Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit PL10-006 - CITY OF TUKWILA - CRISIS DIVERSION FACILITIES CODE AMENDMENTSCRISIS DIVERSION FACILITIES ZONING CODE AMENDMENTS COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TITLE 18 PLI 0-006 El 0-003 J. • CITY OF TUKWILA DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) ADDENDUM 2 Description of Original Proposal: On February 12, 2010, the SEPA Responsible Official issued a Determination of Non - Significance regarding amendments to Title 18 of the City's Zoning Code. The following amendments were proposed: 1. Chapter 18.06 will be modified to include definitions of Crisis Diversion Facility (CDF), Crisis Diversion Interim Service (CDIS); the existing definitions of hospital, correction institutions, convalescent/nursing homes and inpatient facilities are proposed to be modified. 2. Crisis Diversion Facilities and Crisis Diversion Interim Service Facilities are proposed to be listed as unclassified uses within certain areas of the City. The original checklist dated February 8, 2010 applied to the entire city, but focused on allowing the CDF and the CDIS with the Tukwila Urban Center (Southcenter) area of the City. In May of 2010, the SEPA Responsible Official issued addendum 1 to the SEPA Determination. The addendum defined a new geographical area in which CDF and CDIS facilities could locate. On May 27, 2011, the Tukwila City Council adopted Ordinance No. 2287 which allowed CDF and CDIS facilities in the area that was described in Addendum 1. Description of Addendum 2 In January of 2011, the Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearing's Board invalidated Ordinance No. 2287. In the Board's decision, the Board asserts that Ordinance No. 2287 does not comply with the provisions of the Growth Management Act. Additionally, on April 14, 2011 the Washington State Legislature passed Substitute House Bill 1170 addressing Triage facilities, providing a definition for such uses, and allowing Police Officer to use such facilities for individuals suffering from mental illness. In response to the Board's Decision and to accommodate House Bill 1170, the City proposes expanding the area of the City in which Diversion Facilities and Diversion Interim Service Facilities can locate. The City also proposes to amend the definition of Diversion facilities to include the State's definition of "Triage Facilities". Diversion and Diversion Interim facilities are currently permitted within a defined area of West Valley Hwy. The City is considering allowing such facilities along all of West Valley Hwy, a majority of the Urban Center, and in all non-residential zoning south of S. 180th Street. As part of the original SEPA Checklist, the City examined the environmental impact with allowing such BM Page 1 of 2 04/15/2011 3:33:00 PM W:\Users\BRANDON\Review File\SEPA Addendum.doc uses in the areas previously mentioned. The DNS originally was to allow Diversion and Diversion Interim Facilities to locate within part of the Urban Center. The areas listed, have a built environment that is similar to the area that was included in the original DNS. Thus, there are not environmental impacts that cannot be mitigated. Proponent: City of Tukwila Location of Proposal: Citywide Lead Agency: City Of Tukwila File Number: E10-003 The City has determined that the addendum does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21c.030 (2) (c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on filer with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. The original DNS was issued February 12, 2010. This addendum is adopted on April 18, 2011. -62 Jac ld Pace, SEPA Responsible Official for the City of Tukwila, Washington 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 (206) 431-3670 1 The following documents are adopted by reference to this SEPA Addendum, Staff Report to the Planning Commission dated February 18, 2010 and Revised Staff Report to the Planning Commission dated May 13, 2010. BM Page 2 of 2 04/15/2011 3:33:00 PM W:\Users\BRANDON\Review File\SEPA Addendum.doc -11, Cita o f J uNwiea 0 Department Of Community Development AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION 1, _Teri Svedahl HEREBY DECLARE THAT: Notice of Public Hearing X Determination of Non -Significance Project Name: Crisis Diversion Facilities Addendum2 Notice of Public Meeting Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance Mailing requested by: Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice Board of Appeals Agenda Packet 71 , Q g /I Notice of Action Planning Commission Agenda Packet Official Notice Short Subdivision Agenda Notice of Application Shoreline Mgmt Permit Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit _ _ FAX To Seattle Times Classifieds Mail: Gail Muller Classifieds PO Box 70 - Seattle WA 98111 Other: Was mailed to each of the addresses listed/attached on this _21 day of _April in the year 2011 V W:\USERS\TERI\TEMPLATES\AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION.DOC Project Name: Crisis Diversion Facilities Addendum2 Project Number: Mailing requested by: Brandon Miles Mailer's signature: /7 71 , Q g /I V W:\USERS\TERI\TEMPLATES\AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION.DOC • AGENCY LABELS ( ) US Corps of Engineers ( ) Federal HWY Admin ( ) Federal Transit Admin, Region 10 ( ) Dept of Fish & Wildlife Section 1 FEDERAL AGENCIES ( ) US Environmental Protection Agency (E.P.A.) ( )US Dept of HUD ( ) National Marine Fisheries Service Section 2 WASH GTN STATE AGENCIES Dept of Social & Health Services ept of Ecology NW Regional Office, Shoreland Division ( ) ept of Ecology, SEPA Office of Attorney General )Office of Hearing Examiner ( ) Office of Archaeology ( ) Transportation Department (WSDOT NW) ( ) Dept of Natural Resources ( ) Office of the Governor WA State Community Development ( )'WA Fisheries & Wildlife ( ) KC Boundary Review Board ( ) Fire District # 11 ( ) Fire District # 2 ( ) KC Wastewater Treatment Div ( ) KC Dept of Parks & Recreation PKC Assessor's Office Section 3 KING COUNTY AGENCIES ( ) Health Department ( ) Port of Seattle ( ) KC Dev & Enviro Services-SEPA Info Center ( ) KC Metro Transit Div-SEPA Official, Environmental Planning ( ) KC Dept of Natural Resources ( ) KC Dept of Natural Resources, Andy Levesque Tukwila School District ( Tukwila Library ( ) Renton Library ( ) Kent Library ( ) Seattle Library Section 4 SCHOOLS/LIBRARIES ( ) Foster Library ( ) KC Public Library System ( ) Highline School District ( ) Seattle School District ( ) Renton School District ( ) Westfield Mall Library ( ) QWEST Communications ( ) Seattle City Light ( ) Puget Sound Energy ( ) Highline Water District ( ) Seattle Planning &Dev/Water Dept ( ) Comcast Section 5 UTILITIES ( ) BP Olympic Pipeline ( ) Val-Vue Sewer District ( ) Water District # 20 ( ) Water District # 125 ( ) City of Renton Public Works ( ) Bryn Mawr-Lakeridge Sewer/Water Dist ( ) Seattle Public Utilities ( ) Allied Waste Services ( ) Tukwila City Departments ( ) Public Works ( ) Fire ( ) Police ( ) Finance ( ) Planning ( ) Building ( ) Parks & Rec ( ) Mayor ( ) City Clerk Sectiaa & CITY AGENCIES Kent Planning Dept Renton Planning Dept ) City of SeaTac ( )'City of Burien City of Seattle ( trategic Planning *Notice of all Seattle Related Projects ( ) Puget Sound Regional Council ( ) SW KC Chamber of Commerce ( ) Muckleshoot Indian Tribe * ( ) Cultural Resources ( ) Fisheries Program ( ) Wildlife Program ( ) Duwamish Indian Tribe * Section 7 OTHER LOCAL AGENCIES ( ) Puget Sound Clean Air Agency ( ) Sound Transit/SEPA ( ) Duwamish River Clean Up Coalition * ( ) Washington Environmental Council ( ) People for Puget Sound * ( ) Futurewise * send notice of all applications on Green/Duwamish River ( ) Seattle Times ( ) South County Journal Section 8 MEDIA ( ) Highline Times ( ) City of Tukwila Website P:Admin\Admin Forms\Agency Checklist • Public Notice Mailings For Permits. SEPA MAILINGS Mail to: (comment period starts on date of mailing) Dept. of Ecology Environmental Review Section *Applicant *Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list) *Any parties of record * send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination KC Transit Division — SEPA Official would like to receive information about all projects that might affect transit demand Tribes — For any application on the Green/Duwamish River, send the checklist and a full set of plans with the Notice Of Application Send These Documents to DOE: SEPA Determination (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report, usu. with MDNS) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed or sent to newspaper) SHORELINE MAILINGS: Notice of Application for a Substantial Development Permit must be mailed to owners and to property owners within 500 feet of subject property, comments are due 30 days after the notice of application is mailed/posted. The Notice of Application for Shoreline Substantial Development Permit must include a statement that any person desiring to submit written comments on the application or desiring to receive notification of the final decision on the application may do so within 30 days of the Notice of Application. If a hearing will be held on the application, the hearing notice must include the information that written comments may be submitted, or oral presentation made at the hearing. Notice is sent to Ecology's NW Regional Office Shorelands & Environmental Assistance Program. Shoreline Permit Notice of Decision: Mail to: (within 8 days of decision; 21 -day appeal period begins date received by DOE) Department of Ecology Shorelands Section, NW Regional Office State Attorney General *Applicant *Indian Tribes *Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list). *Any parties of record * send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination Send These Documents to DOE and Attorney General: Permit Data Sheet Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report or memo) Shoreline Permit Application Form (filled out by applicant) Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) - Site plan, with mean high water mark & improvements — Cross-sections of site with structures & shoreline - Grading Plan — Vicinity map SEPA determination (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report or memo) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Any background studies related to impacts on shoreline Notice of Application Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed) P:Admin\Admin Forms\Agency Checklist File Number: Applied: Issue Date: Status: City Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 Tukwila, Washington 98188 Phone: 206-431-3670 Fax: 206-431-3665 Web site: http://www.ci.tukwila.wa.us DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) E10-003 02/10/2010 02/12/2010 APPROVED Applicant: CITY OF TUKWILA Lead Agency: City of Tukwila Description of Proposal: This is a non -project action to update Title 18 of the City's Zoning Code. The following amendments are being made: i. Chapter 18.06 will be modified to include definitions of Crisis Diversion Facility (CDF), Crisis Diversion Interim Service Facility (CDIS); the existing definition of hospital, correction institutions, convalescent/nursing homes and inpatient facilities will also be modified. ii. Crisis Diversion Facilities and Crisis Diversion Interim Service Facilities will be listed unclassified uses with certain areas of the City. Council action is anticipated by March 1, 2010. Location of Proposal: Address: Parcel Number: Section/Township/Range: CITY-WIDE The City has determined that the proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21c.030(2) (c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2). Comments must be submitted by 01 �l�/ I V . The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date below. Jack ce, Responsible Official City o kwila 6300 Southcenter Blvd Tukwila, WA 98188 (206)431-3670 (2 Mb0 Date Any appeal shall be linked to a specific governmental action. The State Environmental Policy Act is not intended to create a cause of action unrelated to a specific governmental action. Appeals of environmental determinations shall be commenced within the time period to appeal the governmental action that is subject to environmental review. (RCW 43.21C.075) doc: DNS -4/07 E10-003 Printed: 02-12-2010 IP eit* of ,9anvila IP Department Of Community Development AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION 1, _Teri Svedahl HEREBY DECLARE THAT: Notice of Public Hearing X Determination of Non -Significance Notice of Public Meeting ,J Mailer's signature: / V qfd4 y4(#4, Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice Board of Appeals Agenda Packet Notice of Action Planning Commission Agenda Packet Official Notice Short Subdivision Agenda Notice of Application Shoreline Mgmt Permit Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit _ _ FAX To Seattle Times Classifieds Mail: Gail Muller Classifieds PO Box 70 - Seattle WA 98111 Other: Was mailed to each of the addresses listed/attached on this _12 day of February in the year 2010 W:\USERS\TERIWFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION.DOC Project Name: City of Tukwila Code Amendments Project Number: E10-003 Mailing requested by: Brandon Wiles 4 /--' ,J Mailer's signature: / V qfd4 y4(#4, W:\USERS\TERIWFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION.DOC City of Tukwila Department of Community Development The following threshold determination for a proposed code amendment to the Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) has been made pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). FILE NUMBER: E010-003 FILE NAME: City of Tukwila Code Amendments APPLICANT: City of Tukwila Department of Community Development THRESHOLD DETERMINATION: Determination of Non -Significance The City has determined that the proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement is not required under RCW 43.21c.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. DATE OF ISSUANCE: February 12, 2010 REQUEST: This is a non -project action to update Title 18 of the City's Zoning Code. The following amendments are being made: i. Chapter 18.06 will be modified to include definitions of Crisis Diversion Facility (CDF), Crisis Diversion Interim Service Facility (CDIS); the existing definition of hospital, correction institutions, convalescent/nursing homes and inpatient facilities will also be modified. ii. Crisis Diversion Facilities and Crisis Diversion Interim Service Facilities will be listed as unclassified uses with certain areas of the City. Council action is anticipated by March 1, 2010. LOCATION: Citywide COMMENT: Interested parties may comment on the City's decision to issue a DNS by 5:00 PM, February 26, 2010. Comments can be submitted to Brandon J. Miles, Senior Planner, City of Tukwila, 6300 Southcenter Blvd, Suite 100, Tukwila, WA 98188. For more information call (206) 431-3684 or send an email to bmiles@ci.tukwila.wa.us. I, •- • 1 MEMORANDUM To: Jack Pace, Director From: Brandon Miles, Senior Planner Date: February 11, 2010 Re: E10-003 (SEPA Determination) Project Description: This is a non -project action to update the Title 18 of the City's Zoning Code. The following amendments are being made: i. Chapter 18.06 will be modified to include definitions of Crisis Diversion Facility (CDF), Crisis Diversion Interim Service Facility (CDIS); the existing definition of hospital, correction institutions, convalescent/nursing homes and inpatient facilities will also be modified. ii. Crisis Diversion Facilities and Crisis Diversion Interim Service Facilities will be listed as unclassified uses with certain areas of the City. Council action is anticipated by March 1, 2010. Agencies with Jurisdiction: None, this is a non -project action. Other Required Permits: None, this is a non -project action. Summary of Primary Impacts: Earth No impacts are anticipated, as this is a non -project action. •Air None anticipated, the proposed ordinance will modify the definition section of the City's Zoning Code and permitting CDF and CDIS facilities within areas of the City. • Water Concur with checklist. Brandon Miles, Senior Planner E10-003 SEPA Staff Report Plants N/A, non -project action. Animals Concur with checklist. Energy/Natural Resources Concur with checklist. Environmental Health Concur with checklist. Land/Shoreline Use The proposed ordinances will apply citywide and will impact various zoning districts. Many of these zoning districts border the Duwamish and Green Rivers. Most of the City's shorelines are classified as urban. Any development will have to comply with appropriate development and shoreline regulations at the time an application is submitted. Housing Non -project action, concur with checklist. Aesthetics The City's basic development standards will not be impacted by these changes. Light and Glare None, non -project action. Recreation Concur with checklist. Historic and Cultural Preservation N/A, non -project action. Transportation Non -project action. No impacts anticipated. Public Services H:\SEPA\CDF,CDIS\sepa-staffrpt.doc 2 • Brandon Miles, Senior Planner E10-003 SEPA Staff Report This is a non -project action. It is possible that the operation of a CDF or CDIS could impact Police and EMS services. Any specific impact, including mitigation, will be addressed as part of any permit application. • Utilities Concur with checklist, this is a non -project action. Recommendation: Determination of Non -Significance H:\SEPA\CDF,CDIS\cepa-staffrpt.doc 3 STATE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Amendments to Title 18 of the Tukwila Municipal Code related to the placement of Crisis Diversion Facilities (CDF), Crisis Diversion Interim Service (CDIS) facilities and inpatient treatment facilities 2. Name of Applicant: City of Tukwila DCD 3. Date checklist prepared: February 8, 2010 4. Agency requesting checklist: City of Tukwila 5. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): The Planning Commission is scheduled to Bold a public hearing on February 25, 2010. City Council will consider the proposed code amendments on March 1, 2010. Both dates are tentative and subject to change. 6. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No 7. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. None. 8. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. This is a non -action SEPA for proposed code changes • • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 9. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. A copy of the proposed code changes will need to be filed with the Department of Commerce as is required by State Law 10. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. The amendments are a non -project action that would affect the City's Zoning regulations, specifically the proposed modifications are as follows: i. Chapter 18.06 will be modified to include definitions of Crisis Diversion Facility (CDF), Crisis Diversion Interim Service Facility (CDIS); the existing definition of hospital, convalescent/nursing homes, correction institutions, and inpatient facilities will also be modified. ii. Crisis Diversion Facilities and Crisis Diversion Interim Service Facilities will be listed as an unclassified use within the Tukwila Urban Center Zoning; 11. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, the tax lot number, and section, township, and range. if a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. This is a non -project action and will impact the entire City. The CDF and CDIS will be allowed within the Tukwila Urban Center, also known as the Southcenter area 12. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? The proposed code changes will apply Citywide, but as noted the CDF and CDIS will be allowed within the Southcenter area. The Southcenter area does contain sensitive areas, however this is a non -project action. Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other: This is a non -project action b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? This is a non -project action. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. This is a non -project action d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. This is a non -project action and is not site specific. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Non -project action . • • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Non -project action. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Non -project action. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Non -project action 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (for example, dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Non -project action. It is possible that a fitture CDF and/or CDIS facilities will locate within the Southcenter area of the City. If so, the proposed uses could generate automobile traffic which will generate automobile exhaust. Any emissions would be typical of other uses within the Southcenter area. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. None known, this is a non -project SEPA checklist. • • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: No measures are anticipated to be needed for these code changes to move ahead. 3. Water a. Surface: 1. Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. As noted the proposed code amendments will apply cihywide. City staff has proposed that CDF and CDIS facilities be allowed in the Southcenter area via an unclassified use permit. The Southcenter area contains portions of the Green River and Tukwila Pond. The impacts to surface water bodies will be examined on a case by case basis when a site specific project is proposed. 2. Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. This is a non -project action. 3. Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. Non -project action • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 4. Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. Non -project action. 5. Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. This is a non -project action that will be citywide. There are parts of the City that are within the 100 year floodplain. As noted, staff is proposing to allow CDF and CDIS facilities within the Southcenter area. Due to the presence of the 205 Levee, most of the Southcenter area is considered outside of the 100 -year floodplain. Any proposed project will have to comply with the City's sensitive area and flood regulations. 6. Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. Non Project Action b. Ground: 1. Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. Non -project action. 2. Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve: The proposed uses that are being addressed with this code amendment will be large institutional uses that will likely connect directly to public sewer. Again, this is a non -project action, thus specific site specific impacts are not known. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1. Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Non -project action. Any proposed project will have to comply with the City's surface water regulations at the time a complete application is submitted. 2. Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Non -project action. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Non -project action. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Non -project action. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Non -project action . 5. Animals a. Circle any birds or animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Non -project action Birds: Hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: Mammals Deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: Fish Bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: Other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Non -project action for development regulations that apply citywide. Portions of the Green and Duzvamish Rivers are located within the City and both rivers contain threatened salmon species. The impact on species will be addressed as individual projects are submitted to the City. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. The City of Tukwila is located within the Pacific Flyway which is a major migration route for birds. Additionally, both the Green and Duwamish Rivers contain spawning fish, such as salmon. No impacts to migration routes are anticpated from the proposed code changes d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None needed Deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other Evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other Shrubs Grass Pasture Crop or grain Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other Water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other Other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Non -project action. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Non -project action. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Non -project action . 5. Animals a. Circle any birds or animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Non -project action Birds: Hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: Mammals Deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: Fish Bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: Other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Non -project action for development regulations that apply citywide. Portions of the Green and Duzvamish Rivers are located within the City and both rivers contain threatened salmon species. The impact on species will be addressed as individual projects are submitted to the City. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. The City of Tukwila is located within the Pacific Flyway which is a major migration route for birds. Additionally, both the Green and Duwamish Rivers contain spawning fish, such as salmon. No impacts to migration routes are anticpated from the proposed code changes d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None needed 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Non -project action. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. Non -project action. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Non -project action. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. The proposed code amendments will permit CDF and CDIS facilities within the City. CDF and CDIS facilities may have medical supplies which could be considered as hazardous waste. While this is a non -project action SEPA, compliance with adopted medical procedures and waste handling procedures will ensure that hazardous waste is handled properly. 1. Describe special emergency services that might be required. None 2. Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None b. Noise 1. What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Non -project action. 2. What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Non -project action. Site specific projects which may be proposed under the proposed code amendment will be required to comply with the City's Noise Regulations. 3. Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Non -project action. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Non -project action. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Non -project action. c. Describe any structures on the site. Non -project action. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Non -project action. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? The amendment applies citywide. The CDF and CDIS will be allowed within the Southcenter Area which is zoned Tukwila Urban Center. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? The proposed amendments would affect the entire City. As noted the CDF and CDIS will be permitted within the Southcenter area which is designated as Tukwila Urban Center by the City's Comprehensive Plan. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Non -project action. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. These changes would affect the entire City. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? • • Non -project action. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The amendments are a non -project action that will permit CDF and CDIS facilities as unclassified uses within the City. Any fitture proposals to locate a CDF and/or CDIS within the City will have to comply with applicable land use and development regulations at the time a complete building permit application is submitted to the City. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing? Non -project action.. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Non -project action. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: This is a non -project SEPA action. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? Non -project action. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Non -project action. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Non -project action. 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Non -project action. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Non -project action. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Non -project action. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None. 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, National, State, or Local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. These changes would affect the entire City. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. These changes would affect the entire City c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. These changes would affect the entire City. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? These changes would affect the entire City. As noted the CDF and CDIS will be permitted within the Tukwila Urban Center which will allow both facilities to have access to the transit center located near Southcenter Mall c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Non -project action. No changes are proposed to parking standards. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). Non -project action. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. These changes would affect the entire City. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Non -project action. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: No impacts expected 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. None proposed. The proposed code changes will permit the CDF and CDIS to be allowed in the Southcenter area via an unclassified use permit. Any impacts to public service will be evaluated as part of the unclassified use permit b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None project action. 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other: These changes would affect the entire City b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Non -project action C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Date Submitted: (NON -PROJECT PROPOSALS (E.G., SUBURBAN PLANS AND ZONING CODE TEXT CHANGES) MUST COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PAGES). • • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NON -PROJECT PROPOSALS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposals be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? None are anticipated. The proposed code amendments will modifij the allowable uses within the City's zoning districts. These are minor code changes that will not have an impact on the natural environment. The CDF and CDIS will be allowed within the Southcenter area which is already a built out environment. Any new development under these code changes will have to comply with zoning and development regulations at the time of submittal of a complete application. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: None anticipated 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? No impacts anticipated. Any fitture project will be required to comply with all zoning and development regulations at the time an application is submitted Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: N/A • • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? The proposed code amendments would unlikely affect the consumption of natural resources. N/A Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitats, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Agency Comments The proposed code amendments would not change the substantive requirements for mitigation or preservation in sensitive areas. Any developments under this code amendment will be required to comply with the Cih,/'s SAO, Shoreline and Tree protection ordinances. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: N/A 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? The proposed code amendment will clarify the allowable uses within various city zones. The purpose of this code measure is to ensure that CDF and CDIS facilities are located within a zoning category appropriate for their anticipated impacts; while also preventing such uses from locating within zones where they may be incompatible to surrounding land uses. • • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: N/A 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public service and utilities? No transportation or utilihy impacts are anticipated above what would be needed for typical commercial operations within the City. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: N/A 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with Local, State, or Federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. No such conflicts are anticipated. AGENCY LABELS ( ) US Corps of Engineers ( ) Federal HWY Admin ( ) Federal Transit Admin, Region 10 ( ) Dept of Fish & Wildlife Section FEDERAL AGENCIES ( ) US Environmental Protection Agency (E.P.A.) v US Dept of HUD ( ) National Marine Fisheries Service Section 2 WASFIINGTON STATE AGENCIES 'Dept of Social & Health Services V ( ) Dept of Ecology NW Regional Office, Shoreland Division \ Dept of.'Ecolo9Y;SEPA'LoC VC�U`wilz �. ffice of Attorney General ( )Office of Hearing Examiner ( ) Office of Archaeology ( ) Transportation Department (WSDOT NW) ( ) Dept of Natural Resources ( ) Office of the Governor WA State Community Development ( ) A Fisheries & Wildlife ( ) KC Boundary Review Board ( ) Fire District # 11 ( ) Fire District # 2 ( ) KC Wastewater Treatment Div ( ) KC Dept of Parks & Recreation ( ) KC Assessor's Office Section 3 KING COUNTY AGENCIES ( ) Health Department ( ) Port of Seattle ,KC Dev & Enviro Services-SEPA Info Center `(N1 KC Metro Transit Div-SEPA Official, Environmental Planning " (PKC Dept of Natural Resources ( ) KC Dept of Natural Resources, Andy Levesque Tukwila School District ( ) Tukwila Library ( ) Renton Library ( ) Kent Library Seattle Library Section 4 CHOOLS/LIBRARIES -4( Foster Library () C Public Library System 'JHighline School District �( ) Seattle School District Renton School District ( ) Westfield Mall Library ( ) QWEST Communications ( ) Seattle City Light ( ) Puget Sound Energy " ( ) Highline Water District ( ) Seattle Planning &Dev/Water Dept ( ) Comcast Section 5 UTILITIES ( ) BP Olympic Pipeline ( ) Val-Vue Sewer District ( ) Water District # 20 ( ) Water District # 125 ( ) City of Renton Public Works ( ) Bryn Mawr-Lakeridge Sewer/Water Dist ( ) Seattle Public Utilities ( ) Allied Waste Services ( ) Tukwila City Departments ( ) Public Works ( ) Police ( ) Planning ( ) Parks & Rec ( ) City Clerk ( ) Fire ( ) Finance ( ) Building ( ) Mayor Section�C CITY AGENCIES Kent Planning Dept enton Planning Dept `(.) City of SeaTac City of Burien \ , �)City of Seattle ' ()strategic Planning *Notice of all Seattle Related Projects Puget Sound Regional Council ( ) SW KC Chamber of Commerce ( ) Muckleshoot Indian Tribe * ( ) Cultural Resources ( ) Fisheries Program ( ) Wildlife Program ( ) Duwamish Indian Tribe * Section 7 OTHER LOCAL AGENCIES ( ) Puget Sound Clean Air Agency Sound Transit/SEPA V� ( ) uwamish River Clean Up Coalition * ( ) Washington Environmental Council ( ) People for Puget Sound * ( ) Futurewise * send notice of all applications on Green/Duwamish River ( ) Seattle Times ( ) South County Journal P:Admin\Admin Forms\Agency Checklist • Public Notice Mailings For Permits SEPA MAILINGS Mail to: (comment period starts on date of mailing) Dept. of Ecology Environmental Review Section *Applicant *Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list) *Any parties of record * send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination KC Transit Division — SEPA Official would like to receive information about all projects that might affect transit demand Tribes — For any application on the Green/Duwamish River, send the checklist and a full set of plans with the Notice Of Application Send These Documents to DOE: SEPA Determination (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report, usu. with MDNS) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed or sent to newspaper) SHORELINE MAILINGS: Notice of Application for a Substantial Development Permit must be mailed to owners and to property owners within 500 feet of subject property, comments are due 30 days after the notice of application is mailed/posted. The Notice of Application for Shoreline Substantial Development Permit must include a statement that any person desiring to submit written comments on the application or desiring to receive notification of the final decision on the application may do so within 30 days of the Notice of Application. If a hearing will be held on the application, the hearing notice must include the information that written comments may be submitted, or oral presentation made at the hearing. Notice is sent to' Ecology's NW Regional Office Shorelands & Environmental Assistance Program. Shoreline Permit Notice of Decision: Mail to: (within 8 days of decision; 21 -day appeal period begins date received by DOE) Department of Ecology Shorelands Section, NW Regional Office State Attorney General *Applicant *Indian Tribes *Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list). *Any parties of record * send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination Send These Documents to DOE and Attorney General: Permit Data Sheet Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report or memo) Shoreline Permit Application Form (filled out by applicant) Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) - Site plan, with mean high water mark & improvements - Cross-sections of site with structures & shoreline - Grading Plan — Vicinity map SEPA determination (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report or memo) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Any background studies related to impacts on shoreline Notice of Application Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed) P:Admin\Admin Forms\Agency Checklist eit* of : u F'uui& Department Of Community Development AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION I, Svedahl HEREBY DECLARE THAT: _Teri Notice of Public Hearing X Determination of Non -Significance ADDENDUM Notice of Public Meeting Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet Determination of Significance Lis Scoping Notice Board of Appeals Agenda Packet Project Number: E10-003 Notice of Action Planning Commission Agenda Packet iles Official Notice �, Short Subdivision Agenda Mailer's signature: Notice of Application Shoreline Mgmt Permit Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit _ _ FAX To Seattle Times Classifieds Mail: Gail Muller Classifieds PO Box 70 - Seattle WA 98111 Other: Was mailed to each of the addresses listed/attached on this 13 day of May in the year 2010 W:\USERS\TERI\AF FIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION.DOC Project Name: Code Amendments/City Wide Project Number: E10-003 Mailing requested b : Brandon iles -f: i t'/ �, _ f` Mailer's signature: W:\USERS\TERI\AF FIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION.DOC City of Tukwila • • Jim Haggerton, Mayor Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director CITY OF TUKWILA DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) ADDENDUM Description of Original Proposal: On February 12, 2010, the SEPA Responsible Official issued a Determination of Non -Significance regarding amendments to Title 18 of the City's Zoning Code. The following amendments were proposed: 1 Chapter 18.06 will be modified to include definitions of Crisis Diversion Facility (CDF), Crisis Diversion Interim Service (CDIS); the existing definitions of hospital, correction institutions, convalescent/nursing homes and inpatient facilities are proposed to be modified. 2. Crisis Diversion Facilities and Crisis Diversion Interim Service Facilities are proposed to be listed as unclassified uses within certain areas of the City. The original checklist dated February 8, 2010 applied to the entire city, but focused on allowing the CDF and the CDIS with the Tukwila Urban Center (Southcenter) area of the City. Description of Addendum: On May 3, 2010, the Tukwila City Council requested that staff examine the West Valley Highway area of the City to determine if the area was appropriate for the CDF and/or CDIS. Portions of West Valley Hwy are zoned Tukwila Urban Center and thus were examined under the DNS issued on February 12, 2010. The southern part of West Valley is zoned Commercial/Light Industrial. The physical environment of the north portion of West Valley Hwy is similar to the area around Southcenter Mall, while the southern area of West Valley has a built environment similar to the built environment of the southern area of Tukwila Urban Center. Both areas are located adjacent to the Green River and both areas of a similar natural environment. Like the Urban Center, the West Valley Hwy area of the City is served by existing City roads and can utilize. existing City utilities. Proponent: City of Tukwila Location of Proposal: Citywide Lead Agency: City Of Tukwila File Number: E 10-003 The City has determined that the addendum does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21c.030 (2) (c). Initials W:\Forms\Letterhead.doc Page 1 of2 05/12/2010 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone 206-431-3670 • Fat: 206- 431-3665 • • This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file' with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. The original DNS was issued February 12, 2010. This addendum is adopted on May 13, 2010. Jack Pace, SEPA Responsible Official for the City of Tukwila, Washington 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 (206) 431-3670 1 The following documents are adopted by reference to this. SEPA Addendum, Staff Report to the Planning Commission dated February 18, 2010 and Revised Staff Report to the Planning Commission dated May 13, 2010. Page 2 of 2 05/12/2010 AGENCY US DEPT OF H.U.D WA STATE COMMUNITY DEV WASH DEPT OF SOCIAL/HEALTH WA DEPT OF ECOLOGY WA STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL KC DEV & ENVIRON SERVICES KC METRO TRANSIT/SEPA OFFICIAL KC DEPARTMENT OF NAIL RESOURCES TUKWILA SCHOOL DISTRICT FOSTER LIBRARY HIGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT KENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF RENTON CITY OF SEATAC CITY OF BURIEN CITY OF SEATTLE PUGET SOUND REGIONAL COUNCIL SOUND TRANSIT/SEPA OFFICIAL DEPARTMENT SEPA REVIEW ECOLOGY DEPARTMENT SEPA INFO CENTER ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING PLANNING DEPARTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT SEPA CONTROL PLANNING & DEVEL UNION STATION ADDRESS 909 1st AVE, STE 200 PO BOX 48300 PO BOX 1788 PO BOX 47703 PO BOX 40117 900 OAKSDALE AVE SW 201 S JACKSON ST., MS KSC-TR-0431 2015 JACKSON ST., STE 600 4640 S 144th STREET 4060 5 144th STREET 15675 AMBAUM BLVD SW 300 SW 7TH STREET 220 FOURTH AVE 5 1055 5 GRADY WAY 4800 S 188th STREET 415 SW 150th PO BOX 34019 1011 WESTERN AVE #500 401 S JACKSON STREET CITY ST ZIP SEATTLE WA 98104-1000 OLYMPIA WA 98504-8300 OLYMPIA WA 98504 OLYMPIA WA 98504-7703 LACEY WA 98504-0117 RENTON WA 98055-1219 SEATTLE WA 98104-3856 SEATTLE WA 98104-3855 TUKWILA WA 98168 TUKWILA WA 98168 BURIEN WA 98166 RENTON WA 98055 KENT WA 98032 RENTON WA 98055 SEATAC WA 98188-8605 BURIEN WA 98166 SEATTLE WA 98124-4019 SEATTLE WA 98104 SEATTLE WA 98104 /- 'cs 4A4c-7-) • ( ) US Corps of Engineers ( ) Federal HWY Admin ( ) Federal Transit Admin, Region 10 ( ) Dept of Fish & Wildlife SectionFEDERAL AGENCIES ( ) US Environmental Protection Agency (E.P.A.) Nicl.US Dept of HUD ( ) National Marine Fisheries Service Section 2 WASHINGTON STATE AGENCIES ( ) Office of Archaeology ( ) Transportation Department (WSDOT NW) ( ) Dept of Natural Resources ( ) Office of the Governor WA State Community Development A Fisheries & Wildlife () Dept of Social & Health Services ept of Ecology NW Regional Office, Shoreland Division Dept of Ecology, SEPA clicq#I�1S .� AF nfice of Attorney General 1 ( )'Office of Hearing Examiner ( ) KC Boundary Review Board ( ) Fire District # 11 ( ) Fire District # 2 ( ) KC Wastewater Treatment Div ( ) KC Dept of Parks & Recreation ( ) KC Assessor's Office Section 3 KING COUNTY AGENCIES ( ) Health Department ( ) Port of Seattle 'KC Dev & Enviro Services-SEPA Info Center `(J KC Metro Transit Div-SEPA Official, Environmental Planning 'I. KC Dept of Natural Resources ( ) KC Dept of Natural Resources, Andy Levesque Tukwila School District ( ) Tukwila Library ( ) Renton Library ( ) Kent Library Seattle Library Section 4ACHOOLS/LIBRARIES \-ArLFoster Library () C Public Library System Highline School District `( )Seattle School District Renton School District ( ) Westfield Mall Library ( ) QWEST Communications ( ) Seattle City Light ( ) Puget Sound Energy ( ) Highline Water District ( ) Seattle Planning &Dev/Water Dept ( ) Comcast Section 5 UTILITIES ( ) BP Olympic Pipeline ( ) Val-Vue Sewer District ( ) Water District # 20 ( ) Water District # 125 ( ) City of Renton Public Works ( ) Bryn Mawr-Lakeridge Sewer/Water Dist ( ) Seattle Public Utilities ( ) Allied Waste Services ( ) Tukwila City Departments ( ) Public Works ( ) Fire ( ) Police ( ) Finance ( ) Planning ( ) Building ( ) Parks & Rec ( ) Mayor ( ) City Clerk Sectiones CITY AGENCIES Kent Planning Dept `(Renton Planning Dept `(� City of SeaTac I.ICity of Burien City of Seattle trategic Planning *Notice of all Seattle Related Projects "(N.) Puget Sound Regional Council ( ) SW KC Chamber of Commerce ( ) Muckleshoot Indian Tribe * ( ) Cultural Resources ( ) Fisheries Program ( ) Wildlife Program ( ) Duwamish Indian Tribe * Section 7 OTHER LOCAL AGENCIES ( ) Puget Sound Clean Air Agency Sound Transit/SEPA ( )'Duwamish River Clean Up Coalition * ( ) Washington Environmental Council ( ) People for Puget Sound * ( ) Futurewise * send notice of all applications on Green/Duwamish River ( ) Seattle Times ( ) South County Journal P:Admin\Admin Forms\Agency Checklist • City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director CITY OF TUKWILA DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) ADDENDUM Description of Original Proposal: On February 12, 2010, the SEPA Responsible Official issued a Determination of Non -Significance regarding amendments to Title 18 of the City's Zoning Code. The following amendments were proposed: 1. Chapter 18.06 will be modified to include definitions of Crisis Diversion Facility (CDF), Crisis Diversion Interim Service (CDIS); the existing definitions of hospital, correction institutions, convalescent/nursing homes and inpatient facilities are proposed to be modified. 2. Crisis Diversion Facilities and Crisis Diversion Interim Service Facilities are proposed to be listed as unclassified uses within certain areas of the City. The original checklist dated February 8, 2010 applied to the entire city, but focused on allowing the CDF and the CDIS with the Tukwila Urban Center (Southcenter) area of the City. Description of Addendum: On May 3, 2010, the Tukwila City Council requested that staff examine the West Valley Highway area of the City to determine if the area was appropriate for the CDF and/or CDIS. Portions of West Valley Hwy are zoned Tukwila Urban Center and thus were examined under the DNS issued on February 12, 2010. The southern part of West Valley is zoned Commercial/Light Industrial. The physical environment of the north portion of West Valley Hwy is similar to the area around Southcenter Mall, while the southern area of West Valley has a built environment similar to the built environment of the southern area of Tukwila Urban Center. Both areas are located adjacent to the Green River and both areas of a similar natural environment. Like the Urban Center, the West Valley Hwy area of the City is served by existing City roads and can utilize existing City utilities. Proponent: City of Tukwila Location of Proposal: Citywide Lead Agency: City Of Tukwila File Number: E10-003 The City has determined that the addendum does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21c.030 (2) (c). Initials W:\Forms\Letterhead. doc Page 1 of2 05/12/2010 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone 206-431-3670 • Far: 206- 431-3665 This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file' with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. The original DNS was issued February 12, 2010. This addendum is adopted on May 13, 2010. Jack Pace, SEPA Responsible Official for the City of Tukwila, Washington 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 (206) 431-3670 I The following documents are adopted by reference to this SEPA Addendum, Staff Report to the Planning Commission dated February 18, 2010 and Revised Staff Report to the Planning Commission dated May 13, 2010. Page 2 of 2 05/12/2010