of anticipated
pay items and quantities obtained from the design effort.
Deliverable(s)
* Cost estimate submittals at 30, 60, 90, and 100 percent level of completion
Three hard copies of the construction cost estimate
One electronic copy (PDF) of the construction cost estimate
One electronic copy (NIS Excel) of the construction cost estimate
City of Tukwila tae, gerABAM, PIC0347,00
Strander Blvd/SW lith St Extension September 2017
Tukwila, Washington Exhibit A-1 Pa -e 60 of 60
0 98
CITY OF TUKWILA - STRANDERIUPRR GRADE SEPARATION
PHASE 3 - UPRR UNDERCROSSING
ID 4, 07 2015 2019 2020
1:0 Jul Apt Sap Oal Nov Dec .1i Feb 59 Apr May JIM Jul Aua Sep Oct Yeo Dec fan Feb Mu AK May Ain JO Aug Sep Oct N0v Dec Jal 'Feb ty,..a, Akpa, May .14m Al Amg Sep act Now D..
9r26 • NTP to COMULTANT
2 9126 a MOBILIZE SUBCONSULTANTS
3
ftlif SURVEY 9. MAPPING
10/3 Perform Surrey
11/25 Prepare Saxe Map
30
12 111,11111, FINALIZE STORM WATER CORFIGURATION
13 11125 Confirm Dutfali Location and Route
14 12112 Finalise Draft Memorandum
15 12,26 City Review of Draft Memorandum
15 1116 Resons. to City C.M.MAS
1/16 • Comment Resolution Meeting
1/17 II Fineibe Memorandum
19 1/24 • Final Memorandum
18
"11410 39% UPRR Railroad Design
22 236 Prepare UPRR Concept Design
23 3/20 • Submit UPRR Concept Design
24 3121 Conceptual Design Review by UPFIR
25 639 II= 3014 Design Review
25
27
25
30
31
33! 30% PLANS, SPECIPtCATIONS & ESTIMATES
33 12)26 Prepare 30% PSSE IPerrortting Subm.rttaly
34 3/20 Ea QA/QC it10ng Submittal
35 4/2 * Permitting Subinittai to City
4111•19 GEDTECHNICAL ENGINEERING
932 Final Geolechnical Design Recommendations
9113 NI Flnei Geotecbincal Report
1271 IM=li 90% Design Review
36
37
33
35
40
42
43
44
45
46
47
40
49
50
51
52
5-3
413 City Review of Permitting Submittal
4/24 • Permilling Subrnitlat Continent RR-Wu-F/4m Meeting
4125 Finalize Perintetirto Submitial
5/8 • Submit Permitting Submittal
FINAL 1)/RR Railroad 'Design
7/19 100% Design Review
916 Flnalbe Construction Agreement
584 -AL PLANS, SPEC IFtCATIONS & ESTIMATES
SN Prepare Intermediate ISM) Submittal
911 QA/QC 6054 Sub:mat:al
att4 • 60%Subrnittal to City
6115 Cily Review of 60% Submittal
915 • 6054Siebroiftat Comment Reba/lotion Meeting
Sr% Prepare 60%Sobrnittai
11/1 QAPLIG 9" Sub matal
tun 51/11%Submittal to City
11/26 IM• City Review at 94:1%Submiltal
92/20 • 90% Submittal Corninnet Resolution Meeting
317 Prepare Cott Final Subinliftl
512 In CIA/QC Draft Final Submittal
Tue 615117
1 of 2
Task Mtone •
Sizao.ry• Criticat T
CITY OF TUKWILA - STRANDERIUPRR GRADE SEPARATION
PHASE 3 - UPRR UNDERCROSSING
ID 47 nta 2019 2020
0 Jul ALI Sep OP. Mee Dec Jan Feb Mo A4' May Jun Jul Aura Sep Oct Nay Dec Jan Feb F.to Apr May Jr Jet _ Aug Seo Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Ap' May Jim Jul
522 * Draft final Sitbroittell to Citir
54
55
55
57
53
59
6-5
51
62
02
114
65
65
55
00
63
70
71
73
74
75
76
77
75
19
55
91
5;23 1=1 City Review of Draft Final Submittal
6113 • Draft Foal Submittal Comment Resolution Meeting
414 1=1 Prepare Final Subrnitta/
715 OAICIC Final Sub -mazer
7115 • Final Su bmitlat to City
NEPA REEVALUISIION
•
12126 Confirm Scoping & Water Treatment and Detention
43 pair. Updated Discipline Reports
11129 NM Review by City
7115 Incorporate City Comments
7124 • Submit Draft Updated Discipline Reports to WSOOT
7125 WSOOT Review
6122 an truenzerate WSOOT Comments,
9f5 • Submit Draft Updated Discipline Reports to Agencies
gill ie.° Tr- Agency Review
1341 en Palette Updated Ofsrapline Reports
15117 4. Submit Final Updated Reports to City
10/19 go MOOT Rseriew of NEPA REevalualten
10f31 • INS DOT Approval of NEPA REevaltrallon
PERMITS
1111 Prepare Penns APPPC-non-5
12/12 • Subinft Permit Applications to City
52113 Review by City
TN 0 mg incorporate City Continents
1123 • Submit Permit Applications to Agencies
e‘a 1124 Process Agency Review
05 017 • Permits- issued
84 4118 Incorporate Permit Conditions trno PS&E
es
55
87 519 Complete IRMO Plans Itudirdes reviews)
88 7/4 Comptes! RAY Fun41ng Estimate
89 1111 in Obligate FLW Funding
50 11114 • FLAN Funds Authrerized
91 11115
52
33
9,1
55
55
57
55
55
100
101
102
11)3
104
105
Oct Nevi De
RIGHT CIF WAY PLANS S ACQUISITION (Future Work Not in Scope)
Complete RW Acquisition
1351 igs Complete ROW Certification
11113 * RAN Certified by WSDOT
fr• ADVERTISE, BID & AWARD
11114 Authorize Construction Fending
12d12 Ceraracl Assail -113+y by City
12125, • Final Cominents lo Consultant
1227 irs Prepare Ad Ready Plans If Spealfications
119 41 Subrrei Ad Ready Plans & Specifications
1123 • Advertise
1124 - Sid Period
315 • Open Olds
3f6 Evaluate Bids
3/19 • Award Contract
Toe 915117
2 of 2
Task l&sieslline •
Sim -Tool/ Critcal Task
See attached Exhibit B.
DBE Particn
p i atio
l
Agreement Number:
WSDOT Form 140-089 EF EKhibit B Page I of I
Revised 1013012014 101
STRANDER BOULEVARD/SW 27TH STREET EXTENSION 9/5/2017
EXHIBIT B - DBE PARTICIPATION PLAN
Firm Services to be Provided
DBE
Cert.
No.
Contract Amount DBE Participation
Planned Actual Planned Actual
Berger ABAM
One Alliance Geomatics
Fehr & Peers
Abeyta & Associates
Widener & Associates
Hansen Professional Services
Bright Engineering
Shannon & Wilson
Ott -Sakai & Associates, LLC
R&VV
Project Management, Civil & Structural Engineering
Surveying
Traffic Engineering
Right of Way Planning & Project Funding Estimate
Environmental Documentation & Permitting
Railroad Engineering
Structural Engineering
Geotechnical Engineering
Constructability Review & Construction Cost Estimating
Pump Station Electrical & Control Systems
04M0022928
D5F0019645
D3M0015622
D4M0023226
$ 2,881,529
$ 250,337
$ 164,952
$ 33,220
$ 188,491
$ 179,333
$ 94,991
$ 141,320
$ 42,505
$ 70,650
- 6.19% 0.00%
- 0.82% 0.00%
- 2.35% aim%
- 1.05% 0.00%
Notes: Planned amounts reflect the scope of work and level of
effort at project NTP.
0
Totals = $ 4,047,328 $
0 10.40% 0.00%
Page 1 of 1
Exhibit C
Preparation and Delivery of Electronic Engineering and Other Data
In this Exhibit the agency, as applicable, is to provide a description of the format and standards the consultant is
to use in preparing electronic files for transmission to the agency, The format and standards to be provided may
include, but are not limited to, the following:
1. Surveying, Roadway Design, & Plans Preparation Section
A. Survey Data
See attached Exhibit A-1,
B. Roadway Design Files
Civil 3D, Version to be determined by consultant based on current practice at the time the work is
completed.
C. Computer Aided Drafting Files
AutoCAD. Version to be determined by consultant based on current practice at the time the work is
completed.
Agreement Number:
WSOOT Form 140-089 EF Exhibit C Pagel of
Revised 1013012014 103
D. Specify the Agency's Right to Review Product with the Consultant
See attached Exhibit An I
E. Specify the Electronic De4verables to Be Provided to the Agency
See attached Exhibit As 1,
F. Specify What Agency Furnished Services and Information Is to Be Provided
See attached Exhibit A- I .
Agreement Number
WSDOTForm 140-089 EF Exhibit C Page 2 of 4
Revised 1013012014 104
ll. Any Other Electronic Files to Be Provided
Sce attached Exhibit A-V
IIT, Methods to Electronically Exchange Data
Methods will be determined in consultation with agency during the Course of the work,
WSDOT Form 140.089 EF Exhibit C Page 3 of 4
Revised 1013012014 105
A. Agency Sollware SUite
None,
B, Mectronle Messaging, System
None,
c. Flic -n-ansfers Formal.
See attached Exhibit A-1,
WSOOT Form 140.089 EF Exhibit C Page 4 of 4
Revised 1013012014 106
Exhibit D
0 0
Exhibit D- I - COIISUI.tant Fee Determination
Exhibit D3 - Consultant WSDOT ICK. Letter
Agreement Number:
WSDOT Form 140.089 EF Exhibit D Page 1 of 1
Revised 1013012014 107
L$J a WAR) = I ;J 21fill I W-,W!.*l
DIRECT SALARY COSTS JDSC)
Phase 3 Cost Summary
915/2017
Personnel
Hours
Rate
Cost
1 Principal/Project Manager
414
X
$ 93,03 =
$
38,514
2 Project Engineer
3,599
X
$ 6154
$
228,680
3 Structural Engineer
3,413
X
$ 47.98
$
163,756
4 Civil Engineer
4,371
x
$ 40.67 =
$
177,769
5 Construction Specialist
372
X
$ 62.04 a
$
23,079
6 Designer/CAD Operator
6,010
X
$ 46.26
$
278,023
7 Graphics
136
X
$ 40,00 =
$
5,440
8 Department Coord./Admin
408
X
$ 35,26 =$
14,386
Total Hours
18,723
Subtotal Direct
Salary Costs (DSC) =
$
929,647
Salary Escalation (SE) =
5% of DSC =
$
46,482
Subtotal (DSC + SE)
$
976J29
Overhead (OH)
163,45%
of (DSC + SE) =
$
1,595,483
Fixed Fee (FF)
31,55%
of (D8C + SE)
$
307,968.73
TOTAL SALARY COSTS (DSC + SE + OH + FF) = $ 2,879,681
DIRECT NONSALARY COSTS L
QN Cl
Mileage Design Team Boo miles @ $ 0,560 $ 448
Expendables (photographs, equip rental, etc.) I Estimate $ 1,500 $ 1,500
TOTAL REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES (DNSC) = $ 41
I TOTALBergerASAM = $ 2,881,52E]
SUBCONSULTANTS
One Alliance Geomatics - Survey $ 250,337
Fehr and Peers - Traffic $ 164,952
Abeyta & Associates - ROW Planning Services/Project Funding Estimate (PFE) $ 33,220
Widener & Associates - Environmental $ 188,491
Hanson - Railroad $ 179,333
Bright - Structural $ 94,991
Shannon & Wilson - Geotechnical $ 141,320
Ott Sakai - Constructability $ 42,505
R & W - Pump Station Electrical & Control Systems $ 70,650
TOTAL Subconsutlants; = $ 1.165.799
IManagement Reserve = $ 100,0001
I TOTAL Authorized Amount $ 4:147*,329 I
108
Mom
Classification
INarne
I Rate
I % Participatiori
Principal/Project Manager
Bob Fernandes
$93,03
100%
Project Engineers
Ross French
$6100
Naomi elove
$56,64
Stuart Bennion
$63.54
100%
Matt Huxley
$58.05
Structural Engineers
Greg Banks
$63-64
Santiago Aguilar
$47,98
100%
Civil Engineers
Blake Nelson
$35.58
Brook Emry
$40.67
100%
Construction Specialists
Bob Lee
$62.04
100%
Ed Cline
$58,89
Designer/CAD Operator
John Reyes
$41.61
30%
Jef Blake
$55.19
30%
Lee Childress
$43.05
40%
Graphics
Aaron Savage
$40,00
100%
Kim Crow
$37,91
Department Coord./Admin
Nora Bretana
$34,88
Kelly Robinson
$3516
100%
Rate
40.671
0XII01
WIM
109
EXHBIIT D-1 - CONSULTANTFEE DETERMINATION
CITY OF TUKWILA - STRANDER BOULEVARD EXTENSION
ABAM Phase 3 Hours
9/5/2017
Page 3 of 31
0
Task
Number
a:c
iti '6
C C
a_
c
III
'PT
Q.
Zi' c ci
7
3 0
C
...2 c&P .=
, ii, CI.
rn to (..) 0 Go 0 0
c
ai '43
(7
0.
0_ 0
0 o
0 0 (3
Totals
DSC
5
93,03 f 5
63.54 I 5
47.98 I $ 40.67 j $ 62.04 j 5 46.26 I
5
40.00 I $ 35.26
TASK 1 - PROJECT MANAGEMENT
1
238
708
220 172 104 -
- 156 1.598
Project Coordination (24 months)
1,1
48
95
48 - - -
- 96 288
Quality Assurance-
1.2
18
440
- - 104 -
- 12 574
Preparation of QA Plan and Monitoring
8
60
- - -
12 80
Checking Subconsuitant Work Products
2
100
- 102
30 Percent Submittal OA
2
60
- - 32 -
- - 94
60 Percent Submittal QA
2
80
- - 20 -
- i 102
90 Percent Submittal QA
2
80
- - 32
- - 114
Final Submittal QA
2
60
- 20 -
- 82
Meetings
1.3
172
172
172 172 -
-48 736
Project Team Meetings (52)
52
52
52 52 - -
. - 208
Meetings with City Staff (24)
120
120
120 120 -
- 48 528
i
TASK 2 - DIRECTED SERVICES
2
-
-
- - - -
- - -
Public Involvement
2.1
-
-
- - - -
- - -
Exhibrts
-
Mailings-
_
Summary of Comments
-
Value Engineering (VE)
2.2
-
-
- - -
- - -
Initial Presentation of Project to VE Team
-
Review and Response to VE Recommendations
-
Ad, Bid, and Award Services
2.3
-
-
- - - -
- - -
Answers to Bid -der Questions
Addenda Special Provisions
Addenda Bid Quantities
-
Addenda Plans:
-
TASK 3- INDEPENDENT CONSTRUCTABiLITY REVIEW
3
See Ott Sakai Fee Estimate tor Details
-
ii
Page 3 of 31
0
EXHBIIT D-1 - CONSULTANTFEE DETERMINATION
CITY OF TUKWILA - STRANDER BOULEVARD EXTENS ON
ABAM Phase 3 Hours
9/5/2017
Task
Number
0
a.
E a ci
< c
ci c
io 0
ur e ....'
CO M .0 t 75
...
.... Ins
,
00. gm *
00. MI 0.0
El 0
o O&) DO 0 C3 I)
Totals
DSC
5 93.03 1 $ 63.54 I $ 47.98 I $ 40.67 1 5 62.04 46.26 1 5 40.00 I $ 35.26
TASK 4 - SURVEY AND BASE MAPPING
Record Research, GPS RTK Control and, Terrestrial Control! Survey Work
Topographic Survey
Utility Locate Services
Additional Topographic Survey of Adjacent Wetland(s)
Title and ROW Review
4
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
See One Alliance Fee Estimate for Details
See One Alliance Fee Estimate for Details
See One Alliance Fee Estimate for Details
See One Alliance Fee Estimate for Details
See One Affiance Fee Estimate for Details
TASK 5 - UTILITIES
Transmission, Substation), BP Pipelines (Olympic Pipelme), AT&T, Level 3,
Sprint, King County Sanitary Sewer, Seattle Public Utilities Waler,
Communications (2)
Existing Utility Data
Contact Utilities for As-builts (12 contacts @ 1 hr each)
Collect and Review As -Bulbs and Construction Record Drawings
Collect & Review Sanitary Sewer Masterplan. Hydraulic Model
Compile As-builts into Base map
Prepare Existing Utility Map Exhibit
Preliminary Coordination with Utilities
Utility Coordination Kick Off Meeting (1 hr)
Prepare Materials for Utility Kickoff Meeting
Provide Meeting IVIinutes for Utility Kickoff Meeting
Project Utility Coordination (2 hrs per month)
Additional Utility Coordination Meetings (1-1 hr mtg per utility)
Develop Utility Relocation/Protection Conceptual Design
Review Utility Relocation Conceptual Design with City
Consolidate Comments from Utilities and City
Finalize Utility Relocation/Protection Conceptual Design
Utility Relocation Memorandum
12 166
253
8 116 8 8 571
5.1 2 24 36 16 78
4 8 - 12
2 4 - - 6
12 - 12
4 16 8 - 28
2 2 8 8 - 20
5.2
Co-ordination with Utilities for Final Design 5.3
Respond to Utility Comments
Meeting Minutes
Plan Generation
10 88 76 4 20 8 6 , 212
4 4 4 12
2 4 -1 7
2 - 1 3
36 . 36
12 12 - 24
8 24 8 40
4 4 4 12
4 4 8
8 8 4 20
2 8 16 4 8 8 4 50
20 40 24 84
8 16 - 24
4 8 - - 12
8 16 24 46
Page 4 of 31
EXHBIIT D-1 - CONSULTANTFEE DETERMINATION
CITY OF TUKWILA - STRANDER BOULEVARD EXTENSION
ABAM Phase 3 Hours
9/5/2017
Page 5 of 31
Task
Number
1:-"
o_
Tv t
. CL GI
5 rti
c c
." 0
c
I 1. I
ii
0
:
17
a.
0
c
o <
71 r_.)
W c
‘r.1 c 2 ,5 , CD 0
T.; `u1 -F.,
2 P, = C Gi 0 0
0 CL CD Ct.
tr.) w0 to. 00
0
=
M
6
-E
t c
o -0
E <
CL 0
01 o
0 c...)
Totals
DSC
$ 93.03 1
$ 63.54 1
$ 47.98_1 5 40.67 I 5 62.04 1 5 46.26 1
5
40.00 I
$ 35.26
SPU Waterline Monitoring Plan
5,4
-
16
- - - -
-
-
16
Draft Waterline Monitoring Plan
-
16
- - - -
-
-
16
Coordination with Utilities For Final Design
5,5
-
18
- 101 4 56
-
2
181
King County Coordination Meeting
-
4
- 4 - -
-
-
8
Provide Meeting Minutes for Meeting
-
-
- 1 - -
-
2
3
Develop Design Criteria
-
4
16
-
20
Provide Draft Conceptual Sanitary System Layout
-
4
. 40 - 40
-
-
84
Incorporate County Comments into Conceptual Design
-
2
- 16 - 16
-
-
34
Construction Cost Estimate
-
4
24 4 -
-
-
32
TASK 6 - TRAFFIC ANALYSIS, ILLUMINATION & SIGNAL DESIGN
6
-
-
- - - _
_
_
Traffic Capacity Analysis
6,1
See Fehr and Peers Fee Estimate for Details
-
Preliminary Construction Cost Estimate
6.2
See Fehr and Peers Fee Estimate for Details
-
Preliminary Illumination (30 Percent) Design
6.3
See Fehr and Peers Fee Estimate for Details
-
Traffic Study for Environmental Documentation
64
See Fehr and Peers Fee Estimate for Details
-
TASK 7 - RIGHT OF WAY PLANNING AND COORDINATION
7
30
208
55 324 18 192
-
- 827
I
I
Affected Property Owners (10): Taco Bell, Jack In The Bax, Puget Sound
lEnergy ROW, Sound Transit, Kaiser Permanente, King County Metro Transit
RapidRide, Boeing, BN'SF, UPRR
Local Business Access Design
7.1 30
58
_ ss - 72
-
- 256
Meet with Taco Bell
4
8
- 8 - 4
-
- 24
Develop Revised Access Options
2
8
24 - 16
-
- 50
Review Options for Revised Access with City
3
3
_ - - -
-
- 15
Revise Access Options
-
4
- 16 - 8
..
- 25
Present Options to Taco Bell
3
3
- - - -
- 8
Follow Up Meeting
3
3
- - - 8
-
- 14
I Meet with Jack in the Box
4
8
- 8 - 4
-
-
24
Devetop Revised Access Options
2
8
24 - 16
-
- 50
Review Options for Revised Access with City
3
3
- - -
-
- 6
Revise Access Options
-
4
- 16 - 8
-
.. 26
Present Options to Jack in the Box
3
3
_ _ _ -
-
- 6
Follow Up Meeting
3
3
- -
- 14
Page 5 of 31
EXHBIIT D-1 - CONSULTANTFEE DETERMINATION ABAM Phase 3 Hours
CITY OF TUKWILA - STRANDER BOULEVARD EXTENSION
9/5/2017
DSC
Puget Sound Energy ROW Coordination
Meet with PSE ROW department (1 hr mtg)
Provide Minutes far PSE Mtg
Develop Access Options
Revise Access Options
Present Final Driveway Configuration to PSE ROW
General Coordination (1 hri month)
Sound Transit Coordination
Meet with Sound Transit (6-1 5 hr mtg)
Provide Minutes for Sound Transit Mg
Prepare Eichibits for Sound Transit Meetings and Correspondence
General Coordination (3 hri month)
Kaiser Coordination
Meet with Kaiser (2-1 hr mtg)
Provide Minutes for Kaiser Mg
General Coordination (1 hrl month)
Intersection Pian for Approval (IPA)
(Assume 3 review cycles)
Prepare IPA piens
Submit IPA to WSDOT
Review, respond and address WSDOT Comments
King County Metro (KCM) RapidRide Coordination
Meet with KCM (1 hr mtg)
Provide Minutes for KCM Mtg
Develop Draft Detour Route
Submit Draft Detour Route to KCM for Approval
Submit Final Detour Route to KCM for Approval
General Coordination (0.5 hr/ month)
Boeing ROW Coordination
Meet with Boeing ROW department (1 hr mtg)
Provide Minutes or Boeing Mtg
Develop Draft Construction Route for approval
Task
Numbe
7.2
7.2
7.2
7.2
7.2
7.2
$ 930
$ 63.54
a,
3
1
2
2
c
vi a
-fi t Tn 13 7,
m 0 c 2
u c Lit
2 75) =
40 0 _.?_00
LIJ 0
47.9
0.
0 -0
E
it -a
0. 0
0 0
.67 46.26 1 40.00 35.26
8 8
35 55 32
21 21 -
6 2 -
a 32 32
8 6
6 6
2
14 78
8 60
3
3 18
10
3
1
6
8
20
20
2 4 4
2
2 4 4
11 14 6
3 3
1
2
24
3
1
18
2
130
42
8
80
14
12
2
112
88
3
21
26
3
1 ‘.
10
2
10
Page 6 of 31
6
1
18
EXHBIIT D-1 CONSULTANTFEE DETERMINATION
CITY OF TUKWILA - STRANDER BOULEVARD EXTENSION
ABAM Phase 3 Hours
9/5/2017
Task
Number
w
u
0
0
0
1---
E 7,3 00
c .....
.., _
4.1, .75 cra 42
o a. 00.
0O 00
0.
Totals
DSC
5 93.03 5 63.54 j 5 47.98 J $ 40.67 I $ 62.04 1 $ 46.26 1 $ 40.00 1 $ 35.26
Revise Access Options
Present Final Construction Route to Boeing ROW at Mtg
General Coordination (1 hr/ month)
BNSF ROW Coordination, 7.2
Meet iiirith BNSF (1 hr mtg)
Provide Minutes for BNSF
Revise Access Options
Present Final Impacts to BNSF ROW at Mtg
General Coordination (1 hr! month)
UPRR ROW Coordination 7.2
Meet %%din UPRR (1 hr m19)
Provide Minutes for UPRR Mtg
Revise Access Options
Present Final Impacts to UPRR ROW at Mtg
General Coordination (1 hr/ month)
Right -of -Way Plans & Coordination
(assume 12 properties)
Coordination (4 hr month for 9 months)
Exhibits (Assume 24)
Legal Descriptions (Assume 24)
Plans
7.2
2
3
9
3
1
2
3
9
3
1
2
3
10
6
6
70
36
6
3
6
3
68
68
8
6
21
6
8
6
21
6
1
8
6
184
72
{
112
TASK 8 - ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE/PERMITTING REQs
Design Assistance and Early Agency Coordination
Prepare Area of Potential Effect
Section 106 Report
Noise Study
Hazardous Materials Memorandum
Biological Assessment (BA)
Air Quality Anatysis
NEPA Environmental Classification Summary Update
Wetland and Critical Areas Study
Wetland Mitigation Use Plan
8
8.1
8.2
8.3
8.4
8.5
8.6
8.7
8.8
8.9
8.10
See Widener and Associates Fee Estimate for Details
See Widener and Associates Fee Estimate for Details
See Widener and Associates Fee Estimate for Details
See Widener and Associates Fee Estimate for Details
See Widener and Associates Fee Estimate for Details
See Widener and Associates Fee Estimate for Details
See Widener and Associates Fee Estimate for Details
See Widener and Associates Fee Estimate for Details
See Widener and Associates Fee Estimate for Details
See Widener and Associates Fee Estimate for Details
Page 7 of
31
EXHBIIT D-1 - CONSULTANTFEE DETERMINATION
CITY OF TUKWILA - STRANDER BOULEVARD EXTENSION
ABAM Phase 3 Hours
9/5/2017
Page 8 of 31
Task
Number
t 1-1,
..._,0 ' c .c
c <
' Eli
...., .... c..) t E
c .2
Ts t as 75 ,
E <
,C- al —• = Q C
u —
a u c cku 5 ra.
-27 o "En -
r. c cu ct. ri' ro 0
Totals
DSC
$ 93.03 I $ 63.54 I $ 47.98 I $ 40.67 I S 62.04 I $ 46.26 I $ 40.00 I $ 35.26
SEPA
8.11
See Widener arid Associates Fee Estimate for Details
-
State & Federal! Permits
8.12
See Widener and Associates Fee Estimate for Details
-
City Permits
8.13
See Widener and Associates Fee Estimate for Details
-
TASK 9 - RAILROAD
9
1 20 16 44 - 54 - -
135
Project Coordination
9.1
See Hanson Fee Estimate for Details
-
Railroad Shoofly and 'Phasing Concept
9.2
See Hanson Fee Estimate for Details
-
30 Percent Railroad Shoofly and Phasing Plan
9.3
See Hanson Fee Estimate for Details
-
60, 90 & 100 Percent Railroad Shoofly and Phasing Plan
9.4
See Hanson Fee Estimate for Details
-
Shoofly Plans - Hanson
See Hanson Fee Estimate for Details
-
Shoofly Coordination (BergerABAM)
9.5
1 20 16 44 - 54 - -
135
Shoofly Design Coordination
- 6 8 16 - - -
30
Shoofly Plans - BergerABAM
- 10 - 20 - 54 - .
84
Shoofly Coordination Estimate
1 4 8 8 - - -
21
TASK 10 - STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING
10
75 1,195 2,720 14 168 2,196 48 160
6.576
I
BNSF Bridge and Walls
10.1
22 120 260 - 20 206 - 30
658
Coordination and Meetings with CITY and BNSF (3 Meetings)
12 12 12 - - - 6
42
Retaining Wait and integration
- 12 24 - 4 _ .
40
Foundation Design and Ground improvement
- 20 60 - 8 - - -
88
Staging and Misc Details
- 12 40 - 8 - - -
60
BNSF Bridge Plans
42 84 - 190 - -
316
BNSF Conceptual Submittal
2 4 6 - - - - 4
16
BNSF 30% Submittal
2 4 8 - 8 - 6
28
BNSF 60% Submittal
2 6 12 - - 8 6
34
BNSF Final Submittal
2 4 8 - _ 4
18
WSDOT/CITY Contract Submittal
2 4 6 - - - 4
16
UPRR Bridge and Walls
10.2
22 206 544 - 54 454 - 32
1,312
Goct-dinetion and Meetings with CITY and UPRR (3 Meetings)
12 12 12 - - - - 6
42
Retaining Wall and Integration
- 10 40 - 5 - - -
56
Foundation Design and Ground Improvement
24 BO - 12 - - -
116
Staging and Misc Details
- 12 60 - 24 - - -
96
Superstructure Design and Track Coordination
- 40 120 - 12 - - -
172
Page 8 of 31
EXHBIIT D-1 - CON'SULTANTFEE DETERMINATION
CITY OF TUKWILA - STRANDER OULEVARD EXTENSION
ABAM Phase 3 Hours
9/5/2017
Page 9 of 31
Task
Number
ap
'IT
......
ra r5
cc
E.- 2
a,
c
.....
to
2
o.
0
c <
o o
c a a
15 C 111 ii; Q ,o] 2
2 7: bc = c Q
0 CL, a id.
a5 w o01 0 0
u
o.
CI
.c
0 -0
E <
ic -
a o
0 o
Totals
DSC
5
93_03 1
$ 63.54 .:
$ 47.98 1 $ 40.67 I $ 62.04 I $ 46.26 '
$ 40.00
35.26
UPRR Bridge Plans
-
86
172 - - 438
-
_
696
UPRR Conceptual Submittall
2
4
8 - - 4
-
4
22
UPRR 30% Submittal
2
4
12 - - 4
-
6
28
UPRR 60% Submittal
2
6
20 - - 8
8
44
UPRR Final Submittal
2
4
12 - - -
-
4
22
tevsoonciTY Contract Submittal
2
4
8 - - -
-
4
18
UPRR Temporary Shoring Wall
10.3
-
24
32 - - -
-
8
64
Temporary Shoring Wall Design
See Bright Fee Estimate for Details
-
Coordination of Staging with Civil, Structural, and Shoofly
See Bright Fee Estimate for Details
-
UPRR Temporary Shoring Wall Plans
See Bright Fee Estimate for Details
-
Bright Engineering Design Coordination
-
12
16 - - -
-
28
Coordination with UPPR Submittals in Task 102
-
12
16 - - -
8
36
Sound Transit Vehicular Bridge
10.4
8
136
304 - 26 242
16
26
758
Foundation Design and Ground Improvement
-
28
88 - 6 _
-
122
Superstructure Design
See Bright Fee Est mate for Details
-
Retaining and Shoring Wall Design Coordination
-
16
40 - 12 -
-
-
68
Coordination of Staging with Civil and Structural
-
16
24 - 8 -
-
-
48
Vehicular Bridge Plans (Substructure)
-
46
92 - _ 234
-
-
372
Vehicular Bridge Plans (Superstructure)
See Bright Fee Estimate for Details
-
Bright Engineering Design Coordination
-
12
24 - - -
-
36
30% City Submittal
2
4
8 - - 4
8
6
32
60% City Submittal
2
4
8 - - 4
8
8
34
90% City Submittal
2
6
12 - -
-
4
24
WSDOTICITY Contract Submittal
2
4
8 -
.
8
22
Retaining VValls
10.5
8
340
760 - 28 716
16
26
1,894
Underctossing Wall Concept and Layout
16
40 - 16 12
-
-
84
Coordination with Utilities, Drainage, and Staging
-
12
24 - 12 8
-
1 56
Retaining Wats #1 thru #4 Design
-
24
80 -
-
-
104
Retaining Walls #5, #8 & #17 Design
-
24
72 - - -
-
-
96
Retaining Walls #6 and #7 Design
-
24
60 -
-
8-4
Retaining Walls #9 thru #12 Design
-
32
80 - -
-
-
112
Retaining Walls #13 thru #16 and Moment Slab Design
32
80 - - -
..
-
112
Railing and Fence Design
-
8
24 - - -
-
- 32
Page 9 of 31
EXHBIIT D-1 - CONSULTANTFEE DETERMINATION
CITY OF TUKWILA - STRANDER BOULEVARD EXTENSION
ABAM Phase 3 Hours
915/2017
Page 10 of 31
Task
Nurnber
t;
0
Tv
7
o.
.07
0
o
0
c <
c —
LLI toi` i it_
T "B citl
Z CI c 0 Til
C I:2 ra f a
w cr) o 0
t.,9
E
RI ....
m o
o o
Totais
DSC
$ 93.03
5 5
. 1
47.98 .67 5 62.041
46.26
40.00
.26
Retaining Wall Plans
-
132
264 - ..
668
-
-
1,084
30% City Submittal
2
8
8
4
8
6
35
60% City Submittal
2
8
8 _ -
4
8
38
90% City Submittal
2
12
12 -
-
-
4
30
WSDOTICITY Contract Submittal
2
8
a - -
-
-5
26
Seal and Fascia Walls
10.6
8
200
452 - 24
354
-
16
1,054
Sea i Concept and Layout
-
16
36 12
8
-
-
72
Coordination with Utilities, Drainage. Structures and Staging
-
12
24 - 12
8
-
4
60
Un -Reinforced Seal Design
-
20
40 - -
-
-
-
60
Ground tinprovement Design
-
8
24
-
32
Reinforced Seal Design
-
16
40 - -
-
-
-
5
Edge Beam and Approach Slab Design
-
20
48 -
-
-
-
68
Fascia Wall Design
24
80 - -
-
-
104
Structural Seal Plans
-
66
132 - -
338
..
-
536
30% City Submittal
2
4
4 - -
-
12
60% City Submittal
2
4
6 -
-
-
4
1
90% City Submittal
2
6
12 -
-
-
4
24
WSDOTit !TY Contract Submittal
2
4
6 - -
-
14
TraiI Bridge
10.7
4
56
134 8 8
124
_
342
Conceptual. Design and Coordination with Venders
i.
4
16 - -
-
-
20
Foundation Design
-
16
40 - 4
-
-
60
Coordination of Staging with Civil and Structural
4
16 8 4
-
-
-
32
Pedestrian Bridge Plans
-
24
48 - -
124
-
-
196
30% City Submittal
1
2
4 - -
-
-
60% City Submittal
1
2
4 -
-
-
2
90% City Submittal
1
2
4 - -
-
-
2
9, 1
WSDOT/CITY Contract Submittal
1
2
2 -
-
iscellaneous Structures
10.8
3
58
128 - 8
100
-6
303
Limits of Structural Excavation Development
-
12
20 - 4
-
-
-
36
Luminaire Brackets Design
Signal Bridge Design
-
12
40 - 4
See Bright Fee Estimate for Details
-
-
-
,
Signal Bridge Foundation Design
See Bright Fee Estimate for Details
Page 10 of 31
EXHBIIT D-1 CONSULTANTFEE DETERMINATION
CITY OF TIJKWILA - STRANDER BOULEVARD EXTENS ON
ABAM Phase 3 Hours
9/5/2017
U
0 I.-
Page 11 of 31
Q
-0-' 0)
a.c
71
Task
01 7 % C at 8
o o o t .c til e —
on ti. oi 2
-97. a a
00. 31 0'
c 3— WO.,
2
lc
CL
MI
E ''‘
r -6
a. 0
6.,
Number
a_ (7/ w 0 uo 0 0
0
0 u
Totals
DSC
$ 93,03 I $ 63,54 t $ 47.98 f $ 40.67 1 $ 62.04 I $ 46.26 1
$ 40.00
$ $ 35.26
Miscellaneous Structures Plans
See Bright Fee Estimate for Details
-
Miscellaneous Structures Plans
- 20 40 - - 100
-
-
160 =
Bright Engineering Design Coordination
- 8 16 - - -
-
-
24
60% City Submittal
1 2 4 - - -
-
2
9
90% City Submittal
1 2 4 - - -
2
9
WSDOT/CITY Contract Submittal
1 2 4 - -
-
2
' 9
Structural Special Provisions and Estimate
10.9
_ 45 106 - - -
-
8
160
30% City Submittal - Estimate
- 8 24 - -
-
2
34
60% City Submittal - Special Provision Outline and Estimate
- 20 48 - - -
2
70
90% City Submittal - Special Provision and Estimate
- 12 24 - - -
-
2
38
WSDOT/CITY Contract Submittal
- 6 10 -
-
2
18
Project Aesthetics
10.10
- 9 - 6 - -
16
-
31
Project Aesthetics Meetings (3 - 2 hr Meetings)
- 9 - 6 - -
16
-
31
TASK 11 - GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING SUPPORT
' 11
12 8 18 - - -
-
-
38
Subsurface Explorations and Testing
11.1
See Shannon and Wilson Fee Estimate for Details
-
Update Existing Groundwater Flow Model Structure
11.2
See Shannon and Wilson Fee Estimate for Details
-
Update Groundwater Flow Model Calibration
11.3
See Shannon and Wilson Fee Estimate for Details
-
Groundwater Flow Model Simulations to Incorporate Phase 3A
11.4
See Shannon and Wilson Fee Estimate for Details
Geotechnical Engineering
1 11.5
See Shannon and Wilson Fee Estimate for Details
Geotechnical Review (BergerABAM)
11.9
12 8 18 - - -
-
-
38
Review of Draft Geotechnical Report
9 6 12 - - -
-
-
27
Review of Final Geotechnical Report
3 2 6 - - -
-
-
11
TASK 12 - DRAINAGE DESIGN
12
14 32 - 168 - 28
-
12
254
Determine Preferred Discharge Route
- 4 - 24 8
-
-
36
Determine Wettand Hycfroperiod Baseline with WieleneriCity
- 4 - 4 - -
-
-
8
Finalize Conceptual Drainage Design
'
- 4 - 12 - -
-
-
16
Draft Drainage Memo
8 8 - 100 - 20
-
8
44
Address Comments on Draft Drainage Memo
2 8 - 20 - -
-
-
30
Final Drainage Memo
I
4 4 - 8 -
-
4
20
Page 11 of 31
EXHBIIT D-1 CONSULTANTFEE DETERMINATION
CITY OF TUKWILA - STRANDER BOULEVARD EXTENSION
ABAM Phase 3 Hours
915/2017
Page 12 of 31
Task
Number
00
-ET
a.
To tp•
.) ,a
c c
a.
ILJ
,cg
tt..w
TO ,
I. eD
...
c
w
8
cu
a
-a
:
u
a
o
t 0
c 0
0 0.
in
0
<
t..)
171 0
0 0.
0 0
c
fa 0
00
rD u
Totals
DSC
$ 93.03 1
$ 63.54 I. 5
47.98
5
40.67 1
$ 62.04
$ 46.26 I
$ 40.00
1 5
35.26
TASK 13 - PUMP STATION DESIGN
13
12
312
264
904
20
864
-
48
2,424
Meeling with City to Determine Criteria
13.1
-
4
-
4
-
-
-
2
10
Draft Stormwater Pump Station Memorandum
13.2
-
44
-
84
-
16
-
4
148
Final Pump Station Memorandum
13.3
-
16
-
16
-
-
-
2
34
Public Interest Findings
13.4
-
36
-
-
-
-
-
-
36
Stormwater Pump Station Drawings
13.5
12
116
40
464
-
440
-
-
1,072
Specifications
13.6
-
16
40
80
.
-
40
176
Construction Cost Estimate
13.7
-
4
-
40
20
-
-
-
64
Outfall Pump Station Design (Optional)
13.8
-
76
184
216
.408
-
-
884
!TASK 14 - ROADWAY DESIGN
14
20
950
120
2,492
54
2,560
80
24
6,300
Roadway Geometry
14,1
..
52
-
208
-
228
80
8
576
Determine Design Criteria & Roadway Limits
-
4
-
16
-
4
-
-
24
Develop Cross-sections
-
4
-
8
-
16
28
ReWew Sigh! Distance
-
4
-
16-
-
-
-
20 !
Autotum Analysis
4
-
16
-
16
-
-
36
ADA Analysis
-
4
-
16
.
16
-
-
36
Develop Roadway Conceptual Design
-
8
16
-
16
-
-
40
Review Roadway Conceptual Design with City
-
4
-
-
-
-
_
-
4
Finalize Roadway Conceptual Design
4
-
8
8
-
20
Generating Environmental Documents
-
8
-
32
-
32
-8
80
Base map Review and Roadway Modeling
-
8
-
80
-
120
80
-
288
Trail Layout 14.2
4
24
16
40
-
20
-
-
104
Meet with City and King County Parks
4
4
4
-
-
-
-
12
Develop Trail Conceptual Criteria & Design
-
8
16
4
-
-
28
Develop 3 Alternative Trail Routes/Configuralions
-
4
4
16
-
12
-
-
36
Review Trail Alts with City/County to Determine Preferred Design
-
4
4
-
-
-
-
8
Finalize Trail Conceptual Design
-
4
4
8
-
4
-
-
20
Project Construction Staging 14.3
-
12
16
22
22
8
-
-
80
Develop Constniction Staging/ Phasing Concepts
-
6
12
16
16
4
-
-
56
Review Construction Staging/ Phasing Concepts With City
-
2
2
-
-
-
-
4
Finalize Construction Staging/ Phasing Concepts
-
2
2
6
6
4
.
-
20
Page 12 of 31
EXHBIIT D-1 CONSULTANTFEE DETERMINATION
CITY OF TUKWILA - STRANDER BOULEVARD EXTENS ON
ABAM Phase 3 Hours
915/2017
Page 13 of 31
Task
Number
o
tA c3
c c
-.7 m
a_
io
o
ci.,
c
Q
-2-..
a_
t _C
2 Pi
tr) tfl
c
7=-
a
"Zi 7,
ea
c 0
0 0.
(.) ti)
c
0
CA 0 ri3
ca.
at a.
0 0
0 73
E 4
a. o
0.
0 C)
Totals
DSC
$ 93.03 1
$ 63.54 1
$ 47..98 j
$ 40.67 i 5
62.04 1
$ 46.26 I $ 40.00 1
$ 35.26
Roadway Plans (See General -Civil Drawing List)
Specifications
Construction Cost Estimate
14.4
14.5
14.6
-
8
8
742
60
60
72
8
8
2,142
40
40
-
16
16
2,264 --
- -
40 -
8
8
5,220
140
180
TASK 15 - SANITARY SEWER REPLACEMENT
15
--
.
-
-
- -
-
_
Total
414
3,599
3,413
4,371
372
6,010 136
408
18,723
Page 13 of 31
EXHIBIT DI: CONSULTANT FEE DETERMINATION
CITY OF TUKWILA - STRANDER BOULEVARD EXTENSION
Right -of -Way Drawing List
915/2017
DRAWING UST
Number
o_
p. cn
3 ra
a. E
cr:
c
t
a)
n.
To ..
4- 67 . —
GO
= 4
«. =
La
u ,c
c.7) wu
a
eR
, ,ro
7ii -3
0
.
Lo
a
t)
Z.:
4
c
.,c „..
5 0
0 0
0
u
:c
ci.
fa
0<
6
a
U
--
u c
Totals
DSC
$ 93.03 1
$ 63.54 1
$ 47.98 I] $ 40.67 i
$ 62.04 1
$ 46.26
$ 40.00 I
$ 35.26
] ,
RIGHT-OF-WAY PLANS
_
10
- 34
-
68
-
-
112
man- OF WAY AND EASEMENT KEY MAP
1
2
2
4
8
[
RIGHT OF WAY AND EASEMENT PLANS - SHEET 1
2
2
8
16
26
-..RIGHT OF WAY AND EASEMENT PLANS - SHEET 2
3
2
8
16
26
FRI-Gl-fl- OF WAY AND EASEMENT PLANS - SHEET 3
4
2
8
15
26
'RIGHT OF WAY AND EASEMENT PLANS - SHEET 4
5
2
8
16
26
RK;HT OF WAY MD EASEMENT PLANS - SHE t 5
6
RIGHT OF WAY AND EASEMENT PLANS - SHEET 6
7
IRIC-HT OF WAY AND EASEMENT PLANS - SHEET 7
8
RIGHT OF WAY AND EASEMENT FLANS - SHEET 8
9,
'MGHT OF WAY AND EASEMENT PLANS - SHEET 9
10
RIGHT OF WAY AND EASEMENT PLANS - SHEET 19
11
RIGI-fT OF WAY AND EASEMENT PLANS - SHEET 11
12
IC -4-1T OF WAY AND EASEMENT PLANS. SHEET 12
13
SUBTOTAL - ALL RIGH`T-OF-WAY DRAWINGS
10
34
68
112
Page 14 of 31
EXHIBIT 0-1: CONSULTANT FEE DETERMINATION
CITY OF TUKWILA - STRANDER BOULEVARD EXTENSION
Shoofly Drawing List
9/5/2017
Page 15 of 31
....
C.)
a_
c
Lit
r ,
O
o
C
w r,
LI
.c
_c
c o
a a
.... c
r,
T. C 0
o . a
a.
f ell
E
'0
DRAWING UST
Number
cri ku
to 0
.
o. <
Totals,
DSC
$ .01
6
.54
_1
47.9
4 .67 1 5204 4&26 1
$ 40.00
1
5.2
SHOOFLY PLANS - HA ON
-
- _
.
SHOOFLY EMBANKMENT PLACEMENT - EAST
SHOOFLY EMBANKMENT PLACEMENT - WEST
2
SHOOFLY EMBANKMENT PLACEKENT - WEST END DETAILS
3
SHOOFLY EMBANKMENT PLACEMENT - EAST END DETAILS
4
SHOOFLY EMBANKMENT PLACEMENT - SPU SECTION
5
, UPRR SHOOFLY - TYPICAL SECTiONS
6
1.7PRR SHOOFLY - TEMPORARY - TRACK PLAN AND PROFILE
7
See Hanson Fee Estimate for Details
UPRR SHOOFLY - FINAL - TRACK PLAN AND PROFILE
8
UPRR SHOOFLY - CROSS SECTIONS - SHEET 1
9
UPRR SHOOFLY - CROSS SECTLONS - SHEET 2
10
UPRR SHOOFLY - CROSS SECTIONS - SHEET 3
11
UPRR SHOOFLY - CROSS SECTIONS - SHEET 4
12
UPRR SHOOFLY - CROSS SECTIONS - SHEET 5
13
UPRR SHOOFLY - DROSS SECTIONS - SHEET 6
14
UPRR SHOOFLY - CROSS SECTIONS - SHEET 7
15
i UPRR SHOOFLY - CROSS SECTIONS - SHEET 8
18
I
SHOOFLY PLANS - BER E BA
a
2
-
!SHOOFLY SURCI-AGRE
17 -
2
- 4 . 12
-
-
16
1SHOOFLY END GRADING
16 -
2
4 - 12
16
1SHOOFLY EMBANKMENT CATCH DETAILS (1 OF 2) 19
2
4 - 10
-
16
SHOOFLY EM8AWMENT CATCH DETAILS (2 OF 2) 20 -
2
4 - 10
16
SHOOFLY MISCELLANEOUS 1 21
2
4
-16
,SUBTOT& • ALL SHOOFLY DRAWINGS
10
20 54
84
Page 15 of 31
EXHIBIT D1: CONSULTANT FEE DETERMINATION
CITY OF TUKWILA - STRANDER BOULEVARD EXTENSION
Structures Drawing List
915/2017
DRAWING LIST
Nurnber
w
6
a c
Q. g
5)
Fi
n.
75'
.15.. 2;
0 c
2 E1
rii Et
0
c
u.1
'-f•
6
c
=
_
u fr/
<
5)
a
Ts o
a a
0 0
11
,5
6
0
2 -a
a_<
Totals
DSC
. 1
$ 6154 1
$ 47.98 1
$ 40.67 1
$ 62.04
5
46.26 1
$ 40.00
1 5
35.26 1
BNSF BRIDGE PLANS
10.1
-
42
84
-
-
190
_
-
3 6
BNSF BRIDGE - BRIDGE GENERAL NOTES AND SHEET LIST
1
_
2
4
12
-
-
18
BNSF BRIDGE - GENERAL PLAN
2
2
4
.
-
12
.
-
18
BNSF BRIDGE - ELEVATION AND TYPICAL. SECTION
3
-
2
4
10
-
-
16
BNSF BRIDGE - RETAINING WALL DEMOLTION
4
2
4
-
10
16
BNSF BRIDGE - GROUND IMPROVEMENT - SHEET 1
5
-
2
4
-
10
-
16
BNSF BRIDGE GROUND IMPROVEMENT - SHEET 2
6
2
4
-
10
-
16
BNSF BRIDGE - GROUND IMPROVEMENT - SHEET.3
7
2
4
-
10
-
16
BNSF BRIDGE - PILE LAYOUT PLAN & FOOTING REINFORCEMENT
8
2
4
-
10
-
16
eNSF BRIDGE PILE & FOOTING DETAILS
9
-
2
4
-
10
-
16
BNSF BRIDGE - TYPICAL SECTION & BEARING ELEVATIONS
10
2
4
8
-
-
14
BNSF BRIDGE - ABUTMENT 41 ELEVATION
11
-
2
4
8
14
BNSF BRIDGE ABUTMENT #1 PLAN
12
-
2
4
-
8
-
14
BNSF BRIDGE - ABUTMENT #3 ELEVATION
13
2
4
-
-
8
-
14
BNSF BRIDGE - ABUTMENT F* PLAN
14
2
4
-
8
-
-
14
BNSF BRIDGE - PIER 62 ELEVATION
15
2
-
5
-
14
BNSF BRIDGE - PIER #2 PLAN
16
-
2
4
8
-
-
14
BNSF BRIDGE_ - STAGELINE WALLS AT ABUTMENTS
17
2
4
-
8
-
I
14
BNSF BRIDGE - ABU -WEN I & PIER SECTIONS
18
2
4
8
-
..
14
BNSF BRIDGE - MISCELLANEOUS FOUNDATION DETAILS
19
-
2
4
8
-
14
BNSF BRIDGE - FOUNDATION REINFORCEMENT TABLES
20
2
4
-
-
6
14
BNSF BRIDGE - FOUNDATION ESTIMATED QUANTITIES
21
2
4
8
-
-
14
UPRR BRIDGE PLANS
10 2
-
64
172
-
-
438
-
-
696
UPRR BRIDGE - BRIDGE GENERAL NOTES AND SHEET LIST
22
2
4
-
12
-
18
UPRR BRIDGE - GENERAL PLAN
23
2
4
12
-
-
18
UPRR BRIDGE - ELEVATION AND TYPICAL SECTION
24
2
4
-
12
_
_
18
UPRR BRIDGE - SHEET PILE NOTES
25
2
4
-
12
-
-
18
UPRR BRIDGE - BRIDGE RETIANING WALL PLAN
26
2
4
10
-
-
16
UPRR BRIDGE - BRIDGE RETLANING WALL ELEVATION
27
2
4
10
16
UPRR BRIDGE - GROUND ANCHOR DETAILS
28
2
4
-
10
-
16
UPRR BRIDGE - WALER & ANCHOR VVALL DETAILS
29
-
2
4
10
16
UPRR BRIDGE SHORING, TIEBACK, AND ANCHOR WALL LIMITS
30
2
4
-
10
-
-
16
UPRR BRIDGE - GROUND IMPROVEMENT - SHEET 1
31
-
2
4
-
10
-
16
UPRR BRIDGE - GROUND IMPROVEMENT - SHEET 2
32
2
4
-
10
-
16
UPRR BRIDGE - GROUND IMPROVEMENT - SHEET 3
1 33
2
4
10
-
15
Page 16 o 1
EXHIBIT D1: CONSULTANT FEE DETERMINATION
CITY OF TUKWILA - STRANDER BOULEVARD EXTENSION
Structures Drawing List
9/5/2017
DRAWING UST
Number
1
-wTz6c64'/
o. 2 a.
W
ILAu U 60 0 0
a
-0
a. <
Totals
DSC
5
93.03 I $ 63,54 I
5
47.96 i $ 40.67 1 $ 62.04 ] $ 46.26 I 5
40.00 I 5
35.26
UPRR BRIDGE - PILE- LAYOUT PLAN & FOOTING REINFORCEMENT
34
2
4 - 10
,
-
16
UPRR BRIDGE - PILE & FOOTING DETAILS
35
2
4 10
-
-
16
UPRR BRIDGE - BEARING ELEVATIONS
36
2
4 - 10
-
-
16
UPRR BRIDGE - TYPICAL SECTION
37
2
4 10
16
UPRR BRIDGE- ABUTMENT #1 ELEVATION
38
2
4 - 10
16
UPRR BRIDGE - ABUTMENT #1 PLAN
39
2
4 - 10
-
16
UPRR BRIDGE - ABUTMENT #3 ELEVATION
40
2
4 10
_
16
UPRR BRIDGE - ABUTMENT #3 PLAN
41
- 2
4 - 10
_
-
16
UPRR BRIDGE - PIER #2 ELEVATION
42
2
4 10
-
16
UPRR BRIDGE - PIER #2 PLAN
43
- 2
4 1G
-
-
16
UPRR BRIDGE - STAGELINE WALLS AT ABUTMENTS
44
- 2
4 ID
-
16
UPRR BRIDGE - ABUTMENT & PIER SECTIONS
45
2
4 10
-
16
UPRR BRIDGE - MISCELLANEOUS FOUNDATION DETAILS
46
- 2
4 . ID
-
16
UPRR BRIDGE - FOUNDATION REINFORCEMENT TABLES
47
2
4 - ' 10
-
-
16
UPRR BRIDGE - FOUNDATION ESTIMATED QUANTITIES
48
. 2
4 _ 10
-
16
UPRR BRIDGE - FRAMING PLAN - SPAN 1 (MAIN 1 & 2)
49
2
4 10
-
-
16
UPRR BRIDGE - FRAMING PLAN - SPAN 2 (MAIN 1 & 2)
50
- 2
4 - 10
-
16
UPRR BRIDGE- FRAMING DETAILS
51
2
4 10
16
UPRR BRIDGE - BALLAST PAN PLAN
52
- 2
4 - It)
-
16
UPRR BRIDGE - BALLAST PAN DETAILS
53
2
4 ID
16
UPRR BRIDGE - BEARING DEIAILS
54
- 2
4 - - 10
_
16
UPRR BRIDGE - MISCELLANEOUS STEEL DETAILS (10F 2)
55
2
4 10
16
UPRR BRIDGE - MISCELLANEOUS STEEL DETAILS (2 OF 2)
56
2
4 - 10
-
16
UPRR BRIDGE - HANDRAIL PANEL DETAILS (1 OF 2)
57
2
4 10
16
UPRR BRIDGE - HANDRAIL PANEL DETAILS (2 OF 2)
58
- 2
4 - - 10
-
16
UPRR BRIDGE - BRIDGE DECK WATERPROOFING (1 OF 2)
59
2
4 - 10
16
UPRR BRIDGE - BRIDGE DECK WATERPROOFING (2 OF 2)
60
- 2
4 _ 10
16
UPRR BRIDGE - BRIDGE UTILITY PLAN
61
2
4 10
-
16
UPRR BRIDGE - BRIDGE UTILITY DETAILS
62
- 2
4 - 10
-
16
UPRR BRIDGE - MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS (1 OF 2)
63
- 2
4 - - 10
-
-
16
UPRR BRIDGE - MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS (2 OF 2)
1
64
2
4 - 10
-
16
UPRR TEMPORARY SHORING WALL PLANS
103
- -
_ - - _
-
_.
1
UPRR BRIDGE - SHEET P-ILE NOTES
65
UPRR BRIDGE - TEMPORARY SHORING PLAN - STAGE 1
66
UPRR BRIDGE - TEMPORARY SHORING ELEVATION - STAGE 1
67
See Elnelht Fee Es6rnele for Detaes
UPRR BRIDGE. GROUND ANCHOR DETAILS
68
Page 17 of 31
EXHIBIT D1: CONSULTANT FEE DETERMINATION
CITY OF TUKWILA - STRANDER BOULEVARD EXTENSION
Structures Drawing List
9/5/2017
DRAWING LIST
Number
7
a_
_ ,,,
c
%—.
a. a
c
LU
-•
.
a.
ra ,..
z 0
,e
z a
co w
<
c
-6) 'tz
c c
w -. 12
o ,,. 2 ,
•"">
i..5 0 an 0 0
._
.c
0.
r.9
—
..:
o
o
C . .)
0.
i
ci. <
Totals
DSC
S 93.03 [s
63.54 1
$ 47.98J
5
40. 7 1 $ 62.04 ! $ 46
26 1
5
40.00
1 5
35.26
UPRR BRIDGE - WALER & ANCHOR WALL DETAILS
69
UPRR BRIDGE - SHORING, TIEBACK, AND ANCHOR WALL LIMITS
70
VEHICULAR BRIDGE PLANS
10.4
-
46
92
-234
-
-
372
VEHICULAR BRIDGE - BRIDGE GENERAL NOTES AND SHEET LIST
71
-
2
4
12
18
VEHICULAR BRIDGE - GENERAL PLAN & ELEVATION
72
2
4
-
12
-
-
18
VEHICULAR BRIDGE - SHEET PILE NOTES
73
2
4
.
10
-
-
16
VEHICULAR BRIDGE - BRIDGE RETIANING WALL PLAN
74
-
2
4
-
10
-
-
16
VEHICULAR BRIDGE - BRIDGE RETIANING WALL ELEVATION
75
2
4
- -
10
-
-
16
VEHICULAR BRIDGE - GROUND ANCHOR DETAILS
76
-
2
4
10
-
16
VEHICULAR BRIDGE - WALER & ANCI-IOR WALL DETAILS
77
2
4
-
10
-
16
VEHICULAR BRIDGE - SHORING, TIEBACK, AND ANCHOR WALL LIMITS
78
-
2
4
- -
10
-
16
VEHICULAR BRIDGE - GROUND IMPROVEMENT - SHEET 1
79
-
2
4
10
-
-
16
VEHICULAR BRIDGE - GROUND IMPROVEMENT - SHEET 2
80
2
4
- -
10
-
-
16
VEHICULAR BRIDGE - GROUND IMPROVEMENT - SHEET 3
81
-
2
4
_
10
-
-
16
VEHICULAR BRIDGE - PILE LAYOUT PLAN & FOOTING REINFORCEMENT
82
2
4
-
10
-
16
VEHICULAR BRIDGE - PILE & FOOTING DETAILS
83
2
4
-
10
-
16
VEHICULAR BRIDGE - BEARING ELEVATIONS
84
2
4
-
10
-
-
16
VEHICULAR BRIDGE - ABUTMENT '41 ELEVATION
85
-
2
4
,
10
-
16
VEHICULAR BRIDGE - ABUTMENT #1 PLAN
86
2
4
-
to
-
16
VEHICULAR BRIDGE - ABUTMENT rt3 ELEVATION
87
-
2
4
-
10
-
16
VEHICULAR BRIDGE - ABUTMENT tI3 PLAN
88
2
4
10
16
VEHICULAR BRIDGE - STAGELINE WALLS AT ABUTMENTS
89
2
4
- -
10
-
-
16
VEHICULAR BRIDGE - ABUTMENT & PIER SECTIONS
90
-
2
4
10
-
16
VEHICULAR BRIDGE - MISCELLANEOUS FOUNDATION DETAILS
91
-
2
4
-
10
-
i6
VEHICULAR BRIDGE - FOUNDATION REINFORCEMENT TABLES
92
2
4
-
10
-
16
VEHICULAR BRIDGE - FOUNDATION ESTIMATED 'QUANTITIES
93
-
2
4
-
10
-
-
16
VEHICULAR BRIDGE- FRAMING PLAN
94
VEHICULAR BRIDGE - TYPICAL SECTION
95
VEHICULAR BRIDGE - GIRDER DETAILS (1 OF 3)
96
VEHICULAR BRIDGE- GIRDER DETAILS (2 OF 3)
97
VEHICULAR BRIDGE - GIRDER DETAILS (3 OF 3)
98
VEHICULAR BRIDGE END DIAPHRAGM
99
VEHICULAR BRIDGE - INTERIVIEDIATE DIAPHRAGM
100
VEHICULAR BRIDGE - DECK REiNFORCEMENT
101
VEHICULAR BRIDGE - DECK REINFORCEMENT SECTION
102
VEHICULAR BRIDGE- TRAFFIC BARRIER DETAILS (1 OF 3)
103
Se
BrIgthi Fee Estimate for Details
Page 18 of 31
EXHIBIT 01: CONSULTANT FEE DETERMINATION
CITY OF TUKWILA - STRANDER BOULEVARD EXTENSION
Structures Drawing List
9/5/2017
DRAWING UST
I Number
tl
-2-
—6 'z
cl. Cr)
2 2
ci
Cli
c
. _
oa
Lij
tdi
ci
a
1
z 0
u c
2 a
Cri w
'Eo
0
_
c
IL
_
o
=
.-
o co
<
(..)
cl
c
cm
cTi .cii
0 0
.2
.c
a
6
o
0
.1 c
:i.'
L 71
Totals
DSC
$ 93.03 1
$ 63.54 I
$ 47.98 I
$ 40.67 1
$ 62.04 I
$ 46.26 1
$ 40.00 I
$ 35.26
VEHICULAR BRIDGE - TRAFFIC BAR2R1ER DETAILS (2 OF 3)
104
105
106
107
1013
109
VEHICULAR BRIDGE- TRAFFIC BA RR I E R DETAILS (3 OF 3)
VEHICULAR BRIDGE - EXPANSION JOINT DETAILS
VEHICULAR BRIDGE - APPROACH SLAB DETAILS (1 OF 2)
VEHICULAR BRIDGE- APPROACH SLAB DETAILS (2 OF 2)
VEHICULAR BRIDGE - SUPERSTRUCTURE REINFORCEMENT TABLES
RETAINING WALL PLANS
10.5
-
132
264-
-
688
-
-
1,084
STRUCTURAL RETAINING WALL - GENERAL NOTES AND LIST OF SHEETS
EXISTING RETAINING WALL REMOVAL
SHEET PILE NOTES
RETAINING WALL 81 - PLAN (1 OF 2)
!RETAINING WALL 81 - PLAN (2 OF 2)
RETAINING WALL 81 - ELEVATION (1 OF 2)
RETAINING WALL 81 - ELEVATION (2 OF 2)
RETAINING WALL 41 - SECTIONS
RETAINING WALLS 82 & F/3- PLAN (1 OF 2)
RETAINING WALLS 42 483- PLAN (2 OF 2)
RETAINING WALLS 82 & 83 - ELEVATION (1 OF 2)
RETAINING WALLS 82 & 83 - ELEVATION (2 OF 2)
110
111
112
113
114
115_
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125-
126
127-
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136-
137-
138
.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
4
4
4
4
412
4
4
4-
4-
412
410
4
410
410
4
4
4-
4
410
4
4
4-
4
412
4-
4-
4
4
4-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
_
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
12-
12
10
12-
10
10
10
12
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
12
10
10
10
10
-
-
-
-
-
-
_
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
18
18
16
18
18
16
16
16
18
18
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
18
la
16
16
16
16
RETAINING WALLS 82 & 83 - SECTIONS
RETAINING WALL 44 -PLAN
RETAINING WALL 4.1 - ELEVATION
RETAINING WALL #4 - SECTIONS
RETAINING WALL 85- PLAN
RETAINING WALL 85 ELEVATION
RETAINING WALL 85 - SECTIONS & DETAILS (1 OF 2)
RETAINING WALL 85 - SECTIONS & DETAILS (2 OF 2)
RETAINING WALL 46 PLAN
RETAINING WALL 46 - ELEVATION
RETAINING WALL 46 - SECTIONS
RETAINING WALL 87 - PLAN
RETAINING WALL 87- ELEVATION
RETAINING WALL 87 - SECTIONS
RETAINING WALL 48 - PLAN
RETAINING WALL 88 - ELEVATION
RETAINING WALL 88 - SECTIONS & DETAILS (1 OF 2)
Page 19 of 31
EXHIBIT D1: CONSULTANT FEE DETERMINATION
CITY OF TUKWILA - STRANDER BOULEVARD EXTENSION
Structures Drawing List
9/5/2017
DRAWING UST
Number
rs
co
c
-5
a. c
. . us
CI. cp t
5 oo os
c c —--.
o
...Ct.
a. E a..
0
os
r.
72
1
U , us
ar -3
cl; wCs
o
—
-
To' '5
r 0
Ls u
0
-:-.
m
._ ,.
0 0
0 CE
0 0
o
0
0
0 0 E
- 13
e.5 a. <
Total
DSC
$ 9193 t S 63.54
$ 47.98 I $ 40.67 I
$ 62.04 1
5 46/6 1
$ 40.00 ] $ 35.26
RETAINING WALL a - SECTIONS & DETAILS (2 OF 2)
139
2
4 -
-
10
-
16
RETAINING WALL #9 - PLAN
140
- 2
4
10
.
18
RETAINING WALL #9 - ELEVATION
141
- 2
4 -
-
10
-
16
RETAINING WALL #9 - SECTIONS
142
2
4
-
10
15
RETAINING WALL #10 - PLAN
143
2
4
-
10
-
16
RETAINING VVALL #10 - ELEVATION
144
- 2
4
-
10
-
15
RETAINING WALL #10 - SECTIONS
145
Z
1 -
10
16
RETAINING WALL #11 - PLAN
146
- 2
4
-
10
-
16
RETAINING WALL #11 - ELEVATION (1 OF 21
147
2
4 -
-
12
15
RETAINING WALL #11 - ELEVATION (2 OF 2)
148
2
4
10
16
RETAINING WALL #11 -SECTIONS
149
2
4 -
-
10
16
RETAINING WALL #12 - ELEVATION (I OF 2)
150
, 2
4 -
_
12
18
RETAINING WALL #12 - ELEVATION (2 OF 2)
151
.. 2
4 -
-
10
-
16
RETAINING WALL #12 - SECTIONS
152
2
4 -
-
10
16
RETAINING WALL - GROUND ANCHOR DETIALS (1 OF 2)
153
• 2
4
10
16
RETAINING WALL - GROUND ANCHOR DET1ALS (2 OF 2)
154
2
4 -
-
10
15
RETA)NING WALL - ANCHOR WALL DETIALS (1 06 4)
155
2
4
-
10
16
RETAINING VVALL - ANCHOR WALL DETIALS (2 OF 4)
156
- 2
4
-
10
-
16
RETAINING WALL - ANCHOR WALL DETIALS (3 OF 4)
157
_ 2
4
_
10
15
RETAINING WALL - ANCHOR WALL DETIALS (4 06 41
158
- 2
4
10
16
RETAINING WALLS - SOLDIER PILE WALL DETAILS (1 OF 2)
159
- 2
4
-
12
•
18
'RETAINING WALLS - SOLDIER PILE WALL DETA1LS (2 OF 2)
160
- 2
4 -
12
15
RETAINING WALLS #13 TO #15 - PLAN
161
2
4 -
-
10
.
16
RETAINING WALLS #13  - ELEVATION
162
- 2
4
,
10
-
15
'RETAINING WALLS #14  - ELEVATION
163
2
4 -
10
15
RETAINING WALLS - GEOSYNTETIC WALL DETAILS (1 OF 2)
154
.. 2
4 .
10
16
RETAINING WALLS - GEOSYNTETIC WALL OETAILS (2 OF 2)
165
2
4 -
10
16
MOMENT SLAB DETAILS (1 OF 2)
166
- 2
4
10
16
MOMENT SLAB DETAILS (2 OF 2)
167
24
-
10
15
RETAINING WALL #17 - PLAN
165
- 2
4 -
-
10
16
'RETAINING WALL #12 - ELEVATION
169
2
4 -
12
15
RETAINING WALL *17 - SECTIONS & DETAILS (1 OF 21
170
- 2
4 -
12
18
RETAINING WALL #17 - SECTIONS & DETAILS (2062)
171
- 2
4 -
,
10
16
PEDESTRAIN RAILING (1 OF 2)
172
- 2
4
.
10
16
PEDESTRAIN RAILING (2 OF 2)
173
2
4 -
-
10
16
SAFETY FENCE DETAILS (1 06 2)
174
1'
4 -
-
10
16 1
SAFETY FENCE DETAILS (2 OF 2)
175
- 2
4 -
'
12
-
16
Page 20 of 31
EXHIBIT D1: CONSULTANT FEE DETERMINATION
CITY OF TUKWILA - STRANDER BOULEVARD EXTENSION
Structures Drawing List
91512017
LIST
Number
7.5
0
• „- -
a.
Ii ha-,
co. co
ci. 2
c
tu
6
a.
Ti ,..
U1 11.1
8
c
_
it/
0
c
- 13 c
ji '6EDRAWING
0 La 0 0
:E
0
—
0 c
a_ <
Totals
;
DSC
5
93
63 54 i 5
47.98 1
$ 40.67
1 5
62.04 i $ 46 26 i 5
40.00
[ 5
35.26
STRUCTURAL SEAL PLANS
10.6
-
132
-
, 338
_
-
636
SEAL - FOUNDATION PLAN (1 OF 5)
176
-
2
4
-
- 12
18
SEAL - FOUNDATION PLAN (2 OF 6)
177
.
2
4
12
18
SEAL - FOUNDATION PLAN (3 OF 6)
178
2
4
15
-
16
SEAL FOUNDATION PLAN (4 OF 6)
179
2
4
- 10
16
SEAL - FOUNDATION PLAN (5 OF 6)
180
-
2
4
-
10
-
16
SEAL - FOUNDATION PLAN (6 OF 6)
181
-
2
4
- IC)
-
16
SEAL - SECTIONS (1 OF 4)
182
2
4
-
12
18
SEAL - SECTIONS (2 OF 4)
183
2
4
_ 12
1$
SEAL - SECTIONS (3 OF 4)
184
2
4
-
10
-
15
SEAL SECTIONS (4 OF 4)
185
-
2
4
- 10
le
SEAL - STAGING (1 OF 2)
186
2
4
-
10
16
SEAL - STAGING (2 OF 2)
187
2
4
10
15
SEAL - STRUCTURE/FOUNDATON INTERFACE (1 OF 2)
188
2
4
10
16
SEAL - STRUCTUREFOLINDATION INTERFACE (2 OF 2)
189
-
2
4
10
-
15
SEAL - GROUND ;MPROVEMENT (1 OF 2)
190
2
4
- 10
16
SEAL - GROUND IMPROVEMENT (2 OF 2)
191
-
2
4
-
10
16
SEAL- REINFORCED SEAL DETAILS (1 OF 3)
192
2
4
10
15
SEAL - REINFORCED SEAL DETAILS (I OF 3)
193
2
4
-
10
_
16
SEAL- REINFORCED SEAL DETAILS (1 OF 3)
194
2
4
10
16
SEAL - EDGE BEAM (1 OF 5)
195
2
4
10
-
16
SEAL - EDGE BEAM (2 OF 5)
196
2
4
-
- 10
-
16
SEAL - EDGE BEAM (3 OF 5)
197
2
4
.
10
-
16
SEAL - EDGE BEAM (4 OF 5)
198
2
4
-
10
16
SEAL - EDGE BEAM (5 OF 5)
199
-
2
4
10
16
SEAL- APPROACH SLAB (oVEST)
200
2
4
10
-
16
SEAL - APPROACH SLAB (EAST)
201
2
4
_
- 10
-
16
SEAL - APPROACH SLAB (LOOP)
202
-
2
4
-
10
16
SEAL - APPROACH SLAB (NORTH)
203
2
4
10
16
SEAL - APPROACH SLAB (SOUTH)
204
2
4
-
- 10
-
16
SEAL - APPROACH SLAB DETAILS
205
2
4
10
-
16
SEAL - FASCIA WALL SECTIONS AND DETAILS (1 OF 3)
206
-
2
4
10
16
,SEAL - FASCIA WALL SECTIONS AND DETAILS (2 OF 3)
207
2
4
-
10
16
SEAL - FASCIA WALL SECTIONS AND DETAILS (3 OF 3)
208
-
2
4
- 10
16
!
I
PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE PLANS
10 7 1
-
24
45-
124
-
196
Page 21 of 31
EXHIBIT DI: CONSULTANT FEE DETERMINATION
CITY OF TUKWILA - STRANDER BOULEVARD EXTENSION
Structures Drawing List
91512017
DRAWING LIST
1
Number
):0
c
5.7 co
a
To t IL
.7
3 Ez o
c c "Ei
c- E Q.
To
0 0
u__F
2 cm
I.77, W
, c a
0 0
_c 0
c 2
Lu '-ra is
1-4 -3 2E,
= c ea 7,7
0 0 r.0 0 0
t.)
k
a
fo
L,...
—
..:
0
0
0 c
—
2 -0
a. q
Totals
DSC
$ 93.03 i $ 63,54 1
$ 47.98]
$ 41167 1 S 6104 1 $ 46.26 1
5
40.00 1
5
35.26
TRAIL BRIDGE - BRIDGE GENERAL NOTES AND SHEET LIST
209 . 2
4
- - 12
16
TRAIL BRIDGE - GENERAL PLAN 8 ELEVATION
210 - 2
4
- 12
18
TRAIL BRIDGE - SUPERSTRUCTURE TYPICAL SECTION & NOTES
211 2
4
10
-
16
TRAIL BRIDGE - FOUNDATION PLAN
212
- 2
4
- IC)
16
TRAIL BRIDGE - ABUTMENT ELEVATION
213
- 2
4
- - 10
-
16
TRAIL BRIDGE - ABUTMENT PLAN
214
- 2
4
10
-
16
TRAIL BRIDGE - ABUTMENT CURTAIN WALLS
215
2
4
- 10
-
16
TRAIL BRIDGE - MISCELLANEOUS FOUNDATION DETAILS (i OF 2)
216
. 2
4
. . 10
-
16
TRAIL BRIDGE - MISCELLANEOUS FOUNDATION DETAILS (2 OF 2)
217
- 2
4
- 10
- 16
TRAIL BRIDGE - FOUNDATION REINFORCEMENT TABLES
2/8
2
4
- - 10
-
, 16
TRAIL BRIDGE - FOUNDATION ESTIMATED QUANTITIES
219 - 2
4
- - 10
-
- 1
16
TRAIL BRIDGE - BEARiNGS
220 - 2
4
10
16
NIISCILLANEOLIS STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS
10.8 - 20
40
- . 100
-
-
160
LIMITS OF STRUCTURAL EXCAVATION CLASS A - BNSF FOUNDATION SLAB
221
- 2
4
- 10
-
16
LIMITS OF STRUCTURAL EXCAVATION CLASS A - uPRR FOUNDATION SLAB
222
- 2
4
, 10
-
15
LIMITS OF STRUCTURAL EXCAVATION CLASS A - VEHICULAR FOUNDATION SLA'
223
- 2
4
- 10
15
UM ITS OF STRUCTURAL EXCAVATION CLASS A - PED FOUNDATION FOOTINGS
224
2
4
- 10
-
15
LIMITS OF STRUCTURAL EXCAVATION CLASS A - ANCHOR WALLS
225
2
4
- 10
15
LNITS OF STRUCTURAL EXCAVATION CLASS A - SEAL (1 OF 3)
226
2
4
_ - 10
-
-
15
LIMITS OF STRUCTURAL EXCAVATION CLASS A - SEAL (2 OF 3)
227
- 2
4
- 10
-
-
15
LIMITS OF STRUCTURAL EXCAVATION CLASS A- SEAL (3 OF 3)
228
2
4
10
-
16
LUMINAIRE BRACKET DETAILS (1 OF 2)
229
- 2
4
- 10
16
LUMINAIRE BRACKET DETAILS (2 OF 2)
230
- 2
4
- 10
.
-
16
SIGNAL BRIDGE PLAN AND ELEVATION
231
SIGNAL BRIDGE DETAILS (1 OF 3)
232
SIGNAL BRIDGE DETAILS (2 OF 3)
233
See BrIgths Fee Estimate to Dews
SIGNAL BRIDGE DETAILS (3 OF 3)
234
SIGNAL BRIDGE FOUNDATION (1 OF 2)
235
SIGNAL BRIDGE FOUNDATION (2 OF 2)
236
SUBTOTAL - ALL STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS,
416
832
2112
1 3,360
Page 22 of 31
EXHIBIT D-1: CONSULTANT FEE DETERMINATION
CITY OF TUKWILA - STRANDER BOULEVARD EXTENSION
Pump Station Drawing List
9/5/2017
TASK 0ESCRFPT1ON
Task
Number
0
_ c
E 41I c
L tl
15i
.c
c a
o+ '—
o a.
LI m 00 10
0
1.1
c
Totals
DSC
$ 93.03 ¶ $ 63.54 1 5 47.98 $ 40.67 1 $ 62,04 $ 46.26 5 40.90
35.26
DRAINING LIST
Totals,
PUMP STATION PLANS
OUTFALL PUMP STATION PLANS
PUMP STATIONS - ovERALL PLAN
EXISTING PUMP STATION - DESIGN DATA
EXISING PUMP STATION - ENLARGED PLAN
IEXIS4NG PUMP STATION - DEMOLITON DETAILS - SHEET 1
1EXLS1NG PUMP STATION - OEMOLJTON DETAILS - SHEET 2
EXISING PUMP STATION - DEMOLITON DETAILS - SHEET 3
EXISTING PUMP STATION - WET WELL & VAULT - PLAN
EXISTING PUMP STATION - WET WELL AND VAULT SECTIONS - SHEET 1
EXISTING PUMP STATION - WET WELL AND VAULT SECTIONS - SHEET 2
EXISTING PUMP STATION - WET WELL ANO VAULT SECTIONS - SHEET 3
EXISTING PUMP STATION WET WELL AND VAULT DETAILS - SHEET1
EXISTING PUMP sTA-rtaN - WET WELL AND VAULT IDETFAILS - SHEET 2
EXISTING PUMP STATION - STRUCTURAL NOTES
!EXISTING PUMP STATION - STRUCTURAL DETAILS - SHEET 1
,EXISTING PUMP STATION - STRUCTURAL DETAJLS - SHEET 2
IGROUND WATER PUMP STATION - DESIGN DATA
GROUND WATER PUMP STATION - SITE PLAN
GROUND WATER PU52 STATION - PIPING PLAt4 AND PROFILES
GROUND WATER PUMP STATION - DEMOLITION DETAILS - SHEET 1
GROUND WATER PUMP STATION - DEMOLITION DET.AILS - SHEET 2
GROUND WATER PUMP STATION - WET WELL AND VAULT - PLAN
GROUND WATER PUMP STATION - WETWELL AND VAULT SECTIONS - SHEET 1
GROUND WATER PUMP STATION - WETWELL AND VAULT SECTIONS - SHEET 2
GROUND WATER PUMP STATION - CML DETAILS - SHEET
GROUND WATER PUMP STATION - COAL DETAILS - SHEET 2
OUND WATER PUMP STATION - CML IJETAILS - SHEET 3
OUTFALL PUMP STATION - DESIGN DATA
OUTFALL PIJMP STATION - SITE PLAN
UTFALL PUMP STATION - PIPING PLAN AND PROFILES
OUTFALL PUMP STATION WET WELL AND VAULT PLAN
OUTFALL PUMP STATION - WETWELL AND VAIJLT SECTIONS - SHEET 1
OUTFALL PUMP STATION - WETWELL AND VAULT SECTIONS - SHEET 2
OUTFALL PUMP STATION - WETWELL AND VAULT SECTIONS - SHEET 3
OUTFALL PUMP STATION - CML DETAILS - SHEET
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
15
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
12 1/6 40 464 440
76 184 216 408
112 4 16 16
4 40 6
4 6 18
4 6 16
4 a 16
4 a 16
4 40 16
4 24 16
4 24 16
4 24 15
4 16 16
4 10 16
8 6 15
8 16 24
a 16 24
4 40 16
4 8 24
4 411 15
4 8 15
4 8 16
4 40 24
4 24 16
4 24 15
4 24 16
4 8 16
4 8 16
a 40 15
4 15 16
4 16 24
4 40 24
4 24 24
4 24 16
4 24 16
4 8 16
1,072
884
48
52
28
28
28
28
60
44
44
44
36
36
32
48
dB
60
36
60
28
28
65
44
44
44
28
28
54
36
44
58
52
44
44
28
Page 23 of 31
EXHIBIT D-1: CONSULTANT FEE DETERMINATION
CITY OF TUKVVILA - STRANDER BOULEVARD EXTENSION
Pump Station Drawing List
915/2017
TASK DESCRIPTIDN
Task
Number
): C
f IP
---cc
LLI 15: t;
RD at
a at t't a v
r., t; a
c — — -ED
....
cl.:g .... c
tn. u.s
r9
0
ra,
C
Isl
=
>
_
C
0
;-- —
C.) y
0
<
0
.i.
Ca
c
Cs, .....
0 o
8
0
0
..
u c
o. <
Totats
DSC
5 93.03 I $ 63.54 I $ 47.98 [
$ 40.671 5
62.04
5
46.26 I
$ 40.00
1 5
35.26
OUTFALL PUMP STATION - COAL DETAILS - SHEET 2
OUTFALL PUMP STATION - COAL DETA/LS - SHEET 3
OUTFALL PUMP STATION - CIVIL DETAILS - SHEET 4
OUTFALL PUMP STATION - STRUCTURAL NOTES
OUTFALL PUMP STATION STRUCTURAL PLANS
OUTFALL PUMP STATION - STRUCTURAL ELEVATIONS
OUTFALL PUMP STATION - STRUCTURAL SECTIONS
OUTFALL PuMP STATION - STRUCTURAL DETAILS - SHEET 1
OUTFALL PUMP STATION - STRUCTURAL DETAILS - SHEET 2
OUTFALL PUMP STATIC/14 - STRUCTURAL DETAILS - SHEET 3
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
4
4
4
4 16
4 40
4 40
4 40
4 16
4 16
4 15
13
a
9
16
16
16
16
40
40
40
24
24
24
28
28
26
36
84
64
84
44
44
44
SUBTOTAL
DRAWINGS
12 192 224
680
848.
Page 24 of 31
EXHIBIT D -i: CONSULTANT FEE DETERMINATION
CITY OF TUKWILA - STRANDER BOULEVARD EXTENSION
Genera -Civil Drawing List
9/5/2017
TASK DESCRIPTION
Task
Number
ef
z ca.
L- c
6: 2
..a.:
c
-a
c
w 5 ,=
a a
-E.-.' c
a_ tn. ui
�
a)
c
w
-
(7.)
c
o
c o Ta o
o a Ell a.
u u) o 0
0
-S. E
2 in
a. <
Totals
DSC
5
93.03 1
5
63.54147.98 1
5
40.671
62.04 I $ 46.26 1
5
40.00 j 5
35.26
DRAWING LIST
Number
TotaI5
GENERAL-CEVIL PLANS
-
742 72
2,142
- 2,264
.
5220
,COVER SHEET
1
2
2
a
12
IVIOINITY MAP
2
2
2
5
12
SUMMARY OF QUANTITIES - SHEET 1
3
2 2
4
4
12
' SUMMARY OF QUANTITIES - SHEET 2
4
2 2
4
4
12
INDEX SHEET - SHEET 1
5
2
4
4
10
INDEX SHEET - SHEET 2
6
2
4
4
10
,KEY PLAN LAYOUT
7
2
4
a
14
SURVEY CONTROL - SHEET 1
8
4
9
8
20
EGEND AND AB8REV1ATIONS - SHEET 1
9
2
4
a
14
!LEGEND AND ABBREVIATIONS - SHEET 1
10
2
4
8
14
GENERAL NOTES AND UTILITY NOTES . SHEET 1
11
4
4
4
12
ENERAL NOTES AND UTILITY NOTES - SHEET 2
12
4
4
4
12
GENERAL NOTES AND UTILITY NOTES - SHEET 3
13
4
4
4
12
GENERAL NOTES MD UTILITY NOTES - SHEET 4
14
4
4
4
12
ALIGNMENT KEY MAP - SHEET 1
15
4
4
8
16
ALIGNMENT LAYOUT - SI-TEET 1
16
4
4
8
16
AUGNMENT LAYOUT - S1-EET 2
17
4
4
a
16
ALIGNMENT LAYOUT - SHEET 3
18
4
4
9
16
ALIGNMENT LAYOUT - SHEET 4
19
4
4
5
16
ALIGNMENT LAYOUT - SHEET 5
20
4
4
8
16
ALIGNMENT LAYOUT - SHEET 5
21
4
4
6
16
ALIGNMENT LAYOUT - SHEET 7
22
4
4
9
16
ALIGNMENT LAYOUT - SHEET 8
23
4
4
a
la
ALIGNMENT LAYOUT - SHEET 9
24
4
4
5
16
AUGNMENT LAYOUT - SHEET 10
25
4
4
8
16
RIGHT OF WAY AND EASEMENT KEY MAO
26
2
4
5
14
RIGHT OF WAY AND EASEMENT PLANS - SHEET 1
27
2
2
4
a
iRIGHT OF WAY AND EASEMENT PLANS - S/-IEET 2
26
2
2
4
6
RIGHT OF WAY AND EASEMENT PLANS - SHEET 3
29
2
2
4
5
RIGHT OF WAY AND EASEMENT PLANS - SHEET 4
30
2
2
4
8
Rioi-t-r OF WAY AND EASEMENT PLANS - SHEET 5
31
2
2
4
6
FOGH I OF WAY AND EASEMENT PLANS - SHEET 6
32
RIGHT OF WAY AND EASEMENT PLANS - SHEET 7
33
RGI -IT OF WAY AND EASE WNT PLANS - SHEET 6
34
RIGHT OF WAY AND EASEMENT PLANS - SHEET 9
35
Page 25 of 31
EXHIBIT D-1: CONSULTANT FEE DETERMINATION
CITY OF TUKWILA - STRANDER BOULEVARD EXTENSION
General -Civil Drawing List
915/2017
TASK DESCRIPTION
Task
Number
41
sit a 0
5' c41 <
, at41 0CI
a. c c
Tu to; La uu ...
0 0
a. a) Ii. Lta 1,J, c a c
`i:
a. 2 a. 44 u ca 00
Totals
DSC
RIGHT OF WAY AND EASEMENT PLANS - SHEET 10
RIGI-fi OF WAY AND EASEMENT PLANS - SHEET 11
RIC -HT CIF WAY AND EASEMENT PLAN'S - SHEET 12
C NSTRUCTION STAGING PROJECT - SHEET 1
CONSTRIJCTION STAGING PROJECT - SHEET 2
CONSTRUCTION STAGING PROJECT - SHEET 3
CONSTRUCTION STAGING PROJECT - SHEET 4
CONSTRUCTION STAGING PROJECT - SHEET 5
CONSTRUCTION STAC-1NG UTILITIES - SHEET 1
'CONSTRUCTION STAGING UTILITIES - SHEET 2
CONSTRUCTION STAGING UTILITIES - SHEET 3
CONSTRUCTION STAGING UTILITIES SHEET 4
CONSTRUCTION STAGING UTILITIES - SHEET 5
TRAFFIC CONTROL AND PHASING PLAN SHEET 1
TRAFFIC CONTROL AND PHASING PLAN - SHEET 2
TRAFFIC coraROL AND PHASING PLAN - SHEET 3
TRAFFIC CONTROL .4140 PHASING PLAN - SHEET 4
TRAIL DETOUR - SHEET 1
TRAIL DETOUR - SHEET 2
TRAIL DETOUR - SHEET
TRAIL DETOUR - SHEET 4
SITE PREP AND DEMOLITION - SHEET
SITE PREP 4440 DEMOLITION - SHEET 2
ISI -TE PREP ,AND DEMOLITION - St -18E11 3
ISITE PREP AND DE VDLTTION - SHEET 4
SITE PREP AND DEMOLITION - SHEET 5
SITE PREP AND DEMOLITION - SHEET 6
1SFTE PREP AND DEMOLITION - SHEET 7
SITE PREP .AND DEWILITION - SHEET 8
SITE PREP AND DEMOUTION - SHEET
SITE PREP AND DEMOLITION - SHEET TO
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN - SHEET 1
EROSION, AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN - SHEET 2
EROSION AND SEDI44ENT CONTROL PLAN - SHEET 3
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN - SH-EET 4
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN - SKEET 5
35
37
38
39
40
-1 1
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
55
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
57
68
69
70
71
/2
$ 93,03 5 6154 1 $ 47.98 $ 40.67] 5 62.04 I $ 46.26 1 5 40.00 1 $ 3526
4 4 12 12
4 4 12 12
4 4 12 12
4 4 12 12
4 4 12 12
4 4 12 12
4 4 12 12
4 4 12 12
4 4 12 12
4 4 12 12
4 4 12 12
4 1 12 12
4 4 12 12
4 1 12 12
8 12 12
4 12 12
8 12 12
3 12 12
4 12 12
4 12 12
4 12 12
4 12 12
4 12 12
4 12 12
4 12 12
4 12 12
4 12 12
4 12 12
4 12 12
4 12 12
4 12 12
4 12 12
4 12 12
4 12 12
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
28
28
28
28
28
22
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
Page 26 of 31
EXHIBIT D-1: CONSULTANT FEE DETERMINATION
CITY OF TUKWILA - STRANDER BOULEVARD EXTENSION
General -Civil Drawing List
9/512017
TASK DESCRIPTION
DSC
Task
Number
o_ 2
c
1:31
c
13.1
414,
u w
0 ra
'5' z "ff,
.., c
,
13. 65 w 0
0
5 93.03 $ 63.54 I $ 47.98 $ 40.67 [5 62.04 $
46.26 5 40.00 I 35.26_
Totals
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN - SHEET 6
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN - SHEET 7
EROSIa4 AND SEDIMENT CONTROL FLAN - SHEET 8
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN - SHEET 9
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN- SHEET 19
FINAL GRADING PLAN - SHEET 1
FINIAL GRADING PLAN - SHEET 2
FINAL GRADING PLAN - SHEET 3
FINAL GRADING PLAN. SHEET 4
FINAL GRADING PLAN - SHEEr 5
ROADWAY SECTIONS - SHEET 1
ROADWAY SECTIONS - SHEET 2
ROADWAY SECTIONS - SHEET 3
ROADWAY SECTIONS - SKEET
ROADWAY SECTIONS - SHEET 5
ROADWAY SECTIONS - SHEET 6
ROADWAY SECTIONS - SHEET 7
ROADWAY SECTIONS - SHEET 8
ROADWAY PLAN a PROF ILE - SHEET 1
ROADWAY PLAN a PROFILE - SKEET 2
ROADWAY PLAN a PROFILE - SHEET 3
ROADWAY PLAN a PROF IIE - SHEET 4
ROADWAY PLAN & PROFILE - SHEET 5
ROADWAY PLAN PROFILE - SHEET 6
ROADWAY PLAN & PROFILE - SHEET 7
ROADWAY DETAILS - SNIZET 1
ROADWAY DETAILS - SHEET 2
ROADWAY DETAILS - SHEET 3
ROADWAY !DETAILS - SHEET
TRAIL SITE PLAN
TRAIL PLAN - SHEET 1
TRAIL PLAN - SHEET 2
TRAIL PLAN, - SHEET 3
TRAIL DEIAILS- SNIEEI 1
SOUND TRANSIT PEDESTRIAN! PATH SITE PLAN
SOUND TRANSIT PED PATH - SHEET 1
SOUND TRANSIT PED PATH - SHEET 2
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
81
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
90
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
4 12 52
4 12 12
4 12 12
4 12 I?
4 12 t2
4 12 8
4 12 8
4 12 8
4 12 5
4 12 8
4 16 16
4 16 15
4 15 16
4 113 15
4 16 18
4 16 16
4 16 16
4 16 16
4 15 15
4 15 16
4 16 16
4 16 16
4 15 16
4 16 15
4 15 16
4 16 16
4 15 16
4 16 13
4 16 16
4 16 15
4 16 13
4 15 16
4 16 18
4 16 16
4 18 16
4 16 15
4 16 16
28
28
28
28
28
24
24
24
24
24
35
36
36
35
35
36
36
36
36
38
35
36
16
36
36
36
36
38
36
35
36
36
36
36
36
36
36
Page 27 of 31
EXHIBIT 0-1: CONSULTANT FEE DETERMINATION
General -Civil Drawing List
CITY OF TUKWILA - STRANDER BOULEVARD EXTENSION 915/2017
TASK DESCRIPTION
Task
Number
0. 5)62
Ern
c <
o u 8
• 0
c = o 0
o.
O 0.
05) 0 0 6
Total's
SOUND TRANSIT PED PATH - SHEET 3
SOUND TRANSIT PED PATH DETAILS - SHEEN 1
'PAVING PLAN - SHEET 1
PAVING PLAN - SHEET 2
PAVING PLAN - SHEET 3
PAVING PLAN - SHEET 4
PAVING PLAN - SHEET 5
PAVING PLAN - SHEET 6
PAVING PLAN - SHEET 7
INTERSECTION PLAN - W VALLEY HIGHWAY
-INTERSECTION PLAN - BUSINESS EN1RANCE 1
INTERSECTION PLAN - BUSINESS ENTRANCE 2
INTERSECTION PLAN - TLAVOLA STATIOT4 ACCESS RD
INTERSECTION PLAN - NACHES AVE SW
INTERSECTION PLAN - PSE ACCESS
'INTERSECTION DETAILS - SHEET 1
INTERSECTION DETAILS - SHEET 2
,TACO BELL SITE PLAN - SHEET 1
TACO BELL GRADING PLAN - SHEET ;
1
TACO BELL DETAILS - SHEET 1
TACO BELL DETAILS - SHEET 2
JACK 15 BOX SITE PLAN - SHEET 1
JACK IN BOX GRADING PLAN - SHEET 1
JACK 15 BOX DETAILS - SHEET 1
JACK IN BOX DETAILS - SHEET 2
BUSINESS PARKING LOT PLAN - SHEET 1
BUSINESS PARKING LOT PLAN - SHEET 2
!BUSINESS PARKING LOT DETAILS - SHEET 1
!SIGNING & CI3ANNELIZATION PLAN - SHEET 1
StGNING & CEIANNELIZAT1ON PLAN - SHEET 2
SIGNING & CHANNELIZATICV PLAN - SHEET 3
'SIGNING & CHANNELIZATION PLAN - SHEET A
SIGNING & CHANNELIZATION PLAN - SHEET 5
SIGNING & CHANNELLZATIGN PLAN - SHEET 6
SIGNING & CHANNELIZAT1ON PLAN - SHEET 7
ICHANNEDZATION AND SIGNING DETAILS - SHEET 1
ICHANNEUZATION AND SIGNING DETAILS - SHEET 2
DSC'
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
731
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
$ 53-031 $ 63.54 I 5 47.98 1 $ 40.67 1 $ 6104 1 S 46.26 I $ 40.00 $ 35.26
4 16 16
4 16 16
4 8 12
4 8 72
4 8 12
4 8 12
4 8 12
4 8 12
4 8 12
4 16 16
4 15 16
4 16 16
A 15 16
4 16 15
4 16 16
4 16 16
4 16 16
8 12 12
a 12 12
8 12 12
8 12 12
a 12 12
8 12 12
8 12 12
6 12 12
8 12 16
8 12 16
8 12 16
4 15 16
4 15 15
4 16 15
4 16 16
4 16 16
4 15 16
4 16 16
4 15 16
4 16 16
36
35
24
24
25
24
24
24
24
36
36
36
36
36
36
36
36
32
32
12
32
32
32
32
32
36
36
36
36
36
36
35
36
36
36
36
16
Page 28 of 31
EXHIBIT 0-1: CONSULTANT FEE DETERMINATION
CITY OF TUKWILA - STRANDER BOULEVARD EXTENSION
General -Civil Drawing List
9/5/2017
TASK DESCRIPTION
Task
Number
....
Et
-,-
iu .....
crt
13 rs
cc
-r. c
a. Zc
z cit
'LI c
2. '5
u ULF
I&
o o
C
ta _
=
0 e
(.3 to
0 -
,_.
o o
Cr
c (..,
.=
77) c c
c 0 0 °- t..
0 -o
a_ <
Totals
DSC
5 9303 J $ 63.54 {
$ 47.98 I
$ 40.67 I 5 62.04 I
5 46.26 I $ 40.00 I $ 35.26
OVERALL COMPOSITE UTILITY PLAN
147
4
8
16
28
UTILITY PLAN AND PROFILE- SHEET 1
148
4
16
16
36
UTILITY PLAN AND PROFILE SHEET 2
149
4
16
16
36
liTILITY PLAN AND PROFIR F- SHEET 3
150
4
16
16
36
UTILITY PLAN P240 PROFILE- SFIEET 4
151
4
16
16
36
UTILITY PLAN AND PROFILE- SHEET 5
152
4
16
16
36
UTILITY PLAN AND PROFILE- SHEET 6
153
4
15
16
36
UTILITY P1A.14 AND PROFILE- SHEET 7
154
4
16
16
36
uriu-ri DETAILS - SHEET 1
155
4
16
16
36
UTILITY DETAILS - SHEET 2
156
4
16
16
36
UTILITY DETAILS - SHEET 3
157
4
*5
15
36
BRIDGE STAGE I UTILITY PLAN
158
4
12
12
28
BRIDGE STAGE I UTILITY DETAILS
159
4
12
12
23
BRIDGE STAGE 1E UTILITY PLAN
160
4
12
12
23
BRiDGE STAGE A LJT:LITY DETAILS
161
4
12
t2
28
SPU WATER MAIN PROTECTION - SHEET 1
162
4
4
8
12
28
SPU WATER MAJN PROTECTION - SHEET 2
163
4
4
8
12
26
SPU WATER MAIN PROTEC.TION - SI-IEET 3
164
4
4
8
12
28
DRAINAGE PLAN - SHEET 1
165
4
16
16
36
DRAINAGE PLAN - SHEET 2
165
4
15
1,6
36
DRAINAGE PLAN - SI-rEET 3
167
4
16
15
36
DRAINAGE PLAN - SHEET 4
168
4
16
16
36
DRAINAGE PLAN - SHEET 5
169
4
16
16
38
DRAINAGE PLAN - SHEET 6
170
4
15
15
36
DRAINAGE PLAN - SHEET 7
171
4
15
16
36
DRAINAGE PROFILE - SHEET 1
372
4
16
16
36
DRAINAGE PROFILE - SPEET 2
13
4
16
15
14
DR.AJNAGE PROFILE - SKEET 3
174
4
16
16
36
DRAINAGE PROFILE - SHEET 4
1 75
4
16
16
36
DISCRARGE ROUTE PLAN 6 PROFILE - SHEET 1
176
4
16
16
36
DISCHARGE ROUTE PLAN 6 PROFILE - SHEET 2
177
4
16
15
36
POND PLAN - SHEET 1
1 78
4
16
16
36
POND SECTIONS - SHEET 1
179
4
16
15
36
DRAINAGE DETAILS - SI-FEE_T 1
130
4
16
16
36
RAINAGE DETAILS - SHEET 2
181
4
16
16
35
IDRAINAGE DETAJLS - SHEET 3
182
4
16
15
36
1DRAINAGE DETAILS - SHEET 4
183
4
16
16
36
Page 29 of 31
EXHIBIT D-1: CONSULTANT FEE DETERMINATION
CITY OF TUKWILA STRANDER BOULEVARD EXTENSION
General -Civil Drawing List
91512017
TASK DESCRIPTION
' Task
, Number
7. 4.2
a. *
w
c
=
LU
ar
E
a.
I! "
2
't; =
—2 Ca*"
m Ill
'al
cr
"En
Lu
=
>
—
c
7-.}17;
= ,
0 G
0 Cr)
0
<
---,_
,.
CI
0 0
,,,
c
a
6-
-:
o
0
t _C
S.' E
a. <
Totals
DSC
5 93.03
$ 63.54 1
$ 47.98 1
$ 4067J
62.04
1 5
4616 1
$ 40.00 i 5
35.26
,
OUTFALL PLAN & PROFILE - SHEET 1
F^ DETAILS - SHEET 1
184
185
4
4
742
72
16
16
2142
16
16
2264
36
36
5,220
SUBTOTAL DRAWINGS
Page 30 of 31
EXHIBIT D -T: CONSULTANT FEE DETERMINATION
CITY OF TUKWILA - STP -ANDER BOULEVARD EXTENSION
KC Pump Station DrawIngo
9)512017
TASK DESCRIPTION
Task
Number
o
,
41
cL c,
u m50
cc
E
c
c
76 4-
, to
.3 w
0
= a
5
c
c
En
c
ilo
-,
c
_
5 5
rs
U
ci
41C
U
--
..i,
c
r2.
4,3
La
—
Es
o
1)
7.1 c
Totals
DSC
$ 93.03 1
$ 63.54 J
$ 47.98 1
$ 40,67 1
$ 62.04 1
$ 4626 i
$ 40.00 1.
$ 3526
DRAMN UST
Nwnher
ToWs
PUMP STATION PLANS
-
.
.
-0
-
-
-
KONG COUNT, PUMP STATION - DESIGN DATA
1i
0
KING COUNT* PUMP STATION - SITE PLAN
2
9
KONG COUNT' PUMP STATION SEWER irNE cLAN AND PPOFFLES - SMEET :
3
0
'KING COUNTY Puma STATION SEWER UNE PLAN AND PROFILES - 3) -)EST 2
4
41
KONG COUNTY PUMP STATION - SEWER LINE PLAN AND FROFILES - SHEET 3
5 '
0
KONG COUNTY PUMP STATION - WETWELL AND VAULT PLAN
6
0
.KING COUNTY PUMP STA -PION - WERNELL AND VAULT SECTIONS - SHEET 1
7
0
KING COUNTY PIMP STATION - VVETWITELL AND VAULT SECTIONS - SHEET 2
8
0
KONG COUNTY ELME STATION - wEnArat_ AND VAULT SECTIONS - SHEET 3
cl
0
1KJNG CattNTY PUMP STATION - CP./IL DETAILS . SHEET 7
10
0
KONG courm, RUMP STATION CIVIL DETAILS SHEET 2
11
.3
KING COUNTY P.AAR STATION- CML DETAILS SHEET 3
12
0
KING COUNTY P',./AP STATION CM! DETAILS SI- EET 4
13
0
KING COUNTY PLMF STATION CIVIL DETAILS SKEET 5
14
0
KING COUNTY PUMP STATION C.VIL DETAILS SPEET 6
15 1
0
KING COUNTY PUMP STATION COWL DETAILS SHEEP. 7
15 1
0
KING COUNTY PUMP STATION - CV111 DETAILS - SFEET 5.
17 1
0
KING cour,rTv PUMP STATION -, STRUCTURAL NOTES
18 I
0
KING COUNTY FLMF STATION .. STRUCTURAL FLANS
19 I
0
KING COUNTY PUMP STATION- STRUCTURAL ELEVATIONS
20 i
0
KING counire RCMP STATION - ST RL)CTURAL SECTIONS
21
0
KING COUNTY PLITAP STATION- STRUCTURAL DET/VLS - Si-EET T
22
0
KING' COUNTY POMP STATION - STRIA:TVRAL DETAILS - SI-EET 2
23 1
KING COUNTY RL MR STATION.- STR I:CT.-URAL D'.1 -AILS - SHEET 3
24 1
KING COUNTY RUMP STATION - STRUCTURAL DETAILS - 5, -TET 4
25
0
KING GUNTY Pt -1P STATION - STRUCTURAL DETAILS- 5FIEE7 5
25
0
KING COUNTY PUMP STATION- STRUCTURAL DETAILS - SHEETS
25
SUBTOTAL DNANGS
0
0
0
0
0
0
Page 31;031
[002 lite
AM&
ftshington State
Department of Transportation
November 29, 2010
Bero,erABAM, Inc.
33301 Ninth AVC111LIe South, Suite 300
Federal Way, WA 98003-2600
Subject: Acceptance F 2016 ICC — Audit Office Review
Dear Ms. N/leaun Isaacks:
Transpoilation Btiflding
3 10 Maple Park Avenu� S. E.
P.O. Box 473100
Olympia, WA 08504-7300
360-105-7000
wvrl�.'7 S('10t. "'J a'qo V
Transmitted herewith is the WSDOT Audit Office's inerno of "Acceptance" of your
firm's FYE 2016 Indirect Cost Rate (IC R) of 174.19%. This rate will be applicable for
WSDOT Agreements and Local Agency Contracts in Washington only. This rate may
be subject to additional review if considered necessary by WSDOT. Your ICR must be
updated oil an annual basis.
Costs billed to agreernents/contracts will still be subject to audit of actual costs, based
on the terms and conditions of the respective agreernent/contract.
This was not a cognizant review. Any other entity contracting with Your firill is
responsible for determining the acceptability of the ICR,
If you have any questions, feel free to contact out, office at (360) 705-7019 or via email
Regards-,
fRI I S )N��
Manager, Consultant Services Office
EK-I:kms
Acv,crilaiwe ICR Audii 011`1vtRovink,
139
Berget-ARAM, lue.
ludirect Cost Rate Schedule
For the Year Euded May 31, 2016
Vringe Benefilse'Salary Overhead
Incentive Compensation
Vacation
Holiday
Sick Leave
OtIour Paid Leave
FICA
Federal UnemploNmicnt
State Unemployment
indusn ial Insurance
USL&I4 Work Comp
Group Instirrince
Retirement Fxpense
Benefit Recovery
Franke Benefit Adjustment
Total Fringe Beriefils/Sal, Ovlid.
409,330
1,408,263
625,994
447,026
19,931
1,461,004
13,685
I 19,045
6
143,:318
1,967,3641
438,126 (824)
(6,882) tt
7,053,102 (7,706) 0
409,330
Gencrat
Firm
Accepted
625,994
classification
Ledger
Adjust.
Ret. Amount
%
Direct Labor Base
11 ,394,308
13,695
KI 11,394,308
119.055
I ndircei Salaries
6
000%
03,318
1,26%
Pioposiil Admin Salaries
662,699
437,302
662,699
5.82%
Ptoposal/Negotinfion Salaries
33,225,714
(56,945)
A, Ni 3,168,769
27 81'19
Administrative Salaries
2,597,641
(18,792)
A 2„558,849
22 46 %
Payroll Variance
( 15, 160)
13,523
(13,523)
-0,16%
Office Support Salaric's
0
Employee Welfare
ti
000%
Accounting Salaries
48(1,6) 4 1
062%
486,041
4,27%
llow,ekeepingiStby Salaries
0
43,018
0
0,00%
Professional Activitin Salaries
64,686
64,686
0,57%
rducallon &Tunrling Salarics
257,642
(2,376)
257,642
-), I(,%
Researeb and Development
16,314
106,894
16,314
0.140%
Computer Salary
395,020
RcYcarcb &, Develop Expen3c
395,020
3.47%
Total Indirect Salaries
7,687,50
(95,737)
7,591,860
66.630/,.
Vringe Benefilse'Salary Overhead
Incentive Compensation
Vacation
Holiday
Sick Leave
OtIour Paid Leave
FICA
Federal UnemploNmicnt
State Unemployment
indusn ial Insurance
USL&I4 Work Comp
Group Instirrince
Retirement Fxpense
Benefit Recovery
Franke Benefit Adjustment
Total Fringe Beriefils/Sal, Ovlid.
409,330
1,408,263
625,994
447,026
19,931
1,461,004
13,685
I 19,045
6
143,:318
1,967,3641
438,126 (824)
(6,882) tt
7,053,102 (7,706) 0
409,330
3.59%
I,A08,263
12,36%
625,994
5 49%,
4417,026
392%
19,931
0,17%
1,401,004
12M%
13,695
0.1`2%
119.055
1 04%
6
000%
03,318
1,26%
1,967,364
1727%
437,302
3,84%
0
0.00%
.6,882
-0.06%
7,045,390 61.83%
Ad ini nist rA live Expenses
Travel & Stibsistence
202,238
(21,733)
n. r, r, q
1801 505
1 58%)
Recruning Fee,, & rxponics
69,417
69,417
061%
Contract Personnel
49,938
(29,863)
21,075
0,18%
Advertising
2,300
(2,300)
Ij,C
0 00%
Entertainincrit Expense
000%
Cliarnable Contobutions
13,523
(13,523)
B,D
0
0, 00%)
Employee Welfare
102,28Q
(31,715)
firs
70,565
062%
Employee meals
97,219
(54,191)
N
43,018
0.39%
Library
21,108
(196)
20,912
0 181/0
Profmmrial Activities
14,209
(2,376)
ai
11,933
010%
Fducation & 'I'mining Fees
106,894
(49)
3
106,935
O 94%
RcYcarcb &, Develop Expen3c
0
0
0.00%
General Admin
w2,991
(7,2105)
rA
95,788
094%
Ass. eiation Ducs
87,274
(22,179)
n
65,095
0 57%
General Liability Insurance
88,001
(738)
a. a
97,267
M7%
Legal Fees
174,693
(32,173)
n
142,520
1.25%
Accounting Fees
233,223
(97,9(08)
K
!3>,31
1,19%
Proposal Administration
(444,,806)
(99,500)
11, M. N
-344.306
478%
Proposal & Negotiation
0
0001/4
Office rind Work Space
1,692,464
0
1692,464
14.85%
Operating Experise
75,975
R
75,975
0,67%
Page
140
Berget-ARAM, laic.
Indirect Cost Rate Schedule
For the Year Ended May 31, 2016
174.19%
Refere,rices
Ittmovcd by BerlcrADAIVI
A Unallowable proposal Negotiation Salaries ($56,945 36) and Administrative salaries ($38,792,04)
B Unallowable administrative expenses Firin hacks unallowable expenses on tile gericral ledger,
C Advertising unallolvable per 49 CFR 31.205-1(1)-
1)
1 205-1(J)1) Comributions un -allowable per 48 CV 31,20$-8.
F Removed by Berger/ABAIM in compliance with various FARS regulations,
V (ravel and submstence that are over the daily FAIL alio,.vable rat" per 48 CFR 31.205- 6
G Interest and other financial costs not allowable pet -48 CFR 31 205-20
I -t Fringe Benoit adjwlmerlt-, directly associated cost to unallowable advertising„ public relations and direct
selling labor Unallowable per 48 CFR 31.204-6 a)
I Detcrinining �illaxvabil lily - costs pioperry supported mth adc4ume docrannelation arcallowable CI:R 31 201-21(j)
J CFR31.201,3(b) (I)Delcinniiing, reasonableness - Cosi, teaurally 1101 reconl7wIns oldirlary and rleccssaiy foi the conduct ol'basineAs are unallowable
K Tasrs -Taxts horn which exemptions are available to the callilacior directly are unalluwablc when Lite burden incident to
Oburulning the exemption outweigill the correitionding benefits accruing to the Government. ClItI 1 -105-4 1 (B) (3)
L Txxe%, - Federal incorm and excess profits tastes are unallowable
M Design build to,;$ a4nisimatas
N Unaltowlible adjustments made fican condudirig Q, quant Audit- 11839,22 Froin travel, 878,12 Corm tnuak and,1234.2 I removed from proposal
Page
141
General
rtrjyi
Accepted
Classification
t crlper
1d u4t.
lRel"
Alinfluill
%
Fumiture & Small Equ)ptilent
8,558
8,558
0,08%
turn & Small Office Depr
273,297
273,297
140%
Office Lquipment
0
a
D 00%
Office Supplies
62,126
0
62,126
0,35%
Field Fquipaient
14 195
14,195
0,12%
Field Uquip Dellircciatiori
67„010
67,010
059%
AUIO Fuel & Maintenance
47;551
47,551
0.42%
Auto Insurance & Licerm,
It
26,132
0,23%
Auto &'riuck Depreciation
45,805
45,905
0.40%
Vield kquip Recovery
(11
100%
Telephone
217„979
217,879
1,91%
fl"qflgc & Frel Bull
19-151
19,351
01701:
Reproduction
161680
162,690
1.4 No
Petsollal Profictly'l-a"
24,307
24,307
0.21%
Fidelity Insurance
31,324
31,324
(1,27%
Business & prof l"Icolse
42,04 t
41-041
0 37%
Interest Fxpense
3,072
(3,072)
0
000%
1 -i -tor & 01111sqIons Insurance
600,041
U
600,041
'S 27%
MO Taxcs
536,753
536.753
411%
City, State line] Federal -Tutus
5-39,386
(523,246)
1'.
16, 1,40
0,14%
Computer l3xperlse
590,688
590,688
i 18%
Computer Depreciation
249,730
249,730
i 19%
Wsc income
N4
0
000%
Gain or 1-riss Sale of Asset
(15,3115)
- 15,395
-0.1:}%
Total Admilli'trative Expenses
6,121,564
(940,965)
0
5,190,599
45.47%
Total I ndircct Cush, a old Ovurlivild
20,862,263
(1,044,408)
0
173.92%
19.817,855
lodirect Cost Rate
1.83
1.74
Facil itici Cost of Capital
3 1,()53
11.27%
S20,862,263
($1,044,408)
19,848,908
174.19%
Refere,rices
Ittmovcd by BerlcrADAIVI
A Unallowable proposal Negotiation Salaries ($56,945 36) and Administrative salaries ($38,792,04)
B Unallowable administrative expenses Firin hacks unallowable expenses on tile gericral ledger,
C Advertising unallolvable per 49 CFR 31.205-1(1)-
1)
1 205-1(J)1) Comributions un -allowable per 48 CV 31,20$-8.
F Removed by Berger/ABAIM in compliance with various FARS regulations,
V (ravel and submstence that are over the daily FAIL alio,.vable rat" per 48 CFR 31.205- 6
G Interest and other financial costs not allowable pet -48 CFR 31 205-20
I -t Fringe Benoit adjwlmerlt-, directly associated cost to unallowable advertising„ public relations and direct
selling labor Unallowable per 48 CFR 31.204-6 a)
I Detcrinining �illaxvabil lily - costs pioperry supported mth adc4ume docrannelation arcallowable CI:R 31 201-21(j)
J CFR31.201,3(b) (I)Delcinniiing, reasonableness - Cosi, teaurally 1101 reconl7wIns oldirlary and rleccssaiy foi the conduct ol'basineAs are unallowable
K Tasrs -Taxts horn which exemptions are available to the callilacior directly are unalluwablc when Lite burden incident to
Oburulning the exemption outweigill the correitionding benefits accruing to the Government. ClItI 1 -105-4 1 (B) (3)
L Txxe%, - Federal incorm and excess profits tastes are unallowable
M Design build to,;$ a4nisimatas
N Unaltowlible adjustments made fican condudirig Q, quant Audit- 11839,22 Froin travel, 878,12 Corm tnuak and,1234.2 I removed from proposal
Page
141
Exhibit E
Subwconsultant Cost Computations
The CONSULTANT shall not sub -contract fbl�
the performance of any work under this AGREEME NT without prior written permission of the AGENCY.
Defer to section VI "SUb-Contracting" of this AGREEM ENT.
Exhibit E-1 - Subconsutlant Fee Determination
Exhibit E-3 - Subconsultant WSDOT IC R Letters or Safe Harbor Letter/Rates
Agreement Number-.
WSDOT Form 140-089 EF Exhibit E Page I of 1
Revised 1013012014 142
EXHIBIT E-1, SUBCONSULTANT FEE DETERMINATION
CITY OF TUKWILA- STRANDER BLVD/SW 27TH ST EXTENSION
Ott -Sakai & Associates LLC Strander trade Separation
129 E. Lake Sarnmamish Shin NE
Samrnarnish, WA 98074 Fee Estimate - Censtructability Review
425-890-3533
5/16/2415
Senior
Construe
Principal
tion
Contract
ptt Costs
Rate
Specialist
Manager
$215.26
$209.11/
$159.91./
Item
Scope
/hour
hour
hour
Invoicin and re orcin
4
$639.64
Contructabilit wyL Reports
1 Site Visit 2 Staff)
4
8
$2,533,92
2
Review Prellminary Desion
8
$1.672.88
3
Site Access Flan
24
$5,018.64
4
Temporary Walls
8
$1 ,672,88
5
Bottom Seall Alternatesu to 3 methods
2
24
$5,44916
8 tvlernorandum
16
$3,345.76
9 Meeis 4 (a_4 htrsd
16
$3,345,76
Schedule
14
Pre re Schedule PrelUminar µ 38r C whprl
2
16
$3,776.28
Contractor S e stirnate
11 Pre are estimate 30% and 60% Update)
2,
�56
$12,140.68
meetin
_....................
_
- 2 509.32,
rave
x enaes
$200.00
Sub - Totals
10
188
4
—T
$42,344.92
All Inclusive Hourly Rate
TOfiAL ESTItv1ATEd
$42,504,92
p) Ott
9/4/2411
Page 1 of 1
143
Ott—Sakai & Associates, LLC
1-'9E.IJ..Sanuiian-nshS)iorelane,ZE,-qai-i-inim-ii,s VAM',w
-S90-35 � 3, -sakaixom
bill 0tv 42' bill1dotr
Ktv�n Salai! kvfn E
August 25, 2017
BergerABAM
33301 Ninth Ave. South, Suite 300
Federal Way, WA 98003-2600
Subjject: Hourly Rates
Attn: Kelly Robinson / Bob Fernandes
Ott -Sakai is young and a small firm that that does not have an established overhead rate not- do we have
audited overhead rates. Below are our lowest fully burdened (all-inclusive) hourly billing rates for Ott -
Sakai and Associates, LLC services. These rates are fully burdened and are the lowest rates billed to our
clients for this type of work.
Classification Max. Hourly Rate
Principal, Bill Ott, Kevin Sakai $215,26
Senior. Constr. Specialist $209411
Kevin Parrish
Charlie McCoy
Forrest Dill
David Place
Eric Reichelt
Construction Specialist
Bing Ma $19&80
Contracts Administrator
Janice Christain $159,91
The above hourly rates are fully burdened and are all-inclusive except for travel mileage, parking, or any
other direct expenses.
Ott -Sakai shall comply with the rules and regulations regarding travel costs (excluding air, train, and
rental costs) in accordance with the Tukwila Travel Rules and Procedures, All sub -consultant cost and
direct reimbursable expenses will be at cost with no mark-ups.
Respectfully,
Page I of 2
144
William P. Ott
145
EXHIBIT E-1 - SUBCONSULTANT FEE DETERMINATION
CITY OF TUKWILA STRANDER BOULEVARD/SW 27TH STREET EXTENSION
I ALLIANCE
URVisYINI� & MAPPING
MBE/COBE
LEVEL OF EFFORT
I R" rid +`; 5
2 2 fits r� s t 5-i s yR
s ui ItiL � 5 x
1S 9;6,r t Wnlpi 5
i is dC
Tow4f,44
i f1 6Vi l i �r I F !is 4tsi if Kc +...a 3
TOTA1 HOURS j Im
f iilGl+aC _ICIh(VdPiF} _. iJ
1r.:........ to( 2dfaAA-Inw,
HER
11•L17G
6t
F
w
NAME
Strancicr i;xeraeti:nn
dare
COENT
6eraerAUAM
ei.l
OWNI.R
iiCY u9 Tukwile
d,i t.,
I R" rid +`; 5
2 2 fits r� s t 5-i s yR
s ui ItiL � 5 x
1S 9;6,r t Wnlpi 5
i is dC
Tow4f,44
i f1 6Vi l i �r I F !is 4tsi if Kc +...a 3
TOTA1 HOURS j Im
f iilGl+aC _ICIh(VdPiF} _. iJ
1r.:........ to( 2dfaAA-Inw,
Tnrm DIRCCi PI) RBC 1118 SALARYCoM
t,Au
iEjTCYA41,41tG53 XXA
[PORTS %_' at,fl1511.t1l7
Mom
CCONTROL Lati• d,,,i Pu sc ftii ,h sv I !=;1e+; -
' VIChl`[5 , ui POTl OUS LSTiMATETd a S 100 Tsui do PN u�sd 53ix tli5 to to Lcx..rr ,
t«a l:aS T'il P -69f Rt 7`U KlflttfNfCnAj!!(iltiP u.m.n�y:C71'/t{7k\1 A °n++�. ICunllon jn!,;,
1 Alliance Geomatics, LLC
Main 425.598.2200 ( Fax 425.502.8067
1261-120 Ave NE, Bellevue, WA 98005
146
ALLIANCE
•
d
Tnrm DIRCCi PI) RBC 1118 SALARYCoM
t,Au
iEjTCYA41,41tG53 XXA
[PORTS %_' at,fl1511.t1l7
Mom
CCONTROL Lati• d,,,i Pu sc ftii ,h sv I !=;1e+; -
' VIChl`[5 , ui POTl OUS LSTiMATETd a S 100 Tsui do PN u�sd 53ix tli5 to to Lcx..rr ,
t«a l:aS T'il P -69f Rt 7`U KlflttfNfCnAj!!(iltiP u.m.n�y:C71'/t{7k\1 A °n++�. ICunllon jn!,;,
1 Alliance Geomatics, LLC
Main 425.598.2200 ( Fax 425.502.8067
1261-120 Ave NE, Bellevue, WA 98005
146
[WA"111.0112
AM,
v7o" Washington State
fflDepartment of Transportatill
July 12,2 17
Jason Nakamura, President
I Alliance Geomatics, LL -C
1261 A 120"' Ave NE
Bellevue WA 98005-2 121
Re: I Alliance Gcornatics, LLC
Safe Harbor Indirect Cost Rate Extension
Dear Mr, Nakamura:
Transportation BUIldill!) -
310 Maple Park Avoriva SA -L
P.0, Box .17300
Olyfl-ipin, WA 08504-7300
360-705-7000
TTY. 1-800-833-6380
wwwwsdol.wa,gov
Washirigton State has received approval from our local Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)
Division to continue administering the "safe harbor" indirect cost rate program oil engineering and
design related service contracts, as well as for Local Public Agency projects.
We completed our risk assessment for I Alliance Geomatics, LLC, in May, 2014. Our assessillent was
conducted based on the documentation provided by the firinTile reviewed data included, but was not
limited to, a description of the company, basis of accounting, accounting system and the basis of indirect
costs. used on our review, we found tile firm eligible to use the Safe Harbor rate. I Alliance opted to
use the Safe Harbor rate, rather than provide a FAR -compliant rate.
Based on further review and discussion with the firm, we are issuing an extension of the Safe Harbor
Indirect Cost Rate of 110% of direct, labor with a field rate, where applicable, of 80% of direct labor for
I Alliance Geornatics, LLC.
I Alliance G-coniatics, LLC has agreed to improve Internal Controls and timekeeping processes in order
to be able to develop an Indirect Cost Rate Schedule in the future in accordance with tile Federal
Acquisition Regulations (FAR), Subpart 31, Tile SDOT internal Audit Office has provided guidance
and information related to FARs and the AASUTO Audit Guide. You may use tile Safe Harbor Rate of
1111%, or 80% for field office situations, for agreements entered into prior to June 30, 2019. For
agreements entered into after this date, please contact the WSDOT Consultant Services Office (CSO) or
our office for guidance.
The Safe Harbor Rate will ggj be subject to audit. Please coordinate with CSO or your Local Programs
contact if you have questions about when to apply the Safe Harbor rate to your agreement.
If you have any questions, please contact me, Jeri Sivertson, or Steve McKerney at (360)705-7003.
Sincere
e 2
Schatzie Harvey
Agreement Compliance Audit Manager
cc: Steve McKerney, Director of Internal Audit
Jeri Sivertson, Assistant Director of Internal Audit
Larry Schofield, MS 47323
File
147
EXHIBIT C-1 -SUBCONSULTANT FEE DETERMINATION
CITY OF TUKWILA -STRANDER BLVD/$W 27TH STREET EXTENSION
Task 6.1 Whase 31
Task 6.2 & 6,3 (Phase 31
D -I.) G,.V.sW
Krittin tali.
J.,- Sell.,dt
Curnon Kwan
Sarah K -n -n
kadwl Sn�dl
yuk.,; ktt,-Owt
"'njor As�ociatt
pdr,"Pal Svnlor A33odiup Semen
Senior Engloter1ru
,(I
Eriflilwln/planner
tonk
pilrdow Scrnior
Amdate
Tochldith
E�Afn--Plaunot
Cnqi.",jP)a-e,
4d lnlq,Ai.e
AdministmIn,
,task
response t-om-nt,
8
C,codimb- rneeiinp
4
mi to comments
4
16
-
Document aeve
7
341
34
1p
72
su'"'naffto d.4nrnmrt studies / mwh
2
is
12
public InW"tit Finding suiannitial
Outllno4ert,olaltl wwpoffivolt0for Plime 311
8
4
8
50
44
4
p,einlinh(V analy"rest illurniwi- f tfallfi,
4
AdinniniW0.in
20
72
dpal
Tut.] Heats
16
60
130
114
128 a 32
ask
DiNdph- Repent
S 65.87
$ 48,56
5 37L55
9
101
5 168.42
4
Total Hours
9
4
30% Fee
24
V
2
4
DSR
95.6'7
6581 5
-0,52
48,56
37,50 5
31.73
$ 34.38 S
35,16
(lid 176 041%
$ 16$,42 5
1 7 5,96 5
95.49
66.02 $
55.96
s 6 S
6L79
Adminior.fi-
19,76 51457
r`, ]3.75 a
`1 a2
5 16.31
10.53
L"', 110111,
38
201 .59
148,6;
1, "97,11
250
105,22
107.42
Suhtozai
$2,535: Lt!
$866.35.
5445.84
$2,794 36_1_
5 31.73 5
_$210'435429.68
35.10
Ojq 176,04%
168,42 5
115.96
85.49
S 66.01
5 59.86 S
Intal Budget
57,31,76
Task 6.2 & 6,3 (Phase 31
T.& r a
Daniel G13YUSNI
9,100 Calfa
lbmes SOIIA,d}
CA,.tn i
Sarah Keenan
i Sewell
y.k.0 .111,7111-117
"'njor As�ociatt
pdr,"Pal Svnlor A33odiup Semen
Eqintilflhp
seriw
Eriflilwln/planner
tonk
rnffi,5onaor
0q,jptanno,
todliaglw,
Emgin-r/plawnr
Mem..inline t'.1th, .-l"i, / --pt,-,
response t-om-nt,
8
1`101 visit -- - -
mi to comments
4
16
fralu" optratlw AnalvaN
74
341
34
$8
72
VIAT/GliG airalVtl§
2
is
12
public InW"tit Finding suiannitial
Itai Study A.p.,t
8
4
8
50
44
4
CAurdnallon for erwiroornental 'J."arw000nt
4
AdinniniW0.in
20
72
Convort I'Tauk StUdY Report
Tut.] Heats
16
60
130
114
128 a 32
ask
DiNdph- Repent
S 65.87
$ 48,56
5 37L55
9
101
5 168.42
S a1.S.96
Tralik 11pal Permit
2.
4
30% Fee
M
44
1125
30% Illuniination / n,.i signal med,floWn
11111ing Rate 5 292.74 $ 201-59 149.61 5 11437 5 9711 10122 5 107.42
Sal,MAI 54,5$4.12 512,045.31 5191319.69 513,09321 512,429,63 5841.73 $9,437.44
Total Budget $65,89164
deugn and -lacnrne to can, enh
6
10
24
34
36
Adminior.fi-
12
50
L"', 110111,
38
24
46
262
250
12
50
0511
9567 5
65V
4956
37.50
5 31.73 5
34.3B 5
35.10
Ojq 176,04%
168,42 5
115.96
85.49
S 66.01
5 59.86 S
60 S2 S
61.79
3014 too
5 18 70 s
19.76
ASI
5 11 2e
5 h.9 S
to,;) 5
10,53
Billing Rate
S-71,219
IjfiA
5 114,77
91.11 s
105,22 5
10742
5utgotal
$6,83620
$10,068,43
__$24,21662
S1,262,50
$5,371,011
PM inte-di- traffic C-ts & 24-1,, speedfvolume tube -ni,
5g 096.06
Total Budget
1,770,94,
T.& r a
Note: Optional Task (initial Traffic Signal Timing Plans) Budget to be Provided if included.
Grand Total $164,952,34
F&P Fee
9/3/2017
148
Daniel Gl.VdAl
Ww" 6'.410
14m.& 5all4rds
Como, Kwan
Salah Konan, 851havl Sewell Y,,k.4,i Renomton(T
pit"Cipil
"'njor As�ociatt
serior
f"anwin1plat'not AdMIMISi Ado,nhWolive
rjsk
ro'bolcor,
rnffi,5onaor
0q,jptanno,
60% IIlunslnatlon/tr.Ifki7gnol d-gnau
response t-om-nt,
8
mi to comments
4
16
i4
74
341
and
-i t. --nh
public InW"tit Finding suiannitial
4
i tuppo'T ld, bidding
4
4
AdinniniW0.in
8 32
Tut.] Heats
16
60
130
114
128 a 32
ask
5 95,67
S 65.87
$ 48,56
5 37L55
31 73 5 34,39 5 3` .10
176,04%
5 168.42
S a1.S.96
05,49
5 66.0.
55.86 5' 60.52 5 61,79
30% Fee
28,711
1 CA,
1125
5 9,51 10-31 10.53
11111ing Rate 5 292.74 $ 201-59 149.61 5 11437 5 9711 10122 5 107.42
Sal,MAI 54,5$4.12 512,045.31 5191319.69 513,09321 512,429,63 5841.73 $9,437.44
Total Budget $65,89164
Note: Optional Task (initial Traffic Signal Timing Plans) Budget to be Provided if included.
Grand Total $164,952,34
F&P Fee
9/3/2017
148
AM&
Washington State
Department of Transportation
June 21, 2017
Fehr & Pee"
100 Pringle Avenue, Suite 600
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
Subject: Acceptance FYE 2016 ICR — Audit Office Review
Dear Ms. Marion Donnolly:
Transportation Building
310 Maple Park Avenue S, E.
P.O, BOX 47300
Olympia, WA UBS04-7300
360-705- M00
rTY: 1-800-833-6388
wvvvi.vvsdOt.%Ya.gov
Transmitted herewith is the WSDOT Audit Office's memo of "Acceptance" of your
firm's FYE 2016 Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) of 176.04%. This rate will be applicable for
WSDOT Agreements and Local Agency Contracts in Washington only- This rate may
be subject to additional review if considered necessary by WSDOT, Your ICR must be
updated on an annual basis.
Costs billed to agreements/contracts will still be subject to audit of actual costs, based
on the tenns and conditions of the respective agreement/contract.
This was not a cognizant review. Any other entity contracting with your firm is
responsible for determining the acceptability of the ICR.
If you have any cluestions, feel free to contact our office at (360) 705-7019 or via email
consultantrates@wsdot.wg.gov,
Regards;
ERIK K. JONSON
Manager, Consultant Services Office
EKJ:kms
Acceplanco ICR Audit 01"fice Review
149
Preparri for BergerABAM
tem 1: Project Administration
1 Prop Mgt
Adrnin
EXHlBiT E-1
Strander Grade Separation Phase 3
PM/Sr.
Acq A erot
Acq A ent
SR
Aca A ent
Title
REO
Escrow
Total
Coord & Meetings with Tukwila & BergerABAM
Hours:
0
251
135
0
0
0
0
25
Certification Assistance -
0.00 6,835.50
0
0
0
0
11,830.50
0
Contract Admin -
7
7
PFEIAOS
Clearing Title -
55 105
160
Pre -Design Acq Cost Assessment & Evaluations
Condemn Support -
20
'
20
Project Funding Estimate
40
30
70
Coord wfSubconsultants-
0
0
i
0
0
0
0
0
Hours:
Direct Labor $:
0
0
147 135
0
0
0
0
282
0.00
6,635.50 4,995.00
11,830.50
Item 2: Right -of -Way Acquisition
Title Report Review, ROW Plan and Legal Descriptions
Review
Hours:
0
0 147
135
0
0
0
0
0
Pre-OffenFile Setup
0.00 6,835.50
0
0
0
0
11,830.50
Negotiations
0
0
Clearing Title -
0
0
Condemn Support -
0
Data/file & Diary Maintenance & Delivery
0
Hours:
Direct Labor $:
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.00 0.00
0.00
-
Direct Labor Totals:
Hours:
0
0 147
135
0
0
0
0
282
Dollars:
0.00 6,835.50
4,995.00
0
0
0
11,830.50
Work Break Down:
1 PFE Report Includes 7 Acq, 5 Penn Easements, & 10 TCEls).
Ol
Abeyta Associates
Eir31i2017
Direct Salary Cost
Direct Labor Rate:
Audited Overhead Rate:
Profit:
Composite Multiplier
11,830.50
Total Labor Fee: $
Expenses:
Review Appraisals
Appraisal 6
Mileage/Travel $
Reprographic, Copy, & Printing$
Couriex Overnight Postage
1
1.5
0.3
2.8
33,125.40
95.00
Subtotal: $ 95.00
TOTAL $ 33,220.40
Pagel
Adft
shington State
r7w WaDepartment of Transportation
August 25, 2017
Abeyta & Associates
1011 SW Klickitat Way, Suite 206
Seattle, WA 98134
Subject: Acceptance FYE 2016 ICP - Negotiated
1Z,
Dear Ms. Rosa Villa:
Transportation BUilding
310 Maplo Park Avenue S. E.
RO, Box 47300
Olymp4 WA 98504-7300
3630-M5.7000
I , 1-G00-833-6388
wwmwsdot'wa.gov
We have negotiated and accepted your firms FYE 2016 Indirect Cost Rate (ICP} of
150.00%. This rate will be applicable for Local Agency Contracts in Washington only.
This rate may be subject to additional review if considered necessary by WS T. Your
ICS, must be updated on an annual basis,
Costs billed to agreements/contracts will still be subject to audit of actual costs, based
on the terms and conditions of the respective agreement/contract.
This was not a cognizant review. Any other entity contracting with the firin is,
responsible for determining the acceptability of the ICP.
If you have any questions, feel free to contact our office at (360) 705-7019 or via email
consultantrates@wsdot.wa.&ov.
Regards;
ERtK K. JONSON
Manager, Consultant Services Office
EKJ:kms
Acceptance 1CR Negotiated
151
EXHIBIT E-1 - SUBCONSULTANT FEE DETERMINATION
CITY OF TUKWILA - STRANDER BLVD/SW 27TH ST EXTENSION
Exhibit B
Project Name strander
Client Abam
Location Tukwila
Widener Fee
9/3/2017
Date 12/6/2015
Tasks
Project
Manager
flours
Senior
Biologist
flours
Project
Biologist Archaeologist
Hours flours
1.1 Design Assistance and Early Agency Coordinatio
1.2 Section 106 Consultation
40
4
16
APE
1.3 106 Section Report Coordination
Draft
8
12
2
8
4
-4 36
Final
2
4
2 12
1.4 Noise Report
Draft
Final
12
8
20
8
60
20
WSDOT Review
4
3
16
1.4 Air Report
Draft
Final
12
8
20
8
60
20
WSDO"I'Review
1.5 Hazardous Materials Memo
Draft
4
2
2
3
2
2
16
16
2
-Final
WSDOI'Review
4
2
4
1.6 Environmental Justice Survg,,
draft
12
6
40
final
1.7 Biological Assessment No Effect Letter
6
8
12
Draft
Final
12
8
16
2
40
12
1.8 NEPA ECS
Draft
4
9
32
Final
2
2
WSDOT Review
1.9 Wetland and Critical Areas Study
8
4
4
Field Work[
Draft
8
121
241
601
1201
I of 2
152
EXHIBIT E-1 - SUBCONSULTANT FEE DETERMINATION
CITY OF TUKWILA - STRANDER BLVD/SW 27TH ST EXTENSION
Widener Fee
9/312017
Final
32
8
48
1.10 Wetland Mitigation Use Plan
Draft
40
12
80
Final
20
8
401
1.10 Wetland Mitigation Use Plan
Draft
40
12
80
Final
20
8
40
1. 11 SEPA
Draft
2
2
24
Final
2
2
8
Coordination and RcS JCJnSeComments
81
21
16
1.12 Permit Coordination
Section 404
36
12
80
Section 401
36
12
40
Coordination and RcsLonse Comments
40
8
24
Critical Areas permits
6
12
HPA
Total hours
476
255
1056
48
Surninag
Hours
Direct
Overhead PIvrlt
Cost
Project Manager
476
$64,00
$70,40
$19.20
$73,113.60
Senior Biologist
255
$50.00
$55.00
$15.00
$30,600.00
Project Biologist
1056
$31.00
$34.10
$9.30
$78,566.40
Project Ai-ellaeolo_gjst_
48
$50.00
$55.00
$15.00
$5,760.00
Total Labor
$188,040,00
Expenses
Trips to project(5 'Tri s}
146
miles
$0.56 per mile
$408-80
_site
Tri e to Local Programs 1 Trip)
30
miles
$0,56 per mile
$16,80
Field Su lies
Flagging &_Stakes
$25,00
Total Expenses
$450,60
TOTAL ESTIMATED COST
- - -------
L..$188,4
�,6O
2 oft
153
EXHIBIT E-3
WasChivlgton State
Department of Mlanspunt aUon
Lynn Pvtorson
Secretary of Transportation
February 27, 2014
Jeanette Widener, President
DGK Inc,
10108 32nd Avenue W, Suite D
Everett, WA 98204-1302
Trarmportation Oudding
310 Maple Parlt Avenue S.E,
R(I Box -17300
Olympla, WA 985041-7300
3GO-705-7000
M;
wWvV-kvad01x1,.1,90'1
Re: DGK (dba Widener & Associates) Safe Harbor Indirect Cost Rate
Dear Ms. Widener:
Washington State is one often states who have received approval fi-om Federal Highway
Headquarters to participate in the Test and Evaluation Program (TE -045) for use of a "safe
harbor" indirect cost rate on engineering and design related service contracts, as well as for
Local Public Agency projects.
We have completed our risk assessment for DGK. Our assessment was conducted based on the
documentation provided by the fin -n. The reviewed data included, but was not limited to, a
description of the company, basis of accounting, accounting system and the basis of indirect
costs. used on our review, your firm is eligible to use the Safe Harbor rate for the City of
Bellingham West Horton Road Project.
We are issuing the Safe Harbor Indirect Cost Rate of 110% of direct labor for DGK. The Safe
Harbor rate is effective on February 27, 2014.
DGK has agreed to improve Internal Controls and timekeeping processes in order to be able to
develop an Indirect Cost Rate Schedule in future accordance to Federal cost principles (48 CFR
FAR). The WSDOT Internal Audit Office has provided guidance and information related to
FARs and the AASHTO Audit Guide.
The Safe Harbor Rate will not be subject to audit. Please coordinate with WSDOT Consultant
Services (CSO) or your WSDOT Local Programs Manager if you have questions about when to
apply the Safe Harbor rate to your agreement.
154
Page 2
DGK
February 27, 2014
If you or any representatives of DG K have any questions, please contact Martha Roach, Jeri
Sivertson, or Steve McKemey at (360)70547003.
Sincerely,
P6t�4'—
Martha S, Roach
Agreement Compliance Audit Manager
cc: Steve McKerney, Director of Internal Audit
Jeri Sivertson, Assistant Director of Internal Audit
Larry Schofield, MS 47323
File
155
CE
Firin Name: D t s
project Number/Name; r iR iIn
1, the imelvi-signed, ceri�ft ihal I1701T I-ellit"Ited the proposal to establish 0106, 8'a Hewbol, rate.
The fli'm is efecthig to itse the SAF EHA RB(. R hVDPZrC7' COST RATE qf11 tJr%.
knowledge [Md belicf,-
(1) Thefil'M hCrX IT01' ha(I U FAR conildirmt iMth-eCl cost tw/u previousli, accepted by an), other sime
agmcjr,
h) Thefliwi will pi-ovide reports cis requimd b - v the SAFE HARBOR k4TE, urogram on 11701-
progmss toward coiliplicoice iviih the cost principles Ql'the r "llei-al Acqioishion Rupdations
(FAR) of title 48, Code of'Fedural Regulations Wrl). part 31.
A// kiyolvi) Inelle)-iol wan suctions or events that have occurred a - cling thefinn'x onwership, twgallifalioll
41114iorior & cul -rent i1ad0ect cost ivies have been disclosed.
Thefii-in agrees lofollow the 'Path 10 Compliance ", Sleps noted below:
Tim Pathway mitv inclvdt,,�
A li'llekeephig a)qlwn it-hich inclucks the hilei-wd Owrdi; 4kxcribud in chopler 6
An ucvolmlillgslowem 11-hich sepurolds in(firout coxis 01161 41h.ect covfv
An ucvolwlh1,g aItvwu which separales cillowable cmd miallowatill,, cost
• A eusisplitmijob eostsyslvm which is ge)yer(il letjger 41pil-vil
• rrohringfur acculmling pu)-somiet und kc�v mensugeniont (III Patl J/ of IN PedurerlAcquixision Regulolionv,
Contract Cost Priticiplus and Pruveehwe.v
• A strong writien imernal contralpolivy, it -ills (I polig, undprneecture.v waimol
t
5i gnat Ure:
'Name of Certi6ling Official (Print): 0- a n t N e_ L (4) Ids." ,
�[—
Date ot'Certification (mm/dd/yyyy): _* _Z2J_LL_
4 Note- I'll is form is to be completed by an individual executive or f mane, ial officer- of tile consu Itaill lit a
level no lower than a Vice President or Ciflef Financial Officer, or equivalent, wlio has the authority to
represent the financial intbrination utilized to establish the indirect cost rate proposal submitted in
conjunction with the agreement.
156
DIRECT SALARY COSTS (DSQ
Personnel
Hours
M
HANSON Costs
913/2017
00
1
Principal
10
X
$
90,00 =
$
900
2
Engineer VII (PM)
181
X
$
50,00 =
$
9,050
3
Engineer VII (PE)
744
X
$
50,00 =
$
37,200
4
Engineer V1
0
X
$
50.00
5
Engineer V
173
X
$
KOO =
$
8,650
6
Engineer IV
0
X
$
40.00 =
$
-
7
Engineer 111
30
X
$
40.00 =
$
1,200
8
Technician VII
0
X
$
35,00
$
-
Total Hours
1,138
Subtotal Direct
Salary Costs (DSC)
$
67,000
Salary Escalation (SE)
2% of DSC =
$
1,140
Subtotal (DSC + SE) =
$
58,140
Overhead (OH)
174.37%
of (DSC + SE)
$
101,379
Fixed Fee (FF)
33.00%
of PSC + SE)
$
19,186.20
TOTAL SALARY COSTS (DSC + SE + OH + FF) =
$
178,705
DIRECT NONSALARY COSI§JDNSCI
Mileage
800
miles @ $ 0,535
$
428
Miscellaneous Expendables (photographs, equip rental, etc)
$
200
TOTAL REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES (DNSC) = $ 628
I AUTHORIZED AMOUNT - $ 179,333 1
157
EXHIBIT E-1 - SUBCONSULTANT FEE DETERMINATION
CITY OF TUKWILA - STRANDER BLVD/SW 27TH ST EXTENSION
Hanson Hours
9/3/2017
Task Descriptions
71
5—
C,-
C -"""
w
ct,
'.
w
_
Ui
5riginelqr VI
11
"6
5
so
a
10
5
&
a
FA
a
a
-6,
c
tli
Project Set -Up
I
.
et
,5
or
f---
..,...
475
Labor Rate
90009
50.00
S 50.00
S 50.00
9
Project l.%nagernent (l ttiVit for 56 weeks) ...
50.00
S 40.00
9
40.00
5
35.00
Invoicing Per Client Fornat (14 hring cycles anticipated
anticipated) 14
— 14
Subtask 9.1 — Project Administration
100
0
11
10
250
Project Set -Up
I
4
4
9
Project l.%nagernent (l ttiVit for 56 weeks) ...
0
56
Invoicing Per Client Fornat (14 hring cycles anticipated
anticipated) 14
— 14
0
14
Prepare Progress Reports (14 lotal)
7
14
21
Meetings with Design Team. City, arid/or UPRR
Kick -Off Meeting rn Tukwila
6
6
12
Progress Meetinos in Federal Way
0
10% Plans: :3 meetings
0
9
31
3
21
25% Plans: 3 meetings
S
9
3
j
3
21
30% Plans, 1 meeting
2
4
6
90% Plans: 1 meeting
2
4
2
2
10
100% Plans: 1 meeting
2
4
2
2
10
Progress Meetinas via Conference Ca0
4
10% Plans. 6 cabs
3
59
25% Plans: 6 cabs
i
6
,
,
9
30% Plans: 2 cabs
2
6
8
90% Plans. 2 caE
H
2
4
,
6
100% Plans: 2 callsa
2
'
Site Meetings with UPRR
0
25% Plans- 1 meeting
4
0 '
10
90% Plans- 1 meeting
4
9 ,
I
10
Pre -Bid Meeting (1 meeting)
4
5,
10
Subtask 91 - 10% Railroad Shoofly Plan
2
8
102
0 2)
0,
4
0
137
Site review arid Field Report (concurrent with survey)
2
B
1
Survey Data Reduclion for Engkeering
B,
7
Establish Existing Track Alignment from SurveySurve
a1
9
Shoofly Track Alignment
i
a
2
I
11
10% Earthwork Model (Civil 3D 2017)
16
2
18
10% SI-aofly Plan -1,11x17 - 3 sheets)
32
4
ga
10% Opinion of Protrabte Cost of Eonstroction
1
6
2
9
QC Review
2
2
6
4
14
Final Revisions 8 Prepare PDFs for submittal
2
1
12
4
4
22
Subtask 9.3 - 25% Shoofly and Phasing Plans
2
»
13
239
0 61
9
4
0
,1
316
Review and Prepare responses to LfPPR Design Comments
1.
4
1
6
Phasing Plan Schematic - (11x17 - 2 sheets)
12
2
II
14
Phasing Narrative
1
4
,
6
25% Shoofly Plan & Profile b - s -(9 sheets)
32
6
38
25% Shoofly Typic,e1Seaen Sheets - 14 shftts1
24
I 2
1
26
Curve Data Sheet (1 Sheet)
3
14
Prepare Cbal if Track Detail Sheet (2 stieets1
7
Earthwork Model (Civil 30 2017) by Phase
40
9
48
25% S5cot1 Cross Section Sheets by Phase- (12 sheets)
40
a
46
Review GeotechrStal Report
6
4
,
10
Utlity Review !cc conformance with UPR.R reg.
H
2
1
a1
17
Verify Shoofly Track Draaxage
.
16
4
20
Prepare Quantity Sunman/ Table
3
2
5
Update Opinion of Probable Cost of Construction
2
6 ,
2
,
10
Page 2 of 4
EXHIBIT E-1 - SUBCONSULTANT FEE DETERMINATION
CITY OF TUKWILA STRANDER BLVD/SW 27TH ST EXTENSION.
Hanson Hours
9/3/2017
Task Descriptions
�
� o c
� _
3
�
Engineer V
�
3
�
or
_>
-.
_
8.
, t...
a
ta
Labor Rate '
5
90.00
5
50.00
S 50.0
S sra3.00
S 0 _Cill
a
40.00
5 40.00
, 5 35.00
Resign Report
i
S
4
13
Prepare lrritial TrackSpteefications
2
19
2
14
QC Review
2
2
2
4
10
Final Revisions, & Prepare Pr7Fs for suhrrllta€
2
10
t=
4
22
'Su,btask 9.4 - 30% Plans.. (Update 25% per Site iMeetinn)
2
14
77 '..
0
32
0
40
129
Review and Prepare responses 10 UPPR Site Review
1
3
4
Update Pfbasingl Plan Schematic - (11x17 - 2 sheets?
5
5
Update Phasing 1+tarrative.
1
3
4
Update Shoofly Plan & PxoRle Sheets - (3 sheets)
5
2
7
Update 51tooSy T )pleat Sea on S els - f 4 steels)
5
I
Update Curve Qata. Sheet (1 Sheet)
2
2
Update Prepare Cruit r Tuck Detail Street (2 sheets}
4
4
Update Eart del (Caul 30 2011) by Phase
Update Shoofly Cross, Seuior3 Sheets by Phase- (12 sheets}
I3
g
Review Geotechnical Report '
'.,o
2
:
fS
Adif. Utility Review for conformance with UPRR. req.
3
a
i
10
Update Shoofly Track Drainage ,
'. 6
1
7
Update Quantity Summary Table..
2
2
Update Opinion of Probable Coat. d3 Con struction
2
: 4
2.
:8
Update Design Report.
1
'.. 4
4
4
Update Initial Trackk 5pecifications
1 2
4
F
t3
QC Review
2
2
3
5
12
Finan Revisions & Prepare PEIFs for submotai
2
fi
5
4
17
Subtesk 9.5 - 60% Plans (Update 30% if required. by UPRR)
0
0
L 0
Q.
0
0
i.
0
0
0
Enpirteerbrg Contingency (noire)
0
Subtask 9.6 - 90% Plans
2
6.
189
d
29
0
4
0
150
Update Shoofly'Plan S Profile Sheets - Finalize Cut Ss Fill Lines, signal ft( needed)
14
3.
17
Update Stioaflv o ypicaI Seon S els -14 meets)
10 r
: 4
14
Update Prepare C. F Track Detail Sheet (2 sheets}
7
7
Update Earthwork Model 3r. Potential Signal'. Pads and Special Sections.
28
4
32'.
Update Sthootly Craps Section Sheets incl. Special Secitore Of needed)- (12 steels}
cr i,
1
10
Update Quantity Summary Table
3 j:
'...
3
Update Opinion of Probable Cost of Construction
1
5 1
2
5
Update Design Report
1
5
2
8
QC Review
2
i
10
5
18.
Finalize Track Specifications
1
11
4
16
Contingency to Incorporate Comments from 50%. U Revriev
Final Revisions B Prepare PQFs for svubm9Eal
1
7
4
4
15
Subfask 9.7 - 10-0:,' Plans (Update 90%: rutin all UPRR comments)
2
11
1113
0
'.. 19
y 0
a,
0.
15-4
Update Shoofly Plan S Prohle Sheets - Finaaze Cot & Fill Lines,
i
14
t
16.
Update Shoofly Typical Section Streets. - (4 sheets;
:
11
1
12
Update Prepare Civ 1 Trac Detail. Sheet (2)
5
1
8
Update Earthworir. Model 1rtc1 Potential Sinrrl Pads and Special Sections
15
1
'...
15..
Update Shoofly Crass Section Sheets knit- Special Secaurrs. (if needed)- (10 streelsl
12
-
14
Update Quantity Summary Table
a..
'...
4
Update Opinion of Probable Cosa of Construction
1
3
3
7
Update Design Report
1
3.
3
7
Page
of 4
EXHIBIT E-1 - SUBCONSULTANT FEE DETERMINATION
CITY OF TUKWILA - STRANDER BLVD/SW 27TH ST EXTENSION
Hanson Hours
9/3/2017
Task Descopnons
_
ea
131
5
al-
>
k,
>
0
c
LL1
=
_
`31
0
c
Fr%
La
5
a
m
Tr
i
_
Lanni- Rale
8g000
s50
0
$ 50.00
s
50 GOs
0
s
40
00
s
40
00
, s
35 DO
QC Renew
2
t
I
7
3
i13
Update Fins/ Track Specolisatons enclucemg agreernera mak 'front end' documents
2
le
18
I Bea Support through Award
4T
24
28
Feria/ Revisions & Prepare PDFs Ise subr/Alal
53
4
/3
Hours
10
181
I
744
173
0
3D
0
1138
Page 4 of 4
■
Aft
Washington State
Department of Transportation
July 6, 2017
Hanson Professional Services Inc.
1525 S. Sixth Street
Springfield, IL 62703
Transportation Building
310 Maple Park Avenue S. E.
RO� BOX 47300
Olympia, WA 98504-7300
3BO-705.7000
UN6, 1-800-833-6388
WWw'WSd0T'Wa'q0v
.Subject: Acceptance FYE 2016 ICR — Risk Assessment Review
Dear Ms, Jo Ellen Reim:
Based on Washington State Department of Transportation's (WSDOT) Risk
C,
Assessment review of your Indirect Cost Rate (ICR), we have accepted your proposed
FY E 2016 ICR of 174.37%. This rate is applicable to Washington Local Agency
Contracts only, This rate may be subject to additional review if considered necessary by
WSDOT. Your ICR must be updated on an annual basis.
Costs billed to agreements/contracts will still be subject to audit of actual costs, based
on the terms and conditions of the respective agreernent/contract.
This was not a cognizant review. Any other entity contracting with your firm is
responsible for determining the acceptability of the ICR.
If you have any questions, feet free to contact our office at (360) 705-7019 or via email
consultantrates 04 wsdot.wazov.
Regards;
ERIK K. Jt SON
Manaar0er, Consultant Services Office
RI Jikms
Accel)(asice ICR Audit Office Review
161
I Zf-11 0 1 9J q IN
DIRECT SALARY COSTS JQaC)
Personnel
Hours
w
sm
1
Principal/Project Manager
20
X
$ 71.25 =
$
1,425
2
Project Engineer
108
X
$ 67.00 =
$
7,236
3
Structural Engineer
254
X
$ 60i00 z
$
15,240
4
Civil Engineer
0
X
$ =
$
-
5
Construction Specialist
0
X
$ - =
$
-
6
Designer/ CAD Oper
216
X
$ 3130 =
$
6,761
7
Graphics
0
X
$ - =
$
8
Project Coor, /Admire
12
X
$ 22.50
$
270
Total Hours
610
Subtotal Direct
Salary Costs (DSC)
$
30,932
Salary Escalation (SE)
5% of DSC
$
1,547
Subtotal (DSC + SE)
$
32,478
Overhead (OH)
161.8G%
of (DSC + SE)
$
52,570
Fixed Fee (FF)
30.00%
of PSC + SE) =
$
9,74152
TOTAL SALARY COSTS (DSC + SE + OH + FF) =$
94,791
DIRECT NONSALARY COSTS (DNSC)
Mileage Design Team
300
miles@ $ 0,560
$
168
Expendables (photographs, equip
rental, etc)
1
Estimate $ 32
$
32
TOTAL REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES IDNSC) =
$
200
TOTAL Bright Fee =
$
94,991
162
EXHIBIT E-1 - SUBCONSULTANT FEE DETERMINATION
CITY OF TUKWILA - STRANDER BLVD/SW 27TH ST EXTENSION
Bright Phase 3B Hours
91312017
TASK DESCRIPTION
Task
Number
0
97
a.
75 6
c c
1: m
o. E
a
.c
cc
UJ1, t
_c
'6 2
cr. au
._
z,
w
—'5
c
0
rd.
. -z,-,
VI '-o.
. u c,
0 _
r..) cin
0
<
Q
1_-
, cr i
71
0
0
.._
0
CL
0
—
g
0
., u
a
2i'E
M -o
(5 ct a
Totals
DSC
$ 71.25 ]
$ 67.00 I $ 60.00 I 5
- 1
$ -
I 5
31.30
5
- _ 22.50
TASK 10 - STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING (supplemented)
10
20
108 254
-
216
- 12
610
UPRR Temporary Shoring Wall
10.3
8
30 64
-
56
- 4
162
Temporary Shoring Wall Design
10 24
-
-
-
- -
34
Coordination of Staining with Civil. Structural, and Shoofly
-
4 8
-
-
-
-
12
UPRR Temporary Shoring Wall Plans
-
12 24
-
-
56
- -
92
PM & Submittal Coordination
8
4 8
-
-
4
24
Sound Transit Vehicular Bridge
10.4
8
56 132
-
-
150
- 4
350
Superstructure Design
-
20 60
-
-
-
- -
80
Vehicular Bridge Plans
-
32 64
-
-
150
- -
246
PM & Submittal Coordination
8
4 8
-
-
4
24
Miscellaneous Structures
10.8
4
22 58
-
-
10
- 4
98
Signal Bridge Design
-
8 24
-
-
- -
32
Signal Bridge Foundation Design
-
8 24
-
-
-
- -
32
Pedestrian Bridge Plans
-
2 6
-
-
10
- _
18
PM & Submittal Coordination
4
4 4
-
- 4
16
Total
20
108 254
-
-
216
- 12
610
Page 2 of 3
EXHIBIT E-1 SUBCONSULTANT FEE DETERMINATION
CITY OF TUKWILA - STRANDER BLVD/SW 27TH ST EXTENSION
Bright Strucutres Drawing List
9/3/2017
DRAWING LIST
Number
et
-(3
a.
.c.
up
c=
11.1
111
A,
76
tr.
tt C
0 0
7., L ..c
g3 c
T:l _E 11.1 '-'
a c m _
' C '1
a t LI 0
7,_
co
ea
0
.
c
ry, „.
7. it
o 0
...,
4;
ti
_
0
0
1)
2 -o
a. <
Totals
DSC
6 71.25 I 5
67.00
[ 5
60.00 I $ - [ s
- I s
31.30 I 6
- 1 5
22.50
UPRR TEMPORARY SHORING WALL PLANS
10.3
-
12
24-
-
66
-
-
92
UPRR BRIDGE - SHEET PILE NOTES
1
2
4
•
10
16
UPRR BRIDGE - TEMPORARY SHORING PLAN - STAGE 1
2
-
2
4
10
16
UPRR BRIDGE - TEMPORARY SHORING ELEVATION - STAGE 1
3
-
2
4
-
a
-
14
UPRR BRIDGE GROUND ANCHOR DETAILS
4
-
2
4 -
-
10
16
UPRR BRIDGE WALER 5. ANCHOR WALL DETAILS
5
2
4
10
.
16
UPRR BRIDGE - SHORING, TIEBACK. AND ANCHOR WALL LIMITS
6
2
4 -
a
14
VEHICULAR BRIDGE PLANS
10.4
_
32
64 -
-
160
-
246
VEHICULAR BRIDGE - FRAMING PLAN
1
-
2
4
-
1(1
16
VEHICULAR BRIDGE - TYPICAL SECTION
2
2
6 -
-
la
16
VEHICULAR BRIDGE - GIRDER DETAILS (1 OF 3)
3
-
2
4
-
10
-
-
16
VEHICULAR BRIDGE - GIRDER DETAILS (2 OF 3)
4
-
2
4
-
10
-
-
16
VEHICULAR BRIDGE - GIRDER DETAILS (3 OF 3)
5
-
2
4 -
10
-
16
VEHICULAR BRIDGE END DIAPHRAGM
6
2
4
-
TO
-
-
16
VEHICULAR BRIDGE - INTERMEDIATE DIAPHRAGM
7
-
2
4 -
-
10
16
VEHICULAR BRIDGE - DECK REINFORCEMENT
8
2
4
-
10
-
16
VEHICULAR BRIDGE - DECK REINFORCEMENT SECTION
1
9
2
4 -
10
16
VEHICULAR BRIDGE - TRAFFIC. BARRIER DETAILS (I OF 3)
10
-
2
1 -
-
a
14
V.EHICULAR BRIDGE - TRAFFIC BARRIER DETAJLS (2 OF 3)
11
-
2
4 -
a
-
14
VEHICULAR BRIDGE - TRAFFIC BARRIER DETAILS (3 OF 3)
12
2
4
a
14
VEHICULAR BRIDGE - EXPANSION JOINT DETAILS
13
-
2
4
-
19
16
VEHICULAR BRIDGE - APPROACH SLAB DETAILS (1 OF 2)
14
2
4
-
a
-
14
VEHICULAR BRIDGE - APPROACH SLAB DETAILS (2 OF 2)
15
2
4
B
-
-
14
VEHICULAR BRIDGE - SUPERSTRUCTURE REINFORCEMENT TABLES
16
2
4 -
-
10
-
-
16
MISCILLANEOUS STRUCUTRAL DRAWINGS
10.8
-
1
24 -
-
54
-
-
90
SIGNAL BRIDGE PLAN AND ELEVATION
1
-
2
4 -
-
10
-
16
'SIGNAL BRIDGE DETAILS (I OF 3)
2
2
4 -
-
10
-
16
SIGNAL BRIDGE DETAILS (2 OF
3
-
2
4
-
a
-
14
SIGNAL BRIDGE DETAILS (3 OF 3)
4
-
2
4 -
.
a
-
1
14
SIGNAL BRIDGE FOUNDATION (1 OF 2)
5
2
4 -
-
19
-
-
16
SIGNAL BRIDGE FOUNDATION (2 Of 2)
6
-
2
4 -
-
e
14
SUBTOTAL - ALL STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS
56
112
260
428
Page 3 of 3
ELOJ a g In'Awl I WAMM g all g 101 .1 za lkyj 0 TAT 0
Hours
Rate
S&W Phase 3 Costs
913/2017
Cost
I
Vice President
49
X
$
82,68 =
$
4,010
2
Associate
156
X
$
65,92 =
$
10,284
3
Senior Engineer 1
272
X
$
40,27 =
$
10,953
4
Engineer IV
124
X
$
36,91 =
$
4,577
5
Engineer 11
345
X
$
30.77 =
$
10,616
6
Senior Drafter
22
X
$
35,96 =
$
791
Total Hours
968
Subtotal
Direct
Salary Costs (DSC) =
$
41,230
Salary Escalation (SE) =
4.0% of DSC =
$
1,649
Subtotal (DSC + SE) =
$
42,880
Overhead (OH)
190.27%
of (DSC + SE) =
$
81,687
Fixed Fee (IFF)
30.00%
of (DSC + SE) =
$
12,863.86
TOTAL SALARY COSTS (DSC + SE + OH + FF) =
$
137,330
DIRECT NONSALARY COSTS (DINISC)
Excavator subcontractor
PIT equipment
Pumping test subcontractor
Pumping test ODCs
Mileage
Reproduction
lump sum $ 2,500
lump sum $ 500
lump sum
lump sum
875 miles @ 0,56 $ 490
lump sum $ 500
TOTAL REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES (DINISC) $ __1199
A
F77�)TAIL AUTHORIZED AMOUNT $ 141,320
165
w
166
V
>
TASK
>
c
CL
w
ui
uj
:D
U)
ASK 11 SUPPORT
. .........
...... . ....
48.5
156
272
0
li1
0
347,
. . ..... . ...... ...... . ... .
............
0
22
rrI ana elncntQuo
24
60
.
0
84
Meetings (ass ("IJ tars enuh for 2 people)
Coordinate Ocrinlis, lialfic control, and/or railmad daggers for in situ
0
2
4
16
0
0
22
Coordinate and perform pilot infiltration test
0
2
12
0
12
0
26
install and develop lest well
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Coordinate and c)bsLry jq�Lf�jp
0
0
0
0
iatc results 9�uit� 11 rpp
rr img,
_w a0
0
0
0
0
0
0
— — - —
Seismic design criteria
---------
I
1
3
0
1)
0
5
Liquefaction evaluation
1
2
0
12
0
0
1
-1--l-
3
. ........
0
22
—6r -atio—nAli-u-IR-esisiancc (".3 Cases)
6
0
12
Bridge roundatton Lateral Resistance (3 Cases)
. ..........
1
-, .
3
6
0
12
...... ....
0
22
�I'Iql�iti Ld! L —io aS; —rO U P.. Interaction (3 Cas , es .. . ...........
0.5
......... . . -
3
. .......... . ....... .
6
.............. . —,", .
0
. ............. -- .............. . ..
12
. .
0
�2
Wall Ranh Pressure (6 Cmcs)
1
6
12
0
24
0
43
Ctetnrnln Wall (global Stability d-S—ettle-me—mt -(6-C-ascs)-
-9 - -
1-3-6-
1
4
0
8
- -------- — ---i'Td
i —"I I I m �, I 10 n a I i a ij�,v a
—0
--"
--,-
2
0
32
-,
0
52
Shoolly Funbanknicrit Global Swbilily and Settlement (4 Cases)
1
8
20
0
64
Continae readin, existing clatiloggers on site (I readings)
0
0
3
0
9
12
rtsunrisv, ter model
1
0
12
0
8
0
21
Evaluate construction dewaicTing (6 rases)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Construction Dtwatering-Induced Settlement and Impacts
G
00
a
0
0
0
1
1
4
0
.
i6
0
22
--,
__.w._...._
. . .... . . .. .. . ............................ ............ . .... ........ .......—
New Outfall Recommendations
— - - - -
------- ----" -
0
" ----------------- . .............
1
— — - -
4
- ------------- . . ....
0
. .............. . --
8
. .....
0
—
13
_Val UUIC StGTV1IN%'.IICr irifiltr3linn T31CS
0
2
4
0
0
0
6
Construction Considerations
1
0
211
8
-0
0_
33
4
16
40
60
16
8
144
Revise 60%Report i3ased un CITYind UPRR Commern.s
.............
2
2
8
4
0
2
is
.. . . .. . ............
Prepare final report
-- . . .
2
. .........
8
241
0
16
2
52
Reviewand e
4
4
24
24
0
0
56
Develq_spec i Reat ions (dowaternI,and instrumentation)
0
0
0.
0
0
0
0
Total 110"r.1
d0
iSG
212
124
345
22
968 i
166
EXHIBIT E-3
AM&
Washington State
Department of Transportation
June 14, X017
Shannon & Wilson, Inc,
400 N, 34" Street, Suite 100
Seattle, WA 98103
Subject: Acceptance FY E 2016 lCR — CPA Report
Dear Ms. Noelani Bevilla
Transporlition GLI11(11114]
310 Maple Park Avenue S.E.
M BOX 47100
01yinplal WA 98504-7300
360-705-7000
`TTr 1-800-633-6388
WV,Jv/.WGd0t,Wa.q0V
We have accepted your firms FYE 2016 Indirect Cost Rate (ICS.) of 190.27% based on
the "Independent CPA Report," prepared by CPA Consulting, Inc- This rate will be
applicable for WSDOT Agreements and Local Agency Contracts in Washington only.
This rate may be subject to additional review if considered necessary by WSDOT. Your
ICR must be updated on an annual basis.
Costs billed to agreements/contracts will still be subject to audit of actual costs, based
on the terms and conditions of the respective agreement/contract,
This was not a cognizant review. Any other entity contracting with the firm is
responsible for determining the acceptability of the ICT.
If you have any questions, feel free to contact our office at (360) 705-7019 or via email
conso I tantrates @bwsdot,wa-,,ov-
Regards;
Jonson, Erik
C05i8n
ERIK K. JONSON
Manager, Consultant Service,,; Office
ElUkrns
AcceptattcL ICC CPA Report
167
Firm Name: shannon &Wilson, Inc.
Indirect Cost Rate Proposal: 190.267%
Date of Proposal Preparation (mm/ddlyyyy): 5/190017
Fiscal Period Covered (i-ni-n/dd/yyyy to mm/dd/yyyy): 1r1/2om - i2im/2oi6
1, the undersigned, certify that / have reviewed the proposal to establish final indirect cost rates
for the fiscal period as specified above and to the best of my knowledge and belief,
1) All costs included in this proposal to establish final indirect cost rates are allowable in
accordance with the cost principles of 1176 Federal Acquisition Regulations, (PAR) of title 48,
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), part 31.
2-) This proposal does not include any costs which are expressly unallowable under the cost
principles of the FAR of 48 CFR 31.
All known material transactions or events that have occurred affecting the firm's ownership,
organization and indirect cost rates have been disclosed,
Signature:
Name of Certifying Official* (Print): Hollie L, Ellis
Title: SIR Vice President
Date of Certification (mm/dd/yyyy): 5124/17
"The "Certifying Official" must be an individual executive or financial officer of the firm at a level
no lower than a Vice President or Chief Financial Officer, or equivalent, who has the authority to
represent the financial information utilized to establish the indirect cost rate for use under Agency
contracts.
Ref. FHWA Directive 4478.1A available on line at.
bttL� oovileasreosld,irectiveslordei-s/44701 ajitril
�Jlwwwjhwa,dot
O/H Certification; Nov 2010
168
DIRECT LABOR
FRINGE BENEFITS
Additional compensation
Qualified retirement plans
Vacation, sick and holiday
Payroll fringes
GENERAL OVERHEAD
Administrative salaries
Proposal and business development labor
Equipment
Rent and facility
Travel and auto
Proposal and business development
Interest
Supplies
Outside professional services
Computer
Telephone and postage
Conferences and professional
Depreciation
lnsurance
Taxes and licenses
Bad debts
Revenue from in-house charges
SHANNON & WILSON, EtiC.
STATEMENT OF DIRECT LABOR, FRINGE BENEFITS AND GENERAL OVERHEAD
For the Year Ended December 31, 2016
General Ledger
Balance
Portion
Unallowable
$ 13,074,066 S
2,088,?23
1,264,491
2,484,371
5,196,436
11,033,520
3,3,8,445
3,680,256
265,180
2,127,443
423,066
511,096
10,723
531,011
182,393
768,301
328,508
463,484
484,907
1,085,847
2,482,842
215,341
(651,849)
16,236,992
Total Fringe Benefits and General Overhead S 27,270,5/2
Facilities capital cost of money
400,000
(143,000)
257,000
(3,154)
(203,726)
(5,082)
(3,393)
(357,475)
(10,723)
FAR Reference
(15) 31205-6
2,3
31.205-1,13
(1,4) 31205-6(f),(p)
(5) 31.205-1
(13)
(6)
31.203(b)
31205-46
(7,8,9) 31.205-1,8,14
(1.0) 31_205-20
(27_707) (6,14) 31.205-46,22
(1,862.141) (11) 31.205-41
(215,341) (12) 31.205-3
(2,688,743)
(2,431,743)
Proposed Percent of
Audited Total Direct Labor
13,074,066
2,488,223
1,264,491
2,484,371
5,053,436
11,290,520
3,325,290
3,476,530
265,180
2,122,361
419,673
153,620
531,011
182,393
768,301
328,508
435,777
484,907
1,085,847
620,701
(651,849)
13,548.248
$ 24,838,768
S 34,896,
86.4%
103.6%
190.0%
0267%
See accompanying notes.
3
SHANNON & WILSON, INC.
STATEMENT OF DIRECT LAUOR, FRINGE IIENEFFrS AND GENERAL OVERIIEAD
For the Year Ended December 31, 2016
FAR References:
(1) Unallowable spot bonuses
(2) Taxes related to unallowable promotion labor
(3) Unallowable meals and employee gifts
(4) Not used
(5) Advertising and public relations labor
(6) Excess per diern and travel expense
(7) Unallowable contribution costs
(8) Unallowable entertainment costs
(9) Unallowable advertising and public relations costs
(10) Interest expenses
(11) Federal income taxes
(12) Bad debts
(13) Rent charged as direct costs to projects
(14) Unallowable lobbying cost
(1 5) Accrued prior year bonuses paid in current year
See acconipanying notes,
4
170
SHANNON & WILSON, INC.
NOTES TO STATEMENT OF DIRECT LABOR, FRINGE BENEFITS
AND GENERAL OVERHEAD
For the Year Ended December 1, 2016
NOTE A. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND BASIS OF ACCOUNTING
Description of business — Shannon & Wilson, Inc, (the Company) provide-, geotechnical engineering
and environmental consulting services, primarily thaOUghOUt the United States of America.
Basis of accounting Tire Company maintains its accounting records on the accrual basis for
financial reporting while using the cash method of accounting for federal incorne tax put -poses. The
Company's policy is to prepare its overhead schedules, which support the Statement of Direct Labor,
Fringe Benefits, and General Overhead (the Slaternent), on the basis of accounting practices prescribed
by Pao 31 of the, Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR). Accordingly, the above-mentioned
Statement is not intended to present the results of operations of the Company in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
NOTED: DESCRIPTION OF ACCOUNTINGsYsTEm
Description of accoutiting—The Company maimains a job -order cost accounting systern for the
recording and accumulation of costs incurred under its contracts. Each project is assigned a job
number so that costs may be segregated and accumulated in the Company's job -order cost accounting
systcm
The audited overhead rate is a unitary rate for all disciplines. Direct project costs and allocated
indirect costs are included in the project cost record. The allocation basis for indirect costs is direct
labor, Direct labor of salaried employees is calculated using a standard hourly rate based on an annual
liour base of 2,0M
Direct costs incurred in providing services billed to clients at unit rates or on the basis of a published
fee schedule are charged by 'Functional accounts and accumulated as a single project or grouping to
allow segregation of such costs from other direct costs.
The Company's method of estimating costs for pricing purposes during the proposal process is
consistent with the accumulation and reporting of costs under its job -order cost accounting system.
Direct labor costs — T he Company distributes labor costs directly to projects for all employee
classifications at standard cost, Certain officers and associates are not, paid for the time worked in
excess of 40 hours per week (uncompensated overtime). The uncompensated overtime in excess of 40
hours is credited to administrative salaries in the amount of $1,249.05 1. Overtime premium costs have
been excluded from direct labor and are included in general overhead as part of administrative salaries
and totaled $36,508.
Overhead rate — The calculated overhead rate is a unitary rate for all offices (ten) and includes all
disciplines,
171
NOTE B: DESCRJJI"IrtON OF ACCOUNTING SYSTEM (continued)
Depreciation — Depreciation has been provided on the straight-line method Over the estimated USCU
lives of buildings, equipment and leasehold improvements. The depreciation included in 6encral
Overhead does not exceed the arnount used in The financial statements and is allowable under FAR
31205-11 (e).
Sick leave — Sick, leave costs are neither accrued annually nor paid to an employee upon termination.
Applicable sick leave costs are expensed if paid and then included in the overhead rate.
Compensation —The Company paid no compensation in excess of the FAR 31.205-6(p) limit of
$487,000 per person. Senior executive compensation was analyzed using the 2016 National
Cornpensation Uawix in accordance with the AASI1T'0 Audit Guide and all compensation was
allowable.
NOTE C: FACILITIES CAPITAL COST OF MONEY (FCCM`)
The Facilities Capital Cost of Money rate has been calculated in accordance with FAR Section 31,205-
10; using average net book Values of equipment and facilities multiplied by the average Treasury rates
for the applicable period, as showw
Beginning net capital assets, January 1, 2016 $ 1,717,307
Ending not capital assets, December 31, 2016 1,473,166
Average Net Capital Assets 1,595,237
Average Treasury Rate 1188%
Facilities Cost of Money $ 34,896
Direct Labor Base 13,074,066
FCCM Rate 0.267%
NOTE D: BENEFIT PLANS
,rhe Company has two qualified retirement plans which cover ernployces who W meet eligibility
requirennents. The Company made cash contributions of $1,264,491 to the plans during the year
ended December 31, 2016.
NOTE E: AUDITOR CONTACT
The person to contact relative to this engagement is:
Kristine L. Tryon
CPA Consulting, Inc,, P.S.
Phone (425) 401-5061
172
EXHIBIT El - SUBCONSULTANT FEE DETERMINATION
R&W PS remodel
PROJECT r40. :
DATE
,..-.". -' `,., , r.::::.
C01N1:,-
PSTITT‘TECT.
R&W PROJECT
PLAN BUDGET
-
-, ,, -4 -- T
FEE CALCULATIONS AND SUMMARY
Stec:do:eh N,14 ,Tch eel 3,42:, I!
1
MA URS
S I AFT-
Cass:hints:in HOURS
RATE
t
t
COST I
PEOIEDT TASES
P JPM
Sr Engr It Sr Env I En r Sr Tec P Sr Tech I
Tech/Des
CAD ech
Cler/Admini TOTALS
I
50
P 1 0
PM 11 16
Sr Env It 2 0
Sr Engr i 20 8:5
End= 25 0
Sr Tech II 3 0
Sr Tech I 30 0
TechiCie.s 4 4
CAD/Tad, S 311.5
Cler/Adnctrr 7 4
TOTAL FEE: 139.5
MSC. ExPENSLS,
1
1
0 i lit R
050111 1
ODOR, I
OMER
050011
QA/QT, I'D 44533
SUBTOTAL EXPENSES:
TOTAL COSTS:
CONIINttIN1 I-
(TOTAL BUDGET:
PRINT DATE:
:PREPARED ve , 0
$16000
$14500
$135 00
5125.00
$110_00
511.0.00
$08,00
58730
567.00
54500
SI 00
S0,44
SU,I0
III).
5111,
1 1.45.L44
312,:..
9/3/2007
$ .
5 2,32=0_011 :
5
$ 10,6251.00 :
$
5
5 -
5 350.00 i
$ 2,043.50
5 164.00
S 15,522.50
,
T
,
-,
,
2,173.15
S 12,695.55
5 85131
$ 15,590.00
=Upgrade existing pomp station
5�
,,..
50
earn note
6.00
57E0
Jr6'ty Sere cc PreImnarpLode DndCPcCalms
4.00
5500
'Generate= Si2ing
1:001
2.00 ,
5365
PS istribut:en Celcs
100
2 CD i
53.95
50
UUyCoerd,aDen
2-40
4.
$600
Site edit
3 00
$1,000
gn orkannp
402 ,
5500
$0
&thins
SO
gend
1.00
0.50
,
$159
Site plan
1.8=3
3.80
1100
51056
One Ire diagram
1.
7.00
&OD
63
51thng power, Eighting, signet
2.80
4.00
6.00
51,162
Vau4 penar, i nting, signal
I.00'
1 00
2 00
5904
CC DeIa1r
000
4.80
51,013AIR-
chgdPles
500
3.
200
5529011UP
Parnpshcmalrcr
LOG:
4.00 :
4.00
5913 :
SO
SO
Sencificatlorn
2.00
600
4.00
51,224
,
C,C)St t tate
100
4.00
5535
$0
Meetin = .
24.00
53,003
PM
4.00
5550
0
So
SO
I
SO
TOTALS:
-
15,80
-
3S20 -
4.013
3050
4.00
STAFF C 551FICATtONS:
P: PRINCIPAL IRTECH IL SENIOR TECHNICIAN El
Phii PROIECT MANAGER SR TECH I ' SEN OR TECHN=OAN I
SPIENGR U SEN OR ENGINEER tl TECH/OES. TECHNICIAN/DESIGNER
SR ENGR T . SENIOR ENGINEER I DRAFT CAD: DRAFTING (CAD)
ENGR, ENGINEER CLER/ACAMM CLERICAL/ADMINISTRATIVE
1 of
EXHIBIT E-1 - SUBCONSULTANT FEE DETERMINATION
CITY OF TUKWILA - STRANDFRBI VDISW 27TH ST EXTENSION
PROIEE F -
DATE : PROIECT:
R&W PS remodel (C)
91312617
R&W PROJECT PLAN BUDGET
FEE CALCULATIONS AND SUMMARY
Starld„-Ir& Rate 5,,:hecUe
MANI-OURS
PROJECT TASKS
PM I Sr Er
Sr Engr I 1 Ergs JSrTRch El
Sr Tech ethJISur CAD/Tech Cler/Admin TOTALS
-STAFF
ClassilicatIon HOURS RATE
COSTS
50
Upgrade existing pump station
$0
Drawings
$0,
Contro system power
2.00 4.00
2.
5945
Control :JO
2.00 5.03
EGO
51,545
Mstrurnentation
1.00 1.00
2,00
$810
RTU interconnection
1.0,3 8.00
4.00
51.485
Oeta its
1..00 4.00
400
5985
2.00
4,00
5.1,204
Cost estimate
4.00
$500
511
Team meeting?
CC
51,5
50
50
60
$0
SO
$0
50
$0
Sc
50
SO
SO
50
P 1 0 5183.00 $
PM 11 G $145.00 5
Sr ETV II 2 9 $13500 5 1.215-00
Sr Erg I 2A 48 5125.00 5 6,000.00
Ener 25 0 5110.00 $
Sr Tech. II 3 0 5110.03 $
Sr Tech I 34 0 598 00 5
Tech/Des 4 18 $87.50 5 1,575_00
CAD/Tech 5 0 557 GO 5
Oar/Admin 7 4 549.00 $ 184_00
TOTAL FEE: 79 $ 8,974.00
WHSC. EXPENSES: nILPN
411 I SUES
01HER: SO.UO
011E5 SO 00 n
OTHER: I $0. 551
OTHER: EU US
011115.
OMER'
1110 111S.987.66 $.1, €10
SUBTOTAL EXPENSES:
TOTAL COSTS:
SO
TOTALS:
1200. 48001
18.03 4001
tO,NTINGE NOP
STAFF CLASSIFICATIONS'
P: PRINCIPAL
PM: PROJECT MANAGER
SR.ENGR It: SENIOR ENGINEER
SR ENGR : SENIOR ENGINEER
ENGR: IENIKEER
SR TECH IJ. SEMOR TECHNICIAN II
SR TECH I : SENIOR TECHNICIAN I
TECH/DES: TECHNICIAN/DESIGNER
DRAFT CAD: CRAFTING (CAD?
(LER/ADMEN, CLERICAL/ADMINISTRATIVE
TOTAL BUDGET:
PRINT DATE: 9/3/2017
PREPARED Sr' II
1,255.36
$ 10,230.35
S al • 2
$ 10,740.00
EXHIBIT E- - SUBCONSU TANT FEE DETERMINATION
PROTECT NO5774,757S"Cd1
R&W PROJECT PLAN BUDGET
DATE SG:NIG-II 7 PROJECT, INTGT, 757
R&W New PS
913/201
FEE CALCULATIONS AND SUMMARY
StApdA 7Ix7777 Schedt77777
MANJIOURS
PRO, Ea TASKS
New Pump Station
earn [meeting
111t5h•tv Service Prebrdnary Load Demand Cats
Genecatol Sizing
PS Distribution Calm
Utifity Coordmaton
Site visit
P PM Sr Eng.,
1.00
3.00
Engr I
600
2.00
2.02
2.00
4.00 .
Design. worhadhop 2.00
Drawings
Legend 1.00
STE Plan
One hoe diagram
,ding power, tighting, signal
Vaud power, lthhng, signal
ICC Details
neck -Les
Pomp schematics
Spec ficatops
Cost ethrnate
Meetings
TOTALS.
STAFF CLASSIFICATIONS:
1.00 500
1.30 4.00
2.03 6.00
1.00
2.08
1210
2 00
4.00 [
200
4.00
2.00 6.00
1.00 4.00
24.00
4.80
16.00 83,00
P; PRINCIPAL
PM PROJECT MANAGER
53 ENGR 3: SENIOR ENGINEER ti
SR ENGR I : SENIOR ENGNEER
ENGR: ENGINEER
Engr [ Sr Tech II
r Tech
Tech/Des ICAOffech Cler/Admml TOTAL S.
$0
$0
$0
5753-
5250
5395
5395
$0
400
$sao
5250
0.50
800
4.00,
8.00
700
4 00
2700
00
5159
$3,431
5923
50.576
$525
$768
$529
$913
4.00
$0
$3,224
5645
So
$3,800
$580
$0
$0
400 32.50 4,00
SR TECH El SENIOR TEChNICIAN El
SR TECH I SENOR TECI4NICiAN I
TECH/DES: TECHNICIAN/DESIGNER
DRAFT CAD: DRAFTING (CAD)
CLER/ADMIN: CLERICAtIADMINISTRATIVE
STAFF
Classification HrdIRS RATE CO
1 0 5190.80
PM 16 5145.00 5 2,320.00
Sh Engr Ii 2 0 5135.00 $
Sr Engr 4 2A 83 5125.00 $ 10,375.00
Ener 28 0 $110.00 $
'Sr Tech n 3 0 511000 $
Sr Tech I 94 0 598.00 $
Tech/Des 4 4 587.50 $ 350_00
CAD/Tech 5 52 5 $67 GO $ 2,177_50
Clerhadmin 7 4 $46.00 $ 13400
TOTAL FEE: 139.5 $ 15,4063.
5%
31151. EXPENSES: 5.1735,7 5
2117
DII ER 7 SOPO
DI HUY_ 50,00
OTHER I$0.7:10
OTHr1t I SO OTT 7,
OTHI77
OTHER:
0010, 1i2I1 5 E 35.0
SUBTOTAL EXPENSES'
TOTAL COSTS:.
CONTINGENCY
TOTAL BUDGET:
PRINT DATE: 9/312017
PREPARED DY: 0
$ 2,156-91
5 17,563.41
7.70 , S 5)5.11
$ 18,440,00
3 of 8
EXHIBIT E-1 - SUBCONSULTANT FEE DETERI491NATION
R&W Ne
P
C)
A
PROJE11 NO.
INSTE
R&W PROJECT PLAN BUDGET
PROJECT.
MANHOURS
PROTECT TASKS
IMMEENNEEEMMEMEIETICESII
New Pump 5tati�on. Control
ech/De
ZEZEIMEEM
MMI
Control I/O
RTU irtercn'rrectlon
2.Oil
1
IIM=UMMEN -- 5 1.29'5
EN=11 MINIE3
4. __�MIDE
'
��® 4.00 --
IM 1=Elli=E31
VIMEMIMMI 12.D0 ®--....
,11111=.11..= MMIIMMIll
JIMEM
'l MMIIIM=1
'IMI 111111M=1
.111111 MIIIIIIIIIIIIMIEIIIIMEMIIIIIIIIIIIIIMMNIMIIIMIIMIMIMIIIIIIIIII
aIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMIIIIIIIIMII.H.IIIIIIIMMIIIIMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII.M11
1.111111111.1.11111111111.111111.1111 111111=11.11111.1.1111.1111111111.111MI
®®®MIIIIIIIII®EIMM111111111111111111MIN5
111•11111®IIIIIIIII®
®® .111111M11111.e la- 4.02
TOTALS:
$1,500
$0
"TAFF- C
PRINCIPAL
PM' PROJECT MANAGER
SR_EN OR I7: 5811I06 EtiGl'N'EEA zI
5R. ENGGR I : 5011.06 ENGINEER
EN0R: ENGINEER
SR TECH SI_ SENIORCHNICIAN VI
SR TECH I : SENIOR TECS4NICIAO
TECH/DES: 'TECHNICIAN/DES'GNER'
DRAFT CAD:. DRAFTING ICADI
CLER/ADMIN: CLERICAL/ADrMENISTRATPVE
FEE CALCULATIONS AND SUMMARY
SI:a¢rci:. r Ott-Y¢h.�d;r..l.e.
STAFF
Classuficatuon
HOURS
RATE
COSTS
PM
11
O 5180.00 5
O $145.00 $
Sr Engr 8 Z 5 5131.00 $ 5,080.00
S r Engr @ 2A 38 5525 00 $ 4,710.00
Engr 21 0 5$1.0.00 5
Sr Tech ll 3 0
S r Tech] 3A 0
ed./Den 4 18
CADf T era 5 0 567.02 5..
Crier/Adrn:.n 7 4 546.00 $. 184.8X,7
68. S 7,669.00
1,575.017
TOTAL FEE.
F mISC EXPENSES.
ATTR
DOTER.
O k Eft;
OTHER:
OTHER:
OTHER:
OTHER.,
IS A O.E
SO, CO
J.CILl
50.00 5.
SEE 00
31.1,11 ,.
5.1139331 $1.35_00
SUBTOTAL EXPENSES: 5 0062.46.
TOTAL COSTS: $ 8,551.46
LONE ,NfyEN1,S' 40x0:; S S.l;rS.r
TOTAL BUDGET:
PRINT LATE_
PREPARED BY -
9/3/2717
$ 9,080.00'.
4o€6
EXHIBIT - SUBCONSULTANT FEE DETERMINATION
R&W GW PS
PROJECT NO.
11111
, ... ' . J.'
USCi
PROJECT-
R&W
PROJECT PLAN BUDGET
91
- _ ..T...- _ 3
5, .. ,_ 3
FEE CALCULATPONS AND SUMMARY
',,,t,11-L$rtH Rate. Schedule
.r. .ArEHOURS
r
STAFF
Classificatwart HOURS RATE COSTS
! PROIECT TASKSF
PM
Sr Engr 4
Sr Env
Engr
SrTnrh 9
Sr Tech
Inch/Den CADTIecS Oar/Ad m
TOTALS
!
50
1 C 516030$ .
?M 11 10 5145.00 $ 1,450.00
Sr Eng u 2 0 5135.00 $
Sr Engr i 2A SO 5125.00 $ 5,250.20
Engr 29 0 5110.00 $
Sr Tech 3 3 0 5110.00 5
Sr Tech I 35 0 $93.00 5
Tech/Des 4 0 587.50 S -
CAD/Tech 5 18.5 $57.00 5 1,239.50
C1erfAdmin 7 0 546.00 5
TOTAL FEE: 785 $ 8,939.50
5%
\S( EXCISES SJt
Alp' I 3013
nHER50.0.0
LUHIrH 1 5010 J
OCHER, I 1313
3013
CO HER.
OTHER'
C1 15. 5 9563Cibi 513 E .00
SUBTOTAL EXPENSES. S 1,25153
TOTAL COSTS: 5 10491 03
CONTINGENC1 ',UR— S 549.
TOTAL BUDGET, $ 10,700.00
PRINT DATE- 9/3/2017
PREPARED FY 0
Eon
$
earn rneetrrr.g
6„00
5754
UtaRy SenRce Pm mrnnry Load 0earrdCaks
200
5254
enemator Si2ing
1„00
1 00
5270
PS Disifibuton - _
„OS)
100
5270,
SO '
$0
Ste rnrt
2.00
250
Orrnrgn worSrshrnp
200
$250
0
Legend
100
030
5159
Co
1,055
0'n One 3iagrvrr
100
200
4.00
5563
1
$0
$0
che ules
100
200
2.00
5520
!.. Purrpschematen
100
200
4320 -
913
--,,
$0
,periTcaHenn
100
2.01
5195HEk.
ost estimate
100
'00
5395
1
$0
3 eeungs
moo
$2,500
:PM
200
5290
.,
1
$0
''. T0515:
-
2000
50.00
1 -
.
--
1950 -
0.1 -AFC CLASS1F CATIONS: P: P6I54.1PAL SR TECH 9: SENIOR TECHNICIAN R
PM. PROJECT MANAGER 59 TECH : SENIOR TECHNICIAN
SR_ENGR 9: SENIOR ENGINEER 1, TECHIC ES: TECHNKLAN(DESIGNER
SR ENOR t . SENOR ENGINEER T DRAFT CAD: DRAFTING ICAO}
@MGR ENGINEER CLER/ADM[N: CLER1CAMADACNISTRATNE
of
EXHIBIT E-1 - SUBCONSULTANT FEE DETERMINATION
CITY OF TUKWILA - STRANDFER BLVDISW 27TH ST FXTENSJON
PROJECT No.:
PROIECT-
R&W PROJECT PLAN BUDGET
R&W GW PS (C)
q/3/201
FEE CALCULATIONS AND SUMMARY
Slann., al Rat, SL .edvl e
MANI-IOU RS
PROIECT TASKS
GW Pump Station Control
Drawings
Control system power
Control-
Imstrumentatkon
RTU interconnection
Detaiks
Specs
Cost estimate,
Team meetings
TOTALS,
STAFF CLASSIFICAMONS,
PM I Sr Env
Sr ENr I
2.00
1.00 1 6.00
1.00
1.00
4131)
P, PRINCIPAL
PM PROJECT MANAGER
$R.ENGR 0: SENIOR ENGINEER
SR 81309 SENIOR ENGINEER I
ENG.R. ENGINEER
4.00
2.00
2.00
12 00
5400
Engr
Sr Tech III
Sr Tech I
Tt.ch./Des CAD/Tech er/Admr0 I TOTAL
1.00
4..00
1.02
4.00
400
1400
SR TECH II: SENIOR TECHNICIAr0 II
SR TECH I: SENIOR TECHNICIAN I
TECH/DES: TECHNICIAN/DESIGNER
DRAFT CAD: DRAFTING (CAD)
CIER/ADIVIN: CLERICAVADMINiSTRATIVE
4.00
50
STAFF
Classification HOURS RATE
50 F' 1 0 5130,00 $
50 PM 11 0 5145.00 $
SO
CO
$338 Sr Engr IP 2 4 5135.00 $ 5-40.00
$985 Sr Engr 1 ZA 34 5125.00 5 4:6000
$338 ENT 23 0 5110.00 $
51,235
$985 Sr Tech IE 3 0 511000
50 Sr Tech I 3A 0 598330 $
$569 Tech/Des 4 14 $87.50 $ 1,22500
$250
$0 'CAD/Tech 5 0 557.00 $
$1500 Cler/Adnfin 7 4 543.00 5 1e4.00
$0
SO
50 1TOTAL FEE: 56 S 0,194.00
SO ' 5%
$O AMiSt. EXPENsi.S.
SO irdR. i 5'0.0C
SO ID TI tEit- 1 Scuo
SO ‘oliweR 1 III 33
$o IOTHEH. 1 5000
$0 101flE 0. 1 50.3.7..1 .,
SO OTItE I!
$0 10111E9:
so ICIA/Q,... 4.132667 514,03
$0
SO I SUBTOTAL EXPENSES 5 837.56
$o 1
$O TOTAL COSTS, S 7055.86
50
100 11401\[:( =5 303 3=1
'TOTAL BUDGET: 7,420.00
PR/NT DA9/5/2017
TE:
PREPARED 35 :
6 of 9
W710TUa
Title T1 Assurancej
During the performance of this AGREEMENT, the CONSULXANT, for itself, its assignees, and successors
in interest agrees as follows:
I . Compliance with Regulations: The CONSULTANT shall comply with the Regulations relative to non-
discrimination in federally assisted prograrns of the AGENCY, Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations,
Part 21, as they may be amended from time to time (hereinafter referred to as the "REGULATIONS„},
which are herein incorporated by reference and rnade a part of this AGiREETVIEN'r.
2. Non-discrimination: The CONSULTANT, with regard to the work performed during this AGREEMENT,
shall not discriminate on the grounds of race, color, sex, or national origin in the selection and retention
of sub -consultants, including procurement of materials and leases of equipment. The CONSULTANT
shall not participate either directly or indirectly in the discrimination prohibited by Section 21.5 of the
REGULATIONS, including employment practices when this AGREEMENT covers a program set forth
in Appendix B of the REGULATIONS.
Solicitations for Sub -consultants, Including Procurement of Materials and Equipment: In all solicitations
either by competitive bidding or negotiations made by the CONSULTAN'r for work to be performed
under a sub -contract, including procurement of materials or leases of equipment, each potential sub -
consultant or supplier shall be notified by the CONSULTANT of the CONSULTANT's obligations under
this AGREEMENT and the REGULATIONS relative to non-discrimination on the grounds of race, color,
sex, or national origin,
4, Information and Reports: The CONSULTANT shall provide all information and reports required by the
REGULATIONS or directives issued pursuant thereto, and shall permit access to its books, records,
accounts, other sources of information, and its facilities as may be determined by the AGENCY, the
STATE, or the Federal Highway Administration (FH WA) to be pertinent to ascertain compliance with such
REGULKI]ONS, orders and instructions. Where any information required of a CONSULTANT is in the
exclusive possession of another who fails or refuses to furnish this information, the CONSULTANT shall
so certify to the A(JENCY, the S'rNf'E, or the FHWA as appropriate, and shall set forth what efforts it has
made to obtain tile information.
5. Sanctions for Non-compliance: In the event of the CONSULTANT's non-cornpliance with the non-
discrimination provisions of this AGREEMENT, the AGENCY shall impose Such AGREEMENT sanctions
as it, the STATE, or the FHWA may determine to be appropriate, including, but not limited to:
Withholding of payments to the CONSULTANT under this AGREEMENT until the CONSULTANT'
complies, and/or,
. Cancellation, termination, or suspension of this AGREEMENT, in whole or in part.
Incorporation of Provisions: The CONSULTANT shall include the provisions of paragraphs (1) through
(5) in every subcontract, including procurement of materials and leases of equipment, unless exempt by the
REGULATIONS, or directives issued pursuant thereto. Tile CONSULTANT shall take such action with
respect to any sub -consultant or procurement as the STATE, the AGENCY, or FH WA may direct as a means
of enforcing such provisions including sanctions for non-compliance.
Provided, however, that in the event a CONSULTANT becomes involved in, or is threatened with,
litigation with asub-consultant or supplier as a result of such direction, the CONSULTANT may request
the AGENCY enter into such litigation to protect the interests of the STATE and/or the AGENCY and, in
addition, the CONSULTANT may request the United States enter into such litigation to protect the interests
of the United States. Agrecilieiii. NUmber:
WSDOT Form 140-089 EF Exhibit F Page I of I
Revised 1013012014 179
Exhibit G
Certification Documents
Exhibit G- I (a) Certification of Consultant
Exhibit G- 1(1-x) Certification o1ity of Tukwila
Exhibit G-2 Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension and Other Responsibility Matters -
Primary Covered Transactions
Exhibit C®3 Certification Regarding the Restrictions of the Use of Federal Funds for Lobbying
Exhibit G-4 Certificate of Current Cost or Pricing Data
Agreement Number,
WSDO T Form 140-089 EF Exhibit G Page 1 of I
Revised 1013012014 180
Exhibit G -1(a) Certification of Consultant
I hereby certify that I am the and duly authorized representative of the firm of
BergerABAM Inc.
whose address is
33301 Ninth Avenue S,, Suite 300, Federal Way, WA 98003
and that neither the above firm nor I have:
a) Employed or retained for a commission, percentage, brokerage, contingent fee, or other consideration,
any firm or person (other than a bona fide employee working solely for me or the above CONSULTANT)
to solicit or secure this AGREEMENT;
b) Agreed, as an express or implied condition for obtaining this contract, to employ or retain the services of
any firm or person in connection with carrying out this AGREEMENT; or
c) Paid, or agreed to pay, to any firm, organization or person (other than a bona fide employee working solely
f`or me or the above CONSULTANT) any fee, contribution, donation, or consideration of any kind for, or in
connection with, procuring or carrying out this AGREEMENT; except as hereby expressly stated (if any);
I acknowledge that this certificate is to be furnished to the City of Tukwila
and the Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation in connection with this
AGREEMENT involving participation of Federal -aid highway funds, and Is subject to applicable State and
Federal laws, both criminal and civil.
BergerABAM Inc.
m1rufflMEM,
Sigriature (Authorized Official of Consultant} Date
Agreement Nuniber:
WSDOT Form 1404089 EF Exhibit G Page I of I
Revised 1013012014 181
Exhibit G -1(b) Certification of the City of Tukwila
I hereby certify that I ani the:
a
ME
of the
, and
or its representative has not been required, directly or indirectly as an express or implied condition in connection
with obtaining or carrying out this AGREEMENT to:
a) Employ or retain, or agree to employ to retain, any firm or person; or
b) Pay, or agree to pay, to any firm, person, or organization, any fee, contribution, donation, or consideration
ofariy kind; except as hereby expressly stated (if any)-.
I acknowledge that this certificate is to be furnished to the
and the Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, in connection with this
AGREEMENT involving participation of Federal -aid highway funds, and is SLIlZjeCt to applicable State and
Federal laws, both criminal and civil.
Signature Date
Agreement Number-
WSDO T Form 140.089 EF Exhibit G Page 1 of 1
Revised 1013012014 182
Exhibit G-2 Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension and Oth
Responsibility Matters - Primary Covered Transactions i
1. The prospective primary participant certifies to the best of its knowledge and belief, that it and its principals:
A. Are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for:• debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily
excluded from covered transactions by any Federal department or agency,
B. Have not within a three (3) year period preceding this proposal been convicted of or had a civil judgment
rendered against thern for commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining,
attempting to obtain, or performing a public (Federal, State, or local) transaction or contract under
a public transaction; violation of Federal or State anti-trust statues or cormnission of embezzlement,
theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements, or receiving
.stolen property;
C. Are not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity
(Federal, State, or local) with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph (1)(b)
of this certification, and
D. Have not within a three (3) year period preceding this application / proposal had one or more public
transactions (Federal, State and local) terminated for cause or default.
11. Where the prospective primary participant is unable to certify to any of the statements in this certification,
such prospective participant shall attach an explanation to this proposal.
BergerABAM Inc,
Consultant (Firm Name)
Signature (Authorized Official of Consultant) Date
Agreement Number
INSDOT Form 140.089 EF Exhibit G Page I of I
Revised 1013012014 183
Exhibit G-3 Certification Regarding the Restrictions of the Use of Federal Funds
for Lobbying
The prospective participant certifies, by signing and submitting this bid or proposal, to the best of his or her
knowledge and belief, that:
No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any
person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any Federal agency, a Member
of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or any employee of a Member of Congress in connection
with the awarding of any federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan,
the entering into of any cooperative AGREEMENT, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment,
or modification of Federal contract, grant, loan or cooperative AGREEMENT.
2. If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for
influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any Federal agency, a Mernber of Congress,
an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this
Federal contract, grant, loan or cooperative AGREEMENT, the undersigned shall complete and submit
Standard Form - LLL, "Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying," in accordance with its instructions.
This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction
was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into
this transaction imposed by Section 1.352, Title 31, US. Code, Any person who fails to file the required
certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000.00, and not more than $100,000,00,
[or each such failure.
The prospective participant also agrees by submitting his or her bid or proposal that he or she shall require
that the language of this certification be included in all lower tier sub contracts, which exceed $100,000,
and that all such sub -recipients shall certify and disclose accordingly.
BergerABAM Inc.
Consultant (Firm Name)
Signature (Authorized Official of Consultant) Date
Agreement Number.
WSDOT Form 140-089 EF Exhibit G Page I of I
Revised 1013012014 184
This is to certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, the cost or pricing data (as defined in section
2.101 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) and required under FAR subsection 15,403-4) submitted,
either actually or by specific identification in writing, to the Contracting Officer or to the Contracting Officer's
representative in support of Strander Blvd./SW 27th Street Extension are accurate, complete., and current
as of 9/5/17
This certification includes the cost or pricing data supporting any advance AGREEMENT's and forward pricing
rate AGREEMENT's between the offer or and the Government that are part of the proposal.
Firm: BergerABAM Inc.
Vice President
Signature Title
Date of Execution***:
4demity the proposal, quotation, request for pricing adjustment, or other submission involved, giving the appropriate identifying number (e.g. prqject title.)
**Insert the day, month, and year, when price negotiations were concluded and price AGREEMf,.-,N'I' was reached.
*"Insert, the day, month, and year, of signing
which should be as close as practicable to the date when the price negotiations were concluded and the
contract price was agreed to
Agreement Nurnbev
WSDOT Forrn 140-089 EF Exhibit G Page 1 of I
Revised 1013012014 185
Exhibit H
Liability Insurance Increase
To Be Used Only If Insurance Requirements Are Increased
"The professional liability limit of the CONSULTANT to the AGENCY identified in Section X11, Legal Relations
and Insurance of this Agreement is amended to $
The CONSULTANT shall provide Professional Liability Insurance with minimum per occurrence limits in the
arnount of $
Such "Insurance cove -rage shall be evidenced by one of the following methods:
• Certificate of Insurance.
• Self-insurance through an irrevocable Letter of Credit from a qualified financial institution.
Self-insurance through documentation of a separate fund established exclusively for the payment of professional
liability claims, including claim amounts already reserved against the fund, safeguards established for payment
from the fund, a copy of the latest annual financial statements, and disclosure of the investment portfolio for
those funds.
Should the minimum Professional Liability insurance limit required by the AGENCY as specified above exceed
$1 million per occurrence or the value of the contract, whichever is greater, then justification shall be submitted
to the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) for approval to increase the minimum insurance limit.
If FH WA approval is obtained, the AGENCY may, at its own cost, reimburse the CONSULTANT for the additional
professional liability insurance required.
Notes: Cost of added insurance requirements: $
9 Include all costs, fee increase,. prerniums.
• This cost shall not be billed against an F14WA funded project.
• For final contracts, include this exhibit.
N/A
Agreement Number
WSDOT Form 140-089 EF Exhibit H Page I of I
Revised 1013012014 186
Exhibit I
Alleged Consultant Design Error Procedures
The purpose of this exhibit is to establish a procedure to determine if a consultant's alleged design error is of a
nature that exceeds the accepted standard of care. In addition, it will establish a uniform method for the resolution
and/or cost recovery procedures in those instances where the agency believes it has suffered some material damage
due to tile alleged error by the consultant,
Step I Potential Consultant Design Error(s) is Identified by Agency's Project Manager
At the first indication of potential consultant design error(s), the first step in the process is for the Agency's
project manager to notify the Director of Public Works or Agency Engineer regarding the potential design
error(s). For federally funded projects, the Region Local Programs Engineer should be infornied and
involved in these procedures, (riots: The Director of Public Works or Agency Engineer may appoint an
agency staff person other than the project manager, who has not been as directly involved in the project,
to be responsible for the remaining steps in these procedures.)
Stop 2 Project Manager Documents the Alleged Consultant Design Error(s)
After discussion of the alleged design error(s) and the magnitude of the alleged error(s), and with the
Director of Public Works or Agency Engineer's concurrence, the project manager obtains more detailed
documentation than is normally required on the project. Examples include: all decisions and descriptions
of work; photographs, records of labor, materials and equipment.
Step 3 Contact the Consultant Regarding the Alleged Design Error(s)
If it is determined that there is a need to proceed further, the next step in the process is for the project
manager to contact the consultant regarding (lie alleged design error(s) and the magnitude of the alleged
error(s). The project manager and other appropriate agency staff should represent the agency and the
consultant should be represented by their prqJject manager and any personnel (including sub -consultants)
deemed appropriate for the alleged design error(s) issue.
Step 4 Attempt to Resolve Alleged Design Error with Consultant
After the mecting0(s) with the consultant have been completed regarding the consultant's alleged design
error(s), there are three possible scenarios;
• It is determined via Mutual agreement that there is not a consultant design error(s). If this is the case,
then the process will not proceed beyond this point,
• It is determined via mutual agreement that a consultant design error(s) occurred. Ifthis is the case,
then the Director of Public Works or Agency Engineer, or their representatives, negotiate a settlement
with the consultant. The settlement would be paid to the agency or the amount would be reduced from
the consultant's agreement with the agency for the services on the project in which the design error
took place. The agency is to provide UY, through the Region Local Programs Engineer, a summary
of the settlement for review and to make adjustments, if any, as to how the settlement affects federal
reimbursements. No further action is required.
• There is not a Mutual agreement regarding the alleged consultant design error(s). The consultant may
request that the alleged design error(s) issue be forwarded to the Director of Public Works or Agency
Engineer for review. If the Director Of Public Works or Agency Engineer, after review with their legal
counsel, is not able to reach mutual agreement with the consultant, proceed to Step 5.
Agreement Nunibr:
WSDOT Form 140-089 EF Exhibit I Page 1 of 2
Revised 1013012014 187
Step 5 Forward Documents to Local Programs
I"or federally funded prcjects all available information, including costs, should be forwarded through the
Region Local Programs Engineer to LP for their review and consultation with the FIJWA. LP will meet
with representatives of the agency and the consultant to review the alleged design error(s), and attempt
to find a resolution to the issue. If necessary, LP will request assistance from the Attorney General's Office
for legal interpretation. LP will also identify how the alleged error($) affects eligibility of project costs
for federal reirnbursement-
lf'i-nLitual agreement is reached, the agency and consultant adjust the scope of work and costs
to reflect the agreed upon resolution, LP, in consultation with FIJWA, will 'identify the amount
of federal participation in the agreed upon resolution of the issue.
• If Mutual agreement is not reached, the agency and consultant may seek settlement by arbitration
or by litigation.
Agreement Number:
WSDOT Form 140-089 EF Exhibit I Page 2 of 2
Revised 1013012014 188
Exhibit J
Consultant Claim Procedures
. . ....... . ....
The purpose of this exhibit is to describe a procedure regarding claim(s) on a consultant agreement. The following
procedures should only be utilized on consultant claims greater than $1,000. If the consultant's claim(s) are a total
of $1,000 or less, it would not be cost effective to proceed through the outlined steps. It is suggested that the
Director of Public Works or Agency Engineer negotiate a fair and reasonable price for the consultant's claim(s)
that total $1,000 or less.
This exhibit will outline the procedures to be followed by the consultant and the agency to consider a potential
claire by the consultant,
Step I Consultant Files a Claim with the Agency Project Manager
If the consultant determines that they were requested to perform additional services that were outside
of the agreement's scope of work, they may be entitled to a claim. The first step that must be completed
is the request for consideration of the claim to the Agency's project manager.
The consultant's claim must outline the following:
• Summation of hours by classification for each firm that is included in the claim;
• Any correspondence that directed the consultant to perform the additional work,
• "Timeframe of the additional work that was Outside of the project scope,
• Surnmary of direct labor dollars, overhead costs, profit and reimbursable costs associated with
the additional work; and
• Explanation as to why the consultant believes the additional work was outside of the agreement
scope of work.
Step 2 Review by Agency Personnel Regarding the Consultant's Claim for Additional Compensation
After the consultant has completed step 1, the next step in the process is to forward the request to the
Agency's project manager. The project manager will review the consultant's claim and will met with the
Director of Public Works or Agency Engineer to determine if the Agency agrees with the claim. If the
FHWA is participating in the project's funding, forward a copy of the consultant's claim and the Agency§s
recommendation for federal participation in the claim to the WSDOT Local Programs through the Region
Local Programs Engineer, I r the claim is not eligible for federal participation, payment will need to be firorn
agency funds.
If the Agency project manager, Director of Public Works or Agency Engineer, WSDOT Local Programs
(if applicable), and FHWA (if applicable) agree with the consultant's claim, send a request memo, including
backup documentation to the consultant to either supplement the agreement, or create a new agreement
�
for the claim. After the request has been approved, the Agency shall write the supplement and/or new
agreement and pay the consultant the amount of the claim. Inform the consultant that the final payment for
the agreement is subject to audit. No further action in needed regarding the claim procedures.
If the Agency does not agree with the consultants claim, proceed to step 3 of the procedures.
Agreement Number:
WSDOT Form 140-089 EF Exhibit J Pagel of
Revised 1013012014 189
Step 3 Preparation of Support Documentation Regarding Consultant's Claim(s)
If the Agency does not agree with the consultant's claim, the project manager shall prepare a summary
for the Director of Public Works or Agency Engineer that included the following:
• Copy of information supplied by the consultant regarding the claim;
• Agency's summation of hours by classification for each firrn that should be included in the claim;
• Any correspondence that directed the consultant to perform the additional work;
• Agency's summary of direct labor dollars, overhead costs, profit and reimbursable costs associated
with the additional work;
• Explanation regarding those areas in which the Agency does/does not agree with the consultant's
clairn(s);
• Explanation to describe what has been instituted to preclude future consultant claim(s); and
• Recommendations to resolve the claim.
Step 4 Director of Public Works or Agency Engineer Roiews Consultant Claim and Agency Documentation
The Director of Public Works or Agency Engineer shall review and administratively approve or disapprove
the clairn, or portions thereof, which may include getting Agency Council or Commission approval (as
appropriate to agency dispute resolution procedures). If the project involves federal participation, obtain
concurrence from WSDOT Local Programs and FI-IWA regarding final setilcment of the claire. Ifthe claim
is riot eligible for federal participation, payment will need to be from agency funds,
Step 5 Informing Consultant of Decision Regarding the Claim
The Director of Public Works or Agency Engineer shall notify (in writing) the consultant of their final
decision regarding the consultant's claim(s). Include the final dollar amount of the accepted claim(s)
and rationale utilized for the decision.
Step 6 Preparation of Supplement or New Agreement for the Consultant's Claim(s)
The agency shall write the supplement and/or new agreement and pay the consultant the amount
of the claim. Inform the consultant that the final payment for the agreement is subject to audit,
agreement Number:
WSDOT Form 140.089 EF Exhibit J Page 2 of 2
Revised 1013012014 190
Cl!y of Tukwila
Allan Ekberg, Mayor
TO:
.tt Transportation and Infrastructure Cornmitteg.
FROM1, Bob, Giberson, Public Works Director -iy�v
BY: Mike Perfetti, Habitat Project Manager
CC: Mayor Ekberg
SUBiECT Riverton Creek Flapgate Removal Projec
Project No. 99830103
Resolution for RCO Grant Application
ISSUE
Approve a Resolution to the State of Washington Recreation and Conservation Office (RCCA) for a second
grant application for the Riverton Creek Flapgate Removal Project,
The City is currently working on the design phase of the project, which will expand salmon habitat, including
habitat for ESA-iisted Chinook salmon. This project is a priority project listed in the WRIA 9 Salmon Habitat
Plan. As a recognized local entity, WRIA 9 has recommended to the RCO's Salmon Recovery Funding Board
(SRFB) that the Riverton Creek Flapgate Removal Project receive construction grant funds.
DISCUSSION
The Riverton Greek Flapgate Removal Project is currently estimated to cost approximately $996,430,
including design and construction. To date, the SRFB has granted $551,070 (PSAR grant #16-1892) for this
project, but these funds are on hold until the State Legislature approves the 2017-2019 biennial budget, at
which point the grant contract will be routed through City Council for approval. This second grant application,
for $295,895 (SRFB grant #171048), requires the applicant submit an Application Authorization Form in the
form of a City Resolution,
FISCAL IMPACT
The two grants total $846,965 and both require a 15% City match, or $149,465. There is currently only
$868,000 budgeted for the Riverton Creek Flap Gate Removal project with $551,070 In grant funding and
$318,000 in Surface Water funds. The entire project budget will have to be increased to the estimated
$996,430, but with the second SRFB grant, the surface water funding will be sufficient at $318,000.
RECOMMENDATION
Council is being asked to approve the Resolution authorizing the submission of the second SRFB grant
funding request and consider this item on the Consent Agenda at the September 18, 2017 Regular Meeting.
Attachments: Draft Resolution
page108, 2017-2022 CIP
WAPW EqTROJECTSW DR PromorAffivortort Flap Gale Removal 260B 2011 GoOtInfo Memo 2017 RCU SRF8 Gwt Rew1wim 091217 91,dor.X 191
2016 PSAR grant
$551,070,00
2017 SRFB grant
29 89500
IRS11
RECOMMENDATION
Council is being asked to approve the Resolution authorizing the submission of the second SRFB grant
funding request and consider this item on the Consent Agenda at the September 18, 2017 Regular Meeting.
Attachments: Draft Resolution
page108, 2017-2022 CIP
WAPW EqTROJECTSW DR PromorAffivortort Flap Gale Removal 260B 2011 GoOtInfo Memo 2017 RCU SRF8 Gwt Rew1wim 091217 91,dor.X 191
WHEREAS, under the provisions of the Salmon Recovery Act, state grant assistance
is requested to aid in financing the cost of restoration; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Tukwila considers it in the best public
interest to complete the Riverton Creek Flap Gate Removal Project (#17-1048) described
in the application;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA,
WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Habitat Project Manager, Mike Perfetti, is authorized to make formal
application to the Salmon Recovery Funding Board for grant assistance.
Section 2. The City of Tukwila has reviewed the sample project agreement on the
Washington State Recreation and Conservation Office's Web site (at www.rco.wa.gov
documents/manuals&forms/SaMpjtPro'Lgreement.pd
A f) and authorizes the Mayor to enter
_
into such a project agreement, if funding is awarded. The City Council understands and
acknowledges that the project agreement will contain the indemnification (applicable to any
sponsor) and waiver of sovereign immunity (applicable to Tribes) and other terms and
conditions that are contained in the sample project agreement, and that the sample project
agreement may be revised periodically by the Recreation and Conservation Office, The
City Council recognizes that such changes might occur prior to the authorized
representative signing the actual project agreement, and accepts the responsibility and the
presumption that the authorized representative shall have conferred with them as to any
such changes before he/she executes the project agreement on behalf of the City of
Tukwila and so executes with their authorization.
WMard Roces s lng\Res olutions \Grant funding applicationAverlon Creek 8-30-17
MRbJs Page I of 2
192
Section 3. Any grant assistance received will be used for only direct eligible and
allowable costs that are reasonable and necessary to implement the project(s) referenced
above.
Section 4. The City of Tukwila expects their matching share of project funding will be
derived from City of Tukwila funds and possibly other sources and meets the requirements
of WAC 420-12-040. In addition, the City Council understands the City is responsible for
supporting all non-cash commitments to this project should they not materialize.
Section 5. The City Council acknowledges that if the Salmon Recovery Fund Board
approves grant assistance for the project, the Recreation and Conservation Office will pay
the City on only a reimbursement basis, except for a specially approved advance payment.
It is understood that "reimbursement basis" means the City will only request payment from
the Recreation and Conservation Office after it incurs eligible and allowable costs and has
paid them, The Recreation and Conservation Office may also determine an amount of
retainage and hold that amount until the project is complete. The Recreation and
Conservation Office may approve advance payments in limited circumstances, pursuant to
WAC 420-12-060 and the policy outlined in Manual 8, Reim bursem ents.
Section 6. The City acknowledges that any property restored will be maintained for a
period of 10 years after the project is complete unless otherwise provided and agreed to
by the City of Tukwila and the Salmon Recovery Funding Board in the project agreement or
an amendment thereto.
Section 7. This application authorization becomes part of a formal application to the
Salmon Recovery Funding Board for grant assistance.
Section 8. Appropriate opportunity for public comment on this application was
provided.
Section 9. The City Council of the City of Tukwila certifies that this application
authorization was properly and lawfully adopted following the requirements of the City of
Tukwila and applicable laws and policies and that the person signing as authorized
representative is duly authorized to do so.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, at a
Regular Meeting thereof this day of , 2017,
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
Christy O'Flaherty, MMC, City Clerk Dennis Robertson, Council President
Filed with the City Clerk:
Passed by the City Council:
Resolution Number:
KNWord Processing\Resolutions%Grant funding application -Riverton Creek 8-30-17
MRbis Page 2 of 2
193
CITY OF TUKWILA CAPITAL PROJECT SUMMARY
2017 to 2022
PROJECT- Riverton Creek Flap Gate Removal Project No, 9983012
DESCRIPTION: Remove two culverts and flap gates at Duwamish River; install pipe arch, create open channel confluence,
install trail bridge over now channel, restore/revegetate 200 feet of creek channel and 450 ft. of pond shoreline.
JUSTIFICATION: Increase available salmonid rearing habitat and increase flood refuge in lower Duwamish River. Improve
fish access to Riverton Greek and enhance salmon rearing and resting area.
STATUS: Design at 70% completion in 2011 with a Salmon Recovery Funding Board grant of $42,500 and $30,000
from People for Puget Sound. Construction is grant dependent.
MAINT. IMPACT: Expected to increase maintenance.
COMMENT: Proposed grants include State & Federal habitat grants. Project used as mitigation for East Marginal Way
Pipe Replacement Project and MPA Control#1 33763-1 requires work to be completed by June 11, 2019.
FINANCIAL Through Estimated
(in son(fti 2015 217116 2017 2019 2019 2020 2021 2022 FIFYOND TOTAL
EXPENSES
. ....... . .... ......... .... . ...
Design
114
10
108
232
Land (R]W)
0
Const. Mgmt.
100
100
Construction
650
650
TOTAL EXPENSES
114
10
108 750
0
0
0
01 01
982
FUND SOURCES
Awarded Grant
72
72
Proposed Grant
550
550
Mitigation Actual
0
Mitigation Expected
0
Utility Revenue
42
10
108 200
0
0
0
0 0
360
TOTAL SOURCES 1
1141
10
1 108,1 750 1
0
01
01
0 01
982
2017 - 2022 Capital improvement Program 108 194
Tullkwila Altan Ekberg, May]
Public Works Department - Bob Giber -son, Director
TO: Transportation and Infrastructure Committee
FROM.- Bob Giberson, Public Works Director
DATE: September 8, 2017
SUBJECT: S rint,Communications Company Franchise Ordinance
ISSUE
Approval of Sprint Communications Company Franchise Ordinance.
111
P Ift t" To I
Headquartered in Herndon, VA, the Sprint Communications Company (Sprint) is a wholly owned
subsidiary of US Telecom. Sprint provides long distance telecommunication services and
transmission of voice, data, and video.
ANALYSIS
The attached Franchise Ordinance would allow Sprint to operate and maintain its
telecommunications facilities within City of Tukwila rights-of-way.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
Under the terms of the Franchise, Sprint Communications Company will pay a $5,000
administrative fee within 30 days of franchise approval.
19MOMINIMA IM9
Council is being asked to approve the Ordinance that will grant a Franchise Agreement to Sprint
Communications Company and consider this item on the Consent Agenda at the September 18,
2017 Regular Meeting.
Attachment-, Draft Franchise Ordinance
mlpw oil morno tip On i 9.0.11Aocx
195
*M
A A
61MUMMUM"110111— 0 11 ig Film I= 2 2:0111 VTO 91-111
WHEREAS, Sprint Communications Company LP., hereinafter referred to as
"Sprint," is a telecommunications company that, among other things, provides high
capacity interexchange transport to telecommunications common carriers, including
data transmission, linkage to long distance carriers and other telecommunications
services to customers in the Puget Sound region', and
WHEREAS, Sprint's desired route through the City of Tukwila, hereinafter referred to
as "City," requires the use of certain portions of City rights-of-way for the installation,
operation and maintenance of a telecommunications system; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the use of portions of the City's
rights-of-way for installation of a telecommunications system is appropriate from the
standpoint of the benefits to be derived by local business and the region as a result of
such services; and
WHEREAS, the City Council also recognizes that the use of public rights-of-way must
be restricted to allow for the construction of amenities necessary to serve the future needs
of the citizens of Tukwila and that the coordination, planning and management of the City's
rights-of-way is necessary to ensure that the burden of costs for the operations of none
municipal interests are not borne by the citizenry; and
WHEREAS, the Revised Code of Washington (RCW) authorizes the City to grant and
regulate non-exclusive franchises for the use of public streets, right-of-ways and other
public property for installation, operation and maintenance of a fiber optic system and
transmission of communications;
W: Word Processinq\Ordinances%Sprint Franchise Agreement 8-11-17
BGtjs Page 1 of 12 196
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA,
WASHINGTON, HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Non-exclusive Franchise Granted.
A. The City hereby grants to Sprint, subject to the conditions prescribed in this
ordinance ("Franchise Agreement"), the franchise rights and authority to construct,
replace, repair, monitor, maintain, use and operate the equipment and facilities
necessary for a telecommunications facility within all City -owned rights-of-way,
hereinafter referred to as the "Franchise Area."
S. The foregoing franchise rights and authority ("Franchise") shall not be deemed
to be exclusive to Sprint and shall in no way prohibit or limit the City's ability to grant
other franchises, permits, or rights along, over or under the areas to which this
Franchise has been granted to Sprint; provided, that such other franchises do not
unreasonably interfere with Sprint's exercise of franchise rights granted herein as
determined by the City. This Franchise shall in no way interfere with existing utilities or
in any way limit, prohibit or prevent the City from using the Franchise Area or affect the
City's jurisdiction over such area in any way -
C. This Franchise Agreement merely authorizes Sprint to occupy and use the
Franchise Area, Nothing contained herein shall be construed to grant or convey any
right, title, or interest in the Franchise Area to Sprint.
Section 2. Authority. The Director of Public Works or his or her designee is
hereby granted the authority to administer and enforce the terms and provisions of this
Franchise Agreement and may develop such lawful and reasonable rules, policies and
procedures as he or she deems necessary to carry out the provisions contained herein,
Section 3, Franchise Term. The franchise rights granted herein shall remain in
full force and effect for a period of 10 years from the effective date of this ordinance.
However, this Franchise Agreement shall not take effect and Sprint shall have no rights
under this Franchise Agreement unless a written acceptance with the City is received
pursuant to Section 4 of this Agreement. If Sprint requests a Franchise renewal prior to
the expiration date, the City may, at the City's sole discretion, extend the term of this
Franchise Agreement for up to one year beyond the expiration date to allow processing
of renewal. If the City elects to extend the term of this Franchise, written notice of the
extension shall be provided to Sprint prior to the Franchise expiration date.
Section 4. Acceptance of Terms and Conditions. The full acceptance of this
Franchise Agreement and all the terms and conditions shall be filed with the City Clerk
within 30 days of the effective date of this ordinance in the form attached hereto as
Exhibit A. Failure on the part of Sprint to file said consent within 30 days of the effective
date of this ordinance shall void and nullify any and all rights granted under this
Franchise Agreement.
W: Word Processing\0rdinances\S,,)hnt Franchise Agreement 8-11-17
BG:bjs Page 2 of 12 197
Section 6. Construction Provisions and Standards. The following provisions
shall be considered mandatory and failure to abide by any conditions described herein
shall be deemed as non-compliance with the terms of this Franchise Agreement and
may resultin some or all of the penalties specified in Section 6.
1. Permit Required. No construction, maintenance or repairs (except for
emergency repairs) shall be undertaken in the Franchise Area without first obtaining
appropriate permits from the City of Tukwila, Department of Public Works. In case of an
emergency, Sprint shall, within 24 hours of the emergency, obtain a permit from the City
of Tukwila's Public Works Department,
2. Coordination. All capital construction projects performed by Sprint within
the Franchise Area shall be inspected by a City inspector. All work and inspection shall
be coordinated with the Engineering Division of the Public Works Department to ensure
consistency with City infrastructure, future Capital Improvement Projects, all developer
improvements, and pertinent codes and ordinances.
3, Construction Standards, Any construction, installation, maintenance and
restoration activities performed by or for Sprint within the Franchise Area shall be
constructed and located so as to produce the least amount of interference with the free
passage of pedestrian and vehicular traffic. All construction, installation, maintenance
and restoration activities shall be conducted such that they conform to the City's
development guidelines and standards and comply with Title 11 of the Tukwila
Municipal Code.
4. Underground Installation Required. All telecommunications cables and
junction boxes or other vaulted system components shall be installed underground
unless otherwise exempted frorn this requirement, in writing, by the Public Works
Director.
5, Relocation.
a. The City shall have the right to require Sprint to alter, adjust, relocate,
or protect in place its facilities within the public right-of-way when reasonably necessary
for construction, alteration, repair, or improvement of any portion of the public rights-of-
way for purposes of public welfare, health, or safety ("Public Improvements"), Such
Public Improvements include, by way of example but not limitation, public rights-of-way
construction; public rights-of-way repair (including resurfacing or widening); change of
public rights-of-way grade: construction, installation or repair of sewers, drains, water
pipes, power lines, signal lines, communication lines, or any other type of government-
owned communications, utility or public transportation systems, public work, public
facility, or improvement of any government-owned utility; public rights-of-way vacation,
and the construction of any public improvement or structure by any governmental
agency acting in a governmental capacity. In the event the City requires Sprint to
relocate its facilities, the City shall provide Sprint with written notice requesting such
relocation, along with plans for the public improvement that are sufficiently complete to
allow for the initial evaluation, coordination and the development of a relocation plan.
The City and Sprint shall meet at a time and location determined by the City to discuss
the project requirements including critical timelines, schedules, construction standards,
VT Word ProcessingQrdinances%Sprint Fran rhise Agreement 8-11-17
BG -bis Page 3 of 12 198
utility conflicts, as -built requirements, and other pertinent relocation plan details. The
City shall notify Sprint as soon as practicable of the need for relocation and shall specify
the date by which relocation shall be completed. Except in case of emergency such
notice shall be no less than 90 days.
b. To ensure timely execution of relocation requirements, Sprint shall,
upon written request from the City, provide at Sprint's expense, base maps, current as,
built information, detailed relocation plan (including detailed schedule of relocation
activities, identification of critical path, identification of facilities, and relocation
procedures), and other design, technical or operational requirements reasonably
required for such relocation within the time frame specified by the City.
c. Sprint may, after receipt of written notice requesting a relocation of its
facilities, submit to the City written alternatives to such relocation within the time
specified by the City. Except in case of emergency, as determined by the City in its sole
discretion, such time specified by the City shall be no less than 30 days. Such
alternatives shall include the use and operation of temporary facilities in adjacent rights-
of-way, The City shall evaluate such alternatives and advise Sprint in writing if one or
more of the alternatives are suitable to accommodate the work, which would otherwise
necessitate relocation of the facilities. If requested by the City, Sprint shall submit
additional information as reasonably required to assist the City in making such
evaluation. The City shall give each alternative proposed by Sprint full and fair
consideration. In the event the City, in its sole discretion, decides not to accept the
alternatives suggested by Sprint, Sprint shall relocate its facilities as otherwise specified
in Section 5, subparagraph 5.
d. Upon final approval of the relocation plan by the City, Sprint shall, at its
own expense, unless otherwise prohibited by statute, and at the time frame specified by
the City, temporarily or permanently remove, relocate, place underground, change or
alter the position of any facilities or structures within the right-of-way whenever the City
has determined that such removal, relocation, undergrounding, change or alteration is
reasonably necessary for the construction, repair, maintenance, installation, public
safety, or operation of any public improvement in or upon the rights-of-way. In the event
relocation is required by reason of construction by a third party, non-governmental
entity, for the sole benefit of the third party, non-governmental entity, then Sprint's
relocation costs shall be borne by the third party.
e. If during the construction, repair, or maintenance of the City's public
improvement project an unexpected conflict occurs from Sprint's facilities, Sprint shall,
upon notification from the City, respond within 24 hours to resolve the conflict.
t Sprint acknowledges and understands that any delay by Sprint in
performing the work to alter, adjust, relocate, or protect in place its facilities within the
public rights-of-way may delay, hinder, or interfere with the work performed by the City
and its contractors and subcontractors in furtherance of construction, alteration, repair,
or improvement of the public rights-of-way, and result in damage to the City, including
but not limited to, delay claims. Sprint shall cooperate with the City and its contractors
and subcontractors to coordinate such relocation work to accommodate the public
W: Word Proce5singtOrdjnances`rSprint Franchise Agreement 8-11-17
BGtjs Page 4 of 12 199
improvement project and project schedules to avoid delay, hindrance of, or interference
with such project.
g, Should Sprint fail to alter, adjust, protect in place or relocate any
facilities ordered by the City to be altered, adjusted, protected in place, or relocated,
within the time prescribed by the City, given the nature and extent of the work, or if it is
not done to the City's reasonable satisfaction, the City may, to the extent the City may
lawfully do so, cause such work to be done and bill the reasonable cost of the work to
Sprint, including all reasonable costs and expenses incurred by the City due to Sprint's
delay. In such event, the City shall not be liable for any damage to any portion of
Sprint's system. In addition to any other indemnity set forth in this Franchise
Agreement, Sprint will indemnify, hold harmless, and pay the costs of defending the City
from and against any and all claims, suits, actions, damages, or liabilities for delays on
public improvement construction projects caused by or arising out of the failure of Sprint
to adjust, modify, protect in place, or relocate its facilities in a timely manner; provided
that, Sprint shall not be responsible for damages due to delays caused by the City,
6. Removal or Abandonment. Upon the removal from service of any service
antennas or other associated structures, facilities and amenities, Sprint shall comply
with all applicable standards and requirements prescribed by the City of Tukwila's
Public Works Department for the removal or abandonment of said structures and
facilities, No facility constructed or owned by Sprint shall be abandoned without the
express written consent of the City.
7. Bond. Before undertaking any of the work, installation, improvements,
construction, repair, relocation, or maintenance authorized by this Franchise
Agreement, Sprint shall, upon the written request of the City, furnish a bond executed
by Sprint and a corporate surety authorized to operate a surety business in the State of
Washington, in such sum as may be set and approved by the City as sufficient to
ensure performance of Sprint's obligations under this Franchise Agreement, provided,
however, that such sum shall not exceed 150% of the cost of the work to be done or the
telecommunications system to be installed by Sprint in the City rights-of-way. At
Sprint's sole option, Sprint may provide alternate security in the form of an assignment
of funds or a letter of credit, in the same amount as the bond. All forms of security shall
be in the form reasonably acceptable to the City. The bond shall be conditioned so that
Sprint shall observe all the covenants, terms and conditions and shall faithfully perform
all of the obligations of this Franchise Agreement, and to repair or replace any defective
Sprint work or materials discovered in the City's roads, streets or property.
8, "One -Call" Location and Liability. Sprint shall subscribe to and maintain
membership in the regional "One -Call" utility location service and shall promptly locate
all of its lines upon request. The City shall not be liable for any damages to Sprint's
system components or for interruptions in service to Sprint customers which are a direct
result of work performed for any City project for which Sprint has failed to properly
locate its lines and facilities within the prescribed time limits and guidelines established
by One -Call. The City shall also not be liable for any damages to the Sprint system
components or for interruptions in service to Sprint customers resulting from work
performed under a permit issued by the City.
W: Word ProcessingNOrdinancesXSprint Franchise Agreement a_11-17
BG:bjs Page 5 of 12 200
9, As -Built Plans Required. Sprint shall maintain accurate engineering
plans and details of all installations within the City limits and shall provide such
information in both paper form and electronic form using the most current AutoCAD
version prior to close-out of any permits issued by the City and any work undertaken by
Sprint pursuant to this Franchise Agreement. The City shall determine the acceptability
of any as -built submittals provided under this section.
10. Recovery of Costs. Sprint shall be subject to all permit fees associated
with activities undertaken through the authority granted in this Franchise Agreement or
under ordinances of the City. Where the City incurs reasonable costs and expenses for
review or inspection of activities undertaken through the authority granted in this
Franchise Agreement or any ordinances relating to the subject for which permit fees
have not been established, Sprint shall pay such reasonable costs and expenses
directly to the City within 30 days following receipt of an invoice, together with
reasonable supporting documentation evidencing such costs and expenses.
11. Vacation. If, at any time, the City shall vacate any City road, right-of-way
or other City property which is subject to rights granted by this Franchise Agreement
and said vacation shall be for the purpose of acquiring the fee or other property interest
in said road, right-of-way or other City property for the use of the City, in either its
proprietary or governmental capacity, then the City may, at its option and by giving 60 -
days written notice to Sprint, terminate this Franchise Agreement with reference to such
City road, right-of-way or other City property so vacated, and the City shall not be liable
for any damages or loss to Sprint by reason of such termination other than those
provided for in RCW 35,99.
A. Franchise Violations. The failure by Sprint to fully comply with any of the
provisions of this Franchise Agreement may result in a written notice from the City that
describes the violations of the Franchise Agreement and requests remedial action within
60 days of receipt of such notice, If Sprint has not attained full compliance at the end of
the 60 -day period following receipt of the violation notification, the City may declare an
immediate termination of all franchise rights and privileges, provided that full compliance
was reasonably possible within that 60 -day period,
B. Emergency Actions.
1. If any of Sprint's actions under this Franchise Agreement, or any failure by
Sprint to act to correct a situation caused by Sprint, is deemed by the City to create a
threat to life or property, financial harm, or cause a delay of the construction, repair or
maintenance of the public improvement, the City may order Sprint to immediately
correct said threat, financial harm, or delay or, at the City's discretion, the City may
undertake measures to correct said threat, financial harm or delay itself; provided that,
when possible, the City shall notify Sprint and give Sprint an opportunity to correct
within a specified time said threat, financial harm or delay before undertaking such
corrective measures. Sprint shall be liable for all reasonable costs, expenses and
damages attributed to the correction of such an emergency situation as undertaken by
the City to the extent that such situation was caused by Sprint and shall further be liable
VV: Word Processing\O rd i na ncestS print Franchise Agreement 8-11-17
BG:bj-. Page 6 of 12
201
for all reasonable costs, expenses and damages resulting to the City from such situation
and any reimbursement of such costs to the City shall be made within 30 days of written
notice of the completion of such action or determination of damages by the City. The
failure by Sprint to take appropriate action to correct a situation caused by Sprint and
identified by the City as a threat to public or private safety or property, financial harm, or
delay of the construction, repair or maintenance of the public improvement shall be
considered a violation of the terms of this Franchise Agreement,
2, If, during construction or maintenance of Sprint's facilities, any damage
occurs to an underground facility and the damage results in the release of natural gas or
other hazardous substance or potentially endangers life, health or property, Sprint or its
contractor shall immediately call 911 or other local emergency response number.
C. Other Remedies. Nothing contained in this Franchise Agreement shall limit
the City's available remedies in the event of Sprint's failure to comply with the provisions
of this Franchise Agreement, to include but not limited to, the City's right to a lawsuit for
specific performance and/or damages.
D. Removal of System. In the event this Franchise Agreement is terminated as a
result of violations of the terms of this Franchise Agreement, Sprint shall, at its sole
expense, promptly remove all system components and facilities, provided that the City,
at its sole option, may allow Sprint to abandon its facilities in place.
Section 7. Insurance,
A. Sprint shall maintain liability insurance written on a per -occurrence basis during
the full term of this Franchise Agreement for personal injuries and property damages.
The policy shall contain coverage in the amounts and conditions stipulated in Title 11 of
the Tukwila Municipal Code, Should Title 11 of the TMC be amended to increase the
required amounts and conditions, Sprint shall acquire additional insurance,
B. Such insurance shall specifically name as additional insured, the City, its
officers and employees; shall apply as primary insurance; shall stipulate that no
insurance affected by the City will be called on to contribute to a loss covered
thereunder; and shall further provide that the policy shall not be materially modified or
canceled during the life of the permit or Franchise Agreement without Grantee giving 30
days written notice to the City. Notice shall be by certified mail, return receipt requested
to the City.
Section 8. Other Permits and Approvals. Nothing in this Agreement shall relieve
Sprint from any obligation to obtain approvals or necessary permits from applicable
federal, state and City authorities for all activities in the Franchise Area.
Section 9. Transfer of Ownership.
A. The rights, privileges, benefits, title or interest provided by this Franchise shall
not be sold, transferred, assigned or otherwise encumbered, without the prior written
consent of the City, with such consent not being unreasonably withheld or delayed. No
such consent shall be required, however, for a transfer in trust, by other hypothecation,
or by assignment or any rights, title or interest in Sprint's telecommunications system in
W, Word Processing\Ordinances\Sprint Franchise Agreement 4-11-17
Mbjs Page 7 of 12 202
order to secure indebtedness. Approval shall not be required for mortgaging purposes
provided that the collateral pledged for any mortgage shall not include the assets of this
franchise. Approval shall not be required for any transfer from Sprint to another person
or entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with Sprint. Sprint may
license fibers to other users without the consent of the City provided that Sprint remains
solely responsible for the terms and conditions outlined in this Franchise Agreement.
B. In any transfer of this Franchise that requires the approval of the City, Sprint
shall show that the recipient of such transfer has the technical ability, financial
capability, and any other legal or general qualifications as reasonably determined by the
City to be necessary to ensure that the obligations and terms required under this
Franchise Agreement can be met to the full satisfaction of the City. The qualifications of
any transferee shall be determined by a hearing before the City Council and the
approval to such transfer shall be granted by resolution of the City Council. Any
reasonable administrative costs associated with a transfer of this Franchise that
requires the approval of the City shall be reimbursed to the City within 30 days of such
transfer.
Section 10. Administrative Fees.
A. Pursuant to the Revised Code of Washington (RCW), the City is precluded from
imposing franchise fees for "telephone businesses" as defined in RCW 82,16.010, or
"service provider" as defined in RCW 35.99,010, except that fees may be collected for
administrative expenses related to such franchise. Sprint does hereby warrant that its
operations, as authorized under this Franchise Agreement, are those of a telephone
business as defined in RCW 82.16,010 or a service provider as defined in 35,99,010.
B, Sprint shall be subject to a one-time $5,000 administrative fee for
reimbursement of costs associated with the preparation, processing and approval of this
Franchise Agreement, These costs shall include, but not be limited to, wages, benefits,
overhead expenses, equipment and supplies associated with such tasks as plan review,
site visits, meetings, negotiations and other functions critical to proper management and
oversight of the City's right-of-way. Administrative fees exclude normal permit fees as
stipulated in Title 11 of the Tukwila Municipal Code. Payment of the one-time
administrative fee is due 30 days after notice of franchise approval.
C. The City reserves the right to exercise authority it has or may acquire in the
future to charge a franchise fee as authorized by law.
D. In the event Sprint submits a request for work beyond the scope of this
Franchise Agreement, or submits a complex project that requires significant
comprehensive plan review or inspection, Sprint shall reimburse the City for franchise
amendments and expenses associated with the project. Sprint shall pay such costs
within 60 days of receipt of a bill from the City, together with reasonable supporting
documentation evidencing such costs.
E. Failure by Sprint to make full payment of bills within the time specified shall be
considered sufficient grounds for the termination of all rights and privileges existing
under this ordinance, utilizing the procedures specified in Section 6 of this ordinance.
W: Word Processing\Ordinancen\Sprint Franchise Agreement 8-11-17
BG -Ibis Page 8 of 12 203
Section 11. Notices. Any notice to be served upon the City or Sprint shall be
delivered to the following addresses respectively:
City of Tukwila
Office of the City Clerk
Email: Tukwila CityClerk@tukwilawa,agv
Phone: 206-433-1855
Sprint Communications Company L.P.
ATTN: Manager, Real Estate
6391 Sprint Parkway
M& KSOPHT0101-Z2040
Overland Park, KS 66251
With copies to:
Sprint Communications Company L.P.
Attn� Real Estate Attorney
6391 Sprint Parkway
MS* KSOPHT0101-Z2020
Overland Park, KS 66251
Steven Schauer
Sprint Senior OSP Engineer
2210 S 35th St
Tacoma, WA 98409
Section 12, Indemnification,
A. Sprint shall use reasonable and appropriate precautions to avoid damage to
persons or property in the construction, installation, repair, operation and maintenance
of its structures and facilities within the Franchise Area. Sprint shall indemnify and hold
the City harmless from all claims, actions or damages, including reasonable attorney's
and expert witness fees, which may accrue to or be suffered by any person or persons,
corporation or property to the extent caused in part or in whole by any negligent act or
omission of Sprint, its officers, agents, servants or employees, carried on in the
furtherance of the rights, benefits, and privileges granted to Sprint by this Franchise. In
the event any claim or demand is presented to or filed with the City that gives rise to
Sprint's obligation pursuant to this section, the City shall within a reasonable time notify
Sprint thereof and Sprint shall have a right, at its election, to settle or compromise such
claim or demand. In the event any claim or action is commenced in which the City is
named a party, and which suit or action is based on a claim or demand that gives rise to
Sprint's obligation pursuant to this section, the City shall promptly notify Sprint thereof,
and Sprint shall, at its sole cost and expense, defend such suit or action by attorneys of
its own election. In defense of such suit or action, Sprint may, at its election and at its
VT Word Processinq\0rdinances\,Spr1nt Franchise Agreement 8.11-17
BG:bjs Page 9 of 12 204
sole cost and expense, settle or compromise such suit or action. This section shall not
be construed to require Sprint to:
1. protect and save the City harmless from any claims, actions or damages;
2. settle or compromise any claim, demand, suit or action;
3. appear in or defend any suit or action; or,
4, pay any judgment or reimburse the City's costs and expenses (including
reasonable attorney's fees), to the extent such claim arises out of the negligence or
intentional acts of the City, its employees, agents or independent contractors.
B. To the extent of any concurrent negligence between Sprint and the City,
Sprint's obligations under this paragraph shall only extend to its share of negligence or
fault. The City shall have the right at all times to participate through its own attorney in
any suit or action that arises out of any right, privilege, and authority granted by or
exercised pursuant to this Franchise Agreement when the City determines that such
participation is required to protect the interests of the City or the public, Such
participation by the City shall be at the City's sole cost and expense.
C. With respect to the performance of this Franchise and as to claims against the
City, its officers, agents and employees, Sprint expressly waives its immunity under Title
51 of the Revised Code of Washington, the Industrial Insurance Act, for injuries to its
officers, agents and employees and agrees that the obligation to indemnify, defend and
hold harmless provided for in this paragraph extends to any claim brought by or on
behalf of Sprint's officers, agents or employees. This waiver is mutually negotiated by
the parties.
Section 13. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this
ordinance is held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction,
either party may deem the entire ordinance to be affected and thereby nullified.
However, in the event that a determination is made that a section, sentence, clause or
phrase in this ordinance is invalid or unconstitutional, the parties may agree to treat the
portion declared invalid or unconstitutional as severable and maintain in force the
remaining provisions of this ordinance; provided that, if the City elects, without
agreement by Sprint, to enforce the remaining provisions of the ordinance, Sprint shall
have the option to terminate the Franchise Agreement.
Section 14. Reservation of Rights. The parties agree that this Agreement is
intended to satisfy the requirements of all applicable laws, administrative guidelines,
rules, orders and ordinances. Accordingly, any provision of this agreement or any local
ordinance that may conflict with or violate the law shall be invalid and unenforceable,
whether occurring before or after the execution of this agreement, it being the intention
of the parties to preserve their respective rights and remedies under the law, and that
the execution of this Agreement does not constitute a waiver of any rights or obligations
by either party under the law.
W: Word Pror.ess1rg\Ordinances%Spr1nt Franuhise Agreement 8-11-17
BG:ojs Page 10 of 12 205
Section 15. Police Powers. Nothing contained herein shall be deemed to affect
the City's authority to exercise its police powers, Sprint shall not by this Franchise
Agreement obtain any vested rights to use any portion of the City right-of-way except for
the locations approved by the City and then only subject to the terms and conditions of
this Franchise Agreement. This Franchise Agreement and the permits issued
thereunder shall be governed by applicable City ordinances in effect at the time of
application for such permits,
Section 16. Future Rules, Regulations and Specifications. Sprint
acknowledges that the City may develop rules, regulations and specifications, including
a general ordinance or other regulations governing telecommunications operations in
the City. Such regulations, upon written notice to Sprint, shall thereafter govern Sprint's
activities hereunder; provided, however, that in no event shall regulations:
1, materially interfere with or adversely affect Sprint's rights pursuant to and in
accordance with this Franchise Agreement; or
2. be applied in a discriminatory manner as it pertains to Sprint and other
similar user of such facilities.
Section 17. Repealer. Ordinance Nos. 2102 and 1439 are hereby repealed.
Section 18. Corrections by City Clerk or Code Reviser. Upon approval of the
City Attorney, the City Clerk and the code reviser are authorized to make necessary
corrections to this ordinance, including the correction of clerical errors; references to
other local, state or federal laws, codes, rules, or regulations, or ordinance numbering
and section/subsection numbering.
Section 19. Force Majeure. Sprint will not be held in violation under, or in
noncompliance with, the provisions of this Franchise, nor suffer any enforcement
relating thereto, where such noncompliance or alleged violation occurred or was
caused by circumstances reasonably beyond the ability of Sprint to control. This
includes war or riots, civil disturbances, floods or other natural catastrophes, labor
stoppages or slowdowns not attributable to Sprint's employees, or power outages
exceeding back-up power supplies, and work delays caused by waiting for utility
providers to service or monitor their utility poles to which Sprint's Cable System is
attached as well as verifiable unavailability of materials and/or qualified labor to
perform the work necessary. Sprint shall have a reasonable time, under the
circumstances, to perform the affected obligation under this Franchise or to procure a
substitute for such obligation that is satisfactory to the City. If Sprint believes that a
reason beyond its control has prevented or delayed its compliance with the provisions
of this Franchise, Sprint shall provide documentation as reasonably required by the
City to substantiate Sprint's claim. If Sprint has not yet cured the deficiency, Sprint
shall also provide the City with its proposed plan for remediation, including the timing
for such cure.
W Word Processing\Ordinances\Sprint Franchise Agreement 8-11-17
BG:bjs Page 11 of 12 206
Section 20. Effective Date. This ordinance or a summary thereof shall be
published in the official newspaper of the City, and shall take effect and be in full force
five days after passage and publication as provided by law,
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, at
a Regular Meeting thereof this day of , 2017,
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
Christy O'Flaherty, MMC, City Clerk Allan Ekberg, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM BY: Filed with the City Clerk:
Passed by the City Council:
Published:
Effective Date:
Rachel B, Turpin, City Attorney Ordinance Number:
Attachment: Exhibit A — Franchise Agreement Acceptance Form
VV: Word Processing0rdinances\Sprint Franchise Agreement 8-11-17
BG,bjs Page 12 of 12 207