Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutReg 2017-10-02 Item 5A - Ordinance - Comprehensive Plan Amendments: Transportation Element / Comprehensive Land Use MapCO UNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS Inhtr`als Medi,: Date 09/11/17 Pre erred b NG# Mor's re 'en, Cocrrrci/rcvicru ITEM TITI2 1D 1-, 09/95/17 NG 49, 011'1 GORE' 1012/17 NG fill O R ward El Public .i easing Alflq Date 9/25/17 - 11 Dexurion ITEM INFORMATION ITEM No. 5.A. ST PP SPONSOR: ROBIN TISCHMAK ORlcINAL AGRNDADATi09/11/17 AGENDA ITEM TITI2 Update Transportation Element Comprehensive Plan. in order to attain PSRC certification of 011'1 GORE' 0'/11/17 ❑ 11fIg Aladiarr Date 0 Resolu/iotr MI Dale ward El Public .i easing Alflq Date 9/25/17 1 Other 11 Dexurion • Ordinance • Bid Mtg Dare Alta Date 10/1/17 Altg Data eicfl, Dale SPONSOR DCD ❑.Firacmce DP&R UPo/ice ❑PlV ❑Cnkri 1 Council❑Mayor i♦ FIR 11 ❑Firs ■ TS SPONSOR'S Tukwila considers amending its Comprehensive Plan/Zoning map once per year. A public SUMMARY hearing is scheduled on September 25, 201.7 to receive comments on two items. Following the hearing, the City Council will take final action on whether to approve, modify or deny the applications for 2016-2017. The other item is quasi-judicial and may not be discussed before the hearing and final action. Rli\'II.WI.1) 13? ❑ C.O.W. I tg. ❑ CDN Comm ❑ Arts Comm. • Finance Comm. Comm. CHAIR: KRULLER • Public Safety COMM. ❑ Parks COMMITTEE OA Trans &Infrastructure • Planning Comm. DATE: 8/15/17 RECOMMENDATIONS: SPONSOR/ADMIN. COMMITTEE Public Works Forward to PC, Committee of the Whole for hearings COST IMPACT / FUND SOURCE Exr1.?NDI'FuRI RHQLlIRl D AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION R ouIRED Fund Source: Comrnents: MTC. DATE RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION 09/11/17 Fn Lard t+ dor,. 'e • P blic Hearin• - i i_. 'POillar McPting 09/25%17 MTG. DATE ATTACHMENTS 09/11/17 Memo to Transportation and Infrastructure Committee Minutes from Transportation and Infrastructure 8/15/17 Staff Report to Planning Commission Minutes from the Planning Commission 8/24/2017 1 ational Memorandum and Staff Resort with Plannins Com. Minutes Draft Ordinance with attachments Ordinance in strike-thru underlined format and updated Info Memo 38 City of Tukwila AIIan Ekberg, Mayor INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM TO: Tukwila City Council FROM: Jack Pace, Community Development Department Director BY: Moira Carr Bradshaw, Senior Planner Copy: Mayor Ekberg DATE: September 27, 2017 SUBJECT: Flower Power Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps change ISSUE Additional language is being recommended to the draft ordinances to address the access condition of restricting commercial/light industrial access to S. 134 Place. BACKGROUND The findings and conclusions supporting the decision to change the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning maps include the condition that any commercial/light industrial use be limited to vehicular access from S. 134th Place, DISCUSSION The draft ordinances are being modified to include additional language regarding that condition. The language specified a deadline for the recording of the condition, FINANCIAL IMPACT None RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Council approve the draft ordinances with the revised language. ATTACHMENTS Revised Draft Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code ordinances 39 40 DR FIT AN ORDINANCE OF THB CITY COUNCIL OF THE CII11Y CF TUKWILA, V ASH IN G 11C N, AMBNOIN G 11HE CIC MPREHBNSIVB KLAN AS PART CF ITS ANNUAL CICCKET FCR 2016-2017 BY URDATIING 11HE TRANSIPOR11AMON ELEMENT AND BY MCDIFYING THB CC MPRBHEN SIVE LAND USB MAR; PRCVIDING FCR SEVBRABIIJIT1I; AND ESTABLISHING AN EF FEC11IVB DAM. WHEREAS, the City cf Tukwila is recuirec tc plan under the Grcwth Naniagerrienl Pat (RCW 36.70A.040); and WHEREAS, tt-e Crcwlh Naniagemenl Act requires that cemprlehensive plans and develcpment regulaticns be suL ject lo continuing e ‘ aluation arid review arid allows comprehensive plans tc I e arriendeid c n an annual basis, L ut nc more tt- ars once a ye an, with certain exceptions; and WHEREAS, the Grcwth Management Act provic es that amendments to comprehensive plans shall be considered aimr. Itarleously with an evali ation cf 11 e curriulati‘e effects cf the requested amendments arid fon general consistency of each amendment with the Rlan, whiles else alloP ing for separate review and adcption of each individual proposal; and WHBREASI, it I• as Leen al least c nes year since the City initiated an annual amendment to its Compre t erlsive Plan; arid WHEREAS, tt- a PL gel Sound Regic nal Council 1 RSRC) reviews local cc rriprehensive K1lans to evalk ate consistency it Vision 2040 arid ceirtifical is n is recuirec to receive RSRC finding to proceed with prc jeclls tt- reg, gt- the Regional Transportation ImKlrcvemeint Prcgram; and WHEREAS, the FIE RC kind that di ring T ukwila's 2019 perlicdic update of its Comp -et erisi‘ a Plan, the traffic me dealing did net ise the 2031 employment ni mben fcneicas1 and, therefore, lt-e assumpticns reganc irlg impacts, capital facilities and land use goals and policies were of tdaled; arid W: Pond Paocessing'Odin ancesr7ransporlalion Element oil Comipnehensive Hlan stnike-thru f1-37-17 M B:bjs Rage 1 cf 3 41 WHEREAS, tte City tas revised its €niplcyrrienl loreciast tc tte 2031 assirriptions arid r. nc erlakerl a new traffic model ruri to evaluate the irripacis ori its land USE, crapillal facilities, housing, and other € lerrients of its Cc rriprehensiv€ Fllan based L pon those 203'1 forecasts; and WHEREAS, 9h€ City reciei‘ed two requests from properly owners (Fllcwer Rowell anc Vintage@Tukwila; fcr ne-designation of 1f eir properties as pari of the 2016-2017 annual Comrireterlsive Plan amendment dockEl; arid WHEREAS, on August 1, 20'17, lte City of Tukwila issued an ac deinc um lo it e Tukwila Comprehensive Rlan Envircinrriental Impact Statement IIAilei #1317-0009, previously issued on Cctc be r 9, 1999 file SIL 92-0053; Thal analyzed the potenllial impacnt cf tte changed €rriplcyrrienl assr.mplicns and its implicnations and impacts to the otten Elements of the Compretensive Alan; and WHEREAS, cri September 14, 2017, the City of T1kwila issues a D€ierminalicn cf Nonsignificance rsuant lo the Stale Bnvironrrierllal Policy Act QSEPA) (Ct apten 197- 11 WAC' and Tukwila nicirial Code Title 21 fon It proposed changers to the Plower Pciw€ r site cn the Cla rripr€ he nsive Rlan's Land L se Nap frcirri Low De nsily Resic ential iILCIR) tc Clarrirriencrial/Light Industrial QCI/LI); and WHEREAS, the applicant for Vintage@lhkwila desires lo posllpcn€ the heaving and decision on its ariplicaiion until 2018, pending addilicrial review and analysis of area- wic € impacts to the Ryan Hill neighbcincciod; and WHEREAS, lte City of Tukwila provided the neigt.ineid 60 -cat' nclificaliorr cf the proposes Compretensive Plan amendmerills tc lte Washington Slate Department of Corrime rce (IDC C) t. nden RCA) 3E .70A.106; and WHEREAS, an st 24, 20'17, the City of Tukwila Rlanning Clommissic n t e Id a public hearing arid considerec ihei Hegiesled ctang€s lo 9h€ Tnansporlaiion Element and forwandec its reciommenc ation to the Cily Cot ncil; arid WHEREAS, on Seipterriber 25, 2017, the Ci11y Cloi ncil held a duly noticed public hearing to receive comments on the recommended changers tc the Tnanspcirlallicm BI€ merit anc the rlrorlosed ct anges lo the Compreiheinsi%a Plan's Lane Use Nap; F OW, THEREFORE!, THE CITY CC UNCILI CH 11I- E C1111A CII TUKWILA, WASH INC TON, HEREBY C RDAINSI AS FIC LILCWS: Section 1. Fir d ins s anc Conclusions. The City Cct. nail hereby adopts the Bindings and Conclusions, attached henello as Bxt it it A and incorporated by this ref€ Hence as if fully set fort h he rein. Section II. llhe Tnansrcirlation Blum nt. Tte Tnansporiaiion Element of tte Clity of Tukwila Compre t ensive Rlan is t e neby amended as shown in EA - it it B. Section 3. Flower Power Re -Designation Approved. Flower Rower, located at 13407 48tt Avenr- e S., llr. kw ila, Wast ington, King Cc unit' lax parcel 26/3200028 (the "Blower Power silel"), anc c€pict€d anc legally ceiscriked on the attached Bxhibil C, is her -eh/ r€-d€signaied from Law DEnsiiy Reisideriiial (LDR; lo Commercial/Light W: Weird PIcicessingordinance s\lnransportation Element all Comprehensive Fllan strike-thn 9-21-11 MB:bjs 42 Raga 2 of 3 Ird� stria) (C/LI; subject to the cc nditic n that access and addressing for commercial light inc uslnial L se s sl• all be limited to S. 134th Place. Within 30 days of passage cf this ordinance, the applicant shall record against 11 a subject properly a ccvenarit or ctl-en c caument approved by the City requiring acmpliarice with the siatec cc nditic n. Fair re tc record st, ch a covenant or olhe r apprcved document and/or failunei 10 comply it the cone ition shall cause the cl- arige to T a Comprehensive Plan Nap to be null and void, and the suk jeici property shall neve rl to thea zcninq immediately preceeding passage cf this ordinance. Section 4. Map Amendment Authorizeid. The Comm. nil De\Aelopmerit Director!, or his designee, is I. ereby at, the rizeid to amend the City's official Cc mprehensivei Lanc Use Map tc show the changes in designation from LDR to C/LI for the [lower louver site as at, ilhorizeid in Section 3 of 11- is ordinance. Section 51. Corrections by City Clerk air Code Reviser. L pc n apprioval of the City Attorney, the Cit Clerk and the code reviser are authorized to make necessary ceonriections to is ordinance, including the correction of clerical errors; reilerences 110 other local, stale or federal laves, cotes, rules, or negl.latioris; or ordinance numbering and se ciiori/subsealio ri numbering. Section 6. Severability. If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance or its application 110 any person ori situation shculd be held 10 be invalid c r . ncionslitutional for any reason by a court of competent jurisdiction, sucl• invalidity or t ncionsliiutionality shall not elect the validity on constitutionality of the remaining portions cf this ordinance cr its application tc any other' perscn cr situation. Section 71. Effective Date. This ordinance ori a summary thereof shall be IR blisl- ed in 11 a official neiwspapeir of the City, and shall take Med and be in full force five days after passage and pt.blicaliore as provided by law. fASSBD BY THB CI11Y COU\CIL CR TH8 CITY CR TUKWILA, V\JASHIFCIO F, at a Reigt.lar Meeting thereof this day of , 2017. AT11BEIIILIAUTHBNTICAIIBD: C hristy C'Flaher1y, MNC, City Clerk ARPRCVED AEI TC FICRM BY: Rachel B. Tt, rpin, City Attorney Allan Bkberg, Mayon Riled with the City Clerk: Passed by the C ity Council: Published: Effective Dale: C rdinance N umber: B)t7 it iI A — Findings and Conch. . siiclrs B) h it iI B — C =prat arIsivei F lar 11narspor atior 9lemenl B) h it 11 C — FlavN er Poweul Legal Description and Site N art IN: WcI K Hnciceassing)ordinanceis\llranspor alion element cifl Cornpuehen sive Rlan stri4 a-tr uu 9-17-1A NI Otis Rage3cf3 43 44 Exhibit A Cclmprehensive Plan 2091E-20117 Docket Transportation Elerreint Update and Flower Power Site Specific Map Change Findings and Conclusions Transpcirtatiori Elerr ent Upc Bite Back{ rou nd In 2010 the F u b lice Work s C ElplantrrIEirl be{lana u plc atirig 11- a 1 uanspIaul ation element of Tu kwila's Camprehensive Plan as part of a phased neview and u plc ate maria ated by the Stale. The update inalu c EIC a tnaffiu mac aka Elffont k asec ars pnojectElc householc arc Elmpiciymarl 8nawil h 1V rciu glh au 1 the Clity until the year;I0?ICI. These growth nu m bers were c Ellermined at a regional level arc pirav is EIC to Elaah ,11 risdiatior fan a se ir long range planning efforts. AftEui Tu kwila's u plc ated element was adoptec , th a Puget Sou rc Regional Cat ricil 1P519C1) c Eiveloped reiviseie Epiaw1h plrajeoticirs that reflected the rec lased eoarcimia aril iv i1 y e u e 1 a th El 200EI-2009 nec€lssiar. Those numb Eirs showed a small rec last icer in projeietElc householc nrawlh arc a significant rieduulicir ir plrajeuled employment growth linearly 9CI%). Th El other elemElrlts of the -Tukwila Campineh ensiv e F Ian ware U pc al EIC in lal er phases using 11- e tie\ ised P511IIC nu at bars and a 20311 time harizon, teat ing to an irilariral c iscrEiplarcy in the Flan. Tukwila neoeived cloric itional aF1pnOval lion its Plan l plc ale in 2016 will- 1V El rElqu irE mart that the c iscmeplanuy t EI adc ressed through ac options cif an a plc ale d 1 nansplanl aticir Ekiment b y DE aemt En cif 2CI117. COMPREHEINSIVEI PLAN RE' IEW CRITERIA 111 Describe hciw the issue is Odra! sed .in tilEi Comprehensive Pllan. If thEi h. sue .is not adeiquatelly acidness eia,, is there a need for it? ThE Transplarlaticir Element u plc ale is a 1eahriival conned Ian to the growth pinajEiatians used ir the TranspIarl atiar ElemE n1 1 h at is rE eded 10 b ring internal aonsisl E nay to thE ComprE h E nsivEl Plari arc meet RSRC ccinic itiars fair cianl ification. ThE lawien employment plrajeoticirs resu 11 ed in est imatEls cif lowe n vehicle miles travelEc aric no IciwE rin€I of levels all SE Rice (LOS). As a nese 11 of this ahan{IEI, no goals, plcllicies, or copal improvE ment ppiajE cit ch ars es ane pIrcipIcisE c as part of this actiar. The ch angel iriv ally E 1E xt edits to the narrativ E aric updal E c maps. 31 If the issue is riot adequately addressec ire the ComprehEirsiv a Filar, is 1 I1 Eirei a neElc for the Fliiciposed char{ Ela Under 11'e c riglinal Background FIE paid aric ;1(111C1mac el ru r, h i{Ih E 11 plrajeoticirs were rieIE iv ed linom F 519C1. Tukwila h ac planner to acaommoc ate higher) h au SE h ala and employ ment growth than at. rrE ritly pPiajE cited. Mu ah cif 1 h is growth wigs aril iuiplal ed in the Tuk wila South area, wh iah re mains largely u rc eveloped. Th E timeline fon c EvelopmE ri1 thE rE is a rialE ar, th au oh al least somE i9 likely to occur with in 11, e 2C13111 ime h cirizon cif 1V E au nrient ClcimprehE risivE Plan. ThE new tnaffia model ru r using the 2031 foreuasls pros is EIS irilEIra! ciansistenuy 11, not,ghout the ClcimprehE risivE Plan and is beirg docu mented ir the nevised IanguagE arc maps. F age 11 cif 9 45 !Rh ibill A 31] Is thEI prop cisalc ciH angle 1 h e N est means for meeting th a identiliElc pub tic neEic ?I What other cipltions are there for meeting th Ei identilicic public) rEIEIC ?I As plart of the conditional cant ification ppIacEiss 1 h a (lity of Tu kwila a€piaad 1a 1N El fallavu iri€I P$IR(I caric itians: Ti MK ila City Cahn nciI ac opt for of a plan cif world 1 hat cic dresi<iei_<i tiles cone itior is entified ir thea certijiccitior res€fort by N ciy 31, ;101 EI.1 dopl ad 5/2/20 6 ;1. Sita bmi_<ision of a c rci t arr air c ed com preil air sive pAar and siu pportir g doaurr ant!' Mat address the acir c itior to PSRC Jor reu ieiw ar d comment ir advance cif cidcpl for . Ser t August 14,, 20.17, PSRC ha<i confirmeid ttIcil tileisei ahanigeis are adequate' to meet the cicnditior 3. Cncei tiles condition is acequateIAy ciddreseic,, __<iubrr i_ l or of adopted cImenideic cion preill in__<i a plain circ supporting doaumeir is by December 11, 201 l for review and aeirtfication LI y FISRC. 4I] Will the p roposed change rEIsuIl in a ncit benefit to tH Ei cicimmunity? Gaining lull cert ificatian fcir Tu Nu\ ila's CompinaFansi\a Rlan will maintain the (lily's eligibility Ilan R5IRC anc Ragiarial Transportation Impinavemant Rnagnam fu ric ing. In reviewing (Iampinehensive Rlan aril aria, staff concludes 1h at the ppiaplasec updal El is a technical corrElctian to the growth ppiajElctians used in the Transportation ElarnEinl dal is riEIEic ad la bring internal carisislency to the Clam pinehensive Filani anc meet FI5IRC canc itions fcir centilical ion. Tha projectec traffic levels are Iowan u ric ar thEI re% ised employ ment levels arc 1 N anaforie ria impacts are e) plectEIC tF at v\ ane nat alrElac y acidnessElc under the original Element. A s a nesu 11 of tH is change, no goals, plaliciEis ar uaplil al impinovemant plrajecl changes are nEIEic EIC ar proposed as pans cif this action. Flow er Power Cont Irehan<.iive Plair ar d coning Map Change 9acNgrioL ric This applical ion is part of the 20116-I(I11 annu al dockEll fcir amendment of the Comprall ElnsivEI Man. ThEI purpose cif an annu al docNet is to annu re Oat changes to the ClamprehElnisive Man ane aril considenec once a y can and 11- at 1 F Ery are carisidered caricu nnently and sci tH El cu m ulativEi irri pact of 1 h a ppiciposals can k El c EltEiuminec. TH EI applicarit is seeFl ing cF anges in di El ComplrElh ensk a Plans anc Zoriing maps for 28,210 -square faat lot located at 13407 48th A% a. S., Tu kwila, VV ash in€I1 an, K ing (tau n1 y 1a) parcel ria. 2EI11320-CICI28 (the "Site") foam Low Derisily ResidElnl sal (LDR) to (IammEuicial Light Inc a strial (C/LI) ion 1 F a fallowir reasons: 11. As 0E1 resic aril cif tN El home located or 1F a 9i1 a, he thinks 1 h al 1 F a noise horn the LII` K trains is u niaccapltabla fcir a resic antial setting; 2. Psi,- a property owner of the Site since 1993, he has hac much flacic ing from tH El Sou 1 Fgal a stream 1 h at 1 navElls atonal de south and east sides all 1 h a 51i1 a aria alari€I tH El EIC €Ia of 11' El Ei istin8 Rage 2 of 9 46 Exhibit A Home. A 20(13 City pnojact to install a h ioh flciw ty-plass u p51 ream of thEI 511e c CIEIS not alleviate all flaac ing, Mich aontinu es during nair storms. 3. He awns and openatEls a tusiriElss 8nowiri8 k can sprau ts, Mich he sells cammeraially arid 1 H a1 is tein8 c isplaaElc by a King (Ian my levee projecl in Karn. He would likEl to rielciaal0 His operation 1cl this Site wh one h e au nnently Res. (1/LI zonin8 cin tH a'.IitEI wou Ic allow 11- a H y c naplanic 8riowing of the t can s plrau ts and th ein assem t ly arc c istnit u 1 iani. This non -project proposal is a au asi.judicial charioe 1 cl tH El land u 1El c Eisignal ion on 11- a 11 kwila Camprehensive Plan arc aariin Ei maps. 11111- El zoning is oh anged, any (I/LI use wou lc be permitted subjecl to all City negulatians; 1- ciwev ere, t1- a applicar 1 Has statEic his intent to cionstriucl a nlEIw commercial/ Iig11 Inc u strial t u ildiri8 llan His h ydnoplonia t can s plrau 1 business. 1 h e applicant 51 t mill ed an EI isl ire@I site plan anic a pluaplasElc silo plana as an example cif H is intEinl. COMPRI* 9NSIVE FILAN AND ACININE MAP CHANE 9 CRITERIA 111 The proplosElc amElric menet la the QComprehElnsiue Phan and] zoning map is c cirlsistElri with thEI Elm's, ohjElctiues, and policies of the ClcimplriehensivEl Plan. ComprElh Elns k EI Plan policies discuss hav irl8 ic Elnll ifiable t01 rc arias fcir resic ential c is1 riots. Access zinc orientations allots h as are impact on 11- El cin ality of thEI resic ential Erni% iraniment. Most single-llamily Home owners puller to SEIEI tH El same use amass the 11IlElet 1lriom them as e% ic arced ty Cily policy all "ic EIr l ifiat le neighbonb ood t au ric ailiE15." TH El 5IitEI'S Elx isl incl oriental ion is to 9. 134111 Plage, which is a corn mEuicial local access street, rath en 11- ani 1a 41811 A% aria 9., %A t iuh is a residential local access 11 rElElt. 11- e EIX isting stnu al u rEl, a tame, sits al an EllEly ation 11- at i5 significantly t elclw 48tH A veru i 51. which would make aciciass via 48tH Avenue mare diffiui It, EIxpElrisivEI, and pcllElntially mciiiEI implaclfu 1 to SIouthgatEi stneam than aciciass via 1341H Place. Thus, because acciessis 51. 134th Place is plrElllenrElc, anuli c ing this Site in tH El C/ LI c istricl woulc t El a logical boundary . In addil ion, 1 h EI Comp1re1 ensi%a Hlari's vial u nal Elriv inciriment policies wou Ic suppont l h e IIEIC evEliappment c1111 H El Mite anic the ries) onation cif t11 a buffer) ilon 1 h e 9au thgal a stream. A Cj LI c Ersignial ions wou Id pal EIn1 ially enciau nage the riedevelopment cif 11- e 9i1 a. 11he Flower Power application lion a map cHangle is suplpanlad ty 11a 1lallowin® (Icimpriehensive Pllani plaliuies: The Flesidential Neiohtonhacics ElemElril @Ictal: I land us El F citteirn 111.1ai feriae rcldes ci strong <eins ei cif acimmuruty bN grouping cicimF citiblE and mutually s uFpcirlliue I. A! and separating incompatible' uses. (Goal 7.]j The plalicIiEis cif 11- at Element then speak about reaogniaat IEI boundaries: Mainiairi a ccImprE tIEInsivei Iland use map that supports ile pneservciiliori and enhariaemein>I cif single' family and !liable' milli -family neighborhoods; eliminates inaompalitlllEi land LSE's; cmc clearly eslablisilEI5 applicable devEilapmerit requirements through recicidniaable boundaries. IIAoliay 2.1.J )1 Page 3 cif 9 47 BNHibit A TH El C/ LI zeinEic lot ageing 11- a 51i1 El'S rcul1 F EIC Oa, 4E1219 51. 1134t11 Plasia, is im pro% ac with ani CIIdEIr hal SEI, t l t 01E1 la1 is L sing l SEIC for pail irl€I fcir Hcllac ay Flark, v F iclh is 11-att. siness located acuiciss S. 11?I411 h Place strEIEil (zinc in a CI/LI dist fliclt,) L k rring the L al nc anias fcir these disl incl zoning districil s. 111-a Natural BrIvirlonlrrIEirlt EIemEIrl1 F as thEI follclvk in€I €laal: Water -counsels and their buffelrs .... are protelcltEld from encraactlmerut and degradation and irrpnciueldtilrcw itl mitigation, erflancimelrt, and res1oraticinprcjelclts. (Goat 4.EI) It is diffici It to SEIEI tH El dm elClplment on 1 F a 5111E1 E Elaau se the vcIgatation amens tH El si1 a zinc stream; h av% Elver, 1F El EIA 151 ing stnu cl u ne was ucinstru cited over 7 decac es ago ir the 51 neam bl ffan prior tci enact alert of the CIi1y's environmElnlal rElgLlalions. p rale% ant Bacinomicl De%EIIcIpIment Element policy is: Pr ornate cir c F refs eiruei eiconomic u s el cif industrial elands ciu is ides tile! MAC 11hr ough appropriate buffer irgi rept, framer is and use restrictions. (Ecor orrice DEIVeIoprr eIrt Pcllliciy 2.1..16) THEl aplplliaan1 also lisls ani Ecoramic Development Policy rEda1EIC 1a promclling arc supponling tusiniElss farmatiarl, ea plainsion and 11-a impIcuI1ancEi cif tH El City's EIrIl reppieneurs arc small 1 usinessas in creating jots. TF El aplriliaarll rElfelIerlcEIS SaVEIraI policies in 1 F 9 CClmml nifty Image and Identity EIemEIrl1 rEIIFItEIC 10 (oClal facic produce ion and u it an agrin Iture. 2) 1 H EI proposEic amend ment to the Zonir g Map1 is consistent with 1 h a scciplEI ar d punplase of 111 is title (the Zoning Code] and the c Elscriiptioni arlc purpose of the zcir El alassifiaatiar aplpliec for. 111"El pi rpose of 11-a Clown Eiraial/Light Industrial 11CI/LI) cElsignialion and Jana ane, "...1a plra%ic El fan afleas aharaateriaElc by a mir cif commercial, cilliliae, an Tight irc l strial l sEls.111 a stark ands arEi intended 1 a pIramala viatla zinc altnacli%a aommencial and inc stria! arieas." (TMC 18.30.CI110) 111- a 51i1 EI is similar ire ch anaclan 1a tH El ac jaclent CI/LI propElrties to 11- e noir! H in 11- at it has iriontage along S. 1134th Fllaae, H as SICiu tH Elate 51 neam along 111 streElt franl age, Has fragl aril tri dr tragic alang it's Ira ntaga, and is similan ire topograplHy. The applicant c esti sses c avElloping a commercial/light industrial bl siness that woulc H El consistent with 11-a plraplased Zone and the Site contains 1 Fe aharaatEiristias cilI similar CI/LI propElrties. TF El propci ac C/11 acirling wou lc allay% tH EI aplpllic irll to rlelaaaila H is existing t l siness, wF iah is a hydroponic Lean sprout grow apperatiarl, to 11- El City of Tull wila from the City of K ant. His bl siness is au fluently F ciu SEIC in a wariehou1E1 in Kant 11- at is Laing c isplacElc due to a GrEIElrl River 18VEIEI project. The CI/LI zone allows commercial greanh at. ses witH no size limit whereas ir LO R, grieenhouses arlEi aIIawEIc up la 11,000 squarie feet.) In cicirrt rase, the plu flplase of the law Density Residential (LDH) c istriat is "... 1Ci pro% is El low-density family resic EIri ial areas togetil Eir wi1 h a fill flange of urbarl irlilriastnucl L re sEiruiiaes ir orider 1a maid' air stable resic ElrIl ial relight out- aac s, and 1a prat ant irltrl sions by inclampatible Iarlc uses." (TMC 118.1101.010] EsaEipt for the Site, 01E1 zciriirl€I c Elsignal ion of all properties friornting along 51. 1134tH Place ane CI/LI. Hagge 4 ail 9 48 8Nhibit A Th El !lite i9 rectanplu lar with th EI narrow portion cif tll El lot is alarig 418th Am awe 51 and 1 h e longi side of the lot is along 112411h Place. Th El L arlirlg Cac El Stip. 1E11 E19 thall lot frontage shall Id El "cansidened the ria rrowElst Flail of the Icil 1 H a1 ak 11 s a street." Baca' 9E1 til El 5IitE" i9 a canner" lot and ecause 1h Else is a significant grade c iffenenc€i between 4£11h Avant. El 51. wind the Site, access to the Sit e and overall oriental ions cif til El rIrclplEIrty is currently from 51. 1134t11 PIIacEI. 3] 111. ane are changed corditiors since) the previous zciriing became effective to warrant the proposed amendment to tH El Zoning land Compile!. Elrlsive Pier] Map. In 2007, a Ty ri€i 21 51r1EIcial REnimission fon a k offer rleducl iori was 8nantac to the ppIapIEmly owner" cif 4501151. 134th Plaice. Sound llnansit acq' irac aric in 2(109 consolic a1Eic 1111 residentially zonec parcels acno9s 48th Aven' a 51 and c iagarlally Elcnoss the stneet from th El SlitEI. There was a Complreh arisivEI Plan and Zoning marl change in 2(1110 when 4.1(1(151. 133rd S. was rezanac from C/ LI 1a N EIC iurrl Density Resicantial. 5lauthgate 511 ream traverses 11. is site zinc is lacaled ivto k locks nonth w est of the Site. Thera ham e k earn ra oder zoning charipies ins 1 h is anew since 1995, when 11 e CL !Tani zoririB Ovals irIstitutac . EIW Names and short plaiting ane acc'miing 1a thEI sa'th and west of the Site in thEI LDH c istrial. The initial zoning c istricts created anid mappac fcir this area WEIIIEI not basec upon an in -c cot- analysis cif site specific cornd 11 ions. Greater scrutiny of the site zinc neighborhood characteristics inc icale 1 hal mom in the C1 LI tat. nic aryl 1a z 811. Avant. El 51., with canc itians, mEIEI1 s the pu glom cif th El C) LI Jane. 4) The piuciplosed amendmeril to the I(IcimFilial. ens ivEi Plan arlc] aciriing Map will k in the iritErlest of furl H euiarlce of the publics F EaltH, sal ety,, comfort, convenience, arm €)ar"en"a) well ane,, and will riot adversely alfecil the su nuciu rlc trig nisi®H k Dill oods, neon be irljuria's to otll Er properties in the vicinity ir wh iah the su bjecil property is Iaclatec . The nequest %Akio Id exteric the boundary line llan the C/ LI district is 480 Avenue 51. A complanisarn till standards t E"1 weer 11- a LC R and C/ LI zones 911 aws 1h at the 91 arld ards ane largen ilon a ses in the C/LI than for single family 11ome9 in LDH. Alsci, the siancands fcir builc inial in CI/LI increase wH ori the silo is wil h in 50 feat of LDFI, which was lc be the case fcir the Site. 5ltandarc s thEI C/ LI zciniei arEa in Fplace to minimize impact and any nuisance la ac jacent nesic erll ial properties. Na cine -site hazardous substance pinoce9sinpl, hanc ling, on storage is allawac unless cleanly incic ental to the plenrrlittec use and is St. kjecl 1a state siting criteria. Performance steric arc s are in efileci in the (1/LI fcir air c'ality, noise zinc 5.19RA campliar ce anid em, ironmarll al rEIpIL la1 ions ton rail arinpl ainc pnotecl irig env inanmentally sensitive resources. THE" pnoplosec change would set a mere logical boundary ainc not negalimaly implaci thEl residential em, ironmarll cif 48t11 Avent. El 51. if access is limiled 1a 51. 1134th Placa. Compliance with the applicak IE" C/LI arc rioriconfonrrling slandairc s w ill Ensure the pinaplaseic t. se of the Site will rat EIC ensEily affect or inljt. ra other pplapleniIEIS ir the vicirily. Hage 9 cif 9 49 50 CHAPTER THIRTEEN TRANSPORTATION Exhibit B TUKWILA COMPRFHFNSIVE PLAN 1 51 ELEM€Ni JL TRANSPORTATION TRANSPORTATION WHAT YOU WILL FIND IN THIS CHAPTER: - A description of the existing transportation network in Tukwila; • A discussion of how transportation planning and land use are related; • A discussion of how demand on the transportation network is managed; and Goals and Policies for providing adequate levels of service. PURPOSE STATEMENT: To provide safe and efficient movement of people and goods to, from, within, and through Tukwi la. PURPOSE The Transportation Element establishes Tukwila's transportation goals and policies for the 20 -year planning period. It provides direction for transportation decisions regarding annual plan updates, including: *• The Six -Year Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP); ❖ The Six -Year Capital Improvement Program and Financial Planning Model (CIP/FPM); ❖ The biennial budget; and ,;• Infrastructure Design and Construction Standards. It is key in supporting community livability and economic vitality, as prioritized in Tukwila's Strategic Plan. It also provides guidance for development review and approval, land use and zoning decisions, and continuing transportation and maintenance programs. TheTransportation Element establishes a basis for decision-making that is consistent with Washing- ton's Growth Management Act, King County's Countywide Planning Policies, and the Puget Sound Regional Council's (PSRC) Transportation 2040. The specific requirements of each of these plans are fulfilled by the City of Tukwila Trans ■ ortation Element Back round Re •ort includin• a revised Travel Demand Memorandum dated December 30, 2016) of the Comprehensive Plan Update (hereafter referred to in this element as the Background Report), and summarized herein. The Transportation Background Report, Walk and Roll Non -motorized Transportation Pian. Tukwila Transit Network Plan, Commute Tri ' Reduction CTR Pro • ram and Plan Growth and Trans • ortation Efficiency Center (GTEC) Plan, the annually -updated six-year Transportation Improvement Plan, six-year CIPI FPM, and the budget are all adopted by reference in the Tukwila Comprehensive Plan. TUKWILA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - 2015 52 PAGE 13-2 FL MF N1 1 TRANSPORTATION ISSUES Tukwila's diverse transportation system includes freeways, highways, arterial streets, access streets, bus, Tight rail, commuter rail transit service, Amtrak passenger rail service, sidewalks, trails and neighborhood footpaths. In addition, Sea Tac International Airport and Boeing Field provide air transportation for general, commercial and business aviation. The Duwamish River provides water access to Elliott Bay and beyond. The City's road and rail network enables freight and rail transportation within and through the city. Future Tukwila transportation system additions include Bus Rapid Transit. A detailed inventory of the existing transportation system in Tukwila is contained in the Background Report (Fehr& Peers, May2012), The major transportation issues facing Tukwila include the following: • Physical and geographic barriers that challenge connectivity throughout the City. Physical barriers include the valley wall, the Creen/Duwarnish River, and highways that separate portions of the City from each other, increasing emergency services response times and cost, Residents value quiet neighborhood streets that exist in an incomplete or disconnected street system. With relatively few "through" streets, many vehicles use the streets that do connect, burdening the adjacent properties and residents. The Targe volume of vehicles on through -streets also makes it more difficult to walk to destinations such as schools, libraries or shopping. • Limited funding to satisfy competing priorities. --- Increasing connectivity is very costly given the need to acquire new rights-of-way, conducting engineering studies and design, and construction costs. - Criteria for grant funding are most often targeted to Tukwila's Urban Center or the Manufacturing/Industrial Center because these are the locations where significant employment and residential growth are planned and are supported by regional plans. — There are unmet needs in other areas of the City, including streets that do not meet City standards, and it is unlikely that the roads would be improved by new development in these already developed areas, i Reliance on regional agencies, such as the Port of Seattle, Metro and Sound Transit, to serve local needs. TLIKW1LA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - 2015 PAGE 13-3 53 ELEMENT 13 TRANSPORTATION GOALS, POLICIES AND STRATEGIES The Transportation Element supports the City's Land Use dement. It demonstrates how the City will maintain and preserve the existing network as well as address deficiencies, while demonstrating how planned growth will be accommodated over the next 20 years per the Office of Financial Management (OFM) and PSRC forecasts. The household and job forecasts for Tukwila are for an additional 4,860 4,800 households and 277670-15,500 jobs by the year 2030 2031, with most of that occurring in the Southcenter, Tukwila International Boulevard and Tukwila South mixed-use commercial areas. To plan for land use and transportation changes associated with this growth, these households and jobs are assigned to Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZs) based on the availability of vacant and redevelopable lands (Maps 13-1 and 13-2). Employment forecasts in the Transportation Element - and used for the Transportation Demand Model - that include 2-77670 15,500 additional jobs from 2010-2030 2431_ are nearly -double -the growth -that -current -growth -targets and -forecasts represent -i a 1-5-500 additional -jobs -by 2O -3i -- were updated in a revised transportation model run in 2016. The original Transportation Demand Model run in 2010 was developed using employment forecast information available at the time. Since then, the employment forecast has-been was revised downward significantly due to the effects of the great recession on the regional economy, In addition, current forecasts are based to a greater degree on adopted King County Growth Targets for Tukwila. The City will revise the employment forecast and land use assumptions in the Transportation Element for consistency with land use -related elements and adopted growth targets during the next scheduled Transportation Demand Model update in 2016. GOAL 13.1 GENERAL Tukwila's transportation network provides for safe and efficient movement of people and goods to, from, within, and through Tukwila. GENERAL TRANSPORTATION POLICIES 13,1.1 Prioritize safety in an ongoing monitoring program. 13.1.2 Focus on transportation efficiency by maximizing the movement of people with streets that are designed to be safe for all transportation modes, accommodating existing land uses while designing for the future. 13.1.3 Balance travel efficiency, safety and quality -of -life in residential areas through creative roadway design. TUKWILA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN = 2015 PAGE 13-4 54 ELEMENT 13 TRANSPORTATION See ttle Projected Household nth by REVISED PZo os`s 5:00 pm, Sep 15, 2017 10.5 0,25 0 0,5 Mlles Kent O Map 73-1; Projected Household Growth Legend � ,7) CityLimits Household Growth =I 0-15 X16-50 Q51-100 ®101 - 200 201 and above TUKWILA COMPREHENSIVE: PLAN -- 2015 PAGE 13-5 55 Burien 1 Renton Searao Des Moines 0 0.5 1 MifeS I 0 Revised Map 13-1: Projected Household Growth 56 Projected Household Growth by Traffic Analysis Zone 2010-2031 Legend ity Limits Household Growth 0-15 J 16-50 -51-100 101 - 200 201 and abve Page 13-5 . _ ELEMENT 1 3, TRANSPORTATION Seattle King County Projected Employment Growth by Traffic Analysis Zone 2010-2030 REVISED 5:01 pm, Sep 151 2017 Kent Map 13-2: Projected Employment Growth TUKWILA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - 2015 Legend 1=1CItyLimits Employment Growth ED 0 . 50 ED 51 - 200 I=1 201 - 450 451 - 1500 ang 1501 and above PAGE 13.6 57 Revised Map 13-2: Projected Employment Growth 58 Projected Employment Growth by Traffic Analysis Zone 2010-2031 Legend Employment Growth ! 1 0-50 51 - 100 101 -200 III 201-450 111. 451 and above MIN Page 13-6 TRANSPORTATION WHAT ARE THE KING COUNTY COUNTYWIDE PLANNING POLICIES? The Countywide Planning Policies are a series of policies that address growth management in King County. The Countywide Planning Policies provide a county -wide vision and create a framework each jurisdiction can use when developing its own comprehensive plan. HOW DO THE COUNTYWIDE PLANNING POLICIES AFFECT TRANSPORTATION PLANNING IN TUKWILA? Because each city's comprehensive plan must be consistent with the overall County policy framework, Tukwila has incorporated some of the Countywide Planning Policies into this element. For example, the Countywide Planning Policies identify protection of the natural environment and transportation accessibility for non -drivers as regional priorities. The City has established policies 111.5 and 13.1.13 to address these needs. Other policies throughout this element will reference county -wide priorities and ensure that Tukwila's planning efforts are consistent with the overall transportation vision for King County. TUKWILA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - 2015 Support, encourage and implement transportation programs and improvements that promote water quality and regional air quality. Design and operate transportation facilities in a manner that is compatible with and integrated into the natural and built environments in which they are located. Incorporate features such as natural drainage, native plantings and local design themes that facilitate integration and compatibility. 1 3..1.5 Continue to coordinate with surrounding jurisdictions and with regional and state agencies to finance and develop a multi -modal transportation system that enhances regional mobility and reinforces the county- wide vision for managing growth. Protect the transportation system (e.g. roadway, rail, transit, air and marine) against major disruptions by developing maintenance, prevention and recovery strategies and by coordinating disaster response plans. 13.1.0 Address the need for a range of mobility options including walking, biking, transit and driving in the development and management of local and regional transportation systems. 1 3,1 .:`,7 Support, encourage and implement programs and improvements that promote transit, foot and bicycle access to community amenities, stores and jobs. `l 3.1.1 0 Support car -share, bike -share and other alternatives to individual automobile ownership, to enhance sustainability. 13.1.1 1 Support electric vehicle charging stations and other alternative fuel sources, as available. PAGE 13-7 59 ELEM1SENT 13 TRANSPORTATION STREET CLASSIFICATIONS For street design and operation purposes, engineers classify streets into four categories: principal arterials, minor arterials, collector arterials, and local access streets. These four categories group streets according to whether they primarily provide access to properties or are purely for mobility. The differences in function result in different street widths, number of curb cuts/driveways allowed, speed limit, traffic controls, and other similar design and operation features. TUKWILA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - 2015 60 Implementation Strategies Ongoing monitoring of accidents and level of service, with associated engineering improvements or education/ outreach efforts to improve safety in target areas. ImplementTraffic Calming Program. Implement Walk and Roll Non -motorized Transportation Plan. Implement Complete Streets. Implement Safe Routes to School. Implement Commute Trip Reduction Plan. Implement Growth and Transportation Efficiency Centers Plan. Develop Low -Impact Development/Green Streets strategies. OVAL 13.2 STREET NETWORK The public street network has a hierarchy of street designs that serve pedestrian and vehicle safety, traffic movement, and adjacent land use. STREET NETWORK POLICIES 13.2.1 Develop a street network plan that augments the existing system of streets, breaks up super -blocks in non-residential areas, designs connecting through -streets in all areas, and provides functional separation of traffic through new streets. 13.2.2 Prioritize residential local access through -streets, minimizing cul-de-sacs. PAGE 13-R [ _ its • TRANSPORTATION Create or require the creation of non -motorized connections in lieu of streets where Local access through -streets are not feasible, such as on steep hillsides or where property owners resist streets. Require street improvement projects and development improvements to be in accordance with the general Functional Street System Standards or subarea plans, and require an engineering study. Require all new streets, street improvements, property developments and property improvements to provide sidewalks and other non -motorized infrastructure consistent with adopted standards and subarea plans. Property developments and improvements in commercial areas shall provide direct pedestrian access from sidewalks to buildings, as well as to, from and between parking areas. Incorporate proportionately greater neighborhood -enhancing elements in collector, minor arterial, and principle arterial design. These elements include collector lanes, wider sidewalks, separated sidewalks, and curbline trees. 13.2.7 Design residential access streets to provide at least the minimum capacity for emergency access and for slow traffic, 13.2.8 Design collector arterials with a two -travel -lane, Local access road design to encourage slow but steady speeds. 13.2.9 Design streets, including retrofit projects, to accommodate a range of motorized and non -motorized travel modes in order to reduce injuries and fatalities, to provide access to services, and to encourage non -motorized travel. The design should include well-defined, safe and appealing spaces for pedestrians and bicyclists. 13.2.10 Evaluate street improvement projects for the inclusion of features that support the Complete Streets policy and the Walk and Roll Plan in order to encourage walking, bicycling and transit use. 13.2.11 Design intersections and sidewalks to promote pedestrian safety and foster walking as a viable mode of transportation. 13,2.12 Include roadside plantings whenever feasible for street and road improvement projects on slopes to help mitigate the land used for roadway and sidewalk improvements. TUKWILA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - 2015 PAGE 13-9 61 TRANSPORTATION WHAT 1S TRANSPORTATION CONCURRENCY? The Washington State Growth Management Act requires the City to ensure that transportation programs, projects and services needed to serve growth are regionally coordinated, and are in place either when new development occurs or within six years. This is done to make sure the City can provide the transportation improvements needed to maintain its adopted standards of service and so that conditions do not degrade with the addition of the new households and workers in the City. Implementation Strategies Implement sidewalk ordinance. Implement subdivision ordinance. Implement Street Network Plan. Emergency vehicle criteria in street design standards. Prioritize neighborhood quality design features when reducing street facilities (e.g., removal of one lane of parking before removal of sidewalk). Traffic Calming Program. Develop methods to incentivize and encourage coordinated development between adjacent commercial properties, including shared driveways and direct vehicular access between parking lots. LEVEL O SERVICE The projected growth numbers in Tukwila and surrounding areas were used in the Background Report for the Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan Update to anticipate traffic volumes and levels of service in 2030. The Level of Service (LOS) analysis 15 one of the ways the City plans and budgets for future transportation projects. The City balances the fiscal constraints of its financing plan for transportation programs and projects with planned growth and existing needs. To do this, Tukwila monitors LOS on arterial streets to examine the existing performance of the system and anticipated impacts of planned land use growth, to determine what adjustments will need to be made to maintain adopted LOS standards concurrent with new development. Properly applied and monitored, LOS standards for the transportation network ensure that mobility, vitality and quality of life for the city is maintained. For the 2030 planning horizon, significant new capacity will be required to accommodate future growth throughout the city, although the majority of the project capacity needs are In the Southcenter area. TUKWILA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - 2015 PAGE 13-1D 62 €CEMENT 73. TRANSPORTATION Traditionally, LOS has been used to evaluate vehicular flow with little regard to other forms of transportation such as pedestrians, bicycles and transit. Building upon Tukwila's Walk and Roll Plan, the Complete Streets standard and Transit Network Plan, the City is working to develop a Multi -Modal Level of Service (MMLOS) to help balance transportation goals across all modes of transportation. The City has identified Transit Priority Corridors as part of an analysis done for the Transit Network Plan, and will continue to work closely with transit providers to achieve goals and policies related to transit service, to serve existing needs and to accommodate future growth. AUTOMOBILE LOS In many ways, the existing performance ofTukwila`s transportation system reflects how performance has historically been evaluated—with a strong bias towards auto travel. Automobile LOS is focused on setting an acceptable level of delay drivers can expect along a corridor or at a particular intersection. To see how the transportation system will function in the future, growth projections are incorporated into traffic models to determine future conditions along arterial streets and at intersections. Modeling results, along with a list of projects needed to maintain adopted LOS on arterial streets, are included in the Background Report. Tukwila's transportation system generally accommodates auto travel well, with just a handful of locations operating at a poor automobile LOS. NON -MOTORIZED LOS LOS for pedestrians and bicyclists is focused on measuring factors that impact the safety and comfort of pedestrians and bicycles rather than quantifying congestion and delay. In 2007 and 2008,Tukwila collected data on existing conditions for pedestrians and bicycle facilities on all arterial streets, using the 2010 Highway Capacity Manual's Multi -Modal Level of Service (2010 HCM MMLOS) methodology. The 2010 HCM MM LOS did not produce results that could be used in a similar fashion as the auto- mobile LOS, which categorizes minutes of delay into an A -F rating. The City needs to create or find a system for quantifying the conditions of pedestrian and bicycle facilities so that a goals -based ap- proach to prioritizing these projects is achieved. The City will continue to customize a non -motorized level of service measure to help achieve the City's vision of a more balanced mix of mobility options. TRANSIT LOS Transit service, both frequency and time -span of service, Is an Important aspect of a healthy transportation network. The City uses the Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual, published by the Transportation Research Board, as a methodology to measure level of service for transit. This recommended level of service methodology is included In the City's Transit Network Plan (Perteet 2004). The Pian identified service frequency needs for the City and facility improvements necessary for robust and effective transit service. Tables 13-1 and 13-2 illustrate LOS standards for transit service frequency and hours of service, respectively. TUKWILA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - 2015 PAGE 13-11 63 �LEMNT TRANSPORTATION Table 13.1 Service Frequency LOS: Urban Scheduled Transit Service Table 13-2 Hours of Service LOS LOS Headway (min) Vehicle/hour Comments A <10 >6 Passengers don't need schedule B 10-14 5-6 Frequent service, passengers consult schedules C 15-20 3-4 Maximum desirable time to wait if bus/train missed 0 r 21-30 2 Service unattractive to choice riders E 31-60 1 Service available during hour F >60 <1 Service unattractive to all riders Source: Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual, 2nd Edition, 2003 L05 Hours per Day Comments A 19-24 Night or owl service provided B 17-18 Late evening service provided C 14-16 Early evening service provided D 12-13 Daytime service provided E 4-11 Peak hour service/ limited midday service _ F 0-3 Very limited or no service Source: Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual, 2nd Edition, 2003 King County Metro and Sound Transit provide transit service to Tukwila residents and businesses. At this time, the City is not the owner/operator of a transit service, therefore a minimum level of service standard cannot be enforced. However, Tukwila will encourage all transit providers to achieve and maintain a minimum LOS C and focus service within Tukwila's Transit Priority Corridors. Tukwila's goal is to have transit service every 15-20 minutes throughout most of the day on its Transit Priority Corridors, including early evening. The following is an assessment of existing transit service on Tukwila's Transit Priority Corridors: King County Metro identifies eight corridors in Tukwila on which it has set target service levels (see Table 13-3). Other bus routes not identified in Table 13-3 also currently serve Tukwila. Table 13-3 King County Transit Corridors in Tukwila Between And Via _ _ Major Route Federal Way SeaTac SR -599 A Line Kent Seattle CBD Tukwila _ _ 150 Tukwila Fairwood S 180th St, Carr Road 155 Renton Burien S 154th St 140 (F Line)* Seattle CBD Pacific Hwy 5, 4th Ave 5 124 _Tukwila Admiral District Southcenter — California Ave SW, Military Rd,TIBS 128 Tukwila Des Moines McMicken Heights, Sea Tac 156 Auburn Burien Kent, SeaTac 180 TUKWILA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - 2015 64 "Service scheduled to go into effect June 2014 PAGE 13-12 ELEMENT 13 • TRANSPORTATION C• During peak hours, King County Metro's target LOS on the eight major corridors as of 2011 is consistent with Tukwila's in terms of frequency, except for service from Tukwila to Fairwood and from Admiral District to Southcenter. However, most corridors are not served with frequent service throughout the day with the exception of the Rapid Ride routes, including Rapid Ride A Line and the planned Rapid Ride F Line. Link Light Rail, providing service between SeaTac Airport and Seattle, currently meets the City's LOS standard both in terms of frequency and time -span. (Sound Transit 2013 Service Implementation Plan, p. 21) There are currently nine northbound and nine southbound Sounder Trains providing service between Seattle and Lakewood, with a stop in Tukwila on the Sounder South Line. The Sounder South Line represents 90% of total Sounder ridership. Four new South Line round trips were implemented in September 2013, creating a schedule that includes 20 -minute headways for the peak hour of service, which will bring the South Line into conformance with the City's LOS in terms of frequency during the peak hour, but will not meet the City's LOS in terms of time span. (Sound Transit2013 Service Implementation Flan, p. 29) GOAL 13.3 LEVEL OF SERVICE Traffic levels -of -service provide safe and efficient movement of pedestrians, bicycles, cars, buses and trucks, and incorporate evolving, sustainable land use and traffic patterns. LEVEL -OF -SERVICE POLICIES 13.3.1 In general, use varied Level of Service Standards according to differing levels of development, desired character of streets, and growth management objectives. 13.3.2 Use adopted LOS standards to guide City improvement and development approval decisions. 13.3.2. Maintain adopted LOS standards in planning, development and improvement decisions. 13.3.4 Provide capacity improvements or trip reduction measures so that the LOS standards are not exceeded. 13.3.5 Evaluate impacts to LOS when reviewing private development proposals, and require mitigation and/or reduce or delay project impacts, if necessary in order to maintain adopted LOS standards. TUKWILA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - 2015 PAGE 13-13 65 TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT -I =. .5 Prioritize transportation choices that provide capacity mitigation (i.e., transit use, carpooling/rideshare, pedestrian and bicycle facilities.) After considering these priority improvements, consider other street capacity improvements (i.e., signal improvements, street widening) as a last resort. 13.3. 7 Maintain a program to monitor congestion and evaluate the effectiveness of the LOS standards in providing a competitive business environment and adequate public safety response. AUTOMOBILE LEVEL OF SERVICE 13.3.8 Highways of Statewide significance (HSS), including Interstate 5 (1-5), Interstate 405 (1-405), and State Route 518 (SR -518), are exempt from concurrency requirements. 133.9 L1se the following LOS standards to guide City improvement and development approval decisions: The Southcenter area corridor average is not to exceed LOS E, except for the Strander Boulevard corridor and a portion of the Andover Park E corridors. Methods for computing the average LOS are described in the Background Report. The Strander Boulevard corridor average is not to exceed LOS F with an average delay not to exceed 120 seconds. The Andover Park E corridor, between Tukwila Parkway and Strander Boulevard, is not to exceed LOS F with an average delay not to exceed 120 seconds. • All other non-residential arterial intersections are not to exceed LOS E, • The LOS of minor and collector arterials in predominantly residential areas is not to exceed LOS D for each specific arterial. SR 181 (West Valley Highway) and SR 599, as State highways of regional significance, are subject to a Regional Level of Service Standard established by the Puget Sound Regional Council and WSDOT. Automobile level of service is not to exceed LOS E/Mitigated. 1-5,1-405, SR 518 and SR 99, as highways of Statewide significance, are subject to a LOS standard established by WSDOT. Automobile level of service is not to exceed LOS D. TUKWILA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - 2015 PAGE 13-14 66 PLEMEHT 13 TRANSPORTATION NON -MOTORIZED LEVEL OF SERVICE 13.3.10 Establish multi -modal levels of service consistent with planned development, the countywide vision for managing growth, Vision 2040 and Transportation 2040. 133.11 Use the Transportation Background Report and the Walk and Rol! Plan sidewalk prioritiza- tion scheme, planned trails and bicycle -friendly routes network - in conjunction with this Plan's land use goals - to prioritize construction of new sidewalks, bike lanes and trails, TRANSIT LEVEL OF SERVICE 13,3,12 Advocate for Tukwila representation on the boards of King County Metro and Sound Transit in order to influence service and policies that are effective for Tukwila. 13.3.13 Advocate through verbal and written testimony to King County Metro and Sound Transit to achieve and maintain a minimum LOS C (defined by headway, vehicles per hour and hours of service), and work within Tukwila'sTransit Priority Corridor Classification System. Implementation Strategies Implement concurrency ordinance. Monitor traffic volumes and levels of service. Implement Complete Streets. Implement Transportation Demand Management. Implement Commute Trip Reduction programs. Implement Capital Improvement Plan. Build on work done with the 2010 Highway Capacity Manual LOS to develop a multi -modal level of service standard that includes a calculated standard plus a qualitative element to address desired urban form. Update the analysis done for the Transit Network Plan as the basis for transit service advocacy for Tukwila. TUKWILA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN _ 2015 PAGE 13-15 67 iLEmEnr 13 TRANSPORTATION TRANSI1 The City of Tukwila strives to collaborate and cooperate with the region's transit providers in order to have convenient transit service to support and complement adjacent land uses. The goal of increasing overall transit ridership within the City of Tukwila drives the need for both service and capital improvements. Transit speed and reliability, improved passenger amenities, and access to transit service are all crucial for attracting and maintaining transit riders. King County Metro provides bus service throughout the City of Tukwila. Twelve different routes provide intra -Tukwila service and direct service to Burien, Kent, Auburn, Seattle, Renton and West Seattle. Existing Route 140 is planned to be upgraded to Rapid Ride bus rapid transit, with associated facilities, in 2014. At this time, Sound Transit does not serve any destinations in Tukwila with Regional Express Bus service. Sounder, the regional commuter rail service, has a stop in Tukwila at the Tukwila Station, as does Amtrak regional passenger rail service. Sound Transit Link Light Rail is located in Tukwila, with service from SeaTac Airport to downtown Seattle. Extensions of Link Light Rail are planned to the north, south, and east. To achieve the goal of increased transit frequency and time span of service to Tukwila`s activity centers and regional destinations, a multi -hub system and Transit Priority Corridor Classifications were developed, as shown on Map 13-3. Transit Priority Corridors are those corridors where transit service currently exists. Activity centers are tied together bytheTransit Priority Corridors, and include the Tukwila International Boulevard Link Light Rail Station, the Tukwila Commuter Rail/Amtrak Station, an improved SouthcenterTransit Center, and a new link connecting the Tukwila Commuter Rail/Amtrak Station to areas near Westfield Mall at Southcenter. Improved routes and frequency feed into this multi -hub concept. Transit Priority Corridor Classifications identify transit corridor types by function, ideal transit operational characteristics, optimal adjacent land uses, and supporting physical design features of the public infrastructure. The classification system is designed to be flexible and assist quality decision -ma king. An inventory of present transit routes is contained in the Background Report. Recommendations for service changes and infrastructure needs are contained in the Tukwila Transit Plan. King County Metro and Sound Transit control changes to routes. TUKWILA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN — 2015 PAGE 13-16 68 ELEMENT 13 TRANSPORTATION 1 Lake`. Washir7gton Seattle King County r— - Bolen King County { n on eni .5 0,25 0 0 .111111.1 Map 13-3: Transit Priority Corridors Transit Priority Corridor Classification Legend Transit Way Principal Corridor - Minor Corridor Local Access Potential Transit El Transit Center Park and Ride A Metro South Base Rail Lines Heavy Rail - Light Rail TUKWILA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - 2015 PAGE 13-17 69 CLEMENT TRANSPORTATION GOAL 73.4 TRANSIT Efficient transit capacity that will reduce single -occupancy vehicle trips to, from and through Tukwila, and provide public transportation options for all Tukwila residents. TRANSIT POLICIES 13.4,1 Support and encourage the location of a light rail stop at Boeing Access Road. 13.4.2 Coordinate with the Washington State Department of Transportation to preserve and support the Amtrak Cascades stop in Tukwila. 13.4,3 Recommend and pursue a regional multi -modal center in conjunction with the Tukwila Commuter Rail/Amtrak Station and secondary pedestrian/bicycle/transit hubs elsewhere in the City. 13.4,4 Pursue amenities and funding in support of a pedestrian/bicycle route linking Westfield Mall at Southcenter to the Tukwila Commuter Rail/Amtrak Station. 13.4.5 Continue to provide assistance to King County Metro, Sound Transit, Washington State Department ofTransportation, King County and other agencies in increasing people - carrying capacity of vehicles and reducing trips. 13.4.6 Maintain a partnership with King County Metro in operation and maintenance of the Tukwila Transit Center. 13.4.7 Research and pursue a Southcenter area circulator service that would connect the Tukwila Station, the Transit Center, businesses, and attractions in and adjacent to the urban center, with frequent service to encourage reduction of single -occupant vehicle trips, enhance the Southcenter area's image as a lifestyle center, and bring more customers to ail businesses. 13.4.8 Encourage and support public transportation services, including: • Expanded dial -a -ride and fixed -route van service to areas that do not produce enough transit ridership to warrant a bus route; • Continued development of commuter and light rail, particularly with service to Southcenter and the Manufacturingfindustrial Center; and • Commute Trip Reduction service. TUKWiLA COMPREHENSIVE PLAIN - 2015 PAGE 13.15 70 ELEMENT TRANSPORTATION 13.4.9 The development and extension of any light rail or commuter rail system shall meet the following objectives: Any commuter or light rail system serving Tukwila, Seattle, South King County andfor Sea -Tac Airport should be Iocated in a manner which promotes the coordinated short- term and long-term use of alternative transportation systems, such as carpools, transit, biking and walking. • Such systems shall be Iocated so as to allow for future extensions to commuter and/ or light rail service to East King County and Southeast King County, and shall be coordinated with other transit service. Such systems shall be Iocated in a manner that provides multi -modal connections to Tukwila's urban center, Manufacturing and Industrial Center, and transit centers, so as to encourage development in the manner contemplated by this Plan and the Countywide Planning Policies. Implementation Strategies Implement Commute Trip Reduction Program. Implement Commute Trip Reduction Plan. Implement Growth and Transportation Efficiency Center Plan. Implement Walk and Roll Plan and Design Report for the Walk and Roll Pian, Encourage transit providers to meet minimum level of service standards. TUKWILA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - 2015 PAGE 13-19 71 ELLPIE 'JT 13 TRANSPORTATION TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT Transportation Demand Management (TDM) emphasizes the movement of people and goods, rather than vehicles, by providing transportation alternatives to driving. TDM benefits the community by maximizing the efficiency of existing infrastructure, and limiting the impacts of excessive traffic in neighborhoods by promoting transportation options such as carpooling, vanpooling, transit, walking, biking, teleworking and flexible work hours. Reducing vehicle trips limits air and water pollution and supports the City's commitment to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Tukwila'sTDM activities are directed at employers, workers, business owners, residents and visitors. Tukwila adopted a CommuteTrip Reduction (CTR) Plan in 2008 that sets goals and implementation strategies for Targe employers to reduce drive -alone trips and vehicle miles traveled. Tukwila adopted a Growth and Transportation Efficiency Center (GTEC) Plan in 2008 to set the stage for focused TDM activities in Tukwila's urban center. The CTR Plan and GTEC Plan provide focally - adopted mode -split goals forTukwila's Southcenter/Urban Center and the Manufacturing and Industrial Center (MIC). The City's six-year mode -split targets for the Urban Center are 65.7% drive -alone trips and 34.3% non -drive -alone trips, as defined in the City's GTEC Plan. Within the Urban Center, the City will also try to rneet its GTEC goals with a targeted Vehicle Miles Travelled (VMT) rate of 13.05. In the MIC, mode -split goals are 70% drive -alone, consistent with the remainder of the city. TUKWILA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - 2015 72 PAGE 1a-20 TR AN SP0RTAT10N GOAL 13.5 TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT Support transportation system Improvements and programs which encourage transit use, high -occupancy vehicle trips and non -motorized transportation to reduce single -occupancy vehicle trips, vehicle miles traveled, traffic congestion, and greenhouse gas emissions. POLICIES 13.5,1 Provide Commute Trip Reduction Program services to Tukwila employers to reduce drive - alone trips, vehicle miles traveled, traffic congestion, and greenhouse gas emissions. 13.17. The City ofTukwila will set an example to other employers by a commitment to reducing drive -alone trips, vehicle miles traveled, and greenhouse gas emissions through implementation of CTR goals. 13.r. Work with King County Metro and Sound Transit to provide amenities for transit riders, encourage transit use, and enhance multi -modal connections to transit. 13. r.4 Establish mode -split goals for all significant employment centers which will vary according to development densities, access to transportation service, and levels of congestion. 13.5.5 Continue to encourage the use of rideshare, transit, bicycle, and evolving technological transportation improvements. 13,5.6 Encourage transit -oriented uses, development patterns and pedestrian amenities in the vicinity of high-capacity transit stations. 113.5.7 Require that parking facilities developed in conjunction with transit facilities be adequately sized and managed to prevent spillover parking onto private property, public property, or public streets, Consider a phasing plan to require structured parking if additional parking is needed. Implementation Strategies Implement Commute Trip Reduction Program, Implement and update Growth and Transportation Efficiency Center (GTE() Plan, Promote the use of drive -alone alternatives through social media, RideShareOnline.com, community outreach, and offering assistance with parking management. TUKWILA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - 2015 PAGE13-21 73 E LEMF,Y7 13 TRANSPORTATION NON -MOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION Tukwila adopted its first non -motorized transportation plan - the Walk and Roll Plan - in 2009, as well as a Complete Streets policy. This policy requires all new City transportation improvement projects to provide appropriate accommodation for pedestrians, bicyclists, transit riders and persons of all abilities, while promoting safe operation for all users. The Walk and Roll Plan includes an inventory of existing non -motorized facilities, including bike lanes, trails, sidewalks and pedestrian footpaths (see Map 13-4). The Plan also identifies projects to guide City implementation of a safe and complete non -motorized network. These projects are made up of (1) a list of missing sidewalk segments and a method of prioritizing which missing segments should be constructed first, (2) trail projects to expand the existing system of non -motorized neighborhood connections, and (3) a backbone network of Bicycle Friendly Routes - existing and planned on -street facilities and trail projects that represent a bicycle network connected to Iocal and regional destina- tions, as well as existing and planned bicycle -friendly routes in adjacent jurisdictions (see Map 13-5). The Walk and Roll Plan commits the City to promoting programs that support and encourage biking, walking, commute trip reduction activities, and the City's annual participation in the regional bicycle and pedestrian count. GOAL 73.6 NON -MOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION Tukwila`s non -motorized transportation network is safe and comfortable, provides local and regional connections to neighborhoods and activity centers, and makes cycling and walking viable and enjoyable forms of transportation and recreation. POLICIES 13.6.1 Consider and provide for all users of the roadway, including pedestrians and bicyclists, as appropriate, when new streets and street improvements are made. 1.3.6.2 Allocate funds to the Residential Street Fund in order to build sidewalks on residential Iocal access streets. 13.6.3 Include pedestrian and bicycle improvements in street improvement projects, as appropriate. The prioritized list of missing sidewalk linkages and the Bicycle Friendly Routes rnap adopted with the Walk and Roll Non -motorized Transportation Plan is the priority network to connect schools, employment centers, parks, shopping and other local and regional destinations, TUKWILA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - 2015 PAGE 13-22 74 ELEMENT TRANSPORTATION Map 13-4: Existing Non -motorized Facilities Existing Nonmotorized Facilities Legend --- Sidewalks Paved Shoulders Trails — — — Bike Lanes TUKWILA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - 2015 PAGE 13-23 75 ELEMENT 13 TRANSPORTATION eattle King County r. Kent 0 Map 13-5: Bicycle -Friendly Routes Bicycle Friendly Routes Legend Bike Friendly Routes - Existing Bike Lanes Trails TUKW ILA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN — 2015 PAGE 13-24 76 ELEMENT 13 TRANSPORTATION 13.6.4 Pursue external funding sources to construct pedestrian and non -motorized improvements. 13.6.5 Coordinate with adjacent agencies on the development of regional non -motorized transportation improvements in, through and to Tukwila. 13.6.6 Construct neighborhood links by providing additional sidewalks and trails as opportunities and development occur, 13.6.7 Pursue converting railroad and other easements to pedestrian and bicycle trails. 13.6.8 Require secure bicycle storage (i.e., racks, lockers, cages, etc.) in appropriate locations. 13.6.9 Provide way -finding along roads, sidewalks and trails to direct non -motorized travelers to trails and destinations. 13.6.10 Work with school officials to promote Safe Routes to School projects and programs, and require safe routes to school improvements such as sidewalks and crosswalks - as new development occurs along designated school walk routes. 13.6.11 Provide more than the minimum for pedestrian safety. Options include wider sidewalks, landscape buffers, street trees, pedestrian -level lighting, crossing enhancements, patterned pavement and improved driveway design, to encourage residents and visitors to walk for transportation, recreation and improved health. 13.6.12 Plan and budget for non -motorized transportation projects within the Tukwila Capital Improvement Program. 13.6.13 Draw upon all sources of transportation funding for implementation of Complete Streets improvements. 13.6.14 Maintain existing unimproved rights-of-way if there is a potential future opportunity to create a non -motorized connection through stairs or other trail improvements. TUKWILA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2015 PAGE 13-25 77 ELEMENT 1 TRANSPORTATION Irnplementatian Strategies Follow the Walk and Roll Non -motorized Transportation Plan and Design Report to pursue additional pedestrian and bicycle amenities. Pursue connections between existing pedestrian and bicycle facilities. Update the Infrastructure Design and Construction Standards with improved pedestrian safety and amenity designs. Adopt a multi -modal level of service which may be incorporated into the City's concurrency and traffic impact fee program. Develop local wayfinding programs based on subarea or neighborhood plans. Develop a consistent regional way -finding program for bicycle routes. Provide staff support to the Safe Routes to School Committee made up of City and school district staff to coordinate grant applications, events, and spot improvements in school zones. Adopt the Tukwila School District school walk route maps as the basis for new requirements in the subdivision code. Participate in the National Documentation Project annual count of bicycles and pedestrians at designated locations throughout the City. 7UKWFLA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - 2015 PAGE 13-26 78 ELEMENT 13 TRANSPORTATION FREIGHT, RAIL, WATER, AND AIR TRANSPORTATION Tukwila's Urban Center and Manufacturing and Industrial Center (MIC) include retail, commercial and industrial businesses which serve the region. Railroad tracks owned by the Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) and Union Pacific (UP) railroads run north/south through Tukwila. These rail networks carry international and domestic cargo to inland markets, and serve the Port of Seattle to the north and the Port of Tacoma to the south. Industrial railroad spurs, operated and controlled by the railroad companies and private property owners, are located in the Southcenter and MIC area. BNSF has a multi -modal storage yard in the Manufacturing and industrial Center In northern Tukwila. Both Amtrak and Sound Transit's Sounder Commuter Rail use the BNSF tracks. Given Tukwila's location at the crossroads of two major interstate highways, and the prevalence of manufacturing, warehousing and commercial activities in the City, many streets experience high truck volumes. The streets with the highest truck traffic are West Valley Highway south of Strander Boulevard, Interurban Avenue South north of SR 599, and East Marginal Way South north of Boeing Access Road. The portion of the Duwamish River in Tukwila north of the Turning Basin is located within the City's Manufacturing and Industrial Center and is accessible to shipping activity. The river remains inaccessible to shipping activity south of the Turning Basin, where it can be accessed by small water craft, kayaks and canoes only. King County International Airport, also known as Boeing Field, is located in northern Tukwila at the City's border with Seattle, and is one of the busiest primary non -hub airports in the nation. The airport serves small commercial passenger airlines, cargo carriers, private aircraft owners, helicopters, corporate jets, and military and other aircraft. It is also home to approximately 150 tenant businesses, including the Boeing Company operations. The Museum of Flight is also located there and attracts a large number of visitors to the area. Sea Tac Airport, the State's largest airport, is located within a mile of Tukwila city limits. The airport is a Targe employer for Tukwila residents, and its operations support many Tukwila businesses. TUKWILA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - 2015 PAGE 13-27 79 TRANSPORTATION GOAL 13.7 FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION Tukwila has adequate geometric capacity for commercial freight transportation located in and serving Tukwila. POLICIES 13.7.1 Include trucking design parameters in principal and minor arterial improvements as well as in commercial areas. 13.7.2 Allow truck traffic on all principal and minor arterials, as well as on commercial area local access streets. Consider using Toad limit restrictions on residential collector arterials and residential local access streets. GOAL 13.8 RAIL, WATER, AND AIR TRANSPORTATION Tukwila and the rail and airport operators are collaborators in rectifying poor planning decisions from the past, partners in ,minimizing impacts upon each other's land use activities, and supportive of the mutual benefits between the people of Tukwila and the rail and air operators. POLICIES 13.8.1 Participate with King County and the Port of Seattle in updating their airport master plans to ensure that King County international Airport and SeaTac International Airport operations and development: • Enhance Tukwila goals and policies; • Incorporate Tukwila land use plans and regulations; • Minimize adverse impacts to Tukwila residents; and • Are not encroached upon by incompatible land uses. 13.8.2 Support goods mobility by all modes, recognizing that Tukwila is part of a regional freight distribution hub and a major international trade gateway. 13.8.3 Work with BNSF to mitigate impacts associated with rail and intermodal yard operations within Tukwila's residential neighborhoods. TUKWILA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - 2015 PAGE: 13.28 80 ELEME J1 13 TRANSPORTATION GOAL 13.9 FUNDING SOURCES Funding through grants, mitigations, general funds, and other sources for safety and capacity measures provides safe and efficient movement of people and goods to, from, within and through Tukwila. POLICIES 13.9.1 Pursue grants. 13.9.2 Use an Irnpact fee system that identifies: • Capacity improvements based upon the long-term 2030 LOS needs, but which also accommodate a realistic financing plan; • Costs of improvements needed to mitigate growth.that are reflected in the annual CIP/ FPM update and annual update to the Impact Fee Schedule; • Impact fee assessments, determined by the number of new development trips in the p.m. peak hour; and • Additional mitigation measures, in accordance with the Concurrency Ordinance when development cannot meet Concurrency standards. 13.9.3 Study and pursue funding sources such as Local Improvement Districts (LIDs) to pay for improvements not fully funded by grants, impact fees and general funds. 13.9.4 Update the CIP/FPM bi-annually, adding new projects that implement City goals and deleting completed projects. 13.93 Update the impact Fee Schedule annually, adding new projects, deleting projects as necessary, and keeping project costs at current dollar value. 13.9.6 Prioritize preserving and maintaining existing transportation facilities to avoid costly replacements and to meet public safety objectives in a cost-effective manner. Implementation Strategies Aggressively pursue grant opportunities. Consider interlocal agreements for impact fees with adjacent jurisdictions, recognizing that traffic generated in one jurisdiction contributes to the need to make transportation improvements across jurisdictional boundaries. TUKWILA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - 2015 PAGE 13-39 81 ELEMENT 13 TRANSPORTATION RELATED INFORMATION Transportation Background Report Walk and Rolf Non -motorized Transportation Plan Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) Program and Plan Growth and Transportation Efficiency Center (GTEC) Plan Tukwila Transit Network Plan Fehr & Peers 12/30/2016 Memo on Tukwila 2031 Land Use Revision - Travel Demand Modeling Response to PSRC Comments TUKWILA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - 2015 PAGE 13-30 82 Exhibit C Flower Power Legal Description and Site Map Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map change file # PL 16-0063 1547013 e °s• 9 55516215•. • �'.?d..:y .'• �i''�ti +,.y�V ..mss aM1Ov 't4ryQ-31=414 47.34 N19-21,Y 5sag&ig. rs• lr y5.5 j efil e:.4. 76671 s9 - an 0 12(.109es 51,56)412 Tract 13 Fostoria Garden Tracts Vol. 9 pg. 95 Tax Record; Quarter NE, Section 15, Township 23, Range 4 (NE -15-23-4) Parcel 261320-0028, Fostoria Garden TRS NELY 110 FT 83