The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutReg 2017-10-16 Item 8 - Powerpoint Presentation Shown at Meeting - Public Safety Plan Siting Advisory CommitteePublic Safety Plan Siting Advisory Committee Siting Process and Recommendations Siting Advisory Committee Purpose OProvide advice and recommendations on siting process and sites CProvide input and direction to ensure robust community engagement throughout the siting process Siting Advisory Committee Members C Dennis Roberston OThomas McLeod O Joe Duffie (alternate) O Bob Giberson OTod Bookless, Chair O Kathleen Wilson, Vice Chair O Will Gillespie O Jerry Thornton iting Advisory Committee ork to Date Reviewed information on each facility Reviewed and provided advice on council - approved Siting Criteria for each site Fire Station Location study Participated in the planning and implementation of Open Houses (2) lilt/Ma .17 Red Indicates Essenc,a Compaxnt E'JAL.:AT ON CP.ITEBIA JUSTICE CE,,T JT. ] City Cocr[,anal ? ecLiremerts Nest a. Peace ?eq.. ,ernents -.irgn� .Cnt3t Site Sclec:ion Criteria, v.6 Plan Fae Fides ,�...:c Cerner Crnena Site Ahernauves Ju:tice Center Secure parting for. BC PO ...circles Secure parking for PO equipment v. Secure parking lc.• et/dente ven,les ;optional) el .istr,o1 .. Outdoortra •- •: .roe b. CoJrt ?equaernents II. -regLC-._y'ransit sCC•Cd atC?.c U_btot3 3.t JI cJssit!e .. a.. City Policy acqu.rements7GJidarce abp:C 2CO C above O 7 :. Bend rt to Public Safety Commitment to Customer Servo,: c Ensuring the Efficient 7ellvery of Customer Se•vre d Conta n ng Devebpolent Coss Ensure afar err to deliver all ornmisrd fare nobs c. r.t�nd+Jlncss of Ongoing OpnroTc o Expenses ..-.•:lance of Location s}'^'fano of Flenbllty Opportunity to rata +Re private developments . Opportunities for future expansion [Deet on of treaties and Infrastructure K. Ongoing operat rye expenses . Opportunrles for il1not o- 5u btota'. 7 0 3. PJbllc 7es,e-s icing Advisory Committee ork to Date Reviewed site- specific locations for each facility icing Advisory Committee ork to Date ti Ham ' V'E 14-ist-St Reviewed site- specific locations for each facility 14.4th-St icing Advisory Committee ork to Date 5 -1`1 -5th -St S 12 th-St-- Reviewed site- specific locations for each facility 20th 52ttl�s- ! '\ S_124th-P!~'' 1 , \ i --- juill-1 .!':::::::,... .+ 24th -St - '" • > 4II e1-, ,_,• .4 t i + f icing Advisory Committee ork to Date Reviewed site- specific locations for each facility icing Adv11U1 or,,�c to D Reviewed site- specific locations for each facility icing Advisory Committee ork to Date Reviewed site- specific locations for each facility Public Works Facility Reviewed information on each site and parcel City of Tukwila - Public Facilities Site Selection - Report to Siting Advisory Committee red font No Further Consideration Mho D Dialog Usable Axes BWW Udque Owners Assessed Value AssessedDistance to nen* Environmental Risks liquefaction Susceptibility Value/Sf Results of 7/10 Screen Results of 8/8 Screen PUBUC WORKS PW1 MIC/H 34.5 1 1 524,069,200 516 N/.i Within Urban Shoreline designation Moderate to High Keep for further consideration/ additional info Dropped due to pending permit application, access issues and size PW2 MIC/H 10.9 0 1 56,817,800 514 N/A Within Urban Shoreline designation Moderate to High Keep for further consideration/ additional info Dropped due to pending permit application and access issues PW3 MIC/H 10.6 10 4 59,834,200 521 N/A Within Urban Shoreline designation Moderate to High Insufficient usable land upon further assessment Dropped on 7/10 PW4 MIC/H 11.3 7 5 515,601,800 $32 WA '. one observed Moderate to High Keep for further consideration/ additional info Dropped due to pending permit application and property bisected by power lines PWS MIC/H 1.2.2 5 4 514,212,700 $27 N/A Within Urban Shoreline designation. Portion of property an Ecology cleanup site Moderate to High Keep for further consideration/ additional info Keep for further consideration/ additional info P n/6 MIC/H 6.1 3 2 510,569,800 527 N/A Within Urban Shoreline designation Moderate to High Keep for further consideration/ additional info Keep for further consideration/ additional info PW7 MIC/H 14.8 7 5 523,753,000 537 N/A None observed Moderate to High Keep for further consideration/ additional info Keep for further consideration/ additional info PW8 MIC/H 20.0 13 1 574,497,600 529 N/A Within Urban Shoreline designation. No Ecology facility observed. Superfund site. Moderate to High No further consideration due to environmental conditions, deal complexity and challenging owners that may impact implementation. Dropped on 7/10 PW9 MIC/H 16.1 5 1 515,912,200 S23 N/A Portion of property an Ecology cleanup site Moderate to High PW10 MIC/L 30.5 6 2 550,938,800 536 N/A High risk of landslide an the southern portion of the site. Portion of property an Ecol • :S cleanu • site More than half is bedrock; 40% very low and around 10% moderate to hi h lInnci awns IC1 MIC/H 12.6 4 1 548,347,900 588 Far Within Urban Shoreline designation (non issue as the site is imornvedl Moderate to High No further consideration due to building cost and sienifiranthr more space than Dropped on 7/10 Compared short list against criteria for each facility Site Selection Criteria, v.6 Public Safety Plan Facilities Fire Station Criteria B -Aug -17 1 Sita Alternatives - Fir* Stations Station 52 Station 54 Red ndicates E.sen:idl Co-npunent F552_A F552__ F552_E F552_= F552_G F554_A F554_3 F554_C F554_D 17 77 EVALUATION CRITERIA - FIRE STATIONS T7 1 - - lD 0d J SC Blvd F552 Assemblage mpus North Parking Lot St;; r Nursery►Th ru Star Nursery I . C r: Star Nursery2 (Long) 1. City Operational Requirements - Must Have _. _ucatiu 1 IA' ilii ir :;espun_r Time 'ul..gu•i 5 .10 :.0 5 .10 10 5 -- 5 b. Parcel Size, Environmental Conditions 10 = _ 5 = 5 ublic Engagement Two in-person open houses Two online open houses Mailings with information Comprehensive website Engagement with community organizations Public meetings; regular Council updates Public Engagement What we heard O Ability of projects to transform a neighborhood O Facility needs to fit within a neighborhood O Fire stations should be sited equitably throughout the City O Keep Public Works out of residential areas How we got to recommended sites Location, access and operability key OEmergency response times, particularly for Fire Stations CKeeping our commitments -safe locations away from flood plain, liquefaction areas, etc. CSite selection criteria CCommunity input Recommended Sites r!ting Advisory Committee Recommendations Fire Station 52 City Hall Campus North parking lot icing Advisory CommitFee Recommendations Fire Station 54 42"d Ave. S. & S. l4OthSt. Recommendations Advisory Committee Recommendations Justice Center TIB & S. 150th St. Recommendations Advisory Committee Recommendations Public Works Between TIB, S. 112th St. and E. Marginal Way •• 17 141:711"'. L.! I S ll6thSt Final Thoughts Co, Robust process; highest ranked sites met the criteria OWorkwith the businesses displaced C Understand and support eminent domain; hope for negotiated agreement OContinued advice on community engagement - critical as the projects move forward Excited about the opportunity to improve our community